Loading...
06.28.22 Town Council Regular Meeting PacketPage 1 of 4 ] Prosper is a place where everyone matters. Notice Regarding Public Participation Welcome to the Prosper Town Council. Individuals may attend the meeting in person, or access the meeting via videoconference, or telephone conference call. Join the Zoom Meeting by clicking on the following link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87047432329 To join the meeting by phone, dial (346) 248-7799 Enter Meeting ID: 870 4743 2329 Addressing the Town Council: Those wishing to address the Town Council must complete the Public Comment Request Form located on the Town website or in Council Chambers. If you are attending in person, please submit this form to the Town Secretary prior to the meeting. When called upon, please come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. If you are attending online/virtually, please submit this form to the Town Secretary prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Please ensure your full name appears on the screen and you are unmuted so the meeting moderator can recognize you and allow you to speak. The Chat feature is not monitored during the meeting. The Town assumes no responsibility for technical issues that are beyond our control. If you encounter any problems joining or participating in the meeting, please call our help line at 972-569-1191 for assistance. Call to Order/ Roll Call. Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance and Pledge to the Texas Flag. Announcements of recent and upcoming events. Presentations. 1. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring June 28, 2022, as Hayden Hensley Day. (RB) 2. Receive an update from the Fire & Rescue Department. (SB) Agenda Prosper Town Council Meeting Council Chambers Prosper Town Hall 250 W. First Street, Prosper, Texas Tuesday, June 28, 2022 6:15 PM Page 1 Page 2 of 4 CONSENT AGENDA: Items placed on the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and non-controversial. The Consent Agenda can be acted upon in one motion. Items may be removed from the Consent Agenda by the request of Council Members or staff. 3. Consider and act upon the minutes of the June 14, 2022, Town Council meeting. (MLS) 4. Consider and act upon the minutes of the June 22, 2022, Town Council special meeting. (MLS) 5. Consider and act upon a resolution to deny the application of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC for approval to increase system-wide transmission and distribution rates within the Town. (BP) 6. Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to accept the Economic Development Administration Subregional Broadband Assessment and Strategy project grant award from the U.S. Department of Commerce through the State of Texas Economic Development Administration (EDA). (BP) 7. Consider and act upon approving the purchase of manhole rehabilitation services from Fuquay, Inc., through the Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative; and authorizing the Town Manager to execute documents for the same. (FJ) 8. Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Credit Sales Agreement between Mill Branch LLC, and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to the construction of Fishtrap Road from Stuber Elementary to the Dallas North Tollway. (HW) 9. Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Mitigation Credit Sales Agreement between Wetlands Management, L.P., and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to the construction of Fishtrap Road from Stuber Elementary to the Dallas North Tollway. (HW) 10. Consider and act upon adopting the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) dated June 6, 2022. (SB) 11. Consider and act upon an ordinance to rezone 0.2± acre from Single Family-15 (SF- 15) to Planned Development-Downtown Single Family (PD), located on the north side of Third Street, east of Coleman Street. (Z22-0009). (DS) 12. Consider and act upon an ordinance amending Planned Development-69 (PD-69), on 71.0± acres, generally to modify the allowed uses and landscape standards, located on the southeast corner of Dallas Parkway and Frontier Parkway. (Z22-0007). (DS) 13. Consider and act upon an ordinance amending Planned Development-94 (PD-94), for the Westside Development, on 64.5± acres, northeast corner of US 380 and FM 1385, regarding hotel uses and development standards. (Z22-0001). (DS) 14. Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Development Agreement between Alpha3 Prosper RI, LLC, and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to development on the Westside Development, located on the northeast corner of US 380 and FM 1385. (DS) Page 2 Page 3 of 4 15. Consider and act upon whether to direct staff to submit a written notice of appeal on behalf of the Town Council to the Development Services Department, pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 1.5(C)(7) and 1.6(B)(7) of the Town’s Zoning Ordinance, regarding action taken by the Planning & Zoning Commission on any Site Plans and Preliminary Site Plans, including Westfork Crossing & Westfork Crossing Lot 7. (DS) CITIZEN COMMENTS The public is invited to address the Council on any topic. However, the Council is unable to discuss or take action on any topic not listed on this agenda. Please complete a “Public Comment Request Form” and present it to the Town Secretary prior to the meeting. REGULAR AGENDA: If you wish to address the Council, please fill out a “Public Comment Request Form” and present it to the Town Secretary, preferably before the meeting begins. Pursuant to Section 551.007 of the Texas Government Code, individuals wishing to address the Council for items listed as public hearings will be recognized when the public hearing is opened. For individuals wishing to speak on a non-public hearing item, they may either address the Council during the Citizen Comments portion of the meeting or when the item is considered by the Town Council. Items for Individual Consideration: 16. Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon a request for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for a Day Care Center (Grace Chapel), on 5.4± acres, located on the southeast corner of FM 1385 and Denton Way. The property is zoned Agricultural (A). (S22- 0005). (DS) 17. Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon a request to amend the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 3, Section 1.3 Schedule of Uses, Chapter 3, Section 1.4 Conditional Development Standards, and Chapter 3, Section 2.2 Definitions, to include “Food Pantry”, in the Agricultural, “A,” zoning district. (MD22-0005). (DS) 18. Receive an update of the Downtown Master Plan. (MM) 19. Consider and act upon approving a resolution supporting the proposed revised alignment of FM 1461 from SH 289 (Preston Road) to FM 2478 (Custer Road). (HW) 20. Consider and act upon an ordinance establishing a Homestead Tax Exemption. (HJ) 21. Discussion on Raymond Community Park. (DB) Possibly direct Town staff to schedule topic(s) for discussion at a future meeting. 22. Discuss format of Council Work Sessions. (HJ) 23. Receive an update on FM 1385 and US 380. (HW) 24. Discuss Frontier Park alternate access. (HW) EXECUTIVE SESSION: Recess into Closed Session in compliance with Section 551.001 et seq. Texas Government Code, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act, to deliberate regarding: Section 551.087 – To discuss and consider economic development incentives and all matters incident and related thereto. Page 3 Page 4 of 4 Section 551.072 – To discuss and consider purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property for municipal purposes and all matters incident and related thereto. Section 551.074 – To discuss and consider personnel matters and all matters incident and related thereto. Section 551.076 – To deliberate the deployment or specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devices at Town Hall. Reconvene in Regular Session and take any action necessary as a result of the Closed Session. Adjourn. CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned authority, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at Prosper Town Hall, located at 250 W. First Street, Prosper, Texas 75078, a place convenient and readily accessible to the general public at all times, and said Notice was posted by 5:00 p.m., on Friday, June 24, 2022, and remained so posted at least 72 hours before said meeting was convened. ________________________________ _________________________ Michelle Lewis Sirianni, Town Secretary Date Notice Removed Pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code, the Town Council reserves the right to consult in closed session with its attorney and to receive legal advice regarding any item listed on this agenda. NOTICE Pursuant to Town of Prosper Ordinance No. 13-63, all speakers other than Town of Prosper staff are limited to three (3) minutes per person, per item, which may be extended for an additional two (2) minutes with approval of a majority vote of the Town Council. NOTICE OF ASSISTANCE AT PUBLIC MEETINGS: The Prosper Town Council meetings are wheelchair accessible. For special services or assistance, please contact the Town Secretary’s Office at (972) 569 - 1011 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time. Page 4 Page 1 of 9 ] Prosper is a place where everyone matters. Call to Order/ Roll Call. The meeting was called to order at 5:45 p.m. Council Members Present: Mayor David F. Bristol Mayor Pro-Tem Jeff Hodges Deputy Mayor Pro-Tem Craig Andres Councilmember Marcus E. Ray Councilmember Amy Bartley Councilmember Chris Kern Councilmember Charles Cotten Staff Members Present: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Terry Welch, Town Attorney Michelle Lewis Sirianni, Town Secretary Robyn Battle, Executive Director of Community Services Bob Scott, Executive Director of Administrative Services Hulon Webb, Engineering Services Director David Soto, Planning Manager Betty Pamplin, Finance Director Leigh Johnson, IT Director Todd Rice, Communications Manager Stuart Blasingame, Fire Chief Doug Kowalski, Police Chief Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance and Pledge to the Texas Flag. Mike Martin with Hope Fellowship led the invocation. The Pledge of Allegiance and the Pledge to the Texas Flag were recited. An nouncements of recent and upcoming events. Councilmember Kern made the following announcements: Thank you to all those who attended Discover Downtown: Boots on Broadway on Saturday, June 11. It was a great kick off to our Downtown events and a fun evening of entertainment, food, and live music. A special thanks to all the staff who helped make the event a success. The Summer Reading Program at the Prosper Community Library began on June 1st. This year’s theme is “This is Texas!” Summer reading participants will learn about this big Texas state we live in. Library staff will have Discover Days on Mondays and Tuesdays, and Wednesdays and Thursdays will be Create Days. Each event will offer fun facts, activities, and something to create and take home. Visit the Library’s website or Facebook page for more information. MINUTES Prosper Town Council Meeting Council Chambers Prosper Town Hall 250 W. First Street, Prosper, Texas Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Page 5 Item 3. Page 2 of 9 The annual Pride in the Sky Independence Day Celebration will take place on Saturday, July 2 at Frontier Park. Festivities begin at 5:00 p.m. and will include live music, Kid Zones, food, games, and fireworks set to music. Come out for a night of celebration and fun. Join us for the next the Discover Downtown event series on Saturday, July 16 for Fun in the Sun from 3:00 to 6:00 p.m. Come beat the heat and have some fun with water slides, inflatables, games, and fun kid-centered entertainment, topped off with cool summer treats! Councilmember Bartley extended her thanks to the Prosper Ladies Association for their sponsorship to the Fire and Police banquets. She also recognized Matt Furr, Parks Superintendent for going above and beyond for picking up trash at the downtown event. Mayor Bristol acknowledged Flag Day and provided a brief history of the holiday. Presentations. 1. Receive a presentation regarding the 2022 Mayor's Fitness Challenge. (TH) Mr. Helton gave statistics from this year’s fitness challenge with over 81 participants and over 5,000 hours of logged activity. He announced the winner of the Fitbit and congratulated and thanked all those that attended. CONSENT AGENDA: Items placed on the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and non-controversial. The Consent Agenda can be acted upon in one motion. Items may be removed from the Consent Agenda by the request of Council Members or staff. 2. Consider and act upon the minutes of the May 24, 2022, Town Council meeting. (MLS) 3. Consider and act upon the minutes of the May 25, 2022, Town Council Work Session meeting. (MLS) 4. Receive the April financial report. (BP) 5. Consider and act upon Resolution No. 2022-24 authorizing the placement of orders for the purchase of replacement vehicles in FY 2022-2023 to realize current incentives related to said purchase with payment to be made from the Town’s Vehicle Equipment and Replacement Fund (VERF) in FY 2022-2023. (BP) 6. Consider and act upon approving the purchase of athletic equipment and related accessories from Fit Supply, LLC., through the Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative. (SB) 7. Consider and act upon the purchase of Holmatro Vehicle Extrication Equipment for two new fire apparatus (Pumper Engine & Quint) from Metro Fire Apparatus Specialist, Inc. through the Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative. (SB) 8. Consider and act upon the purchase of Stryker Medical Equipment for newly ordered Fire Department apparatus from Stryker Medical through the National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO) program. (SB) Page 6 Item 3. Page 3 of 9 9. Consider and act upon approving the purchase of one (1) Cascade SCBA Fill Station from August Industries Inc., through the Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative. (SB) 10. Consider and act upon approving the purchase of 12 SCBA’s, 42 Air Cylinders, and two (2) RIT-PAK III’s for newly ordered Fire Department apparatus from Municipal Emergency Services through the Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative. (SB) 11. Consider and act upon approving the purchase of public safety communication mobile radios, portable radios, and equipment for newly ordered Fire Department apparatus from Motorola Solutions through a Texas Department of Information Resources (DIR) Purchasing Contract. (SB) 12. Consider and act upon approving the purchase of public safety communication radios and equipment for the new Central Fire Station and Emergency Operations Center, from Motorola Solutions, through a Texas Department of Information Resources (DIR) Purchasing Contract. (SB) 13. Consider and act upon approving the purchase of installation services of mobile radios, fire station alerting system, antennas, and all associated equipment. (SB) 14. Consider and act upon awarding Bid No. 2022-05-B, EDA Award No. 08-79-05522 to Archer Western Construction, related to the construction services for the Lower Pressure Plane (LPP) Pump Station and LPP Water Line Phase 2 project; and authorizing the Town Manager to execute a construction agreement for same. (HW) 15. Consider and act upon awarding CSP No. 2022-38-B to DDM Construction Corporation, related to construction services for Prosper Public Works Highpoint Drive (Hays Road to Betts Drive); and authorizing the Town Manager to execute a construction agreement for same. (FJ) 16. Consider and act upon awarding CSP No. 2022-40-B to North Rock Construction, related to construction services for the Tanners Mill Park (2108-PK); and authorizing the Town Manager to execute a construction agreement for same. (PN) 17. Consider and act Resolution No. 2022-25 authorizing the Town Manager to execute an application to the Collin County Parks & Open Space Project Funding Assistance Program for the construction of the First Street Pedestrian Tunnel and Trail Project. (PN) 18. Consider and act upon Ordinance No. 2022-26 for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) on 0.7± acre, for a Wireless Communication and Support Structure, to allow for additional antennas on an existing tower located in the Bradford Farms subdivision located east of Hays Road, north of First Street. (S22-0003). (DS) 19. Consider and act upon an ordinance amending Planned Development-94 (PD- 94), for the Westside Development, on 64.5± acres, northeast corner of US 380 and FM 1385, regarding hotel uses and development standards. (Z22-0001). (DS) 20. Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Development Agreement between Alpha3 Prosper RI, LLC, and the Town of Prosper, Texas, Page 7 Item 3. Page 4 of 9 related to development on the Westside Development, located on the northeast corner of US 380 and FM 1385. (DS) 21. Consider and act upon whether to direct staff to submit a written notice of appeal on behalf of the Town Council to the Development Services Department, pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 1.5(C)(7) and 1.6(B)(7) of the Town’s Zoning Ordinance, regarding action taken by the Planning & Zoning Commission on any Site Plans and Preliminary Site Plans, including NWC 380 & Teel and Westside. (DS) Mayor Bristol pulled item 19, and Councilmember Bartley requested to pull items 4 and 20. Councilmember Cotten made a motion to approve consent agenda items 2 thru 21 except items 4, 19, and 20. Mayor Pro Tem Hodges seconded that motion, and the motion was unanimously approved. Councilmember Bartley asked questions regarding expenditures and numbers reflected for the commercial plan reviews by Bureau Veritas in relation to item 4. Councilmember Bartley made a motion to approve item 4 as presented. Deputy Mayor Pro-Tem Andres seconded that motion, and the motion was unanimously approved. Regarding items 19 and 20, Councilmember Bartley asked questions within Exhibits C, E, and F of the Development Agreement. She would like to ensure all changes are reflected before approving. Thereby, requested to table both items. Councilmember Bartley made a motion to table item 19 to June 28, 2022. Councilmember Cotten seconded that motion, and the motion was unanimously approved. Councilmember Bartley made a motion to table item 20 to June 28, 2022. Deputy Mayor Pro- Tem Andres seconded that motion, and the motion was unanimously approved. CITIZEN COMMENTS Nicole Pala, 961 Whistler Lane was not in attendance. Therefore, no comments were made. Barbara Nugent, 961 Grass Shore Lane, extended her praise to the Parks and Recreation Department for the Senior trip to Mineral Wells. She had a great time as it was entertaining and educational. Yuricma Oquendo, 2103 West Yorkshire and Lisa Lee, 309 Cypress Garden Drive were not in attendance. Therefore, no comments were made. Items for Individual Consideration: Councilmember Bartley stepped away from the dais. 22. Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon a request to rezone a portion of Planned Development-36, and a portion of Planned Development-63, to Planned Development (PD) for Legacy Gardens, on 121.4± acres, in order to modify the residential development standards, including but not limited to reducing permitted lot sizes, located on the south side of Frontier Parkway, west of Dallas Parkway. (Z20-0019). (DS) Mr. Soto stated this is a request to rezone 121.4± acres on a portion of Planned Development-36 (PD-36), and a portion of Planned Development-63 (PD-63), to Page 8 Item 3. Page 5 of 9 establish a new Planned Development. Per the Council’s request, the applicant updated the development standards and number of lot sizes. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended by a 6-0 vote to approve the request subject to the conditions of limiting 8F Type lots to a maximum of 75, 9F Type lots to a maximum of 57, 10F Type lots to a maximum of 148, and increasing the maximum dwelling size to 1,800 square feet for all proposed lot types. Staff recommends approval. The Town Council discussed the increase in larger lot sizes as well as the minimum dwelling size. Mayor Bristol opened the public hearing. No comments were made. Mayor Bristol closed the public hearing. Councilmember Ray made a motion to approve a request to rezone a portion of Planned Development-36, and a portion of Planned Development-63, to Planned Development (PD) for Legacy Gardens, on 121.4± acres, to modify the residential development standards, including but not limited to reducing permitted lot sizes, located on the south side of Frontier Parkway, west of Dallas Parkway and subject to approval of a Development Agreement. Mayor Pro-Tem Hodges seconded that motion. The motion passed with a 6-0 vote. Councilmember Bartley returned to the dais. 23. Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon a request to rezone 0.2± acre from Single Family-15 (SF-15) to Planned Development-Downtown Single Family (PD), located on the north side of Third Street, east of Coleman Street. (Z22-0009). (DS) Mr. Soto stated the purpose of this rezoning request is to allow for deviation from the required lot depth from 120 feet to 100 feet for the purpose of developing a single- family downtown residence. The existing house will be demolished in order to re-build. At the May 17, 2022, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the Commission recommended approval by a vote of 6-0. Staff recommends approval. The Council discussed the property to the north and completion time of the re-build. Mayor Bristol opened the public hearing. No comments were made. Mayor Bristol closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro-Tem Hodges made a motion to approve a request to rezone 0.2± acre from Single Family-15 (SF-15) to Planned Development-Downtown Single Family (PD), located on the north side of Third Street, east of Coleman Street . Deputy Mayor Pro- Tem Andres seconded that motion, and the motion was unanimously approved. 24. Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon a request to amend Planned Development-69 (PD-69), on 71.0± acres, generally to modify the allowed uses and landscape standards, located on the southeast corner of Dallas Parkway and Frontier Parkway. (Z22-0007). (DS) Page 9 Item 3. Page 6 of 9 Mr. Soto stated the proposed amendment to PD-69 is to modify the allowed uses and landscape standards. The applicant is proposing to allow the following uses within Tract 1: Big Box, Restaurant with drive-through to be incorporated with the Big Box, convenience store with gas pumps and/or gas pumps, car wash (accessory use to convenience store with gas pumps and/or gas pumps, and outdoor merchandise display. There is no amendment for the uses on Tract 2. The applicant is also requesting modifications to the landscape regulations in order to allow 25’ of the required 30’ landscape buffer to be allowed within the 100’ drainage easement along Frontier Parkway, and to not place earthen berms along Frontier Parkway. At the May 17, 2022, Planning and Zoning Commission, the Commission recommended approval by a vote of 6-0. Staff recommends approval. The Town Council discussed drive-throughs and their current locations in that area, and the placement of outdoor merchandise displays. Matt Moore, 301 S. Coleman, with ClayMoore Engineering stated that he has worked continuously with staff to modify the amendment to meet the Town’s requirements. Mayor Bristol opened the public hearing. No comments were made. Mayor Bristol closed the public hearing. Councilmember Ray made a motion to approve a request to amend Planned Development-69 (PD-69), on 71.0± acres, generally to modify the allowed uses and landscape standards, located on the southeast corner of Dallas Parkway and Frontier Parkway. Councilmember Cotten seconded that motion, and the motion was unanimously approved. 25. Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon a request for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for a Restaurant with Drive-Through Service on 1.2± acres, located on the north side of US 380, west of Custer Road. (The property is zoned Commercial (C)). (S22-0002). (DS) Mr. Soto stated this request is to allow for a drive-through restaurant use within a 2,400-standalone building. The site includes adequate parking and stacking. Staff has reviewed the request for the SUP and believes the applicant has satisfied the criteria within the Town’s Zoning Ordinance. However, staff is concerned with the total number of drive-through restaurants within the proposed area. Staff recommends approval subject to a Development Agreement including, but not limited to, right-of-way and/or easement dedication, and architectural building materials. The Town Council discussed the current landscaping, the expansion of US 380 in relation to the project area, and traffic volume. Mayor Bristol opened the public hearing. No comments were made. Mayor Bristol closed the public hearing. The Council further discussed the traffic flow, consecutive drive-throughs in the area, enhanced landscaping, and removal of the billboard in that location. Page 10 Item 3. Page 7 of 9 Councilmember Ray made a motion to approve a request for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for a Restaurant with Drive-Through Service on 1.2± acres, located on the north side of US 380, west of Custer Road subject to the approval of a Development Agreement, including, but not limited to, right-of-way and/or easement dedication, and architectural building materials. Further, the developer shall endeavor to reposition the outdoor trash receptacle to be screened from view along U.S. Highway 380; and the existing billboard on the property shall be removed within 90 days of the effective date of this ordinance. Councilmember Cotten seconded that motion. The motion passed with a 5-2 vote, with Councilmembers Bartley and Kern voting in opposition. 26. Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to execute a First Amendment to the Development Agreement between Founders Classical Academy of Prosper, and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to the Founders development. (DS) Mr. Soto stated the initial Site Plan was approved in June 2020 and the Development Agreement in March 2021. As part of the agreement, all the outdoor lighting standards shall comply with a 0.0-foot candle. Staff inspected the lighting on several different occasions and although improvements were made to reduce light pollution, it was not meeting the requirement. The applicant has requested a revised Development Agreement to modify the outdoor lighting standards to follow the Town requirements. Staff recommends approval. The Town Council discussed the impact of the lights to the surrounding subdivisions, and the difference in the foot candle measurements. Carrie Moore, 4011 Pepper Grass Lane, expressed her concern of the cost to change out the lights and requested the Council to hold them to the same standards as others. Bryan Dahlberg, 845 Proton Road, San Antonio, representative of the school, requested to be held to the same standards of others and supports the proposed amendment. Anthony DeGuerre, 7920 Collin David South, Apt. 201, expressed his concerns on how this may impact the school’s budget, and requested to be held to same standards as others. Austin Tull, 1301 Waters Ridge Dr., Lewisville, stated that the school has made efforts to bring the lighting into compliance with the Town’s requirements. He supports the proposed amendment. Heather Brown, 4300 E. First Street, stated as a teacher at Founders Classical Academy, she indicated the extra measures in place to ensure lighting is not an issue and try to go above and beyond to be good neighbors. The following citizens requested to speak but were not in attendance. Annie Kim, 10718 Brandenberg Dr., Frisco. Heather Richardson, 2365 Weston Road, Celina. Suzanne Cartmill, 7808 Chief Spotted Tail Drive, McKinney. Nancy DeBolt, 730 Camden Way, Prosper. Shelly Creel, 1620 Hidden Glen Court, Prosper. Page 11 Item 3. Page 8 of 9 Brandon Cartmill, 7808 Chief Spotted Tail Drive, McKinney. The Town Council further discussed the lighting and the Town’s current ordinance requirements. Councilmember Cotten made a motion to authorizing the Town Manager to execute a First Amendment to the Development Agreement between Founders Classical Academy of Prosper, and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to the Founders development. Councilmember Ray seconded that motion, and the motion was unanimously approved. 27. Consider and act upon Ordinance No. 2022-28 amending Ordinance No. 2021-55 (FY 2021-2022 Annual Budget). (BP) Ms. Pamplin provided an overview of the proposed amendments from the General Fund. The Town Council discussed the Energov software implementation and the personnel expenses within the proposed budget amendments. Councilmember Cotten made a motion to approve Ordinance 2022-28 amending Ordinance No. 2021-55 (FY 2021-2022 Annual Budget). Mayor Pro-Tem Hodges seconded that motion, and the motion was unanimously approved. 28. Receive an update regarding schematic design for Fire Station No. 4. (SB) Chief Blasingame stated BRW has completed the schematic design for Fire Station No. 4. He provided renderings of the design and indicated staff continues to work with the architect to find cost savings. The anticipated completion date of the project is March to April 2024. 29. Consider and act upon awarding RFP No. 2022-46-B Construction Manager-At- Risk for Prosper Fire Station No. 4 to Pogue Construction Co., LP; and authorizing the Town Manager to execute documents for the same. (SB) Chief Blasingame stated the Town received five (5) proposals for the project. The proposals were evaluated by a committee of 11 members based on certain criteria set forth in the bid. Upon completion of the evaluation, Pogue Construction Co. was the top ranked contractor. Pogue has extensive fire administration and station construction experience with favorable responses received from references. Staff recommends approval. Councilmember Cotten made a motion to approve awarding RFP No. 2022-46-B Construction Manager-At-Risk for Prosper Fire Station No. 4 to Pogue Construction Co., LP; and authorizing the Town Manager to execute documents for the same. Councilmember Ray seconded that motion, and the motion was unanimously approved. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Recess into Closed Session in compliance with Section 551.001 et seq. Texas Government Code, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act, to deliberate regarding: Section 551.087 – To discuss and consider economic development incentives and all matters incident and related thereto. Page 12 Item 3. Page 9 of 9 Section 551.072 – To discuss and consider purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property for municipal purposes and all matters incident and related thereto. Section 551.074 – To discuss and consider personnel matters and all matters incident and related thereto. Section 551.074 – To discuss appointments to the Board of Adjustment/Construction Board of Appeals, Parks & Recreation Board, Library Board, Prosper Economic Development Corporation Board, and Planning & Zoning Commission. Section 551.074 - To discuss and consider the Town Manager's performance review. The Town Council recessed into Executive Session at 8:43 p.m. Reconvene in Regular Session and take any action necessary as a result of the Closed Session. The Town Council reconvened into Regular Session at 10:42 p.m. Mayor Pro-Tem Hodges made a motion to approve the amended and restated Developers Agreement with Prosper Residences, LLC and authorize the Town Manager to execute on behalf of the Town. Councilmember Cotten seconded that motion, and the motion was unanimously approved. Mayor Pro-Tem Hodges made a motion to appoint David Bristol to the Prosper Economic Development Corporation. Councilmember Ray seconded that motion, and the motion was unanimously approved. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 10:44 p.m. These minutes approved on the 28th day of June 2022. APPROVED: David F. Bristol, Mayor ATTEST: Michelle Lewis Sirianni, Town Secretary Page 13 Item 3. Page 1 of 2 ] Prosper is a place where everyone matters. Call to Order/ Roll Call. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 a.m. Council Members Present: Mayor David F. Bristol Councilmember Marcus E. Ray Councilmember Amy Bartley Councilmember Chris Kern Councilmember Charles Cotten Council Members Absent: Mayor Pro-Tem Jeff Hodges Deputy Mayor Pro-Tem Craig Andres Staff Members Present: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Michelle Lewis Sirianni, Town Secretary Robyn Battle, Executive Director of Community Services Hulon Webb, Director of Engineering Invocation Mayor Bristol led an invocation. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Recess into Closed Session in compliance with Section 551.001 et seq. Texas Government Code, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act, to deliberate regarding: Section 551.074 - To discuss and consider the Town Manager's performance review and all matters incident and related thereto. The Town Council recessed into Executive Session at 7:31 a.m. Reconvene in Regular Session and take any action necessary as a result of the Closed Session. The Town Council reconvened into Regular Session at 8:04 a.m. Councilmember Cotten made a motion to authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement with the Town Manager as discussed in closed session. Councilmember Bartley seconded that motion, and the motion was unanimously approved. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 a.m. These minutes approved on the 28th day of June 2022. MINUTES Prosper Town Council Special Meeting Council Chambers Prosper Town Hall 250 W. First Street, Prosper, Texas Wednesday, June 22, 2022 Page 14 Item 4. Page 2 of 2 APPROVED: David F. Bristol, Mayor ATTEST: Michelle Lewis Sirianni, Town Secretary Page 15 Item 4. Page 1 of 2 To: Mayor and Town Council From: Betty Pamplin, Finance Director Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Bob Scott, Executive Director of Administrative Services Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon a resolution to deny the application of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC for approval to increase system-wide transmission and distribution rates within the Town. (BP) Description of Agenda Item: Oncor Electric Delivery Company ("Oncor" or "the Company") filed an application on or about May 13, 2022 with cities retaining original jurisdiction seeking to increase system-wide transmission and distribution rates by about $251 million or approximately 4.5% over present revenues. The Company asks the Town to approve an 11.2% increase in residential rates and a 1.6% increase in street lighting rates. If approved, a residential customer using 1,300 kWh per month would see a bill increase of about $6.02 per month. The resolution suspends the August 1, 2022 effective date of the Company's rate increase for the maximum period permitted by law to allow the Town, working in conjunction with the Steering Committee of Cities Served by Oncor, to evaluate the filing, determine whether the filing complies with law, and if lawful, to determine what further strategy, including settlement, to pursue. The law provides that a rate request made by an electric utility cannot become effective until at least 35 days following the filing of the application to change rates. The law permits the Town to suspend the rate change for 90 days after the date the rate change would otherwise be effective. If the Town fails to take some action regarding the filing before the effective date, Oncor's rate request is deemed administratively approved. The Town of Prosper is a member of a 169-city coalition known as the Steering Committee of Cities Served by Oncor ("Steering Committee"). The Steering Committee has been in existence since the late 1980s. It took on a formal structure in the early 1990s when cities served by the former TXU gave up their statutory right to rate case expense re imbursement in exchange for higher franchise fee payments. Empowered by city resolutions and funded by per capita assessments, the Steering Committee has been the primary public interest advocate before the Prosper is a place where everyone matters. FINANCE DEPARTMENT Page 16 Item 5. Page 2 of 2 Public Utility Commission, the Courts, and the Legislature on electric utility regulation matters for the last 30 years. Although Oncor has increased rates many times over the past few years, this is the first comprehensive base rate case for the Company since March 2017. Legal Obligations and Review: Terrance Welch of Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P., has reviewed the resolution as to form and legality. Attached Documents: 1. Resolution Town Staff Recommendation: Town staff recommends adoption of a resolution to deny the application of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC for approval to increase system-wide transmission and distribution rates within the Town. Proposed Motion: I move to adopt a resolution to deny the application of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC for approval to increase system-wide transmission and distribution rates within the Town. Page 17 Item 5. Resolution No. 2022-__ - Page 1 TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. ____ A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, SUSPENDING THE AUGUST 1, 2022, EFFECTIVE DATE OF ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY’S REQUESTED RATE CHANGE TO PERMIT THE TOWN TIME TO STUDY THE REQUEST AND TO ESTABLISH REASONABLE RATES; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH THE STEERING COMMITTEE OF CITIES SERVED BY ONCOR TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION AND APPEALS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS RESOLUTION IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; REQUIRING NOTICE OF THIS RESOLUTION TO THE COMPANY AND LEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE STEERING COMMITTEE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on or about May 13, 2022, Oncor Electric Delivery Company (“Oncor”), pursuant to PURA §§ 33.001 and 36.001, filed with the Town of Prosper, Texas (“Town”), a Statement of Intent to increase electric transmission and distribution rates in all municipalities exercising original jurisdiction within its service area effective August 1, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Town is a member of the Steering Committee of Cities Served by Oncor (“Steering Committee”) and will cooperate with the 169 similarly situated city members and other city participants in conducting a review of the Company’s application and to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants and to prepare a common response and to negotiate with the Company prior to getting reasonable rates and direct any necessary litigation; and WHEREAS, § 36.108 of the Texas Public Utility Regulatory Act (“PURA”) grants local regulatory authorities the right to suspend the effective date of proposed rate changes for ninety (90) days after the date the rate change would otherwise be effective; and WHEREAS, PURA § 33.023 provides that costs incurred by Cities in ratemaking proceedings are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1 All of the above premises are found to be true and correct legislative determinations of the Town of Prosper, Texas, and are hereby approved and incorporated into the body of this Resolution as if copied in their entirety. SECTION 2 The August 1, 2022, effective date of the rate request submitted by Oncor on or about May 13, 2022, is hereby suspended for the maximum period allowed by law to permit adequate time to review the proposed changes and to establish reasonable rates. Page 18 Item 5. Resolution No. 2022-__ - Page 2 SECTION 3 As indicated in the Town’s resolution approving membership in the Steering Committee, the Executive Committee of the Steering Committee is hereby authorized to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations regarding reasonable rates, and to intervene and direct any necessary administrative proceedings or co urt litigation associated with an appeal of a rate ordinance and the rate case filed with the Town or the Texas Public Utility Commission. SECTION 4 The Town’s reasonable rate case expenses shall be reimbursed by Oncor. SECTION 5 It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Resolution is passed is open to the public as required by law and the public notice of the time, place, and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 6 A copy of this Resolution shall be sent to Oncor, Care of Howard V. Fisher, Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC, 1616 Woodall Rodgers Freeway, Dallas, Texas 75202 and to Thomas Brocato, Counsel to the Steering Committee, at Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C., P.O. Box 1725, Austin, Texas 78767-1725. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022. ___________________________________ David F. Bristol, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Michelle Lewis Sirianni, Town Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: __________________________________ Terrence S. Welch, Town Attorney Page 19 Item 5. Page 1 of 2 To: Mayor and Town Council From: Betty Pamplin, Finance Director Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Bob Scott, Executive Director of Administrative Services Re: Town Council Meeting - June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to accept the Economic Development Administration Subregional Broadband Assessment and Strategy project grant award from the U.S. Department of Commerce through the State of Texas Economic Development Administration (EDA). Description of Agenda Item: This item is for the Economic Development Administration (EDA) grant awarded to the Town of Prosper Subregional Broadband Assessment & Strategy project. Budget Impact: This award is for $360,000, which is the 80% Federal match. The Town’s match is $90,000 for a total project cost of $450,000. A future budget amendment will be requested to account for the grant income and to allocate funding for this project. Legal Obligations and Review: Terrence Welch of Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P., has approved the terms and conditions and all award documentation as to form and legality. Attached Documents: 1. U.S. Department of Commerce Award Letter 2. Form CD-450 Town Staff Recommendation: Town staff recommends the Town Council accept the EDA Subregional Broadband Assessment and Strategy project grant award from the U.S. Department of Commerce through the State of Texas Economic Development Administration (EDA). Prosper is a place where everyone matters. Finance Department Page 20 Item 6. Page 2 of 2 Proposed Motion: I move to accept the EDA Subregional Broadband Assessment and Strategy project grant award from the U.S. Department of Commerce through the State of Texas Economic Development Administration (EDA). Page 21 Item 6. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economic Development Administration AUSTIN REGIONAL OFFICE 903 San Jacinto Blvd. Suite 206 Austin, TX, 78701 In reply refer to: Investment No.: 08-69-05611 Harlan Jefferson Town Manager Town of Prosper 250 W. First Street Prosper, TX 75078 Dear Mr. Jefferson, I am pleased to inform you that the Department of Commerce’s Economic Development Administration (EDA) has approved your application for a $360,000 EDA investment to support the Prosper Subregional Broadband Assessment & Strategy project. Enclosed is the Financial Assistance Award. To accept the grant award, please sign the Financial Assistance Award document. Your signature may be completed either electronically with a secured system or in ink. The executed document must be returned electronically to Lissette Villarruel at lvillarruel@eda.gov. Your signature indicates your acceptance of the terms and conditions for the grant award. If not signed and returned within 30 days of receipt, EDA may declare the Award null and void. Please do not make any commitments in reliance on this award until you have carefully reviewed and accepted the terms and conditions. Any commitments entered into prior to obtaining the approval of EDA in accordance with its regulations and requirements will be at your own risk. EDA’s mission is to lead the federal economic development agenda by promoting innovation and competitiveness, preparing American regions for growth and success in the worldwide economy. EDA implements this mission by making strategic investments in the nation’s most economically distressed communities that encourage private sector collaboration and creation of higher-skill, higher-wage jobs. EDA investments are results-driven, embracing the principles of technological innovation, entrepreneurship and regional development. I share your expectations regarding the impact of this investment and look forward to working with you to meet the economic development needs of your community. Sincerely, Jorge D. Ayala Regional Director Page 22 Item 6. Page 23 Item 6. Page 1 of 2 To: Mayor and Town Council From: Frank E. Jaromin, P.E., Director of Public Works Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon approving the purchase of manhole rehabilitation services from Fuquay, Inc., through the Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative; and authorizing the Town Manager to execute documents for the same. Description of Agenda Item: Due to recent smoke testing projects and camera inspections, staff has located nine (9) manholes in need of rehabilitation because of Hydrogen Sulfide damage, which is corrosion from a toxic gas. The manholes are located on the gravity feed line at First Street and Wilson Creek, First Street and Coit Road, near Prosper High School, and in the Stone Creek subdivision. We believe this damage occurred when La Cima 2 lift station pumped into La Cima 1 lift station. Local governments are authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation Act, V.T.C.A. Government Code, Chapter 791, to enter into joint contracts and agreements for the performance of governmental functions and services, including administrative functions normally associated with the operation of government (such as purchasing necessary materials and equipment). In June 2005, the Town of Prosper entered into an Interlocal Participation Agreement with the Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative. Participation in the cooperative purchasing program allows local governments to purchase goods and services from the cooperative’s online purchasing system, BuyBoard, while satisfying all competitive bidding requirements. Budget Impact: The total price is $80,629.00 and will be funded from System Improvements, account number 200- 5670-50-03. Legal Obligations and Review: Terrence Welch of Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P., has approved the standard construction agreement as to form and legality. Prosper is a place where everyone matters. PUBLIC WORKS Page 24 Item 7. Page 2 of 2 Attached Documents: 1. Proposal Town Staff Recommendation: Town staff recommends approving the purchase of manhole rehabilitation services from Fuquay, Inc., through the Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative; and authorizing the Town Manager to execute documents for the same. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the purchase of manhole rehabilitation services from Fuquay, Inc., through the Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative; and authorize the Town Manager to execute documents for the same. Page 25 Item 7. FUQUAY, INC. 4861 Old Hwy 81, New Braunfels, TX 78132 Phone (830) 606-1882 Fax (830) 606-1885 DATE: May 23, 2022PROJECT: TOWN OF PROSPER 2022 MH REHABILITATION (9 MHS)ITEM 22Structure (Manhole) Rehabilitation and Corrosion Protectionand Related ItemsMH 1 - 4' DIA. x 7 VFSection II Item 2222103Condition Standards and Repair Methods -- Condition 3SQFT101$45.00$4,545.00-$3.15$41.85$4,226.85$40.00$4,040.00Section II Item 2222104Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout MaterialGAL1$267.50$267.50-$18.73$248.78$248.78$235.00$235.00Section II Item 2222105Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout Material-Labor & EquipmentHR1$203.50$203.50-$14.25$189.26$189.26$185.00$185.00Section II Item 2222106Manhole Bench and Invert Repair 4' Diameter BaseEA1$669.00$669.00-$46.83$622.17$622.17$600.00$600.00Section II Item 2222130 Travel and Mobilization- Manhole Rehabilitation Crew from New Braunfels, TX MILE 290 $16.00 $4,640.00 -$1.12 $14.88 $4,315.20 $3.00 $870.00TOTAL $10,325.00 TOTAL $9,602.25TOTAL $5,930.00MH 2 - 4' DIA. x 8 VFSection II Item 2222103Condition Standards and Repair Methods -- Condition 3SQFT113$45.00$5,085.00-$3.15$41.85$4,729.05$40.00$4,520.00Section II Item 2222104Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout MaterialGAL2$267.50$535.00-$18.73$248.78$497.55$235.00$470.00Section II Item 2222105Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout Material-Labor & EquipmentHR2$203.50$407.00-$14.25$189.26$378.51$185.00$370.00Section II Item 2222106Manhole Bench and Invert Repair 4' Diameter BaseEA1$669.00$669.00-$46.83$622.17$622.17$600.00$600.00TOTAL $6,696.00 TOTAL $6,227.28TOTAL $5,960.00MH 3 - 5' DIA. x 16 VFSection II Item 2222103Condition Standards and Repair Methods -- Condition 3SQFT271$45.00$12,195.00-$3.15$41.85$11,341.35$40.00$10,840.00Section II Item 2222104Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout MaterialGAL3$267.50$802.50-$18.73$248.78$746.33$235.00$705.00Section II Item 2222105Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout Material-Labor & EquipmentHR3$203.50$610.50-$14.25$189.26$567.77$185.00$555.00Section II Item 2222107Manhole Bench and Invert Repair 5' Diameter BaseEA1$776.00$776.00-$54.32$721.68$721.68$700.00$700.00TOTAL $14,384.00 TOTAL $13,377.12TOTAL $12,800.00MH 4 - 4' DIA. x 7 VFSection II Item 2222103Condition Standards and Repair Methods -- Condition 3SQFT101$45.00$4,545.00-$3.15$41.85$4,226.85$40.00$4,040.00Section II Item 2222104Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout MaterialGAL1$267.50$267.50-$18.73$248.78$248.78$235.00$235.00Section II Item 2222105Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout Material-Labor & EquipmentHR1$203.50$203.50-$14.25$189.26$189.26$185.00$185.00Section II Item 2222106Manhole Bench and Invert Repair 4' Diameter BaseEA1$669.00$669.00-$46.83$622.17$622.17$600.00$600.00TOTAL $5,685.00 TOTAL $5,287.05TOTAL $5,060.00MH 5 - 4' DIA. x 8.5 VFSection II Item 2222103Condition Standards and Repair Methods -- Condition 3SQFT119$45.00$5,355.00-$3.15$41.85$4,980.15$40.00$4,760.00Section II Item 2222104Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout MaterialGAL2$267.50$535.00-$18.73$248.78$497.55$235.00$470.00Section II Item 2222105Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout Material-Labor & EquipmentHR2$203.50$407.00-$14.25$189.26$378.51$185.00$370.00Section II Item 2222106Manhole Bench and Invert Repair 4' Diameter BaseEA1$669.00$669.00-$46.83$622.17$622.17$600.00$600.00SECTION II: UV CURED PRODUCTPROPOSALCured In Place Pipe CIPP for Pipeline Rehabilitation #635-21PROJECT SPECIFIC LIST PRICINGMEMBER PRICINGDISCOUNTED PRICINGPage 26Item 7. TOTAL $6,966.00 TOTAL $6,478.38TOTAL $6,200.00MH 6 - 4' DIA. x 13 VFSection II Item 2222103Condition Standards and Repair Methods -- Condition 3SQFT176$45.00$7,920.00-$3.15$41.85$7,365.60$40.00$7,040.00Section II Item 2222104Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout MaterialGAL3$267.50$802.50-$18.73$248.78$746.33$235.00$705.00Section II Item 2222105Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout Material-Labor & EquipmentHR3$203.50$610.50-$14.25$189.26$567.77$185.00$555.00Section II Item 2222106Manhole Bench and Invert Repair 4' Diameter BaseEA1$669.00$669.00-$46.83$622.17$622.17$600.00$600.00TOTAL $10,002.00 TOTAL $9,301.86TOTAL $8,900.00MH 7 - 4' DIA. x 10 VFSection II Item 2222103Condition Standards and Repair Methods -- Condition 3SQFT138$45.00$6,210.00-$3.15$41.85$5,775.30$40.00$5,520.00Section II Item 2222104Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout MaterialGAL3$267.50$802.50-$18.73$248.78$746.33$235.00$705.00Section II Item 2222105Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout Material-Labor & EquipmentHR3$203.50$610.50-$14.25$189.26$567.77$185.00$555.00Section II Item 2222106Manhole Bench and Invert Repair 4' Diameter BaseEA1$669.00$669.00-$46.83$622.17$622.17$600.00$600.00Section II Item 2222110Structure Repair (any size)SQFT19$48.00$912.00-$3.36$44.64$848.16$41.00$779.00TOTAL $9,204.00 TOTAL $8,559.72TOTAL $8,159.00MH 8 - 5' DIA. x 23 VFSection II Item 2222103Condition Standards and Repair Methods -- Condition 3SQFT381$45.00$17,145.00-$3.15$41.85$15,944.85$40.00$15,240.00Section II Item 2222104Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout MaterialGAL3$267.50$802.50-$18.73$248.78$746.33$235.00$705.00Section II Item 2222105Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout Material-Labor & EquipmentHR3$203.50$610.50-$14.25$189.26$567.77$185.00$555.00Section II Item 2222107Manhole Bench and Invert Repair 5' Diameter BaseEA1$776.00$776.00-$54.32$721.68$721.68$700.00$700.00TOTAL $19,334.00 TOTAL $17,980.62TOTAL $17,200.00MH 9 - 4' DIA. x 16 VFSection II Item 2222103Condition Standards and Repair Methods -- Condition 3SQFT214$45.00$9,630.00-$3.15$41.85$8,955.90$40.00$8,560.00Section II Item 2222104Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout MaterialGAL3$267.50$802.50-$18.73$248.78$746.33$235.00$705.00Section II Item 2222105Inflow & Infiltration Repair -- Injection of Chemical Grout Material-Labor & EquipmentHR3$203.50$610.50-$14.25$189.26$567.77$185.00$555.00Section II Item 2222106Manhole Bench and Invert Repair 4' Diameter BaseEA1$669.00$669.00-$46.83$622.17$622.17$600.00$600.00TOTAL $11,712.00 TOTAL $10,892.16TOTAL $10,420.00TOTAL FOR 9 MANHOLES: $80,629.00ALL MATERIAL IS GUARANTEED TO BE AS SPECIFIED, AND THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEDRAWING AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED FOR THE ABOVE WORK AND COMPLETED IN A SUBSTANTIAL WORKMANLIKEMANNER. ANY ALTERATION OR DEVIATION FROM SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS INVOLVING EXTRA COSTS WILL BEEXECUTED ONLY UPON WRITTEN ORDERS AND WILL BECOME AN EXTRA CHARGE OVER AND ABOVE THE QUOTATION.WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE ON ABOVE WORK TO BE FURNISHED BY FUQUAY, INC.THERE MAY BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE FOR PROVIDING A WAIVER OF SUBROGATION AND/OR BEINGLISTED AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED ON FUQUAY'S INSURANCE. THE CHARGE SHALL BE EQUAL TO THEAMOUNT CHARGED TO FUQUAY FOR SAID SERVICE.EXCLUSIONS:BOND, SALES TAX, AND OCPBARRICADES, SIGNS, TRAFFIC HANDLINGPERMITS, BURDENS, FEESINFILTRATION REPAIRWASTE HAUL-OFFDEWATERINGSURVEYINGALL BYPASS PUMPING AND PIPE PLUGGINGSITE CLEARINGPROVIDING AND/OR PERFORMING ANY TESTINGTERMS:PAYMENT FOR SERVICES SHALL BE DUE AND PAYABLE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE DATE/MONTH THE WORK IS ACCEPTED BY:PERFORMED. THIS PROPOSAL MAY BE WITHDRAWN BY US IF NOT ACCEPTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS.COMPANY:RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,NAME:FUQUAY, INC.TITLE:Page 27Item 7. Page 1 of 2 To: Mayor and Town Council From: Hulon T. Webb, Jr., Interim Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure Services Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Credit Sales Agreement between Mill Branch LLC, and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to the construction of Fishtrap Road from Stuber Elementary to the Dallas North Tollway. Description of Agenda Item: The construction of Fishtrap Road from Stuber Elementary to the Dallas North Tollway project crosses four stream corridors that are protected under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The design process included identifying these protected waters and working to limit impacts. Due to the nature of these water courses position in the roadway corridor, types of aquatic features, and length of impacts, a permit was acquired for the unavoidable impacts. This permit demonstrated all the avoidance and minimization efforts required to secure the permit, but the impacts still required compensatory mitigation. Compensatory mitigation that the regulatory agencies utilize is accomplished through purchasing mitigation credits from a mitigation bank. Mitigation banks are essentially areas where entities create streams and wetlands to sell to permittees who are forced to impact protected areas. Mill Branch Mitigation Bank will provide the intermittent stream credits necessary to satisfy the intermittent stream mitigation obligation for this project. The Town investigated developing its own responsible mitigation for improvements to offset the mitigation costs for the unavoidable impacts. Prior to 2010 it was standard practice for a municipality to undergo a mitigation plan for improvements to offset the mitigation costs on a project. However, a study conducted by the National Academy of Science found that most “permittee responsible mitigation” sites failed over time. As a result, the USACE has determined that issuing permits with permittee responsible mitigation had a net loss of wetlands and waters of the United States. The Fort Worth District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has adopted the position that was established in the federal register based on the study, that they will not allow any permittee responsible mitigation for improvements if there is an open and operational mitigation bank that serves the site. As there are operational mitigation banks serving this area, the Town must purchase mitigation credits. Prosper is a place where everyone matters. ENGINEERING SERVICES Page 28 Item 8. Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact: The cost of intermittent stream credits is $747,782. The FY 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program includes $18,000,000 for the 2012-ST Fishtrap Road (Elem – DNT) project. The funding source is Account No. 750-6610-10-00-2012-ST. Legal Obligations and Review: Terrence Welch of Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P., has reviewed and approved the Credit Sales Agreement as to form and legality. Attached Documents: 1. Credit Sales Agreement 2. Location Map 3. Areas of Impact Map Town Staff Recommendation: Town staff recommends that the Town Council authorize the Town Manager to execute a Credit Sales Agreement between Mill Branch LLC, and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to the construction of Fishtrap Road from Stuber Elementary to the Dallas North Tollway. Proposed Motion: I move to authorize the Town Manager to execute a Credit Sales Agreement between Mill Branch LLC, and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to the construction of Fishtrap Road from Stuber Elementary to the Dallas North Tollway. Page 29 Item 8. Mill Branch LLC CREDIT SALES AGREEMENT This CREDIT SALES AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as “Agreement”) is made and entered into this _____ day of__________, 2022 by and between MILL BRANCH LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as “MB”), and the Town of Prosper, Texas (hereinafter referred to as “Purchaser”). 1. PROJECT NAME: Fishtrap Road (hereinafter the “Project”) USACE PERMIT NUMBER: SWF-2021-00250 USACE PERMIT TYPE: NWP 14 SERVICE AREA: Mill Branch Primary PURCHASER: Town of Prosper 250 West First Street Prosper, Texas 75078 2. PRICING: Number of credits purchased: 534.13 Credit type: 534.13 Intermittent Credit price (per unit): $1,400 Total Purchase Price $747,782.00 Page 30 Item 8. 2 3. PAYMENT: 3.1 Nonrefundable Payment: MB agrees to accept from Purchaser at the time of execution of this Agreement a nonrefundable payment in the amount of seven hundred forty seven thousand seven hundred eighty-two dollars and 00/100 ($747,782.00), representing the Total Purchase Price. 3.2 Sale and Transfer: Immediately following MB’s receipt of the Total Purchase Price, 534.13 Credits shall be made available for immediate transfer to Purchaser by MB. Such transfer shall occur at a time of Purchaser’s choosing. No credits shall be transferred, sold, or otherwise conveyed by MB to Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement prior to MB’s receipt of the Total Purchase Price. 4. DELIVERABLES: See Attached Draft Credit Transaction Notification 5. INFORMATION AND RELIANCE: MB and Purchaser acknowledge and agree that MB is relying upon information provided solely by Purchaser in providing compensatory mitigation pursuant to this Agreement. Purchaser shall indemnify and hold MB harmless in the event that any such information proves to be inaccurate, false, or otherwise deficient or in error. Purchaser warrants that the information provided to MB for the purposes of determining the nature and amount of compensatory mitigation for the Project is accurate and complete to the best of Purchaser's knowledge. MB shall not be liable for inaccuracies or omissions in the calculation or determination of the amount of compensatory mitigation required for the Project. 6. LIABILITY FOR COMPENSATORY MITIGATION: In consideration for receiving the Total Purchase Price from Purchaser, MB shall assume liability for providing compensatory mitigation under the terms of this Agreement and in accordance with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Section 401 certification requirements. 7. FINAL SALE: The sale of credits by MB to Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement is final. Under no circumstances shall Purchaser be entitled to a refund of any amounts provided to MB for compensatory mitigation for the Project. 8. COMPLETE AGREEMENT: This Agreement constitutes the full and complete agreement by and between MB and Purchaser for the sale of compensatory mitigation credits for the Project. Page 31 Item 8. 3 9. RECEIPT OF TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE: By executing this Agreement the Parties acknowledge that Purchaser has tendered to MB the Total Purchase Price set forth in Paragraph 2, above. 10. GOVERNING LAW: This Agreement shall be construed, interpreted, and enforced under the laws of the State of Texas with the sole proper venue being Travis County, Texas. 11. NONASSIGNABILITY: This Agreement may not be assigned without the consent, in writing, of the other Party. 12. AGREEMENT BINDING ON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties, their legal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns to the fullest extent of prevailing law. _____________________________(By) Harlan Jefferson Town Manager Authorized for: Town of Prosper, Texas Date: ________________________ _____________________________(By) J. Adam Riggsbee, PhD Authorized for: Mill Branch LLC Date: ________________________ Page 32 Item 8. P.O. Box 29921, Austin, TX 78755 Mill Branch LLC 512.241.3775 Mill Branch LLC Date Brian Bartels Delivered via Email US Army Corps of Engineers 819 Taylor Street Room 3A37 Fort Worth, TX 76102 RE: CREDIT TRANSACTION NOTIFICATION for SWF-2021-00250; Fishtrap Road Dear Mr. Bartels, Per our Mill Branch Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI; SWF-2010-00321), we are required to report all credit sales within thirty (30) days of transaction. This letter serves as notice that a transaction was concluded on Date with Mill Branch Mitigation Bank covering a portion of the mitigation requirements under SWF-2021-00250. The Mill Branch RIBITS Ledger will be debited appropriately within 30 days from the date of this transaction. The number of credits purchased by the buyer was: o Five hundred thirty-four and thirteen hundredths (534.13) Intermittent In-Channel Credits to be debited from the following portions of Mill Branch Mitigation Bank o TBD Additional specifics regarding the purchaser and other relevant USACE permit information have been recorded in the Mill Branch Ledger as required under our MBI (Section IV Part 4). Sincerely, J. Adam Riggsbee, PhD President Cc: Brent Jasper Rudi Reinecke Harlan Jefferson Page 33 Item 8. LOCATION MAP 2012-ST Fishtrap (Elem - DNT) - 4 lanes Dallas North Tollway First Street Legacy Drive Stuber Elementary Page 34 Item 8. Figure 1.General Location Map Area of Detail Scale: 1 inch equals 10 miles 04.080.0848/9/2021File Ref.Date: Survey Corridor -0 2,500 Feet1 in = 2,500 feet Fishtrap Road ImprovementsTown of ProsperCollin and Denton Counties, Texas Page 35 Item 8. Figure 2Proposed Site Plan Fishtrap Road ImprovementsTown of ProsperCollin and Denton Counties, Texas 04.080.0848/9/2021File Ref.Date:-0 750 Feet1 in = 750 feet Survey Corridor Limits of Disturbance Right of Way Limits Pavement Grading Contours Site Plan Page 36 Item 8. Impact 195 LF0.042 acres Impact 352 LF0.010 acres Impact 251 LF0.023 acres Impact 467 LF0.017 acres Impact 50.075 acres Su rve y Corrid orFigure 3Impacts to Waters of the U.S.Crossing 1 Fishtrap RoadTown of ProsperCollin & Den ton Coun ties, Texas 04.080.0848/17/2021File Ref.Date:-0 125 Feet1 in = 125 feet Area of Detail Scale: 1 inch equals 3,500 feet Limits of D istu rb ance BridgeRight of Way L imits RiprapPaveme nt Grading Contours Site Plan We tlands , O ther Spec ial Aquatic Sites ,and O the r Wate rs Tribu tary Wetland Im pa cts to Wetlands, Other Spe cialAquatic Site s, and O ther Wa ters Direct/Perm anent Direct/Tem porary Page 37 Item 8. Impact 100.020 acres Impact 90.159 acres Impact 8284 LF0.093 acres Impact 727 LF0.015 acres Impact 656 LF0.012 acres Su rve y Corrid orFigure 4Impacts to Waters of the U.S.Crossing 2 Fishtrap RoadTown of ProsperCollin & Den ton Coun ties, Texas 04.080.0848/17/2021File Ref.Date:-0 125 Feet1 in = 125 feet Area of Detail Scale: 1 inch equals 3,500 feet Limits of D istu rb ance BridgeRight of Way L imits RiprapPaveme nt Grading Contours Site Plan Im pa cts to Wetlands, Other Spe cialAquatic Site s, and O ther Wa ters Direct/Perm anent Direct/Tem porary We tlands , O ther Spec ial Aquatic Sites ,and O the r Wate rs Tribu tary Wetland Page 38 Item 8. Impact 1455 LF0.005 acre Impact 1542 LF0.003 acre Impact 1127 LF0.009 acreImpact 1237 LF0.008 acre Impact 1336 LF0.006 acre Impact 170.158 acre Impact 160.026 acreImpact 1820 LF0.001 acre Impact 1913 LF0.0007 acre Figure 5Impacts to Waters of the U.S.Crossing 3 Fishtrap RoadTown of ProsperCollin & De nton Cou nties, Texa s 04.080.08410/21/2021File Ref.Date:-0 125 Feet1 in = 125 feet Area of Detail Scale: 1 inch equals 3,500 feet Site PlanSurvey Corridor Impacts to Wetlan ds, Other SpecialAquatic Sites, and Other W etlands Direct/Permanent Direct/Temporary Wetlands, Other Sp ecial Aquatic Sites,and Other Waters Tributary Wetland Limits of Disturbance Bridge Right of Way Limits Riprap Pavement Grading Contours Page 39 Item 8. Impact 20119 LF0.015 acres Impact 2191 LF0.005 acres Impact 2296 LF0.006 acres Impact 23120 LF0.022 acre Impact 25271 LF0.021 acreImpact 2426 LF0.005 acre Survey Corridor Impacts to Wetlands, Othe r Spe cialAquatic Sites, and O ther We tlands Direct/Permanent Direct/Temporary Wetlands, Other Spec ial AquaticSites, and Other Wa ter s Tributary Figure 6Impacts to Waters of the U.S.Crossing 4 Fishtrap RoadTown of ProsperCollin & De nton Cou nties, Texa s 04.080.08410/21/2021File Ref.Date:-0 125 Feet1 in = 125 feet Area of Detail Scale: 1 inch equals 3,500 feet Limits of Disturbance Bridge Right of Way Limits Riprap Pavement Grading Contours Site Plan Page 40 Item 8. Page 1 of 2 To: Mayor and Town Council From: Hulon T. Webb, Jr., Interim Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure Services Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Mitigation Credit Sales Agreement between Wetlands Management, L.P., and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to the construction of Fishtrap Road from Stuber Elementary to the Dallas North Tollway. Description of Agenda Item: The construction of Fishtrap Road from Stuber Elementary to the Dallas North Tollway project crosses four stream corridors that are protected under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The design process included identifying these protected waters and working to limit impacts. Due to the nature of these water courses position in the roadway corridor, types of aquatic features, and length of impacts, a permit was acquired for the unavoidable impacts. This permit demonstrated all the avoidance and minimization efforts required to secure the permit, but the impacts still required compensatory mitigation. Compensatory mitigation that the regulatory agencies utilize is accomplished through purchasing mitigation credits from a mitigation bank. Mitigation banks are essentially areas where entities create streams and wetlands to sell to permittees who are forced to impact protected areas. Wetlands Management Mitigation Bank will provide the wetlands credits necessary to satisfy the wetlands mitigation obligation for this project. The Town investigated developing its own responsible mitigation for improvements to offset the mitigation costs for the unavoidable impacts. Prior to 2010 it was standard practice for a municipality to undergo a mitigation plan for improvements to offset the mitigation costs on a project. However, a study conducted by the National Academy of Science found that most “permittee responsible mitigation” sites failed over time. As a result, the USACE has determined that issuing permits with permittee responsible mitigation had a net loss of wetlands and waters of the United States. The Fort Worth District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has adopted the position that was established in the federal register based on the study, that they will not allow any permittee responsible mitigation for improvements if there is an open and operational mitigation bank that serves the site. As there are operational mitigation banks serving this area, the Town must purchase mitigation credits. Prosper is a place where everyone matters. ENGINEERING SERVICES Page 41 Item 9. Page 2 of 2 Budget Impact: The cost of wetlands credits is $17,800. The FY 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program includes $18,000,000 for the 2012-ST Fishtrap Road (Elem – DNT) project. The funding source is Account No. 750-6610-10-00-2012-ST. Legal Obligations and Review: Terrence Welch of Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P., has reviewed and approved the Mitigation Credit Sales Agreement as to form and legality. Attached Documents: 1. Mitigation Credit Sales Agreement 2. Location Map 3. Areas of Impact Map Town Staff Recommendation: Town staff recommends that the Town Council authorize the Town Manager to execute a Mitigation Credit Sales Agreement between Wetlands Management, L.P., and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to the construction of Fishtrap Road from Stuber Elementary to the Dallas North Tollway. Proposed Motion: I move to authorize the Town Manager to execute a Mitigation Credit Sales Agreement between Wetlands Management, L.P., and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to the construction of Fishtrap Road from Stuber Elementary to the Dallas North Tollway. Page 42 Item 9. 1 MITIGATION CREDIT SALES AGREEMENT This Mitigation Credit Sales Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into by and between Wetlands Management, L.P., a Texas limited partnership (“Wetlands”), and Town of Prosper, Texas, (the “Purchaser”). RECITALS: A. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to that certain Mitigation Banking Instrument Agreement dated April 30, 2008, (the “MBI”) between, among others, Wetlands Management, L.P., a Texas limited partnership (“Wetlands”), as the sponsor, and the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (“USACE”) which established the Bunker Sands Mitigation Bank (BSMB) under Permit Number SWF-2004-00420 (the “Bank”). B. Pursuant to the terms of the MBI, Wetlands intends to develop, restore, enhance, create and preserve wetlands, and open water habitat on certain real property described in the MBI in exchange for mitigation bank credits authorized by USACE (the “Credits”). C. The Purchaser is developing certain real property, and in conjunction with such development, USACE has required that the Purchaser provide off-site wetland mitigation to compensate for impacts to USACE jurisdictional wetlands. D. The Purchaser desires to purchase 0.4 credits (the “Credits”) to satisfy the Purchaser’s mitigation obligation for 0.412 acres of low-quality wetland habitat. The Purchaser’s Permit Number is SWF-2021-00250. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration described in this Agreement, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Purchaser and Wetlands agree as follows: 1. Sale of the Credits. Wetlands hereby agrees to sell and assign, and does hereby sell, assign, transfer and convey to the Purchaser, and the Purchaser hereby agrees to purchase and accept, and does hereby purchase, accept, acquire and receive from Wetlands, 0.4 credits (the “Credits”). 2. Payment for Credits. In consideration of the delivery of the Credits, the Purchaser agrees to pay to Wetlands the sum of Seventeen Thousand, Eight Hundred Dollars and No/100 ($17,800.00) for all of the Credits purchased pursuant to this Agreement. Page 43 Item 9. 2 3. Representations. (a) Representations of Wetlands. Wetlands represents to the Purchaser the following: (i.) The Credits are free and clear of all liens, pledges, security interests or other encumbrances other than those imposed by the MBI; (ii.) Wetlands has duly taken all action necessary to authorize its execution and delivery of this Agreement and to authorize the consummation and performance of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; (iii.) Wetlands shall issue to Purchaser such documentation as is required by USACE to show the purchase of 0.4 Credits was consummated by Purchaser in accordance with the MBI; (iv.) this Agreement, and all other agreements executed in connection with this Agreement, are the legal, valid and binding obligations of Wetlands, enforceable in accordance with their terms except as such enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws of general application relating to the enforcement of creditors’ rights; and (v.) Wetlands is operating and will continue to operate the Bank in accordance with all applicable USACE laws, regulations, orders, permit requirements, agreements and guidance, including, without limitation, the MBI and Permit Number SWF-2004-00420. Other than as expressly set forth above, Wetlands does not make any representations or warranties to Purchaser, including, without limitation, the suitability of the Credits or whether or not the Credits will satisfy, in whole or part, any mitigation obligation of the Purchaser. (b) Representations of Purchaser. The Purchaser represents to Wetlands the following: (i.) The Purchaser has duly taken all action necessary to authorize its execution and delivery of this Agreement and to authorize the consummation and performance of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; and (ii.) This Agreement, and all other agreements executed in connection with this Agreement, are the legal, valid and binding obligations of the Purchaser, enforceable in accordance with their terms except as such enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws of general application relating to the enforcement of creditors’ rights. Page 44 Item 9. 3 Other than as expressly set forth above, Purchaser does not make any representations or warranties to Wetlands. 4. Confidentiality. The Purchaser shall keep absolutely confidential the existence of this Agreement, its terms, and all information regarding the MBI, Wetlands, the Credits and the Bank that the Purchaser learned, was provided or was otherwise disclosed to Purchaser in connection with the negotiation, execution and consummation of this Agreement, except for the disclosure of those items that are already in the public domain, where disclosure is otherwise required by law, or the disclosure is approved by Wetlands in writing. 5. Notices. Notices or other communications under this Agreement by either party to the other shall be given or delivered sufficiently if they are in writing and are delivered personally, or are dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage pre-paid, or facsimile, addressed or delivered to the other party as set forth on the signature pages to this Agreement. 6. Binding Agreement; Assignment. This Agreement, and its benefits and obligations, shall inure to and bind the respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. This Agreement may not be assigned by Wetlands or the Purchaser without the written consent of the other. 7. Attorney’s Fees. If there is a dispute between the Purchaser and Wetlands under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all costs incurred, including reasonable attorney’s fees, paralegal’s fees and appellate and post- judgment proceedings and all costs thereof. 8. Final Agreement. This Agreement embodies the whole agreement of the Purchaser and Wetlands. This Agreement shall supersede all previous communications, discussions, representations, advertisements, proposals or agreements either verbal or written, between the Purchaser and Wetlands not otherwise contained in this Agreement. 9. Captions. The captions in this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall be given no legal effect whatsoever. 10. Modification. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument executed by both the Purchaser and Wetlands. Page 45 Item 9. 4 11. Choice of Laws: Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas, and the venue for all disputes with respect to this Agreement shall be in Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. 12. Partial Invalidity. Should any part of this Agreement be rendered void, invalid or unenforceable by any court of law for any reason, such a determination shall not render void, invalid or unenforceable any other part of this Agreement, provided, however, that the parties receive the full consideration bargained for hereunder. 13. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement. (the remainder of this page intentionally left blank) Page 46 Item 9. 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Purchaser and Wetlands have executed this Agreement effective for all purposes as of the _______ day of _______________, 2022. WETLANDS: WETLANDS MANAGEMENT, L.P. By:____________________________ John M. Dziminski Its: President Address: 2101 Cedar Springs Road Suite 1600 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: 214-849-9145 THE PURCHASER: Town of Prosper, Texas By: ______________________________ Harlan Jefferson Town Manager Address: 250 W. First Street Prosper, TX 75078 Telephone: ______________________ Page 47 Item 9. LOCATION MAP 2012-ST Fishtrap (Elem - DNT) - 4 lanes Dallas North Tollway First Street Legacy Drive Stuber Elementary Page 48 Item 9. Figure 1.General Location Map Area of Detail Scale: 1 inch equals 10 miles 04.080.0848/9/2021File Ref.Date: Survey Corridor -0 2,500 Feet1 in = 2,500 feet Fishtrap Road ImprovementsTown of ProsperCollin and Denton Counties, Texas Page 49 Item 9. Figure 2Proposed Site Plan Fishtrap Road ImprovementsTown of ProsperCollin and Denton Counties, Texas 04.080.0848/9/2021File Ref.Date:-0 750 Feet1 in = 750 feet Survey Corridor Limits of Disturbance Right of Way Limits Pavement Grading Contours Site Plan Page 50 Item 9. Impact 195 LF0.042 acres Impact 352 LF0.010 acres Impact 251 LF0.023 acres Impact 467 LF0.017 acres Impact 50.075 acres Su rve y Corrid orFigure 3Impacts to Waters of the U.S.Crossing 1 Fishtrap RoadTown of ProsperCollin & Den ton Coun ties, Texas 04.080.0848/17/2021File Ref.Date:-0 125 Feet1 in = 125 feet Area of Detail Scale: 1 inch equals 3,500 feet Limits of D istu rb ance BridgeRight of Way L imits RiprapPaveme nt Grading Contours Site Plan We tlands , O ther Spec ial Aquatic Sites ,and O the r Wate rs Tribu tary Wetland Im pa cts to Wetlands, Other Spe cialAquatic Site s, and O ther Wa ters Direct/Perm anent Direct/Tem porary Page 51 Item 9. Impact 100.020 acres Impact 90.159 acres Impact 8284 LF0.093 acres Impact 727 LF0.015 acres Impact 656 LF0.012 acres Su rve y Corrid orFigure 4Impacts to Waters of the U.S.Crossing 2 Fishtrap RoadTown of ProsperCollin & Den ton Coun ties, Texas 04.080.0848/17/2021File Ref.Date:-0 125 Feet1 in = 125 feet Area of Detail Scale: 1 inch equals 3,500 feet Limits of D istu rb ance BridgeRight of Way L imits RiprapPaveme nt Grading Contours Site Plan Im pa cts to Wetlands, Other Spe cialAquatic Site s, and O ther Wa ters Direct/Perm anent Direct/Tem porary We tlands , O ther Spec ial Aquatic Sites ,and O the r Wate rs Tribu tary Wetland Page 52 Item 9. Impact 1455 LF0.005 acre Impact 1542 LF0.003 acre Impact 1127 LF0.009 acreImpact 1237 LF0.008 acre Impact 1336 LF0.006 acre Impact 170.158 acre Impact 160.026 acreImpact 1820 LF0.001 acre Impact 1913 LF0.0007 acre Figure 5Impacts to Waters of the U.S.Crossing 3 Fishtrap RoadTown of ProsperCollin & De nton Cou nties, Texa s 04.080.08410/21/2021File Ref.Date:-0 125 Feet1 in = 125 feet Area of Detail Scale: 1 inch equals 3,500 feet Site PlanSurvey Corridor Impacts to Wetlan ds, Other SpecialAquatic Sites, and Other W etlands Direct/Permanent Direct/Temporary Wetlands, Other Sp ecial Aquatic Sites,and Other Waters Tributary Wetland Limits of Disturbance Bridge Right of Way Limits Riprap Pavement Grading Contours Page 53 Item 9. Impact 20119 LF0.015 acres Impact 2191 LF0.005 acres Impact 2296 LF0.006 acres Impact 23120 LF0.022 acre Impact 25271 LF0.021 acreImpact 2426 LF0.005 acre Survey Corridor Impacts to Wetlands, Othe r Spe cialAquatic Sites, and O ther We tlands Direct/Permanent Direct/Temporary Wetlands, Other Spec ial AquaticSites, and Other Wa ter s Tributary Figure 6Impacts to Waters of the U.S.Crossing 4 Fishtrap RoadTown of ProsperCollin & De nton Cou nties, Texa s 04.080.08410/21/2021File Ref.Date:-0 125 Feet1 in = 125 feet Area of Detail Scale: 1 inch equals 3,500 feet Limits of Disturbance Bridge Right of Way Limits Riprap Pavement Grading Contours Site Plan Page 54 Item 9. Page 1 of 2 To: Mayor and Town Council From: Stuart Blasingame, Fire Chief Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon adopting the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) dated June 6, 2022. Description of Agenda Item: Collin County Emergency Management and participating municipalities have completed the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Plan. This plan identifies the major potential threats to the county and municipalities, and provides mitigation plans and strategies to address those threats. Following FEMA’s evaluation and approval of the plan, the Collin County Commissioners court unanimously approved and adopted the plan. All participating municipalities are asked to formally adopt the plan as well. Budget Impact: There is no cost impact as this plan is adopted and sustained actions taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from hazards and their effects. Legal Obligations and Review: Terrence Welch of Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P., has previously reviewed the resolution as to form and legality. Attached Documents: 1. Resolution 2. Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan, June 6, 2022 Town Staff Recommendation: Town staff recommends approval of the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) dated June 6, 2022. Prosper is a place where everyone matters. FIRE DEPARTMENT Page 55 Item 10. Page 2 of 2 Proposed Motion: I move to approve the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) dated June 6, 2022. Page 56 Item 10. TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, ADOPTING THE COLLIN COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN, JUNE 6, 2022; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Town of Prosper recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property within Collin County, Texas; and WHEREAS, Collin County has prepared a multi-hazard mitigation plan, hereby known as Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan, June 6, 2022, in accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000; and WHEREAS, Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan, June 6, 2022, identifies mitigation goals and actions to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property in Prosper from the impacts of future hazards and disasters; and WHEREAS, adoption by the Town of Prosper demonstrates its commitment to hazard mitigation and achieving the goals outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan, June 6, 2022. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS: SECTION 1 The Town Council of the Town of Prosper, Texas, in accordance with the Prosper Town Charter, hereby adopts the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan, June 6, 2022. SECTION 2 This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022. _________________________ David F. Bristol, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Michelle Lewis Sirianni, Town Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ___________________________ Terrence S. Welch, Town Attorney Page 57 Item 10. State of Texas Collin County Commissioners Court Court Order 2022-519-06-06 An order of the Collin County Commiss ioners Court appro vin g th e adoption o f the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. T h e Collin County Commissione rs Court hereby approves the adoption of the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan, as d etailed in t h e attached docu menta t ion . A m otion w as m ad e, seconded , and carried by a majority of the court members in at te ndance during a reg u la r session on M onday, June 6, 2022. C hris Hill, Coun ty Judge Darr ell H ale, Commissi o n er , Pc t 3 Su sa n Fletch er, Co m missione r , Pct l AT' "ST : Stacey Kemp , Coun ty-Cle rk Page 58 Item 10. Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Collin County, Texas June 6, 2022 Page 59 Item 10. Page | 1 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Executive Summary Mitigation is commonly defined as sustained actions taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from hazards and their effects. Hazard mitigation focuses attention and resources on community policies and actions that will produce successive benefits over time. A mitigation plan states the aspirations and specific courses of action that a community intends to follow to reduce vulnerability and exposure to future hazard events. These plans are formulated through a systematic process centered on the participation of citizens, businesses, public officials, and other community stakeholders. The planning area for this plan update is for Collin County, Texas and includes the following jurisdictions: A. Collin County (unincorporated) B. City of Allen C. City of Anna D. City of Blue Ridge E. City of Celina F. Town of Fairview G. City of Farmersville H. City of Frisco I. City of Josephine J. City of Lavon K. City of Lowry Crossing L. City of Lucas M. City of Melissa N. City of Murphy O. Town of New Hope P. City of Parker Q. City of Princeton R. Town of Prosper S. Town of St. Paul T. City of Wylie The contents of this plan update are designed and organized to be as reader-friendly and functional as possible. The structure and format of this plan has not significantly changed from the Mitigation Plan that was adopted in 2016. As this plan is an update to previous plans updates to developments and evolutions to the hazard mitigation strategy of Collin County have been included. Each jurisdiction’s individual mitigation strategy is discussed in their annex. Jurisdictions that participated in the 2016 HazMAP have changes in development highlighted in their individual annex. As the growth of Collin County has expanded since the previous version of the plan; however, no new hazards have been included. The vulnerability analysis has changed and these updates have been included. Discussion of all hazards can be found in chapter 3. The objectives of this updated plan remain the same as in the previous plans. These include: Page 60 Item 10. Page | 2 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • To save lives and reduce injuries. • Minimize damage to buildings and infrastructure (especially critical facilities). • Minimize economic losses Further examination of the action items from the 2016 plan, including the status of each action item, can be found in Chapter 4 of the main plan. New action items for each jurisdiction are located in the jurisdictional annexes. During the development phase of this updated planning document, the review team noted some changes. While the scope and intent of the 2011 priorities remain the same, some of the underlying factors driving the priorities reflect new external trends, such as public perceptions and expectations, or are indicative of new awareness and approaches to community mitigation strategies. Areas of 2016 Priories • Post disaster conditions o With the potential for significant reimbursement for post-disaster projects through FEMA grants, it was prudent the plan be updated. • Financial, legal and political realities o The Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) was updated to new standards utilizing a HMA grant and the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). This provided the necessary financial assistance and personnel to help organize the jurisdictions of Collin County, as well as compile the data into a cohesive plan. o Due to a HMA grant funding the NCT Safe Room Rebate Program, there was initial concern that only jurisdictions that were part of the county plan or had their own HazMAP would be eligible. As a result, most of the Collin County jurisdictions opted to participate in the Collin County HazMAP. • Changes in hazard focus o Collin County has not changed the overall focus on hazards but has updated the likelihood of an occurrence based on new data from past meteorological and archival data. With these updates, the data has shown we are more likely to experience certain disasters over others. Through the use of the Priority Risk Index, persons interested in the plan will be able to better understand the rank of disasters and why one disaster may be considered at a higher risk than others. In addition, expansive soils and lightning were included as potential hazards. These hazards were not included in the 2011 plan. Areas of 2021 Priority Refinement: • The Plan was updated based on the current standards, which were the same standards during the 2016 update • The Plan was updated without contractor help and with local jurisdictions updating their areas of responsibility accordingly • The Plan was simplified in regards to maps. Unless a map was needed for a specific jurisdiction, Countywide maps were used for the 2021 update. The 2021 Planning Team acknowledges this mitigation plan is a planning document, not a regulatory document. The plan meets Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) planning requirements by addressing hazards, vulnerability and risk. Page 61 Item 10. Page | 3 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan This page intentionally left blank. Page 62 Item 10. Page | 4 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Table of Contents 4 Chapter 1: Introduction 6 1.1 Purpose 6 1.2 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Planning Process 6 1.3 HazMAP Planning Process Point of Contact and Demographics 7 1.4 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Organization 9 1.5 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Strategy Maintenance Process 9 1.6 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Adoption 10 Chapter 2: Planning Process 11 Chapter 3: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment 13 3.1 Profiling Hazards 13 3.2 Location of Hazards 17 3.3 Extent 84 3.4 Geographic Information System Based Analysis 100 3.5 Statistical Risk Assessment 134 3.6 Qualitative Assessment 168 3.7 Summary 170 Chapter 4: 2016 Plan Action Items 172 Chapter 5: Plan Maintenance 284 5.1 Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan 284 5.2 Plan Incorporation 285 5.3 Continued Public Involvement 285 Chapter 6: Introduction to Jurisdictional Annexes 286 Jurisdictional Annexes 287 Appendix A: Planning Process Documentation 1021 Page 63 Item 10. Page | 5 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan This page intentionally left blank. Page 64 Item 10. Page | 6 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Chapter One: Introduction 1.1 Purpose Collin County is susceptible to a number of different natural hazards that have potential to cause property damage or loss, loss of life, economic hardship, and threats to public health and safety. Occurrence of natural disasters cannot be prevented; however, their impact on people and property can be lessened through hazard mitigation measures. The Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan has been developed by the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT). The plan represents collective efforts of citizens, elected and appointed government officials, business leaders, non-profit organizations, and other stakeholders. Through the development of this plan, the Planning Team identified the natural hazards that could affect Collin County, and evaluated the risks associated with these hazards. The implementation of this plan will make Collin County more disaster- resilient because the benefits that can be gained by planning ahead and taking measures to reduce damages before the next disaster strikes have been recognized. The plan will allow Collin County and participating jurisdictions to comply with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) and it’s implementing regulations 44 CFR Part 201.6, thus resulting in eligibility to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster hazard mitigation project funding. 1.2 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Planning Process The Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) was created in order to meet current federal and state hazard mitigation plan regulations in compliance with the following rules and regulations: Section 322, Mitigation Planning, of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as enacted by Section 104 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-390) Federal Emergency Management Administration’s Interim Final Rule, published in the Federal Register on February 26, 2002, at 44 CFR Part 201. Each jurisdiction participated by having a Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (HMPC). Each HMPC participated in the creation of and contributed to the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Emergency Preparedness Department also participated in the HazMAP update341. NCTCOG’s role was to assist in compiling the jurisdictional information and preparing the plan for submission. Collin County hazard mitigation planning meetings were held on August 12, 2020, November 2, 2020, November 5, 2020, November 12, 220, and June 10, 2021. Page 65 Item 10. Page | 7 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 1.3 HazMAP Planning Process Point of Contact and Demographics The following were the points of contacts during the HazMAP planning process for 2020: Jurisdiction Agency Title Jurisdiction Agency Title Collin County Emergency Management Assistant EMC Lowry Crossing Administration City Secretary Collin County Emergency Management Assistant EMC Lucas Fire Dept. EMC/Asst. Fire Chief Allen Fire Department Division Chief Melissa Fire Dept. Fire Chief Anna Fire Dept. Fire Chief Melissa Fire Department Admin. Assistant Anna Fire Department Bat. Chief Murphy Fire Dept. Fire Chief Blue Ridge Public Works City Secretary Murphy Fire Dept. Fire Marshal Celina Fire Dept. Assistant Chief New Hope City Admin. Town Secretary Fairview City Management Asst. to City Manger New Hope City Council Alderman Farmersville Fire Dept. Police Chief Parker Fire Dept. Fire Lieutenant Frisco Fire Dept. Deputy EMC Parker Police Dept. Police Chief Frisco Fire Dept EM Analysis Princeton Administration EMC/Fire Lt. Josephine Fire Dept. Police Chief Prosper Fire Dept. EMC Lavon Fire Department Fire Chief St. Paul City Council Town Secretary Lavon City Management City Administrator Wylie Fire Dept. EMC Jurisdiction 2014 Population 2019 Population Collin County 846,850 1,034,730 Allen 90,030 105,823 Anna 10,250 15,778 Blue Ridge 822 1,023 Celina 6,660 27,607 Fairview 8,310 12,738 Farmersville 3,292 3,351 Frisco 137,310 200,490 Josephine 811 1,966 Page 66 Item 10. Page | 8 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Jurisdiction 2014 Population 2019 Population Lavon 2,740 4,210 Lowry Crossing 1,710 1,756 Lucas 5,970 8,553 Melissa 6,190 12,381 Murphy 18,020 20,500 New Hope 614 705 Parker 4,110 5,177 Princeton 7,840 15,330 Prosper 14,710 28,830 St. Paul 1,070 1,090 Wylie 44,280 53,067 Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates, United States Census Bureau & Texas Association of Counties Figure 1. Collin County Source: Texas National Resource Inventory Page 67 Item 10. Page | 9 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 1.4 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Organization The Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan is organized into five chapters which satisfy the mitigation requirements in 44 CFR Part 201, with an appendix providing the required supporting documentation. Chapter One: Introduction Describes the purpose of the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan and introduces the mitigation planning process. Chapter Two: Planning Process Describes the planning process and organization for each participating jurisdiction, satisfying requirements 201.6(c)(1), 201.6(b)(2), 201.6(b)(1), 201.6(b)(3), 201.6(c)(4)(iii), 201.6(c)(4)(i). Chapter Three: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Describes the hazards identified, known national extent scales, location of hazards, previous events, and jurisdictional profiles, satisfying requirements 201.6(c)(2)(i), 201.6(c)(2)(ii). Chapter Four: Previous Action Items Examines the ability of Collin County and participating jurisdictions to implement and manage a comprehensive mitigation strategy. The past action items are listed with their current status of deferred, in progress, completed or deleted. Chapter Five: Plan Maintenance Describes the monitoring, evaluating, updating, plan incorporation, and future public updates for each participating jurisdiction, satisfying requirements 201.6(c)(4)(i), 201.6(c)(4)(ii), 201.6(c)(4)(iii). Chapter Six: Individual Jurisdictional Annexes Each participating jurisdiction has written a personalized annex detailing their planning process, hazard analysis, capabilities, mitigation strategies and action items, and maintenance plan. Appendix A: Documentation from Planning and Public Meetings 1.5 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Strategy Maintenance Process The Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Planning Team will continue to collaborate as a planning group and in in coordination with other surrounding jurisdictions and the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Emergency Preparedness Department as needed. Primary Contact will be through emails and conference calls with strategy meetings to occur at least annually. Collin County will lead the plan maintenance and update processes by: Page 68 Item 10. Page | 10 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Assisting jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Teams in updating their individual contributions to the County HazMAP • Assisting interested jurisdictions in the County who would like to begin their mitigation planning process • Facilitating Collin County HazMAP meetings and disseminating information • Corroborating data for the county-wide sections • Requesting updates and status-reports on planning mechanisms • Requesting updates and status reports on mitigation action projects • Assisting jurisdictions in mitigation grants • Assisting jurisdictions in implementing mitigation goals and action projects • Providing mitigation training opportunities • Maintaining documentation of local adoption resolutions for the County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 1.6 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Adoption Once the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan has received FEMA “Approved Pending Local Adoption” each participating jurisdiction will take the Collin County HazMAP to their Commissioner’s Courts or City Councils for final public comment and local adoption. A copy of the resolution will be inserted into the Collin County HazMAP and held on file at the North Central Texas Council of Governments. Page 69 Item 10. Page | 11 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Chapter Two: Planning Process (In compliance with 201.6(c)(1)) Chapter Two of the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) describes the comprehensive planning and open public process utilized by the participating jurisdictions within Collin County during the plan development and through to plan completion. Each of the jurisdictions involved developed an integrated approach specific to their jurisdiction that provided for not only hazard mitigation teams and management input, but also an opportunity for the public to comment on the plan. This information is included in each individual jurisdictional annex. The development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was orchestrated to provide an opportunity for all stakeholders to participate in the planning process. This planning process also included review and incorporation of other existing plans, documents, and studies related to reducing the effects of natural disasters, so as to avoid duplication and streamline hazard mitigation efforts. The following outlines the planning process: Planning Process Collin County has been and continues to be proactive in efforts to provide a comprehensive hazard mitigation program. Preparation and use of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan is expected to bring an even higher level of cohesion and direction to emergency preparation in Collin County. As a contributor to the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP), all jurisdictions participated in the planning process. Emergency management staff assessed a readiness to plan, secured political support from elected officials, and began to engage the communities in the process of emergency planning. Public Involvement The Hazard Mitigation Planning Team knows that participation and feedback from their community is pertinent in developing a successful Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. Collin County worked to increase public response to the plan by holding public meetings and posting notices on the County and city websites. The HazMAP planning process provides an excellent avenue for residents to exchange quality information and improve the county response to emergencies. This is accomplished through speaking engagements, website information, disaster awareness campaigns and information pamphlets, among other opportunities. Plan Incorporation The Office of Emergency Management made efforts for a comprehensive mitigation plan by incorporating other city plans and creating layers of data. These layers were useful in determining vulnerabilities and susceptible neighborhoods. This information was used when creating current risk assessment data. City and County Appraisal Data (2020), and the Texas Forest Service and Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Public Involvement Incorporation of planning mechanisms Hazard Mitigation Team Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Planning Process Page 70 Item 10. Page | 12 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Report were also incorporated. Other sources listed in the annexes were also used for the mitigation action plan. By reviewing plans and documents from the sources listed in the individual annexes, the Hazard Mitigation Team was able to take pertinent information and turn it into the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. Page 71 Item 10. Page | 13 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Chapter Three: Hazard Identification Risk Assessment 3.1 Profiling Hazards The Hazard Mitigation Action Plan for Collin County is a tool to assist in the identification and documentation of all the hazards faced in the region. The 2016 Collin County profile was one of many developed by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) under the FEMA Hazard Mitigation program. These plans are created by compiling data from the NCTCOG regional natural hazards risk assessments, damage assessments, hazard profiling and identification as well as historical data and geographic information. The current update is an update versus rewrite, and is based on previous data. It is being updated by internal city and county staff. Hazards Addressed The Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan has identified the following natural hazards as having the potential to cause damage in the county. Of the 15 hazards identified in the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, 12 will be discussed. The remaining three (coastal erosion, land subsidence, and hurricane/tropical storm) have no impact on the area. Collin County is not in coastal area nor experience land subsidence so these hazards have been omitted at this time. This applies to all participating jurisdictions in this plan, as listed on page 1. Wildland fire, flooding, and dam failure are the only hazards recognized to have predictable vulnerable areas. All other hazards are equally likely to occur throughout Collin County jurisdictions. Dam Failure A dam is defined as a barrier constructed across a watercourse for the purpose of storage, control, or diversion of water. Dams typically are constructed of earth, rock, concrete, or mine tailings. A dam failure is an accidental or unintentional collapse, breach, or other failure of an impoundment structure that results in downstream flooding. Because dams are man-made structures, dam failures are usually considered technological hazards. However, since most dam failures result from prolonged periods of rainfall, they are often cited as secondary or cascading effects of natural flooding disasters and are not named as the primary hazard that causes disaster declarations. There have not been any inundation studies for the dams in Collin County and the county does not have information from the owners or Emergency Operations Plans for the dams. Therefore, more research is needed for inundation data before the next update. The data presented is from the National Inventory of Dams (NID). Based on a quantitative analysis of the dams currently in place in Collin County and a qualitative analysis of the potential impacts that dam failures would have on the social, economic, and environmental components of the region, the risk of a dam failure hazard is moderate. Drought Drought can be defined as a water shortage caused by the natural reduction in the amount of precipitation expected over an extended period of time, usually a season or more in length. It can be aggravated by other factors such as high temperatures, high winds, and low relative humidity. Texas experiences a cycle of extended wet and drought conditions that can extend over a period of months even years. Extended periods of drought can have an enormous impact on an area by affecting the abundance of water supply, the agriculture economy, and foundations of structures. Drought has the potential to occur within the entire planning area. Page 72 Item 10. Page | 14 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3EarthquakeT An earthquake is a sudden motion or trembling caused by an abrupt release of accumulated strain on the tectonic plates that comprise the Earth's crust. The theory of plate tectonics holds that the Earth's crust is broken into several major plates. These rigid, 50- to 60- mile thick plates move slowly and continuously over the interior of the earth, meeting in some areas and separating in others. As the tectonic plates move together they bump, slide, catch, and hold. Eventually, faults along or near plate boundaries slip abruptly when the stress exceeds the elastic limit of the rock, and an earthquake occurs. The ensuing seismic activity and ground motion provoke secondary hazards: surface faulting, ground failure, and tsunamis. The vibration or shaking of the ground during an earthquake is referred to as ground motion. In general, the severity of ground motion increases with the amount of energy released and decreases with distance from the causative fault or epicenter. When a fault ruptures, seismic waves are propagated in all directions, causing the ground to vibrate at frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 30 Hz. Seismic waves are referred to as P waves, S waves, and surface waves. Due to the risk associated to a distant quake, earthquakes have the potential to occur anywhere within the planning area. The most likely risk for a significant earthquake event is associated to a large quake which might occur in Missouri, Tennessee, or Oklahoma, though these earthquakes are probable to occur only once every 500 years. There is no history of earthquakes occurring within Collin County, however, there have been earthquakes measuring up to 3.7 on the Richter scale in nearby counties. Because of the lack of earthquake data for Collin County and increasing quakes in nearby jurisdictions, more research is needed. Expansive Soils Expansive soils are soils that contain large percentages of swelling clays that may experience volume changes of up to 40% in the absence or presence of water. This type of plastic deformation is common in the North Central Texas region. Over time, expansive soils can be hazardous to buildings and other infrastructure, with the most extensive damage occurring to highways, streets, and building foundations. Expansive soils have the potential to affect the entire planning area, however a study needs to be conducted to collect more precise data. Extreme Heat Extreme heat is characterized by a combination of a very high temperatures and exceptionally humid conditions. When persisting over a period of time, it is called a heat wave. Extreme heat can also be a factor that drastically impacts drought conditions as high temperatures lead to an increased rate of evaporation. Extreme heat can also lead to heat stroke and even death in vulnerable populations such as the elderly and the very young if exposed to the high temperatures for an extended period of time. Extreme heat has the potential to affect the entire planning area. Flooding 33TFlooding is defined as the accumulation of water within a water body and the overflow of excess water onto adjacent floodplain lands. The floodplain is the land adjoining the channel of a river, stream, ocean, lake, or other watercourse or water body that is susceptible to flooding. The statistical meaning of terms like “25-year storm” and “100-year flood” can be confusing. Simply stated, a floodplain can be located anywhere; it just depends on how large and how often a flood event occurs. Floodplains are those areas that are subject to inundation from flooding. Floods and the floodplains associated with them are often described in terms of the percent chance of a flood event happening in any given year. As a community management or planning term, “floodplain” most often refers to an area that is subject to inundation by a flood that has a one percent chance of occurring in any given year (commonly and incorrectly referred to as the 100-year floodplain). Common flooding hazards within the planning area include flash flooding and flood hazards resulting from new development. Page 73 Item 10. Page | 15 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan A flash flood is a rapid flood that inundates low-lying areas in less than six hours. This is caused by intense rainfall from a thunderstorm or several thunderstorms. Flash floods can also occur from the collapse of a man-made structure or ice dam. Construction and development can change the natural drainage and create brand new flood risks as new buildings, parking lots, and roads create less land that can absorb excess precipitation from heavy rains, hurricanes, and tropical storms. Flash floods are a high risk hazard since they can roll boulders, tear out trees, and destroy buildings and bridges. Hail 33THail occurs when, at the outgrowth of a severe thunderstorm, balls or irregularly shaped lumps of ice greater than 0.75 inches in diameter fall with rain. Early in the developmental stages of a hailstorm, ice crystals form within a low-pressure front due to warm air rising rapidly into the upper atmosphere and the subsequent cooling of the air mass. Frozen droplets gradually accumulate on the ice crystals until, having developed sufficient weight, they fall as precipitation. Hail has the potential to occur within the entire planning area. High Winds Wind is defined as the motion of air relative to the earth’s surface. The horizontal component of the three-dimensional flow and the near-surface wind phenomenon are the most significant aspects of the hazard. Straight-line winds are often responsible for the wind damage associated with a thunderstorm. These winds are often confused with tornados because of similar damage and wind speeds. However, the strong and gusty winds associated with straight-line winds blow roughly in a straight line unlike the rotating winds of a tornado. Downbursts or micro-bursts are examples of damaging straight-line winds. A downburst is a small area of rapidly descending rain and rain-cooled air beneath a thunderstorm that produces a violent, localized downdraft covering 2.5 miles or less. Wind speeds in some of the stronger downbursts can reach 100 to 150 miles per hour, which is similar to that of a strong tornado. The winds produced from a downburst often occur in one direction, and the worst damage is usually on the forward side of the downburst. High winds has the potential to occur within the entire planning area. Lightning Lightning results from the buildup and discharge of electrical energy between positively and negatively charged areas within thunderstorms. A “bolt” or brilliant flash of light is created when the buildup becomes strong enough. These bolts of lightning can be seen in cloud-to-cloud or cloud-to- ground strikes. Bolts of lightning can reach temperatures approaching 50,000° Fahrenheit. While lightning is mostly affiliated with thunderstorms, lightning often strikes outside of these storms, as far as 10 miles away from any rainfall. Federal Emergency Management Agency states that an average of 300 people are injured and 80 people are killed in the United States each year by lightning. Direct strikes have the power to cause significant damage to buildings, critical facilities, infrastructure, and ignition of wildfires which can result in widespread damages to property. Lightning has the potential to occur anywhere in the planning area. Tornado A tornado is a violently rotating column of air, in contact with the ground, both pendant from a cumuliform cloud or underneath a cumuliform cloud, and often (but not always) visible as a condensation funnel. Tornadoes have the potential to occur anywhere in the planning area. Wildland Fire Wildland fire is any fire occurring on grassland, forest, or prairie, regardless of ignition source, damages or benefits. Wildland fires are fueled almost exclusively by natural vegetation. They typically occur in national forests and parks, where federal agencies are responsible for fire management and suppression. Interface or intermix fires are urban/wildland fires in which vegetation and the built- environment provide fuel. Firestorms are events of such extreme intensity that effective suppression is Page 74 Item 10. Page | 16 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan virtually impossible. Firestorms occur during extreme weather and generally burn until conditions change or the available fuel is exhausted. For the purposes of this hazard analysis, wildland fires are assessed under what is known as the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). The WUI is an area of development that is susceptible to wildland fires due to the amount of structures located in an area with vegetation that can act a fuel for a wildland fire. Wildfires are most likely to occur within the WUI. Winter Storms Winter storms originate as mid-latitude depressions or cyclonic weather systems, sometimes following the path of the jet stream. A winter storm or blizzard combines heavy snowfall, high winds, extreme cold and ice storms. Many winter depressions give rise to exceptionally heavy rain and widespread flooding and conditions worsen if the precipitation falls in the form of snow. The winter storm season varies widely, depending on latitude, altitude and proximity to moderating influences. Winter storms have the potential to occur within the entire planning area. Cold snaps in which temperatures fall below the freezing point of 32° Fahrenheit do happen on an annual basis in the planning area and can lead to issues with infrastructure, especially frozen roads and bridges. Page 75 Item 10. Page | 17 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3.2 Location of Hazards The following maps illustrate the location of the hazards in Collin County. Maps concerning tornado and hail incidents are in reference to previous events as they have equal potential to occur throughout the county. Winter storms, extreme heat, and drought have potential to occur equally throughout the county and their previous events data is not represented by a map. Likewise, it is assumed that those hazard listed as having equal potential to occur throughout the HazMAP planning area will affect the area as described in each city’s critical infrastructure and structure maps G.1-G.6, in section 3.6. Map Series A Dams/FLOOD ZONES Map A.1 Collin County Dams/Floodzones Map A.2 City of Allen Dams/Floodzones Map A.3 City of Anna Dams/Floodzones Map A.4 City of Blue Ridge Dams/Floodzones Map A.5 City of Celina Dams/Floodzones Map A.6 City of Fairview Dams/Floodzones Map A.7 City of Farmersville Dams/Floodzones Map A.8 City of Frisco Dams/Floodzones Map A.9 City of Josephine Dams/Floodzones Map A.10 City of Lavon Dams/Floodzones Map A.11 City of Lowry Crossing Dams/Floodzones Map A.12 City of Lucas Dams/Floodzones Map A.13 City of Melissa Dams/Floodzones Map A.14 City of Murphy Dams/Floodzones Map A.15 City of New Hope Dams/Floodzones Map A.16 City of Parker Dams/Floodzones Map A.17 City of Princeton Dams/Floodzones Map A.18 City of Prosper Dams/Floodzones Map A.19 City of St. Paul Dams/Floodzones Map A.20 City of Wylie Dams/Floodzones Map Series B – Land Use and Critical Infrastructure Map B.1 Collin County Land Use and Critical Infrastructure Map Series C Hail Incident Map C.1 Collin County Hail Incidents Map Series D Tornado Incident Map D.1 Collin County Tornado Incidents Map Series E Wildfire Risk Assessment Map E.1 Collin County Wildfire Threat Map E.2 City of Allen Wildfire Threat Map E.3 City of Anna Wildfire Threat Map E.4 City of Blue Ridge Wildfire Threat Page 76 Item 10. Page | 18 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Map E.5 City of Celina Wildfire Threat Map E.6 City of Fairview Wildfire Threat Map E.7 City of Farmersville Wildfire Threat Map E.8 City of Frisco Wildfire Threat Map E.9 City of Josephine Wildfire Threat Map E.10 City of Lavon Wildfire Threat Map E.11 City of Lowry Crossing Wildfire Threat Map E.12 City of Lucas Wildfire Threat Map E.13 City of Melissa Wildfire Threat Map E.14 City of Murphy Wildfire Threat Map E.15 City of New Hope Wildfire Threat Map E.16 City of Parker Wildfire Threat Map E.17 City of Princeton Wildfire Threat Map E.18 City of Prosper Wildfire Threat Map E.19 City of St. Paul Wildfire Threat Map E.20 City of Wylie Wildfire Threat Map Series F Wildland Urban Interface Map F.1 Collin County Wildland Urban Interface Map F.2 City of Allen Wildland Urban Interface Map F.3 City of Anna Wildland Urban Interface Map F.4 City of Blue Ridge Wildland Urban Interface Map F.5 City of Celina Wildland Urban Interface Map F.6 City of Fairview Wildland Urban Interface Map F.7 City of Farmersville Wildland Urban Interface Map F.8 City of Frisco Wildland Urban Interface Map F.9 City of Josephine Wildland Urban Interface Map F.10 City of Lavon Wildland Urban Interface Map F.11 City of Lowry Crossing Wildland Urban Interface Map F.12 City of Lucas Wildland Urban Interface Map F.13 City of Melissa Wildland Urban Interface Map F.14 City of Murphy Wildland Urban Interface Map F.15 City of New Hope Wildland Urban Interface Map F.16 City of Parker Wildland Urban Interface Map F.17 City of Princeton Wildland Urban Interface Map F.18 City of Prosper Wildland Urban Interface Map F.19 City of St. Paul Wildland Urban Interface Map F.20 City of Wylie Wildland Urban Interface Page 77 Item 10. Page | 19 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan This page intentionally left blank. Page 78 Item 10. Page | 20 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 79 Item 10. Page | 21 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 80 Item 10. Page | 22 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan INSERT Page 81 Item 10. Page | 23 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 82 Item 10. Page | 24 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 83 Item 10. Page | 25 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 84 Item 10. Page | 26 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 85 Item 10. Page | 27 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 86 Item 10. Page | 28 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 87 Item 10. Page | 29 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 88 Item 10. Page | 30 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 89 Item 10. Page | 31 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 90 Item 10. Page | 32 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 91 Item 10. Page | 33 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 92 Item 10. Page | 34 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 93 Item 10. Page | 35 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 94 Item 10. Page | 36 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 95 Item 10. Page | 37 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 96 Item 10. Page | 38 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 97 Item 10. Page | 39 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 98 Item 10. Page | 40 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Map Series B – Land Use, Critical Infrastructure, and Flood Zones Page 99 Item 10. Page | 41 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Map Series C – Hail Events Page 100 Item 10. Page | 42 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Map Series D – Tornado Events Page 101 Item 10. Page | 43 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Map Series E – Wildfire Threat Page 102 Item 10. Page | 44 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 103 Item 10. Page | 45 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 104 Item 10. Page | 46 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 105 Item 10. Page | 47 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 106 Item 10. Page | 48 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 107 Item 10. Page | 49 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 108 Item 10. Page | 50 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 109 Item 10. Page | 51 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 110 Item 10. Page | 52 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 111 Item 10. Page | 53 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 112 Item 10. Page | 54 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 113 Item 10. Page | 55 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 114 Item 10. Page | 56 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 115 Item 10. Page | 57 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 116 Item 10. Page | 58 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 117 Item 10. Page | 59 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 118 Item 10. Page | 60 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 119 Item 10. Page | 61 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 120 Item 10. Page | 62 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 121 Item 10. Page | 63 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 122 Item 10. Page | 64 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Map Series F – Wildland Urban Interface Page 123 Item 10. Page | 65 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 124 Item 10. Page | 66 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 125 Item 10. Page | 67 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 126 Item 10. Page | 68 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 127 Item 10. Page | 69 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 128 Item 10. Page | 70 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 129 Item 10. Page | 71 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 130 Item 10. Page | 72 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 131 Item 10. Page | 73 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 132 Item 10. Page | 74 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 133 Item 10. Page | 75 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 134 Item 10. Page | 76 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 135 Item 10. Page | 77 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 136 Item 10. Page | 78 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 137 Item 10. Page | 79 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 138 Item 10. Page | 80 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 139 Item 10. Page | 81 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 140 Item 10. Page | 82 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 141 Item 10. Page | 83 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 142 Item 10. Page | 84 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3.3 Extent Natural Hazards are judged on specific extent scales. The following are the known extent scales for the natural hazards as addressed in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. Drought PDSI Classifications for Dry and Wet Periods 4.00 or more Extremely wet 3.00 to 3.99 Very wet 2.00 to 2.99 Moderately wet 1.00 to 1.99 Slightly wet 0.50 to 0.99 Incipient wet spell 0.49 to -0.49 Near normal -0.50 to -0.99 Incipient dry spell -1.00 to -1.99 Mild drought -2.00 to -2.99 Moderate drought -3.00 to -3.99 Severe drought -4.00 or less Extreme drought Source: 46TUhttp://drought.unl.edu/whatis/indices.htmU46T Drought conditions do occur in this community. The PDSI Classification allows community planners to anticipate the effects of drought and plan preparedness and mitigation activities for future events as they will likely occur. The last event of widespread drought in Collin County was in August 2018. Page 143 Item 10. Page | 85 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Collin County and participating jurisdictions have experienced 57 drought events, ranging from Abnormally Dry (D0) to Exceptional Drought (D4), during the time period analyzed for this plan (01/01/1996-09/22/2020). It can be expected that future drought events will be of similar magnitude. Earthquake: Mercalli & Richter Scales Comparison Mercalli Scale Richter Scale I. 0 – 1.9 Not felt. Marginal and long period effects of large earthquakes. II. 2.0 -2.9 Felt by persons at rest, on upper floors, or favorably placed. III. 3.0 – 3.9 Felt indoors. Hanging objects swing. Vibration like passing of light trucks. Duration estimated. May not be recognized as an earthquake. IV. 4.0 - 4.3 Hanging objects swing. Vibration like passing of heavy trucks. Standing motor cars rock. Windows, dishes, doors rattle. Glasses clink the upper range of IV, wooden walls and frame creak. V. 4.4 - 4.8 Felt outdoors; direction estimated. Sleepers wakened. Liquids disturbed, some spilled. Small unstable objects displaced or upset. Doors swing, close, open. Pendulum clocks stop, start. VI. 4.9 - 5.4 Felt by all. Many frightened and run outdoors. Persons walk unsteadily. Windows, dishes, glassware broken. Books, etc., off shelves. Pictures off walls. Furniture moved. Weak plaster and masonry D cracked. Small bells ring. Trees, bushes shaken. VII. 5.5 - 6.1 Difficult to stand. Noticed by drivers of motor cars. Hanging objects quiver. Furniture broken. Damage to masonry D, including cracks. Weak chimneys broken at roof line. Fall of plaster, loose bricks, stones, tiles, cornices. Some cracks in masonry C. Waves on ponds. Small slides and caving in along sand or gravel banks. Large bells ring. Concrete irrigation ditches damaged. VIII. 6.2 - 6.5 Steering of motor cars affected. Damage to masonry C; partial collapse. Some damage to masonry B. Fall of stucco and some masonry walls. Twisting, fall of chimneys, factory stacks, monuments, towers, elevated tanks. Frame houses moved on foundations. Decayed piling broken off. Branches broken from trees. Changes in flow or temperature of springs and wells. Cracks in wet ground and on steep slopes. IX. 6.6 - 6.9 General panic. Masonry D destroyed; masonry C heavily damaged, sometimes with complete collapse; masonry B seriously damaged. (General damage to foundations.) Serious damage to reservoirs. Underground pipes broken. Conspicuous cracks in ground. In alluvial areas sand and mud ejected, earthquake fountains, sand craters. X. 7.0 - 7.3 Most masonry and frame structures destroyed with their foundations. Some well-built wooden structures and bridges destroyed. Serious damage to dams, dikes, embankments. Large landslides. Water thrown on banks of canals, rivers, lakes, etc. Sand and mud shifted horizontally on beaches and flat land. Rails bent slightly. XI. 7.4 - 8.1 Rails bent greatly. Underground pipelines completely out of service. XII. > 8.1 Damage nearly total. Large rock masses displaced. Lines of sight and level distorted. Objects thrown into the air. Masonry A: Good workmanship, mortar, and design; reinforced, especially laterally, and bound together by using steel, concrete, etc.; designed to resist lateral forces. Masonry B: Good workmanship and mortar; reinforced, but not designed in detail to resist lateral forces. Masonry C: Ordinary workmanship and mortar; no extreme weaknesses like failing to tie in at corners, but neither reinforced nor designed against horizontal forces. Masonry D: Weak materials, such as adobe; poor mortar; low standards of workmanship; weak horizontally. Source: 46Thttp://www.abag.ca.gov/bayarea/eqmaps/doc/mmigif/m10.html46T Page 144 Item 10. Page | 86 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The Mercalli and Richter Scales allow planners to assess the impact earthquakes have. There have been no recorded earthquakes in Collin County. Collin County and participating jurisdictions did not experience any earthquakes during the time period analyzed for this plan (01/01/1996 – 09/22/2020). There is the potential for future earthquake events. At this time, due to Collin County not experiencing any earthquakes in recent history, there is no way to quantify the impacts on Collin County. Extreme Heat / Heat Index Source: 46Thttp://www.ima.army.mil/southwest/sites/divisions/Safety/Heat%20Index.gif46T The Heat Index chart displays the relative danger in regards to air temperature and relative humidity. Extreme heat is a hazard this community faces on an annual basis during the summer season. A combination of high temperatures and high humidity prompt heat advisories. This chart allows communities to assess the citizen’s danger in regards to heat index. According to the National Centers for Environmental Information, there have been 8 extreme heat events recorded in Collin County since 1/1/1996. Collin County and participating jurisdictions experienced 19 excessive heat events during the time period analyzed for this plan (01/01/1996 – 09/22/2020). The whole North Texas region experienced over a month of 100-degree plus temperatures during this time. It can be expected that any future heat or excessive heat incidents will be similar in magnitude. Page 145 Item 10. Page | 87 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Expansive Soils Swelling Clays Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey; Swelling Clays Map of the Conterminous U.S. The U.S. Geological Survey map above shows the varying types of expansive soils found in Texas. The type of soil predominate in Collin County is generally comprised of less than 50% of clay that has a high swelling potential. Page 146 Item 10. Page | 88 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Flooding Flood Zones Zone A The 100-year or Base Floodplain. There are six types of A zones: A The base floodplains mapped by approximate methods, i.e., BFEs are not determined. This is often called an unnumbered A zone or an approximate A zone. A1-30 These are known as numbered A zones (e.g., A7 or A14). This is the base floodplain where the firm shows a BFE (old format). AE The base floodplain where base flood elevations are provided. AE zones are now used on new format FIRMs instead of A1-30 zones. AO The base floodplain with sheet flow, ponding, or shallow flooding. Base flood depths (feet above ground) are provided. AH Shallow flooding base floodplain. BFE's are provided. A99 Area to be protected from base flood by levees or Federal flood protection systems under construction. BFEs are not determined. AR The base floodplain that results from the de-certification of a previously accredited flood protection system that is in the process of being restored to provide a 100- year or greater level of flood protection Zone V and VE V The coastal area subject to velocity hazard (wave action) where BFEs are not determined on the FIRM. VE The coastal area subject to velocity hazard (wave action) where BFEs are provided on the FIRM. Zone B and Zone X (shaded) Area of moderate flood hazard, usually the area between the limits of the 100-year and the 500-year floods. B zones are also used to designate base floodplains or lesser hazards, such as areas protected by levees from the 100-year flood, or shallow flooding areas with average depths of less than one foot or drainage areas less than 1 square mile. Zone C and Zone X (unshaded) Area of minimal flood hazard, usually depiction FIRMs as exceeding the 500-year flood level. Zone C may have ponding and local drainage problems that do not warrant a detailed study or designation as base floodplain. Zone X is the area determined to be outside the 500-year flood. Zone D Area of undetermined but possible flood hazards. Source: 46Thttp://www.fema.gov/floodplain-management/flood-zones46T Flood hazard areas are identified as a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). SFHAs are defined as the area that will be inundated by the flood event having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The 1-percent annual chance flood is also referred to as the base flood or 100-year flood. SFHAs are labeled as Zone A, Zone V, and Zone VE. Moderate flood hazard areas, labeled Zone B or Zone X, are the areas between the limits of the base flood and the 0.2-percent-annual-chance (or 500- year) flood. The areas of minimal flood hazard, which are the areas outside the SFHA and higher than the elevation of the 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood, are defined as Zone C or Zone X. These flood zone identifications allow planners to determine appropriate land use in designated zones. The planning communities are participants in the National Flood Insurance Program and actively take measures to plan land use. The communities are subject to flash flooding hazards such as the event in 6/26/2007 that occurred in the City of Celina. According to the National Centers for Environmental Information, the flash flood event resulted in $20,000 worth of property damage. Collin County and participating jurisdictions experienced 86 flood and flash flood events during the time period analyzed for this plan (01/01/1996 - 09/22/2020). Most of the flood and flash flood events were a result of excessive rainfall over a short amount of time. These events resulted mainly in over-the-road Page 147 Item 10. Page | 89 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan flooding and minor to moderate property damage. Floodwaters during these events ranged from 2-5 inches to feet. It can be expected that any future flood or flash flood events will be similar in magnitude. Due to many variables, the full extent and impacts of flooding is not fully known at this time. Collin County typically sees more nuisance flooding and flash flooding. Some of this is temporary in nature to construction and can be difficult to know the impacts until an event occurs. An example of this, was in September of 2018. Highway 75 was under construction in Plano and the area received over 5 inches of rain. Typically the roadway does not flood, but due to temporary barriers installed, this area became a river. Once the construction was completed, and the barriers removed, the same area no longer floods. As stated previously, determine the exact impacts from flooding could use more data to help predict where flooding is more likely to occur, even out of flood zones, and then assist in the development of potential action items to mitigate those impacts. Hail Combined NOAA/TORRO Hailstorm Intensity Scales Size Code Intensity Category Typical Hail Diameter (inches) Approximate Size Typical Damage Impacts H0 Hard Hail up to 0.33 Pea No damage H1 Potentially Damaging 0.33-0.60 Marble or Mothball Slight damage to plants, crops H2 Potentially Damaging 0.60-0.80 Dime or grape Significant damage to fruit, crops, vegetation H3 Severe 0.80-1.20 Nickel to Quarter Severe damage to fruit and crops, damage to glass and plastic structures, paint and wood scored H4 Severe 1.2-1.6 Half Dollar to Ping Pong Ball Widespread glass damage, vehicle bodywork damage H5 Destructive 1.6-2.0 Silver dollar to Golf Ball Wholesale destruction of glass, damage to tiled roofs, significant risk of injuries H6 Destructive 2.0-2.4 Lime or Egg Aircraft bodywork dented, brick walls pitted H7 Very destructive 2.4-3.0 Tennis ball Severe roof damage, risk of serious injuries H8 Very destructive 3.0-3.5 Baseball to Orange Severe damage to aircraft bodywork H9 Super Hailstorms 3.5-4.0 Grapefruit Extensive structural damage. Risk of severe or even fatal injuries to persons caught in the open H10 Super Hailstorms 4+ Softball and up Extensive structural damage. Risk of severe or even fatal injuries to persons caught in the open Source: 46Thttp://www.torro.org.uk/site/hscale.php46T Page 148 Item 10. Page | 90 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The Hailstorm Intensity Scale is representative of the damage from hailstorms this community has experienced in the past and will likely experience in the future. The Hailstorm Intensity Scale allows planners to gauge past damage and mitigate for future expected damage. For example, according to the National Centers for Environmental Information, on 5/21/2011, 2.00in (H6/egg size) hail caused $25,000 of property damage in the City of Celina. Collin County and participating jurisdictions experienced 459 hail events ranging from magnitude H2 (.75 inch diameters) to magnitude H10 (4+ inch diameters), during the time period analyzed for this plan (01/01/1985—09/22/2020). It can be expected that any future hail events will be similar in magnitude. Page 149 Item 10. Page | 91 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan High Winds Beaufort Wind Scale Force Wind WMO Appearance of Wind Effects (Knots) Classification On the Water On Land 0 Less than 1 Calm Sea surface smooth and mirror- like Calm, smoke rises vertically 1 1-3 Light Air Scaly ripples, no foam crests Smoke drift indicates wind direction, still wind vanes 2 4-6 Light Breeze Small wavelets, crests glassy, no breaking Wind felt on face, leaves rustle, vanes begin to move 3 7-10 Gentle Breeze Large wavelets, crests begin to break, scattered whitecaps Leaves and small twigs constantly moving, light flags extended 4 11-16 Moderate Breeze Small waves 1-4 ft. becoming longer, numerous whitecaps Dust, leaves, and loose paper lifted, small tree branches move 5 17-21 Fresh Breeze Moderate waves 4-8 ft. taking longer form, many whitecaps, some spray Small trees in leaf begin to sway 6 22-27 Strong Breeze Larger waves 8-13 ft., whitecaps common, more spray Larger tree branches moving, whistling in wires 7 28-33 Near Gale Sea heaps up, waves 13-20 ft., white foam streaks off breakers Whole trees moving, resistance felt walking against wind 8 34-40 Gale Moderately high (13-20 ft.) waves of greater length, edges of crests begin to break into spindrift, foam blown in streaks Whole trees in motion, resistance felt walking against wind 9 41-47 Strong Gale High waves (20 ft.), sea begins to roll, dense streaks of foam, spray may reduce visibility Slight structural damage occurs, slate blows off roofs 10 48-55 Storm Very high waves (20-30 ft.) with overhanging crests, sea white with densely blown foam, heavy rolling, lowered visibility Seldom experienced on land, trees broken or uprooted, "considerable structural damage" 11 56-63 Violent Storm Exceptionally high (30-45 ft.) waves, foam patches cover sea, visibility more reduced 12 64+ Hurricane Air filled with foam, waves over 45 ft., sea completely white with driving spray, visibility greatly reduced Source: 46Thttp://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/beaufort.html46T The Beaufort Wind Scale is representative of the damage from high winds this community may endure. The Beaufort Wind Scale allows planners in the community to assess historical data and mitigate for future high windstorms. For example, according to the National Centers for Environmental Information , in 2010 the City of Wylie experienced Force 12 (64+ knots) winds that blew down trees and fences, which caused $50,000 worth of damage. Collin County and participating jurisdictions experienced 369 high wind events ranging from Force 0 to Force 12 (0 knots to 64+ knots), during the time period analyzed for this plan (01/01/1950—09/22/2020). It can be expected that any future high wind events will be similar in magnitude. Page 150 Item 10. Page | 92 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lightning Activity Level Grid Lightning Activity Level (LAL) A scale which describes lightning activity. Values are labeled 1-6: LAL 1 No thunderstorms LAL 2 Isolated thunderstorms. Light rain will occasionally reach the ground. Lightning is very infrequent, 1 to 5 cloud to ground strikes in a five minute period. LAL 3 Widely scattered thunderstorms. Light to moderate rain will reach the ground. Lightning is infrequent, 6 to 10 cloud to ground strikes in a 5 minute period. LAL 4 Scattered thunderstorms. Moderate rain is commonly produced Lightning is frequent, 11 to 15 cloud to ground strikes in a 5 minute period. LAL 5 Numerous thunderstorms. Rainfall is moderate to heavy. Lightning is frequent and intense, greater than 15 cloud to ground strikes in a 5 minute period. LAL 6 Dry lightning (same as LAL 3 but without rain). This type of lightning has the potential for extreme fire activity and is normally highlighted in fire weather forecasts with a Red Flag Warning. Source: 34T34T46Thttp://www.nws.noaa.gov/forecasts/wfo/definitions/defineLAL.html46T The Lightning Activity Level grid provides a way to gauge the average number of strikes that may accompany a given type of storm. The average number of strikes is given since the density of lightning strikes varies from storm to storm. Typically Collin County would see LAL 5 and lower. Dry lightning is not typically found in our area as we receive moisture from the Gulf of Mexico. Collin County and participating jurisdictions experienced 56 lightning events during the time period analyzed for this plan (01/01/1996—09/22/2020). It can be expected that any future lightning events will be similar in magnitude. Page 151 Item 10. Page | 93 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Tornado Fujita Scale F-Scale Number Intensity Phrase Wind Speed Type of Damage F0 Gale tornado 40-72 mph Some damage to chimneys; breaks branches off trees; pushes over shallow-rooted trees; damages sign boards. F1 Moderate tornado 73-112 mph The lower limit is the beginning of hurricane wind speed; peels surface off roofs; manufactured homes pushed off foundations or overturned; moving autos pushed off the roads; attached garages may be destroyed. F2 Significant tornado 113-157 mph Considerable damage. Roofs torn off frame houses; manufactured homes demolished; boxcars pushed over; large trees snapped or uprooted; light object missiles generated. F3 Severe tornado 158-206 mph Roof and some walls torn off well-constructed houses; trains overturned; most trees in forest uprooted F4 Devastating tornado 207-260 mph Well-constructed houses leveled; structures with weak foundations blown off some distance; cars thrown and large missiles generated. F5 Incredible tornado 261-318 mph Strong frame houses lifted off foundations and carried considerable distances to disintegrate; automobile sized missiles fly through the air in excess of 100 meters; trees debarked; steel reinforced concrete structures badly damaged. F6 Inconceivable tornado 319-379 mph These winds are very unlikely. The small area of damage they might produce would probably not be recognizable along with the mess produced by F4 and F5 wind that would surround the F6 winds. Missiles, such as cars and refrigerators would do serious secondary damage that could not be directly identified as F6 damage. If this level is ever achieved, evidence for it might only be found in some manner of ground swirl pattern, for it may never be identifiable through engineering studies Source: 46Thttp://tornadoproject.com/fscale/fscale.htm46T On February 1, 2007, the Fujita scale was decommissioned in favor of the more accurate Enhanced Fujita Scale, which replaced it. None of the tornados recorded on or before January 31, 2007 will be re- categorized. Therefore maintaining the Fujita scale will be necessary when referring to previous events. Page 152 Item 10. Page | 94 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Enhanced Fujita Scale Enhanced Fujita Category Wind Speed (mph) Potential Damage EF0 65-85 Light damage. Peels surface off some roofs; some damage to gutters or siding; branches broken off trees; shallow-rooted trees pushed over. EF1 86-110 Moderate damage. Roofs severely stripped; manufactured homes overturned or badly damaged; loss of exterior doors; windows and other glass broken. EF2 111-135 Considerable damage. Roofs torn off well-constructed houses; foundations of frame homes shifted; manufactured homes completely destroyed; large trees snapped or uprooted; light-object missiles generated; cars lifted off ground. EF3 136-165 Severe damage. Entire stories of well-constructed houses destroyed; severe damage to large buildings such as shopping malls; trains overturned; trees debarked; heavy cars lifted off the ground and thrown; structures with weak foundations blown away some distance. EF4 166-200 Devastating damage. Well-constructed houses and whole frame houses completely leveled; cars thrown and small missiles generated. EF5 >200 Incredible damage. Strong frame houses leveled off foundations and swept away; automobile-sized missiles fly through the air in excess of 100 m (109 yd.); high-rise buildings have significant structural deformation; Source: 46Thttp://www.spc.noaa.gov/efscale/46T The Enhanced Fujita Scale is representative of the damage from tornados this community has faced in the past and will no doubt face in the future. The Enhanced Fujita Scale allows planners to prepare and mitigate future potential damage by assessing the historical nature of tornados in the planning community. For example, according to the National Centers for Environmental Information in 2007, an F0 tornado occurred in the City of Wylie . The tornado caused $500,000 worth of property damage. Collin County and participating jurisdictions experienced 48 tornado events ranging from EF0 to F3 (65mph to 206mph), during the time period analyzed for this plan (01/01/1950 — 09/22/2020). It can be expected that any future tornado events will be similar in magnitude. Page 153 Item 10. Page | 95 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Wildfire Keetch-Byram Drought Index KBDI Fire Potential 0-200 Soil and fuel moisture are high. Most fuels will not readily ignite or burn. However, with sufficient sunlight and wind, cured grasses and some light surface fuels will burn in spots and patches. 200-400 Fires more readily burn and will carry across an area with no gaps. Heavier fuels will still not readily ignite and burn. Also, expect smoldering and the resulting smoke to carry into and possibly through the night. 400-600 Fire intensity begins to significantly increase. Fires will readily burn in all directions exposing mineral soils in some locations. Larger fuels may burn or smolder for several days creating possible smoke and control problems. 600-800 Fires will burn to mineral soil. Stumps will burn to the end of underground roots and spotting will be a major problem. Fires will burn through the night and heavier fuels will actively burn and contribute to fire intensity. Source: 46Thttp://www.tamu.edu/ticc/KBDI%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf46T The index scale ranges from 0 to 800 and represents moisture deficiency in hundredths of an inch. By looking at indicators of moisture deficiency in the soil in this chart, communities are able to assess when they are at a heightened danger for a wildfire. According to the National Centers for Environmental Information, there have been four wildfire events in Collin County since 1/1/1996. In 9/5/2011, a wildfire caused $50,000 in property damage. Collin County and participating jurisdictions experienced four wildfire events during the time period analyzed for this plan (01/01/1996 — 9/22/2020). These fires ranged from grassfires that destroyed 12 bales of hay, five homes, and caused one death, to a wildfire that burned 100 acres. It can be expected that any future wildland fire events will be similar in magnitude. Page 154 Item 10. Page | 96 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Fire Danger Source: 46Thttp://www.wfas.net/index.php/fire-danger-rating-fire-potential--danger-32/class-rating-fire- potential-danger-51?task=view46T Page 155 Item 10. Page | 97 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Wind Chill Wind Chill is a measure of how cold the wind makes real air temperature feel to the human body. Since wind can dramatically accelerate heat loss from the body, a blustery 30° day would feel just as cold as a calm day with 0° temperatures. The index was created in 1870, and on November 1, 2001, the National Weather Service released a more scientifically accurate equation, which we use today. Here is a chart for calculating wind chill. (Please note that it is not applicable in calm winds or when the temperature is over 50°.) Source: National Weather Service and NOAA The Wind Chill Chart displays the frostbite times in regard to temperature and wind. This chart allows the communities to prepare for severe winter storm or an ice event. These events are infrequent but can cause damage. The primary areas of concern are on bridges and roadways. For example, according to the National Centers for Environmental Information , on 2/11/2010, a heavy snowstorm caused $1,000,000 in property damage across Collin County. Collin County and participating jurisdictions experienced 56 winter storm events ranging from heavy snow to ice, during the time period analyzed for this plan (01/01/1996—09/22/2020). Accumulations during these events ranged from 1-3 inches of sleet, .25-1.5 inches of ice, and .5 to 12 inches of snow. It can be expected that any future events will be similar in magnitude. Page 156 Item 10. Page | 98 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 34TLocal Extent34T Having identified the extent scales by which hazards are ranked, the participating jurisdictions have utilized the following definitions to determine the expected extent/severity for their planning area. High Medium Low Dam Failure • Greater than 50% of city structures are in the inundation zone. Greater than 50% of the city’s critical infrastructure in the identified inundation zone • 20%-50% of city structures are in the inundation zone. • 20%-50% of the city’s critical infrastructure in the inundation zone • Less than 20% of city structures are in the inundation zone. • Less than 20% of the city’s critical infrastructure in the inundation zone Drought • PDSI P - P3.00- P - P4.00 or less • Severe to extreme drought conditions • PDSI P - P1.00- P - P2.99 • Mild to moderate drought conditions • PDSI P P4.00 or more - P - P0.99 • Extremely wet to incipient dry spells Earthquake • Mercalli Scale: VIII-XII • Richter Scale: 6.2->8.1 • Driving will be difficult, increase in damage to infrastructures and objects can be thrown • Mercalli Scale: VI-VII • Richter Scale: 4.9-6.1 • All will feel the event, walking will be difficult, glassware will break, irrigation ditches damaged • Mercalli Scale: I-V • Richter Scale: 0-4.8 • Range of feeling the event is cannot be felt to being felt outdoors. Doors may swing close and liquids may be disturbed. Expansive Soils • EI Expansion Potential: 91- 130 (High) • EI Expansion Potential: >130 (Very High) • EI Expansion Potential: 51- 90 (Medium) • EI Expansion Potential: 21-50 (Low) • EI Expansion Potential: 0-21 (Very Low) Extreme Heat • Heat Index >130F • Heatstroke or sunstroke likely • Heat Index 105F-129F • Sunstroke, muscle cramps, and/or heat exhaustion likely. Heatstroke possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity. • Heat Index 80F-105F • Fatigue possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity, Sunstroke, muscle cramps, and/or heat exhaustion possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity. Flooding • 100yr Flood Zone, Zone A • The extent of severity in the 100yr Flood Zone will be dependent on the structures and livestock located in the identified area. • 500yr Flood Zone, Zone B • The extent of severity in the 500yr Flood Zone will be dependent on the structures and livestock located in the identified area. • Outside of 100yr and 500yr Flood Zones, Zone C, F, X • Potential for flooding due to local drainage problem Hail • H7-H10, 2.4”->4” • There will be severe damage. Including roof and structural damage and risk of serious injuries to fatalities. • H5-H6, 1.6”-2.4” • There will be a range of severe damage from well- constructed houses being destroyed to houses being swept away. • H0-H4, 0”-1.6” • There will be a variance of destruction to vegetation and slight damage to glass. High Winds • Force: 8-12 • Knots: 28-64+ • Whole trees moving to considerable structure damage • Force: 4-6 • Knots: 11-27 • Dust, leaves, and loose paper lifted. Small to Large branches moving. • Force: 0-3 • Knots: <1-10 • Calm, leaves rustle, light flags extended Page 157 Item 10. Page | 99 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • • • High Medium Low Tornado • EF3-EF5 • There will be a range of severe damage from well- constructed houses being destroyed to houses being swept away • EF1-EF2 • There will be a range of moderate to considerate damage. Roofs will be severely stripped, manufactured homes overturned, and cars lifted off of the ground • EF0 • There will be light damage. Roofs will be peeled off, gutters damaged, and branches broken Wildland Fire • KBDI 600-800 • Associated with severe drought. Intense, deep- burning fires with significant downwind spotting. • KBDI 200-400 • Ranges from lower litter and duff layers are drying and beginning to contribute to fire intensity to them causing the fire to burn actively. • KBDI 0-200 • Soil moisture and large class fuel moistures are high and do not contribute much to fire intensity. Winter Storms • Temperatures 15F- P - P45F • Wind Chill 7F- P - P98F • At wind chill of P - P19 frostbite will occur in 30 minutes increasing in severity to occurrence in 5 minutes. • Temperatures 30F- 20F • Wind Chill 25F- P - P4F • Bridges and roadways are at risk to ice • Temperatures 40F- 35F • Wind Chill 36F-17F • Vulnerable populations and agriculture at risk to lower temperatures and wind chill. Lightning • Lightning is ranked based on LAL, see page 91. It is not typically ranked based on severity, but based on frequency; however, even one lightning strike can have the same, if not more, impacts than many lightning strikes depending on what it impacts/strikes. Unlike other hazards that are typically ranked/rated on severity. See Page 91 for LAL scale and information. The charts below depict the estimated average of extent as ranked by the jurisdictions. Collin County Allen Anna Blue Ridge Celina Dam Failure Low None Medium None Low Drought Medium Low Medium Medium Medium Earthquake Medium None None Low None Expansive Soils Medium None Low Low Low Extreme Heat Medium Medium Low Medium Medium Flooding Low Low Low Medium High Hail High Medium Low Low Low High Winds Medium Medium Medium Medium Low Lightning Low Low Low Low Medium Tornado Medium Medium Medium High High Wildland Fire Medium No Low Medium Medium Winter Storms Low Medium Medium Medium Medium Page 158 Item 10. Page | 100 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Fairview Farmersville Frisco Josephine Lavon Dam Failure None Medium Low None Low Drought Medium Medium Low Medium Low Earthquake Low Low Medium Low Low Expansive Soils Low Low Medium Low Low Extreme Heat Low Low Low Low Medium Flooding Low Low Low Low Low Hail Low Low Medium Low Low High Winds Low Medium Medium Low Low Lightning Low Low Medium Low Low Tornado Medium Medium Medium Medium High Wildland Fire Low Medium Low Medium Medium Winter Storms Low Medium High Medium Medium Lowry Crossing Lucas Melissa Murphy New Hope Dam Failure None None Low None Low Drought Medium Medium Medium Medium Low Earthquake Low Low Low Low Low Expansive Soils Low Low Low Low Low Extreme Heat Low Medium Low Medium Medium Flooding Low Medium Low Low Low Hail Low Low Low Low Medium High Winds Low Low Low Low Low Lightning Low Medium Low Medium Low Tornado Medium Medium Medium Low Medium Wildland Fire Low Medium Medium Low Low Winter Storms Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Parker Princeton Prosper St. Paul Wylie Dam Failure None None Low None Low Drought Medium Medium Medium Medium Low Earthquake None Low Low Low Low Expansive Soils Low Low Low Low Low Extreme Heat Low Medium Medium Low Low Flooding Low Medium Medium Low Low Hail Low Low Medium Low Medium High Winds Low Medium Medium Low Low Lightning Low Low High Low Low Tornado Low Medium High Medium High Wildland Fire Low Low Medium Medium Low Winter Storms Low Medium Medium Medium Medium Page 159 Item 10. Page | 101 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 160 Item 10. Page | 102 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3.4 Geographic Information System Based Analysis For the Geographic Information System-based assessment, digital data was collected from local, state, and national sources. ESRI® ArcMap™ 10.2 was used to assess risk utilizing digital data, which included local tax records for individual parcels and geo-referenced point locations for buildings and critical facilities. The objective of the Geographic Information System-based analysis was to determine the estimated vulnerability of the five categories of assets to the identified hazards for Collin County using best available geospatial data. Local databases made available through Collin County, such as local tax assessor records, parcel boundaries, building footprints and critical and emergency facilities data, were used in combination with digital hazard data obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the analysis provided an estimated number of people, as well as the numbers and values of buildings and critical facilities determined to be potentially at risk to hazards with delineable geographic hazard boundaries. For some of the hazards, the Geographic Information System analysis was supplemented with a statistical analysis conducted on the historical data obtained from National Centers for Environmental Information and the Texas Forest Service for wildfires. The data included both casualty and property losses from hazard events that occurred in Collin County from 1/1/1950 or 1/1/1985 or 1/1/1996 to 9/22/2020. Annualized personal and property losses were calculated by dividing the total losses by the number of years for which data was available (i.e. 24 or 35 or 70 years). Page 161 Item 10. Page | 103 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Drought Because drought impacts large areas that cross jurisdictional boundaries, all of the improved property and population in Collin County are considered to be exposed to this hazard. However, drought impacts are mostly experienced in water shortages and crop losses on agricultural lands, with little to no impact on buildings. Since crop losses are expected to be the most vulnerable assets for this hazard, agricultural land acreage was acquired from the USGS land cover classification data to estimate the relative area of Collin County that would be affected by this event. Table 3.1 below provides the distribution of agricultural land for each jurisdiction in Collin County. Collin County as a whole has a total of 263,746.98 acres of agricultural lands, which represents approximately 58.65% of Collin County territory, with the vast majority located in the unincorporated areas. Table 3.1 Agricultural Land in Collin County Jurisdiction Total Acres Agricultural Land Acres Percentage (%) of Total Acres Unincorporated County 288,727 215,882 74.77% Allen 16,899.45 1,228.98 7.27% Anna 10,273.53 7,240 70.47% Blue Ridge 1,066.43 427.11 40.05% Celina 21,575.35 14,727.29 68.26% Fairview 5,672.38 1,036.25 18.27% Farmersville 2,2724.78 635.73 23.33% Frisco 27,747.7 6,425.11 23.16% Josephine 1,132.93 643.3 56.77% Lavon 2112 621.79 29.44% Lowry Crossing 1,644.51 685.42 41.68% Lucas 10,196.92 2530.5 24.82% Melissa 7,583.93 1,785.22 23.54% Murphy 3632.7 70.93 2.00% New Hope 896.65 717.95 80.10% Parker 5,431.27 1,900.84 35.00% Princeton 6,792.03 2,005.08 29.52% Prosper 11,677.37 4,103.97 35.14% St. Paul 894.62 199.11 22.26% Page 162 Item 10. Page | 104 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Jurisdiction Total Acres Agricultural Land Acres Percentage (%) of Total Acres Wylie 23,170.14 880.4 3.80% Total 449,690.42 263,746.98 58.65% Sources: Texas Forest Service, U.S. Geological Survey, and local jurisdictions Based on the available information, vulnerability to drought was assessed using two techniques: (1) to comply with Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B), historical loss data obtained from the Texas Hazard Mitigation Package was used to predict expected monetary and human losses from the event; (2) in fulfillment of Element A of Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A), geographical hazard areas identified for drought and the nature of the impacts expected from drought events were used to identify the assets, including existing structures, vulnerable to this hazard. The vulnerability to future structures was not conducted at this time due to unattainable data. Therefore, compliance with Element B of Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A), describing vulnerability in terms of the types and numbers of future buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities will be an objective in the five-year planning cycle. Table 3.2 presents Collin County’s recorded historical losses due to drought events as provided in the hazard events database obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information . Property and personal losses in each expected in each jurisdiction are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.2 Historical Losses Due to Drought (1/1/1996-9/22/2020) Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Collin (Zone) 8/1/1996 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 7/1/1998 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 8/1/2000 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 9/1/2000 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 5/1/2005 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 6/1/2005 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 7/1/2005 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 8/1/2005 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 9/1/2005 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 10/1/2005 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 11/1/2005 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/1/2005 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 1/1/2006 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Page 163 Item 10. Page | 105 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Collin (Zone) 2/1/2006 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/1/2006 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 4/1/2006 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 5/1/2006 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 6/6/2006 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 7/1/2006 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 8/1/2006 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 9/1/2006 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 10/1/2006 0:00 Drought 0 0 $500,000 $500,000 Collin (Zone) 11/1/2006 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $800,000 Collin (Zone) 3/21/2011 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $8,000 Collin (Zone) 4/1/2011 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $10,000 Collin (Zone) 8/1/2011 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $10,000 Collin (Zone) 9/1/2011 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $25,000 Collin (Zone) 10/1/2011 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $5,000 Collin (Zone) 8/7/2012 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 9/25/2012 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $2,000 Collin (Zone) 11/1/2012 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $3,000 Collin (Zone) 12/1/2012 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $2,000 Collin (Zone) 1/1/2013 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $3,000 Collin (Zone) 2/1/2013 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $2,000 Collin (Zone) 3/1/2013 0:00 Drought 0 0 $2,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 7/9/2013 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $1,000 Collin (Zone) 8/1/2013 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $3,000 Collin (Zone) 9/1/2013 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $3,000 Collin (Zone) 3/1/2014 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $4,000 Page 164 Item 10. Page | 106 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Collin (Zone) 4/1/2014 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $3,000 Collin (Zone) 5/1/2014 0:00 Drought 0 0 $ $3,000 Collin (Zone) 6/1/2014 0:00 Drought 0 0 $ $3,000 Collin (Zone) 7/1/2014 0:00 Drought 0 0 $ $3,000 Collin (Zone) 8/1/2014 0:00 Drought 0 0 $ $2,000 Collin (Zone) 9/1/2014 0:00 Drought 0 0 $5,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 10/1/2014 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $3,000 Collin (Zone) 11/1/2014 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $2,000 Collin (Zone) 12/1/2014 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $5,000 Collin (Zone) 1/1/2015 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $2,000 Collin (Zone) 2/1/2015 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $2,000 Collin (Zone) 3/1/2015 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $1,000 Collin (Zone) 4/1/2015 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $1,000 Collin (Zone) 9/1/2015 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $1,000 Collin (Zone) 10/1/2015 0:00 Drought 0 0 $2,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 11/21/201 7 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/1/2017 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $1,000 Collin (Zone) 8/1/2018 0:00 Drought 0 0 $0 $1,000 Totals: 0 0 $509,000 $1,414,000 Source: National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) As observed in Table 3.2 Historical Losses Due to Drought, calculations of annualized losses were conducted using historical data obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information. The annualized loss value can be interpreted as the impact expected from drought in terms of annualized human losses and human injuries, and annualized property losses. As observed in table 3.2, Collin County can expect approximately an annual $21,208.33 in property losses and $58,916.67 of crop losses each year as a result of drought, however values may be underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No injuries or deaths are expected from this event. Since the geographical occurrence of drought is typically regional, the area of potential impacts corresponds to all of Collin County’s territory. However, due to the nature of this event, property losses are more likely related to crop damage. Buildings and infrastructure are not expected to be directly impacted by drought events. Therefore, improved property, emergency and critical facilities, and critical structures are not exposed to this hazard. Page 165 Item 10. Page | 107 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan In compliance to Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii), vulnerability to drought and impacts to assets expected from drought events can be summarized as follows: • Population: According to National Centers for Environmental Information(NCEI) no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. All the population of Collin County is exposed to this hazard. • Improved Property: According to National Centers for Environmental Information(NCEI), a loss of $21,208.33 per year can be expected in property loss due to damage from drought though values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Available historical data indicates that the expected losses from drought correspond to crop losses in the amount of $58,916.67 per year, mostly experienced in water shortages and crop losses on agricultural lands though values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. • Emergency Facilities: Because of the nature of this hazard, there are no losses or direct impacts expected on emergency facilities due to drought events. • Critical Facilities: Because of the nature of this hazard, there are no losses or direct impacts expected on critical facilities due to drought events. • Critical Infrastructure: Because of the nature of this hazard, there are no losses or direct impacts expected on critical infrastructure due to drought events. Information needed to fulfill Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C), which addresses land uses and development trends was unattainable during the preparation of this hazard mitigation plan. Compliance with this requirement will be an objective in the five-year planning cycle. Page 166 Item 10. Page | 108 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Flood Floods impact large areas and cross jurisdictional boundaries. All five categories of assets are considered vulnerable and can be exposed to this hazard. Based on the available information, vulnerability to flooding was assessed using two techniques: (1) to comply with Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B), historical loss data obtained from National Centers for Environmental Information was used to predict expected monetary and human losses from the event; (2) in fulfillment of Element A of Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A), geographical data was used to identify the assets, including existing structures, vulnerable to flooding. The vulnerability to future structures was not assessed at this time due to unattainable data. Therefore, compliance with Element B of Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A), describing vulnerability in terms of the types and numbers of future buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities will be an objective in the five-year planning cycle. Table 3.3 presents Collin County’s recorded historical losses due to flooding as provided in the hazard events database obtained by National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). Although specific data is provided by jurisdiction, the figures presented may reflect the place where the event was more relevant or where it started. There were no recorded floods or flash flood events for the following jurisdictions: Josephine, Lowry Crossing, Lucas, New Hope, and St. Paul. Table 3.3 Historical Losses Due to Flood Events (1/1/1996-9/22/2020) Location 32BDate Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Frisco 10/27/1996 21:20 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 11/7/1996 0:30 Flash Flood 0 0 $10,000 $0 Plano 2/19/1997 16:30 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 2/19/1997 16:51 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Lolaville 2/19/1997 18:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersvill e 2/19/1997 18:25 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 4/4/1997 22:25 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 5/19/1997 18:15 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 5/19/1997 19:02 Flash Flood 0 0 $10,000 $0 Plano 5/19/1997 19:30 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 6/9/1997 20:48 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 6/9/1997 21:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 12/20/1997 20:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 1/4/1998 16:40 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 1/4/1998 16:45 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Blue Ridge 1/4/1998 16:50 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Princeton 1/4/1998 17:52 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 1/4/1998 21:09 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Nevada 12/4/1998 1:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Central Portion 12/4/1998 1:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Lavon 5/17/1999 15:33 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Page 167 Item 10. Page | 109 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Plano 6/8/1999 19:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersvill e 6/4/2000 2:15 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Murphy 6/11/2000 12:55 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 6/15/2000 2:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Countywide 2/16/2001 1:34 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Countywide 2/16/2001 3:51 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 5/6/2001 1:28 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 10/19/2002 2:05 Flash Flood 0 0 $25,000 $0 Plano 12/30/2002 14:30 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 8/15/2005 19:45 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Countywide 3/19/2006 15:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 1/12/2007 17:15 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 3/30/2007 20:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 4/3/2007 18:52 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Celina 4/24/2007 20:09 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 5/2/2007 19:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $50,000 $0 Lavon 5/27/2007 9:06 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 5/30/2007 8:30 Flash Flood 0 0 $10,000 $0 Anna 6/18/2007 2:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $10,000 $0 Melissa 6/18/2007 8:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Celina 6/26/2007 15:01 Flash Flood 0 0 $20,000 $0 Farmersvill e 6/27/2007 17:43 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 7/5/2007 13:30 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 7/11/2007 16:42 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 10/15/2007 7:42 Flash Flood 0 0 $80,000 $0 Plano 3/18/2008 11:54 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Biggers 3/18/2008 14:38 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 3/18/2008 16:54 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 3/18/2008 17:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $4,000 $0 Melissa 4/23/2008 22:55 Flash Flood 0 0 $2,000 $0 Parker 8/20/2008 6:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 8/20/2008 6:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $20,000 $0 Wylie 8/20/2008 6:45 Flash Flood 0 0 $4,000 $0 Forest Grove 8/20/2008 15:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 5/2/2009 18:25 Flash Flood 0 0 $20,000 $0 McKinney 5/2/2009 20:38 Flash Flood 0 0 $2,000 $0 Blue Ridge 5/3/2009 4:05 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Celina 10/25/2009 21:21 Flash Flood 0 0 $3,000 $0 Page 168 Item 10. Page | 110 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage McKinney 10/25/2009 22:44 Flash Flood 0 0 $3,000 $0 Desert 11/20/2009 11:00 Flood 0 0 $20,000 $0 Celina 1/25/2012 5:00 Flood 0 0 $50,000 $0 Lolaville 3/20/2012 0:00 Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 7/31/2014 7:15 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Weston 5/9/2015 10:19 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 5/9/2015 11:13 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 5/9/2015 15:30 Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Fairview 5/17/2015 7:45 Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 5/29/2015 5:14 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Plano Shiloh 5/29/2015 5:15 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 5/292015 8:30 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 5/30/2015 6:05 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Lavon 6/21/2015 7:29 Flash Flood 0 0 $1,000 $0 Celina 11/27/2015 6:45 Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Parker 12/26/2015 19:53 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 6/12/2016 16:40 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Celina 7/5/2017 19:50 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Princeton 7/5/2017 19:50 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 7/5/2017 19:56 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Lavon 8/17/2017 5:30 Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Lake Lavon 8/17/2017 7:27 Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 9/21/2018 19:00 Flash Flood 0 0 $10,000 $0 Renner 9/21/2018 19:30 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 10/192018 15:00 Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 4/23/2019 22:02 Flash Flood 0 0 $10,000 $0 Fayburg 3/18/2020 4:15 Flash Flood 0 0 $0 $0 Totals: 0 0 $364,000 $0 Source: National Centers for Environmental Information NFIP repetitive losses due to flood events. Some events may duplicate NCEI reported events. Table 3.4 NFIP Losses Due to Flood Events Location Date Type Total Payments for Damages Collin County 05/12/1982 Flood $137,421.75 Collin County 10/13/1981 Flood $56,653.53 Collin County 03/18/2008 Flood $30,538.62 Collin County 03/19/2006 Flood $2,804.32 Collin County 12/20/1991 Flood $15,420.52 Fairview 03/15/1997 Flood $8,234.44 Page 169 Item 10. Page | 111 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Type Total Payments for Damages Fairview 06/01/1994 Flood $10,533.74 Fairview 04/11/1991 Flood $15,263.41 Fairview 01/31/1990 Flood $8,844.92 Fairview 05/16/1989 Flood $6,033.50 Fairview 01/04/1998 Flood $5,701.14 Fairview 05/16/1989 Flood $6,532.68 Murphy 04/12/1991 Flood $69,726.51 Murphy 05/02/1990 Flood $10,137.18 Murphy 05/17/1989 Flood $37,866.00 Murphy 05/12/1982 Flood $9,283.31 Murphy 10/31/1981 Flood $14.429.25 Parker 04/12/1991 Flood $4,962.09 Parker 05/02/1990 Flood $4,880.80 Parker 04/11/1991 Flood $9,256.63 Parker 05/02/1990 Flood $2,298.37 Parker 08/20/2008 Flood $20,750.05 Parker 12/29/2006 Flood $15,835.07 Parker 04/11/1991 Flood $24,872.33 Parker 05/02/1990 Flood $8,110.35 Parker 05/16/1989 Flood $30,207.89 Parker 08/19/2008 Flood $118,111.47 Parker 04/11/1991 Flood $45,394.51 Parker 05/01/1990 Flood $2,971.26 Parker 05/16/1989 Flood $8,714.54 As observed in Table 3.3, Historical Losses Due to Flood Events, calculations of annualized losses were conducted using historical data obtained from National Centers for Environmental Information. The annualized loss value can be interpreted as the impact expected from flooding in terms of annualized human losses and human injuries, and annualized property losses. As observed in Table 3.3, Collin County can expect a total property loss of $15,166.67 each year as a result of flooding, with no injuries, no fatalities, and no crop losses. Property damage and crop damage values may be underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. In order to assess flood risk and vulnerability of the identified assets, a Geographic Information System- based analysis was conducted to estimate exposure to flood events using Federal Emergency Management Agency’s digital 100-year floodplain in combination with Collin County Central Appraisal District property records and the geo-referenced assets provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool. By overlaying the geo-referenced assets and the floodplain layers using Geographic Information System, the number of emergency facilities, critical facilities, and critical infrastructure located within the 100-year floodplain was calculated. Although, having a facility located within the floodplain does not necessarily imply that would be impacted by the 100-year storm event (e.g., the building could be flood-proofed, or Page 170 Item 10. Page | 112 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan the buildings may be constructed above the 100-year elevation), it provides with a good approximation of potential impacts from flooding. According to the analysis conducted, no emergency or critical facilities are located within the 100-year floodplain. Critical infrastructure located within the 100-year floodplain is presented in Table 3.5. Table 3.5 Critical Infrastructure Located in 100-year FEMA Floodplain Jurisdiction Critical Infrastructure Railway/ Highway Bridges Dams Water Treatment Facilities Waste Water Treatment Facilities Natural Gas Airports Total Percentage (%) Total Percentage (%) Total Percentage (%) Total Percentage (%) Total Percentage (%) Total Percentage (%) Collin County 142 34.4 % 67 48.6 % 0 0% 13 61.9% 0 0% 0 0% Total 142 34.4 % 67 48.6 % 0 0% 13 61.9% 0 0% 0 0% Source: Regional Hazard Assessment Tool and local jurisdictions As noted in Table 3.5, the total and percentage of critical infrastructure located within the 100-year floodplain corresponds to approximately 48.6% of dams and 61.9% of wastewater treatment works. Additionally, treated wastewater is typically discharged towards streams, which makes portions of wastewater treatment facilities likely to be located within the floodplain. However, some of the critical facilities located within the 100-year floodplain may be subject to impacts from flooding. Vulnerability to flooding can also be measured by assessing the number of people and buildings exposed to flood events. Table 3.6 shows Residential Parcels and Improved Property at risk from flooding events. The determination of residential parcel vulnerability was calculated by adding the total residential parcel counts from 2013 that had at least some portion located within the 100-year floodplain. The determination of commercial and utility property value at-risk (exposure) was calculated adding the total assessed building values for only those parcels that were confirmed to have at least one building located within the 100-year floodplain. Table 3.6 Residential Parcels and Buildings potentially located within the 100-year FEMA Floodplain Jurisdiction Residential Parcels located in the 100-year Floodplain Percentage of Total Residential Parcels located in the 100-year Floodplain Commercial and Utility parcels in the 100-year Floodplain Percentage of Commercial and Utility Parcels in the 100-year Floodplain Collin County* 989 4.67% 72 9.41% Page 171 Item 10. Page | 113 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Jurisdiction Residential Parcels located in the 100-year Floodplain Percentage of Total Residential Parcels located in the 100-year Floodplain Commercial and Utility parcels in the 100-year Floodplain Percentage of Commercial and Utility Parcels in the 100-year Floodplain Allen 350 1.13% 71 6.31% Anna 139 1.82% 8 3.56% Blue Ridge 18 3.65% 3 4.17% Celina 332 4.16% 22 8.43% Fairview 280 7.52% 2 2.02% Farmersville 79 5.25% 21 7.00% Frisco 410 1.22% 142 7.28% Josephine 92 10.13% 23 60.53% Lavon 14 0.66% 2 3.28% Lowry Crossing 128 20.03% 2 9.52% Lucas 335 12.84% 4 5.8% Melissa 54 0.91% 8 4.02% Murphy 185 3.10% 19 11.24% New Hope 2 0.73% 1 11.11% Parker 230 12.09% 10 38.46% Princeton 101 1.31% 13 5.28% Prosper 152 1.86% 36 10.34% St. Paul 3 0.82% 1 2.56% Wylie 427 2.7% 80 10.61% Total 4,320 2.71% 543 7.96% Source: Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, National Centers for Environmental Information , and local jurisdictions *Collin County unincorporated areas As it can be observed in Table 3.6, approximately 2.71% of the residential parcels in Collin County, and 7.96% of its commercial and utility parcels are located within the 100-year floodplain. Since Collin County is composed by large areas used for cropland, an analysis was conducted to determine the vulnerability of the land to flooding relative to the type of land cover (Table 3.7). The calculations were made using Geographic Information System. The USGS land cover shapefile was Page 172 Item 10. Page | 114 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan clipped with the 100-year floodplain to calculate the area (acreage) of each land cover type potentially affected by flooding. Reservoirs, streams, and channels were excluded from the calculations. Table 3.7 Land Cover Types and Acreage located within the 100-year FEMA Floodplain Land Cover Type Total Areas For Collin County (Acres) Total Area Affected By 100-year Flood (Acres) Percentage of Area Affected By 100-year Flood (%) Commercial 53,547.25 17,666.73 32.99 Utilities 4674.94 1671.4 35.75% Residential 114,382.69 13,086.41 11.44% Farmland/Undeveloped 340,108.98 186,590.25 54.86% Total 512,713.86 219,014.79 42.72% Source: USGS As observed, on average approximately 42.72% of the total area of Collin County is located within the 100-year floodplain. Note, that a higher percentage than the average of the total farm and undeveloped land (54.86%) located within the floodplain, while commercial (32.99%), utilities (35.75%), and residential (11.44%) are all below the total average area. In compliance to Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii) Collin County vulnerability from flooding and impacts to assets expected from flooding can be summarized as follows: • Population: Based on historical data, flooding produces an expected annualized zero injuries and fatalities per year. In total, portions of the Collin County population are vulnerable to the 100-year floodplain. • Improved Property: Based on historical data, a loss of $15,166.67 per year can be expected in property loss due to flooding with no expected crop losses, however these values could be underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Based on geographic information and assuming that a facility within the 100-year floodplain is exposed to impact, 2.40% of the total assessed value of improvements in Collin County is at risk from the 100-year storm event. • Emergency Facilities: Based on geographic information and assuming that a facility within the 100-year floodplain is exposed to impact, there are no emergency facilities at imminent risk from the 100-year storm event. • Critical Facilities: Based on geographic information and assuming that a facility within the 100- year floodplain is exposed to impact, there are no critical facilities at imminent risk from the 100- year storm event. • Critical Infrastructure: Based on geographic information and assuming that a critical infrastructure within the 100-year floodplain is exposed to impact, 13 wastewater treatment facilities and 142 railway and highway bridges are at risk from the 100-year storm event. Note that treated wastewater is typically discharged towards streams, which makes portions of wastewater treatment facilities likely to be located within the floodplain. Information needed to fulfill Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C), which addresses land uses and development trends was unattainable during the preparation of this hazard mitigation plan. Compliance with this requirement will be an objective in the five-year planning cycle. Repetitive Loss As per Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii) “The risk assessments in all plans approved after October 1, 2008 must also address National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) insured structures that have been Page 173 Item 10. Page | 115 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan repetitively damaged by floods.” Repetitive Loss Property information provides local jurisdictions with the properties that had submitted insurance claims due to flooding damage to buildings and its contents. The information provided by Federal Emergency Management Agency included repetitive loss properties in Collin County as of 5/31/2014 (Table 3.8). Address information available for repetitive loss properties recorded allowed those properties to be geo- referenced using ESRI® ArcMap™ 10.2. The probability of future repetitive losses on those properties was estimated using Geographic Information System by overlying the geo-referenced properties with the 100-year floodplain layer. Table 3.8 summarizes with the number of properties located within the 100- year floodplain as obtained using this approach. Table 3.8 Repetitive Loss Properties located within the 100-year FEMA Floodplain Jurisdiction Total Number of Repetitive Loss Properties Properties within 100-year Floodplain Total Number of Repetitive Loss Properties Within 100- year Floodplain Percent of Repetitive Loss Properties Within 100- year Floodplain Single Family Other Residential Non Residential Collin County* 2 2 0 0 1 50% Allen 0 0 0 0 0 0 Anna 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blue Ridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 Celina 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fairview 2 2 0 0 1 50% Farmersville 0 0 0 0 0 0 Frisco 0 0 0 0 0 0 Josephine 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lavon 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lowry Crossing 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lucas 0 0 0 0 0 0 Melissa 0 0 0 0 0 0 Murphy 1 1 0 0 1 100% New Hope 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parker 5 5 0 0 5 100% Princeton 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prosper 0 0 0 0 0 0 St. Paul 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wylie 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 10 10 0 0 8 80% Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency As noted in Table 3.8 there are few repetitive loss properties located within the 100-year floodplain in Unincorporated Collin County and all participating jurisdictions. In compliance with Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii), Table 3.7 provides the type (residential, commercial, institutional, etc.) and numbers of repetitive loss properties located in the identified flood hazard zones within Collin County. Page 174 Item 10. Page | 116 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.9 shows the repetitive loss property statistics for the zero properties recorded in the Collin County classified by jurisdiction. The numbers provided can be used to estimate the vulnerability to repetitive loss properties in terms of dollar losses. Table 3.9 Repetitive Loss Property Statistics Unincorporated Collin County Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 1981, 1982, 1991, 2006, 2008 2 5 $242,838.74 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 1981, 1982, 1991, 2006, 2008 2 5 $242,838.74 Allen Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Anna Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Blue Ridge Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Celina Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Page 175 Item 10. Page | 117 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Fairview Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 1989-1991, 1994, 1997, 1998 2 7 $61,143.83 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 1989-1991, 1994, 1997, 1998 2 7 $61,143.83 Farmersville Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Frisco Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Josephine Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Lavon Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Page 176 Item 10. Page | 118 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Lowry Crossing Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Lucas Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Melissa Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Murphy Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 1981, 1982, 1989, 1990 1 5 $141,442.25 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 New Hope Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Page 177 Item 10. Page | 119 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Parker Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 1989, 1990, 1991, 2006, 2008 5 13 $296,365.36 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 1989, 1990, 1991, 2006, 2008 5 13 $296,365.36 Princeton Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Prosper Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 St. Paul Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Wylie Years Properties Number of losses Payments Single Family 0 0 0 $0.00 Other Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Page 178 Item 10. Page | 120 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Non Residential 0 0 0 $0.00 Total 0 0 0 $0.00 Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency The dollar amounts in the tables represent the payments made for insurance claims due to flood damage to buildings and contents. Although both repetitive loss information (Tables 3.8 and 3.9) and the historical annualized losses expected from flooding (Table 3.3) represent actual historical information, the data cannot be compared or correlated to each other. The repetitive loss information presents insurance claims on properties and buildings, whereas the historical annualized losses represent property losses in the community due to flood events. Page 179 Item 10. Page | 121 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hail As described in section 3.3, damage from hail events is determined by the intensity of the storm, which, based on the hail diameter, ranges from hard hail to super hailstorm. These events are unpredictable, and all areas Collin County can be affected. All five categories of assets are exposed to this hazard and could potentially be impacted. However, the most vulnerable assets are those related to property and infrastructure, particularly roofs and structures. Damages from hail can potentially translate into significant insurance claims and expenses. Based on the available information, vulnerability to hail was assessed using two techniques: (1) to comply with Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B), historical loss data obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information was used to predict expected monetary and human losses from the event; (2) in fulfillment of Element A of Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A), geographical hazard areas identified for hail and the nature of the impacts expected from hail were used to identify the assets, including existing structures, vulnerable to this hazard event. The vulnerability to future structures was not conducted at this time due to unattainable data. Therefore, compliance with Element B of Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A, describing vulnerability in terms of the types and numbers of future buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities will be an objective in the five-year planning cycle. Table 3.10 presents Collin County’s recorded historical losses due to hailstorm events as provided in the hazard events database obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information. Based on the starting location of the hailstorm event, these events were geo-referenced using ESRI® ArcMap™ 10.2. The resulting layer was overlaid with the jurisdiction boundary layer to determine the property and personal losses in each jurisdiction. Table 3.10 Historical Losses Due to Hail Events (1/1/1985-9/22/2020) Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Collin Co. 4/29/1985 20:58 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 7/2/1985 15:35 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 3/11/1986 18:58 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/12/1986 0:15 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/12/1986 0:50 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 5/24/1986 10:00 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 5/24/1986 10:34 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 5/3/1987 21:03 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 5/14/1987 15:10 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 7/2/1987 23:30 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/1/1988 14:02 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/5/1988 16:35 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 5/8/1988 6:50 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 11/15/1988 15:00 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 11/15/1988 15:29 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/28/1989 19:25 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/28/1989 20:10 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/28/1989 20:30 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/28/1989 21:50 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 7/2/1989 15:43 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 7/2/1989 16:06 Hail 4.50 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 180 Item 10. Page | 122 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Collin Co. 7/2/1989 16:21 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/15/1990 20:52 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/27/1990 15:00 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/27/1990 15:30 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 3/22/1991 6:12 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/18/1991 18:12 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/27/1991 2:30 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 6/22/1991 19:10 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 6/22/1991 19:20 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 10/28/1991 16:45 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 3/24/1992 14:05 Hail 1.74 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 5/11/1992 20:16 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 5/11/1992 20:28 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 5/11/1992 21:15 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 5/11/1992 21:30 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 5/11/1992 21:45 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 5/11/1992 22:00 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 5/14/1992 9:15 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 6/10/1992 21:55 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 6/25/1992 4:30 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 8/2/1992 15:12 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 8/2/1992 15:47 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 9/2/1992 23:15 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 9/2/1992 23:20 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 9/3/1992 0:15 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 10/7/1992 16:12 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 4/19/1993 17:15 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Garland 4/19/1993 18:00 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Airport 4/19/1993 18:30 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Love Field 4/19/1993 18:30 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 9/20/1993 17:50 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 10/19/1993 4:00 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 4/25/1994 18:25 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 4/29/1994 1:45 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 5/2/1994 13:56 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 5/2/1994 14:20 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Lake Lavon 5/14/1994 17:40 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 5/14/1994 18:01 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Nevada 5/14/1994 19:23 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 7/12/1994 19:50 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 7/15/1994 17:39 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 8/7/1994 13:25 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 10/21/1994 12:45 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 10/21/1994 13:33 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Meridian 4/22/1995 15:39 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 4/22/1995 15:40 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Westminster 5/1/1995 1:08 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 181 Item 10. Page | 123 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage McKinney 5/7/1995 22:40 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 5/24/1995 16:37 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 5/24/1995 17:05 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Princeton 5/25/1995 17:05 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 2/27/1996 9:15 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Copeville 2/27/1996 10:15 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 3/18/1996 0:10 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 3/24/1996 15:10 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 3/24/1996 15:20 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 3/24/1996 15:27 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 3/24/1996 15:40 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Princeton 4/4/1996 1:40 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 4/12/1996 12:38 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 4/12/1996 12:38 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 4/12/1996 16:45 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 4/12/1996 16:48 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 4/12/1996 17:26 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 4/13/1996 21:39 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Weston 4/13/1996 21:48 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Murphy 4/13/1996 22:08 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Lucas 5/27/1996 4:14 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Murphy 5/28/1996 17:42 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Culleoka 5/28/1996 18:10 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 6/12/1996 17:10 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 6/17/1996 16:50 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 6/17/1996 16:55 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 7/23/1996 12:30 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Princeton 7/30/1996 19:08 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 10/21/1996 10:50 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 10/21/1996 14:35 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 10/21/1996 14:50 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 4/22/1997 3:30 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Celina 5/25/1997 22:04 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 6/9/1997 20:14 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 6/9/1997 20:19 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 6/9/1997 20:19 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 6/9/1997 20:45 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 6/16/1997 19:03 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 6/16/1997 19:10 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 8/13/1997 16:10 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 1/4/1998 16:22 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 1/4/1998 16:25 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Branch 1/4/1998 16:30 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Murphy 1/21/1998 16:25 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 2/25/1998 19:39 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 2/25/1998 19:40 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 182 Item 10. Page | 124 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Celina 4/16/1998 0:30 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Desert 5/2/1998 21:28 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 5/2/1998 21:35 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 5/8/1998 20:25 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 5/8/1998 20:35 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 5/8/1998 20:53 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 5/8/1998 20:54 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 5/8/1998 21:26 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 5/8/1998 21:54 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 5/8/1998 21:55 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Blue Ridge 10/2/1998 18:20 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 2/6/1999 19:54 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 2/6/1999 20:50 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Celina 4/3/1999 5:11 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Weston 5/4/1999 12:10 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 5/25/1999 18:18 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Lavon 2/25/2000 23:17 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 3/2/2000 18:10 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 3/2/2000 18:15 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 3/2/2000 18:24 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 3/2/2000 18:29 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 3/2/2000 18:50 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 3/10/2000 10:45 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 3/16/2000 21:28 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Parker 5/12/2000 16:40 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 5/27/2000 16:50 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 3/11/2001 14:40 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 5/6/2001 18:22 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 5/6/2001 18:43 Hail 3.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 5/6/2001 19:00 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Blue Ridge 4/16/2002 23:15 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 5/9/2002 23:10 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 12/30/2002 13:30 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 12/30/2002 14:30 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 4/5/2003 22:16 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 4/5/2003 22:32 Hail 3.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 4/6/2003 12:55 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 4/6/2003 13:00 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Blue Ridge 5/13/2003 5:22 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Nevada 5/24/2003 21:30 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 5/24/2003 22:47 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 6/14/2003 16:23 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 6/14/2003 16:40 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Celina 7/2/2003 16:15 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 7/22/2003 15:46 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 7/22/2003 16:22 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 183 Item 10. Page | 125 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Plano 7/22/2003 16:45 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 6/5/2004 16:35 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 6/19/2004 13:22 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 1/12/2005 17:15 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 2/22/2005 23:21 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Blue Ridge 2/23/2005 0:15 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Westminster 2/23/2005 0:25 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 4/5/2005 15:50 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 4/5/2005 16:00 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 4/5/2005 16:12 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 4/5/2005 16:14 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 4/5/2005 16:58 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Blue Ridge 4/5/2005 17:50 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 5/25/2005 12:30 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 6/13/2005 22:52 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 5/9/2006 21:04 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $5,000 $0 Plano 4/3/2007 18:05 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 4/3/2007 18:23 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 4/24/2007 14:26 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Blue Ridge 4/24/2007 14:52 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $5,000 $0 McKinney 5/30/2007 8:45 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Murphy 5/30/2007 9:05 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 6/4/2007 14:50 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 6/9/2007 13:44 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Westminster 6/20/2007 5:05 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 2/5/2008 2:20 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $5,000 $0 Wylie 2/5/2008 14:00 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 2/16/2008 6:40 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 2/16/2008 6:40 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $25,000 $0 Foot 2/16/2008 6:45 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 2/16/2008 6:47 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 2/16/2008 6:54 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $5,000 $0 McKinney 4/4/2008 1:15 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Plano 4/4/2008 2:40 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 4/4/2008 2:50 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 4/8/2008 22:20 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 4/8/2008 22:33 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Lucas 4/8/2008 22:48 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Copeville 4/8/2008 23:19 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 4/8/2008 23:44 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Princeton 4/17/2008 21:01 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 5/7/2008 16:19 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 5/7/2008 16:30 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $5,000 $0 Celina 6/28/2008 16:50 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 2/10/2009 22:03 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Celina 4/12/2009 22:09 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 184 Item 10. Page | 126 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Melissa 4/12/2009 22:32 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $2,000 $0 McKinney 5/2/2009 13:47 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 5/2/2009 19:10 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Parker 7/19/2009 13:15 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 10/24/2010 15:41 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $500 $0 Allen 3/15/2011 15:10 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 4/4/2011 4:04 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Rockhill 4/10/2011 23:29 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Prosper 4/10/2011 23:34 Hail 2.75 in. 0 0 $200,000 $0 Plano 4/14/2011 21:39 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 4/14/2011 21:40 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $20,000 $0 Shepton 4/14/2011 21:45 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $25,000 $0 Plano 4/14/2011 21:48 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 4/14/2011 21:49 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 4/14/2011 22:32 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 4/19/2011 16:25 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 4/24/2011 18:53 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $15,000 $0 Wylie 4/24/2011 21:35 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 4/25/2011 9:48 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 4/25/2011 15:04 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 4/26/2011 16:28 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 5/1/2011 22:03 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 5/1/2011 22:05 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 5/2/2011 0:18 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 5/2/2011 1:20 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 5/20/2011 13:25 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 5/20/2011 13:25 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 5/20/2011 14:19 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Lucas 5/20/2011 15:58 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Renner 5/23/2011 11:39 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Celina 5/24/2011 20:48 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $25,000 $0 Frisco 5/24/2011 21:10 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 9/18/2011 18:05 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 9/18/2011 18:25 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 9/18/2011 18:38 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 9/18/2011 19:01 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 10/17/2011 20:25 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 10/23/2011 0:20 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 4/3/2012 13:50 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $800,000 $0 Frisco 4/3/2012 13:50 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $1,000,000 $0 Allen 4/3/2012 16:10 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 5/14/2012 17:53 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 5/30/2012 22:30 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Murphy 5/30/2012 22:45 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 6/6/2012 14:50 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 6/6/2012 15:12 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 6/6/2012 15:15 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 185 Item 10. Page | 127 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Wylie 6/6/2012 15:50 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 6/13/2012 16:45 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $80,000 $0 Shepton 6/13/2012 16:52 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $75,000 $0 McKinney 6/13/2012 19:03 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $60,000 $0 Parker 6/13/2012 19:34 Hail 3.25 in. 0 0 $800,000 $0 Shepton 8/17/2012 20:52 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 8/17/2012 20:53 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 8/17/2012 20:54 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 8/17/2012 21:00 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 8/17/2012 21:13 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $2,000 $0 Plano 8/17/2012 21:15 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Foot 3/23/2013 14:09 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Valdasta 3/31/2013 6:34 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 3/31/2013 6:43 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Blue Ridge 3/31/2013 6:50 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 3/31/2013 7:20 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 3/27/2014 19:18 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $5,000 $0 Princeton 3/27/2014 19:24 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 3/27/2014 19:43 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Blue Ridge 3/28/2014 14:23 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $3,000 $0 Anna 4/3/3014 15:53 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 4/3/3014 16:02 Hail .75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 4/3/3014 17:48 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $5,000 $0 Celina 4/3/3014 17:49 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Roland 4/3/3014 18:15 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 4/3/3014 18:37 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 4/3/3014 18:40 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $60,000 $0 Allen 4/3/3014 18:50 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $70,000 $0 Allen 4/3/3014 19:00 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 4/3/3014 19:00 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $100,000 $0 Allen 4/3/3014 19:07 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $80,000 $0 Melissa 4/3/3014 19:18 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Lucas 4/3/3014 19:20 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $70,000 $0 Allen 4/3/3014 19:35 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $175,000 $0 Allen 4/27/2014 8:00 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Murphy 4/27/2014 8:15 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $1,000 $0 Wylie 4/27/2014 8:17 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $1,000 $0 Wylie 4/27/2014 8:19 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 4/24/2015 17:18 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 5/28/2015 17:21 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 5/28/2015 17:26 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $30,000 $0 Farmersville 5/28/2015 17:30 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 5/28/2015 17:30 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Parker 8/24/2015 15:40 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Princeton 3/17/2016 9:30 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $8,000 $0 Blue Ridge 3/17/2016 10:45 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 186 Item 10. Page | 128 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Plano 3/23/2016 21:15 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $150,000,00 0 $0 Shepton 3/23/2016 21:15 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 3/23/2016 21:20 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $150,000,00 0 $0 Plano 3/23/2016 21:25 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 3/23/2016 21:25 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $100,000,00 0 $0 Plano 3/23/2016 21:25 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $5,000 $0 Renner 3/23/2016 21:31 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 3/23/2016 21:34 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 3/23/2016 21:35 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Murphy 3/23/2016 21:35 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $50,000 $0 Sachse 3/23/2016 21:37 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $100,000,00 0 $0 Parker 3/23/2016 21:37 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $100,000,00 0 $0 Murphy 3/23/2016 21:40 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $20,000 $0 Wylie 3/23/2016 21:42 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 3/23/2016 21:45 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $50,000,000 $0 Farmersville 4/11/2016 14:51 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 4/11/2016 16:30 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $100,000 $0 Frisco 4/11/2016 16:42 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 4/11/2016 16:45 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $100,000 $0 Frisco 4/11/2016 16:48 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $1,000,000 $0 Plano 4/11/2016 16:50 Hail 2.50 in. 0 0 $1,000,000 $0 Allen 4/11/2016 16:50 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $500,000 $0 Allen 4/11/2016 16:54 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $500,000 $0 McKinney 4/11/2016 16:55 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $50,000 $0 Forest Grove 4/11/2016 16:56 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $5,000,000 $0 Plano 4/11/2016 17:57 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $1,000,000 $0 Lucas 4/11/2016 17:03 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $250,000 $0 Parker 4/11/2016 17:03 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $250,000 $0 Allen 4/11/2016 17:03 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $1,000,000 $0 Wylie 4/11/2016 17:07 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $50,000 $0 Plano 4/11/2016 17:07 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $100,000 $0 Wylie 4/11/2016 17:12 Hail 2.75 in. 0 0 $5,000,000 $0 Wylie 4/11/2016 17:15 Hail 3.50 in. 0 0 $50,000,000 $0 Wylie 4/11/2016 17:17 Hail 4.25 in. 0 0 $100,000,00 0 $0 Lavon 4/11/2016 17:18 Hail 2.50 in. 0 0 $250,000 $0 Wylie 4/11/2016 17:19 Hail 5.25 in. 0 0 $60,000,000 $0 Shepton 5/10/2016 19:25 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Lolaville 5/10/2016 19:34 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 5/29/2016 17:45 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Murphy 5/29/2016 18:25 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 5/29/2016 18:30 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 5/29/2016 18:43 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 187 Item 10. Page | 129 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Frisco 2/27/2017 12:37 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 2/27/2017 12:44 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 3/26/2017 1930 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $100,000 $0 Frisco 3/26/2017 19:31 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Frisco 3/26/2017 19:35 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Frisco 3/26/2017 19:36 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Fairview 3/26/2017 19:45 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 3/26/2017 19:46 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Frisco 3/26/2017 19:50 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $5,000 $0 Fairview 3/26/2017 19:57 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 3/26/2017 20:00 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $5,000 $0 Melissa 3/26/2017 20:07 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Murphy 3/29/2017 2:08 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Climax 4/4/2017 18:30 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Culleoka 4/4/2017 18:32 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Princeton 4/4/2017 18:38 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 4/10/2017 13:54 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $2,000 $0 Allen 4/10/2017 14:04 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 4/10/2017 21:30 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 4/10/2017 23:22 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Frisco 4/10/2017 23:24 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $ $0 Frisco 4/10/2017 23:40 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 4/10/2017 23:41 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Celina 4/21/2017 19:29 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $5,000 $0 Celina 4/21/2017 19:35 Hail 2.50 in. 0 0 $120,000 $0 Celina 4/21/2017 19:35 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Prosper 4/21/2017 19:40 Hail 2.75 in. 0 0 $60,000 $0 Celina 4/21/2017 19:41 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Prosper 4/21/2017 19:43 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 McKinney 4/21/2017 19:47 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 McKinney 4/21/2017 19:52 Hail 2.75 in. 0 0 $20,000 $0 Fairview 4/21/2017 19:56 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $5,000 $0 Allen 4/21/2017 20:00 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $5,000 $0 Fairview 4/21/2017 20:03 Hail 2.50 in. 0 0 $200,000 $0 Shepton 4/21/2017 21:54 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $2,000 $0 Addison Arpt Da 4/21/2017 22:00 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $100,000 $0 Plano 4/21/2017 22:06 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $120,000 $0 Allen 1/21/2018 17:36 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 4/6/2018 16:30 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Prosper 4/6/2018 16:31 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Rhea Mills 4/6/2018 16:34 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Celina 4/6/2018 16:35 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 4/6/2018 16:35 Hail 2.50 in. 0 0 $25,000 $0 Celina 4/6/2018 16:38 Hail 3.00 in. 0 0 $100,000 $0 Prosper 4/6/2018 16:41 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 188 Item 10. Page | 130 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Foot 4/6/2018 16:44 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Foot 4/6/2018 16:44 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 McKinney 4/6/2018 16:52 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 4/6/2018 16:54 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Allen 4/6/2018 16:55 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 4/6/2018 17:00 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Lebanon 4/6/2018 17:25 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 4/6/2018 17:34 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 4/6/2018 17:35 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Plano 4/6/2018 17:35 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Plano 4/6/2018 17:48 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Wylie 4/6/2018 17:49 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Prosper 4/13/2018 16:30 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $ $0 Foot 4/13/2018 16:35 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Foot 4/13/2018 16:35 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 4/13/2018 16:37 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 4/13/2018 16:46 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 4/13/2018 16:50 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 4/13/2018 16:51 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Blue Ridge 4/13/2018 17:03 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 4/13/2018 17:09 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 4/13/2018 17:14 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 4/13/2018 17:16 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Roland 4/13/2018 17:16 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 4/13/2018 17:17 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 6/5/2018 6:54 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 6/6/2018 00:18 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Biggers 6/6/2018 00:29 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 11/30/2018 21:34 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 3/9/2019 5:14 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 3/9/2019 5:34 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Prosper 3/24/2019 17:17 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Fairview 3/24/2019 17:28 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Frisco 3/24/2019 17:33 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Frisco 3/24/2019 17:35 Hail 2.75 in. 0 0 $100,000 $0 Fairview 3/24/2019 17:35 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Allen 3/24/2019 17:40 Hail 2.50 in. 0 0 $50,000 $0 Allen 3/24/2019 17:40 Hail 3.00 in. 0 0 $100,000 $0 Allen 3/24/2019 17:43 Hail 4.50 in. 0 0 $500,000 $0 McKinney 3/24/2019 17:47 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Allen 3/24/2019 17:48 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Allen 3/24/2019 17:48 Hail 2.25 in. 0 0 $50,000 $0 Frisco 3/24/2019 17:54 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Lucas 3/24/2019 17:55 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Allen 3/24/2019 17:57 Hail 3.00 in. 0 0 $100,000 $0 Allen 3/24/2019 18:00 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Page 189 Item 10. Page | 131 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Allen 3/24/2019 18:06 Hail 2.50 in. 0 0 $50,000 $0 McKinney 3/24/2019 18:12 Hail 2.50 in. 0 0 $50,000 $0 Renner 3/24/2019 21:36 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Plano 3/24/2019 21:39 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 Murphy 3/24/2019 21:47 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Wylie 3/24/2019 21:50 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 5/1/2019 19:55 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Shepton 5/18/2019 12:29 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 6/19/2019 15:31 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 6/19/2019 15:31 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Desert 6/19/2019 15:44 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Fayburg 6/19/2019 16:02 Hail 2.50 in. 0 0 $10,000 $0 McKinney 6/19/2019 20:04 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 6/19/2019 20:08 Hail 1.25 in. 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 6/19/2019 20:10 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 6/19/2019 20:40 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 6/19/2019 20:48 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Melissa 10/20/2019 23:38 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 $0 $0 Totals: 0 0 $882,172,00 0 $0 Source: National Centers for Environmental Information As observed in Table 3.10, Historical Losses Due to Hail Events, calculations of annualized losses were conducted using historical data obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information. The annualized loss value can be interpreted as the impact expected from hail in terms of annualized human losses and human injuries, and annualized property losses. As observed in Table 3.10, Collin County can expect a total property loss of $25,204,914.29 each year as a result of hail, with no injuries, deaths, or crop losses expected from this event. The geographical occurrence of hailstorm events cannot be predicted; therefore, the area of potential impacts corresponds to all of Collin County’s territory. Therefore, all improved property, emergency and critical facilities, and critical structures are exposed to this hazard, including 37 fire stations, 14 police stations, 46 hospitals, 212 schools, and 135 historical properties. As described above, roofs and structures are more vulnerable to this hazard. Therefore, it is expected that building improvements would be most affected. In compliance to Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii), vulnerability to hail and impacts to assets expected from hail events can be summarized as follows: • Population: According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. All the population of Collin County is exposed to this hazard, but there are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. • Improved Property: Based on historical data, a loss of $25,204,914.29 per year can be expected in property loss due to hailstorm damage though values could be underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all improved property in Collin County is exposed to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for Collin County indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Page 190 Item 10. Page | 132 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Emergency Facilities: Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. • Critical Facilities: Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. • Critical Infrastructure: Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructure in Collin County is exposed to this hazard. Information needed to fulfill Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C), which addresses land uses and development trends was unattainable during the preparation of this hazard mitigation plan. Compliance with this requirement will be an objective in the five-year planning cycle. Page 191 Item 10. Page | 133 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Wildfires By definition, wildfires are fires occurring in a wildland area (e.g., grassland, forest, brush land) except for fire under prescription. Therefore, impacts from this hazard are related to wildland areas and what is known as Wildland Urban Interface (WUI), which are defined as the area where structures and other human development meet or intermingle with undeveloped wildland. The WUI creates an environment in which fire can move readily between structural and vegetation fuels. The expansion of these areas has increased the likelihood that wildfires will threaten structures and people. Wildfires can cause significant damage to property and threatens the lives of people who are unable to evacuate WUI areas. All five categories of assets located in these wildfire-prone areas are considered vulnerable and can be exposed to this hazard. WUI data was obtained from the Texas Forest Service wildfire database. The data provides GIS data for wildfires and households affected. Data from the National Centers for Environmental Information provided the property and crop damage totals for Collin County wildfires. According to the NCEI, there were no specific recorded instances of wildfire during the period studied for Anna, Celina, Fairview, Farmersville, Josephine, Lavon, Lowry Crossing, Lucas, Melissa, Murphy, New Hope, Parker, Prosper, St. Paul, and Wylie. Table 3.11 provides the magnitude, number of fatalities, property and crop damage caused by fires in the county. Table 3.11 Historical Losses due to Wildfires (1/1/1996-9/22/2020) Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Princeton 2/15/1996 10:00 Wildfire 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 6/25/2006 11:00 Wildfire 0 0 $17,000 $2,400 Collin (Zone) 9/5/2011 13:00 Wildfire 0 0 $50,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 5/23/2012 10:10 Wildfire 1 0 $0 $0 Totals: 1 0 $67,000 $2,400 Source: National Centers for Environmental Information In order to assess wildfire risk and vulnerability of the identified assets, a Geographic Information System- based analysis was conducted to estimate exposure to this event using GIS data in combination with Collin Central Appraisal District property records, and the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool. Wildland fires in Collin County are highly likely to occur in the next year and will impact the county as a whole. Based on previous occurrences, the extent of wildland fires will be very high. Fires will start easily and spread at a rapid rate, which can result in extensive county wide property damage. According to the Texas Forest Service Wildfire Summary Report, 52% of Collin County’s population is located in the Wildland Urban Interface. Page 192 Item 10. Page | 134 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.12 Distribution of WUI Interface Communities in Collin County Jurisdiction Area (Sq. Mile) WUI-Interface Community Low Density (Sq. Mile) Medium Density (Sq. Mile) High Density (Sq. Mile) Total (Sq. Mile) Percentage of Total Area (%) Unincorporated 451.14 150.16 94.71 7.39 252.26 55.92% Allen 26.41 0.75 2.41 6.01 9.17 34.72% Anna 16.05 2.98 2.52 0.89 6.39 39.81% Blue Ridge 1.67 0.42 0.55 0.52 1.49 89.22% Celina 33.71 9.02 3.89 1.17 14.08 41.77% Fairview 8.86 0.91 4.04 2.53 7.48 84.42% Farmersville 4.26 0.61 1.00 1.22 2.83 66.43% Frisco 43.36 3.75 3.85 6.6 14.2 32.75% Josephine 1.77 0.02 0.68 0.21 0.91 51.41% Lavon 3.05 0.43 0.85 0.32 1.6 52.46% Lowry Crossing 2.57 0.09 1.41 0.90 2.4 93.39% Lucas 15.93 1.59 9.75 0.65 11.99 75.27% Melissa 11.85 2.76 3.05 1.33 7.14 60.25% Murphy 5.68 0.16 0.92 1.62 2.7 47.54% New Hope 1.40 0.09 0.84 0.35 1.28 91.43% Parker 8.49 0.75 3.60 1.14 5.49 64.66% Princeton 10.61 1.24 1.81 1.57 4.62 43.54% Prosper 18.25 2.16 3.61 1.20 6.97 38.19% St. Paul 1.40 0.01 0.80 0.35 1.16 82.86% Wylie 36.20 2.36 5.19 6.23 13.78 38.07% Source: Texas Forest Service Page 193 Item 10. Page | 135 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The determination of property vulnerability to wildfires was calculated by overlaying the County’s parcel data and the Texas Fire Service data. The 21T31Tdetermination of assessed value at-risk (exposure) to wildfires was calculated by overlaying the impr21T31Toved property shapefile to the WUI polygons, and adding the total assessed building values within each of the low/medium/high density WUI Interface communities (Table 3.12). Table 3.13 Parcels and Assessed Value of Improvements Jurisdiction Residential Parcels Commercial Parcels Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings & Contents) at Risk Percentage (%) of Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings & Contents) at Risk Collin County 104,743 7,983 $41,609,034,512 32.19% Source: Texas Forest Service As observed in Table 3.13 approximately 32.19% of Collin County’s improved property is vulnerable to wildfires. Based on geographical location, a total of $41,609,034,512 worth of property value composed of buildings and its contents are vulnerable to this hazard. In compliance to Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii) Collin County’s vulnerability to wildfire and impacts to assets expected from this event can be summarized as follows: • Population: According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events, Based on geographical data, approximately 104,743 residential parcels in Collin County are vulnerable to wildfires. • Improved Property: Based on historical data, a loss of $2,791.67 per year can be expected in property loss and $100 per year in crop losses due to hailstorm damage though values could be underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Based on geographical data, a loss of $41,609,034,512 worth of buildings and its contents is exposed to wildfires. This corresponds to a 32.19% overall property improvement values across Collin County. • Emergency Facilities: Based on geographic information and assuming that the facilities located within the WUI, there are emergency facilities exposed to the wildfire hazard. • Critical Facilities: Based on geographic information and assuming that the facilities located within the WUI, there are critical facilities exposed to the wildfire hazard. • Critical Infrastructure: Based on geographic information and assuming that the infrastructure located within the WUI, there are critical infrastructure exposed to the wildfire hazard. Information needed to fulfill Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C), which addresses land uses and developm ent trends was unattainable during the preparation of this hazard mitigation plan. Compliance with this requirement will be an objective in the five-year planning cycle. Page 194 Item 10. Page | 136 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3.5 Statistical Risk Assessment A statistical risk assessment uses statistical and mathematical tools to predict hazard frequency and hazard estimated impacts. Data collected from National Centers for Environmental Information storm events database (recorded historic hazard events), census block data from the U.S. Census 2010 block data provided by the Texas Forest Service and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool were used to assess vulnerability of the five vulnerable categories of assets: population, improved property, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and emergency facilities. The statistical analysis was conducted using the historical data obtained from National Centers for Environmental Information. The data included both casualty and property losses from hazard events that occurred in Collin County from 1/1/1950 or 1/1/1996 to 9/22/2020. Annualized personal and property losses were calculated by dividing the total losses by the number of years for which data was available (i.e. 24 or 70 years). Page 195 Item 10. Page | 137 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Extreme Heat Extreme heat impacts large areas and cross jurisdictional boundaries; therefore, all Collin County and all of the jurisdictions participating on this plan are exposed to this hazard. Improved property, emergency facilities, critical infrastructure, and critical facilities are not considered vulnerable to extreme heat or cold events; therefore, estimated vulnerability to these assets is anticipated to be minimal. However, population is significantly vulnerable to extreme heat. Based on the available information, vulnerability to extreme heat was assessed using two techniques: 1) to comply with Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B), historical loss data obtained from the National Centers for Environmental information was used to predict expected monetary and human losses from the event; 2) in fulfillment of Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A), geographical hazard areas identified for extreme heat and the nature of the impacts expected from this hazard event were used to identify the vulnerable assets. Table 3.14 presents Collin County’s recorded historical losses due to extreme heat events as provided in the hazard events database obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information. The annualized losses due to extreme events were calculated using the methodology described in section 3.3 Table 3.14 Extreme Heat Historical Occurrences Between (1/1/1996-9/22/2020) Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Collin (Zone) 7/19/1997 18:00 Heat 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 7/1/1998 0:00 Heat 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 8/1/1999 0:00 Heat 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 7/1/2000 0:00 Heat 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 8/1/2000 0:00 Heat 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 9/1/2000 0:00 Heat 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 8/1/2011 6:00 Excessive Heat 1 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 8/6/2011 2:21 Heat 1 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 7/19/2015 16:00 Excessive Heat 1 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 6/14/2016 10:30 Heat 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 7/19/2016 16:00 Heat 1 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 6/20/2019 15:00 Excessive Heat 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 7/8/2019 12:00 Heat 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 7/16/2019 12:00 Heat 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 8/7/2019 11:00 Heat 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 8/17/2019 11:00 Heat 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 8/26/2019 13:00 Heat 0 0 $0 $0 Totals: 4 0 $0 $0 Source: National Centers for Environmental Information The annualized loss value can be interpreted as the impact expected from extreme heat in terms of annualized human losses and human injuries, and annualized property losses. As observed in Table 3.14, Collin County can expect 0.17 fatalities and no injuries per year, and no property or crop losses expected from extreme heat. Page 196 Item 10. Page | 138 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The occurrence of extreme heat is regional; therefore the area of potential impacts corresponds to all Collin County’s territory. However, according to the recorded historical information, extreme heat does not have a significant impact on property value. In compliance to Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii), vulnerability to extreme heat and impacts to assets expected from these events can be summarized as follows: • Population: Based on historical data, extreme heat can be expected to produce an average of 0.17 fatalities and no injuries per year. All the population of Collin County is exposed to this hazard. • Improved Property: Based on historical data and the negligible impact of extreme heat to developed areas, the improved property in Collin County is not exposed to this hazard. • Emergency Facilities: Based on historical data and the negligible impact of extreme heat to buildings, the existing and future emergency facilities in Collin County are not exposed to this hazard. • Critical Facilities: Based on historical data and the negligible impact of extreme heat to buildings, the existing and future critical facilities in Collin County are not exposed to this hazard. • Critical Infrastructure: Based on historical data and the negligible impact of extreme heat to existing and future critical infrastructure, exposure to this hazard is considered minimal in Collin County. Information needed to fulfill Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C), which addresses land uses and development trends was unattainable during the preparation of this hazard mitigation plan. Compliance with this requirement will be an objective in the five-year planning cycle. Page 197 Item 10. Page | 139 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan High Wind High wind events impact large areas and cross jurisdictional boundaries; therefore, all of Collin County is exposed to this hazard. Improved property, emergency facilities, critical infrastructure, and critical facilities, and population are considered vulnerable to this hazard. Based on the available information, vulnerability to high winds was assessed using two techniques: (1) to comply with Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B), historical loss data obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information was used to predict expected monetary and human losses from the event; (2) in fulfillment of Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A), geographical hazard areas identified for high winds and the nature of the impacts expected from this hazard event were used to identify the vulnerable assets. Table 3.15 presents Collin County’s recorded historical losses due to high wind events as provided in the hazard events database obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information. According to the NCEI, there were no recorded high winds events for New Hope, Princeton, and St. Paul. Table 3.15 High Wind Historical Occurrences Between (1/1/1950-9/22/2020) Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TCollin Co.46T 11/17/1958 9:50 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 3/5/1959 21:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 3/31/1959 23:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/8/1961 3:27 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/27/1963 19:40 Thunder storm Wind 62 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 3/3/1970 4:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 4/25/1970 5:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 4/25/1970 5:35 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/23/1971 16:55 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 198 Item 10. Page | 140 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TCollin Co.46T 4/15/1972 5:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 9/29/1972 18:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/6/1975 17:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 3/27/1977 7:35 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 3/23/1978 19:15 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 3/23/1978 19:25 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/2/1978 22:15 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/28/1978 15:48 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/28/1978 17:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 7/10/1979 2:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 8/22/1979 1:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 4/24/1980 21:10 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/20/1980 3:15 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 10/17/1980 5:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 3/17/1981 20:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 199 Item 10. Page | 141 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TCollin Co.46T 4/3/1981 18:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 4/28/1981 19:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/23/1981 20:45 Thunder storm Wind 56 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 8/26/1981 15:42 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/17/1982 1:25 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/31/1982 4:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/22/1983 22:00 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 7/5/1983 3:55 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 8/12/1983 0:10 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 3/18/1984 18:20 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 3/27/1984 0:20 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/27/1984 21:40 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 8/30/1984 15:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 1 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 12/13/1984 10:45 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 5 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 2/23/1985 2:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 200 Item 10. Page | 142 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TCollin Co.46T 3/26/1985 22:45 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 7/22/1985 15:35 Thunder storm Wind 56 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 3/11/1986 18:58 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 3/11/1986 19:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 4/19/1986 13:15 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 4/19/1986 13:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 4/19/1986 13:49 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/9/1986 20:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 7/21/1986 13:45 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 9/28/1986 17:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 9/28/1986 17:30 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 2/14/1987 21:35 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/3/1987 19:47 Thunder storm Wind 51 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/14/1987 16:29 Thunder storm Wind 55 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/28/1987 17:52 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 201 Item 10. Page | 143 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TCollin Co.46T 5/28/1987 18:10 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/19/1987 19:08 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/23/1987 19:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 7/2/1987 10:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 8/23/1988 19:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 9/17/1988 16:40 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 2 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 11/12/1988 6:10 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 11/15/1988 15:45 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/2/1989 20:10 Thunder storm Wind 56 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/4/1989 0:35 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/4/1989 2:00 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/4/1989 2:30 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/12/1989 5:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/13/1989 4:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 7/2/1989 18:50 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 202 Item 10. Page | 144 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TCollin Co.46T 8/6/1989 14:25 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 1/17/1990 7:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 1/17/1990 7:30 Thunder storm Wind 60 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 1/19/1990 7:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 3/14/1990 9:45 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 4/15/1990 20:45 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/2/1990 22:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/11/1990 21:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 8/21/1990 17:30 Thunder storm Wind 62 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 10/17/1990 16:20 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 4/11/1991 22:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 4 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 4/17/1991 17:11 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 4/28/1991 13:10 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 4/28/1991 13:25 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/4/1991 16:20 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 203 Item 10. Page | 145 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TCollin Co.46T 6/5/1991 14:15 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 7/15/1991 16:55 Thunder storm Wind 65 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 9/24/1991 12:00 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/11/1992 20:05 Thunder storm Wind 51 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 5/11/1992 20:55 Thunder storm Wind 51 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/6/1992 2:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/8/1992 15:35 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/28/1992 5:12 Thunder storm Wind 65 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 7/28/1992 16:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 8/2/1992 17:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 9/2/1992 22:21 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 9/2/1992 22:40 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 9/2/1992 22:45 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 9/2/1992 23:05 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 9/2/1992 23:50 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 204 Item 10. Page | 146 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TCollin Co.46T 11/1/1992 1:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TMcKinney46T 10/19/1993 4:00 Thunder storm Wind 70 Kts. 0 0 $50,000 $0 46TFrisco46T 4/2/1994 20:15 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TAllen46T 4/26/1994 23:05 Thunder storm Wind 4 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TAllen46T 5/13/1994 4:40 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $50,000 $0 46TMelissa46T 5/29/1994 9:15 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $50,000 $0 46TWylie46T 5/29/1994 9:45 Thunder storm Wind 57 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TFarmersville46 T 6/19/1994 15:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TFrisco46T 7/12/1994 19:39 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TWylie46T 7/12/1994 20:10 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TAnna46T 8/7/1994 12:10 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $500 $0 46TMcKinney46T 8/7/1994 12:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $500 $0 46TRoyse City46T 11/4/1994 22:50 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TCelina46T 4/17/1995 21:05 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $30,000 $0 46TFrisco46T 4/17/1995 21:05 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $40,000 $0 Page 205 Item 10. Page | 147 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TPlano46T 4/17/1995 21:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $2,000 $0 46TParker46T 5/7/1995 22:10 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCulleoka46T 5/7/1995 22:39 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $15,000 $0 46TFarmersville46 T 5/7/1995 22:50 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $200,000 $0 46TMelissa46T 5/24/1995 17:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $100,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 5/24/1995 17:10 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCountywide46T 5/24/1995 17:30 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TArthur City46T 5/24/1995 18:45 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TCelina46T 7/4/1995 23:15 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $2,000 $0 46TPlano46T 7/5/1995 2:45 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $2,000 $0 46TMelissa46T 8/20/1995 17:45 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $75,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 8/20/1995 18:00 Thunder storm Wind 0 Kts. 0 0 $100,000 $0 46TLucas46T 5/27/1996 4:15 Thunder storm Wind 68 Kts. 0 0 $1,000 $0 46TProsper46T 6/6/1996 21:20 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TPlano46T 3/29/1997 21:52 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 Page 206 Item 10. Page | 148 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TAllen46T 3/29/1997 22:16 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $20,000 $0 46TPlano46T 5/19/1997 17:58 Thunder storm Wind 57 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TPlano46T 6/16/1997 19:10 Thunder storm Wind 58 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TMcKinney46T 5/8/1998 20:25 Thunder storm Wind 53 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TFrisco46T 5/8/1998 20:35 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. 0 0 $100,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 5/8/1998 20:50 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. 0 0 $100,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 5/8/1998 20:57 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TPlano46T 11/9/1998 23:10 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. 0 0 $0 $0 46TWylie46T 2/25/2000 22:35 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. E 0 0 $0 $0 46TLavon46T 2/25/2000 23:17 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. E 0 0 $0 $0 46TPlano46T 2/25/2000 23:40 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. E 0 0 $0 $0 46TFrisco46T 5/27/2000 16:20 Thunder storm Wind 57 Kts. M 0 0 $0 $0 46TWylie46T 5/27/2000 16:50 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. E 0 0 $0 $0 46TMcKinney46T 5/28/2001 0:08 Thunder storm Wind 57 Kts. E 0 0 $0 $0 46TCountywide46T 6/14/2001 18:45 Thunder storm Wind 58 Kts. E 0 0 $0 $0 Page 207 Item 10. Page | 149 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TMcKinney46T 6/14/2001 19:00 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. E 0 0 $0 $0 46TMelissa46T 9/18/2001 18:05 Thunder storm Wind 73 Kts. E 0 0 $0 $0 46TCelina46T 10/10/2001 22:51 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. E 0 0 $0 $0 46TMcKinney46T 10/12/2001 20:20 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. E 0 0 $0 $0 46TCelina46T 8/25/2002 14:26 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. E 0 0 $10,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 8/27/2002 5:50 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. E 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TFarmersville46 T 5/24/2003 21:20 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. ES 0 0 $20,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 5/24/2003 22:47 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. ES 0 0 $0 $0 46TFrisco46T 6/11/2003 21:55 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. ES 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TPlano46T 8/22/2003 16:10 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. ES 0 0 $0 $0 46TPlano46T 8/22/2003 16:30 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. ES 0 0 $2,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 8/26/2003 14:38 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. ES 1 4 $15,000 $0 46TFrisco46T 8/26/2003 14:58 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. ES 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TNevada46T 3/4/2004 15:20 Thunder storm Wind 60 Kts. ES 0 0 $75,000 $0 46TFarmersville46 T 3/4/2004 15:41 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. ES 0 0 $250,000 $0 Page 208 Item 10. Page | 150 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TMcKinney46T 6/2/2004 18:32 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. ES 0 0 $2,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 4/5/2005 16:50 Thunder storm Wind 58 Kts. MS 0 0 $0 $0 46TAllen46T 5/25/2005 12:38 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. ES 0 0 $0 $0 46TPrinceton46T 7/15/2005 15:53 Thunder storm Wind 55 Kts. MS 0 0 $0 $0 46TWylie46T 8/4/2005 16:37 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. ES 0 0 $1,000 $0 46TPrinceton46T 9/28/2005 18:35 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. ES 0 0 $15,000 $0 46TFrisco46T 3/13/2006 1:11 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. ES 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin (Zone)46T 4/7/2006 16:35 Strong Wind 45 Kts. ES 0 0 $20,000 $0 46TCollin (Zone)46T 6/16/2006 15:20 Strong Wind 48 Kts. ES 0 0 $2,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 8/12/2006 16:10 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. ES 0 0 $0 $0 46TPlano46T 8/22/2006 16:45 Thunder storm Wind 40 Kts. MS 0 0 $15,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 8/22/2006 17:10 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. ES 0 0 $0 $0 46TMcKinney46T 8/23/2006 17:00 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. ES 0 0 $0 $0 46TPlano46T 8/27/2006 15:30 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. ES 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TFrisco46T 9/17/2006 4:30 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. ES 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TCollin (Zone)46T 10/31/2006 10:00 Strong Wind 32 Kts. EG 0 0 $2,000 $0 Page 209 Item 10. Page | 151 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TCollin (Zone)46T 11/15/2006 6:00 Strong Wind 40 Kts. MG 0 0 $20,000 $0 46TCollin (Zone)46T 2/24/2007 12:00 High Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $200,000 $0 46TMurphy46T 3/30/2007 20:10 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $25,000 $0 46TPlano46T 4/3/2007 18:10 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 46TAllen46T 4/13/2007 18:15 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 46TAllen46T 4/24/2007 14:23 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 4/24/2007 19:35 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $40,000 $0 46TBlue Ridge46T 4/24/2007 20:55 Thunder storm Wind 55 Kts. MG 0 0 $0 $0 46TPlano46T 5/2/2007 18:20 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 46TPlano46T 5/2/2007 18:30 Thunder storm Wind 65 Kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 46TPlano46T 5/2/2007 18:31 Thunder storm Wind 59 Kts. MG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TAllen46T 5/2/2007 18:34 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 46TMcKinney46T 5/2/2007 18:55 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $40,000 $0 46TFrisco46T 5/2/2007 19:00 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 46TMcKinney46T 5/2/2007 19:03 Thunder storm Wind 62 Kts. MG 0 0 $0 $0 Page 210 Item 10. Page | 152 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TPlano46T 5/30/2007 8:47 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $15,000 $0 46TPlano46T 8/29/2007 14:54 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin (Zone)46T 1/29/2008 10:50 High Wind 51 Kts. MG 0 0 $0 $0 46TCollin (Zone)46T 1/29/2008 7:00 Strong Wind 30 Kts. MS 0 0 $65,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 4/10/2008 3:03 Thunder storm Wind 56 Kts. MG 0 0 $0 $0 46TMcKinney46T 4/10/2008 3:17 Thunder storm Wind 76 Kts. MG 0 0 $0 $0 46TCelina46T 6/17/2008 10:20 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $1,000 $0 46TPlano46T 6/17/2008 10:38 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 46TMcKinney46T 6/17/2008 10:38 Thunder storm Wind 55 Kts. MG 0 0 $0 $0 46TPlano46T 6/17/2008 10:45 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 46TCelina46T 6/28/2008 17:07 Thund erstor m Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $1,000 $0 46TProsper46T 2/9/2009 4:05 Thunder storm Wind 58 Kts. EG 0 0 $15,000 $0 46TWylie46T 2/10/2009 22:00 Thunder storm Wind 65 Kts. EG 0 0 $50,000 $0 46TFrisco46T 4/30/2009 2:05 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 46TFrisco46T 5/2/2009 20:50 Thunder storm Wind 55 Kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 Page 211 Item 10. Page | 153 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TCelina46T 5/6/2009 5:07 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $2,000 $0 46TWylie46T 5/6/2009 5:23 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $3,000 $0 46TFrisco46T 6/10/2009 18:14 Thunder storm Wind 63 Kts. MG 0 0 $4,000 $0 46TFrisco46T 6/10/2009 18:15 Thunder storm Wind 65 Kts. EG 0 0 $10,000 $0 46TFrisco46T 6/10/2009 18:15 Thunder storm Wind 65 Kts. EG 0 0 $6,000 $0 46TPlano46T 6/10/2009 18:19 Thunder storm Wind 68 Kts. MG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TPlano46T 6/10/2009 18:20 Thunder storm Wind 65 Kts. EG 0 0 $3,000 $0 46TAllen46T 6/10/2009 18:30 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TFoot46T 6/10/2009 18:30 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 6/10/2009 18:35 Thunder storm Wind 65 Kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TCelina46T 6/10/2009 18:35 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TCelina46T 6/10/2009 18:35 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. EG 0 0 $3,000 $0 46TAnna46T 6/10/2009 18:50 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. EG 0 0 $12,000 $0 46TShepton46T 7/8/2009 16:10 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $6,000 $0 46TPlano46T 7/19/2009 13:13 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $8,000 $0 Page 212 Item 10. Page | 154 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TMelissa46T 8/5/2009 16:16 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TShepton46T 5/14/2010 12:23 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 8/17/2010 17:10 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $100 $0 46TProsper46T 4/10/2011 23:34 Thunder storm Wind 70 Kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TMelissa46T 4/14/2011 22:32 Thunder storm Wind 56 Kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 46TShepton46T 4/23/2011 22:37 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $2,000 $0 46TMelissa46T 4/25/2011 14:58 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 46TCelina46T 5/24/2011 20:48 Thunder storm Wind 56 Kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TPlano46T 5/24/2011 21:25 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. EG 0 0 $8,000 $0 46TCopeville46T 5/24/2011 21:37 Thunder storm Wind 54 Kts. MG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/21/2011 2:09 Thunder storm Wind 58 Kts. EG 0 0 $8,000 $0 46TFarmersville46 T 7/2/2011 17:00 Thunder storm Wind 56 Kts. EG 0 0 $10,000 $0 46TWestminster 46T 9/18/2011 18:45 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $15,000 $0 46TMurphy46T 9/18/2011 19:10 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. EG 0 0 $15,000 $0 46TFrisco46T 10/23/2011 0:15 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $2,000 $0 Page 213 Item 10. Page | 155 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TPlano46T 10/23/2011 0:21 Thunder storm Wind 61 Kts. MG 0 0 $0 $0 46TCelina46T 5/4/2012 20:25 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $20,000 $0 46TProsper46T 5/4/2012 20:35 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TLolaville46T 5/30/2012 2:25 Thunder storm Wind 62 Kts. MG 0 0 $15,000 $0 46TForest Grove46T 6/6/2012 15:30 Thunder storm Wind 43 Kts. EG 0 0 $3,000 $0 46TFoot46T 6/6/2012 15:35 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TPrinceton46T 7/20/2012 15:10 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $160,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 7/20/2012 15:20 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $2,000 $0 46TProsper46T 8/6/2012 14:30 Thunder storm Wind 52 Kts. EG 0 0 $2,000 $0 46TRhea Mills46T 8/6/2012 14:36 Thunder storm Wind 55 Kts. EG 0 0 $8,000 $0 46TCopeville46T 12/19/2012 21:30 Thunder storm Wind 65 Kts. EG 0 0 $150,000 $0 46TCollin (Zone)46T 12/20/2012 0:00 Strong Wind 43 Kts. EG 0 0 $13,000 $0 46TShepton46T 2/10/2013 3:05 Thunder storm Wind 50 Kts. EG 0 0 $1,000 $0 46TFairview46T 5/21/2013 13:33 Thunder storm Wind 56 Kts. EG 0 0 $50,000 $0 46TBiggers46T 5/21/2013 13:33 Thunder storm Wind 59 Kts. MG 0 0 $50,000 $0 Page 214 Item 10. Page | 156 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TMcKinney46T 5/21/2013 13:33 Thunder storm Wind 56 Kts. EG 0 0 $50,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 5/21/2013 13:33 Thunder storm Wind 56 Kts. EG 0 0 $50,000 $0 46TPrinceton46T 5/21/2013 13:49 Thunder storm Wind 56 Kts. EG 0 0 $50,000 $0 46TFarmersville46 T 5/21/2013 14:00 Thunder storm Wind 54 Kts. EG 0 0 $40,000 $0 46TAllen46T 6/17/2013 6:45 Thunder storm Wind 35 Kts. EG 0 0 $2,000 $0 46TAnna46T 8/23/2013 16:05 Thunder storm Wind 43 Kts. EG 2 0 $10,000 $0 Farmersville 4/3/2014 18:50 Thunder storm Wind 59 kts. MG 0 0 $90,000 $0 McKinney 4/7/2014 18:38 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. MG 0 0 $8,000 $0 Plano 5/12/2014 14:40 Thunder storm Wind 56 kts. EG 0 0 $17,000 $0 Lolaville 5/12/2014 14:53 Thunder storm Wind 52 kts. EG 0 0 $7,000 $0 Melissa 5/12/2014 15:05 Thunder storm Wind 52 kts. EG 0 0 $7,000 $0 Forest Grove 7/14/2014 14:00 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 10/2/2014 16:10 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $10,000 $0 Anna 10/10/2014 22:02 Thunder storm Wind 54 kts. MG 0 0 $0 $0 Princeton 10/10/2014 22:05 Thunder storm Wind 61 kts. EG 0 0 $0 $5,000 Page 215 Item 10. Page | 157 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Allen 10/13/2014 1:18 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $1,000 $0 Allen 4/18/2015 19:43 Thunder storm Wind 60 kts. MG 0 0 $10,000 $0 Anna 4/18/2015 19:58 Thunder storm Wind 52 kts. MG 0 0 $5,000 $0 Anna 4/18/2015 20:03 Thunder storm Wind 52 kts. MG 0 0 $5,000 $0 Anna 11/17/2015 4:35 Thunder storm Wind 56 kts. MG 0 0 $0 $0 Fairview 12/26/2015 19:30 Thunder storm Wind 48 kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 Frisco 3/8/2016 9:00 Thunder storm Wind 56 kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 Murphy 3/23/2016 21:37 Thunder storm Wind 60 kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 Frisco 4/11/2016 16:45 Thunder storm Wind 61 kts. EG 0 0 $30,000 $0 Wylie 4/11/2016 17:15 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $2,000 $0 Celina 4/29/2016 15:50 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 Anna 5/29/2016 18:30 Thunder storm Wind 56 kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 Shepton 7/15/2016 8:22 Thunder storm Wind 52 kts. EG 0 0 $1,000 $0 Allen 1/15/2017 21:30 Thunder storm Wind 56 kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 1/15/2017 21:40 Thunder storm Wind 52 kts. EG 0 0 $2,000 $0 Page 216 Item 10. Page | 158 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Murphy 1/15/2017 22:00 Thunder storm Wind 56 kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 Frisco 3/29/2017 1:49 Thunder storm Wind 60 kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 Frisco 3/29/2017 1:50 Thunder storm Wind 65 kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 3/29/2017 1:50 Thunder storm Wind 60 kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 Lolaville 3/29/2017 1:51 Thunder storm Wind 55 kts. MG 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 3/29/2017 1:55 Thunder storm Wind 65 kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 Allen 3/29/2017 1:58 Thunder storm Wind 52 kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 Lolaville 3/29/2017 2:00 Thunder storm Wind 55 kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 Lolaville 3/29/2017 2:04 Thunder storm Wind 65 kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 McKinney 7/8/2017 14:10 Thunder storm Wind 54 kts. MG 0 0 $0 $0 Allen 7/8/2017 14:40 Thunder storm Wind 60 kts. EG 0 0 $10,000 $0 Princeton 7/23/2017 20:40 Thunder storm Wind 55 kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 Blue Ridge 8/12/2017 16:00 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $1,000 $0 McKinney 5/25/2018 12:20 Thunder storm Wind 48 kts. EG 0 0 $1,000 $0 McKinney 6/7/2018 18:21 Thunder storm Wind 43 kts. EG 1 0 $40,000 $0 Page 217 Item 10. Page | 159 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Plano 8/18/2018 19:00 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $2,000 $0 Weston 8/18/2018 19:05 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $0 $0 Altoga 8/18/2018 19:17 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 Plano Shiloh Arpk Ar 8/18/2018 19:25 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $5,000 $0 Renner 3/13/2019 4:12 Thunder storm Wind 67 kts. MG 0 0 $ $0 Renner 3/13/2019 4:21 Thunder storm Wind 63 kts. MG 0 0 $ $0 McKinney 3/13/2019 4:25 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. MG 0 0 $ $0 Allen 5/18/2019 12:14 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $ $0 Chambersvil le 5/21/2019 5:40 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $ $0 McKinney 6/9/2019 12:32 Thunder storm Wind 52 kts. MG 0 0 $ $0 Lolaville 6/9/2019 12:57 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $ $0 Foot 6/29/2019 17:30 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $ $0 Culleoka 10/20/2019 23:39 Thunder storm Wind 74 kts. EG 0 0 $ $0 Farmersville 10/20/2019 23:46 Thunder storm Wind 74 kts. EG 0 3 $ $0 Nevada 10/21/2019 00:05 Thunder storm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 $ $0 Page 218 Item 10. Page | 160 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Lebanon 10/21/2019 23:15 Thunder storm Wind 48 kts. EG 0 0 $ $0 Lolaville 4/28/2020 22:04 Thunder storm Wind 48 kts. EG 0 0 $ $0 Total: 4 20 $4,293,000 $5,000 Source: National Centers for Environmental Information The annualized losses due to high wind events were calculated using the methodology described previously. The annualized loss value can be interpreted as the impact expected from high wind in terms of 21T31Ta21T31Tnnualized human losses and human injuries, and annualized property losses. As observed in Table 3.15, Collin County can expect a per year average of $61,328.57 in property losses, 0.06 fatalities, 0.29 injuries, and $71.43 in crop losses from high wind events. The occurrence of high winds is regional; therefore, the area of potential impacts corresponds to all Collin County’s territory. According to the recorded historical information, high winds impact property. Currently, there is no information available that specifically identifies to the type structures that have been historically damaged by high wind events. However, fatalities, injuries, and crop and property damage has occurred. Because of the regional character of this hazard event, all improved property, emergency and critical facilities, and critical structures are exposed to this hazard. In compliance to Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii), vulnerability to high wind and impacts to assets expected from this event can be summarized as follows: • Population: Based on historical data, high wind events can be expected to produce an average of .29 injuries and 0.06 fatalities per year. All the population of Collin County is exposed to this hazard. • Improved Property: Based on historical data, an average loss of $61,328.57 per year in property losses and $71.43 in crop losses are expected from this hazard in Collin County. • Emergency Facilities: Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all existing and future emergency facilities in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. • Critical Facilities: Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all existing and future emergency facilities in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. • Critical Infrastructure: Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all existing and future critical infrastructures in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. Information needed to fulfill Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C), which addresses land uses and development trends was unattainable during the preparation of this hazard mitigation plan. Compliance with this requirement will be an objective in the five-year planning cycle. Page 219 Item 10. Page | 161 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lightning Because the location at which a lightning event cannot be predicted, all existing and future buildings, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, emergency facilities, improved property, and population are considered to be exposed to this hazard. Based on the available information, vulnerability to lightning was assessed using two techniques: (1) to comply with Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B), historical loss data obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information was used to predict expected monetary and human losses from the event; (2) in fulfillment of Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A), geographical hazard areas identified for lightning and the nature of the impacts expected from this hazard event were used to identify the vulnerable assets. Table 3.16 presents Collin County’s recorded historical losses due to lightning events as provided in the hazard events database obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information. According to the NCEI, there were no recorded lightning events for the Fairview, Farmersville, Josephine, Lowry Crossing, Melissa, New Hope, Parker, Princeton, St. Paul, and Wylie. Table 3.16 Historical Lightning Occurrences between (1/1/1996-9/22/2020) Location Date Time Event Magnitude Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TWeston46T 7/8/1996 16:30 Lightning 0 0 $100,000 $0 46TPlano46T 7/23/1996 12:45 Lightning 0 0 $80,000 $0 46TPlano46T 5/19/1997 17:45 Lightning 0 0 $50,000 $0 46TBlue Ridge46T 1/4/1998 22:00 Lightning 0 0 $20,000 $0 46TAllen46T 10/9/1999 6:00 Lightning 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TPlano46T 12/12/1999 8:00 Lightning 0 0 $30,000 $0 46TPlano46T 3/10/2000 12:30 Lightning 0 0 $25,000 $0 46TPlano46T 2/16/2001 0:24 Lightning 0 0 $750,000 $0 46TMc Kinney46T 4/29/2002 15:00 Lightning 0 1 $0 $0 46TMc Kinney46T 8/26/2003 15:30 Lightning 0 0 $300,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 4/24/2007 15:30 Lightning 0 0 $20,000 $0 46TPlano46T 5/3/2007 18:10 Lightning 0 0 $250,000 $0 46TAnna46T 5/30/2007 9:20 Lightning 0 0 $50,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 7/31/2007 14:45 Lightning 0 0 $7,300 $0 46TLebanon46T 2/15/2008 1:45 Lightning 0 0 $500,000 $0 46TMcKinney46T 5/27/2008 10:30 Lightning 0 0 $70,000 $0 46TLucas46T 7/19/2009 13:15 Lightning 0 0 $405,000 $0 46TMurphy46T 7/19/2009 13:20 Lightning 0 0 $200,000 $0 46TLolaville46T 8/21/2009 4:21 Lightning 0 0 $750,000 $0 Page 220 Item 10. Page | 162 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Magnitude Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 46TMurphy46T 9/11/2009 17:00 Lightning 0 0 $150,000 $0 46TMurphy46T 9/11/2009 17:00 Lightning 0 0 $5,000 $0 46TCelina46T 9/1/2010 13:30 Lightning 0 0 $25,000 $0 46TCollin Co.46T 6/21/2011 23:18 Lightning 0 0 $30,000 $0 46TFoot46T 5/30/2012 10:15 Lightning 0 0 $275,000 $0 46TLebanon46T 5/30/2012 10:22 Lightning 0 0 $450,000 $0 46TFoot46T 5/30/2012 10:30 Lightning 0 0 $275,000 $0 46TFoot46T 5/30/2012 10:59 Lightning 0 0 $250,000 $0 Frisco 10/2/2014 15:00 Lightning 0 0 $100,000 $0 Lavon 6/21/2015 7:00 Lightning 0 0 $50,000 $0 Lolaville 6/26/2015 19:20 Lightning 0 0 $25,000 $0 Foot 4/29/2016 1:11 Lightning 0 0 $200,000 $0 Frisco 5/23/2016 7:25 Lightning 0 0 $300,000 $0 Plano 5/29/2016 18:30 Lightning 0 0 $200,000 $0 Shepton 6/12/2016 16:51 Lightning 0 0 $4,000 $0 Parker 1/2/2017 5:55 Lightning 0 0 $500,000 $0 Lebanon 7/5/2017 20:00 Lightning 0 0 $1,000,000 $0 Allen 8/7/2017 00:50 Lightning 0 0 $100,000 $0 Foot 10/22/2017 00:00 Lightning 0 0 $225,000 $0 Rockhill 8/9/2018 20:08 Lightning 0 0 $400,000 $0 Lebanon 8/18/2018 19:00 Lightning 0 0 $2,000 $0 Foot 12/26/2018 16:15 Lightning 0 0 $100,000 $0 Lolaville 4/23/2019 21:30 Lightning 0 0 $150,000 $0 Foot 4/23/2019 21:45 Lightning 0 0 $500 $0 Frisco 4/23/2019 22:00 Lightning 0 0 $100,000 $0 Frisco 6/9/2019 12:40 Lightning 0 0 $1,000 $0 Frisco 6/16/2019 2:00 Lightning 0 0 $5,000 $0 Lebanon 6/16/2019 15:51 Lightning 0 0 $1,000 $0 Prosper 10/20/2019 23:21 Lightning 0 0 $150,000 $0 Foot 3/18/2020 4:15 Lightning 0 0 $800,000 $0 Frisco 4/28/2020 22:00 Lightning 0 0 $83,000 $0 Lebanon 4/28/2020 22:00 Lightning 0 0 $8,000 $0 Page 221 Item 10. Page | 163 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Magnitude Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Lebanon 4/28/2020 22:00 Lightning 0 0 $500,000 $0 Frisco 4/28/2020 22:00 Lightning 0 0 $3,000 $0 Frisco 4/28/2020 22:00 Lightning 0 0 $30,000 $0 Lebanon 5/23/2020 00:11 Lightning 0 0 $200,000 $0 Frisco 6/23/2020 6:45 Lightning 0 0 $250,000 $0 Totals: 0 1 $10,560,000 $0 Source: National Centers for Environmental Information The annualized losses due to lightning events were calculated using the methodology described in table 3.16. The annualized loss value can be interpreted as the impact expected from lightning in terms of annualized human losses and human injuries, and annualized property losses. As observed in Table 3.16, Collin County can expect $440,000 in property losses, with no fatalities, 0.04 injuries, and no losses in crop production from lightning events. The geographical occurrence of lightning events cannot be predicted; therefore the area of potential impacts corresponds to all Collin County’s territory. According to the recorded historical information, lightning impact property. Because of the regional character of this hazard event, all improved property, emergency and critical facilities, and critical structures are exposed to this hazard. In compliance to Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii), vulnerability to lightning and impacts to assets expected from this event can be summarized as follows: • Population: Based on historical data, lightning events can be expected to cause no fatalities and 0.04 injuries in Collin County per year. All the population of Collin County is exposed to this hazard. • Improved Property: Based on historical data, an average of $440,000 per year in property losses and $0 in crop losses is expected from lightning events in Collin County. • Emergency Facilities: Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all existing and future emergency facilities in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. • Critical Facilities: Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all existing and future critical facilities in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. • Critical Infrastructure: Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all existing and future critical infrastructures in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. Information needed to fulfill Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C, which addresses land uses and development trends was unattainable during the preparation of this Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with this requirement will be an objective in the five-year planning cycle. Page 222 Item 10. Page | 164 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Tornado The areas of impact from tornado events cannot be predicted, and they can affect extensive areas of a county. All existing and future buildings, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, emergency facilities, improved property, and population are considered to be vulnerable to this hazard. Based on the available information, vulnerability to tornados was assessed using two techniques: 1) to comply with Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B), historical loss data obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information, and the Texas Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was used to predict expected monetary and human losses from the event; 2) in fulfillment of Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A), geographical hazard areas identified for tornados and the nature of the impacts expected from this hazard event were used to identify the vulnerable assets. Table 3.17 presents Collin County’s recorded historical losses due to tornado events as provided in the hazard events database obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information. Table 3.17 Historical Tornado Occurrences between (1/1/1950-9/22/2020) Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Collin Co. 3/24/1954 21:30 Tornado F1 0 4 $25,000 $0 Collin Co. 5/25/1954 18:15 Tornado F0 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/2/1957 16:20 Tornado F3 0 2 $250,000 $0 Collin Co. 4/27/1958 15:30 Tornado F2 0 0 $250,000 $0 Collin Co. 10/4/1959 6:00 Tornado F3 0 5 $250,000 $0 Collin Co. 4/22/1963 17:30 Tornado F2 0 0 $250,000 $0 Collin Co. 4/28/1963 12:30 Tornado F1 0 0 $2,500 $0 Collin Co. 5/19/1963 15:00 Tornado F0 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 3/25/1967 21:00 Tornado F0 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 3/25/1967 21:00 Tornado F0 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 4/22/1968 7:50 Tornado F1 0 0 $25,000 $0 Collin Co. 5/13/1968 3:00 Tornado F2 0 0 $25,000 $0 Collin Co. 4/27/1969 5:10 Tornado F2 0 45 $250,000 $0 Collin Co. 10/12/1969 7:44 Tornado F3 0 0 $2,500 $0 Collin Co. 4/18/1970 21:30 Tornado F1 0 2 $2,500 $0 Collin Co. 9/1/1970 16:15 Tornado F1 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 7/19/1971 17:15 Tornado F1 0 0 $25,000 $0 Collin Co. 12/14/1971 18:15 Tornado F0 0 0 $25,000 $0 Collin Co. 8/10/1972 16:00 Tornado F0 0 0 $2,500 $0 Collin Co. 11/20/1973 1:10 Tornado F1 0 3 $25,000 $0 Collin Co. 6/9/1975 18:40 Tornado F0 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 3/27/1977 4:54 Tornado F2 0 0 $250,000 $0 Collin Co. 9/7/1977 15:40 Tornado F1 0 0 $2,500 $0 Collin Co. 9/12/1977 16:20 Tornado F2 0 0 $25,000 $0 Collin Co. 3/29/1979 14:15 Tornado F0 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 7/27/1982 13:00 Tornado F0 0 0 $2,500 $0 Collin Co. 3/27/1984 16:30 Tornado F1 0 0 $2,500 $0 Page 223 Item 10. Page | 165 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time Event Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Collin Co. 10/18/1985 9:30 Tornado F2 0 2 $250,000 $0 Collin Co. 3/17/1987 19:40 Tornado F0 0 0 $0 $0 Collin Co. 9/13/1993 10:10 Tornado F0 0 0 $0 $0 Farmersville 7/12/1994 21:15 Tornado F0 0 0 $50,000 $0 Princeton 10/7/1994 15:00 Tornado F1 0 2 $500,000 $0 Mc Kinney 3/16/1998 19:05 Tornado F1 0 0 $200,000 $0 Frisco 9/5/2001 14:05 Tornado F0 0 0 $0 $0 Celina 9/5/2001 14:30 Tornado F1 0 0 $30,000 $0 Frisco 7/1/2003 13:50 Tornado F0 0 0 $0 $0 Lavon Res 3/4/2004 15:35 Tornado F1 0 2 $150,000 $0 Anna 5/9/2006 21:26 Tornado F0 0 0 $0 $0 Anna 5/9/2006 21:33 Tornado F0 0 0 $30,000 $0 Anna 5/9/2006 21:37 Tornado F3 2 6 $1,000,000 $0 Wylie 3/30/2007 20:20 Tornado EF0 0 0 $500,000 $0 Allen 4/10/2008 3:04 Tornado EF1 0 0 $12,000,000 $0 Princeton 4/3/2014 18:27 Tornado EF0 0 1 $200,000 $0 Copeville 12/26/2015 19:09 Tornado EF2 2 119 $1,400,000 $0 Farmersville 12/26/2015 19:17 Tornado EF1 0 0 $1,500,000 $0 Fayburg 12/26/2015 19:33 Tornado EF1 1 2 $600,000 $0 Weston 4/29/2016 15:53 Tornado EF0 0 0 $30,000 $0 Allen 10/20/2019 23:22 Tornado EF0 0 0 $200,000 $0 Totals: 5 195 $20,332,000 $0 Source: Texas Forest Service, National Centers for Environmental Information The annualized losses due to tornado events were calculated using the methodology described in Table 3.17. The annualized loss value can be interpreted as the impact expected from tornados in terms of annualized human losses and human injuries, and annualized property losses. As observed in Table 3.17, Collin County can expect an average of 0.07 fatalities and 2.79 injuries per year. All the population of Collin County is exposed to this hazard. Also, an expected average of $290,457.14 per year in property losses is expected from tornados, with most of the historical events occurring in the unincorporated areas of Collin County. Finally, there are no expected crop losses as result of tornado events. As stated previously, the geographical area of impact for tornado events cannot be predicted, the area of potential impacts corresponds to all Collin County’s territory, and all improved property, emergency and critical facilities, and critical structures are exposed to this hazard. According to the recorded historical information, expected casualties and property losses from tornado events are significant. In compliance to Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii), vulnerability to tornados and impacts to assets expected from this event can be summarized as follows: • Population: Based on historical data, tornado events can be expected to cause an average of 2.79 injuries and 0.07 fatalities per year in Collin County. All the population of Collin County is exposed to this hazard. Page 224 Item 10. Page | 166 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Improved Property: Based on historical data, an average loss of $290,457.14 per year in property losses are expected to result from tornado events in Collin County. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in Collin County. • Emergency Facilities: Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all existing and future emergency facilities in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. • Critical Facilities: Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all existing and future critical facilities in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. • Critical Infrastructure: Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all existing and future critical infrastructures in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. Information needed to fulfill Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C), which addresses land uses and development trends was unattainable during the preparation of this hazard mitigation plan. Compliance with this requirement will be an objective in the five-year planning cycle. Winter Storms Because winter storm events are large and can affect extensive areas of a county, all existing and future buildings, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, emergency facilities, improved property, and population are considered to be exposed to this hazard. Based on the available information, vulnerability to winter storms was assessed using two techniques: 1) to comply with Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B), historical loss data obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information was used to predict expected monetary and human losses from the event; 2) in fulfillment of Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A), geographical hazard areas identified for winter storms and the nature of the impacts expected from this hazard event were used to identify the vulnerable assets. Table 3.18 presents Collin County’s recorded historical losses due to winter storm events as provided in the hazard events database obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Information. Table 3.18 Winter Storm Historical Occurrences between (1/1/1996-9/22/2020) Location Date Time 33BEvent Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Collin (Zone) 11/24/1996 14:00 Winter Storm 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/17/1996 12:00 Winter Weather 0 0 $0 $0 Mc Kinney 1/6/1997 12:00 Winter Weather 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 1/12/1997 20:00 Winter Weather 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 1/14/1997 23:00 Winter Weather 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/22/1998 0:00 Ice Storm 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 1/25/2000 0:00 Winter Storm 1 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/12/2000 18:00 Winter Storm 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/25/2000 0:00 Winter Storm 0 0 $0 $0 Page 225 Item 10. Page | 167 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time 33BEvent Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Collin (Zone) 12/31/2000 0:00 Winter Storm 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 1/1/2001 0:00 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 11/29/2001 6:00 Ice Storm 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 2/5/2002 8:00 Winter Storm 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/2/2002 6:00 Winter Storm 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 2/24/2003 11:20 Winter Storm 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 2/14/2004 3:00 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/22/2004 0:01 Winter Weather 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/7/2005 12:00 Winter Storm 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 2/18/2006 3:30 Winter Weather 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 11/30/2006 1:00 Winter Storm 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 1/13/2007 11:00 Ice Storm 0 0 $30,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 1/17/2007 3:00 Winter Weather 0 0 $30,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 2/2/2007 1:00 Winter Weather 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/3/2008 22:00 Winter Weather 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/15/2008 18:00 Winter Weather 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/23/2008 6:00 Winter Weather 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 1/27/2009 7:00 Ice Storm 0 0 $60,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/24/2009 12:30 Winter Weather 0 0 $100,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 2/11/2010 5:00 Heavy Snow 0 0 $1,000,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/20/2010 19:00 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 1/9/2011 9:00 Heavy Snow 0 0 $150,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 2/1/2011 0:30 Ice Storm 0 0 $150,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 2/3/2011 23:30 Heavy Snow 0 0 $10,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/25/2012 13:30 Heavy Snow 0 0 $550,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/5/2013 14:30 Winter Storm 0 0 $500,000 $0 Page 226 Item 10. Page | 168 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Location Date Time 33BEvent Mag Fatalities Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage Collin (Zone) 2/22/2015 18:00 Winter Storm 0 0 $10,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 2/27/2015 9:00 Heavy Snow 0 0 $200,000 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 00:02 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 00:23 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 00:25 Winter Weather 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 00:50 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 1:00 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 1:02 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 1:15 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 1:34 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 1:34 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 1:46 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 2:50 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 3:59 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 8:15 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 9:11 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 9:11 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 10:20 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 3/5/2015 11:29 Heavy Snow 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 12/7/2017 9:00 Winter Weather 0 0 $0 $0 Collin (Zone) 2/11/2018 10:00 Winter Weather 0 0 $0 $0 Totals: 1 0 $2,790,000 $0 Source: National Centers for Environmental Information The annualized losses due to winter storm events were calculated using the methodology described previously. The annualized loss value can be interpreted as the impact expected from winter storm in terms of annualized human losses and human injuries, and annualized property losses. As observed in Table 3.18, Collin County can expect in average an annual $116,250 in property losses, with no injuries, 0.04 fatalities, and no crop losses from winter storm events. Page 227 Item 10. Page | 169 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The geographical occurrence of winter storm events is widespread; therefore, the area of potential impacts corresponds to all Collin County’s territory. According to the recorded historical information, winter storm events impact property. Because of the regional character of this hazard event, all improved property, emergency and critical facilities, and critical structures are exposed to this hazard. In compliance to Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii), vulnerability to winter storm events and impacts to assets expected from this event can be summarized as follows: • Population: Based on historical data, winter storm events can be expected to cause an average of zero injuries and 0.04 fatalities per year in Collin County. All the population of Collin County is exposed to this hazard. • Improved Property: Based on historical data, an average loss of $116,250 per year in property losses are expected to result from winter storm events in Collin County. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in Collin County. • Emergency Facilities: Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all existing and future emergency facilities in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. • Critical Facilities: Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all existing and future critical facilities in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. • Critical Infrastructure: Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all existing and future critical infrastructures in Collin County are exposed to this hazard. Information needed to fulfill Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii)(c), which addresses land uses and development trends was unattainable during the preparation of this hazard mitigation plan. Compliance with this requirement will be an objective in the five-year planning cycle. Page 228 Item 10. Page | 170 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3.6 Qualitative Analysis In compliance to Requirement 201.6(c)(2)(ii) a qualitative analysis was made for three of the hazards representing low risk to Collin County: Dam Failure, Earthquake, and Expansive Soil. Because historical and geographical data regarding these events is unattainable for quantitative analysis at the present time, a qualitative analysis is in order. Quantitative analyses for these hazards will be an objective in the five- year planning cycle update, should information become available. Dam Failure The probability of occurrence for dam and/or levee events in Collin County is likely. There is no record of a dam failing in Collin County; therefore, there is a lack of information regarding this hazard and quantitative predictions are not available at the present time. A study is needed to gather more inundation information. All five categories, population, improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, and critical infrastructure are considered vulnerable to damage caused by dam and/or levee failure. According to the Priority Risk Index analysis presented in section 3.3, any estimated losses associated with this hazard are anticipated to be of moderate to no risk across Collin County. Based on data from the participating jurisdictions a total of 153 dams are located in Collin County (Table 3.19). Table 3.19 Dams located in Collin County and Participating Jurisdictions Jurisdiction Number of Dams Dam Classification High Significant Low Collin County 153 59 9 85 Total 153 59 9 85 Source: National Inventory of Dams The Hazard Mitigation Planning Team provided a list of high hazard dams located in Collin County. (Table 3.19). Table 3.20 High Hazard Dams Jurisdiction Dam Name Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 32A DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 1C DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 3A DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 8A DAM Collin County LAVON LAKE Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 5A DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 10 DAM Collin County LITTLE ELM AND LATERALS WS SCS SITE 18A DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 33 DAM Collin County ROWLETT CREEK WS SCS SITE 5 DAM Collin County PILOT GROVE CREEK WS SCS SITE 83A DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 3C DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 4 DAM Page 229 Item 10. Page | 171 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Jurisdiction Dam Name Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 11 DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 9 DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 30 DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 2B DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 1A DAM Collin County WILLOW BEND LAKE NO 1 DAM Collin County PILOT GROVE CREEK WS SCS SITE 82 DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 8G DAM Collin County PILOT GROVE CREEK WS SCS SITE 80 DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 16 DAM Collin County UPPER EAST FK LATERALS WS SCS SITE 2 DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 3B DAM Collin County ROWLETT CREEK WS SCS SITE 7 DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 12 DAM Collin County PILOT GROVE CREEK WS SCS SITE 28 DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 3E DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 31 DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 14 DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 3D DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 17 DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 15 DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 2A DAM Collin County EAST FORK ABOVE LAVON WS SCS SITE 32 DAM Collin County ROWLETT CREEK WS SCS SITE 4 DAM Collin County PILOT GROVE CREEK WS SCS SITE 79 DAM Collin County STONEBRIDGE LAKE F 3 DAM Collin County STONEBRIDGE LAKE F 4 DAM Collin County STONEBRIDGE LAKE F 2 DAM Collin County STONEBRIDGE LAKE 13 DAM Collin County STONEBRIDGE LAKE 11 D DAM Collin County STONEBRIDGE LAKE 12 DAM Collin County PRESTONWOOD WEST DAM Collin County STONEBRIDGE LAKE 11 A DAM Collin County STONEBRIDGE LAKE B DAM Collin County STONEBRIDGE LAKE F 1 DAM Collin County SISTER GROVE CREEK WS SCS SITE 38 DAM Collin County LAGO GRANDE DAM Collin County SISTER GROVE CREEK WS SCS SITE 3 DAM Collin County WILLOW BEND LAKE NO 2 DAM Collin County ROACH TRACT LOWER DAM Page 230 Item 10. Page | 172 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Jurisdiction Dam Name Collin County ROACH TRACT DAM Collin County STONEBRIDGE LAKE A DAM Collin County LAKE LACIMA DAM Collin County GLENEAGLES DAM D6 Collin County STONEBRIDGE LAKE C DAM Collin County CARTER RANCH DAM Source: National Inventory of Dams Earthquake The probability of occurrence for an earthquake event in Collin County is extremely low. Due to unattainable information regarding this hazard, quantitative predictions are not available at the present time and further study is needed. All five categories, population, improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, and critical infrastructure are considered vulnerable to damage caused by an earthquake. According to the Priority Risk Index analysis presented in section 3.3 any estimated losses associated with this hazard are anticipated to be of little to no risk across Collin County. Expansive Soils The probability of occurrence for expansive soil events in Collin County is at a low to moderate risk. Damage from expansive soils is difficult to document. Further studies are needed. There have been no documented previous occurrences of expansive soils in Collin County and the jurisdictions participating on this plan, with the exception of Fairview. The documentation of the occurrence can be found in Annex F. Population is not considered vulnerable to damage caused by expansive soils; therefore, any estimated population losses associated with this hazard are anticipated to be minimal across Collin County. Improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, and critical Infrastructures are more vulnerable to this event. Collin County is located in an area which contains abundant clay with high swelling potential. According to the Priority Risk Index analysis, impacts from expansive soils have a low to moderate risk of creating a hazard that could cause damage to highways, streets, as well as other structures 3.7 Summary Table 3.21 provides a summary of annualized losses for each of the nine hazard events for which the quantitative analysis (Geographic Information System and/or statistical) was conducted. Table 3.22 summarizes the qualitative analysis conducted on the remaining three hazard events. Hurricane/Tropical Storm, Land Subsidence, and Coastal Erosion are not listed due to lack of impact. Table 3.21 Annualized Losses Expected from Hazards Analyzed using a Quantitative Analysis Page 231 Item 10. Page | 173 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hazard Event Annualized Expected Fatalities Annualized Expected Injuries Annualized Expected Property Losses Annualized Expected Crop Loss Annualized Expected Crop Loss per Acre Drought 0 0 $21,208.33 $58,916.67 $0.25 Extreme Heat 0.17 0 $0 $0 $0 Flood 0 0 $15,166.67 $0 $0 Hail 0 0 $25,204,914.29 $0 $0 High Wind 0.06 0.29 $61,328.57 $71.43 $0 Lightning 0 0.06 $440,000 $0 $0 Tornado 0.07 2.79 $290,457.14 $0 $0 Wildfire 0.04 0 $2,791.67 $100 $0.01 Winter Storm 0.04 0 $116,250 $0 $0 Table 3.22 Summary of Qualitative Analysis Hazard Event Probability of Occurrence According to the Priority Risk Index Vulnerable Categories Population Property Damage Emergency Facilities Critical Facilities Critical Infrastructures Dam Failure Moderate to No Risk √ √ √ √ √ Earthquake Low to No Risk √ √ √ √ √ Expansive Soils Negligible to No Risk √ √ √ √ Page 232 Item 10. Page | 174 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Chapter Four: 2016 Plan Action Items 4.1 Unincorporated Collin County Action Items: 2016 Plan Collin County Action Item Adopt and promote a comprehensive public education program that provides resources to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department Homeland Security Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions employed, can reduce the damage from multiple hazards to existing buildings. Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions implements, can reduce damages from multiple hazards to new buildings. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion This program will include discussion about mitigation projects for all identified hazards and what mitigation actions can be taken. Status Some work performed in this area using regional resources along with utilizing general fund dollars from Collin County. Collin County Action Item Develop and implement building codes to mitigate against structural damages caused by drought, high winds and tornado. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Low Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Funding Lead Department Collin County Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings If retrofitted, could mitigate damages to old buildings. Effect on New Buildings This action can reduce the effects of drought, tornadoes, and high winds on new buildings. Cost Effectiveness The cost of this project is low compared to the potential benefits of reducing the effects of drought. Discussion During times of drought, earth experiences significant changes that often impact structural foundations. Building codes can mitigate these effects through mandatory use of new technologies such as resource- efficient (low-flow) plumbing for drought and water conservation. Roof bracing requirements for new construction will mitigate damages from tornado and high Winds. Status Collin County utilizes adopted building codes. Page 233 Item 10. Page | 175 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Collin County Action Item Expand water conservation measures to new developments and populations Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings May require low-flow retrofits and soil stabilization through landscaping for existing foundations to reduce effects of drought. Effect on New Buildings May require low-flow plumbing installations during construction, foundation protection through alternate landscaping to reduce effects of drought. Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Work with local water suppliers and building developers to expand water conservation measures in new areas of development, to include reduced taps and drought resistant landscaping. Status Deferred, but rely heavily on local water districts to educate and implement needed programs. Additionally, added water systems have been brought online along with new systems being constructed as of 2021. Collin County Action Item Implement Community Tornado Safe Room Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Local Funds Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, Donations, In-Kind Match, Resident Match Lead Department Fire Marshal/Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Existing building may be retrofitted for community safe room installation. Effect on New Buildings New buildings may include construction of safe rooms for the community. Cost Effectiveness Community and residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Implement Local Community Tornado Safe Room Program in Identified Vulnerable Areas. Page 234 Item 10. Page | 176 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Collin County residents were able to apply, and some received, grant funding through the North Central Texas Council of Government (NCTCOG) Saferoom Rebate Program. This program provided funding for saferooms through December 2020, when it was ended. Collin County Action Item Develop and Implement a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources Texas A&M Forest Service and USDA Grants Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Marshal Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Can prevent serious damages to or loss of existing buildings due to wildfire. Effect on New Buildings Can prevent serious damages to or loss of new buildings due to wildfire. Cost Effectiveness CWPPs identify where wildfire mitigation efforts would be most effective. Discussion Identify wildland urban interface areas that would benefit from mitigation actions. Based on the individual variables of each area, actions such as fuel management, or defensible space development could be implemented. Status Deferred – no actions Collin County Action Item Implement Firewise mitigation programs in unincorporated Collin County. Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources USDA and Texas A&M Forest Service Grants Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Marshal Implementation Schedule 1-4 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Cost Effectiveness Cost low compared to potential loss of life and property to wildfire. Discussion Firewise communities experience fewer losses to wildfire than communities without the program. Status Deferred – no actions Page 235 Item 10. Page | 177 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Collin County Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that identifies locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources. Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials. Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold. Status Places identified during past event, however, additional resources need to be utilized to make this a viable option for residents Collin County Action Item Coordinate and complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones. Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones. Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – most dams are now under the jurisdictions of incorporated cities. Page 236 Item 10. Page | 178 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Collin County Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 4-B, 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes. Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes. Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – no action. Many of the earthquake threats in the region of slowed Collin County Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils. Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 4-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – no action Collin County Action Item Distribute all-hazards NOAA Weather Radios to vulnerable populations. Hazard(s) Addressed 3-C, 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Page 237 Item 10. Page | 179 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Goal/Objective Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 - $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings n/a Effect on New Buildings n/a Cost Effectiveness Cost of lives lost and injuries sustained is very high compared to cost of proactive mitigation. Discussion This project would lead to greater capabilities for vulnerable populations to take mitigation actions prior to and in the event of all hazards. Status Deferred – no action Page 238 Item 10. Page | 180 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan This page intentionally left blank. Page 239 Item 10. Page | 181 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.2 City of Allen Action Items: 2016 Plan City of Allen Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other hazards and civil emergencies. Status Cancelled – No longer a viable action item City of Allen Action Item Develop and establish extreme temperature plan including cooling and heating shelters for vulnerable residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Emergency Management, CERT Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings May require retrofit to accommodate new designs, resources needed Effect on New Buildings Will make new buildings safer for vulnerable populations Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of reduced injury and death related to extreme temperature. Page 240 Item 10. Page | 182 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Developing an extreme temperature program that identifies both public and private safe locations for vulnerable residents to go during periods of extreme temperatures would reduce levels of injury and death in this segment of the population. Status Cancelled – No longer a viable action item City of Allen Action Item Adopt and promote a comprehensive public education program, including information about mitigation projects. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, High Wind, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Winter Storms, Flooding, Hail, Expansive Soils, Dam Failure, Earthquake Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $15,000 Potential Funding Sources General fund, HMGP, PDM, other state/federal grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds, citizen cost-share, donations Lead Department Emergency Management, CERT Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits and other actions Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is an extremely effective low cost method. Discussion Adopt and promote a comprehensive public education program based on the hazards identified in this annex, including information on mitigation projects. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Allen Action Item Expand outdoor warning sirens to cover new populations Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, High Wind, Tornado , Dam Failure, Lightning Goal/Objective 1-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $35,000 each Potential Funding Sources General fund, HMGP, PDM, other state/federal grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency Management Page 241 Item 10. Page | 183 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings May require siren tower construction on existing buildings Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Cost of implementation is low compared to the benefits of reduced injury and death related to tornados. Discussion Replacement of old or damaged warning sirens and expanding coverage to new populations is a proactive approach to mitigating the effects of severe weather and prevent loss of life by providing advanced warning to citizens. Status Cancelled – No longer a viable action item City of Allen Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Cancelled – No longer a viable action item City of Allen Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Page 242 Item 10. Page | 184 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for earthquake damage Effect on New Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for earthquake damage Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Cancelled – No longer a viable action item City of Allen Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Cancelled – No longer a viable action item Allen Action Item Improve construction standards and techniques through requiring, by ordinance, builders to utilize water saving plumbing and fixtures in new construction. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 2-C Page 243 Item 10. Page | 185 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Priority High Estimated Cost $2,000-3,000 Potential Funding Sources Local budget, Builders. Lead Department Building Department Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings No effect unless retrofitted Effect on New Buildings Reduced water consumption Cost Effectiveness Cost is very low compared to water shortages. Discussion This project would require low-flow plumbing and fixtures in all new construction, mitigating the effects of drought. Status Cancelled – No longer a viable action item Page 244 Item 10. Page | 186 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.3 City of Anna Action Items: 2016 Plan City of Anna Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program, including hazard mitigation activities. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Expansive Soil, Extreme Heat, Hail, Lightning, Flooding, Earthquake Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits and other actions. Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion This public education program would be based on the hazards that the City of Anna identified as being vulnerable to. The program would use a combination of distributed literature, social media, and civic presentations to educate residents on natural hazards and promote hazard mitigation. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Anna Action Item Establish centers for vulnerable residents to go for relief during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost Current staffing project time/resources Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate space and resources. Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials. Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling and heating shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold. Page 245 Item 10. Page | 187 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Anna Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures. Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures. Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion This program gives rebates to residents who purchase and install safe rooms in their homes or on their properties to protect against severe weather. Status Will be included in 2021, however, come residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program City of Anna Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Hail, Lightning, Flooding Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 per siren, number of sirens TBD Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1—2 years Effect on Old Buildings May entail adding a siren tower to existing buildings. Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. Discussion This project will expand the City of Anna’s siren coverage to new areas of development not currently protect by sirens. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Anna Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Page 246 Item 10. Page | 188 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones. Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones. Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Anna Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Anna Action Item Develop a drought contingency plan. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Page 247 Item 10. Page | 189 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results may entail retrofits for low-flow plumbing. Effect on New Buildings Results may require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundations. Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. Status Plan developed and will be continued to be modified updated to meet the City’s needs City of Anna Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results could define required retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes. Effect on New Buildings Results could require updated codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes. Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Anna Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils. Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Page 248 Item 10. Page | 190 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Anna Action Item Purchase and distribute NOAA Weather Radios to vulnerable residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on any mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages. Effect on New Buildings Depending on any mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages. Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 249 Item 10. Page | 191 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.4 City of Blue Ridge Action Items: 2016 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program, including resources to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds, Winter Storm, Wildfire, Drought, Hail, Flooding, Lightning, Extreme Heat, Expansive Soils, Dam Failure, Earthquake Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion Develop and distribute, via social media, information about mitigating the hazards identified and what actions can be taken in this annex Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Blue Ridge Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that establishes centers for vulnerable residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost Current staffing project time/resources Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Page 250 Item 10. Page | 192 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Develop and Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Winds, Tornado, Hail Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Status Deferred – Residents did received funding through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program. The NCTCOG Program has been suspended City of Blue Ridge Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed High W inds, Tornado, Wildfire, Hail, Lightning, Flooding Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Page 251 Item 10. Page | 193 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. Discussion The City of Blue Ridge will expand its current siren program into newly developed areas of the jurisdiction that are currently outside of siren coverage. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Develop and implement a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Page 252 Item 10. Page | 194 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire and implement mitigation actions to reduce vulnerability. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Develop and implement a drought contingency plan that will implement water mandatory water conservation measures. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings Results may require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage and mandatory water restrictions for water conservation. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Page 253 Item 10. Page | 195 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results would help identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Page 254 Item 10. Page | 196 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 255 Item 10. Page | 197 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.5 City of Celina Action Items: 2016 Plan City of Celina Action Item Purchase and utilize mobile back-up generator Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding, Tornado, Earthquake, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Wildfire, Winter Storms, Dam Failure, Hail, High Winds Goal/Objective 2-D Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000 - $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Funding Potential Matching Sources Local Funding Lead Department Public Works, OEM Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Some buildings will need to be retrofit with ability to connect with generator Effect on New Buildings Buildings will need to be planned with the ability to connect to generator Cost Effectiveness Backup generator will prevent loss of power and data to critical government buildings Discussion Introduction of a mobile back-up generator will allow the City of Celina or other critical facilities to function as close to normal as possible in the event of a massive power loss. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Celina Action Item Develop and implement a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. Page 256 Item 10. Page | 198 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Celina Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Celina Action Item Implement all-hazards community education program, including information on mitigation activities. Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding, Tornado, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Wildfire, Winter Storms, Dam Failure, Hail, High Winds, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority High Estimated Cost $1,000 - $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local funding Potential Matching Sources Local grants, FEMA Lead Department OEM Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Page 257 Item 10. Page | 199 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Educating public on mitigation against loss of life and property will save government resources in the event of a disaster event Discussion Community education is important for reducing loss of life and property. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Celina Action Item Analyze needs, develop and implement water conservation measures for new populations Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C Priority High Estimated Cost $1,000 - $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local funding Potential Matching Sources Local grants, citizen match Lead Department Public Works, OEM Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings New constraints will be placed on water usage without compromising soil integrity. Effect on New Buildings New constraints will be placed on water usage without compromising soil integrity. Cost Effectiveness Expanded water and soil consistency standards will help the city of Celina plan for a boost in infrastructure and population and help maintain normal water levels Discussion As the City of Celina grows water conservation measures will encompass new infrastructure and residential/commercial areas. This plan implements conservation efforts that also maintain soil consistency, mitigating damage from expansive soils. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Celina Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Page 258 Item 10. Page | 200 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Celina Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results would identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Celina Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost TBD Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Page 259 Item 10. Page | 201 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 260 Item 10. Page | 202 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.6 Town of Fairview Action Items: 2016 Plan Town of Fairview Action Item Implement all-hazards public education program, including hazard mitigation activities for each identified hazard Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 3-B, 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources Local Grants Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public Education is extremely effective for low cost Discussion The Town of Fairview will implement an all-hazards comprehensive public education program based on the hazards identified in this annex and what actions can be taken to mitigate impacts. This program will use a variety of means for distributing information, including social media, printed literature, and presentations to civic groups. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Town of Fairview Action Item Implement tornado safe room education program Hazard(s) Addressed High Winds, Tornados Goal/Objective 1-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $500 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources Local Grants/FEMA Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Retrofit will be required on some structures Page 261 Item 10. Page | 203 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Moderate to high depending on level of acceptance Discussion Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease the likelihood of personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornado or hail events. Status Will be included in 2021, however, come residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program Town of Fairview Action Item Implement and actively promote Nixle Notification alert system. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B, 3-B, 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $1,500 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources Local Grants/FEMA Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warnings will assist in saving lives for no cost. Discussion Weather/all-hazards notifications are a proven means to alert and warn citizens about severe weather conditions as well as other emergency and hazard information. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Fairview Action Item Update and enforce water conservation measures and implement public education outreach Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C, 3-C Priority Medium/Low Estimated Cost $1000 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources North Texas Municipal Water District Page 262 Item 10. Page | 204 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department Public Works, Code Enforcement Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Water conservations measures would stabilize soils, mitigating damage to existing structures. Effect on New Buildings Water conservations measures would stabilize soils, mitigating damage to new structures. Cost Effectiveness Low-cost effort for increasing awareness of water restrictions. Discussion Town of Fairview will review water conservation measures and update as necessary. These conservation efforts regulate water used for maintaining soil consistency. Updates will be communicated to the public. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Fairview Action Item Develop and implement regulations for the construction of town buildings deemed “critical infrastructure”. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-C, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E Priority Medium/Low Estimated Cost $5000 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources NCTCOG/FEMA Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings May involve cascading retrofits Effect on New Buildings Strengthening construction requirements for new critical infrastructure will result in greater resiliency to hazards Cost Effectiveness Moderate to High. Discussion Town will develop and implement construction design regulations for new Critical Infrastructure, as defined by the EMC. Regulations would include elevating structures, reinforcing doors and windows, using flame-retardant, hail and wind resistant external materials, roof bracing, installing higher grade insulation, stabilizing foundations, installing lightning rods, and using low-flow technology for all plumbing. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Fairview Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Page 263 Item 10. Page | 205 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Engineering/ NRCS Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Fairview Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed Earthquake Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results would identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 264 Item 10. Page | 206 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.7 Town of Farmersville Action Items: 2016 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Develop and Implement a Comprehensive Public Education Program to Mitigate the Impacts of Each Identified Hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion Farmersville will develop a program for educating the public on our hazards and effective mitigation activities for each. Program will combine distributed written literature and social media to educate residents on hazards, their dangers, and how to mitigate against them to protect life and property. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Farmersville Action Item Develop and implement water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Page 265 Item 10. Page | 207 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Farmersville will develop stringent regulations/codes for water conservation. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Develop and Implement an Extreme Temperature Program Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Developing heating and cooling shelters as part of an extreme temperature program would allow threatened residents to reduce their vulnerability to extreme temperature hazards. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C, 2-D Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Page 266 Item 10. Page | 208 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion By implementing its own program separate of that run by the North Central Texas COG, Farmersville would be able to directly target its residents for storm shelter rebates, ensuring their lives and property are protected against High Winds, Tornado, and Hail Status Will be included in 2021, however, come residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program City of Farmersville Action Item Purchase and install outdoor warning sirens to increase coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Hail, Lightning, Flooding Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 per siren Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, user fees Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Could entail tower construction on existing buildings Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness High. Early warning is a key element in outdoor safety Discussion Installing sirens in areas of new development, Farmersville can ensure long-term reduction of vulnerability to life and personal property. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Page 267 Item 10. Page | 209 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion A CWPP would identify locations in Farmersville that are vulnerable to wildfire. These locations might include critical facilities, critical infrastructure, or other properties that are vital to the interests of Farmersville. By identifying these locations, targeted preparedness and response measures can be implemented. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Page 268 Item 10. Page | 210 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results would identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Page 269 Item 10. Page | 211 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 270 Item 10. Page | 212 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.8 City of Frisco Action Items: 2016 Plan City of Frisco Action Item Expanding the Early Warning Sirens and Local Warning System to notify new populations of impending severe weather or imminent hazards to reduce the loss of life and mitigate the effects of the hazards. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, hail, high winds, lightning, wildfire Goal/Objective 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $40,000 - $50,000 each siren / total to be determined Potential Funding Sources City of Frisco annual budget, HMGP Lead Department Fire Department Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Outdoor warning sirens do not have an impact on structures; they are designed to be heard outdoors only. Effect on New Buildings The outdoor warning sirens do not have an impact on structures; they are designed to be heard outdoors only. Cost Effectiveness The costs associated with maintaining an outdoor warning system are minimal and less expensive than total replacement of an outdoor warning system. Discussion The outdoor warning siren system is the most effective tool for outdoor notification, especially as relative to the fact that Frisco has many outdoor parks, trails, and nature areas that are used by citizens. City of Frisco Action Item Implement the Texas Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Locally Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 1-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost 50% of cost (up to) $3,000 per shelter. Number of shelters to be determined Potential Funding Sources County Budget, HMGP, PDM, Homeowner, Work-in-kind Lead Department Building Inspections Department, Emergency Management, HMC Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings This action will improve the safety of existing homes with either in- ground or in-house shelters. Effect on New Buildings This action will improve the safety of new homes with either in-ground or in-house shelters. Cost Effectiveness The cost of this project is low compared to the potential benefits of reduction in personal injuries and/or deaths. Discussion Residential safe room sheltering can decrease potential personal injuries or deaths in the event of a tornado. Page 271 Item 10. Page | 213 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.9 City of Josephine Action Items: 2016 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion This public education program would be based on the hazards that the City of Josephine identified. The program would use a combination of distributed literature, social media, and civic presentations to educate residents on natural hazards and promote hazard mitigation. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Josephine Action Item Identify and establish heating and cooling centers for vulnerable populations Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Page 272 Item 10. Page | 214 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Establishing heat and cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat and cold Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion This program gives rebates to residents who purchase and install safe rooms in their homes or on their properties to protect against severe weather. Status Deferred – Residents did received funding through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program. The NCTCOG Program has been suspended City of Josephine Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Hail, Flooding, Lightning Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 per siren. Number of sirens TBD. Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Page 273 Item 10. Page | 215 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. Discussion This project will expand Josephine’s siren coverage to new areas of development not currently protect by sirens. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Develop and implement a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Page 274 Item 10. Page | 216 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion A CWPP will Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire, and identify potential targeted mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Develop, adopt, and enforce water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion City of Josephine will develop, adopt, and enforce water conservation ordinances, codes, and other regulatory measures to conserve water during times of drought. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Page 275 Item 10. Page | 217 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost TBD Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Page 276 Item 10. Page | 218 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan . Page 277 Item 10. Page | 219 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.10 City of Lavon Action Items: 2016 Plan Lavon Action Item Establish an AM radio station to broadcast weather conditions, hazards and road closures. Also will allow for broadcast of watches, warnings, evacuation routes, shelter information, and mitigation information. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources City Budget, Grant Programs Lead Department City Manager’s Office Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness This project’s cost effectiveness is in the lives it saves by alerting citizens to take shelter during extreme weather conditions. Discussion The AM Radio Station will reduce the threats to the citizens by alerting them to impending severe weather and warn citizens to seek appropriate shelter inside. Status Deferred – included in 2021 Action Items Lavon Action Item Reduce the impact of Severe Heat by utilizing Green Landscaping Roofing on all new city construction. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat Goal/Objective 2-B, 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources Local funding, HMGP Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings No effect Effect on New Buildings The green landscaping will reduce overall effect of extreme heat on buildings, making cooling more efficient and reducing the use of electricity as well as reducing the effects of extreme summer heat on the citizens. Cost Effectiveness This project is cost effective in the reduction of hazards to citizens as well as the reduced power and electricity requirements for cooling buildings in summer heat. Discussion By utilizing landscaping on the roofs several significant benefits will be utilized. Including, insulation in the facility reducing the need for electricity, reducing the impact of extreme heat on the residents. Page 278 Item 10. Page | 220 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Deferred – included in 2021 Action Items Lavon Action Item Develop and implement a Master Storm Water Drainage Plan for the City. Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-E Priority High Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources City Budget, Grant Programs Lead Department Department of Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Improved planning reduces potential flooding impacts Effect on New Buildings Mitigates flooding impacts Cost Effectiveness This project is extremely cost effective when compared to the property and agriculture/crop damage that will be avoided once the Master Storm Drainage plan enactment begins. Discussion There is currently no Master Storm Drainage Plan. By preparing and implementing this plan, it will reduce the occurrence of flash flooding and sudden inundation of areas. It will improve transportation during severe weather. Reduce vulnerabilities to those homeowners who are located in areas outside of flood zones but vulnerable to overflow flooding. And eliminate the rerouting of storm water to unattended areas. Status Deferred – included in 2021 Action Items Lavon Action Item Implement Building Codes requiring New Commercial Facilities to utilize Hail Resistant Roofing Materials. Hazard(s) Addressed Hail Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, Local budget Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Hail resistant roofing and window coverings will significantly mitigate the potential hazards of property damage as well as possible personal injury due to severe storm and hail. Effect on New Buildings Reduce impacts of hail on new structures Cost Effectiveness The cost effectiveness of the project will be the reduction of damage to property as well as reducing the need for debris disposal after a storm. Page 279 Item 10. Page | 221 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion The City of Lavon will enact codes for new development and city construction by requiring developers to install hail resistant roofing and window coverings, thus reducing the effect of severe weather and damage. Status Deferred – included in 2021 Action Items Lavon Action Item Retrofit an existing structure or construct a new City Hall built to withstand an EF2 Tornado. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000,000 Potential Funding Sources City Budget, Grant Programs Lead Department Department of Public Works Implementation Schedule 3-5 years Effect on Old Buildings No effect on existing buildings unless retrofit Effect on New Buildings This would affect the new City Hall building, making it able to withstand an EF2 tornado, mitigating the loss of such critical infrastructure. Cost Effectiveness This project is cost effective because the current City Hall building is manufactured and will not withstand an EF2 tornado. City Hall houses many functions, documents, and records, and the potential loss of those greatly outweighs the cost of a new hardened structure. Discussion The current City Hall houses Administration, Clerical, Secretary, Devel. Services, Marshal Office, Council Court, PW and all the records are housed. The City Hall facility is currently two manufactured modular trailer buildings. The construction or retrofit of the new City Hall should include a hardened infrastructure to withstand known hazard extent levels. Status Deferred – included in 2021 Action Items Lavon Action Item Retrofit an existing structure or construct a new Public Works office and shop built to withstand a EF2 Tornado Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources City Budget, Grant Programs Lead Department Department of Public Works Implementation Schedule 2-4 years Effect on Old Buildings No effect on existing buildings unless retrofit Page 280 Item 10. Page | 222 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings This would affect the new Public Works office and shop buildings, making them able to withstand an EF2 tornado, mitigating the loss of such critical infrastructure. Cost Effectiveness This project is cost effective because the current Public Works buildings are manufactured and will not withstand an EF2 tornado. These buildings house many functions, documents, and records, and the potential loss of those greatly outweighs the cost of a new hardened structure. Discussion The current Public Works office and shop contain all document and vital records. The offices are currently manufactured modular trailer buildings, and these would not withstand an EF2 tornado. In order to mitigate the effects of that hazard, the retrofit or construction of the new Public Works office and shop should include a hardened infrastructure to withstand known hazard extent levels. Status Deferred – included in 2021 Action Items Lavon Action Item Implement a program to inspect and clear excessive brush along high- voltage power lines and surrounding land, reducing the vulnerability to citizens located in potential wildland fire areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Wildland Fire Goal/Objective 2-C Priority High Estimated Cost $500,000/year Potential Funding Sources Local funding, HMGP Lead Department Public Works, Fire Department Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings This would mitigate the effects of wildland fire encroaching upon built up areas for existing construction. Effect on New Buildings This would mitigate the effects of wildland fire encroaching upon built up areas for new structures. Cost Effectiveness This project’s cost effectiveness is seen in the management of wildland fire fuels to significantly reduce the damage or loss of buildings, structures, agriculture products, or homes to wildland fire. Discussion Currently the City of Lavon is susceptible to wildland due to the large amounts of family owned and un-maintained land along with the large farming industry. With the clearing of brush around high power voltage lines and surrounding land, this will create a fire break, greatly reducing the hazard and risks associated with possible ignition sources of wildland fire. Status Deferred – included in 2021 Action Items Lavon Action Item Develop and implement a community awareness program utilizing the City’s existing communication outlets including the website and newsletter in order to mitigate the effects of wildland fire. Hazard(s) Addressed Wildland Fire Page 281 Item 10. Page | 223 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority High Estimated Cost $7,000-$10,000 Potential Funding Sources City Budget Lead Department Development Services Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings This will greatly mitigate the effect of wildland fire on all buildings by increasing mitigation actions through public awareness and education campaigns, especially during periods of low rain and high heat. Effect on New Buildings This will greatly mitigate the effect of wildland fire on all buildings by increasing mitigation actions through public awareness and education campaigns, especially during periods of low rain and high heat. Cost Effectiveness This project is cost effective when compared to property damage, crop consumption, and potential loss of life that can be attributed to the hazards of wildland fire. Discussion The City of Lavon is highly susceptible to the dangers posed by wildland fire. By educating the public, they will be more aware of conditions, hazard assessment, and any applicable codes or burn ban enforcements applied by the city. This will mitigate the hazards associated with wildland fire. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 282 Item 10. Page | 224 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.11 City of Lowry Crossing Action Items: 2016 Plan Lowry Crossing Action Item Implement Hazard Mitigation Education Series to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 2A, 2B, 2C Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources FEMA Potential Matching Sources N/A Lead Department City Administration Implementation Schedule 0 – 24 Months Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Will be instrumental in planning and correction. Discussion In FY2022 Lowry Crossing is partnering with NCTCOG on a flood study of 17 miles of tributary within the city. Status Continue - Received supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Lowry Crossing Action Item Implement Storm Shelter/Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High W inds Goal/Objective 1B Priority High Estimated Cost $3000/safe room Potential Funding Sources Federal Grants Potential Matching Sources NCTCOG Lead Department City Administration Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Existing construction could have safe room added Effect on New Buildings New building could be constructed with safe rooms Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind. Discussion Develop list of storm shelter and safe rooms for emergency personnel to check safety of inhabitants. Page 283 Item 10. Page | 225 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Continue - Will be included in 2021, however, some residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program Lowry Crossing Action Item Develop and adopt a drought contingency plan. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 3A, 3B, 3C Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Funds Potential Matching Sources Lead Department City Administration Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Very low cost to ensure benefit of saving water for future generations. Discussion Drought contingency plan will limit water usage based on drought conditions. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Lowry Crossing Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that establishes heating and cooling centers for vulnerable residents Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-A, 2-D, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Page 284 Item 10. Page | 226 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Lowry Crossing Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS Implementation Schedule 12-18 Months Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Lowry Crossing Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 4-B Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 6 months – 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Page 285 Item 10. Page | 227 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Lowry Crossing Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 4-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Lowry Crossing Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Page 286 Item 10. Page | 228 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 287 Item 10. Page | 229 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.12 City of Lucas Action Item: 2016 Plan City of Lucas Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management with assistance from Collin County and the Texas A&M Forest Service. Implementation Schedule 18-36 Months Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show officials where to focus their efforts in preventing wildfire. Saving lives and protecting property is cost effective in the long-run. Discussion This project will become needed as the population in the Wildland Urban Interface area increases. This plan will protect life and property. Status Not yet started. City of Lucas Action Item Develop a wildfire and drought education program for residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000.00 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management with assistance from the Texas A&M Forest Service Implementation Schedule 0-12 months Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing buildings to wildfire and drought through resident education and behavior. Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new buildings to wildfire and drought through resident education and behavior. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion Residents will be educated on mitigation actions to protect their lives and property from wildfire and drought. Residents will be provided Page 288 Item 10. Page | 230 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan with supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2Do Program. Status Not yet started. The City will request supplies and materials from the NCTCOG when a plan for education and distribution has been determined. City of Lucas Action Item Develop an extreme heat education program for residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing buildings to extreme heat through resident education and behavior. Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new buildings to extreme heat through resident education and behavior. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion Residents will be educated on mitigation actions to protect their lives and property from extreme heat. Residents will be provided with supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2Do Program. Status Not yet started. The City will request supplies and materials from the NCTCOG when a plan for education and distribution has been determined. City of Lucas Action Item Develop a winter weather/storm education program for residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Winter Storms Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing buildings to winter weather/storms through resident education and behavior. Page 289 Item 10. Page | 231 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new buildings to winter weather/storms through resident education and behavior. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion Residents will be educated on mitigation actions to protect their lives and property from winter weather/storms. Residents will be provided with supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2Do Program Status Not yet started. The City will request supplies and materials from the NCTCOG when a plan for education and distribution has been determined. City of Lucas Action Item Develop a Large Animal Rescue Plan and educate residents on actions to mitigate impact to large animals from severe weather and natural disasters. Hazard(s) Addressed Flood, Tornado, Winter Storm, Wildfire Goal/Objective 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue Implementation Schedule 18-36 months Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion This project will help Lucas Fire-Rescue educate owners of large animals about how to mitigate impact to their large animals from severe weather and natural disasters. This plan will also give Lucas Fire-Rescue the plans and directions on rescuing large animals around the City during disaster. Status Not yet started. City of Lucas Action Item Implement stricter building codes and standards to mitigate the impacts of hazards to buildings around the City. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 - $15,000 Page 290 Item 10. Page | 232 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Funding Sources Local Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Planning and Zoning, Code Enforcement, Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Old buildings would be retrofitted to meet current or updated building code standards. Effect on New Buildings New buildings would be constructed to meet current or updated building code standards. Cost Effectiveness This is cost effective because it will protect life and property from future disasters. Discussion Updated and current building code standards will be continuously implemented in the City through retrofits to old buildings and initial construction to new buildings. Status The City of Lucas has adopted current building code and will continue to adopt the most current building codes. This action item will be included in future HazMAP updates. City of Lucas Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed Earthquake Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Public Works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce the vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low. Discussion Study results will identify information to determine mitigation projects Status No longer a relevant action item to the City of Lucas. This item will not be included as a 2021 Action Item. Page 291 Item 10. Page | 233 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Lucas Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils. Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants and/or state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency Management, Public Works, Planning and Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. This soil analysis will protect life and property. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Not yet started. City of Lucas Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Emergency Management, Planning and Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Page 292 Item 10. Page | 234 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status No longer a relevant action item to the City of Lucas. This item will not be included as a 2021 Action Item. Page 293 Item 10. Page | 235 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.13 City of Melissa Action Item: 2016 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Adopt and promote public education program to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 9-12 months Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion Program will include information on hazard mitigation and what actions can be taken to reduce impacts on people and property. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Melissa Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 9-12 months Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in the safety of citizens who are outdoors Page 294 Item 10. Page | 236 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Outdoor warning sirens help prevent loss of life during severe storms. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that identifies both safe locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost Current staffing project time/resources Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings May require retrofit Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 12 to 24 months Effect on Old Buildings Retrofit will increase life safety Effect on New Buildings Will add additional protection to reduce injury and loss of life Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Page 295 Item 10. Page | 237 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Residential safe room programs help prevent loss of life during tornado or severe storm. Status Deferred – Residents did received funding through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program. The NCTCOG Program has been suspended City of Melissa Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Page 296 Item 10. Page | 238 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 18 – 36 months Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Develop and implement mandatory water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Page 297 Item 10. Page | 239 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Promote water conservation throughout the county and work with local water supplies to increase public education on drought. Develop and implement mandatory water restrictions for water conservation. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost TBD Page 298 Item 10. Page | 240 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Page 299 Item 10. Page | 241 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.14 City of Murphy Action Items: 2016 Plan City of Murphy Action Item Increase the percentage of population covered by Outdoor Warning Sirens by relocating one siren and purchasing and installing an additional siren. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds, Hail Goal/Objective 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $38,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department Fire/OEM Implementation Schedule 6-18 months Effect on Old Buildings N/A Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Very cost effective. Quantifying the value of a human life is extremely difficult at best. Discussion The city has four tower sites currently, but has a gap in coverage in some areas. Relocating an existing site and adding one site would allow full coverage for the city and its residents. Status 100% Complete City of Murphy Action Item Obtain portable generators to ensure continuity of operations at critical facilities. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-E Priority High Estimated Cost $7,500 each Potential Funding Sources HGMP, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, In-kind Lead Department Fire Implementation Schedule 3-6 Months Effect on Old Buildings Would require retrofit for generator hookups Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Very cost effective Discussion Natural hazards can create power outages for extended periods of time. Page 300 Item 10. Page | 242 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Not started and no longer a viable action item. Will be removed from Plan City of Murphy Action Item Purchase and Install CASA-WX Weather Radar Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds, Hail Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $2.5 Million Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department Fire/OEM Implementation Schedule 3-6 months Effect on Old Buildings N/A Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Very cost effective. Quantifying the value of a human life is extremely difficult at best. Discussion The Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere (CASA WX) project is a multi‐sector partnership dedicated to engineering revolutionary weather‐sensing networks. The more accurate data will also provide a better means to analyze severe weather post event which can also help in the assessment of damage after a severe weather event. Status No longer a viable project for Murphy, will be removed from Plan on 2021 City of Murphy Action Item Implement the Residential Safe Room Rebate Program locally Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 1-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $3,000 per safe room Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department City Council – City Manager Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Some buildings may be modified for shelter retrofit Effect on New Buildings New home construction would result in safer houses Page 301 Item 10. Page | 243 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness Moderate: Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornados or high winds events. Discussion Support the existing active FEMA 320 safe room rebate program for North Central Texas by helping offset the cost to the resident. Status Will be included in 2021, however, come residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program City of Murphy Action Item Develop and implement seasonal program for identifying and removing tree limbs that threaten infrastructure. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, W ildfire, Winter Storm, High Winds, Lightning Goal/Objective 1-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department Parks Implementation Schedule 3-6 Months Effect on Old Buildings Reduce potential for power line/debris/limb damage to existing buildings during extreme weather Effect on New Buildings Reduce potential for power line/debris/limb damage to new construction during extreme weather Cost Effectiveness Very cost effective in mitigating tree limbs prior to severe weather events. Discussion Severe storms, winter storms, and wildfires damage tree limbs and power lines that damage homes, buildings, vehicles and create power outages when they fall. Roads become impassable due to the obstructions created by the falling limbs and charged power lines as well. The ability to mitigate these overgrowth items and strategically located limbs will lessen the effects of the hazards. Status Completed City of Murphy Action Item Retrofit the existing Emergency Operations Center to harden it against multiple hazards Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 2-B Priority High Estimated Cost $30,000-$150,000 Page 302 Item 10. Page | 244 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, In-kind, Bond Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 12 – 24 months Effect on Old Buildings Existing building would be retrofitted to mitigate against structure- impacting hazards. Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Low cost effectiveness for construction, but very cost effective for ‘command structure’ to remain intact to operate through emergency events Discussion Dry floodproofing ground floor; reinforcing doors and windows; installing flame-retardant, hail and wind resistant external materials (window coatings, roofing); roof bracing; higher grade insulation; foundations stabilizers; lightning rods; soil stabilizing plants, and low- flow plumbing. Status Partially completed and will continue to perform enhancements. Will be included in 2021 Plan. City of Murphy Action Item Replace undersized culverts at five locations. Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-A, 2-E Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $620,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, in-kind, Bonds Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce flooding for existing structures in area Effect on New Buildings Reduce flooding for planned construction in area Cost Effectiveness Very effective for the long term results gained Discussion Providing proper water flow and drainage during times of excessive rains is imperative. Improper water flow results in damage to roads, bridges and property; which may lead to injuries and deaths. These replacements will be for 5 separate projects that have been identified as insufficient. Status Mostly completed and will be included in 2021 Update Page 303 Item 10. Page | 245 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Murphy Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in the 2021 Plan City of Murphy Action Item Drainage channel improvements and additions. Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-A, 2-E Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $3.11 Million Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, in-kind, Bonds Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 12 – 18 Months Effect on Old Buildings Reduce flooding for existing structures in area Effect on New Buildings Reduce flooding for planned construction in area Cost Effectiveness Very effective for the long term results gained Page 304 Item 10. Page | 246 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Providing proper water flow and drainage during times of excessive rains is imperative. Improper water flow results in damage to roads, bridges and property; which may lead to injuries and deaths. These replacements will be for 4 separate projects that have been identified as insufficient. Status Mostly completed and will be included in 2021 Update City of Murphy Action Item Purchase and install lightning detection equipment for city parks Hazard(s) Addressed Lightning Goal/Objective 1-A Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, in-kind Lead Department Public works Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings N/A Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Very cost effective. Quantifying the value of a human life is extremely difficult at best. Discussion The city has two major parks with outdoor sporting event capabilities, pavilions and an amphitheater where multiple events are held throughout the year. Providing a secondary source of severe weather information such as lightning indication could prevent injury or death to one or more of our citizens or guests Status No longer a viable project. Will not be included in the 2021 Plan City of Murphy Action Item Develop and implement a water conservation plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Page 305 Item 10. Page | 247 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and protection of foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Promote water conservation and work with local water supplies to increase mitigation measures for drought. Develop and implement mandatory water restrictions/codes for water conservation measures that address soil stabilization. Status Deferred – will be included in the 2021 Plan Page 306 Item 10. Page | 248 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.15 Town of New Hope Action Items: 2016 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Adopt and promote public education program to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds General fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule Yearly effort Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion The utilization of social media will be key in this program. Program will include educational information about hazard awareness and mitigation. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado/High Winds Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Residents receiving grant Lead Department N/A Implementation Schedule 1-3 Years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance Safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelter potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornados, or high wind events Page 307 Item 10. Page | 249 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Status Will be included in 2021, however, come residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program Town of New Hope Action Item Develop and Implement an extreme temperature program that identifies both locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-A, 2D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, General fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources, including but not limited to emergency generators. Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, General Fund, citizen cost-share Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Page 308 Item 10. Page | 250 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios could be especially useful to provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information to residents without use of their cell phones or access to Internet. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $25,000 per siren Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, General Fund, Developer cost Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 9-12 months Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens notified of hazards. Discussion Obtaining grants will be key to implementation of outdoor warning siren coverage due to high costs and New Hope’s ow fiscal capability assessment scores. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the County. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flooding Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $50,000 Page 309 Item 10. Page | 251 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, General Fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. There are currently no dams located in or immediately surrounding New Hope. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 1-A, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local, General Fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 18 – 36 m onths Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show town officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion With assistance from Collin County Fire Marshall, identify mitigation strategies for all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Develop a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Page 310 Item 10. Page | 252 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Goal/Objective 3-C, 4-B Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local, General Fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and preservation of foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on North Collin Special Utility District recommendations. Use of social media will be key in implementing this plan. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 4-B Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 6 – 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 311 Item 10. Page | 253 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils. Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2A, Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local, General Funds Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Expansive soils are not prevalent in New Hope. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 312 Item 10. Page | 254 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.16 City of Parker Action Items: 2016 Plan City of Parker Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion This public education program would be based on the hazards that the City of Parker identified as being vulnerable to. The program would use a combination of distributed literature, social media, and civic presentations to educate residents on natural hazards and promote hazard mitigation. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Parker Action Item Establish centers for vulnerable residents to mitigate the effects of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Page 313 Item 10. Page | 255 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling and heating shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Parker Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion This program gives rebates to residents who purchase and install safe rooms in their homes or on their properties to protect against severe weather. Status Deferred – Residents did received funding through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program. The NCTCOG Program has been suspended City of Parker Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 per siren, number of sirens TBD Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Page 314 Item 10. Page | 256 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 9-12 months Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. Discussion This project will expand Parker’s siren coverage to new areas of development not currently protected by sirens. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Parker Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flooding Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Parker Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Page 315 Item 10. Page | 257 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify and mitigate all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Parker Action Item Develop a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing, soil conditioning around foundations Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and preservation of foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Parker Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Page 316 Item 10. Page | 258 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Parker Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status City of Parker Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Page 317 Item 10. Page | 259 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 318 Item 10. Page | 260 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.17 City of Princeton Action Items: 2016 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Adopt and promote a public education program to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion Program will include information on hazard mitigation and what actions can be taken. Status Utilize as able regional, state, and federal public education information. Will be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that establishes centers for vulnerable residents Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Fire Department/EMC Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Page 319 Item 10. Page | 261 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Status Deferred – Will be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per safe room Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program . Status Will be included in 2021, however, come residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program City of Princeton Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 each Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Page 320 Item 10. Page | 262 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness Cost is low compared to lives saved and reduced injuries Discussion Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2A, 3C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 3-4 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Develop a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Page 321 Item 10. Page | 263 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. Status Deferred – Will be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flooding Goal/Objective 2A, 3A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Page 322 Item 10. Page | 264 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Page 323 Item 10. Page | 265 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – W ill be included in 2021 Plan Page 324 Item 10. Page | 266 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.18 Town of Prosper Action Items: 2016 Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Adopt and promote a public education program to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flooding, High Wind, Lightning, Wildfire, Tornado, Hail, Extreme Heat, Drought, Winter Storms, Earthquakes, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 4A, 4B, 4C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $15,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, EMPG, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, citizen cost-share, donations Lead Department Fire Department Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Extreme cost effectiveness Discussion Share perceptions of disaster myths, increases information gathering. Program will include information about mitigation actions for each hazard. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Develop, implement, and enforce ordinances to restrict the use of public water resources for non-essential usage, such as washing cars, landscape, and filling swimming pools Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 2A, 2C, 3C Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $45,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, EMPG, other grants Potential Matching Sources Local donations, in-kind matching Lead Department Public Works, OEM Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings May require retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and lawn sprinklers Page 325 Item 10. Page | 267 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness High. With millions of dollars potentially lost due to drought, this mitigation technique would have a long term benefit on local farmers and citizens Discussion Additional project to include working with builders to encourage drought –tolerant landscape to reduce water usage with incentives Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Implement individual/public tornado safe rooms and location awareness Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Wind Goal/Objective 1C, 2D, 4A, 4B, Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per residential safe room/$1,000,000 public retrofit Potential Funding Sources FEMA, Local grants, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local Funding, Donations, Resident Match Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential/public structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness High, Residential safe room shelters decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes, or high winds Discussion Possible FEMA rebate program Status Will be included in 2021, however, come residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program Town of Prosper Action Item Protect citizens from extreme weather by building covered patios in public parks Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Hail, High Winds, Lightning Goal/Objective 2D Priority High Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources PDM, General Budget, State and Federal Grants Potential Matching Sources Citizen cost-share, Donations Lead Department Public Works/Parks Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Potentially add covered patios to existing small structures Page 326 Item 10. Page | 268 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Cost is low compared to loss of life from heat illness and debris injuries Discussion Covered patios are an effective means of providing temporary relief from severe weather Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Radios to Vulnerable Populations Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Goal/Objective 3C Priority High Estimated Cost $60,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, General Budget, Donations, citizens cost-share Lead Department Fire Department, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness moderate Discussion Early warning, hazard and mitigation information, and reliable communications have been established to reduce loss of life, injuries, and property damage Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Develop, Implement, and Enforce Private Residential and Commercial Construction Requirements Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Goal/Objective 1C, 2C Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources PDM, EMGP Potential Matching Sources General budget, In-Kind Page 327 Item 10. Page | 269 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department Development Services, OEM Implementation Schedule 6-9 Months Effect on Old Buildings New standards could be used to drive retrofitting Effect on New Buildings Buildings will be safer and more resilient in face of hazards Cost Effectiveness High Discussion Develop and adopt building codes to harden private construction based on the hazards identified in this annex such as hail-resistant roofing and windows; wind and impact resistant doors, windows, and roofing ; wildfire breaks and fire resistant building materials; stricter foundation standards for earthquake and expansive soils; increased elevation (BFE) standards for flooding; higher grade insulation to mitigate extreme heat and winter weather; and resource-efficient (low-flow) plumbing for drought. Also, additional codes for dry- proofing and lightning protection (rods, grounding) for public buildings to mitigate flood, dam failure and lightning Status Town of Prosper has adopted current building code and will continue to adopt the most current building codes – will continue to be in future plans and updates Town of Prosper Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 2A, 3A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 328 Item 10. Page | 270 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred will be included in 2021 Plan (50,000) Town of Prosper Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Page 329 Item 10. Page | 271 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 330 Item 10. Page | 272 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.19 Town of St. Paul Action Items: 2016 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Adopt and promote public education program. Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Goal/Objective 4A, 4B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $15,000 Potential Funding Sources General fund, HMGP, PDM, other state/federal grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds, citizen cost-share, donations Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion Also the utilization of social media will be key in this program. Program will include information about mitigation actions and education. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Town of St. Paul Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornadoes Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost $3,000 per safe room Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Some buildings modified for safe room retrofit Effect on New Buildings Buildings constructed with safe rooms Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Page 331 Item 10. Page | 273 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Deferred – Residents did received funding through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program. The NCTCOG Program has been suspended Town of St. Paul Action Item Purchase of a CASA (WX) Weather Radar system Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Tornadoes, Wildfire, Flooding, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-A, 3-C Priority High Estimated Cost $550,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Funding, Federal Funding, HMPG Potential Matching Sources Local Grants Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 12‐36 Months Effect on Old Buildings n/a Effect on New Buildings Increase response decisions by 100% Cost Effectiveness Cost effectiveness is low compared to the benefits. Discussion The Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere (CASA WX) project is a multi‐sector partnership dedicated to engineering revolutionary weather‐sensing networks. The main purpose of the CASA WX project is to save lives and minimize injuries due to severe weather. This is accomplished through the enhancement of data by providing lower atmospheric coverage at faster rates. The CASA WX radars provide jurisdictions more accurate weather data and geographically specific weather data culled from the most active levels of the atmosphere. This data could save lives by providing the public more time to react and prepare appropriately as severe weather affects their location. The more accurate data will also provide a better means to analyze severe weather post event which can also help in the assessment of damage after a severe weather event. Status No longer viable project for St. Paul Town of St. Paul Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Populations, Businesses, and Critical Infrastructure. Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Expansive Soils, Earthquake, Dam Failure, Flooding Goal/Objective 3-C Priority High Estimated Cost $60,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Page 332 Item 10. Page | 274 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning saves lives, which outweighs the cost of the radios. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens about severe weather, civil emergencies and hazard information. It is impossible to quantify the value of a human life or value of an injury. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 1-A, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $65,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind, grants Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 18-36 Months Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show county officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around lake development properties. Discussion This project will become increasingly needed as development around Richland Chambers (Tarrant County Water Supply) increases. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Page 333 Item 10. Page | 275 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 12-18 Months Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that identifies locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop, implement, and enforce building codes that would prevent building deterioration from structure-impacting hazards. Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Goal/Objective 2-C, 3-C Priority Low Page 334 Item 10. Page | 276 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Estimated Cost $5,000- $7,500 Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 12 Months Effect on Old Buildings New building codes would allow for existing buildings to be retrofitted to mitigate against structure-impacting hazards. Effect on New Buildings New building codes would allow for new buildings to be constructed to mitigate against structure-impacting Cost Effectiveness Low - Benefits outweigh costs Discussion Building codes would help to promote better building standards such as including hail-resistant roofing and windows; wind and impact resistant doors, windows, and roofing ; wildfire breaks and fire resistant building materials; stricter foundation standards for earthquake and expansive soils; increased elevation (BFE) standards for flooding; higher grade insulation to mitigate extreme heat and winter weather; and resource-efficient (low-flow) plumbing for drought. Also, additional codes for dry-proofing and lightning protection (rods, grounding) for public buildings to mitigate flood, dam failure and lightning. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop and implement mandatory water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $1,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Promote water conservation throughout the county and work with local water supplies to implement mandatory water restrictions Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 335 Item 10. Page | 277 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop and implement storm water management on creek waterways Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-D, 2-E, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, General Funds Potential Matching Sources Local funds, In-kind match Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 6 months Effect on Old Buildings My prevent flooding of existing structures Effect on New Buildings May prevent flooding of planned development areas Cost Effectiveness Low compared to life safety benefits Discussion Project would prevent erosion, stopping expansion of the floodplain Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop and implement debris management program targeting stream banks at bridges Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-E, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $534,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, General Funds Potential Matching Sources Local funds, In-kind match Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 6 months Effect on Old Buildings Could prevent flooding and disruption to transportation Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Low compared to life safety benefits Discussion Town of St. Paul needs to ensure clear waterways in order to prevent buildup of debris and materials that could cause flooding and contribute to damage to bridges. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 336 Item 10. Page | 278 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public W orks Implementation Schedule 6 months – 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion . Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Page 337 Item 10. Page | 279 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 338 Item 10. Page | 280 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4.20 City of Wylie Action Items: 2016 Plan City of Wylie Action Item Add outdoor warning sirens to meet the needs of the growing population in newly developed areas and/or subdivisions. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Flooding, Wildfire Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $30,000 per siren Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Outdoor warning systems will help alert the public to reduce personal and property damage before a disaster strikes. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Wylie Action Item Adopt and implement water conservation regulations Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 2-C, 3-C Priority High Estimated Cost $7,500 to $15,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to benefit to community Discussion This will mitigate against drought conditions. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 339 Item 10. Page | 281 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Wylie Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to educate on the actions to help mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority High Estimated Cost $7,500-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Wylie Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that provides resources and identifies locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, NPO donations, In-kind Lead Department Emergency Management, Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Page 340 Item 10. Page | 282 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Wylie Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Wylie Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Page 341 Item 10. Page | 283 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Wylie Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Wylie Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Page 342 Item 10. Page | 284 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan . Page 343 Item 10. Page | 285 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) The National Flood Insurance Program is a federally run program which enables property owners in participating communities to purchase insurance as a protection against flood losses in exchange for State and community floodplain management regulations that reduce future flood damages. Community Participation A community applies for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) either as a result of interest in eligibility for flood insurance or as a result of receiving notification from FEMA that it contains one or more Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs). In order for a community to apply for and receive participation in the NFIP, that community must adopt resolutions or ordinances to minimally regulate new construction in identified SFHAs. FEMA works closely with state and local officials to identify flood hazard areas and flood risks. The floodplain management requirements within the SFHA are designed to prevent new development from increasing the flood threat and to protect new and existing buildings from anticipated flood events. When a community chooses to join the NFIP, it must require permits for all development in the SFHA and ensure that construction materials and methods used will minimize future flood damage. Permit files must contain documentation to substantiate how buildings were actually constructed. In return, the Federal Government makes flood insurance available for almost every building and its contents within the community. Communities must ensure that their adopted floodplain management ordinance and enforcement procedures meet program requirements. Local regulations must be updated when additional data are provided by FEMA or when Federal or State standards are revised A more in-depth description of each jurisdiction’s NFIP program is addressed in the jurisdictional annexes. Page 344 Item 10. Page | 286 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Chapter Five: Plan Maintenance 5.1 Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), Collin County has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County, along with participating jurisdictions, is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the Collin County Commissioners Court and the city council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by the County and participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation action items and implementation are monitored, evaluated, and reviewed biannually by emailing all the participating jurisdictions for updates on their individual action items. The progress of the action items will be tracked electronically as “in progress”, “deferred” or “completed”. Project implementation will be included in the Mitigation Strategies for the 5 year update of the plan. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT), whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, Collin County will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the annual monitoring, review and evaluation process, Collin County will provide reports regarding implementation of actions and project completion dates for the plan. Also, as part of the evaluation, the HMPT will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. At least once every five years the HazMAP will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information and analyses, and new and/or modified mitigation plans will be developed. The revised collaborative plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval. It will then be presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and to the city councils of the respective incorporated cities included on the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans, with submission to the local governing body for approval. The plan will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. ** Each individual city’s maintenance schedule is included in their annex. Page 345 Item 10. Page | 287 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5.2 Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4)(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The Hazard Mitigation team will use an established process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Past and present Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plans discuss incorporating mitigation activities through various vehicles. Local planning mechanisms identified include: building codes, planning and zoning ordinances, fire codes, NFIP, and capital improvement plans. Information was also incorporated into the Collin County Emergency Operations Plan and the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This integration and incorporation strategy will continue with all members of the Collin County HazMAP, provided there is sufficient political, fiscal, and administrative capital to do so. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. **Each jurisdiction’s individual integration plan can be found in their respective annex. Once the plan is adopted, the HMPT will coordinate implementation with the engineering, planning, and emergency management departments for the county, participating jurisdictions, river authorities, and drainage districts. 5.3 Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) the plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning committee will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 346 Item 10. Page | 288 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Chapter Six: Individual Jurisdictional Annexes Chapter Six contains the individual jurisdictional annexes. The annexes were developed by each individual jurisdiction in order to provide a greater level of detail specific to the jurisdiction. Each annex contains seven sections. Section One provides a brief introduction to jurisdiction and contents of the annex Section Two covers the planning process and those involved. Elements included in this section are: plan development and adoption process, planning organization, existing data and plans incorporation, the planning committee, hazard mitigation team members, external stakeholders, the dates of planning meetings, and public involvement. The planning process documentation is contained in Appendix A, located at the back of the plan. (Requirements: §201.6(c)(1)), §201.6(b)(2)), §201.6(b)(1)), §201.6(b)(3)), §201.6(c)(4)(iii)), and §201.6(c)(4)(i)). Section Three is the hazard identification and risk assessment. This section contains the Priority Risk Index, which allows each individual jurisdiction to rank the hazards in their area; vulnerability narratives, which identifies points of vulnerability in each jurisdiction for each hazard; and the asset identification and vulnerability assessment. (Requirements §201.6(c)(2)(i)) and §201.6(c)(2)(ii)) Section Four provides a summary of jurisdictional capabilities. Elements in this section include: legal and regulatory capabilities, administrative and technical capabilities, fiscal capabilities, and implementation capabilities. (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)). Sections Five and Six provide the jurisdictional mitigation strategies and action items. The elements included are: mitigation goals and the action items associated with those goals. Additionally, Section Six includes National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance information. (Requirements §201.6(c)(3)(ii)), §201.6(c)(3)(i)), §201.6(c)(3)(iv)), and §201.6(c)(3)(iii)). Section Seven is the maintenance portion of the annex. Included are: plan monitoring, evaluating, and updating; and plan incorporation mechanisms. (Requirements §201.6(c)(4)(i)) and §201.6(c)(4)(ii)). Page 347 Item 10. Page | 289 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Jurisdictional Annexes: A. Unincorporated Collin County B. Allen C. Anna D. Blue Ridge E. Celina F. Fairview G. Farmersville H. Frisco I. Josephine J. Lavon K. Lowry Crossing L. Lucas M. Melissa N. Murphy O. New Hope P. Parker Q. Princeton R. Prosper S. St. Paul T. Wylie Page 348 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-290 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex A: Unincorporated Collin County 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2020 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. Collin County participated in the Collin County HazMAP Planning Team (HMPT) by representing the unincorporated areas of the County. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the previous section, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the unincorporated areas of Collin County. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While Collin County has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped Collin County officials recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and the local newspaper. In accordance with Part 201.6(c) (5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data were gathered through numerous sources. Table 2.1 outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences Nationals Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Wildland/Urban Interface Page 349 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-291 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Source Data National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Planning Team This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team and team members dedicated to the unincorporated areas of the county. The efforts of the planning team members for unincorporated Collin County were led by the Collin County Assistant Emergency Manager. The Planning Team was assembled in September, 2020 with representatives from county departments, local hazard mitigation committees, and the general public. The Collin County Fire Marshal/Emergency Management Office acted as the lead plan facilitator, providing hazard mitigation planning services. Table 2.2 provides a list of the primary representative for each department on the planning team for unincorporated Collin County. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Team – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role Fire Marshal/Emergency Management Emergency Manager Plan Supervision Fire Marshal/Emergency Management Assistant Emergency Manager Plan Supervision/Plan Development GIS GIS Analyst Data Analysis Fire Marshal/Emergency Management Emergency Management Intern Plan Development Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions, including the unincorporated areas of Collin County, by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Manager to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning team and local committees. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the planning team and local committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and local committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the cities and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified Page 350 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-292 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. Stakeholders involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role American Red Cross Field Representative Review of plan City of Plano Emergency Management Specialist Review of plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, Collin County organizations above are committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating team to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County: • Collin County Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 • Collin County HazMAP Planning Meeting – Week of 11/05/2020 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 1/12/2022 at 9AM Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. Page 351 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-293 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 352 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-294 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The HMPT members for unincorporated Collin County identified several natural hazards and man-made hazards that could affect the unincorporated areas of the county. The HMPT decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for Collin County and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Page 353 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-295 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for Unincorporated Collin County Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 1 1 1 0.7 Drought 2 0 2 3 1.4 Earthquake 0 2 3 3 1.75 Expansive Soils 3 0 0 3 1.2 Extreme Heat 3 2 0 3 1.9 Flooding 2 0 1 1 0.95 Hail 2 1 3 3 2 High Winds 3 0 1 1 1.25 Lightning 3 0 0 0 0.9 Tornado 1 2 3 1 1.85 Wildfire 3 0 3 0 1.65 Winter Storms 2 0 0 3 0.9 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for Collin County jurisdictions resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in Page 354 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-296 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in Collin County. Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for Unincorporated Collin County High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Hail Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Drought Earthquake Extreme Heat High Winds Tornado Wildfire Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Dam Failure Expansive Soil Flooding Lightning Winter Storm Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) None Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Collin County was a participating jurisdiction in the 2011 and 2016 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. Since then, Collin County has completed one of their original action items in an effort to lower vulnerability on populations and property from natural hazards. The development and implementation of this project directly led to lower vulnerability for residents and property located in unincorporated Collin County. New priorities are noted and ranked in each new action item, Section 6. Except for actions completed or cancelled, other priorities remain the same as in the previous version of this plan. Due to recent changes in annexation laws, Collin County can expect our population to continue to grow in the unincorporated areas. This is due to the fact, that cities no longer and force annex property into their jurisdiction. It was always assumed that the cities would continue to annex and the unincorporated areas would get smaller; however, it must be assumed that the population in the unincorporated area will remain flat, if not increase moving forward. Page 355 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-297 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability unincorporated Collin County faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation. Dam and Levee Failure Development of the downstream areas necessitates the original low hazard classifications to be changed to higher hazard classifications because the dams are no longer adequate for the increased downstream risks. NRCS data shows that there are 6 dams in Collin County that are no longer adequate for increased downstream risks. This percentage could actually be higher because detailed current evaluations of NRCS dams have not been conducted due to resource limitations. In addition, many of these inadequate dams have not been updated because many of the legally responsible entities of these dams do not have sufficient mechanisms funding for updates, or even adequate maintenance, in some cases. Soil and Water Conservation Districts do not have any statutory funding capability of their own, and counties, especially those with small populations and multiple dams, are not able to generate the resources needed to sustain a consistent and comprehensive effort upgrade these structures. While no record could be found of any previous dam failures in Collin County, three things are clear: • Many of the dams in Collin County are nearing the end of their designed project lives. • Many of these dams are in desperate need of detailed evaluations and consistent maintenance • Increased development downstream of the dams has put more people, property, and infrastructure at risk. Collin County is responsible for 38 high hazard dams identified by the NRCS in both the unincorporated County area and in several cities due to the use of easements and the Emergency Operations Plans for those dam sites. While a dam failure event would affect jurisdictions not participating in the Collin County Local Mitigation Strategy, the HMT has chosen to include all High Hazard dams the county is responsible for in emergency planning for plan incorporation purposes. High Risk FRS in Unincorporated Collin County Dam Name Site Acres Year Completed Sed. Pool Elevation Acres Flood Pool Elevation Acres Easement Elevation Acres Top of Dam Elevation Little Elm & Laterals WS NRCS Site 18A 5.3 1970 728.0 13.0 743.0 51.0 745.0 60.0 747.4 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 1C 6.1 1964 688.3 26.5 701.5 80.5 703.5 93.5 705.7 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 2A 4.3 1958 648.6 31.0 668.4 155.0 670.4 165.0 673.4 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 2B 4.7 1959 630.5 16.0 642.0 36.0 644.0 41.2 647.0 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 3A 3.2 1958 693.2 13.9 702.4 25.4 704.4 32.0 708.0 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 3B 5.9 1958 645.0 22.0 661.4 40.7 663.4 42.7 673.7 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 3C 6.1 1958 621.1 19.2 633.8 48.0 635.8 54.2 638.3 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 3D 5.0 1958 597.3 17.3 608.1 36.9 610.1 40.8 613.0 Page 356 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-298 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Dam Name Site Acres Year Completed Sed. Pool Elevation Acres Flood Pool Elevation Acres Easement Elevation Acres Top of Dam Elevation East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 3E 3.3 1967 582.3 4.5 594.5 24.6 596.5 29.0 597.4 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 4 13.1 1959 610.5 33.0 626.5 108.0 628.5 120.0 632.6 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 5A 5.3 1958 575.2 23.5 590.0 48.0 592.0 55.0 594.9 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 8A 10.7 1968 664.5 35.0 679.0 116.0 681.0 129.3 683.0 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 8G 11.1 1955 717.5 39.8 732.0 125.3 734.0 144.3 737.4 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 9 6.6 1951 636.5 17.1 650.0 46.3 652.0 50.9 655.0 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 10 8.5 1952 648.0 14.9 662.0 43.8 664.0 49.0 667.0 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 11 8.5 1952 644.0 36.3 656.0 72.2 658.0 80.0 661.0 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 12 7.4 1952 638.0 18.8 650.0 49.6 652.0 56.6 655.0 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 14 4.0 1951 630.0 13.6 642.0 35.8 644.0 40.9 647.0 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 15 4.5 1951 614.0 22.7 626.0 49.3 628.0 54.5 631.0 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 16 4.2 1951 613.0 28.6 624.0 55.8 626.0 59.6 629.0 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 30 8.5 1965 655.7 18.0 664.3 40.0 666.3 45.2 667.0 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 31 7.6 1965 646.5 12.5 659.3 32.3 661.3 35.5 663.2 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 32 6.0 1966 637.8 17.0 651.0 42.0 653.0 45.9 655.1 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 32A 3.6 1966 628.3 10.0 639.0 22.0 641.0 26.0 642.4 East Fork Above Lavon WS NRCS Site 33 6.5 1966 642.3 23.0 653.0 53.0 655.0 62.0 656.9 Sister Grove Creek WS NRCS Site 3 9.9 1963 630.5 19.0 638.5 40.8 640.5 48.5 643.0 Sister Grove Creek WS NRCS Site 4 3.7 1960 621.7 15.0 630.0 35.0 632.0 42.0 633.5 Sister Grove Creek WS NRCS Site 5 10.0 1952 649.0 11.0 666.0 55.0 668.0 61.4 671.0 Pilot Grove Creek WS NRCS Site 28 13.5 1964 572.5 46.0 585.0 144.0 587.0 168.0 590.0 Pilot Grove Creek WS NRCS Site 79 11.1 1965 561.7 20.8 573.4 66.5 575.4 74.0 577.3 Pilot Grove Creek WS NRCS Site 80 12.7 1965 564.8 16.9 578.4 53.4 580.4 58.0 582.5 Pilot Grove Creek WS NRCS Site 82 4.7 1967 584.4 80.0 589.0 111.0 591.0 130.0 592.5 Pilot Grove Creek WS NRCS Site 83A 6.3 1967 590.5 21.5 599.5 54.5 601.5 62.5 603.0 Rowlett Creek WS NRCS Site 4 16.1 1956 506.4 53.0 525.8 347.0 527.8 386.0 533.1 Rowlett Creek WS NRCS Site 5 7.1 1956 517.1 26.6 526.0 88.5 528.0 104.3 532.8 Rowlett Creek WS NRCS Site 7 13.4 1957 487.2 59.0 504.0 225.0 506.0 257.5 509.9 U. East Fork Laterals WS NRCS Site 2 8.3 1959 498.7 51.0 512.0 174.0 514.0 204.0 516.5 Page 357 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-299 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of Unincorporated Collin County are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni and the Trinity Aquifer are water sources for Unincorporated Collin County and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the unincorporated area of Collin County’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake While there are no known reports of seismic activity in the county, there is the possibility that seismic events could happen anywhere in the planning area. Buildings constructed under older building codes, dams, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Building codes in the Collin County do not typically meet any type of seismic standards. Even a small earthquake could result in significant damage and impacts. Expansive Soils The entire planning area is vulnerable to expansive soils. All property has the potential to be vulnerable to expansive soils. Extreme Heat Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Flooding Collin County has identified several low water crossings that are subject to periodic flash flooding. Affected areas differ with each storm as there are several different branches and tributaries of rivers and creeks subject to overflow, and also are dependent upon which area receives the rain. These areas are low water crossings mainly on unimproved county roads that consist of dirt, rock, and caliche (sedimentary rock which cements together other materials, including gravel, sand, clay, and silt). Since the county roads are not paved, when flash flooding occurs these areas need to be barricaded, and the location of the storm determines which areas require barricading. Typical road closures due to flooding occur on the following county roads: 429, 504, 427, 338, 581, 331, 579, 1216, 677, 668, 622, 618, 590, 696, 317, 850, 600, 597, 210, 466, 470, 825, 574, 578, 590, 638, 677, 483, and 484. Hail can occur anywhere within the planning area; exposed populations, structures, and vehicles are most vulnerable. There are no building codes in place to mitigate the impact of hail on private property; however, there are new materials such as hail resistant shingles are available in the marketplace today. High Winds The entire planning area and populations therein are vulnerable to high winds. Manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable to high winds. High winds can just as destructive, if not more destructive, than some tornados. They can also be harder to forecast and detect. Lightning events can happen anywhere in the unincorporated areas of the county, but most strikes have occurred in areas with little vulnerability. Structures without dedicated lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado Tornados can occur anywhere in the geographic planning area; residents in manufactured homes are most vulnerable. Page 358 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-300 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Wildfire in Collin County is a moderate risk due to the well managed and readily available resources for response. While the entire unincorporated county may experience wildfire, they primarily occur roughly north of highway 380, in the unimproved areas of the county. Collin County contracts with city fire departments to respond to fires within the unincorporated county area, and during times of drought, burn bans, and high fire threat, automatic mutual aid between the cities is enacted. Structures, crops, and populations in the WUI are most vulnerable. Winter Storms Winter storms have the potential to affect the entire planning area. Winter storms have the potential to make roads impassable for days. Residents may be confined to their homes due to storms and may be without basic services, such as water, data/communications and electricity, for an extended period of time. The homeless, elderly, and populations without heat being most vulnerable. Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of unincorporated Collin County geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in unincorporated Collin County as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, and the Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, and the Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator. The following tables provide a breakdown of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the Texas Association of Counties Population Estimates, the total population of Unincorporated Collin County in 2020 is 53,082 people, with 13,837 households as shown in Table 3.4. Table 3.4 Unincorporated Collin County Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total Household Density (Sq. Mile) Unincorporated Collin County 53,082 4.86% 116.28 18,690 4.86% 40.94 Page 359 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-301 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Source: Texas Association of Counties Population Estimate & Collin County Appraisal District Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for unincorporated Collin County). Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 Unincorporated Collin County 35,644 51,144 53,082 1,938 3.79% Source: Texas Association of Counties Population Estimate Property There are an estimated 39,145 parcels in unincorporated Collin County, with an estimated $9,238,947,093 in total assessed value of improvements. Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 Unincorporated Collin County 39,145 7.54% $9,238,947,093 Source: Collin County Appraisal District 1Includes public buildings (residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, religion, government, education) Emergency Facilities There are 2 identified emergency facilities in Unincorporated Collin County, including 2 fire stations, 0 police stations, 0 and hospitals. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals Unincorporated Collin County 2 0 0 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Critical Facilities There are 80 critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in unincorporated Collin County. The critical facilities include 3 schools and 77 historical property sites (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Page 360 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-302 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property Unincorporated Collin County 3 77 Source: Local jurisdictions Critical Infrastructure There are 147 identified critical infrastructure facilities in Collin County, including 1 airport, 6 natural gas facilities, 4 water treatment facilities, 16 wastewater treatment facilities, 88 dams, and 32 railway/highway bridges (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges Unincorporated Collin County 1 6 5 17 88 32 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, Collin County’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for Collin County, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, 5 using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining 3 hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Page 361 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-303 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property loss due to damage from drought is expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Available historical data indicates that the expected losses from drought correspond to unknown crop due to lack of accurate reporting, mostly experienced in water shortages and crop losses on agricultural lands. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), fatalities and injuries due to extreme heat are unknown due to lack of Page 362 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-304 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Extreme Heat accurate reporting. Unincorporated Collin County and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in unincorporated Collin County is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and emergency facilities in unincorporated Collin County are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in unincorporated Collin County are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in unincorporated Collin County Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero fatalities and injuries per year through the values may be inaccurate due to lack of reporting. Approximately 989 residential parcels in unincorporated Collin County are located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property Property loss due to flooding in unincorporated Collin County is expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Approximately $205,695,851 of the total assessed value is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities Emergency facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Facilities Critical facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure Critical Infrastructure have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events through the values may be inaccurate due to lack of accurate reporting. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Page 363 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-305 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hail Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property loss in unincorporated Collin County due to hailstorm damage is expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting and all improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for unincorporated Collin County indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in unincorporated Collin County are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in unincorporated Collin County are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in unincorporated Collin County are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), fatalities and injuries from high wind events are unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. All the population of unincorporated Collin County are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses from high wind events in unincorporated Collin County is expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Unknown crop losses resulted from this hazard in unincorporated Collin County due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in unincorporated Collin County are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in unincorporated Collin County are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in unincorporated Collin County are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 364 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-306 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), fatalities and injuries from lightning events in unincorporated Collin County are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. All the population of unincorporated Collin County are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property or crop losses resulting from lightning in unincorporated Collin County is unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in unincorporated Collin County are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in unincorporated Collin County are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in unincorporated Collin County are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is an unknown number of fatalities and injuries in unincorporated Collin County due to tornadoes however the values may be inaccurate due to lack of accurate reporting. All the population of unincorporated Collin County are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses from tornadoes is expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Unknown crop losses resulted from this hazard in unincorporated Collin County, but values may be underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in unincorporated Collin County are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in unincorporated Collin County are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in unincorporated Collin County are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 365 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-307 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is an unknown number of fatalities and injuries in unincorporated Collin County due to wildfires however the values may be inaccurate due to lack of accurate reporting. Based on geographical data, approximately 55.92% of unincorporated Collin County is vulnerable to wildfires. Improved Property Based on geographical data, property loss due to wildfires is expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting, which is an unknown percent of the overall property improvement values in unincorporated Collin County. Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there are no fire stations at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are no schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are no bridges, no dams, no wastewater treatment facility, and no water treatment facility at risk from wildfire events. Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), fatalities and injuries from winter storms are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. All the population of unincorporated Collin County are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses from winter storm events is expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Unknown crop losses are expected from this hazard in unincorporated Collin County due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in unincorporated Collin County are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in unincorporated Collin County are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in unincorporated Collin County are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 366 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-308 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serve as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, Collin County considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction Unincorporated Collin County Y N Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y N N N 57.1% Average % Yes Capabilities – 57.1% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 367 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-309 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency Manager Grant writers % Yes Unincorporated Collin County Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y 90% Average % Yes Capabilities – 61.5% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes Unincorporated Collin County N Y N N N Y N N N N 20% Average % Yes Capabilities – 20% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 368 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-310 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify Collin County’s legal and regulatory, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, unincorporated Collin County has 61.5% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 90% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 22.2% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities Collin County County Judge The Commissioners Court, including the County Judge and County Commissioners, approve the county budget, approve Commissioners Court Orders and county policies, hire staff, approve plans, and determine the direction of the county overall. As the governing body, the ability to approve and regulate mitigation activities, expand and improve existing capabilities to better serve mitigation activities, and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 369 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-311 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2011 and 2016 HazMAPs, the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team developed mitigation strategies for the Plan update. The goals are similar to the goals identified in Section 6. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones within Unincorporated Collin County. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 370 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-312 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of the new and deferred action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis economic considerations were weighed for each action. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. Unincorporated Collin County Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan Collin County Action Item Adopt and promote a comprehensive public education program that provides resources to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department Homeland Security Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions employed, can reduce the damage from multiple hazards to existing buildings. Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions implements, can reduce damages from multiple hazards to new buildings. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion This program will include discussion about mitigation projects for all identified hazards and what mitigation actions can be taken. Status Some work performed in this area using regional resources along with utilizing general fund dollars from Collin County. Collin County Action Item Develop and implement building codes to mitigate against structural damages caused by drought, high winds and tornado. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 3-C Page 371 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-313 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Priority Low Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Funding Lead Department Collin County Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings If retrofitted, could mitigate damages to old buildings. Effect on New Buildings This action can reduce the effects of drought, tornadoes, and high winds on new buildings. Cost Effectiveness The cost of this project is low compared to the potential benefits of reducing the effects of drought. Discussion During times of drought, earth experiences significant changes that often impact structural foundations. Building codes can mitigate these effects through mandatory use of new technologies such as resource- efficient (low-flow) plumbing for drought and water conservation. Roof bracing requirements for new construction will mitigate damages from tornado and high Winds. Status Collin County utilizes adopted building codes. Collin County Action Item Expand water conservation measures to new developments and populations Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings May require low-flow retrofits and soil stabilization through landscaping for existing foundations to reduce effects of drought. Effect on New Buildings May require low-flow plumbing installations during construction, foundation protection through alternate landscaping to reduce effects of drought. Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Work with local water suppliers and building developers to expand water conservation measures in new areas of development, to include reduced taps and drought resistant landscaping. Status Deferred, but rely heavily on local water districts to educate and implement needed programs. Additionally, added water systems have been brought online along with new systems being constructed as of 2021. Collin County Action Item Implement Community Tornado Safe Room Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 1-C Page 372 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-314 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Local Funds Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, Donations, In-Kind Match, Resident Match Lead Department Fire Marshal/Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Existing building may be retrofitted for community safe room installation. Effect on New Buildings New buildings may include construction of safe rooms for the community. Cost Effectiveness Community and residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Implement Local Community Tornado Safe Room Program in Identified Vulnerable Areas. Status Collin County residents were able to apply, and some received, grant funding through the North Central Texas Council of Government (NCTCOG) Saferoom Rebate Program. This program provided funding for saferooms through December 2020, when it was ended. Collin County Action Item Develop and Implement a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources Texas A&M Forest Service and USDA Grants Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Marshal Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Can prevent serious damages to or loss of existing buildings due to wildfire. Effect on New Buildings Can prevent serious damages to or loss of new buildings due to wildfire. Cost Effectiveness CWPPs identify where wildfire mitigation efforts would be most effective. Discussion Identify wildland urban interface areas that would benefit from mitigation actions. Based on the individual variables of each area, actions such as fuel management, or defensible space development could be implemented. Status Deferred – no actions Collin County Action Item Implement Firewise mitigation programs in unincorporated Collin County. Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Page 373 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-315 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources USDA and Texas A&M Forest Service Grants Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Marshal Implementation Schedule 1-4 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Cost Effectiveness Cost low compared to potential loss of life and property to wildfire. Discussion Firewise communities experience fewer losses to wildfire than communities without the program. Status Deferred – no actions Collin County Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that identifies locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources. Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials. Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold. Status Places identified during past event, however, additional resources need to be utilized to make this a viable option for residents Collin County Action Item Coordinate and complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS, Emergency Management Page 374 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-316 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones. Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones. Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – most dams are now under the jurisdictions of incorporated cities. Collin County Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 4-B, 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes. Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes. Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – no action. Many of the earthquake threats in the region of slowed Collin County Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils. Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 4-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Page 375 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-317 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – no action Collin County Action Item Distribute all-hazards NOAA Weather Radios to vulnerable populations. Hazard(s) Addressed 3-C, 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Goal/Objective Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 - $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings n/a Effect on New Buildings n/a Cost Effectiveness Cost of lives lost and injuries sustained is very high compared to cost of proactive mitigation. Discussion This project would lead to greater capabilities for vulnerable populations to take mitigation actions prior to and in the event of all hazards. Status Deferred – no action Unincorporated Collin County Action Items: New Collin County Action Item Generators on or available for all critical infrastructure Hazard(s) Addressed Winter Weather, Tornado, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Dam Failure, Flooding, Lightning, Hail, High Winds, Wildland Fire Goal/Objective 2-B Priority High Estimated Cost $250,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings n/a Effect on New Buildings n/a Cost Effectiveness Cost of lives lost and injuries sustained is very high compared to cost of proactive mitigation. Page 376 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-318 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion This project would help ensure all critical facilities do not lose power during events such as winter weather, tornados, or others in which we lose connection to the electrical grid Collin County Action Item Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions employed, can reduce the damage from multiple hazards to existing buildings. Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions implements, can reduce damages from multiple hazards to new buildings. Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. Collin County Action Item Develop and implement building codes to mitigate against structural damages caused by drought, high winds, expansive soils and tornado. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Tornado, High Winds, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Low Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Funding Lead Department Collin County Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings If retrofitted, could mitigate damages to old buildings. Effect on New Buildings This action can reduce the effects of drought, tornadoes, and high winds on new buildings. Cost Effectiveness The cost of this project is low compared to the potential benefits of reducing the effects of drought. Discussion During times of drought, earth experiences significant changes that often impact structural foundations. Building codes can mitigate these effects through mandatory use of new technologies such as resource- efficient (low-flow) plumbing for drought and water conservation. Roof Page 377 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-319 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan bracing requirements for new construction will mitigate damages from tornado and high Winds. Collin County Action Item Expand water conservation measures to new developments and populations Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings May require low-flow retrofits and soil stabilization through landscaping for existing foundations to reduce effects of drought. Effect on New Buildings May require low-flow plumbing installations during construction, foundation protection through alternate landscaping to reduce effects of drought. Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Work with local water suppliers and building developers to expand water conservation measures in new areas of development, to include reduced taps and drought resistant landscaping. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. Collin County Action Item Implement Community Tornado Safe Room Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Local Funds Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, Donations, In-Kind Match, Resident Match Lead Department Fire Marshal/Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Existing building may be retrofitted for community safe room installation. Effect on New Buildings New buildings may include construction of safe rooms for the community. Cost Effectiveness Community and residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Implement Local Community Tornado Safe Room Program in Identified Vulnerable Areas. Page 378 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-320 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Collin County Action Item Develop and Implement a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources Texas A&M Forest Service and USDA Grants Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Marshal Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Can prevent serious damages to or loss of existing buildings due to wildfire. Effect on New Buildings Can prevent serious damages to or loss of new buildings due to wildfire. Cost Effectiveness CWPPs identify where wildfire mitigation efforts would be most effective. Discussion Identify wildland urban interface areas that would benefit from mitigation actions. Based on the individual variables of each area, actions such as fuel management, or defensible space development could be implemented. Collin County Action Item Implement Firewise mitigation programs in unincorporated Collin County. Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources USDA and Texas A&M Forest Service Grants Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Marshal Implementation Schedule 1-4 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Cost Effectiveness Cost low compared to potential loss of life and property to wildfire. Discussion Firewise communities experience fewer losses to wildfire than communities without the program. Collin County Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that identifies locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Page 379 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-321 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources. Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials. Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold. Collin County Action Item Coordinate and complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones. Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones. Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Collin County Action Item Coordinate and complete flood impact maps that include possible depth and speed information Hazard(s) Addressed Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, TWDB Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS, Emergency Management Page 380 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-322 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in and out of flood zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in and out of flood zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Flood data and maps are available for Collin County; however, data on potential flood water depths or water flow rates depending on rain fall amounts and/or intensity are not available. This data would help better identify potential areas that would benefit from mitigation action items. Collin County Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 4-B, 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes. Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes. Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Collin County Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils. Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 4-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Page 381 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-323 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Collin County Action Item Distribute all-hazards NOAA Weather Radios to vulnerable populations. Hazard(s) Addressed 3-C, 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Goal/Objective Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 - $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings n/a Effect on New Buildings n/a Cost Effectiveness Cost of lives lost and injuries sustained is very high compared to cost of proactive mitigation. Discussion This project would lead to greater capabilities for vulnerable populations to take mitigation actions prior to and in the event of all hazards. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance Collin County participates in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 480130# COLLIN COUNTY* COLLIN COUNTY 12/6/1977 3/16/1981 6/2/2009 6/16/1981 No *: Unincorporated Collin County Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Page 382 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-324 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Jurisdiction Compliance Once the community applies for the NFIP, FEMA arranges for a study of the community to determine base flood elevations and flood risk zones. Consultation with the community occurs at the start of and during the study, and those communities with minimal flood risk are converted to the Regular Program without a study. FEMA provides the studied community with a Flood Insurance Rate Map delineating base flood elevations and flood risk zones. The community is then given 6 months to adopt base flood elevations in its local zoning and building code ordinances. Once the community adopts more stringent ordinances, FEMA converts the community to the NFIP’s Regular Program. FEMA then authorizes the sale of additional flood insurance in the community up to the Regular Program limits. The community must implement and enforce the adopted floodplain management measures. FEMA provides periodic community assistance visits with local officials to provide technical assistance regarding complying with NFIP floodplain management requirements. The purchase of flood insurance is mandatory as a condition of receipt of federal or federally-related financial assistance for acquisition and/or construction of buildings in SFHAs of any participating community. Those communities notified as flood-prone which do not apply for participation in the NFIP within 1 year of notification are ineligible for federal or federally-related financial assistance for acquisition, construction, or reconstruction of insurable buildings in the SFHA. Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Page 383 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-325 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement Unincorporated Collin County Director of Engineering Taking action to minimize the effects of flooding on people, property, and building contents through measures including flood warning, emergency response, and evacuation planning Collin County approved a Commissioners Court Order to deal with flooding issues in the county. The court order imposes stands for developing in flood- prone areas, including but not limited to, requiring construction materials be resistant to flooding, requiring “new construction or substantial improvements” to be designed to prevent water from entering or accumulating within electrical components, and requiring all new subdivision proposals have adequate storm water drainage plans. NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with County’s flood damage prevention order shall result in fines not more than $2000.00 for each violation, and in addition shall pay all costs and expenses involved in the case. The Community Rating System (CRS) The Community Rating System (CRS) is a voluntary program for NFIP-participating communities. The goals of the CRS are to reduce flood damages to insurable property, strengthen and support the insurance aspects of the NFIP, and encourage a comprehensive approach to floodplain management. All CRS communities must maintain completed FEMA elevation and flood proofing certificates for all new and substantially improved construction in the Special Flood Hazard Area after the date of application for CRS classification. Collin County will apply for and participate in the CRS program to provide discounted insurance premium incentives for communities to go beyond the minimum floodplain management requirements and to analyze and manage future development. The following link provides information on jurisdictions that currently have CRS: http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=3629 Page 384 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-326 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c) (4) (i), Collin County has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by Collin County Commissioners Court, and formal adoption of the plan by city council by each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Plan will be implemented by the county and participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning team, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, Collin County will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning team will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Activity Schedule Assistant Emergency Managers Monitoring Plan: Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c) (4) (ii)) 2016 Plan Incorporation: The State of Texas Mitigation Plan, vulnerability assessments, and capabilities assessments were carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions Page 385 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-327 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan outlined in this plan will be incorporated into existing local planning strategies. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan Unincorporated Collin County County Commissioners Budget Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Emergency Management Coordinator Emergency Management Plan Reviewed Annually, updated as needed EMP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain Ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. County Commissioners Capital Improvement Plan Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, County Commissioners, Water Districts Drought Contingency Plan As needed Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicle to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c) (4) (iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c) (4) (iii) the plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. Page 386 Item 10. Unincorporated Collin County Annex Page | A-328 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 387 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-329 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex B: City of Allen This annex was prepared in 2020 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP). This plan updates the Allen hazard mitigation plan submitted to FEMA as part of the 2016 Collin County plan. The City of Allen participated on the Collin County HazMAP Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) for this update. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Allen. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 1. Introduction The City of Allen is located at latitude 33°6’11”N and longitude 96°40’13”W. It sits in the southern region of Collin County with McKinney to its North and Plano to the South. Two (2) feeder creeks exist in Allen, Mustang Creek and West Rowlett Creek. There are four (4) main creek systems, Rowlett Creek, Cottonwood Creek, Watters Creek, and Russell Creek. The City of Allen was named after Ebenezer Allen, a state politician and railroad promoter in 1872. Incorporated in 1953, Allen is home to the Allen Independent School District’s new open-air sports facility Eagle Stadium as well as the city-owned and operated indoor arena, the Allen Event Center. Allen also hosts a satellite campus of Collin College, located inside Allen High School. According to the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG), the population of Allen is estimated to be about 105,623. The city has a total area of approximately 27.11 square miles of land area. The City of Allen operates under a system of local government called Council/Manager, wherein all powers of the city are vested in the City Council. Allen has a wide variety of local businesses and business development sites including Andrew’s Distribution, Cabela’s, Top Golf, Experian Information Solutions, Frontier Communications, and Cisco. Prominent in the local retail economy are The Village at Allen, Allen Premium Outlets, and Watters Creek at Montgomery Farm. The city offers much in the way of recreational facilities and entertainment events which include the Allen Event Center which is home to the Allen Americans hockey team and the Dallas Sidekicks indoor soccer team; Celebration Park, which Page 388 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-330 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan hosts the annual pre-Fourth of July gala called the Allen USA Celebration; the Joe Farmer Recreation Center; the Don Rodenbaugh Natatorium; and Chase Oaks Golf Club. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While Allen has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped Allen officials to recognize the benefits of a long- term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and online. In accordance with Part 201.6(c) (5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. Table 2.1 outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Urban Interface National Inventory of Dams Dam information City Ordinances Structural and Safety designs Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the City of Allen Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and the Collin County Page 389 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-331 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan HMPT. Allen planning committee representatives participated on the HMPT, with local efforts led by the City of Allen Emergency Management Coordinator. The planning committee was assembled with representatives from the city, including the mayor, city manager, emergency management representatives, department heads, and the general public. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services. Table 2.2 provides a list of the primary representatives on the Allen planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role City of Allen Mayor General Policy Guidance City of Allen City Manager Policy Implementation City of Allen Emergency Management Coordinator Supervise Collin County Asst. Emergency Management Coordinator General Assistance Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan Page 390 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-332 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan External stakeholders emailed and involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital - Allen Chief of Security/Risk Management Review of plan Texas Independent Insurance Group - Allen Owner/Agent Review of plan Allen Board of Adjustment, Building and Standards Commission, and Sign Control Board Citizen Board Member Review of plan Allen Independent School District (AISD) Risk Manager Review of plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each organization above is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County and included participation by all jurisdictions: • Plan provided to the City of Allen on August 18, 2020 • Collin County Planning Meeting – November 5, 2020 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 at 9AMTBD Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and Allen planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign-in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. Page 391 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-333 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 392 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-334 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The planning committee for the City of Allen identified several natural hazards and man-made hazards that could affect the city. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for Collin County and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 Page 393 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-335 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for the City of Allen Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 0 0 0 0 Drought 2 0 0 3 0.9 Earthquake 0 0 0 0 0 Expansive Soils 1 0 0 1 0.4 Extreme Heat 2 1 0 3 1.25 Flooding 1 1 1 1 1 Hail 3 0 1 2 1.35 High Winds 2 1 1 2 1.4 Lightning 3 0 1 2 1.35 Tornado 1 2 2 2 1.7 Page 394 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-336 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Wildfire 0 0 0 0 0 Winter Storms 2 1 0 2 1.15 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the City of Allen resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in the City of Allen. Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings City of Allen High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Tornado High Winds Hail Lightning Extreme Heat Winter Storms Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Flooding Drought Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Expansive Soils Dam Failure Earthquake Wildfire Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) The City of Allen was a participating jurisdiction in the 2016 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. Since then, the city has seen an increase in growth and commuter traffic and forecasts additions to single-family lots. Based on 2020 Census projections, the population of Allen increased from 98,344 to 105,623 during the time period 2015-2019. Housing units increased from 28,877 to 30,436, and related transportation routes and business structures also increased to accommodate the growing population. Travel lanes were added to US HWY-75 and widths of major roadways including Stacy Road, Bethany Road, Exchange Parkway, and Watters Road were increased. Overall growth is rated at 9%. To minimize the damage caused by manmade and natural disasters, the City of Allen developed, implemented and enforces up-to-date building and fire codes and adopted a policy to prohibit development in FEMA identified flood plains. In addition, Allen has completed one of their original action items. • Education and Awareness Projects o Develop and institute water conservation education program to mitigate and reduce the effects of extreme heat. Page 395 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-337 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan In 2011, the Fire Department added an additional fire station (Station 5) located on McDermott Road near the Custer Road intersection. The construction of Station 5 facilitated the addition of an early warning siren at the same location. The development and implementation of these mitigation projects have directly led to lower vulnerability for residents and property located in the City of Allen. New priorities are noted and ranked in each new action item, Section 6. Except for actions completes or cancelled, other priorities remain the same as in the previous version of this plan. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the City of Allen faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation. Dam and Levee Failure The City of Allen is not perceived to be vulnerable to dam or levee failure on a large scale. One (1) dam was constructed within a small, residential neighborhood called The Preserve, located at the intersection of McDermott Drive and Shallowater Drive. The dam was constructed to preserve the original stock-pond impoundment, which dated back to the original farmstead use, as an amenity to the residents. Even though the impoundment is small, the dam has been registered with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, incurs routine inspection, and has an emergency action plan in-place for the structure. Drought When defining drought as an occurrence in Texas it is best to consider two types of drought - agricultural and hydrologic. Agricultural drought is a dry period of sufficient length and intensity that markedly reduces crop yields. Hydrologic drought is a long term condition of abnormally dry weather that ultimately leads to the depletion of surface and ground water supplies, the drying up of rivers and streams and the cessation of spring flows. These two types of drought may, but do not necessarily, occur together. It should be noted that the severity of a drought cannot be completely measured in terms of precipitation alone, but precipitation statistics do provide an easily obtainable index of drought severity. Declining reservoir and stock tank levels due to a prolonged lack of precipitation are stark evidence of a severe drought. Texas experiences a cycle of extended wet and drought conditions that can extend over a period of months even years. Extended periods of drought can have an enormous impact on an area by affecting the abundance of water supply, the agriculture economy, and foundations of structures. All geographic areas of Allen have the potential to be vulnerable to drought. An adequate supply of high quality water has become a critical issue for the future prosperity of Texas, where water is a limited resource. Due to increasing population, water demand is projected to exceed supply by 2030, based on current use rates. Protecting, managing and planning for the wise use of our water resources is an efficient and effective strategy to meet future water supply needs. The City of Allen is a member city of the North Texas Municipal Water District (NTMWD). All of Allen's Water and Waste Water Treatment Services are provided by NTMWD, who is the regional wholesale supplier of potable water. More than 1.8 million people rely on this treated water. The raw water sources include Bonham Lake, Lavon Lake, Lake Texoma, Jim Chapman Lake (Cooper Lake), Lake Tawakoni, and the East Fork of the Trinity River southeast of Dallas. Page 396 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-338 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The construction of a $306 million water transmission line from Lake Texoma to the water treatment plant at Wylie was completed and has begun delivery of water to the treatment plant in June 2014. It is estimated to be online in June 2014. Even with the return of the Lake Texoma water, it must be blended with Lake Lavon. Due to Lake Lavon's current level, Allen must continue water conservation efforts. Stage 3 of the Water Conservation and Drought Contingency and Emergency Water Response Plan for the City of Allen, Texas and Ordinance Numbers 2760-8-08 and 3234-6-14 are currently in effect. A 10% reduction goal is required by NTMWD. Restrictions caused by a drought affect local revenues significantly and can have major impacts on local industry, fire protection, and local agriculture. Allen’s summer water consumption is 3.75 times our winter consumption due to increased landscape irrigation. This fact should make it apparent why the City of Allen restricts landscape irrigation as the primary way to achieve water use reductions as we continue Stage 3 conservation into the foreseeable future. Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally, all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of the city are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake An earthquake is a sudden motion or trembling caused by an abrupt release of accumulated strain on the tectonic plates that comprise the Earth's crust. The theory of plate tectonics holds that the Earth's crust is broken into several major plates. These rigid, 50- to 60- mile thick plates move slowly and continuously over the interior of the earth, meeting in some areas and separating in others. As the tectonic plates move together they bump, slide, catch, and hold. Eventually, faults along or near plate boundaries slip abruptly when the stress exceeds the elastic limit of the rock, and an earthquake occurs. The ensuing seismic activity and ground motion provoke secondary hazards: surface faulting, ground failure, and tsunamis. The vibration or shaking of the ground during an earthquake is referred to as ground motion. In general, the severity of ground motion increases with the amount of energy released and decreases with distance from the causative fault or epicenter. When a fault ruptures, seismic waves are propagated in all directions, causing the ground to vibrate at frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 30 Hz. Seismic waves are referred to as P waves, S waves, and surface waves. Earthquakes have the potential to occur anywhere in the geographic planning area, therefore all geographic areas are potentially vulnerable. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. However, this hazard was identified as having negligible or no risk to the City of Allen. Expansive Soils Soil conditions can have a significant effect on urban development as different soils can create various problems for structures and uses. Most soils have moderate to severe limitations for urban development as a result of shallow bedrock, high shrink-swell potential, and low strength. These problems must be recognized in construction to avoid foundation problems. During months of prolonged high temperatures and drought, expansive soils may become more prevalent. Surface layers of soil can form sizable cracks as it expands and contracts over time, leading to structural foundation problems. Expansive soils are not a prevalent hazard within the City of Allen and were found to pose only a minor threat. Geographically, areas of Allen have the potential to be vulnerable to expansive soils. This hazard was identified as having negligible or no risk to the City of Allen. Page 397 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-339 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Extreme Heat Extreme heat contributes to and may exacerbate drought conditions due to increased water use. Elevated heat indexes also affect asthma patients and the elderly when exposed. Working conditions outside are more difficult and heat stroke becomes a greater danger. Instances of heat stroke and death occur in vulnerable populations such as the homeless, elderly, and the very young if exposed to the high temperatures for an extended period of time. Electrical usage also spikes during the summer which can result in periods of grid blackout. Extreme heat has the potential to affect the entire planning area. Allen’s climate can be characterized as very humid and sub-tropical in the summer. It is usually very hot and dry with average maximum highs in the heart of summer reaching 96°F. However, the temperature frequently rises above 100°F. On average, Allen experiences 16 days per year where temperatures meet or exceed 100°F. Overnight lows usually stay in the lower to mid-70s, but sometimes they fail to fall below 80°F during extreme hot spells. Coupling these warm temperatures with high humidity creates what is called the heat index. The hottest temperature ever recorded, 113°F, occurred for two consecutive days on June 26th and 27th, 1980. Incidentally, that summer is the hottest summer on record with nearly forty (40) consecutive days of triple digit heat. The City of Allen has the potential during heat emergencies to exceed the capabilities of the local hospital and Emergency Medical System. Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Flooding is the most prevalent and costly disaster in the United States. Floods have the ability to roll boulders the size of cars, uproot trees, and transport building. At the point the water concentration hyper extends the capacity of the flood way, the water enters the floodplain. Floods are most common in seasons of rain and thunderstorms. Floods can be associated with other natural phenomenon such as rainstorms, thunderstorms, hurricanes, earthquakes, and rapidly melting snow. The City of Allen has a comprehensive flood program to go along with organized growth. The Allen Land Development Code (Ordinance # 2112-11-02) has dedicated one complete article to the aspect of flood control and several related sections on drainage. The highlights of the city ordinance, with regards to flood control, are topics related to: what constitutes flood hazards, methods of reducing flood losses, flood plain administration, and risk reduction. The City of Allen has had an ordinance (since 1991) to evaluate development in terms of the “Ultimate 100-Year Flood”. The term “Ultimate” indicates a model for fully developed conditions on the upstream portion of the watershed condition. The provision for flood related structures (bridges, culverts, drainage ditches, storm pipes etc.) designed for fully developed conditions and the requirement for the lowest floor of buildings to be a minimum of 18” above the base flood elevation in the case of commercial structures and 24” for residential structures have worked effectively to serve the city in heavy storms and floods. The city has improved several structures that were inherited prior to the above referenced ordinance. Mustang Creek channel improvements in 2001, upstream of Main Street, has removed several houses from the flood plain. The rebuilding of McDermott Drive and the subsequent improvement of several drainage structures has prevented the road from flooding. Also, the project to replace the existing Exchange Parkway (Old Rowlett Road) Bridge with a new bridge made Exchange Parkway a safe conduit for traffic to cross Rowlett Creek. Overall, Allen has handled flood related issues with enough foresight to avoid major failures and significantly reduce hazards. Page 398 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-340 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The City of Allen can be affected by two types of floods, though in limited areas. These include:  Riverine Flood – Occurs in the floodplain of a river or stream when the amount of water and the rate at which the moving increases. This type generally can be forecast in advance, and proper precautions taken to save lives.  Flash Flood – A type of Riverine flood that occurs after a heavy storm, when the ground cannot absorb the high amount of precipitation. This can occur when heavy precipitation falls on already- saturated soils. Flash Floods occur rapidly with little warning. The city lies in the Blackland Prairies where the maximum elevation is 1000 feet and the minimum elevation is 450 feet. Allen is located in the Trinity River Basin where rainfall is between 30 to 40 inches per year, on average. Two (2) feeder creeks exist in Allen, Mustang Creek and West Rowlett Creek. There are four (4) main creek systems, Rowlett Creek, Cottonwood Creek, Watters Creek, and Russell Creek. The City of Allen enjoys a relatively low susceptibility of flooding due to above average drainage and sewer systems as well as a robust infrastructure. Allen’s most important measure to ensure that flooding does not become a life threatening hazard is to limit the use of flood prone areas. Other methods include the use of automatic roadblocks over roadways which are prone to seasonal flooding. Hail Two conditions must be fulfilled for a thunderstorm to become a hail storm: (1) updraft velocities must be sufficiently strong enough to support hail storms during their growth; and, (2) liquid moisture must accumulate in a super-cooled state in the upper parts of the storm. Hail ranges in size from vanishing small particles to grapefruit dimensions. They may be spherical, conical or very irregular in shape. The hail hazard is primarily in terms of damage of crops and property. Injury and loss of human life are rarely associated with hailstorms. Hail tends to fall in swaths that may be from 20 to 115 miles long and 5 to 30 miles wide. A hail swath is not a continuous path of hail but generally consists of a series of hail strikes, which are produced by individual thunderstorm cells traversing the same general area. Hail strikes are typically about 1/2 mile wide and 5 miles long. They may partially overlap, but often they leave completely undamaged areas between them. The amount of damage and destructive effects of a hailstorm is governed by size, number of hailstones, mass of ice, momentum, impact energy, and the dimensions of the hail swaths. Strong winds and heavy rains, which often accompany hail, will also add to the damage to crops and property. Hail storms are most prevalent in the State of Texas in the north (where Allen is located) and western areas of the state. This can be contributed to the effects from large-scale weather systems that are evident in a broad band of maximum occurrence from New Mexico to Ohio. This is directly related to the area of greatest tornado activity known as “tornado alley”. It is significant that hailstorm frequency is greatest during early spring and summer months. Hail during the three hottest months of the summer, however, is rare. All geographic areas of Allen are potentially susceptible to damaging hail. Damage in the City of Allen due to hail could result in a significant loss. Insurance is the most widely used mitigation measure for property damage due to hail. It is not unusual for people in hail prone area to replace the roof covering of structures every three to five years due primarily to the use of cheaper, less hail resistant roof covering products. Windstorms and hail damage is the one single most costly loss suffered by Texans. Severe roof damage can be reduced by installing roofing products that are manufactures using heavy duty, quality materials that has the Underwriters Page 399 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-341 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Laboratory (UL) 2218, hail resistant product listing. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable to hail. High Winds Straight-line winds are often responsible for the wind damage associated with a thunderstorm. These winds are often confused with tornadoes because of similar damage and wind speeds. However, the strong and gusty winds associated with straight-line winds blow roughly in a straight line unlike the rotating winds of a tornado. Downbursts or micro-bursts are examples of damaging straight-line winds. A downburst is a small area of rapidly descending rain and rain-cooled air beneath a thunderstorm that produces a violent, localized downdraft covering 2.5 miles or less. Wind speeds in some of the stronger downbursts can reach 100 to 150 miles per hour, which is similar to that of a strong tornado. The winds produced from a downburst often occur in one direction, and the worst damage is usually on the forward side of the downburst. High winds have the potential to affect the entire planning area. High winds are a frequent occurrence with severe thunderstorms and they can affect all areas of Allen. These winds can occur suddenly and without warning during severe weather and may pose access challenges due to fallen trees on roadways. There have been several instances of damage occurring to business and commercial structures as a result of high winds. Outside of primary residential structures, there are few locations for the public to seek shelter during high winds. The City of Allen has typically experienced power outages, fires, and damage to roofs, cars, out buildings, and electrical utilities due to high winds. These events create significant planning and recovery issues. Lightning damage results from four (4) effects of lightning strike: electrocution of humans and animals; vaporization of materials along the path of strike; fire caused by the high temperature produced by the strike; and a sudden power surge that can damage electrical and electronic utility substations and distribution lines. It is estimated that throughout the United States, a power outage caused by lightning occurs on 50 percent of the days throughout the year. Lightning has the potential to affect all populations and property in the City of Allen. Although property damage is the major cost of the lightning hazard, it should be emphasized that lightning kills more people in the US each year than either tornadoes or hurricanes. On the average, six (6) people die from lightning strike every year in Texas. Allen has lost at least one (1) citizen due to electrocution from a lightning strike. Additionally, lightening is responsible for at least five (5) residential structure fires over the past two (2) years resulting in a total loss for each residence. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado Tornadoes are directly associated with dark, heavy cumulonimbus (thunderstorm, squall line) clouds with intense lightning. The average tornado path is four (4) miles long but tornado tracks of more than 150 miles have been reported. The average width is 300 to 400 yards; however, some tornadoes cut swaths more than a mile wide. Precipitation usually occurs first as rain preceding the storm, frequently with hail and as a heavy down pour immediately to the left of the tornado’s path. While tornadoes in Texas can occur in any month and at all hours of the day or night, they occur with greatest frequency during the late spring and early summer months and during late afternoon and early evening hours. Page 400 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-342 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Allen is in an area where the annual average tornado occurs 15 to 20 times per year. Special issues concerning a tornado incident within the City of Allen involve the large population of special needs residents within nursing homes and the many daycares and schools. An additional concern is the number of large trees in residential areas that could impact power lines and the restriction into areas needing assistance due to limbs blocking roadways. The single most important factor influencing human response to tornado hazards is the adequate emergency warning system. Because a tornado is a very sudden event, a “short fused” type of disaster, there rarely is sufficient warning time. Police, Fire and Rescue, and volunteer storm spotters trained by the National Weather Service (NWS) SKYWARN tornado preparedness programs provide the initial step in adequate warning system. The City of Allen incorporates the mentioned measures of early detection and utilizes the Emergency Operation Plan at the moment the NWS issues a tornado watch or warning. Additionally, sufficient insurance is the first order of mitigation to cover major losses of the home and belongings. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. Wildland Fire Wildland fire is any fire occurring on grassland, forest, or prairie, regardless of ignition source. Wildland fires are fueled almost exclusively by natural vegetation. Typically, wildland fires occur in national forests and state parks where federal or state agencies are responsible for fire management and suppression. Interface or intermix fires are urban/wildland fires in which vegetation and the built- environment provide fuel. Firestorms are events of such extreme intensity that effective suppression is virtually impossible. Firestorms occur during extreme weather and generally burn until conditions change or the available fuel is exhausted. For the purposes of this hazard analysis, wildland fires are assessed under what is known as the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). The WUI is an area of development that is susceptible to wildland fires due to the amount of structures located in an area with vegetation that can act a fuel for a wildland fire. Due to the lack of fuel, there is negligible to no risk in Allen for a wildland fire. There have been no major wildland fires in the city for the past 10 years. Winter Storms Winter storms in Allen can and have occurred with enough severity to be a threat to people and property. The types of winter storms that Allen is most familiar with are ice storms and cold waves. A snowfall with an accumulation of four (4) or more inches in a 12-hour period is considered a heavy snowfall. Although it has never been witnessed in Allen, blizzards are also possible, and can create a threat to the community. An ice storm occurs when rain falls out of the warm and moist upper levels of the atmosphere into a cold and dry layer near the ground. The rain freezes on contact with the cold ground and accumulates on exposed surfaces. If a half-inch of rain freezes on trees and utility wires, damage can occur, especially if accompanied by high winds. Ice storm usually occurs from late December to mid-February. Winter storms have the potential to occur anywhere in the geographic planning area, with greatest vulnerabilities in highly populated or commercial areas. Allen has experienced multiple severe ice storms over the past six (6) years. Loss of utilities, such as natural gas and electrical services has resulted from some of these storms. There have also been instances of structural damage to various roofs and car ports in Allen due to ice accumulation. Page 401 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-343 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The passage of a winter cold front with a drastic drop in temperature heralds the arrival of a cold wave. Blizzards are the most perilous of all winter storms, characterized by low temperatures and strong winds in excess of 35 MPH, bearing large amounts of blowing or drifting snow. True blizzards are rare in the Allen area; however, blizzard like conditions do exist during heavy snowstorms when gusty winds cause blowing and drifting snow. The city has two (2) major highways (US 75 and SH 121) that may be impacted during winter storms. Areas impacted include local commerce, medical services, and local sheltering capabilities for potential stranded motorists. Page 402 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-344 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of Allen’s geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the US Census Bureau, the total population of Allen in 2020 was 105,823 people, with 30,436 households. The population breakdown is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4 City of Allen Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total** Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total** Household Density (Sq. Mile) Allen 105,823 9.50% 3927.91 36,526 9.50% 1386.07 Source: US Census Bureau & Collin County Appraisal District **Includes totals from incorporated jurisdictions not participating in the plan Page 403 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-345 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population change absolute and percent predications for Allen). Table 3.5 City of Allen Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 Allen 84,246 87,980 90,030 2050 2.28% Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates Property There are an estimated 37,282 thousand parcels in Allen, with an estimated $11,650,015,117 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 Allen 37,282 7.48% $11,650,015,117 Source: Collin County Appraisal District 1Includes public buildings (residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, religion, government, education) Emergency Facilities There are seven (7) identified emergency facilities in the City of Allen, including five (5) fire stations, one (1) police station, and two (2) hospitals. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 City of Allen Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals Allen 5 1 2 Source: FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool Critical Facilities There are thirty two (32) critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in Allen. The critical facilities include thirty one (31) schools and one (1) historical property site (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 City of Allen Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property Allen 31 1 Page 404 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-346 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Source: FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool Critical Infrastructure There are eighty seven (87) identified critical infrastructure facilities in the City of Allen, including two (2) natural gas facilities, one (1) dam, three (3) railway bridges, forty four (44) highway bridges, and 37 city- owned vehicular bridges (Table 3.9). The rail system in Allen is owned by Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) and is not currently in use. Table 3.9 City of Allen Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges Allen 0 2 0 0 1 84 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, a City of Allen vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for the City of Allen, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Page 405 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-347 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerability Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Allen are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Allen are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the City of Allen. The City of Allen and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the City of Allen is not vulnerable to this hazard. Page 406 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-348 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in the City of Allen are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the City of Allen are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is no impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in Allen. Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Improved Property There have been two (2) recorded flood events in the City of Allen. Property losses are expected at $5,000 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded. Approximately $5,046,310,777 of the total assessed value is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities Emergency facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Facilities Critical facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure Critical Infrastructure has the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Allen are expected at $91,428.57 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Page 407 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-349 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in Allen are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in Allen are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in Allen are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events. All the population of Allen is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Allen are expected at $1,900 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in Allen. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in Allen are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in Allen are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in Allen are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events can be expected to cause no deaths and no injuries in Allen. All the population of Allen is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Allen are expected at $4,375 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in Allen. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in Allen are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 408 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-350 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in Allen are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in Allen are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in Allen. All the population of Allen is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), an average loss of $174,285.71 per year in property losses is expected to result from tornado events however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in Allen. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in Allen are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in Allen are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in Allen are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are unknown but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there are no fire stations in Allen at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are no schools at risk from wildfire events in Allen. Page 409 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-351 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are no bridges, no dams, no wastewater treatment facilities, and no water treatment facilities at risk from wildfire events in Allen. Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Allen. All the population of Allen is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Allen are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Allen. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in Allen are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in Allen are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in Allen are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 410 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-352 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serve as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the City of Allen considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction Allen Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N 71 % Average % Yes Capabilities – 71% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 411 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-353 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes per Jurisdiction Allen Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y 80% Average % Yes Capabilities – 80% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes per Jurisdiction Allen Y Y N Y Y Y N N N N 50% Average % Yes Capabilities – 50% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 412 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-354 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify City of Allen’s legal and regulatory, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, the City of Allen has 71% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 80% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 50% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities City of Allen City Manager The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro- tem, and council members, along with the city manager, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. As the governing body, the ability to implement, expand, and approve mitigation actions and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 413 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-355 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2021 HazMAP, the City of Allen Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones within Allen. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Page 414 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-356 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of the new and deferred action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Allen Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan City of Allen Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other hazards and civil emergencies. Status Cancelled – No longer a viable action item Page 415 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-357 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Allen Action Item Develop and establish extreme temperature plan including cooling and heating shelters for vulnerable residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Emergency Management, CERT Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings May require retrofit to accommodate new designs, resources needed Effect on New Buildings Will make new buildings safer for vulnerable populations Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of reduced injury and death related to extreme temperature. Discussion Developing an extreme temperature program that identifies both public and private safe locations for vulnerable residents to go during periods of extreme temperatures would reduce levels of injury and death in this segment of the population. Status Cancelled – No longer a viable action item City of Allen Action Item Adopt and promote a comprehensive public education program, including information about mitigation projects. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, High Wind, Wildfire, Tornado, Drought, Winter Storms, Flooding, Hail, Expansive Soils, Dam Failure, Earthquake Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $15,000 Potential Funding Sources General fund, HMGP, PDM, other state/federal grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds, citizen cost-share, donations Lead Department Emergency Management, CERT Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits and other actions Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is an extremely effective low cost method. Page 416 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-358 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Adopt and promote a comprehensive public education program based on the hazards identified in this annex, including information on mitigation projects. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Allen Action Item Expand outdoor warning sirens to cover new populations Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, High Wind, Tornado , Dam Failure, Lightning Goal/Objective 1-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $35,000 each Potential Funding Sources General fund, HMGP, PDM, other state/federal grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings May require siren tower construction on existing buildings Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Cost of implementation is low compared to the benefits of reduced injury and death related to tornados. Discussion Replacement of old or damaged warning sirens and expanding coverage to new populations is a proactive approach to mitigating the effects of severe weather and prevent loss of life by providing advanced warning to citizens. Status Added 9 additional sirens since last report, all are operational Cancelled – No longer a viable action item City of Allen Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Page 417 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-359 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Cancelled – No longer a viable action item City of Allen Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for earthquake damage Effect on New Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for earthquake damage Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Cancelled – No longer a viable action item City of Allen Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Page 418 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-360 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Cancelled – No longer a viable action item Allen Action Item Improve construction standards and techniques through requiring, by ordinance, builders to utilize water saving plumbing and fixtures in new construction. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 2-C Priority High Estimated Cost $2,000-3,000 Potential Funding Sources Local budget, Builders. Lead Department Building Department Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings No effect unless retrofitted Effect on New Buildings Reduced water consumption Cost Effectiveness Cost is very low compared to water shortages. Discussion This project would require low-flow plumbing and fixtures in all new construction, mitigating the effects of drought. Status Cancelled – No longer a viable action item City of Allen Action Items: New City of Allen Action Item Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Page 419 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-361 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Estimated Cost $15,000 Potential Funding Sources General fund, HMGP, PDM, other state/federal grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds, citizen cost-share, donations Lead Department Emergency Management, CERT Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits and other actions Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. City of Allen Action Item Purchase and utilize mobile back-up generator Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding, Tornado, Earthquake, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Wildfire, Winter Storms, Hail, High Winds Goal/Objective 2-D Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000 - $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Funding Potential Matching Sources Local Funding Lead Department Public Works, OEM Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Some buildings will need to be retrofit with ability to connect with generator Effect on New Buildings Buildings will need to be planned with the ability to connect to generator Cost Effectiveness Backup generator will prevent loss of power and data to critical government buildings Discussion Introduction of a mobile back-up generator will allow the City of Celina or other critical facilities to function as close to normal as possible in the event of a massive power loss. City of Allen Action Item Develop and implement a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Page 420 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-362 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. City of Allen Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information City of Allen Action Item Analyze needs, develop and implement water conservation measures for new populations Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Page 421 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-363 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Goal/Objective 2-C Priority High Estimated Cost $1,000 - $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local funding Potential Matching Sources Local grants, citizen match Lead Department Public Works, OEM Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings New constraints will be placed on water usage without compromising soil integrity. Effect on New Buildings New constraints will be placed on water usage without compromising soil integrity. Cost Effectiveness Expanded water and soil consistency standards will help the city of Celina plan for a boost in infrastructure and population and help maintain normal water levels Discussion As the City of Allen grows water conservation measures will encompass new infrastructure and residential/commercial areas. This plan implements conservation efforts that also maintain soil consistency, mitigating damage from expansive soils. City of Allen Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results would identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Page 422 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-364 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Allen Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost TBD Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Page 423 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-365 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance Allen is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 480131# ALLEN, CITY OF COLLIN COUNTY 12/20/1974 6/1/1978 6/2/2009 6/1/1978 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Compliance Once the community applies for the NFIP, FEMA arranges for a study of the community to determine base flood elevations and flood risk zones. Consultation with the community occurs at the start of and during the study, and those communities with minimal flood risk are converted to the Regular Program without a study. FEMA provides the studied community with a Flood Insurance Rate Map delineating base flood elevations and flood risk zones. The community is then given 6 months to adopt base flood elevations in its local zoning and building code ordinances. Once the community adopts more stringent ordinances, FEMA converts the community to the NFIP’s Regular Program. FEMA then authorizes the sale of additional flood insurance in the community up to the Regular Program limits. The community must implement and enforce the adopted floodplain management measures. FEMA provides periodic community assistance visits with local officials to provide technical assistance regarding complying with NFIP floodplain management requirements. Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Page 424 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-366 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement Allen Program Manager Adopt comprehensive regulations pertaining to the development and maintenance of the floodplain within city limits. City Council adoption and amendment of Article V of the Allen Land Development Code (ALDC). NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with City’s flood damage prevention order shall result in fines up to $500 per violation plus court costs. The City of Allen is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. The City has an article in the Allen Land Development Code (ALDC), adopted by ordinance, dedicated exclusively to floodplain management and development regulations. The community philosophy has been to identify and preserve floodplain areas when development occurs in close proximity to watercourses and creeks. The regulations require the floodplain areas to remain in a natural state and avoid encroachment without offsetting mitigation. Allen is a freeboard community, requiring 2-feet of elevation difference between residential structures (1.5-feet for commercial uses) and the fully-developed 100-year water surface elevation. As a result of these conservative standards, the City of Allen has been able to keep flood insurance policies within our community to a very low number. Article V – “Special Zones” of the ALDC was most recently updated in September of 2014. Page 425 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-367 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c) (4) (i), Collin County has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the City of Allen, the county, and the city council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning team, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, Allen will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning team and committees will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented in table 7.1: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel What Time Emergency Management Coordinator Monitoring Plan: Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Page 426 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-368 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c) (4) (ii)) 2020 Plan Incorporation: The Allen City Council adopts a rolling five-year capital improvement plan each and every year, subsequent to a recommendation from the Planning & Zoning Commission. Bank stabilization at two locations has occurred to mitigate the effects of erosion along publicly maintained creeks and waterways. This past calendar year, the Engineering Department administered bank stabilization projects for: The Old Stone Dam (along Cottonwood Creek, upstream of Exchange Parkway) and The Cottonwood Trail (Cottonwood Creek, upstream of Bethany). The Old Stone Dam Project ($500,000 approx.) was to preserve and stabilize banks on either side of a historic dam constructed in 1874. The Cottonwood Trail Project ($800,000 approx.) was implemented to preserve an existing hike and bike trail, and avoid further risk to a neighboring residential structure. The residential structure was not in the regulatory floodplain, but the edge of the bank had come within 10 feet of the backyard fence. NFIP language in Article V was also updated (2014), stricter water conservation plans have been instituted, and building codes were update to the 2009 International Building Code. 2021 Plan Incorporation: The State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, vulnerability assessments, and capabilities assessments for each jurisdiction were carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and planning committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into existing local planning strategies and mechanisms, as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan Allen City Council Budget Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Emergency Management Coordinator Emergency Action Plan Every five years EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain Ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. City Council Capital Improvement Plan Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, City Council Drought Contingency Plan As needed Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Page 427 Item 10. City of Allen Annex Page | B-369 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan Planning Director, City Council Natural Resource Conservation Plan Annually Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the City of Allen Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicle to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c) (4) (iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c) (4) (iii) the plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committees will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. . Page 428 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-370 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex C: The City of Anna 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2021 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi- Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. The City of Anna participated on the Collin County HazMAP Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT). This is a new hazard mitigation plan and the first to be submitted to FEMA for the City of Anna. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Anna. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While the City of Anna has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped City officials to recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and online. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. Table 2.1 outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and Demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard Occurrences National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Hazard Occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Wildland/Urban Interface Page 429 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-371 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the City of Anna Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and the Collin County HMPT. An Anna planning committee representative participated on the county HMPT, with local committee efforts led by the fire chief. The planning committee was assembled with several representatives including the Anna city manager; police chief; fire chief; finance, public works and planning directors; and the general public. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services. Table 2.2 provides a list of the primary representatives on the Anna planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role Fire Department Fire Chief/EMC Plan Development Planning Department Planning Director Plan Development Finance Department Finance Director Plan Development Public Works Department Public Works Director/Floodplain Manager Plan Development Police Department Police Chief Plan Development City Management City Manager Plan Development Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions, including the unincorporated areas of Collin County, by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the cities and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. Page 430 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-372 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders emailed and involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Anna Independent School District Executive Director Review of plan American Medical Response Collin County Supervisor Review of plan Atmos Energy District Representative Review of plan TXU Energy District Representative Review of plan Grayson-Collin Electric Cooperative Area Representative Review of plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each jurisdiction above is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County and included all jurisdiction’s participation: • Collin County HazMAP Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 • Collin County HazMAP Planning Meeting – Week of 11/05/2020 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 at 9AM Page 431 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-373 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning comm ittee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 432 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-374 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The planning committee for the City of Anna identified several natural hazards and man-made hazards that could affect the city. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for Collin County and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Page 433 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-375 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Page 434 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-376 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for the City of Anna Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 1 1 2 1 1.25 Drought 3 0 1 3 1.45 Earthquake 0 1 0 1 0.45 Expansive Soils 2 0 0 1 0.7 Extreme Heat 1 1 0 2 0.85 Flooding 1 1 0 0 0.65 Hail 2 0 0 1 0.7 High Winds 2 1 1 1 1.3 Lightning 1 0 1 0 0.55 Tornado 2 1 2 1 1.55 Wildfire 1 1 1 1 1 Winter Storms 2 0 2 3 1.4 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the City of Anna resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in the City of Anna. Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for the City of Anna High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Tornado Drought High Winds Winter Storms Dam Failure Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Extreme Heat Expansive Soils Hail Flooding Lightning Wildfire Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Earthquake Page 435 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-377 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability The City of Anna faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex; therefore, the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation in this plan. Dam and Levee Failure While there are no dams or levees in the City of Anna, there are dams near the city in unincorporated Collin County. Population and infrastructure would be negatively affected by dam failure. As a participant in the county plan inundation studies will be considered. Drought Although droughts happen often in the City of Anna their impact has been negligible, the risk is considered to be moderate. Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally, all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of the city are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork, Woodbine Aquifer and the Trinity Aquifer are water sources for the City of Anna and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake Even though earthquakes were identified as having negligible to no risk to the City of Anna they still have the potential to occur anywhere in the geographic planning area. Therefore, all geographic areas are potentially vulnerable. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Expansive Soils The City of Anna is vulnerable to this hazard; however, its impact on infrastructure is projected to be minor. All property has the potential to be affected by expansive soils, especially those constructed under older building codes. Extreme Heat The City of Anna has experienced rolling blackouts due to extreme heat through the years. Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but it is especially dangerous to the homeless, elderly, the very young, those without air conditioning, and those who require refrigerated medications. Flooding When flash flooding occurs, roads in low lying areas need to be closed. The location of the storm determines which areas require closure however, typical road closures due to flooding occur on Rosamond and Victoria Falls. Hail All geographic areas, property, and populations of the City of Anna have the potential to be vulnerable to hail. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Winds All geographic areas, property, and populations of the City of Anna have the potential to be vulnerable to high winds, manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Page 436 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-378 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lightning The City of Anna has experienced lightning strikes in the past, including one that damaged electrical equipment in the fire station. All property and populations have are potentially vulnerable to lightning. Exposed populations and property without lightning protection are most vulnerable. Tornado All geographic areas and populations of the City of Anna have the potential to be vulnerable to tornados. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. Wildland Fire 39.81% of the City of Anna’s population lives in the Wildland Urban Interface, but wildfire in the City of Anna is a moderate vulnerability due to the well managed and readily available resources for response. According to the Texas A&M Forest Service the majority of the WUI is in the low threat area location in the middle of the city and the east and west sides of the city are in the moderate threat area. Winter Storms All geographic areas of the City of Anna have the potential to be vulnerable to winter storms. These winter storms have the potential to make roads impassable for days. Residents may be confined to their homes due to the storm and may be without basic services, such as water and electricity, for an extended period of time. Page 437 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-379 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of the City of Anna’s geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the 2020 NCTCOG Population Predictions, the total population of City of Anna in 2020 was 16,945 people, with 5,770 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total Household Density (Sq. Mile) City of Anna 16,945 1.44% 983.05 5,555 1.44% 346.15 Source: US Census Bureau & Collin County Appraisal District **Includes totals from incorporated jurisdictions not participating in the plan Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for the City of Anna). Page 438 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-380 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 City of Anna 8,249 13,690 15,010 1,320 9.6% Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Predictions Property There are an estimated 8,030 parcels in the City of Anna, with an estimated $1,147,264,604 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 City of Anna 8,030 0.94% $1,147,264,604 Source: Collin County Appraisal District Emergency Facilities There are two identified emergency facilities in the City of Anna, including one fire station, one police station, and one free standing ER facility, but no hospitals ]. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals City of Anna 1 1 0 Source: City Data Critical Facilities There are six critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in the City of Anna. The critical facilities include five schools and one historical property site (Table 3.8). Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property City of Anna 5 1 Source: City and County Data Critical Infrastructure There are 10 identified critical infrastructure facilities in the City of Anna, including one natural gas facility, one water treatment facility, one wastewater treatment facilities, and three railway/highway bridges (Table 3.9). Page 439 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-381 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges City of Anna 0 1 1 5 0 3 Source: City/County Data Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, Collin County’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for Collin County, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System-based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Page 440 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-382 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Anna are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Anna are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the City of Anna. The City of Anna and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the City of Anna is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the emergency facilities in the City of Anna are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the City of Anna are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is no impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in the City of Anna. Page 441 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-383 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 147, based on parcels within or that intersect the floodplain. Improved Property Though there have been two (2) recorded flood events in the City of Anna, property losses are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded county- wide. Approximately 34 parcels with an estimated 2020 value of $6,549,778 are located in the 100-year flood plain. In addition, 271 parcels, with a value of $63,346,653 are within or in some way intersect the 100 year floodplain. Emergency Facilities Emergency facilities do not have the potential to be as risk in the 100- year storm event. Critical Facilities One critical facility has the potential to be at risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure Critical Infrastructure have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), a loss of $285.71 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for City of Anna indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in City of Anna are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in City of Anna are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in City of Anna are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), there are two (2) recorded fatalities and no recorded injuries from high wind events. All the population of City of Anna are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Anna are expected at $1,421.43 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of Page 442 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-384 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in City of Anna. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in City of Anna are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in City of Anna are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in City of Anna are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 443 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-385 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events can be expected to cause no deaths and no injuries in Collin County. All the population of City of Anna is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Anna are expected at $2,083.33 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in City of Anna. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in City of Anna are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in City of Anna are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in City of Anna are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been 6 recorded injuries and 2 fatalities from tornado events in the City of Anna. All the population of City of Anna is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), an average loss of $14,714.29 per year in property losses is expected to result from tornado events however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Anna. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the City of Anna are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the City of Anna are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the City of Anna are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 39.81% of the City of Anna is vulnerable to wildfires Improved Property Based on historical data, annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are unknown but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the City of Anna are also unknown. Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there are zero (0) fire stations at risk from wildfire events. Page 444 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-386 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are no schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are zero (0) bridges, zero (0) dams, zero (0) wastewater treatment facility, and zero (0) water treatment facility at risk from wildfire events. Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Anna. All the population of the City of Anna are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Anna are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Anna. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in City of Anna are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in City of Anna are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in City of Anna are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serve as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the City of Anna considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Page 445 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-387 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Anna Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ? 100% Average % Yes Capabilities – 100% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 446 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-388 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency Manager Grant writers % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Anna Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y N 70% Average % Yes Capabilities – 70% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Anna Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N ? 70% Average % Yes Capabilities – 70% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 447 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-389 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify the City of Anna’s legal and regulatory, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, the city of Anna has 100% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 70% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 70% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities The City of Anna City Manager The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro- tem, and council members, along with the city manager, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. As the governing body, the Ability to implement, approve, and expand mitigation actions and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 448 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-390 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016 HazMAP, the City of Anna Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 449 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-391 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Anna Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan City of Anna Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program, including hazard mitigation activities. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Expansive Soil, Extreme Heat, Hail, Lightning, Flooding, Earthquake Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits and other actions. Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion This public education program would be based on the hazards that the City of Anna identified as being vulnerable to. The program would use a combination of distributed literature, social media, and civic presentations to educate residents on natural hazards and promote hazard mitigation. Page 450 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-392 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Anna Action Item Establish centers for vulnerable residents to go for relief during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost Current staffing project time/resources Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate space and resources. Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials. Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling and heating shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Anna Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures. Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures. Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion This program gives rebates to residents who purchase and install safe rooms in their homes or on their properties to protect against severe weather. Status Will be included in 2021, however, come residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program Page 451 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-393 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Anna Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Hail, Lightning, Flooding Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 per siren, number of sirens TBD Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1—2 years Effect on Old Buildings May entail adding a siren tower to existing buildings. Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. Discussion This project will expand the City of Anna’s siren coverage to new areas of development not currently protect by sirens. Status Cost prohibitive at this time and requires significant maintenance. Not as an effective tool to notify the public as in the past. There are many other tools that are more effective today. City of Anna Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones. Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones. Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status The City no longer has plans to undertake this action item. City of Anna Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Page 452 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-394 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan. This will be included in the upcoming Community Risk Assessment study. City of Anna Action Item Develop a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results may entail retrofits for low-flow plumbing. Effect on New Buildings Results may require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundations. Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. Status Plan developed and will be continued to be modified updated to meet the City’s needs City of Anna Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Page 453 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-395 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Results could define required retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes. Effect on New Buildings Results could require updated codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes. Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status No longer a needed action item. City of Anna Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils. Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Anna Action Item Purchase and distribute NOAA Weather Radios to vulnerable residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on any mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages. Effect on New Buildings Depending on any mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages. Page 454 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-396 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information. Status No longer a viable option, use Hyper-Reach to notify the community City of Anna Action Items: New City of Anna Action Item Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits and other actions. Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages. Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. City of Anna Action Item Establish centers for vulnerable residents to go for relief during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost Current staffing project time/resources Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate space and resources. Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials. Page 455 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-397 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling and heating shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold. City of Anna Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures. Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures. Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion This program gives rebates to residents who purchase and install safe rooms in their homes or on their properties to protect against severe weather. City of Anna Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. City of Anna Action Item Maintain and enhance the City’s drought contingency plan. Page 456 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-398 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results may entail retrofits for low-flow plumbing. Effect on New Buildings Results may require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundations. Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Utilize existing plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan includes strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. City of Anna Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils. Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. City of Anna Action Item Purchase and utilize mobile back-up generator Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding, Tornado, Earthquake, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Wildfire, Winter Storms, Dam Failure, Hail, High Winds Goal/Objective 2-D Priority High Page 457 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-399 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Estimated Cost $8,000 - $15,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Funding Potential Matching Sources Local Funding Lead Department Public Works, OEM Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Some buildings will need to be retrofit with ability to connect with generator Effect on New Buildings Buildings will need to be planned with the ability to connect to generator Cost Effectiveness Backup generator will prevent loss of power and data to critical government buildings Discussion Introduction of a mobile back-up generator will allow the City of Anna or other critical facilities to function as close to normal as possible in the event of a massive power loss. City of Anna Action Item Analyze needs, develop and implement water conservation measures for new populations Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C Priority High Estimated Cost $2,000 - $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local funding Potential Matching Sources Local grants, citizen match Lead Department Public Works, OEM Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings New constraints will be placed on water usage without compromising soil integrity. Effect on New Buildings New constraints will be placed on water usage without compromising soil integrity. Cost Effectiveness Expanded water and soil consistency standards will help the City of Anna plan for a boost in infrastructure and population and help maintain normal water levels Discussion As the City of Anna grows, water conservation measures will encompass new infrastructure and residential/commercial areas. This plan implements conservation efforts that also maintain soil consistency, mitigating damage from expansive soils. Page 458 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-400 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance The City of Anna participates in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 Anna NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 480132# ANNA, CITY OF COLLIN COUNTY 8/9/1974 4/2/1991 06/02/09(M) 11/19/1996 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Compliance Once the community applies for the NFIP, FEMA arranges for a study of the community to determine base flood elevations and flood risk zones. Consultation with the community occurs at the start of and during the study, and those communities with minimal flood risk are converted to the Regular Program without a study. FEMA provides the studied community with a Flood Insurance Rate Map delineating base flood elevations and flood risk zones. The community is then given 6 months to adopt base flood elevations in its local zoning and building code ordinances. Once the community adopts more stringent ordinances, FEMA converts the community to the NFIP’s Regular Program. FEMA then authorizes the sale of additional flood insurance in the community up to the Regular Program limits. The community must implement and enforce the adopted floodplain management measures. FEMA provides periodic community assistance visits with local officials to provide technical assistance regarding complying with NFIP floodplain management requirements. The purchase of flood insurance is mandatory as a condition of receipt of federal or federally-related financial assistance for acquisition and/or construction of buildings in SFHAs of any participating community. Those communities notified as flood-prone which do not apply for participation in the NFIP within 1 year of notification are ineligible for federal or federally-related financial assistance for acquisition, construction, or reconstruction of insurable buildings in the SFHA. Jurisdiction Actions In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Page 459 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-401 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 6.2 Anna NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement The City of Anna City Engineer Complete and maintain FEMA elevation certificates for pre-FIRM and or post-FIRM buildings Permits shall be presented to the Floodplain Administrator. The City of Anna requires 2 feet of freeboard above the base flood elevation for the top of bottom floor on residential structures and non-residential structures that will be built on properties created or platted after the effective date of the Flood Damage Prevention Order NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Floodplain development permits Permits are required for any new construction in a floodplain. Participate with FEMA in identifying Special Flood Hazard Areas for future FIRM maps City of Anna participates in Risk Assessment, Mapping and Planning Partners (RAMPP) meetings held by FEMA and/or their contractors to better identify areas that are flood prone that are not shown on current Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Future Mitigation Projects City of Anna will continue to monitor for new areas of flooding that have not been previously identified for mitigation. The City is also considering the adoption of a stormwater utility to fund future mitigation projects. Page 460 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-402 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), the City of Anna has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County and the participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the City of Anna, the county, and the city council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, the City of Anna will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented in table 7.1: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Action Time Fire Chief/EMC Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when Page 461 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-403 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and planning committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan City of Anna City Council Budget Meetings Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Emergency Management Coordinator Emergency Action Plan updates Every five years EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. Planning Director, City Manager Capital improvement plans Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, City Council Drought Contingency plans As needed Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Planning Director, City Council Natural Resource Conservation Plan Annually Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the City of Anna Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicles to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committees will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful Page 462 Item 10. City of Anna Annex Page | C-404 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 463 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-405 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex D: City of Blue Ridge 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2020 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP). The City of Blue Ridge participated on the Collin County HazMAP Planning Team (HMPT). In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Blue Ridge. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While the City of Blue Ridge has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped Blue Ridge officials recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and online. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), the City of Blue Ridge developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data were gathered through numerous sources. Table 2.1 outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Hazard occurrences Page 464 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-406 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Source Data Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Wildland/Urban Interface National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the City of Blue Ridge Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County HMPT. The efforts of the planning committee were led by the Mayor. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in November 2020 with representatives from participating county jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services. Table 2.2 provides a list of the primary representative on the Blue Ridge planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role City Council Mayor Plan Development City Council Council Members Plan Development Volunteer Department Fire Chief Plan Development Public Works Department Director Plan Development Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. Page 465 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-407 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders emailed and involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Blue Ridge Independent School District School Board Review of plan Atmos Energy Manager of Public Affairs Review of plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each organization above is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were hosted by Collin County: • Collin County Hazard Mitigation Committee Meeting – November 11, 2020 • Collin County and Blue Ridge Meeting – November 12, 2020 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 at 9AM Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and local planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. Page 466 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-408 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 467 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-409 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the City of Blue Ridge identified several natural hazards and man-made hazards that could affect the unincorporated areas of the County. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 Collin County HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for the City of Blue Ridge and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 Page 468 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-410 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for the City of Blue Ridge The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the City of Blue Ridge resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in the City of Blue Ridge. Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 0 0 0 0 Drought 3 1 1 2 1.7 Earthquake 0 1 0 1 0.45 Expansive Soils 2 0 0 1 0.7 Extreme Heat 3 1 0 0 1.25 Page 469 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-411 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Flooding 2 1 1 1 1.3 Hail 2 0 0 1 0.7 High Winds 3 1 2 2 1.95 Lightning 2 0 1 0 0.85 Tornado 2 3 3 2 2.6 Wildfire 3 1 2 1 1.85 Winter Storms 1 2 3 2 1.95 Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for the City of Blue Ridge High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Tornado Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.95) High Winds Winter Storm Wildfire Drought Flooding Extreme Heat Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Lightning Hail Expansive Soil Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Dam Failure Earthquake Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the City of Blue Ridge faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation. Dam and Levee Failure The City of Blue Ridge is not subject to dam failure because no Dams are located inside the city limits. The city is not knowingly vulnerable to a Dam failure that occurs outside the city limits, but as a participant in the county plan inundation studies will be considered. Drought Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally, all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of the City of Blue Ridge are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. The Woodbine Aquifer is the water sources for the city and is vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s Page 470 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-412 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake All geographic areas of Blue Ridge have the potential to be vulnerable to earthquake. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Expansive Soils The City of Blue Ridge is vulnerable to of expansive soil. All property has the potential to be vulnerable to expansive soils, especially those constructed under older building codes. Road failures are also a common occurrence from this hazard. Extreme Heat We have experienced rolling blackouts due to extreme heat through the years. Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but it is especially dangerous to the homeless, elderly, the very young, those without air conditioning, and those who require refrigerated medications Flooding The intersection of North Church Street and School Street frequently floods during periods of heavy rainfall and must be closed. Hail All geographic areas of Blue Ridge have the potential to be vulnerable to hail. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Winds Because Blue Ridge is located in a rural area with many trees, high winds have the potential to block roads, disrupt power, and damage homes. Lightning All geographic areas, property, and populations in Josephine have the potential to be vulnerable to lightning. Lightning is responsible for at least one (1) residential structure fire over the past ten (10) years resulting in a total loss for the residence. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado All geographic areas of Blue Ridge have the potential to be vulnerable to tornado. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. Wildland Fire According to the Texas Forest Service, 89.22% of the population of the City of Blue Ridge is located in the Wildland/Urban Interface. The City of Blue Ridge is predominately rural with a significant amount of wildland-urban area interface. Due to large fuel loads, there is significant risk in Blue Ridge for a wildland fire. There have been two wildland fires in the city in the last year; therefore, this hazard has the potential to harm the City of Blue Ridge. Winter Storms Winter storms pose a threat to the City of Blue Ridge. These winter storms have the potential to make roads impassable for days. Residents may be confined to their homes due to the storm and may be without basic services, such as water and electricity, for an extended period of time. The entire city is vulnerable to this hazard mainly due to its isolation from a major city. Page 471 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-413 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of Collin County geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the Texas Association of Counties Population Estimates, the total estimated population of Blue Ridge in 2020 was 1023 people, with 360 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total** Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total** Household Density (Sq. Mile) Blue Ridge 1023 0.09% 612.57 360 0.09% 215.70 Source: Texas Association of Counties Population Estimates & Collin County Appraisal District Page 472 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-414 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan **Includes totals from incorporated jurisdictions not participating in the plan Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for the City of Blue Ridge). Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 Blue Ridge 799 916 926 10 1.1% Source: Texas Association of Counties Population Estimates -: Data Currently Unavailable Property There are an estimated 598 parcels in the City of Blue Ridge, with an estimated $51,331,247 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 Blue Ridge 598 0.19% $51,331,247 Source: Collin County Appraisal District 1 Includes public buildings (residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, religion, government, education) Emergency Facilities There is one identified emergency facility in the City of Blue Ridge, including one fire station. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals Blue Ridge 1 0 0 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Critical Facilities There are 5 critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in the City of Blue Ridge. The critical facilities include three schools and zero historical property sites (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property Blue Ridge 3 0 Page 473 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-415 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Source: Local jurisdictions Critical Infrastructure There are 2 identified critical infrastructure facilities in the City of Blue Ridge, including one wastewater treatment facility and one potable water treatment facility (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges Blue Ridge 0 0 1 1 0 0 Source: Local jurisdictions Page 474 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-416 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, The City of Blue Ridge’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System-based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for Collin County, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Page 475 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-417 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events in the City of Blue Ridge. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Blue Ridge are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Blue Ridge are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the City of Blue Ridge. The City of Blue Ridge and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the City of Blue Ridge is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in the City of Blue Ridge are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the City of Blue Ridge are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is no impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in the City of Blue Ridge Page 476 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-418 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 18 residential parcels in the City of Blue Ridge are located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property Though there have been zero (0) recorded flood events in the City of Blue Ridge, property losses are unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded county-wide. Approximately $539,608 of the total assessed value is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities Emergency facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Facilities Critical facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure 0% of railways/highways and bridges, 0% of dams, 100% of water treatment works, and 100% waste water treatment facilities are at risk from the 100-year storm event. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events in the City of Blue Ridge. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), a loss of $228.57 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard in the City of Blue Ridge. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for the City of Blue Ridge indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the City of Blue Ridge are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the City of Blue Ridge are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Blue Ridge are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 477 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-419 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events the City of Blue Ridge. All the population of the City of Blue Ridge is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Blue Ridge are expected at $42.86 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in the City of Blue Ridge. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in the City of Blue Ridge are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the City of Blue Ridge are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the City of Blue Ridge are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events can be expected to cause no deaths or injuries in the City of Blue Ridge. All the population of the City of Blue Ridge is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Blue Ridge are expected at $833.33 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the City of Blue Ridge are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the City of Blue Ridge are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the City of Blue Ridge are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 478 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-420 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in the City of Blue Ridge. All the population of the City of Blue Ridge is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Blue Ridge are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Blue Ridge. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the City of Blue Ridge are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the City of Blue Ridge are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the City of Blue Ridge are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 89.22% of the City of Blue Ridge is vulnerable to wildfires. There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are unknown but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the City of Blue Ridge are also unknown. Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information 1 fire stations at moderate risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information 5 schools at moderate risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are 0 bridges, 0 dams, 1 wastewater treatment facility, and 0 water treatment facility at moderate risk from wildfire events. Page 479 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-421 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Blue Ridge. All the population of The City of Blue Ridge are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Blue Ridge are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Blue Ridge. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in the City of Blue Ridge are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the City of Blue Ridge are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Blue Ridge are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 480 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-422 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serves as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the City of Blue Ridge considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capability to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Blue Ridge Y Y Y N N Y Y Y N Y Y N N N 57% Average % Yes Capabilities – 57% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 481 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-423 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers (used as needed – not on staff) % Yes City of Blue Ridge Y Y Y N N Y Y N N Y 60% Average % Yes Capabilities – 60% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes City of Blue Ridge Y N Y Y Y Y N N N N 50% Average % Yes Capabilities – 50% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know To quantify City of Blue Ridge legal and regulatory, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), and Page 482 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-424 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, the city of Blue Ridge has 50% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 50% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 10% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities City of Blue Ridge City Secretary The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, along with the city manager, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. As the governing body, the ability to implement and approve mitigation actions and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 483 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-425 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016 HazMAP, the City of Blue Ridge Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the Plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones within City of Blue Ridge. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 484 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-426 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Blue Ridge Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program, including resources to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds, Winter Storm, Wildfire, Drought, Hail, Flooding, Lightning, Extreme Heat, Expansive Soils, Dam Failure, Earthquake Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion Develop and distribute, via social media, information about mitigating the hazards identified and what actions can be taken in this annex Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Page 485 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-427 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that establishes centers for vulnerable residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost Current staffing project time/resources Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Develop and Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Winds, Tornado, Hail Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Status Deferred – Residents did received funding through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program. The NCTCOG Program has been suspended Page 486 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-428 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed High W inds, Tornado, Wildfire, Hail, Lightning, Flooding Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. Discussion The City of Blue Ridge will expand its current siren program into newly developed areas of the jurisdiction that are currently outside of siren coverage. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 487 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-429 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Develop and implement a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire and implement mitigation actions to reduce vulnerability. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Develop and implement a drought contingency plan that will implement water mandatory water conservation measures. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings Results may require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage and mandatory water restrictions for water conservation. Page 488 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-430 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Completed and adopted on 4/02/2019 City of Blue Ridge Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results would help identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Page 489 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-431 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Blue Ridge Action Items: New City of Blue Ridge Action Item Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation of each identified hazard.. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Page 490 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-432 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation City of Blue Ridge Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that establishes centers for vulnerable residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost Current staffing project time/resources Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold City of Blue Ridge Action Item Develop and Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Winds, Tornado, Hail Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Page 491 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-433 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion City of Blue Ridge Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Hail, Lightning, Flooding Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. Discussion The City of Blue Ridge will expand its current siren program into newly developed areas of the jurisdiction that are currently outside of siren coverage. This action item would be specific to installation/placement of new OWS sirens in the jurisdiction. City of Blue Ridge Action Item Develop and implement a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Page 492 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-434 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire and implement mitigation actions to reduce vulnerability. City of Blue Ridge Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results would help identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. City of Blue Ridge Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Page 493 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-435 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. City of Blue Ridge Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information City of Anna Action Item Develop City’s drought contingency plan. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results may entail retrofits for low-flow plumbing. Effect on New Buildings Results may require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundations. Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Page 494 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-436 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Utilize existing plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan includes strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. Page 495 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-437 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance The City of Blue Ridge is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 Blue Ridge NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 481628# BLUE RIDGE, TOWN OF COLLIN COUNTY - 04/02/1991 06/02/2009(M) 04/02/91 No (M): No Elevation Determined - All Zone A, C and X Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Page 496 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-438 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 6.2 Blue Ridge NIFP Activity Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement City Manager Complete and maintain FEMA elevation certificates for pre-FIRM and or post-FIRM buildings Permits are issued through the Department of Environmental Health. City of Blue Ridge requires 2 feet of freeboard above the base flood elevation for the top of bottom floor on residential structures and non- residential structures that will be built on properties created or platted after the effective date of the Flood Damage Prevention Order NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with City’s flood damage prevention order shall result in fines up to $500 per violation plus court costs. Floodplain development permits Permits are required for any new construction in a floodplain. Participate with FEMA in identifying Special Flood Hazard Areas for future FIRM maps City of Blue Ridge participates in Risk Assessment, Mapping and Planning Partners (RAMPP) meetings held by FEMA and/or their contractors to better identify areas that are flood prone that are not shown on current Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Take action to minimize the effects of flooding on people, property, and building contents through measures including flood warning, emergency response, and evacuation planning City of Blue Ridge public works installs signs at low water crossings that indicate "When flooded turn around don't drown". Future Mitigation Projects City of Blue Ridge will continue to monitor for new areas of flooding that have not been previously identified for mitigation. Page 497 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-439 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), the City of Blue Ridge has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the City of Blue Ridge, the county, and the city council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, the City of Blue Ridge will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented table 7.1: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Activity Schedule Fire Chief Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Likewise, each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submit same for approval by the state, FEMA and each local jurisdiction’s governing body. The plan will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Page 498 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-440 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan City of Blue Ridge City manager, City Council Budget Meetings. Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs City manager, Fire Chief Emergency Action Plan updates Once every five years EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards City manager, Director of Public Works Floodplain ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. City manager, Planning director Capital improvement plans Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. City manager, Director of Public Works Drought Contingency plans As needed Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education City manager, Planning Director Natural Resource Conservation Plan Annually Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the City of Blue Ridge Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this Page 499 Item 10. City of Blue Ridge Annex Page | D-441 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicles to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committees will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. . Page 500 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-442 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex E: City of Celina 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2020 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. The City of Celina participated in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT). This is a new hazard mitigation plan and the first to be submitted to FEMA for the City of Celina. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Celina. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While Celina has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped Celina officials to recognize the benefits of a long- term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and online. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. Table 2.1 outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Wildland/Urban Interface analysis National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Page 501 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-443 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the City of Celina Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County HMPT. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in November, 2020 with representatives from participating county jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services. The efforts of the planning committees and the HMPT were led by the Collin County Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator. Table 2.2 below provides a list of the primary representatives on the Celina planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee– Primary Representatives Representing Position Role City of Celina Fire Chief Plan development City of Celina Deputy Fire Chief Plan development Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and Page 502 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-444 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders emailed and involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Fire Department Fire chief/ Deputy Fire chief Emergency Response Capabilities Police Department Police chief/Sergeant Emergency Response Capabilities City Engineering City Engineer Infrastructure Preparedness Public Works Public Works Director Utilities Preparedness City Planning City Planner Development Planning Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each organization above is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County and included all jurisdiction’s participation: • Collin County HazMAP Kickoff Meeting – 11/05/2020 • City of Celina Hazard Mitigation Team Meeting – 12/3/2020 • City of Celina HazMAP Discussion/Update – 1/5/2021 • City of Celina Hazard Team Meeting – 12/4/2020 • Collin County Public Meeting – 11/2/2021at 2PM • Collin County Public Meeting 01/12/2022 Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring Page 503 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-445 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 504 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-446 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the City of Celina identified several natural hazards and man-made hazards that could affect the city. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Chapter 3 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for Collin County and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Page 505 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-447 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Page 506 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-448 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for City of Celina Hazard Category/Degre e of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 2 0 1 0.8 Drought 3 0 0 3 1.2 Earthquak e 0 0 0 0 0 Expansive Soils 3 0 0 1 1 Extreme Heat 3 1 0 3 1.55 Flooding 3 2 1 2 2.05 Hail 2 0 0 2 0.8 High Winds 2 0 0 3 0.9 Lightning 3 1 0 2 1.45 Tornado 2 2 3 2 2.25 Wildfire 1 1 1 3 1.2 Winter Storms 1 1 2 3 1.45 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the City of Celina resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in the City of Celina. Page 507 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-449 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for City of Celina High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Tornado Flooding Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Extreme Heat Wildfire Winter Storms Lightning Drought Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Expansive Soils High Winds Dam Failure Hail Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Earthquake Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the City of Celina faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation. Dam and Levee Failure The City of Celina has identified one dam that poses a threat to the northern part of Preston Road. The dam is located and Kirk Ranch and could cause damage to Preston Road if it were to fail. The dam has a less than 1% probability to fail. Drought The City of Celina is at moderate risk for a drought occurring. The city needs to enforce water conservation laws and continue to conserve and maintain the water supply. Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of Celina are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. The Lake Ray Roberts-Lewisville-Grapevine reservoir system, Trinity Aquifer, and Woodbine Aquifer are water sources for the City of Celina and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake This hazard was identified as having negligible to no risk. All property and populations have the potential to be affected by earthquake. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Page 508 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-450 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Expansive Soils Expansive soils are categorized as a high probability occurrence annually, but overall as low risk. However, it is unlikely that this hazard will cause any loss of life or severe property damage. Extreme Heat Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Flooding The City of Celina is surrounded by large agricultural land mass with very few concrete structures. This lack of development keeps water from impacting a large percentage of property within the city. Historically, the City of Celina has responded to streets impacted by floodwater. Overall, the City of Celina has not had to deal with large amounts of property damage or life impacts because of flooding. Hail All geographic areas and populations in the City of Celina have the potential to be vulnerable to hail. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Winds All geographic areas in the city of Celina have the potential to be vulnerable to high winds. High wind events can cause debris on roadways which can endanger people's lives and property. Manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Lightning All geographic areas and populations in the City of Celina have the potential to be vulnerable to lightning. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado All geographic areas and populations in the City of Celina have the potential to be vulnerable to tornados. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. Wildland Fire The City of Celina is less than 41.77% built-out with the remainder as maintained agricultural land. The projected buildout for the City of Celina is roughly 380,000 people. Due to a high concentration of fuel within the city limits of the City of Celina, wildfires have been considered a possible risk for the city. Wildfire poses a low life impact risk and property impact risk with a high spatial extent impact. In order to mitigate against this wildfire risk, agricultural land needs to remain well maintained in order to prevent the spread of fire. Structures and populations in the WUI are most vulnerable to wildfire. According to the Texas A&M Forest Service, 54% of the City of Celina lives in the Wildland/Urban Interface. Winter Storms The City of Celina has identified winter storms as the hazard that could cause the most interruption in daily life and business. A winter storm would have a large property impact as well as a spatial impact. In 2013, response by first responders was an issue because the departments did not have vehicles that could drive on ice safely. Loss of power and heat to critical buildings and infrastructure was also an issue. Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of Celina geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were Page 509 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-451 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the City of Celina the current in City population is 22,105 people as of December 1st 2020. The Service Area population (Light Farms included) is 27,607 people as of December 1st 2020. According to the 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates and the US Census Bureau, the total estimated population of the City of Celina in 2019 is 16,299 people, with 5,253 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total** Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total** Household Density (Sq. Mile) City of Celina 27,607 1.31% 514.06 6,101 1.59% 181.00 Source: US Census Bureau & **Includes totals from incorporated jurisdictions not participating in the plan Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for the City of Celina). Page 510 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-452 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 City of Celina 6,028 13,090 17,680 4,590 35.06% Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates Property There are an estimated 10,132 thousand parcels in the City of Celina, with an estimated $1,588,281,438 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 City of Celina 10,132 1.19% $1,588,281,438 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool 1 Includes public buildings (residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, religion, government, education) This also includes properties from Denton County. The % of County only reflects the Collin County portion of Celina and in relation to only Collin County. Emergency Facilities There are three identified emergency facilities in the City of Celina, including two fire stations and one police station. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals City of Celina 2 1 0 Source: Celina GIS Dept Critical Facilities There are 8 critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in the City of Celina. The critical facilities include 7 schools, and 1 historical properties. (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property City of Celina 7 1 Page 511 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-453 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Source: Celina GIS Dept 1 High School – Celina ISD 1 Middle School – Celina ISD 3 Elementary Schools – Prosper ISD 2 Elementary Schools – Celina ISD Critical Infrastructure There are 6 identified critical infrastructure facilities in City of Celina, including 3 water treatment facilities, 1 wastewater treatment facility, 1 dam, and 1 bridge (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges City of Celina 0 0 1 3 5 1 Source: Celina GIS Dept 4 Low Hazard Dam and 1 Uknown Hazard Dam within the City Limits Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, the City of Celina vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for the City of Celina, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Page 512 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-454 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Page 513 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-455 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) 0 recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Celina are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Celina are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the City of Celina. The City of Celina and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the City of Celina is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in the City of Celina are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the City of Celina are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is no impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in the City of Celina Page 514 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-456 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 332 residential parcels in the City of Celina are located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property Though there have been six (6) recorded flood events in the City of Celina, property losses are at $12,666.67 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded county-wide. Approximately $27,779,401 of the total assessed value is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities Emergency facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Facilities Critical facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure Critical Infrastructure have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Celina are expected at $7,714.29 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for the City of Celina indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the City of Celina are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the City of Celina are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Celina are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 515 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-457 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events. All the population of the City of Celina is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Celina are expected at $1,312.86 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in the City of Celina. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in the City of Celina are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the City of Celina are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the City of Celina are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events can be expected to cause no deaths or injuries in The City of Celina. All the population of the City of Celina is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Celina are expected at $1,041.67 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the City of Celina are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the City of Celina are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the City of Celina are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 516 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-458 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in the City of Celina. All the population of the City of Celina is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Celina are expected at $428.57 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Celina. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the City of Celina are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the City of Celina are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the City of Celina are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 41.77% of the City of Celina is vulnerable to wildfires. There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are unknown but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, 41.77% percentage of the overall property improvement values across the City of Celina are also unknown. Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there are 0 fire stations at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are no schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are 0 bridges, 0 dams, 0 wastewater treatment facility, and 0 water treatment facility at risk from wildfire events. Page 517 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-459 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Celina. All the population of City of Celina is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Celina are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in City of Celina. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in City of Celina are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in City of Celina are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in City of Celina are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 518 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-460 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serve as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the City of Celina considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl ) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Celina Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N Y N 71% Average % Yes Capabilities – 71% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 519 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-461 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Celina Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y 90% Average % Yes Capabilities – 90% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Celina N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N 70% Average % Yes Capabilities – 70% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 520 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-462 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify the city of Celina’s legal and regulatory, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that, on average, the city of Celina has 71% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 90% of identified and technical capabilities, and 70% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities City of Celina City Manager The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, along with the city manager, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. As the governing body, the ability to implement and approve mitigation actions, expand, and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 521 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-463 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016 HazMAP, the City of Celina Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for this plan. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones within Celina. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 522 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-464 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Celina Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan City of Celina Action Item Purchase and utilize mobile back-up generator Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding, Tornado, Earthquake, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Wildfire, Winter Storms, Dam Failure, Hail, High Winds Goal/Objective 2-D Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000 - $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Funding Potential Matching Sources Local Funding Lead Department Public Works, OEM Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Some buildings will need to be retrofit with ability to connect with generator Effect on New Buildings Buildings will need to be planned with the ability to connect to generator Cost Effectiveness Backup generator will prevent loss of power and data to critical government buildings Discussion Introduction of a mobile back-up generator will allow the City of Celina or other critical facilities to function as close to normal as possible in the event of a massive power loss. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 523 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-465 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Celina Action Item Develop and implement a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Celina Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information Page 524 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-466 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Celina Action Item Implement all-hazards community education program, including information on mitigation activities. Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding, Tornado, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Wildfire, Winter Storms, Dam Failure, Hail, High Winds, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority High Estimated Cost $1,000 - $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local funding Potential Matching Sources Local grants, FEMA Lead Department OEM Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Educating public on mitigation against loss of life and property will save government resources in the event of a disaster event Discussion Community education is important for reducing loss of life and property. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Celina Action Item Analyze needs, develop and implement water conservation measures for new populations Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C Priority High Estimated Cost $1,000 - $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local funding Potential Matching Sources Local grants, citizen match Lead Department Public Works, OEM Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings New constraints will be placed on water usage without compromising soil integrity. Effect on New Buildings New constraints will be placed on water usage without compromising soil integrity. Page 525 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-467 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness Expanded water and soil consistency standards will help the city of Celina plan for a boost in infrastructure and population and help maintain normal water levels Discussion As the City of Celina grows water conservation measures will encompass new infrastructure and residential/commercial areas. This plan implements conservation efforts that also maintain soil consistency, mitigating damage from expansive soils. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Celina Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Celina Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works, Planning Zoning Page 526 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-468 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results would identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Celina Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost TBD Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Celina Action Items: New City of Celina Action Item Purchase and utilize mobile back-up generator Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding, Tornado, Earthquake, Extreme Heat, Lightning, Wildfire, Winter Storms, Dam Failure, Hail, High Winds Goal/Objective 2-D Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000 - $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Funding Page 527 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-469 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local Funding Lead Department Public Works, OEM Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Some buildings will need to be retrofit with ability to connect with generator Effect on New Buildings Buildings will need to be planned with the ability to connect to generator Cost Effectiveness Backup generator will prevent loss of power and data to critical government buildings Discussion Introduction of a mobile back-up generator will allow the City of Celina or other critical facilities to function as close to normal as possible in the event of a massive power loss. City of Celina Action Item Develop and implement a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. City of Celina Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Page 528 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-470 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken on structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information City of Celina Action Item Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority High Estimated Cost $1,000 - $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local funding Potential Matching Sources Local grants, FEMA Lead Department OEM Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. City of Celina Action Item Analyze needs, develop and implement water conservation measures for new populations Page 529 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-471 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C Priority High Estimated Cost $1,000 - $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local funding Potential Matching Sources Local grants, citizen match Lead Department Public Works, OEM Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings New constraints will be placed on water usage without compromising soil integrity. Effect on New Buildings New constraints will be placed on water usage without compromising soil integrity. Cost Effectiveness Expanded water and soil consistency standards will help the city of Celina plan for a boost in infrastructure and population and help maintain normal water levels Discussion As the City of Celina grows water conservation measures will encompass new infrastructure and residential/commercial areas. This plan implements conservation efforts that also maintain soil consistency, mitigating damage from expansive soils. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. City of Celina Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Page 530 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-472 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. City of Celina Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results would identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. City of Celina Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost TBD Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Page 531 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-473 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. City of Celina Action Item Purchase and implement citywide radio communications system Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Earthquake, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $150,000 -$165,000 Potential Funding Sources Local funding, Grant funding Potential Matching Sources Local grants, citizen match Lead Department Public Works, OEM, Police, Fire Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings No effect on old buildings Effect on New Buildings No effect on old buildings Cost Effectiveness Allow for consistent and reliable communication across all departments in the city. To include Police, Fire, Emergency Management, Public Works, and City officials Discussion This project will improve the overall communication in the city by installing repeaters and implementing a clear and reliable city wide radio system. City of Celina Action Item Frontier/Parvin Road extension and bridge project Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A, 2-B, 2-D, 2-E, 4-C Goal/Objective Flooding Priority High Estimated Cost $60,000,000 Potential Funding Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share, Local grants, Federal grants, State grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Public Works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to flooding Effect on New Buildings Results would identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to flooding by adding bridges over low lying roadway Cost Effectiveness Low Page 532 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-474 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future flood mitigation projects. Page 533 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-475 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance The City of Celina is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 Celina NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 480133# CELINA, CITY OF DENTON COUNTY/COLLIN COUNTY 4/12/1974 11/1/1979 4/18/2011 11/1/1979 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Compliance Once the community applies for the NFIP, FEMA arranges for a study of the community to determine base flood elevations and flood risk zones. Consultation with the community occurs at the start of and during the study, and those communities with minimal flood risk are converted to the Regular Program without a study. FEMA provides the studied community with a Flood Insurance Rate Map delineating base flood elevations and flood risk zones. The community is then given 6 months to adopt base flood elevations in its local zoning and building code ordinances. Once the community adopts more stringent ordinances, FEMA converts the community to the NFIP’s Regular Program. FEMA then authorizes the sale of additional flood insurance in the community up to the Regular Program limits. The community must implement and enforce the adopted floodplain management measures. FEMA provides periodic community assistance visits with local officials to provide technical assistance regarding complying with NFIP floodplain management requirements. Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Table 6.2 Celina NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement City of Celina City Manager Actions are taken to prevent flood damage to pre- existing structures, reduce loss of life Regularly hold educational seminars within the community to inform citizens in flood-prone areas During meetings to create, adopt, update, or otherwise change any documents that have an effect on vulnerability to natural Page 534 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-476 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan in flood prone areas about the benefits of having flood insurance hazards, the City of Celina will consult the most recent version of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. Provided there is sufficient political, fiscal, and administrative capability, actions detailed in the HazMAP will be integrated into the document wherever applicable. Page 535 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-477 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), Collin County has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the City of Celina, the county, and the city/town council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning team, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, Celina will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Activity Schedule Deputy Fire Chief Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Likewise, each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting same for approval by the state, FEMA and each local jurisdiction’s governing body. The plan will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Page 536 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-478 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan City of Celina City Council, City Manager Budget Meetings Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Fire Chief, Deputy Fire Chief Emergency Action Plan updates Every five years EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. County Commissioners Capital improvement plans Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, County Commissioners Drought Contingency plans As needed Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Public Works Director, County Commissioners Natural Resource Conservation Plan Annually Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Page 537 Item 10. City of Celina Annex Page | E-479 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Once the plan is adopted, the HMPT will coordinate implementation with the engineering, planning, and emergency management departments for the county, participating jurisdictions, river authorities, and drainage districts. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The HMPT and committees will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 538 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-480 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex F: Town of Fairview 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2021 as part of an update to the Town of Fairview Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. Following the review and approval of the Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), This annex shall be updated every five (5) years or as necessary to ensure its continued accuracy and effectiveness. The Town of Fairview participates on the Collin County HazMAP Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT). In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the Town of Fairview. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While Fairview has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped Fairview officials to recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Fairview’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and online. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), The Town of Fairview developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten The Town of Fairview and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. Table 2.1 outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2021 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Wildland/Urban Interface Page 539 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-481 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Source Data National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Dam Information Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by The Town of Fairview Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County. The Collin County HMPT was assembled with representatives from participating planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services. Table 2.2 provides a list of the primary representatives on the Fairview planning committee and the departments they represent. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role The Town of Fairview Town Council Mayor Input and Review The Town of Fairview Town Administration Town Manager Input and Review The Town of Fairview Emergency Management Emergency Management Coordinator Plan Leader The Town of Fairview Fire Department Fire Chief Input and Review The Town of Fairview Public Works Town Engineer Input and Review The Town of Fairview Police Department Police Chief Input and Review Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Office to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the HMPT and planning committees. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning committee as coordinated by the Town of Fairview or Page 540 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-482 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Collin County. • Assisted the Town of Fairview and Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted the Town of Fairview and Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with the Town of Fairview and Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders emailed and involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Baxter I.T. Consulting Services Owner/Operator Review of plan Lincoln Property Company COO/Senior Vice President Review of plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each organization above is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were hosted by Collin County and included all participating jurisdictions: • HazMAP Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 • Collin County Planning Meeting – November 11, 2020 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public Page 541 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-483 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 542 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-484 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the Town of Fairview identified several natural hazards and man-made hazards that could affect the town. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016-2021 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for the Town of Fairview and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for the Town of Fairview jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Town of Fairview HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in the Town of Fairview based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for the Town of Fairview, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaking down the value of each category is below. Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 Page 543 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-485 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for the Town of Fairview Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 0 0 0 0 Drought 2 0 1 3 1.15 Earthquake 0 1 0 0 0.35 Expansive Soils 2 0 0 1 0.7 Extreme Heat 1 1 0 2 0.85 Flooding 1 1 0 1 0.75 Hail 2 0 0 1 0.7 High Winds 1 0 0 1 0.4 Lightning 1 0 0 0 0.3 Tornado 2 1 1 1 1.3 Wildfire 1 0 0 1 0.4 Winter Storms 2 0 0 2 0.8 Page 544 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-486 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the Town of Fairview resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in the Town of Fairview. Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for the Town of Fairview High Risk (PRI 2.00-3.00) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Tornado Drought Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Extreme Heat Winter Storms Flooding Expansive Soils Hail Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0-0.49) Wildfire Earthquake High Winds Lightning Dam Failure Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the Town of Fairview faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation. Dam and Levee Failure The Town of Fairview has three (3) dams or levees in its jurisdiction and we are unaware of any significant structures upstream from our jurisdiction which could potentially cause harm within our jurisdiction. This hazard was identified as having negligible to no risk to the jurisdiction, but as a participant in the county plan inundation studies will be considered. Drought This hazard was identified as having moderate risk similar to the rest of the county and surrounding jurisdictions. Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of the Town of Fairview are vulnerable to this hazard. The agriculture industry is typically affected the hardest due to a lack of crops, water for livestock, and feed. The Town of Fairview has minimal agricultural crops and livestock in its jurisdiction. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork and the Lake Chapman-Cooper reservoir system are water sources for the town and are vulnerable to drought. As a drought continues, many residents Page 545 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-487 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan who are on private wells as well as those served by the over taxed North Texas Municipal Water District begin to experience water shortages. The lack of water can also impact emergency responder capabilities in the form of firefighting efforts. Earthquake Due to the risk being associated to a distant quake, earthquakes have the potential to affect the entire planning area. This hazard was identified as having negligible to no risk to the jurisdiction. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Expansive Soils While there are no documented significant occurrences of damage to structures in its jurisdiction, the Town of Fairview residents do from time-to-time experience foundation issues due to shifting soils. This hazard was identified as having low risk similar to the rest of the county and surrounding jurisdictions. Extreme Heat This hazard was identified as having low risk similar to the rest of the county and surrounding jurisdictions. Extended extreme heat can cause a rapid and continual loss of moisture in vegetation leading to an escalation of wildfires. Most of the Town of Fairview jurisdiction is developed residential property with some areas of wild land interface in our ETJ. Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. The potential exists for extended heat emergencies to exceed capabilities of our local hospital and Emergency Medical System (in surrounding jurisdictions) due to a large elderly population (1144 units) in Heritage Ranch, an active adult community within the Town of Fairview. Flooding Common flooding hazards within the planning area include flood hazards from flash flooding and from new development. Flash floods are a high risk hazard since they can roll boulders, tear out trees, and destroy buildings and bridges. This hazard was identified as having low risk in the Town of Fairview’s jurisdiction mainly due to limited areas in a flood plain and the potential for flash flooding in the extreme eastern portion of the Town of Fairview’s and the ETJ. Hail occurs when, at the outgrowth of a severe thunderstorm, balls or irregularly shaped lumps of ice greater than 0.75 inches in diameter fall with rain. Early in the developmental stages of a hailstorm, ice crystals form within a low-pressure front due to warm air rising rapidly into the upper atmosphere and the subsequent cooling of the air mass. Frozen droplets gradually accumulate on the ice crystals until, having developed sufficient weight, they fall as precipitation. Hail has the potential to affect the entire planning area. This hazard was identified as having low risk similar to the rest of the county and surrounding jurisdictions. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Winds Wind is defined as the motion of air relative to the earth’s surface. The horizontal component of the three-dimensional flow and the near-surface wind phenomenon are the most significant aspects of the hazard. Straight-line winds are often responsible for the wind damage associated with a thunderstorm. These winds are often confused with tornadoes because of similar damage and wind speeds. However, the strong and gusty winds associated with straight-line winds blow roughly in a straight line unlike the rotating winds of a tornado. Downbursts or micro-bursts are examples of damaging straight-line winds. A downburst is a small area of rapidly descending rain and rain-cooled air beneath a thunderstorm that produces a violent, localized downdraft covering 2.5 miles or less. Wind speeds in some of the stronger downbursts can reach 100 to 150 miles per hour, which is similar to that of a strong Page 546 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-488 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan tornado. The winds produced from a downburst often occur in one direction, and the worst damage is usually on the forward side of the downburst. High winds may affect the entire planning area. The Town of Fairview has the potential for power outages, fires, damage to roofs, cars, out buildings, and electrical utilities due to high winds. Areas affected may pose access challenges due to fallen trees on roadways. High winds can occur suddenly and without warning during severe weather. Outside of primary residential structures, there are few locations for the public to seek shelter during high winds. This hazard was identified as having negligible risk to the jurisdiction. Lightning results from the buildup and discharge of electrical energy between positively and negatively charged areas within thunderstorms. A “bolt” or brilliant flash of light is created when the buildup becomes strong enough. These bolts of lightning can be seen in cloud-to-cloud or cloud-to-ground strikes. Bolts of lightning can reach temperatures approaching 50,000° Fahrenheit. While lightning is mostly affiliated with thunderstorms, lightning often strikes outside of these storms, as far as 10 miles away from any rainfall. The Federal Emergency Management Agency states that an average of 300 people are injured and 80 people are killed in the United States each year by lightning. Direct strikes have the power to cause significant damage to buildings, critical facilities, infrastructure, and ignition of wildfires which can result in widespread damages to property. All geographic areas, property, and populations in the Town of Fairview have the potential to be vulnerable to lightning. This hazard was identified as having negligible to no risk to the jurisdiction. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado A tornado is a violently rotating column of air, in contact with the ground, both pendant from a cumuliform cloud or underneath a cumuliform cloud, and often (but not always) visible as a condensation funnel. Tornadoes have the potential affect the entire planning area. This hazard was identified as having moderate risk similar to the rest of the county and surrounding jurisdictions. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. Wildland Fire A wildland fire is any fire occurring on grassland, forest, or prairie, regardless of ignition source, damages or benefits. Wildland fires are fueled almost exclusively by natural vegetation. They typically occur in national forests and parks, where federal agencies are responsible for fire management and suppression. Interface or intermix fires are urban/wildland fires in which vegetation and the built- environment provide fuel. Firestorms are events of such extreme intensity that effective suppression is virtually impossible. Firestorms occur during extreme weather and generally burn until conditions change or the available fuel is exhausted. Wildland fires affect the entire planning area. For the purposes of this hazard analysis, wildland fires are assessed under what is known as the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). The WUI is an area of development that is susceptible to wildland fires due to the number of structures located in an area with vegetation that can act a fuel for a wildland fire. 91% of the Town of Fairview is located in the WUI. The Texas A&M Forest Services’ wildfire risk assessment report ranks the wildfire threat from low to moderate with the west side of the town located in the low threat area and the east side of town in the moderate threat area. Winter Storms Winter storms originate as mid-latitude depressions or cyclonic weather systems, sometimes following the path of the jet stream. A winter storm or blizzard combines heavy snowfall, high winds, extreme cold and ice storms. Many winter depressions give rise to exceptionally heavy rain and widespread flooding and conditions worsen if the precipitation falls in the form of snow. The winter storm season varies widely, depending on latitude, altitude and proximity to moderating influences. Winter Page 547 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-489 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan storms affect the entire planning area. Cold snaps in which temperatures fall below the freezing point of 32° Fahrenheit do happen on an annual basis in the planning area and can lead to issues with infrastructure, especially frozen roads and bridges. For the Town of Fairview, this hazard was identified as having low risk similar to the rest of the county and surrounding jurisdictions. These winter storms have the potential to make roads impassable for days. Residents may be confined to their homes due to the storm and may be without basic services, such as water and electricity, for an extended period of time. Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of the Town of Fairview geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates and the Collin County Appraisal District, the total population of the Town of Fairview in 2020 was 9,770 people, with 3,601 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Page 548 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-490 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.4. Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total** Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total** Household Density (Sq. Mile) Town of Fairview 9,770 .90% 1,045.35 4,582 1.20% 490.25 Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates Publication, US Census Bureau & Collin County Appraisal District **Includes totals from incorporated jurisdictions not participating in the plan Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for Town of Fairview). Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 Town of Fairview 7,248 9,520 9,610 90 .95% Source: 2020 Census Data & 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates Publication Property There are an estimated 4,547 parcels in the Town of Fairview, with an estimated $1,596,754,123 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 Town of Fairview 4,547 1.30% $1,596,754,123 Source: Collin County Appraisal District 1 Includes public buildings (residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, religion, government, education) Emergency Facilities There are three (3) identified emergency facilities in the Town of Fairview, including two (2) fire stations, one (1) police station and zero (0) hospitals. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals Town of Fairview 2 1 0 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Page 549 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-491 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Facilities There are three (3) critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in the Town of Fairview. The critical facilities include three (3) schools and zero (0) historical property sites (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property Town of Fairview 3 0 Source: Local jurisdictions Critical Infrastructure There are eight (8) identified critical infrastructure facilities in the Town of Fairview, including zero (0) airports, zero (0) natural gas facilities, zero (0) water treatment facilities, zero (0) wastewater treatment facility, zero (0) dams, and eight (8) railway/highway bridges (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges Town of Fairview 0 0 0 0 3 7 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, the Town of Fairview’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System-based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for the Town of Fairview, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Page 550 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-492 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System-based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) zero (0) recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of Fairview are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the Town of Fairview are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Page 551 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-493 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the Town of Fairview. The Town of Fairview and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is minor impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the Town of Fairview is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is minor impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in the Town of Fairview are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is minor impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the Town of Fairview are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is minor impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in the Town of Fairview. Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 7.38% of the population of the Town of Fairview is located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property Property losses in the Town of Fairview are expected to be $8,734.83 per year. No crop losses are expected or recorded county-wide. Approximately $7,594,973 of the total assessed value of improvements in the Town of Fairview is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities There are zero (0) emergency facilities at imminent risk from the 100- year storm event. Critical Facilities There are zero (0) critical facilities located within the 100-year storm event. Page 552 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-494 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure 0% of railways/highways and bridges, 0% of dams, 0% of water treatment works, and 0% waste water treatment facilities are at risk from the 100-year storm event. Many of these structures are designed to traverse or be located within the floodplain due to unavoidable circumstances. Additionally, treated wastewater is typically discharged towards streams, which makes portions of wastewater treatment facilities likely to be located within the floodplain. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of Fairview are expected at $6,426.57 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for the Town of Fairview indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the Town of Fairview are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the Town of Fairview are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in the Town of Fairview are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events. All the population of the Town of Fairview is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of Fairview are expected at $814.29 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in the Town of Fairview. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in the Town of Fairview are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 553 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-495 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the Town of Fairview are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the Town of Fairview are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from lightning events in the Town of Fairview. All the population of the Town of Fairview is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of Fairview are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the Town of Fairview are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the Town of Fairview are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the Town of Fairview are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in the Town of Fairview. All the population of the Town of Fairview is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) property losses in the Town of Fairview are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the Town of Fairview. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the Town of Fairview are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the Town of Fairview are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 554 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-496 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the Town of Fairview are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 84.42% of the Town of Fairview is vulnerable to wildfires. There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the Town of Fairview are also unknown. Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there are two (2) fire stations and one (1) police station at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are three (3) schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are zero (0) bridges, zero (0) dams, zero (0) wastewater treatment facility, and zero (0) water treatment facility at risk from wildfire events. Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the Town of Fairview. All the population of the Town of Fairview is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of Fairview are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the Town of Fairview. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in the Town of Fairview are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the Town of Fairview are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in the Town of Fairview are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 555 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-497 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 556 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-498 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serve as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the Town of Fairview considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction Town of Fairview Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y 93% Average % Yes Capabilities – % Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 557 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-499 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes per Jurisdiction Town of Fairview Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y 90% Average % Yes Capabilities – % Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes per Jurisdiction Town of Fairview N Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y 80% Average % Yes Capabilities – 80% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 558 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-500 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify the Town of Fairview’s legal and regulatory, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31- 70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, the town of Fairview has a moderate level of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, a strong level of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and strong level of identified fiscal capabilities per the rating categories. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities Town of Fairview Town Manager The town council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, along with the town manager, address the budget; approve/pass ordinances, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the town overall. As the governing body, the ability to implement and approve mitigation actions, expand, and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized Page 559 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-501 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016-2021 HazMAP, the Town of Fairview Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the Plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through encouragement of the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Work with stake holders to identify high hazard critical infrastructure for the possibility of rehabilitation or retrofit. Objective 2-C Assess the need for enacting and/or enforcing regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Ensure the construction of new facilities take into account methods designed to mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Update hazard/vulnerability assessments of personal properties and structures located in flood zones within the Town of Fairview. Objective 3-B Develop and execute new awareness programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties. Page 560 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-502 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. Town of Fairview Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan Town of Fairview Action Item Implement all-hazards public education program, including hazard mitigation activities for each identified hazard Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 3-B, 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources Local Grants Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public Education is extremely effective for low cost Discussion The Town of Fairview will implement an all-hazards comprehensive public education program based on the hazards identified in this annex and what actions can be taken to mitigate impacts. This program will use a variety of means for distributing information, Page 561 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-503 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan including social media, printed literature, and via the Town of Fairview official website. Status Town began the implementation of this action item via online public education materials. Town plans to receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Town of Fairview Action Item Implement tornado safe room education program Hazard(s) Addressed High Winds, Tornados Goal/Objective 1-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $500 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources Local Grants/FEMA Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Retrofit will be required on some structures Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Moderate to high depending on level of acceptance Discussion Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease the likelihood of personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornado or hail events. Status Will be included in 2021, however, some residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program Town of Fairview Action Item Implement and actively promote Nixle Notification alert system. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B, 3-B, 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $1,500 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources Local Grants/FEMA Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Page 562 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-504 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warnings will assist in saving lives for no cost. Discussion Weather/all-hazards notifications are a proven means to alert and warn citizens about severe weather conditions and other emergency and hazard information. Status This action item was implemented and will continue to be promoted in order to increase subscribers. Continue – will be included in 2021. Town of Fairview Action Item Update and enforce water conservation measures and implement public education outreach Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C, 3-C Priority Medium/Low Estimated Cost $1000 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources North Texas Municipal Water District Lead Department Public Works, Code Enforcement Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Water conservations measures would stabilize soils, mitigating damage to existing structures. Effect on New Buildings Water conservations measures would stabilize soils, mitigating damage to new structures. Cost Effectiveness Low-cost effort for increasing awareness of water restrictions. Discussion Town of Fairview will review water conservation measures and update as necessary. These conservation efforts regulate water used for maintaining soil consistency. Updates will be communicated to the public. Status The Town has a Water Conservation Plan and a Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan it reviews and updates, if necessary. No updates were necessary in recent years. Continue – will be included in 2021. Town of Fairview Action Item Develop and implement regulations for the construction of town buildings deemed “critical infrastructure”. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-C, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E Priority Medium/Low Page 563 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-505 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Estimated Cost $5000 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources NCTCOG/FEMA Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings May involve cascading retrofits Effect on New Buildings Strengthening construction requirements for new critical infrastructure will result in greater resiliency to hazards Cost Effectiveness Moderate to High. Discussion Town will develop and implement construction design regulations for new Critical Infrastructure, as defined by the EMC. Regulations would include elevating structures, reinforcing doors and windows, using flame-retardant, hail and wind resistant external materials, roof bracing, installing higher grade insulation, stabilizing foundations, installing lightning rods, and using low-flow technology for all plumbing. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Fairview Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-A Priority Medium/Low Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Engineering/ NRCS Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 564 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-506 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of Fairview Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed Earthquake Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results would identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Fairview Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost TBD Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency Management, Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 565 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-507 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of Fairview Action Items: New Town of Fairview Action Item Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 3-B, 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources Local Grants Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. Town of Fairview Action Item Implement tornado safe room education program Hazard(s) Addressed High Winds, Tornados Goal/Objective 1-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $500 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources Local Grants/FEMA Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Retrofit will be required on some structures Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Moderate to high depending on level of acceptance Discussion Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease the likelihood of personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornado or hail events. Page 566 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-508 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of Fairview Action Item Implement and actively promote Nixle Notification alert system. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B, 3-B, 4-A, 4-B Priority High Estimated Cost $1,500 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources Local Grants/FEMA Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warnings will assist in saving lives for no cost. Discussion Weather/all-hazards notifications are a proven means to alert and warn citizens about severe weather conditions as well as other emergency and hazard information. Town of Fairview Action Item Update and enforce water conservation measures and implement public education outreach Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C, 3-C Priority Medium/Low Estimated Cost $1000 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources North Texas Municipal Water District Lead Department Public Works, Code Enforcement Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Water conservations measures would stabilize soils, mitigating damage to existing structures. Effect on New Buildings Water conservations measures would stabilize soils, mitigating damage to new structures. Cost Effectiveness Low-cost effort for increasing awareness of water restrictions. Discussion Town of Fairview will review water conservation measures and update as necessary. These conservation efforts regulate water used for maintaining soil consistency. Updates will be communicated to the Page 567 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-509 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan public. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. Town of Fairview Action Item Develop and implement regulations for the construction of town buildings deemed “critical infrastructure”. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning Goal/Objective 1-C, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E Priority Medium/Low Estimated Cost $5000 Potential Funding Sources Operating Budget Potential Matching Sources NCTCOG/FEMA Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings May involve cascading retrofits Effect on New Buildings Strengthening construction requirements for new critical infrastructure will result in greater resiliency to hazards Cost Effectiveness Moderate to High. Discussion Town will develop and implement construction design regulations for new Critical Infrastructure, as defined by the EMC. Regulations would include elevating structures, reinforcing doors and windows, using flame-retardant, hail and wind resistant external materials, roof bracing, installing higher grade insulation, stabilizing foundations, installing lightning rods, and using low-flow technology for all plumbing. Town of Fairview Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed Earthquake Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Page 568 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-510 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Results would identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Town of Fairview Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost TBD Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency Management, Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Page 569 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-511 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance The Town of Fairview is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 481069# FAIRVIEW, TOWN OF COLLIN COUNTY 1/10/1975 11/1/1979 6/7/2017 11/1/1979 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Compliance Once the community applies for the NFIP, FEMA arranges for a study of the community to determine base flood elevations and flood risk zones. Consultation with the community occurs at the start of and during the study, and those communities with minimal flood risk are converted to the Regular Program without a study. FEMA provides the studied community with a Flood Insurance Rate Map delineating base flood elevations and flood risk zones. The community is then given 6 months to adopt base flood elevations in its local zoning and building code ordinances. Once the community adopts more stringent ordinances, FEMA converts the community to the NFIP’s Regular Program. FEMA then authorizes the sale of additional flood insurance in the community up to the Regular Program limits. The community must implement and enforce the adopted floodplain management measures. FEMA provides periodic community assistance visits with local officials to provide technical assistance regarding complying with NFIP floodplain management requirements. Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Page 570 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-512 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement Town of Fairview Town Engineer Review new development adjacent to floodplains and require 3 feet of freeboard (existing floodplain) or 2 feet of freeboard Development plans are reviewed. If base flood elevations are known, then set minimum FF elevations on plats. If base flood elevations are unknown, developer must perform flood modeling to establish the BFE. NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, the use of Flood Hazard zoning regulations, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with the Town’s flood damage prevention order shall result in fines up to $2000 per violation per day. Floodplain development permits Permits are required for any new construction in a floodplain, including fill. Fairview prohibits structures that enclose people or animals in the flood plain. Reduce flooding effects of upstream development on downstream properties in or near the flood plain Fairview is having a drainage master plan prepared to lessen the effects of upstream development on downstream flooding including regional detention Maintain a zero rise in the floodplain near sensitive properties Fairview requires computer modeling and hydraulic calculations to demonstrate a zero rise in the 100 year flood plain near properties that are threatened Future Mitigation Projects Fairview has identified some property for floodplain mitigation and will work with developers to make improvements at the time of development Page 571 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-513 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), Fairview has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. The Town of Fairview along with participating jurisdictions is responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the Town of Fairview, the county, and the city/town council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, the Town of Fairview will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Activity Schedule Emergency Management Coordinator Monitoring Plan: Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Likewise, each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting same for approval by the state, FEMA and each local jurisdiction’s governing body. The plan will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Page 572 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-514 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan Town of Fairview Town Council Budget Meetings Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Emergency Management Coordinator Emergency Action Plan updates Every Five Year EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. Town Council, Town Engineer Capital improvement plans Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, Town Council Drought Contingency plans Assessed annually and updated as needed. Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Town Engineer, Town Council Natural Resource Conservation Plan Assessed annually and updated as needed. Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Page 573 Item 10. City of Fairview Annex Page | F-515 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Fairview Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicles to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committees will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 574 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-516 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex G: City of Farmersville 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2020 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. The City of Farmersville participated on the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT). In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Farmersville. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While Farmersville has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped Collin County officials recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and online. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Urban Interface National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Page 575 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-517 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the Farmersville Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County HMPT. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in November 2020 with representatives from participating county jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services. The efforts of the planning committees and the HMPT were led by the Collin County Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator. The table below provides a list of the primary representatives on the Farmersville planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role City of Farmersville Fire Chief Plan Development City of Farmersville GIS Analyst Plan Development City of Farmersville City Manager Plan Development City of Farmersville City Secretary Plan Development/Primary Point of Contact City of Farmersville Chief of Police Plan Development Collin County Homeland Security Assistant Emergency Manager Plan Assistance Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified Page 576 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-518 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders emailed and involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Farmers Insurance Insurance Agent Review of plan State Farm Insurance Insurance Agent Review of plan First Baptist Church, Farmersville Disaster Response Coordinator Review of plan North Texas Municipal Water District Representative for Farmersville Review of plan RE/MAX International Realtor Review of plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, the City of Farmersville organization is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a Coordinating Committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by the City of Farmersville: • Collin County HazMAP Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 • Collin County Planning Meeting – April 21, 2021 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022TBD Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. Page 577 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-519 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 578 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-520 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee identified several natural hazards and man-made hazards that could affect Farmersville. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for the City of Farmersville and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Page 579 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-521 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for City of Farmersville The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the City of Farmerville resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in the City of Farmersville. Page 580 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-522 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 1 2 1 0 1.25 Drought 2 0 1 3 1.15 Earthquake 0 1 0 1 0.45 Expansive Soils 2 0 0 1 0.7 Extreme Heat 1 1 0 2 0.85 Flooding 1 1 0 0 0.65 Hail 2 0 0 1 0.7 High Winds 2 1 0 1 1.05 Lightning 1 0 0 0 0.3 Tornado 2 1 1 1 1.3 Wildfire 1 2 0 1 1.1 Winter Storms 2 1 2 3 1.75 Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings City of Farmersville High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Winter Storm Dam Failure Tornado Drought Wildfire High Winds Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Expansive Soils Extreme Heat Hail Flooding Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Earthquake Lightning Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Page 581 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-523 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the City of Farmersville faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation. Dam and Levee Failure A dam is defined as a barrier constructed across a watercourse for the purpose of storage, control, or diversion of water. Dams typically are constructed of earth, rock, concrete, or mine tailings. A dam failure is an accidental or unintentional collapse, breach, or other failure of an impoundment structure that results in downstream flooding. Because dams are man-made structures, dam failures are usually considered technological hazards. However, since most dam failures result from prolonged periods of rainfall, they are often cited as secondary or cascading effects of natural flooding disasters and are not named as the primary hazard that causes disaster declarations. Development of the downstream areas necessitates the original low hazard classifications to be changed to higher hazard classifications because the dams are no longer adequate for the increased downstream risks. NRCS data shows that there are 6 dams in Collin County that are no longer adequate for increased downstream risks. This percentage could actually be higher because detailed current evaluations of NRCS dams have not been conducted due to resource limitations. In addition, many of these inadequate dams have not been updated because many of the legally responsible entities of these dams do not have sufficient mechanisms funding for updates, or even adequate maintenance, in some cases. Soil and Water Conservation Districts do not have any statutory funding capability of their own, and counties, especially those with small populations and multiple dams, are not able to generate the resources needed to sustain a consistent and comprehensive effort upgrade these structures. While no record could be found of any previous dam failures in Collin County, three things are clear: • These dams are in desperate need of detailed evaluations and consistent maintenance • Increased development downstream of the dams has put more people, property, and infrastructure at risk. The City of Farmersville is responsible for 2 high hazard dams identified by the NRCS in both the City Limits of Farmersville due to the use of easements and the Emergency Operations Plans for those dam sites. While a dam failure event would affect jurisdictions not participating in the Collin County Local Mitigation Strategy, the HMT has chosen to include all High Hazard dams the City is responsible for in Emergency Planning for plan incorporation purposes. Drought Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of Farmersville are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork, and the Lake Chapman-Cooper reservoir system are water sources for the City of Farmersville and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. The lack of water can also impact emergency responder capabilities (not facilities) in the form of firefighting efforts as Farmersville has one of the largest fire districts in Collin County. Earthquake An earthquake is a sudden motion or trembling caused by an abrupt release of accumulated strain on the tectonic plates that comprise the Earth's crust. The theory of plate tectonics Page 582 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-524 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan holds that the Earth's crust is broken into several major plates. These rigid, 50- to 60- mile thick plates move slowly and continuously over the interior of the earth, meeting in some areas and separating in others. As the tectonic plates move together they bump, slide, catch, and hold. Eventually, faults along or near plate boundaries slip abruptly when the stress exceeds the elastic limit of the rock, and an earthquake occurs. The ensuing seismic activity and ground motion provoke secondary hazards: surface faulting, ground failure, and tsunamis. The vibration or shaking of the ground during an earthquake is referred to as ground motion. In general, the severity of ground motion increases with the amount of energy released and decreases with distance from the causative fault or epicenter. When a fault ruptures, seismic waves are propagated in all directions, causing the ground to vibrate at frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 30 Hz. Seismic waves are referred to as P waves, S waves, and surface waves. Earthquakes have the potential to occur anywhere in the geographic planning area; therefore, all geographic areas are potentially vulnerable. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. This hazard was identified as having negligible or no risk to the City of Farmersville. Expansive Soils Any soil that expands when wet and shrinks when dry is an expansive soil. Soils are tested using an accepted standard of measurement to determine swell potential. Expansive soils can exert pressures up to 15,000 lbs. per foot causing the breakdown of building foundations and structural integrity. Roadbeds may also be affected, and could lead to avalanche and collapse when cutting into mountains and hillsides. Problems often associated with expansive soils include foundation cracks, heaving and cracking of floor slabs and walls, jammed doors and windows, ruptured pipelines, having and cracking of sidewalks and roads, and damage to the upper floors of a building when motion in the structure is significant. Expansive soils are present throughout the world are known in every United States state. Every year they cause billions of dollars in damage. The entire Farmersville geographic planning area has the potential to be vulnerable to expansive soils. Extreme Heat Severe summer heat is characterized by a combination of a very high temperatures and exceptionally humid conditions. When persisting over a period of time, it is called a heat wave. Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Utilities can also be impacted due to rolling blackouts. Flooding Flooding is defined as the accumulation of water within a water body and the overflow of excess water onto adjacent floodplain lands. The floodplain is the land adjoining the channel of a river, stream, ocean, lake, or other watercourse or water body that is susceptible to flooding. The statistical meaning of terms like “25-year storm” and “100-year flood” can be confusing. Simply stated, a floodplain can be located anywhere; it just depends on how large and how often a flood event occurs. Floodplains are those areas that are subject to inundation from flooding. Floods and the floodplains associated with them are often described in terms of the percent chance of a flood event happening in any given year. As a community management or planning term, “floodplain” most often refers to an area that is subject to inundation by a flood that has a one percent chance of occurring in any given year (commonly and incorrectly referred to as the 100-year floodplain). Common flooding hazards within the planning area include impacts from flash flooding and from new development. A flash flood is a rapid flood that inundates low-lying areas in less than six hours. This is caused by intense rainfall from a thunderstorm or several thunderstorms. Flash floods can also occur from the collapse of a man-made structure or ice dam. Construction and development can change the natural drainage and create brand new flood risks as new buildings, parking lots, and roads create less land that Page 583 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-525 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan can absorb excess precipitation from heavy rains, hurricanes, and tropical storms. Flash floods are a high risk hazard since they can roll boulders, tear out trees, and destroy buildings and bridges. The City of Farmersville has identified several low water crossings that are subject to periodic flash flooding. Affected areas differ with each storm as there are several different branches and tributaries of rivers and creeks subject to overflow, and also are dependent upon which area receives the rain. These areas are low water crossings mainly on improved city streets. Hail Hail is an outgrowth of a severe thunderstorm in which balls or irregularly shaped lumps of ice greater than 0.75 inches in diameter fall with rain. Early in the developmental stages of a hailstorm, ice crystals form within a low-pressure front due to warm air rising rapidly into the upper atmosphere and the subsequent cooling of the air mass. Frozen droplets gradually accumulate on the ice crystals until, having developed sufficient weight, they fall as precipitation. The entire geographic planning area has the potential to be vulnerable to hail, exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Winds Straight-line winds are often responsible for the wind damage associated with a thunderstorm. Downbursts or micro-bursts are examples of damaging straight-line winds. A downburst is a small area of rapidly descending rain and rain-cooled air beneath a thunderstorm that produces a violent, localized downdraft covering 2.5 miles or less. Wind speeds in some of the stronger downbursts can reach 100 to 150 miles per hour, which is similar to that of a strong tornado. The winds produced from a downburst often occur in one direction, and the worst damage is usually on the forward side of the downburst. High winds have the potential to affect the entire planning area, manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. High winds are a frequent occurrence with severe thunderstorms and they can affect all areas of Farmersville. These winds can occur suddenly and without warning during severe weather and may pose access challenges due to fallen trees on roadways. There have been several instances of damage occurring to business and commercial structures as a result of high winds. Outside of primary residential structures, there are few locations for the public to seek shelter during high winds. Lightning Lightning damage results from four (4) effects of lightning strike: electrocution of humans and animals; vaporization of materials along the path of strike; fire caused by the high temperature produced by the strike; and a sudden power surge that can damage electrical and electronic utility substations and distribution lines. It is estimated that throughout the United States, a power outage caused by lightning occurs on 50 percent of the days throughout the year. Lightning has the potential to affect all populations and property in the City of Farmersville. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado A violently rotating column of air, in contact with the ground, either pendant from a cumuliform cloud or underneath a cumuliform cloud, and often (but not always) visible as a condensation funnel cloud. The entire Farmersville geographic planning area has the potential to be vulnerable to tornadoes. Manufactured homes and exposed populations are extremely vulnerable to tornadoes. Wildfire Wildfires are any fire occurring on grassland, forest, or prairie, regardless of ignition source, damages or benefits. Wildfires are fueled almost exclusively by natural vegetation. Interface or intermix fires are urban/wildfires in which vegetation and the built-environment provide fuel. Firestorms are events of such extreme intensity that effective suppression is virtually impossible. Firestorms occur during Page 584 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-526 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan extreme weather and generally burn until conditions change or the available fuel is exhausted. 66.43% of the population is vulnerable to the WUI and the risk is identified as moderate by the Texas Forest Service. Automatic mutual aid between city fire departments is enacted to respond to wildfires, especially during times of drought, burn bans and high fire threat. Winter Storms Winter storms originate as mid-latitude depressions or cyclonic weather systems, sometimes following the path of the jet stream. A winter storm or blizzard, combines heavy snowfall, high winds, extreme cold and ice storms. Many winter depressions give rise to exceptionally heavy rain and widespread flooding and conditions worsen if the precipitation falls in the form of snow. The winter storm season varies widely, depending on latitude, altitude and proximity to moderating influences. The entire geographic planning area has the potential to be vulnerable to winter storms. Populations at greatest risk are the elderly, the homeless, and populations without access to heat. Critical facilities are also vulnerable. Page 585 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-527 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of unincorporated Collin County geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, and the Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, and the Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator. The following tables provide a breakdown of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates, the total population of the City of Farmersville in 2020 was 3,351 people, with 1,206 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total Household Density (Sq. Mile) City of Farmersville 3,351 0.31% 786.62 1,179 0.31% 276.98 Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate & Collin County Appraisal District Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for the City of Farmersville). Page 586 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-528 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.5 Population Predictions* Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018-2019 Percent (%) Change 2018-2019 City of Farmersville 3,301 3,330 3,340 10 .03% Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate Property There are an estimated 1,888 parcels in the City of Farmersville, with an estimated $217,208,478 in total assessed value of improvements. Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 City of Farmersville 1,888 0.48% $217,208,478 Source: Collin County Appraisal District Emergency Facilities There is one identified emergency facilities in Farmersville, including Public Safety Building which houses the fire station and police station. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals City of Farmersville 1 1 0 Source: City/County Data Critical Facilities There is four critical facility, which is considered non-emergency in Farmersville. The critical facility is the Public Safety Building which will include schools. (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Page 587 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-529 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property City of Farmersville 4 0 Source: Local jurisdictions Critical Infrastructure There are 7 identified critical infrastructure facilities in Farmersville, including one airport, a water treatment facility, a wastewater treatment facility, three dams, and one railway/highway bridges (Table 3.9). In addition to the information on the table Farmersville also has one electric city wide system. Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges City of Farmersville 1 0 1 1 3 1 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, the City of Farmersville’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System-based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for Collin County, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Page 588 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-530 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) zero (0) recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Farmersville are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Farmersville are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting . Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Page 589 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-531 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the City of Farmersville. The City of Farmersville and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the City of Farmersville is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in the City of Farmersville are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the City of Farmersville are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), the impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure would be on the one city-wide electrical system. Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 5.54% of the population of the City of Farmersville is located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property There have been three (3) recorded flood events in the City of Farmersville. Property losses are expected but unknown due to inaccurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded county- wide. Emergency Facilities There are not emergency facilities at imminent risk from the 100-year storm event. Critical Facilities There are not critical facilities located within the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure 100% of railways/highways and bridges, 100% of dams, 100% of water treatment works, 100% waste water treatment facilities, and 100% electric system facilities are at risk from the 100-year storm event. Many of these structures are designed to traverse or be located within the floodplain due to unavoidable circumstances. Additionally, treated wastewater is typically discharged towards streams, which makes portions of wastewater treatment facilities likely to be located within the floodplain. Summary Table 3.14 Page 590 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-532 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Farmersville are expected at $871.43 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for the City of Farmersville indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the City of Farmersville are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the City of Farmersville are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Farmersville are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are three (3) recorded injuries and no recorded fatalities from high wind events. All the population of the City of Farmersville is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Farmersville are expected at $16,642.86 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in the City of Farmersville. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in the City of Farmersville are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the City of Farmersville are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the City of Farmersville are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Page 591 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-533 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events can be expected to cause no deaths or injuries the City of Farmersville. All the population of the City of Farmersville is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Farmersville are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the City of Farmersville are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the City of Farmersville are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the City of Farmersville are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in the City of Farmersville. All the population of the City of Farmersville is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Farmersville are expected at $22,142.86 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in the City of Farmersville. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the City of Farmersville are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the City of Farmersville are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the City of Farmersville are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 592 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-534 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 66.43%% of the City of Farmersville is vulnerable to wildfires. There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, property losses in the City of Farmersville are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the City of Farmersville are also unknown.. Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there is one fire station in City of Farmersville at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are four schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are one bridge, three dams, one wastewater treatment facility, one water treatment facility, and one electric system at risk from wildfire events. Page 593 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-535 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Farmersville. All the population of the City of Farmersville is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Farmersville are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Farmersville. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in the City of Farmersville are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the City of Farmersville are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Farmersville are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serves as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the City of Farmersville considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Page 594 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-536 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction Farmersville Y Y Y Y ? Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N 84% Average % Yes Capabilities – 84% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 595 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-537 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes Farmersville Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y 80% Average % Yes Capabilities – 80% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes Farmersville Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y 90% Average % Yes Capabilities – 90% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 596 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-538 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify Farmersville’s legal and regulatory, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, Farmersville has a strong level of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, a strong level of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and a strong level of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities City of Farmersville City Manager The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, along with the city manager, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. As the governing body, the ability to implement and approve mitigation actions, expand, and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 597 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-539 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016 HazMAP, the City of Farmersville Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 598 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-540 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Farmersville Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Develop and Implement a Comprehensive Public Education Program to Mitigate the Impacts of Each Identified Hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion Farmersville will develop a program for educating the public on our hazards and effective mitigation activities for each. Program will combine distributed written literature and social media to educate residents on hazards, their dangers, and how to mitigate against them to protect life and property. Page 599 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-541 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Farmersville Action Item Develop and implement water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Farmersville will develop stringent regulations/codes for water conservation. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Develop and Implement an Extreme Temperature Program Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Page 600 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-542 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Developing heating and cooling shelters as part of an extreme temperature program would allow threatened residents to reduce their vulnerability to extreme temperature hazards. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C, 2-D Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion By implementing its own program separate of that run by the North Central Texas COG, Farmersville would be able to directly target its residents for storm shelter rebates, ensuring their lives and property are protected against High Winds, Tornado, and Hail Status Will be included in 2021, however, come residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program City of Farmersville Action Item Purchase and install outdoor warning sirens to increase coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Hail, Lightning, Flooding Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 per siren Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, user fees Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Could entail tower construction on existing buildings Page 601 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-543 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness High. Early warning is a key element in outdoor safety Discussion Installing sirens in areas of new development, Farmersville can ensure long-term reduction of vulnerability to life and personal property. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Page 602 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-544 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion A CWPP would identify locations in Farmersville that are vulnerable to wildfire. These locations might include critical facilities, critical infrastructure, or other properties that are vital to the interests of Farmersville. By identifying these locations, targeted preparedness and response measures can be implemented. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results would identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Page 603 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-545 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Farmersville Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 604 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-546 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Farmersville Action Items: New City of Farmersville Action Item Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. City of Farmersville Action Item Develop and implement water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Page 605 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-547 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Farmersville will develop stringent regulations/codes for water conservation. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. City of Farmersville Action Item Develop and Implement an Extreme Temperature Program Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Developing heating and cooling shelters as part of an extreme temperature program would allow threatened residents to reduce their vulnerability to extreme temperature hazards. City of Farmersville Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C, 2-D Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Page 606 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-548 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion By implementing its own program separate of that run by the North Central Texas COG, Farmersville would be able to directly target its residents for storm shelter rebates, ensuring their lives and property are protected against High Winds, Tornado, and Hail City of Farmersville Action Item Purchase and install outdoor warning sirens to increase coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Hail, Lightning, Flooding, Earthquake Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 per siren Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, user fees Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Could entail tower construction on existing buildings Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness High. Early warning is a key element in outdoor safety Discussion Installing sirens in areas of new development, Farmersville can ensure long-term reduction of vulnerability to life and personal property. This action item would be specific to installation/placement of new OWS sirens in the jurisdiction. City of Farmersville Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Page 607 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-549 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. City of Farmersville Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion A CWPP would identify locations in Farmersville that are vulnerable to wildfire. These locations might include critical facilities, critical infrastructure, or other properties that are vital to the interests of Farmersville. By identifying these locations, targeted preparedness and response measures can be implemented. City of Farmersville Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Page 608 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-550 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Results would help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results would identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. City of Farmersville Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. City of Farmersville Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Page 609 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-551 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information Page 610 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-552 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance The City of Farmersville is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 481627# FARMERSVILLE, CITY OF COLLIN COUNTY 4/2/1991 06/02/09(M) 4/2/1991 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Manager NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement City of Farmersville City Secretary Complete and maintain FEMA elevation certificates for pre- FIRM and or post- FIRM buildings Permits are issued through the City Secretary. The City of Farmersville requires 2 feet of freeboard above the base flood elevation for the top of bottom floor on residential structures and non- residential structures that will be built on properties created or platted after the effective date of the Flood Damage Prevention Order NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with City’s flood damage prevention order shall result in fines up to $500 Floodplain development permits Permits are required for any new construction in a floodplain. Participate with FEMA in identifying Special The City of Farmersville participates in Risk Assessment, Mapping Page 611 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-553 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Manager NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement Flood Hazard Areas for future FIRM maps and Planning Partners (RAMPP) meetings held by FEMA and/or their contractors to better identify areas that are flood prone that are not shown on current Flood Insurance Rate Maps. per violation plus court costs. Take action to minimize the effects of flooding on people, property, and building contents through measures including flood warning, emergency response, and evacuation planning County Road Operations department installs signs at low water crossings that indicate "When flooded turn around don't drown". Future Mitigation Projects The City of Farmersville will continue to monitor for new areas of flooding that have not been previously identified for mitigation. Page 612 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-554 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), the City of Farmersville has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. The City of Farmersville, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the City of Farmersville, the county, and the city council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The City of Farmersville’s Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, the City of Farmersville will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel What Time City Manager Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning committee members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually External Stakeholders and Planning Committee Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually City Council Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and committees will establish a process in Page 613 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-555 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan City of Farmersville City Council Budget Meetings Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Emergency Management Coordinator Emergency Action Plan updates Once every five years EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. City Council, Director of Planning Capital improvement plans Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, City Council Drought Contingency plans As needed Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Planning Director, City Council Natural Resource Conservation Plan Annually Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Farmersville Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicles to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Page 614 Item 10. City of Farmersville Annex Page | G-556 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committees will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. . Page 615 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-557 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex H: City of Frisco 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2021 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan updates the Frisco hazard mitigation plan submitted to FEMA as part of the 2016 Collin County plan. The City of Frisco participated on the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Team (HMPT) for this update. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Frisco. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While the City of Frisco has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped the City of Frisco officials to recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and jurisdictional websites. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2012 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Wildland/Urban Interface analysis National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Page 616 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-558 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the City of Frisco Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and the Collin County HMPT. Frisco planning committee representatives participated on the HMPT, with local efforts led by the City of Frisco Emergency Management Specialist. The Planning Committee was assembled with representatives from participating planning committees, including city management, police and fire chiefs, engineers, public and private representatives. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services. The table below provides a list of the primary representatives on the Frisco planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role City of Frisco Deputy Emergency Management Coordinator General Policy Guidance City of Frisco Emergency Management Analyst Coordination / Information Gathering / Submittals City of Frisco Public Safety GIS Information Support Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. Page 617 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-559 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders emailed and involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Frisco Independent School District Director of Emergency Management Review of plan Centennial Medical Center Director of Emergency Management Review of plan Baylor Medical Center of Frisco Director of Emergency Management Review of plan American Red Cross Collin County VOAD Member Review of plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each organization above is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a Coordinating Committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the planning committee met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County and included all jurisdictions’ participation: • Collin County Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 • Collin County HazMAP Planning Meeting – Week of 11/05/2020 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring Page 618 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-560 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 619 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-561 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the City of Frisco identified several natural hazards and man-made hazards that could affect the city. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Chapter 3 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 Collin County HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for the City of Frisco and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Page 620 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-562 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Page 621 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-563 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for the City of Frisco Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 1 0 0 0.35 Drought 2 0 0 3 0.9 Earthquake 0 1 0 1 0.45 Expansive Soils 3 0 0 2 1.1 Extreme Heat 2 0 0 3 0.9 Flooding 1 1 0 1 0.75 Hail 2 1 1 3 1.5 High Winds 2 1 1 3 1.5 Lightning 2 1 1 3 1.5 Tornado 2 1 1 3 1.5 Wildfire 1 0 0 0 0.3 Winter Storms 2 0 1 3 1.15 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the City of Frisco, resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in the City of Frisco. Page 622 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-564 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for the City of Frisco High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Hail High Winds Lightning Tornado Winter Storms Expansive Soils Earthquake Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Drought Extreme heat Flooding Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Dam Failure W ildfire Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d)(3)) Since 2011, the City of Frisco has seen tremendous growth both in population and development. The population in 2011 was 119,738; it is now 203,795. Frisco Independent School District grew from 37,300 students to over 60,000 students across 10 high school,17 middles schools and 42 elementary schools. Commercial permits issued each year continues to rise; in 2014 we issued 85 new permits and in 2020 we issued 82 permits. Housing permits are estimated to have increased 15% from 2019 with the city issuing 7,399 single family and multi family dwelling permits. The Fire Department has added an additional two stations within this timeframe. Frisco is home to five large capacity special event venues, which host a variety of sporting and special events including the NFL Dallas Cowboys Headquarters and Training facility, NCAA Division I Finals, Major League Soccer, Minor League Baseball, basketball, and hockey as well as a variety of concerts. Frisco will also be home to the Professional Golf Association (PGA) in the coming year. It is not uncommon to have events occurring simultaneously at all five venues, effectively bringing an additional 20,000 to 30,000 visitors into the city within a matter of hours. Yearly the City of Frisco hosts approximately 6.6 million visitors. These increases alter the city’s vulnerabilities to natural hazards by not only adding more citizens, more visitors and more infrastructure but also major commercial development. The City of Frisco was a participating jurisdiction in the 2016 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. Since then, Frisco has completed several of their original action items, in an effort to lower vulnerability on populations and property from natural hazards. The following actions, sorted by type of action, have had a direct impact on lowering vulnerability: • Natural Systems Protection o Develop and implement system for ensuring maintenance of utility infrastructure in easement right-of-ways are clear of obstructions to include excessive tree/brush growth. o Establish water systems to handle increased rates and volumes of runoff from new developments. • Local Rules and Regulations o Compliance with the NFIP through enforcement of local floodplain ordinances. • Education and Awareness Projects o Expanding early warning sirens and local warning system to notify the public of impending severe weather and reduce the loss of life and mitigate the effects of the hazards. Page 623 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-565 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The development and implementation of these projects have directly led to lower vulnerability for residents and property located in Frisco. It should be noted that, although these action items, have been completed, these action items may continue to be necessary to reduce vulnerability in the future. New priorities are noted and ranked in each new action item, Section 6. Except for actions completes or cancelled, other priorities remain the same as in the previous version of this plan. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the City of Frisco faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation. Dam and Levee Failure This hazard was identified as having negligible to no risk to the City of Frisco, but as a participant in the county plan inundation studies will be considered. Drought This hazard was identified as having low risk to the City of Frisco. Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of Frisco are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork and the Lake Chapman-Cooper reservoir system are water sources for the City of Frisco and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake This hazard was identified as having moderate risk to the City of Frisco. All populations and property have the potential to be vulnerable to earthquake. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Expansive Soils The City of Frisco has building requirements for the design and engineering of foundations based on the soils. All populations and property have the potential to be vulnerable to expansive soils, especially those constructed under older building codes. Extreme Heat This hazard was identified as having low risk to the City of Frisco. All geographic areas have the potential to be vulnerable to extreme heat. Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Flooding This hazard was identified as having low risk to the City of Frisco. Flood events often occur on neighborhood streets, and in one instance in 2007 the Collin County Health Department flooded. Hail All geographic areas, property, and populations in the City of Frisco have the potential to be vulnerable to hail. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. It is common for roofs of houses and vehicles to suffer damage from the occasional hail storm. Most citizens carry insurance that covers these damages. Page 624 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-566 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan High Winds All geographic areas in the City of Frisco have the potential to be vulnerable to high winds; however, manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. It is common for fences and trees to suffer damage from the occasional high wind storm. Most citizens carry insurance that covers these damages. The city participates in public education and public alerting for high wind scenarios. High Winds also contribute to debris removal. The city has a storm management plan that addresses debris removal. Lightning All geographic areas, property, and populations in the planning area have the potential to be vulnerable to lightning. This hazard was identified as having moderate risk to the City of Frisco. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado The City of Frisco is within “tornado alley.” Although the city has not experienced a devastating tornado, there is the potential for one. The City of Frisco has one manufactured home park in the center of the City that would be severely impacted by a tornado. Wildland Fire This hazard was identified as having low to no risk to the City of Frisco. 32.75% of the population is vulnerable to the WUI. Winter Storms The city has three major highways, State Hwy 121, US 380, and the Dallas North Tollway. All of these can be impacted during winter storms. These highways give access to and from our critical infrastructure including our receiving hospital and fire and police stations. Winter storms also contribute to debris removal. The City has a storm management plan that addresses debris removal. The homeless, elderly, and populations without access to heat are most vulnerable. Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of the City of Frisco’s geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County as delineated by U.S. Census 2010 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities Page 625 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-567 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates and the US Census Bureau, the total population of Frisco in 2019 was 200,490 people, with 31,334 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4 Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total** Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total** Household Density (Sq. Mile) Frisco 200,490 19.38% 2,897.67 31,334 10.71% 452.87 Source: US Census Bureau & Collin County Appraisal District Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for the City of Frisco). Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 Frisco 116,989 171,960 182,580 10,620 6.18% Source 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate Property There are an estimated 40,956 parcels in the City of Frisco, making up $17,625,127,264 of the parcels in Collin County. Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 Frisco (Collin County) 40,956 10.46% $17,625,127,264 Frisco (Denton County) 27,676 7.35% $10,008,823,511 Frisco Total 68,632 $27,633,950,775 Page 626 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-568 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Source: Collin County Appraisal District 1Includes public buildings (residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, religion, government, education) Emergency Facilities There are sixteen identified emergency facilities in the City of Frisco, including nine fire stations, one police station, and six hospitals. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals Frisco 9 1 6 Source: Local data Critical Facilities There are 157 critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in the City of Frisco. The critical facilities include 95 schools and twenty-nine (29) historical property sites (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Number Frisco ISD 89 (includes other FISD facilities) Private Schools 6 Senior Living, Assisted Living, Nursing Homes 30 Dialysis Centers 3 Historic Sites 29 Source: Local jurisdictions Critical Infrastructure There are forty-one (41) identified critical infrastructure facilities in the City of Frisco, including, two (2) wastewater treatment facilities, two (2) dams, and thirty-eight (38) railway/highway bridges (Table 3.9). Page 627 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-569 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges Frisco 0 0 2 0 2 38 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, the City of Frisco’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for the City of Frisco, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.9 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure x Drought x Earthquake x Expansive Soils x Extreme Heat x Flooding x Hail x High Winds x Lightning x Tornado x Wildfire x Winter Storms x Page 628 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-570 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Page 629 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-571 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Frisco are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Frisco are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the City of Frisco. The City of Frisco and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is zero (0) impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the City of Frisco is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is zero (0) impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in the City of Frisco are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is zero (0) impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the City of Frisco are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is zero (0) impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in the City of Frisco. Page 630 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-572 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 1.56% of the population of the City of Frisco is located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property There have been three (3) recorded flood events in the City of Frisco. Property losses are at $16,666.67 per year. No crop losses are expected or recorded county-wide. Approximately 0% of the total assessed value of improvements in the City of Frisco is at risk from the 100-year floodplain. Emergency Facilities There are 0 emergency facilities located within the 100-year floodplain. Critical Facilities There are 0 critical facilities located within the 100-year floodplain. Critical Infrastructure 0 railways/highways and bridges, 0 dams, 1 water treatment plant and 1 water storage tank are at risk from the 100-year storm event. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Frisco are expected at $89,914.28 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for the City of Frisco indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the City of Frisco are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the City of Frisco are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Frisco are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 631 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-573 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events. All the population of the City of Frisco is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Frisco are expected at $4,200 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in the City of Frisco. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in the City of Frisco are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the City of Frisco are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the City of Frisco are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events can be expected to cause no deaths or injuries in the City of Frisco. All the population of the City of Frisco is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Frisco are expected at $25,916.67 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the City of Frisco are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the City of Frisco are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the City of Frisco are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 632 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-574 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in the City of Frisco. All the population of the City of Frisco is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Frisco are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the City of Frisco are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the City of Frisco are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the City of Frisco are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 32.75% of the City of Frisco is vulnerable to wildfires, with the City of Frisco and the unincorporated areas contributing with the majority of the exposed population. There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the City of Frisco are also unknown. Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there are 0 fire stations in the City of Frisco at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are 0 schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are 0 bridges, 0 dams, 0 wastewater treatment facilities, and 0 water treatment facilities at risk from wildfire events. Page 633 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-575 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Frisco. All the population of the City of Frisco is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Frisco are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Frisco County. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in the City of Frisco are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the City of Frisco are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Frisco are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 634 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-576 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serves as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the City of Frisco considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Frisco Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y 93% Average % Yes Capabilities – 93% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 635 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-577 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes City of Frisco Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 100% Average % Yes Capabilities – 100% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes City of Frisco Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 100% Average % Yes Capabilities – 100% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 636 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-578 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify the city of Frisco’s legal and regulatory, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, the city of Frisco and its jurisdictions have 93% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 100% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 100% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities City of Frisco City Manager The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, along with the city manager, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. As the governing body, the ability to implement and approve mitigation actions, expand, and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 637 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-579 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016 HazMAP, the City of Frisco Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones within the City of Frisco. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 638 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-580 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of the new and deferred action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Frisco Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan City of Frisco Action Item Expanding the Early Warning Sirens and Local Warning System to notify new populations of impending severe weather or imminent hazards to reduce the loss of life and mitigate the effects of the hazards. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, hail, high winds, lightning, wildfire Goal/Objective 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $40,000 - $50,000 each siren / total to be determined Potential Funding Sources City of Frisco annual budget, HMGP Lead Department Fire Department Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Outdoor warning sirens do not have an impact on structures; they are designed to be heard outdoors only. Effect on New Buildings The outdoor warning sirens do not have an impact on structures; they are designed to be heard outdoors only. Cost Effectiveness The costs associated with maintaining an outdoor warning system are minimal and less expensive than total replacement of an outdoor warning system. Discussion The outdoor warning siren system is the most effective tool for outdoor notification, especially as relative to the fact that Frisco has many outdoor parks, trails, and nature areas that are used by citizens. City of Frisco Action Item Implement the Texas Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Locally Page 639 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-581 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 1-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost 50% of cost (up to) $3,000 per shelter. Number of shelters to be determined Potential Funding Sources County Budget, HMGP, PDM, Homeowner, Work-in-kind Lead Department Building Inspections Department, Emergency Management, HMC Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings This action will improve the safety of existing homes with either in- ground or in-house shelters. Effect on New Buildings This action will improve the safety of new homes with either in-ground or in-house shelters. Cost Effectiveness The cost of this project is low compared to the potential benefits of reduction in personal injuries and/or deaths. Discussion Residential safe room sheltering can decrease potential personal injuries or deaths in the event of a tornado. City of Frisco Action Items: New City of Frisco Action Item Emergency power generators to provide life safety due to power outages caused by natural hazards. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $100,000- $1.2M each Potential Funding Sources Local funds, Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in kind Lead Department Emergency Management, Facilities, Public Works Implementation Schedule 0-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Any old buildings would meet building construction standards. Effect on New Buildings New structures would have standards for construction Cost Effectiveness Medium-High, Relative Discussion Frisco will install, upgrade, and/or replace generators for critical facilities, including fire stations, City Hall, the Police Department, Public Works, water/wastewater pump and lift stations, shelter sites, and any facility that is essential to maintain city services. City of Frisco Action Item Harden existing critical facilities to protect against natural hazard damage. Page 640 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-582 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $20,000- $150,000 each Potential Funding Sources Local funds, Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in kind Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Old buildings protected against damage from natural hazards Effect on New Buildings New structures would have standards for construction Cost Effectiveness Medium-High, Relative Discussion Frisco will harden critical infrastructure through mitigation by use of tornado, wind, fire, hail, ground movement, and impact resistant materials (windows, doors, roofing, construction, siding, roof bracings); dry-proofing buildings; upgrading to higher standard insulation; installing lightning rods and grounding systems; retrofitting for low-flow plumbing; replacing landscaping with drought and fire resistant plants; implementing higher standards for foundations. This includes hail-resistant covered parking for city facilities. City of Frisco Action Item Identify and implement building standards to reduce or avert expansive-soils damages and losses to structures and infrastructure, with emphasis on critical facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 - $15,000 Potential Funding Sources Private Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings New standards for constructing buildings to defend against expansive soils Cost Effectiveness Relative Page 641 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-583 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Frisco Action Item Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000 - $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. Discussion Building standards will keep buildings from being built in expansive soil troubled areas. City of Frisco Action Item Add all-directional sirens and solar panels to the outdoor warning system to notify the public of impending severe weather. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds, Hail, Lightning, Flooding Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B, 2-D Priority High Estimated Cost $200,000 - $300,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Cost is minimal compared to possibility of injury Page 642 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-584 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Frisco Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Discussion All directional sirens would multiply the area of effect for the outdoor warning system. Solar panels would add a level of resiliency by protecting the sirens against power outages that can accompany severe weather. This action item would be specific to installation/placement of new OWS sirens in the jurisdiction. City of Frisco Action Item Implement seasonal trimming/removal of trees along utility and road corridors, preventing potential winter storm damage. Hazard(s) Addressed Winter Storms Goal/Objective 3-C Priority High Estimated Cost $10,000 - $15,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce potential for debris/limb damages during severe weather Effect on New Buildings Reduce potential for debris/limb damages during severe weather Cost Effectiveness Cost is minimal compared to possibility of injury Discussion Separate from regular maintenance, this program would identify high-hazard areas adjacent to roadways or utility areas and target those locations for abatement measures, including, but not limited to, tree trimming and/or removal. Page 643 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-585 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. City of Frisco Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. City of Frisco Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Page 644 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-586 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. City of Frisco Action Item Update Frisco’s Drought Contingency & Water Emergency Response Plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds; in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify needs for retrofits, such as low flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water resources Discussion Develop a plan for conversing water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. Page 645 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-587 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance Frisco is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance Collin County Communities Participating in the National Flood Program CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 480134# FRISCO, CITY OF DENTON COUNTY/COLLIN COUNTY 1/24/1975 6/18/1980 4/18/2011 6/18/1980 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activities Activity Description Enforcement Senior Stormwater Engineer Require permits for all proposed construction or other development in the community. Permits are issued through the Development Services or Engineering Department. NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Review proposed development to assure that all necessary permits have been received from those governmental agencies from which approval is required by Federal or State law. Review all permit applications to determine whether proposed buildings site will be reasonably safe from flooding. Review subdivision proposals and other proposed developments to determine whether such proposals will be reasonably safe from flooding. Page 646 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-588 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), the City of Frisco has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. The City of Frisco, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the City of Frisco, the county, and the city council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The City of Frisco Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, the City of Frisco will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Activity Schedule Emergency Management Analyst Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdictions, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Page 647 Item 10. City of Frisco Annex Page | H-589 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) 2011 Plan Incorporation: Collin County’s 2011 mitigation plan was incorporated into Frisco’s fire codes and building codes through code updates (2012), as appropriate and planned in the 2011 HazMAP. 2016 Plan Incorporation: The vulnerability and capabilities assessments for each jurisdiction were carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into existing local planning strategies and mechanisms. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan City of Frisco Emergency Management Analyst Budget Meetings Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Emergency Operations Plan updates Triennially EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Frisco Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicle to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committees will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 648 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-590 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex I: City of Josephine 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2020 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. The City of Josephine participated in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT). This is a new hazard mitigation plan and the first to be submitted to FEMA for the City of Josephine. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Josephine. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While the City of Josephine has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped Josephine officials recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and online. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences Nationals Centers of Environmental Information (NCEI) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Urban Interface National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Page 649 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-591 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the City of Josephine Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County HMPT. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in November 2020 with representatives from participating county jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services. The efforts of the planning committees and the HMPT were led by the Collin County Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator. The table below provides a list of the primary representatives on the Josephine planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role Josephine City Council Mayor Plan Development Josephine Police Department Police Chief Plan Development Josephine Fire Department Assistant Fire Chief Plan Development Coordinator Engineering City Engineer Plan Development Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. Page 650 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-592 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders emailed and involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Josephine Economic Development Committee Committee Secretary Review of plan Josephine Food Bank Food Bank Coordinator Review of plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each organization above is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County and included all jurisdiction’s participation: • Collin County Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 • Collin County HazMAP Planning Meeting – Week of 11/05/2020 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022TBD at 9AM Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. Page 651 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-593 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 652 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-594 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the City of Josephine identified several natural and man- made hazards that could affect the city. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for the city of Josephine and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Page 653 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-595 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Life Impact Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for the City of Josephine Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 0 0 0 0 Drought 2 0 1 3 1.15 Earthquake 0 1 0 1 0.45 Expansive Soils 2 0 0 1 0.7 Extreme Heat 1 1 0 2 0.85 Flooding 1 1 0 0 0.65 Hail 2 0 0 1 0.7 High Winds 1 0 1 1 0.65 Lightning 1 0 0 0 0.3 Tornado 2 1 1 2 1.4 Wildfire 1 2 0 1 1.1 Page 654 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-596 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Winter Storms 2 0 2 3 1.4 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the City of Josephine, resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in the City of Josephine. Table 3.3 Hazard Ranking for the City of Josephine High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Tornado Winter Storms Drought Wildfire Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Extreme Heat Expansive Soils Hail High Winds Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Earthquake Flooding Lightning Dam Failure Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the City of Josephine faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation in this plan. Dam and Levee Failure This hazard was identified as having negligible to no risk to the city of Josephine because there are no dams within the city Limits. There are dams to the north west of the city, therefore as a participant in the county plan inundation studies will be considered. Drought Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of Josephine are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Page 655 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-597 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork and the Lake Chapman-Cooper reservoir system are water sources for the City of Josephine and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake Earthquakes have the potential to occur anywhere in the geographic planning area, therefore all geographic areas are potentially vulnerable. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Expansive Soils Although expansive soils are prevalent throughout Collin County, this hazard is considered a low risk to the City of Josephine. All property has the potential to be vulnerable to expansive soils, especially those constructed under older building codes. Extreme Heat Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Flooding There is a history of minor flooding at FM 1777 and FM6 that obstructs the roadway. Flooding around city hall occurs during heavy rainfall events, roughly an estimated 1-2 times per year. Roadway at Main and Swanson is obstructed from minor flooding. Hail All geographic areas, property, and populations in Josephine have the potential to be vulnerable to hail. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Winds All geographic areas of Josephine have the potential to be vulnerable to high winds; however, due to Josephine’s geography (flat, open area), manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Lightning All geographic areas, property, and populations in Josephine have the potential to be vulnerable to lightning. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado Residents on the northwest side of Josephine are most vulnerable to tornados. Many of the houses are manufactured homes whose residents, due to the secluded nature of the area, may be unable to reach shelter quickly. Wildland Fire 51.41% of the city is in the WUI; therefore, most, if not all, areas, property, and population of Josephine are vulnerable to wildfire. Winter Storms Winter storms are a significant threat to the City of Josephine. These winter storms have the potential to make roads impassable for days. Residents may be confined to their homes due to the storm and may be without basic services, such as water and electricity, for an extended period of time. Josephine residents live a distance from stores and may be unable to buy supplies in the event of a prolonged storm. Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment Page 656 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-598 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan An inventory of the City of Josephine geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates, the total population of the City of Josephine in 2020 was 1,966 people, with 695 households. The count breakdown by is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. The City of Josephine Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total** Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total** Household Density (Sq. Mile) Josephine 1,966 0.18% 1127.68 702 0.24% 397.07 Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate & Collin County Appraisal District **Includes totals from incorporated jurisdictions not participating in the plan Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for the City of Josephine). Page 657 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-599 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 Josephine 812 1450 1550 100 6.89% Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate Property There are an estimated 993 parcels in the City of Josephine, with an estimated $102,041,382 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 Josephine 993 0.20% $102,041,382 Source: Collin County Appraisal District 1Includes public buildings (residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, religion, government, education) Emergency Facilities There are 2 identified emergency facilities in the City of Josephine, including 1 fire station, 1 police station, and 0 hospitals. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals Josephine 1 1 0 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Critical Facilities There are six critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in the City of Josephine. The critical facilities include 0 schools and six historical property sites (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property Josephine 0 6 Source: Local jurisdictions Page 658 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-600 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure There are 5 identified critical infrastructure facilities in the City of Josephine, including 0 airports, 0 natural gas facilities, 1 water treatment facilities, 0 wastewater treatment facilities, 0 dams, and 4 railway/highway bridges (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges Josephine 0 0 0 1 0 4 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, the City of Josephine’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System-based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for the City of Josephine, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System -based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Page 659 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-601 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Josephine are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Josephine are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting . Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were four (4) county-wide fatalities recorded due to extreme heat, none from the City of Josephine. The City of Josephine and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the City of Josephine is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in the City of Josephine are not vulnerable to this hazard. Page 660 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-602 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the City of Josephine are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is no impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in the City of Josephine. Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 92 residential parcels in the City of Josephine are located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property There have been zero (0) recorded flood events in the City of Josephine. Property losses are expected but unknown due to inaccurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded county-wide. Approximately $4,467,551 of the total assessed value is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities Emergency facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Facilities Critical facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure Critical Infrastructure have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Josephine are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for the City of Josephine indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the City of Josephine are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the City of Josephine are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 661 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-603 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Josephine are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 662 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-604 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events. All the population in the City of Josephine are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Josephine are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in the City of Josephine. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in the City of Josephine are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the City of Josephine are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the City of Josephine are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events can be expected to cause no deaths or injuries in the City of Josephine. All the population in the City of Josephine are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Josephine are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the City of Josephine are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the City of Josephine are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the City of Josephine are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 663 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-605 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in the City of Josephine. All the population of Josephine is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Josephine are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Josephine. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the City of Josephine are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the City of Josephine are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the City of Josephine are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 51.41% of the City of Josephine is vulnerable to wildfires. There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the City of Josephine are also unknown. Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there are 0 fire stations at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are no schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are 0 bridges, 0 dams, 0 wastewater treatment facilities, and 0 water treatment facilities at risk from wildfire events. Page 664 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-606 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Josephine. All the population of the City of Josephine are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Josephine are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Josephine. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in the City of Josephine are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the City of Josephine are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Josephine are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serves as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the City of Josephine considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Page 665 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-607 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Josephine Y Y Y Y N Y Y N N Y N N Y N 61% Average % Yes Capabilities – 61% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 666 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-608 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Josephine Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N N 60% Average % Yes Capabilities – % Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Josephine Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N 90% Average % Yes Capabilities – % Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 667 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-609 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify Josephine’s legal and regulatory capabilities, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31- 70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, Josephine has 61% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 60% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 90% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities City of Josephine City Manager The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, along with the city manager, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. Ability to implement and approve mitigation actions and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 668 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-610 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016 HazMAP, the City of Josephine Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events while promoting insurance coverage for catastrophic hazards. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones within City of Josephine. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 669 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-611 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Josephine Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Winter Storm, Drought, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Wildfire, Expansive Soils, Hail, Earthquake, High Winds, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion This public education program would be based on the hazards that the City of Josephine identified. The program would use a combination of distributed literature, social media, and civic Page 670 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-612 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan presentations to educate residents on natural hazards and promote hazard mitigation. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Josephine Action Item Identify and establish heating and cooling centers for vulnerable populations Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Establishing heat and cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat and cold Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Page 671 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-613 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion This program gives rebates to residents who purchase and install safe rooms in their homes or on their properties to protect against severe weather. Status Deferred – Residents did received funding through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program. The NCTCOG Program has been suspended City of Josephine Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Hail, Flooding, Lightning Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 per siren. Number of sirens TBD. Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. Discussion This project will expand Josephine’s siren coverage to new areas of development not currently protect by sirens. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Page 672 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-614 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Develop and implement a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion A CWPP will Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire, and identify potential targeted mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Develop, adopt, and enforce water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Page 673 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-615 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion City of Josephine will develop, adopt, and enforce water conservation ordinances, codes, and other regulatory measures to conserve water during times of drought. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost TBD Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Page 674 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-616 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Josephine Action Items: New City of Josephine Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to educate on the actions to help mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Page 675 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-617 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. City of Josephine Action Item Identify and establish heating and cooling centers for vulnerable populations Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Establishing heat and cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat and cold City of Josephine Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Page 676 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-618 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion This program gives rebates to residents who purchase and install safe rooms in their homes or on their properties to protect against severe weather. City of Josephine Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas Hazard(s) Addressed High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Hail, Flooding, Lightning Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 per siren. Number of sirens TBD. Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. Discussion This project will expand Josephine’s siren coverage to new areas of development not currently protect by sirens. This action item would be specific to installation/placement of new OWS sirens in the jurisdiction. City of Josephine Action Item Develop and implement a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants Page 677 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-619 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion A CWPP will Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire, and identify potential targeted mitigation projects. City of Josephine Action Item Develop, adopt, and enforce water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion City of Josephine will develop, adopt, and enforce water conservation ordinances, codes, and other regulatory measures to conserve water during times of drought. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. City of Josephine Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Page 678 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-620 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. City of Josephine Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost TBD Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. City of Josephine Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Page 679 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-621 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as other emergency and hazard information Page 680 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-622 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance Josephine is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg- Emer Date Tribal 480756# JOSEPHINE, CITY OF HUNT COUNTY/COLLIN COUNTY 05/28/76 01/02/80 01/06/12 12/15/95 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Manager NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement City of Josephine City Secretary Complete and maintain FEMA elevation certificates for pre-FIRM and or post- FIRM buildings Permits are issued through City Hall. City of Josephine requires 2 feet of freeboard above the base flood elevation for the top of bottom floor on residential structures and non-residential structures that will be built on properties created or platted after the effective date of the Flood Damage Prevention Order NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Any person who violates this article or fails to comply with any of its requirements shall upon conviction thereof be fined in accordance with the general penalty found in section 1.01.009 of this code per violation, and in addition shall pay all costs and expenses involved in the case. Each day a Floodplain development permits Permits are required for any new construction in a floodplain. Future Mitigation Projects City of Josephine will continue to monitor for new areas of flooding that have not been previously identified for mitigation. Page 681 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-623 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan violation occurs is a separate offense. 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), Collin County has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the City of Josephine, the county, and the city council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, Josephine will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Activity Time Police Chief Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation Page 682 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-624 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan City of Josephine City Council Budget Meetings Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Police Chief Emergency Action Plan updates Annually EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. City Council, Director of Planning Capital improvement plans Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, City Council Drought Contingency plans As needed Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Page 683 Item 10. City of Josephine Annex Page | I-625 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan Planning Director, City Council Natural Resource Conservation Plan Annually Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Josephine Hazard Mitigation Planning Team considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicles to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committees will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 684 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-626 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex J: City of Lavon 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2020 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan updates the Lavon hazard mitigation plan submitted to FEMA as part of the 2016 Collin County plan. The City of Lavon participated on the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) for this update. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Lavon. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While the City of Lavon has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped Lavon officials recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and online. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Wildland/Urban Interface National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Page 685 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-627 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the Lavon Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County HMPT. The efforts of the planning committee were coordinated with the HMPT by the Collin County Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator; the City of Lavon acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in 2020 with representatives from participating jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. The table below provides a list of the primary representatives on the Lavon planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role Fire Department Fire Chief Plan Development City Council Councilmember Plan Development City Council Mayor Plan Development Police Department Police Chief Plan Development Public Works Director of Public Works Plan Development Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. Page 686 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-628 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders emailed and involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Community ISD School Board Member Review of plan North Texas Municipal Water District Board Member Review of plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each organization above is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The City of Lavon was provided the plan for update on 8/18/2020 and provided input and updates on April 30, 2021. The city provided updates that included information from multiple departments within the city including council and the fire department. The following meetings were held by Collin County: • Collin County Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 • Collin County HazMAP Planning Meeting – Week of 11/05/2020 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. Page 687 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-629 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 688 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-630 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the City of Lavon identified several natural and man-made hazards that could affect the city. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for the city of Lavon and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Page 689 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-631 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Page 690 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-632 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for the City of Lavon Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 0 1 0 0.25 Drought 2 0 0 3 0.9 Earthquake 0 1 0 1 0.45 Expansive Soils 2 0 0 1 0.7 Extreme Heat 2 1 0 2 1.15 Flooding 1 1 0 1 0.75 Hail 2 0 0 1 0.7 High Winds 2 0 0 2 0.8 Lightning 1 0 0 0 0.3 Tornado 2 2 2 2 2 Wildfire 2 1 2 2 1.65 Winter Storms 2 0 2 3 1.4 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the City of Lavon, resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in the City of Lavon. Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for City of Lavon High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Tornado Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Wildfire Winter Storms Extreme Heat Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) High Winds Flooding Expansive Soils Hail Drought Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Earthquake Lightning Dam Failure Page 691 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-633 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d)(3)) In terms of physical development for the City of Lavon, based on 2020 Census estimates the population of Lavon increased 100%, from 2,219 to 4,469. Housing units increased from approximately 775 to 1500. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the City of Lavon faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation in this plan. Dam and Levee Failure The City of Lavon is not subject to dam failure because no Dams are located inside the city limits and the city is not vulnerable to a Dam failure that might occur outside the city limits, but as a participant in the county plan inundation studies will be considered. Drought Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of Lavon are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork and the Lake Chapman-Cooper reservoir system are water sources for the City of Lavon and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake Earthquakes have the potential to occur anywhere in the geographic planning area, therefore all geographic areas are potentially vulnerable. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. However, this hazard was identified as having negligible or no risk to the City of Lavon. Expansive Soils All property has the potential to be affected by expansive soils, especially those constructed under older building codes. Extreme Heat The entire population has the potential to be vulnerable to extreme heat. The homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Flooding There are several undersized culverts that need to be upgraded. This makes the City of Lavon at risk for flooding. Hail The entire geographic planning area, properties, and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to hail. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Winds The entire geographic planning area has the potential to be vulnerable to high winds. Significant vegetative debris generated during high wind events requires removal to keep roads passable. Manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Lightning All geographic areas, property, and populations in Josephine have the potential to be vulnerable to lightning. Direct strikes have the power to cause significant damage to buildings, critical facilities, infrastructure, and ignition of wildfires which can result in widespread damages to property. The Page 692 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-634 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Lavon is at low risk for lightning. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado The entire geographic planning area has the potential to be vulnerable to tornadoes, with manufactured home populations being most vulnerable. Wildland Fire All geographic areas in Lavon are susceptible to wildfire, with the most vulnerable structures and populations located in the WUI. 52.46% of the city’s population lives in the Wildland Urban Interface, and this area is at a high level of risk according to the Texas Forest Service Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary. Winter Storms The entire geographic area of Lavon has the potential to be vulnerable to winter storms, with the homeless, elderly, and populations without access to heat being most vulnerable. These winter storms have the potential to make roads impassable for days. Residents may be confined to their homes due to the storm and may be without basic services, such as water and electricity, for an extended period of time. Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of the City of Lavon geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population Page 693 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-635 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan According to the 2020 NCTCOG Population Predictions, the total population of the City of Lavon in 2020 was 4,102 people, with 1,610 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total Household Density (Sq. Mile) City of Lavon 4,210 0.38% 1354.24 1,500 0.38% 454.55 Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate & Collin County Appraisal District Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for the City of Lavon). Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 City of Lavon 2,219 3,750 4,090 340 9.07% Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate Property There are an estimated 2,458 parcels in the City of Lavon, with an estimated $362,865,134 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 City of Lavon 2,458 0.26% $362,865,134 Source: Collin County Appraisal District 7-2021 Emergency Facilities There is one identified emergency facility in the City of Lavon, including one fire station, one police station, and no hospitals. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Page 694 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-636 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Number of Fire Stations Number of Police Stations Number of Hospitals City of Lavon 1 1 0 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Critical Facilities There is one critical facility, which are considered non-emergency in the City of Lavon. The critical facilities include one school and two historical property sites (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property City of Lavon 1 2 Source: Local jurisdictions Critical Infrastructure There are 4 identified critical infrastructure facilities in the City of Lavon, including no airports, no natural gas facilities, no water treatment facilities, one wastewater treatment facilities, no dams, and 3 railway/highway bridges (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges City of Lavon 0 0 1 0 0 3 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, the City of Lavon’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for the City of Lavon, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding Page 695 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-637 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) zero (0) recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lavon are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Lavon are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Page 696 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-638 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the City of Lavon. The City of Lavon and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is little impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in City of Lavon is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is little impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in City of Lavon are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is little impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in City of Lavon are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is little impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in City of Lavon Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 14 residential parcels in the City of Lavon are located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property There have been four (4) recorded flood events in the City of Lavon. Property losses are expected but unknown due to inaccurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded county-wide. Approximately $259,195 of the total assessed value is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities Emergency facilities have the potential to be at risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Facilities Critical facilities have the potential to be at risk in the 100-year storm event. Page 697 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-639 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure Critical Infrastructure have the potential to be at risk in the 100-year storm event. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lavon are expected at $7,142.86 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for City of Lavon indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in City of Lavon are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in City of Lavon are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in City of Lavon are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are one (1) recorded injury and no recorded fatalities from high wind events. All the population of City of Lavon is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lavon are expected at $628.57 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No in crop losses resulted from this hazard in City of Lavon. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in City of Lavon are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in City of Lavon are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 698 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-640 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in City of Lavon are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events can be expected to cause no deaths or injuries in City of Lavon. All the population of City of Lavon is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lavon are expected at $2,083.33 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in City of Lavon are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in City of Lavon are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in City of Lavon are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in City of Lavon. All the population of City of Lavon is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lavon are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in City of Lavon are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in City of Lavon are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in City of Lavon are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 699 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-641 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 52.46% of City of Lavon is vulnerable to wildfires. There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the City of Lavon are also unknown. Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there are 1 fire stations at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are no schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are 0 bridges, 0 dams, 0 wastewater treatment facility, and 0 water treatment facility at risk from wildfire events. Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Lavon. All the population of City of Lavon exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lavon are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in City of Lavon. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in City of Lavon are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in City of Lavon are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in City of Lavon are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serves as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, Lavon considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Page 700 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-642 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Lavon Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N ? 76% Average % Yes Capabilities – 76% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 701 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-643 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes City of Lavon Y Y Y Y N N N N Y Y 60% Average % Yes Capabilities – 60% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes City of Lavon Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N ? 70% Average % Yes Capabilities – 70% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 702 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-644 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify Lavon’s legal and regulatory capabilities, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, Lavon has 76% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 60% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 70% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities City of Lavon Mayor The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, along with the department heads, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. As the governing body, the ability to implement and approve mitigation actions and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 703 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-645 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2021 HazMAP, the City of Lavon Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Expand adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones within Lavon. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 704 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-646 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of the new and deferred action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Lavon Action Items: Modified from 2016 Plan Lavon Action Item Employ an automated alert system to broadcast weather conditions, hazards and road closures. Also will allow for broadcast of watches, warnings, evacuation routes, shelter information, and mitigation information. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $3,000 Potential Funding Sources City Budget Lead Department City Manager’s Office Implementation Schedule Done Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness This project’s cost effectiveness is in the lives it saves by alerting citizens to take shelter during extreme weather conditions. Discussion The automated alert system will reduce the threats to the citizens by alerting them to impending severe weather and warn citizens to seek appropriate shelter inside. Status Completed Lavon Action Item Reduce the impact of Severe Heat by utilizing Green Landscaping Roofing on all new city construction. Page 705 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-647 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat Goal/Objective 2-B, 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources Local funding, HMGP Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings No effect Effect on New Buildings The green landscaping will reduce overall effect of extreme heat on buildings, making cooling more efficient and reducing the use of electricity as well as reducing the effects of extreme summer heat on the citizens. Cost Effectiveness This project is cost effective in the reduction of hazards to citizens as well as the reduced power and electricity requirements for cooling buildings in summer heat. Discussion By utilizing landscaping on the roofs several significant benefits will be utilized. Including, insulation in the facility reducing the need for electricity, reducing the impact of extreme heat on the residents. Status Deferred – included in 2021 Action Items Lavon Action Item Develop and implement a Master Storm Water Drainage Plan for the City. Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-E Priority High Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources City Budget, Grant Programs Lead Department Department of Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Improved planning reduces potential flooding impacts Effect on New Buildings Mitigates flooding impacts Cost Effectiveness This project is extremely cost effective when compared to the property and agriculture/crop damage that will be avoided once the Master Storm Drainage plan enactment begins. Discussion There is a Storm Sewer Map currently, but no Master Storm Drainage Plan. By preparing and implementing this plan, it will reduce the occurrence of flash flooding and sudden inundation of areas. It will improve transportation during severe weather. Reduce vulnerabilities to those homeowners who are located in areas outside of flood zones but vulnerable to overflow flooding. And eliminate the rerouting of storm water to unattended areas. Status Deferred – included in 2021 Action Items Page 706 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-648 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lavon Action Item Implement Building Codes requiring New Commercial Facilities to utilize Hail Resistant Roofing Materials to the extent allowed by State law.. Hazard(s) Addressed Hail Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, Local budget Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Hail resistant roofing and window coverings will significantly mitigate the potential hazards of property damage as well as possible personal injury due to severe storm and hail. Effect on New Buildings Reduce impacts of hail on new structures Cost Effectiveness The cost effectiveness of the project will be the reduction of damage to property as well as reducing the need for debris disposal after a storm. Discussion The City of Lavon will enact codes for new development and city construction by requiring developers to install hail resistant roofing and window coverings, thus reducing the effect of severe weather and damage. Status Deferred – included in 2021 Action Items Lavon Action Item Retrofit an existing structure or construct a new City Hall built to withstand an EF2 Tornado. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000,000 Potential Funding Sources City Budget, Grant Programs Lead Department Department of Public Works Implementation Schedule 5-10 years Effect on Old Buildings No effect on existing buildings unless retrofit Effect on New Buildings This would affect the new City Hall building, making it able to withstand an EF2 tornado, mitigating the loss of such critical infrastructure. Cost Effectiveness This project is cost effective because the current City Hall building is a renovated historic structure and will not withstand an EF2 tornado. City Hall houses many functions, documents, and records, and the potential loss of those greatly outweighs the cost of a new hardened structure. Discussion The current City Hall houses Administration and Finance, Development Services, Building Inspection and Permitting, , Municipal Court and City Page 707 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-649 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Council Chambers, PW, community meeting rooms, gymnasium and all the records are housed. The City Hall facility is a historic structure. The construction or retrofit of the new City Hall should include a hardened infrastructure to withstand known hazard extent levels. Status Deferred – included in 2021 Action Items Lavon Action Item Retrofit an existing structure or construct a new Public Works office and shop built to withstand a EF2 Tornado Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources City Budget, Grant Programs Lead Department Department of Public Works Implementation Schedule 2-4 years Effect on Old Buildings No effect on existing buildings unless retrofit Effect on New Buildings This would affect the new Public Works office and shop buildings, making them able to withstand an EF2 tornado, mitigating the loss of such critical infrastructure and protecting critical equipment. Cost Effectiveness This project is cost effective because the current Public Works building will not withstand an EF2 tornado. The building houses many functions, documents, operations equipment, heavy equipment, and records, and the potential loss of those greatly outweighs the cost of a new hardened structure. Discussion The current Public Works building contain operations and heavy equipment. The building would not withstand an EF2 tornado. In order to mitigate the effects of that hazard, the retrofit or construction of the new Public Works office and shop should include a hardened infrastructure to withstand known hazard extent levels. Status Deferred – included in 2021 Action Items Lavon Action Item Implement a program to inspect and clear excessive brush along high- voltage power lines and surrounding land, reducing the vulnerability to citizens located in potential wildland fire areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Wildland Fire Goal/Objective 2-C Priority High Estimated Cost $500,000/year Potential Funding Sources Local funding, HMGP Lead Department Public Works, Fire Department Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Page 708 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-650 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings This would mitigate the effects of wildland fire encroaching upon built up areas for existing construction. Effect on New Buildings This would mitigate the effects of wildland fire encroaching upon built up areas for new structures. Cost Effectiveness This project’s cost effectiveness is seen in the management of wildland fire fuels to significantly reduce the damage or loss of buildings, structures, agriculture products, or homes to wildland fire. Discussion Currently the City of Lavon is susceptible to wildland fires due to the large amounts of family owned and un-maintained land along with the large farming industry. With the clearing of brush around high power voltage lines and surrounding land, this will create a fire break, greatly reducing the hazard and risks associated with possible ignition sources of wildland fire. Status Deferred – included in 2021 Action Items Lavon Action Item Develop and implement a community awareness program utilizing the City’s existing communication outlets including the website, social media, and newsletter in order to mitigate the effects of wildland fire. Hazard(s) Addressed Wildland Fire Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority High Estimated Cost $7,000-$10,000 Potential Funding Sources City Budget Lead Department Development Services Implementation Schedule 1-5 years Effect on Old Buildings This will greatly mitigate the effect of wildland fire on all buildings by increasing mitigation actions through public awareness and education campaigns, especially during periods of low rain and high heat. Effect on New Buildings This will greatly mitigate the effect of wildland fire on all buildings by increasing mitigation actions through public awareness and education campaigns, especially during periods of low rain and high heat. Cost Effectiveness This project is cost effective when compared to property damage, crop consumption, and potential loss of life that can be attributed to the hazards of wildland fire. Discussion The City of Lavon is highly susceptible to the dangers posed by wildland fire. By educating the public, they will be more aware of conditions, hazard assessment, and any applicable codes or burn ban enforcements applied by the city. This will mitigate the hazards associated with wildland fire. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 709 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-651 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Lavon Action Items: New City of Lavon Action Item Implement Hazard Mitigation Education Series to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority High Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 9-12 months Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation City of Lavon Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that establishes heating and cooling centers for vulnerable residents Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-A, 2-D, 3-C Priority High Estimated Cost Current staffing project time/resources Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Page 710 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-652 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold City of Lavon Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Program would give rebates to residents who purchase and install safe rooms for their homes or properties. City of Lavon Action Item Continue to increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness High. Cost to implement small compared to benefits Discussion Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. This action item would be specific to installation/placement of new OWS sirens in the jurisdiction. Page 711 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-653 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Lavon Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Watershed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. City of Lavon Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CW PPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire and measures to mitigate vulnerability. Page 712 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-654 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Lavon Action Item Adopt and enforce water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Adopt and enforce water restriction ordinances to limit water consumption to mitigate against drought. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. City of Lavon Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Page 713 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-655 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Lavon Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. City of Lavon Action Item Hardening of critical public buildings to include installation of generators and other measures necessary to ensure continuous operation. Hazard(s) Addressed Flood, Winter Storm, Thunderstorm, Wind, Earthquake Goal/Objective Priority High Estimated Cost $2,000,000 Potential Funding Sources FEMA, HMGP, GLO Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department City Administration, Approved Contractor Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Significant protection for City Hall, Police Department, Fire Department and other critical public buildings throughout the City. Effect on New Buildings Improve effectiveness of new structures and infrastructure. Cost Effectiveness High. This reduces the risk to existing and future structures and interruption of critical services. Page 714 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-656 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Ensure continuous operation of critical facilities to reduce environmental impacts due to failure to function, reduce threat to public health and safety. City of Lavon Action Item Develop Cybersecurity and Response Plan Hazard(s) Addressed Critical information systems for emergency and public safety services, traffic signals, sanitary sewer operations Goal/Objective Priority High Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department City Administration Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings NA. Effect on New Buildings NA Cost Effectiveness High. This Plan would provide additional training and resources to prevent cybersecurity incidents Discussion Plan would be used to identify vulnerabilities and improvements. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance Lavon is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 481313# LAVON, CITY OF COLLIN COUNTY 5/23/1978 4/2/1991 06/02/09(M) 5/13/1991 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Page 715 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-657 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement City of Lavon City Engineer Complete and maintain FEMA elevation certificates for pre- FIRM and or post- FIRM buildings Permits are issued through the City Services office. The City of Lavon requires 2 feet of freeboard above the base flood elevation for the top of bottom floor on residential structures and non- residential structures that will be built on properties created or platted after the effective date of the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with City’s flood damage prevention order shall result in fines up to $500 per violation plus court costs. Floodplain development permits Permits are required for any new construction in a floodplain. Participate with FEMA in identifying Special Flood Hazard Areas for future FIRM maps The City of Lavon participates in Risk Assessment, Mapping and Planning Partners (RAMPP) meetings held by FEMA and/or their contractors to better identify areas that are flood prone that are not shown on current Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Take action to minimize the effects of flooding on people, property, and building contents through measures including flood warning, emergency response, and evacuation planning City public works department installs signs at low water crossings. Future Mitigation Projects The City of Lavon will continue to monitor for new areas of flooding that have not been previously identified for mitigation. Page 716 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-658 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), the City of Lavon has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County, along with participating jurisdictions, is ultimately responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the City of Lavon, the county, and the city council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, the City of Lavon will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Activity Schedule City Administrator Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Fire Chief Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Likewise, each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting same for approval by the state, FEMA and each local jurisdiction’s governing body. The plan will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Page 717 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-659 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) 2016 Plan Incorporation: The vulnerability and capabilities assessments for each jurisdiction were carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into existing local planning strategies and mechanisms. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan City of Lavon City Council Budget. Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Fire Chief Emergency Action Plan Triennially EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain Ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. City Council, City Administrator Capital Improvement Plan Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, City Council Drought Contingency Plans As needed Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Planning Director, City Council Natural Resource Conservation Plan As needed Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Page 718 Item 10. City of Lavon Annex Page | J-660 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Lavon Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicle to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committees will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 719 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-661 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex K: City of Lowry Crossing 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2020 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. The City of Lowry Crossing participated on the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT). This is a new hazard mitigation plan and the first to be submitted to FEMA for the main plan; this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Lowry Crossing. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex is explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While Lowry Crossing has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped Lowry Crossing officials to recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and onlne. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences Page 720 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-662 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Source Data National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Wildland/Urban Interface National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the Lowry Crossing Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County HMPT. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in November 2020 with representatives from participating jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services; the efforts of the planning committee were led by the Lowry Crossing Emergency Management Coordinator. The table below provides a list of the primary representatives on the Lowry Crossing planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role Lowry Crossing City Council Mayor Pro Tem Plan Development City of Lowry Crossing City Secretary Plan Development Lowry Crossing Fire Dept. Chief Plan Development Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified Page 721 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-663 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders emailed and involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Milligan Water Supply General Manager Review of plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each organization above is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the planning committee met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County and included all jurisdiction’s participation: • Mitigation Plan sent to Lowry Crossing for update – August 18, 2020 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2021 at 9AM The City provided input back to the County after internal review an updates on March 23, 2020. Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring Page 722 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-664 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 723 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-665 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the City of Lowry Crossing identified several natural and man-made hazards that could affect the city. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for Lowry Crossing and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Page 724 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-666 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Life Impact Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for Lowry Crossing Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 0 0 0 0 Drought 2 0 1 2 1.05 Earthquake 0 1 0 1 0.45 Expansive Soils 2 0 1 1 0.95 Extreme Heat 2 0 0 0 0.6 Flooding 1 0 1 0 0.55 Hail 2 0 0 1 0.7 High Winds 2 0 1 1 0.95 Lightning 1 0 0 0 0.3 Tornado 2 1 1 2 1.4 Wildfire 2 0 0 1 0.7 Winter Storms 2 0 2 2 1.3 Page 725 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-667 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for Collin County jurisdictions, resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in Lowry Crossing. Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for the City of Lowry Crossing High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Drought Tornado Winter Storm Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) High Winds Expansive Soils Flooding Hail Wildfire Extreme Heat Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Dam Failure Earthquake Lightning Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability Lowry Crossing faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included in this plan. Dam Failure the City of Lowry Crossing is not known to be subject to dam failure, but as a participant in the county plan inundation studies will be considered. Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of Lowry Crossing are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork and the Lake Chapman-Cooper reservoir system are water sources for the City of Lowry Crossing and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Page 726 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-668 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Earthquake While there are no known reports of seismic activity in Lowry Crossing, there is always the possibility that it could happen. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Expansive Soil Lowry Crossing is extremely vulnerable to the effects of expansive soil. Road failures are a common occurrence from this hazard. This can create driving conditions that may be dangerous for an experienced driver, let alone a new driver. Extreme Heat Extreme Heat is a definite threat throughout all of Collin County, including Lowry Crossing. We have experienced rolling blackouts due to extreme heat through the years. Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but it is especially dangerous to the homeless, elderly, the very young, those without air conditioning, and those who require refrigerated medications. Flooding The City of Lowry Crossing has experienced some flash flooding in the past, specifically on Bridgefarmer Road in the 2200 block and the 1700 block area. FM 546 also has issues will flooding from Lake Lavon. Hail As all other areas, populations and properties in Lowry Crossing have the potential to be vulnerable to hail and hail damage. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Winds Lowry Crossing usually has at least one high wind event with damage each year. Most of these are roof and fence damage events with debris Lightning is a threat to everyone. Lowry Crossing relies on the volunteer fire department to respond to any situation created by lightning. Direct strikes have the power to cause significant damage to buildings, critical facilities, infrastructure, and ignition of wildfires which can result in widespread damages to property. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornadoes The City of Lowry Crossing has several areas that are vulnerable to tornadoes. The City does not have storm sirens at this time. A few citizens have storm shelters or safe rooms. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. Wildfires According to the Texas Forest Service Lowry Crossing is moderate risk for wildfires with 93.39% of the population in the WUI area. While we are primarily a bedroom community, there are still many open areas and borders Corps of Engineer land along the East Fork of the Trinity River. During times of drought, burn bans, and high fire threat, automatic mutual aid between the cities is enacted. The Lowry Crossing Volunteer Fire Department has a brush truck. They have supplied mutual aid to nearby cities and county areas for grass fires. We provide fire-wise education to the citizens on a regular basis. Winter Storms Lowry Crossing has experienced winter storms and the winter of 2013 provided power outages for multiple days for many of our citizens. Travel was treacherous. Vulnerable populations include the elderly, homeless, and those without heat. Page 727 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-669 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of Lowry Crossing’s geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the 2020 NCTCOG population estimates, the total population of the City of Lowry Crossing in 20202 was 1,756 people, with 607 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total Household Density (Sq. Mile) Lowry Crossing 1,756 0.16% 683.27 618 0.16% 240.59 Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate Page 728 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-670 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for Lowry Crossing). Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 Lowry Crossing 1,711 1,710 1,710 0 0% Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate Property There are an estimated 855 parcels in Lowry Crossing, with an estimated $127,734,063 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 Lowry Crossing 855 0.10% $127,734,063 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Emergency Facilities There is one identified emergency facilities in Lowry Crossing, a volunteer fire station located at 1407 S. Bridgefarmer Road. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals Lowry Crossing 1 0 0 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Critical Facilities There are no critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in Lowry Crossing. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property Lowry Crossing 0 0 Source: Local jurisdictions Page 729 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-671 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure There is one identified critical infrastructure facilities in Lowry Crossing, including one helipad, there are no natural gas facilities, no water treatment facilities, no wastewater treatment facilities, no dams, or railway/highway bridges (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges Lowry Crossing 1 0 0 0 0 1 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, Lowry Crossing’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for Lowry Crossing, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Page 730 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-672 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerability Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) zero (0) recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lowry Crossing are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Lowry Crossing are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the City of Lowry Crossing. The City of Lowry Crossing and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is zero (0) impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the City of Lowry Crossing is not vulnerable to this hazard. Page 731 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-673 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is zero (0) impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in City of Lowry Crossing are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), there is zero (0) impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in City of Lowry Crossing are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is zero (0) impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in City of Lowry Crossing . Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 19.70% of the population of City of Lowry Crossing is located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property There have been zero (0) recorded flood events in the City of Lowry Crossing. Property losses are expected but unknown due to inaccurate reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $15,166.67 per year. No crop losses are expected or recorded county-wide. Approximately $213,547,769 of the total assessed value is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities There are zero (0) emergency facilities at imminent risk from the 100-year storm event. Critical Facilities There are zero (0) critical facilities located within the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure 10% of railways/highways and bridges, 0% of dams, 0% of water treatment works, and 0% waste water treatment facilities are at risk from the 100-year storm event. Many of these structures are designed to traverse or be located within the floodplain due to unavoidable circumstances. Additionally, treated wastewater is typically discharged towards streams, which makes portions of wastewater treatment facilities likely to be located within the floodplain. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lowry Crossing are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, Page 732 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-674 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan available historical data for Lowry Crossing indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the City of Lowry Crossing are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the City of Lowry Crossing are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Lowry Crossing are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events. All the population of the City of Lowry Crossing is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lowry Crossing are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in the City of Lowry Crossing. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in the City of Lowry Crossing are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the City of Lowry Crossing are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the City of Lowry Crossing are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events can be expected to cause no deaths or injuries in Lowry Crossing. All the population of the City of Lowry Crossing is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lowry Crossing are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Page 733 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-675 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the City of Lowry Crossing are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the City of Lowry Crossing are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the City of Lowry Crossing are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in the City of Lowry Crossing. All the population of Lowry Crossing is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) property losses in the City of Lowry Crossing are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Lowry Crossing. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the City of Lowry Crossing are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the City of Lowry Crossing are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the City of Lowry Crossing are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 93.39% of Lowry Crossing is vulnerable to wildfires, with the City of Lowry Crossing and the unincorporated areas contributing with the majority of the exposed population. There have been one (1) recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, property losses in the City of Lowry Crossing are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the City of Lowry Crossing are also unknown. Page 734 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-676 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there are one fire stations at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are zero schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are one helipad, one bridge, zero dams, zero wastewater treatment facility, and zero water treatment facility at risk from wildfire events. Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Lowry Crossing. All the population of the City of Lowry Crossing are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lowry Crossing are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Lowry Crossing. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in the City of Lowry Crossing are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the City of Lowry Crossing are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Lowry Crossing are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 735 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-677 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serves as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, Lowry Crossing considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction Lowry Crossing Y Y Y Y N Y N N Y Y Y N N N 75% Average % Yes Capabilities – 75% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 736 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-678 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes Lowry Crossing Y Y Y Y N Y N N Y Y 70% Average % Yes Capabilities – 70% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes Lowry Crossing N N N N N Y N N N N 10% Average % Yes Capabilities – 10% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know To quantify Collin County’s legal and regulatory capabilities, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31- Page 737 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-679 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, Collin County and its jurisdictions have 70% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 10% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 10% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities Lowry Crossing Mayor The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. Ability to implement and approve mitigation actions and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 738 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-680 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016 HazMAP, the Town of Lowry Crossing Hazard Mitigation Planning Team developed mitigation strategies for the Plan update. The goals are similar to the goals identified in Section 6 by the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Working Group. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 739 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-681 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Lowry Crossing Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan Lowry Crossing Action Item Implement Hazard Mitigation Education Series to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 2A, 2B, 2C Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources FEMA Potential Matching Sources N/A Lead Department City Administration Implementation Schedule 0 – 24 Months Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Will be instrumental in planning and correction. Discussion In FY2022 Lowry Crossing is partnering with NCTCOG on a flood study of 17 miles of tributary within the city. Status Continue - Received supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Page 740 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-682 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lowry Crossing Action Item Implement Storm Shelter/Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 1B Priority High Estimated Cost $3000/safe room Potential Funding Sources Federal Grants Potential Matching Sources NCTCOG Lead Department City Administration Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Existing construction could have safe room added Effect on New Buildings New building could be constructed with safe rooms Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind. Discussion Develop list of storm shelter and safe rooms for emergency personnel to check safety of inhabitants. Status Continue - Will be included in 2021, however, some residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program Lowry Crossing Action Item Develop and adopt a drought contingency plan. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 3A, 3B, 3C Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Funds Potential Matching Sources Lead Department City Administration Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Very low cost to ensure benefit of saving water for future generations. Discussion Drought contingency plan will limit water usage based on drought conditions. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 741 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-683 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lowry Crossing Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that establishes heating and cooling centers for vulnerable residents Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-A, 2-D, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Lowry Crossing Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS Implementation Schedule 12-18 Months Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Page 742 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-684 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Lowry Crossing Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 4-B Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 6 months – 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Lowry Crossing Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 4-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Page 743 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-685 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Lowry Crossing Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Lowry Crossing Action Items: New Items Lowry Crossing Action Item Encourage all residents to use weather alert apps on smart phones Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning, Earthquake Goal/Objective 1A Priority High Estimated Cost 0 Potential Funding Sources N/A Potential Matching Sources N/A Lead Department Department of City Administration Implementation Schedule 12 – 36 months Page 744 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-686 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings N/A Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Discussion Lowry Crossing would encourage residents to utilize severe weather alerts on smart phones to warn about impending natural hazard events. Lowry Crossing Action Item Implement Hazard Mitigation Education Series to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning Goal/Objective 2A, 2B, 2C Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 (city portion) Potential Funding Sources FEMA Potential Matching Sources N/A Lead Department Department of City Administration Implementation Schedule 0 – 24 Months Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Will be instrumental in planning and correction. Discussion In FY2022 Lowry Crossing is partnering with NCTCOG on a flood study of 17 miles of tributary within the city. Lowry Crossing Action Item Implement Storm Shelter/Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 1B Priority High Estimated Cost $3000/safe room Potential Funding Sources Federal Grants Potential Matching Sources NCTCOG Lead Department Department of City Administration Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Existing construction could have safe room added Effect on New Buildings New building could be constructed with safe rooms Page 745 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-687 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind. Discussion Develop list of storm shelter and safe rooms for emergency personnel to check safety of inhabitants. Lowry Crossing Action Item Develop and adopt a drought contingency plan. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3A, 3B, 3C Priority High Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Funds Potential Matching Sources Lead Department Department of City Administration Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Very low cost to ensure benefit of saving water for future generations. Discussion Drought contingency plan will limit water usage based on drought conditions. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. Lowry Crossing Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that establishes heating and cooling centers for vulnerable residents Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-A, 2-D, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Page 746 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-688 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Lowry Crossing Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 4-B Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 6 months – 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Lowry Crossing Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 4-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Department of City Administration Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Page 747 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-689 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Lowry Crossing Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Department of City Administration Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Lowry Crossing Action Item Generator on City Hall Hazard(s) Addressed Winter Weather, Tornado, Severe Storms, Earthquake Goal/Objective 2-B, 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost TBD Potential Funding Sources General Funds Potential Matching Sources General Funds Lead Department Department of City Administration Implementation Schedule FY 2022 Effect on Old Buildings Provides backup power to current City Hall in the event of power loss from an all-hazards event Effect on New Buildings N/A (RetroFit) Cost Effectiveness Low Page 748 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-690 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion This will provide backup power to the City Hall. This space could be used for multiple functions in the City in the event of power outages. It also would allow for City Functions to continue following a power outage. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance Lowry Crossing is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 481631# LOWRY CROSSING, CITY OF COLLIN COUNTY 12/6/1977 3/16/1981 6/2/2009 8/22/1991 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Compliance Once the community applies for the NFIP, FEMA arranges for a study of the community to determine base flood elevations and flood risk zones. Consultation with the community occurs at the start of and during the study, and those communities with minimal flood risk are converted to the Regular Program without a study. FEMA provides the studied community with a Flood Insurance Rate Map delineating base flood elevations and flood risk zones. The community is then given 6 months to adopt base flood elevations in its local zoning and building code ordinances. Once the community adopts more stringent ordinances, FEMA converts the community to the NFIP’s Regular Program. FEMA then authorizes the sale of additional flood insurance in the community up to the Regular Program limits. The community must implement and enforce the adopted floodplain management measures. FEMA provides periodic community assistance visits with local officials to provide technical assistance regarding complying with NFIP floodplain management requirements. Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Page 749 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-691 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement Lowry Crossing City Secretary Complete and maintain FEMA elevation certificates for pre- FIRM and or post- FIRM buildings Permits are issued through the office of the City Secretary. Lowry Crossing requires 2 feet of freeboard above the base flood elevation for the top of bottom floor on residential structures and non-residential structures that will be built on properties created or platted after the effective date of the Flood Damage Prevention Order NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with City’s flood damage prevention order shall result in fines up to $2000 per violation plus court costs. Floodplain development permits Permits are required for any new construction in a floodplain. Participate with FEMA in identifying Special Flood Hazard Areas for future FIRM maps Lowry Crossing works with Collin County in Risk Assessment, Mapping and Planning Partners (RAMPP) meetings held by FEMA and/or their contractors to better identify areas that are flood prone that are not shown on current Flood Insurance Rate Maps. 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), Collin County has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the City of Lowry Crossing, the county, and the city council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, Lowry Crossing will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or Page 750 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-692 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Activity Schedule City Secretary Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan Lowry Crossing City Secretary, City Council Budget Meetings Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Page 751 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-693 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan Emergency Action Plan updates Triennially EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Floodplain ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. Capital improvement plans Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Drought Contingency plans As needed Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Natural Resource Conservation Plan Annually Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Lowry Crossing Hazard Mitigation Planning Team considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicles to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committees will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 752 Item 10. City of Lowry Crossing Annex Page | K-694 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 753 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-695 Annex L: City of Lucas 1. Introduction This annex was updated in 2021 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan updates the Lucas Hazard Mitigation Plan submitted to FEMA as part of the 2021 Collin County HazMAP. The City of Lucas participated on the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) for this update. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Lucas. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While the City of Lucas has historically implemented measures to reduce vulnerability to hazards, passage of the DMA 2000 helped city officials to recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which seeks to achieve a gradual decrease of hazard impacts through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts and collaboration of all participating jurisdictions, the public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for members of the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and the local newspaper. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data 2020 Collin County Appraisal District; U.S. Census Bureau – QuickFacts: City of Lucas, TX; North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Regional Data Center Population and demographics Page 754 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-696 Source Data Regional Hazard Assessment Tool; National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service – Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire threat and Wildland Urban Interface data National Inventory of Dams Dam information Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the City of Lucas Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County HMPT. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in November 2020 with representatives from participating jurisdictions’ planning committees. Representatives included mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services. The efforts of the planning committees and the HMPT were led by the Collin County Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator. The table below provides a list of the primary representatives on the City of Lucas Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee. Table 2.2 City of Lucas Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role Fire-Rescue/Emergency Management Assistant Fire Chief/EMC Plan Development and Update Fire-Rescue/Emergency Management Division Chief/Assistant EMC Plan Development and Update Emergency Management Emergency Management Intern Plan Development and Update Fire-Rescue Fire Chief Plan Development and Update Development Services Development Services Director Plan Feedback Engineering/Public Works City Engineer/Public Work Director Plan Feedback Public Works Public Works Supervisor Plan Feedback Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing, and formatting. Page 755 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-697 • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders involved in reviewing the City of Lucas Annex: PlanTable 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Love Joy ISD Facilities Supervisor Plan review/comment After State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each organization is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County and the City of Lucas: • Collin County 2021 Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 • Collin County Hazard Mitigation Committee Meeting – November 5, 2020 • City of Lucas Hazard Mitigation Committee Meeting – January 10, 2021 • City of Lucas HazMAP Discussion and Update – February 10, 2021 and May 24, 2021 Page 756 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-698 • Collin County 2021 HazMAP Update Meeting 2 – June 10, 2021 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 at 9AM Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. As there were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties, no feedback was incorporated. Public meetings provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non-profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 757 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-699 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the City of Lucas identified several natural and technological (man-made) hazards that could affect the city. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources from federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for Lucas and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the PRI allows for the prioritization of identified high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes and, more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but, rather, is meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in the City of Lucas based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were determined by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%) in decimal form. These values may be adjusted during future updates to this plan. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned Index Value for each category is multiplied by the Weighing Factor. Then, the PRI value for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Page 758 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-700 Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Page 759 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-701 Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for City of Lucas Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 0 0 0 0 Drought 2 0 1 3 1.15 Earthquake 0 1 0 1 0.45 Expansive Soils 2 0 0 1 0.70 Extreme Heat 2 1 0 2 1.15 Flooding 2 1 1 0 1.2 Hail 2 0 1 1 0.95 High Winds 1 0 0 1 0.4 Lightning 3 0 2 0 1.40 Tornado 2 1 2 1 1.55 Wildfire 2 1 0 1 1.05 Winter Storms 2 0 2 3 1.40 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the City of Lucas resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For classification purposes, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in Collin County. Page 760 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-702 Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for City of Lucas High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Drought Tornado Winter Storm Extreme Heat Wildfire Lightning Flooding Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Expansive Soils Hail Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Earthquake High Winds Dam Failure Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d)(3)) The City of Lucas was a participating jurisdiction in the 2011 and 2016 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plans (HazMAP) and this 2021 Collin County HazMAP update and will participate in future HazMAP updates. According to U.S. Census and the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) data, projections estimate that the population of Lucas has grown from 5,166 (2010) to approximately 8,110 (2020), an increase of 67%. According to Collin County Appraisal District data, new housing developments have been established, increasing housing units from approximately 1,641 to 2,227. Structural and economic development (including Walmart, Wendy's, Starbucks, Chipotle, other fast food restaurants, Bank of America, 10 small business buildings, and several shopping centers) has taken place, with several other business buildings currently in development. No new developments were built within a floodplain. To help mitigate the impacts of a disaster, Lucas has adopted storm water run-off regulations/ordinances and a design manual for retention ponds. To further mitigate impact of disaster, Lucas is committed to staying a certified Storm Ready and Firewise community. New priorities are noted and ranked in each new action item, Section 6. Except for actions completed or cancelled, other priorities remain the same as in the previous version of this plan. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the City of Lucas faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation in this plan. Dam and Levee Failure – This hazard was identified as having negligible to no risk to the City of Lucas, but as a participant in the county plan inundation studies will be considered. Page 761 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-703 Drought – Drought is considered a moderate risk in Lucas. Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally. All improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, and the entire population of Lucas are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable, however, older structures and those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork and the Lake Chapma-Cooper reservoir system are water sources for City of Lucas and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife, and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake – This hazard was identified as having negligible to no risk to the City of Lucas. Although considered negligible risk using the PRI, the hazard can occur anywhere in the geographic planning area. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Expansive Soils – Although expansive soils are prevalent throughout Collin County, this hazard is considered a low risk to the City of Lucas based on the PRI. Structures with unmitigated foundations are at highest risk. Extreme Heat – Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, children, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Extreme heat is considered a moderate risk in the City according to the PRI. Flooding – The City of Lucas has two bridges that are occasionally affected by flash flooding and five roadways that are seldom affected by flash flooding, but are still a concern. These two bridges mentioned below are within the 1% (100-year) flood zone. As the City utilizes culverts instead of storm drains, multiple days of heavy rain can overwhelm culverts and cause flooding in residential areas. Flooding is considered a moderate risk in the City, according to the PRI. The primary areas of flash flooding concern are the following bridges: • The bridge at Stinson Road at Muddy Creek • The bridge at Snider Lane at White Rock During heavy rain events and when roadways are flooded, City staff from City of Lucas Fire-Rescue and City of Lucas Public Works barricade the roads to prevent vehicles from attempting to cross the flooded area. Access to the area is still available from other directions at both sites, however, direct access is temporarily disrupted. This temporary disruption could be averted if larger drainage structures could be built to manage storm water flow and retention. While the roadway is flooded, vehicles must drive three or four miles more in another direction to access the other roads into the area, therefore increasing the distance for emergency access into the area. There are five other roadways that are seldom affected by flooding, but are still considered a concern by the City when flooding does occur. Those locations are: • Winningkoff Road, ¼ mile south of Snider Lane • Winningkoff Road, ¼ mile north of FM 3286 • Rock Ridge Road, ¼ mile north of FM 2170 • Rock Ridge Road, ¼ mile south of FM 1378 • The intersection of FM 1378 and FM 3286 Page 762 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-704 Hail – All geographic areas of the City of Lucas are potentially vulnerable to hail. Based on the PRI, however, hail is considered a low risk in Lucas. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable to hail. High Winds – All geographic areas of the City of Lucas have the potential to be vulnerable to high winds. Based on the PRI, however, this hazard is rated as negligible to no risk in the City. Manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Lightning – All geographic areas of the City of Lucas have the potential to be vulnerable to lightning. Based on the PRI, this hazard is rated as moderate risk in the City. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. A majority of the recent building fires in the City have been caused by lightning strikes, increasing the risk that lightning poses to the City. Tornado – All geographic areas and populations of the City of Lucas have the potential to be vulnerable to tornadoes. Based on the PRI, tornadoes are rated as moderate risk in the City. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable to damage from the high winds. Wildfire – The City of Lucas is a diverse area of 12.6 square miles that is comprised of many small farms, ranch estates, and subdivisions. This creates a localized wildland fire issue. With so many existing farmhouses, ranch estates, and housing subdivisions intermixed and near each other, there are large open areas with a large number of houses and barns that are exposed to wildland fires. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ property runs adjacent to parts of the City of Lucas. This puts the city within the Wildland Urban Interface. This area is an additional concern to the City as drought impacts Lake Lavon and the surrounding Corps property. There is currently no fuel management program or agreement with the Corps to manage fuel and this issue has been addressed in Chapter 4. However, the City of Lucas Fire-Rescue department is only responsible for response if wildfire were to occur in this area. There are no identified City of Lucas improved property, critical facilities, or critical infrastructure on the property. Lucas sits on the West side of Lake Lavon where there are vast areas of open spaces where campers and boaters use campfires for outdoor enjoyment and recreation. This has been the cause of a great majority of the wildland fires within the Lucas Fire District. There is a significant risk of wildland fire during the hot dry summers and dry winter conditions in Texas. Wildland fire is considered a moderate risk in the City according to the PRI. Lucas Fire-Rescue currently has one (1) Type III Wildland Engine, funded by a cost-share from the Texas A&M Forest Service Emergency Services Grant. Lucas Fire-Rescue also has one (1) Type VI Wildland Engine. The long range plan for Lucas Fire-Rescue is to sustain Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) firefighting capability equipment, training, and response. This plan also provides for Lucas to answer on first alarms for any wildland fires in the southern part of Collin County. This project will support all other fire departments in Collin County through Collin County Mutual Aid. Lucas Fire-Rescue will also continue to be a part of the Texas Infrastructure Fire Mutual Aid System (TIFMAS), thus offering resources for the entire State of Texas. Lucas is an NFPA Recognized Firewise USA Community and has been since 2012. Lucas holds an annual Firewise Educational Outreach program. Lucas, in cooperation with the Texas A&M Forest Service, will be conducting a Firewise Home Assessment training in the future to teach City residents how to do home assessments. To maintain Firewise status, residents of Lucas are encouraged to submit their volunteer hours for mitigation work they do around their homes and properties. Additionally, in order to mitigate wildland fire affecting structures, updated building codes have been enacted requiring all new residential and new commercial structures to have fire suppression systems in the structures. Page 763 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-705 Lucas Fire-Rescue currently has 18 (out of 28 total) firefighters that have completed National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) training S130 and 190. Lucas Fire-Rescue actively reports fires on the TFS Fire Reporting website and TXFIRS/NFIRS. Winter Storms – Winter storms are considered a moderate risk threat to the City of Lucas according to the PRI. These winter storms have the potential to make roads impassable for days. Residents may be confined to their homes due to the storm and may be without basic utility services, such as water and electricity, for an extended period of time. The most vulnerable populations to this hazard are the homeless, the elderly, and those without access to heat. Structures at risk include critical facilities and emergency facilities. Page 764 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-706 Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of Lucas geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non- emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Page 765 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-707 Population According to the 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates and the US Census Bureau, the total population of Lucas in 2020 was 8,553 people, with 2,227 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. Lucas Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total Household Density (Sq. Mile) City of Lucas 8,553 0.61% 509.10 2,855 0.74% 179.26 Source: US Census Bureau, Collin County Appraisal District, NCTCOG Regional Data Center **Includes totals from incorporated jurisdictions not participating in the plan Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for City of Lucas). Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2019 Estimate Population 2020 Estimate Absolute Change 2019- 2020 Percent (%) Change 2019- 2020 City of Lucas 5,166 7,960 8,110 150 1.88% Source: NCTCOG Regional Data Center Improved Property There are an estimated 3,446 parcels in Collin County, with an estimated $1,172,028,807 in total assessed value of building improvements. Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 City of Lucas 3,446 0.96% $1,172,028,807 Source: Collin County Appraisal District 1 Includes public buildings (residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, religious, government, education) Emergency Facilities There are three identified emergency facilities in the City of Lucas: City of Lucas Fire-Rescue station, City of Lucas City Hall, and City of Lucas Public Works building. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals Government Buildings City of Lucas 1 0 0 2 Page 766 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-708 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Critical Facilities There are eight critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in the City of Lucas. The critical facilities include six schools, two water pump stations, two water towers, and one sewer lift station. (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Water Pump Station Water Tower Sewer Lift Station City of Lucas 6 2 2 1 Source: City of Lucas Critical Infrastructure There are two identified critical infrastructure facilities in City of Lucas. Two bridges are used for access to residential areas. The bridges are especially important should residents ever need to make a hasty evacuation of the area. There are no other critical infrastructure facilities in the City. There are no airports, no natural gas facilities, no water treatment facilities, zero wastewater treatment facilities, and zero dams. (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges City of Lucas 0 0 0 0 0 2 Source: City of Lucas Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, the City of Lucas’ vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for the City of Lucas, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System- based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Page 767 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-709 Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), zero (0) recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lucas are expected, but financially unknown due to the lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Lucas are expected mostly during water shortages, but this is financially unknown due to the lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Foundation issues could occur to emergency facilities due to drought events. Critical Facilities Foundation issues could occur to critical facilities due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Foundation issues and road degradation could occur to critical infrastructure due to drought events. Page 768 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-710 Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat in the City of Lucas. The City of Lucas and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas. The improved property in the City of Lucas is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings. The emergency facilities in the City of Lucas are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings. The critical facilities in the City of Lucas are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure. Vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in the City of Lucas. Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 335 residential parcels in the City of Lucas are located within the 100-year (1% annual chance) floodplain. Improved Property There have been zero (0) recorded flood events in the City of Lucas. Property losses are expected but unknown due to inaccurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded county-wide. Approximately $521,154,047 of the total assessed value is at risk from a 100-year (1% annual chance) storm event. As the City utilizes culverts instead of storm drains, multiple days of heavy rain can overwhelm the culverts and result in flooding in residential areas. Emergency Facilities Emergency facilities are potentially at risk during a 100-year (1% annual chance) storm event. Critical Facilities Critical facilities are potentially at risk during a 100-year (1% annual chance) storm event. Critical Infrastructure Critical infrastructure are potentially at risk during a 100-year (1% annual chance) storm event. Page 769 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-711 Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lucas are expected to be $9,428.57 per year from hail, however, these values are potentially underestimated due to the lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops can be damaged by hail events, available historical data for the City of Lucas indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictable geographical nature of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the City of Lucas are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictable geographical nature of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the City of Lucas are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictable geographical nature of hailstorms, all critical infrastructure in the City of Lucas are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events. The entire population of the City of Lucas is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lucas are expected at $14.28 per year due to high wind events, however, these values are potentially underestimated due to the lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses have resulted from this hazard in Collin County. Emergency Facilities Because of the extensive geographical nature of high wind events, all emergency facilities in the City of Lucas are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the extensive geographical nature of high wind events, all critical facilities in the City of Lucas are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the extensive geographical nature of high wind events, all critical infrastructure in the City of Lucas are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 770 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-712 Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events are not expected to cause any deaths or injuries in Collin County. However, the entire population of the City of Lucas is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lucas are expected at $16,875 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. A majority of recent building fires in the City have been started by lightning. This has elevated the risk that lightning poses to the City. Emergency Facilities Because of the extensive geographical nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the City of Lucas are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the extensive geographical nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the City of Lucas are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the extensive geographical nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the City of Lucas are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in the City of Lucas. The entire population of the City of Lucas is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lucas are expected but unknown due to the lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Lucas. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictable geographical impact of tornados, all emergency facilities in the City of Lucas are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictable geographical impact of tornados, all critical facilities in the City of Lucas are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of unpredictable geographical impact of tornados, all critical infrastructure in the City of Lucas are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 771 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-713 Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 75.27% of the City of Lucas is vulnerable to wildfires. This includes both the City proper as well as the unincorporated areas that the City of Lucas Fire-Rescue services. There are no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires in the City. Improved Property Annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Because of this, the percentage of the overall property improvement values impacted by wildfire across the City of Lucas are also unknown. Emergency Facilities Based on geographic location, there is one (1) fire station at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic location, there are four (4) schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic location, there are two (2) bridges, zero (0) dams, zero (0) wastewater treatment facilities, and zero (0) water treatment facilities at risk from wildfire events. Page 772 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-714 Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms. It was not from the City of Lucas. The entire population of the City of Lucas is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Lucas are expected but unknown due to the lack of reporting. However, data indicates that county-wide property loss is expected to be $116,250 per year from this hazard. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Lucas. Emergency Facilities Because of the extensive geographical nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in the City of Lucas are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the extensive geographical nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the City of Lucas are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of extensive geographical nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructure in the City of Lucas are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 773 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-715 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serve as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the City of Lucas considered the level of hazard risk as well as the City’s existing capabilities that can be used to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Lucas Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N ? ? 64.3% Average % Yes Capabilities – 64.29% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 774 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-716 Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes City of Lucas Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y 90% Average % Yes Capabilities – 90% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes City of Lucas N Y Y Y Y Y Y ? N ? 60% Average % Yes Capabilities – 22.2% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know To quantify Collin County’s legal and regulatory capabilities, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), Page 775 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-717 and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, Lucas has 62.49% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 90% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 60% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities City of Lucas City Manager The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, along with the city manager, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. As the governing body, the ability to implement and approve mitigation actions, expand, and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 776 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-718 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team developed a mitigation strategy for the Plan update, utilizing the results of both assessments as well as reviewing the goals and objectives that were included in the 2009 HazMAP. These strategies were similar to the goals identified in Section 6 by the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Working Group. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events while promoting insurance coverage for catastrophic hazards. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones within Lucas. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 777 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-719 6. Action Items Below is a list of the new and deferred action items identified for the HazMAP update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic, and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Lucas: Action Items Deferred from 2016 Plan City of Lucas Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management with assistance from Collin County and the Texas A&M Forest Service. Implementation Schedule 18-36 Months Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show officials where to focus their efforts in preventing wildfire. Saving lives and protecting property is cost effective in the long-run. Discussion This project will become needed as the population in the Wildland Urban Interface area increases. This plan will protect life and property. Status Not yet started. City of Lucas Action Item Develop a wildfire and drought education program for residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire, Drought Page 778 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-720 Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000.00 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management with assistance from the Texas A&M Forest Service Implementation Schedule 0-12 months Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing buildings to wildfire and drought through resident education and behavior. Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new buildings to wildfire and drought through resident education and behavior. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion Residents will be educated on mitigation actions to protect their lives and property from wildfire and drought. Residents will be provided with supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2Do Program. Status Not yet started. The City will request supplies and materials from the NCTCOG when a plan for education and distribution has been determined. City of Lucas Action Item Develop an extreme heat education program for residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing buildings to extreme heat through resident education and behavior. Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new buildings to extreme heat through resident education and behavior. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion Residents will be educated on mitigation actions to protect their lives and property from extreme heat. Residents will be provided with supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2Do Program. Status Not yet started. The City will request supplies and materials from the NCTCOG when a plan for education and distribution has been determined. Page 779 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-721 City of Lucas Action Item Develop a winter weather/storm education program for residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Winter Storms Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing buildings to winter weather/storms through resident education and behavior. Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new buildings to winter weather/storms through resident education and behavior. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion Residents will be educated on mitigation actions to protect their lives and property from winter weather/storms. Residents will be provided with supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2Do Program Status Not yet started. The City will request supplies and materials from the NCTCOG when a plan for education and distribution has been determined. City of Lucas Action Item Develop a Large Animal Rescue Plan and educate residents on actions to mitigate impact to large animals from severe weather and natural disasters. Hazard(s) Addressed Flood, Tornado, Winter Storm, Wildfire Goal/Objective 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue Implementation Schedule 18-36 months Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion This project will help Lucas Fire-Rescue educate owners of large animals about how to mitigate impact to their large animals from severe weather and natural disasters. This plan will also give Lucas Fire-Rescue the Page 780 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-722 plans and directions on rescuing large animals around the City during disaster. Status Not yet started. City of Lucas Action Item Implement stricter building codes and standards to mitigate the impacts of hazards to buildings around the City. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 - $15,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Planning and Zoning, Code Enforcement, Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Old buildings would be retrofitted to meet current or updated building code standards. Effect on New Buildings New buildings would be constructed to meet current or updated building code standards. Cost Effectiveness This is cost effective because it will protect life and property from future disasters. Discussion Updated and current building code standards will be continuously implemented in the City through retrofits to old buildings and initial construction to new buildings. Status The City of Lucas has adopted current building code and will continue to adopt the most current building codes. This action item will be included in future HazMAP updates. City of Lucas Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed Earthquake Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Public Works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Page 781 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-723 Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce the vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low. Discussion Study results will identify information to determine mitigation projects Status No longer a relevant action item to the City of Lucas. This item will not be included as a 2021 Action Item. City of Lucas Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils. Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants and/or state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency Management, Public Works, Planning and Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. This soil analysis will protect life and property. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Not yet started. City of Lucas Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Emergency Management, Planning and Zoning Page 782 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-724 Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status No longer a relevant action item to the City of Lucas. This item will not be included as a 2021 Action Item. City of Lucas: 2021 Action Items City of Lucas Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management with assistance from Collin County and the Texas A&M Forest Service. Implementation Schedule 18-36 Months Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire. Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show officials where to focus their efforts in preventing wildfire. Saving lives and protecting property is cost effective in the long-run. Discussion This project will become needed as the population in the Wildland Urban Interface area increases. This plan will protect life and property. City of Lucas Action Item Develop a wildfire and drought education program for residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire, Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 4-A, $-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000.00 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Page 783 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-725 Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management with assistance from the Texas A&M Forest Service Implementation Schedule 2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing buildings to wildfire and drought through resident education and behavior. Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new buildings to wildfire and drought through resident education and behavior. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion Residents will be educated on mitigation actions to protect their lives and property from wildfire and drought. Residents will be provided with supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2Do Program. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. City of Lucas Action Item Develop an extreme heat education program for residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing buildings to extreme heat through resident education and behavior. Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new buildings to extreme heat through resident education and behavior. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion Residents will be educated on mitigation actions to protect their lives and property from extreme heat. Residents will be provided with supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2Do Program. City of Lucas Action Item Develop a winter weather/storm education program for residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Winter Storms Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Page 784 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-726 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing buildings to winter weather/storms through resident education and behavior. Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new buildings to winter weather/storms through resident education and behavior. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion Residents will be educated on mitigation actions to protect their lives and property from winter weather/storms. Residents will be provided with supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2Do Program City of Lucas Action Item Develop a Large Animal Rescue Plan and educate residents on actions to mitigate impact to large animals from severe weather and natural disasters. Hazard(s) Addressed Flood, Tornado, Winter Storm, Wildfire Goal/Objective 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue Implementation Schedule 18-36 months Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion This project will help Lucas Fire-Rescue educate owners of large animals about how to mitigate impact to their large animals from severe weather and natural disasters. This plan will also give Lucas Fire-Rescue the plans and directions on rescuing large animals around the City during disaster. City of Lucas Action Item Implement stricter building codes and standards to mitigate the impacts of hazards to buildings around the City. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Page 785 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-727 Estimated Cost $10,000 - $15,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Planning and Zoning, Code Enforcement, Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Old buildings would be retrofitted to meet current or updated building code standards. Effect on New Buildings New buildings would be constructed to meet current or updated building code standards. Cost Effectiveness This is cost effective because it will protect life and property from future disasters. Discussion Updated and current building code standards will be continuously implemented in the City through retrofits to old buildings and initial construction to new buildings. City of Lucas Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils. Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils, Drought Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants and/or state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency Management, Public Works, Planning and Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. This soil analysis will protect life and property. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. City of Lucas Action Item Develop a tornado education program for residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Page 786 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-728 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing buildings to tornados through resident education and behavior. Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new buildings to tornados through resident education and behavior. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion Residents will be educated on mitigation actions to protect their lives and property from tornados. Residents will be provided with supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2Do Program. City of Lucas Action Item Develop a Debris Management Plan Hazard(s) Addressed High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Flooding Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management with assistance from Collin County, the Texas A&M Forest Service, and a private consulting firm. Implementation Schedule 18-36 Months Effect on Old Buildings Will ensure that debris from older buildings and neighborhoods is properly managed and cleared before and after disaster. Effect on New Buildings Will ensure that debris from newer buildings and neighborhoods is properly managed and cleared before and after disaster. Cost Effectiveness Debris management is cost effective if done right. A Debris Management Plan will guide the City’s debris management before and after disaster. Discussion This project is needed to ensure that the City has a clear plan for keeping debris minimal before disaster and cleaning/clearing debris effectively after disaster. City of Lucas Action Item Develop a flood education program for residents. Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Page 787 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-729 Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Fire-Rescue and Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of existing buildings to floods through resident education and behavior. Effect on New Buildings Will reduce vulnerability of new buildings to floods through resident education and behavior. Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective with a low cost. Discussion Residents will be educated on mitigation actions to protect their lives and property from floods. Residents will be provided with supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2Do Program. City of Lucas Action Item Build three carports: one at Fire-Rescue station for personal vehicles and two at City Hall, one for personal vehicles and one for City vehicles. Hazard(s) Addressed Hail Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $35,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, and/or General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, and/or grants Lead Department Engineering and Development Services Implementation Schedule 2 years Effect on Old Buildings No effect on existing buildings. Effect on New Buildings No effect on new buildings. Cost Effectiveness Protecting both employee and City vehicles from hail damage will save the City money in the long run. Discussion Carports will protect both City employees’ personal vehicles as well as City vehicles from hail damage. City of Lucas Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to educate on the actions to help mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Earthquakes, Hail, Winds, Expansive Soils, and Lightning Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Page 788 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-730 Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 9-12 months Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation.be taken to reduce impacts on people and property. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance The City of Lucas is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified areas vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for flood mitigation measures. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Current Effective Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 481545# LUCAS, CITY OF COLLIN COUNTY 07/25/75 04/02/91 06/02/09 07/03/79 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Compliance Once the community applies for the NFIP, FEMA arranges for a study of the community to determine base flood elevations and flood risk zones. Consultation with the community occurs at the start of and during the study, and those communities with minimal flood risk are converted to the Regular Program without a study. FEMA provides the studied community with a Flood Insurance Rate Map delineating base flood elevations and flood risk zones. The community is then given 6 months to adopt base flood elevations in its local zoning and building code ordinances. Once the community adopts more stringent ordinances, FEMA converts the community to the NFIP’s Regular Program. FEMA then authorizes the sale of additional flood insurance in the community up to the Regular Program limits. The community must implement and enforce the adopted floodplain management measures. FEMA provides periodic community assistance visits with local officials to provide technical assistance regarding complying with NFIP floodplain management requirements. The purchase of flood insurance is mandatory as a condition of receipt of federal or federally-related financial assistance for acquisition and/or construction of buildings in SFHAs of any participating community. Those communities notified as flood-prone which do not apply for participation in the NFIP within 1 year of notification are ineligible for federal or federally-related financial assistance for acquisition, construction, or reconstruction of insurable buildings in the SFHA. Page 789 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-731 Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to create and maintain a list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Enforcement City of Lucas City Manager Restrict or prohibit uses that are dangerous to health, safety or property in times of flooding, or cause excessive increases in flooding heights or velocities NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Require that uses vulnerable to floods, including facilities which serve such uses, be protected against flood damage at the time of initial construction Control the alteration of natural floodplains, stream channels, and natural protective barriers, which are involved in the accommodation of floodwaters Control filling, grading, dredging and other development which may increase flood damage Prevent or regulate the construction of flood barriers which will unnaturally divert floodwaters or which may increase flood hazards to other lands. Page 790 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-732 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), Collin County has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County, along with participating jurisdictions, are responsible for monitoring implementation of their plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the City of Lucas, the county, and the city council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose mem bers will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, Lucas will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Activity Schedule Emergency Management Coordinator, Emergency Management Intern Monitoring Plan: Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations. Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval and then presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising, and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five (5) years in accordance with federal requirements. Page 791 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-733 Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) 2016 Plan Incorporation: The vulnerability and capabilities assessments for each jurisdiction were carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into existing local planning strategies and mechanisms, as appropriate. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan City of Lucas City Council Budget Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Fire Chief, Emergency Management Coordinator Emergency Action Plan Every Five Year EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain Ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. City Council, Planning Director Capital Improvement Plan Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, City Council Drought Contingency Plan Assessed annually and updated as needed. Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Planning Director, City Council Natural Resource Conservation Plan Assessed annually and updated as needed. Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Lucas Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicle to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Page 792 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Lucas Annex Page | L-734 Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committee will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 793 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-735 Annex M: City of Melissa 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2020 as part of an update to the City of Melissa County Multi- Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. The City of Melissa participated on the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT). This is a new hazard mitigation plan and the first to be submitted to FEMA for the City of Melissa. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Melissa. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While the City of Melissa has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped City of Melissa officials to recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. City of Melissa’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and online. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 the City of Melissa developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten the City of Melissa and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Page 794 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-736 Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Wildland/Urban Interface National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the City of Melissa Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County HMPT. The efforts of the planning committee were led by the City of Melissa Emergency Management Coordinator. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in November 2020 with representatives from participating jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. The City of Melissa acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services. The table below provides a list of the primary representatives on the Melissa planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role Fire Department Fire Chief Plan Development Police Department Police Chief Plan Development City Administration City Manager Plan Development City Council Councilmember Plan Development City Council Mayor Plan Development Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the county’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Page 795 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-737 Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each organization is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. External stakeholders involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Collin County Assistant EMC Review of plan Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by City of Melissa and included all jurisdiction’s participation: • Melissa was provided with the Plan on August 12, 2020 • Meeting with Melissa and Collin County 8/24/2021 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 at 9AM Page 796 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-738 Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 797 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-739 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the City of Melissa identified several natural and man- made hazards that could affect the city. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for Melissa and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Melissa jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Melissa HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Melissa based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Melissa, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Page 798 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-740 35% Life Impact Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for City of Melissa Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 0 1 0 0.25 Drought 1 2 1 0 1.25 Earthquake 0 1 0 1 0.45 Expansive Soils 2 0 0 1 0.7 Extreme Heat 1 1 0 2 0.85 Flooding 1 1 0 0 0.65 Hail 2 0 0 1 0.7 Page 799 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-741 High Winds 1 0 0 1 0.4 Lightning 1 0 0 0 0.3 Tornado 2 1 1 1 1.3 Wildfire 1 2 0 1 1.1 Winter Storms 2 0 2 3 1.4 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for Collin County Jurisdictions, resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in Melissa. Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for the City of Melissa High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Tornado W inter Storms Wildfire Drought Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Extreme Heat Expansive Soils Hail Flooding Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Earthquake High Winds Lightning Dam Failure Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the City of Melissa faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation. Dam and Levee Failure At this time City of Melissa does not appear to be vulnerable to a dam failure, but as a participant in the county plan inundation studies will be considered. Page 800 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-742 Drought Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of Melissa are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork and the Lake Chapman-Cooper reservoir system are water sources for City of Melissa and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Likewise the extent to how and when water is used from water sources does have a potential effect on revenues for the City of Melissa. Earthquake Although the City of Melissa does not sit directly on a fault zone it located near the Balcones Fault. Should an earthquake of medium/high magnitude occur along this fault, the City of Melissa would see damage to roadways, water/sewer lines, gas lines, buildings, and critical infrastructure. All properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to earthquakes. Expansive Soils The City of Melissa has expansive soils in its jurisdiction. While great care is and has been taken to prevent the effects of soil expansion, should drought occur or periods of low rainfall occur residents, commercial, and industrial properties could see adverse effects to the structural integrity of their respective buildings. Expansive soils also have an effect on infrastructure causing pipes to crack and break. All properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to expansive soils. Extreme Heat The City of Melissa can be subject to high or extreme heat from late April to early October. The highest recorded temperature in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area was 113 F. While most of the time city is not exposed to temperatures above 110 it is still possible. Temperatures of 95 F or above coupled with high humidity can have detrimental effects to not only the residential population, but also commercial and industrial operations. High heat can cause roving black outs, drying out of vegetation in undeveloped areas (increasing fire risk), and the need for cooling centers for residents. High heat also has an effect on public works and public safety due to working in these temperatures and the damage to infrastructure. Equipment in the water pump house often malfunctions during times of extreme heat. Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Flooding The City of Melissa could be subject to flooding due to the various infrastructure and development projects which are currently taking place. Highways and roadways are currently under development which could cause water to be inadvertently channeled to an unanticipated located. These same effects could occur as areas of the city are developed Hail Severe thunderstorms are frequent in the Metroplex area, of which the City of Melissa is included. Severe thunderstorms have the potential to spawn tornados, high winds, hail, flooding, and lightning. All of these can result in damage to residential, commercial, and industrial properties. Damage to power lines and vegetation can occur as well. Roadways can be blocked due to low visibility and debris. Public Works and Public Safety departments are often taxed due to the calls for service. All properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to hail High Winds Severe thunderstorms are frequent in the Metroplex area, of which the City of Melissa is included. Severe thunderstorms have the potential to spawn tornados, high winds, hail, flooding, and lightning. All of these can result in damage to residential, commercial, and industrial properties. Damage to power lines and vegetation can occur as well. Power outages are frequent and it may take anywhere from 30 minutes to 30 days to restore power. Roadways can be blocked due to low visibility and debris. Page 801 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-743 Public Works and Public Safety departments are often taxed due to the calls for service. All properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to high winds. Lightning Severe thunderstorms are frequent in the Metroplex area, of which the City of Melissa is included. Severe thunderstorms have the potential to spawn tornados, high winds, hail, flooding, and lightning. All of these can result in damage to residential, commercial, and industrial properties. Damage to power lines and vegetation can occur as well. Power outages are frequent and it may take anywhere from 30 minutes to 30 days to restore power. Roadways can be blocked due to low visibility and debris. Public Works and Public Safety departments are often taxed due to the calls for service. Lightning also has the potential to start fires in structures as well as in open pastures. All properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to lightning. Tornado Severe thunderstorms are frequent in the Metroplex area, of which the City of Melissa is included. Severe thunderstorms have the potential to spawn tornados. These can result in damage to residential, commercial, and industrial properties. Damage to power lines and vegetation can occur as well. Power outages are frequent and it may take anywhere from 30 minutes to 30 days to restore power. Roadways can be blocked due to low visibility and debris. Public Works and Public Safety departments are often taxed due to the calls for service. Tornados also have the capacity to leave many homeless and injured. It may take days, weeks, months, or even years to return to normal operations should a tornado occur in the City of Melissa. All properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable. Wildland Fire The City of Melissa is in the middle of the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). The WUI has the potential to not only effect crops but also residential structures as fire swiftly burns across vegetation. Large wildfires have the potential to restrict traffic through roadways due to low visibility and the need to use all lanes for evacuation. At greatest risk are structures and populations located within the WUI. According to the Texas Forest Service, 60.25% of the population of Melissa lives within in the Wildland/Urban Interface. Winter Storms The City of Melissa is subject to winter storms. Ice and snow can accumulate on roadways trapping drivers on the road and increasing the likelihood of accidents. Residents can be ill prepared for storms and may even be in their homes without electricity, heat, or running water. Commercial and industrial business see adverse effects as potential customers remain in doors and workers are unable to report for their jobs. All of which negative impacts on the City of Melissa economy. All properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to winter storms. Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of Melissa geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by the 2020 NCTCOG population estimates. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Melissa. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements Page 802 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-744 that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Melissa Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, and Melissa. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Melissa Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates and the US Census Bureau, the total population of Melissa in 2020 was 12,381 people, with 4,589 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total Household Density (Sq. Mile) Melissa 19,161 1.13% 1,044.81 5,813 1.13% 367.89 Source: US Census Bureau & Collin County Appraisal District Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for Melissa). Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 Melissa 4,695 11,927 13,980 2,053 12.94% Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate Page 803 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-745 Property There are an estimated 6,466 parcels in Melissa, with an estimated $1,014,828,346 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 Melissa 6,466 1.34% $1,014,828,346 Source: Collin County Appraisal District Emergency Facilities There are 2 identified emergency facilities in the City of Melissa, including 1 fire station and 1 police station, and zero hospitals. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals Melissa 1 1 0 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Critical Facilities There are 5 critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in Melissa. The critical facilities include five schools and zero historical property sites. Table 3.8. Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property Melissa 6 3 Source: Local jurisdictions Critical Infrastructure There are 30 identified critical infrastructure facilities in Melissa, including 0 airports, 2 natural gas facilities, no water treatment facilities, 0 wastewater treatment facilities, 0 dams, and 28 railway/highway bridges. (Table 3.9). Page 804 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-746 Table 3.8 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges Melissa 0 2 0 0 1 28 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, the City of Melissa vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for the City of Melissa, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System -based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Page 805 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-747 Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Melissa are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Melissa are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were one (1) fatality recorded due to extreme heat from the City of Melissa. All of the City of Melissa and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the City of Melissa is not vulnerable to this hazard. Page 806 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-748 Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in the City of Melissa are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the City of Melissa are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Extreme heat has had an impact on equipment at the water pump house causing it to malfunction and become inoperable. However, overall vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in the City of Melissa. Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 54 residential parcels in the City of Melissa are located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property There have been five (5) recorded flood events in the City of Melissa. Property losses are expected at $7,400 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded county-wide. Approximately $6,742,366 of the total assessed value is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities Emergency facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Facilities Critical facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure Critical Infrastructure have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Melissa are expected at $342.86 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for the City of Melissa indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Page 807 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-749 Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the City of Melissa are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the City of Melissa are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Melissa are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events. All the population of the City of Melissa is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Melissa are expected at $3,514.29 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in the City of Melissa. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in the City of Melissa are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the City of Melissa are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the City of Melissa are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events can be expected to cause no deaths or injuries in the City of Melissa. All the population of the City of Melissa is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Melissa are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting Page 808 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-750 Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the City of Melissa are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the City of Melissa are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the City of Melissa are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in the City of Melissa. All the population of the City of Melissa is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Melissa are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Melissa. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the City of Melissa are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the City of Melissa are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the City of Melissa are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 60.25% of Melissa is vulnerable to wildfires. There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the City of Melissa are also unknown. Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there is 1 fire station and 1 police station at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are 6 schools at risk from wildfire events. Page 809 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-751 Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are 4 natural gas facilities and 28 railway/highway bridges at risk from wildfire events. Page 810 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-752 Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Melissa. All the population of the City of Melissa are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Melissa are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Melissa. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in the City of Melissa are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the City of Melissa are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Melissa are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 811 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-753 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serves as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, Melissa considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Melissa Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ? 92% Average % Yes Capabilities – 92.86% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 812 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-754 Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes City of Melissar Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y N 70% Average % Yes Capabilities – 70% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 813 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-755 Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Melissa Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y ? 70% Average % Yes Capabilities – 70% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know To quantify Mellissa’s legal and regulatory capabilities, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31- 70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire response indicated that Melissa has 92.86% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 70% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 70% of identified fiscal capabilities. Page 814 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-756 Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities City of Melissa City Manager The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, along with the city manager, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. Ability to implement and approve mitigation actions and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 815 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-757 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016 HazMAP, the City of Melissa Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the Plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones within the City of Melissa. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 816 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-758 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Melissa Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Adopt and promote public education program to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 9-12 months Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Page 817 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-759 Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion Program will include information on hazard mitigation and what actions can be taken to reduce impacts on people and property. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Melissa Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 9-12 months Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in the safety of citizens who are outdoors Discussion Outdoor warning sirens help prevent loss of life during severe storms. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that identifies both safe locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost Current staffing project time/resources Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Page 818 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-760 Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings May require retrofit Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 12 to 24 months Effect on Old Buildings Retrofit will increase life safety Effect on New Buildings Will add additional protection to reduce injury and loss of life Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Residential safe room programs help prevent loss of life during tornado or severe storm. Status Deferred – Residents did received funding through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program. The NCTCOG Program has been suspended City of Melissa Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Page 819 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-761 Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Page 820 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-762 Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 18 – 36 months Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Develop and implement mandatory water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public W orks Page 821 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-763 Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Promote water conservation throughout the county and work with local water supplies to increase public education on drought. Develop and implement mandatory water restrictions for water conservation. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priorit y Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public W orks, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Melissa Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Page 822 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-764 Estimated Cost TBD Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status City of Melissa Action Items: New City of Melissa Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to educate on the actions to help mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 9-12 months Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Page 823 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-765 Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation.be taken to reduce impacts on people and property. City of Melissa Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 9-12 months Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in the safety of citizens who are outdoors Discussion Outdoor warning sirens help prevent loss of life during severe storms. This action item would be specific to installation/placement of new OWS sirens in the jurisdiction. City of Melissa Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that identifies both safe locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost Current staffing project time/resources Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department H.R. Dept. Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings May require retrofit Page 824 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-766 Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold City of Melissa Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 12 to 24 months Effect on Old Buildings Retrofit will increase life safety Effect on New Buildings Will add additional protection to reduce injury and loss of life Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Residential safe room programs help prevent loss of life during tornado or severe storm. City of Melissa Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Page 825 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-767 Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information City of Melissa Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. City of Melissa Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Page 826 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-768 Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 18 – 36 months Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. City of Melissa Action Item Develop and implement mandatory water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public W orks Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Promote water conservation throughout the county and work with local water supplies to increase public education on drought. Develop and implement mandatory water restrictions for water conservation. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. Page 827 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-769 City of Melissa Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priorit y Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public W orks, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. City of Melissa Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priorit y Low Estimated Cost TBD Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Page 828 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-770 Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance Melissa is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 481626# MELISSA, CITY OF COLLIN COUNTY - 4/2/1991 06/02/09(M) 4/9/2009 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions Page 829 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-771 . Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Communit y Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement City of Meliss a City Engineer Complete and maintain FEMA elevation certificates for pre-FIRM and or post-FIRM buildings Permits are issued through the City Engineer. The City of Melissa requires 2 feet of freeboard above the base flood elevation for the top of bottom floor on residential structures and non-residential structures that will be built on properties created or platted after the effective date of the Flood Damage Prevention Order NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Floodplain developme nt permits Permits are required for any new construction in a floodplain. Future Mitigation Projects The City of Melissa will continue to monitor for new areas of flooding that have not been previously identified for mitigation. Page 830 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-772 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), Collin County has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the City of Melissa, the county, and the city council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, the City of Melissa will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Activity Schedule Fire Chief Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective Page 831 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-773 councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan City of Melissa City Council Budget Meetings Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Fire Chief Emergency Action Plan updates Every Five Year EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. City Council, Director of Planning Capital improvement plans Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, City Council Drought Contingency plans Assessed annually and updated as needed. Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Page 832 Item 10. Collin County Hazard Mitigation City of Melissa Annex Page | M-774 Planning Director, City Council Natural Resource Conservation Plan Assessed annually and updated as needed. Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Melissa Hazard Mitigation Planning Team considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicles to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committees will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 833 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-775 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex N: City of Murphy 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2020 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. The City of Murphy participated on the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT). This is a new hazard mitigation plan and the first to be submitted to FEMA for the City of Murphy. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Murphy. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While the City of Murphy has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped Murphy officials recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and online. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Wildland/Urban Interface National Resource Conservation Services Dam information National Inventory of Dams Dam information Page 834 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-776 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the City of Murphy Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the HMPT. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in November 2020 with representatives from participating jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. The City of Murphy acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services; the efforts of the planning committees and the HMPT were led by the Collin County Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator. The table below provides a list of the primary representatives on the Murphy planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role Murphy Fire Rescue Fire Chief/Emergency Management Coordinator Facilitator/Plan Development Murphy Fire Rescue Fire Marshal/Emergency Management Specialist Plan Development/Data Research Murphy City Management City Manager Provided Data/Mapping Murphy Public Works Public Works Director Provide Data/Flood Plain Murphy Police Department Police Chief Plan Development Murphy Community Development Building Official Plan Development Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. Page 835 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-777 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Community ISD School Board Member Review of plan North Texas Municipal Water District Board Member Review of plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each jurisdiction also is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County and included all jurisdiction’s participation: • Collin County HazMAP Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 • Collin County Planning Meeting – November 5, 2020 • Collin County Planning Meeting – June 12, 2021 • Murphy and Collin Planning Meeting/Discussion – July 21, 2021 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 at 9AM Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committees provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public Page 836 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-778 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 837 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-779 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Committee for the City of Murphy identified several natural hazards and man-made hazards that could affect the city. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for the City of Murphy and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Page 838 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-780 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Page 839 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-781 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for the City of Murphy Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 0 0 0 0 Drought 2 0 1 3 1.15 Earthquake 0 1 0 1 0.45 Expansive Soils 2 0 0 1 0.7 Extreme Heat 2 1 0 2 1.15 Flooding 1 1 0 2 0.85 Hail 1 0 0 2 0.5 High Winds 1 0 1 2 0.75 Lightning 2 0 2 1 1.2 Tornado 1 0 0 1 0.4 Wildfire 1 0 0 1 0.4 Winter Storms 2 0 1.5 3 1.28 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the City of Murphy, resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in the City of Murphy. Table 3.3 Hazard Ranking for the City of Murphy High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Extreme Heat Drought Winter Storms Lightning Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Expansive Soils Flooding Hail High Winds Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Wildfire Earthquake Dam Failure Tornado Page 840 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-782 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Vulnerability Narratives The natural hazards identified that were rated of negligible to no risk were not included in this plan. This annex therefore focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the City of Murphy faces with each hazard. The hazards identified earlier in the plan are all addressed in this annex. Dam and Levee Failure A dam is defined as a barrier constructed across a watercourse for the purpose of storage, control, or diversion of water. Dams typically are constructed of earth, rock, concrete, or mine tailings. A dam failure is an accidental or unintentional collapse, breach, or other failure of an impoundment structure that results in downstream flooding. Because dams are man-made structures, dam failures are usually considered technological hazards. However, since most dam failures result from prolonged periods of rainfall, they are often cited as secondary or cascading effects of natural flooding disasters and are not named as the primary hazard that causes disaster declarations. The City of Murphy is not subject to dam failure because no Dams are located inside the city limits and the city is not vulnerable to a dam failure that might occur outside the city limits. As a participant in the county plan inundation studies will be considered. Drought The City of Murphy is a moderate risk for drought Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of Murphy are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. The City of Murphy receives its water supply from the North Texas Municipal Water District (NTMWD). Restrictions sanctioned on the City of Murphy by the NTMWD caused by a drought affect local revenues significantly. The lack of water can also impact emergency responder capabilities in the form of firefighting efforts (not facilities). Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake An earthquake is a sudden motion or trembling caused by an abrupt release of accumulated strain on the tectonic plates that comprise the Earth's crust. The theory of plate tectonics holds that the Earth's crust is broken into several major plates. These rigid, 50- to 60- mile thick plates move slowly and continuously over the interior of the earth, meeting in some areas and separating in others. As the tectonic plates move together they bump, slide, catch, and hold. Eventually, faults along or near plate boundaries slip abruptly when the stress exceeds the elastic limit of the rock, and an earthquake occurs. The ensuing seismic activity and ground motion provoke secondary hazards: surface faulting, ground failure, and tsunamis. The vibration or shaking of the ground during an earthquake is referred to as ground motion. In general, the severity of ground motion increases with the amount of energy released and decreases with distance from the causative fault or epicenter. When a fault ruptures, seismic waves are propagated in all directions, causing the ground to vibrate at frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 30 Hz. Seismic waves are referred to as P waves, S waves, and surface waves. Due to the risk being associated to a distant quake, earthquakes may affect the entire planning area equally. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Page 841 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-783 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan There is no history of earthquakes occurring within the City of Murphy; however, there have been six (6) earthquake activity events between1997 – 2008. Those ranged from 27.3 miles to 96.7 miles away from the city center. There have also been hundreds of small earthquakes recently in North Texas possibly from the gas and oil industry drilling and disposal known as fracking. Venture companies continue to look for new drill sites in this general area. The City of Murphy is a low risk for an earthquake. The most likely risk to a significant earthquake event is associated to either a distant larger quake which might occur in Missouri, Tennessee, or Oklahoma, though these earthquakes are probable to occur only once every 500 years. Expansive Soils Expansive soils contain minerals such as “smectite” clays that are capable of absorbing water. When they absorb water they increase in volume. The more water they absorb the more their volume increases. Expansions of ten percent or more are not uncommon. This change in volume can exert enough force on a building or other structure to cause damage. Expansive soils will also shrink when they dry out. This shrinkage can remove support from buildings or other structures and result in damaging foundations. Fissures in the soil can also develop. These fissures can facilitate the deep penetration of water when moist conditions or runoff occurs. This produces a cycle of shrinkage and swelling that places repetitive stress on structures, especially those constructed under older building codes. The City of Murphy is a low risk for expansive soils. Extreme Heat Extreme heat is characterized by a combination of a very high temperatures and exceptionally humid conditions. When persisting over a period of time, it is called a heat wave. Extreme heat can also be a factor that drastically impacts drought conditions as high temperatures lead to an increased rate of evaporation. Extreme heat can also lead to heat stroke and even death in vulnerable populations such as the homeless, elderly, very young, and populations without air conditioning if exposed to the high temperatures for an extended period of time. Extreme heat may affect the entire population equally. The City of Murphy is a moderate risk of extreme heat. The City of Murphy has the potential during heat emergencies to exceed capabilities of our local hospitals and Emergency Medical System. Extreme heat happens regularly and often for extended periods of time during the June through September timeframe. Flooding Flooding is defined as the accumulation of water within a water body and the overflow of excess water onto adjacent floodplain lands. The floodplain is the land adjoining the channel of a river, stream, ocean, lake, or other watercourse or water body that is susceptible to flooding. The statistical meaning of terms like “25-year storm” and “100-year flood” can be confusing. Simply stated, a floodplain can be located anywhere; it just depends on how large and how often a flood event occurs. Floodplains are those areas that are subject to inundation from flooding. Floods and the floodplains associated with them are often described in terms of the percent chance of a flood event happening in any given year. As a community management or planning term, “floodplain” most often refers to an area that is subject to inundation by a flood that has a one percent chance of occurring in any given year (commonly and incorrectly referred to as the 100-year floodplain). Common flooding hazards within the planning area include flood hazards from flash flooding and from new development. A flash flood is a rapid flood that inundates low-lying areas in less than six hours. This is caused by intense rainfall from a thunderstorm or several thunderstorms. Flash floods can also occur from the Page 842 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-784 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan collapse of a man-made structure or ice dam. Construction and development can change the natural drainage and create brand new flood risks as new buildings, parking lots, and roads create less land that can absorb excess precipitation from heavy rains, hurricanes, and tropical storms. Flash floods are a high risk hazard since they can roll boulders, tear out trees, and destroy buildings and bridges. The City of Murphy is a low risk for flooding. There are a few homes currently lying within a flood plain within the City of Murphy. A large creek system dissects the city basically in half and abuts approximately 30% of all neighborhood subdivisions. The city only houses one fire station. Emergency responses may be severely impacted when attempting to respond to the other side of the creek with flooding present. Hail Hail occurs when, at the outgrowth of a severe thunderstorm, balls or irregularly shaped lumps of ice greater than 0.75 inches in diameter fall with rain. Early in the developmental stages of a hailstorm, ice crystals form within a low-pressure front due to warm air rising rapidly into the upper atmosphere and the subsequent cooling of the air mass. Frozen droplets gradually accumulate on the ice crystals until, having developed sufficient weight, they fall as precipitation. Hail may affect the entire planning area equally. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. The City of Murphy is a low risk for hail. The City of Murphy covers a small area with a higher population ratio than the more rural areas in Collin County. All areas of the city are susceptible to hail damage. Damage in the city due to hail could result in a much higher loss due to density. High Winds Wind is defined as the motion of air relative to the earth’s surface. The horizontal component of the three-dimensional flow and the near-surface wind phenomenon are the most significant aspects of the hazard. Straight-line winds are often responsible for the wind damage associated with a thunderstorm. These winds are often confused with tornadoes because of similar damage and wind speeds. However, the strong and gusty winds associated with straight-line winds blow roughly in a straight line unlike the rotating winds of a tornado. Downbursts or micro-bursts are examples of damaging straight-line winds. A downburst is a small area of rapidly descending rain and rain-cooled air beneath a thunderstorm that produces a violent, localized downdraft covering 2.5 miles or less. Wind speeds in some of the stronger downbursts can reach 100 to 150 miles per hour, which is similar to that of a strong tornado. The winds produced from a downburst often occur in one direction, and the worst damage is usually on the forward side of the downburst. High winds may affect the entire planning area equally. The City of Murphy typically has power outages, fires, damage to roofs, cars, out buildings, and electrical utilities due to high winds. These events create significant planning and recovery issues. The City of Murphy is a low risk for high winds. The City of Murphy has and encourages a high density of trees with the city limits. High winds create a lot of power outages due to tree limbs compromising such power lines and also creates a Significant vegetative debris is generated during high wind events that requires removal to keep roads passable. Lightning Lightning results from the buildup and discharge of electrical energy between positively and negatively charged areas within thunderstorms. A “bolt” or brilliant flash of light is created when the buildup becomes strong enough. These bolts of lightning can be seen in cloud-to-cloud or cloud-to- ground strikes. Bolts of lightning can reach temperatures approaching 50,000° Fahrenheit. While lightning is mostly affiliated with thunderstorms, lightning often strikes outside of these storms, as far as 10 miles away from any rainfall. Federal Emergency Management Agency states that an average of 300 people are injured Page 843 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-785 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan and 80 people are killed in the United States each year by lightning. Direct strikes have the power to cause significant damage to buildings, critical facilities, infrastructure, and ignition of wildfires which can result in widespread damages to property. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. The City of Murphy is a low risk for lightning. Tornado A tornado is a violently rotating column of air, in contact with the ground, both pendant from a cumuliform cloud or underneath a cumuliform cloud, and often (but not always) visible as a condensation funnel. Tornadoes may affect the entire planning area equally, manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. The City of Murphy is a low risk for tornado activity. Tornados are likely to occur within the City of Murphy as they are within any other area in Collin County. Special issues concerning a tornado incident within the City are due to a population density of 3,596 per square mile. An additional concern is the vast numbers of large trees in the residential areas that could impact power lines and the restriction into areas needing assistance due to trees and limbs blocking roadways. Wildland Fire Wildland fire is any fire occurring on grassland, forest, or prairie, regardless of ignition source, damages or benefits. Wildland fires are fueled almost exclusively by natural vegetation. They typically occur in national forests and parks, where federal agencies are responsible for fire management and suppression. Interface or intermix fires are urban/wildland fires in which vegetation and the built- environment provide fuel. Firestorms are events of such extreme intensity that effective suppression is virtually impossible. Firestorms occur during extreme weather and generally burn until conditions change or the available fuel is exhausted. Wildland fires affect the entire planning area equally. For the purposes of this hazard analysis, wildland fires are assessed under what is known as the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). The WUI is an area of development that is susceptible to wildland fires due to the amount of structures located in an area with vegetation that can act a fuel for a wildland fire. The City of Murphy is a low to moderate risk for wildland fire. 47.54% of Murphy’s population lives in the Wildland Urban Interface which is predominately in the north and east sides of the city, according to the Texas Forest Service Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary. Winter Storms Winter storms originate as mid-latitude depressions or cyclonic weather systems, sometimes following the path of the jet stream. A winter storm or blizzard combines heavy snowfall, high winds, extreme cold and ice storms. Many winter depressions give rise to exceptionally heavy rain and widespread flooding and conditions worsen if the precipitation falls in the form of snow. The winter storm season varies widely, depending on latitude, altitude and proximity to moderating influences. W inter storms affect the entire planning area equally. Cold snaps in which temperatures fall below the freezing point of 32° Fahrenheit do happen on an annual basis in the planning area and can lead to issues with infrastructure, especially frozen roads and bridges. Winter storms affect the entire City of Murphy when they occur and have multiple impacts including, but not limited to travel, power, and exposure for the homeless, elderly, and populations without access to heat. With the potential for freezing precipitation, icing of roadways are of an utmost concern. These winter storms have the potential to make roads impassable for days. Residents may be confined to their homes due to the storm and may be without basic services, such as water and electricity, for an extended period of time. The city has two state highways, FM 544 and FM 2551 that can be impacted during winter storms. Areas impacted include local commerce, exceeding the capabilities of our local hospital, over Page 844 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-786 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan extending local capabilities to shelter stranded motorist. The City of Murphy serves as a cross connection point between IH 30 and US Highway 75 and is a major thoroughfare. The vehicle count for FM 544 alone is approximately 50,000 cars per day. With a very high tree population within the city; public works, fire and police departments are overwhelmed with the impacts caused by the loss of limbs associated with severe weather. Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of the City of Murphy geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by the 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates, the total population of the City of Murphy in 2020 was 20,500 people, with 6,179 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Page 845 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-787 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.4 Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total Household Density (Sq. Mile) City of Murphy 20,500 1.98% 3,605.63 7,211 1.88% 1,269.59 Source: US Census Bureau & Collin County Appraisal District Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for the City of Murphy). Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2013- 2014 Percent (%) Change 2013- 2014 City of Murphy 17,708 20,060 20,080 20 0.09% Source: 2020 North Central Texas Council of Governments Population Estimate Property There are an estimated 7,077 parcels in the City of Murphy, with an estimated $2,065,761,767 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 City of Murphy 7,077 1.68% $2,065,761,767 Source: Collin County Appraisal District Emergency Facilities There are three identified emergency facilities in the City of Murphy, including one fire station, one police station, and no hospitals. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals City of Murphy 1 1 1 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Critical Facilities There are five critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in the City of Murphy. The critical facilities include five schools and zero historical property sites (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Page 846 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-788 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property City of Murphy 5 0 Source: Local jurisdictions Critical Infrastructure There are five identified critical infrastructure facilities in the City of Murphy, including no airports, no natural gas facilities, no water treatment facilities, no wastewater treatment facilities, no dams, and five railway/highway bridges (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges City of Murphy 0 0 0 0 0 5 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, the City of Murphy’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for the City of Murphy, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Page 847 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-789 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) zero (0) recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Murphy are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Murphy are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the City of Murphy. The City of Murphy and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 848 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-790 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is zero (0) impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the City of Murphy; predominantly a residential community, is vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is zero (0) impact of extreme heat to emergency facilities; however, there are two standalone emergency room facilities, one fire station, one police station and one animal shelter in the City of Murphy which are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are zero (0) critical facilities; however, there are five school facilities in the City of Murphy which are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is zero (0) impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and exposure; however, there are four bridges within the City of Murphy and the risk is considered minimal.. Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 185 residential parcels in the City of Murphy are located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property There have been six (6) recorded flood events in the City of Murphy. Property losses are expected at $23,573.70 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded county-wide. Approximately $65,866,390 of the total assessed value is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities Emergency facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Facilities Critical facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure Critical Infrastructure have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Murphy are expected at $2,028.57 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although Page 849 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-791 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for the City of Murphy indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the City of Murphy are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the City of Murphy are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Murphy are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events. All the population of the City of Murphy is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Murphy are expected at $785.71 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in the City of Murphy. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in the City of Murphy are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the City of Murphy are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the City of Murphy are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events can be expected to cause no fatalities or injuries in City of Murphy. All the population of the City of Murphy is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Murphy are expected at $14,791.67 per year Page 850 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-792 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Murphy is exposed to this hazard. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the City of Murphy are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the City of Murphy are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the City of Murphy are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in the City of Murphy. All the population of the City of Murphy is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Murphy are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Murphy. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the City of Murphy are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the City of Murphy are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the City of Murphy are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 47.54% of the City of Murphy is vulnerable to wildfires. There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the City of Murphy are also unknown. Page 851 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-793 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there are 0 fire stations at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are no schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are 0 bridges, 0 dams, 0 wastewater treatment facility, and 0 water treatment facility at risk from wildfire events. Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Murphy. All the population of the City of Murphy is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Allen are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Murphy. With significant ice storms for this area the City of Murphy is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in the City of Murphy are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the City of Murphy are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Murphy are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 852 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-794 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serves as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the City of Murphy considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Murphy Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N N N 64% Average % Yes Capabilities – 64% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 853 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-795 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes City of Murphy Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y 90% Average % Yes Capabilities – 90% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes City of Murphy N Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N 60% Average % Yes Capabilities – 60% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 854 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-796 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify Collin County’s legal and regulatory capabilities, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31- 70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, the City of Murphy has 64% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 90% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 60% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities City of Murphy City Manager The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, along with the city manager, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. Ability to implement and approve mitigation actions and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 855 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-797 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2021 HazMAP, the City of Murphy Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Objective 1-D Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornado, ice events, power outages and high winds through tree pruning practices. Objective 1-E Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from drought through urban interface practice due to wildfires. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Objective 2-F Provide ample supply of fuel for all city vehicles and public safety vehicles for emergency responses. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones within the City of Murphy. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Page 856 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-798 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Murphy Deferred Items from 2016 Plan City of Murphy Action Item Increase the percentage of population covered by Outdoor Warning Sirens by relocating one siren and purchasing and installing an additional siren. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds, Hail Goal/Objective 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $38,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department Fire/OEM Implementation Schedule 6-18 months Effect on Old Buildings N/A Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Very cost effective. Quantifying the value of a human life is extremely difficult at best. Discussion The city has four tower sites currently, but has a gap in coverage in some areas. Relocating an existing site and adding one site would allow full coverage for the city and its residents. Page 857 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-799 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status 100% Complete City of Murphy Action Item Obtain portable generators to ensure continuity of operations at critical facilities. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-E Priority High Estimated Cost $7,500 each Potential Funding Sources HGMP, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, In-kind Lead Department Fire Implementation Schedule 3-6 Months Effect on Old Buildings Would require retrofit for generator hookups Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Very cost effective Discussion Natural hazards can create power outages for extended periods of time. Status Not started and no longer a viable action item. Will be removed from Plan City of Murphy Action Item Purchase and Install CASA-WX Weather Radar Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds, Hail Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $2.5 Million Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department Fire/OEM Implementation Schedule 3-6 months Effect on Old Buildings N/A Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Very cost effective. Quantifying the value of a human life is extremely difficult at best. Discussion The Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere (CASA WX) project is a multi‐sector partnership dedicated to engineering revolutionary weather‐sensing networks. The more accurate data will Page 858 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-800 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan also provide a better means to analyze severe weather post event which can also help in the assessment of damage after a severe weather event. Status No longer a viable project for Murphy, will be removed from Plan in 2021 City of Murphy Action Item Implement the Residential Safe Room Rebate Program locally Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 1-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $3,000 per safe room Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department City Council – City Manager Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Some buildings may be modified for shelter retrofit Effect on New Buildings New home construction would result in safer houses Cost Effectiveness Moderate: Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornados or high winds events. Discussion Support the existing active FEMA 320 safe room rebate program for North Central Texas by helping offset the cost to the resident. Status With the ending of the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program this program is no longer a viable action item. Will be removed from Plan. City of Murphy Action Item Develop and implement seasonal program for identifying and removing tree limbs that threaten infrastructure. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, High Winds, Lightning Goal/Objective 1-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department Parks Implementation Schedule 3-6 Months Page 859 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-801 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Reduce potential for power line/debris/limb damage to existing buildings during extreme weather Effect on New Buildings Reduce potential for power line/debris/limb damage to new construction during extreme weather Cost Effectiveness Very cost effective in mitigating tree limbs prior to severe weather events. Discussion Severe storms, winter storms, and wildfires damage tree limbs and power lines that damage homes, buildings, vehicles and create power outages when they fall. Roads become impassable due to the obstructions created by the falling limbs and charged power lines as well. The ability to mitigate these overgrowth items and strategically located limbs will lessen the effects of the hazards. Status Completed City of Murphy Action Item Retrofit the existing Emergency Operations Center to harden it against multiple hazards Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 2-B Priority High Estimated Cost $30,000-$150,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, In-kind, Bond Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 12 – 24 months Effect on Old Buildings Existing building would be retrofitted to mitigate against structure- impacting hazards. Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Low cost effectiveness for construction, but very cost effective for ‘command structure’ to remain intact to operate through emergency events Discussion Dry floodproofing ground floor; reinforcing doors and windows; installing flame-retardant, hail and wind resistant external materials (window coatings, roofing); roof bracing; higher grade insulation; foundations stabilizers; lightning rods; soil stabilizing plants, and low- flow plumbing. Status Partially completed and will continue to perform enhancements. Will be included in 2021 Plan. City of Murphy Action Item Replace undersized culverts at five locations. Page 860 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-802 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-A, 2-E Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $620,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, in-kind, Bonds Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce flooding for existing structures in area Effect on New Buildings Reduce flooding for planned construction in area Cost Effectiveness Very effective for the long term results gained Discussion Providing proper water flow and drainage during times of excessive rains is imperative. Improper water flow results in damage to roads, bridges and property; which may lead to injuries and deaths. These replacements will be for 5 separate projects that have been identified as insufficient. Status Mostly completed and will be included in 2021 Update City of Murphy Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Page 861 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-803 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Status No longer a viable project for Murphy, will be removed from Plan in 2021 City of Murphy Action Item Drainage channel improvements and additions. Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-A, 2-E Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $3.11 Million Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, in-kind, Bonds Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 12 – 18 Months Effect on Old Buildings Reduce flooding for existing structures in area Effect on New Buildings Reduce flooding for planned construction in area Cost Effectiveness Very effective for the long term results gained Discussion Providing proper water flow and drainage during times of excessive rains is imperative. Improper water flow results in damage to roads, bridges and property; which may lead to injuries and deaths. These replacements will be for 4 separate projects that have been identified as insufficient. Status Mostly completed and will be included in 2021 Update City of Murphy Action Item Purchase and install lightning detection equipment for city parks Hazard(s) Addressed Lightning Goal/Objective 1-A Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, in-kind Lead Department Public works Implementation Schedule 12 months Page 862 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-804 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings N/A Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Very cost effective. Quantifying the value of a human life is extremely difficult at best. Discussion The city has two major parks with outdoor sporting event capabilities, pavilions and an amphitheater where multiple events are held throughout the year. Providing a secondary source of severe weather information such as lightning indication could prevent injury or death to one or more of our citizens or guests Status No longer a viable project. Will not be included in the 2021 Plan City of Murphy Action Item Develop and implement a water conservation plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and protection of foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Promote water conservation and work with local water supplies to increase mitigation measures for drought. Develop and implement mandatory water restrictions/codes for water conservation measures that address soil stabilization. Status 100% Completed City of Murphy New 2021 Action Items City of Murphy Action Item Retrofit the existing Emergency Operations Center to harden it against multiple hazards Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning Goal/Objective 2-B Priority High Page 863 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-805 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Estimated Cost $30,000-$150,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, In-kind, Bond Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 12 – 24 months Effect on Old Buildings Existing building would be retrofitted to mitigate against structure- impacting hazards. Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Low cost effectiveness for construction, but very cost effective for ‘command structure’ to remain intact to operate through emergency events Discussion Dry floodproofing ground floor; reinforcing doors and windows; installing flame-retardant, hail and wind resistant external materials (window coatings, roofing); roof bracing; higher grade insulation; foundations stabilizers; lightning rods; soil stabilizing plants, and low- flow plumbing. City of Murphy Action Item Replace undersized culverts at five locations. Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-A, 2-E Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $620,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, in-kind, Bonds Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce flooding for existing structures in area Effect on New Buildings Reduce flooding for planned construction in area Cost Effectiveness Very effective for the long term results gained Discussion Providing proper water flow and drainage during times of excessive rains is imperative. Improper water flow results in damage to roads, bridges and property; which may lead to injuries and deaths. These replacements will be for 5 separate projects that have been identified as insufficient. Page 864 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-806 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Murphy Action Item Drainage channel improvements and additions. Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-A, 2-E Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $2.91 Million Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, in-kind, Bonds Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 12 – 18 Months Effect on Old Buildings Reduce flooding for existing structures in area Effect on New Buildings Reduce flooding for planned construction in area Cost Effectiveness Very effective for the long term results gained Discussion Providing proper water flow and drainage during times of excessive rains is imperative. Improper water flow results in damage to roads, bridges and property; which may lead to injuries and deaths. These replacements will be for 4 separate projects that have been identified as insufficient. Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Promote water conservation and work with local water supplies to increase mitigation measures for drought. Develop and implement mandatory water restrictions/codes for water conservation measures that address soil stabilization. City of Murphy Action Item Obtain fixed emergency building generators and complete the electrical wiring to retrofit the existing buildings for critical infrastructure buildings Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning Goal/Objective 2-B, 2-D Priority High Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Existing building would be retrofitted to prevent shutdown of building Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Moderate Discussion Tornados, High winds, extreme heat and ice (winter storm) create power outages for extended periods of time. People become trapped in their Page 865 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-807 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Murphy Action Item Install fuel tanks, fuel pumps, roadway, and all appurtenances for city vehicle refueling needs during emergency responses. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning Goal/Objective 2-F Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $1.75 Million Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local, In-kind, Bond Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 12 – 24 months Effect on Old Buildings N/A Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Very effective for the long-term results gained Discussion When fuel shortages result from local, state, or national events, we lose our may lose our ability to quickly respond to events. This would include not just traditional first responders, but also Public Works and others. Ensuring we maintain our own fuel and ability to fill up vehicles will help ensure we can mitigation events here in Murphy due to us having the ability to respond at all times. homes without power for heating and cooling needs and other necessities for extended periods of time. These elements will provide electricity to the buildings and it will allow the critical components of the building to still operate. These structures would allow for them to serve as warming and cooling shelters City of Murphy Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost TBD Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, citizen cost share Lead Department Economic Development, Public Works Implementation Schedule 2-4 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage Page 866 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-808 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage Cost Effectiveness Moderate. This study could lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout the jurisdiction. City of Murphy Action Item Research and develop an urban interface wildfire program for residents Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 1-E Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $1000 - $5000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, citizen cost share Lead Department Parks & Fire Department Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce property damage due to increased wildfire risk Effect on New Buildings Reduce property damage due to increased wildfire risk Cost Effectiveness Low-moderate cost for effective means to reduce wildfire risk Discussion Drought in general leads to an increased chance of wildfire. With most wildfire loss occurring in open undeveloped wildlands there is still a moderate chance of wildfire in smaller areas of developed urban areas of high population. Specific clearing of underbrush and debris near homes and businesses will reduce the property damages due to wildfire. City of Murphy Action Item Implement all-hazards community education program, including information on mitigation activities. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning Goal/Objective 4A- 4B Priority High Estimated Cost $1000 - $5000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-4 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing buildings safer, stronger, and less vulnerable to damages by providing a qualitative understanding of hazards and how to mitigate them. Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing buildings safer, stronger, and less vulnerable to damages by Page 867 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-809 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Murphy Action Item Continue to enhance mandatory water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public W orks Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Promote water conservation throughout the county and work with local water supplies to increase public education on drought. Develop and implement mandatory water restrictions for water conservation. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance The City of Murphy is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. providing a qualitative understanding of hazards and how to mitigate them. Cost Effectiveness Low-cost effectiveness for providing information to citizens to make good sound decisions based on current practices for mitigation. Discussion Community education is important for reducing loss of life and property. Page 868 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-810 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 480137# MURPHY, CITY OF COLLIN COUNTY 12/7/1973 4/1/1980 6/2/2009 4/1/1980 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Compliance Once the community applies for the NFIP, FEMA arranges for a study of the community to determine base flood elevations and flood risk zones. Consultation with the community occurs at the start of and during the study, and those communities with minimal flood risk are converted to the Regular Program without a study. FEMA provides the studied community with a Flood Insurance Rate Map delineating base flood elevations and flood risk zones. The community is then given 6 months to adopt base flood elevations in its local zoning and building code ordinances. Once the community adopts more stringent ordinances, FEMA converts the community to the NFIP’s Regular Program. FEMA then authorizes the sale of additional flood insurance in the community up to the Regular Program limits. The community must implement and enforce the adopted floodplain management measures. FEMA provides periodic community assistance visits with local officials to provide technical assistance regarding complying with NFIP floodplain management requirements. Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Page 869 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-811 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement City of Murphy City Manager Maintain FEMA elevation certificates for pre-FIRM and or post-FIRM buildings Permits are issued through the City Manager’s Office. City of Murphy requires 2 feet of freeboard above the base flood elevation for the top of bottom floor on residential structures and non-residential structures that will be built on properties created or platted after the effective date of the Flood Damage Prevention Order NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with City’s flood damage prevention order shall result in fines up to $500 per violation plus court costs. Floodplain development permits Permits are required for any construction in a floodplain. Take action to minimize the effects of flooding on people, property, and building contents through measures including flood warning, emergency response, and evacuation planning City of Murphy Street Department distributes barricades during times of flooding events. Future Mitigation Projects City of Murphy will continue to monitor for new areas of flooding that have not been previously identified for mitigation. Page 870 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-812 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), Collin County has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the City of Murphy, the county, and the city council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, The City of Murphy will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Jurisdiction Personnel Activity Time City of Murphy Fire Marshal Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will Page 871 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-813 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and planning committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan City of Murphy City Council Budget Meetings Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Emergency Management Specialist Emergency Action Plan updates Every Five Year EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. City Council, Director of Planning Capital improvement plans Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, City Council Drought Contingency plans Assessed annually and updated as needed. Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Planning Director, City Council Natural Resource Conservation Plan Assessed annually and updated as needed. Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Page 872 Item 10. City of Murphy Annex Page | N-814 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Murphy Hazard Mitigation Planning Team considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicles to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committee will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 873 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-815 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex O: Town of New Hope 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2020-2021 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. The Town of New Hope participated on the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT). The New Hope annex contains information specific to the town, including capability assessment information, vulnerability assessments, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While the Town of New Hope has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped New Hope officials recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and the local newspaper. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), the Town of New Hope developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Urban Interface Page 874 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-816 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the Town of New Hope Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County HMPT. The efforts of the Planning Committee were led by the Mayor. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in June 2020 with representatives from participating jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services. The efforts of the planning committee were led by the mayor of New Hope. The table below provides a list of the primary representatives on the New Hope planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role Town Council Mayor Plan Development Town Council Council Members Plan Development Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. Page 875 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-817 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Collin County Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator General Assistance Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each jurisdiction also is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County: • Collin County HazMAP Kickoff Meeting – November 5, 2020 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 at 9AM Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. Page 876 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-818 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non-profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 877 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-819 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the Town of New Hope identified several hazards that could affect the town. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified on pages O-9 through O-10 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for the Town of New Hope and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Page 878 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-820 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Page 879 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-821 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for the Town of New Hope Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 1 0 0 0.35 Drought 1 0 0 0 0.3 Earthquake 0 0 0 2 0.2 Expansive Soils 1 0 0 1 0.4 Extreme Heat 2 1 0 2 1.15 Flooding 1 0 0 1 0.4 Hail 2 1 0 2 1.15 High Winds 2 0 0 1 0.7 Lightning 2 0 0 0 0.6 Tornado 2 2 2 1 1.9 Wildfire 1 1 1 1 1 Winter Storms 2 1 2 3 1.75 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for Collin County jurisdictions, resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in Collin County. Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for the Town of New Hope High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Tornado W inter Storms Extreme Heat Hail Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) High Winds Lightning Wildfire Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Earthquake Dam Failure Drought Expansive Soils Flooding Page 880 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-822 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the Town of New Hope faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation. Dam and Levee Failure As a participant in the county plan inundation studies will be considered. There are currently no dams in or immediately surrounding New Hope. Drought Droughts have the potential to impact the entire planning area equally: all improved property and the entire population of New Hope are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. North Texas Municipal Water District (NTMWD) is the source of water for the Town of New Hope, and NTMWD’s water sources and reservoirs are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake Earthquakes have the potential to occur anywhere in the geographic planning area, therefore all geographic areas are potentially vulnerable. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Expansive Soils All the geographic areas and properties in the Town of New Hope have the potential to be vulnerable to expansive soils, especially properties constructed under older building codes. Expansive soils are not a prevalent hazard in New Hope. Extreme Heat Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Flooding Geographic areas, properties, and populations in the Town of New Hope have the potential to be vulnerable to flooding. Areas around Big Branch Creek are vulnerable to flooding and roadways with poor drainage are vulnerable to flash flooding. Hail All the geographic areas, properties, and populations in the Town of New Hope have the potential to be vulnerable to hail. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Winds High winds have the potential to damage trees in the Town of New Hope. Because roads and houses in New Hope are surrounded by large trees, high winds have the potential to block roads and damage houses. Manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Page 881 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-823 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lightning All the geographic areas, properties, and populations in the Town of New Hope have the potential to be vulnerable to lightning. Buildings without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado All the geographic areas, properties, and populations in the Town of New Hope have the potential to be vulnerable to tornados. Manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Wildland Fire 91.43% of the population of the Town of New Hope lives in the Wildland/Urban Interface. Both the east and west side of New Hope are vulnerable to wildland fires because of their WUI and because of their distance from a main highway (Hwy 380). Winter Storms Winter storms are a significant threat to the Town of New Hope. These winter storms have the potential to make roads impassable for days. Residents may be confined to their homes due to the storm and may be without basic services, such as water and electricity, for an extended period of time. New Hope residents live a distance from major stores and may be unable to buy supplies in the event of a prolonged storm or power outage. Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of unincorporated Collin County geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by U.S. Census Bureau Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2019. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools, Town Halls, and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. The New Hope Town Hall could act as an Emergency Operations Center (EOC) in the event of a major emergency or disaster. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical infrastructure was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Page 882 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-824 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 883 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-825 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Population According to the US Census Bureau Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2019, the total population of the Town of New Hope in 2019 was 628 people, with 276 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. New Hope Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total Household Density (Sq. Mile) Town of New Hope 628 0.06 436.11 276 0.09 191.67 Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate and US Census Bureau Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2019 & Collin County Appraisal District Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for the Town of New Hope). Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 Town of New Hope 614 633 628 -5 -0.79% Source: 2010 Census Data & US Census Bureau Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2019 Property There are an estimated 380 parcels in the Town of New Hope, with an estimated $55,290,291 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 Town of New Hope 380 0.10% $55,290,291 Source: Collin County Appraisal District Page 884 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-826 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Emergency Facilities There are zero identified emergency facilities in the Town of New Hope(Table 3.7). Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals Town of New Hope 0 0 0 Source: FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool Critical Facilities There is one identified critical facility in the Town of New Hope (Table 3.8). Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Town Hall Historical Property Town of New Hope 0 1 0 Source: FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool & Local jurisdictions Critical Infrastructure There are zero identified critical infrastructure facilities in the Town of New Hope (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges Town of New Hope 0 0 0 0 0 0 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, the Town of New Hope’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System-based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for the Town of New Hope, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System -based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Page 885 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-827 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of New Hope are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the Town of New Hope are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no emergency facilities are at risk. Page 886 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-828 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities, but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure There is no critical infrastructure located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no critical infrastructure is at risk. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the Town of New Hope. The Town of New Hope and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the Town of New Hope is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no emergency facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the Town of New Hope are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure There is no critical infrastructure located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no critical infrastructure is at risk. Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Portions of two (2) residential parcels in the Town of New Hope are located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property Property losses in the Town of New Hope are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded county-wide. Approximately $194,858 of the total assessed value is at risk from the 100-year storm event Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no emergency facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities Critical facilities have the potential to be at risk in a 100 year storm event. Page 887 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-829 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure There is no critical infrastructure located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no critical infrastructure is at risk. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of New Hope are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no emergency facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the Town of New Hope are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure There is no critical infrastructure located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no critical infrastructure is at risk. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events county-wide. All the population of the Town of New Hope is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of New Hope are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Minimal crop losses resulted from this hazard county-wide with none reported from the Town of New Hope. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no emergency facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the Town of New Hope are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure There is no critical infrastructure located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no critical infrastructure is at risk. Page 888 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-830 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events can be expected to cause no fatalities or injuries. All the population of the Town of New Hope is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of New Hope are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard county-wide with none reported from the Town of New Hope. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no emergency facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the Town of New Hope are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure There is no critical infrastructure located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no critical infrastructure is at risk. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in the Town of New Hope. All the population of the Town of New Hope is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of New Hope are expected but financially unknown due to lack of reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard county-wide with none reported from the Town of New Hope. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no emergency facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornadoes, all critical facilities in the Town of New Hope are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure There is no critical infrastructure located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no critical infrastructure is at risk. Page 889 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-831 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from wildfires in the Town of New Hope. Based on geographical data, approximately 91.43% of New Hope is vulnerable to wildfires. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of New Hope are expected but financially unknown due to lack of reporting. No crop loss reported from the Town of New Hope. Therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the Town of New Hope are also unknown. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no emergency facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information, there is one critical facility at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure There is no critical infrastructure located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no critical infrastructure is at risk. Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the Town of New Hope. All the population of the Town of New Hope are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of New Hope are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the Town of New Hope. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no emergency facilities are at risk Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the Town of New Hope are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure There is no critical infrastructure located within the Town of New Hope. Therefore, no critical infrastructure is at risk. Page 890 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-832 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serves as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, New Hope considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction Town of New Hope Y Y Y N N Y Y N N Y Y N N ? 50% Average % Yes Capabilities – 50% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 891 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-833 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes Town of New Hope N N N N N N N N N Y 10% Average % Yes Capabilities – 20% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes Town of New Hope N N Y N N N N N N ? 10% Average % Yes Capabilities – 10% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 892 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-834 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify New Hope’s legal and regulatory capabilities, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31- 70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, New Hope’s and its jurisdictions have 50% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 10% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 10% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities Town of New Hope Mayor The Town Council, including the Mayor, Mayor Pro-Tem, and Town Council members, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the overall direction of the Town. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 893 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-835 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2011 HazMAP, the Town of New Hope Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the Plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events while promoting insurance coverage for catastrophic hazards. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones within New Hope. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 894 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-836 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. Town of New Hope Deferred Items from 2016 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Adopt and promote public education program to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds General fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule Yearly effort Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion The utilization of social media will be key in this program. Program will include educational information about hazard awareness and mitigation. Page 895 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-837 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado/High Winds Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Residents receiving grant Lead Department N/A Implementation Schedule 1-3 Years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance Safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelter potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornados, or high wind events Discussion Status Will be included in 2021, however, come residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program Town of New Hope Action Item Develop and Implement an extreme temperature program that identifies both locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-A, 2D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, General fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources, including but not limited to emergency generators. Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Page 896 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-838 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, General Fund, citizen cost-share Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios could be especially useful to provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information to residents without use of their cell phones or access to Internet. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $25,000 per siren Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, General Fund, Developer cost Lead Department Town Council Page 897 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-839 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 9-12 months Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens notified of hazards. Discussion Obtaining grants will be key to implementation of outdoor warning siren coverage due to high costs and New Hope’s ow fiscal capability assessment scores. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the County. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flooding Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, General Fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. There are currently no dams located in or immediately surrounding New Hope. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 1-A, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Page 898 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-840 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local, General Fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 18 – 36 m onths Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show town officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion With assistance from Collin County Fire Marshall, identify mitigation strategies for all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Develop a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 3-C, 4-B Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local, General Fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and preservation of foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on North Collin Special Utility District recommendations. Use of social media will be key in implementing this plan. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 4-B Goal/Objective Earthquake Page 899 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-841 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 6 – 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils. Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2A, Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local, General Funds Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Expansive soils are not prevalent in New Hope. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 900 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-842 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to educate on the actions to help mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds General fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule Yearly effort Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion The utilization of social media will be key in this program. Program will include educational information about hazard awareness and mitigation. Town of New Hope New 2021 Action Items Town of New Hope Action Item Develop and implement storm water management Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-D, 2-E,3-C Priority Low Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP PDM Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, General Fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 1-3 years Effect on Old Buildings May prevent flooding of existing structures Effect on New Buildings May prevent flooding of new development. Cost Effectiveness Low compared to life safety events. Discussion Project would prevent erosion Page 901 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-843 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of New Hope Action Item Develop and Implement an extreme temperature program that identifies both locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-A, 2D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, General fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources, including but not limited to emergency generators. Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Town of New Hope Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, General Fund, citizen cost-share Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Page 902 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-844 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Weather Alert Radios could be especially useful to provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information to residents without use of their cell phones or access to Internet. Town of New Hope Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $25,000 per siren Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, General Fund, Developer cost Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 9-12 months Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens notified of hazards. This action item would be specific to installation/placement of new OWS sirens in the jurisdiction. Discussion Obtaining grants will be key to implementation of outdoor warning siren coverage due to high costs and New Hope’s ow fiscal capability assessment scores. Town of New Hope Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the County. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flooding Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, General Fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Page 903 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-845 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. There are currently no dams located in or immediately surrounding New Hope. Town of New Hope Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 1-A, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local, General Fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 18 – 36 m onths Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show town officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion With assistance from Collin County Fire Marshall, identify mitigation strategies for all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. Town of New Hope Action Item Develop a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C, 4-B Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local, General Fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Page 904 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-846 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and preservation of foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on North Collin Special Utility District recommendations. Use of social media will be key in implementing this plan. Ensuring residents have sufficient water to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation rate will mitigate droughts and drying soils which is a result of expansive soils of our region. Town of New Hope Action Item Develop and implement debris management program targeting buildup of debris and materials at bridges built over metal culverts that could result in flooding and damage to roadways. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-E, 3-C Goal/Objective Flooding Priority Low Estimated Cost $500,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local, General Fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12 months – 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Could prevent flooding and disruption to transportation Effect on New Buildings Could prevent flooding and disruption to transportation Cost Effectiveness Low compared to benefits Discussion The Town of New Hope needs to ensure clear pathways for the flow of stormwater to prevent buildup of debris and materials that could cause flooding and possible damage to roadways and bridges. Town of New Hope Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils. Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2A, Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Page 905 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-847 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local, General Funds Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Expansive soils are not prevalent in New Hope. Town of New Hope Action Item Implement all-hazards community education program, including information on mitigation activities. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 4A- 4B Priority High Estimated Cost $1000 - $5000 Potential Funding Sources HGMP, PDM, HMA, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-4 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing buildings safer, stronger, and less vulnerable to damages by providing a qualitative understanding of hazards and how to mitigate them. Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing buildings safer, stronger, and less vulnerable to damages by providing a qualitative understanding of hazards and how to mitigate them. Cost Effectiveness Low-cost effectiveness for providing information to citizens to make good sound decisions based on current practices for mitigation. Discussion Community education is important for reducing loss of life and property. Page 906 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-848 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance New Hope is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 480138# NEW HOPE, TOWN OF COLLIN COUNTY - 1/19/1996 06/02/09(M) 4/19/1996 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Page 907 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-849 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement Town of New Hope Town Secretary Complete and maintain FEMA elevation certificates for pre- FIRM and or post- FIRM buildings Permits are issued through the Town Hall. New Hope requires 2 feet of freeboard above the base flood elevation for the top of bottom floor on residential structures and non-residential structures that will be built on properties created or platted after the effective date of the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with Town’s flood damage prevention order shall result in fines up to $500 per violation plus court costs. Floodplain development permits Permits are required for any new construction in a floodplain. Participate with FEMA in identifying Special Flood Hazard Areas for future FIRM maps New Hope participates in Risk Assessment, Mapping and Planning Partners (RAMPP) meetings held by FEMA and/or their contractors to better identify areas that are flood prone that are not shown on current Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Future Mitigation Projects New Hope will continue to monitor for new areas of flooding that have not been previously identified for mitigation. Page 908 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-850 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), the Collin County HMPT has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the Town of New Hope, the county, and the city/town council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) will be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, the Town of New Hope will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Jurisdiction Personnel Activity Schedule New Hope Mayor Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information and analyses and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and councils for the incorporated municipalities included in the Collin County plan for approval. Likewise, each participating jurisdiction will undergo the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting same for state, federal and each jurisdiction’s local governing body approval. The plan will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Page 909 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-851 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and planning committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan Town of New Hope Town Council Budget Meetings Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Emergency Action Plan updates Every Five Year EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Floodplain ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. Capital improvement plans Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the New Hope Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicles to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Page 910 Item 10. Town of New Hope Annex Page | O-852 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committee will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 911 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-853 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex P: City of Parker This annex was prepared in 2021 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. The City of Parker participated on the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT). In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Parker. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 1. Introduction The City of Parker is a residential community generally located at the northeast area of Dallas; we pride ourselves on large lots and open spaces. Parker is located at latitude 33°03’17N and longitude 96°37’17”W , and sits in the southern end of Collin County, with Allen to its North, Plano to the West, Murphy to the south, and Wylie to the east. The City of Parker was incorporated in 1969, and the home of the infamous Southfork Ranch. According to the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG), the population of Parker is estimated to be about 5,000. The city has a total area of 10.1 square miles of land area. Parker is a “Type A” general law city which operates under a system of local government called Council - Manager, wherein all powers of the city are vested in the city council. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While the City of Parker has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped City of Parker officials to recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and jurisdictional websites. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the DMA 2000, Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. Data was gathered through numerous sources, and includes GIS, statistical and qualitative data. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Page 912 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-854 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Wildland/Urban Interface analysis National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the City of Parker Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County HMPT. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in November 2020 with representatives from participating jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services; the efforts of the planning committee were led by the City of Parker Emergency Management Specialist. The table below provides a list of the primary representatives on the Parker planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role City of Parker Mayor Plan Development City of Parker Mayor Pro-Tem Plan Development City of Parker City Administrator Plan Development City of Parker Police Chief Plan Development City of Parker Fire Chief Plan Development City of Parker Councilmember Plan Development City of Parker City Attorney Plan Development Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of Page 913 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-855 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each organization above is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. External stakeholders involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role NCTCOG Emergency Preparedness Prog. Asst. Review of plan Collin County Homeland Security Dept. Coordinator Review of plan Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County and included all jurisdictions’ participation: • Collin County HazMAP Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 • Collin County Planning Meeting – November 2, 2020 Page 914 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-856 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Collin County Planning Meeting – November 5, 2020 • Collin County Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 at 9AM Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 915 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-857 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Assessment and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Committee for the City of Parker identified several natural and man-made hazards that could affect the city. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this Update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards identified are provided in the City of Parker Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) as provided in Appendix A-1 of this annex. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for Collin County and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Page 916 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-858 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Page 917 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-859 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for the City of Parker Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 0 0 0 0 Drought 3 0 1 3 1.45 Earthquake 0 0 0 0 0 Expansive Soils 2 0 1 1 0.95 Extreme Heat 2 0 0 0 0.6 Flooding 2 0 1 1 0.95 Hail 2 0 0 3 0.9 High Winds 3 0 1 1 1.25 Lightning 3 0 1 1 1.25 Tornado 3 1 1 1 1.6 Wildfire 1 0 1 1 0.65 Winter Storms 1 1 0 1 0.75 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the City of Parker resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in the City of Parker. Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for the City of Parker High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Drought Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Hail Expansive Soils High Winds Tornado Lightning Flooding Extreme Heat Wildfire Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Dam Failure Winter Storms Earthquake Page 918 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-860 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the City of Parker faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation. Dam and Levee Failure This hazard was identified as having negligible to no risk to the City of Parker. As a participant in the county plan inundation studies will be considered. Drought Drought can have a significant impact on the City of Parker because of the large farming community. Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, agricultural community and the entire population of Parker are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork and the Lake Chapman-Cooper reservoir system are water sources for City of Parker and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake Earthquakes have the potential to occur anywhere in the geographic planning area, therefore all geographic areas are potentially vulnerable. This hazard was identified as having negligible to no risk to the City of Parker. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Expansive Soils All geographic areas and properties have the potential to be vulnerable to expansive soils, especially facilities constructed under older building codes. Extreme Heat Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Flooding The City of Parker can be affected by two types of floods though in limited areas. These include: • Riverine Flood o Occurs in the floodplain of a river or stream when the amount of water and the rate at which the moving increases. This type generally can be forecast in advance, and proper precautions taken to save lives. • Flash Flood o A type of Riverine flood that occurs after a heavy storm, when the ground cannot absorb the high amount of precipitation. This can occur when heavy precipitation falls on already- saturated soils. Flash Floods occur rapidly with little warning. • Locations: Below are the descriptions of the areas in the City of Parker that are affected by flooding: Page 919 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-861 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan o The City of Parker has two major tributaries that run through or along the city and drains to Lake Ray Hubbard. o The two are Maxwell Creek and Cottonwood Creek. Major flash floods may occur during heavy rains when the ground is saturated which would affect creeks and roadways. Hail All geographic areas, properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to hail. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Winds All geographic areas, properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to high winds, manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Lightning All geographic areas, properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to lightning. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado All geographic areas, properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to tornadoes. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. Wildland Fire According to the Texas A&M Forest Service, 64.66% of the population of the City of Parker live in the Wildland/Urban Interface. Additionally, due to the large amounts of farmland, the city is at elevated risk of wildfires. Winter Storms All geographic areas, properties, and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to winter storms. Winter storms have the potential to make roads impassable for days. Residents may be confined to their homes due to the storm and may be without basic services, such as water and electricity, for an extended period of time. The homeless, elderly, and populations without access to heat are most vulnerable. Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of Parker’s geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in the Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. Page 920 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-862 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the US Census Bureau, the total population of the City of Parker in 2020 was 5,177 people, with 1,665 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total** Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total** Household Density (Sq. Mile) City of Parker 5,177 0.43% 557.01 1,665 0.43% 196.13 Source: US Census Bureau & Collin County Appraisal District Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for City of Parker). Table 3.5 Population Predictions County Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 City of Parker 3,811 4,600 4,840 240 5.21% Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate Property There are an estimated 2,111 parcels in the City of Parker, with an estimated $465,566,442 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 City of Parker 2,111 0.96% $839,789,857 Source: Collin County Appraisal District Page 921 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-863 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Emergency Facilities There is two identified emergency facilities in the City of Parker, including one fire station, and one police station. (Figure 3.18). Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals City of Parker 1 1 0 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Critical Facilities There are one critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in the City of Parker, (Figure 3.19). The critical facilities include no schools and one historical property sites (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property City of Parker 1 1 Source: Local jurisdictions Critical Infrastructure There are one identified critical infrastructure facilities in the City of Parker, including no airports, no natural gas facilities, no water treatment facilities, no wastewater treatment facilities, no dams, and one railway/highway bridge (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges City of Parker 0 0 0 0 0 1 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, the City of Parker’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Page 922 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-864 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Of the 12 hazards evaluated for the City of Parker, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, five using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Parker are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Parker are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Page 923 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-865 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the City of Parker. The City of Parker and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the City of Parker is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is minimal impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in the City of Parker. The City of Parker is somewhat vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the City of Parker are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is minimal impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in the City of Parker. Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. About 230 residential parcels in the City of Parker are located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property There have been thirteen (13) recorded flood events in the City of Parker. Property losses are expected annually however these reported values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded county-wide. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities at imminent risk from the 100-year storm event. Page 924 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-866 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Facilities There are no critical facilities located within the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure No % of railways/highways and bridges, no % of dams, no % of water treatment works, and no % waste water treatment facilities are at risk from the 100-year storm event. Many of these structures are designed to traverse or be located within the floodplain due to unavoidable circumstances. Additionally, treated wastewater is typically discharged towards streams, which makes portions of wastewater treatment facilities likely to be located within the floodplain. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Parker are expected at $2,887,157.14 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for the City of Parker indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the City of Parker are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the City of Parker are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Parker are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events. All populations in the City of Parker are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Parker are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Unknown crop losses resulted from this hazard in the City of Parker. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in the City of Parker are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 925 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-867 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the City of Parker are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the City of Parker are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from lightning events. All populations in the City of Parker are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Parker are expected at $20,833.33 however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the City of Parker are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the City of Parker are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the City of Parker are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in City of Parker. All populations in the City of Parker are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Parker are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in City of Parker. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the City of Parker are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the City of Parker are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 926 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-868 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the City of Parker are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 927 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-869 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data from Texas A&M Forest Service, a majority of the City of Parker is vulnerable to wildfires. There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there is one fire station at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are no schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are no bridges, no dams, no wastewater treatment facility, and no water treatment facility at risk from wildfire events. Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Parker. All populations in the City of Parker are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Parker are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Parker. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in the City of Parker are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the City of Parker are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Parker are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 928 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-870 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serves as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the City of Parker considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Parker Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y ? 85.7% Average % Yes Capabilities – 85.7% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 929 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-871 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes City of Parker Y Y Y Y N Y Y ? Y N 70% Average % Yes Capabilities – 70% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes per Jurisdiction City of Parker N Y Y Y N Y N N N N 40% Average % Yes Capabilities – 40% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 930 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-872 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify the City of Parker’s legal and regulatory, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, the City of Parker has strong identified legal and regulatory capabilities, strong identified administrative and technical capabilities, and moderate identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities City of Parker City Administrator The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, along with the city administrator, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. Ability to implement and approve mitigation actions and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 931 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-873 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016 HazMAP, the Parker Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate communication. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of properties and structures located in flood zones. Objective 3-B Develop a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 932 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-874 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Parker Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan City of Parker Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost - Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion This public education program would be based on the hazards that the City of Parker identified as being vulnerable to. The program would use a combination of distributed literature, social media, and Page 933 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-875 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan civic presentations to educate residents on natural hazards and promote hazard mitigation. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 City of Parker Action Item Establish centers for vulnerable residents to mitigate the effects of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling and heating shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Status Discontinued – Shelters will be opened in existing infrastructure as needed during incidents of extreme temperature, City of Parker Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per shelter Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Page 934 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-876 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion This program gives rebates to residents who purchase and install safe rooms in their homes or on their properties to protect against severe weather. Status Discontinued – Residents did received funding through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program. The NCTCOG Program has been suspended City of Parker Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 per siren, number of sirens TBD Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 9-12 months Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. Discussion This project will expand Parker’s siren coverage to new areas of development not currently protected by sirens. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Parker Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flooding Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Planning Page 935 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-877 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Discontinued – Dam Failure of Extremely low risk to City as none are present within city limits. City of Parker Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify and mitigate all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Parker Action Item Develop a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Page 936 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-878 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing, soil conditioning around foundations Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and preservation of foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Parker Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Discontinued – Relevant studies for the region were conducted by reputable research institutions, City of Parker Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Page 937 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-879 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Discontinued City of Parker Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be modified and included in 2021 Plan Page 938 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-880 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Parker Action Items: New City of Parker Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Medium Estimated Cost - Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Coordinate with TFS to Identify and mitigate all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. City of Parker Action Item Establish outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $35,000 per siren, number of sirens TBD Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 36-48 months Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. Discussion This project will expand siren coverage to areas of development not currently protected by sirens. This action item would be specific to installation/placement of new OWS sirens in the jurisdiction. Page 939 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-881 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Parker Action Item Develop a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost - Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 12 - 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing, soil conditioning around foundations Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and preservation of foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Coordinate with Parker Public Works to Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. City of Parker Action Item Develop and Implement an Emergency Notification System Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost - Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of program Infrastructure. Page 940 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-882 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Parker Action Item Develop and Implement a NIMS Training Program Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost - Potential Funding Sources NIMS Grants, General Fund Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Fire Department Implementation Schedule 12-24 m onths Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Low cost – Training is provided by National, State and Local Government Programs Discussion Utilize existing free training programs to bring training of city employees and volunteers that may respond to an emergency scene or EOC with the occurrence of an emergency or disaster affecting the City of Parker. City of Parker Action Item Implement all-hazards community education program, including information on mitigation activities. Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost - Potential Funding Sources Local Funding Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department Fire Department Implementation Schedule 12-24 months Discussion Utilize local Emergency alerting to warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Page 941 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-883 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Educating public on mitigation against loss of life and property will save government resources in the event of a disaster event Discussion Community education is important for reducing loss of life and property. City of Parker Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to educate on the actions to help mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds General fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule Yearly effort Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion The utilization of social media will be key in this program. Program will include educational information about hazard awareness and mitigation. City of Parker Action Item Develop and Implement an extreme temperature program that identifies both locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-A, 2D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Page 942 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-884 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local funds, General fund Lead Department Town Council Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources, including but not limited to emergency generators. Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Page 943 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-885 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance The City of Parker is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 480139# PARKER, CITY OF COLLIN COUNTY 12/27/1977 08/15/1979 06/02/2009 08/15/1979 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Compliance Once the community applies for the NFIP, FEMA arranges for a study of the community to determine base flood elevations and flood risk zones. Consultation with the community occurs at the start of and during the study, and those communities with minimal flood risk are converted to the Regular Program without a study. FEMA provides the studied community with a Flood Insurance Rate Map delineating base flood elevations and flood risk zones. The community is then given 6 months to adopt base flood elevations in its local zoning and building code ordinances. Once the community adopts more stringent ordinances, FEMA converts the community to the NFIP’s Regular Program. FEMA then authorizes the sale of additional flood insurance in the community up to the Regular Program limits. The community must implement and enforce the adopted floodplain management measures. FEMA provides periodic community assistance visits with local officials to provide technical assistance regarding complying with NFIP floodplain management requirements. The purchase of flood insurance is mandatory as a condition of receipt of federal or federally-related financial assistance for acquisition and/or construction of buildings in SFHAs of any participating community. Those communities notified as flood-prone which do not apply for participation in the NFIP within 1 year of notification are ineligible for federal or federally-related financial assistance for acquisition, construction, or reconstruction of insurable buildings in the SFHA. Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Page 944 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-886 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement City of Parker City Administrator Completing and maintaining FEMA elevation certificates for pre- FIRM and or post- FIRM buildings City Hall is responsible for issuing floodplain permits. NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with City’s flood damage prevention order shall result in fines up to $500 per violation plus court costs. Requiring and maintaining FEMA elevation certificates for all new and improved buildings located in floodplains Implementing damage reduction measures for existing buildings such as acquisition, relocation, retrofitting, and maintenance of drainage ways and retention basins Maintenance of drainage ways and retention basins. Installation of retention basins on new construction. Taking action to minimize the effects of flooding on people, property, and building contents through measures including flood warning, emergency response, and evacuation planning Implementing newly developed Storm-water Management Program which includes public education, new development standards, and other programs and policies. Page 945 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-887 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), the City of Parker has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. The City of Parker, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring the implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by the City of Parker, the county, and the city council of each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan (HazMAP) would be implemented by participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT), whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, Collin County will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the annual monitoring, review and evaluation process, Collin County will provide reports regarding implementation actions and action completion dates for the plan. Also, as part of the evaluation, the HMPT will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel What Time Emergency Management Coordinator Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Page 946 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-888 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and planning committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan City of Parker City Council, City Administrator Budget Meetings Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs City Administrator , Police Chief, Fire Chief, Emergency Management Coordinator Emergency Action Plan updates Every Five Year EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain Ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. City Council, City Administrator Capital improvement plans Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, City Council Drought Contingency plans Assessed annually and updated as needed. Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Public Works Director, City Council Natural Resource Conservation Plan Assessed annually and updated as needed. Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Page 947 Item 10. City of Parker Annex Page | P-889 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Parker Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicles to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committee will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. . Page 948 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-890 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex Q: City of Princeton 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2021 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. The City of Princeton participated on the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) by representing the City of Princeton within the areas of the county. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Princeton. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, the City of Princeton along with local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While Collin County has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped Collin County and City officials recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort The City of Princeton participated in the comprehensive county wide approach that was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and o. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Wildland/Urban Interface National Inventory of Dams Dam information Page 949 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-891 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Source Data City of Princeton Ordinance Flood Plain Ordinance Ch. 34 Flood Prevention Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the City of Princeton Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support from the North Central Texas Council of Governments, Collin County and the HMPT. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in November 2020 with representatives from participating jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public The Collin County Department of Homeland Security acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services; the efforts of the Princeton planning committee were led by the City of Princeton Emergency Management Coordinator. The table below provides a list of the primary representatives on the Princeton planning committee. Table 2.2 Planning Committee - Primary Representatives Representing Position Role Department of Emergency Management Emergency Management Coordinator Plan Development Department of Engineering City Engineer Plan Development Fire Department Fire Chief Plan Development Police Department Police Chief Plan Development Public Works Department Public Works Director Plan Development Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. Page 950 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-892 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role City of Princeton Community Development Corporation Board Member Plan Review Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, these organizations are also committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the H met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County: • Collin County HazMAP Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 • Collin County Planning Meeting – November 11, 2020 • Collin County Planning Meeting – June 12, 2021 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 at 9AM Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring Page 951 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-893 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 952 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-894 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the City of Princeton identified several natural hazards and man-made hazards that could affect the incorporated areas of the city. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for Princeton and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Princeton to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Page 953 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-895 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Life Impact Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for Princeton Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 0 0 0 0 Drought 2 0 1 3 1.15 Earthquake 0 1 0 1 0.45 Expansive Soils 2 0 1 1 0.95 Extreme Heat 2 1 0 2 1.15 Flooding 3 1 2 1 1.85 Hail 2 0 1 1 0.95 High Winds 2 0 1 2 1.05 Lightning 1 0 1 1 0.65 Tornado 2 1 2 2 1.65 Wildfire 1 1 1 1 1 Winter Storms 2 0 2 3 1.4 Page 954 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-896 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the City of Princeton, resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in Princeton. Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for City of Princeton High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Extreme Heat Drought Tornado Flooding High Winds Winter Storm Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Expansive Soils Lightning Wildfire Hail Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Dam Failure Earthquake Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the City of Princeton faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation. Dam and Levee Failure A dam is defined as a barrier constructed across a watercourse for the purpose of storage, control, or diversion of water. Dams typically are constructed of earth, rock, concrete, or mine tailings. A dam failure is an accidental or unintentional collapse, breach, or other failure of an impoundment structure that results in downstream flooding. Because dams are man-made structures, dam failures are usually considered technological hazards. However, since most dam failures result from prolonged periods of rainfall, they are often cited as secondary or cascading effects of natural flooding disasters and are not named as the primary hazard that causes disaster declarations. The City of Princeton has not identified any dams that present a hazard at this time, but as a participant in the county plan inundation studies will be considered. Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of Princeton are vulnerable to Page 955 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-897 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork and the Lake Chapman-Cooper reservoir system are water sources for the City of Princeton and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake An earthquake is a sudden motion or trembling caused by an abrupt release of accumulated strain on the tectonic plates that comprise the Earth's crust. The theory of plate tectonics holds that the Earth's crust is broken into several major plates. These rigid, 50- to 60- mile thick plates move slowly and continuously over the interior of the earth, meeting in some areas and separating in others. As the tectonic plates move together they bump, slide, catch, and hold. Eventually, faults along or near plate boundaries slip abruptly when the stress exceeds the elastic limit of the rock, and an earthquake occurs. The ensuring seismic activity and ground motion provoke secondary hazards: surface faulting, ground failure, and tsunamis. The vibration or shaking of the ground during an earthquake is referred to as ground motion. In general, the severity of ground motion increases with the amount of energy released and decreases with distance from the causative fault or epicenter. When a fault ruptures, seismic waves are propagated in all directions, causing the ground to vibrate at frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 30 Hz. Seismic waves are referred to as P waves, S waves, and surface waves. Even though rated negligible risk, the entire geographic planning area, properties, and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to earthquakes. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Expansive Soils Expansive soils, also referred as swelling soils, are those soils which have tendency to increase in the volume whenever the moisture content (i.e. water content) in it is increased. Foundation with swelling soil will heave and can cause lifting of a building or structure laid on it whenever the moisture content rises. This can ultimately lead to the failure of foundation and structure laid on it. They swell when water is added to them and shrink when they dry out. The entire geographic planning area, properties, and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to expansive soils, especially buildings constructed under older building codes. Extreme Heat Severe summer heat is characterized by a combination of a very high temperatures and exceptionally humid conditions. When persisting over a period of time, it is called a heat wave. Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Flooding The City of Princeton has identified several low water crossings that are subject to periodic flash flooding. Affected areas differ with each storm as there are several different branches and tributaries of rivers and creeks subject to overflow, and also are dependent upon which area receives the rain. These areas are low water crossings mainly on older city streets and roads that have drainage ditches adjacent to the road or street. The drainage system gets impeded with material like (sedimentary rock which cements together other materials, including gravel, sand, clay, and silt). When flash flooding occurs these areas need to be barricaded, and the location of the storm determines which areas require barricading. Typical road closures due to flooding occur on West College Street at the bridge crossing and streets in the older part of the city. Hail is an outgrowth of a severe thunderstorm in which balls or irregularly shaped lumps of ice greater than 0.75 inches in diameter fall with rain. Early in the developmental stages of a hailstorm, ice crystals Page 956 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-898 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan form within a low-pressure front due to warm air rising rapidly into the upper atmosphere and the subsequent cooling of the air mass. Frozen droplets gradually accumulate on the ice crystals until, having developed sufficient weight, they fall as precipitation. The entire geographic planning area, properties, and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to hail. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Winds Straight-line winds are often responsible for the wind damage associated with a thunderstorm. These winds are often confused with tornadoes because of similar damage and wind speeds. However, the strong and gusty winds associated with straight-line winds blow roughly in a straight line unlike the rotating winds of a tornado. Downbursts or micro-bursts are examples of damaging straight-line winds. A downburst is a small area of rapidly descending rain and rain-cooled air beneath a thunderstorm that produces a violent, localized downdraft covering 2.5 miles or less. Wind speeds in some of the stronger downbursts can reach 100 to 150 miles per hour, which is similar to that of a strong tornado. The winds produced from a downburst often occur in one direction, and the worst damage is usually on the forward side of the downburst. High winds have the potential to affect the entire planning area. High winds are a frequent occurrence with severe thunderstorms and they can affect all areas of the City of Princeton. These winds can occur suddenly and without warning during severe weather and may pose access challenges due to fallen trees on roadways. Manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Lightning results from the buildup and discharge of electrical energy between positively and negatively charged areas within thunderstorms. A “bolt” or brilliant flash of light is created when the buildup becomes strong enough. These bolts of lightning can be seen in cloud-to-cloud or cloud-to-ground strikes. Bolts of lightning can reach temperatures approaching 50,000° Fahrenheit. While lightning is mostly affiliated with thunderstorms, lightning often strikes outside of these storms, as far as 10 miles away from any rainfall. Federal Emergency Management Agency states that an average of 300 people are injured and 80 people are killed in the United States each year by lightning. Direct strikes have the power to cause significant damage to buildings, critical facilities, infrastructure, and ignition of wildfires which can result in widespread damages to property. The entire geographic planning area, properties, and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to lightning. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado A violently rotating column of air, in contact with the ground, either pendant from a cumuliform cloud or underneath a cumuliform cloud, and often (but not always) visible as a condensation funnel cloud. The entire geographic planning area, properties, and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to tornados. Manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Wildfire in the City of Princeton is a low to moderate risk due to the well managed and readily available resources for response and 43.54% of the population lives in the WUI; the moderate threat area is location on the eastern side of the city and the low threat areas are located in the western side of the city. The City of Princeton gets mutual aid from surrounding agencies in Collin County that respond to fires within the City of Princeton during times of drought, burn bans, and high fire threat, this is part of the automatic mutual aid between the cities. Page 957 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-899 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Winter Storms Winter storms originate as mid-latitude depressions or cyclonic weather systems, sometimes following the path of the jet stream. A winter storm or blizzard, combines heavy snowfall, high winds, extreme cold and ice storms. Many winter depressions give rise to exceptionally heavy rain and widespread flooding and conditions worsen if the precipitation falls in the form of snow. The winter storm season varies widely, depending on latitude, altitude and proximity to moderating influences. The entire geographic planning area, properties, and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to winter storms. Winter storms have the potential to make roads impassable for days. Residents may be confined to their homes due to the storm and may be without basic services, such as water and electricity, for an extended period of time. The homeless, elderly, and populations without access to heat are most vulnerable. Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of Princeton geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, and the City of Princeton Emergency Management Coordinator. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, City of Princeton Emergency Management Coordinator. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, and the City of Princeton Emergency Management Coordinator. The following tables provide a breakdown of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to city municipal information of residential water meters and 3.5 persons per households, the estimated total population of City of Princeton in 2020 was 15,330 people, with 7,163 households . The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Page 958 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-900 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.4. Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total Household Density (Sq. Mile) City of Princeton 15,330 1.4% 1,444.86 5,397 1.4% 508.75 Source: Local Jurisdiction, US Census Bureau & Collin County Appraisal District Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for the City of Princeton. Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 City of Princeton 6,807 10,560 12,680 2,120 20.08% Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate Property There are an estimated 7,603 parcels in Princeton, with an estimated $1,003,526,396 in total assessed value of improvements. Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 City of Princeton 7,603 0.82% $1,003,526,396 Source: Collin County Appraisal District Emergency Facilities There are three identified emergency facilities in Princeton, including two fire stations, one police station. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals City of Princeton 2 1 0 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Page 959 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-901 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Facilities There are 12 critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in Princeton, including twelve schools and two historical properties. Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property City of Princeton 12 2 Source: Local jurisdictions Critical Infrastructure There are 22 identified critical infrastructure facilities, including nine lift stations, three natural gas facilities, two water treatment facilities, zero wastewater treatment facilities, zero dams, and eight railway/highway bridges (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Lift Stations Natural Gas and liquid Petroleum Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges City of Princeton 9 3 0 2 0 8 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, Princeton’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 13 hazards evaluated for Princeton, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System- based analysis, 5 using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining 4 hazards using qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these 4 hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Page 960 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-902 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Princeton are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Princeton are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Page 961 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-903 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the City of Princeton. The City of Princeton and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the City of Princeton is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the City of Princeton are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is no impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in the City of Princeton. Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 1.43% of the population of City of Princeton is located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property There have been two (2) recorded flood events in the City of Princeton. Property losses are expected but unknown due to inaccurate reporting No crop losses are expected. Approximately $3,240,000 of the total assessed value is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities Emergency facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Facilities Critical facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure Critical Infrastructure have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Page 962 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-904 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Princeton are expected at $228.57 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for the City of Princeton indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the City of Princeton are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the City of Princeton are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Princeton are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries from high wind events. All the population of the City of Princeton are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Princeton are expected at $4,228.57 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Crop losses expected at $71.43 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in the City of Princeton are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the City of Princeton are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the City of Princeton are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Page 963 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-905 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), lightning events can be expected to cause no fatalities or injuries in the City of Princeton. All populations in the City of Princeton are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Princeton are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the City of Princeton are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the City of Princeton are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the City of Princeton are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been 3 recorded injuries and no recorded fatalities from tornado events in the City of Princeton. All the population of the City of Princeton is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), an average loss of $10,000 per year in property losses is expected to result from tornado events. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in the City of Princeton. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the City of Princeton are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the City of Princeton are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the City of Princeton are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 43.54% of the City of Princeton is vulnerable to wildfires, with the City of Princeton and the unincorporated areas contributing with the majority of the exposed population. Page 964 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-906 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Improved Property Based on geographical data, property losses in the City of Princeton are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the City of Princeton are also unknown... Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there are 0 fire stations and 0 police stations at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are no schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are 0 bridges, 0 dams, 0 wastewater treatment facilities, and 0 water treatment facilities at risk from wildfire events. Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Princeton. All the population of the City of Princeton is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Princeton are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Princeton. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in the City of Princeton are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the City of Princeton are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Princeton are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 965 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-907 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serves as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, Collin County considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes Princeto n Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N N ? 71% Average Yes Capabilities – 71% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 966 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-908 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes Princeton Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y 90% Average Yes Capabilities – 90% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes Princeton Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N ? 70% Average Yes Capabilities – 70% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 967 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-909 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify Collin County’s legal and regulatory, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, Princeton has 71% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 90% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 70% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities Princeton City Manager The city council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, along with the city manager, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. As the governing body, the ability to implement and approve mitigation actions and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 968 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-910 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016 HazMAP, the Princeton Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events while promoting insurance coverage for catastrophic hazards. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 969 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-911 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Princeton Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Adopt and promote a public education program to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Flooding, Expansive Soils, Hail, Drought, Earthquake, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion Program will include information on hazard mitigation and what actions can be taken. Status Utilize as able regional, state, and federal public education information. Will be included in 2021 Plan Page 970 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-912 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Princeton Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that establishes centers for vulnerable residents Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Fire Department/EMC Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Status Deferred – Will be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per safe room Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program . Status Will be included in 2021, however, come residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program Page 971 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-913 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Princeton Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 each Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Cost is low compared to lives saved and reduced injuries Discussion Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2A, 3C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 3-4 years Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 972 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-914 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Princeton Action Item Develop a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. Status Deferred – Will be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flooding Goal/Objective 2A, 3A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 973 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-915 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Princeton Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Page 974 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-916 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – W ill be included in 2021 Plan City of Princeton Action Items: New City of Princeton Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to educate on the actions to help mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Page 975 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-917 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety. Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. City of Princeton Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that establishes centers for vulnerable residents Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Fire Department/EMC Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold City of Princeton Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed High Wind, Tornado Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per safe room Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Page 976 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-918 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program . City of Princeton Action Item Increase outdoor warning siren coverage for new development areas. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Wildfire, High Winds, Flooding, Hail, Lightning Goal/Objective 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $25,000 each Potential Funding Sources General Fund, HMGP, Developer cost Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind Lead Department EMC Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Cost is low compared to lives saved and reduced injuries Discussion Early warning is a key element in keeping citizens that are outdoors notified of hazards. This action item would be specific to installation/placement of new OWS sirens in the jurisdiction. City of Princeton Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 2A, 3C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000 Potential Funding Sources TFS Grants, Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Fire Dept. Implementation Schedule 3-4 years Page 977 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-919 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show city officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around new development properties. Discussion Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential wildfire. City of Princeton Action Item Develop a drought contingency plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local sponsors, in-kind Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Develop a plan for conserving water based on the stages of drought. Plan would include strategies for soil movement abatement depending on drought stage. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. City of Princeton Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Page 978 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-920 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. City of Princeton Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. City of Princeton Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Page 979 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-921 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information City of Princeton Action Item Increase back-up generator capabilities of critical facilities Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding, tornado, earthquake, extreme heat, lightning, wildfire, winter storms, hail, high winds Goal/Objective 2-d Priority High Estimated Cost $100,000-$20,000 Potential Funding Sources Local funding, HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local Funding Lead Department Public Works, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Some buildings will need to be retrofitted with the ability to connect to a generator Effect on New Buildings Buildings will need to be planned with the ability to connect to a generator Cost Effectiveness Very effective when taking into account the extended loss of power to critical facilities would negatively affect all the city and its citizens Discussion Back-up generator will allow the ongoing function of critical facilities as close to normal as possible during the event of a massive power outage Page 980 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-922 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance Princeton is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance Collin County Communities Participating in the National Flood Program CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 480757# PRINCETON, CITY OF COLLIN COUNTY 7/25/1975 3/16/1988 06/02/09(M) 3/16/1988 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Page 981 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-923 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement City of Princeton Chief Building Official Complete and maintain FEMA elevation certificates for pre-FIRM and or post-FIRM buildings Permits are issued through the Development Department. Princeton requires new construction to be elevated to or above the base flood elevation for the top of bottom floor on residential structures and non-residential structures that will be built on properties created or platted after the effective date of the Flood Damage Prevention Order NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with City’s flood damage prevention order shall result in fines up to $2,000 per violation plus court costs. Floodplain development permits Permits are required for any new construction in a floodplain. Participate with FEMA in identifying Special Flood Hazard Areas for future FIRM maps Princeton participates in Risk Assessment, Mapping and Planning Partners (RAMPP) meetings held by FEMA and/or their contractors to better identify areas that are flood prone that are not shown on current Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Page 982 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-924 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement Future Mitigation Projects Princeton will continue to monitor for new areas of flooding that have not been previously identified for mitigation. 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), City of Princeton has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Following formal adoption by Collin County Commissioners Court, and formal adoption of the plan by City Council by each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Plan would be implemented by the county and participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, City of Princeton will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel What Time City Manager Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years Page 983 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-925 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and planning committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan Princeton City Council Budget Meetings Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Emergency Management Coordinator Emergency Action Plan updates Every Five Year EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. City Council, Director of Planning Capital improvement plans Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, City Council Drought Contingency plans Assessed annually and updated as needed. Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Princeton Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this Page 984 Item 10. City of Princeton Annex Page | Q-926 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicles to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committee will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 985 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-927 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex R: Town of Prosper 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2021 as part of an update to the Town of Prosper/County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This is the second hazard mitigation plan to be submitted to FEMA for the Town of Prosper. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the Town of Prosper. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While Prosper has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped Prosper officials to recognize the benefits of a long- term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. The Town of Prosper’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and online. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), the Town of Prosper developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten the Town of Prosper and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Urban Interface National Inventory of Dams Dam information Page 986 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-928 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the Town of Prosper Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County HMPT. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in June 2020 with representatives from participating jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. The Town of Prosper acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services; the efforts of the planning committee were led by the Prosper Emergency Management Coordinator. The table below provides a list of the primary representatives on the Prosper planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role Town of Prosper Emergency Management Coordinator Identify vulnerabilities, review plan, prioritize risks Town of Prosper Fire Chief Review plan Town of Prosper Assistant Fire Chief Review plan Town of Prosper Police Chief Review plan Town of Prosper Finance Director Review plan Town of Prosper Asst. Police Chief Review plan Town of Prosper Building Official Review plan Town of Prosper Director of Engineering Identify mitigation strategies/NFIP manager Town of Prosper Director of Public Works Review plan Town of Prosper Executive Director of Infrastructure Identify Action Items and review plan Citizen 1 CERT Team Member Review plan Citizen 2 CERT Team Member Review plan Prosper EDC Director of Economic Development Review plan Prosper ISD Director of Security Review plan Homeland Security Asst. Director Identify strategies and Review plan Page 987 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-929 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Prosper ISD Director of Security Review of plan Town of Prosper Prosper Citizens (2) Review of plan Town of Prosper Director of Economic Development Review plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each organization is also committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. Page 988 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-930 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by the Town of Prosper and or Collin County and included all jurisdiction’s participation: • Collin County HazMAP Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 • Collin County HazMAP Committee Meeting – November 15th, 2020 • The Town of Prosper Hazard Mitigation Team Meeting – December 09, 2020 • The Town of Prosper Hazard Team Meeting – January 15th, 2021 • The Town of Prosper HazMAP Discussion/Update – February 15, 2021 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 at 9AM Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Town of Prosper’s Facebook page inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 989 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-931 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the Town of Prosper identified several natural and man- made hazards that could affect the town. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for the Town of Prosper and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for the Town of Prosper, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Page 990 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-932 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Life Impact Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for the Town of Prosper Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 1 1 1 1 1 Drought 2 1 1 1 1.3 Earthquake 1 0 0 3 0.6 Expansive Soils 1 1 1 1 1 Extreme Heat 1 2 0 2 1.2 Flooding 2 1 2 1 1.55 Hail 3 1 2 1 1.85 High Winds 3 1 1 3 1.8 Lightning 3 2 2 3 2.4 Tornado 3 2 2 3 2.4 Wildfire 2 1 1 1 1.3 Winter Storms 2 1 1 1 1.3 Page 991 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-933 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the Town of Prosper, resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in the Town of Prosper. Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for the Town of Prosper High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Lightning Tornado Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Extreme Heat High Winds Wildfire Winter Storm Flooding Drought Hail Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Dam Failure Earthquake Expansive Soils Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the Town of Prosper faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation. Dam Failure There are three FWRS Dams located within the limits of the Town of Prosper. Due to a lack of data, inundation studies need to be completed to determine the vulnerabilities of the town. Drought A prolonged drought can have a serious economic impact on a community. Increased demand for water and electricity may result in shortages of resources. Moreover, since 1996, droughts have caused crop damages in neighboring communities and the Town of Prosper amount to well over 2.7 million dollars along with over one million dollars in property damage. Price increases due to shortages and increased demand would impact Prosper’s residents. Page 992 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-934 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of Prosper are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork and the Lake Chapman-Cooper reservoir system are water sources for the Town of Prosper and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake Although no active fault lines exist in the North Texas region, there has been 33 tremors recorded in the past 50 years. There is a possibility that the Town of Prosper may experience an earthquake ranging from Modified Mercalli Intensity I to V, equating to 4.8 and under on the Richter Scale. All properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to earthquakes. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Expansive Soils Soil capacity will heave and cause potential foundation movement when the ground experiences a moisture fluctuation. This expansive soil vulnerability can lift buildings or settle them into the ground. Increasing our town’s irrigation system and improving current culverts will mitigate future expansive soil problems. All properties has the potential to be vulnerable to expansive soils, especially those constructed under older building codes. Extreme Heat Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. What constitutes extreme heat can vary based on what the population is accustomed to in their respective climates. Temperatures that hover 10 degrees or more above the average high temperature for a region and last for several weeks are defined as extreme heat by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Extreme heat is common in Texas. The Town of Prosper has experienced 10 extreme heat events in the past 23 years, resulting in a 100 percent probability of an extreme heat event occurring every year. The most severe extreme temperature event to impact the Town of Prosper occurred in August 2011, when Collin County experienced triple-digit temperatures nearly every day during the month of August. An excessive heat warning was in effect for most of Texas. After the excessive heat warning ended on the morning of August 6, a heat advisory was in effect for several days during the month. A heat advisory was in effect for all or parts of North Texas for most of the remainder of the month, except for a few days in the middle of the month. The prolonged heat took its toll on North Texans, resulting in 27 heat-related deaths and many more heat-related illnesses. According to a Collin County medical examiner, one person died on August 12 as a result of the heat. Flooding is the most prevalent and costly disaster in the United States. Floods have the ability to cause devastation to property, people, and agriculture. Floods occur any time and are typically the result of dam failures, heavy rains, or melting of snow. The Town of Prosper has low topography in several areas which is vulnerable to flooding. The area located on and near Dallas Parkway has experienced flash flooding more than once in the past 5 years. With no signage to warn citizens of the potential danger, this increases the town’s vulnerability to loss of life, property, and agriculture, as a result of flooding. Page 993 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-935 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hail Since 1996, 168 incidents involving hail have occurred. This hazard has caused over one billion dollars in damage throughout our two counties and includes agriculture damage as well. The Town of Prosper, its buildings, and citizen’s property are vulnerable to hail and extreme hail storms. Property such as automobiles, roofs, siding, and windows are most vulnerable to such events. Extensive power outages may also occur, leading to secondary and possibly tertiary effects. Mitigation efforts can be made to lessen the effect of such a hazard. These efforts include ample warning systems which cover our entire jurisdiction, public education to encourage action and precautionary measures during weather events which could produce hail, and stronger protection measures facilitated by town codes. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Winds Windstorms can cause power outages, transportation and economic disruptions, and significant property damage and pose a high risk for injuries and loss of life. All critical facilities as well as all public, private, and commercial properties are vulnerable to severe thunderstorms. Risk/vulnerability includes the entire population of the Town of Prosper because there is no way to determine the impact/magnitude of a windstorm, and no way to predict where a storm will occur. People are vulnerable to severe windstorms through power outages, effects on transportation routes, establishment of shelters, roofs blown off structures, etc. Windstorms occur frequently within the Town of Prosper. Manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Overall, severe thunderstorms and high winds pose one of the greatest threats to the Town of Prosper in terms of property damage, injuries, and loss of life. Severe thunderstorms and high winds are the most frequently occurring natural hazard in the Town of Prosper and have the greatest chance of affecting the Town of Prosper each year. Based on the frequency of this hazard (134 events since 1996) and its ability to negatively affect the Town of Prosper (7 deaths, 15 injuries, and $5.975 million in property damage within our geographical area). Lightning The Town of Prosper has significant exposure to lightning and thunderstorms. Overall, lightning is the most constant and widespread threat to our citizens. 38 damaging events have occurred since 1996, within our two counties, which has caused over $7.88 million in damages to property. The probability that lightning will occur in the Town of Prosper is extremely high and mitigation actions, such as a lightning detection system, will help mitigate the risk of this hazard. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado Tornadoes can strike anywhere and cause extensive damage. Since 1996, North Texas has experienced 17 tornado events causing near $6 million in damages, two deaths, and eight injuries. According to NOAA data, the highest recorded magnitude was an EF-3, which occurred 20 miles from the Town of Prosper and caused $1 million in damages. Currently, the Town of Prosper has implemented improved construction standards to strengthen new buildings which will withstand higher winds produced by tornadoes. Other mitigation measures that will help minimize tornado destruction in the Town of Prosper are: Increasing the number of safe rooms via FEMA grants, education programs concerning loose items, and increased capabilities on the town’s current warning system. Manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Wildland Fire Wildfires typically start in woodland or prairie areas. They can occur naturally or exacerbate by human activities. This hazard can be hard to control, and mitigation efforts are needed to prevent wildfires from occurring in the Town of Prosper. Since 1996, Collin and Denton counties have had five events involving wildfires totaling over $100,000 in damages and a loss of life (1). The Town of Prosper and the surrounding counties are currently in a severe drought phase, thus increasing the town’s Page 994 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-936 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan vulnerability to wildfires. Mitigation efforts which will help prevent or lessen the effect of wildfires in the Town of Prosper need to include education programs, zoning, burning restrictions, property maintenance, and increased capabilities of our local fire department. According to the Texas A&M Forest Service 38.19% of the Town of Prosper’s population live in the Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI). Wildfire low threat areas are predominately to the east and west areas of the city with the majority of the center of the city in the non-burnable area. Winter Storms Generally, winter storm season in the Town of Prosper is between the months of November to mid-March. Residents who are disrupted more severely by severe winter storms include those without sufficient heating systems, and those impacted by extended power outages due to falling tree limbs or ice. Most residents do not have backup power sources. Since 1996, 27 winter storm events have occurred within 30 miles of the Town of Prosper, which has led to one death and $891,000 in property damage. Mitigation efforts to prevent the effects of this hazard should include establishing a warming center for Prosper residents that experience insufficient heating during winter storms, tree management, burying power lines, and an outreach program (CRW -system) to identify isolated, vulnerable, and functional-needs populations. Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of the Town of Prosper geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Page 995 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-937 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Population According to the US Census bureau, the total population of the Town of Prosper in 2020 was 28,380 people, with 7,313 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. Population Counts Jurisdictio n Population Households Population % of County Total** Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total Household Density (Sq. Mile) Prosper 28,380 1.96% 1,555.07 9,992 2.60% 547.56 Source: US Census Bureau & Collin County Appraisal District Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for the Town of Prosper. Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2020 Estimate Absolute Change 2019- 20120 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2010 Prosper 9,423 22,650 28,380 2750 10.7% Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate Property There are an estimated 13,048 parcels in the Town of Prosper, with an estimated $4,023,541,491 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings) Prosper 13,048 2.68% $4,023,541,491 Source: Collin County Appraisal District This also includes properties from Denton County. The % of County only reflects the Collin County portion of Prosper and in relation to only Collin County. Emergency Facilities There are six identified emergency facilities in the Town of Prosper, including two fire stations, one police station, and three hospitals. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals Prosper 2 1 3 Page 996 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-938 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Critical Facilities There are13 critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in in the Town of Prosper. The critical facilities include 11 schools and two historical property sites (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property Prosper 11 2 Source: Local jurisdictions Critical Infrastructure There are 14 identified critical infrastructure facilities in the Town of Prosper, including six lift stations, one natural gas facility, no water treatment facilities, no potable water treatment facilities, no dams, one railroad, one highway, and four bridges (Table 3.9). In addition to the information in the table the Town of Prosper also has one water-pump facility, one elevated storage facility, and two water towers. Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Lift Stations Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Water Pump Facility Dams Railway/ Highway/ Bridges Prosper 6 1 0 1 3 6 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, the Town of Prosper’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System-based analysis, and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for the Town of Prosper, two were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, seven using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining three hazards using a qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Page 997 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-939 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) zero (0) recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of Prosper are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the Town of Prosper are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Page 998 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-940 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the Town of Prosper. The Town of Prosper and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the Town of Prosper is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in the Town of Prosper are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the Town of Prosper are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in the Town of Prosper. Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 152 residential parcels in the Town of Prosper are located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property Though there have been three (3) recorded flood events in the Town of Prosper, property losses are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded county- wide. Approximately $467,505,513 of the total assessed value is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities Emergency facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Facilities Critical facilities have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure Critical Infrastructure have the potential to be as risk in the 100-year storm event. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Page 999 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-941 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of Prosper are expected at $9,428.57 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the Town of Prosper are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the Town of Prosper are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in the Town of Prosper are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events. All the population of the Town of Prosper are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of Prosper are expected at $700 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in the Town of Prosper. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in the Town of Prosper are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the Town of Prosper are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the Town of Prosper are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from lightning events. All the population of the Town of Prosper is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of Prosper are expected at $7,500 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. Page 1000 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-942 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the Town of Prosper are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the Town of Prosper are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the Town of Prosper are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in Prosper. All the population of the Town of Prosper is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of Prosper are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the Town of Prosper. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the Town of Prosper are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the Town of Prosper are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the Town of Prosper are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 38.19% of the Town of Prosper is vulnerable to wildfires, with the Town of Prosper and the unincorporated areas contributing with the majority of the exposed population. There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on geographical data, property losses in the Town of Prosper are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the Town of Prosper are also unknown... Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there are zero fire stations at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are seven schools at risk from wildfire events. Page 1001 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-943 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are four bridges, zero dams, one water facility, two water towers, and one water treatment facility at risk from wildfire events. Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the Town of Prosper. All the population of the Town of Prosper are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of Prosper are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the Town of Prosper. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in the Town of Prosper are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the Town of Prosper are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in the Town of Prosper are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 1002 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-944 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serves as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the Town of Prosper considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction Town of Prosper Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N ? N 64% Average % Yes Capabilities – 64% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 1003 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-945 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes Town of Prosper Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y 90% Average % Yes Capabilities – 90% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes Town of Prosper N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ? N 70% Average % Yes Capabilities – 70% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 1004 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-946 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify Prosper’s legal and regulatory capabilities, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, the Town of Prosper and its jurisdictions have 64% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 90% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 70% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities The Town of Prosper Town Manager The Town council, including the mayor, mayor pro-tem, and council members, along with the town manager, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the town overall. As the governing body, the ability to implement and approve mitigation actions and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 1005 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-947 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016 HazMAP, the Prosper Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the plan update. . Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate Early Warning Systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events while promoting insurance coverage for catastrophic hazards. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 1006 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-948 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic, and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. Town of Prosper Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Adopt and promote a public education program to mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flooding, High Wind, Lightning, Wildfire, Tornado, Hail, Extreme Heat, Drought, Winter Storms, Earthquakes, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 4A, 4B, 4C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $30,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, EMPG, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, citizen cost-share, donations Lead Department Fire Department Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger, and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger, and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Extreme cost effectiveness Discussion Share perceptions of disaster myths, increases information gathering. Program will include information about mitigation actions for each hazard. Page 1007 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-949 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Develop, implement, and enforce ordinances to restrict the use of public water resources for non-essential usage, such as washing cars, landscape, and filling swimming pools Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 2A, 2C, 3C Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $45,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, EMPG, other grants Potential Matching Sources Local donations, in-kind matching Lead Department Public Works, OEM Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings May require retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and lawn sprinklers Cost Effectiveness High. With millions of dollars potentially lost due to drought, this mitigation technique would have a long-term benefit on local farmers and citizens Discussion Additional project to include working with builders to encourage drought –tolerant landscape to reduce water usage with incentives Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Implement individual/public tornado safe rooms and location awareness Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Wind Goal/Objective 1C, 2D, 4A, 4B, Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per residential safe room/$1,000,000 public retrofit Potential Funding Sources FEMA, Local grants, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local Funding, Donations, Resident Match Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential/public structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness High, Residential safe room shelters decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes, or high winds Discussion Possible FEMA rebate program Page 1008 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-950 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Will be included in 2021, however, come residents were able to obtain funds through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program Town of Prosper Action Item Protect citizens from extreme weather by building covered patios in public parks Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Hail, High Winds, Lightning Goal/Objective 2D Priority High Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources PDM, General Budget, State and Federal Grants Potential Matching Sources Citizen cost-share, Donations Lead Department Public Works/Parks Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Potentially add covered patios to existing small structures Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Cost is low compared to loss of life from heat illness and debris injuries Discussion Covered patios are an effective means of providing temporary relief from severe weather Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Radios to Vulnerable Populations Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Goal/Objective 3C Priority High Estimated Cost $60,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, General Budget, Donations, citizens cost-share Lead Department Fire Department, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger, and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger, and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness moderate Page 1009 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-951 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Early warning, hazard and mitigation information, and reliable communications have been established to reduce loss of life, injuries, and property damage Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Develop, Implement, and Enforce Private Residential and Commercial Construction Requirements Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Goal/Objective 1C, 2C Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $85,000 Potential Funding Sources PDM, EMGP Potential Matching Sources General budget, In-Kind Lead Department Development Services, OEM Implementation Schedule 6-9 Months Effect on Old Buildings New standards could be used to drive retrofitting Effect on New Buildings Buildings will be safer and more resilient in face of hazards Cost Effectiveness High Discussion Develop and adopt building codes to harden private construction based on the hazards identified in this annex such as hail-resistant roofing and windows; wind and impact resistant doors, windows, and roofing ; wildfire breaks and fire resistant building materials; stricter foundation standards for earthquake and expansive soils; increased elevation (BFE) standards for flooding; higher grade insulation to mitigate extreme heat and winter weather; and resource-efficient (low-flow) plumbing for drought. Also, additional codes for dry- proofing and lightning protection (rods, grounding) for public buildings to mitigate flood, dam failure and lightning Status Town of Prosper has adopted current building code and will continue to adopt the most current building codes – will continue to be in future plans and updates Town of Prosper Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 2A, 3A Priority High Estimated Cost $150,000 Page 1010 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-952 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $45,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred will be included in 2021 Plan (50,000) Town of Prosper Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2A Page 1011 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-953 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Priority Low Estimated Cost $100,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of Prosper Action Items: New Town of Prosper Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to educate on the actions to help mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4A, 4B, 4C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $30,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, EMPG, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, citizen cost-share, donations Lead Department Fire Department Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger, and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger, and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. Page 1012 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-954 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Develop, implement, and enforce ordinances to restrict the use of public water resources for non-essential usage, such as washing cars, landscape, and filling swimming pools Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2A, 2C, 3C Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $45,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund, EMPG, other grants Potential Matching Sources Local donations, in-kind matching Lead Department Public Works, OEM Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings May require retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and lawn sprinklers Cost Effectiveness High. With millions of dollars potentially lost due to drought, this mitigation technique would have a long-term benefit on local farmers and citizens Discussion Additional project to include working with builders to encourage drought –tolerant landscape to reduce water usage with incentives When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. Town of Prosper Action Item Implement individual/public tornado safe rooms and location awareness Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Wind Goal/Objective 1C, 2D, 4A, 4B, Priority High Estimated Cost Up to $3,000 per residential safe room/$1,000,000 public retrofit Potential Funding Sources FEMA, Local grants, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local Funding, Donations, Resident Match Lead Department Engineering Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Enhance safety of existing residential/public structures through retrofit Effect on New Buildings Enhance safety of new residential structures Cost Effectiveness High, Residential safe room shelters decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes, or high winds Discussion Possible FEMA rebate program Page 1013 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-955 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Protect citizens from extreme weather by building covered patios in public parks Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Hail, High Winds, Lightning Goal/Objective 2D Priority High Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources PDM, General Budget, State and Federal Grants Potential Matching Sources Citizen cost-share, Donations Lead Department Public Works/Parks Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Potentially add covered patios to existing small structures Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Cost is low compared to loss of life from heat illness and debris injuries Discussion Covered patios are an effective means of providing temporary relief from severe weather Town of Prosper Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Radios to Vulnerable Populations Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Goal/Objective 3C Priority High Estimated Cost $60,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, General Budget, Donations, citizens cost-share Lead Department Fire Department, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger, and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger, and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness moderate Discussion Early warning, hazard and mitigation information, and reliable communications have been established to reduce loss of life, injuries, and property damage Page 1014 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-956 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of Prosper Action Item Develop, Implement, and Enforce Private Residential and Commercial Construction Requirements Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Goal/Objective 1C, 2C Priority Moderate Estimated Cost $25,000 Potential Funding Sources PDM, EMGP Potential Matching Sources General budget, In-Kind Lead Department Development Services, OEM Implementation Schedule 6-9 Months Effect on Old Buildings New standards could be used to drive retrofitting Effect on New Buildings Buildings will be safer and more resilient in face of hazards Cost Effectiveness High Discussion Develop and adopt building codes to harden private construction based on the hazards identified in this annex such as hail-resistant roofing and windows; wind and impact resistant doors, windows, and roofing ; wildfire breaks and fire resistant building materials; stricter foundation standards for earthquake and expansive soils; increased elevation (BFE) standards for flooding; higher grade insulation to mitigate extreme heat and winter weather; and resource-efficient (low-flow) plumbing for drought. Also, additional codes for dry- proofing and lightning protection (rods, grounding) for public buildings to mitigate flood, dam failure and lightning Town of Prosper Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 2A, 3A Priority High Estimated Cost $125,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Page 1015 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-957 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Town of Prosper Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Town of Prosper Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2A Priority Low Estimated Cost $50,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Page 1016 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-958 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Town of Prosper Action Item Install outdoor warning sirens Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, High Winds Goal/Objective 1A, 1B Priority High Estimated Cost $175,000 Potential Funding Sources EMPG, PDM BRIC, General Funds, Developers, Potential Matching Sources General Funds, In-Kind Lead Department OEM Implementation Schedule 6 Months Effect on Old Buildings N/A Effect on New Buildings N/A Cost Effectiveness Moderate Discussion To achieve 100% coverage to all residents of our fast growing jurisdiction, 4 new sirens would need to be installed. This action item would be specific to installation/placement of new OWS sirens in the jurisdiction. Page 1017 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-959 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance The Town of Prosper is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 480141# PROSPER, TOWN OF DENTON COUNTY/COLLIN COUNTY 6/21/1974 5/4/1982 4/18/2011 5/4/1982 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Compliance Once the community applies for the NFIP, FEMA arranges for a study of the community to determine base flood elevations and flood risk zones. Consultation with the community occurs at the start of and during the study, and those communities with minimal flood risk are converted to the Regular Program without a study. FEMA provides the studied community with a Flood Insurance Rate Map delineating base flood elevations and flood risk zones. The community is then given 6 months to adopt base flood elevations in its local zoning and building code ordinances. Once the community adopts more stringent ordinances, FEMA converts the community to the NFIP’s Regular Program. FEMA then authorizes the sale of additional flood insurance in the community up to the Regular Program limits. The community must implement and enforce the adopted floodplain management measures. FEMA provides periodic community assistance visits with local officials to provide technical assistance regarding complying with NFIP floodplain management requirements. The purchase of flood insurance is mandatory as a condition of receipt of federal or federally-related financial assistance for acquisition and/or construction of buildings in SFHAs of any participating community. Those communities notified as flood-prone which do not apply for participation in the NFIP within 1 year of notification are ineligible for federal or federally-related financial assistance for acquisition, construction, or reconstruction of insurable buildings in the SFHA. Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Page 1018 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-960 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement Town of Prosper Senior Engineer/Director Completing and maintaining FEMA elevation certificates for pre- FIRM and or post- FIRM buildings The Engineering Department is responsible for issuing floodplain permits. NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with town’s flood damage prevention order shall result in fines up to $500 per violation plus court costs. Requiring and maintaining FEMA elevation certificates for all new and improved buildings located in floodplains The Engineering Department is responsible for issuing floodplain permits. Implementing damage reduction measures for existing buildings such as acquisition, relocation, retrofitting, and maintenance of drainage ways and retention basins Maintenance of drainage ways and retention basins. Installation of retention basins on new construction. Taking action to minimize the effects of flooding on people, property, and building contents through measures including flood warning, emergency response, and evacuation planning Implementing newly developed Storm- water Management Program which includes public education, new development standards, and other programs and policies. Page 1019 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-961 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), the Town of Prosper has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Town of Prosper, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by Collin County Commissioners Court, and formal adoption of the plan by City/Town Council by each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Plan would be implemented by the county and participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, the Town of Prosper will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Activity Schedule Emergency Management Team Monitoring Plan: Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Planning Team Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising, and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Page 1020 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-962 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and planning committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives, and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives, and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdiction al Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan Town of Prosper Town Council Budget Meetings As needed Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Emergency Management Coordinator Emergency Action Plan updates Every Five years EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. Town Council, Director of Planning Capital improvement plans Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, Town Council Drought Contingency plans As needed Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Planning Director, Town Council Parks & Recreation Master Plan Triennially Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Page 1021 Item 10. Town of Prosper Page | R-963 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Prosper Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicles to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committee will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 1022 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-964 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex S: Town of St. Paul 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2020 as part of an update to the Collin County Multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. The Town of St. Paul participated on the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT). This is a new hazard mitigation plan and the first to be submitted to FEMA for the Town of St. Paul. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the Town of St. Paul. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While the Town of St. Paul has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped the Town of St. Paul officials to recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places and online. In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Urban Interface National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Page 1023 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-965 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the Town of St. Paul Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County HMPT. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in November 2020 with representatives from participating jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services; the efforts of the planning committee were led by the Town of St. Paul Emergency Management Coordinator. The table below provides a list of the primary representatives on the St. Paul planning committee. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role Town of St. Paul Mayor Review of plan Town of St. Paul Town Secretary Review of plan Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed Page 1024 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-966 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan plan. External stakeholders involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role NCTCOG Emergency Preparedness Prog. Asst. Review of plan Collin County Homeland Security Dept. Coordinator Review of plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each jurisdiction also is committed to accomplishing the following activities: • Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. • Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. • Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County and included all jurisdictions’ participation: • Emailed Plan to St. Paul for updates – August 12, 2020 • Collin County Planning Meeting – November 5, 2020 • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM • Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 at 9AM Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. • The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. • A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. Page 1025 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-967 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 1026 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-968 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the Town of St. Paul identified several natural and man- made hazards that could affect the town. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for St. Paul and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries 3 Page 1027 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-969 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophic More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for the Town of St. Paul Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 0 0 0 0 0 Drought 2 0 1 3 1.15 Earthquake 0 1 0 1 0.45 Expansive Soils 2 0 0 1 0.7 Extreme Heat 1 1 0 2 0.85 Flooding 1 1 0 0 0.65 Hail 2 0 2 1 1.2 High Winds 1 0 0 1 0.4 Lightning 1 0 0 0 0.3 Tornado 2 1 1 1 1.3 Wildfire 1 2 0 1 1.1 Winter Storms 2 0 2 3 1.4 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for Collin County jurisdictions, resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in Collin County. Page 1028 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-970 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings for the Town of St. Paul High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Tornado W inter Storms Drought Wildfire Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Extreme Heat Expansive Soils Hail Flooding Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Earthquake High Winds Lightning Dam Failure Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d) (3)) Our jurisdiction is in one of the fastest growing areas of the nation, hence development has increased and will continue to increase our vulnerability to hazards that may impact us. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the Town of St. Paul faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation. Dam and Levee Failure A dam is defined as a barrier constructed across a watercourse for the purpose of storage, control, or diversion of water. Dams typically are constructed of earth, rock, concrete, or mine tailings. A dam failure is an accidental or unintentional collapse, breach, or other failure of an impoundment structure that results in downstream flooding. Because dams are man-made structures, dam failures are usually considered technological hazards. However, since most dam failures result from prolonged periods of rainfall, they are often cited as secondary or cascading effects of natural flooding disasters and are not named as the primary hazard that causes disaster declarations. Development of the downstream areas necessitates the original low hazard classifications to be changed to higher hazard classifications because the dams are no longer adequate for the increased downstream risks. NRCS data shows that there are no dams in the St. Paul that are no longer adequate for increased downstream risks. This percentage could actually be higher because detailed current evaluations of NRCS dams have not been conducted due to resource limitations. In addition, many of these inadequate dams have not been updated because many of the legally responsible entities of these dams do not have sufficient mechanisms funding for updates, or even adequate maintenance, in some cases. Soil and Water Conservation Districts do not have any statutory funding capability of their own, and counties, especially those with small populations and multiple dams, are not able to generate the resources needed to sustain a consistent and comprehensive effort upgrade these structures. While no record could be found of any previous dam failures in Collin County, three things are clear: • There are no dams in St. Paul that are nearing the end of their designed project lives Page 1029 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-971 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • There are no dams in St. Paul that are in desperate need of detailed evaluations and consistent maintenance • Increased development downstream of any dams may put more people, property, and infrastructure at risk. Based on a quantitative analysis of no dams currently being in place in St. Paul and a qualitative analysis of the potential impacts that dam failures would have on the social, economic, and environmental components of the region, the risk of a dam failure hazard is negligible but as a participant in the county plan, inundation studies will be considered. St. Paul is responsible for no high hazard dams identified by the NRCS in both the unincorporated County area and in several cities due to the use of easements and the Emergency Operations Plans for those dam sites. Drought Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of St. Paul are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork and the Lake Chapman-Cooper reservoir system are water sources for the Town of St. Paul and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake An earthquake is a sudden motion or trembling caused by an abrupt release of accumulated strain on the tectonic plates that comprise the Earth's crust. The theory of plate tectonics holds that the Earth's crust is broken into several major plates. These rigid, 50- to 60- mile thick plates move slowly and continuously over the interior of the earth, meeting in some areas and separating in others. As the tectonic plates move together they bump, slide, catch, and hold. Eventually, faults along or near plate boundaries slip abruptly when the stress exceeds the elastic limit of the rock, and an earthquake occurs. The ensuring seismic activity and ground motion provoke secondary hazards: surface faulting, ground failure, and tsunamis. The vibration or shaking of the ground during an earthquake is referred to as ground motion. In general, the severity of ground motion increases with the amount of energy released and decreases with distance from the causative fault or epicenter. When a fault ruptures, seismic waves are propagated in all directions, causing the ground to vibrate at frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 30 Hz. Seismic waves are referred to as P waves, S waves, and surface waves. Earthquakes have the potential to occur anywhere in the geographic planning area, therefore all geographic areas are potentially vulnerable. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Expansive Soils Expansive soils contain minerals such as “smectite” clays that are capable of absorbing water. When they absorb water they increase in volume. The more water they absorb the more their volume increases. Expansions of ten percent or more are not uncommon. This change in volume can exert enough force on a building or other structure to cause damage. Expansive soils will also shrink when they dry out. This shrinkage can remove support from buildings or other structures and result in damaging foundations. Fissures in the soil can also develop. These fissures can facilitate the deep penetration of water when moist conditions or runoff occurs. This produces a cycle of shrinkage and swelling that places repetitive stress on structures. The Town of St. Paul is at low risk from expansive Page 1030 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-972 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan soils. The entire geographic planning area and properties have the potential to be vulnerable to expansive soils, especially buildings constructed under older building codes. Extreme Heat Severe summer heat is characterized by a combination of a very high temperatures and exceptionally humid conditions. When persisting over a period of time, it is called a heat wave. Extreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Flooding Flooding is defined as the accumulation of water within a water body and the overflow of excess water onto adjacent floodplain lands. The floodplain is the land adjoining the channel of a river, stream, ocean, lake, or other watercourse or water body that is susceptible to flooding. The statistical meaning of terms like “25-year storm” and “100-year flood” can be confusing. Simply stated, a floodplain can be located anywhere; it just depends on how large and how often a flood event occurs. Floodplains are those areas that are subject to inundation from flooding. Floods and the floodplains associated with them are often described in terms of the percent chance of a flood event happening in any given year. As a community management or planning term, “floodplain” most often refers to an area that is subject to inundation by a flood that has a one percent chance of occurring in any given year (commonly and incorrectly referred to as the 100-year floodplain). Common flooding hazards within the planning area include impacts from flash flooding and from new development. A flash flood is a rapid flood that inundates low-lying areas in less than six hours. This is caused by intense rainfall from a thunderstorm or several thunderstorms. Flash floods can also occur from the collapse of a man-made structure or ice dam. Construction and development can change the natural drainage and create brand new flood risks as new buildings, parking lots, and roads create less land that can absorb excess precipitation from heavy rains, hurricanes, and tropical storms. Flash floods are a high risk hazard since they can roll boulders, tear out trees, and destroy buildings and bridges. There were no trouble areas identified in St. Paul. Hail Outgrowth of a severe thunderstorm in which balls or irregularly shaped lumps of ice greater than 0.75 inches in diameter fall with rain. Early in the developmental stages of a hailstorm, ice crystals form within a low-pressure front due to warm air rising rapidly into the upper atmosphere and the subsequent cooling of the air mass. Frozen droplets gradually accumulate on the ice crystals until, having developed sufficient weight, they fall as precipitation. The entire geographic planning area, properties, and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to hail. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Wind Straight-line winds are often responsible for the wind damage associated with a thunderstorm. These winds are often confused with tornadoes because of similar damage and wind speeds. However, the strong and gusty winds associated with straight-line winds blow roughly in a straight line unlike the rotating winds of a tornado. Downbursts or micro-bursts are examples of damaging straight-line winds. A downburst is a small area of rapidly descending rain and rain-cooled air beneath a thunderstorm that produces a violent, localized downdraft covering 2.5 miles or less. Wind speeds in some of the stronger downbursts can reach 100 to 150 miles per hour, which is similar to that of a strong tornado. The winds produced from a downburst often occur in one direction, and the worst damage is usually on the forward side of the downburst. High winds have the potential to affect the entire planning area. Manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Page 1031 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-973 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan High winds are a frequent occurrence with severe thunderstorms and they can affect all areas of St. Paul. These winds can occur suddenly and without warning during severe weather and may pose access challenges due to fallen trees on roadways. There have been several instances of damage occurring to business and commercial structures as a result of high winds. Outside of primary residential structures, there are few locations for the public to seek shelter during high winds. Lightning Lightning damage results from four (4) effects of lightning strike: electrocution of humans and animals; vaporization of materials along the path of strike; fire caused by the high temperature produced by the strike; and a sudden power surge that can damage electrical and electronic utility substations and distribution lines. It is estimated that throughout the United States, a power outage caused by lightning occurs on 50 percent of the days throughout the year. Lightning has the potential to affect all populations and property in the Town of St. Paul. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado A violently rotating column of air, in contact with the ground, either pendant from a cumuliform cloud or underneath a cumuliform cloud, and often (but not always) visible as a condensation funnel cloud. Tornados may occur anywhere in the geographic planning area, making all properties and populations potentially vulnerable. Manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Wildland Fire Wildland fire is any fire occurring on grassland, forest, or prairie, regardless of ignition source, damages or benefits. Wildland fires are fueled almost exclusively by natural vegetation. They typically occur in national forests and parks, where federal agencies are responsible for fire management and suppression. Interface or intermix fires are urban/wildland fires in which vegetation and the built- environment provide fuel. Firestorms are events of such extreme intensity that effective suppression is virtually impossible. Firestorms occur during extreme weather and generally burn until conditions change or the available fuel is exhausted. For the purposes of this hazard analysis, wildland fires are assessed under what is known as the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). The WUI is an area of development that is susceptible to wildland fires due to the amount of structures located in an area with vegetation that can act a fuel for a wildland fire. Wildland fires can occur anywhere in the geographic planning area, but most vulnerable populations and structures are located in the WUI. According to the Texas Forest Service Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary 82.86% of the town’s population lives in the Wildland Urban Interface and is at moderate threat to wildfires. Winter Storms Winter storms originate as mid-latitude depressions or cyclonic weather systems, sometimes following the path of the jet stream. A winter storm or blizzard, combines heavy snowfall, high winds, extreme cold and ice storms. Many winter depressions give rise to exceptionally heavy rain and widespread flooding and conditions worsen if the precipitation falls in the form of snow. The winter storm season varies widely, depending on latitude, altitude and proximity to moderating influences. The entire geographic planning area, properties, and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to winter storms. Winter storms have the potential to make roads impassable for days. Residents may be confined to their homes due to the storm and may be without basic services, such as water and electricity, for an extended period of time. The homeless, elderly, and populations without access to heat are most vulnerable. Page 1032 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-974 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of the Town of St. Paul geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: • Population: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. • Improved property: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. • Emergency facilities: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. • Critical facilities: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. T hese are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. • Critical infrastructure: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates, the total population of Town of St. Paul in 2020 was 1090 people, with 379 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4. Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total Household Density (Sq. Mile) St. Paul 1090 0.09% 674.29 332 0.09% 237.42 Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate & Collin County Appraisal District Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predications for Town of St. Paul. Page 1033 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-975 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 St. Paul 1,066 1,090 1,090 0 0% Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimate Property There are an estimated 446 parcels in Town of St. Paul, with an estimated $94,227,833in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings)1 St. Paul 446 0.16% $94,227,833 Source: Collin County Appraisal District Emergency Facilities There are zero identified emergency facilities in the Town of St. Paul, including no fire stations, no police stations, and no hospitals. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals St. Paul 0 0 0 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Critical Facilities There is one critical facility, which are considered non-emergency in Town of St. Paul. The critical facility is one historical property site (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property St. Paul 0 1 Source: Local jurisdictions Page 1034 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-976 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure There are no identified critical infrastructure facilities in the Town of St. Paul. (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges St. Paul 0 0 0 0 0 0 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, Collin County’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for Collin County, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, 5 using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining 3 using qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these 3 hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X High Winds X Lightning X X Page 1035 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-977 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) zero (0) recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of St. Paul are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the Town of St. Paul are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting . Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of St. Paul. Therefore, no facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were no fatalities recorded due to extreme heat from the Town of St. Paul. The Town of St. Paul and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the Town of St. Paul is not vulnerable to this hazard. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of St. Paul. Therefore, no facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the Town of St. Paul are not vulnerable to this hazard. Page 1036 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-978 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is no impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in the Town of St. Paul. Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 0.99% of the population of the Town of St. Paul is located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property Though there have been zero (0) recorded flood events in the Town of St. Paul, property losses are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded. Approximately 0.99% of the total assessed value of improvements in the Town of St. Paul is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of St. Paul. Therefore, no facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities There are no critical facilities located within the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure 0% of railways/highways and bridges, 0% of dams, 0% of water treatment works, and 0% waste water treatment facilities are at risk from the 100- year storm event. Many of these structures are designed to traverse or be located within the floodplain due to unavoidable circumstances. Additionally, treated wastewater is typically discharged towards streams, which makes portions of wastewater treatment facilities likely to be located within the floodplain. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of St. Paul are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event.. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of St. Paul. Therefore, no facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the Town of St. Paul are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 1037 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-979 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events. All the population of the Town of St. Paul are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of St. Paul are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in St. Paul. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of St. Paul. Therefore, no facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the Town of St. Paul are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the Town of St. Paul are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from lightning events. All the population of the Town of St. Paul is vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of St. Paul are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of St. Paul. Therefore, no facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the Town of St. Paul are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the Town of St. Paul are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 1038 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-980 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in the Town of St Paul. All the population of St. Paul is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of St. Paul are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the Town of St. Paul. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of St. Paul. Therefore, no facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the Town of St. Paul are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the Town of St. Paul are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 82.86% of the Town of St. Paul is vulnerable to wildfires. There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, percentage of the overall property improvement values across the Town of St. Paul are also unknown. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of St. Paul. Therefore, no facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are 0 schools at risk from wildfire events. Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are 0 bridges, 0 dams, 0 wastewater treatment facility, and 0 water treatment facility at risk from wildfire events. Page 1039 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-981 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the Town of St. Paul. All the population of the Town of St. Paul are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the Town of St. Paul are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the Town of St. Paul. Emergency Facilities There are no emergency facilities located within the Town of St. Paul. Therefore, no facilities are at risk. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the Town of St. Paul are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in the Town of St. Paul are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Page 1040 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-982 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serve as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the Town of St. Paul considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdiction Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction Town of St. Paul Y Y Y Y N Y Y N N Y Y N N ? 57% Average % Yes Capabilities – 62% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 1041 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-983 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes Town of St. Paul Y Y Y N Y N Y N Y N 60% Average % Yes Capabilities – 60% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes Town of St. Paul N Y Y N N Y Y Y N ? 50% Average % Yes Capabilities – 50% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 1042 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-984 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan To quantify the Town of St. Paul’s legal and regulatory capabilities, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), and strong (70-100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, the Town of St. Paul has 57.14% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 60% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 50% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities Town of St. Paul Town Secretary The town council, including the mayor, mayor pro- tem, and council members, along with the town secretary, address the budget; pass laws, regulations, and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the town overall. Ability to implement and approve mitigation actions and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 1043 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-985 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016 HazMAP, the Town of St. Paul Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the plan update. Goal 1 Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate early warning systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornados through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties for the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages from chronic hazard events. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 1044 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-986 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis, economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. Town of St. Paul Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Adopt and promote public education program. Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Goal/Objective 4A, 4B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $15,000 Potential Funding Sources General fund, HMGP, PDM, other state/federal grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds, citizen cost-share, donations Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Public education is extremely effective for low cost. Discussion Also the utilization of social media will be key in this program. Program will include information about mitigation actions and education. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Page 1045 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-987 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornadoes Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost $3,000 per safe room Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Some buildings modified for safe room retrofit Effect on New Buildings Buildings constructed with safe rooms Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Status Deferred – Residents did received funding through the NCTCOG Saferoom Rebate Program. The NCTCOG Program has been suspended Town of St. Paul Action Item Purchase of a CASA (WX) Weather Radar system Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Tornadoes, Wildfire, Flooding, Lightning, Dam Failure Goal/Objective 1-A, 3-C Priority High Estimated Cost $550,000 Potential Funding Sources Local Funding, Federal Funding, HMPG Potential Matching Sources Local Grants Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 12‐36 Months Effect on Old Buildings n/a Effect on New Buildings Increase response decisions by 100% Cost Effectiveness Cost effectiveness is low compared to the benefits. Discussion The Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere (CASA WX) project is a multi‐sector partnership dedicated to engineering revolutionary weather‐sensing networks. The main purpose of the CASA WX project is to save lives and minimize injuries due to severe weather. This is accomplished through the enhancement of data by providing lower atmospheric coverage at faster rates. The CASA WX radars provide jurisdictions more accurate weather data and geographically specific weather data culled from the most active levels of the atmosphere. This data Page 1046 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-988 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan could save lives by providing the public more time to react and prepare appropriately as severe weather affects their location. The more accurate data will also provide a better means to analyze severe weather post event which can also help in the assessment of damage after a severe weather event. Status No longer viable project for St. Paul Town of St. Paul Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Populations, Businesses, and Critical Infrastructure. Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Expansive Soils, Earthquake, Dam Failure, Flooding Goal/Objective 3-C Priority High Estimated Cost $60,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning saves lives, which outweighs the cost of the radios. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens about severe weather, civil emergencies and hazard information. It is impossible to quantify the value of a human life or value of an injury. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 1-A, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $65,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind, grants Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 18-36 Months Page 1047 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-989 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show county officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around lake development properties. Discussion This project will become increasingly needed as development around Richland Chambers (Tarrant County Water Supply) increases. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams within the county. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 2-A, 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 12-18 Months Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that identifies locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Town Administration Page 1048 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-990 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop, implement, and enforce building codes that would prevent building deterioration from structure-impacting hazards. Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Goal/Objective 2-C, 3-C Priority Low Estimated Cost $5,000- $7,500 Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 12 Months Effect on Old Buildings New building codes would allow for existing buildings to be retrofitted to mitigate against structure-impacting hazards. Effect on New Buildings New building codes would allow for new buildings to be constructed to mitigate against structure-impacting Cost Effectiveness Low - Benefits outweigh costs Discussion Building codes would help to promote better building standards such as including hail-resistant roofing and windows; wind and impact resistant doors, windows, and roofing ; wildfire breaks and fire resistant building materials; stricter foundation standards for earthquake and expansive soils; increased elevation (BFE) standards for flooding; higher grade insulation to mitigate extreme heat and winter weather; and resource-efficient (low-flow) plumbing for drought. Also, additional codes for dry-proofing and lightning protection (rods, grounding) for public buildings to mitigate flood, dam failure and lightning. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 1049 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-991 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop and implement mandatory water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $1,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Promote water conservation throughout the county and work with local water supplies to implement mandatory water restrictions Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop and implement storm water management on creek waterways Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-D, 2-E, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, General Funds Potential Matching Sources Local funds, In-kind match Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 6 months Effect on Old Buildings My prevent flooding of existing structures Effect on New Buildings May prevent flooding of planned development areas Cost Effectiveness Low compared to life safety benefits Discussion Project would prevent erosion, stopping expansion of the floodplain Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop and implement debris management program targeting stream banks at bridges Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Page 1050 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-992 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Goal/Objective 2-E, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $534,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, General Funds Potential Matching Sources Local funds, In-kind match Lead Department Town Administration Implementation Schedule 6 months Effect on Old Buildings Could prevent flooding and disruption to transportation Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Low compared to life safety benefits Discussion Town of St. Paul needs to ensure clear waterways in order to prevent buildup of debris and materials that could cause flooding and contribute to damage to bridges. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works Implementation Schedule 6 months – 18 months Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion . Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Page 1051 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-993 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, Water Shed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Page 1052 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-994 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan Town of St. Paul Items: New Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to educate on the actions to help mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4A, 4B, 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $15,000 Potential Funding Sources General fund, HMGP, PDM, other state/federal grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds, citizen cost-share, donations Lead Department Department of Town Administration Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation.. Town of St. Paul Action Item Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Hazard(s) Addressed Tornadoes Goal/Objective 1-C Priority High Estimated Cost $3,000 per safe room Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, Resident Match Potential Matching Sources Local Grants, FEMA Lead Department Department of Town Administration Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Some buildings modified for safe room retrofit Effect on New Buildings Buildings constructed with safe rooms Page 1053 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-995 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness Residential safe room shelters potentially decrease personal injuries and death during severe weather, tornadoes or high wind events. Discussion Implement Individual Tornado Safe Room Rebate Program Town of St. Paul Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Populations, Businesses, and Critical Infrastructure. Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Expansive Soils, Earthquake, Flooding Goal/Objective 3-C Priority High Estimated Cost $60,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Department of Town Administration Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning saves lives, which outweighs the cost of the radios. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens about severe weather, civil emergencies and hazard information. It is impossible to quantify the value of a human life or value of an injury. Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Hazard(s) Addressed Wildfire Goal/Objective 1-A, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $65,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind, grants Lead Department Department of Town Administration Implementation Schedule 18-36 Months Effect on Old Buildings Reduce vulnerability of existing structures to damages or loss from wildfire Effect on New Buildings Reduce vulnerability of new structures to damages or loss from wildfire Page 1054 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-996 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness CWPPs show county officials where to redouble their efforts in preventing wildfire, saving time and money. Also work to establish urban wildfire interface around lake development properties. Discussion This project will become increasingly needed as development around Richland Chambers (Tarrant County Water Supply) increases. Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that identifies locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $5,000-$10,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Department of Town Administration Implementation Schedule 12 months Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop, implement, and enforce building codes that would prevent building deterioration from structure-impacting hazards. Hazard(s) Addressed Hail, Lightning, Drought, Extreme Heat, High Winds, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storm, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Flooding Goal/Objective 2-C, 3-C Priority Low Estimated Cost $5,000- $7,500 Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Department of Town Administration Implementation Schedule 12 Months Effect on Old Buildings New building codes would allow for existing buildings to be retrofitted to mitigate against structure-impacting hazards. Effect on New Buildings New building codes would allow for new buildings to be constructed to mitigate against structure-impacting Page 1055 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-997 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Cost Effectiveness Low - Benefits outweigh costs Discussion Building codes would help to promote better building standards such as including hail-resistant roofing and windows; wind and impact resistant doors, windows, and roofing ; wildfire breaks and fire resistant building materials; stricter foundation standards for earthquake and expansive soils; increased elevation (BFE) standards for flooding; higher grade insulation to mitigate extreme heat and winter weather; and resource-efficient (low-flow) plumbing for drought. Also, additional codes for dry-proofing and lightning protection (rods, grounding) for public buildings to mitigate flood, dam failure and lightning. Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop and implement mandatory water conservation measures Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 4-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $1,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM, General Fund Potential Matching Sources Local funds, donations, in-kind Lead Department Department of Town Administration Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Low cost for effective means of preserving water. Discussion Promote water conservation throughout the county and work with local water supplies to implement mandatory water restrictions. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop and implement storm water management on creek waterways Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-D, 2-E, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, General Funds Page 1056 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-998 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Potential Matching Sources Local funds, In-kind match Lead Department Department of Town Administration Implementation Schedule 6 months Effect on Old Buildings My prevent flooding of existing structures Effect on New Buildings May prevent flooding of planned development areas Cost Effectiveness Low compared to life safety benefits Discussion Project would prevent erosion, stopping expansion of the floodplain Town of St. Paul Action Item Develop and implement debris management program targeting stream banks at bridges Hazard(s) Addressed Flooding Goal/Objective 2-E, 3-C Priority Medium Estimated Cost $534,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, General Funds Potential Matching Sources Local funds, In-kind match Lead Department Department of Town Administration Implementation Schedule 6 months Effect on Old Buildings Could prevent flooding and disruption to transportation Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Low compared to life safety benefits Discussion Town of St. Paul needs to ensure clear waterways in order to prevent buildup of debris and materials that could cause flooding and contribute to damage to bridges. Town of St. Paul Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Department of Town Administration Implementation Schedule 6 months – 18 months Page 1057 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-999 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion . Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Town of St. Paul Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Department of Town Administration Implementation Schedule 12-18 months Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Page 1058 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-1000 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Page 1059 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-1001 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance St. Paul is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg-Emer Date Tribal 481318# ST. PAUL, TOWN OF COLLIN COUNTY 6/6/1978 4/2/1991 06/02/09(M) 8/12/2002 No Source: http://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Compliance Once the community applies for the NFIP, FEMA arranges for a study of the community to determine base flood elevations and flood risk zones. Consultation with the community occurs at the start of and during the study, and those communities with minimal flood risk are converted to the Regular Program without a study. FEMA provides the studied community with a Flood Insurance Rate Map delineating base flood elevations and flood risk zones. The community is then given 6 months to adopt base flood elevations in its local zoning and building code ordinances. Once the community adopts more stringent ordinances, FEMA converts the community to the NFIP’s Regular Program. FEMA then authorizes the sale of additional flood insurance in the community up to the Regular Program limits. The community must implement and enforce the adopted floodplain management measures. FEMA provides periodic community assistance visits with local officials to provide technical assistance regarding complying with NFIP floodplain management requirements. Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Page 1060 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-1002 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement Town of St. Paul Mayor Taking action to minimize the effects of flooding on people, property, and building contents through measures including flood warning, emergency response, and evacuation planning No current areas of repetitive flooding. Floodplain Administrator will continue to monitor for any new flooding areas. NFIP com pliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with town’s flood damage prevention order shall result in fines up to $2000 per violation plus court costs. Complete and maintain FEMA elevation certificates for pre-FIRM and or post-FIRM buildings Permits are issued through the Town of St. Paul. Collin County requires 2 feet of freeboard above the base flood elevation for the top of bottom floor on residential structures and non-residential structures that will be built on properties created or platted after the effective date of the Flood Damage Prevention Order Future Mitigation Projects The Town of St. Paul will continue to monitor for new areas of flooding that have not been previously identified for mitigation. Page 1061 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-1003 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), the Town of St. Paul has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. The Town of St. Paul , along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by Collin County Commissioners Court, and formal adoption of the plan by City/Town Council by each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Plan would be implemented by the county and participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, the Town of St. Paul will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Activity Schedule Town Secretary Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Page 1062 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-1004 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) Based on the requirements set forth in § 201.6(c)(4(ii), the State of Texas Mitigation Plan, the vulnerability and capabilities assessment for each jurisdiction was carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and planning committees will establish a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into the existing regional and local planning strategies. Local and regional planning committees currently use comprehensive land use planning, capital improvements planning, and building code ordinances to guide development. The mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be integrated into these existing mechanisms as applicable. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdiction Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan Town of St. Paul Mayor, Town Council Budget Meetings Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Emergency Action Plan updates Every Five Years EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Floodplain ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. Capital improvement plans As Needed Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Drought Contingency plans As needed Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Natural Resource Conservation Plan As Needed Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the St. Paul Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicles to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. Page 1063 Item 10. Town of St. Paul Annex Page | S-1005 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committee will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participants. Page 1064 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1006 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Annex T: City of Wylie 1. Introduction This annex was prepared in 2020 as part of an update to the Collin County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan updates the Wylie hazard mitigation plan submitted to FEMA as part of the 2016 Collin County plan. The City of Wylie participated in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) for this update. In addition to the countywide hazards and strategies discussed in the main plan, this annex serves as a complete hazard mitigation planning tool for the City of Wylie. It contains capability assessment information, a specific vulnerability assessment, and a complete mitigation strategy. The methodology and process for developing this annex are explained throughout the following sections. 2. Plan Development and Adoption Process In order to apply for federal aid for technical assistance and post-disaster funding, local jurisdictions must comply with Part 201.3 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 implemented in the Federal Code of Regulations 44 CRF Part 201.6. While the City of Wylie has historically implemented measures to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, passage of DMA 2000 helped Wylie officials to recognize the benefits of a long-term approach to hazard mitigation, which achieves a gradual decrease of impacts associated through the implementation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. Collin County’s Hazard Mitigation Action Plan represents the collective efforts of all participating jurisdictions, the general public, and stakeholders. Organizing the Planning Effort A comprehensive county approach was taken in developing the plan. An open public involvement process was established for the public, neighboring communities, regional agencies, businesses, academia, etc. to provide opportunities for everyone to become involved in the planning process and to make their views known. The meetings were advertised with notices in public places, including online. .In accordance with Part 201.6(c)(5) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Collin County developed this Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. This plan identifies hazards and mechanisms to minimize future damages associated with these hazards, which threaten Collin County and its jurisdictions. Existing Data and Plans Existing hazard mitigation information and other plans were reviewed during the development of the Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. GIS, statistical and qualitative data was gathered through numerous sources. The table below outlines the sources of data for the plan: Table 2.1 Plan Source Data Source Data City and County Appraisal Data 2020 Population and demographics Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Hazard occurrences National Center for Environmental Information (NCEI) Hazard occurrences Texas Forest Service/Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Summary Report Wildfire Threat and Wildland/Urban Interface National Inventory of Dams Dam Information Page 1065 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1007 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Planning Committee This Hazard Mitigation Action Plan was developed by the City of Wylie Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, with support of the North Central Texas Council of Governments and in conjunction with the Collin County HMPT. The Collin County HMPT was assembled in November 2020 with representatives from participating jurisdiction planning committees, including mayors, police chiefs, fire chiefs, and the general public. Collin County acted as the plan development consultant providing hazard mitigation planning services; the efforts of the Wylie planning committee were led by the City of Wylie Emergency Management Coordinator. Table 2.2 Hazard Mitigation Committee – Primary Representatives Representing Position Role City of Wylie Emergency Management Coordinator Information Collection City of Wylie City Engineer Building/Planning Floodplain Manager Information Collection Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator General Assistance Collin County served as the coordinator and lead agency for all jurisdictions by accomplishing the following activities through the planning process: • Assigned the County’s Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator to provide technical assistance and necessary data to the planning committee. • Scheduled, coordinated, and facilitated community meetings with the assistance of the HMPT and the planning committees. • Provided any necessary materials, handouts, etc. for public planning meetings. • Worked with the HMPT and planning committees to collect and analyze data and develop goals and implementation strategies. • Prepared, based on community input and planning team/committee direction, the first draft of the plan, and provided technical writing assistance for review, editing and formatting. • Coordinated with the stakeholders within the jurisdictions and the unincorporated areas of Collin County during plan development. Each of the individual jurisdictions participated in accomplishing similar activities associated with development of the plan as follows: • Coordinated input from representatives of neighborhood stakeholder groups and provided a representative to the County HMPT. • Attended regular meetings of the planning team as coordinated by Collin County. • Assisted Collin County staff with identifying hazards and estimating potential losses from future hazard events. • Assisted Collin County in developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to address the identified risks. • Assisted Collin County in coordinating public meetings to develop the plan. • Identified the community resources available to support the planning effort. Page 1066 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1008 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan • Worked for the support of neighborhood stakeholders for the recommendations resulting from the planning process. • Submitted the proposed plan to all appropriate departments for review and comment and worked with Collin County to incorporate the resulting comments into the proposed plan. External stakeholders involved in reviewing the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan: Table 2.3 External Stakeholders Representing Position Role Lakepointe Hospital Representative Review of plan Wylie ISD Representative Review of plan First Baptist Church Wylie Representative Review of plan Subsequent to the State of Texas and FEMA approval of the plan, each organization also is committed to accomplishing the following activities: 1. Appoint members to a coordinating committee to monitor and work toward plan implementation. 2. Publicize the plan to neighborhood interests and ensure that new community members are aware of the plan and its contents. 3. Monitor progress in achieving the plan’s goals through regular maintenance and implementation projects. Planning Meetings During the planning process, the HMPT met to obtain relevant information from the participating jurisdictions and to discuss the objectives and progress of the plan. The objectives of these meetings were to gather information and to provide guidance for each jurisdiction throughout the planning stages. The following meetings were held by Collin County and included all jurisdiction’s participation: ● Collin County HazMAP Kickoff Meeting – August 12, 2020 ● Collin County Planning Meeting – November 11, 2020 ● Collin County Planning Meeting – June 12, 2021 ● Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 11/2/2021 at 2PM ● Collin County HazMAP Public Meeting – 01/12/2022 a 9AM Public Involvement Support from the community is vital for any successful hazard mitigation plan. The HMPT and planning committee provided opportunities, announced through public communication means, for public participation and input throughout the planning process prior to this draft and before approval of the finalized plan. Advertisement and sign in sheets for these meetings are located in Appendix A. ● The first public meeting was held on November 2, 2021 at 2PM, and advertised on the Collin County website along with other jurisdictional websites inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to comment. The meeting was held virtually via WebEX. Page 1067 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1009 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan ● A second public meeting was held on January 12, 2022 at 9AM. Announcements were placed on jurisdictions websites, including Collin County inviting the public, neighboring communities, local business, academia, agencies, and nonprofits to view and comment on the HazMAP prior to plan submission. There were no comments directly related to the mitigation plan received from citizens, non-profits, businesses, academia, or interested parties; therefore, no feedback was incorporated. An additional opportunity for the public to comment on the plan will be held prior to formal plan adoption. This provided all citizens, stakeholders, neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, academia, non- profit organizations, and all interested parties an opportunity to be involved in the planning process and to take part in the decisions making process that affect the future of the communities that they live in. Page 1068 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1010 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 3. Jurisdictional Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee for the City of Wylie identified several natural and man-made hazards that could affect the city. The committee decided to focus on the natural hazards identified in Section 5 of this update. This was done after reviewing the 2016 HazMAP, the State of Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan, as well as other sources such as federal and state agencies. The hazards were ranked using the Priority Risk Index. Priority Risk Index A Priority Risk Index (PRI) was developed with the purpose of categorizing potential hazards for Collin County and ranks each hazard as high, moderate, low, or negligible to no risk. The hazard classification generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for Collin County jurisdictions to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The PRI is used to assist all jurisdictions participating in the Collin County HazMAP in determining which hazards pose the most significant threat based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective and systematic planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Collin County based on standardized criteria. The PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another. The sum of all four categories equals the final PRI value, as shown below: PRI Value = (Probability x .30) + (Life Impact x .35) + (Property Impact x .25) + (Spatial Extent x .10) The higher the PRI value, the greater the hazards risk. These values were obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to four categories for each hazard: Probability, Life Impact, Property Impact, and Spatial Extent (Table 3.1). Each category has been assigned an Index Value (0 to 3) and a Weighing Factor (0 – 100%). These values may be adjusted during future plan updates. In order to evaluate the risk of each hazard, the assigned PRI Value for each category is multiplied by the weighing factor. Then, the PRI for each hazard is calculated by adding the product obtained in each category. According to the weighing scheme applied for Collin County, the highest possible PRI value is 3.0. The PRI calculations are presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.1 breaks down the value of each category. Page 1069 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1011 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.1 Priority Risk Index Value Assigned Weighing Factor PRI Category Degree of Risk Level Criteria Index Value 30% Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 0 Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 1 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 2 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 3 35% Life Impact Minor Very few injuries, if at all none 0 Limited Minor Injuries 1 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries 2 Catastrophi c High number of deaths/injuries 3 25% Property Impact Minor Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 0 Limited More than 10% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 1 Critical More than 25% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 2 Catastrophi c More than 50% of property in affected area damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 3 10% Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 0 Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 1 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 2 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 3 Page 1070 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1012 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.2 Priority Risk Index for the City of Wylie Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Index Value (0 - 3 30%) Life Impact Index Value (0 - 3 35%) Property Impact Index Value (0 - 3 25%) Spatial Extent Index Value (0 - 3 10%) PRI Value 2021 Dam Failure 1 0 0 0 0.3 Drought 2 0 1 3 1.15 Earthquake 0 1 0 1 0.45 Expansive Soils 2 0 0 1 0.7 Extreme Heat 1 1 0 3 0.95 Flooding 1 1 0 1 0.75 Hail 2 0 1 2 1.05 High Winds 1 0 0 1 0.4 Lightning 2 1 0 0 0.95 Tornado 2 2 2 2 2 Wildfire 1 0 0 0 0.3 Winter Storms 2 0 1 3 1.15 The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for the city of Wylie resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to four categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, Low Risk, and Negligible to No Risk (Table 3.3). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the probability of occurrence and estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property in the city of Wylie. Table 3.3 Hazard Rankings City of Wylie High Risk (PRI 2 - 3) Tornado Moderate Risk (PRI 1.01 -1.9) Hail Winter Storms Low Risk (PRI 0.50 – 1) Drought Lightning Expansive Soils Extreme Heat Flooding Negligible to No Risk (PRI 0 – 0.49) Earthquake Dam Failure Wildfire High Winds Page 1071 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1013 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Changes in Development and Priorities (Requirement §201.6(d)(3)) The City of Wylie was a participating jurisdiction in the 2016 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan. Since then, Wylie has completed several of their original action items, in an effort to lower vulnerability on populations and property from natural hazards. The following actions, sorted by type of action, have had a direct impact on lowering vulnerability: ● Natural Systems Protection ● Local Rules and Regulations o Maintained continued NFIP compliance through continued enforcement and compliance with city ordinance. o Expanded early warning sirens and local warning system to notify the public of impending severe weather to reduce the loss of life and mitigate the effects of the hazards. The City of Wylie is continuously working to increase their outdoor warning system to accommodate expanding areas. The development and implementation of these projects have directly led to lower vulnerability for residents and property located in Wylie. A NexGEN software upgrade has been completed and two new outdoor warning sirens are scheduled for installation by fall of 2021 with more to follow along with siren upgrades. As of January 1, 2015 the official population was 45,000 and the current population is 56,376. Housing units have increased from approximately 14,971 to 19,113. Enrollment in Wylie IDS rose from 14,426 in 2015 to approximately 18,300 for the 2021 school year. The City of Wylie has new developments that include Collin College, an apartment complex, Holiday Inn Express, La Quinta, Whataburger, Chik-Fil-A, new subdivisions, expansions of existing subdivisions, various retail and an assisted living facility. Planned development for the City of Wylie includes Wylie Fire Rescue Station #4, an expansion of the KCS yard, an apartment complex, and various retail. New priorities are noted and ranked in each new action item, Section 6. Except for actions completed or cancelled, other priorities remain the same as in the previous version of this plan. Vulnerability Narratives This annex focuses on specific areas of vulnerability the City of Wylie faces with each hazard. The hazards identified in the main plan are all addressed in this annex, therefore the natural hazards rated negligible to no risk are included, described, and considered for mitigation in this plan. Dam and Levee Failure The City of Wylie borders along the southern and western area of Lake Lavon including just west of the Lake Lavon Dam. Lake Lavon is owned and managed by the Army Corps of Engineers. In the event of a worst case scenario dam failure the inundation zone does not affect the City of Wylie. This was tested in a joint exercise with the Army Corps of Engineers. The land south of Lake Lavon Dam is the spillway then it leads to the next lake which is Lake Ray Hubbard. Therefore the City of Wylie is not considered to be at risk for dam failure although unincorporated areas served by Wylie Fire Rescue may be, so inundation studies will be considered. Muddy Creek Dam is owned by the City of Wylie and is located west of Country Club Road across from the Municipal Complex. Any breach of this dam would flow southeast towards FM 544 and may have an effect on businesses and some residences depending on capacity. This inundation would possibly have an effect on the neighboring jurisdictions of Page 1072 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1014 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Sachse and Rowlett. This would be a low risk as it would not affect a high population but could still cause damage for some businesses/residents. Drought 24T Drought has the potential to impact the entire planning area equally; all improved property, emergency facilities, critical facilities, critical infrastructure, and the entire population of Wylie are vulnerable to this hazard. Foundations of all buildings are vulnerable; however, older structures, or those built under less stringent foundation code requirements are most vulnerable. Lake Lavon, Lake Texoma, Lake Tawakoni, Lake Fork and the Lake Chapman-Cooper reservoir system are water sources for the City of Wylie and are vulnerable to drought. In turn, the city’s population, wildlife and vegetation are vulnerable. Lower income populations who may not have the resources to buy containerized water in the event of a shortage may be more vulnerable than other populations. Earthquake All properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to earthquakes. Buildings constructed under older building codes, aging underground infrastructure, and roads are most vulnerable to damages from seismic activity. Expansive Soils All properties have the potential to be vulnerable to expansive soils, especially those constructed under older building codes. Extreme Heat 24TExtreme heat generally affects the entire population, but the homeless, very young, elderly, and populations without air conditioning are most vulnerable. Flooding This hazard was identified as having low risk to the City of Wylie. Areas that are prone to flash flooding are: the S curve on McMillan Rd off of Country Club and Sachse Rd at Creek Crossing on the border of Wylie and Sachse. Hail 24THail storms are common during the severe weather months within “tornado alley.” It is common for roofs of houses and vehicles to suffer damage from the occasional hail storm. All properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to hail. Exposed populations, manufactured homes, and older properties are most vulnerable. High Winds High Winds are common during the severe weather months within “tornado alley”. It is common for fences and trees to suffer damage from the occasional high wind storm. All properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to high winds, manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. 24TLightning All properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to lightning. Property without lightning protection and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Tornado The City of Wylie is within “tornado alley”, therefore, there is the potential for a tornado to occur. All properties and populations have the potential to be vulnerable to tornadoes, manufactured homes and exposed populations are most vulnerable. Wildland Fire This hazard was identified as having minimal or low risk to the City of Wylie. According to data by the Texas Forest Service, it is estimated that 38.07% percent of Wylie’s population lives within the WUI which is located primarily in the southern part of the city. Page 1073 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1015 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Winter Storms 24TTexas is greatly affected by winter storms because this is not a common occurrence as in some states. Heavy ice and snow can cause loss of power for an extended amount of time as well as transportation issues which impact life safety. Freezing temperatures and blowing winds can also contribute to life safety issues as well as property damage. Vulnerable populations include the homeless, elderly, and those without access to heat. Critical facilities are also at risk. Identification of Assets and Vulnerability Assessment An inventory of Wylie’s geo-referenced assets was created in order to identify and characterize property and population potentially at risk to the identified hazards. By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. For this assessment, five categories of assets were evaluated using Geographic Information System and statistical analysis. The five categories of vulnerable assets include: ● UPopulationU: Includes the number of people residing in Collin County jurisdictions as delineated by U.S. Census 2020 block data provided by NCTCOG. ● UImproved propertyU: Includes all developed properties according to local parcel data from the Collin County Central Appraisal District. The information has been expressed in terms of the total assessed value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. ● UEmergency facilitiesU: Includes fire stations, police stations and hospitals, provided by the Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. ● UCritical facilitiesU: Includes schools and historic places provided by Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. These are non-emergency facilities, but still provide critical services and functions for vulnerable sectors of the population. ● UCritical infrastructureU: Includes airports, natural gas facilities, wastewater facilities, potable water treatment facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, dams, and bridges. Data for all critical facilities was obtained from Regional Hazard Assessment Tool, Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, and participating jurisdictions. The following tables provide a breakdown by municipal jurisdiction of the geo-referenced assets that were used for the vulnerability assessment. Population According to the US Census Bureau, the total population of the City of Wylie in 2020 was 53,067 people, with 19,113 households. The count breakdown by municipal jurisdiction is provided in Table 3.4. Table 3.4 Collin County Population Counts Jurisdiction Population Households Population % of County Total Population Density (Sq. Mile) Household % of County Total Household Density (Sq. Mile) Wylie 53,067 4.44% 1340.36 17,084 4.44% 471.96 Source: US Census Bureau & Collin County Appraisal District Page 1074 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1016 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 3.5 summarizes population counts and population chance (absolute and percent predictions for Collin County). Table 3.5 Population Predictions Jurisdiction Population 2010 Census Population 2018 Estimate Population 2019 Estimate Absolute Change 2018- 2019 Percent (%) Change 2018- 2019 Wylie 41,427 49,500 51,730 2,230 4.51% Source: 2020 NCTCOG Population Estimates Property There are an estimated 17,130 parcels in Wylie, with an estimated $4,065,640,595 in total assessed value of, Table 3.6 lists the total number and percentage of parcels by jurisdiction. Table 3.6 Parcel Counts and Improvements Value Jurisdiction Number of Parcels % of County Total Total Assessed Value of Improvements (Buildings) Wylie 17,130 4.09% $4,065,640,595 Source: Collin County Appraisal District Emergency Facilities There are 5 identified emergency facilities in the City of Wylie, including 3 fire stations, 1 police station (including communications), and 1 hospital. Table 3.7 presents the distribution of emergency facilities by jurisdiction. Geographic coordinates were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.7 Emergency Facilities Jurisdiction Fire Stations Police Stations Hospitals Wylie 3 1 1 Source: County Data and Regional Hazard Assessment Tool Critical Facilities There are 29 critical facilities, which are considered non-emergency in Wylie. The critical facilities include 20 schools and 9 historical property sites (Table 3.8). Geographic coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) were used to determine the location of each facility. Table 3.8 Critical Facilities Jurisdiction Schools Historical Property Wylie 20 9 Source: Local jurisdictions Page 1075 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1017 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure There are two identified critical infrastructure facilities in Wylie, including zero airports, zero natural gas facilities, one water treatment facilities, one wastewater treatment facilities, two dams, and zero railway/highway bridges (Table 3.9). Table 3.9 Critical Infrastructure Jurisdiction Airports Natural Gas Facilities Wastewater Treatment Facilities Potable Water Treatment Facilities Dams Railway/ Highway Bridges Wylie 0 0 1 1 2 0 Source: Local jurisdictions Methodology Based on the type of information available for analysis, Collin County’s vulnerability assessment was conducted using two distinct methodologies, a Geographic Information System -based analysis and a statistical risk assessment methodology. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation of historical occurrence information provided by National Centers for Environmental Information, the Texas Forest Service, and the FEMA Resilience and Planning Tool. The results of the vulnerability assessment are provided by jurisdiction for each hazard analyzed. Of the 12 hazards evaluated for Collin County, four were analyzed using a Geographic Information System-based analysis, 5 using a statistical risk assessment methodology, and the remaining 3 using qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was used due to lack of information, the inability to define specific areas of risk, and/or inexistence of historical records. Additional information regarding these 3 hazards is unattainable at the present time; studies to address this data deficiency are noted as action items in this update. Table 3.10 summarizes the methodology used for each hazard. Table 3.10 Analysis used for Vulnerability Assessment Collin County Hazard Geographic Information System- based Analysis Statistical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Dam Failure X Drought X Earthquake X Expansive Soils X Extreme Heat X Flooding X Hail X Page 1076 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1018 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan High Winds X Lightning X Tornado X Wildfire X Winter Storms X Summary of Vulnerably Assessment A summary of the vulnerability assessment for each hazard using geographic and statistical analysis is presented in the following pages. The detailed assessment is presented in the following sections. Summary Table 3.11 Drought Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) no recorded injuries or fatalities have been recorded for drought events. There are no personal losses expected from drought events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Wylie are expected but financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; however county-wide property loss is estimated at $21,208.33 per year. Historical data indicates that crop losses in the City of Wylie are expected mostly during water shortages, financially unknown due to lack of accurate reporting however county-wide crop loss is estimated to be $58,916.67 per year. Emergency Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on emergency facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Facilities Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical facilities but foundation issues could occur due to drought events. Critical Infrastructure Because of the nature of this hazard, no losses are expected on critical infrastructure but foundation issues and road degradation could occur due to drought events. Summary Table 3.12 Extreme Heat Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there were four (4) county-wide fatalities recorded due to extreme heat, none from the City of Wylie. The City of Wylie and its population are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to developed areas and the improved property in the City of Wylie is not vulnerable to this hazard. Page 1077 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1019 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Emergency Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings and the emergency facilities in the City of Wylie are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there is no impact of extreme heat to buildings, and the critical facilities in the City of Wylie are not vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) there is no impact of extreme heat to critical infrastructure, and vulnerability to this hazard is considered minimal in the City of Wylie. Summary Table 3.13 Flooding Population Flooding produces an expected annualized count of zero (0) fatalities and injuries per year. Approximately 427 residential parcels in the City of Wylie are located within the 100-year floodplain. Improved Property There have been five (5) recorded flood events in the City of Wylie. Property losses are expected at $2,800 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses are expected or recorded. Approximately $60,830,722 of the total assessed value is at risk from the 100-year storm event. Emergency Facilities Emergency facilities have the potential to be at risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Facilities Critical facilities have the potential to be at risk in the 100-year storm event. Critical Infrastructure Critical Infrastructure has the potential to be at risk in the 100-year storm event. Summary Table 3.14 Hail Population According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), no injuries or fatalities have been recorded for hailstorm events. There are no personal losses expected from hailstorm events. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Wylie are expected at $7,573,171.43 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. All improved property is vulnerable to this hazard. Although some crops are susceptible to hail hazards, available historical data for Wylie indicates that there are no expected crop losses from this event. Page 1078 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1020 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Emergency Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all emergency facilities in the City of Wylie are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical facilities in the City of Wylie are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the unpredictability of the geographical location of hailstorms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Wylie are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.15 High Wind Population According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from high wind events. All the population of the City of Wylie are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Wylie are expected at $900 per year however these values are underestimated due to lack of accurate reporting. No crop losses resulted from this hazard in the City of Wylie. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all emergency facilities in the City of Wylie are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical facilities in the City of Wylie are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of high winds, all critical infrastructures in the City of Wylie are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.16 Lightning Population According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there are no recorded injuries or fatalities from lightning events. All the population of the City of Wylie are vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Wylie are expected but unknown due to lack of accurate reporting. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all emergency facilities in the City of Wylie are vulnerable to this hazard. Page 1079 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1021 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical facilities in the City of Wylie are vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of lightning, all critical infrastructures in the City of Wylie are vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.17 Tornado Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there have been no recorded injuries or fatalities from tornado events in the City of Wylie. All the population of the City of Wylie is exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), an average loss of $7,142.86 per year in property losses is expected to result from tornado events. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Wylie. Emergency Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all emergency facilities in the City of Wylie are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical facilities in the City of Wylie are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the impossibility to predict the geographical area of impact for tornados, all critical infrastructures in the City of Wylie are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Summary Table 3.18 Wildfire Population Based on geographical data, approximately 38.07% of the City of Wylie is vulnerable to wildfires. There have been no recorded injuries or fatalities due to wildfires. Improved Property Based on historical data, annual financial losses expected from property loss due to wildfires are unknown due to lack of accurate reporting; therefore, the percentage of the overall property improvement values across the City of Wylie are also unknown. Emergency Facilities Based on geographic information there are two fire stations, one police station, and one hospital at risk from wildfire events. Critical Facilities Based on geographic information there are 17 schools and 15 historical properties at risk from wildfire events. Page 1080 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1022 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Critical Infrastructure Based on geographic information there are no bridges, no dams, one wastewater treatment facility, and no water treatment facility at risk from wildfire events. Summary Table 3.19 Winter Storm Population According to National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), there was one (1) county-wide fatality recorded due to winter storms, none from the City of Wylie. All the population of the City of Wylie are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Improved Property According to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), property losses in the City of Wylie are expected but unknown due to lack of reporting; however county-wide property loss is estimated at $116,250 per year. No crop losses are expected from this hazard in the City of Wylie. Emergency Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all emergency facilities in the City of Wylie are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Facilities Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical facilities in the City of Wylie are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. Critical Infrastructure Because of the expected geographical widespread nature of winter storms, all critical infrastructures in the City of Wylie are exposed and vulnerable to this hazard. 4. Capability Assessment The risk assessment and capabilities assessment serve as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the City of Wylie considered not only its level of hazard risk but also the existing capabilities to minimize or eliminate that risk. Page 1081 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1023 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.1 Legal and Regulatory Capability Summary Legal and Regulatory Capabilities Jurisdictio n Building Code Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance or regulation Special purpose ordinances (floodplain management, storm water management, hillside or steep slope ordinances wildfire ordinances, hazard setback requirements) Growth management ordinances (also called "smart Growth" or anti-sprawl programs) Site Plan review requirements General or comprehensive plan A capital improvements plan An economic development plan An emergency response plan A post-disaster recovery plan A post-disaster recovery ordinance Real estate disclosure requirements Other % Yes per Jurisdiction Wylie Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N 71% Average % Yes Capabilities – 71% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Page 1082 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1024 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Table 4.2 Administrative and Technical Capability Summary Administrative and Technical Capabilities Jurisdiction Planner(s) or engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management Engineer(s) or professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineer(s) with an understanding of natural and/or human caused hazards Floodplain manager Surveyors Staff with education or expertise to assess the community's vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Emergency manager Grant writers % Yes per Jurisdiction Wylie Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y 80% Average % Yes Capabilities – 80% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know Table 4.3 Fiscal Capability Summary Fiscal Capabilities Jurisdiction Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital improvements project funding Authority to levy taxes for specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric service Impact fees for homebuyers or developers for new developments/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold spending in hazard-prone areas Other % Yes per Jurisdiction Wylie N Y N Y N N N N Y N 20% Average % Yes Capabilities – 20% Y- Yes N- No ?- Don't Know To quantify Wylie’s legal and regulatory, administrative and technical, and fiscal capabilities, an overall rating system was administered for each category: limited (0-30%), moderate (31-70%), and strong (70- Page 1083 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1025 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 100%). Questionnaire responses indicated that on average, Wylie has 71.42% of identified legal and regulatory capabilities, 80% of identified administrative and technical capabilities, and 20% of identified fiscal capabilities. Table 4.4 Administrative Information Jurisdiction Chief Administrative Officer Ability to Implement Capabilities City of Wylie City Manager The city manager, along with Directors (department heads), address the budget; pass ordinances and codes; hire staff; approve plans; and determine the direction of the city overall. As the governing body, the ability to implement and approve mitigation actions, expand mitigation activities and programs, and integrate mitigation into existing policies and programs is a function of this group. Specific actions that can expand and improve existing capabilities, authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include: budgeting and passing policies and procedures, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving the hiring and training of staff for mitigation activities, and approving mitigation updates and additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Page 1084 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1026 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 5. Mitigation Strategies Based on the results of the risk and capability assessments, and reviews of the goals and objectives included in the 2016 HazMAP, the Wylie Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee developed mitigation strategies for the plan update. 24TGoal24T 1 4Reduce or eliminate loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from severe weather events. Objective 1-A Provide adequate warning and communication before, during, and after a hazard event. Objective 1-B Expand and coordinate early warning systems currently in use. Objective 1-C Reduce or eliminate loss of life and property damage from tornadoes through the construction and use of safe rooms or shelter areas. Goal 2 Protect existing and new properties from the effects of all natural hazards. Objective 2-A Conduct studies to determine hazard and vulnerability threat assessment for all natural hazards. Objective 2-B Rehabilitate or retrofit identified high hazard critical infrastructure. Objective 2-C Enact and enforce regulatory measures that enforce hazard mitigation measures. Objective 2-D Construct enhancements or additions to current and new facilities which mitigate the effects of natural hazards. Objective 2-E Maintain NFIP compliance, storm water management, and implement drainage projects. Goal 3 Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events47T. Objective 3-A Conduct a hazard/vulnerability assessment of personal properties and structures located in flood zones. Objective 3-B Develop and implement a buyout program for those personal properties and structures located in high hazard flood zones starting with those that are most vulnerable to life and property loss. Objective 3-C Develop and execute new programs which identify and reduce threats from natural hazards. Goal 4 Develop public education campaigns to disseminate information about actions to mitigate potential loss of life, injuries and property damage resulting from natural hazards. Objective 4-A Educate the public on risks, threats, and vulnerability from all natural hazards. Objective 4-B Educate the public on actions they can take to prevent or reduce the loss of life or property from all natural hazards. Objective 4-C Develop and implement a community education campaign to heighten public awareness about chronic flooding and options for insurance coverage to protect their personal properties as well as long term benefits from a buyout program. Page 1085 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1027 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 6. Action Items Below is a list of the new and deferred action items identified for the HazMAP Update. Each of the actions in this section were prioritized based on FEMA’s STAPLEE criteria, which includes considering the social, technical, administrative, political, legal, economic and environmental factors necessary for the implementation of each action. As part of the STAPLEE analysis economic considerations were weighed for each action. The STAPLEE was used for the 2016 Plan along with the 2021 Update. Priority rankings are classified as indicated in the table below. Priority Description High Benefits of mitigating risk of death or severe bodily injury outweigh costs to implement actions rated as high priorities. Medium Reducing vulnerability to threats and the resulting improvement in quality of life and peace of mind are benefits for actions rated as medium priorities. Low Awareness of low risk/low impact hazards offer benefits of time to assess, plan and integrate low priority mitigation actions as time, need, and funding permit. City of Wylie Action Items: Deferred from 2016 Plan City of Wylie Action Item Add outdoor warning sirens to meet the needs of the growing population in newly developed areas and/or subdivisions. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Flooding, Wildfire Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $30,000 per siren Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Outdoor warning systems will help alert the public to reduce personal and property damage before a disaster strikes. Status Two Sirens and software have been added or in the process of being added. Continue to add additional sirens as needed based on population needs. City of Wylie Action Item Adopt and implement water conservation regulations Page 1086 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1028 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Hazard(s) Addressed Drought Goal/Objective 2-C, 3-C Priority High Estimated Cost $7,500 to $15,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to benefit to community Discussion This will mitigate drought conditions. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Wylie Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to educate on the actions to help mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority High Estimated Cost $7,500-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. Status Receive supplies and materials from the NCTCOG KnoWhat2do Program and provide to residents. Continue – will be included in 2021 Page 1087 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1029 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan City of Wylie Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that provides resources and identifies locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, NPO donations, In-kind Lead Department Emergency Management, Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of the program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Wylie Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, W atershed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. Page 1088 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1030 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Wylie Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public Works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Wylie Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Lead Department Emergency management, Public works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Page 1089 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1031 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Wylie Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Status Deferred – will be included in 2021 Plan City of Wylie Action Items: New City of Wylie Action Item Add outdoor warning sirens to meet the needs of the growing population in newly developed areas and/or subdivisions. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Flooding, Wildfire Goal/Objective 1-A, 1-B Priority High Estimated Cost $30,000 per siren Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Page 1090 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1032 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Effect on Old Buildings None Effect on New Buildings None Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Outdoor warning systems will help alert the public to reduce personal and property damage before a disaster strikes. This action item would be specific to installation/placement of new OWS sirens in the jurisdiction. City of Wylie Action Item Adopt and implement water conservation regulations Hazard(s) Addressed Drought, Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-C, 3-C Priority High Estimated Cost $7,500 to $15,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Will identify need for retrofits, such as low-flow plumbing Effect on New Buildings May require new codes for low-flow plumbing and foundation integrity Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to benefit to community Discussion This will mitigate drought conditions. When water is conserved and not used for landscape during droughts, this would provide water for homeowners to use, through drip irrigation, to keep their foundations at a consistent saturation level, mitigating the impacts of drought and lack of water. City of Wylie Action Item Develop and implement a comprehensive public education program to educate on the actions to help mitigate the impacts of each identified hazard. Hazard(s) Addressed Tornado, Hail, Winter Storms, High Winds, Dam Failure, Lightning, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Earthquake, Flooding, Wildfire, Drought Goal/Objective 4-A, 4-B, 4-C Priority High Estimated Cost $7,500-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources General Fund Potential Matching Sources None Lead Department Emergency Management Page 1091 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1033 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Implementation Schedule 2-3 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Minimal compared to preservation of life safety Discussion Public education can help educate the public to reduce personal and property damage during disasters. Program will include information about hazard mitigation. City of Wylie Action Item Develop and implement an extreme temperature program that provides resources and identifies locations for vulnerable residents to go to during periods of extreme temperatures. Hazard(s) Addressed Extreme Heat, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 2-D Priority Medium Estimated Cost $10,000-$15,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP, PDM Potential Matching Sources Local funds, NPO donations, In-kind Lead Department Emergency Management, Planning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Could require retrofit to accommodate required space and resources Effect on New Buildings May entail enhanced construction materials Cost Effectiveness Cost to implement this program is low compared to the benefits of the program. Discussion Cooling shelters would allow special populations to reduce their vulnerability to extreme heat, as warming centers would aid residents in extreme cold. City of Wylie Action Item Hire consultant to complete new inundation studies of all high and moderate hazard dams. Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Flood Goal/Objective 3-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources HMPG, W atershed Authorities, Dam Sponsors Potential Matching Sources Local Sponsors, In-Kind Page 1092 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1034 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department Planning and Zoning/ NRCS, Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed to protect existing buildings in inundation zones Effect on New Buildings Results will determine what mitigation actions are needed for new buildings in inundation zones Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Dam Failure data deficiency identified in Chapter 3. Identify all structures and infrastructures that would be impacted by a potential dam failure. City of Wylie Action Item Conduct earthquake assessment study to determine potential for earthquakes to affect public facilities and utilities. Hazard(s) Addressed 2-A Goal/Objective Earthquake Priority Low Estimated Cost $20,000 Potential Funding Sources HMGP Potential Matching Sources Local Funds Lead Department Public W orks, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Results will help identify/define retrofits or additions to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Effect on New Buildings Results will identify/define codes for new construction to reduce vulnerability to earthquakes Cost Effectiveness Low Discussion Project outputs will guide development of future earthquake mitigation projects. City of Wylie Action Item Conduct a soil analysis to determine the scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils Hazard(s) Addressed Expansive Soils Goal/Objective 2-A Priority Low Estimated Cost $10,000 Potential Funding Sources Federal grants, state grants Potential Matching Sources Local funds Page 1093 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1035 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Lead Department Emergency management, Public works, Planning Zoning Implementation Schedule 1-2 years Effect on Old Buildings Study would identify existing construction most at risk for expansive soil damage. Effect on New Buildings Study would be used to identify undeveloped areas at risk for expansive soil damage for real estate disclosure. Cost Effectiveness High. This study would lead to targeted mitigation projects to lower vulnerability to expansive soils. Discussion Study would be used to identify scope, impact, and extent of expansive soils throughout jurisdiction. City of Wylie Action Item Purchase and Distribute NOAA Weather Radios to Vulnerable Residents Hazard(s) Addressed Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Expansive Soils, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hail, High Winds, Lightning, Tornado, Wildfire, Winter Storms Goal/Objective 1-A Priority High Estimated Cost $75,000 Potential Funding Sources Grant Funds, HMPG, PDM, Partial payment by receiving party Potential Matching Sources Local funds, in-kind, donations, citizen cost-share Lead Department Emergency Management Implementation Schedule 2-5 years Effect on Old Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make existing building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages through retrofits Effect on New Buildings Depending on mitigation actions taken for structures, can make new building safer, stronger and less vulnerable to damages Cost Effectiveness Advanced warning and mitigation information saves lives which outweighs the cost of a radio. Discussion Weather Alert Radios are a proven means to alert and warn citizens and provide information about severe weather as well as provide other emergency and hazard information Page 1094 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1036 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Compliance Wylie is participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and has identified their respective areas as vulnerable to flooding. This is incorporated into all current and future planning for dealing with repetitive loss vulnerabilities. Table 6.1 NFIP Compliance CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Curr Eff Map Date Reg- Emer Date Tribal 480759# WYLIE, CITY OF ROCKWALL COUNTY/DALLAS COUNTY/COLLIN COUNTY 11/12/1976 6/4/1980 7/7/2014 6/4/1980 No Source: 35TUhttp://www.fema.gov/cis/TX.html Jurisdiction Activities In order to maintain eligibility with NFIP, jurisdictions are required to maintain their list of properties that hold a policy with NFIP, along with up-to-date maps of the floodplains in the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction participating in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan completes this basic requirement and has the information on file with the jurisdiction’s designated floodplain manager. Using this plan, participating jurisdictions will be able to continue their compliance with NFIP by implementing damage control measures and to take action to minimize the effects of flooding in their respective jurisdictions. Table 6.2 NIFP Activity Jurisdiction Community Floodplain Administrator NFIP Activity Activity Description Enforcement City of Wylie City Engineer Complete and maintain FEMA elevation certificates for pre-FIRM and or post-FIRM buildings Permits are issued through the Building Dept. The City requires a residential structure to have the lowest floor elevated at least 2 feet above the base flood elevation. Non- residential is the same or be designed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with the walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water. NFIP compliance is implemented and enforced through a process of floodplain identification using FEMA floodplain maps, permit issuance, building requirements, and compliance inspections pending approval. Failure to comply with City’s flood ordinance can Floodplain development permits Permits are required for any new construction in a floodplain. Coordinate with FEMA in identifying The City of Wylie attends meetings held by FEMA Page 1095 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1037 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Special Flood Hazard Areas for future FIRM maps and/or their contractors to better identify areas that are flood prone that are not shown on current Flood Insurance Rate Maps. shall result in a fine up to $2,000. Take action to minimize the effects of flooding on people, property, and building contents through measures including flood warning, emergency response, and evacuation planning Maintain road closures to known flood prone areas. Use public outreach via Nixle for flash flood warnings. Future Mitigation Projects The City of Wylie will continue to monitor for new areas of flooding that have not been previously identified for mitigation. Page 1096 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1038 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan 7. Plan Maintenance Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan In Compliance with requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(i), Collin County has developed a plan maintenance process which is described in the following paragraphs. Collin County, along with participating jurisdictions are responsible for monitoring implementation of the plan, executing a yearly evaluation of its effectiveness, and updating the plan within a 5-year cycle. Following formal adoption by Collin County Commissioners Court, and formal adoption of the plan by City Council by each participating jurisdiction, the actions outlined in the Collin County Hazard Mitigation Plan would be implemented by the county and participating jurisdictions as described throughout this document. The Collin County Emergency Management Coordinator, working in conjunction with the respective jurisdictions, will be responsible for ensuring the mitigation plan is monitored, evaluated, and reviewed on an annual basis. This will be accomplished by calling an annual meeting of the planning committee, whose members will provide assistance and expertise for plan review, evaluating, updating, and monitoring. This meeting will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. During this annual meeting, Wylie will provide information on the implementation status of each action included in the plan. As part of the evaluation, the planning committee will assess whether goals and objectives address current and expected conditions, whether the nature and/or magnitude of the risks have changed, if current resources are appropriate for implementing the plan, whether outcomes have occurred as expected, and if agencies and other partners participated as originally proposed. These activities will take place according to the timetable presented below: Table 7.1 Plan Maintenance Timeline Personnel Activity 1BSchedule Emergency Management Coordinator Monitoring Plan : Track implementation and action items, changes to risk assessment, changes to planning team members, changes to capabilities, plan integrations Biannually Evaluate Plan: Assess effectiveness by evaluating completed actions, implementation processes, responsible personnel and lessons learned. Annually Update Plan Once every 5 years At least once every five (5) years, or more frequently, if such a need is determined by the participating jurisdiction, the multi-jurisdictional plan will undergo a major update. During this process, all sections of the plan will be updated with current information, analyses done and new and/or modified mitigation action plans will be developed. The revised plan will be submitted for state and federal review and approval, and presented for approval to the Collin County Commissioner’s Court and the respective councils of incorporated cities/towns included in the Collin County plan. Each participating jurisdiction will undertake the same process for reviewing, revising and updating their respective plans and submitting them for approval. The plans will be updated every five years in accordance with federal requirements. Page 1097 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1039 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Plan Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(ii)) 2016 Plan Incorporation: The vulnerability and capabilities assessments for each jurisdiction were carefully reviewed and considered when developing the mitigation actions for this plan. The HMPT and planning committees have established a process in which the mitigation strategy, goals, objectives and actions outlined in this plan will be incorporated into existing local planning strategies and mechanisms, as appropriate. Those mechanisms include the following: Table 7.2 Plan Incorporation Mechanisms Jurisdictions Responsible Personnel Jurisdictional Plans Integration Schedule Integration Plan 0BCity of Wylie City Council Budget Annually Integration of mitigation projects identified in HazMAP, grants, and other fiscal allowances for mitigation actions and related costs Emergency Management Coordinator Emergency Action Plan Every Five Year EAP Mitigation annex updates based on HazMAP HIRA; update preparedness, response and recovery actions related to identified hazards Designated Floodplain Manager Floodplain Ordinances As needed Enhance mitigation of flood hazards using HazMAP flood data for floodplain management and community development. City Council, Director of Planning Capital Improvement Plan Annually Strengthen critical infrastructure and key resources based on HazMAP hazard analysis, incorporate vulnerability data and action items. Public Works Director, City Council Drought Contingency Plan Assessed annually and updated as needed. Integrate drought actions such as xeriscaping, water restrictions, and public education Planning Director, City Council Natural Resource Conservation Plan Assessed annually and updated as needed. Integrate conservation measures by directing development away from hazard-prone areas identified in HazMAP. Page 1098 Item 10. City of Wylie Page | T-1040 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Although it is recognized there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this HazMAP into other planning mechanisms, the Wylie Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee considers this HazMAP, including development and maintenance, to be the primary vehicle to ensure implementation of local hazard mitigation actions. The process described here is the same as was used since the last planning update. Continued Public Involvement (In compliance with 201.6(c)(4)(iii)) As stated in requirement § 201.6(c)(4)(iii) The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. To address this requirement, ongoing public participation will be encouraged throughout the entire planning and implementation process. A copy of the plan will be provided on the Collin County website. The planning team and committees will continue meeting on a regular basis to ensure the successful implementation of the plan and to discuss any additional issues regarding the emergency management of Collin County. The annual meetings for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the plan will be open to the public and public notices will encourage community participation. Page 1099 Item 10. Appendix A Page | U-1041 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Planning Process Documents Public Meeting #1 Announcement Page 1100 Item 10. Appendix A Page | U-1042 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Public Meeting #1 Attendees Name Email Address City Edie Sims esims@blueridgecity.com Blue Ridge Alexa Bach kyrosalexa@gmail.com Plano Simon Katz skatz@parkertexas.us Parker Meredith Nurge mnurge@co.collin.tx.us Collin County Amanda Meldrum ameldrum@friscofire.com Frisco Janis Cable jcable@lowrycrossingtexas.org Lowry Crossing Dustin Lankford dlankford@princetontx.us Princeton Eric Everson eeverson@celina-tx.gov Celina Kent Bauer kbauer@prospertx.gov Town of Prosper Perry Elliott pelliott@murphytx.org Murphy Dustin Butler dbutler@csmediatexas.com Wylie Elizabeth Carlberg ecarlberg@co.collin.tx.us McKinney Adam Wilbourn awilbourn@fairviewtexas.org Fairview Carol King carol.king@newhopetx.gov McKinney Dustin Butler dbutler@csmediatedas.com Princeton Lance Gant lgant@lucastexas.us Lucas Kim Dobbs kdobbs@lavontx.gov Lavon Tenishea Turner tturner@princetontx.us Princeton Carl Nix cnix@cityofmelissa.com Melissa Brittany Elliott belliott@cityofmelissa.com Melissa Cody Nelson cnelson@annatexas.gov Anna Jason Lane jlane@friscofire.com Frisco Randall Gurney rgurney@co.collin.tx.us McKinney Page 1101 Item 10. Appendix A Page | U-1043 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Public Meeting #2 Announcement Page 1102 Item 10. Appendix A Page | U-1044 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Public Meeting #2 Attendees Name Email Address City Danny Anthony danthony@lavontx.gov Lavon Danny Anthony danthony@cityoflavon.gov Lavon Danny Anthony danny.anthony@lavonvfd.org lavon Gina Zimmel gzimmel@collincountytx.gov LeAnn Strait townhall@stpaultexas.us St Paul Dustin Butler dbutler@csmediatexas.com Wylie Connor Pittman cpittman@csmediatexas.com Pandora Wilson pawski1@gmail.com McKinney Adam Wilbourn awilbourn@fairviewtexas.org Fairview Barry KOFFROTH bkoffroth@gmail.com PROSPER Amy Bartley abartley95@gmail.com Prosper Leigh Ann Nolen lnolen@co.collin.tx.us Collin County Yoon Kim ykim@co.collin.tx.us McKinney Elizabeth Carlberg ecarlberg@co.collin.tx.us McKinney T Scally wiztoms@hotmail.com Princeton Tom Harvey tharvey@princetontx.us Princeton Dustin Lankford dlankford@princetontx.us Princeton Carol King carol.king@newhopetx.gov New Hope Kim Dobbs kdobbs@lavontx.gov LAVON Amanda Meldrum ameldrum@friscofire.com Frisco Jason Lane jlane@friscofire.com Frisco Eric Everson eeverson@celina-tx.gov Celina Lance Gant lgant@lucastexas.us Lucas Randall Gurney rgurney@co.collin.tx.us McKinney Page 1103 Item 10. Appendix A Page | U-1045 Collin County Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Meeting News Report Page 1104 Item 10. Page 1 of 1 To: Mayor and Town Council From: David Soto, Planning Manager Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Hulon T. Webb, Jr., Interim Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure Services Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon an ordinance to rezone 0.2± acre from Single Family-15 (SF-15) to Planned Development-Downtown Single Family (PD), located on the north side of Third Street, east of Coleman Street. (Z22-0009). Description of Agenda Item: The purpose of the zoning request, which was approved by Town Council on June 14, 2022, by a vote of 7-0 is to rezone the property to Planned Development-Downtown Single Family to allow for deviation from the required lot depth, from 120 feet to 100 feet. The purpose is to develop a single-family downtown residence in the future. The existing house will be demolished. Prior to development, the developer will be required to submit a plat for review and approval. The applicant has been advised of the standards necessary for development. A Planned Development ordinance has been prepared accordingly. Legal Obligations and Review: Town Attorney, Terrence Welch of Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P., has approved the standard ordinance as to form and legality. Attached Documents: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibits A-F Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of an ordinance to rezone 0.2± acre from Single Family-15 (SF-15) to Planned Development-Downtown Single Family (PD), located on the north side of Third Street, east of Coleman Street. (Z22-0009). Proposed Motion: I move to approve an ordinance to rezone 0.2± acre from Single Family-15 (SF-15) to Planned Development-Downtown Single Family (PD), located on the north side of Third Street, east of Coleman Street. (Z22-0009). Prosper is a place where everyone matters. PLANNING Page 1105 Item 11. TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 2022-___ AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY REZONING A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF 0.2 ACRE, SITUATED IN BLOCK 12, BRYANT’S ADDITION , TOWN OF PROSPER, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM SINGLE FAMILY-15 DISTRICT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; DESCRIBING THE TRACT TO BE REZONED; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR REPEALING, SAVING AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Prosper, Texas (the “Town Council”), has investigated and determined that the Zoning Ordinance should be amended; and WHEREAS, the Town of Prosper, Texas (“Prosper”) has received a request (Case Z22- 0009) from Jeanna Montgomery (“Applicant”), to rezone 0.2 acre of land, more or less, situated in Block 12, Bryant’s addition, Town of Prosper, Collin County, Texas, from Single Family-15 District to Planned Development and being more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has investigated and determined that the facts contained in the request are true and correct; and WHEREAS, all legal notices required for rezoning have been given in the manner and form set forth by law, Public Hearings have been held, and all other requirements of notice and completion of such procedures have been fulfilled; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has further investigated into and determined that it will be advantageous and beneficial to Prosper and its inhabitants to rezone this property as set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS: SECTION 1 Findings Incorporated. The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2 Amendment to the Town’s Zoning Ordinance. The Town’s Zoning Ordinance, as amended, is hereby amended as follows: The zoning designation of the below described property containing 0.2 acre of land, more or less, situated in Block 12, Bryant’s Addition, Town of Prosper, Collin County, Texas, and all streets, roads, and alleyways contiguous and/or adjacent thereto are hereby zoned as Planned Development and being more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes as if set forth verbatim. Page 1106 Item 11. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 2 The development plans, standards, and uses for the Property in this Planned Development District shall conform to, and comply with (1) the Statement of Intent and Purpose, attached hereto as Exhibit B; (2) the Development Standards, attached hereto as Exhibit C; (3) the Site Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit D; (4) the Development Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit E; (5) the Façade Plans, attached hereto as Exhibit F; all of which are incorporated herein for all purposes as if set forth verbatim. Two (2) original, official, and identical copies of the zoning exhibit map are hereby adopted and shall be filed and maintained as follows: a. One (1) copy shall be filed with the Town Secretary and retained as an original record and shall not be changed in any manner. b. One (1) copy shall be filed with the Building Official and shall be maintained up-to-date by posting thereon all changes and subsequent amendments for observation, issuing building permits, certificates of compliance and occupancy, and enforcing the zoning ordinance. Reproduction for information purposes may from time-to-time be made of the official zoning district map. SECTION 3 No Vested Interest/Repeal. No developer or property owner shall acquire any vested interest in this Ordinance or in any other specific regulations contained herein. Any portion of this Ordinance may be repealed by the Town Council in the manner provided for by law. SECTION 4 Unlawful Use of Premises. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to make use of said premises in some manner other than as authorized by this Ordinance, and shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to construct on said premises any building that is not in conformity with the permissible uses under this Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 5 Penalty. Any person, firm, corporation, or business entity violating this Ordinance or any provision of Prosper’s Zoning Ordinance, as amended, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be fined any sum not exceeding Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each continuing day’s violation under this Ordinance shall constitute a separate offense. The penal provisions imposed under this Ordinance shall not preclude Prosper from filing suit to enjoin the violation. Prosper retains all legal rights and remedies available to it pursuant to local, state and federal law. SECTION 6 Severability. Should any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it is expressly provided that any and all remaining portions of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Prosper hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid. Page 1107 Item 11. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 3 SECTION 7 Savings/Repealing Clause. Prosper’s Zoning Ordinance, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this or any other Ordinance. All provisions of any ordinance in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent they are in conflict; but such repeal shall not abate any pending prosecution for violation of the repealed ordinance, nor shall the appeal prevent a prosecution from being commenced for any violation if occurring prior to the repealing of the ordinance. Any remaining portions of said ordinances shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 8 Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its adoption and publications as required by law. DULY PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, ON THIS __ DAY OF JUNE, 2022. ______________________________ David F. Bristol, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Michelle Lewis Sirianni, Town Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _________________________________ Terrence S. Welch, Town Attorney Page 1108 Item 11. Exhibit APage 1109Item 11. Exhibit B Statement of Intent of Purpose The purpose of the request is to rezone a single family lot from Single family 15 to Planned Development – Downtown Single Family to facilitate setbacks to accommodate a new build structure of approximately 1900sq ft. The current setbacks would not allow an updated and useful new structure to be built. The current lot is 20ft short on the required 120 ft depth. The developer will incorporate craftsman style architecture into the exterior design and follow guidelines for the downtown residential revitalization program. Due to lot constraints the developer is requesting to decrease the lot depth from 120ft to 100ft. Page 1110 Item 11. Exhibit C PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 207 E. Third St Prosper TX 75078 The proposed development will conform to the development standards of the DTSF ( Downtown Single Family) District of the Town of Prosper’s Zoning Ordinance, as it exists or may be amended, and Subdivision Ordinance, as it exists or may be amended, except as otherwise set forth in these Development Standards. 1. Except as noted below, the Tract shall develop in accordance with the DTSF District requirements of the Town of Prosper’s Zoning Ordinance, as it exists or may be amended. 2. Development Plans a. Concept Plan: The tract shall be developed in general accordance with the attached concept plan, set forth in Exhibit D b. Elevations: The tract shall be developed in general accordance with the attached elevations, set forth in Exhibit F 3. Uses. Uses shall be permitted in accordance with the DTSF. 4. Exceptions The lot will conform to the DTSF standards with the exception of- a. Minimum lot depth of 100ft. Page 1111 Item 11. site plan --- 207 East 3rd Street --- RESIDENCE Exhibit D Page 1112 Item 11. Exhibit E – Development Schedule April 2022 – Submit for Planned Development – Downtown Single Family Zoning May 2022 – Planning & Zoning Commission Approval June 2022 - Town Council Approval and Ordinance Adoption July 2022 – Submit Building permits August- December 2022 - Complete construction Page 1113 Item 11. 04-17-222REVISIONS NO.SHEET NO.DATE DRAWNA NEW RESIDENCE FOR: DATE DESCRIPTION DO NOT SCALE THESE PLANS. DESIGNER ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY OR THESE PLANS MAY HAVE TO BE MODIFIED TO MEET ENGINEERING AND/OR BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. TO EXCEED THE PRICE PAID FOR THESE PLANS. AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND LIABILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND/OR CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS NOTIFY DESIGNER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE BEGINNING OR FABRICATING ANY WORK. TECHNIQUES. LIMIT OF THE DESIGNER LIABILITY NOT R E S I D E N T I A L D E S I G N Allen, Texas 75013 700 S. Central Expy. - Suite 400 www.sshomedesign.com 235469Office :1819front elevationleft side elevation207 East 3rd StreetExhibit FPage 1114Item 11. Page 1 of 1 To: Mayor and Town Council From: David Soto, Planning Manager Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Hulon T. Webb Jr., Interim Executive Director of Development & Infrastructure Services Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon an ordinance amending Planned Development-69 (PD-69), on 71.0± acres, generally to modify the allowed uses and landscape standards, located on the southeast corner of Dallas Parkway and Frontier Parkway. (Z22-0007). Description of Agenda Item: The purpose of the zoning request, which was approved by Town Council on June 14, 2022, by a vote of 7-0 is to amend Planned Development-69 (PD-69), on 71.0± acres, generally to modify the allowed uses and landscape standards, located on the southeast corner of Dallas Parkway and Frontier Parkway. A Planned Development ordinance has been prepared accordingly. Legal Obligations and Review: Town Attorney, Terrence Welch of Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P., has approved the standard ordinance as to form and legality. Attached Documents: 1. Ordinance 2. Ordinance Exhibits Town Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Town Council approve an ordinance amending Planned Development-69 (PD-69), on 71.0± acres, generally to amend the residential tract to allow for non-residential uses, located on the southeast corner of Dallas Parkway and Frontier Parkway. Proposed Motion: I move to approve an ordinance amending Planned Development-69 (PD-69), on 71.0± acres, generally to amend the residential tract to allow for non-residential uses, located on the southeast corner of Dallas Parkway and Frontier Parkway. Prosper is a place where everyone matters. PLANNING Page 1115 Item 12. TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 2022-__ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PROSPER’S ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 05-20; REZONING A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF 70.9 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN THE COLLIN COUNTY SCHOOL LAND SURVEY NO. 12, ABSTRACT NO. 147, IN THE TOWN OF PROSPER, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, HERETOFORE ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-69 (PD-69) IS HEREBY REZONED AND PLACED IN THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-69 (PD-69); DESCRIBING THE TRACT TO BE REZONED; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR REPEALING, SAVING AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Prosper, Texas (the “Town Council”) has investigated and determined that Zoning Ordinance No. 05-20 should be amended; and WHEREAS, the Town of Prosper, Texas (“Prosper”) has received a request from Metten Real Estate, L.P. (“Applicant”) to rezone 70.9 acres of land, more or less, situated in the Collin County School Land Survey No. 12, Abstract No. 147, in the Town of Prosper, Collin County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has investigated into and determined that the facts contained in the request are true and correct; and WHEREAS, all legal notices required for rezoning have been given in the manner and form set forth by law, and public hearings have been held on the proposed rezoning and all other requirements of notice and completion of such zoning procedures have been fulfilled; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has further investigated into and determined that it will be advantageous and beneficial to Prosper and its inhabitants to rezone this property as set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS: SECTION 1 Findings Incorporated. The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2 Amendments to Zoning Ordinance No. 05-20. Zoning Ordinance No. 05-20 is amended as follows: The zoning designation of the below-described property containing 70.9 acres of land, more or less, situated in the Collin County School Land Survey No. 12, Abstract No. 147, in the Town of Prosper, Collin County, Texas, (the “Property”) and all streets, roads and alleyways contiguous and/or adjacent thereto is hereby rezoned as Planned Development-69 (PD-69). The property as a whole and the boundaries for each zoning classification are more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes as if set forth verbatim. Page 1116 Item 12. Ordinance No. 2022-__, Page 2 The development plans, standards, and uses for the Property in this Planned Development District shall conform to, and comply with 1) the statement of intent and purpose, attached hereto as Exhibit “B”; 2) the planned development standards, attached hereto as Exhibit “C”; 3) the conceptual development plan requirements, attached hereto as Exhibit “D”; and 4) the development schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit “E”, and 5) Landscape Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit “F” which are incorporated herein for all purposes as if set forth verbatim . Except as amended by this Ordinance, the development of the Property within this Planned Development District must comply with the requirements of all ordinances, rules, and regulations of Prosper, as they currently exist or may be amended. Two (2) original, official, and identical copies of the zoning exhibit map are hereby adopted and shall be filed and maintained as follows: a. One (1) copy shall be filed with the Town Secretary and retained as an original record and shall not be changed in any manner. b. One (1) copy shall be filed with the Building Official and shall be maintained up to date by posting thereon all changes and subsequent amendments for observation, issuing building permits, certificates of compliance and occupancy, and enforcing the zoning ordinance. Reproduction for information purposes may from time-to-time be made of the official zoning district map. Written notice of any amendment to this District shall be sent to all owners of properties within the District as well as all properties within two hundred feet (200’) of the District to be amended. SECTION 3 No Vested Interest/Repeal. No developer or property owner shall acquire any vested interest in this Ordinance or in any other specific regulations contained herein. Any portion of this Ordinance may be repealed by the Town Council in the manner provided for by law. SECTION 4 Unlawful Use of Premises. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to make use of said premises in some manner other than as authorized by this Ordinance, and shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to construct on said premises any building that is not in conformity with the permissible uses under this Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 5 Penalty. Any person, firm, corporation or business entity violating this Ordinance or any provision of Prosper’s Zoning Ordinance No. 05-20, or as amended, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be fined any sum not exceeding Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each continuing day’s violation under this Ordinance shall constitute a separate offense. The penal provisions imposed under this Ordinance shall not preclude Prosper from filing suit to enjoin the violation. Prosper retains all legal rights and remedies available to it pursuant to local, state and federal law. SECTION 6 Page 1117 Item 12. Ordinance No. 2022-__, Page 3 Severability. Should any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it is expressly provided that any and all remaining portions of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Prosper hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid. SECTION 7 Savings/Repealing Clause. Prosper’s Zoning Ordinance No. 05-20 shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this or any other Ordinance. All provisions of any ordinance in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent they are in conflict; but such repeal shall not abate any pending prosecution for violation of the repealed ordinance, nor shall the appeal prevent a prosecution from being commenced for any violation if occurring prior to the repealing of the ordinance. Any remaining portions of said ordinances shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 8 Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its adoption and publications as required by law. DULY PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, ON THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022. ______________________________ David F. Bristol, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Michelle Lewis Sirianni, Town Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _________________________________ Terrence S. Welch, Town Attorney Page 1118 Item 12. COLLIN COUNTY VOLUME 5772, PAGE 2404 O.P.R.C.C.T. TREJAX, LP. DOC. NO. 20121206001558000 O.P.R.C.C.T. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 BLOCK E 1 2 3 4 5 BLOCK F LAKES OF PROSPER NORTH PHASE 2 VOLUME 2015, PAGE 675 P.R.C.C.T. LOT 2, BLOCK A PROSPER SPORTS COMPLEX VOLUME 2012, PAGE 344 P.R.C.C.T. THOMAS MOSEY AND JULIE MOSEY AS TRUSTEE OF THE TRUST AGREEMENT OF THOMAS MOSEY DOC. NO. 20190830001072500 O.P.R.C.C.T. TRACT 2 TOLL SOUTHWEST LLC DOC. NO. 20191125001498990 O.P.R.C.C.T. COLLIN COUNTY VOLUME 5786, PAGE 4659 O.P.R.C.C.T. S 89°18'34" W 2453.23' R=5744.58' D=2°17'26" CB=N 00°24'01" E CL=229.65' A=229.67'//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////•••••••DRAINAGE EASEMENT DOC. No. 20201222002309730 O.P.R.C.C.T. (CALLED 3.56 ACRES) PARCEL NO. 12 PERMANENT RIGHT-OF-WAY DOC. No. 20201222002309720 O.P.R.C.C.T. LOT 5, BLOCK X (CALLED 6.034 ACRES) RIGHT-OF-WAY DONATION DOC.NO. 20060425000545800 O.P.R.C.C.T.(N 01°32'32" E)(S 01°00'35" W)(N 89°54'01"W)DALLAS PARKWAYCONCRETE ROADWAYVARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.(211.14')N 01°32'44" EN 00°44'43" W 764.27'(N 00°44'55" W)S 00°22'04" W 1245.04'N 44°25'23" E 71.45' S 84°18'58" E 100.00' N 89°25'23" E 417.85' N 86°47'13" E 239.17' N 89°25'23" E 243.00'N 89°39'23" E 1384.64' N 89°39'23" E 29.94' FRONTIER PARKWAY/CR. 5 VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W. 1/2" CIRF "SPIARS ENG" CIRS CIRS 1/2" CIRF "SPIARS ENG" 1/2" CIRF "BH&C" CIRS CIRS CIRS CIRS CIRS CIRS CIRS WATERVIEW DRIVE 50' WIDTH R.O.W.////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////KIRKWOOD LANE50' WIDTH R.O.W.STRAIT LANE50' WIDTH R.O.W.DALLAS PARKWAYCONCRETE ROADWAYVARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.TRACT 2 TOLL SOUTHWEST LLC DOC. NO. 20191125001498990 O.P.R.C.C.T.FRONTIER PARKWAY/CR. 5 VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W. TRACT 1 EX. LAND USE: UNDEVELOPED EX. ZONING: R/PD-69 PROPOSED LAND USE: RETAIL PROPOSED ZONING: R/PD-69 TRACT 2 EX. LAND USE: UNDEVELOPED EX. ZONING: PD-69 RETAIL PROPOSED LAND USE: RETAIL PROPOSED ZONING: R/PD-69 EX. LAND USE: SPORTS COMPLEX EX. ZONING: AGRICULTURE CITY OF CELINA EX. LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL EX. ZONING: SF-10 PD-8 EX. LAND USE: UNDEVELOPED EX. ZONING: CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL CITY OF CELINA EXHIBIT ASP-1 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch = ft. 100 100 200 100 50 DATENo.REVISIONBYDATE: SHEET CASE NO. CHECKED: MAM DRAWN:DC DESIGN:PROSPER COMMERCIALBEING PART OF 70.91 ACRES OF LANDOUT OF COLLIN COUNTY SCHOOL LANDSURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 147PROSPER, TEXAS1903 CENTRAL DRIVE, SUITE #406PHONE: 817.281.0572BEDFORD, TX 76021 WWW.CLAYMOOREENG.COMTEXAS REGISTRATION #14199 MAM 5/13/2022 PRELIMINARY CLAYMOORE ENGINEERING COUNTY SURVEY:ABSTRACT NO. COLLIN COUNTY SCHOOL 147 CITY:STATE: TOWN OF PROSPER TEXAS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OWNER: APPLICANT/ENGINEER: PD CASE #: Z22-0007 CONTACT NAME: MATT MOORE COLLIN BEING PART OF 70.91 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE COLLIN COUNTY SCHOOL LAND SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 147, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS ARCHITECT CONTACT NAME: ACCORDING TO MAP NO. 48085C0115J, DATED 06/02/2009 OF THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM MAP, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP OF COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION, THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN ZONE "X", (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE OF THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN). FLOODPLAIN NOTE CLAYMOORE ENGINEERING, INC. 301 S COLEMAN, SUITE 40 PROSPER, TX 75078 PH: 817.201.6982 O'BRIEN ARCHITECTS 5800 DEMOCRACY DRIVE, SUITE 200B PLANO, TX 75024 PH: 972.788.1010 DNT FRONTIER, LP 4303 W LOVERS LANE, SUITE 200 DALLAS, TX 75209 PH: 817.201.6982 CONTACT NAME: DAVID FOGEL Page 1119 Item 12. EXHIBIT B – STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PURPOSE March 18, 2022 Planning Dept. Town of Prosper 250 W. First Street Prosper, Texas 75078 Re: Zoning Request – DSF Capital (Metten Tract) Letter of Intent To whom it may concern, Please let this letter serve as the Letter of Intent for the PD Zoning amendment associated with the proposed development located at the SE corner of Frontier Parkway and Dallas Parkway. The subject tract is currently zoned PD-69-Retail. The purpose of the planned development amendment is to request a specific use permit for a proposed retail development and modification to a few landscape requirements associated with the project. It is intended to utilize the Town’s base standards and incorporate some additional uses and criteria which will better position the proposed development due to proximity to the future Tollway. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Matt Moore, P.E. Claymoore Engineering, Inc. 301 S. Coleman, Suite 40 Prosper, TX 75078 817-281-0572 Page 1120 Item 12. Case Z22-0007 Exhibit C – Planned Development Standards The proposed development will conform to the development standards of the Retail District of the Town of Prosper’s Zoning Ordinance, as it exists or may be amended, and Subdivision Ordinance, as it exists or may be amended, except as otherwise set forth in these Development Standards. 1. Except as noted below, the Tract shall develop in accordance with the Retail District requirements of the Town of Prosper’s Zoning Ordinance, as it exists or may be amended. 2. Development Plans a) Concept Plan: Tract 1 shall be developed in general accordance with the attached concept plan, set forth in Exhibits D. b) Landscape Plan: Tract 1 shall be developed in general accordance with the attached landscape plan, set forth in Exhibit F. 3. TRACT 1 & 2 Retail A. Permitted Uses: In addition to those permitted uses as allowed per the Retail District of the Town of Prosper Zoning Ordinance, the following use shall be permitted in the retail areas indicated on Exhibit" D". Uses followed by an S are only permitted by Specific Use Permit. Uses followed by a C are permitted subject to the conditional standards in the Town’ s Zoning Ordinance: Tract 1 a) Big Box on Lot 5 as shown on Exhibit D. b) Restaurant with drive-through to be incorporated with the big box on Lot 5 as shown on Exhibit D. c) Convenience Store with Gas Pumps and or Gas Pumps – In addition to conditional standards, shall only be allowed on Lot 5 as shown on Exhibit D. d) Car Wash (Accessory Use to Convenience Store with Gas Pumps and or Gas Pumps) on Lot 5 as shown on Exhibit D. e) Outdoor Merchandise Display, Incidental on Lot 5 as shown on Exhibit D. Tract 2 a) Hotels – C b) Theater, Regional c) Research & Development Center – S d) Automobile Repair, Minor – In addition to conditional standards, shall not be located within 230 feet of residentially zoned property e) Automobile Parts Sales – Shall not be located within 230 feet of residentially zoned property f) Restaurant – In addition to conditional standards, shall not be located within 230 feet of residentially zoned property. g) Retail Shops and Stores – In addition to conditional standards, shall not be located within 230 feet of residentially zoned property. Page 1121 Item 12. B. Max. FAR: Max. FAR for buildings taller than two (2) stories shall be 1.5:1. Max. FAR for all other buildings shall be 0.4:1. C. Building Heights: The permitted height of all buildings within the retail areas of the Planned Development District shall be as follows: a) The allowed height for Hotels, Office buildings, and Hospitals located within the retail tract shall be eight (8) stories, not greater than one hundred (100) feet. All other uses shall be limited to two (2) stories, not greater than forty (40) feet. b) Non-residential buildings located within one hundred fifty feet (150') of a single- family zoned area shall be limited to a maximum height of two (2) stories, not greater than forty (40) feet. c) Non-residential buildings, which exceed two (2) stories in height, shall be required to have additional setbacks from single- family zoned areas. These additional setbacks will require one foot (1') of setback, beyond the aforementioned one hundred fifty feet (150'), for each additional foot of building height above two (2) stories. d) Only one-story structures are allowed within 84 feet of the south property line of Tract 2. D. Landscape Standards: a) 25’ of the required 30’ Landscape Buffer to be allowed within the 100’ Drainage Easement Along Frontier Parkway. Landscaping Proposed will comply with the Town of Prosper’s Zoning Ordinance. b) Required Foundation Plantings trees to be placed elsewhere on the site on Lot 5 as shown on Exhibit D. c) No Trees to be located within 150’ of the front doors of the proposed big box building on Lot 5. The required trees within 150’ of the front door to be place somewhere else on the site. d) The required trees may be planted in groups with appropriate spacing for species both Tract 1 & 2. e) Earthen berms are not required along Frontier Parkway for both Tract 1 & 2. f) In Tract 2, a 30-foot landscape buffer shall be provided adjacent to residentially zoned property. g) In Tract 2, Perimeter landscaping adjacent to residentially zoned property shall consist of a double row of Nellie R Stevens Holly or Eastern Red Cedar trees, or similar as approved by the Parks Department, planted on 15-foot-centers, minimum of eight feet (8’) in height at the time of planting, in addition to canopy tees as require by the Zoning Ordinance. 1. The landscape buffer and associated planting shall be provided in conjunction with the first development that occurs within Tract 2. E. Screening: a) Dumpster enclosures shall not be permitted within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property for retail/restaurant uses. b) An eight- foot (8’) ornamental metal fence shall be required along the east property line for a minimum distance of 200 feet and commencing at the southeast corner of the subject property. 1. The ornamental metal fence shall be provided in conjunction with the first development that occurs within Tract 2. c) In Tract 1 - Loading docks, truck parking, trash collection, dumpsters, and other service functions shall be incorporated into the overall design of the building or placed behind or on the side of a building and screened to not be seen from the rights-of-way. On corner lots, these areas shall be located behind the buildings. d) In Tract 1 - Roofs shall be designed and constructed in such a way that they acknowledge their visibility from other buildings and from the street. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be adequately screened with durable material that is architecturally compatible with the building design. Screening shall insure mechanical equipment cannot be seen from the public right of way Page 1122 Item 12. Additional Regulations: 1. Restaurant, Drive-Thru Service Where site conditions permit, drive-thru queuing lanes shall be designed so that the queuing wraps behind the building instead of in front of the building. If the queue lane wraps in the front of the building, the site shall provide for an ample amount of landscaping that will provide a buffer from the public rights-of-way. In additional to the condition standards, there shall be a maximum of two drive-thru restaurants permitted for every 5 acres on a PD development plan. Drive throughs associated with an anchor tenant (50,000 gross square feet or larger) are excluded provided the drive through is supporting an accessory use such as pharmacy, or restaurant. 2. Big Box with Gas Pumps a. The design of pump islands and canopy should be architecturally integrated with other structures on-site using similar colors, materials, and architectural detailing. All signage should be architecturally integrated with their surroundings in terms of size, shape and lighting so that they do not visually compete with architecture of the building and design of the sight. 3. Include Public Art in Gateway Areas to promote vitality and provide a unique sense of identity. Art can be an expression of a collective community identity. It can celebrate what is unique about a community and honor the past and present heritage. Art can include references to the Town’s geography, history, landmarks, ethnic and cultural diversity which can increase a sense of belonging when people can associate themselves with a place. a. Art should be integrated into the community fabric of the Tollway and should be used to mark significant intersections of the Tollway. b. Developers should incorporate artist into the design team from the inception of planning to integrate works of art into their projects. c. Stand-alone public art can also be used and does not necessarily have to be tied to a project. Local artists should be used whenever possible. d. Art may be incorporated into existing structures such as retaining walls or integrated into utility systems to enhance or screen the use of those systems. 4. Site Plan and Elevations for Lot 5 set forth in Exhibit D shall be submitted and approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council. Page 1123 Item 12. LOT 02 ±1.19 AC LOT 01 ±1.59 AC LOT 03 ±1.91 AC LOT 04 ±2.42 AC 267' 258' 258'327'335'256' REMAINDER ±42.23 AC 324'203'264'15' LANDSCAPE EASEMENTLOT 05 ±19.78 AC COLLIN COUNTY VOLUME 5772, PAGE 2404 O.P.R.C.C.T. COLLIN COUNTY VOLUME 5826, PAGE 2101 O.P.R.C.C.T. TREJAX, LP. DOC. NO. 20121206001558000 O.P.R.C.C.T. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 BLOCK E LAKES OF PROSPER NORTH PHASE 2 VOLUME 2015, PAGE 675 P.R.C.C.T. THOMAS MOSEY AND JULIE MOSEY AS TRUSTEE OF THE TRUST AGREEMENT OF THOMAS MOSEY DOC. NO. 20190830001072500 O.P.R.C.C.T. TRACT 2 TOLL SOUTHWEST LLC DOC. NO. 20191125001498990 O.P.R.C.C.T. COLLIN COUNTY VOLUME 5786, PAGE 4659 O.P.R.C.C.T. S 89°18'34" W 2453.23' R=5744.58' D=2°17'26" CB=N 00°24'01" E CL=229.65' A=229.67'///////////////////////////////////////////////////•••••••••DRAINAGE EASEMENT DOC. No. 20201222002309730 O.P.R.C.C.T. (CALLED 3.56 ACRES) PARCEL NO. 12 PERMANENT RIGHT-OF-WAY DOC. No. 20201222002309720 O.P.R.C.C.T. LOT 5, BLOCK X (CALLED 6.034 ACRES) RIGHT-OF-WAY DONATION DOC.NO. 20060425000545800 O.P.R.C.C.T.(N 01°32'32" E)(N 89°54'01"W)DALLAS PARKWAYCONCRETE ROADWAYVARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.(211.14')N 01°32'44" EN 00°44'43" W 764.27'(N 00°44'55" W)N 44°25'23" E 71.45' N 89°25'23" E 417.85' N 86°47'13" E 239.17' N 89°25'23" E 243.00'N 89°39'23" E 1384.64' FRONTIER PARKWAY/CR. 5 VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W. WATERVIEW DRIVE 50' WIDTH R.O.W.KIRKWOOD LANE50' WIDTH R.O.W.50' WIDTH R.O.W.DALLAS PARKWAYCONCRETE ROADWAYVARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.TRACT 2 TOLL SOUTHWEST LLC DOC. NO. 20191125001498990 O.P.R.C.C.T.FRONTIER PARKWAY/CR. 5 VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W. R30'R30'R30'R30' 150' STORAGE110' TRANS. 80' STRG.110' TRANS.80' STRG.110' TRANS.R50' COMMERCIAL COLLECTOR RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION (1.74 ACRES) 365.2' FUTURE 6 LANE DIVIDED THOROUGHFARE FUTURE TRAFFIC SIGNALCITY OF CELINA FH 163.06'EX. LAND USE: UNDEVELOPED EX. ZONING: PD-69 RETAIL PROPOSED LAND USE: RETAIL PROPOSED ZONING: R/PD-69 EX. LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL EX. ZONING: SF-10 PD-8 EX. LAND USE: UNDEVELOPED EX. ZONING: CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL EXIST. POWER POLE (TYP.) FH EXIST. INLET RETENTION POND 30' 15'15' PROPOSED BUILDING 60' R.O.W. 36' F/F R3 0 ' R30'R30' R5 0 'R60' R 3 0 ' R30'R30'R3 0 ' R30' R30' R 3 0 ' R 3 0 'R3 0 'R30'R30'R30'R30'R 3 0 'R30'R3 0 'R30'R30'R30'R6 0 '30'R5' R30' 30'30'30'30'R30' R 3 0 '80' STRG.110' TRANS.80' STRG.110' TRANS.19' 19' TYP. 38' TYP.18' TYP.9' TYP . 38' TYP. 19' TYP. 18' TYP.9' TYP .18'9'9' 9'12'12'5'9'9'5'9'9'R10'R10'R10'R10'R10' R 1 0 ' R 1 0 ' 26' 20'9'R30'R 1 0 'R2 5 ' 12' 30'187.98'FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH FH CAR WASH 5-PUMP GAS 435.27'308.34'127.97'TRUCK DOCK COMPACTOR W/12' HIGH SCREENWALL CONDENSER UNITS TRANSFORMER PHARMACY DRIVE-THRU CURBSIDE PICKUP 36' F/F 60' R.O.W.8'8' 6' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXIST. POWER POLE (TYP.) FH FH FH FH 196.51'GENERATOR W/12' HIGH SCREENWALL EXIST. INLET EXIST. INLET NO TRUCKS SIGN SECONDARY FUTURE DRIVE-THRU MASONRY SCREEN WALL 6' WIDE MEANDERING SIDEWALK 6' WIDE MEANDERING SIDEWALK30' LANDSCAPEEASEMENT5'30' LANDSCAPEEASEMENT5'100' DRNG.EASEMENTR5 0 ' FH 10' WIDE TRAIL 20' SAN. SEW. ESMT 30' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT 30' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT R80' TRUCK MANEUVERING AREA 5' LANDSCAPE SETBACK CANOPY FUEL TANKS ±160 SF KIOSK30'CART CORRAL (TYP.) NUM. AND LOC. TBDR3 0 ' R30' R30' 24'EXHIBIT DSP-2 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch = ft. 100 100 200 100 50 DATENo.REVISIONBYDATE: SHEET CASE NO. CHECKED: MAM DRAWN:DC DESIGN:PROSPER COMMERCIALBEING PART OF 70.91 ACRES OF LANDOUT OF COLLIN COUNTY SCHOOL LANDSURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 147PROSPER, TEXAS1903 CENTRAL DRIVE, SUITE #406PHONE: 817.281.0572BEDFORD, TX 76021 WWW.CLAYMOOREENG.COMTEXAS REGISTRATION #14199 MAM 5/6/2022 PRELIMINARY CLAYMOORE ENGINEERING LEGEND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PARKING COUNT PROPOSED FIRE LANE STRIPING SITE PLAN NOTES: 1.DUMPSTERS AND TRASH COMPACTORS SHALL BE SCREENED PER THE ZONING ORDINANCE. 2.OPEN STORAGE, WHERE PERMITTED, SHALL BE SCREENED PER THE ZONING ORDINANCE. 3.OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LIGHTING AND GLARE STANDARDS CONTAINED WITHIN THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. 4.LANDSCAPING SHALL CONFORM TO LANDSCAPE PLANS APPROVED BY THE TOWN. 5.ALL ELEVATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS CONTAINED WITHIN THE ZONING ORDINANCE. 6.BUILDINGS OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET OR GREATER SHALL BE 100% FIRE SPRINKLED. ALTERNATIVE FIRE PROTECTION MEASURES MAY BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. 7.OCCUPANT NOTIFICATION PER THIS SECTION AND 907.5 SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR EXISTING CONSTRUCTION COMPLYING WITH THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, FOR RENOVATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDINGS, TENANT SPACES, CHANGES IN OCCUPANCY, REPLACEMENT OR MODIFICATION OF THE EXISTING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM, OR AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE CODE OFFICIAL, FOR ALL BUILDINGS OR SPACES PROVIDED WITH AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM. 8.FIRE LANES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED PER TOWN STANDARDS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. 9.TWO POINTS OF ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE PROPERTY AT ALL TIMES. 10.SPEED BUMPS/HUMPS ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHIN A FIRE LANE. 11.FIRE LANES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 150 FEET OF ALL EXTERIOR WALLS OF ANY BUILDING FOR HOSE LAY REQUIREMENTS. AMENDMENT 503.1.1 12.THE FIRE LANE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 24 FEET WIDE. AMENDMENT 503.2.1 13.BUILDINGS MORE THAN 30 FEET IN HEIGHT ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF A 26-FOOT WIDE FIRE LANE IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY FOR FIREFIGHTING OPERATIONS OF THE BUILDING. ONE OF THE 26-FOOT WIDE FIRE LANES SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET FROM THE BUILDING AND NO MORE THAN 30 FEET. APPENDIX D105 14.THE INSIDE TURNING RADIUS OF THE 24-FOOT FIRE LANE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 30 FEET. AMENDMENT 503.2.4 15.THE INSIDE TURNING RADIUS OF THE 26-FOOT FIRE LANE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 30 FEET. AMENDMENT 503.2.4 16.DEAD-END FIRE LANES ARE ONLY PERMITTED WITH APPROVED HAMMERHEADS. 17.FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE ENTRANCES AND INTERSECTIONS. AMENDMENT 507.5.1 18.AS PROPERTIES DEVELOP, FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AT ALL INTERSECTING STREETS AND THE MAXIMUM SPACING SHALL BE EVERY 300 FEET (300') FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS, AND FACILITIES OTHER THAN R3. R-3 DEVELOPMENTS SHALL BE EVERY 500 FEET (500'). DISTANCES BETWEEN HYDRANTS SHALL BE MEASURED ALONG THE ROUTE THAT FIRE HOSE IS LAID BY A FIRE APPARATUS FROM HYDRANT–TO-HYDRANT, NOT AS THE "CROW FLIES." AMENDMENT 507.5.1 19.FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND 50 FEET OF A FIRE LANE. 5” STORZ, 30-DEGREE DOWNWARD TURN WITH LOCKING CAP. AMENDMENT 507.5.1 20.FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 2 FOOT (2') TO 6 FOOT (6') BACK FROM THE CURB OR FIRE LANE AND SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN THE BULB OF A CUL-DE-SAC. AMENDMENT 507.5.1 21.THERE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) FIRE HYDRANTS SERVING EACH PROPERTY WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED DISTANCES LISTED ABOVE. A MINIMUM OF ONE FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE LOCATED ON EACH LOT. AMENDMENT 507.5.1 22.A MINIMUM 10-FOOT UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND A BUILDING FOR ADEQUATE FIRE DEPARTMENT ABOVE. A CONTINUOUS ROW OF PARKING AND LANDSCAPING SHALL BE CONSIDERED A BARRIER. AMENDMENT 503.1.1 23.THE MAXIMUM DEAD- END CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH SHALL NOT EXCEED SIX HUNDRED FEET (600') AS MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE INTERSECTION STREET TO THE CENTER POINT OF THE RADIUS. AMENDMENT 503.1.5 24.ONE-AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AUTOMATIC FIRE SYSTEMS. AUTOMATIC FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS PER NFPA 13D OR NFPA 13R SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL ONE-AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS WITH A CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA OF 5,500 SQUARE FEET (511 M2) OR GREATER, DWELLINGS THREE (3) STORIES OR GREATER, OR DWELLINGS WITH ROOF HEIGHTS EXCEEDING THIRTY-FIVE FEET (35') FROM GRADE. IRC-2015 AMENDMENT R313.2 25.HANDICAPPED PARKING AREAS AND BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY SHALL CONFORM TO THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) AND WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT, ADOPTED BUILDING CODE. 26.ALL SIGNAGE IS SUBJECT TO BUILDING OFFICIAL APPROVAL. 27.ALL FENCES AND RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND ARE SUBJECT TO BUILDING OFFICIAL APPROVAL. 28.ALL EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS ARE SUBJECT TO BUILDING OFFICIAL APPROVAL AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROVED FAÇADE PLAN. 29.SIDEWALKS OF NOT LESS THAN SIX (6) FEET IN WIDTH ALONG THOROUGHFARES AND COLLECTORS AND FIVE (5) FEET IN WIDTH ALONG RESIDENTIAL STREETS AND BARRIER-FREE RAMPS AT ALL CURB CROSSINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED PER TOWN STANDARDS. 30.APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN IS NOT FINAL UNTIL ALL ENGINEERING PLANS ARE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. 31.SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE THE GRADING RELEASE. 32.ALL NEW ELECTRICAL LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND/OR RELOCATED UNDERGROUND. 33.ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW PER THE ZONING ORDINANCE. 34.ALL LANDSCAPE EASEMENTS MUST BE EXCLUSIVE OF ANY OTHER TYPE OF EASEMENT. 35.IMPACT FEES WILL BE ASSESSED PER THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION(S) IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE DATA SUMMARY TABLE; HOWEVER, CHANGES TO THE PROPOSED LAND USE AT THE TIME OF CO AND/OR FINISH-OUT PERMIT MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEES AND/OR PARKING REQUIREMENTS. 36.THE APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN SHALL BE EFFECTIVE FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION, AT THE END OF WHICH TIME THE APPLICANT MUST HAVE SUBMITTED AND RECEIVED THE APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING PLANS AND BUILDING PERMITS. IF THE ENGINEERING PLANS AND BUILDING PERMITS ARE NOT APPROVED, THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL, TOGETHER WITH ANY PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY, IS NULL AND VOID. COUNTY SURVEY:ABSTRACT NO. COLLIN COUNTY SCHOOL 147 CITY:STATE: TOWN OF PROSPER TEXAS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OWNER: APPLICANT/ENGINEER: CLAYMOORE ENGINEERING, INC. 301 S COLEMAN, SUITE 40 PROSPER, TX 75078 PH: 817.201.6982 PD CASE #: Z22-0007 CONTACT NAME: MATT MOORE COLLIN BEING PART OF 70.91 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE COLLIN COUNTY SCHOOL LAND SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 147, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS ARCHITECT O'BRIEN ARCHITECTS 5800 DEMOCRACY DRIVE, SUITE 200B PLANO, TX 75024 PH: 972.788.1010 CONTACT NAME: ACCORDING TO MAP NO. 48085C0115J, DATED 06/02/2009 OF THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM MAP, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP OF COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION, THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN ZONE "X", (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE OF THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN). FLOODPLAIN NOTE TYPICAL INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND 13' 38' R 3 . 0 ' 352 S. F. LAN D S C A P E 18" CONC .STRIP SEE DETAIL DNT FRONTIER, LP 4303 W LOVERS LANE, SUITE 200 DALLAS, TX 75209 PH: 817.201.6982 CONTACT NAME: DAVID FOGEL 9' CONCEPTUAL ONLY ALL DEVELOPMENT SHALL FOLLOW THE TOWN OF PROSPER ZONING ORDINANCE AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE Page 1124 Item 12. Exhibit E – DSF Retail Development Schedule It is anticipated that the sanitary sewer line needed to serve this property will be installed by March 2024. Currently, it is anticipated that design of the retail building will occur in 2023 and construction will commence in 2024. Page 1125 Item 12. REHXOFAETETH IT E SK CT ERAC STIEGRREBLCANDSDREEM.LTAPEE SAS T 99305.13.22LP.01MEEKS DESIGN GROUP, INC.1755 N. COLLINS BLVD.RICHARDSON, TX 75080P: (972) 690-7474F: (972) 690-7878SUITE 30003.22.22CITY SUBMITTAL05.06.22CITY RESUBMITTAL05.15.22CITY RESUBMITTALCITY SUBMITTAL PLANN 60 1200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 60'-0" (45) ORNAMENTAL TREE SCREEN PER REQUIREMENTS LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TABLE TOTAL SITE AREA: 3,088,839.6 SF SPECIFIC AREA: 862,923.6 SF DALLAS PARKWAY FRONTAGE:416 LF FRONTIER PARKWAY FRONTAGE:338 LF # OF PARKING SPACES:778 PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS DALLAS PARKWAY REQUIREMENT: 30' LANDSCAPE EDGE (1) 3" CAL. SHADE TREE (OR 3 ORNAMENTALS) AND (15) 5 GAL. SHRUBS PER 30 LF OF FRONTAGE 416 LF / 30 = (13.9) 3" CAL. SHADE AND X 15 = (207.9) 5 GAL. SHRUBS PROVIDED: (9) 3" SHADE TREES, (15) ORNAMENTAL TREES SUBSTITUTING FOR 5SHADE TREES, AND (210) 5 GAL. SHRUBS ALONG DALLAS PARKWAY FRONTIER PARKWAY REQUIREMENT: 30' LANDSCAPE EDGE (1) 3" CAL. SHADE TREE AND (15) 5 GAL. SHRUBS PER 30 LF OF FRONTAGE 338 LF / 30 = (11.3) 3" CAL. SHADE AND X 15 = (168.9) 5 GAL. SHRUBS PROVIDED: (12) 3" SHADE TREES AND (169) 5 GAL. SHRUBS ALONG FRONTIER PARKWAY EASTERN PERIMETER: REQUIREMENT: 15' LANDSCAPE EDGE (1) 3" CAL. SHADE TREE AND (15) 5 GAL. SHRUBS PER 30 LF OF FRONTAGE 821 LF / 30 = (27.36) 3" CAL. SHADE AND X 15 = (410.49) 5 GAL. SHRUBS PROVIDED: (27) 3" SHADE TREES AND (411) 5 GAL. SHRUBS ALONG FRONTIER PARKWAY SOUTHERN AND LOTS 1,2,3,4 PERIMETER: REQUIREMENT: 5' SET BACK WITH 15' LANDSCAPE EDGE SMALL TREE AND (1) 5 GAL. SHRUBS PER 15 LF PROVIDED: (1) SMALL TREES AND (1) 5 GAL. SHRUBS CLUSTERED IN GROUPS TO MEET PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS DRIVE-THRU REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENT: MIN. 10' WIDE LANDSCAPE ISLAND PROVIDED: 10' WIDE LANDSCAPE ISLAND REQUIREMENT: 3" CAL ORNAMENTAL TREE PLANTED 15' O.C. WITH MIN. 5 GAL. SHRUBS PLANTED 3' O.C. PROVIDED: DRIVE-THRU REQUIREMENTS MET WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TREES WITHIN 150' OF FRONT DOORS.. PER APPROVAL, TREES WERE RELOCATED TO ANOTHER LOCATION TO SCREEN DRIVE-THRU INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT: (15) SF. OF PERMEABLE LANDSCAPE FOR EACH PARKING SPACE 778 SPACES X 8 SF = 11,670 SF OF PERMEABLE LANDSCAPE PROVIDED: 48,824.88 SF REQUIREMENT: (1) SHADE TREE PER EVERY LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND WITHIN 150 FT. OF EVERY PARKING SPACE PROVIDED: (1) SHADE TREE IN EVERY ISLAND (EXCEPT THOSE WITHIN 150 FT. OF BUILDING FACE) AND ALL PARKING SPACES WITHIN 150 FT. OF A SHADE TREE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT: 7% OF LOT AREA IS REQUIRED TO BE OPEN SPACE. THIS SPACE SHALL NOT CONSIST OF VEHICULAR PAVING, PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, BUILDING FOOTPRINT, LANDSCAPE EDGE, OR SIDEWALKS PROVIDED: MORE THAN 7% OF OPEN SPACE PROVIDED BUILDING LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT: (1) LARGE 3" CAL. TREE FOR EVERY 10,000 SQ. FT. OF BUILDING AREA 108,418.67 / 10,000 = 10.8 TREES PROVIDED: 11 TREES 6' WIDE SIDEWALK INTERIOR PARKING TREE (PT) (TYP.) LANDSCAPE HYDROZONE SCHEDULE (LWR): SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER: 1.25 X [(55.85 X 0.5) - 8.7] x 17,845 / 1.604 = 267,355.14 GAL. WARM SEASON TURFGRASS: 1.33 X [(55.85 X 0.6) - 8.7] x 258,522.6 / 1.604 = 5,318,296.5 GAL. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MEEKS DESIGN GROUP, INC. 1755 N. COLLINS BLVD., STE 300 RICHARDSON, TEXAS 75080 PH: (972) 690-7474 CONTACT: HERB MEEKS hmeeks@mdgland.com OWNER/APPLICANT HEB GROCERY CO. 3890 NORTHWEST HWY., STE 300 DALLAS, TEXAS 75075 PH: (214) 680-7600 CONTACT: JOHN E. ROSE III, P.E. rose.john@heb.com PROPERTY LINE SOD (TYP.) GROUNDCOVER (TYP.) PARKING LOT SHRUB (TYP.) REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SHRUBS LOCATED 10' INTO DRAINAGE EASEMENT 30'-0"FIRELANEEASEMENT(TYP.)SAN. SEWER SIZE METER DOM.IRR. METER WATER ID METER SIZENUMBER WATER METER SCHEDULE 3 12" PT //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••DALLAS PARKWAYCONCRETE ROADWAYVARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.FRONTIER PARKWAY/CR. 5 VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W./////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// //////••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••DALLAS PARKWAYCONCRETE ROADWAYVARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.FRONTIER PARKWAY/CR. 5 VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W. //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••DALLAS PARKWAYCONCRETE ROADWAYVARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.FRONTIER PARKWAY/CR. 5 VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W./////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// //////PROPERTY LINE PTPT PT PRT PRT PRT PRT PRT PTPRT PRT PRT PRT PRT PRT PT PRT PRT PRT PRT PRT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT S S S S S S S S S SOD (TYP.) SOD AROUND POND (TYP.) LANDSCAPE EDGE SHRUBS 30'-0" LANDSCAPE EDGE VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) W PROSPER TRAIL N COLEMAN STN DALLAS PARKWAYW FRONTIER PARKWAY TALON LANESITE LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 SUPERSTORE LARGE TREE STORE FRONT REQ. (S) 3 REMAINING25' LANDSCAPEEDGE INEASEMENTEXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED PTPT 15'-0" LANDSCAPE EDGE PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PTPT PTPT PTPT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT PT STORE FRONT SHRUBS (TYP.) S5'-0"LANDSCAPEEDGE AT TOPOF BANK10' WIDE SIDEWALK 5'-0"LANDSCAPESETBACK15'-0" LANDSCAPE EDGE 15'-0" MIN. LANDSCAPE EDGE 12 3 ORNAMENTAL TREES SUBSTITUTE W/ RATIO OF 3:1 DUE TO OVERHEAD POWER LINES REQUIRED LANDSCAPE EDGE SHADE TREES IN MIN 5' EDGE AT TOP OF BANK NOTE: INSTALLING THE TREE ON TOP OF BANKS MUST MEET TOWN PLANTING REQUIREMENTS. THE DETAILS FOR THE PLANTING MUST BE PROVIDED WITH THE SITE PLAN AND NEED TO BE APPROVED BY PARKS AND REC.100'DRAINAGEEASEMENT10'-0"PT PT PT PT PT PT PT REQUIRED PERIMETER SHRUBS REQUIRED PERIMETER SHADE TREES DRIVE-THRU SHRUBS 3' O.C. (45) SHRUB SCREEN PER REQUIREMENTS15'-0"LANDSCAPEEDGE(16) PARKING ISLAND TREES RELOCATED DUE TO REQUIREMENT OF NO TREES WITHIN 150' OF FRONT DOORS (PRT) PT PT PRT PRT PRTPRTPRT (7) DRIVE-THRU ISLAND ORNAMENTAL TREES 15' O.C. RELOCATED DUE TO REQUIREMENT OF NO TREES WITHIN 150' OF FRONT DOORS (DRT) 6' WIDE SIDEWALK DRIVE-THRU ORNAMENTAL TREES 15' O.C.150'-0" CIRCLESAROUND FRONTDOORS - NO TREESWITHIN CIRCLESNOTE: LANDSCAPE EASEMENT FOR THE WEST AND THE EAST WILL NOT OVERLAP THE UTILITY EASEMENT NOTE: THIS IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND THE DETAILS PER THE PD AND TOWN ORDINANCES WILL BE PROVIDED WITH THE SP / PSP RETENTIONPOND NOTE: NO POWER POLE IS ALLOWED IN THE TRAIL (22)ORNAMENTAL TREE SCREEN PER REQUIREMENTS (22) SHRUB SCREEN PER REQUIREMENTS (13) ORNAMENTAL TREE SCREEN PER REQUIREMENTS (13) SHRUB SCREEN PER REQUIREMENTS (13) ORNAMENTAL TREE SCREEN PER REQUIREMENTS (13) SHRUB SCREEN PER REQUIREMENTS (5) MORE PARKING ISLAND TREES RELOCATED DUE TO REQUIREMENT OF NO TREES WITHIN 150' OF FRONT DOORS (PRT) Page 1126 Item 12. Page 1 of 2 To: Mayor and Town Council From: David Soto, Planning Manager Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Hulon T. Webb, Jr., Interim Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure Services Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon an ordinance amending Planned Development-94 (PD-94), for the Westside Development, on 64.5± acres, northeast corner of US 380 and FM 1385, regarding hotel uses and development standards. (Z22-0001). Description of Agenda Item: On April 26, 2022, the Town Council approved the proposed rezoning request, by a vote of 6-0 subject to: 1. Approval of a Development Agreement to prohibit certain business establishments for Lots 15 & 16. Per the discussions at the June 14, 2022, Town Council meeting, Staff has made the following corrections: 1. Exhibit C, Paragraph A2.2.a: Changed wording from two (2) limited service hotels to one (1) extended stay hotel. Also, added clarification extended stay hotel can be developed on either Lot 15 or Lot 16. 2. Exhibit C, Paragraph B2.1: Confirmed that Lot 8 and Lot 15 are correct lot designations as called out in original PD. Also, added clarification extended stay hotel can be developed on either Lot 15 or Lot 16. 3. Exhibit C, Paragraph A5.1.a.ii: Changed timing of the construction of urban park open space from Phase 1 to prior to any construction of Phase 1B. 4. Exhibit C, Paragraph B5.1.a.ii: Changed timing of the construction of urban park open space from Phase 1 to prior to any construction of Phase 1B. 5. Exhibit F: Added missing elevations. An ordinance has been prepared accordingly. The Development Agreement between the Town of Prosper and Alpha3 Prosper RI, LLC, is also on the June 28, 2022, Town Council agenda for consideration. Prosper is a place where everyone matters. PLANNING Page 1127 Item 13. Page 2 of 2 Legal Obligations and Review: Town Attorney, Terrence Welch of Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P., has approved the standard ordinance as to form and legality. Attached Documents: 1. Ordinance Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of an ordinance to amend Planned Development-94 (PD-94), for the Westside Development, on 64.5± acres, northeast corner of US 380 and FM 1385, regarding hotel uses and development standards Proposed Motion: I move to approve an ordinance to amend Planned Development-94 (PD-94), for the Westside Development, on 64.5± acres, northeast corner of US 380 and FM 1385, regarding hotel uses and development standards. Page 1128 Item 13. TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 2022-___ AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY REZONING A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF 64.501 ACRES, SITUATED IN THE J. GONZALEZ SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 447, THE B. HODGES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 593, THE P. BARNES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 79, THE R.TAYLOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1671, THE J. HAYNES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 573 AND THE ANGUS JAMISON SURVEY, TOWN OF PROSPER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-94 (PD-94) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-94; DESCRIBING THE TRACT TO BE REZONED; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR REPEALING, SAVING AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Prosper, Texas (the “Town Council”), has investigated and determined that the Zoning Ordinance should be amended; and WHEREAS, the Town of Prosper, Texas (“Prosper”) has received a request (Case Z22- 0001) from Perry Molubhoy and Shiva Kondru (“Applicants”), to rezone 64.601 acres of land, more or less, in the J. Gonzalez Survey, Abstract No. 447, the B. Hodes Survey, Abstract No. 593, the P. Barnes Survey, Abstract No. 79, the R. Taylor Survey, Abstract No. 1671, the Haynes Survey, Abstract No. 573 and the Angus Jamison Survey, Town of Prosper, Denton County, Texas, from Planned Development-94 to Planned Development-94 (PD-94) and being more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has investigated and determined that the facts contained in the request are true and correct; and WHEREAS, all legal notices required for rezoning have been given in the manner and form set forth by law, Public Hearings have been held, and all other requirements of notice and completion of such procedures have been fulfilled; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has further investigated into and determined that it will be advantageous and beneficial to Prosper and its inhabitants to rezone this property as set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS: SECTION 1 Findings Incorporated. The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2 Amendment to the Town’s Zoning Ordinance. The Town’s Zoning Ordinance, as amended, is hereby amended as follows: The zoning designation of the below described property containing 64.501 acres of land, more or less, in the J. Gonzalez Survey, Abstract No. 447, the Page 1129 Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 2 B. Hodes Survey, Abstract No. 593, the P. Barnes Survey, Abstract No. 79, the R. Taylor Survey, Abstract No. 1671, the Haynes Survey, Abstract No. 573 and the Angus Jamison Survey, Town of Prosper, Denton County, Texas, and all streets, roads, and alleyways contiguous and/or adjacent thereto are hereby zoned as Planned Development-94 and being more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes as if set forth verbatim. The development plans, standards, and uses for the Property in this Planned Development District shall conform to, and comply with (1) the Statement of Intent and Purpose, attached hereto as Exhibit B; (2) the Development Standards, attached hereto as Exhibit C; (3) the Site Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit D; (4) the Development Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit E; (5) the Façade Plans, attached hereto as Exhibit F; and (6) the Landscape Plans, attached hereto as Exhibit G, all of which are incorporated herein for all purposes as if set forth verbatim, subject to the following conditions of approval by the Town Council: 1.Approval of a Development Agreement, which includes but is not limited to, prohibiting certain business establishments. Two (2) original, official, and identical copies of the zoning exhibit map are hereby adopted and shall be filed and maintained as follows: a.One (1) copy shall be filed with the Town Secretary and retained as an original record and shall not be changed in any manner. b.One (1) copy shall be filed with the Building Official and shall be maintained up-to-date by posting thereon all changes and subsequent amendments for observation, issuing building permits, certificates of compliance and occupancy, and enforcing the zoning ordinance. Reproduction for information purposes may from time-to-time be made of the official zoning district map. SECTION 3 No Vested Interest/Repeal. No developer or property owner shall acquire any vested interest in this Ordinance or in any other specific regulations contained herein. Any portion of this Ordinance may be repealed by the Town Council in the manner provided for by law. SECTION 4 Unlawful Use of Premises. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to make use of said premises in some manner other than as authorized by this Ordinance, and shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to construct on said premises any building that is not in conformity with the permissible uses under this Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 5 Penalty. Any person, firm, corporation, or business entity violating this Ordinance or any provision of Prosper’s Zoning Ordinance, as amended, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be fined any sum not exceeding Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each continuing day’s violation under this Ordinance shall constitute a separate offense. The penal provisions imposed under this Ordinance shall not preclude Prosper from Page 1130 Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 3 filing suit to enjoin the violation. Prosper retains all legal rights and remedies available to it pursuant to local, state and federal law. SECTION 6 Severability. Should any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it is expressly provided that any and all remaining portions of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Prosper hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid. SECTION 7 Savings/Repealing Clause. Prosper’s Zoning Ordinance, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this or any other Ordinance. All provisions of any ordinance in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent they are in conflict; but such repeal shall not abate any pending prosecution for violation of the repealed ordinance, nor shall the appeal prevent a prosecution from being commenced for any violation if occurring prior to the repealing of the ordinance. Any remaining portions of said ordinances shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 8 Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its adoption and publications as required by law. DULY PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, ON THIS __ DAY OF JUNE, 2022. ______________________________ David F. Bristol, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Michelle Lewis-Sirianni, Town Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _________________________________ Terrence S. Welch, Town Attorney Page 1131 Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 4 Exhibit A Page 1132 Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 5 EXHIBIT B STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PURPOSE WESTSIDE 1.Statement of Intent A.Overall Intent The purpose of this project is to create a walkable urban neighborhood using a horizontal mix of uses. Access to shopping, housing, community retail and park land promotes a quality of life that nurtures the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, prosperity and general welfare of the immediate community, as well as to assist in the orderly and controlled growth and development of the land area described within this document. B.Description of Property The subject property comprises approximately 64 acres of vacant land at the northeast corner of U.S. Highway 380 and F.M. 1385 in Prosper, Texas. It is additionally bounded by the Glenbrooke single family neighborhood to the north and Doe Branch Creek to the east. An existing trail exists along the property’s north boundary and currently serves the adjacent single family neighborhood. This trail may extend into the Doe Branch drainage system and be part of the larger Town of Prosper Trails Plan. C.Description of Proposed Property The subject property as depicted in Exhibit “D” has been divided into two distinct sub-districts. The purpose of sub-district requirements is to define the character of new development within each sub-district. They have been carefully designed to allow enough flexibility for creative building solutions, while being prescriptive in areas necessary to preserve consistency throughout the development. Given that the subject property resides at the hard corner of two major thoroughfares and will serve as a gateway to the Town of Prosper, a portion of land with a size yet to be determined, will be set aside as a signage easement for a Town gateway sign near the intersection of U.S. 380 and F.M. 1385. 2.Current Zoning and Land Uses A.Current Zoning The subject property comprises land that fall under two distinct zoning classifications. At the intersection of U.S. 380 and F.M. 1385 is a small portion of acreage that zoned for Single Family. The remainder of the property is zoned for Agriculture. B.Future Land Use Plan The Future Land Use Plan designates the entire subject property as US 380 District, which is defined as having a variety of uses, such as big box development, hotels, banks, gas/convenience and residential that serves as a buffer between the commercial and nearby single family. Z22-0001 Page 1133 Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 6 Z22-0001 EXHIBIT C DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WESTSIDE Conformance with the Town’s Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance: Except as otherwise set forth in these Development Standards, the regulations of the Town’s Zoning Ordinance, as it exists or may be amended, and the Subdivision Ordinance, as it exists or may be amended, shall apply. Tract A – Retail District A1. Except as noted below, the Tract shall develop in accordance with the Retail District as it exists or may be amended. A2. Uses. Uses shall be permitted in accordance with the Retail District with the exception of the following: Permitted Uses 1.Restaurant (with Drive-Through) a.A restaurant with drive-through shall be permitted by right in accordance with the Conditional Development Standards, outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. A maximum of two (2)noncontiguous drive-through restaurants shall be permitted along US 380, and a maximum of two (2) drive-through restaurants shall be permitted along FM 1385, as shown on Exhibit D. 2.Hotel, Extended Stay a.An extended stay hotel shall be permitted by right on the subject property, as shown on Exhibit D, on either Lot 15 or Lot 16, and shall otherwise be permitted in accordance with the Conditional Development Standards, outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. Prohibited Uses: 1.Athletic Stadium or Field, Public 2.Automobile Parking Lot/Garage 3.Automobile Paid Parking Lot/Garage 4.Recycling Collection Point 5.School District Bus Yard A3. Regulations. Regulations shall be permitted in accordance with the Retail District with the exception of the following: 1.Maximum Height a. Commercial Amusement, Indoor: Two (2) stories, no greater than fifty (50) feet at the parapet height, with an additional twenty (20) feet above the parapet for a marquee. b. Hotel, Extended Stay: Five (5) stories, no greater than seventy-five (75) feet. i.Minimum height of four (4) stories. A4. Design Guidelines 1.Elevation Review and Approval a.Conceptual Elevations, conforming to Exhibit F, shall be submitted at the time of Preliminary Site Plan, subject to approval by the Planning & Zoning Commission. Page 1134 Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 7 b.Detailed Façade Plans conforming to the Conceptual Elevations shall be submitted for each building at the time of Site Plan, subject to approval by the Planning & Zoning Commission. Façade Plans for the Extended Stay Hotels and the Indoor Commercial Amusement uses shall also be subject to Town Council approval. 2.Architectural Standards a.At least eighty percent (80%) of each building’s façade (excluding doors and windows) shall be finished in one of the following materials: Masonry (brick or stone) i.Commercial Amusement, Indoor may utilize architectural finished concrete as a primary masonry material, and may be used for up to one hundred percent (80%) of a building elevation, as shown on Exhibit F. In addition, a maximum of ten percent (10%) secondary material, and minimum of ten percent (10%) stone, per elevation, shall be required for Commercial Amusement, Indoor. b.For retail/restaurant uses, no more than thirty percent (30%) of each façade elevation shall use wood-based high pressure laminate (i.e. Prodema, Trespa, CompactWood), as shown on Exhibit F. c.No more than fifteen percent (15%) of each façade elevation may use a combination of accent materials such as cedar or similar quality decorative wood, architectural metal panel, tile, stucco, or Exterior Insulating Finishing System (EIFS). Stucco and EIFS may only be used eight feet (8’) above the ground floor and is prohibited on all building elevations with the exception of its use for exterior trim and molding features. Commercial Amusement, Indoor shall be limited to a maximum ten percent (10%). d.Architectural embellishments not intended for human occupancy that are integral to the architectural style of the buildings, including spires, belfries, towers, cupolas, domes, marquees and roof forms whose area in plan is no greater than fifteen percent (15%) of the ground floor footprint may exceed the height limits by up to ten feet (10’). e.No single material shall exceed eighty percent (80%) percent of an elevation area. Except for Commercial Amusement, Indoor, a minimum of twenty percent (20%) of the front façade and all facades facing public right-of-way shall be natural or manufactured stone. A minimum of ten percent (10%) of all other facades shall be natural or manufactured stone. Commercial Amusement, Indoor shall require a minimum ten percent (10%) stone, per elevation. i.All buildings shall be designed to incorporate a form of architectural articulation every thirty feet (30’), both horizontally along each wall’s length and vertically along each wall’s height. Acceptable articulation may include the following: ii.Canopies, awnings, or porticos; iii.Recesses/projections; iv.Arcades; v.Arches; vi.Display windows, including a minimum sill height of thirty (30) inches; vii.Architectural details (such as tile work and moldings) integrated into the building facade; viii.Articulated ground floor levels or base; ix.Articulated cornice line; x.Integrated planters or wing walls that incorporate landscape and sitting areas; xi.Offsets, reveals or projecting rib used to express architectural or structural bays; or xii.Varied roof heights; f.All buildings shall be architecturally finished on all four (4) sides with same materials, detailing, and features. Page 1135 Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 8 g.Except for the Commercial Amusement, Indoor, all primary and secondary exterior building materials (exclusive of glass) shall be of natural texture and shall be neutrals, creams, or other similar, non-reflective earth tone colors. Bright, reflective, pure tone primary or secondary colors, such as red, orange, yellow, blue, violet, or green are not permitted. h.Corporate identities that conflict with the building design criteria shall be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and approved by the Director of Development Services or his/her designee. The applicant may appeal the decision to the Planning & Zoning Commission and Town Council using the appeal procedure in Chapter 4, Section 1 of the Town’s Zoning Ordinance. i.Exposed conduit, ladders, utility boxes, and drain spouts shall be painted to match the color of the building or an accent color. Natural metal finishes (patina) are an acceptable alternative to paint. j.All retail/commercial buildings with facades greater than two hundred feet (200’) in length shall incorporate wall plane projections or recesses that are at least six feet (6’) deep. Projections/recesses must be at least twenty five percent (25%) of the length of the facade. Except for Commercial Amusement, Indoor, no uninterrupted length of facade may exceed one hundred feet (100’) in length. 3.Windows and Doors a.All ground floor front facades of buildings along streets or public ways with on-street parking or that face directly onto Open Space and contain non-residential uses shall have transparent storefront windows covering no less than thirty percent (30%) of the façade area. Hotels shall have no less than ten percent (10%) of the façade. i.Clear glass is required in all non-residential storefronts. Smoked, reflective, or black glass that blocks two-way visibility is only permitted above the first story. Windows shall have a maximum exterior visible reflectivity of thirty percent (30%). 4.Awning, Canopies, Arcades, and Overhangs a.Awnings shall not be internally illuminated. b.Canopies shall not exceed one hundred linear feet (100’) without a break of at least five feet (5’). c.Awnings and canopies shall not extend beyond ten feet (10’) from the main building façade. A5. Additional Standards 1.Open Space a.Urban Open Space i.An open space as depicted on the Landscape Plan (Exhibit G) shall comprise a minimum of one (1) acre of useable land area that will serve as the central park to the commercial development. A minimum of one (1) pedestrian connection shall be required from the Urban Open Space to the Rural Open Space; a minimum of one (1) pedestrian connection shall be required from the Urban Open Space to the Glenbrooke neighborhood via Kent Drive. Gates and/or fencing on any pedestrian or vehicular way accessing Kent Drive shall be prohibited. ii.The urban park open space shall be constructed prior to any construction of Phase 1B. The urban park open space shall be constructed at the developer’s cost. iii.The hike and bike trail system and trailhead shall be constructed at the time of construction of Phase 1B. The hike and bike trail system shall be constructed at the developer’s cost. Page 1136 Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 9 b.Rural Open Space i.An open space as depicted on the Landscape Plan (Exhibit G) shall comprise a minimum of nine (9) acres of useable land area that will serve the greater community with both active and passive open space. c.Combined Urban Open Space and Rural Open Space shall collectively satisfy all Open Space requirements for both Tract A and Tract B as required by the Town of Prosper Zoning Ordinance. 2.Landscape Screening and Buffering a.A thirty-foot (30’) landscape easement shall be required along roadways when an adjacent building sides or backs the road. The landscape buffer shall consist of a minimum three- foot (3’) foot berm. b.A minimum of twenty feet (20’) of landscape easement shall be exclusive of all utility easements, right turn lanes, drainage easements, and rights-of-way. None of the required trees and/or shrubs shall be located within any utility easement. c.A minimum ten-foot (10’) landscape buffer is required adjacent to Urban and Rural Open Space. d.Berming shall be required behind the Entertainment/Indoor Commercial Amusement structure located in Phase 2A as reflected on the Phasing Diagram. 3.Lot Frontage a.Lots are not required to front on a public right-of-way, provided an access easement is established by plat prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for any building on a lot not fronting on right-of-way. 4.Parking Requirement a.Hotel, Extended Stay: One (1) parking space, equivalent to seventy-five percent (75%) of the total number of rooms/keys provided. Parking spaces for Lots 15 and 16 may be shared, provided the minimum requirements per the zoning ordinance and herein are met. Tract B – Multifamily District B1. Except as noted below, the Tract shall develop in accordance with the Multifamily District as it exists or may be amended. B2. Multifamily Construction 1.For Phase 1B, as shown on Exhibit E2, which consists of a maximum of 243 units, construction may not commence until construction of the first floor framing has begun on the restaurant/retail building as shown on Lot 8 on Exhibit D and the Extended Stay Hotel on either Lot 15 or Lot 16 on Exhibit D. 2.For Phase 2B, as shown on Exhibit E2, which consists of a maximum of 237 units, construction may not commence until vertical construction has begun on a minimum fifty thousand (50,000) square foot Indoor Commercial Amusement building or similar size retail building. B3. Regulations. Regulations shall be permitted in accordance with the Multifamily District with the exception of the following: 1. Maximum Number of Units: Four hundred and eighty (480) units. Page 1137 Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 10 2.Maximum Height: a.Two (2) stories, no greater than forty feet (40’) for buildings within one hundred (100) feet of a single family zoning district. b.Three (3) stories, no greater than fifty feet (50’). c.Four (4) stories, no greater than sixty-five feet (65’). 3.Size of Yards a.In accordance with Exhibit D. 4.Minimum Dwelling Area a.One (1) bedroom: 650 square feet b.Two (2) bedroom: 925 square feet c.Three (3) bedroom: 1,150 square feet 5.Lot Coverage: Maximum fifty percent (50%) B4. Design Guidelines 1.Elevation Review and Approval a.Conceptual Elevations, conforming to Exhibit F, shall be submitted at the time of Preliminary Site Plan, subject to approval by the Planning & Zoning Commission. b.Detailed Façade Plans conforming to the Conceptual Elevations shall be submitted for each building at the time of Site Plan, subject to approval by the Planning & Zoning Commission. 2.Architectural Standards a.At least eighty percent (80%) of each building’s façade (excluding doors and windows) shall be finished in one of the following materials: Masonry (brick and stone). b.No more than fifteen percent (15%) of each façade elevation shall use a combination of accent materials such as cedar or similar quality decorative wood, fiber cement siding, resin- impregnated wood panel system, cementitious-fiber clapboard (not sheet) with at least a fifty (50) year warranty, architectural metal panel, split-face concrete block, tile, stucco, or Exterior Insulating Finishing System (EIFS). Stucco and EIFS may only be used eight feet (8’) above the ground floor and is prohibited on all building elevations with the exception of its use for exterior trim and molding features. c.Any enclosed one or two-car garage shall be designed and constructed of the same material as the primary building. B5. Additional Standards 1.Open Space a.Urban Open Space i.An open space as depicted on the Landscape Plan (Exhibit G) shall comprise a minimum of one (1) acre of useable land area that will serve as the central park to the commercial development. A minimum of one (1) pedestrian connection shall be required from the Urban Open Space to the Rural Open Space; a minimum of one (1) pedestrian connection shall be required from the Urban Open Space to the Glenbrooke neighborhood via Kent Drive. Gates and/or fencing on any pedestrian or vehicular way accessing Kent Drive shall be prohibited. ii.The urban park open space shall be constructed prior to any construction of Phase 1B. The urban park open space shall be constructed at the developer’s cost. Page 1138 Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 11 iii.The hike and bike trail system and trailhead shall be constructed at the time of construction of Phase 1B. The hike and bike trail system shall be constructed at the developer’s cost. b.Rural Open Space i.An open space as depicted on the Landscape Plan (Exhibit G) shall comprise a minimum of nine (9) acres of useable land area that will serve the greater community with both active and passive open space. c.Combined Urban Open Space and Rural Open Space shall collectively satisfy all Open Space requirements for both Tract A and Tract B as required by the Town of Prosper Zoning Ordinance. 2.Landscape Screening and Buffering a.As depicted on the Landscape Plan (Exhibit G), two (2) rows of minimum three inch (3”) caliper trees every fifty feet (50’) on center, offset, shall be planted along the northern property line. b.A minimum of twenty feet (20’) of landscape easement shall be exclusive of all utility easements, right turn lanes, drainage easements, and rights-of-way. None of the required trees and/or shrubs shall be located within any utility easement, except for the twenty-five foot (25’) UTRWD utility easement that currently resides immediately south of the property’s north property line. c.A minimum ten-foot (10’) landscape buffer is required adjacent to Rural Open Space. 3.Lot Frontage a.Lots are not required to front on a public right-of-way, provided an access easement is established by plat prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for any building on a lot not fronting on right-of-way. 4.Parking a.Minimum “Off-Street” Parking. For the purpose of this ordinance, off-street parking shall mean any parking not located immediately adjacent to and along public drives (i.e. parallel parking) used for internal circulation throughout the development. i.One (1) and two (2) bedroom units: 1.8 parking spaces per unit. ii.Three (3) bedroom units: 2.0 parking spaces per unit. b.Tandem parking shall count towards the parking provided for each designated tract or phase that the parking resides within. c.Surface parallel parking that is provided along interior drives shall count towards the parking provided for each designated tract or phase that the parking resides within. 5.The provisions of Chapter 4, Section 9.14 (Non-Residential and Multifamily Development Adjacent to a Major Creek) shall apply to the proposed development. 6.The provisions of Chapter 4, Section 9.16 (Residential Open Space) shall apply to the proposed development. Page 1139 Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 12 7.The provision of Chapter 4, Section 9.17 (Multifamily Site Design) shall not apply to the proposed development. Page 1140 Item 13. Scale: 1"=100' September, 2018 SEI Job No. 17-219 SHT. 1 OF 8 TOWN OF PROSPER CASE NO. Z18-0012 Exhibit D Conceptual Plan WestSide BLOCK A, LOTS 1-19 BEING 64.501 ACRES OF LAND (GROSS) 63.858 ACRES OF LAND (NET) IN THE B. HODGES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 593 & IN THE J. GONZALEZ SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 447 & IN THE P. BARNES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 79 & IN THE R. TAYLOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1671 & IN THE J. HAYNES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 573 & IN THE ANGUS JAMISON SURVEY TOWN OF PROSPER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS LOCATION MAP 1" = 2000' PROJECT LOCATION APPLICANT MCF Investments 15700 S.H. 121 Frisco, Texas 75035 Telephone (214) 619-4930 Contact: Mike Fannin ENGINEER / SURVEYOR Spiars Engineering, Inc. 765 Custer Road, Suite 100 Plano, TX 75075 Telephone: (972) 422-0077 TBPE No. F-2121 / TBPLS No. F-10043100 Contact: Kevin Wier OWNER Taylor Hansel P.O. Box 770 Frisco, Texas75034var. width R.O.W.variable width R.O.W.Doc. No. 2012-59927OPRDCT 50' R.O W 50' R.O.W.Doc. No. 2012-59927OPRDCTCab. XPg 7 1 7P RDCTCab. XPg 7 17P R D C T 50' R. 1:250; 1:100; 1:350; REFER TO SHEET A0.2A 68,396 35,482RESTAURANT/RETAIL/OFFICE/SERVICEENTRY RESIDENCE INN BY MARRIOTTBUILDINGAREA:+/-96,750SQ.F.4 STORIES 124 ROOMS Z22-0001 MAYSE & ASSOCIATES ONLY ADJUSTED LOT 15 AND 16.THE REST BY OTHERS AND PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LOT 15LOT 161 01/27/2022 ADJUSTED LOT 15&16 RETAIL/RESTAURANT/ OFFICE 1.2 10,85852,296 123,227 10,858 27,780 96,750 124 N/A 55' 40' 1 SPACE PER GUESTROOM 124 100 163 SHARED PARKING 6 6 6,229+/- 27,051+/- 1 1:250; 1:100; 1:350; REFER TO SHEET A0.2A 63 22.5% 20.7% 0.78:1 0.20:1 1 1 96,176+/- 46,067+/- Page 1141 Item 13. N 17°14'23"E 426.71'N17°14'23"E19.26'S 72°45'37"E 179.77'S 72°45'37"E 37.06'S 89°04'33"E 189.30'S 72°45'37"E 52.30'N 89°04'33"W 472.97'N 17°14'23"E 310.52'R=500.00'D=6°24'08"L=55.87'CB= S14°02'19"WCD=55.84'6839R 30' - 0"RESTAURANT/RETAIL/OFFICE/SERVICEENTRY18' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0"RESIDENCE INN BY MARRIOTTBUILDING AREA: +/-96,750 SQ.F.4 STORIES 124 ROOMS 25' - 5 1/2"EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTEXISTING FIRE HYDRANT13' - 3"4975885939993699873R 30' - 0"R 3 0 ' - 0 "R 30' - 0"R 30' - 0"12' - 0"1028' - 5 1/2"DOG PARK15' - 7"12' - 7"27' - 7"24' - 7"24' - 7"27' - 7"24' - 7"5' -0" LANDSCAPE SET BACK5' - 0"5' -0" LANDSCAPE SET BACK5' -0" LANDSCAPE SET BACK5' - 0"FIRE HYDRANTPROPOSED NEW FIRE HYDRANTR 30' - 0"TYP.9' - 0"9' - 0"1010526' - 0"6' - 0"18' - 0"26' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"24' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"26' - 0"18' - 0"10' - 0"56' - 5"3' - 6"8' - 0"R 3 0 ' - 0 "9' - 0"26' - 0"26' - 0"R 30' - 0"R 30' - 0"103' - 1 1/2"18' - 10"PROPOSED TRANSFORMERPROPOSED TRANSFORMERPROPOSED NEW FIRE HYDRANT70' - 0"59' - 0"70' - 0"EQEQGAS METERWATER VAULT8' - 0"EQEQ8' - 0"NEW PROPOSED PROPERTY LINEMONUMENT SIGNMONUMENT SIGNPATIO1,970 SQ.F.18' - 0"R 30' - 0"R 30' - 0"26' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"LANDSCAPE PLANTER/4' METAL FENCE9' - 0"DUMPSTER8' MASONRY FENCEPAVERS26' FIRE LANEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPOOL 650 S.F.222MONUMENT SIGN6' - 0"6' SIDEWALK8' SIDEWALK8' SIDEWALK8' - 0"6' SIDEWALK6' - 0"22' - 0"8' - 0"LANDSCAPE PLANTER/4' METAL FENCE18' - 0"26' - 0"23' - 11 1/2"20' - 11 1/2"10' - 0"8' - 9"12' - 4"10' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 0"11' - 10 1/2"199' - 0"14' - 1"26' - 0"EV CHARGINGDUMPSTERFRONT LOADING TRUCKFRONT LOADING TRUCKPROPOSED PARK SPACE TO BE DEVELOPED BY OTHERS6' - 0"1PARKING FOR FUTURE RESIDENTIALPROPOSED WINDMILL8' SIDEWALKEXISTING FIRE HYDRANTEXISTING FIRE HYDRANTR 30 ' - 0"18' - 0"5' - 0"6' - 0"5' LANDSCPAE SETBACK9' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"5' -0" LANDSCAPE SET BACKR 3 0 ' - 0 "18' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"5' -0" LANDSCAPE SET BACK5' - 0"USEQTYREQUIRED PARKING RATIOPARKING REQUIRED BY ORDINANCEHOTEL -GUESTROOMS1.0 SPACE PER GUEST ROOM PLUS (1) SPACE FOR EACH 200 SQ.FT. OF COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA CONTAINED124 KEYS124PARKING TABULATION PROVIDED PARKING 163RETAILRESTAURANTOFFICE1.0 SPACE PER 350 SQ.FT. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA1.0 SPACE FOR EACH 100 SQ.FT OF GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR RESTAURANTS LOCATED WITHIN A MULTI-TENANT BUILDING.1.0 SPACE PER 250 SQ.FT. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA3,888 SQ.FT3,795 SQ.FT3,175 SQ.FT16938100PROPOSED ACKNOWLEDGE SHARE PARKING0.8 SPACE PER GUEST ROOM381.0 SPACE FOR EACH 100 SQ.FT OF GROSS FLOOR AREA1.0 SPACE PER 250 SQ.FT. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA161.0 SPACE PER 350 SQ.FT. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA9REGULAR CARS 20'x9' 72REGULAR CARS 18'x9' 80EV ONLY PARKING 20'X8' 4HANDICAP CAR PARKING 5HANDICAP VAN PARKING 2TOTAL PARKING 1631879ADDITIONAL PARKING SPOTS BEING BUILT FOR RESIDENTIAL ARE NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL NUMBER OF CURRENT PARKING SPACES.1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR 4TH FLOOR 27,780 SF +/-22,990 SF +/-96,750 SF +/-BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGETOTAL FLOORAREA PER FLOOR SF22,990 SF +/-22,990 SF +/-1ST FLOOR STUDIO KING ASTUDIO KING D ACCONE BEDROOM END G2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR 4TH FLOOR TOTALSPECIFIC GUEST ROOM TYPE MATRIX133STUDIO KING CD/Q F ACCTWO BED ROOM H TWO BED ROOM J ACC 10425D/Q E 117111TOTAL12444332225211233334441610010111010011314141212SITE LEGENDLANDSCAPECONCRETE SIDEWALKINDICATES TRAFFIC DIRECTIONPROPERTY LINEEASEMENT LINE AS INDICATEDBUILDING FOOT PRINTPAVERSPAVERSSITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES1. ALL NEW UTILITIES WILL BE INSTALLEDUNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITHCITY REQUIREMENTS.2. ALL COMMERCIAL DUMPSTERS SHALL BECONSTRUCTED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF PROSPER CODE OF ORDINANCES.3. ALL SIGNAGE WILL COMPLY WITH CITY OFPROSPER CODE OF ORDINANCES AND ONA SEPARATE PERMIT.4. ALL PAVING MATERIALS WILL MEETMINIMUM CITY STANDARDS.5. ALL FENCES, SIGNS, LIGHTING ANDLUMINARIES SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OFPROSPER ORDINANCES. EXCEPT WHERESPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON THESITE PLAN.AMENITIESAPPROX SQUARE FOOTAGE01. HOTEL LOBBY/LOUNGE04. FITNESS CENTER @ 1ST FLOOR03. DINNING AREA & PANTRYLIST OF HOTEL AMENITIES PROVIDED02. REGISTRATION DESK05. MEETING ROOM/BOARD ROOM @ 1ST FLOOR342 SQ.FT.846 SQ.FT.937 SQ.FT.165 SQ.FT.855 SQ.FT.+/-+/-+/-+/-+/-CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSEAL:sheet no.job no.datesheet titleRevisions:This drawing and all prints of it are the property of Mayse & Associates, Inc. Reproductions of these drawings without the written consent of Mayse & Associates, Inc. is not permitted, and Mayse & Associates, Inc. retains all common law and statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright.© 2016 MAYSE & ASSOCIATES, INC.UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION PROHIBITED.#12Engineer:A1234BCDEABCDE12341601 BRYAN STREET, SUITE M-210, DALLAS, TEXAS 75201C:\Revit\21122 - RI Prosper - Central - New Gate House - R20_pekhtiari@mayseassociates.com.rvtNo1/24/2022 3:38:58 PMA0.2AEXHIBIT D-1RESIDENCE INNBY MARRIOTTATLANTIC HOTELGROUPLOTS 15&16 WESTSIDEADDITION, US 380/FM 1385, PROSPER, TX01/03/2022211221" = 20'-0"A3.0A0.2A1SITE PLAN7281451Page 1142Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 14 Page 1143 Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 15 Page 1144 Item 13. 2808 Fairmount Street,Suite 300Dallas, Texas 75201 |214.303.15003300 West 7th Street,Suite 110Fort Worth, Texas 76107 |817.303.150013/32"=1'-0"EAST ELEVATION23/32"=1'-0"WEST ELEVATION33/32"=1'-0"NORTH ELEVATION43/32"=1'-0"SOUTH ELEVATIONPage 1145Item 13. CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSEAL:sheet no.job no.datesheet titleRevisions:This drawing and all prints of it are the property of Mayse & Associates, Inc. Reproductions of these drawings without the written consent of Mayse & Associates, Inc. is not permitted, and Mayse & Associates, Inc. retains all common law and statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright.© 2016 MAYSE & ASSOCIATES, INC.UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION PROHIBITED.#12Engineer:1601 BRYAN STREET, SUITE M-210, DALLAS, TEXAS 75201C:\Revit\21122 - RI Prosper - Central - New Gate House - R20_pekhtiari@mayseassociates.com.rvtNo1/24/2022 3:41:28 PMA0.4Z22-0001 EXHIBIT FRESIDENCE INNBY MARRIOTTATLANTIC HOTELGROUPLOTS 15&16 WESTSIDEADDITION, US 380/FM 1385, PROSPER, TX01/03/202221122PERSPECTIVE - EAST VIEWPERSPECTIVE -HOTEL MAIN ENTRYPERSPECTIVE -NORTH VIEWPage 1146Item 13. CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSEAL:sheet no.job no.datesheet titleRevisions:This drawing and all prints of it are the property of Mayse & Associates, Inc. Reproductions of these drawings without the written consent of Mayse & Associates, Inc. is not permitted, and Mayse & Associates, Inc. retains all common law and statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright.© 2016 MAYSE & ASSOCIATES, INC.UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION PROHIBITED.#12Engineer:1601 BRYAN STREET, SUITE M-210, DALLAS, TEXAS 75201C:\Revit\21122 - RI Prosper - Central - New Gate House - R20_pekhtiari@mayseassociates.com.rvtNo1/24/2022 3:41:28 PMA0.5Z22-0001 EXHIBIT FRESIDENCE INNBY MARRIOTTATLANTIC HOTELGROUPLOTS 15&16 WESTSIDEADDITION, US 380/FM 1385, PROSPER, TX01/03/202221122PERSPECTIVE -SOUTH WEST VIEW PERSPECTIVE -WEST VIEW (FACING PARK)PERSPECTIVE -SOUTH EAST VIEWPage 1147Item 13. EXTERIOR ELEV. GEN. NOTES1. ALL MATERIALS END ON INSIDE CORNERUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE2. STUCCO CONTROL JOINTS & REVEALPATTERNS SHALL BE RETURNED TOINSIDE CORNERS AT FACES NOT SHOWN.VERIFY WITH ARCHITECT3. REFER TO ELECTRICAL FOR EXTERIORWALL MOUNTED FIXTURES4. ALL STONE VENEER WALLS TO HAVECONTROL JOINTS AT ALL INSIDECORNERS AND AT MINIMUM OF 75 FT.5. ALIGN WINDOWS AT HEAD ACROSSBUILDING (TYP.)Level 1100' -0"Level 2112' -0"Level 3123' -0"Level 4134' -0"ROOF145' -0"T.O.P 1148' -0"ABCDEFGHIJKNPRSTT.O.P. 2151' -0"T.O.P. 4155' -0"T.O.P. 3153' -0"2' - 0"2' - 0"3' - 0"3' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 0"45' - 0"55' - 0"8' - 10"LMBR-2BR-1BR-2STBR-3BR-3BR-3BR-1BR-1BR-1BR-1BR-1BR-2BR-2BR-2BR-2BR-3BR-3BR-3BR-3BR-3BR-3BR-3BR-3STSTSTBR-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1STSTSTSTSTSTLevel 1100' -0"Level 2112' -0"Level 3123' -0"Level 4134' -0"ROOF145' -0"T.O.P 1148' -0"ABCDEFGHIJKNPRST2' - 0"2' - 0"3' - 0"3' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"12' - 0"T.O.P. 2151' -0"T.O.P. 4155' -0"T.O.P. 3153' -0"10' - 0"45' - 0"55' - 0"LMBR-2BR-1BR-1BR-1BR-3BR-3STBR-3STBR-1BR-1BR-1BR-2BR-3BR-3BR-3BR-1BR-2BR-2STSTBR-1BR-1BR-1BR-2BR-3E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1FACADE MATERIAL ANALYSISNORTH ELEVATIONMATERIALAREA%STONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3SOUTH ELEVATIONSTONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3EAST ELEVATIONSTONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3WEST ELEVATIONSTONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 31,490 SF +/-3,710 SF +/-1,915 SF +/-560 SF +/-TOTAL8,840 SF +/-2,455 SF +/-5,895 SF +/-2,255 SF +/-1,490 SF +/-14,130 SF +/-TOTAL4,140 SF +/-6,530 SF +/-2,400 SF +/-1,450 SF +/-16,545 SF +/-TOTAL2,580 SF +/-3,560 SF +/-1,735 SF +/-1,220 SF +/-10,310 SF +/-TOTALMATERIAL TABLEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2STONE25%34.5%16.8%11.9%100%16.9%42%21.7%6.3%100%25%39.5%14.5%8.8%100%17.4%41.8%16%10.6%100%MANGANESE IRON SPOT -VELOR (BR-1)COTTON WOOD HONED (ST)AUTUMN SAND (BR-2) EIFS APPLIQUESAND BEACH (E-1)EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 11,165 SF +/-13.1%2,035 SF +/-14.2%2,025 SF +/-12.2%1,215 SF +/-11.8%BRICK COLOR 3ARCTIC WHITE (BR-3)EXTERIOR FINISH LEGENDBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3STONEEIFS COLOR 1CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSEAL:sheet no.job no.datesheet titleRevisions:This drawing and all prints of it are the property of Mayse & Associates, Inc. Reproductions of these drawings without the written consent of Mayse & Associates, Inc. is not permitted, and Mayse & Associates, Inc. retains all common law and statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright.© 2016 MAYSE & ASSOCIATES, INC.UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION PROHIBITED.#12Engineer:A1234BCDEABCDE12341601 BRYAN STREET, SUITE M-210, DALLAS, TEXAS 75201C:\Revit\21122 - RI Prosper - Central - New Gate House - R20_pekhtiari@mayseassociates.com.rvtNo1/24/2022 3:40:41 PMA3.0Z22-0001 EXHIBIT FRESIDENCE INNBY MARRIOTTATLANTIC HOTELGROUPLOTS 15&16 WESTSIDEADDITION, US 380/FM 1385, PROSPER, TX01/03/2022211223/32" = 1'-0"A3.01EAST BUILDING ELEVATION3/32" = 1'-0"A3.02WEST BUILDING ELEVATIONPage 1148Item 13. EXTERIOR ELEV. GEN. NOTES1. ALL MATERIALS END ON INSIDE CORNERUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE2. STUCCO CONTROL JOINTS & REVEALPATTERNS SHALL BE RETURNED TOINSIDE CORNERS AT FACES NOT SHOWN.VERIFY WITH ARCHITECT3. REFER TO ELECTRICAL FOR EXTERIORWALL MOUNTED FIXTURES4. ALL STONE VENEER WALLS TO HAVECONTROL JOINTS AT ALL INSIDECORNERS AND AT MINIMUM OF 75 FT.5. ALIGN WINDOWS AT HEAD ACROSSBUILDING (TYP.)Level 1100' -0"Level 2112' -0"Level 3123' -0"Level 4134' -0"ROOF145' -0"T.O.P 1148' -0"2345691127810111314T.O.P. 2151' -0"T.O.P. 4155' -0"T.O.P. 3153' -0"12' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"3' - 0"3' - 0"2' - 0"2' - 0"55' - 0"45' - 0"10' - 0"BR-1BR-1BR-1BR-1BR-1BR-1BR-2BR-2BR-2BR-2BR-3BR-3BR-3BR-3BR-1BR-3BR-3STSTSTSTSTE-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1STSTLevel 1100' -0"Level 2112' -0"Level 3123' -0"Level 4134' -0"ROOF145' -0"T.O.P 1148' -0"2345691122' - 0"2' - 0"3' - 0"3' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"12' - 0"T.O.P. 2151' -0"T.O.P. 4155' -0"T.O.P. 3153' -0"10' - 0"45' - 0"55' - 0"BR-1BR-1BR-1BR-1BR-1BR-2BR-2BR-2BR-2BR-1BR-3BR-3BR-3BR-3BR-3BR-3STSTSTSTE-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1E-1PROPOSED TRANSFORMERFACADE MATERIAL ANALYSISNORTH ELEVATIONMATERIALAREA%STONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3SOUTH ELEVATIONSTONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3EAST ELEVATIONSTONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3WEST ELEVATIONSTONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 31,490 SF +/-3,710 SF +/-1,915 SF +/-560 SF +/-TOTAL8,840 SF +/-2,455 SF +/-5,895 SF +/-2,255 SF +/-1,490 SF +/-14,130 SF +/-TOTAL4,140 SF +/-6,530 SF +/-2,400 SF +/-1,450 SF +/-16,545 SF +/-TOTAL2,580 SF +/-3,560 SF +/-1,735 SF +/-1,220 SF +/-10,310 SF +/-TOTALMATERIAL TABLEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2STONE25%34.5%16.8%11.9%100%16.9%42%21.7%6.3%100%25%39.5%14.5%8.8%100%17.4%41.8%16%10.6%100%MANGANESE IRON SPOT -VELOR (BR-1)COTTON WOOD HONED (ST)AUTUMN SAND (BR-2) EIFS APPLIQUESAND BEACH (E-1)EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 11,165 SF +/-13.1%2,035 SF +/-14.2%2,025 SF +/-12.2%1,215 SF +/-11.8%BRICK COLOR 3ARCTIC WHITE (BR-3)EXTERIOR FINISH LEGENDBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3STONEEIFS COLOR 1CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSEAL:sheet no.job no.datesheet titleRevisions:This drawing and all prints of it are the property of Mayse & Associates, Inc. Reproductions of these drawings without the written consent of Mayse & Associates, Inc. is not permitted, and Mayse & Associates, Inc. retains all common law and statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright.© 2016 MAYSE & ASSOCIATES, INC.UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION PROHIBITED.#12Engineer:A1234BCDEABCDE12341601 BRYAN STREET, SUITE M-210, DALLAS, TEXAS 75201C:\Revit\21122 - RI Prosper - Central - New Gate House - R20_pekhtiari@mayseassociates.com.rvtNo1/24/2022 3:40:44 PMA3.1Z22-0001 EXHIBIT FRESIDENCE INNBY MARRIOTTATLANTIC HOTELGROUPLOTS 15&16 WESTSIDEADDITION, US 380/FM 1385, PROSPER, TX01/03/2022211223/32" = 1'-0"A3.12NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION3/32" = 1'-0"A3.11SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATIONPage 1149Item 13. Level 1100' -0"Level 2112' -0"Level 3123' -0"Level 4134' -0"ROOF145' -0"T.O.P 1148' -0"T.O.P. 2151' -0"T.O.P. 4155' -0"T.O.P. 3153' -0"2' - 0"2' - 0"3' - 0"3' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 0"11' - 0"34' - 0"55' - 0"GLAZINGBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 1STONEGLAZINGVTAC GRILLVTAC GRILL ON SIDE WALLGLAZINGSTONESTANDING SEAM SLOPED ROOFSTONEGLAZINGSTONEGLAZINGVTAC GRILLVTAC GRILL ON SIDE WALL.BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2GLAZINGBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 1BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 2BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2EIFS COLOR 1CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2EIFS COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 3CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1EQUIPMENT SCREENBRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2BRICK CONTROL JOINT, TYP.BRICK CONTROL JOINT, TYP.BRICK CONTROL JOINT, TYP.PROPOSED SIGNAGE LOCATION TO BE PERMITTED SEPARATELYPROPOSED SIGNAGE LOCATION TO BE PERMITTED SEPARATELYMEP EQUIPMENT BEYONDMEP EQUIPMENT BEYONDLevel 1100' -0"Level 2112' -0"Level 3123' -0"Level 4134' -0"ROOF145' -0"T.O.P 1148' -0"T.O.P. 2151' -0"T.O.P. 4155' -0"T.O.P. 3153' -0"2' - 0"2' - 0"3' - 0"3' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 0"45' - 0"55' - 0"BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2VTAC GRILLEGLAZINGBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 1BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2STONEVTAC GRILLEGLAZINGVTAC GRILLE ON SIDE WALLPROPOSED GAS METERPROPOSED TRANSFORMERSTONETRELLISCORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 3EIFS COLOR 1BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 3CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1STONE CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLORBRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2EIFS COLOR 1BRICK CONTROL JOINT, TYP.BRICK CONTROL JOINT, TYP.BRICK CONTROL JOINT, TYP.BRICK CONTROL JOINT, TYP.PROPOSED SIGNAGE LOCATION TO BE PERMITTED SEPARATELYMEP EQUIPMENT BEYONDEXTERIOR FINISH LEGENDBRICK COLOR 1 (BR-1)BRICK COLOR 2 (BR-2)BRICK COLOR 3 (BR-3)STONE (ST)PERFORATED CORTEN PANEL (CR)EIFS COLOR 1 (E-1)FACADE MATERIAL ANALYSISNORTH ELEVATIONMATERIALAREA%STONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3SOUTH ELEVATIONSTONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3EAST ELEVATIONSTONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3WEST ELEVATIONSTONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 31,490 SF +/-3,710 SF +/-1,915 SF +/-560 SF +/-TOTAL8,840 SF +/-2,455 SF +/-5,895 SF +/-2,255 SF +/-1,490 SF +/-14,130 SF +/-TOTAL4,140 SF +/-6,530 SF +/-2,400 SF +/-1,450 SF +/-16,545 SF +/-TOTAL2,580 SF +/-3,560 SF +/-1,735 SF +/-1,220 SF +/-10,310 SF +/-TOTALMATERIAL TABLEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2STONE25%34.5%16.8%11.9%100%16.9%42%21.7%6.3%100%25%39.5%14.5%8.8%100%17.4%41.8%16%10.6%100%MANGANESE IRON SPOT -VELOR (BR-1)COTTON WOOD HONED (ST)AUTUMN SAND (BR-2) EIFS APPLIQUESAND BEACH (E-1)EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 11,165 SF +/-13.1%2,035 SF +/-14.2%2,025 SF +/-12.2%1,215 SF +/-11.8%BRICK COLOR 3ARCTIC WHITE (BR-3)CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSEAL:sheet no.job no.datesheet titleRevisions:This drawing and all prints of it are the property of Mayse & Associates, Inc. Reproductions of these drawings without the written consent of Mayse & Associates, Inc. is not permitted, and Mayse & Associates, Inc. retains all common law and statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright.© 2016 MAYSE & ASSOCIATES, INC.UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION PROHIBITED.#12Engineer:1601 BRYAN STREET, SUITE M-210, DALLAS, TEXAS 75201C:\Revit\21122 - RI Prosper - Central - New Gate House - R20_pekhtiari@mayseassociates.com.rvtNo1/24/2022 3:41:52 PMA3.2Z22-0001 EXHIBIT FRESIDENCE INNBY MARRIOTTATLANTIC HOTELGROUPLOTS 15&16 WESTSIDEADDITION, US 380/FM 1385, PROSPER, TX01/03/2022211223/32" = 1'-0"A3.22EAST BUILDING ELEVATION - COLOR3/32" = 1'-0"A3.21WEST BUILDING ELEVATION- COLORPage 1150Item 13. EXTERIOR FINISH LEGENDBRICK COLOR 1 (BR-1)BRICK COLOR 2 (BR-2)BRICK COLOR 3 (BR-3)STONE (ST)PERFORATED CORTEN PANEL (CR)EIFS COLOR 1 (E-1)Level 1100' -0"Level 2112' -0"Level 3123' -0"Level 4134' -0"ROOF145' -0"T.O.P 1148' -0"T.O.P. 2151' -0"T.O.P. 4155' -0"T.O.P. 3153' -0"12' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"3' - 0"3' - 0"2' - 0"2' - 0"45' - 0"10' - 0"55' - 0"BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2GLAZINGBRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 1GLAZINGSTONEGLAZINGSTONEGLAZINGVTAC GRILLEVTAC GRILLESTONECORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 3EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2EIFS COLOR 1BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2EIFS COLOR 1BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 1CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1STANDING SEAM SLOPED ROOFBRICK CONTROL JOINT, TYP.BRICK CONTROL JOINT, TYP.MEP EQUIPMENT BEYONDSTANDING SEAM SLOPED ROOFTRELLISLevel 1100' -0"Level 2112' -0"Level 3123' -0"Level 4134' -0"ROOF145' -0"T.O.P 1148' -0"T.O.P. 2151' -0"T.O.P. 4155' -0"T.O.P. 3153' -0"2' - 0"2' - 0"3' - 0"3' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"11' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 0"45' - 0"55' - 0"BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3GLAZINGBRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3BRICK COLOR 1GLAZINGGAS METERSTONETRELLISGLAZINGSTONESTONE9' - 4"CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 2 EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, COLOR 3CORNICE, EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1BRICK CONTROL JOINT, TYP.BRICK CONTROL JOINT, TYP.PROPOSED SIGNAGE LOCATION TO BE PERMITTED SEPARATELYMEP EQUIPMENT BEYONDFACADE MATERIAL ANALYSISNORTH ELEVATIONMATERIALAREA%STONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3SOUTH ELEVATIONSTONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3EAST ELEVATIONSTONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 3WEST ELEVATIONSTONEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2BRICK COLOR 31,490 SF +/-3,710 SF +/-1,915 SF +/-560 SF +/-TOTAL8,840 SF +/-2,455 SF +/-5,895 SF +/-2,255 SF +/-1,490 SF +/-14,130 SF +/-TOTAL4,140 SF +/-6,530 SF +/-2,400 SF +/-1,450 SF +/-16,545 SF +/-TOTAL2,580 SF +/-3,560 SF +/-1,735 SF +/-1,220 SF +/-10,310 SF +/-TOTALMATERIAL TABLEBRICK COLOR 1BRICK COLOR 2STONE25%34.5%16.8%11.9%100%16.9%42%21.7%6.3%100%25%39.5%14.5%8.8%100%17.4%41.8%16%10.6%100%MANGANESE IRON SPOT -VELOR (BR-1)COTTON WOOD HONED (ST)AUTUMN SAND (BR-2) EIFS APPLIQUESAND BEACH (E-1)EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 1EIFS COLOR 11,165 SF +/-13.1%2,035 SF +/-14.2%2,025 SF +/-12.2%1,215 SF +/-11.8%BRICK COLOR 3ARCTIC WHITE (BR-3)CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSEAL:sheet no.job no.datesheet titleRevisions:This drawing and all prints of it are the property of Mayse & Associates, Inc. Reproductions of these drawings without the written consent of Mayse & Associates, Inc. is not permitted, and Mayse & Associates, Inc. retains all common law and statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright.© 2016 MAYSE & ASSOCIATES, INC.UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION PROHIBITED.#12Engineer:1601 BRYAN STREET, SUITE M-210, DALLAS, TEXAS 75201C:\Revit\21122 - RI Prosper - Central - New Gate House - R20_pekhtiari@mayseassociates.com.rvtNo1/24/2022 3:42:33 PMA3.3Z22-0001 EXHIBIT FRESIDENCE INNBY MARRIOTTATLANTIC HOTELGROUPLOTS 15&16 WESTSIDEADDITION, US 380/FM 1385, PROSPER, TX01/03/2022211223/32" = 1'-0"A3.32NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION- COLOR3/32" = 1'-0"A3.31SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION- COLORPage 1151Item 13. FACADE MATERIAL ANALYSISD1 NORTH ELEVATION-AREA 'B'MATERIALAREA (SF)%2 1/2" ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHEDCONCRETE000STAINLESS STEEL TILE-T11000STUCCO FINISH-PAINT P5000EXPOSED TILT WALL PANEL; TEXTUREDPAINT58271004" ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHEDCONCRETE0005827TOTAL100C1 NORTH ELEVATION-AREA 'A'MATERIALAREA (SF)%191018.5000000838981.500.0010,299TOTAL100B1 SOUTH ELEVATION-AREA 'A'MATERIALAREA (SF)%509180.200071811.30005428.56351TOTAL100A1 SOUTH ELEVATION-AREA 'B'MATERIALAREA (SF) %292932.5000000396143.9211323.59,003TOTAL1002 1/2" ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHEDCONCRETESTAINLESS STEEL TILE-T11STUCCO FINISH-PAINT P5EXPOSED TILT WALL PANEL; TEXTUREDPAINT4" ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHEDCONCRETE2 1/2" ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHEDCONCRETESTAINLESS STEEL TILE-T11STUCCO FINISH-PAINT P5EXPOSED TILT WALL PANEL; TEXTUREDPAINT4" ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHEDCONCRETE2 1/2" ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHEDCONCRETESTAINLESS STEEL TILE-T11STUCCO FINISH-PAINT P5EXPOSED TILT WALL PANEL; TEXTUREDPAINT4" ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHEDCONCRETEPage 1152Item 13. FACADE MATERIAL ANALYSISB1 WEST ELEVATIONMATERIALAREA (SF)%341542.94886.1236338124800TOTAL7,951100A1 EAST ELEVATIONMATERIALAREA (SF)%00007468.7779991.300TOTAL8,5451002 1/2" ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHEDCONCRETESTAINLESS STEEL TILE-T11STUCCO FINISH-PAINT P5EXPOSED TILT WALL PANEL;TEXTURED PAINT4" ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHEDCONCRETE2 1/2" ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHEDCONCRETESTAINLESS STEEL TILE-T11STUCCO FINISH-PAINT P5EXPOSED TILT WALL PANEL;TEXTURED PAINT4" ARCHITECTURALLY FINISHEDCONCRETEPage 1153Item 13. Page 1154Item 13.  5(1'(5,1* $1' (/(9$7,216 21 6+((76 55 $1' 5 $5( 5(35(6(17$7,9(7+( %8,/',1* '2 127 (;$&7/< 5()/(&7 7+26(2) 7+( 352326(' 352-(&7 %87 $5( ,1',&$7,9(2) '(6,*1 ,17(17 $1' 6,0,/$5 &21',7,2165($5,17(5,25 (/(9$7,215($5,17(5,25 (/(9$7,2155Page 1155Item 13.  5(1'(5,1* $1' (/(9$7,216 21 6+((76 55 $1' 5 $5( 5(35(6(17$7,9(7+( %8,/',1* '2 127 (;$&7/< 5()/(&7 7+26(2) 7+( 352326(' 352-(&7 %87 $5( ,1',&$7,9(2) '(6,*1 ,17(17 $1' 6,0,/$5 &21',7,216)5217 (/(9$7,21)5217 (/(9$7,2155Page 1156Item 13.  5(1'(5,1* $1' (/(9$7,216 21 6+((76 55 $1' 5 $5( 5(35(6(17$7,9(7+( %8,/',1* '2 127 (;$&7/< 5()/(&7 7+26(2) 7+( 352326(' 352-(&7 %87 $5( ,1',&$7,9(2) '(6,*1 ,17(17 $1' 6,0,/$5 &21',7,216)5217 (/(9$7,21)5217 (/(9$7,2155)5217 (/(9$7,215Page 1157Item 13. 22UTRWD 60' UTILITY EASEMENTOPEN SPACE(OUTSIDE OF FLOODPLAIN)2.8 ACRESAPPROXIMATEALIGNMENT OFMAGNOLIA BOULEVARDUTRWD 25' UTILITY EASEMENT 7CONNECTIONTO WESTFORK CROSSINGTRAILHEADPROPOSED EXPANSIONOF THE TOWN OF PROSPERTRAIL SYSTEMSECURITY GATE3" CALIPER EVERGREEN TREE-TYPE II3" CALIPER TREE-TYPE I33 TREES TYPE 133 TREES TYPE 215 GALLON SHRUBRESTAURANT7,700 SF6,500 SFRESTAURANTREST/RETAIL60,000 SFENTERTAINMENT3,750 SFEXISTINGF.M. 1385100 YEAR FLOODPLAINAREA OF FLOODPLAIN8.3 ACRESEXISTINGSINGLE FAMILYSINGLE FAMILYDOE BRANCHU.S. HIGHWAY 380(UNIVERSITY DRIVE)LOT 4LOT 5LOT 19LOT 147,400 SF2,900 SFREST/RETAILLOT 18LOT 37,400 SFLOT 12LOT 13LOT 94,800 SF3,000 SFREST/RETAILREST/RETAILLOT 10REST/RETAILREST/RETAILLOT 8LOT 116,350 SFLOT 7REST/RETAILREST/RETAILLOT 6REST/RETAIL2,900 SF4,500 SF3,200 SFLOT 2LOT 1REST/RETAIL10,900 SF0 100 200 400 FeetNLOT 15LOT 16MAYSE & ASSOCIATES ONLY ADJUSTEDLOT 15 AND 16.THE REST BY OTHERS ANDPREVIOUSLY APPROVEDFOR CONCEPTUAL PROPOSE ONLY.FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL BESUBMITTED DURING PERMITTING.1101/27/2022ADJUSTED LOT 15&16THIS TABLE IS NOT UPDATED FOR LOT 15 AND LOT 16 CHANGESNote: The minimum requirements for perimeter landscaping and parking terminus landscaping islands will be provided at the time of Site Plan, subject to Park and Recreation Department approval. Page 1158Item 13. Ordinance No. 2022-___, Page 17 Exhibit G Page 1159 Item 13. Page 1 of 1 To: Mayor and Town Council From: David Soto, Planning Manager Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Hulon T. Webb, Jr., Interim Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure Services Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Development Agreement between Alpha3 Prosper RI, LLC, and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to development on the Westside Development, located on the northeast corner of US 380 and FM 1385. Description of Agenda Item: On April 26, 2022, the Town Council approved a zoning request Z20-0001 by a vote of 6-0, subject to an amendment to the existing Development Agreement with the Town. The purpose of the Development Agreement is to amend the existing Development Agreement to prohibit certain business establishments for Lots 15 & 16. A Development Agreement has been prepared accordingly. Legal Obligations and Review: Town Attorney, Terrence Welch of Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P., has reviewed the agreement as to form and legality. Attached Documents: 1. Development Agreement Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Town Council authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Development Agreement between Alpha3 Prosper RI, LLC, and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to development on the W estside Development, located on the northeast corner of US 380 and FM 1385. Proposed Motion: I move to authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Development Agreement between Alpha3 Prosper RI, LLC, and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to development on the Westside Development, located on the northeast corner of US 380 and FM 1385. Prosper is a place where everyone matters. PLANNING Page 1160 Item 14. Page 1161 Item 14. Page 1162 Item 14. Page 1163 Item 14. Page 1164 Item 14. Page 1165 Item 14. Page 1166 Item 14. Page 1167 Item 14. Scale: 1"=100' September, 2018 SEI Job No. 17-219 LOCATION MAP 1" = 2000' PROJECT LOCATION METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION TOWN OF PROSPER CASE NO. Z18-0012 Exhibit A WestSide BEING 64.501 ACRES OF LAND (GROSS) 63.858 ACRES OF LAND (NET) IN THE B. HODGES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 593 & IN THE J. GONZALEZ SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 447 & IN THE P. BARNES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 79 & IN THE R. TAYLOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1671 & IN THE J. HAYNES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 573 & IN THE ANGUS JAMISON SURVEY TOWN OF PROSPER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS APPLICANT MCF Investments 15700 S.H. 121 Frisco, Texas 75035 Telephone (214) 619-4930 Contact: Mike Fannin ENGINEER / SURVEYOR Spiars Engineering, Inc. 765 Custer Road, Suite 100 Plano, TX 75075 Telephone: (972) 422-0077 TBPE No. F-2121 / TBPLS No. F-10043100 Contact: Kevin Wier OWNER Taylor Hansel P.O. Box 770 Frisco, Texas 75034 POINT OF BEGINNING 50' R.OW 50' R.O.W. 50' R.O W 64.051 Acres 2, 790,075 Sq. Ft.)Cab. XPg717P R D C T var. width R.O.W.variable width R.O.W. Doc. No. 2012-59927 OPRDCT 50' R.O W 50' R.O.W.Doc. No. 2012- Page 1168 Item 14. Page 1169 Item 14. Scale: 1"=100' September, 2018 SEI Job No. 17-219 SHT. 1 OF 8 TOWN OF PROSPER CASE NO. Z18-0012 Exhibit D Conceptual Plan WestSide BLOCK A, LOTS 1-19 BEING 64.501 ACRES OF LAND (GROSS) 63.858 ACRES OF LAND (NET) IN THE B. HODGES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 593 & IN THE J. GONZALEZ SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 447 & IN THE P. BARNES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 79 & IN THE R. TAYLOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1671 & IN THE J. HAYNES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 573 & IN THE ANGUS JAMISON SURVEY TOWN OF PROSPER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS LOCATION MAP 1" = 2000' PROJECT LOCATION APPLICANT MCF Investments 15700 S.H. 121 Frisco, Texas 75035 Telephone (214) 619-4930 Contact: Mike Fannin ENGINEER / SURVEYOR Spiars Engineering, Inc. 765 Custer Road, Suite 100 Plano, TX 75075 Telephone: (972) 422-0077 TBPE No. F-2121 / TBPLS No. F-10043100 Contact: Kevin Wier OWNER Taylor Hansel P.O. Box 770 Frisco, Texas75034var. width R.O.W.variable width R.O.W.Doc. No. 2012-59927OPRDCT 50' R.O W 50' R.O.W.Doc. No. 2012-59927OPRDCTCab. XPg 7 1 7P RDCTCab. XPg 7 17P R D C T 50' R. 1:250; 1:100; 1:350; REFER TO SHEET A0.2A 68,396 35,482RESTAURANT/RETAIL/OFFICE/SERVICEENTRY RESIDENCE INN BY MARRIOTTBUILDING AREA: +/-96,750 SQ.F.4 STORIES 124 ROOMS Z22-0001 MAYSE & ASSOCIATES ONLY ADJUSTED LOT 15 AND 16.THE REST BY OTHERS AND PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LOT 15LOT 161 01/27/2022 ADJUSTED LOT 15&16 RETAIL/RESTAURANT/ OFFICE 1.2 10,85852,296 123,227 10,858 27,780 96,750 124 N/A 55' 40' 1 SPACE PER GUESTROOM 124 100 163 SHARED PARKING 6 6 6,229+/- 27,051+/- 1 1:250; 1:100; 1:350; REFER TO SHEET A0.2A 63 22.5% 20.7% 0.78:1 0.20:1 1 1 96,176+/- 46,067+/- Page 1170 Item 14. N 17°14'23"E 426.71'N17°14'23"E 19.26'S 72°45'37"E 179.77'S 72°45'37"E 37.06'S 89°04'33"E 189.30'S 72°45'37"E 52.30'N 89°04'33"W 472.97'N 17°14'23"E 310.52'R=500.00'D=6°24'08"L=55.87'CB= S14°02'19"WCD=55.84'6839R 30' - 0"RESTAURANT/RETAIL/OFFICE/SERVICEENTRY18' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0"RESIDENCE INN BY MARRIOTTBUILDING AREA: +/-96,750 SQ.F.4 STORIES 124 ROOMS 25' - 5 1/2"EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTEXISTING FIRE HYDRANT13' - 3"4975885939993699873R 30' - 0"R 3 0 ' - 0 "R 30' - 0"R 30' - 0"12' - 0"1028' - 5 1/2"DOG PARK15' - 7"12' - 7"27' - 7"24' - 7"24' - 7"27' - 7"24' - 7"5' -0" LANDSCAPE SET BACK5' - 0"5' -0" LANDSCAPE SET BACK5' -0" LANDSCAPE SET BACK5' - 0"FIRE HYDRANTPROPOSED NEW FIRE HYDRANTR 30' - 0"TYP.9' - 0"9' - 0"1010526' - 0"6' - 0"18' - 0"26' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"24' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"26' - 0"18' - 0"10' - 0"56' - 5"3' - 6"8' - 0"R 3 0 ' - 0 "9' - 0"26' - 0"26' - 0"R 30' - 0"R 30' - 0"103' - 1 1/2"18' - 10"PROPOSED TRANSFORMERPROPOSED TRANSFORMERPROPOSED NEW FIRE HYDRANT70' - 0"59' - 0"70' - 0"EQEQGAS METERWATER VAULT8' - 0"EQEQ8' - 0"NEW PROPOSED PROPERTY LINEMONUMENT SIGNMONUMENT SIGNPATIO1,970 SQ.F.18' - 0"R 30' - 0"R 30' - 0"26' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"LANDSCAPE PLANTER/4' METAL FENCE9' - 0"DUMPSTER8' MASONRY FENCEPAVERS26' FIRE LANEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPOOL 650 S.F.222MONUMENT SIGN6' - 0"6' SIDEWALK8' SIDEWALK8' SIDEWALK8' - 0"6' SIDEWALK6' - 0"22' - 0"8' - 0"LANDSCAPE PLANTER/4' METAL FENCE18' - 0"26' - 0"23' - 11 1/2"20' - 11 1/2"10' - 0"8' - 9"12' - 4"10' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 0"11' - 10 1/2"199' - 0"14' - 1"26' - 0"EV CHARGINGDUMPSTERFRONT LOADING TRUCKFRONT LOADING TRUCKPROPOSED PARK SPACE TO BE DEVELOPED BY OTHERS6' - 0"1PARKING FOR FUTURE RESIDENTIALPROPOSED WINDMILL8' SIDEWALKEXISTING FIRE HYDRANTEXISTING FIRE HYDRANTR 30 ' - 0"18' - 0"5' - 0"6' - 0"5' LANDSCPAE SETBACK9' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"5' -0" LANDSCAPE SET BACKR 3 0 ' - 0 "18' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"5' -0" LANDSCAPE SET BACK5' - 0"USEQTYREQUIRED PARKING RATIOPARKING REQUIRED BY ORDINANCEHOTEL -GUESTROOMS1.0 SPACE PER GUEST ROOM PLUS (1) SPACE FOR EACH 200 SQ.FT. OF COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA CONTAINED124 KEYS124PARKING TABULATION PROVIDED PARKING 163RETAILRESTAURANTOFFICE1.0 SPACE PER 350 SQ.FT. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA1.0 SPACE FOR EACH 100 SQ.FT OF GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR RESTAURANTS LOCATED WITHIN A MULTI-TENANT BUILDING.1.0 SPACE PER 250 SQ.FT. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA3,888 SQ.FT3,795 SQ.FT3,175 SQ.FT16938100PROPOSED ACKNOWLEDGE SHARE PARKING0.8 SPACE PER GUEST ROOM381.0 SPACE FOR EACH 100 SQ.FT OF GROSS FLOOR AREA1.0 SPACE PER 250 SQ.FT. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA161.0 SPACE PER 350 SQ.FT. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA9 REGULAR CARS 20'x9' 72REGULAR CARS 18'x9' 80EV ONLY PARKING 20'X8' 4HANDICAP CAR PARKING 5HANDICAP VAN PARKING 2TOTAL PARKING 1631879ADDITIONAL PARKING SPOTS BEING BUILT FOR RESIDENTIAL ARE NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL NUMBER OF CURRENT PARKING SPACES.1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR 4TH FLOOR 27,780 SF +/-22,990 SF +/-96,750 SF +/-BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGETOTAL FLOORAREA PER FLOOR SF22,990 SF +/-22,990 SF +/-1ST FLOOR STUDIO KING ASTUDIO KING D ACCONE BEDROOM END G2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR 4TH FLOOR TOTALSPECIFIC GUEST ROOM TYPE MATRIX133STUDIO KING CD/Q F ACCTWO BED ROOM H TWO BED ROOM J ACC 10425D/Q E 117111TOTAL12444332225211233334441610010111010011314141212SITE LEGENDLANDSCAPECONCRETE SIDEWALKINDICATES TRAFFIC DIRECTIONPROPERTY LINEEASEMENT LINE AS INDICATEDBUILDING FOOT PRINTPAVERSPAVERSSITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES1. ALL NEW UTILITIES WILL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.2. ALL COMMERCIAL DUMPSTERS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF PROSPER CODE OF ORDINANCES.3. ALL SIGNAGE WILL COMPLY WITH CITY OF PROSPER CODE OF ORDINANCES AND ON A SEPARATE PERMIT.4. ALL PAVING MATERIALS WILL MEET MINIMUM CITY STANDARDS.5. ALL FENCES, SIGNS, LIGHTING AND LUMINARIES SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF PROSPER ORDINANCES. EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE SITE PLAN.AMENITIESAPPROX SQUARE FOOTAGE01. HOTEL LOBBY/LOUNGE04. FITNESS CENTER @ 1ST FLOOR03. DINNING AREA & PANTRYLIST OF HOTEL AMENITIES PROVIDED02. REGISTRATION DESK05. MEETING ROOM/BOARD ROOM @ 1ST FLOOR342 SQ.FT.846 SQ.FT.937 SQ.FT.165 SQ.FT.855 SQ.FT.+/-+/-+/-+/-+/-CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSEAL:sheet no.job no.datesheet titleRevisions:This drawing and all prints of it are the property of Mayse & Associates, Inc. Reproductions of these drawings without the written consent of Mayse & Associates, Inc. is not permitted, and Mayse & Associates, Inc. retains all common law and statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright.© 2016 MAYSE & ASSOCIATES, INC.UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION PROHIBITED.#12Engineer:A1234BCDEABCDE12341601 BRYAN STREET, SUITE M-210, DALLAS, TEXAS 75201C:\Revit\21122 - RI Prosper - Central - New Gate House - R20_pekhtiari@mayseassociates.com.rvtNo1/24/2022 3:38:58 PMA0.2AEXHIBIT D-1RESIDENCE INNBY MARRIOTTATLANTIC HOTELGROUPLOTS 15&16 WESTSIDEADDITION, US 380/FM 1385, PROSPER, TX01/03/2022211221" = 20'-0"A3.0A0.2A1SITE PLAN7281451Page 1171Item 14. Page 1 of 1 To: Mayor and Town Council From: David Soto, Planning Manager Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Hulon T. Webb, Jr., Interim Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure Services Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon whether to direct staff to submit a written notice of appeal on behalf of the Town Council to the Development Services Department, pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 1.5(C)(7) and 1.6(B)(7) of the Town’s Zoning Ordinance, regarding action taken by the Planning & Zoning Commission on any Site Plans and Preliminary Site Plans, including Westfork Crossing & Westfork Crossing Lot 7. Description of Agenda Item: Attached are the Site Plans that were acted on by the Planning & Zoning Commission at their June 7, 2022, meeting. Per the Zoning Ordinance, the Town Council has the ability to direct staff to submit a written notice of appeal on behalf of the Town Council to the Development Services Department for any Preliminary Site Plan or Site Plan acted on by the Planning & Zoning Commission. Attached Documents: 1. Preliminary Site Plan for Westfork Crossing 2. Site Plan for Westfork Crossing Lot 7 Town Staff Recommendation: Town staff recommends the Town Council take no action on this item. Prosper is a place where everyone matters. PLANNING Page 1172 Item 15. Scale: 1" = 200' April, 2022 SEI Job No. 21-211 OWNER / APPLICANT Northwest 423/380 LP 7001 Preston Road, Suite 410 Dallas, Texas 75205 Telephone (214) 224-4600 Contact: Robert Dorazil ENGINEER / SURVEYOR Spiars Engineering, Inc. TBPE No. F-2121 765 Custer Road, Suite 100 Plano, TX 75075 Telephone: (972) 422-0077 Contact: Kevin Wier LOCATION MAP 1" = 2000' PROJECT LOCATION Sheet 1 of 3 REVISED PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN WESTFORK CROSSING BLOCK A, LOTS 10, 11 & 12X 82.596 Acres SITUATED IN THE M.E.P. RAILROAD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1476 P. BARNES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 79 A. JAMISON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 672 TOWN OF PROSPER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS CASE No. - D22-0039 Variable width ROW Lot 1 Lot 2Lot 3Lot 4Lot 5Lot 6 Lot 7Lot 8 Doc. No. 2018-84666 OPRDCT Doc. No. 2018-84666 OPRDCT Doc. No. 2020-55 PRDCT Doc. No. 2018-84666 OPRDCT Variable width ROW Variable width ROWLot 1 Lot 2Lot 3Lot 4Lot 5Lot 6 Lot 7Lot 8 Doc. No. 2018-84666 OPRDCT Doc. No. 2018-84666 OPRDCT Doc. No. 2020-55 PRDCT Doc. No. 2018-84666 OPRDCT Variable width ROW Page 1173 Item 15. Sheet 2 of 3 REVISED PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN WESTFORK CROSSING BLOCK A, LOTS 10, 11 & 12X 82.596 Acres SITUATED IN THE M.E.P. RAILROAD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1476 P. BARNES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 79 A. JAMISON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 672 TOWN OF PROSPER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS Scale: 1" = 60' April, 2022 SEI Job No. 21-211 OWNER / APPLICANT Northwest 423/380 LP 7001 Preston Road, Suite 410 Dallas, Texas 75205 Telephone (214) 224-4600 Contact: Robert Dorazil ENGINEER / SURVEYOR Spiars Engineering, Inc. TBPE No. F-2121 765 Custer Road, Suite 100 Plano, TX 75075 Telephone: (972) 422-0077 Contact: Kevin Wier CASE No. - D22-0039 Lot 7Lot 8 Variable width ROW Variable width ROWLot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4Lot 5 Lot 6 Lot 7Lot 8 Page 1174 Item 15. Scale: 1" = 60' April, 2022 SEI Job No. 21-211 OWNER / APPLICANT Northwest 423/380 LP 7001 Preston Road, Suite 410 Dallas, Texas 75205 Telephone (214) 224-4600 Contact: Robert Dorazil ENGINEER / SURVEYOR Spiars Engineering, Inc. TBPE No. F-2121 765 Custer Road, Suite 100 Plano, TX 75075 Telephone: (972) 422-0077 Contact: Kevin Wier Sheet 3 of 3 REVISED PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN WESTFORK CROSSING BLOCK A, LOTS 10, 11 & 12X 82.596 Acres SITUATED IN THE M.E.P. RAILROAD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1476 P. BARNES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 79 A. JAMISON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 672 TOWN OF PROSPER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS CASE No. - D22-0039 Doc. No. 2018-84666 OPRDCT Doc. No. 2018-84666 OPRDCT Doc. No. 2020-55 PRDCT Variable width ROW Doc. No. 2018-84666 OPRDCT Doc. No. 2018-84666 OPRDCT Doc. No. 2020-55 PRDCT Page 1175 Item 15. SITE PLAN WESTFORK CROSSING BLOCK A, LOT 7 2.918 Acres SITUATED IN THE M.E.P. & P.R.R. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1476 TOWN OF PROSPER, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS Scale: 1" = 40' April, 2022 SEI Job No. 18-217 OWNER / APPLICANT Northwest 423/380 LP 7001 Preston Road, Suite 410 Dallas, Texas 75205 Telephone (214) 224-4600 Contact: Robert Dorazil ENGINEER / SURVEYOR Spiars Engineering, Inc. TBPE No. F-2121 765 Custer Road, Suite 100 Plano, TX 75075 Telephone: (972) 422-0077 Contact: Kevin Wier CASE No. - D22-0041 LOCATION MAP NTS PROJECT LOCATION Variable width ROWLot 1 Lot 2 Lot 8 Lot 9 Page 1176 Item 15. Page 1 of 2 To: Mayor and Town Council From: David Soto, Planning Manager Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Hulon T. Webb, Jr., Interim Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure Services Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon a request for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for a Day Care Center (Grace Chapel), on 5.4± acres, located on the southeast corner of FM 1385 and Denton Way. The property is zoned Agricultural (A). (S22-0005). Description of Agenda Item: The zoning and land use of the surrounding properties are as follows: Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use Plan Subject Property Agricultural Undeveloped Low Density Residential North Agricultural Undeveloped Low Density Residential East Agricultural Undeveloped Low Density Residential South Agricultural Undeveloped Low Density Residential West City of Aubrey City of Aubrey City of Aubrey Requested Zoning – The purpose of this request is to allow for a day care for Grace Chapel. The church is requesting a SUP to allow for the use upon development of the subject tract. Exhibit B shows the proposed layout, which consists of a one-story, 19,403 square-foot building. The depicted number of off-street parking spaces and outdoor play area meet the minimum standards of the Zoning Ordinance. Exhibit C is a conceptual landscape plan, which depicts the location of required landscaping. The landscaping meets the minimum standards of the Town’s Zoning Ordinance. Prosper is a place where everyone matters. PLANNING Page 1177 Item 16. Page 2 of 2 Exhibit D shows a conceptual rendering depicting the architectural look and style of the building. The conceptual design meets the non-residential design and development standards of the Zoning Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance contains four criteria to be considered in determining the validity of a SUP request, as follows: 1. Is the use harmonious and compatible with its surrounding existing uses or proposed uses? 2. Are the activities requested by the applicant normally associated with the requested use? 3. Is the nature of the use reasonable? 4. Has any impact on the surrounding area been mitigated? Staff believes the applicant has satisfied the noted criteria and recommends approval of the request. Future Land Use Plan – The Future Land Use Plan recommends Low Density Residential. The proposed zoning request conforms to the Future Land Use Plan. Thoroughfare Plan – The property has direct access to Denton Way, a 60-foot, 2-lane divided thoroughfare, which connects to FM 1385 to the west and Fishtrap Road to the south. This request conforms to the Thoroughfare Plan. Parks Master Plan – The Parks Master Plan does not indicate a park is needed on the subject property. Legal Obligations and Review: Notification was provided to neighboring property owners as required by the Zoning Ordinance and state law. To date, staff has not received any Public Hearing Notice Reply Forms in response to this request. Attached Documents: 1. Aerial and Zoning Maps 2. Exhibits A-D Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation: At their June 7, 2022, meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended the Town Council approve the request, by a vote of 7-0. Town Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for a Day Care Center (Grace Chapel), on 5.4± acres, located on the southeast corner of FM 1385 and Denton Way. (S22-0005) subject to the following: 1. Town Council approval of a Development Agreement, including, but not limited to, architectural building materials. Proposed Motion: I move to approve the request for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for a Day Care Center (Grace Chapel), on 5.4± acres, located on the southeast corner of FM 1385 and Denton Way. (S22- 0005) subject to the following: 1. Town Council approval of a Development Agreement, including, but not limited to, architectural building materials. Page 1178 Item 16. Page 1179 Item 16. Page 1180 Item 16. F.M. HIGHWAY 1385 ASPHALT ROADWAY80' RIGHT-OF-WAY DENTON WAY592592592 592 591 591591591591 591 590 5 9 0 590590 589589 589 589 58858 8 587587586 5 8 6 586586 585 58 5 5 8 5 585584 5 8 4 58458358 3 5 8 2 58 2 10' UTILITY EASEMENTDOC. NO. 2006-27087O.R.D.C.T.20' WATER EASEMENTDOC. NO. 2015-375P.R.D.C.T.LOT 1410' CROSSTEX EASEMENTDOC. NO. 2006-27086O.R.D.C.T.5' UTILITY EASEMENTDOC. NO. 2018-58247O.R.D.C.T.5' UTILITY EASEMENTDOC. NO. 2018-367P.R.D.C.T.CROSSTIMBERS DRIVE54' RIGHT-OF-WAY LOT 15XLOT 16X 5915905895885875865855845 8 3 5 8 2 5 8 1SSTRACT 2CALLED 39.4269 ACRESLEIDECKER PROPERTIES LTD.DOC. NO. 2006-42667O.R.D.C.T.TRACT 2CALLED 39.4269 ACRESLEIDECKER PROPERTIES LTD.DOC. NO. 2006-42667O.R.D.C.T.ZONING: AGRICULTUREUSE: AGRICULTUREFUTURE USE: CHURH/ ADMIN/ CLASSROOM40'432,459 SQ. FEET9.928 ACRESCALLED 65.133 ACRESDENTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTDOC. NO. 2017-65208O.R.D.C.T.N 01°38'47" E 685.31 TRACT 2CALLED 39.4269 ACRESLEIDECKER PROPERTIES LTD.DOC. NO. 2006-42667O.R.D.C.T.TRACT 2CALLED 39.4269 ACRESLEIDECKER PROPERTIES LTD.DOC. NO. 2006-42667O.R.D.C.T.CALLED 0.427 ACRESDENTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTDOC. NO. 2021-174358O.R.D.C.T.CALLED 65.133 ACRESDENTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTDOC. NO. 2017-65208O.R.D.C.T.BLOCK AUNION PARK PHASE 3A-1DOC. NO. 2018-367P.R.D.C.T.CALLED 69.696 ACRESPULTE HOMES OF TEXAS,L.P.DOC. NO. 2018-104237O.R.D.C.T.LOT 1X, BLOCK 1DRAINAGE EASEMENTARROW BROOKEPHASE 1ADOC. NO. 2015-375P.R.D.C.T.30' RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICAITONDOC. NO. 2015-375P.R.D.C.T.S 89°54'39" W 641.71'S 00°05'21" E 685.00'N 89°54'39" E 620.95'70' 60'R.O.W. TAKE0GRAPHIC SCALE1 inch = ft.4040804020DATENo.REVISION BYDATE:SHEETFile No. 2020-064CHECKED:MKTDRAWN:MKTDESIGN:1903 CENTRAL DRIVE, SUITE #406 PHONE: 817.281.0572 BEDFORD, TX 76021 WWW.CLAYMOOREENG.COM TEXAS REGISTRATION #14199ASD4/12/2022GRACE CHAPEL PROSPER FM 1385 & DENTON WAY PROSPER, TX PRELIMINARYCLAYMOORE ENGINEERINGEXHIBIT AEXH-AVICINITY MAPN.T.S.DOVE CREEK CIR.DENTON WAYSITEUNION PARK BLVD.FISHTRAP RD.FM 1385 RIDGE CREEK LN.COUNTYSURVEY:ABSTRACT NO.DENTONJOHN MORTON SURVEY793CITY:STATE:TOWN OF PROSPERTEXASLEGAL DESCRIPTION:OWNER/DEVELOPER:APPLICANT:CLAYMOORE ENGINEERING, INC.1903 CENTRAL DRIVE, SUITE #406BEDFORD, TX 76021PH: 817.281.0572SURVEYOR:EAGLE SURVEYING, LLC210 SOUTH ELM STREET,SUITE 104 ,TX 75057PH: 940.222.3009LOTS 1 , BLOCK ANORTH TEXAS CONFERENCE OF THEMETHODIST CHURCH ADDITIONGROSS AREA: 5.422 OR 236,172 SFCONTACT NAME: DREW DONOSKYCONTACT NAME: MASON DECKEREXHIBIT AGRACE CHAPEL PROSPERNORTH TEXAS CONFERENCE OF THEUNITED METHODIST CHURCHPO BOX 866128PLANO, TEXAS 75086CONTACT NAME: KENNETH WOLVERTONPage 1181Item 16. PROPOSEDBUILDINGFFE=591.25OUTDOORPLAYGROUNDOUTDOORPLAYGROUNDF.M. HIGHWAY 1385 ASPHALT ROADWAY80' RIGHT-OF-WAY DENTON WAYX CUTZ=591.14TBM 3X CUTZ=591.36TBM 5 CIRSZ=587.43592592592 591 591 591 590 590590 589589 589 588587586 586586 5 8 5 585584 10' CROSSTEX EASEMENTDOC. NO. 2006-27086O.R.D.C.T.5915905895885875865855845 8 3 5 8 2 9'9'9'9'9'9' 5'18'24'20'20'24'20'20'30'12'19.7'24'18'12'24'18' 18'24' 5' 50.64'5'25'30.41'24'50.1'16' 16' 15' 12' 12'R30'R30'R45'R25'R3'R3'R 3 'R3 'R3'R6 ' R 3 'R6'R3'R 6 'R6'R3'R 3 5 'R25'R45'R10'R45'R69'30'24'R30'R30'9'5'18' 95.5' 196'62.5'99.8'8'5'5' 2' OVERHANG 2' OVERHANG 2' OVERHANG SS5' DRAINAGEESMT.SANITARYSEWER MANHOLEFIREHYDRANT25'25' BUILDINGSETBACK50' BUILDINGSETBACK25' LANDSCAPE &ACCESS EASEMENTDISD STREET ESMT.34.7'BRFBRFBRFBRFFIRE HYDRANT10' WATER ESMT.FIREHYDRANT10' WATER ESMT.FIREHYDRANTFDCBRF9'TYP.9'TYP.9'TYP.30' FIRE LANE &ACCESSEASEMENT15' WATERESMT.15'12WATERESMT.25'129.4'59.08'122.64'104.56'122.81'74.7'55.92'5.5'28.9'15'10' SANITARYSEWER ESMT.(16,000 SQ. FT.)(4,640 SQ. FT.)14.7'9'9' 6' 10'25.7'R3'R6'R3'R10'R 6 'R6'R6'R3 'R3'R3'R3'R3'R3'R3'R3'R3'10' WATERESMT.5'R10'R10' 17.67' 10'10.5'5'R5'R5'DUMPSTERENCLOSUREWILL BE CONSTRUCTEDWITH BRICK & STONETO MATCH MAINBUILDING43.75'R4'5'5'5' DRAINAGEESMT.10'15' LANDSCAPESETBACK15'5' LANDSCAPESETBACK5'5' LANDSCAPESETBACK5'25'25' LANDSCAPE &ACCESS EASEMENT5'5' STREET EASEMENTBRF PER CITYDETAIL6'9' TYP. 9' TYP. 9' TYP. 9' TYP. 9' TYP. 9' TYP. 9' TYP.6 FT. HIGH CHAINLINK FENCE70'40'10' TRAIL10' TRAIL30'5'MONUMENT SIGN49.2'PROPOSED PADMOUNTEDTRANSFORMER108.3' 60'R.O.W. TAKE50'35.2'10'R152.6'R220.3'R220'R130.8' 10'10' ELEC. ESMT.R3'R3'R3'R3 'R3 'R3'2' OVERHANG32.5'NO CURBR3'R30'FIRE HYDRANTPROPOSEDLIGHT POLE(TYP.)PROPOSEDLIGHT POLE(TYP.)(4,790 SQ. FT.)19.8'17.67'0GRAPHIC SCALE1 inch = ft.3030603015DATENo.REVISION BYDATE:SHEETFile No. 2020-064CHECKED:MKTDRAWN:MKTDESIGN:1903 CENTRAL DRIVE, SUITE #406 PHONE: 817.281.0572 BEDFORD, TX 76021 WWW.CLAYMOOREENG.COM TEXAS REGISTRATION #14199ASD4/12/2022GRACE CHAPEL PROSPER FM 1385 & DENTON WAY PROSPER, TX PRELIMINARYCLAYMOORE ENGINEERINGEXHIBIT BSUP VICINITY MAPN.T.S.DOVE CREEK CIR.DENTON WAYSITEUNION PARK BLVD.FISHTRAP RD.FM 1385 RIDGE CREEK LN.TOWN OF PROSPER SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES:DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW GUIDELINES1.THE BUILDING HEIGHT, WIDTH, LENGTH, AND SQUARE FOOTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL STRUCTURES ON THE DRAWING.2.THE CLASSIFICATION OF EACH BUILDING SHALL BE IDENTIFIED IN THE DRAWING.3.A MINIMUM OF TWO POINTS OF ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY SPACED NO LESS THAN 140 FEET APART. AMENDMENT 503.1.44.FIRE LANES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 150 FEET OF ALL EXTERIOR WALLS OF ANY BUILDING FOR HOSE LAY REQUIREMENTS. AMENDMENT 503.1.15.THE FIRE LANE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 24 FEET WIDE. AMENDMENT 503.2.16.BUILDINGS MORE THAN 30 FEET IN HEIGHT ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF A 26-FOOT WIDE FIRE LANE IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY FOR FIREFIGHTINGOPERATIONS OF THE BUILDING. ONE OF THE 26-FOOT WIDE FIRE LANES SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET FROM THE BUILDING AND NO MORE THAN 30FEET. APPENDIX D1057.THE INSIDE TURNING RADIUS OF THE 24-FOOT FIRE LANE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 30 FEET. AMENDMENT 503.2.48.THE INSIDE TURNING RADIUS OF THE 26-FOOT FIRE LANE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 30 FEET. AMENDMENT 503.2.49.DEAD-END FIRE LANES ARE ONLY PERMITTED WITH APPROVED HAMMERHEADS.10.FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE ENTRANCES AND INTERSECTIONS. AMENDMENT 507.5.111.AS PROPERTIES DEVELOP, FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AT ALL INTERSECTING STREETS, AND THE MAXIMUM SPACING SHALL BE EVERY 300 FEET (300')FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS AND FACILITIES OTHER THAN R3. R-3 DEVELOPMENTS SHALL BE EVERY 500 FEET (500'). DISTANCES BETWEEN HYDRANTS SHALL BEMEASURED ALONG THE ROUTE THAT FIRE HOSE IS LAID BY A FIRE APPARATUS FROM A HYDRANT-TO-A HYDRANT, NOT AS THE "CROW FLIES." AMENDMENT507.5.112.FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF A FIRE HYDRANT AND 50 FEET OF A FIRE LANE.5" STORZ, 30-DEGREE DOWNWARD TURN WITH LOCKING CAP. AMENDMENT 507.5.113.FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 2 FOOT (2') TO 6 FOOT (6') BACK FROM THE CURB OR FIRE LANE AND SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN THE BULB OF A CUL-DE-SAC.AMENDMENT 507.5.114.THERE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) FIRE HYDRANTS SERVING EACH PROPERTY WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED DISTANCES LISTED ABOVE. A MINIMUM OF ONEFIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE LOCATED ON EACH LOT. AMENDMENT 507.5.115.A MINIMUM 10-FOOT UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND A BUILDING FOR ADEQUATE FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS. A CONTINUOUS ROW OFPARKING AND LANDSCAPING SHALL BE CONSIDERED A BARRIER. AMENDMENT 503.1.1WHILE THERE IS AN ARRAY OF BENEFITS TO EMERGENCY RESCUE AND FIREFIGHTING TACTICS, THE FOLLOWING ARE A FEW BASIC SCENARIOS TO EXPLAIN THERATIONALE.1.)LADDER ANGLE IN THE EVENT OF EMERGENCY RESCUE.2.)LADDER ANGLE IN THE EVENT OF ROOF VENTILATION.3.)360° SIZE-UP IS A BASIC PROTOCOL AND PROCEDURE OF THE FIRST ARRIVING OFFICER. THIS ALLOWS FIREFIGHTERS TO SIZE UP THE DANGER(S) TODETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL APPARATUS AND AID WILL BE NEEDED.4.)HOSE LAY MANEUVERABILITY IN THE EVENT OF A HOSE ATTACK; FIREFIGHTERS MUST PULL HOSE(S). IT IS COMMON PRACTICE THROUGHOUT THE INDUSTRY.UNFORTUNATELY, THERE IS NO ORDERLY OR SINGLE APPROACH TO STRETCHING HOSE OUT WHEN A BUILDING IS ON FIRE.5.)STAGING RESCUE EQUIPMENT AND VENTILATION FANS, TOOLS, THE MANEUVERABILITY OF EMS EQUIPMENT, AND SO FORTH.16.AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS IF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE EXCEEDS 5,000 SQUARE FEET TO THEDRIP LINE ON EACH LOT OR THE OCCUPANT LOAD WITHIN THE ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY EXCEEDS 100 PEOPLE. AMENDMENT 903.2.11.9.WATER METER SCHEDULEIDTYP.SIZENO.SAN. SEWERDOM.2"26"IRR.1"2N/A21COUNTYSURVEY:ABSTRACT NO.DENTONJOHN MORTON SURVEY793CITY:STATE:TOWN OF PROSPERTEXASLEGAL DESCRIPTION:OWNER/DEVELOPER:APPLICANT:CLAYMOORE ENGINEERING, INC.1903 CENTRAL DRIVE, SUITE #406BEDFORD, TX 76021PH: 817.281.0572SURVEYOR:EAGLE SURVEYING, LLC210 SOUTH ELM STREET,SUITE 104 ,TX 75057PH: 940.222.3009LOTS 1 , BLOCK ANORTH TEXAS CONFERENCE OF THEMETHODIST CHURCH ADDITIONGROSS AREA: 5.422 OR 236,172 SFCONTACT NAME: DREW DONOSKYCONTACT NAME: MASON DECKERSUP SITE PLANGRACE CHAPEL PROSPERNORTH TEXAS CONFERENCE OF THEUNITED METHODIST CHURCHPO BOX 866128PLANO, TEXAS 75086CONTACT NAME: KENNETH WOLVERTONACCORDING TO MAP NO. 48121C0410G, DATED APRIL 18, 2011 OF THENATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM MAP, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPOF COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY,FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION, THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN ZONE "X"(UNSHADED) AND IS NOT WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA.FLOODPLAIN NOTEPARKING SUMMARYPARKING REQUIREDCHURCH = 300 / 3 SEATS = 100CLASSROOM = 6*1.5 = 9ADMIN/DAYCARE = 21CHILDREN = 142130 SPACESPARKING PROVIDED137 SPACESADA REQUIRED5 SPACESADA PROVIDED5 SPACESSITE SUMMARY TABLE:LEGENDLIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTCONCRETE SIDEWALKPROPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTERPROPOSED FIRE LANE STRIPING PERCITY STANDARDSPARKING COUNTDUMPSTER DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTFIRE LANE CONCRETE PAVEMENT PERTOWN OF PROSPER STANDARDS10PUBLIC CONCRETE SIDEWALKPER CITY DETAILSHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTPLAYGROUND SUMMARYPLAYGROUND AREAREQUIRED = 65 SF / KID= 142 KIDS * 65 SF9,230 SFPLAYGROUND AREA PROVIDED9,430 SFPage 1182Item 16. PROPOSED BUILDING FFE=591.25 FUTURE EXPANSION OUTDOOR PLAYGROUND TRACT 2 CALLED 39.4269 ACRES LEIDECKER PROPERTIES LTD. DOC. NO. 2006-42667 O.R.D.C.T. TRACT 2 CALLED 39.4269 ACRES LEIDECKER PROPERTIES LTD. DOC. NO. 2006-42667 O.R.D.C.T. 592 592 592591591591590590590589589589588587586586586585585 584591 590 589 588 587 586 585 584 583582581S 6 FT. WIDE CURB CUT WITH 15'x15' RIPRAP 6 FT. WIDE CURB CUT WITH 15'x15' RIPRAP 6 FT. WIDE CURB CUT WITH 15'x15' RIPRAP SWALE LANDSCAPE BERM CONNECT TO ROOF DRAINS 10" Ø PVC @ MIN. 1.00% SLOPE CONNECT TO ROOF DRAINS F.M. HIGHWAY 1385ASPHALT ROADWAY80' RIGHT-OF-WAYDENTON WAY ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////6 LO 5 QM 6 GA 32 IB 2 BRO 2 BRO 2 BRO 2 BRO 2 BRO 2 BRO 10 LO 10 QM 42 GA 32 IB 19 GA 1 CE 1 CE 1 CE 1 CE 1 CE 1 CE 2 CE 2 CE 211 IB 99 GA 165 IB 23 DW2 23 IB 40 VC40 GA 3-31-22 L HINIRSTEAC CTTESADETST AIREG 61 O F 9 8 ET XE R LDRE CAANDS E EP A E CELANDSCAPE PLANTINGLP-1 GENERAL PLANTING NOTES 1. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL EXISTING VEGETATION (EXCEPT WHERE NOTED TO REMAIN). BEFORE STARTING WORK, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE GRADE OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE WITHIN +/-0.1' OF FINISH GRADE. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY SHOULD ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE DETAILED INSTRUCTION ON TURF AREA AND PLANTING BED PREPARATION. 2. CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN FINISH GRADES IN LANDSCAPE AREAS AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLANS, AND CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN SLOPES AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM STRUCTURES AT THE MINIMUM SLOPE SPECIFIED IN THE REPORT, AND AREAS OF POTENTIAL PONDING SHALL BE REGRADED TO BLEND IN WITH THE SURROUNDING GRADES AND ELIMINATE PONDING POTENTIAL. SHOULD ANY CONFLICTS AND/OR DISCREPANCIES ARISE BETWEEN THE GRADING PLANS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, THESE NOTES, AND ACTUAL CONDITIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY BRING SUCH ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, GENERAL CONTRACTOR, AND OWNER. 3. ENSURE THAT THE GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS SHALL BE 2" BELOW FINISH GRADE AFTER INSTALLING SOIL AMENDMENTS, AND 1" BELOW FINISH GRADE IN SOD AREAS AFTER INSTALLING SOIL AMENDMENTS. MULCH COVER WITHIN 6" OF CONCRETE WALKS AND CURBS SHALL NOT PROTRUDE ABOVE THE FINISH SURFACE OF THE WALKS AND CURBS. MULCH COVER WITHIN 12" OF WALLS SHALL BE AT LEAST 3" LOWER THAN THE TOP OF WALL. 4. INSTALL 5 OUNCE, WOVEN, NEEDLE-PUNCHED POLYPROPYLENE FABRIC (DeWITT "PRO-5" OR EQUAL) UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS AND INDIVIDUAL TREE RINGS. 5. INSTALL MULCH TOPDRESSING, TYPE AND DEPTH PER MULCH NOTE, IN ALL PLANTING BEDS AND TREE RINGS. DO NOT INSTALL MULCH WITHIN 6" OF TREE ROOT FLARE. 6. INSTALL 14G, GREEN STEEL EDGING BETWEEN ALL PLANTING BEDS AND TURF AREAS, AND BETWEEN GROUNDCOVERS AND OTHER PLANTS (WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLAN). 7. HYDROMULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE OF PROPERTY LIMITS (UNLESS SHOWN AS SOD). 8. ALL PLANT LOCATIONS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. ACTUAL LOCATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER PRIOR TO PLANTING. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY ARE MET (I.E., MINIMUM PLANT QUANTITIES, PLANTING METHODS, TREE PROTECTION METHODS, ETC.). 9. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING PLANT QUANTITIES; PLANT QUANTITIES SHOWN ON LEGENDS AND CALLOUTS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE PLAN AND THE PLANT LEGEND, THE PLANT QUANTITY AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN (FOR INDIVIDUAL SYMBOLS) OR CALLOUT (FOR GROUNDCOVER PATTERNS) SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. 10.NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IF SOME OF THE PLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING (VIA PROPER CHANNELS). 11. PLANTS MAY BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED OR REJECTED ON THE JOBSITE BY THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 12. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS FOR 90 DAYS BEYOND FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPE WORK BY THE OWNER. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WEEKLY SITE VISITS FOR THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS (AS APPROPRIATE): PROPER PRUNING, RESTAKING OF TREES, RESETTING OF PLANTS THAT HAVE SETTLED, MOWING AND AERATION OF LAWNS, WEEDING, RESEEDING AREAS WHICH HAVE NOT GERMINATED WELL, TREATING FOR INSECTS AND DISEASES,REPLACEMENT OF MULCH, REMOVAL OF LITTER, REPAIRS TO THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DUE TO FAULTY PARTS AND/OR WORKMANSHIP, AND THE APPROPRIATE WATERING OF ALL PLANTINGS. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER, WITH SCHEDULING ADJUSTMENTS BY SEASON TO MAXIMIZE WATER CONSERVATION. 13. SHOULD SEEDED AND/OR SODDED AREAS NOT BE COVERED BY AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHAL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING THESE AREAS AND OBTAINING A FULL STAND OF GRASS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 14. TO ACHIEVE FINAL ACCEPTANCE AT THE END OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST OCCUR: A. THE LANDSCAPE SHALL SHOW ACTIVE, HEALTHY GROWTH (WITH EXCEPTIONS MADE FOR SEASONAL DORMANCY). ALL PLANTS NOT MEETING THIS CONDITION SHALL BE REJECTED AND REPLACED BY HEALTHY PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. B. ALL HARDSCAPE SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. C. SODDED AREAS MUST BE ACTIVELY GROWING AND MUST REACH A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 1 1/2 INCHES BEFORE FIRST MOWING. HYDROMULCHED AREAS SHALL SHOW ACTIVE, HEALTHY GROWTH. BARE AREAS LARGER THAN TWELVE SQUARE INCHES MUST BE RESODDED OR RESEEDED (AS APPROPRIATE) PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. ALL SODDED TURF SHALL BE NEATLY MOWED. 15. SEE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR FURTHER REQUIREMENTS. (800) 680-6630 15455 Dallas Pkwy., Ste 600 Addison, TX 75001 www.EvergreenDesignGroup.com EVERGREEN D E S I G N G R O U P DATENo.REVISIONBYDATE: SHEET CHECKED: DRAWN: DESIGN:GRACE CHAPEL PROSPERFM 1385 & DENTON WAYPROSPER, TXFile No:1903 CENTRAL DR. SUITE #406PHONE: 817.281.0572BEDFORD, TX 76021 WWW.CLAYMOOREENG.COMTEXAS FIRM #14199 STREET FRONTAGE: FM 1385 346 LF TREES @ 1 / 30 LF:11 TREES REQUIRED 11 TREES PROVIDED SHRUBS @ 15 / 30 LF:165 SHRUBS REQUIRED 165 SHRUBS REQUIRED NOLES ROAD 600 LF 1 / 30 LF:20 TREES REQUIRED 20 TREES PROVIDED SHRUBS @ 15 / 30 LF:300 SHRUBS REQUIRED 300 SHRUBS REQUIRED PARKING LOT TOTAL PARKING SPACES:144 REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA: 2,160 SF (15 SF / PARKING SPACE) PROVIDED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA: 3,225 SF 1 TREE PROVIDED AT THE TERMINUS OF EACH PARKING BAY ADDITIONAL SHRUBS PROVIDED AS A SOLID LIVING SCREEN PERIMETER LANDSCAPE EAST PROPERTY LINE 346 LF TREES REQUIRED (1 ORNAMENTAL TREE / 15 LF):23 TREES PROVIDED:23 SHRUBS REQUIRED (1 SHRUBS/15 LF): 23 SHRUBS PROVIDED:23 SOUTH PROPERTY LINE 600 LF TREES REQUIRED (1 ORNAMENTAL TREE / 15 LF):40 TREES PROVIDED:40 SHRUBS REQUIRED (1 SHRUBS/15 LF): 40 SHRUBS PROVIDED:40 LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TREES CODE COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY EX Existing Tree to Remain existing existing 2 reference TD sheets DW2 Desert Willow / Chilopsis linearis CONT. 3"Cal 23 min. 12' ht; buffer tree BRO Burr Oak / Quercus macrocarpa CONT. 3"Cal 12 min. 12' ht; parking lot tree QM Texas Red Oak / Quercus texana CONT. 3"Cal 15 min. 12' ht; street tree LO Live Oak / Quercus virginiana CONT. 3"Cal 16 min. 12' ht; street Tree CE Cedar Elm / Ulmus crassifolia CONT. 3"Cal 10 min. 12' ht; parking lot tree VC Chaste Tree / Vitex agnus-castus CONT. 3"Cal 40 Purple; Multi-trunk SHRUBS CODE COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY GA Glossy Abelia / Abelia grandiflora 5 gal 206 36" o.c.; min. 24" ht. IB Burford Holly / Ilex cornuta `Burfordii` 10 gal.462 min. 36" ht; 30" o.c. GROUND COVERS CODE COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY BG Bermuda Grass / Cynodon dactylon hydro 62,888 sf CD Bermuda Grass / Cynodon dactylon `tif 419` sod 54,282 sf PLANT_SCHEDULE 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch = 30 ft. 30 30 6015 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ROOT BARRIERS NEAR ALL NEWLY-PLANTED TREES THAT ARE LOCATED WITHIN FIVE (5) FEET OF PAVING OR CURBS. ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE "CENTURY" OR "DEEP-ROOT" 24" DEEP PANELS (OR EQUAL). BARRIERS SHALL BE LOCATED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO HARDSCAPE. INSTALL PANELS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE CONTRACTOR USE ROOT BARRIERS OF A TYPE THAT COMPLETELY ENCIRCLE THE ROOTBALL. ROOT BARRIERS AFTER ALL PLANTING IS COMPLETE, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 3" THICK LAYER OF 1-1/2" SHREDDED WOOD MULCH OVER LANDSCAPE FABRIC IN ALL PLANTING AREAS (EXCEPT FOR TURF AND SEEDED AREAS). CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SAMPLES OF ALL MULCHES TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ABSOLUTELY NO EXPOSED GROUND SHALL BE LEFT SHOWING ANYWHERE ON THE PROJECT AFTER MULCH HAS BEEN INSTALLED. MULCHES PLANTING AND IRRIGATION GUARANTEE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE THAT ALL NEWLY INSTALLED AND EXISTING PLANTS SHALL SURVIVE FOR ONE YEAR AFTER FINAL OWNER ACCEPTANCE OF THE INSTALLATION WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATE WATERING OF THE LANDSCAPE THROUGH INSTALLATION OF A PROPERLY DESIGNED IRRIGATION SYSTEM. THE OWNER SHALL APPROVE THE SYSTEM DESIGN BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PLANTS OR IRRIGATION. Page 1183 Item 16. 8 WEED FABRIC UNDER MULCH.8 B SCALE: NTS SHRUB AND PERENNIAL PLANTING 7 6 5 3" HIGH EARTHEN WATERING BASIN. UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL. ROOT BALL. BACKFILL. AMEND AND FERTILIZE ONLY AS RECOMMENDED IN SOIL FERTILITY ANALYSIS. FINISH GRADE. MULCH, TYPE AND DEPTH PER PLANS. PLACE NO MORE THAN 1" OF MULCH WITHIN 6" OF PLANT CENTER. SHRUB, PERENNIAL, OR ORNAMENTAL GRASS. 3 2 1 4 7 6 5 1 2 3 2X X 4 C SCALE: NTS PLANT SPACING EQUAL EDGE OF PLANTING AREAEQUAL EQUALNOTE: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED AT EQUAL TRIANGULAR SPACING (EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS AS INFORMAL GROUPINGS). REFER TO PLANT LEGEND FOR SPACING DISTANCE BETWEEN PLANTS. AREA DIVIDER PLANT SPACING TO DETERMINE NO. OF PLANTS 6"0.25 8"0.45 10"0.69 12"1 15"1.56 18"2.25 24"4 30"6.25 36"9 EXAMPLE: PLANTS AT 18" O.C. IN 100 SF OF PLANTING AREA = 100/2.25 = 44 PLANTSEQUALTURF (WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN).4 PLANT.3 MULCH LAYER.2 CURB.1 1 432 OF MATURE CANOPY 24" MIN. TO EDGE DISTANCE PER PLAN E SCALE: NOT TO SCALE HEDGE PLANTING AT PARKING AREA FINISH GRADE.13 13 NON-CONIFEROUS TREE A SCALE: NOT TO SCALE TREE PLANTING 12 5 3 2 5 3X ROOTBALL DIA. 4 1 11 10 9 8 7 6 4 2 STAKING EXAMPLES (PLAN VIEW) PREVAILING WINDS CONIFEROUS TREE TRUNK FLARE. 4" HIGH EARTHEN WATERING BASIN. UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL. ROOT BALL. BACKFILL. AMEND AND FERTILIZE ONLY AS RECOMMENDED IN SOIL FERTILITY ANALYSIS. WEED FABRIC UNDER MULCH. MULCH, TYPE AND DEPTH PER PLANS. DO NOT PLACE MULCH WITHIN 6" OF TRUNK. PRESSURE-TREATED WOOD DEADMAN, TWO PER TREE (MIN.). BURY OUTSIDE OF PLANTING PIT AND 18" MIN. INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL. 24" X 3/4" P.V.C. MARKERS OVER WIRES. GREEN STEEL T-POSTS. EXTEND POSTS 12" MIN. INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL. CINCH-TIES (24" BOX TREES AND SMALLER) OR 12 GAUGE GALVANIZED WIRE WITH NYLON TREE STRAPS AT TREE AND STAKE (36" BOX TREES AND LARGER). SECURE TIES OR STRAPS TO TRUNK JUST ABOVE LOWEST MAJOR BRANCHES. TREE CANOPY. 3 2 1 NOTES: 1. SCARIFY SIDES OF PLANTING PIT PRIOR TO SETTING TREE. 2. REMOVE EXCESS SOIL APPLIED ON TOP OF THE ROOTBALL THAT COVERS THE ROOT FLARE. THE PLANTING HOLE DEPTH SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE ROOTBALL RESTS ON UNDISTURBED SOIL, AND THE ROOT FLARE IS 2"-3" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 3. FOR BALLED-AND-BURLAPPED TREES, REMOVE WIRE BASKET AND BURLAP BEFORE BACKFILLING. 4. REMOVE ALL NURSERY STAKES AFTER PLANTING. 5. FOR TREES OVER 3" CALIPER AND TREES 36" BOX AND LARGER, USE THREE STAKES OR DEADMEN (AS APPROPRIATE), SPACED EVENLY AROUND TREE. 6. STAKING SHALL BE TIGHT ENOUGH TO PREVENT TRUNK FROM BENDING, BUT LOOSE ENOUGH TO ALLOW SOME TRUNK MOVEMENT IN WIND. PREVAILING WINDS 12 10 11 9 8 1 4 7 6 5 B. GENERAL PLANTING 1. REMOVE ALL NURSERY TAGS AND STAKES FROM PLANTS. 2. EXCEPT IN AREAS TO BE PLANTED WITH ORNAMENTAL GRASSES, APPLY PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDES AT THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED RATE. 3. TRENCHING NEAR EXISTING TREES: a. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB ROOTS 1-1/2" AND LARGER IN DIAMETER WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (CRZ) OF EXISTING TREES, AND SHALL EXERCISE ALL POSSIBLE CARE AND PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID INJURY TO TREE ROOTS, TRUNKS, AND BRANCHES. THE CRZ IS DEFINED AS A CIRCULAR AREA EXTENDING OUTWARD FROM THE TREE TRUNK, WITH A RADIUS EQUAL TO 1' FOR EVERY 1" OF TRUNK DIAMETER-AT-BREAST-HEIGHT (4.5' ABOVE THE AVERAGE GRADE AT THE TRUNK). b. ALL EXCAVATION WITHIN THE CRZ SHALL BE PERFORMED USING HAND TOOLS. NO MACHINE EXCAVATION OR TRENCHING OF ANY KIND SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE CRZ. c. ALTER ALIGNMENT OF PIPE TO AVOID TREE ROOTS 1-1/2" AND LARGER IN DIAMETER. WHERE TREE ROOTS 1-1/2" AND LARGER IN DIAMETER ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE FIELD, TUNNEL UNDER SUCH ROOTS. WRAP EXPOSED ROOTS WITH SEVERAL LAYERS OF BURLAP AND KEEP MOIST. CLOSE ALL TRENCHES WITHIN THE CANOPY DRIP LINES WITHIN 24 HOURS. d. ALL SEVERED ROOTS SHALL BE HAND PRUNED WITH SHARP TOOLS AND ALLOWED TO AIR-DRY. DO NOT USE ANY SORT OF SEALERS OR WOUND PAINTS. C. TREE PLANTING 1. TREE PLANTING HOLES SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO MINIMUM WIDTH OF TWO TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE ROOTBALL, AND TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL LESS TWO INCHES. 2. SCARIFY THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF THE PLANTING HOLE PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE TREE. REMOVE ANY GLAZING THAT MAY HAVE BEEN CAUSED DURING THE EXCAVATION OF THE HOLE. 3. FOR CONTAINER TREES, TO REMOVE ANY POTENTIALLY GIRDLING ROOTS AND OTHER ROOT DEFECTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SHAVE A 1" LAYER OFF OF THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF THE ROOTBALL OF ALL TREES JUST BEFORE PLACING INTO THE PLANTING PIT. DO NOT "TEASE" ROOTS OUT FROM THE ROOTBALL. 4. INSTALL THE TREE ON UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SO THAT THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL IS TWO TO THREE INCHES ABOVE THE SURROUNDING GRADE. 5. BACKFILL THE TREE HOLE UTILIZING THE EXISTING TOPSOIL FROM ON-SITE. ROCKS LARGER THAN 1" DIA. AND ALL OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SOIL PRIOR TO THE BACKFILL. SHOULD ADDITIONAL SOIL BE REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH THIS TASK, IMPORT ADDITIONAL TOPSOIL FROM OFF-SITE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 6. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TREE STAKES (BEYOND THE MINIMUMS LISTED BELOW) WILL BE LEFT TO THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S DISCRETION. SHOULD ANY TREES FALL OR LEAN, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL STRAIGHTEN THE TREE, OR REPLACE IT SHOULD IT BECOME DAMAGED. TREE STAKING SHALL ADHERE TO THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES: a. 15 - 30 GAL TREES TWO STAKES PER TREE b. 45 - 100 GAL TREES THREE STAKES PER TREE c. MULTI-TRUNK TREES THREE STAKES PER TREE MINIMUM, POSITIONED AS NEEDED TO STABILZE THE TREE 7. UPON COMPLETION OF PLANTING, CONSTRUCT AN EARTH WATERING BASIN AROUND THE TREE. COVER THE INTERIOR OF THE TREE RING WITH THE WEED BARRIER CLOTH AND TOPDRESS WITH MULCH (TYPE AND DEPTH PER PLANS). D. SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTING 1. DIG THE PLANTING HOLES TWICE AS WIDE AND 2" LESS DEEP THAN EACH PLANT'S ROOTBALL. INSTALL THE PLANT IN THE HOLE. BACKFILL AROUND THE PLANT WITH SOIL AMENDED PER SOIL TEST RECOMMENDATIONS. 2. INSTALL THE WEED BARRIER CLOTH, OVERLAPPING IT AT THE ENDS. UTILIZE STEEL STAPLES TO KEEP THE WEED BARRIER CLOTH IN PLACE. 3. WHEN PLANTING IS COMPLETE, INSTALL MULCH (TYPE AND DEPTH PER PLANS) OVER ALL PLANTING BEDS, COVERING THE ENTIRE PLANTING AREA. E. SODDING 1. SOD VARIETY TO BE AS SPECIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. 2. LAY SOD WITHIN 24 HOURS FROM THE TIME OF STRIPPING. DO NOT LAY IF THE GROUND IS FROZEN. 3. LAY THE SOD TO FORM A SOLID MASS WITH TIGHTLY FITTED JOINTS. BUTT ENDS AND SIDES OF SOD STRIPS - DO NOT OVERLAP. STAGGER STRIPS TO OFFSET JOINTS IN ADJACENT COURSES. 4. ROLL THE SOD TO ENSURE GOOD CONTACT OF THE SOD'S ROOT SYSTEM WITH THE SOIL UNDERNEATH. 5. WATER THE SOD THOROUGHLY WITH A FINE SPRAY IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING TO OBTAIN AT LEAST SIX INCHES OF PENETRATION INTO THE SOIL BELOW THE SOD. F. HYDROMULCHING 1. THE HYDROMULCH MIX (PER 1,000 SF) SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: a. WINTER MIX (OCTOBER 1 - MARCH 31) 50# CELLULOSE FIBER MULCH 2# UNHULLED BERMUDA SEED 2# ANNUAL RYE SEED 15# 15-15-15 WATER SOLUBLE FERTILIZER b. SUMMER MIX (APRIL 1 - SEPTEMBER 30) 50# CELLULOSE FIBER MULCH 2# HULLED BERMUDA SEED 15# 15-15-15 WATER SOLUBLE FERTILIZER G. CLEAN UP 1. DURING LANDSCAPE PREPARATION AND PLANTING, KEEP ALL PAVEMENT CLEAN AND ALL WORK AREAS IN A NEAT, ORDERLY CONDITION. 2. DISPOSED LEGALLY OF ALL EXCAVATED MATERIALS OFF THE PROJECT SITE. H. INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE 1. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE SITE CLEAN, FREE OF DEBRIS AND TRASH, AND SUITABLE FOR USE AS INTENDED. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL THEN REQUEST AN INSPECTION BY THE OWNER TO DETERMINE FINAL ACCEPTABILITY. 3. WHEN THE INSPECTED PLANTING WORK DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE AND/OR REPAIR THE REJECTED WORK TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION WITHIN 24 HOURS. 4. THE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PERIOD WILL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL THE LANDSCAPE WORK HAS BEEN RE-INSPECTED BY THE OWNER AND FOUND TO BE ACCEPTABLE. AT THAT TIME, A WRITTEN NOTICE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE ISSUED BY THE OWNER, AND THE MAINTENANCE AND GUARANTEE PERIODS WILL COMMENCE. I. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 1. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS FOR 90 DAYS BEYOND FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPE WORK BY THE OWNER. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WEEKLY SITE VISITS FOR THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS (AS APPROPRIATE): PROPER PRUNING, RESTAKING OF TREES, RESETTING OF PLANTS THAT HAVE SETTLED, MOWING AND AERATION OF LAWNS, WEEDING, RESEEDING AREAS WHICH HAVE NOT GERMINATED WELL, TREATING FOR INSECTS AND DISEASES,REPLACEMENT OF MULCH, REMOVAL OF LITTER, REPAIRS TO THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DUE TO FAULTY PARTS AND/OR WORKMANSHIP, AND THE APPROPRIATE WATERING OF ALL PLANTINGS. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN PROPER WORKING ORDER, WITH SCHEDULING ADJUSTMENTS BY SEASON TO MAXIMIZE WATER CONSERVATION. 2.SHOULD SEEDED AND/OR SODDED AREAS NOT BE COVERED BY AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHAL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING THESE AREAS AND OBTAINING A FULL, HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 3. TO ACHIEVE FINAL ACCEPTANCE AT THE END OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST OCCUR: a. THE LANDSCAPE SHALL SHOW ACTIVE, HEALTHY GROWTH (WITH EXCEPTIONS MADE FOR SEASONAL DORMANCY). ALL PLANTS NOT MEETING THIS CONDITION SHALL BE REJECTED AND REPLACED BY HEALTHY PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. b. ALL HARDSCAPE SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. c. SODDED AREAS MUST BE ACTIVELY GROWING AND MUST REACH A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 1 1/2 INCHES BEFORE FIRST MOWING. HYDROMULCHED AREAS SHALL SHOW ACTIVE, HEALTHY GROWTH. BARE AREAS LARGER THAN TWELVE SQUARE INCHES MUST BE RESODDED OR RESEEDED (AS APPROPRIATE) PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. ALL SODDED TURF SHALL BE NEATLY MOWED. J. WARRANTY PERIOD, PLANT GUARANTEE AND REPLACEMENTS 1. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL TREES, SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, SOD, SEEDED/HYDROMULCHED AREAS, AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE OWNER'S FINAL ACCEPTANCE (90 DAYS FOR ANNUAL PLANTS). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE AND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ANY PLANTS WHICH DIE IN THAT TIME, OR REPAIR ANY PORTIONS OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WHICH OPERATE IMPROPERLY. 2. AFTER THE INITIAL MAINTENANCE PERIOD AND DURING THE GUARANTEE PERIOD, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ONLY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACEMENT OF PLANTS WHEN PLANT DEATH CANNOT BE ATTRIBUTED DIRECTLY TO OVERWATERING OR OTHER DAMAGE BY HUMAN ACTIONS. K. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF (2) COPIES OF RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. A RECORD DRAWING IS A RECORD OF ALL CHANGES THAT OCCURRED IN THE FIELD AND THAT ARE DOCUMENTED THROUGH CHANGE ORDERS, ADDENDA, OR CONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT DRAWING MARKUPS. GENERAL A. QUALIFICATIONS OF LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR 1. ALL LANDSCAPE WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SINGLE FIRM SPECIALIZING IN LANDSCAPE PLANTING. 2. A LIST OF SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED PROJECTS OF THIS TYPE, SIZE AND NATURE MAY BE REQUESTED BY THE OWNER FOR FURTHER QUALIFICATION MEASURES. 3. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUST HOLD A VALID NURSERY AND FLORAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, AS WELL AS OPERATE UNDER A COMMERCIAL PESTICIDE APPLICATOR LICENSE ISSUED BY EITHER THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OR THE TEXAS STRUCTURAL PEST CONTROL BOARD. B. SCOPE OF WORK 1. WORK COVERED BY THESE SECTIONS INCLUDES THE FURNISHING AND PAYMENT OF ALL MATERIALS, LABOR, SERVICES, EQUIPMENT, LICENSES, TAXES AND ANY OTHER ITEMS THAT ARE NECESSARY FOR THE EXECUTION, INSTALLATION AND COMPLETION OF ALL WORK, SPECIFIED HEREIN AND / OR SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, NOTES, AND DETAILS. 2. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, CODES AND REGULATIONS REQUIRED BY AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER SUCH WORK, INCLUDING ALL INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS REQUIRED BY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN SUPPLY, TRANSPORTATION AND INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. 3. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES (WATER, SEWER, ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, GAS, CABLE, TELEVISION, ETC.) PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY WORK. PRODUCTS A. ALL MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS SHALL BE NEW. B. CONTAINER AND BALLED-AND-BURLAPPED PLANTS: 1. FURNISH NURSERY-GROWN PLANTS COMPLYING WITH ANSI Z60.1-2004. PROVIDE WELL-SHAPED, FULLY BRANCHED, HEALTHY, VIGOROUS STOCK FREE OF DISEASE, INSECTS, EGGS, LARVAE, AND DEFECTS SUCH AS KNOTS, SUN SCALD, INJURIES, ABRASIONS, AND DISFIGUREMENT. ALL PLANTS WITHIN A SPECIES SHALL HAVE SIMILAR SIZE, AND SHALL BE OF A FORM TYPICAL FOR THE SPECIES. ALL TREES SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES WITHIN 200 MILES OF THE PROJECT SITE, AND WITH SIMILAR CLIMACTIC CONDITIONS. 2. ROOT SYSTEMS SHALL BE HEALTHY, DENSELY BRANCHED, FIBROUS ROOT SYSTEMS, NON-POT-BOUND, FREE FROM ENCIRCLING AND/OR GIRDLING ROOTS, AND FREE FROM ANY OTHER ROOT DEFECTS (SUCH AS J-SHAPED ROOTS). 3. ANY PLANT DEEMED UNACCEPTABLE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND SHALL BE REPLACED WITH AN ACCEPTBLE PLANT OF LIKE TYPE AND SIZE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S OWN EXPENSE. ANY PLANTS APPEARING TO BE UNHEALTHY, EVEN IF DETERMINED TO STILL BE ALIVE, SHALL NOT BE ACCEPTED. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER SHALL BE THE SOLE JUDGES AS TO THE ACCEPTABILITY OF PLANT MATERIAL. 4. ALL TREES SHALL BE STANDARD IN FORM, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. TREES WITH CENTRAL LEADERS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF LEADER IS DAMAGED OR REMOVED. PRUNE ALL DAMAGED TWIGS AFTER PLANTING. 5. CALIPER MEASUREMENTS FOR STANDARD (SINGLE TRUNK) TREES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: SIX INCHES ABOVE THE ROOT FLARE FOR TREES UP TO AND INCLUDING FOUR INCHES IN CALIPER, AND TWELVE INCHES ABOVE THE ROOT FLARE FOR TREES EXCEEDING FOUR INCHES IN CALIPER. 6. MULTI-TRUNK TREES SHALL BE MEASURED BY THEIR OVERALL HEIGHT, MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. 7. ANY TREE OR SHRUB SHOWN TO HAVE EXCESS SOIL PLACED ON TOP OF THE ROOT BALL, SO THAT THE ROOT FLARE HAS BEEN COMPLETELY COVERED, SHALL BE REJECTED. C. SOD: PROVIDE WELL-ROOTED SOD OF THE VARIETY NOTED ON THE PLANS. SOD SHALL BE CUT FROM HEALTHY, MATURE TURF WITH SOIL THICKNESS OF 3/4" TO 1". EACH PALLET OF SOD SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A CERTIFICATE FROM SUPPLIER STATING THE COMPOSITION OF THE SOD. D. SEED: PROVIDE BLEND OF SPECIES AND VARIETIES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS, WITH MAXIMUM PERCENTAGES OF PURITY, GERMINATION, AND MINIMUM PERCENTAGE OF WEED SEED AS INDICATED ON PLANS. EACH BAG OF SEED SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A TAG FROM THE SUPPLIER INDICATING THE COMPOSITION OF THE SEED. E. TOPSOIL: SANDY TO CLAY LOAM TOPSOIL, FREE OF STONES LARGER THAN ½ INCH, FOREIGN MATTER, PLANTS, ROOTS, AND SEEDS. F. COMPOST: WELL-COMPOSTED, STABLE, AND WEED-FREE ORGANIC MATTER, pH RANGE OF 5.5 TO 8; MOISTURE CONTENT 35 TO 55 PERCENT BY WEIGHT; 100 PERCENT PASSING THROUGH 3/4-INCH SIEVE; SOLUBLE SALT CONTENT OF 5 TO 10 DECISIEMENS/M; NOT EXCEEDING 0.5 PERCENT INERT CONTAMINANTS AND FREE OF SUBSTANCES TOXIC TO PLANTINGS. NO MANURE OR ANIMAL-BASED PRODUCTS SHALL BE USED. G. PLANTING MIX: AN EQUAL PART MIXTURE OF TOPSOIL, SAND AND COMPOST. H. FERTILIZER: GRANULAR FERTILIZER CONSISTING OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS, POTASSIUM, AND OTHER NUTRIENTS IN PROPORTIONS, AMOUNTS, AND RELEASE RATES RECOMMENDED IN A SOIL REPORT FROM A QUALIFIED SOIL-TESTING AGENCY (SEE BELOW). I. MULCH: SIZE AND TYPE AS INDICATED ON PLANS, FREE FROM DELETERIOUS MATERIALS AND SUITABLE AS A TOP DRESSING OF TREES AND SHRUBS. J. WEED FABRIC: 5 OUNCE, WOVEN, NEEDLE-PUNCHED FABRIC, SUCH AS DEWITT PRO5 LANDSCAPE FABRIC (OR APPROVED EQUAL). K. TREE STAKING AND GUYING 1. STAKES: 6' LONG GREEN METAL T-POSTS. 2. GUY AND TIE WIRE: ASTM A 641, CLASS 1, GALVANIZED-STEEL WIRE, 2-STRAND, TWISTED, 0.106 INCH DIAMETER. 3. STRAP CHAFING GUARD: REINFORCED NYLON OR CANVAS AT LEAST 1-1/2 INCH WIDE, WITH GROMMETS TO PROTECT TREE TRUNKS FROM DAMAGE. L. STEEL EDGING: PROFESSIONAL STEEL EDGING, 14 GAUGE THICK X 4 INCHES WIDE, FACTORY PAINTED DARK GREEN. ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS INCLUDE COL-MET OR APPROVED EQUAL. M. PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDES: ANY GRANULAR, NON-STAINING PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE THAT IS LABELED FOR THE SPECIFIC ORNAMENTALS OR TURF ON WHICH IT WILL BE UTILIZED. PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDES SHALL BE APPLIED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S LABELED RATES. METHODS A. SOIL PREPARATION 1. BEFORE STARTING WORK, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE GRADE OF ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE WITHIN +/-0.1' OF FINISH GRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY SHOULD ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST. 2. SOIL TESTING: a. AFTER FINISH GRADES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED, CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE SOIL SAMPLES TESTED BY AN ESTABLISHED SOIL TESTING LABORATORY FOR THE FOLLOWING: SOIL TEXTURAL CLASS, GENERAL SOIL FERTILITY, pH, ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT, SALT (CEC), LIME, SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO (SAR) AND BORON CONTENT. EACH SAMPLE SUBMITTED SHALL CONTAIN NO LESS THAN ONE QUART OF SOIL. b. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO SUBMIT THE PROJECT'S PLANT LIST TO THE LABORATORY ALONG WITH THE SOIL SAMPLES. c. THE SOIL REPORT PRODUCED BY THE LABORATORY SHALL CONTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING (AS APPROPRIATE): GENERAL SOIL PREPARATION AND BACKFILL MIXES, PRE-PLANT FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS, AND ANY OTHER SOIL RELATED ISSUES. THE REPORT SHALL ALSO PROVIDE A FERTILIZER PROGRAM FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD AND FOR LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SOIL AMENDMENTS AND FERTILIZERS PER THE SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. ANY CHANGE IN COST DUE TO THE SOIL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS, EITHER INCREASE OR DECREASE, SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER WITH THE REPORT. 4.FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY, THE SOIL PREPARATION SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: a. TURF: INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS INTO THE TOP 8" OF SOIL BY MEANS OF ROTOTILLING AFTER CROSS-RIPPING: i. NITROGEN STABILIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT - 4 CU. YDS. PER 1,000 S.F. ii. AMMONIUM PHOSPHATE 16-20-0 - 15 LBS PER 1,000 S.F. iii. AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM - 100 LBS PER 1,000 S.F. b. TREES, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS: INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS INTO THE TOP 8" OF SOIL BY MEANS OF ROTOTILLING AFTER CROSS-RIPPING: i. NITROGEN STABILIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT - 4 CU. YDS. PER 1,000 S.F. ii. 12-12-12 FERTILIZER - 10 LBS. PER CU. YD. iii. AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM - 10 LBS. PER CU. YD. iv. IRON SULPHATE - 2 LBS. PER CU. YD. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT THE GRADE IN SOD AREAS SHALL BE 1" BELOW FINISH GRADE AFTER INSTALLING SOIL AMENDMENTS, AND 2" BELOW FINISH GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS AFTER INSTALLING SOIL AMENDMENTS. MULCH COVER WITHIN 6" OF CONCRETE WALKS AND CURBS SHALL NOT PROTRUDE ABOVE THE FINISH SURFACE OF THE WALKS AND CURBS. MULCH COVER WITHIN 12" OF WALLS SHALL BE AT LEAST 3" LOWER THAN THE TOP OF WALL. 6. ONCE SOIL PREPARATION IS COMPLETE, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO DEBRIS, TRASH, OR STONES LARGER THAN 1" REMAINING IN THE TOP 6" OF SOIL. PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS LANDSCAPE DETAILS &SPECIFICATIONS3-31-22 L HINIRSTEAC CTTESADETST AIREG 61 O F 9 8 ET XE R LDRE CAANDS E EP A E CELP-2 (800) 680-6630 15455 Dallas Pkwy., Ste 600 Addison, TX 75001 www.EvergreenDesignGroup.com EVERGREEN D E S I G N G R O U P DATENo.REVISIONBYDATE: SHEET CHECKED: DRAWN: DESIGN:GRACE CHAPEL PROSPERFM 1385 & DENTON WAYPROSPER, TXFile No:1903 CENTRAL DR. SUITE #406PHONE: 817.281.0572BEDFORD, TX 76021 WWW.CLAYMOOREENG.COMTEXAS FIRM #14199 TOWN OF PROSPER MAINTENANCE STANDARDS A. THE OWNER, TENANT AND/OR THEIR AGENT, IF ANY, SHALL BE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPING REQUIRED BY THIS ORDINANCE. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PERPETUALLY MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY AND GROWING CONDITION AS IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE SEASON OF THE YEAR. PLANT MATERIALS THAT DIE SHALL BE REPLACED BY PROPERTY OWNER, TENANT OR AGENT WITH PLANT MATERIAL OF SIMILAR VARIETY AND SIZE, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF NOTIFICATION BY THE TOWN OR A DATE APPROVED BY THE TOWN. B. ALL TREES LOCATED ON TOWN PROPERTY SHALL BE CARED FOR BY THE TOWN UNLESS THAT RESPONSIBILITY IS TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER ENTITY THROUGH A COUNCIL-APPROVED AGREEMENT. THE DIRECTOR OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT SHALL ENSURE THAT THE TOWN, OR ITS CONTRACTOR, MONITORS AND CARES FOR TREES IN A WAY THAT PROMOTES A HEALTHY AND GROWING URBAN FOREST, IS PERFORMED ACCORDING TO ANSI A300, “STANDARDS FOR TREE CARE OPERATIONS,” AND TREE CARE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE. IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL TO REMOVE, PRUNE, DAMAGE OR OTHERWISE HARM TREES ON TOWN PROPERTY WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE DIRECTOR OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT. THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEVELOPING AND UPDATING AN ANNUAL WORK PLAN. THIS WORK PLAN SHALL DOCUMENT WHAT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES ARE BEING PERFORMED AND SCHEDULED EACH YEAR. THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MAY APPOINT AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO FOCUS ON ISSUES AND INITIATIVES THAT PERTAIN TO ANY URBAN FOREST THAT IS LOCATED ON PUBLIC LANDS. 1)Plant material shall be measured and sized according to the latest edition of the Texas Nursery & Landscape Association (TNLA) Specifications, Grades and Standards. 2) All plant substitutions are subject to Town approval and must be specified on the approved landscape plan. 3) All turf areas to be established prior to the Certificate of Occupancy, unless otherwise approved by the Town. 4) Ground covers used in lieu of turf grass must provide complete coverage within one (1) year of planting and maintain adequate coverage as approved by the Town. 5) Trees must be planted four (4) feet or greater from curbs, sidewalks, utility lines, screening walls, and/or other healthy root growth. 6) Tree pits shall have roughened sides and be two to three times wider than the root ball of the tree in order to facilitate healthy root growth. 7) Tree pits shall be tested for water percolation. If water does not drain out of tree pit within a 24-hour period, the contractor shall provide berming, or devise alternative drainage. 8) Trees shall not be planted deeper than the base of the “trunk flare”. 9) The tree pit shall be backfilled with native topsoil free of rock and other debris. 10) Burlap, twine, and wire baskets shall be loosened and pulled back from the trunk of tree as much as possible. 11) Trees shall not be watered to excess that results in soil saturation. If soil becomes saturated, the watering schedule shall be adjusted to allow for drainage and absorption of the excess water. 12) A 3-4” layer of mulch shall be provided around the base of the planted tree. The mulch shall be pulled back 1-2” from the trunk of the tree. 13) No person(s) or entity may use improper or malicious maintenance or pruning techniques which would likely lead to the death of the tree. Improper or malicious techniques include, but are not limited to, topping or other unsymmetrical trimming of trees, trimming trees with a backhoe, or use of fire or poison to cause the death of a tree. 14) Topsoil shall be a minimum of eight (8) inches in depth in planting areas. Soil shall be free of stones, roots, and clods and any other foreign material that is not beneficial for plant growth. 15) All plant beds shall be top-dressed with a minimum of three (3) inches of mulch. 16)Trees overhanging walks and parking shall have a minimum clear trunk height of seven (7) feet. Trees overhanging public street pavement drive aisles and fire lanes shall have a minimum clear trunk height of fourteen (14) feet. 17) A visibility triangle must be provided at all intersections, where shrubs are not to exceed thirty (30) inches in height, and trees shall have a minimum clear trunk height of nine (9) feet. 18) Trees planted on a slope shall have the tree well at the average grad of slope. 19) No shrubs shall be permitted within areas less than three (3) feet in width. All beds less than three (3) feet in width shall be grass, groundcover, or some type of fixed paving. 20) The owner, tenant, and/or their agents, if any, shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance, establishment, and permanence of plant material. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. This shall include, but not limited to, mowing, edging, pruning, fertilizing, watering, and other activities necessary for the maintenance of landscaped areas. 21) All plant material shall be maintained in a healthy and growing condition as is appropriate for the season of the year. Plant material that is damaged, destroyed, or removed shall be replaced with plant material of similar size and variety within thirty (30) days unless otherwise approved in writing by the Town of Prosper. 22) Landscape and open areas shall be kept free of trash, litter, and weeds. 23) An automatic irrigation system shall be provided to irrigate all landscape areas. Overspray on streets and walks is prohibited. A permit from the Building Inspection Division is required for each irrigation system. 24) No plant material shall be allowed to encroach on right-of-way, sidewalks, or easements to the extent that the vision or route of travel for vehicular, pedestrian, or bicycle traffic is impeded. 25) No planting areas shall exceed 3:1 slope (3 ft Horizontal to 1 ft Vertical). 26) Earthen berms shall not include construction debris. Contractor must correct slippage or damage to the smooth finish grad of the berm prior to acceptance. 27) All walkways shall meet ADA and TAS requirements. 28) Contact Town of Prosper Parks and Recreation Division at (972) 569-1160 for landscape inspection. Note that landscape installation must comply with approved landscape plans prior to final acceptance by the Town and/or obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. 29) Final inspection and approval of screening walls, irrigation, and landscape is subject to all public utilities, including but not limited to manholes, valves, water meters, cleanouts, and other appurtenances, to be accessible, adjusted to grade, and to the Town of Prosper’s Public Works Department standards. 30) Prior to calling for a landscape inspection, the contractor is responsible for marking all manholes, valves, water meters, cleanouts, and other utility appurtenances with flagging for field verification by the Town. TOWN OF PROSPER GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES Page 1184 Item 16. PROPOSED BUILDING FFE=591.25 FUTURE EXPANSION OUTDOOR PLAYGROUND TRACT 2 CALLED 39.4269 ACRES LEIDECKER PROPERTIES LTD. DOC. NO. 2006-42667 O.R.D.C.T. CALLED 65.133 ACRES DENTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT DOC. NO. 2017-65208 O.R.D.C.T. TRACT 2 CALLED 39.4269 ACRES LEIDECKER PROPERTIES LTD. DOC. NO. 2006-42667 O.R.D.C.T. TRACT 2 CALLED 39.4269 ACRES LEIDECKER PROPERTIES LTD. DOC. NO. 2006-42667 O.R.D.C.T. JOHN MOR T O N S U R V E Y , ABSTRACT N O . 7 9 3 4680 4681 4682 4683 4687 4685 4686 592 592 592592591591591591591591590590590590589589589589588588587587 586586586586585585585585 584584584583583582582CALLED 0.427 ACRES DENTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT DOC. NO. 2021-174358 O.R.D.C.T.10' CROSSTEX EASEMENTDOC. NO. 2006-27086O.R.D.C.T.LOT 16X591 590 589 588 587 586 585 584 583582581S 6 FT. WIDE CURB CUT WITH 15'x15' RIPRAP 6 FT. WIDE CURB CUT WITH 15'x15' RIPRAP 6 FT. WIDE CURB CUT WITH 15'x15' RIPRAP SWALE LANDSCAPE BERM CONNECT TO ROOF DRAINS 10" Ø PVC @ MIN. 1.00% SLOPE CONNECT TO ROOF DRAINS JOHN MOR T O N S U R V E Y , ABSTRACT N O . 7 9 3F.M. HIGHWAY 1385ASPHALT ROADWAY80' RIGHT-OF-WAYDENTON WAY/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////4680 4681 4682 4683 4687 4685 4686 TREE DISPOSITION PLANTD-1 3-31-22 L HINIRSTEAC CTTESADETST AIREG 61 O F 9 8 ET XE R LDRE CAANDS E EP A E CE(800) 680-6630 15455 Dallas Pkwy., Ste 600 Addison, TX 75001 www.EvergreenDesignGroup.com EVERGREEN D E S I G N G R O U P DATENo.REVISIONBYDATE: SHEET CHECKED: DRAWN: DESIGN:GRACE CHAPEL PROSPERFM 1385 & DENTON WAYPROSPER, TXFile No:1903 CENTRAL DR. SUITE #406PHONE: 817.281.0572BEDFORD, TX 76021 WWW.CLAYMOOREENG.COMTEXAS FIRM #14199 STATUS LOCATION MITIGATION OFF-SITE X 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch = 40 ft. 20 804040 X RETAIN REMOVE ON-SITE ON-SITE ON-SITE RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN RETAIN OFF-SITE OFF-SITE OFF-SITE OFF-SITE X “I Daniel Reece, being a Texas landscape architect attest that the identification and size of trees identified on this survey are correct and that all Protected Trees have been shown. Signature: ____________________________ Date: ________________3-1-22 FLOODPLAIN % NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOTE: NO MITIGATION REQUIRED DUE TO SPECIES OF REMOVED TREE. Page 1185 Item 16. TREE DISPOSITIONTD-2SPECIFICATIONS3-31-22 L HINIRSTEAC CTTESADETST AIREG 61 O F 9 8 ET XE R LDRE CAANDS E EP A E CE(800) 680-6630 15455 Dallas Pkwy., Ste 600 Addison, TX 75001 www.EvergreenDesignGroup.com EVERGREEN D E S I G N G R O U P DATENo.REVISIONBYDATE: SHEET CHECKED: DRAWN: DESIGN:GRACE CHAPEL PROSPERFM 1385 & DENTON WAYPROSPER, TXFile No:1903 CENTRAL DR. SUITE #406PHONE: 817.281.0572BEDFORD, TX 76021 WWW.CLAYMOOREENG.COMTEXAS FIRM #14199 TREES THAT ARE MARKED TO BE PRESERVED ON A SITE PLAN AND FOR WHICH UTILITIES MUST PASS TROUGH THEIR ROOT PROTECTION ZONES MAY REQUIRE TUNNELING AS OPPOSED TO OPEN TRENCHES. THE DECISION TO TUNNEL WILL BE DETERMINED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS BY THE ENGINEER. TUNNELS SHALL BE DUG THROUGH THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE ROOT DAMAGE. A SCALE: NOT TO SCALE TREE PROTECTION FENCE - ELEVATION BORING THROUGH ROOT PROTECTION ZONE SCALE: NOT TO SCALEB TREE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONS MATERIALS 1. FABRIC: 4 FOOT HIGH ORANGE PLASTIC FENCING AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND SHALL BE WOVEN WITH 2 INCH MESH OPENINGS SUCH THAT IN A VERTICAL DIMENSION OF 23 INCHES ALONG THE DIAGONALS OF THE OPENINGS THERE SHALL BE AT LEAST 7 MESHES. 2. POSTS: POSTS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 72 INCHES LONG AND STEEL 'T' SHAPED WITH A MINIMUM WEIGHT OF 1.3 POUNDS PER LINEAR FOOT. 3. TIE WIRE: WIRE FOR ATTACHING THE FABRIC TO THE T-POSTS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN NO. 12 GAUGE GALVANIZED WIRE, 4. USED MATERIALS: PREVIOUSLY-USED MATERIALS, MEETING THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS AND WHEN APPROVED BY THE OWNER, MAY BE USED. CONSTRUCTION METHODS ALL TREES AND SHRUBS (SHOWN TO REMAIN) WITHIN THE PROXIMITY OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY. EMPLOY THE SERVICES OF AN ISA (INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE) CERTIFIED ARBORIST (AND OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS) TO PRUNE THE EXISTING TREES FOR CLEANING, RAISING AND THINNING. ENSURE ALL TREES RECEIVE A COMMERCIAL-GRADE ROOT STIMULATOR APPLICATION AFTER PRUNING. PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE ERECTED OUTSIDE THE DRIPLINE AT LOCATIONS SHOWN IN THE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT AND/OR CITY ARBORIST OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AT THE DRIP LINE OF TREES (ROOT PROTECTION ZONE, RPZ) AND/OR LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL INCLUDING NATURAL AREAS. FENCING SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING SITE CONSTRUCTION. PROTECTIVE FENCE LOCATIONS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO STREET INTERSECTIONS OR DRIVES SHALL ADHERE TO THE APPLICABLE JURISDICTION'S SIGHT DISTANCE CRITERIA. THE PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE ERECTED BEFORE SITE WORK COMMENCES AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE DURING THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PHASE. THE INSTALLATION POSTS WILL BE PLACED EVERY 6 FEET AROUND THE DRIP LINE OR RPZ AND EMBEDDED TO 18 INCHES DEEP. FABRIC ATTACHMENT SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE INSTALLATION POSTS BY THE USE OF SUFFICIENT WIRE TIES TO SECURELY FASTEN THE FABRIC TO THE 'T-POSTS' TO HOLD THE FABRIC IN A STABLE AND UPRIGHT POSITION. 1. DO NOT CLEAR, FILL OR GRADE IN THE RPZ OF ANY TREE. 2. DO NOT STORE, STOCKPILE OR DUMP ANY JOB MATERIAL, SOIL OR RUBBISH UNDER THE SPREAD OF THE TREE BRANCHES. 3. DO NOT PARK OR STORE ANY EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES UNDER THE SPREAD OF THE TREE BRANCHES. 4. DO NOT SET UP ANY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS UNDER THE SPREAD OF THE TREE BRANCHES (EX. PIPE CUTTING AND THREADING, MORTAR MIXING, PAINTING OR LUMBER CUTTING). 5. DO NOT NAIL OR ATTACH TEMPORARY SIGNS METERS, SWITCHES, WIRES, BRACING OR ANY OTHER ITEM TO THE TREES. 6. DO NOT PERMIT RUNOFF FROM WASTE MATERIALS INCLUDING SOLVENTS, CONCRETE WASHOUTS, ASPHALT TACK COATS (MC-30 OIL), ETC. TO ENTER THE RPZ. BARRIERS ARE TO BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT SUCH RUNOFF SUBSTANCES FROM ENTERING THE RPZ WHENEVER POSSIBLE, INCLUDING IN AN AREA WHERE RAIN OR SURFACE WATER COULD CARRY SUCH MATERIALS TO THE ROOT SYSTEM OF THE TREE. ROUTE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TO AVOID THE RPZ. IF DIGGING IS UNAVOIDABLE, BORE UNDER THE ROOTS, OR HAND DIG TO AVOID SEVERING THEM. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD AVOID CUTTING ROOTS LARGER THAN ONE INCH IN DIAMETER WHEN EXCAVATION OCCURS NEAR EXISTING TREES. EXCAVATION IN THE VICINITY OF TREES SHALL PROCEED WITH CAUTION. REMOVE ALL TREES, SHRUBS OR BUSHES TO BE CLEARED FROM PROTECTED ROOT ZONE AREAS BY HAND. TREES DAMAGED OR LOST DUE TO CONTRACTOR'S NEGLIGENCE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE MITIGATED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND TO THE PROJECT OWNER'S SATISFACTION. ANY TREE REMOVAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO ITS REMOVAL. COVER EXPOSED ROOTS AT THE END OF EACH DAY WITH SOIL, MULCH OR WET BURLAP. IN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREAS THAT CANNOT BE PROTECTED DUING CONSTRUCTION AND WHERE HEAVY TRAFFIC IS ANTICIPATED, COVER THOSE AREAS WITH EIGHT INCHES OF ORGANIC MULCH TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. THIS EIGHT INCH DEPTH OF MULCH SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. WATER ALL TREES, MOST HEAVILY IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, DEEPLY ONCE A WEEK DURING PERIODS OF HOT DRY WEATHER. SPRAY TREE CROWNS WITH WATER PERIODICALLY TO REDUCE DUST ACCUMULATION ON THE LEAVES. WHEN INSTALLING CONCRETE ADJACENT TO THE ROOT ZONE OF A TREE, USE A PLASTIC VAPOR BARRIER BEHIND THE CONCRETE TO PROHIBIT LEACHING OF LIME INTO THE SOIL. WHEN AN EXCAVATION OR EMBANKMENT IS PLACED WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF ANY TREE GREATER THAN EIGHT INCHES IN DIAMETER, A TREE WELL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO PROTECT THE TREE AS INDICATED, WHEN THE CUT OR FILL EXCEEDS EIGHT INCHES. WHERE PAVING OR FILLING IS NECESSARY WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF ANY TREE EIGHT INCHES OR GREATER, A PERMEABLE PAVEMENT AND AERATION SYSTEM MUST BE INSTALLED. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING WHEN ALL THREATS TO THE EXISTING TREES FROM CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN REMOVED. TREE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS 1. A ROOT PROTECTION ZONE WILL BE ESTABLISHED AROUND EACH TREE OR ANY VEGETATION TO BE PRESERVED. THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE SHALL BE AN AREA DEFINED BY THE RADIUS EXTENDING OUTWARD FROM THE TRUNK OF THE TREE A DISTANCE OF ONE (1) LINEAR FOOT FOR EACH INCH DIAMETER INCH AT BREAST HEIGHT (4.5') OF THE TREE. EXAMPLE: A 10-INCH DIAMETER TREE WILL HAVE A 10 FOOT RADIUS ROOT PROTECTION ZONE. 2. NO WORK SHALL BEGIN WERE TREE PROTECTION FENCING HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED AND APPROVED. TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED, MAINTAINED AND REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE FENCING WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 4' HEIGHT. 3. ALL ROOTS LARGER THAN ONE-INCH IN DIAMETER ARE TO BE CUT CLEANLY. FOR OAKS ONLY, ALL WOUNDS SHALL BE PAINTED WITH WOUND SEALER WITHIN 30 MINUTES. 4. EXPOSED ROOTS SHALL BE COVERED AT THE END OF THE WORK DAY USING TECHNIQUES SUCH AS COVERING WITH SOIL, MULCH OR WET BURLAP. 5. NO EQUIPMENT, VEHICLES OR MATERIALS SHALL BE OPERATED OR STORED WITHIN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE. NO CLEAN-OUT AREAS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED SO THAT THE MATERIAL WILL BE IN OR MIGRATE TO THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE. 6. NO GRADE CHANGE MORE THAN 3" IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE. 7. ROOTS OR BRANCHES IN CONFLICT WITH CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CUT CLEANLY ACCORDING TO PROPER PRUNING METHODS. ALL WOUNDS SHALL BE PAINTED WITHIN 30 MINUTES TO PREVENT OAK WILT INFECTION (OAK TREES ONLY). 8.ANY TREE REMOVAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION'S ARBORIST. 9.TREES WHICH ARE DAMAGED OR LOST DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S NEGLIGENCE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED WITH TREE QUANTITIES AND SIZES ACCEPTABLE TO THE LOCAL JURISDICTION. 10. TREES MUST BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD HEALTH THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. MAINTENANCE MAY INCLUDE WATERING THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE AND/OR WASHING FOLIAGE. 11. NO WIRES, NAILS OR OTHER MATERIALS MAY BE ATTACHED TO PROTECTED TREES. 12. THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE SHALL BE PRESERVED AT NATURAL GRADE. NO CUTTING, FILLING, TRENCHING, ROOT DISTURBANCE, SOIL DISTURBANCE, OR CONSTRUCTION SHALL OCCUR CLOSER TO THE TRUNK THAN ONE-HALF (1/2) THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE RADIUS EXCEPT IN PARKING AREAS, WHERE APPROVED ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS AND METHODS MAY BE USED AND CONSTRUCTION MAY OCCUR AS CLOSE AS FIVE (5) FEET FROM THE ROOT FLARES ON ONE SIDE OF THE TREE. NATIVE UNDERSTORY VEGETATION WITHIN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE SHALL BE PRESERVED, HOWEVER THE REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLY TO ROOT PROTECTION ZONE AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN LANDSCAPED. THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE MAY BE SHIFTED AND CLUSTERED AS LONG AS THERE IS NO CONSTRUCTION CLOSER TO THE TRUNK THAN ONE-HALF (1/2) THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE RADIUS. THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS SHALL BE ALLOWED IN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE, AS LONG AS EXCAVATION DOES NOT EXCEED THREE (3) INCHES. 13. DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ON SITE, AT LEAST A SIX-INCH LAYER OF A COARSE MULCH SHALL BE PLACED AND MAINTAINED OVER THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE. THE IMPERVIOUS COVER MAY ENCROACH WITHIN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE IF SAID ENCROACHMENT IS APPROVED BY THE ARBORIST. TUNNEL TO MINIMIZE ROOT DAMAGE (TOP) AS OPPOSED TO SURFACE-DUG TRENCHES IN ROOT PROTECTION ZONE WHEN THE 5' MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM TRUNK CAN NOT BE ACHIEVED. TREES THAT ARE MARKED TO BE PRESERVED ON A SITE PLAN AND FOR WHICH UTILITIES MUST PASS TROUGH THEIR ROOT PROTECTION ZONES MAY REQUIRE TUNNELING AS OPPOSED TO OPEN TRENCHES. THE DECISION TO TUNNEL WILL BE DETERMINED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS BY THE ENGINEER. TUNNELS SHALL BE DUG THROUGH THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE ROOT DAMAGE. OPEN TRENCHING MAY BE USED IF EXPOSED TREE ROOTS DO NOT EXCEED 3" OR ROOTS CAN BE BENT BACK. 12" MIN & 48" MAX DEPTH Page 1186 Item 16. 8'-0"2"24'-0"7'-4"12'-0"4'-0"12'-0"4'-0"12'-0"12'-0"12'-0"9'-4"7'-11 1/2"2'-0"14'-9"2'-0"8'-1 1/2"5'-2"12'-0"4'-0"23'-4"4'-5 7/8"116'-8"34'-10"21'-2"2'-1"6'-0"6'-0"1'-0"7'-0"4'-2" 4" 8'-0"1'-0"5'-0"5'-0"21'-11"25'-4"8'-0"7'-0"4"1'-0"3'-0"1'-0"GRADE = 100'-0"T.O. STONE = 106'-0"T.O. AWNING = 113'-1"T.O. ENTRY COLUMN = 118'-0"T.O. TILT WALL = 130'-0"T.O. STONE = 124'-0"4'-0 3/8"60°60°60°60°STONE, ST-1METAL COPING, MT-3METAL LOUVEREDSCREENING WALL, MT-5RTU, BEYONDRTU, BEYONDSTONE, ST-1SOLAR SHADE, MT-2VERTICAL WALLPANEL, FC-1STONE, ST-1VERTICAL WALLPANEL, FC-1LINE OF ROOF,BEYONDHORIZONTAL WALLPANEL, FC-2METAL COPING, MT-34"VERTICAL WALLPANEL, FC-12'-10 3/4"21'-1"2 1/4"METAL LADDER, MT-7METAL CANOPY, MT-1METAL CANOPY, MT-1VERTICAL WALLPANEL, FC-1STONE, ST-1METAL STOREFRONT, MT-4PAINTED CONCRETEPANEL, C-1HORIZONTAL WALLPANEL, FC-2RTU, BEYONDVERTICAL WALLPANEL, FC-1STONE, ST-1METALSTOREFRONT, MT-4METAL COPING, MT-3V-2V-1V-2V-1V-2V-1V-2V-1V-2V-1V-2V-1V-2V-1V-2V-1METAL LOUVEREDSCREENING WALL, MT-5,WITH RTU BEYOND2'-10 3/4" 3'-10 3/4"METAL LOUVEREDSCREENING WALL, MT-5;RTU, BEYOND T.O. SCREEN WALL = 134'-3 3/4"4'-1 3/4"196'-0" T.O. CANOPY = 115'-4 1/2"T.O. CANOPY ROOF = 125'-4 1/2"2'-3 1/2" 1'-4"METAL LOUVERED SCREENINGWALL, MT-5, WITH RTU BEYOND3'-5 1/4" 3'-11" 3'-0 1/2" 1'-0" 1'-0" 1'-0" 1'-0" 1'-0" 1'-0" 1'-0"JJJJ2'-0"4" 'FIRE RISER' VINYLSIGNAGE ON DOORFDC; COORDINATEWITH FIRE MARSHALGAS METER ANDLINE UP TO ROOF;PAINT TO MATCHVERTICAL FIBERCEMENT BOARD2"17'-10"62'-8"20'-0"12'-0"22'-8"12'-0"7'-10"7'-6"25'-4"8'-0"2 7/8"85°4'-8 3/8"60°33'-4"74'-6"METAL LADDER, MT-7METAL SCUPPER &DOWNSPOUT, MT-64"7'-0"1'-0"6'-0"6'-0"12'-0"2'-10"6'-4"2'-10"BACK SIDE OF METALLOUVERED SCREENINGWALL, MT-5RTU & CONDENSINGUNITRTU & CONDENSINGUNITGRADE = 100'-0"T.O. STONE = 106'-0" T.O. SOLAR SHADE = 113'-0"T.O. CANOPY = 114'-0"T.O. TILT WALL = 130'-0"T.O. STONE = 124'-0"SOLAR SHADE, MT-2METAL STOREFRONT,MT-4METAL CANOPY,MT-1VERTICAL WALLPANEL, FC-1HORIZONTAL WALLPANEL, FC-2STONE, ST-1VERTICAL WALL PANEL, FC-12"PAINTED CONCRETEPANEL, C-1METAL CANOPY, MT-1METAL COPING, MT-3VERTICAL WALLPANEL, FC-1METAL COPING, MT-323'-0"LINE OF ROOF,BEYONDRTU, BEYONDRTU, BEYOND2'-1"V-2V-1V-2V-1V-2V-1BACK SIDE OF METALLOUVERED SCREENINGWALL, MT-53'-10 3/4" 2'-7 1/2" 1'-3" T.O. SCREEN WALL = 136'-0"3'-11"METAL FENCE INFOREGROUND (WHITE)LINE OF ROOF, BEYOND4'-1 3/4"RTUBACK SIDE OF METALLOUVERED SCREENINGWALL, MT-52'-10 3/4" 1'-0"1'-0" 1'-0"JJJJGRADE = 100'-0"METAL FENCE INFOREGROUND(WHITE)T.O. STONE = 106'-0" T.O. SOLAR SHADE = 113'-0"T.O. CANOPY = 114'-0" T.O. ENTRY COLUMN = 118'-0"T.O. CANOPY ROOF = 125'-0"T.O. TILT WALL = 130'-0"T.O. STONE = 124'-0"25'-2"7'-4"12'-0"4'-0"16'-0"4'-0"12'-0"7'-4"12'-0"2"2'-1"6"9'-6"8"20'-0"6'-0"6'-0"7'-0"21'-1"2 1/4"2'-10 3/4" 4"3'-4"1'-0"14'-4"6'-0" 4'-0"STONE, ST-1METAL CANOPY, MT-1PAINTED CONCRETEPANEL, C-1SOLAR SHADE, MT-2METAL COPING, MT-3HORIZONTAL WALLPANEL, FC-2METAL LOUVEREDSCREENING WALL,MT-5CONDENSING UNITRTU, BEYONDMETAL COPING, MT-3STONE, ST-1VERTICAL WALL PANEL, FC-1RTU, BEYONDMETAL CANOPY, MT-1STONE, ST-1VERTICAL WALL PANEL, FC-174'-8"6'-3 1/2"2'-0"5'-9 1/2"2'-1"85°60°METALSTOREFRONT,MT-4METAL STOREFRONT,MT-4METAL STOREFRONT,MT-4METAL STOREFRONT,MT-4METAL STOREFRONT,MT-4V-2V-1V-2V-1V-2 T.O. SCREEN WALL = 136'-0"1'-0"4'-2"LINE OF ROOF, BEYOND4'-1 3/4"1'-0"JMETAL LADDER, MT-7GRADE = 100'-0"T.O. STONE = 106'-0"T.O. AWNING = 113'-1"T.O. ENTRY COLUMN = 118'-0"T.O. CANOPY ROOF = 125'-4 1/2"T.O. TILT WALL = 130'-0"T.O. STONE = 124'-0"20'-8"14'-0"10'-0 5/8"10'-0"90'-6"55'-10"12'-0"2'-10"6'-4"2'-10"STONE, ST-1METAL SCUPPER &DOWNSPOUT, MT-6PAINTED CONCRETEPANEL, C-1SOLAR SHADE, MT-2METAL COPING, MT-3VERTICAL WALLPANEL, FC-1METAL COPING, MT-3STONE, ST-1METAL COPING, MT-3METAL LOUVEREDSCREENING WALL, MT-5;RTU, BEYONDHORIZONTAL WALLPANEL, FC-2VISION GLASS, V-2METAL CANOPY, MT-1METAL CANOPY, MT-1RTU, BEYONDMETAL SCUPPER &DOWNSPOUT, MT-6METAL SCUPPER &DOWNSPOUT, MT-6VERTICAL WALL PANEL, FC-18"22'-4"2'-1"5'-9 1/2"2'-0"4'-5"85°60°LINE OF ROOF,BEYONDMETAL STOREFRONT, MT-4V-2V-11'-2"108'-3 1/2"RTU, BEYONDCONDENSING UNITLINE OF ROOF, BEYOND T.O. SCREEN WALL = 134'-3 3/4"3'-11"METAL FENCE INFOREGROUND (WHITE)1'-2 1/2"A3.1BUILDING ELEVATIONSSTONE; ST-1 (CREAM)HORIZONTAL WALL PANEL, FC-2(WHITE)VERTICAL WOOD-LOOK WALLPANEL, FC-1 (BROWN)CONCRETE PANEL; C-1 (WHITE)METAL CANOPY, MT-1 (WHITE)VISION GLASS, V-1 (GRAY)METAL SOLAR SHADE, MT-2(WHITE)METAL COPING, MT-3 (WHITE)* REFER SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONMETAL STOREFRONT, MT-4 (WHITE)MATERIAL LEGENDSCALE:1/8"=1'-0"EAST ELEVATION2A3.1SCALE:1/8"=1'-0"WEST ELEVATION1A3.1SCALE:1/8"=1'-0"SOUTH ELEVATION3A3.1SCALE:1/8"=1'-0"NORTH ELEVATION4A3.1VISION GLASS, V-2 (DARKER GRAY)(FRONT ELEVATION)METAL LOUVERED SCREENING WALL, MT-5(WHITE)METAL SCUPPER & DOWNSPOUT, MT-6(WHITE)METAL ROOF LADDER, MT-7 (WHITE)4/14/2022 4:02:34 PMProject No:Drawn By:Checked By:Designed By:CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY ©2022 EIKON Consulting Group LLC. All rights reserved - do not duplicate without permission DCBA54321www.eikoncg.comTexas Firm F-12759ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERSNOT F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N TDLR #EIKON Consulting Group1405 West Chapman DriveSanger, Texas 76266Phone 940.458.7503Issue Record# Description Date GRACE CHAPEL PROSPER PROSPER, TEXAS 20086EXHIBIT 'D'FACADE PLANIssued Date:<Blank>IN PRO G R E S SAMPAMPJBB THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF INTERIM REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OFANN PINKHAM, TX 28330 ON 01/12/2022. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION, BIDDING,ORPERMIT PURPOSES.EXHIBIT 'D'OWNER/DEVELOPER:NORTH TEXAS CONFERENCE OF THEUNITED METHODIST CHURCHPO BOX 866128PLANO, TEXAS 75086CONTACT NAME: KENNETH WOLVERTONAPPLICANT:CLAYMOORE ENGINEERING, INC.1903 CENTRAL DRIVE, SUITE #406BEDFORD, TX 46021PH: 817.281.0572CONTACT NAME: DREW DONOSKYARCHITECT:EIKON CONSULTING GROUP, LLC1405 WEST CHAPMAN DRIVESANGER, TX 76266PH: 940.458.7503CONTACT NAME: ANN PINKHAMEAGLE SURVEYING, LLC210 SOUTH ELM STREET, SUITE #104TX 75057PH: 940.222.3009CONTACT NAME: MASON DECKERSURVEYOR:LEGAL DESCRIPTION:LOTS 1, BLOCK ANORTH TEXAS CONFERENCE OF THEMETHODIST CHURCH ADDITIONGROSS AREA: 5.422 OR 236,172 SFCOUNTY:SURVEY:JOHN MORTON SURVEYABSTRACT NO.793CITY:TOWN OF PROSPERSTATE:TEXASDENTONDATE: 04/18/2022GRACE CHAPEL PROSPERFACADE PLAN NOTES1. SEE FACADE PLAN SHEET A3.2 FOR NOTES,ABBREVIATIONS, AND MATERIAL CALCULATIONS.2. SEE 11x17 SAMPLE BOARD [EXHIBIT A] FORPROPOSED MATERIALS.Page 1187Item 16. J104'- 6 1/2"108'-3 1/2"414'-1 1/2"11° 3.7°2.7°PARAPETS BLOCK SIGHTLINES TO ROOFTOPHVAC EQUIPMENTPARAPET AND SCREENING WALLBLOCK SIGHT LINE TOROOFTOP HVAC EQUIPMENTGRADEWEST PROPERTY LINE (ALONG FM 1385)EAST PROPERTY LINE6'-0"0.5°PARAPET AND SCREENING WALLBLOCK SIGHT LINE TOROOFTOP HVAC EQUIPMENTPARAPETS BLOCK SIGHTLINES TO ROOFTOPHVAC EQUIPMENT15°6'-0"122' - 8"196'-0"58'-11 1/4"PARAPET BLOCKS SIGHT LINETO HVAC EQUIPMENT8.4°PARAPETS BLOCK SIGHTLINES TO ROOFTOPHVAC EQUIPMENTGRADENORTH PROPERTY LINE(ALONG DENTON WAY)SOUTH PROPERTY LINE1.6°PARAPETS BLOCK SIGHTLINES TO ROOFTOPHVAC EQUIPMENTGRADE = 100'-0"STONE (ST-1) OVER 8"CMUELEVATION = 108'-0"METAL COPING, MT-317'-8"GRADE = 100'-0"STONE (ST-1) OVER 8"CMUELEVATION = 108'-0"METAL COPING, MT-3GRADE = 100'-0"STONE (ST-1) OVER 8"CMU1'-4"ELEVATION = 108'-0"METAL COPING, MT-315'-0" (INSIDE CLEAR)13'-10"METAL GATE (WHITE)6" TUBE METAL POSTAND HINGE (WHITE)7'-8"1'-4"7"7"PAINTED STEELHORIZONTAL AND CROSSBRACE (WHITE)6'-8 1/2"4"6'-8 1/2"1"4"17'-8"1'-4"15'-0" (INSIDE CLEAR)1'-4"17'-8"1'-4"15'-0" (INSIDE CLEAR)1'-4"104'- 6 1/2"108'-3 1/2"414'-1 1/2"7.9°6.8°PARAPETS BLOCK SIGHTLINES TO ROOFTOPHVAC EQUIPMENTPARAPET AND SCREENING WALLBLOCK SIGHT LINE TOROOFTOP HVAC EQUIPMENTGRADEWEST PROPERTY LINE (ALONG FM 1385)EAST PROPERTY LINE6'-0" 0.5°PARAPET AND SCREENING WALLBLOCK SIGHT LINE TOROOFTOP HVAC EQUIPMENTPARAPETS BLOCK SIGHTLINES TO ROOFTOPHVAC EQUIPMENTJJJJ2.1°0.6°A3.2DUMPSTERELEVATIONS, SIGHTLINE STUDY, &MATERIALCALCULATIONSSCALE:1/32 "= 1'-0"EAST/ WEST CROSS SIGHT LINE STUDY FROM PROPERTY LINES2A3.2SCALE:1/32" = 1'-0"NORTH / SOUTH CROSS SIGHT LINE STUDY FROM PROPERTY LINES1A3.2SCALE:1/8 "= 1'-0"NORTHEAST DUMPSTER ELEVATION3A3.2SCALE:1/8 "= 1'-0"NORTHWEST DUMPSTER ELEVATION4A3.2SCALE:1/8 "= 1'-0"SOUTHWEST DUMPSTER ELEVATION5A3.2FACADE PLAN NOTES1. ABBREVIATIONS FOR ELEVATIONS:T.O. = TOP OF REFERENCE PLANEB.O. = BOTTOM OF REFERENCE PLANE2. VARIATIONS IN DIMENSIONING MAY EXIST BETWEEN EDGE OF FOUNDATION ANDFACE OF EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL AT GRADE LEVEL. ON ELEVATIONS, THEINITIAL HORIZONTAL DIMENSION STRING IS FOR MATERIALS AND THE SECONDDIMENSION STRING TIES BACK TO THE EDGE OF FOUNDATION.3. SIGHT LINES ARE ESTABLISHED FROM 6'-0" ABOVE GRADE AT PROPERTY LINE.4. SEE 11x17 SAMPLE BOARD [EXHIBIT A] FOR PROPOSED MATERIALS.5. THIS FACADE PLAN IS FOR CONCEPTUAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL BUILDING PLANSREQUIRE REVIEW FROM BUILDING INSPECTIONS DIVISION.6. ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW. ROOFTOPMOUNTED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED BY A PARAPET WALL OR SCREENINGWALL. SCREENING WALLS SHALL BE THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE ZONINGORDINANCE.7. WHEN PERMITTED, EXPOSED UTILITY BOXES AND CONDUITS SHALL BE PAINTED TOMATCH THE BUILDING.8. ALL SIGNAGE AREAS AND LOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THEBUILDING INSPECTIONS DIVISION.9. WINDOWS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM EXTERIOR VISIBLE REFLECTIVITY OF TENPERCENT (10%).10. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED FACADE PLAN WILL REQUIRE RE-APPROVALBY THE TOWN OF PROSPER.11. A MINIMUM 4'-0" x 4'-0" BUILDING MATERIAL MOCK-UP BOARD MUST BECONSTRUCTED AT WORK SITE AND INSPECTED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION PRIORTO VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION.(LOOKING NORTH)(LOOKING WEST)STONE; ST-1 (CREAM)HORIZONTAL WALL PANEL, FC-2 (WHITE)VERTICAL WOOD-LOOK WALL PANEL, FC-1 (BROWN)CONCRETE PANEL; C-1 (WHITE)METAL CANOPY, MT-1 (WHITE)VISION GLASS, V-1 (GRAY)METAL SOLAR SHADE, MT-2 (WHITE)METAL COPING, MT-3 (WHITE)* REFER SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONMETAL STOREFRONT, MT-4 (WHITE)MATERIAL LEGENDVISION GLASS, V-2 (DARKER GRAY)METAL LOUVERED SCREENING WALL, MT-5 (WHITE)METAL SCUPPER & DOWNSPOUT, MT-6 (WHITE)METAL ROOF LADDER, MT-7 (WHITE)4/14/2022 4:02:34 PMProject No:Drawn By:Checked By:Designed By:CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY ©2022 EIKON Consulting Group LLC. All rights reserved - do not duplicate without permission DCBA54321www.eikoncg.comTexas Firm F-12759ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERSNOT F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N TDLR #EIKON Consulting Group1405 West Chapman DriveSanger, Texas 76266Phone 940.458.7503Issue Record# Description Date GRACE CHAPEL PROSPER PROSPER, TEXAS 20086EXHIBIT 'D'FACADE PLANIssued Date:<Blank>IN PRO G R E S SAMPAMPJBB THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR THE PURPOSE OF INTERIM REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OFANN PINKHAM, TX 28330 ON 01/12/2022. IT IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION, BIDDING,ORPERMIT PURPOSES.EXHIBIT 'D'OWNER/DEVELOPER:NORTH TEXAS CONFERENCE OF THEUNITED METHODIST CHURCHPO BOX 866128PLANO, TEXAS 75086CONTACT NAME: KENNETH WOLVERTONAPPLICANT:CLAYMOORE ENGINEERING, INC.1903 CENTRAL DRIVE, SUITE #406BEDFORD, TX 46021PH: 817.281.0572CONTACT NAME: DREW DONOSKYARCHITECT:EIKON CONSULTING GROUP, LLC1405 WEST CHAPMAN DRIVESANGER, TX 76266PH: 940.458.7503CONTACT NAME: ANN PINKHAMEAGLE SURVEYING, LLC210 SOUTH ELM STREET, SUITE #104TX 75057PH: 940.222.3009CONTACT NAME: MASON DECKERSURVEYOR:LEGAL DESCRIPTION:LOTS 1, BLOCK ANORTH TEXAS CONFERENCE OF THEMETHODIST CHURCH ADDITIONGROSS AREA: 5.422 OR 236,172 SFCOUNTY:SURVEY:JOHN MORTON SURVEYABSTRACT NO.793CITY:TOWN OF PROSPERSTATE:TEXASDENTONDATE: 04/18/2022GRACE CHAPEL PROSPERBUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL CALCULATIONSNORTH ELEVATIONMATERIALAREAPERCENTAGE*1. VERTICAL WALL PANELS521 SQ. FT.19%2. HORIZONTAL WALL PANELS160 SQ. FT. 6%3. CONCRETE PANELS983 SQ. FT.35%4. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILING METALS224 SQ. FT. 8%5. METAL SCREENING 85 SQ. FT. 3%6.STONE818 SQ. FT.29%NET SURFACE ELEVATION AREA 2,792 SQ. FT 100%7. GLAZING SURFACE AREA196 SQ. FT.TOTAL SURFACE ELEVATION AREA 2,988 SQ. FT.SOUTH ELEVATIONMATERIALAREAPERCENTAGE*1. VERTICAL WALL PANELS 1,710 SQ. FT.59%2. HORIZONTAL WALL PANELS 220 SQ. FT. 7%3. CONCRETE PANELS 396 SQ. FT.14%4. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILING METALS 208 SQ. FT. 7%5. METAL SCREENING 62 SQ. FT. 2%6.STONE 312 SQ. FT.11%NET SURFACE ELEVATION AREA 2,908 SQ. FT. 100%7. GLAZING SURFACE AREA 73 SQ. FT.TOTAL ELEVATION AREA 2,981 SQ. FT.EAST ELEVATIONMATERIALAREAPERCENTAGE*1. VERTICAL WALL PANELS1,896 SQ. FT.41%2. HORIZONTAL WALL PANELS160 SQ. FT. 3%3. CONCRETE PANELS 1,870 SQ. FT.40%4. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILING METALS314 SQ. FT. 7%5. METAL SCREENING118 SQ. FT. 2%6.STONE312 SQ. FT. 7%NET SURFACE ELEVATION AREA 4,670 SQ.FT. 100%7. GLAZING SURFACE AREA153 SQ. FT.TOTAL ELEVATION AREA4,823 SQ. FT.WEST ELEVATIONMATERIALAREAPERCENTAGE*1. VERTICAL WALL PANELS 1,167 SQ.FT.28%2. HORIZONTAL WALL PANELS394 SQ. FT. 9%3. CONCRETE PANELS499 SQ. FT.12%4. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILING METALS422 SQ. FT.10%5. METAL SCREENING224 SQ. FT. 5%6.STONE 1,542 SQ. FT.36%NET SURFACE ELEVATION AREA 4,248 SQ. FT. 100%7. GLAZING SURFACE AREA715 SQ. FT.TOTAL ELEVATION AREA 4,963 SQ. FT.OVERALL BUILDINGMATERIALAREAPERCENTAGE*1. VERTICAL WALL PANELS 5,294 SQ. FT.36%2. HORIZONTAL WALL PANELS934 SQ. FT. 6%3. CONCRETE PANELS 3,748 SQ. FT.25%4.MISCELLANEOUS DETAILING METALS 1,168 SQ. FT. 8%5. METAL SCREENING 833 SQ. FT. 5%6.STONE 2,984 SQ. FT.20%NET SURFACE ELEVATION AREA 14,618 SQ. FT. 100%7. GLAZING SURFACE AREA 1,137 SQ. FT.8. TOTAL ELEVATION AREA 15,755 SQ. FT.*CALCULATED PERCENTAGE AREA OF EACH MATERIAL IS CALCULATED AGAINST THE NET SURFACE AREASCALE:1/32 "= 1'-0"EAST/ WEST CROSS SIGHT LINE STUDY FROM PROPERTY LINES6A3.2(LOOKING SOUTH)(LOOKING SOUTH)(LOOKING NORTH)(LOOKING EAST)Page 1188Item 16. Page 1 of 3 To: Mayor and Town Council From: David Soto, Planning Manager Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Hulon T. Webb, Jr., Interim Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure Services Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Conduct a Public Hearing, and consider and act upon a request to amend the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 3, Section 1.3 Schedule of Uses, Chapter 3, Section 1.4 Conditional Development Standards, and Chapter 3, Section 2.2 Definitions, to include “Food Pantry”, in the Agricultural, “A,” zoning district. (MD22-0005). Description of Agenda Item: The purpose of this request is to amend the zoning ordinance to include a new use and definition “Food Pantry”, in the Agricultural, “A,” zoning district with conditional development standards as shown below. Currently the Town of Prosper does not have a term for Food Pantry. Any food pantry use will be in allowed in the Agricultural District subject to the conditional development standards. The purpose of those standards is to allow flexibility, but also to have some standards that mitigate the use since it will be allowed in the Agricultural District. Staff has created some of these conditional standards based off an existing food pantry operation. Chapter 3 Permitted Uses and Definition 1.3 – Schedule of Uses. SECTION 1.3(C) EDUCATIONAL, INSTITUTIONAL, PUBLIC, AND SPECIAL USES Residential Districts Non-Residential Districts A - Agricultural SF – Single Family (E – 10) DTSF – Downtown SF TH - Townhome 2F – Two Family MF – Multifamily MH – Mobile Home O – Office DTO – Downtown Office NS – Neighborhood Service DTR – Downtown Retail R – Retail DTC – Downtown Commercial C – Commercial CC – Commercial Corridor I – Industrial Food Pantry 48 Prosper is a place where everyone matters. PLANNING Page 1189 Item 17. Page 2 of 3 “1.4 Conditional Development Standards * * * 48. Food Pantry A food pantry shall be subject to the following development standards: a) All food in storage must meet Town public health regulations. b) Food must be distributed in its original packaging, except fresh produce may be distributed unpackaged. c) Hours of operation must be clearly displayed on or near its entrance. d) It is not allowed for money or services to be required as a condition of receiving food. e) No outside storage of food shall be permitted. f) Except for fresh produce, food distribution shall occur no more than two (2) days per calendar week for no more than five (5) hours each day. g) Distribution of fresh produce shall be authorized once per week when available, and fresh produce distribution may occur no more than once per calendar week.” Section 2, 2.2 – Definitions Food Pantry – A non-profit organization authorized pursuant to § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, not affiliated with a religious land use, that provides food directly to individuals and families in need at no cost to those individuals and families. Food pantries may receive, buy, store and/or distribute food; however, on-site preparation of food is not permitted. Legal Obligations and Review: Notice of the Town Council Public Hearing was provided in the newspaper as required by the Zoning Ordinance and state law. To date, Town staff has not received any correspondence. Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation: At their June 21, 2022, meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended the Town Council approve the request, by a vote of 7-0 subject to the following: 1. Revise condition e) to state “no food shall be stored on the exterior of the facility” 2. Remove conditions f) and g). Town Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request to amend the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 3, Section 1.3 Schedule of Uses, Chapter 3, Section 1.4 Conditional Development Standards, and Chapter 3, Section 2.2 Definitions, to include “Food Pantry”, in the Agricultural, “A,” zoning district. (MD22- 0005). 1. Revise condition e) to state “No food shall be stored on the exterior of the facility.” 2. Remove condition g). Page 1190 Item 17. Page 3 of 3 Proposed Motion: I move to approve the request to amend the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 3, Section 1.3 Schedule of Uses, Chapter 3, Section 1.4 Conditional Development Standards, and Chapter 3, Section 2.2 Definitions, to include “Food Pantry”, in the Agricultural, “A,” zoning district per Town Staff Recommendation. (MD22-0005). Page 1191 Item 17. Page 1 of 1 To: Mayor and Town Council From: Mary Ann Moon, Economic Development Executive Director Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Receive an update of the Downtown Master Plan. Description of Agenda Item: After numerous requests by the community’s residents to expand and enhance Prosper’s Downtown, the Town Council and Prosper Economic Development Corporation (PEDC) joined forces to fund a Downtown Master Plan. Under the leadership of a Downtown Master Plan Development Committee comprised of David Bristol, Ray Smith, Craig Andres, Charles Cotten, Teague Griffin, Mike Pettis, Seth Ringley, David Blom, Scott Shipp, Matt Moore, and Roger Thedford (John Webb, Rebecca Zook, Khara Dodds, Jason Dixon), an RFP was done with fifteen (15) consultants responding to the RFP. The Committee rated each based upon specific criteria and scope of work deliverables. Stantec was selected to conduct the comprehensive analysis and provide recommendations. The Committee held work sessions, obtained public input, conducted public and private interviews and meetings, as well as provided an interactive website. Monthly updates were sent out from Prosper’s residents, developers, and business owners for the final plan. Drafts were given to the Committee and members of the Town staff and Council for comments, editing and recommendations. The final product is thorough and provides specific recommendations for a path forward which, if embraced, will result in the continued growth of Prosper’s Historic Downtown. It is the desire of the Committee that the plan become an integral part of Prosper’s Comprehensive Plan for the community. In addition, that a permanent Downtown Committee be established and the PEDC and Town Staff work in partnership to establish programs, policy, and possible incentives to spur additional growth and investment, supporting existing businesses and new ones. Attached Documents: 1. Assessment Town Staff Recommendation: Town staff recommends that the Town Council give staff feedback and direction on the Downtown Master Plan. Prosper is a place where everyone matters. Economic Development Corporation Page 1192 Item 18. 1 Downtown Master Plan DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN Town of Prosper DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN Town of Prosper June 2022 Page 1193 Item 18. 2 Town of Prosper ACKNOWLEDGMENT PDDC Roger Thedford Craig Andres Teague Griffin Jason Dixon* David Bristol David Blom Ray Smith Charles Cotton Scott Shipp Khara Dodds Seth Ringley Matt Moore Mike Pettis PEDC Board Members David F. Bristol Jordan Simms Roger Thedford Don Perry Ray Smith Reno Jones David Blom Technical Advisory Team Khara Dodds, Director of Development Services Alex Glushko, Planning Manager David Soto, Senior Planner Pamela Clark, Planning/GIS Analyst Evelyn Mendez, Planning Technician A special thanks to the Town of Prosper stakeholders, developers, business owners,property owners, residents; Without your help, none of this would be possible. * Term ended as Councilman Page 1194 Item 18. 3 Downtown Master Plan Khara Dodds, Director of Development Services Alex Glushko, Planning Manager David Soto, Senior Planner Pamela Clark, Planning/GIS Analyst Evelyn Mendez, Planning Technician Consultant Team Members Bradley Cowan Steven Chaffer Mark Maldonado Mona Hashemi Yazdi Ami Parikh Angus MacInnis Jared Beck PEDC Staff Mary Ann Moon Jordyn Williams Susanne Barney Town Council Ray Smith Marcus E. Ray Craig Andres Amy Bartley Meigs Miller Jeff Hodges Charles Cotten Page 1195 Item 18. 4 Town of Prosper Page 1196 Item 18. 5 Downtown Master Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 Executive Summary 02 Where We Are At What We Want03 04 Where We Are Going 05 How We Get There Appendix06 Page 1197 Item 18. 6 Town of Prosper Page 1198 Item 18. 7 Downtown Master Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 01 Page 1199 Item 18. 8 Town of Prosper A PLACE WHERE EVERYONE MATTERS Page 1200 Item 18. 9 Downtown Master Plan Executive Summary The Downtown Master Plan sets the course for the Town and its partners in the upcoming years to re-imagine its historic commercial downtown and surrounding neighborhood. Developed from the vision that this community articulated so clearly through the public engagement process, and refined with the Master Plan committee, this plan harnesses the existing assets of downtown and identifies the catalytic opportunities to spur ongoing redevelopment. Among those catalytic opportunities is public investment in three signature public realm spaces that will create activity and event destinations; Town Green, Downtown Connector, and Downtown Plaza. These opportunities also include four private development sites that will introduce restaurant, retail, office, maker space, and housing. Preliminary financial proformas identify the need for proactive incentives to attract private investment, and the ways in which to do that have been identified. In addition to catalytic opportunities, this plan identifies other factors that may be limiting the redevelopment of downtown today, and addresses these with a range of actions for the Town to consider. The plan includes an implementation program that was developed in support of the vision, and built on six primary pillars; political, organizational, regulatory, financial, physical and market. Within each of these pillars, the recommended actions have been identified along with a priority, approximate cost magnitude, and sponsors. Over time, these will change with new actions added, priorities and costs adjusted, and new sponsors added to help implement. Downtown redevelopment is an ambitious and lengthy process. Maintaining consistent political support, developing a broad network of community organizations and stakeholders to take part in implementing it, and thoughtfully organizing the funding mechanisms will make this plan a success! Page 1201 Item 18. 10 Town of Prosper Page 1202 Item 18. 11 Downtown Master Plan WHERE WE ARE AT: COMMUNITY SNAPSHOT 02 Page 1203 Item 18. 12 Town of Prosper About This Plan The Downtown Master Plan is a tool that captures the community driven hopes and vision for creating a dynamic and authentic downtown Prosper. This plan has been developed from the community, built on past planning efforts, and designed for implementation. Spanning the entire downtown area this plan is based on six pillars that will guide implementation of strategies that will have broad impact on all aspects of downtown and it’s various features. This plan also recognizes the opportunity larger private or public investments can serve as catalysts for redevelopment. As a key part of this plan, four private development catalyst sites have been identified, and working with the Master Plan committee and design team, physical and financial models have been developed based on current market data that help guide and portray the community vision and representation of potential character. This plan also identifies three significant public projects that compliment and support private redevelopment while also providing much needed quality space for community gathering, programming, and active use. The following pages will tell the downtown Prosper story by identifying where we a re at, what we want, where we are going, and how we get there. Page 1204 Item 18. 13 Downtown Master Plan Denton County Collin County Texas Town of Prosper Page 1205 Item 18. 14 Town of Prosper Settled in 1902 Page 1206 Item 18. 15 Downtown Master Plan The Prosper Story The Town of Prosper grew from two early settlements, Rockhill and Richland. In 1902 the two settlements were united when the St. Louis & San Francisco built its line through Western Collin County. Railroad officials named the Town Prosper because of the prosperous living conditions the area provided. Soon after the tracks reached the area the residents and businesses of nearby Rockhill moved to the new railroad community. Prosper incorporated in 1914 with the commission form of government and a population of 500. It served as a farm market center for area farmers, who produced primarily cotton and corn in the rich agricultural region of the Blackland Prairie. After decades of growth, the Great Depression halted the growth of the community and population dropped to 271 by 1940 and continued to decline until the late 1950s. The number of residents did not surpass that of the mid-1920s until 1970, when it reaches 501. In 1980, when light industrial uses were introduced to the Town to support the overall development boom in the North Texas area the next period of growth for Prosper occurred and has continued up to now. The history of Prosper is rooted within downtown area. During the early 20th century, this area was a commercial “heart” of the community with multiple grocery / dry good stores, drug stores, banks, a flour mill, a cotton gin and numerous other shops servicing the community. While many of the historic structures that existed during Old Town’s heyday are now gone, a small core area of commercial uses still exists there along a two-block area on Broadway Street. This core area will provide the inspiration and a basic framework for future development of the downtown area. During the early 20th century, Prosper was a commercial “heart” of the community Page 1207 Item 18. 16 Town of Prosper Parking Ordinance Dangerous Structure Ordinance 2011 2012 2014 Town of Prosper Comprehensive Plan (Whole Town) Sign Ordinance, updated Prosper Master Thoroughfare Plan (Whole Town) Future Land Use Plan (Whole Town) Old Town Transportation Plan Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan (Whole Town) Residential Standards (Whole Town), Zoning Ordinance (Whole Town), updated Prosper Old Town Area Assessment: •Community Vision •Physical Conditions Assessment •Market Assessment •Stakeholder Interviews •Development Framework Plan •Community Workshop •Implementation Priorities 2015 2016 2017 •Define Boundaries of Old Town Prosper •Field Research and Existing Conditions •Transportation Assessment •Parking Inventory and Analysis •Market Assessment •Public Engagement •Downtown Development Committee •Land Use and Development Framework Plan 2021 Downtown Master Plan 2010 2011 2012 2014 2015 2016 2017 2020 -2021 Great Recession COVID-19 Timeline of External Forces •Redevelopment Concepts •Urban Design and Character Plan •Transportation Plan •Public and Open Space Design Concepts •Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan •Placemaking Audit •Pop Up Events (Test Recommendations in Real Time) •Interactive Online Survey •Development Proforma Analysis •Implementation Strategy •Funding Strategy 2010 Previous Planning Efforts Page 1208 Item 18. 17 Downtown Master Plan Starting in 2010, previous planning efforts in the Town of Prosper and continuing forward to now have focused largely on the quality of life as well as access to key amenities in the Town. Key plans during this time were the Old Town Transportation Plan (2015), Parks, Recreation, and Open Spaces Master Plan (2015), Prosper Comprehensive Plan (2012) and Update (2020), and the Hike and Bike Trail Master Plan (2020). These Plans showcase four (4) common themes: Identity, Neighborhoods, Infrastructure, and Parks, Trails, and Open Space. Studying these plans will assist with the coordination of recommendations that should be included in the downtown plan. OLD TOWN TRANSPORTATION PLAN (2015) The Old Town Transportation plan seeks to provide a better pedestrian experience along major throughway’s in the Old Town district. The Old Town district largely consist of single- family housing and office space as the second largest use type in the area. PARKS, RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN (2015) The purpose of the Town of Prosper Parks Master Plan is to provide Prosper the parks and recreation needs of a growing community over the next 10 years. The existing parks are inventoried and compares them to park industry standards. Along with community and stakeholder input recommendations were developed to identify future needs, including land acquisition. In addition, this plan recognizes a path to update and maintain the facilities the Town already has and identifies priorities for actual park improvements. PROSPER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (2012) & UPDATE (2020) Prosper’s 2012 Comprehensive Plan’s aim is to create an overarching vision and guide for the Town’s development for the coming years. The Plan seeks to focus on joint efforts between citizens, decision makers, Town staff, and other stakeholders I a means to preserve the character of the Town while it expands to meet the demand of new arrivals to the area. HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL MASTER PLAN (2020) The Hike and Bike Trail Master Plan was adopted in late 2020. It’s primary focus is to evaluate the existing trails and planned trails, assess the need for additional trails, and recommend potential trail corridors and connections. This plan recommends future bikeway accommodations on Broadway, Main Street, McKinley Street. Page 1209 Item 18. 18 Town of Prosper Growth Pressures: Past, Present, and Future The Town of Prosper of the last decade has experience explosive growth, going from 9,700 residents to approximately 31,700 residents in 2021. With this, the Town on average has welcomed 18,810 residents each year to the Town, a 300% increase in the Towns from the past decade. Likewise, this strong growth for the Town will most likely continue into the future with the affects of Covid-19 creating a resurge of interest towards suburban and rural living, away from urban locations. The large explosion of the Town growth is in most part to its proximity to the Dallas North Tollway which provides quick access to downtown Dallas. During Prospers large growth from 2010 – 2020 Dallas population also increased by 100 thousand to give the city a population of 1.3 million residents. This shift in population has created significant opportunity for downtown Propser. The intent of this Master Plan is to provide the basic framework to help attract and support the redevelopment of downtown. Page 1210 Item 18. 19 Downtown Master PlanRegional Location Map City of Prosper Master Plan Existing Conditions DALLASUS 289 / PRESTON RDMCKINNEY FRISCO PROSPER HACKBERRY DALLAS PARKWAYTOWN OF PROSPER POPULATION: 29,100 FRISCOPOPULATION: 224,500 DALLAS POPULATION: 1,350,000 MCKINNEYPOPULATION: 200,000 HACKBERRY POPULATION: 1,860 0 mi 1/2 mi 1 mi 2 mi FRISCO CORRIDOR CURRENTLY PLANNED TO ENDS HERE OPPORTUNITY TO EXTEND POSSIBLE FUTURE ‘FRISCO CORRIDOR’ RAIL LINE US 380 REGIONAL LOCATION MAP Page 1211 Item 18. 20 Town of Prosper About the People Page 1212 Item 18. 21 Downtown Master Plan 116.0%82.6%86.2%59.1%40.0%34.7%50.8% 106.0% 345.9% 203.5% 0.0% 100.0% 200.0% 300.0% 400.0% 1970-80 1980-90 1990-2000 2000-2010 2010-2020 Population Growth 1970-2020 Collin County Prosper The Town of Prosper is located at the northern edge of the Dallas/Fort Worth Metropolitan area, in western Collin County and eastern Denton County which are fast growing counties within the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. From 2000 to 2010, the Town has experienced very rapid and robust growth with growth rate of 345.9%. In more recent years, population growth has slowed slightly but continues to expand at a considerable rate which is 291% from 2010 to 2020. Generally speaking, this is a high rate of growth for a community which was not an accident but is indicative of the rapid northern expansion of the DFW metropolitan area. Downtown has experienced comparable growth pattern, the population grew by 91.8% from 2000 to 2010 and then has slowed down. In 2020 the downtown population was 561, which represented a 19.3% increase since 2010. According to the NCTCOG population projection for 2040, Collin and Denton Counties will continue growing, thus will be the case for Prosper and its downtown. The extension of Dallas North Tollway by construction of a new bridge over U.S. 380 toward First Street, will bring more development and population to the area. 31,700 2021 Population 34 Median Age 9,532 Households $478,284 Median Home Value 96% Population 16+ Employed 82% White Collar Jobs 4% No High School Diploma 14% High School Graduate 18% Some College 64% Bachelor’s/ Grad/Prof Degree 77% White Dominant Race $143,583 Median Household Income 151 Housing Affordability Index Page 1213 Item 18. 22 Town of Prosper According to ESRI 2020 population data for downtown of Prosper, individuals between the ages of 25 and 54 which are considered the working age cohort collectively made up the largest percentage of the population at 44.7%. The portion of the population aged 15 years and younger make up 28.3% of the population. Having a significant percentage of the population 15 years old and younger and the large percentage of labor force cohort indicates the strong presence of families living in downtown Prosper. Males and their female counterparts comprise equal percentage of the downtown population. The median age of downtown residents in 2020 was 35 years, which is closely aligned with the median age for all of Texas at 34.4 years but is slightly younger than the median age for the nation as a whole at 37.8 years. Young population of downtown Prosper reflects younger families moving to the area. Downtown racial composition in 2020 was similar to the Town of Prosper racial makeup which significant majority were White population (80.5%). The second largest cohort identified as some other race alone (8.8%). The Hispanic origin population changed from 19.8% in 2010 to 22.6% in 2020. The diversity index which summarizes racial and ethnic diversity and range from 0 (no diversity) to 100 (completely diverse) changed from 50.7 to 57.8 over the last 10 years. Prosper is a well-educated Town. Nearly 95 percent of Prosper residents have a high school diploma, and nearly 55 percent have a bachelor’s degree. The Town’s education profile continues to improve. Since 2010 the percentage of people with graduate degrees has grown from 10.4% to 18% in 2020. That’s a significant increase over the course of ten years. More than 70% of the downtown’s population work in management, business, science, sales and administrative support occupations. Demographics describe quantifiable characteristics of individuals and groups of people. Psychographics build on demographic characteristics, helping identify preferences for certain types of products or activities based on a person’s values, attitudes, lifestyle, and other factors. Two people might be demographically identical – the same age, household size, profession, income, etc. – but one might prefer canned domestic beer, for example, while the other prefers bottled imports. To better understand some of the general lifestyle characteristics and consumer preferences of Prosper, we used data from ESRI. ESRI has developed a proprietary classification system, called Tapestry, to classify residential neighborhoods in the US into 14 major “LifeMode” groups, then into 67 more detailed segments, or subgroups, based on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. It then identifies concentrations, or clusters, of individuals and households throughout the US according to these characteristics. On the following, we have summarized ESRI’s description of each of the major Tapestry LifeMode groups and the detailed subsegments in downtown Prosper. In brief, ESRI has identified two clusters in the area: Soccer Moms (4A) and Up and Coming Families(7A).About the PeoplePage 1214 Item 18. 23 Downtown Master Plan Household: Married Couples Average Household Size: 2.96 Median Income: 90K Median Age: 37.0 Housing: Single Family Soccer Moms (4A) • Go jogging, biking, golfing, boating • Carry high level of debt • Visit theme parks, zoos • Shop, bank online • Family-oriented purchases • Own 2+ vehicles (minivans, SUVs) Up and Coming Families (7A) Household: Married Couples Average Household Size: 3.12 Median Income: 72K Median Age: 31.4 Housing: Single Family • Visit theme parks, zoos • Hold student loans, mortgages • Contract for home and landscaping services • Go online to shop, bank, for entertainment • Own late model compact car, SUV • Careful shoppers, aware of prices, willing to shop around for the best deals 73.7% of The Prosper Downtown HH 26.3% of The Prosper Downtown HH Page 1215 Item 18. 24 Town of Prosper Market Demographics and Trade Area Demographics The demographic story in Prosper over the last decade is growth. Household and population numbers more than tripled. That growth is a demand driver for housing, retail goods and services, and office and industrial development. Prosper households tend to be family households rather than roommate or single person households. They are higher income, more educated and less diverse than Collin County as a whole. A very high proportion (87%) of Prosper households own their homes. Trade Area The market analysis conducted for downtown Prosper focused on identifying market opportunities within a trade area that was identified for this analysis. A trade area is defined as an area from which a project(s) or locale will draw the majority of its residents (housing), patrons (retail), employees (office, industrial, institutional), and visitors (lodging). The boundaries of a trade area are often irregular as they are influenced by the following conditions physical barriers, location of competing developments, proximity to population and/ or employment concentrations, zoning, market factors, drive times, and spending and community patterns. For the downtown Prosper 2020 Indicator (unless otherwise noted) Town of Prosper Prosper Trade Area Collin County 2010 Households 2,855 125,500 283,759 2021 Households 9,532 222,900 399,654 Annual Household Growth Rate (2021 to 2031) 11.0%3.3%3.0% Average Household Size 3.21 2.89 2.84 Percent Non-Family Households 20%23%26% Percent Renters 13%29%35% Percent Age 65+7%9%11% Percent With Bachelors Degree 57%58%52% Median Household Income $146,733 $110,700 $96,900 Percent Hispanic 7%15%16% Percent Black/African-American 7%9%13% Percent Asian American 5%9%6% Page 1216 Item 18. 25 Downtown Master Plan 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 $150K and up $100K-$150K $75K-$100K $50K-$75K $35K-$50K $25K-$35K $15K-$25K Rental Apartment Units Townhomes, Condominiums Single Family Homes Trade Area Residential Demand Ten Years, 2022-2031 Total Trade Area Residential Demand by Type Single Family Homes Townhomes, Condominiums Rental Apartment Units 28,105 12,045 12,138 Residential Housing Production Over the past 10 years, annual residential construction in the Town of Prosper has averaged 721units, representing approximately 8% of the residential development in the trade area. Multifamily housing was only part of that growth. Multifamily development in the Town of Prosper represented less than 1% of total Trade Area construction, despite the demographic predictors of high demand for these types of products. Multi-family Production In the trade area as a whole, the inventory of multifamily housing has grown dramatically. About 40% of all existing multifamily housing in the trade area was developed in just the last five years. The current vacancy rate of 9.4% reflects the presence of new apartment buildings that are still in their initial rent-up period. Similarly, the 16.1% increase in apartment rents over the past year is primarily a consequence of newer properties coming on line which charge higher rents than existing properties. Trade Area Projected Growth The North Central Texas Council of Governments projects a growth of 52,027 households in the trade area over the next ten years—an annual growth of around 4.0%. Taking into consideration vacancy rates and the demand for second homes, we estimate a demand for 53,355 housing units over the period. If preferences for rental vs ownership housing is assigned by income levels, and 30% of all ownership housing is assumed to be in attached formats such as Townhomes and condominiums, housing demand in the Trade Area for three major housing types is as illustrated in Figure xx, and further summarized in Table xx. Similarly, the 16.1% increase in apartment rents over the past year is primarily a consequence of newer properties coming on line which charge higher rents than existing properties. Page 1217 Item 18. 26 Town of Prosper 0 250,000 500,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 Self-Employed Government Other Services Leisure and Hospitality Educational and Health Services Professional and Business Services Financial Activities Information Trade, Transportation and Utilities Manufacturing Natural Resources, Mining and Construction 113,161 157,955 44,518 162,898 44,637 246,420 245,929 422,658 156,762 112,001 176,798 69,127 154,905 573,105 187,161 167,998 40,928 250,415 Trade Area Retail Demand Ten Years, 2022-2031 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 Food service & Drinking Places Miscellaneous Stores General Merchandise Sporting Goods, Hobby, Books & Music Clothing & Accessories Health & Personal Care Food & Beverage (Grocery) Bldg Materials, Garden Equipment Electronics & Appliance Furniture & Home Furnishings Recapture of Retail Leakage Household Growth 288,890 74,458 724,463 323,347 940,078 763,437 1,272,647 408,208 549,996 Trade Area Office and Industrial Demand Ten Years, 2022-2031 167,998 240,624 Industrial Floor Area (square feet) Retail Retail Market Responding to the rapid growth in homes and office developments, retail development has been occurring at a rapid pace. Much of the inventory is centered in the Frisco area, anchored by the retail centers in the Stonebriar Centre area. But the sizable new Gates of Prosper reflects the market reality that residential growth in and around Prosper requires retail support. Retail Demand Figure xx illustrates the estimated retail demand in the Trade Area over the next decade by retail category. The primary driver of retail growth will be anticipated household growth, as illustrated by the green bars in the chart. The red bars show the opportunity for retail stores and services to recapture the spending of trade area households that occurs outside of the trade area. Page 1218 Item 18. 27 Downtown Master Plan Employment Sectors Office Market Office growth in the Trade Area has been dramatic, with its center of gravity in the Frisco Area. The flagship office center is the Star at Frisco, which houses the Dallas Cowboys headquarters and a cluster of other office buildings. The Town of Prosper benefits from the DFW north metro reputation for office development, and when the north suburban freeway improvements are completed it may well become attractive for large-scale office development. Industrial Market Industrial growth in the trade area has matched the growth in other market sectors. Ongoing demand is demonstrated by relatively high rents. Continued population growth offers a labor pool that will support business growth, and require warehousing and distribution support. Office and Industrial Demand Demand for employment (office and industrial) space runs in two directions. Growth in population represents a labor pool which is attractive to businesses. And the business dynamism of the area stimulates housing growth so that employees can live near where they work. Based on an overall annual employment growth of 3.5%, the Trade Area could support an additional 5.7 million square Downtown Prosper Development Demand Downtown Prosper has the potential to capture a fair share of the trade area growth over the next 10 years for a variety of residential, retail/restaurant/service and employment land uses. The supported land use mix focuses on redevelopment and reinvestment in central and infill downtown neighborhoods, with real estate products appropriate for those areas. Downtown Prosper Market Support by Residential Land Use Type Land Use Type Trade Area Demand (Dwelling Units) Downtown Prosper Demand Market Share Absorption (Dwelling Units) Low High Low High Single Family Detached 28,100 0%0%0 0 Single Family Attached 12,000 3%5%360 600 Rental Apartments 12,100 3%5%363 605 Total 52,200 723 1,205 Downtown Prosper Market Support by Residential Land Use Type Land Use Type Trade Area Demand (Square Feet) Downtown Prosper Demand Market Share Absorption (Square Feet) Low High Low High Retail 3,300,000 2%4%66,000 132,000 Employment (Office / Industrial)5,700,000 2%4%114,000 228,000 Total 9,000,000 180,000 360,000 Page 1219 Item 18. 28 Town of Prosper In general, the majority of development within Prosper has occurred over the past decade, in conjunction with the rapid increase in population. The vast majority of development has been single family residential, although some retail has been added along main roads, thus is the case in the downtown which single- family residential is the dominant land use (23%) in the area. The other uses in downtown include a mix of retail, office, civic (Town Hall, police department, churches, public library etc.), multi-family residential, open space and some light industrial which indicates that mixed uses are permitted within the area; however, there are a significant number of parcels (30%) that are vacant or underutilized which provide great sites for new residential, commercial and gathering spaces within the growing city. There is a retail core along Broadway and Coleman Street which is remained from the Old Town’ heyday. Coleman Street serves as a divider between residential uses to the east and non-residential uses to the west. The western side of Coleman is the primary area for mixed use developments, retail, restaurants offices and civic uses and the eastern side is dominated by single-family residential units. The Town of Prosper has a significant presence in the area with the Town Hall, Town Hall Annex Municipal Court, Police Department, Development Services and Public Works which are located nearby. Additionally, the new multi-purpose Town Hall, which includes the Library, on the west side of Main Street provided an important employment and destination base in the area. Currently, some of parcels along First street on the western side of Coleman street are vacant. Downtown Prosper Existing Land Use Page 1220 Item 18. 29 Downtown Master Plan By construction and expansion of Dallas North Tollway toward First street, this area would flourish and attract regional attention and investments. Additionally, in the appeal of the historic character of downtown that would attract more residents from the outlying region, for specialty shopping, dining and entertainment. BNSF Railway is passing through the area and some light industries and manufactures have located along the railway. The Prosper Business Park with light industrial, commercial warehousing, office storage and commercial uses and outside storage will be located in the western side of the railway and will bring more population and employment. Downtown Prosper Vacant Developable Land Vacant and Developable Land Page 1221 Item 18. 30 Town of Prosper Currently, there are five different zoning districts in downtown Prosper. The majority of land is in the single family, commercial/retail and Office/Service zones. Comparison between existing land use and existing zoning indicates that there is a conformity between them, and properties are being utilized according to its main zoning designation. Corresponding zoning regulations could encourage development more consistent with the downtown Vision and allow for more market-driven development. The following is the brief description of each zone: SF-15 - SINGLE FAMILY-15 DISTRICT: This District will provide for development of single family detached dwelling units on a minimum lot size of fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. Other uses, such as religious and educational facilities, parks, and open spaces will be provided for to maintain a balanced, orderly, convenient, and attractive residential area DTO - DOWNTown OFFICE DISTRICT: This District is established to maintain existing and encourage additional office development in the original downtown portion of the Town. DTC - DOWNTown COMMERCIAL DISTRICT: This District is established to maintain existing and encourage additional retail and commercial development in the original downtown portion of the Town. Zoning Downtown Prosper Existing Zoning Page 1222 Item 18. 31 Downtown Master Plan C - COMMERCIAL DISTRICT: This District is intended predominately for heavy retail, service, light intensity wholesale and commercial uses, but excluding warehousing uses. R - RETAIL DISTRICT: This District is established to provide locations for various types of general retail and service uses for one or more neighborhoods. To encourage reinvestment in the Old Town Area, the Town created Neighborhood Empowerment Zone No. 1 (NEZ) for the commercial core of downtown in 2009. This is a tool to generate tax increment financing which is then reinvested in downtown through community improvement projects. It is only applicable to property owners in the downtown area for the construction of new, non- residential development. Most of downtown parcels are less than two acres in size, they are under private ownership and the majority of these private-owned properties are already built out. There are several larger than two acres lands that most of them are vacant. Map shows the large property owners in the area and for those vacant developable lands. Consolidated parcels under single ownership would make the process of land acquisition and further development easier and faster. Downtown Prosper Property Ownership Property Ownership Page 1223 Item 18. 32 Town of Prosper Both the Dallas Parkway / N. Dallas Tollway and US 289 / Preston Rd. are the primary vehicular circulators accessing Prosper from southern cities like Frisco and Dallas. The planned ‘Frisco Corridor’ will put public transit close to Prosper with the possibility to extend the rail in future plans. Intersections at 1st St. & Preston Rd. and Broadway St. & Preston Rd are the main vehicular intersections leading to downtown. Both 1st St. and Broadway St. are the primary access routes to Main St. in downtown, approximately ¾ miles east of both intersections. These are rural residential streets with no pedestrian sidewalks or bike lanes integrated into the street design. There is also a lack of street lighting which is important for safety and security. The surrounding residences also lack a sidewalk network disconnecting them from the downtown area. Currently, most of Prosper’s sidewalks are constrained to the downtown area. Implementing sidewalks and bike lanes along 1st St. and Broadway St. will give people more alternate options to access downtown and will ultimately promote more activity. Accessibility Where We Are At: Main Accessibility and Intersections Page 1224 Item 18. 33 Downtown Master Plan Page 1225 Item 18. 34 Town of Prosper There are existing conditions hinting at branded placemaking and signage moments scattered throughout Prosper and the streets leading up to it. Through our studies we’ve identified these key projects that reflect Prosper’s updated signage with selected colors and material palette: • Town Entry Monument • Town of Prosper Sign on the ‘Water Tower’ • Boyer Park • Downtown Monument All these key moments provide the foundation to create a more comprehensive signage program directing visitors and residents to the downtown area. There is currently no wayfinding signage directing people to downtown. The Town of Prosper ‘Water Tower’ sign is the only sign in the downtown area indicating that you are in Prosper. This is also the largest existing placemaking moment in Prosper. The downtown area lacks any signage or wayfinding and there are no entry monuments upon arrival to Main St. or Broadway St. Street signs and streetlights along Main St. and Broadway St., in Placemaking Where We Are At: Placemaking & Views Diagram Page 1226 Item 18. 35 Downtown Master Plan downtown, are updated with the Town of Prosper logo and decorative banners. These are good components in creating a more pedestrian-focused place but there needs to be a more robust application and a more diverse kit-of-parts to pull from. This will create more intimate environments that reflect Prosper’s identity, resulting in more enjoyable and walkable places. The silos are another intriguing piece that seems integral to downtown Prosper’s identity. They are large and draw a lot of visual attention. The views alone could garner great backdrops to a vibrant pedestrian-oriented Main St and Broadway St. Page 1227 Item 18. 36 Town of Prosper Town Hall The downtown area in Prosper is slowly getting updated. The new ‘Town Hall & Library’ reflects a material palette and general ‘look and feel’ of architectural character that seems appropriate for Prosper. It also aligns well with the newer signage installments at ‘Gates of Prosper’ and Boyer Park. These precedents might help establish building material guidelines in the downtown area. The new ‘Town Hall & Library’ is an important placemaking anchor along Main St., but it is isolated in a sea of parking and lacks any retail and community buildings/parks adjacent to it. There is an open space located directly south of Town Hall, but it seems unused and inactivated. Encouraging more dense and diverse mixed-use developments around Town Hall will put people in the middle of downtown activating it on a regular basis. Building around community and civic landmarks in downtown will help define a ‘look and feel’ unique to Prosper’s identity, creating a sense of place and arrival. Retail Most of the retail in downtown is located off the intersection of Main St. and Broadway St. There is a limited selection of food and beverage retailers in the entire downtown area, and they seem constrained to the northern part of downtown along Broadway St. There is currently little to no outdoor seating for restaurants and no retail spill out, i.e., supplemental signage and product displayed outside. These are key components that contribute to the vibrancy and overall vitality of a successful human-focused downtown. Activating the sidewalks and allowing retail to spill out of storefronts creates a pleasant and inviting place that piques curiosity and makes people want to stay. It’s also important to consider the types of retail that are in downtown. As Prosper grows, the downtown area will begin to naturally transform from a small downtown into an area of regional appeal and community focused commerce. Retail can also be a key contributor to creating an increased regional appeal. Curating certain types and brands of retail, i.e., food and beverage, brewery, are great opportunities that allow retail to tell the story of Prosper while simultaneously contributing to vibrancy of place. There could also be a series of tenant improvement guidelines that helps retailers successfully align with the architectural character and ‘look and feel’ of downtown. Downtown & Public Realm Page 1228 Item 18. 37 Downtown Master Plan Pedestrian & Bike Access Sidewalks are limited to downtown. There is a lack of sidewalks extending beyond downtown into adjacent neighborhoods and no pedestrian connections to the larger community outside of the area. In downtown, the sidewalks are wide and inactive. These areas are prime real-estate for retail spill-out to occur. Successful downtowns tend to let people and retail create the colorful vibrancy of place. An active storefront with lots of people is the ultimate people magnet for more activity. There is currently a lack of bike lanes and trail networks throughout the Town of Prosper. It is important to provide multi-modal transportation alternatives not only for non-vehicular access but integrating bike lanes and sidewalks into street programs can help slow traffic down and create more enjoyable environments for those not driving. Street Furniture & Tree Program Along Broadway St. close to the intersection at Main St., there appears to be an updated street furniture and tree program. Light poles, street signs, stop sign poles, potted plants, and outdoor seating have been installed along Broadway St. and demonstrate the beginning of a comprehensive street furniture program. Currently, it feels like it’s lacking vitality. This might be due to the lack of retail activation on sidewalks as well as a lack of quantity of street furniture. Trees along Broadway St. in downtown are placed in rhythm and seem like they will take some time to mature. Larger trees create more impactful places where people want to stay. Being such a critical component to placemaking, it might be worthwhile to place some more mature trees in key areas around downtown. This can create an iconic moment that the community can easily rally behind. Downtown Parking & Streets Aside from the parking at Town Hall, there is a lot of angled parking throughout downtown. This is more efficient than 90-degree pull-in parking, but it still takes up a lot of space and is more vehicle-centric than pedestrian-focused. Decreasing the depth of street parking will give more space back to the public realm and allow for more retail to spill-out. This also creates space for restaurant patios and terraces. More visible storefront activation is critical for retail too succeed and is also a key part in creating lovely and enjoyable places. Page 1229 Item 18. 38 Town of Prosper 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLACEMAKING SUMMARYSTANTEC ViBE 1112 Pearl St. Boulder, CO80302 stantec.com DATE July 2021 Town of Prosper | Regional Location Map Regional Location Map City of Prosper Master Plan Existing Conditions DALLASUS 289 / PRESTON RDMCKINNEY FRISCO PROSPER HACKBERRY DALLAS PARKWAYTOWN OF PROSPER POPULATION: 29,100 FRISCO POPULATION: 224,500 DALLAS POPULATION: 1,350,000 MCKINNEYPOPULATION: 200,000 HACKBERRY POPULATION: 1,860 0 mi 1/2 mi 1 mi 2 mi FRISCO CORRIDOR CURRENTLY PLANNED TO ENDS HERE OPPORTUNITY TO EXTEND POSSIBLE FUTURE ‘FRISCO CORRIDOR’ RAIL LINE NEARBY CITIES MAIN ACCESS ROUTE TOWN OF PROSPER RAIL Where We Are At: Downtown Placemaking Opportunities 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLACEMAKING SUMMARYSTANTEC ViBE 1112 Pearl St. Boulder, CO80302 stantec.com DATE July 2021 Town of Prosper | Regional Location Map Regional Location Map City of Prosper Master Plan Existing Conditions DALLASUS 289 / PRESTON RDMCKINNEY FRISCO PROSPER HACKBERRY DALLAS PARKWAYTOWN OF PROSPER POPULATION: 29,100 FRISCO POPULATION: 224,500 DALLAS POPULATION: 1,350,000 MCKINNEY POPULATION: 200,000 HACKBERRY POPULATION: 1,860 0 mi 1/2 mi 1 mi 2 mi FRISCO CORRIDOR CURRENTLY PLANNED TO ENDS HERE OPPORTUNITY TO EXTEND POSSIBLE FUTURE ‘FRISCO CORRIDOR’ RAIL LINE NEARBY CITIES MAIN ACCESS ROUTE TOWN OF PROSPER RAIL Page 1230 Item 18. 39 Downtown Master Plan Many downtowns, at all scales, are trying to decrease the amount of vehicle traffic and parking in key community-oriented commerce areas like Main Street. Shifting to a different approach focused more on the pedestrian experience will help improve footfall and improve the types and brands of retail attracted to downtown. The street paving in downtown is typical throughout the Town of Prosper. It’s standard concrete paving with a few brick pedestrian crosswalks. Key intersections and downtown paving materials are also key components to placemaking that help define place. Changing the paving material at main intersections and key areas along streets helps break up visual monotony and indicates specialness of place. It also is a visual tool to help mitigate high car speeds. Community Space It seems like Prosper is missing a key component integral to community and sense of place. There is no iconic outdoor community space. Whether that be an iconic park, or a quaint main street drag that captures your heart. This is a space that functions as the ‘go to’ place Where We Are at: Public Realm Placemaking Opportunities 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLACEMAKING SUMMARYSTANTEC ViBE 1112 Pearl St. Boulder, CO80302 stantec.com DATE July 2021 Town of Prosper | Regional Location Map Regional Location Map City of Prosper Master Plan Existing Conditions DALLASUS 289 / PRESTON RDMCKINNEY FRISCO PROSPER HACKBERRY DALLAS PARKWAYTOWN OF PROSPER POPULATION: 29,100 FRISCO POPULATION: 224,500 DALLAS POPULATION: 1,350,000 MCKINNEY POPULATION: 200,000 HACKBERRY POPULATION: 1,860 0 mi 1/2 mi 1 mi 2 mi FRISCO CORRIDOR CURRENTLY PLANNED TO ENDS HERE OPPORTUNITY TO EXTEND POSSIBLE FUTURE ‘FRISCO CORRIDOR’ RAIL LINE NEARBY CITIES MAIN ACCESS ROUTE TOWN OF PROSPER RAIL Page 1231 Item 18. 40 Town of Prosper for all community events and becomes a venue for the Town of Prosper to express itself to the greater Frisco/Dallas community. There are lots of opportunities to alter and massage all the existing placemaking assets in the downtown area, but it will take a much more comprehensive approach in synthesis with mobility, retail, architecture, and urban planning. Through our studies we’ve identified a few trends that have begun to give us insight into what/where community placemaking and identity can be explored: Areas of Opportunity Community Space/Event Venue/Programmed Park • Front Porch Park: Activate the south side of Town Hall with a community amenity/park. • Back Porch Park: Turn the parking field on the north side of Town Hall into an iconic programmed park rivaled by neighboring communities. Downtown • Main Street: Transform Main St. & Broadway St. into vibrant ‘Main Streets’ where people want to live and enjoy fantastic food and retail. • Regional Attraction: Create a regional destination as well as strengthen existing community principles/vision. • Pedestrian-Focused Place: Create a safe and accessible place for everyone. • Equity for All: Integrate key principles into the planning process that gives everyone access to equity at all levels, i.e., community gardens, affordable housing, diverse affordable food offerings. Placemaking & Identity • Legacy & Prophecy: Important for the brand identity of downtown to root itself in the historic context of Prosper while communicating ambitions for future visions. • Placemaking Follies: Series of curated art or iconic wayfinding moments will help tell the story of Prosper. • Sign Monuments & Pageantry: There is a big gap in signage and overall pageantry in the downtown area. Creating a more robust signage program with supplemental pageantry will bring more charm to downtown. • Breadcrumb Effect: The ‘Silos’ are the most iconic placemaking element in Town. There needs to be more of these moments and at a variety of scale to. This will naturally direct people towards downtown. Existing Constraints • Lack of Street Development: Many streets don’t have sidewalks, bike lanes, or dedicated landscaping. • Architectural Character: There is a lack of ‘look and feel’/architectural character in all building types in the downtown area. This will be important in creating a cohesive downtown experience. • Lots of Parking: So much parking taking up a lot of space. Parking fields are a great opportunity to develop more density in the downtown area creating edges in downtown that help contain energy and place. • Retail Tenants: Challenge in getting the right tenants in that will benefit the community the most. Page 1232 Item 18. 41 Downtown Master Plan Mobility Downtown mobility is an important asset for creating a safe, pedestrian friendly place for all people. The 1800’s brought Prosper mule-drawn wagon and horse-drawn buggy. Since, the downtown area has been used in ways that did not necessitate development of a pedestrian network, thus creating a more vehicular-centric environment. Moving forward with this plan, downtown Prosper will work to ensure that the future of downtown is an environment that is a pedestrian friendly place and supports multi-modal transportation. Street Network The existing downtown street network is mostly built on a traditional grid with varying roadway and right-of-way widths. The local street network is very auto dominated with single lanes in each direction. Broadway Street and First Street form the primary east-west and Coleman Street as the north-south vehicular corridors. Coleman Street provides connection between Lovers Lane to Prosper Trail and further north. First Street is the only street in the downtown area traveling west, past the railroad tracks, providing the connection between Where We Are At: Downtown Mobility Plan Today PRESTON RDS. COLEMAN ST1ST ST. 1ST ST. BROADWAY BROADW A Y CRAIG RDCHURCH STCRAIG RDSTOP LIGHTS STOP LIGHTS 3/4 Mile 15 Minutes 1/2 Mile 10 Minutes 1/4 Mile 5 Minutes 2ND ST. 1ST ST. 3RD ST. STOP SIGNS RAIL ROAD GRADE CHANGE 500 feet250 feet0 feet Minor Thoroughfare (4 lane; 90’ row) Commercial Couplet (3 lane; 65’ row) Two-lane Neighborhood Downtown Prosper Old Town Distric (Section Varies)t Major Thoroughfare (6 lane; 120’ row) LEGEND:PRESTON RDS. COLEMAN ST1ST ST. 1ST ST. BROADWAY BROADW A Y CRAIG RDCHURCH STCRAIG RDSTOP LIGHTS STOP LIGHTS 3/4 Mile15 Minutes1/2 Mile10 Minutes1/4 Mile5 Minutes 2ND ST. 1ST ST. 3RD ST. STOP SIGNS RAIL ROAD GRADE CHANGE 500 feet250 feet0 feet Minor Thoroughfare (4 lane; 90’ row) Commercial Couplet (3 lane; 65’ row) Two-lane Neighborhood Downtown Prosper Old Town Distric (Section Varies)t Major Thoroughfare (6 lane; 120’ row) LEGEND: Page 1233 Item 18. 42 Town of Prosper Dallas North Tollway (DNT) and Preston Road (SH 289). Preston Road provides regional connection between downtown and surrounding areas. The completion of Cook Lane provides an alternate connection between Prosper Trail and First Street as well as a more direct connection to the Police headquarters. Recently built sidewalks and bump-outs in some downtown blocks provide pleasant walking experience with wide sidewalks along with on-street parking. The existing rail corridor on the Broadway Main Street Fifth Street First Street Street Name Direction Existing ROW ROW Utilized Coleman St.North-South 72’ to 195’22’ to 27’ Main St.North-South 50’ to 86’24’ to 85’ McKinley St.North-South 50’ to 55’25’ to 27’ Broadway East-West 63’ to 106’27’ to 100’ First St.East-West 30’ to 45’24’ to 45’ Fifth St.East-West 25.5’ to 62’22’ to 26’ Preston Rd.North-South 172’ to 208’- Craig St.North-South 27’ to 62’22’ - 49’ Church St.North-South 50’ to 64’23’ 6th St.East-West 42’ to 44’23’ Page 1234 Item 18. 43 Downtown Master Plan western side of the downtown creates an opportunity for a future rail station while at the same time becoming a barrier for future connections. With the shift from residential to retail and office along the major corridors, it is crucial to have provision for multiple modes as well as on-street parking. Traffic Volumes Downtown area streets are mostly 25-35 mph posted speed limit with relatively low vehicular traffic. The main north-south artery in downtown, Coleman Street, carries 2,430 vehicles per day at 30-mph which increases to 5,025 vehicles north of Old Town area which is also identified as minor thoroughfare. Broadway Street carries 2,280 vehicles per day serving as primary east-west corridor with 35-mph speed limit. Preston Road forms the eastern boundary of the downtown providing north-south regional connection to neighboring communities carrying more than 42,000 vehicles per day. First Street forms the southern edge traveling almost parallel to US 380, from Preston Road crossing Dallas North Tollway to FM 1385 in the west carrying about 4,300 vehicles per day. The design for reconstruction of First Street is underway that would expand the existing two-lane roadway to four-lane divided suburban arterial between Dallas North Tollway and Coleman Street. The completion of Cook Lane construction will provide another north-south connection between First Street and Prosper Trail, besides Coleman Street, which could possibly shift some traffic volumes. Crashes in Downtown Area The crashes in the study area are mainly along the major roadways with highest along Preston Road correlating with the amount of vehicular traffic. The intersections of Broadway Street and First Street at Preston Road appear, the only two signalized intersections in the study area, have high crashes. About 50 percent of the intersection related crashes at Preston Road involved turning vehicle. Majority of the crashes on the area roadways were caused by driver inattention or following too closely of vehicles traveling in the same direction. While majority of the crashes in the study area only involved property damages, there was one fatal crash reported at Broadway Street/Preston Road intersection. Gateway elements, enhanced signage, landscape, lighting, and other streetscape elements will likely increase driver awareness and help reduce potential crashes. Pedestrian Network Pedestrian network is limited, disconnected and inconsistent in the study area. Recent improvements along portions of Broadway Street include on-street parking, bump-outs and wider sidewalk space that encourages patio seating and other sidewalk activities. Since the construction of the new Town Hall and library on Main Street, it has become the focal point with increased pedestrian activity making it a much more active street. However, most of the downtown roadways being auto dominated have narrow or absent sidewalks. Some of the newer developments have sidewalks, however, most of the roadway network is single lane in each direction with limited or no pedestrian facility making it an unsafe and uncomfortable walking environment. The Old Town Area Transportation Plan recommends different cross-sections for the area street network with 8-10 feet wide sidewalks on major roadways and on-street parking on Broadway Street and segment of First Street between Coleman Street and Craig Street. McKinley Street is also proposed with 10’ wide sidewalk facility and on-street parking extending further north and turning to end at Coleman Street. Bicycle Facility Besides few blocks with wide sidewalks, the bicycle facility in downtown Prosper is mostly non-existent. Previous planning studies identified connector trails and developable trails connecting downtown. McKinley Street, Main Street, Sixth Street, Broadway Street, Church Street and part of Craig Street were identified for future bikeway accommodations. While none of the corridors currently have bikeway accommodations future expansion could include a separate bike lane, shared lane marking, signed route, or bicycle boulevard connecting other area trails. The existing street network utilizes limited right-of-way with room for expansion to include such facilities. Page 1235 Item 18. 44 Town of Prosper Currently there is no fixed route transit serving the Town of Prosper. In 2019, Town of Prosper partnered with Collin County Transit – a partnership between City of McKinney, the McKinney Urban Transit District (MUTD)and the Denton County Transportation Authority (DCTA) to begin operating in the Town. The service is a subsidized taxi voucher program providing transportation for older adults, individuals with disabilities as well as low-income residents. As part of a long-term multimodal vision for the Dallas-Fort Worth Region identified under NCTCOG’s Mobility 2045, the Frisco Corridor was identified as a potential passenger rail corridor. This corridor along predominantly BNSF freight rail right-of-way extends up to US- 380 in Frisco however, there is no identified funding for this project. This corridor provides an opportunity for Prosper by extending this rail line north to a potential future stop located in downtown. This should be studied further as port of the long-term multimodal vision. Parking Parking is provided with on-street parking spaces, Town owned parking lots (predominantly at the Town Hall), and on private parking lots. The current inventory observed indicates there are approximately 514 spaces within the commercial downtown area available for parking. Of these spaces, approximately 225 parking spaces are located on street, with additional 185 parking spaces located at the Town Hall property. The remaining spaces are located in parking lots adjacent to existing businesses. Actual parking use inventories had been completed in June and September of 2019. While this data is aging it appears to be generally reflective of parking demand reviewed during the planning process. These inventories identified a peak daytime use of approximately 113 and 102 spaces between on-street, public parking lot, and private parking lots. Conventional parking requirements are based on single-use peak demand, or that every single use is maximizing it’s total parking requirements at all times. This is a challenging approach in many projects as the peak demand varies by the type of use and hours of operation. For example, a shopping plaza a with a medical office and a movie theater will not both be fully utilized at the same. The medical office will have peak demand during weekday daytime hours whereas the movie theater will have peak demand during evening and weekend hours. While this concept of “shared parking” is accommodated in Prosper’s code, it is very restricted, requiring studies, supplemental approvals and only one parcel to be involved. However, the potential benefit of sharing is significant. The Urban Land Institute (ULI) produces a guide called “Shared Parking” (now in its 3rd Edition), which ITE also supports, that estimates the varying peak demands of many land uses. Applying ULI’s methodology to a fully-occupied downtown Prosper would result in only 561 parked cars, and reductions for the frequency of people to park once and visit more than one destination on foot based on the local context further reduces this to 531 cars. While this suggests only a small parking shortage if all existing uses in downtown were fully occupied and utilized, existing building occupancies produce a peak demand of over 400 fewer cars. Transit Current Uses and Parking Demand Modeling Land Use Type (field survey)Units Total Office Sq. Ft.41,500 Govt. Office Sq. Ft.25,500 Retail Sq. Ft.32,000 Apartments Units 12 Warehouse Sq. Ft.79,000 Light Industrial Sq. Ft.450,000 Gym Sq. Ft.9,000 Church Sq. Ft.3,500 Auto Pars / Service Center Sq. Ft. 4,000 Existing Parking Spaces 514 Parking Condition Units Total Unshared Peak Demand Vehicles 1,136 Shared Peak Demand (no context)Vehicles 783 Shared Peak Demand (context)Vehicles 710 Observed Peak Demand Vehicles 113 Page 1236 Item 18. 45 Downtown Master Plan Where We Are At: Downtown Mobility Today CHURCH STCRAIG RD3/4 Mile 15 Minutes 1/2 Mile 10 Minutes 1/4 Mile 5 Minutes 2ND ST. 1ST ST. 3RD ST.PRESTON RDCHURCH STS. COLEMAN ST1ST ST. 1ST ST. BROADWAY BROADW A Y CRAIG RDS. COLEMAN ST500 feet250 feet0 feet Existing Sidewalk On-street Parking Two-lane Neighborhood Downtown Prosper Four-lane / Divided / Improved Intersection LEGEND:CHURCH STCRAIG RD3/4 Mile 15 Minutes 1/2 Mile 10 Minutes 1/4 Mile 5 Minutes 2ND ST. 1ST ST. 3RD ST.PRESTON RDCHURCH STS. COLEMAN ST1ST ST. 1ST ST. BROADWAY BROADW A Y CRAIG RDS. COLEMAN ST500 feet250 feet0 feet Existing Sidewalk On-street Parking Two-lane Neighborhood Downtown Prosper Four-lane / Divided / Improved Intersection LEGEND: Page 1237 Item 18. 46 Town of Prosper Old Town Transportation Plan Section A: Four lane divided roadway with a landscaped median and a landscaped parkway separating pedestrians from traffic. This section serves as a major entrance into Old Town from the east. No on-street parking. Section B: Two lane divided boulevard with a large center median containing landscaping. Wide travel lanes allow for bicycle accommodation and a landscaped parkway separates pedestrians from traffic. No on-street parking. Section C: Two lane divided boulevard with a large center median containing landscaping. On-street parallel parking is permitted and a landscaped parkway separates pedestrians from traffic. Section D: Two lane undivided urban roadway. Wide 20’ sidewalks accommodate patio seating, pedestrian traffic and street trees. On-street angled parking is permitted and bulb-outs are located at intersections to enhance pedestrian visibility at crosswalks. Section E: Two lane undivided roadway with on-street parallel parking and an immediately adjacent 8’ sidewalk. A large private setback of 25’ is included. Section F: Two lane undivided roadway with on-street parallel parking and a 15’ sidewalk. 10’ of the sidewalk will be located within the right-of-way and the additional 5 feet will be a 5’ setback to building face. Section G: Two lane divided roadway with a center median containing landscaping. On-street parallel parking and a 10’ sidewalk are included. Land Use The predominant land use within Old Town will be single-family residential. All infill development within such areas should conform to the architectural guidelines established for the Old Town district. Such guidelines are created to protect the continuity of look and feel within Old Town. Along Broadway and First Street, single-family uses will gradually transition to boutique, cottage-style office and/or specialty retail uses. Broadway west of Coleman, will be the retail core of the downtown. Shops, restaurants, and small office uses may be located within the main street retail area. This area is intended to be the heart and main activity center of the Old Town Area. As redevelopment occurs, building frontages should be brought to the property line to be consistent with ultimate streetscape improvements. Adjacent to the retail core, a mixed-use district incorporating mixed use lofts/apartments will serve as a buffer between the Business Park and the core of Old Town. This area will also provide rooftops that service adjacent retail establishments. The Green space area will serve as a community park and its location adjacent to the retail core of Old Town and the mixed-use district will make it an opportunistic and useable open space area. Niche retail is recommended along Preston Road and at the northern end of Coleman. Retail development within these areas should fit within the architectural framework of the Old Town area. Setbacks should be reduced, when possible, along Coleman and Broadway to frame the roadways. Where We Are At: Adopted Old Town Transportation Plan Page 1238 Item 18. 47 Downtown Master Plan Streets In previous planning efforts, an overall transportation plan has been prepared for the Town including detailed roadway sections within the Downtown Area as shown in the image to the left. This plan, the “Old Town Transportation Plan” has been formally adopted by the Town. During this Master Plan process and review of the adopted transportation plans, a recommendation has been included to re-evaluate theses sections prior to detailed design and funding for construction for the various segments. Infrastructure As a well established downtown the core infrastructure exists throughout. Much of the commercial downtown has benefited from recent streetscape replacement projects that include sidewalks, lighting, landscape and furnishings. Beyond the commercial core streets are of varying age with some improvements occurring. As noted in previous sections there is a general lack of sidewalks, pedestrian scale lighting, and other elements in the residential portion of downtown. Power is served throughout the Town by Oncor throughout with some powerlines visible overhead. There are existing sanitary sewer and water lines throughout downtown, and based on discussions with Town staff, there is sufficient capacity to continue serving the ongoing redevelopment of downtown. The existing lines do not necessary follow the same network however, it Sanitary Sewer Lines Water Main Lines Page 1239 Item 18. 48 Town of Prosper Page 1240 Item 18. 49 Downtown Master Plan WHAT WE WANT: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 03 Page 1241 Item 18. 50 Town of Prosper Page 1242 Item 18. 51 Downtown Master Plan Overview3-1 Prosper’s downtown plans need to be the community’s plans. We provided a comprehensive and varied set of engagement tools. These provided two-way communication. They informed the planning process and helped stakeholders understand the process and its implications and provide input. This helped win early support by residents, property owners, business owners, area developers, and regional/public development partners. Community engagement happened during every phase of the downtown Prosper planning process. Page 1243 Item 18. 52 Town of Prosper This section provides details of engagement activities and tools our team used to engage community in the planning process and the summary of feedbacks and responses we received in each phase. The exact combination of activities and tools for this project were developed in collaboration with the PEDC staff. The engagement activities for this study were focused around the four major stages of the planning process: • Phase1- Discovery: Understanding what exists, what has been done, and what is planned • Phase 2- Development: Exploring Alternatives • Phase 3- Design: Implementation Strategies • Phase 4- Delivery 02 Development Discovery Engagement Plan Review of Existing Plans, Projects, and Programs Boundary Determination Market Assessment 03 Design Community Visioning Listening Sessions - 8 Existing Condition Summary PDDC Meeting Plan Development Virtual Townhall Focused Design Sessions - 8 Online Survey and Interactive Map Vision and Goals Document Data Collection Plan Framework Document PDDC Meeting Funding Opportunities Implementation Sessions - 2 04 Draft Plan Document Stakeholder Review Final Plan Document Approval Process Delivery Online Feedback Open Space Concepts Catalyst Site Concepts Site Specific Meetings Pop-up Event 01 OverviewPage 1244 Item 18. 53 Downtown Master Plan Engagement Planning Phase 1: Discovery- Foundation Building Phase 1 Public Engagement • Community Visioning • Listening Sessions-8 • Project Website Phase 2: Development - Plan Framework and Opportunity Analysis Phase 2 Public Engagement • Virtual Townhall • Focused Design Sessions-8 • Online Feedback • Online Survey and Interactive Map Phase 3: Design - Catalyst Investment Areas & development Strategies Phase 3 Public Engagement • Pop-up Event • Implementation Sessions-2 Phase 4: Delivering the Tools – Final Document Phase4 Public Engagement • Stakeholder Review • Plan Adoption The purpose of the discovery phase is to set a baseline of existing conditions upon which the plan may build. As part of a series of stakeholder listening sessions, online surveying and interactive mapping, and a large community workshop, more than 400 people kicked off the downtown Prosper Master Plan. This gave the project team an opportunity to hear from people in small group discussions, during community events (Crawfish Boil), on their own time at home via downtown Prosper Website, or in a fun and interactive big event. Participants told us what they loved about downtown Prosper and how it could be better and they shared their future visions. The feedback led to a refined understanding of the existing conditions in downtown, what participants wanted us to focus on in the plan, and more than anything, a vision for downtown Prosper. In the following we provide more details about each engagement activities including developing the project website, holding 8 listening sessions , and facilitating community visioning workshop. Phase 1 Engagement 3-2 Page 1245 Item 18. 54 Town of Prosper Project Website Our team developed and maintained a project-specific website throughout the duration of the Project. The project website had been developed to match the project graphic standards and it included a location for the public to give on-line comments, answer surveys, sign-up for project notifications, read interim reports, review public documents, and stay up to date on upcoming public engagement/outreach events. Here is the link to the Prosper Downtown website: https://downtown-prosper.com/ Online engagement activities in phase 1 included :Survey, Idea wall and Interactive Mapping. Page 1246 Item 18. 55 Downtown Master Plan The Stantec Team joined the Crawfish boil community event which was held on April 17th outside the Gin. A three hours of community activities and discussions allowed our team to explore ideas, themes, and preferred outcomes for the downtown area through Six Word Story, Budget Exercise, and Drawing a Boundary Exercises. We wanted to know their thoughts and ideas for downtown to ensure that this is truly the community’s plan and creates a downtown where they want to live, work, and play. In the Six Word Story Exercise, the community were asked to write their downtown Prosper story in 6 words on the card and pin it to the string; in the Budget Exercise, the participants were asked to distribute the dollars in the envelop between the four jars to show us their priorities; and a large scale map had been provided to allow them to draw their desired boundary of the downtown. The following is the summary of what we heard. Community Visioning Workshop We wanted to know their thoughts and ideas for downtown to ensure that this is truly the community’s plan. Page 1247 Item 18. 56 Town of Prosper Once the planning effort for downtown was underway, a list of key stakeholders with the assist of The Prosper Economic Development Corporation was drafted. They were selected from community leaders, Town staff, business owners, developers, employees, residents and students. Our team met with up to eight (8) groups or individuals as part of this step. The purpose of this task is to meet with individuals and groups with the potential to impact future investment and reinvestment in downtown Prosper, as well as vet the Vision concept and stated goals. In each session, participants were asked to discuss about what they like or do not like about the area, their wish for the downtown and the Prosper newspaper headline which would describe downtown Prosper in 2030. These sessions provided valuable insight from those that have an interest in and a deep knowledge of the community. The table shows the detail of each session: Listening Sessions Listening Session 1 Town Staff What We Heard: • The Town is an open canvas • Town Hall is a place and (for) events • There is no hook or draw to people • Town needs a bold vision not just an easy win • Small business owners so the process for permits is restrictive for temporary signs and events • Cost complaints from small business • Need a better way to get event information required by permits to the public • Walkability is key • Small Town feel • The community is proud and ready for growth Listening Session 2 Seniors What We Heard: Wishes: • Develop everything around the Town hall (food and entertainment) - make it the main draw • Spots for food and entertainment (small business) • Family oriented boutique business • Maintain the character • Pickle ball, games, activities, etc. • Activity center for all age groups to start development Important: • Historic character • Family feel • Arts and Music • Compliment existing nearby development Listening Session 3 Residents What We Heard: Wishes: • Organic farmers market - rules too strict • Small business office space • Be able to live and work in Town • No major destination downtown and connections are just not there from outside of downtown • A mixed-use development like South Lake Town Center • Town Square or place to put small business and events • Outdoor music, eating, events, and lighting • Water feature, green space, shade - something to draw people after eating • Convert existing buildings instead of demolishing to keep character Listening Session 4 Students What We Heard: Wishes: • A book store plus cafe - talk and read books • In-n-out, Trader Joe’s (healthy grocery store) • Pedestrian friendly, bike lanes • Place you can take a walk with your family • Good blend of restaurants and stores • Outdoor eating area, green open spaces with benches • Signs to navigate downtown and make it look nice (wayfinding) at the entrances to downtown • Downtown events (fairs, rides, smaller scale of state fair), rodeo • Hard to find downtown - cannot walk there Page 1248 Item 18. 57 Downtown Master Plan The most popular wishes that we heard in different sessions are combined in the following: • A place to Live, work, and Play • A safe walkable unique downtown • Connected, all inclusive • Maintain the character • Make the Town hall the cornerstone of Downtown • Strong foundation for the future • Attractive destinations • Outdoor music, eating, events • A good blend of local restaurants and stores • Place you can take a walk with your family • Pedestrian and bike friendly • Activities for all age groups • A good place for small businesses and startups • A better version of downtown Celina and McKinney. Page 1249 Item 18. 58 Town of Prosper Phase 2 Engagement Prosper’s downtown plans needs to be the community’s plans. We provided a comprehensive and varied set of engagement tools. These provided two-way communication and informed the planning process while helping stakeholders understand the process and its implications and provide input. This helped win early support by residents, property owners, business owners, area developers, and regional/ public development partners. This section provides details of engagement activities and tools our team used to engage community in the planning process and the summary of feedbacks and responses we received in each phase. Located at https://downtownprosper.mysocialpinpoint.com/Town-of-prosper-downtown-plan/ideas#/ online feedback is crafted into a blog board were residents can suggest and like popular ideas for the plans development. The format and use of the board allows for individuals who wouldn’t normally be able to add input or subjections the access to do so. The online nature of the board also allows for opportunities for younger individuals to provide input into planning phase. An interactive map is a powerful tool that enables the community to virtually walk through the downtown Prosper, show or draw their ideas for the area, mark the areas of opportunities and challenges and discover the others discussions and comments through an online platform. This map showed us the areas that participants wanted us to focus on in the plan. Online Feedback Interactive Map Page 1250 Item 18. 59 Downtown Master Plan The ideas wall allows Prosper residents to post their comments along with photos and respond to others using discussions. Figure .... shows the most popular comments that had been posted in the website. In summary, people like to see the downtown Prosper as a walking location like downtown McKinney or Celina with more local restaurants, bars, coffee shops, moms and pops stores, boutiques, farmer markets and event venues with a unique historic style. A place with charming outdoor seating areas and green landscape that could draw local residents out of the house and offer them a good community gathering spot with live music and events and provide the opportunity to spend their dollars in their community. Keeping the small Town/ village type flavor with the silos setting was another bold ideas for downtown Prosper that was repeated. Idea Wall Page 1251 Item 18. 60 Town of Prosper In the early steps of the Project, a survey was posted in the website with 15 multiple-choice questions to discover the community’s attitudes, opinions, experiences, and needs about downtown Prosper. Questions were organized in three main sections including: Relationship to downtown, Feedback and Vision, and Demographics. A total of 345online surveys were completed during the response period. Many questions included an optional open response – “Other” – and a space for other comments. As anticipated, restaurants prove the largest draw in bringing people into the downtown, but they desired for more signature restaurants and bars to anchor the downtown area and attract other businesses. They believed restaurants and retail shops are pillars of downtown’s success, but not just any establishments are welcome. They emphasized on diverse local shops that are associated with the small Town atmosphere and historical character of downtown Prosper. Praise was awarded to the preservation and adaptation of Silos and the Gin. Public space where people can meet without spending money and for cultural institutions like galleries and event venues also received heavy attention. In identifying opportunities, respondents pointed out that preserving the historic feel is essential to the ongoing atmosphere of what most commenter’s preferred to call “Old Town”. The arts and culture sector is also highlighted as an area of opportunity by participants Online Survey I love Downtown Prosper because: 69.5% Dining 74.3% Preserving historic character 48.2% Strengthen arts & culture scene 29.3% Connections to open space 28.4% Adding jobs 21% Additional parking garages 10.4% 26.342.6% 44.1% 48.2% 88.5% Top three reasons for visiting Downtown:I love Downtown because: Top challenges facing Downtown:Top opportunities: Amenities that I would add: 36.1% Special Events/ Festivals 23.7% Shopping Not enough shopping Right mix of retail Lack of available parking Lack of regional draws for festivals & events Providing a family friendly environment Rising rents for storefronts Lack of pedestrian safety / crossings Too congested (cars / people) None of the above Bike safety & bike parking 56% 46% 45% 39% 26% 9% 7.5% 7% 2.5% 2% Restaurants Retail store Bars / breweries Parks / Open space Event venues Galleries / museums 69.5% Dining 74.3% Preserving historic character 48.2% Strengthen arts & culture scene 29.3% Connections to open space 28.4% Adding jobs 21% Additional parking garages 10.4% 26.342.6% 44.1% 48.2% 88.5% Top three reasons for visiting Downtown:I love Downtown because: Top challenges facing Downtown:Top opportunities: Amenities that I would add: 36.1% Special Events/ Festivals 23.7% Shopping Not enough shopping Right mix of retail Lack of available parking Lack of regional draws for festivals & events Providing a family friendly environment Rising rents for storefronts Lack of pedestrian safety / crossings Too congested (cars / people) None of the above Bike safety & bike parking 56% 46% 45% 39% 26% 9% 7.5% 7% 2.5% 2% Restaurants Retail store Bars / breweries Parks / Open space Event venues Galleries / museums 69.5% Dining 74.3% Preserving historic character 48.2% Strengthen arts & culture scene 29.3% Connections to open space 28.4% Adding jobs 21% Additional parking garages 10.4% 26.342.6% 44.1% 48.2% 88.5% Top three reasons for visiting Downtown:I love Downtown because: Top challenges facing Downtown:Top opportunities: Amenities that I would add: 36.1% Special Events/ Festivals 23.7% Shopping Not enough shopping Right mix of retail Lack of available parking Lack of regional draws for festivals & events Providing a family friendly environment Rising rents for storefronts Lack of pedestrian safety / crossings Too congested (cars / people) None of the above Bike safety & bike parking 56% 46% 45% 39% 26% 9% 7.5% 7% 2.5% 2% Restaurants Retail store Bars / breweries Parks / Open space Event venues Galleries / museums 69.5% Dining 74.3% Preserving historic character 48.2% Strengthen arts & culture scene 29.3% Connections to open space 28.4% Adding jobs 21% Additional parking garages 10.4% 26.342.6% 44.1% 48.2% 88.5% Top three reasons for visiting Downtown:I love Downtown because: Top challenges facing Downtown:Top opportunities: Amenities that I would add: 36.1% Special Events/ Festivals 23.7% Shopping Not enough shopping Right mix of retail Lack of available parking Lack of regional draws for festivals & events Providing a family friendly environment Rising rents for storefronts Lack of pedestrian safety / crossings Too congested (cars / people) None of the above Bike safety & bike parking 56% 46% 45% 39% 26% 9% 7.5% 7% 2.5% 2% Restaurants Retail store Bars / breweries Parks / Open space Event venues Galleries / museums 69.5% Dining 74.3% Preserving historic character 48.2% Strengthen arts & culture scene 29.3% Connections to open space 28.4% Adding jobs 21% Additional parking garages 10.4% 26.342.6% 44.1% 48.2% 88.5% Top three reasons for visiting Downtown:I love Downtown because: Top challenges facing Downtown:Top opportunities: Amenities that I would add: 36.1% Special Events/ Festivals 23.7% Shopping Not enough shopping Right mix of retail Lack of available parking Lack of regional draws for festivals & events Providing a family friendly environment Rising rents for storefronts Lack of pedestrian safety / crossings Too congested (cars / people) None of the above Bike safety & bike parking 56% 46% 45% 39% 26% 9% 7.5% 7% 2.5% 2% Restaurants Retail store Bars / breweries Parks / Open space Event venues Galleries / museums Page 1252 Item 18. 61 Downtown Master Plan Community Crawfish Boil: Winery Cool & quaint live music Dog friendly restaurants Art spaces (murals) Local business Multi-family complexes Dancing & sports Farmers market High rise apartments Open air markets Sidewalks and bike lanes Green space Live music Outdoor space Page 1253 Item 18. 62 Town of Prosper Page 1254 Item 18. 63 Downtown Master Plan WHERE WE ARE GOING: VISION, GOALS & PRINCIPLES04 Page 1255 Item 18. 64 Town of Prosper Page 1256 Item 18. 65 Downtown Master Plan Vision “Downtown will be an authentic and appealing destination for people who want to work, shop, and gather with friends and neighbors in a unique place that reflects Prosper’s proud rural heritage and its support for local people and businesses.” Future policy and strategic investment decisions should be made in consideration of this statement of intent - developed during the 2017 Old Town Plan process. Page 1257 Item 18. 66 Town of Prosper Page 1258 Item 18. 67 Downtown Master PlanGuiding Principles1. Investment and reinvestment will have sustained value and reflect the authenticity and distinctive character of a downtown environment. 2. Regulations or standards intended to advance the long-term vision for downtown that increase development costs and widen the economic feasibility gap, will be offset by corresponding economic incentives. 3. Uses will be marketed and maintained as a single district with a consistent brand reflected in a cohesive system of public and open spaces and gathering places, signage, and community amenities. 4. Particular efforts will be made to keep street level spaces occupied by a healthy mix of commercial and service businesses. 5. Public expenditures will prioritize investment in shared facilities and infrastructure to effectively leverage limited resources and increase the potential of private properties to generate municipal revenues. 6. Capital improvements in downtown will facilitate easy vehicular and non-vehicular access while also preserving the area’s autonomy as a stand-alone mixed-use district that compliments, rather than competes with other commercial concentrations in the community. 7. The downtown physical form will balance the role of vehicles, pedestrians, and other modes of transportation. 8. Preference will be given to projects that further a greater diversity of uses and attract a broader market. 9. Vacant and underdeveloped properties will be expeditiously put into productive use in a manner consistent with the vision expressed herein. 10. Criteria will inform the location of community facilities, particularly those deemed essential for the success of this Master Plan. Page 1259 Item 18. 68 Town of Prosper Main Intersections & Access Town of Prosper Master Plan Existing ConditionsPRESTON RD1ST STREET BROADWAY ST. 1/4 Mile 5 Minutes 1/2 Mile 10 Minutes 3/4 Mile 15 Minutes BOYER PARK SILO PARK EXISTING SILOS EXISTING RAILWAY PRESTON RD. & FIRST ST. PRESTON RD. & BROADWAY ST. DOWNTOWN WATER TOWER TO DALLAS PARKWAY 3RD ST 2ND ST INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROMOTES TRAFFIC CALMING CHURCH STCRAIG RDTOWN HALL & LIBRARY SITE 2 SITE 3 SITE 1 500 feet250 feet0 feet GATEWAY GATEWAY PRIMARY GATEWAY GATEWAY PRIMARY GATEWAY PRIMARY GATEWAY SITE 4 OPEN SPACE 1 OPEN SPACE 2 OPEN SPACE 3S. COLEMAN STMULTI-FAMILY INLINE RETAIL NEW SIDEWALKS THROUGHOUT DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD NEW STREET SIGNAGE AND LIGHTING WILL IMPROVE LIFE & SAFETY IN DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOODS SIDEWALKS AND BIKE LANES INCREASE MOBILITY OPTIONS & TIE INTO HIKE & BIKE NETWORK SIDEWALKS AND BIKE LANES INCREASE MOBILITY OPTIONS & TIE INTO HIKE & BIKE NETWORK PARK, REC, OPEN SPACE POTENTIAL RECREATION ELEMENTS AROUND RETENTION POND *INCORPORATE INTO PARK, REC, & OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN ENHANCED SCENIC BOULEVARD GATEWAY TO PROSPER DEVELOPMENT UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BIKE LANES THROUGHOUT DOWNTOWN CONNECTS TO HIKE & BIKE NETWORK POTENTIAL RAIL EXTENSION FUTURE EXTENSION OF THE FRISCO LINE NORTH OF US 380 TO DOWNTOWN TO FRISCO 8 MILES TO DALLAS 39 MILES JUDY RUCKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EAGLE LANDING PARK PROSPER HIGH SCHOOL CHURCH RESIDENTIAL ROAD WITH NO SIDEWALK & BIKE LANES FUTURE TRAILHEAD CONNECTION HIKE & BIKE NETWORK FUTURE TRAIL CONNECTION PROSPER TOWN CENTER CVS PHARMACY PROSPER MEDICAL CENTER BANK 7-ELEVEN TEXAS BANK TO DALLAS 39 MILES As investment takes hold and both public and private projects begin they will reshape downtown while building upon its unique history and the character that has defined it for decades. With this new development, restaurants and retail will line the Towns streets creating activity and appeal, while offices will support further economic growth. More people will call downtown home with the introduction of new housing units, and this will in turn help support new business development. Downtown will become a destination for visitors and residents alike. Public improvements will create special places for gathering, socializing, and providing the Town greater opportunity for programming events and activities for the community to celebrate throughout the year. Streetscape improvements will help unify the old and the new - building upon the theme that has already begun with furnishings, lighting and landscape. Overall, access, mobility, and connectivity accompanied by new signage and wayfinding will make downtown easier to visit and more functional for those already here. Downtown Prosper Looking Forward Where We Are Going: Imagine Downtown Page 1260 Item 18. 69 Downtown Master Plan Main Intersections & Access Town of Prosper Master Plan Existing ConditionsPRESTON RD1ST STREET BROADWAY ST. 1/4 Mile 5 Minutes 1/2 Mile 10 Minutes 3/4 Mile 15 Minutes BOYER PARK SILO PARK EXISTING SILOS EXISTING RAILWAY PRESTON RD. & FIRST ST. PRESTON RD. & BROADWAY ST. DOWNTOWN WATER TOWER TO DALLAS PARKWAY 3RD ST 2ND ST INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROMOTES TRAFFIC CALMING CHURCH STCRAIG RDTOWN HALL & LIBRARY SITE 2 SITE 3 SITE 1 500 feet250 feet0 feet GATEWAY GATEWAY PRIMARY GATEWAYGATEWAY PRIMARY GATEWAY PRIMARY GATEWAY SITE 4 OPEN SPACE 1 OPEN SPACE 2 OPEN SPACE 3S. COLEMAN STMULTI-FAMILY INLINE RETAIL NEW SIDEWALKS THROUGHOUT DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD NEW STREET SIGNAGE AND LIGHTING WILL IMPROVE LIFE & SAFETY IN DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOODS SIDEWALKS AND BIKE LANES INCREASE MOBILITY OPTIONS & TIE INTO HIKE & BIKE NETWORK SIDEWALKS AND BIKE LANES INCREASE MOBILITY OPTIONS & TIE INTO HIKE & BIKE NETWORK PARK, REC, OPEN SPACE POTENTIAL RECREATION ELEMENTS AROUND RETENTION POND *INCORPORATE INTO PARK, REC, & OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN ENHANCED SCENIC BOULEVARD GATEWAY TO PROSPER DEVELOPMENT UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BIKE LANES THROUGHOUT DOWNTOWN CONNECTS TO HIKE & BIKE NETWORK POTENTIAL RAIL EXTENSION FUTURE EXTENSION OF THE FRISCO LINE NORTH OF US 380 TO DOWNTOWN TO FRISCO 8 MILES TO DALLAS 39 MILES JUDY RUCKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EAGLE LANDING PARK PROSPER HIGH SCHOOL CHURCH RESIDENTIAL ROAD WITH NO SIDEWALK & BIKE LANES FUTURE TRAILHEAD CONNECTION HIKE & BIKE NETWORK FUTURE TRAIL CONNECTION PROSPER TOWN CENTER CVS PHARMACY PROSPER MEDICAL CENTER BANK 7-ELEVEN TEXAS BANK TO DALLAS 39 MILES Downtown has big visions for the future, and it will take a community effort to do realize this. The Town will have a central role on some level in nearly all aspects of implementing the Master Plan. It will need to be supported by organizations such as the PEDC, the Downtown Business Alliance, and the Chamber of Commerce to assist in implementing initiatives, assisting in securing funding, helping to build and maintain momentum, and work to attract investment. Business and property owners will have a key role as well - understanding the realistic opportunity for their properties if they want to see redevelopment, and invest in them to support the vision. Business owners will need to continue developing their Downtown Business Alliance, and over time will take an increasing role in promoting and attracting visitors and residents to downtown. Lastly, residents - downtowns can become a “living room” for a community and the vision for downtown Prosper has been crafted by this community. Residents must support the businesses, attend the events and programs, and continue to believe in downtown.Page 1261 Item 18. 70 Town of Prosper Where We Are Going: Imagine Downtown Page 1262 Item 18. 71 Downtown Master Plan Where We Are Going: Imagine Downtown Page 1263 Item 18. 72 Town of Prosper Page 1264 Item 18. 73 Downtown Master Plan Public investment in quality public open spaces and placemaking downtown drives private investment, attracts business development, and improves the quality of life for the Town’s residents. “Big picture” thinking should be layered into any capital projects to maximize these benefits: 1. Large public capital projects, such as a streetscape replacement project should also include upgrading capacity of existing utilities if what is in place will not support the entire build-out of downtown. This will minimize future disruption, reduces overall cost, and removes private development hurdles; 2. Functional design such as incorporating on-street parking make easier for visitors to be there; 3. Quality hardscape, landscape – including shade trees, pedestrian lighting, signage and wayfinding, and furnishings make an area more comfortable, attractive, and appealing for people to visit; 4. Designing spaces for multiple uses – an urban park or plaza shouldn’t be thought of as only a gathering space, but should incorporate elements for active programming, such as dimensions that will allow for event tents, art or farmers markets, access to power, loading and unloading for event setup, public restrooms, trash and recycling, sound systems and lighting; 5. Support future development impacts by incorporating blue green spaces to accommodate excess stormwater and plan for temporary overflow parking areas for special events; The Town has been investing in public realm improvements and placemaking in recent years and has the opportunity to expand that investment into the broader vision that will, in addition to the public benefits, act as a catalyst for additional private development and activity within downtown. Three key public projects have been identified and conceptually developed that will help downtown do this: TOWN GREEN Creates a large activity center for programmed and passive use. DOWNTOWN PLAZA DOWNTOWN CONNECTOR Creates an urban open space for public gathering, and programming for smaller events, activities, and allows for a higher level of detailed placemaking to attract visitors. Creates a functional, attractive public connection between the Town Green and Downtown Plaza that has been designed to both attract visitors by its placemaking elements and provide additional space for programming events and activities. The following pages expand on these and illustrate the detailed vision for each. Character, Placemaking & Open Space Page 1265 Item 18. 74 Town of Prosper CHARACTER, PLACEMAKING & OPEN SPACE Town Green Development of the Town Green will create both a “backyard” for the Town Hall, while also creating a terrific new gathering space for both active and programmed uses as well as create a terrific large open play and recreation spaces for residents. Large events, festivals and community celebrations that characterize Prosper will occur here, as will concerts from the performance area on the western end. It will be a “backyard” for the community as well - become a favorite for a pick up Saturday morning soccer game or flying kites on a Sunday afternoon. The park numerous areas for residents and visitors to gather, shade to help keep it comfortable, and all of it will be branded to reflect downtown Prosper. West First Street Page 1266 Item 18. 75 Downtown Master Plan Page 1267 Item 18. 76 Town of Prosper Downtown Plaza The Downtown Plaza will become a special place for visitors to gather, relax, and catch up on life. Detailed design features and elements from specialty paving patterns to public art will create interest and further reinforce the character of downtown. Shaded seating areas, furnishings, a small open lawn, and flower gardens will add the charm and comfort that will help activate it. It also serves as an addition space local for small events and programming. The Downtown Plaza will become the places everyone wants to pass by just in case there’s an impromptu art show, area musician playing or a street performer in the act. CHARACTER, PLACEMAKING & OPEN SPACE Page 1268 Item 18. 77 Downtown Master Plan Page 1269 Item 18. 78 Town of Prosper Downtown Connector Friday night food trucks, a weekend farmer’s market, or a Saturday art show are examples of low-cost events that could be routinely programmed in the Downtown Connector to help create routine visitation downtown. This linear public plaza would feature large, paved areas for things such as event tents, vendors, and allow for the supporting equipment smaller events require. Numerous smaller and more intimate gathering spaces have been incorporated for informal use, and to provide a place to sit and socialize. A pavilion adds protection from rain and sun, while a flower garden creates more interest and softens the plaza. Ample space is here to support things the Town may later desire - an information kiosk, public restrooms, or a docking for a bike rentals. Equally important as the design, the Downtown Connector links the Town Green with the Downtown Plaza while also creating great visual interest along the street. CHARACTER, PLACEMAKING & OPEN SPACE Page 1270 Item 18. 79 Downtown Master Plan Page 1271 Item 18. 80 Town of Prosper Page 1272 Item 18. 81 Downtown Master Plan The robust growth in Prosper and existing developer interest will help the Town realizing downtown redevelopment sooner rather than later. Four sites within downtown have been identified as ideal catalyst projects to build momentum. One of these, Catalyst Site #1 is currently in the development planning process. These sites have been conceptually developed in the following pages and developed within the broader framework of this Master Plan. These sites build off the previously identified public open space and placemaking projects, and will require changes within the existing zoning code and development parameters. Detailed recommendations contained within the next chapter provide all of the action steps necessary to support these sites however, they are primarily related to frontages, design standards, and may likely require some form of gap funding or incentive to initiate. In addition to the design and overall aesthetics of these sites, changes to the current parking requirements and establishing a shared parking strategy (further outlined in the following pages and in the recommendations) will help in minimizing cost to developers, construction of excess parking, and reduce the amount of gap funding or incentive required. Each of these sites have been developed to be stand alone developments however, they collectively have a range and mix of uses that will support the overall redevelopment of downtown. Combined, the four catalyst sites will create a compact critical mass of residents and expand the existing business community to have meaningful impact on the activation of downtown. The table below summarizes the overall development impact these sites will have, and the following pages elaborate further. 95,200 N/ARETAIL / RESTAURANT OFFICE / EMPLOYMENT 25,000 N/A RESIDENTIAL HOTEL / LODGING DEVELOPMENT USE: SQ. FT. UNITS Catalyst Redevelopment Sites 105,60 277 24,000 30 Page 1273 Item 18. 82 Town of Prosper Site 1 The redevelopment of Catalyst Site #1, including it’s silo renovation into a hotel with design and development plans underway will stimulate additional development interest and add activity to the terminus of Broadway Street. Incorporating retail and restaurants will expand the offerings of downtown, help active nightlife, and be an amenity for hotel guests. The outdoor dining and bar area will help add street activity and attract others visiting downtown. Overflow into the planned open lawn and gathering area will create a unique appeal to this development site and allow for programming by the businesses located in it. Site Features: Site Area: 139,697 sq. ft. 3.21 acres Uses: Retail / Restaurant / Ent. 30,200 sq. ft. Hotel / Lodging 30 keys / rooms 24,000 sq. ft. Gross Floor Area: 54,200 sq. ft. Floor Area Ratio: 39% Surface Parking: 211 spaces 73,920 sp. ft. 1.70 acres CATALYST SITES Page 1274 Item 18. 83 Downtown Master Plan Page 1275 Item 18. 84 Town of Prosper Site 1- alt. During the master plan process, the owner of Catalyst Site 1 has begun plans for future redevelopment. Many of the features included in these plans reflect the vision developed during this planning process. Key features will included a central lawn, adjacent multi-story “container” buildings with view below, preservation of the silo as an identifying feature, and will include a hotel along with restaurants and retail. CATALYST SITES Page 1276 Item 18. 85 Downtown Master Plan Page 1277 Item 18. 86 Town of Prosper Site 2 The second catalyst site is the largest of the four private projects identified in the Master Plan and has the greatest amount of development opportunity. This site is preliminarily programmed to include 200 residential units which will help in adding daily foot traffic and spending within downtown. This project, due to it’s size, will also help increase the awareness of market opportunity in downtown as a true mixed-use community. A modest amount of ground-floor retail has been included in the proforma to continue increasing opportunity downtown. This project will line a parking garage that will serve its residents and could be developed in conjunction with the Town to also provide public parking. Overall parking spaces within the garage could be reduced by utilizing a shared use parking approach. Site Features: Site Area: 215,021sq. ft. 4.94 acres Uses: Retail / Restaurant / Ent. 24,000 sq. ft. Residential 200 units 117,600 sq. ft. Gross Floor Area: 201,600 sq. ft. Floor Area Ratio: 94% Structured Parking: 490 spaces 3.93 acres CATALYST SITES Page 1278 Item 18. 87 Downtown Master Plan Page 1279 Item 18. 88 Town of Prosper Site 3 New retail, office and maker space will expand downtown with development of Catalyst Site #3. Unique to this development program is the maker space and the live-work Townhomes proposed that would help in fostering new business startup beyond restaurant and traditional retail. This will also provide an additional type of housing product within downtown and expand it’s overall appeal as a place to live too! At the south end of downtown it will not have the same foot traffic other parts of downtown receive and should be designed with a frontage along First Street that attracts passer-by’s to stop with features like storefronts and outdoor cafe seating. Commercial tenants in this development will likely benefit from events and programs at the Town Green and the frontage along Crockett Street should be designed to welcome them. Site Features: Site Area: 201,813 sq. ft. 4.6 acres Uses: Retail / Office / Flex 50,000 sq. ft. Residential 49 units (Live-work / Townhome) 108,600 sq. ft. Gross Floor Area: 158,600 sq. ft. Floor Area Ratio: 79% Surface Parking: 270 spaces* 98,814 sq. ft. 2.26 acres *Townhomes are self-parked. CATALYST SITES Page 1280 Item 18. 89 Downtown Master Plan Page 1281 Item 18. 90 Town of Prosper Site 4 The last of the private development catalyst sites will provide commercial street frontage along Main Street and incorporate an additional 32 residential units. Commercial uses in this development are anticipated to include both retail and office. The incorporation of both Townhomes and lofts, somewhat similar to the previous site, will continue expanding the residential product mix within downtown. The preliminary program assumes some portion of these will be rental units and suitable for Airbnb or similar short term rental program. Nightly or other short term rentals (such as hotel rooms) can be beneficial for a downtown as visitors typically spend throughout the day from morning coffee to evening dinner and drinks. Site Features: Site Area: 88,566 sq. ft. 2.03 acres Uses: Retail / Restaurant / Ent. 16,000 sq. ft. Townhomes (rental): 20 units 32,000 sq. ft. Lofts / Airbnb (rental): 8 units 12,800 sq. ft. Gross Floor Area: 60,800 sq. ft. Floor Area Ratio: 69% Surface Parking: 140 spaces 49,060 sq. ft. 1.13 acres CATALYST SITES Page 1282 Item 18. 91 Downtown Master Plan Page 1283 Item 18. 92 Town of Prosper Land Use & Housing Zoning districts within the downtown area are primarily Single-Family, Commercial / Retail, and Office / Service. Multi-Family development is currently underway with more anticipated in the future. These districts are each subject to urban design standards that are applied on a parcel by parcel basis. This approach, while beneficial in many areas, is overly prescriptive and restrictive in mixed-use redevelopment projects. For downtown to have the flexibility to support mixed- use development and be receptive to market changes, a broader approach would be more suitable. This could be done through the creation of a new zoning district, such as Downtown Mixed-Use District. While a stand alone district will be the most user-friendly, an interim option is the creation of an overlay district. The catalyst sites have been developed with this approach in mind. This approach would focus more on building frontages, overall mass and height allowing greater flexibility for developers to build their projects while also meeting and reacting to market demand. Supplemental to this district would be creating detailed design guidelines that specifically focus on building appearance and street frontages. While Texas State Statue prohibits broad application of detailed design standards, incorporation of these as a requirement to receive any type of Town or EDC incentives is allowable. The Neighborhood Empowerment Zone (NEZ) already in place will support this and implementation of future incentive funding sources as outlined in the recommendations should mirror this. The Downtown Mixed-Use District should generally include the area identified in the map below. Downtown Mixed-Use District Where We Are Going: Downtown Mixed-Use Zoning District Page 1284 Item 18. 93 Downtown Master Plan Prosper is benefiting from the tremendous growth it has experienced over the last several years with housing as the key driver. This growth is anticipated to continue as th e Town is an increasingly desirable home market for those commuting to Dallas and other nearby cities. As communities compete for growth, increasingly the access to a local urban downtown is a key decision maker for many residents. Additionally, knowledge economy residents (also typically higher income earners) tend to gravitate towards areas that an urban component, which in turn helps to attract more jobs. Although Prosper has been primarily occupied by single- family housing, an increasing demand for mult-housing within proximity of downtown will become more commonplace, and should be encouraged. Many different kinds of people seek out urban living with easy access to amenities and services. These groups can include retirees, young professionals, and childless adult couples. For those living within close distance of downtown their spending is an equally powerful tool in growing the downtown economy. On average, every 1,000 new housing within comfortable walking distance will activate one block of traditional “Main Street.” The catalyst sites in this plan that include housing will already account for more than 1/4 of that number. The new multifamily housing developing to the north and within walking distance of downtown will add to that. Embracing additional mixed-use housing in downtown will drive resident investment while also supporting commercial development. The Downtown Mixed-Use District as mentioned on the previous page will focus development standards on the overall form and appearance of new buildings and should encourage (or incentivize) integration of varying housing sizes and price points. Conventional requirements such as minimum residential unit size and Floor Area Ratio should be excluded from this zoning classification and not a part of any development approval process. A developer will not build what the market won’t support. Mixed-Use & Multi-Family Housing 62% of US household stock is single family 22% of US households are married couples To satisfy growing demand for housing in urban settings, the US alone will need to create tens of millions of walkable, multifamily units by the early 2030s. Education < 4 years of college Education > 4 years of college 26-49 year olds (2000-2014)Suburbs Urban Core Knowledge workers want to live in lively urban places. Where they cluster, jobs and investment follow. 1990-2010 2010-2030 35 to 65 under 35 over 65 Through the 2030s, the clear majority of newly formed households in North America will comprise individuals or couples, groups that strongly prefer urban-style multifamily housing. Page 1285 Item 18. 94 Town of Prosper Parking The catalyst sites developed with the master plan committee will introduce more than 120,000 sq. ft. of restaurant, office, and retail uses and more than 240 residential units downtown and require the parking to support them. In general, parking requirements are based on the use and a method of calculating parking spaces per square footage, tabletops, bedrooms, etc. Conventionally, where multiple commercial uses are adjacent these parking requirements stack, and subsequently assume that each business and residence will need all of it’s parking at every hour of the day. This approach becomes less effective in managing parking needs as more businesses or mixed-use residences are developed with a shared parking field or structure as simply no one business or residence will actually need all of it’s parking at every hour of the day. In downtowns this becomes even less effective and challenging as there are typically many areas to choose from to park with many different uses that span the clock. Downtowns also benefit from visitors going to multiple businesses within one trip, further minimizing potential demand. More so, land in downtowns have high value and creating excess parking consumes this valuable land, reduces opportunity for development of buildings or public spaces. Additionally, if structured parking is built it comes at a very high cost. Catalytic Sites Parking Demand Modeling Land Use Type Units Catalyst Concepts TotalCatalyst #1 Catalyst #2 Catalyst #3 Catalyst #4 Office Sq. Ft.25,000 4,000 29,000 Retail Sq. Ft.15,100 12,000 12,500 8,000 47,600 Restaurant Sq. Ft.15,100 12,000 12,500 8,000 47,600 Apartments / Townhomes Units 200 12 30 242 Hotel Units 30 30 Proposed Parking Supply Spaces 211 490 270 130 1,101 Street Name Units Total Unshared Peak Demand Vehicles 1,008 Shared Peak Demand (No Context)Vehicles 844 Shared Peak Demand (with Context)Vehicles 766 Catalytic sites program is an oversupply of up to 330 spaces (unless shared with the existing downtown at higher activity levels.Page 1286 Item 18. 95 Downtown Master Plan6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 AM10:00 AM11:00 AM12:00 AM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM10:00 PM11:00 PM12:00 AM200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Industry Standard Requirement: 1,008 Proposed Parking Supply: 1,101 6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 AM10:00 AM11:00 AM12:00 AM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM10:00 PM11:00 PM12:00 AM200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Industry Standard Requirement: 1,008 Proposed Parking Supply: 1,101 Model Peak Demand (With Context): 766 6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 AM10:00 AM11:00 AM12:00 AM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM10:00 PM11:00 PM12:00 AM200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Industry Standard Requirement: 1,008 Proposed Parking Supply: 1,101 Model Peak Demand (No Context): 844 Apartment / Low Rise Hotel General Office Building Shopping Center Lounge / Bar, Sit Down Based on concern by the committee there may be inadequate parking required in the development of the catalyst sites overall parking was slightly elevated during the proforma development to program a highest case scenario. In doing so, the catalyst sites would collectively require 1,101 parking spaces. This requirement is somewhat higher than generally industry standards which would total 1,008 spaces. To accommodate for the mix of uses, hours of operation, adjusting for people who walk from business to business, and including those that may bike or walk downtown can be applied to develop a more practical parking requirement. Factoring these considerations in, the same catalysts sites with a shared parking scenario without the context of people visiting multiple businesses, would require 844 parking spaces. Further applying this and factoring in those who will visit multiple businesses, this parking requirements reduce to 766 parking spaces. The difference between the parking spaces required based on current standards and a shared parking scenario with context is 335 spaces. This total becomes even more significant as communities or developers require parking structures. Generally, a structured parking space is roughly $15,000 more per space than a surface parking lot. Assuming just half of those 335 saved parking spaces were accommodated in a newly built parking garage (168 spaces), the increase in cost to the city or developer would be $2,520,000. Shared parking programs better accommodate actual demand, reduce land consumptions, and reduce costs. Detailed parking recommendations are included within the appendix. Parking Demand & Time of Day Parking Demand with Context Standard Parking Analysis Page 1287 Item 18. 96 Town of Prosper HOW WE GET THERE: RECOMMENDATIONS Page 1288 Item 18. 97 Downtown Master Plan HOW WE GET THERE: RECOMMENDATIONS05 Page 1289 Item 18. 98 Town of Prosper Implementation Strategies The implementation plan for downtown follows the six primary plan pillars; political, organizational, regulatory, physical, financial and market. Collectively, these actions will support the overall plan implementation, catalyst sites, and reflect the guiding principles of the plan. Each pillar has numerous actions, some of which will have repetition with those in other pillars. Each action has also been identified as low, medium, or high priority, and suggested responsible sponsors for leading or supporting the plan implementation. These should be reviewed an updated periodically including identifying other organizations, committees or individuals that may also be action sponsors. Many of the actions identified will have limited cost and be accomplished by staff or through standard municipal practices. Others will require more substantial cost and resources will have to be identified. Within each of these there may be additional actions required however, this plan proposes the broad framework. The diagram on the adjacent page states the strategy for each of the pillars. The following pages include a snapshot of the most critical short term actions and most likely funding sources to support the overall redevelopment. Following these are detailed recommendations. As the plan implementation proceeds, these should be evaluated and considered in the context of available resources (time, staff, funding, and the funding strategy) of the Town, PEDC, and others. The most important part of implementation is to begin! Page 1290 Item 18. 99 Downtown Master PlanPHYSICAL FI N A N C I A L REGULATORYPOLITICAL OR G A N I Z A T I O N A LREGULATORY PHYSICALFINANCIAL MARKET POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONAL REGULATORY FINANCIAL PHYSICAL MARKET Actively pursue all options within the Town’s resources to establish and provide dedicated funding mechanisms for plan implementation. Commit to investing the resources and creating partnership necessary to attract and support new project and business development opportunities. Support the development of private and Support the development of private and public projects within downtown that will public projects within downtown that will create the vision established in the plan.create the vision established in the plan. Provide and support the necessary regulatory Provide and support the necessary regulatory framework that will enable development of framework that will enable development of the planthe plan. Build and support an organizational framework that will empower/enable successful plan implementation. Ensure there is a continued understanding Ensure there is a continued understanding by elected officials of the importance of by elected officials of the importance of downtown, including economic, and that downtown, including economic, and that there is consistent support of the plan there is consistent support of the plan including allocating funding and staff including allocating funding and staff resources as a part of the Town’s roleresources as a part of the Town’s role Implementation Strategies Page 1291 Item 18. 100 Town of Prosper Grant Program Agency General Uses Local Parks Grants Texas Parks and Wildlife Dept. (TPWD) Development, renovation or redevelopment of outdoor recreation facilities including property acquisition. Governor’s Community Achievement Awards Keep Texas Beautiful & Texas Department of Transportation Landscaping along public right-of-ways. Texas Commission on the Arts Texas Commission on the Arts Broad range of uses to incorporate art within projects with a construction cost exceeding $250,000. Healthy Kids, Healthy Families Blue Cross Blue Shield of TX To support the health and well-being of children and families through various focus areas including physical activity. Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Program* U.S Economic Development Administration (EDA) Funds construction, non-construction, and revolving loan projects to leverage existing assets and fund key public infrastructure projects to support economic development strategies. Implementation Snapshot The Town has a solid and growing tax base that will serve it well in supporting continued investment in downtown and funding the catalyst open space and placemaking projects developed in the Master Plan. One of the best ways to maximize the Towns’ investment is through identifying projects with a grant strategy. This means, evaluating all of the potential projects and identifying which elements may in any way fall within various grant program criteria - and this may include creative uses. The next step is then identifying the ways in which potential grants can be layered to increase the overall amount of dollars accessed. The Grants section located within the Appendix further discusses this. More specifically to the downtown Master Plan, five grant programs have been identified that could directly support investment in each of the open space catalyst sites and overall public realm investment and should be where the Town focuses its funding pursuits. Funding *Note: Various federal grant programs generally only apply to distressed communities however, since the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, all communities now meet this eligibility criteria. It is anticipated this will continue for the foreseeable future. Page 1292 Item 18. 101 Downtown Master Plan Priority Recommendations Downtown Zoning Establish a new Downtown Mixed-Use Zoning District to support mixed-use development including design guidelines to the extent allowable by Texas Statute. This should include shared uses and facilities including parking. Design Guidelines Establish enhanced design guidelines that are supplementary to the new Downtown Mixed-Use Zoning District that reflect the desired character of downtown Prosper and will be used in evaluating incentive awards to private developers. Development Incentive Programs Develop a user friendly policy and protocol for the award of incentives as part of the Neighborhood Empowerment Zone (NEZ) to developers investing in downtown. This award criteria should factor in use of the design guidelines. Downtown Manager Hire a qualified downtown manager and allocate an annual budget for this position to work with existing businesses, create and manage downtown events, promote and market, and, among other things, act as the dedicated advocate for the redevelopment of downtown. Parking Management Establish a parking management program that tracks existing available parking, actual parking demand, future parking spaces through approved development projects, and continue to evaluate reduced parking standards to be incorporated into the Downtown Mixed-Use Zoning District. This should also include future assessment of parking revenues if implemented such as parking meters or future garage fees. Business and Community Grants Allocate funding to support attraction and investment of locally based business for costs such as tenant build-out, business and marketing training, and co-op advertising. Funding should also be allocated to community based organizations seeking assistance to host special events downtown that will attract visitor spending. TIRZ Create a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) to provide a funding mechanism for capital investment and providing incentives. Promote Downtown Develop a marketing plan to promote downtown business, activities, and development opportunities. Page 1293 Item 18. 102 Town of Prosper As explained above, local government plays a critical role advancing area-specific redevelopment efforts, as the entity with the largest and longest-term interest. This said, the Town will need to have a visible and ongoing presence and provide sustained public support for revitalization of downtown Prosper. It will need to provide leadership, and partner with other agencies to eliminate investment obstacles, and capitalize on investment opportunities. As such, the Town will have the ongoing legal responsibility to address many of the implementation elements of the plan and be the logical conduit to supplemental public and private resources. Also important, the private sector will be looking to the Town and its advocacy partners for consistency in its commitment to a long-term vision for downtown that is reflected in its policy and funding decisions for the entire community. Presented below is a representative list of political issues impacting investment decisions in the downtown area. Strategy Ensure there is a continued understanding by elected officials of the importance of downtown, including economic, and that there is consistent support of the plan including allocating funding and staff resources as a part of the Town’s role. Key Recommendations 1. Provide a commitment the Town will remain focused on the redevelopment of downtown, including supporting necessary regulatory changes as well as allocation and pursuit of funding. 2. Establish an incentive program that will attract private investment to downtown and to be used as a tool to ensure that future development is compatible with the vision the Town desires. These incentives may range from landscape and facade improvement grants to shared infrastructure costs, such as parking or utility improvements. 3. Spread the word on the positive things Prosper is doing to activate downtown in every available communications channel from in- person discussions with community organizations to social media and constituent newsletter updates. PILLAR POLITICALPHYSICAL FIN A N C I A L REGULATORYRecommendations: Political Page 1294 Item 18. 103 Downtown Master Plan The greatest influence on the success of a redevelopment plan is the consistent political support behind implementing the adopted plan and funding it’s implementation actions. Prosper is in the early years of redevelopment, and this plan will span many election cycles. It will be essential that current Town Council supports the adoption of this plan, and that future council members are well educated on the plan, it’s goals, the work that has been done, and the work that is yet to come. This support will be necessary in approving actions initiated by the Town staff such as regulatory changes or proposed budgets, and in providing direction for plan implementation actions that must come from the Council. This also includes committing annual funding towards plan implementation. This funding will span many areas of the plan implementation from potentially hiring a Downtown Manager, funding special event grants, and investing in capital projects such as streetscapes and public plazas. It will be important that the Town staff and all key stakeholders consistently inform the Council on downtown progress, events, and future initiatives and engaging with future elected officials to ensure they support downtown and the plan from the beginning. Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Town policy. Memorialize a Town policy that expresses an ongoing commitment to redevelopment of downtown, along with support for growth management policies that are balanced, and the pursuit of effective public-private partnerships, collectively reflected in Council priorities. Incentive policy. Prepare and adopt a community wide, and downtown-specific, incentive policy to support private development, along with criteria for identifying and evaluating projects deemed meritorious and able to advance the recommendations of this Master Plan. These should range from smaller scale landscape and facade improvement grants to larger scale shared infrastructure funding such as parking structures that provide a public parking element or enhancement of existing utilities. Town Council Town Staff Town Council Town StaffPHYSICAL FI N A N C I A L REGULATORYHigh / Short Term Priority Medium Term Priority Low / Long Term Priority Under $50,000 $50,000 to $250,000 Over $250,000 Page 1295 Item 18. 104 Town of Prosper Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Informational activities. Involve the Town’s leaders in routine updates, events, programs, and discussions to ensure they remain engaged and interested in continuing to support downtown redevelopment activities, and that this information is shared by the Council to others. Comparative communities. Identify examples of communities with similar project components for elected officials to tour to help visualize redevelopment initiatives and maintain support for implementing the plan. Key Town staff, stakeholder organizations and community members should participate in these as well if desired. Informational sessions. Schedule a series of informational meetings with the Town’s leaders regarding a variety of topics reflected in the vision and Master Plan such as need for a diversity of housing product types and their real impact (social, monetary, fiscal, value), as well as why current conditions (demographic and psychographic) support certain development products, both downtown and community-wide, i.e., Rowlett, TX. Streamlined entitlement review. Establish eligibility criteria for streamlined entitlement review and approval processes, among them, the project location in downtown, size or value thresholds, complexity of financing, diversification of product offerings, and others. (Expand on the Town’s current use of a “Go-Team” of departmental representatives which shepherd development applications. Measurement benchmarks. Work with the Town’s leaders to establish criteria (or benchmarks) that will be used to measure the impact of certain redevelopment initiatives going forward (memorialize and update them to ensure ongoing support). Town Staff PEDC Business Alliance Prosper Chamber Town Council Town Staff PEDC Town Council Town Staff PEDC Prosper Chamber Town Council Town Staff PEDC Town Council Town Staff Page 1296 Item 18. 105 Downtown Master Plan Page 1297 Item 18. 106 Town of Prosper Recommendations: Organizational Strategy Build and support an organizational framework that will empower/enable successful plan implementation. Key Recommendations 1. Formalize the organizations that will be responsible for implementing the Master Plan, including those such as the Downtown Business Alliance, that may have greater roles as downtown redevelopments. 2. Establishing clear roles, responsibilities, expectations, milestones and monitoring for completing the actions each organization or individual commits to participate in implementing. 3. Develop a clear communications protocol for prospective developers or business owners within the formalized stakeholder organizations. This should include all aspects of downtown redevelopment including design guidelines, planning and permitting processes, incentives, special events, downtown programs or other initiatives, and capital projects, among others. Downtowns in municipalities of any size require an advocacy entity with a sole purpose – growing and maintaining a healthy community core. While it can be difficult to finance this type of position or organization, particularly in the early years of a redevelopment initiative, mid- to long-term it will be imperative that any momentum created in early phases are not lost when Town staff’s responsibilities in other areas make it impossible for them to spend the hours necessary to continue advancing the plan. PILLAR ORGANIZATIONPHYSICAL FIN A N C I A L REGULATORYPage 1298 Item 18. 107 Downtown Master Plan Downtown redevelopment will take time and will be most successful when implemented by a strong organizational system of organizations and people that have the resources available to implement the plan or will benefit from downtown’s reinvestment. Generally, these will be led by the Town or City making the greatest commitment followed with key partners such as the / an Economic Development Council, Tourist Development Council, Chamber of Commerce, the Citizen’s Academy, and a Business and Property Owners Alliance (over time this entity will increase it’s role and may eventually transition into the leading entity guiding redevelopment) , along with others that may have a goal or general interest in driving investment and visitor spending downtown. Each of the key entities should champion specific components of the redevelopment plan that are best aligned with their mission and goals. Developing clear expectations and milestones are critical for all to be accountable and committed to the overall effort, and a clear communication plan along with identification of specific roles should be agreed to. It will be important that each entity and their staff or respective departments understand the organizations role and expectations related to downtown redevelopment, and processes be in place for coordination among different staff members within each organization and among the others. Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Formalize stakeholder organizations. Establish the structure for those that will have a key role in supporting and implementing the Master Plan, including the Downtown Business Alliance, PEDC, Chamber of Commerce, Citizen’s Academy, and others if appropriate. Within each, identify the primary point of contact for all matters related to downtown and it’s redevelopment. Identify clear roles. Each key stakeholder organization should identify specific plan implementation actions that they have the resources and will commit to advancing. There may be multiple entities that support various actions. In this process, establish realistic milestones, identification of other support needed by the sponsor organization and where those resources may come from. Commit to collectively monitor implementation successes and areas that need additional support. Town Staff PEDC Prosper Chamber Business Alliance PEDC Prosper Chamber Business Alliance Town StaffPHYSICAL FI N A N C I A L REGULATORYHigh / Short Term Priority Medium Term Priority Low / Long Term Priority Under $50,000 $50,000 to $250,000 Over $250,000 Page 1299 Item 18. 108 Town of Prosper Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Communication plan. Develop a clear communication plan among the key stakeholder organizations and ensure organization staff and departments understand this and the importance of it. For example, a developer may contact the PEDC about a potential project site and permitting requirements. PEDC staff should have a specific developer liaison within the Town that the developer may be introduced to as their development liaison. This communication also includes disseminating information for review or informational purposes by multiple organizations such as development proposals, incentive application requests, marketing initiatives, and community event or festival programs. Main Street Texas. Engage with Main Street Texas and evaluate the eligibility of downtown Prosper for nomination as a Texas Main Street. Dedicate staff resources to pursue and identify appropriate partners to implement Main Street actions, most likely the Downtown Business Alliance which should be formalized as a key stakeholder organization. Town department support. Engage the Town departments in the downtown redevelopment process and build support within to ensure departments work collaboratively on all aspects of redevelopment, including public capital projects, private development projects, expedited permitting, inspections, special event approvals, and other initiatives impacting downtown. Event guidelines. Work with the Development Services Department and Parks and Recreation Department to establish specific event guidelines specific to downtown, preferred event areas if located in the public right-of-way, and expedited review and approval process. Additional organizations. Identify additional organizations that may have an interest in supporting continued investment in, and visitor attraction to downtown, and determine their greatest resources and ways to be involved. These may include large entities such as Travel Texas or smaller locally and regionally based entities such as business incubators, large developers, or private foundations. Town Staff PEDC Business Alliance Prosper Chamber Town Council Town Staff PEDC Town Staff Town Staff Business Alliance Town Staff Page 1300 Item 18. 109 Downtown Master Plan Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Citizens’ academy. Continue supporting the citizens’ academy program to grow civic awareness among area residents, business and property owners, institutional representatives, and others invested in Prosper’s success, that allows for networking and small group interactions, and provides Town officials with a forum to share and receive information on topics such as priority initiatives, market forces, fiscal realities, and others impacting the Town and region. Ambassador program. Within the citizen’s academy program and/or Community Engagement Committee, develop an ambassador component for participation during community events or at peak times to welcome visitors, provide information on items such as parking, public restrooms, event, or area activities, etc. This should be developed under or in conjunction with the Downtown Business Alliance and direction of a future Downtown Manager. Town Staff Business Alliance Residents Town Staff Business Alliance Residents Page 1301 Item 18. 110 Town of Prosper PILLAR In the context of this discussion, public policies, regulations that inform land use and development, and design standards, are all considered in this category. Among the most effective tools municipalities use to foster a sustainable downtown environment are growth management programs that reward efficient development patterns, and codes that are flexible and encourage creative solutions. (Note: There are reports that certain businesses, including a potential restaurant, was lost due to parking requirements.) When growth is allowed to occur in a land intensive and sometimes inefficient way that ultimately subsidizes lower densities, redevelopment efforts tend to operate at a competitive disadvantage, both financially and fiscally. While these types of policies may seem inconceivable or even infeasible for many Texas communities, Prosper’s location in the Metroplex, and the fact that it is surrounded on all sides by other competitive communities, essentially land-locked and nearing buildout, makes them critical to ensure a sustainable diverse and high- quality mix of real estate targeted to the needs and preferences of existing and future population groups. Further, local efforts and the prioritization of resources, should reflect the same, with appropriate levels allocated between newly developing and redeveloping areas, and regulations consider the unique attributes and challenges of these distinctly unique environments. Recommendations: Regulatory Strategy Provide and support the necessary regulatory framework that will enable development of the plan. Key Recommendations 1. Establish a new Downtown Mixed-Use Zoning District to support mixed-use development including design guidelines to the extent allowable by Texas Statute. This should include shared uses and facilities including parking. 2. Establish enhanced design guidelines that are supplementary to the new Downtown Mixed-Use Zoning District that reflect the desired character of downtown Prosper and will be used in evaluating incentive awards to private developers. 3. Establish a clear development approval process and general guidelines for awarding various incentives (these may range from monetary to additional development approvals). 4. Develop a shared parking strategy for downtown. REGULATORYPHYSICAL FIN A N C I A L REGULATORYPage 1302 Item 18. 111 Downtown Master Plan Historically, many downtown’s were developed before a time of significant development regulation that allowed for the level of activity and efficiency in development that occur. Today, mixed-use downtown redevelopment is most successful when the regulatory framework allows for a substantial flexibility while also framing the vision for a community. Conventional codes addressing things like standard buffers or setbacks, parking requirements, prescribed uses, and stormwater are examples of those that cannot be applied in downtowns the way they are elsewhere in a community. Prosper has worked to support downtown redevelopment by adapting some of its zoning district classifications, which is a positive first step. Building on what has already been done, identifying what has worked well and what hasn’t, and integrating general downtown development realities into future actions and plans will help result in predictable redevelopment that will bring the vision for downtown Prosper into reality. Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Downtown mixed-use zoning district. Establish a new downtown mixed-use zoning district (or overlay) specifically for downtown west of Coleman Street with standards that will support mixed-use development in an urban context and will articulate the Town’s vision for downtown. Creating a new zoning district will be more efficient than amending all existing codes and preferred by developers. If the Town objects, the existing codes should be amended. The downtown mixed-use zoning district should address elements such as building heights, frontages, setbacks (reduced), excluded uses, parking and shared parking, landscape, signage, fencing, lighting, back-of-house (dumpsters, equipment, and storage) and access, and loading zones, among others. This should also include controls for use of café and restaurant seating, “sandwich” board or other portable signage, and performances or other uses that may extend within the right-of-way. Town Staff Town CouncilPHYSICAL FI N A N C I A L REGULATORYHigh / Short Term Priority Medium Term Priority Low / Long Term Priority Under $50,000 $50,000 to $250,000 Over $250,000 Page 1303 Item 18. 112 Town of Prosper Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Design guidelines. Incorporate design guidelines within the new downtown mixed-use zoning district (or overlay) and eligible for incentive funding that will articulate the specific building frontages and facades that fit the Town’s vision. Clear and concise design expectations will help in attracting predictable development and simplify the design review and approval process. Designated Business and Developer Program. Promote the Town’s recently established Designated Business and Developers Program, and the overall efficiency of Town staff, design review, and permitting as processes are established or refined. Historic preservation. Establish a historic preservation element within the zoning code and specifically downtown west of Coleman Street to further support the application of design guidelines. This may include the establishment of a Historic Preservation Commission that will review an approve all exterior building permit applications within the defined area. Incentive framework. Adopt a general framework for awarding funding or other incentives (such as bonus density) to ensure a minimum level of uniformity in awards and to assure residents and businesses that there is an established process that is fair and equitable in the Town goal of redeveloping downtown. Consider additional incentives for the appropriate rehabilitation of historic buildings rather than demolition and new construction. Shared parking strategy. Adopt a shared parking strategy that allows for reduced parking requirements as part of an overall parking management and revenue system. This will require developers commit to participate in the shared parking program with other developers or allow contributions to a Town fund that may be used for future construction of on-street, surface, or garage parking. Reduced parking strategies provide financial relief for developers from creating excess parking beyond what will actually be needed and allows land to be used for a higher and better use. While reduced ratios in downtown acknowledge the opportunity of shared parking, the current approval process and stated restrictions against off-site sharing greatly limit this opportunity, such that the exiting regulations would still overpark demand. Town Staff Town Council Town Staff Town Council Town Staff PEDC Town Council Town Staff Business Alliance Developers Town Council Town Staff PEDC Prosper Chamber Business Alliance Developers Town Council Page 1304 Item 18. 113 Downtown Master Plan Recommendation Priority Costs Sponsors Short-term business permitting. Amend existing permitting requirements to accommodate short-term or pop-up retail, art, or other similar commercial uses in downtown storefronts that will allow property owners to offer short-term rental or lease agreements (monthly or quarterly) when no permanent tenants are in place and not require complete tenant build-out. For example, a vacant restaurant space could be used by area artists to showcase their work without any renovation required. Conversely, a local baker with appropriate licensure for the preparation and sale of food for consumption could use a vacant storefront for selling baked goods without requiring construction of a kitchen. This creates activity along the street frontage and promotes local entrepreneurs. Old Town Transportation Plan. Update the Old Town Transportation Plan as downtown development and roadway designs proceed. Several street segments, specifically along East First Street, Broadway Street, Coleman Street, and McKinley Street appear to be misaligned with longer term redevelopment. Based on the current development pattern, it is anticipated there will be significant community resistance to on-street parking on these streets east of Coleman, and the frequency of curb cuts required to accommodate existing residences and buildings would minimize the benefit of parking gain. On-street parking may also be limited on Coleman north of Broadway and McKinley Streets as projects evolve. Bike lanes or shared-use lanes should be incorporated in all of the primary streets. Right-of-way’s vary within roadways vary and will accommodate changes in road design as time evolves. As the Town begins capital planning for future roadway improvements, a review of current development patterns, conditions, and transportation need should be performed. Streetscape master plan. Adopt a streetscape master plan for downtown west of Coleman Street that future development and redevelopment, including Town capital projects shall comply with. Public art. Adopt a public art contribution program and ordinance for all private and publicly funded new development or major rehabilitation projects within downtown. This may include establishing a percent-for-art fund where developers and the City (for publicly funded capital projects) pay into the fund in lieu of providing public art on the project site or area. Typically, this does not apply to standard interior renovation of existing buildings or routine repair, maintenance, and replacement of elements on an existing building. Town Staff Town Council Town Staff Business Alliance Town Council Town Staff Business Alliance PEDC Prosper Chamber Town Council Town Staff Business Alliance Town Council Page 1305 Item 18. 114 Town of Prosper Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Parking regulations. Adopt downtown parking regulations and consider establishing a mobility enterprise that allows for short-term visitor parking and / or metered street or fee-based lots for daily use should those be desired. A process for parking and appropriate street signage for use during special events and street closures should be included. Hike and Bike Trail Master Plan. As streetscape improvements are completed, including sidewalks, bike lanes, and the multi-path, incorporate or make appropriate modifications as may be needed to the 2020 Hike and Bike Trail Master Plan. Thoroughfare Plan. As needed, update the Prosper Thoroughfare Plan based on redevelopment plan recommendations or as further design is completed based on need and development patterns at that time. Parks, Recreation, & Open Space Master Plan. As downtown population increases, evaluate to the Parks, Recreation, & Open Space Master Plan and identify any future investment that may be warranted for a new downtown park, and update the Parks, Recreation, & Open Space Master Plan accordingly. Texas Parks and Wildlife requires parks master plans to be updated every 10 years. This update will allow the Town to remain eligible for potential grant funding. Town Staff Business Alliance Town Council Town Staff Town Council Town Staff Town Council Town Staff Town Council Page 1306 Item 18. 115 Downtown Master Plan Page 1307 Item 18. 116 Town of Prosper PILLAR Physical Strategy Support the development of private and public projects within downtown that will create the vision established in the plan. Key Recommendations 1. Develop detailed design drawings, cost estimates, and identify potential funding sources to begin the reconfiguration of Main Street, along with development of the Downtown Connector and Downtown Green. 2. Pursue funding and begin implementation of the previous recommendation as soon as possible. 3. Develop an overall public realm plan for hardscape, landscape, lighting, furnishings, signage and wayfinding. 4. Begin implementation of the previous recommendation as soon as possible within right-of-ways that will not be reconstructed within the short term. This also includes development of gateways, enhanced canopy coverage, as well as installation of sidewalks and improved lighting within the overall downtown area. Although the absence of physical improvements is a major obstacle to development in both new and established locations, the condition and capacity of existing infrastructure can be the chief hurdle for investment activity in downtowns and infill properties. Essential elements for any redevelopment initiative should include an understanding of infrastructure and utilities, and plan for completing necessary capital improvements. Also important will be a strategy for financing and introducing a variety of enhancements that collectively will -- reinforce the area’s intended image and theme such as effective signage, and presence of public spaces (formal and informal), lighting and street furniture; and -- ensure success among its private development and operating uses such as ample and accessible parking facilities, off site and out of area shared improvements (i.e., detention facilities), and access to adjacent and region- serving connections (i.e., trails, bike routes, etc.). Whereas capital expenditures frequently have the biggest impact on the economic feasibility of a development project, and although they are generally considered an acceptable use for public sector resources, it can be harder for elected officials to justify expenditures (even incentives) for the repair or expansion of existing infrastructure rather than construction of new ones, that is unless the comparatively favorable fiscal return associated with investment in established locations is understood. PHYSICALPHYSICAL FIN A N C I A L REGULATORYPage 1308 Item 18. 117 Downtown Master Plan The physical redevelopment of downtown reflecting the vision of Prosper will result from the work and funding invested in the previous pillars. This will be the most important and will rely on both public and private investment and a genuine desire to realize the vision. Public investment will be significant in improvements to streets, mobility, and public gathering areas along with providing the regulatory framework and where needed, the incentives, to ensure the build private development matches the vision. Private investment will need to have a solid grasp of the redevelopment goals, understand the complexities and uniqueness of downtown redevelopment, and a willingness to maintain a long-term view on what defines success. Where possible, public and private investment should intersect and occur in a way that has the greatest impact on downtown and support one another. Building frontages, streetscapes, parking, utilities and other infrastructure will work collectively in creating the overall experience and maximize both public and private investment. As projects are completed, they should be evaluated for their overall benefit in activating downtown. Lessons will be learned and it will be important to adapt over time to ensure that each project in the limited amount of land available has the greatest impact. Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Infrastructure and utility condition and capacity. In preparation for impending five-year review of impact fees, enlist Town staff from relevant departments to determine the condition and capacity of existing infrastructure and utilities. (Use knowledge gained to support any adjustment in the fee structure and provide an enhanced stream of revenue for construction and maintenance). Capital improvement priorities. Prioritize capital improvements and aesthetic enhancements downtown (including undergrounding of overhead utilities or placement of any overhead utilities at the rear or non-street facing frontages) that support a system of shared infrastructure and have the capacity to leverage private investment, particularly in key locations of the district. Town Staff Town Staff Town CouncilPHYSICAL FI N A N C I A L REGULATORYHigh / Short Term Priority Medium Term Priority Low / Long Term Priority Under $50,000 $50,000 to $250,000 Over $250,000 Page 1309 Item 18. 118 Town of Prosper Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Downtown Plaza. Identify and incorporate opportunities for larger public gathering areas for programmable use such as removal of the northeast portion of the surface parking lot at Town Hall. This area could be highly designed with landscape areas, art, sculpture, and landscape gardens, play activity for children and families, water features, and should include ample shade and usable surface space for small programmed or impromptu events. Crockett Street. Develop detailed designs and fund the improvement Crockett Street as a downtown street with sidewalks, lighting, landscape, and parking where appropriate and that is compatible with catalyst site development programs. S. Main Street. Develop detailed designs and fund the reconfiguration of S. Main Street to include parallel parking on the east side of the street and remove the angled-parking on the west side between W. Broadway and W. Second Streets to increase usable space on the western side of the right-of-way. Downtown Green. Develop detailed design and program plans and budget for construction of a Downtown Green located south of Town Hall between Crockett and Main Streets. The Downtown Green should include a large open lawn flexible for free play and also usable for large events and festivals. Features such as a stage, amphitheater, event, and equipment staging, restrooms, walking and gathering areas as well as hardscape to for use with event tents and vendors, or other pop-up uses. Functional elements including loading and unloading, trash and recycling, power supply, shade, and other elements must be included. This should be considered a signature feature of downtown. Downtown Connector. Develop detailed design plans to connect the Downtown Green to W. Broadway Street with a formalized plaza in the space gained by reconfiguring W. Main Street (see master plan), and budget for implementation. This should include gathering areas, plaza space, clear pedestrian routes, areas for pop-up vendors and small events. It should be heavily landscaped to provide shade, include pedestrian and enhanced lighting, trash and recycling, ample power supply for uses and consider a semi-permanent or permanent structure for vending purposes and/or restrooms, visitor center, etc. This should be considered a signature feature. Landscape design. Develop detailed landscape design plans for the streetscapes, including enhanced landscape for street sections where medians may be installed. Town Staff Business Alliance PEDC Town Council Town Staff Business Alliance Town Council Town Staff Business Alliance Town Council Town Staff Business Alliance Town Council Town Staff Business Alliance PEDC Town Council Town Staff Business Alliance Town Council Page 1310 Item 18. 119 Downtown Master Plan Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Parking strategy. Develop a near- and long-term parking strategy for public, private, and shared facilities, including spaces on-street and in alleyways, that reflects current conditions and potential pressures from a more intense level of development, increase in residences, and potential for destination uses. Branding. Engage a branding specialist to assist in developing the downtown “look and feel” that should be used in signage and wayfinding, gateways, streetscape furnishings, lighting, temporary signage such as for special events, and other features to compliment the overall aesthetic and define the downtown area. This theme should also be integrated into marketing and promotional material used for downtown. Furnishings plan. Develop a detailed street furnishings plan and budget to expand on what has already been installed and supporting the theme identified above. Ensure there are sufficient trash, recycling, seating, bike racks, and other furnishings to support the build-out of downtown. These program specifications may be used by the Town or developers as projects make right-of-way improvements. Neighborhood improvement. Develop a neighborhood improvement plan for the residential portions of downtown to include the installation of sidewalks, pedestrian scale lighting (similar or same to commercial downtown), and shade trees within all right-of-ways. Require installation of sidewalks and street trees on all future residential developments. Signage and wayfinding. Design an overall signage and wayfinding program building on those already installed reflecting the character of downtown and feature signature elements such as the silos. These features should be elaborated at gateways, and there should be a distinction between the commercial and residential areas of downtown. Gateways. Develop gateway features expanding on those already developed with hierarchy appropriate to the location. Gateway locations may include W. First Street and S. Coleman Street, S. Coleman Street and W. Third Street, and S. Coleman Street and W. Broadway Street. Secondary gateway features may include S. Preston Road and E. First Street, S. Preston Road and Broadway Street, and E. First Street and S. Craig Road. Town Staff Business Alliance Town Council Town Staff Residents Town Council Town Staff Business Alliance PEDC Town Council Town Staff Business Alliance Town Council Town Staff Business Alliance PEDC Town Council Town Staff Business Alliance PEDC Town Council Page 1311 Item 18. 120 Town of Prosper Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Intersection improvements. Design intersection improvements to increase awareness of activity areas and promote traffic calming. These may include features such as rough-edged pavers or murals. Locations may include all streets intersecting with Main Street, and all locations with gateway features. Redevelopment parcels. Evaluate and consider acquisition of future key redevelopment parcels for later resale to targeted private development. This may be part of the overall incentive program provided by the Town as noted under the Market pillar. Neighborhood pocket parks. Evaluate and consider acquisition of select vacant parcels within the single-family portion of downtown for development as neighborhood pocket parks. Public facilities. Evaluate the potential location and cost to construct and maintain public restrooms within the commercial downtown. Other features such as a visitor kiosk, vending space, and digital message and advertising boards may be constructed or installed with this. Future roadway connections. Incorporate the primary connector road once detailed design is complete to access for the major new development proposed south of W. First Street. This will be a key gateway and transition into downtown. Pedestrian and bike access should be a consideration and potential reconfiguration of pedestrian and bike access along W. First Street may be required. Canopy trees. Incorporate mature canopy street trees within the commercial downtown. Consider transplanting existing smaller caliper trees in less visible locations in the Town and replacing with larger trees for a greater impact and pedestrian comfort. Shared Dumpsters. Incorporate locations to support shared dumpster use in future alley reconstruction, or when possible, within new development projects that will serve multiple downtown businesses. Town Staff Property Owners Alleyway Improvements. Improve all unimproved alleys within the downtown area to improve overall mobility and access to properties abutting them. Town Staff Property Owners Town Staff Business Alliance Town Council Town Staff PEDC Town Council Town Staff Town Staff Town Staff Business Alliance PEDC Town Council Town Staff Residents Town Council Page 1312 Item 18. 121 Downtown Master Plan Page 1313 Item 18. 122 Town of Prosper PILLAR Financial Strategy Actively pursue all options within the Town’s resources to establish and provide dedicated funding mechanisms for plan implementation. Key Recommendations 1. Establish a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) to include, at a minimum, the overall downtown area and consider a much more expansion approach including commercial portions along North Preston Road. 2. Begin annually allocating a committed minimum amount of funding to support downtown incentives and capital investments. Making a public commitment to ongoing funding will provide assurances to developers and investors that Prosper is seriously committed to redeveloping downtown. 3. Allocate annual funding to hire a full time dedicated Downtown Manager to work as a liaison between stakeholder organizations, work with existing and future businesses and developers, assist in the development process, identify and pursue additional grant funds, review and input on incentive programs, manage marketing and events, and represent downtown Prosper, among other duties. A lack of financial resources, public or private, is often considered the sole reason investment or reinvestment does not occur in certain geographies within a community. While the availability of economic resources is an important component of any successful redevelopment initiative, it is not the only component, nor the most significant deterrent. Redevelopment initiatives will always compete with new development for limited resources. What needs to be understood, however, is while more assistance may be needed during the early phase of downtown and infill initiatives, it is fiscally more practical than expending resources in greenfield or undeveloped areas, and almost always nets a higher return for the municipality. Experience has shown that private investment follows public commitment, and while the responsibility for encouraging investment in its aging and under-performing assets has historically been borne by the public sector alone; advancing these types of redevelopment initiatives actually requires the time and resources of a broad range of stakeholders with the largest portion often expended by private entities. FINANCIALPHYSICAL FIN A N C I A L REGULATORYPage 1314 Item 18. 123 Downtown Master Plan Implementing the plan for downtown Prosper will require financial investment. The source of those resources, and the lead party in constructing different plan elements, will vary. In considering the availability of funding, it can be helpful to think of plan elements in three broad categories. For public realm elements such as streets, sidewalks and parks, the Town of Prosper is likely to play the lead role in their funding and construction. Having said that, the resources to make those improvements can come from a broad range of sources. And other parties can play important roles, including the Prosper EDC, business associations, and even public-minded corporations or individuals. Real estate development such as apartments, stores and restaurants, and hotels are funded primarily by developers and property owners, but where the financial return falls short of the cost of construction additional financial support is needed to attract development. The financial resources to supplement private investment can come from a variety of sources. Programmatic activities in downtown Prosper also need to be paid for, and funding for these may come from the broadest set of contributors. The Town, the PEDC, the Downtown Business Alliance, the Chamber of Commerce, individual businesses, civic organizations—all play a role in putting on downtown events, promoting shopping and dining, sprucing up storefronts and signage, rehabilitating older buildings, etc. The financial strategy for downtown Prosper recognizes that the existing budgets of the Town of Prosper and Prosper EDC (PEDC) are largely committed to existing and ongoing purposes and programs. For that reason, much of the financial investment required to realize the vision for downtown Prosper will need to come from new funding sources. The Town of Prosper and the Prosper EDC have already established some funding sources that can play an important role in funding public realm improvements and supporting real estate development, including the following. Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Neighborhood Empowerment Zone. The Town of Prosper has created a Neighborhood Empow- erment Zone (NEZ) that encompasses the previously defined Old Town Prosper. Projects within the NEZ may be awarded a waiver of 75% of development fees, a refund of municipal property taxes for a period of ten years, and a refund of sales tax proceeds for a period of ten years. This program should be promoted and used as an incentive with Town approved design guidelines. Town Council Town StaffPHYSICAL FI N A N C I A L REGULATORYHigh / Short Term Priority Medium Term Priority Low / Long Term Priority Under $50,000 $50,000 to $250,000 Over $250,000 Page 1315 Item 18. 124 Town of Prosper Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Economic Development Sales Tax. An Economic Development Sales Tax funds much of the activity of the Prosper EDC. These funds are designated for economic development activities including commercial development and expansion. The Charter of the PEDC has been modified in a way that would allow it to fund some additional types of downtown improvements. Continue to support downtown redevelopment where possible. Hotel Occupancy Tax. The Town of Prosper has established a Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT). There are not hotels currently within the Town of Prosper, but three different hotels are in planning or pre- development stages. These hotels will levy a 7% HOT tax on top of their own room charges. Those revenues will be forwarded to the Town of Prosper, which can utilize the funds for tourism related investments including some of the public realm improvements called for in this plan. These existing funding sources provide a strong foundation, but additional resources will be necessary to support the full range of development and public realm investments envisioned in the Plan. The following are recommended strategies. Create a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ). A TIRZ increases the resources available to support redevelopment projects. Establish a TIRZ for overall downtown Prosper. Focus existing resources. To realize this ambitious vision, existing resources need to be promoted and leveraged, including those that are available through the NEZ, the HOT Tax. The PEDC can consider contributing to the public realm investments in the plan by utilizing the Type B funding authorities that it established in its recent Charter change. Streetscaping investments and other downtown public realm improvements can be intentionally prioritized in the Town’s capital improvement program over the next five to ten years. Evaluate the potential of additional funding resources. Additional sources of funding should be evaluated for the contribution they can make toward funding elements of the plan that are difficult to fund. For example, state law authorizes municipalities to establish a venue tax on ticket sales asso- ciated with designated venues. Community minded corporations or individuals may wish to fund particular public realm improvements such as a park or bandshell. Town Staff Town Council PEDC Town Council Town Staff PEDC Prosper Chamber Town Staff Town Council Town Staff PEDC Page 1316 Item 18. 125 Downtown Master Plan Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Engage the lending community. Engage area lending institutions to solicit their participation in pooling resources (e.g., Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) earmarked monies) to share risk and make available low interest loans and grants. Identify additional funding mechanisms to supplement primary financing including matching fund for facade improvements, tools for gap-financing, and other sources to support downtown reinvestment. The preceding strategies relate to physical investments, but downtown focused programs and activities play an equally important role in building the vibrancy of downtown Prosper. Organizational recommendations for downtown vibrancy programs are discussed elsewhere. Financial strategies for supporting downtown vibrancy program include the following. Special events grant. Consider establishing an annual special events grant program funded by the City to draw events to downtown that will attract visitor and consumer spending at downtown busi- ness and help in building the recognition of downtown as an area destination. Public Art. Investigate and establish a public art contribution program and ordinance for all private and publicly funded new development or major rehabilitation projects within downtown. This may include establishing a percent-for-art fund where developers and the City (for publicly funded capital projects) pay into the fund in lieu of providing public art on the project site or area. Typically, this does not apply to standard interior renovation of existing buildings or routine repair, maintenance and replacement of elements on an existing buildings. Municipal Management District. Explore the creation of a Municipal Management District, or identify a comparable mechanism, to provide a budget for 1) enhanced maintenance and cleanup, waste pickup, landscape maintenance, to build a safe and clean perception of downtown, and 2) downtown marketing, promotions, events, and coalition building. These activities enhance downtown vibrancy, leading to increases in business revenues and property values that are typically much greater than the MMD assessments. Business Alliance Town Staff Town Council Town Staff Town Council PEDC Prosper Chamber Town Staff Page 1317 Item 18. 126 Town of Prosper PILLAR One of the most significant, yet least known challenges to community-led redevelopment initiatives is a lack of accurate market information (quantitative and qualitative). While most data available through credible sources is accurate, some figures are not, and still others are published without appropriate context or explanation. Misconceptions about a market's potential can not only result in flawed public policies, but ineffective incentive and gap filling resources and lack of investment interest. Now more than ever before, particularly given enhanced access to unverified sources, municipalities need to be proactive in doing the development community’s market due diligence. They need to be the principal source regarding facts about their own community, rather than leave this to data seekers who may or may not be able to discern development and redevelopment opportunities. Information about existing businesses, property owners, and potential partnerships, consumer profiles and their spending patterns, and finally public initiatives intended to catalyze private sector activity, should be shared, and used to develop marketing and promotional materials which tell the local "investment story." Market Strategy Commit to investing the resources and creating partnership necessary to attract and support new project and business development opportunities. Key Recommendations 1. Establish and initiate a site assembly program with dedicated staff to evaluate potential acquisitions and future disposition. 2. Aggressively market development opportunities within the overall region. 3. Develop an overall “brand” for downtown Prosper to be integrated in all future marketing material and design features such as signage and wayfinding. 4. Develop a clear program to support “temporary businesses” from area pop-up’s to short term occupancy of vacant storefronts to help create activity downtown and support future business development. MARKETPHYSICAL FIN A N C I A L REGULATORYPage 1318 Item 18. 127 Downtown Master Plan New development will be attracted to the environment that is being created in downtown Prosper. People will find it an attractive place to live. Distinctive retail stores and restaurants will take advantage of the pedestrian traffic. Nevertheless, the rents that are estimated to come from future developments are short of what developers would need to support the full cost of the development. Market strategies address the disparity between the cost of development and the return on investment in a variety of ways. Recommended strategies include the following. Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsor Site assembly. Establish a site assembly program with dedicated staff, evaluation criteria for acquisitions, and identified resources that can be utilized, for the purpose of acquiring the properties needed for development projects. Marketing to developers. Identify and solicit the interest of local and regional developers with experience in downtown redevelopment and the capacity to advance the projects envisioned for downtown Prosper. For publicly owned sites, prepare developer solicitations to attract developers who are interested in partnering with the PEDC and Town of Prosper on developing the sites. Geographic phasing. Choose a subarea of one or two blocks within the downtown area for an initial focus, completing all development and public realm improvements in that area. Establishing that vibrant place will establish momentum, and demonstrate what is envisioned, which in turn lowers hurdles and reduces the development risk for subsequent development. Town Staff PEDC Town Staff Prosper Chamber Town Council Town StaffPHYSICAL FI N A N C I A L REGULATORYPage 1319 Item 18. 128 Town of Prosper Recommendation Priority Cost Sponsors Branding. Develop the downtown “brand” further, so that it is clear and easy to utilize in promoting the downtown area to developers, investors, visitors, and residents. Business incubator. Prepare a business plan to identify and support potential “temporary” businesses such as “pop up stores” and / or food trucks, for the purpose of proving up the potential for different business concepts and incubating entrepreneurial endeavors. In the restaurant arena, an area chef could be invited to host a restaurant demonstration project in downtown. Evaluate opportunity with existing commercial property owners or consider partnership with future developer to incorporate incubator space within development for local startup. Work with local partners to promote incubator program and businesses. Retail recruitment. Identify or establish a retail recruitment program to attract strategic anchor businesses in target markets such as restaurant, retail store categories, etc. Predevelopment activity. Perform predevelopment tasks that facilitate project readiness and remove hurdles for a developer. These could include platting, street dedication, rezoning, conducting a Phase I or Phase II environmental investigation, preliminary development approvals, etc. Site assembly. Establish a site assembly program with dedicated staff, evaluation criteria for acquisitions, and identified resources that can be utilized, for the purpose of acquiring the properties needed for development projects. Mitigate development impacts. Develop and employ programs to support the Downtown Business Alliance in continuing their achievements and prepare for mitigating potential adverse impacts associated with new construction projects, significant capital improvements, and ongoing events and activities. Market studies. Commission a detailed market study to research and document the market demand context and achievable rents for residential and retail development in downtown Prosper, and make that information available to prospective developers, investors, brokers, and property owners. Town Staff Town Council Town Council Town Staff PEDC PEDC Town Council Town Staff Town Staff Town Council Page 1320 Item 18. 129 Downtown Master Plan Page 1321 Item 18. 130 Town of Prosper Page 1322 Item 18. 131 Downtown Master Plan APPENDIX 06 Page 1323 Item 18. 132 Town of Prosper Page 1324 Item 18. 133 Downtown Master Plan APPENDIX A Catalyst Site Proformas The following pages include the catalyst sites and conceptual proformas developed for each. The proformas have included various assumptions which are intended to provide a general understanding of project costs and potential funding gap. The table below includes a summary of each of the four catalyst sites including the gap that resulted in each. The gaps identified indicate the magnitude in which financial incentives may be required for a developer to undertake each project. These proformas are based on parking requirements as they currently are. The parking section of this report identified that current parking requirements in Prosper exceed industry standards, and do not factor any shared use parking reduction. Establishing a more urban parking strategy could significantly closet he gap on the development site proformas thereby, reducing overall incentives required. PROSPER EDC DOWNTOWN PROSPER MASTER PLAN CATALYST PROJECT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY REVISED MARCH 2022 Catalyst Site Catalyst Site Catalyst Site Catalyst Site Project Indicator #1 #2 #3 #5 Private Sector Investment Development Sq Ft: Project Land Area (Acres)3.21 4.94 1.77 2.03 Retail/Restaurant 30,200 24,000 25,000 16,000 Office/Employment 0 0 25,000 0 Residential (Rental)0 177,600 27,000 44,800 Residential (For-Sale)0 0 81,600 0 Hotel/Lodging 24,000 0 0 0 Total Private Development 54,200 201,600 158,600 60,800 Floor Area Ratio 39%94%79%69% Total Project Value (@ Build-Out)$16,108,947 $56,174,400 $30,622,000 $16,484,000 Total Project Costs (@ Build-Out)$18,735,926 $59,626,554 $41,676,536 $17,585,614 Project Margin/(Gap)($2,626,979)($3,452,154)($11,054,536)($1,101,614) Project Margin/(Gap) %-14%-6%-27%-6% Catalyst Project Concepts You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Page 1325 Item 18. 134 Town of Prosper 1 CATALYST SITES PRELIMINARY VISIONINGDATE February 2022 STANTEC ViBE 1112 Pearl St. Boulder, CO80302 stantec.com Town of Prosper | Site 1 Site 1 Totals 500 feet250 feet0 feet Program Retail / Restaurant / Entertainment Hotel / Lodging Gross Floor Area Project Land Area Floor Area Ratio Surface Parking Existing silo adaptive reuse to hotel and supporting event space Supplemental open space / amenity High visibility corners down Broadway St. view corridor All urban edges to accommodate for parallel parking, furnishing zone, and pedestrian sidewalk Square Feet 30,200 24,000 54,200 139,697 39% 73,920 Units / Spaces 30 211 SILO PARK / GREENWAYOFFICE CULTURALCULTURALGATEWAYGATEWAYCULTURALRESIRESIRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALOFFICEOFFICEGROCERYRail CrossingMove to Broadway St.Gas Line EasementPARCELS AND BUILDINGS TO BEADJUSTED BASED OFF OFEXISTING EASEMENTDOWNTOWNCOREPRIORITY AREA 1DOWNTOWNCOREPRIORITY AREA 3DOWNTOWNCOREPRIORITY AREA 2500 feet250 feet0 feetPARK / OPEN SPACE / AMENITY RETAIL OFFICE RESIDENTIAL HOTEL / LODGING PARKING General assumptions for unit sizes can be found in the ‘Catalyst Project Economic Analysis’ Report from Ricker/Cunningham Page 1326 Item 18. 135 Downtown Master Plan PROSPER EDC DOWNTOWN PROSPER MASTER PLAN CATALYST PROJECT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: SITE #1 DECEMBER 2021 Development Program Number Square Feet Retail/Restaurant/Entertainment 30,200 Office/Employment 0 Residential (Rental)0 0 700 SF/Unit Residential (For-Sale)0 0 1,800 SF/Unit Hotel/Lodging 30 24,000 800 SF/Unit Gross Floor Area 54,200 Project Land Area 139,697 3.21 Acres Floor Area Ratio 39% Surface Parking 211 73,920 350 SF/Space Structured Parking 0 0 350 SF/Space Estimated Project Value (Stabilized Yr) Total Retail/Restaurant Rentable SF 30,200 100%Bldg. Efficiency Ratio Rent/SF*$25.00 Total Employment Rentable SF 0 100%Bldg. Efficiency Ratio Rent/SF*$20.00 Total Residential Rentable SF 0 90%Bldg. Efficiency Ratio Rent/SF $30.00 $2.50 Monthly Rent/SF Total Parking Spaces (Structured)0 Rent/Space $600 $50 Monthly Rent/Space Gross Income $755,000 Occupancy 90% Effective Gross Income $679,500 Operating Costs $15,100 $0.50 $/SF (Wtd. Avg. All Uses) Net Operating Income $664,400 Capitalization Rate 8.0% Project Value -- Retail/Restaurant/Entertainment $8,305,000 Total Housing Units 0 Sales Price/Unit (Wtd Avg)$350,000 Gross Revenue $0 Less Marketing Costs $0 7%% of Sales Net Sale Proceeds $0 Project Value -- For-Sale Housing $0 Total Hotel Rooms 30 Average Daily Rate (ADR)$175 Gross Income $1,916,250 Occupancy Rate 70% Effective Gross Income $1,341,375 Operating Expenses $600,000 $20,000 $/Room Net Operating Income (NOI)$741,375 Capitalization Rate 9.5% Project Value -- Hotel $7,803,947 Total Project Value $16,108,947 * Retail rents based on triple net lease; Office rents based on gross lease. Development Cost Estimate Property Purchase (Acquisition/Demolition)$2,793,940 $20.00 $/SF Land On-Site Improvements (Surface Parking)$633,600 $3,000 $/Space On-Site Improvements (Structured Parking)$0 $20,000 $/Space Site Development (Mall, Park, Patio)$1,476,000 $50.00 $/SF Building Construction (Hard Costs)$9,756,000 $180 $/SF (Wtd. Avg. All Uses) Construction Contingency $593,280 5%% of Construction Costs Soft Costs (% of Hard Costs)$1,779,840 15%% of Hard Costs Developer Profit $1,703,266 10%% of Total Costs Total Project Cost $18,735,926 $346 $/SF Development Economic Summary Total Project Value $16,108,947 Total Project Cost $18,735,926 Project Margin/"Gap"($2,626,979) % Project Margin/"Gap"-14% Source: Stantec and Ricker I Cunningham. Assumption Factors You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Page 1327 Item 18. 136 Town of Prosper Page 1328 Item 18. 137 Downtown Master Plan PROSPER EDC DOWNTOWN PROSPER MASTER PLAN CATALYST PROJECT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: SITE #2 DECEMBER 2021 Development Program Number Square Feet Retail/Restaurant 24,000 Office/Employment 0 Residential (Rental)200 177,600 888 SF/Unit Residential (For-Sale)0 0 1,500 SF/Unit Hotel/Lodging 0 0 800 SF/Unit Gross Floor Area 201,600 Project Land Area 215,021 4.94 Acres Floor Area Ratio 94% Surface Parking 0 0 350 SF/Space Structured Parking 490 171,500 350 SF/Space Estimated Project Value (Stabilized Yr) Total Retail/Restaurant Rentable SF 24,000 100%Bldg. Efficiency Ratio Rent/SF*$25.00 Total Employment Rentable SF 0 100%Bldg. Efficiency Ratio Rent/SF*$20.00 Total Residential Rentable SF 159,840 90%Bldg. Efficiency Ratio Rent/SF $30.00 $2.50 Monthly Rent/SF Total Parking Spaces (Structured)490 Rent/Space $600 $50 Monthly Rent/Space Gross Income $5,689,200 Occupancy 90% Effective Gross Income $5,120,280 Operating Costs $907,200 $4.50 $/SF (Wtd. Avg. All Uses) Net Operating Income $4,213,080 Capitalization Rate 7.5% Project Value -- Retail/Restaurant $56,174,400 Total Housing Units 0 Sales Price/Unit (Wtd Avg)$350,000 Gross Revenue $0 Less Marketing Costs $0 7%% of Sales Net Sale Proceeds $0 Project Value -- For-Sale Housing $0 Total Hotel Rooms 0 Average Daily Rate (ADR)$175 Gross Income $0 Occupancy Rate 70% Effective Gross Income $0 Operating Expenses $0 $20,000 $/Room Net Operating Income (NOI)$0 Capitalization Rate 9.5% Project Value -- Hotel $0 Total Project Value $56,174,400 * Retail rents based on triple net lease; Office rents based on gross lease. Development Cost Estimate Property Purchase (Acquisition/Demolition)$4,300,428 $20.00 $/SF Land On-Site Improvements (Surface Parking)$0 $3,000 $/Space On-Site Improvements (Structured Parking)$9,800,000 $20,000 $/Space Site Development $295,200 $10.00 $/SF Building Construction (Hard Costs)$31,492,742 $156 $/SF (Wtd. Avg. All Uses) Construction Contingency $2,079,397 5%% of Construction Costs Soft Costs (% of Hard Costs)$6,238,191 15%% of Hard Costs Developer Profit $5,420,596 10%% of Total Costs Total Project Cost $59,626,554 $296 $/SF Development Economic Summary Total Project Value $56,174,400 Total Project Cost $59,626,554 Project Margin/"Gap"($3,452,154) % Project Margin/"Gap"-6% Source: Stantec and Ricker I Cunningham. Assumption Factors You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Page 1329 Item 18. 138 Town of Prosper Page 1330 Item 18. 139 Downtown Master Plan PROSPER EDC DOWNTOWN PROSPER MASTER PLAN CATALYST PROJECT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: SITE #3 REVISED MARCH 2022 Development Program Number Square Feet Retail/Restaurant 15,000 Office/Employment 15,000 Residential (Rental)0 0 888 SF/Unit Residential (For-Sale)0 0 1,500 SF/Unit Hotel/Lodging 0 0 800 SF/Unit Gross Floor Area 30,000 Project Land Area 77,101 1.77 Acres Floor Area Ratio 39% Surface Parking 135 47,250 350 SF/Space Structured Parking 0 0 350 SF/Space Estimated Project Value (Stabilized Yr) Total Retail/Restaurant Rentable SF 15,000 100%Bldg. Efficiency Ratio Rent/SF*$25.00 Total Employment Rentable SF 15,000 100%Bldg. Efficiency Ratio Rent/SF*$25.00 Total Residential Rentable SF 0 90%Bldg. Efficiency Ratio Rent/SF $30.00 $2.50 Monthly Rent/SF Total Parking Spaces (Structured)0 Rent/Space $600 $50 Monthly Rent/Space Gross Income $750,000 Occupancy 90% Effective Gross Income $675,000 Operating Costs $99,000 $3.30 $/SF (Wtd. Avg. All Uses) Net Operating Income $576,000 Capitalization Rate 8.0% Project Value -- Retail/Restaurant $7,200,000 Total Housing Units 0 Sales Price/Unit (Wtd Avg)$350,000 Gross Revenue $0 Less Marketing Costs $0 7%% of Sales Net Sale Proceeds $0 Project Value -- For-Sale Housing $0 Total Hotel Rooms 0 Average Daily Rate (ADR)$175 Gross Income $0 Occupancy Rate 70% Effective Gross Income $0 Operating Expenses $0 $20,000 $/Room Net Operating Income (NOI)$0 Capitalization Rate 9.5% Project Value -- Hotel $0 Total Project Value $7,200,000 * Retail rents based on triple net lease; Office rents based on gross lease. Development Cost Estimate Property Purchase (Acquisition/Demolition)$963,763 $12.50 $/SF Land On-Site Improvements (Surface Parking)$405,000 $3,000 $/Space On-Site Improvements (Structured Parking)$0 $20,000 $/Space Site Development $295,200 $10.00 $/SF Building Construction (Hard Costs)$5,400,000 $180 $/SF (Wtd. Avg. All Uses) Construction Contingency $305,010 5%% of Construction Costs Soft Costs (% of Hard Costs)$915,030 15%% of Hard Costs Developer Profit $828,400 10%% of Total Costs Total Project Cost $9,112,403 $304 $/SF Development Economic Summary Total Project Value $7,200,000 Total Project Cost $9,112,403 Project Margin/"Gap"($1,912,403) % Project Margin/"Gap"-21% Source: Stantec and Ricker I Cunningham. Assumption Factors You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Page 1331 Item 18. 140 Town of Prosper Page 1332 Item 18. 141 Downtown Master Plan PROSPER EDC DOWNTOWN PROSPER MASTER PLAN CATALYST PROJECT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: SITE #4 REVISED MARCH 2022 Development Program Number Square Feet Retail/Restaurant/Entertainment 16,000 Office/Employment 0 Townhome (Rental)20 32,000 1,600 SF/Unit (avg) Loft/Airbnb (Rental)8 12,800 1,600 SF/Unit Hotel/Lodging 0 0 800 SF/Unit Gross Floor Area 60,800 Project Land Area 88,566 2.03 Acres Floor Area Ratio 69% Surface Parking 140 49,060 350 SF/Space Structured Parking 0 0 350 SF/Space Estimated Project Value (Stabilized Yr) Total Retail/Restaurant Rentable SF 16,000 100%Bldg. Efficiency Ratio Rent/SF*$25.00 Total Employment Rentable SF 0 100%Bldg. Efficiency Ratio Rent/SF*$20.00 Total Townhome/Loft Rentable SF 40,320 90%Bldg. Efficiency Ratio Rent/SF $30.00 $2.50 Monthly Rent/SF Total Parking Spaces (Structured)0 Rent/Space $600 $50 Monthly Rent/Space Gross Income $1,609,600 Occupancy 90% Effective Gross Income $1,448,640 Operating Costs $129,920 $2.90 $/SF (Wtd. Avg. All Uses) Net Operating Income $1,318,720 Capitalization Rate 8.0% Project Value -- Retail/Restaurant $16,484,000 Total Housing Units 0 Sales Price/Unit (Wtd Avg)$350,000 Gross Revenue $0 Less Marketing Costs $0 7%% of Sales Net Sale Proceeds $0 Project Value -- For-Sale Housing $0 Total Hotel Rooms 0 Average Daily Rate (ADR)$175 Gross Income $0 Occupancy Rate 70% Effective Gross Income $0 Operating Expenses $0 $20,000 $/Room Net Operating Income (NOI)$0 Capitalization Rate 9.5% Project Value -- Hotel $0 Total Project Value $16,484,000 * Retail rents based on triple net lease; Office rents based on gross lease. Development Cost Estimate Property Purchase (Acquisition/Demolition)$2,214,150 $25.00 $/SF Land On-Site Improvements (Surface Parking)$420,510 $3,000 $/Space On-Site Improvements (Structured Parking)$0 $20,000 $/Space Site Development $295,200 $10.00 $/SF Building Construction (Hard Costs)$10,761,600 $177 $/SF (Wtd. Avg. All Uses) Construction Contingency $573,866 5%% of Construction Costs Soft Costs (% of Hard Costs)$1,721,597 15%% of Hard Costs Developer Profit $1,598,692 10%% of Total Costs Total Project Cost $17,585,614 $289 $/SF Development Economic Summary Total Project Value $16,484,000 Total Project Cost $17,585,614 Project Margin/"Gap"($1,101,614) % Project Margin/"Gap"-6% Source: Stantec and Ricker I Cunningham. Assumption Factors You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Page 1333 Item 18. 142 Town of Prosper Political Priority Not Started In Progress Done Town policy. Memorialize ongoing commitment to downtown redevelopment. Incentive policy. Prepare and adopt a community wide, and downtown-specific incentive policy. Informational activities. Involve the Town’s leaders in routine updates, events, programs, and discussions. Comparative communities. Identify examples of communities with similar project components for elected officials to tour. Streamlined entitlement review. Establish eligibility criteria for streamlined entitlement review and approval processes. Informational sessions. Schedule a series of informational meetings with the Town’s leaders regarding a variety of topics reflected in the vision and Master Plan. Measurement benchmarks. Work with the Town’s leaders to establish criteria (or benchmarks) that will be used to measure the impact of certain redevelopment initiatives. APPENDIX B Implementation Matrix To help track overall plan implementation, the following pages include each of the proposed recommendations and a brief description, along with the priority assigned and status. Periodically throughout the year, the Town and partner organizations should review the current status of these recommendations and identify opportunities for further implementation, and to track the progress that has been. Goal setting for implementation will be important in the overall success of this plan. These tables should be used as a tool to identify and assign goals throughout the year. Funding Page 1334 Item 18. 143 Downtown Master Plan Organizational Priority Not Started In Progress Done Formalize stakeholder organizations. Establish the structure for those that will have a key role in supporting and implementing the Master Plan. Identify clear roles. Each key stakeholder organization should identify specific plan implementation actions that they have the resources and will commit to advancing. Communication plan. Develop a clear communication plan among the key stakeholder organizations. Main Street Texas. Engage with Main Street Texas and evaluate the eligibility of downtown Prosper for nomination as a Texas Main Street. Town department support. Engage the Town departments in the downtown redevelopment process and build support within to ensure departments work collaboratively. Event guidelines. Work with the Development Services Department and Parks and Recreation Department to establish specific event guidelines specific to downtown. Additional organizations. Identify additional organizations that may have an interest in supporting continued investment in, and visitor attraction to downtown. Citizens’ academy. Continue supporting the citizens’ academy program to grow civic awareness among area residents, business and property owners, institutional representatives, and others. Ambassador program. Within the citizen’s academy program develop an ambassador component for participation during community events or at peak times to welcome visitors. Regulatory Priority Not Started In Progress Done Downtown mixed-use zoning district. Establish a new downtown mixed-use zoning district. Design guidelines. Incorporate design guidelines within the new downtown mixed-use zoning district. Designated Business and Developer Program. Promote the Town’s recently established Designated Business and Developers Program. Historic preservation. Establish a historic preservation element within the zoning code. Page 1335 Item 18. 144 Town of Prosper Regulatory Priority Not Started In Progress Done Incentive framework. Adopt a general framework for awarding funding or other incentives (such as bonus density) to ensure a minimum level of uniformity in awards. Shared parking strategy. Adopt a shared parking strategy that allows for reduced parking requirements as part of an overall parking management and revenue system. Short-term business permitting. Amend existing permitting requirements to accommodate short- term or pop-up retail, art, or other similar commercial uses in downtown storefronts. Old Town Transportation Plan. Update the Old Town Transportation Plan as downtown development and roadway designs proceed. Streetscape master plan. Adopt a streetscape master plan for downtown west of Coleman Street that future development and redevelopment, including Town capital projects shall comply with. Public art. Adopt a public art contribution program and ordinance for all private and publicly funded new development or major rehabilitation projects within downtown. Parking regulations. Adopt downtown parking regulations and consider establishing a mobility enterprise that allows for short-term visitor parking and / or metered street or fee-based. Hike and Bike Trail Master Plan. As streetscape improvements are completed, including sidewalks, bike lanes, and the multi-path, incorporate or make appropriate modifications. Thoroughfare Plan. As needed, update the Prosper Thoroughfare Plan based on redevelopment plan recommendations or as further design is completed based. Parks, Recreation, & Open Space Master Plan. Continue to evaluate to the Parks, Recreation, & Open Space Master Plan and identify any future investment that may be warranted for a new downtown park, and update the Parks, Recreation, & Open Space Master Plan accordingly. Physical Priority Not Started In Progress Done Infrastructure and utility condition and capacity. Determine the condition and capacity of existing infrastructure and utilities. Capital improvement priorities. Prioritize capital improvements and aesthetic enhancements downtown that support a system of shared infrastructure. Page 1336 Item 18. 145 Downtown Master Plan Physical - Cont’d.Priority Not Started In Progress Done Downtown Plaza. Identify and incorporate opportunities for larger public gathering areas for programmable use such as removal of the northeast portion of the surface parking lot at Town Hall. Crockett Street. Develop detailed designs and fund the improvement Crockett Street. S. Main Street. Develop detailed designs and fund the reconfiguration of S. Main Street. Downtown Green. Develop detailed design and program plans and budget for construction of a Downtown Green located south of Town Hall between Crockett and Main Streets. Downtown Connector. Develop detailed design plans to connect the Downtown Green to W. Broadway Street with a formalized plaza in the space gained by reconfiguring W. Main Street. Landscape design. Develop detailed landscape design plans for the streetscapes, including enhanced landscape for street sections where medians may be installed. Parking strategy. Develop a near- and long-term parking strategy for public, private, and shared facilities, including spaces on-street and in alleyways. Branding. Engage a branding specialist to assist in developing the downtown “look and feel” that should be used in signage and wayfinding, gateways, streetscape furnishings, lighting, temporary signage such as for special events, and other features. Furnishings plan. Develop a detailed street furnishings plan and budget to expand on what has already been installed. Neighborhood improvement. Develop a neighborhood improvement plan for the residential portions of downtown to include the installation of sidewalks, pedestrian scale lighting, and shade trees within all right-of-ways. Signage and wayfinding. Design an overall signage and wayfinding program. Gateways. Develop gateway features expanding on those already developed with hierarchy appropriate to the location. Intersection improvements. Design intersection improvements to increase awareness of activity areas and promote traffic calming. Page 1337 Item 18. 146 Town of Prosper Physical - Cont’d.Priority Not Started In Progress Done Redevelopment parcels. Evaluate and consider acquisition of future key redevelopment parcels for later resale to targeted private development. Neighborhood pocket parks. Evaluate and consider acquisition of select vacant parcels within the single-family portion of downtown for development as neighborhood pocket parks. Public facilities. Evaluate the potential location and cost to construct and maintain public restrooms within the commercial downtown. Future roadway connections. Incorporate the primary connector road once detailed design is complete to access for the major new development proposed south of W. First Street. Canopy trees. Incorporate mature canopy street trees within the commercial downtown. Shared Dumpsters. Incorporate locations to support shared dumpster use. Alleyway Improvements. Improve all unimproved alleys within the downtown area. Financial Priority Not Started In Progress Done Neighborhood Empowerment Zone. This program should be promoted and used as an incentive with Town approved design guidelines. Economic Development Sales Tax. Continue to support downtown redevelopment where possible from this funding source and, if possible, provide a consistent annual allocation. Create a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ). Establish a TIRZ for overall downtown Prosper. Focus existing resources. Prioritize investment downtown through all funding sources including the NEZ, HOT Tax, the PEDC, and the Town capital improvement plan and annual budget. Evaluate the potential of additional funding resources. Additional sources of funding should be evaluated for the contribution they can make toward funding elements of the plan. Engage the lending community. Engage area lending institutions to solicit their participation in pooling resources (e.g., Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) earmarked monies). Special events grant. Consider establishing an annual special events grant program funded by the City to draw events to downtown that will attract visitor and consumer spending. Page 1338 Item 18. 147 Downtown Master Plan Financial - Cont’d.Priority Not Started In Progress Done Public Art. Investigate and establish a public art contribution program and ordinance for all private and publicly funded new development or major rehabilitation projects within downtown. Municipal Management District. Explore the creation of a Municipal Management District, or identify a comparable mechanism. Hotel Occupancy Tax. Utilize these funds to attract tourism by investing in the public realm improvements called for in this plan. Market Priority Not Started In Progress Done Site assembly. Establish a site assembly program for evaluation of acquisitions for the purpose of acquiring the properties needed for development projects. Marketing to developers. Identify and solicit the interest of local and regional developers with experience in downtown redevelopment. Geographic phasing. Choose a subarea of one or two blocks within the downtown area for an initial focus, completing all development and public realm improvements in that area. Branding. Develop a downtown “brand.” Business incubator. Prepare a business plan to identify and support potential “temporary” businesses such as “pop up stores” and / or food trucks. Retail recruitment. Identify or establish a retail recruitment program to attract strategic anchor businesses in target markets such as restaurant, retail store categories, etc. Predevelopment activity. Perform predevelopment tasks such as platting, street dedication, rezoning, conducting environmental investigation, preliminary development approvals, etc. Site assembly. Establish a site assembly program. Mitigate development impacts. Develop and employ programs to support the Downtown Business Alliance and for mitigating potential adverse impacts associated with new construction. Market studies. Commission a detailed market study to research and document the market demand context and achievable rents for residential and retail development in downtown Prosper. Page 1339 Item 18. 148 Town of Prosper Parking While the Committee’s recommended parking supply for the four catalytic sites will ensure ample parking for the proposed development, based on national standards from the ITE plus the ULI—both of which include hundreds of observations from across the country for similar land uses—applied to our model of future parking demand, there will be a significant number of empty parking spaces. Combined with nearly 400 empty spaces in downtown today at the peak of existing demand, empty parking spaces will consume a lot of land, constrain the public realm and present a serious financial challenge for developers—especially those interested in making a viable mixed-use and walkable downtown. Therefore, it is recommended that a significantly smaller shared parking supply of 718 new spaces be developed for the catalyst sites. However, these spaces will only operate efficiently if certain elements of Prosper’s parking code are revised to enable sharing. These include: • Removing the Chapter 4.6.F. stipulation that “Shared parking must be on the same site,” otherwise the catalyst sites cannot share parking. • Doubling the Chapter 4.7.A. accessory off-site parking radii from 300 and 600 feet to 600 feet (a 3 minute walk) and 1,200 feet (a 6 minute walk). While these changes will benefit the current proposed catalyst sites, the benefits of shared parking would not pass on to other existing or future land uses without other changes. In particular, if the Town were to treat the entire downtown as a shared parking district, parking efficiencies have the opportunity to attract compatible development that is focused on a quality public realm, rather than excessive areas of parking. Parking operations and enforcement changes that make customer parking areas clear to visitors— whether or not they are under public control—and promote long-term parking in appropriate areas that do not detract from front-door customer parking would help visitors and regulars alike with clear parking expectations. Shared districts often offer a pool of spaces to new development, allowing underutilized facilities to become utilized—sometimes as new revenue for an existing landowner, while offering the savings of not building new parking. Consistent signing, wayfinding, rules and access designs are other common features that could easily make downtown attractive and work efficiently. To make a shared approach work, many additional changes to the current code are needed: APPENDIX C Page 1340 Item 18. 149 Downtown Master Plan6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 AM10:00 AM11:00 AM12:00 AM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM10:00 PM11:00 PM12:00 AM200 400 600 800 1,000 Industry Standard Requirement: 937 Proposed Parking Supply: 718 Model Peak Demand (With Context): 653 6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 AM10:00 AM11:00 AM12:00 AM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM10:00 PM11:00 PM12:00 AM200 400 600 800 1,000 Industry Standard Requirement: 937 Model Peak Demand - 844 Proposed Parking Supply: 718 Apartment / Low Rise Hotel General Office Building Shopping Center Lounge / Bar, Sit Down • While the 50% reduction in downtown requirements (Chapter 4.6.F. and Chapter 4.7.C.) is intended to promote sharing, a better approach is to adopt a shared reductions table that encourages a better mix of uses, such as the example on the next page. • Conditional approvals of shared parking (Chapter 4.6.F.) and the ability to rescind those approvals is too risky for most developers and effectively nullifies the Town’s intent. These should be removed so sharing is as-of-right. • Off-site sharing is a necessity, not only for the current catalyst sites, but for similar future developments, as well as any existing parcel seeking to intensity its use or redevelop if there isn’t sufficient land today. However, Chapter 4.7.B. requires a written agreement approved by the Town Attorney, again increasing the hurdle to develop in downtown. The Town is better-off providing simple guidance and samples to future developers of shared-use agreements, including clear guidance on liability and maintenance, leaving the ultimate decision to the private parties. • The Town should consider adopting clear language which guarantees that any landowner who shares their parking does not lose their own allotment of recorded spaces, avoiding any fears that sharing would remove credit for existing parking. Parking Demand & Time of Day Parking Demand with Context6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 AM10:00 AM11:00 AM12:00 AM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM10:00 PM11:00 PM12:00 AM200 400 600 800 1,000 Industry Standard Requirement: 937 Proposed Parking Supply: 718 Standard Parking Analysis Page 1341 Item 18. 150 Town of Prosper Catalytic Sites Shared Parking Demand Modeling Land Use Type Units Catalyst Concepts TotalCatalyst #1 Catalyst #2 Catalyst #3 Catalyst #4 Office Sq. Ft.25,000 4,000 29,000 Retail Sq. Ft.15,100 12,000 12,500 8,000 47,600 Restaurant Sq. Ft.15,100 12,000 12,500 8,000 47,600 Apartments / Townhomes Units 200 12 30 242 Hotel Units 30 30 Proposed Parking Supply Spaces 138 320 176 85 718 Street Name Units Total Unshared Peak Demand Vehicles 937 Shared Peak Demand (No Context)Vehicles 718 Shared Peak Demand (with Context)Vehicles 653 Parking Sample Shared Parking Reductions by Use Land Use Type 12 AM - 7 AM 7 AM - 6 PM 6 PM - 12 AM Office 5%100%5% Retail 0%100%50%50% Residential 100%55%85% Restaurant 5%70%*100% Industrial 5%100%5% Hotel 100%65%90% Church 0%10%30% Cinema / Live Entertainment 0%70%100% * 0% if shared with over 150,000 sq ft of office space Page 1342 Item 18. 151 Downtown Master Plan Page 1343 Item 18. 152 Town of Prosper Funding The funding strategy for Prosper to implement the Master Plan will rely on identifying the various funding sources and opportunities to leverage these against one another to maximize overall return. Many of the actions included in the implementation plan have little cost beyond staff time while others will take a long-range planning a clear strategy to fund. The implementation section of this plan includes “sponsors” or those who should take the lead or have a role in each action. Understanding which organization has the ability and willingness to undertake each will be a key first step to success. The Town will have a primary role in nearly all actions. As such, it should evaluate each of these and identify which ones may be accomplished through normal government operations and with minimal cost. Actions that relate to processes, organization, or the regulatory framework would be among these. Some of the actions may be incorporated into the Town’s capital improvements planning or have funds allocated during the annual budget process. Others will require substantial additional monies likely to be received through grant funds. Many of these, and generally all federal grants which are the most substantial, typically require a 20% non-federally funded match. It will be essential that the Town plan in advance the grants it may choose to pursue, understand it’s match requirements, and begin budgeting accordingly. Additionally, many state grants are funded by the federal government and are typically not eligible match funding - meaning, the local government or it’s partners must plan for their required contribution. Some of the implementation actions pertain to establishing or utilizing additional revenue sources by the Town including the creation of a TIRZ or a Municipal Management District, and the eventual use of HOT funding following hotel development downtown. These sources are ideal sources to earmark for grant funding match requirements because they do not draw from the Town’s existing revenue sources and their revenues are generally predictable and can be seen as reliable funding sources by grantor’s. The PEDC will be another arm of the overall plan implementation and can assist the Town in funding some projects directly while also pursuing additional funding on behalf of the Town. The PEDC can also be helpful in building support for establishment of the TIRZ or MMD, and help in growing the Downtown Business Alliance and it’s ability to generate revenue for certain components of implementation. The Appendix of this report includes matrices of funding sources under several categories; Outdoor Recreation, Underground Utilities, Transportation, Small and Local Business Development, Event and Programming, and Branding and Tourism. Within each of these grants are feature the specific program, eligible use of funds, maximum grant awards, and funding cycles, among others. As the Town proceeds with implementation it will be important to evaluate these for opportunities to stack funding sources. The simplest way to do this is identify a grant program project that will have a large impact and that the Town is prepared to provide matching funds for, and then identify all additional grants that may contribute to portions of the overall project for which the Town’s existing allocation of funding may also be applied to. For example, a grant pursuit for roadway improvements may also leverage the Town’s local contribution against for a mobility grant that may fund sidewalks, lighting, wayfinding and signage, and an outdoor recreation grant that may fund stormwater components and landscape. The following page provides an overview of the various types of activities that may be funded under each of the grant categories included within the matrices. APPENDIX D Page 1344 Item 18. 153 Downtown Master Plan Grant Program Typical Grant Uses Outdoor Recreation Recreational trails and facilities, conservation projects including community outreach, water and stormwater improvements, nature based infrastructure, action plans, cultural, arts, and tourism facilities, workforce training and capacity building, outdoor recreation programs and facilities, acquisition of recreation (land) areas and development costs, signage, landscaping and beautification, public art, artist and creative industry support, creative business development, art in roadways (murals) and public spaces such as plazas, bicycle infrastructure, and build, rebuild or refresh community spaces. Underground Utilities Construction, non-construction, technical assistance, revolving loan fund projects, water, wastewater, septic tanks, roads and streets, general drainage, and parks and recreational activities (limited). Transportation Public safety, intercity transit - bus and vehicles, bicycle infrastructure, shared use paths, sidewalks improvements, infrastructure related to any non-motorized transportation, buses and bus facilities, technology introductions and innovation, planning and engineering design funding, general roadway improvements, master or corridor plans, risk assessments, activities to increase civic engagement, supporting vibrant spaces by improving access to open spaces, parks and other community amenities, general walkability, signage and wayfinding, housing, and public art. Small and Local Business Development Projects that benefit small and emerging businesses in rural areas, technical assistance including project planning, business counseling and training, market research, feasibility studies, professional or technical reports, acquisition or development of land, easements, or rights of way, construction,conversion and renovation of existing buildings, improvements for access to streets and roads, parking areas, and utilities, pollution control, start-up loans and working capital, distance adult learning for job training, technology-based economic development, and other job training. Event and Programming Activities to support art, craft and culinary arts, dance, design and architecture, film and medial, fold and traditional, literal, musical, visual arts, theater and performance, and other formal and informal creative practices, support for fundraisers and other events such as galas, festivals, parades, and general operations or organization, projects that increase awareness and understanding of access to preventative health care services, chronic disease management, community involvement, and branding and brand visibility. Branding and Tourism Projects that benefit small and emerging businesses in rural areas, technical assistance including project planning, business counseling and training, market research, feasibility studies, professional or technical reports, acquisition or development of land, easements, or rights of way, construction,conversion and renovation of existing buildings, improvements for access to streets and roads, parking areas, and utilities, pollution control, start-up loans and working capital, distance adult learning for job training, technology-based economic development, and other job training. Page 1345 Item 18. 154 Town of Prosper Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Outdoor Recreation - recreation and greenspace; public art; gateways and wayfinding Program Agency Purpose / Goals Eligible Applicants Eligible Use of Funds National Recreational Trails Fund Federal Highway Administration, administered by Texas Parks & Wildlife To fund motorized and non- motorized trail projects.Local Governments Funds can be spent on both motorized and non-motorized recreational trail projects such as the construction of new recreational trails, to improve existing trails, to develop trailheads or trailside facilities, and to acquire trail corridors. National Parks Service Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance (RTCA) National Parks Service (NPS) The main focus areas of this program are building healthy communities, conservation, engaging youth in outdoor recreation, and facilitating support between NPS and communities to achieve shared goals. State and local governments, tribes, nonprofits, or citizen organizations. This program provides technical assistance to community led conservation and outdoor recreation projects throughout the country. The types of assistance includes: community outreach strategies, developing concept plans for trails and parks, creating project management and action plans, engaging collaborative partners and stakeholders, and other consulting services that can be tailored towards the needs of the project. Competitive Tourism & Outdoor Recreation Grants US Economic Development Administration (EDA) Competitive grants will help tourism communities invest in infrastructure, workforce, or other projects to support the recovery of the industry and economic resilience of the community in the future. States, cities, counties; Indian tribes; commonwealths and territories of the US; and nonprofits. "(1) Water and stormwater/wastewater improvements. (2) Pier construction and improvements. (3) New outdoor recreation and trail infrastructure and public access enhancements. (4) Nature-based infrastructure and public access enhancements. (5) Cultural, arts, and tourism facilities (e.g., visitor or tourist information centers). (6) Workforce training facilities and capacity building programs. (7) Accessibility enhancements. (8) County-wide or multi-state travel, tourism, or outdoor recreation promotion (Because state and local tourism promotion and marketing projects are eligible uses of funds under State Tourism Grants, such projects are not eligible under the EDA Competitive Tourism Grants component.)" Local Parks Grants Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) The Local Park Grant Program consists of 5 individual programs that assist local governments with the acquisition and/or development of public recreation areas and facilities throughout the State of Texas. Emphasis on public health, safety, the natural environment, barrier-free access, and the protection of recreational community values of the area. The 5 different grant programs include: Small Community (population <20,000), Nonurban Outdoor Recreation (<500,000 people), Nonurban Indoor Recreation (<500,000), Urban Outdoor Recreation (>500,000), & Urban Indoor Recreation (>500,000). Eligible applicants includes cities, counties, utility districts, and other special districts. Applications must receive at least one public hearing prior to submission." Eligible projects may consist of basic outdoor recreation facilities and related support facilities that serve the general public. Facilities may be developed, renovated, or redeveloped on lands or water owned or controlled by the applicant. Examples of eligible development projects: playgrounds, trails, golf courses, sports courts, community gardens, recreational support facilities. Page 1346 Item 18. 155 Downtown Master Plan Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Outdoor Recreation - recreation and greenspace; public art; gateways and wayfinding - Cont’d Loan or Grant Maximum Terms/Requirements/ Notes Funding Cycle Contact Website 80% of project costs, up to $200,000 for non-motorized trail grants and a maximum award of $400,000 for motorized (off-highway vehicle) trail grants. Thirty percent of the total NRTF grants must be spent on motorized recreational trails, while another 30 percent must be spent on nonmotorized trail projects. The remaining 40 percent is discretionary. Annual solicitation, February 1 deadline. "Trey Cooksey, (512) 389-8743 trey.cooksey@tpwd. texas.gov" https://tpwd.texas. gov/business/grants/ recreation-grants/ recreational-trails- grants This is a nonmonetary grant program. NPS assists communities by providing a broad range of services and support. They are also helpful in bringing funding partners to the table. NPS recommends applicants consult with a staff member at least 30 days prior to the application deadline. This program is offered on an annual basis. The next application deadline is March 1, 2023. Intermountain Region Program Manager Ericka Pilcher, RTCA_ Apps_IMR@nps.gov "https://www.nps. gov/orgs/rtca/ apply.htm" "The program will fund 80-100% of a project between $500,000 and $10,000,000. In determining the grant rate, EDA’s Grants Officers in the applicable Regional Office will consider on a case-by-case basis whether the circumstances of the proposed project warrant a larger federal share." "Must align with regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) document or the creation of a CEDS. Work with and/or secure support of North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCG). " Anticipate this to be an annual program from the US EDA. "NCTCOG: Lucille Johnson ljohnson@nctcog.org Prit Patel ppatel@nctcog.org USEDA: Robert Peche 512-568-7732 rpeche1@eda.gov" Grant funds are provided on a matching basis with the local applicant providing 50% of the project costs that must be available at the time of the application. The grant ceiling for the Local Parks Nonurban Outdoor Recreation Program is $750,000. The grant ceiling for the Nonurban Indoor Recreation Program is $1 million. For Small Community and Non-Urban Outdoor and Indoor Recreation Grants Programs, all active projects that are at least 2 years old must be reimbursed for a minimum of 50% of the approved grant amount. The total of approved grant funds that have not been reimbursed may not exceed $2 million for all active grant projects. Local Parks Grants are funded on an annual basis. Applications typically open at the beginning of September with an application deadline of December 4th. Awards are announced in May. Local Parks Program Manager Dan Reece, (512) 389-4656, dan. reece@tpwd.texas.gov "https://tpwd.texas. gov/business/ grants/recreation- grants/about-local- parks-grants" Page 1347 Item 18. 156 Town of Prosper Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Outdoor Recreation - recreation and greenspace; public art; gateways and wayfinding Program Agency Purpose / Goals Eligible Applicants Eligible Use of Funds Local Parks Non-Urban Outdoor Recreation Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) "To assist local units of government with the acquisition and/or development of public recreation areas and facilities throughout the State of Texas. " Eligible applicants includes political subdivisions of the State of Texas legally responsible for providing public recreation services to their citizens. This includes cities, counties, river authorities, municipal utility districts, and other special districts. For this program, community must be 500,000 or less in population. Acquisition and/or development of public recreation areas and facilities. Points may be received through the applicable “Project Priority Scoring System” for projects which meet priorities identified in Department-accepted, locally-endorsed parks, recreation, and open space master plans. A jurisdiction wide master plan is NOT required to participate in the grant program, nor does Texas Parks & Wildlife Department’s acceptance of a plan guarantee that points will be awarded for any project. There are no points in the Small Community scoring criteria for having a master plan. Master Plans must be submitted to TPWD at least 60 days prior to the grant deadline in which you wish to participate in order to be considered for points. Recreational Trails Grants Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) In conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration, this federally funded program receives its funding from federal gas taxes paid on fuel used in non-highway recreational vehicles. Local Governments Funds can be spent on both motorized and non-motorized recreational trail projects such as the construction of new recreational trails, improvements to existing trails, navigational aids such as signage, development of trailheads or trailside facilities, and to acquire trail corridors. Community Outdoor Outreach Program (CO- OP) Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) To engage the target under- represented audiences in outoor recreation, environmental education and conservation. Tax-exempt organizations such as local government, Universities, school districts, and non-profit organizations. "Programming for outdoor recreation, environmental education, and / or conservation. Eligible expenses include: Personnel, Food and Travel, Training, Participant liability insurance, Fees (Park, Program, and Lodging fees), Outdoor service project expenses, Supplies and equipment. Funds cannot be used for facility construction projects, gazebos, ponds, benches, trail building, etc. The CO-OP grant is to be used to fund programs, not construction projects." Governor's Community Achievement Awards Keep Texas Beautiful in partnership with Texas Department of Transportation To award Texas communities for their outstanding overall efforts to keep their communities beautiful. Texas communities The funds are to be used for landscaping projects along local rights-of-way. A community's environmental program is judged on achievements in seven areas: community leadership and coordination, public awareness, education, beautification and community improvement, litter prevention and cleanup, solid waste management, litter law and illegal dumping enforcement. Texas Commission on the Arts (TCA) Texas Commission on the Arts (TCA) Investing in a creative Texas. Any county, municipality, or other political subdivision of Texas undertaking a public construction project estimated to cost more than $250k Staff are available to advise on conducting a public art project ranging from scoping the project, developing the RFP, identifying committee members, developing a review process, intellectual property rights, conservation, etc. Page 1348 Item 18. 157 Downtown Master Plan Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Outdoor Recreation - recreation and greenspace; public art; gateways and wayfinding - Cont’d Loan or Grant Maximum Terms/Requirements/ Notes Funding Cycle Contact Website Will fund 50% of project costs, up to $750,000. "All grant assisted sites must be dedicated as parkland in perpetuity, properly maintained and open to the public. All applicants must hold at least one public hearing prior to submission." Annually, October 1. "Dan Reece, (512) 389-4656 dan.reece@tpwd. texas.gov" - Maximum award of $200,000 for non- motorized trail grants and maximum award of $400,000 for motorized trail grants. Reimbursable grants can be up to 80% of project costs. The annual application deadline is February 1st. Awards are typically announced in May. In 2016, TPWD approved $3.54 million in recreational trail grants to fund 22 projects throughout the state. "Recreational Trails Program Manager Trey Cooksey, (512) 389-8743, trey. cooksey@tpwd.texas. gov " https://tpwd.texas. gov/business/grants/ recreation-grants/ recreational-trails- grants "Grants up to $60,000; no match required. " Target demographics include female, ethnic minority, low income, and individuals with a disability. Projects can serve other audiences, however, proposals who serve the target audience will be more competitive in the scoring evaluation process. Annually, November 1. "Carly Blankenship (512) 389-8209 carly.blankenship@ tpwd.texas.gov" https://tpwd- recgrants. intelligrants. com/Portal2. aspx?&sitID=15 Ten winning communities will split $2 million with the amount awarded based on population size. Ranges from category 1 (<3,000 population) receiving $90k through category 10 (>180,000 population) receiving $310K. After being awarded an applicant is not eligible for four years. Applications for the 2022 awards are closed. Anticipate 2023 annual cycle will open January 2023 and close February 2023. Sara Nichols- sara@ ktb.org https://www.ktb.org/ gcaa No maximum grant amount or matching requirements listed A percent not to exceed one percent of the cost of the construction project shall be used for fine arts projects.No cycles listed. Laura Wiegand (512)- 936-6565 laura@arts. texas.gov https://www.arts. texas.gov/initiatives/ public-art/ Page 1349 Item 18. 158 Town of Prosper Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Outdoor Recreation - recreation and greenspace; public art; gateways and wayfinding Program Agency Purpose / Goals Eligible Applicants Eligible Use of Funds Our Town National Endowment for the Arts Supports projects that integrate arts, culture, and design activities into efforts that strengthen communities by advancing local economic, physical, and/or social outcomes. Partnerships required between governmental, nonprofit, and private sector leadership. These partnerships must involve two primary partners, as defined by these guidelines: Nonprofit organization; Local government entity; and one of these two primary partners must be a cultural (arts or design) organization. "Projects may include activities such as: Arts Engagement: Artist residency, Arts festivals, Community co-creation of art, Performances, Public art; Cultural Planning: Creating a cultural plan, or integrating plans and policies around arts and culture as part of a city master planning process, Cultural district planning, Creative asset mapping, Public art planning; Design: Artist/designer-facilitated community planning, Design of artist space, Design of cultural facilities i.e. design processes to support the creation of a dedicated building or space for creating and/or showcasing arts and culture, Public space design i.e. The process of designing elements of public infrastructure, or spaces where people congregate (e.g., parks, plazas, landscapes, neighborhoods, districts, infrastructure, and artist-produced elements of streetscapes). Artist and Creative Industry Support: Creative business development, Professional artist development." Asphalt Art Initiative Bloomberg Philanthropies Using art to reimagine roadways and vertical infrastructure, improving street safety, revitalizing public spaces, and bringing communities together. U.S. cities with populations of approximently 30,000-500,000 "Three categories: 1. ART ON THE ROADWAY - mural projects on paved areas that are accessible to motor vehicles, such as intersections, crosswalks, and other surfaces within the active roadway. 2. ART IN PEDESTRIAN SPACE - art projects on paved areas that are inaccessible to motor vehicles while the artwork is in place, such as curb and sidewalk extensions as well as any surface that has been temporarily or permanently converted into a public space or plaza. 3. ART ON VERTICAL INFRASTRUCTURE - art projects installed on vertical infrastructure, including utility boxes, traffic barriers, and highway underpasses. " Community Grants People for Bikes To build momentum for bicycling in communities across the U.S. Non-profit organizations, city or county agencies or departments, and state or federal agencies working locally Bicycle infrastructure projects such as: Bike paths, lanes, trails, and bridges; Mountain bike facilities; Bike parks and pump tracks; BMX facilities; End-of-trip facilities such as bike racks, bike parking, bike repair stations and bike storage. Globe Life Texas Rangers Baseball and Softball Grant Program Texas Rangers Baseball Foundation To support the growth of the sport and making sure that every child is afforded the opportunity to experience joy and community through baseball and softball. Nonprofit organizations with 501(c)3 IRS status that specifically support youth baseball or softball, operating in the Texas Rangers home territory which includes: Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas only. Cannot be used to supplement team travel expenses and/ or tournament fees. Project should advance the Foundation's mission of affording youth 18 and younger growth in baseball or softball. The Foundation has funded field construction, field renovation, equipment, and league development. Page 1350 Item 18. 159 Downtown Master Plan Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Outdoor Recreation - recreation and greenspace; public art; gateways and wayfinding - Cont’d Loan or Grant Maximum Terms/Requirements/ Notes Funding Cycle Contact Website Grants range from $25,000 - $150,000 with 50% non-federal match required. Project may be subject to the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and/or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Annual program, typically in August.OT@arts.gov https://www.arts.gov/ grants-organizations/ our-Town/grant- program-description Maximum grant award is $25,000; no match required; however, competitive proposals will include in-kind support from the municipality and/or funding from other sources. Eligible sites can include portions of active roadways, sidewalks, pedestrian plazas, or transportation infra- structure such as traffic barriers, highway underpasses, or utility boxes. Sites may be located in and managed by one or multiple jurisdictions (city, state or county, public utility, regional transit authority, etc.) but must be largely or completely on public property and be fully open to the public. Rolling application period; no dead- line for submittal. "https://asphaltart. bloomberg.org/ grants/" Grant, 50% up to $10,000 "Two-step application process: 1, Letter of Interest 2. Full Application: PFB will request a full project appli- cation from a short list of qualified applicants." No current open grant cycles. "Zoe Kircos, (720) 726-3335 zoe@peopleforbikes. org" https://peoplefor- bikes.org/our-work/ community-grants/ No maximum grant amount or matching requirements listed If awarded a grant, applicant agrees to participate in public relations activities associated with receipt of grant and will display Rangers Foundation signage acknowledging grant. Annual grant solicitation, typically due June 30; awards in August. "foundation@texas- rangers.com (817) 533-1513" - Page 1351 Item 18. 160 Town of Prosper Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Outdoor Recreation - recreation and greenspace; public art; gateways and wayfinding Program Agency Purpose / Goals Eligible Applicants Eligible Use of Funds Healthy Kids, Healthy Families® (HKHF) Blue Cross Blue Shield of TX To support the health and well-be- ing of the children and families across the states in which we operate through four focus areas: American Lung Association, Phys- ical Activity, Mobile Health Vans, Food Banks. Nonprofit organizations with 501(c)3 IRS status or government, civic and cultural organizations in Texas. "The program must be measurable and demonstrate how the goals will be met as defined in the grant proposal. The community lead organization must be a nonprofit, tax exempt, 501(c)(3) organization; have the financial capacity and qualified staff to oversee and manage the project (defined as organizations operating a current annual budget of $2 million or more); collaborate on proposed program with a health partner – i.e., hospital, clinic, federally qualified health center." HomeTown Grants T-Mobile To support small Towns across America by funding community projects. Small Towns with populations less than 50,000. Projects to build, rebuild, or refresh community spaces that help foster local connections in the Town. For example, this might include the Town square pavilion, a historic building, an outdoor park, a ball field, or a library -- places where friends and neigh- bors connect. Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Underground Utilities Program Agency Purpose / Goals Eligible Applicants Eligible Use of Funds Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Program U.S Economic Development Administration (EDA) Provides economically distressed communities and regions with resources to address a wide variety of economic needs. Projects will sup- port the mission of the EDA to create and retain jobs, increase private investment, enhance innovation, and grow ecosystems that attract investment. Nonprofits, county and state gov- ernments, special districts, tribal governments, public and private institutions of higher education, city or Township governments. Projects in rural or urban areas that support construction, non-construction, technical assistance, and revolving loan fund projects. Grants are designed to leverage existing regional assets and support the implementation of economic development strategies in distressed communities by developing key public infrastructure. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for Rural Texas Department of Housing & Urban Development - through Texas Department of Agriculture The primary goal of this program is to develop viable communities by providing affordable housing or expanding economic opportunities for communities of low- to moderate- income. Nonurban cities and counties (population less than 50,000 or 200,000 people, respectively) that are not designated as eligible for the entitlement portion of the federal CDBG program. Priority projects for NCTCOG are Water/Wastewater; Septic Tanks; Water/Wastewater Yard Lines; Roads/Streets; Drainage. Other eligible activities does include parks and recreational activities. The funding for parks and recreation depends on how many parks already exist in the community. If there is more than one park or recreational facility, the applicant must identify the service area of the park or recreational facility that is included in the proposed project. Page 1352 Item 18. 161 Downtown Master Plan Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Outdoor Recreation - recreation and greenspace; public art; gateways and wayfinding - Cont’d Loan or Grant Maximum Terms/Requirements/ Notes Funding Cycle Contact Website For this grant program, they defer to the expertise of the applicants on the funding needed to run a successful program. The intention is that the requested amount should reflect the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed program and be put within the context of the specific needs and challenges of the communities involved. Recent Texas park example: "We’re working to get kids physically active with Imagination Playground, a ground-breaking pop-up playground design with uniquely shaped foam blocks and loose parts that help kids play creatively. With the addition of shade structures to 34 Texas playgrounds, we’re helping kids and families have more sun-safe access to great places to play." Annual grant solicitation, typically letters of intent are due mid August with full applications (if invited) due end of September. "healthykidshealthy- families @hcsc.net" - Up to $50,000. Applicants will be notified 30-60 days after the end of each quarter on the status of the submission. "Applications will be open on a quarterly basis with the following schedule: Spring: Jan – March Summer: April – June Fall: July – Sept Winter: Oct – Dec Portal will close on the last day of each quarter and reopen for the new quarter on the first of the month." - https://www.t-mo- bile.com/brand/ homeTown-grants Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Underground Utilities - Cont’d Loan or Grant Maximum Terms/Requirements/ Notes Funding Cycle Contact Website Award ceiling: $3,000,000 Award Floor: $100,000 Need to demonstrate “distressed” community through low-income or disadvantaged populations, high unemployment, and/or recent manufacturing layoffs. While EDA encourages eligible applicants to submit their applications as soon as possible, EDA strongly advises eligible applicants to submit complete applications no later than March 31, 2022 Consult with NCTCOG then regional EDA rep out of Austin https://eda.gov/ funding-oppor- tunities/#:~:tex- Grant maximums range from $75,000 - $800,000 and varies by region. "The Community Development Fund is available through a competition that takes place in each of the state planning regions. Must apply Federal Davis Bacon Wage Rates to construction activities. Administered through NCTCOG." The fund is available on a biennial basis. The next application deadline appears to be February 2023 as the last cycle closed February 2021. "Olivia Kale 817-695-9213 OKale@nctcog.org" - Page 1353 Item 18. 162 Town of Prosper Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Transportation - infrastructure and mobility (pedestrian and bicycle) Program Agency Purpose / Goals Eligible Applicants Eligible Use of Funds Highway Safety Im- provement Program (HSIP) TxDOT (orig. Federal Highway Administration) For highway safety projects that eliminate or reduce the number of fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads Any local agency that owns, operates, and maintains public roadways "Improvements that address the crash types identified in the Texas Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). Funds are provided for construction and operational improvements both on and off the state highway system. Project must address the following priorities: * Is the strategy, activity, or project consistent with the priorities of Texas’ SHSP? * Does the project address a serious crash risk such as a hot spot, systemic risk factor, road segment, or crash type that has been identified through a data driven process? * Is the project likely to contribute to a significant reduction in Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) Build America Bureau, US Department of Transportation To fill market gaps and leverage substantial private co-investment by providing supplemental and subordinate capital. State and local governments, transit agencies, railroad companies, special authorities, special districts, and private entities. Highway projects and transit capital projects are eligible, including intelligent transportation systems (ITS). In addition, the following types of projects are eligible: international bridges and tunnels; intercity passenger bus and rail facilities and vehicles; publicly owned freight rail facilities; private facilities providing public benefit for highway users; intermodal freight transfer facilities; projects that provide access to such facilities; service improvements on or adjacent to the National Highway System; and projects located within the boundary of a port terminal under certain conditions. "Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside (TA) Program " Federal Highway Administration - administered by TxDOT Preserve historic, archaeological, scenic and environmental resources related to surface transportation, and to facilitate bicycle and pedestrian use. Local governments; Regional transportation authorities; Transit agencies; Natural resource or public land agencies; School districts, local education agencies, or schools; Tribal governments; Nonprofit entities responsible for the administration of local transportation safety programs; Any other local or regional governmental entity with responsibility for oversight of transportation or recreational trails (other than a metropolitan planning organization or a State agency). "Eligible TA activities for the department’s 2021 TA Program Call for Projects included: 1. Bicycle infrastructure improvements; 2. Shared use paths; 3. Sidewalk improvements; 4. Infrastructure- related projects to improve safety for non-motorized transportation. Construction and engineering costs are eligible for projects in communities of 50,000 or less in population, while only construction costs are eligible for projects in communities of 50,001 or greater in population." Page 1354 Item 18. 163 Downtown Master Plan Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Transportation - infrastructure and mobility (pedestrian and bicycle) - Cont’d Loan or Grant Maximum Terms/Requirements/ Notes Funding Cycle Contact Website The HSIP is federally funded. Program funds are eligible to cover 90 percent of project construction costs. The remaining 10 percent of project construction costs must be covered by state or local participation. "HSIP funded projects are also required to be evaluated for cost effectiveness. Completed projects are subject to cost/benefit analysis using three to five years of before and after crash data, average annual daily traffic for the years before and after the improvement, and actual construction costs. " December 17, 2021 close for District Project Proposals Due for FY’s 22-25 Heather Lott, heather.lott@txdot. gov https://www.txdot. gov/inside-txdot/ forms-publications/ publications/ highway-safety.html Low interest loan program. Major requirements include a capital cost of at least $50 million (or 33.3 percent of a state's annual apportionment of Federal-aid funds, whichever is less) or $15 million in the case of ITS. TIFIA credit assistance is limited to a maximum of 33% of the total eligible project costs. The project also must be supported in whole or in part from user charges or other non-Federal dedicated funding sources and be included in the state's transportation plan. Ongoing; multi-step process beginning with the submission of a letter of interest (LOI). The estimated time frame for the initial technical review is approximately 30 days; then a creditworthiness review, which takes about 45 to 90 days after receipt of all requested information. If a project satisfies all of the criteria, the Department will invite the project sponsor to apply for TIFIA credit assistance. Estimated time for approval is no more than 90 days after receipt of the application. (202) 366-2300, BuildAmerica@dot. gov https://www. transportation. gov/buildamerica/ financing/tifia "No maximum listed but limited by total appropriations. 20% non-federal match required. A project must also have an estimated project cost exceeding $500,000." "The TA program dictates that 50% of funds received are to be suballocated based on MPO and COG based on their relative share of the total 2010 Census population. The remaining 50% of the funds are to be available for use in any area of the State, to be administered by the Department, or may be transferred to another category. " Two-step application process with pre-applications typically due in March and final applications due in June. "Phillip Hays, 817- 370-6591 Phillip.Hays@txdot. gov Also should work through NCTCOG." https://www.txdot. gov/inside-txdot/ division/public- transportation/ bicycle-pedestrian. html#:~:text=%20 Transportation%20 Alternatives%20 Set-Aside%20 %28TA%29%20 Program%20 TxDOT%20 Page 1355 Item 18. 164 Town of Prosper Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Transportation - infrastructure and mobility (pedestrian and bicycle) Program Agency Purpose / Goals Eligible Applicants Eligible Use of Funds Urbanized Area Formula Grants - 5307 Federal Highway Administration To enhance mobility in urbanized areas Transit providers serving populations between 50,000 and 200,000 are eligible. McAllen and Arlington, both with populations over 200,000, are included because they are eligible for state funds Capital funds can be spent on buses and bus facilities, fixed guide-way system projects, technology introductions and innovative techniques and methods. Planning funds are available for engineering design, evaluation of public transportation projects and other technical studies. Allowable operating expenses are limited to direct labor, materials and overhead expenses incurred by the transit operator. Program funds may be used for capital, planning, operating and administrative costs Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) Federal Highway Administration Support economic vitality at the national and regional level; leverage Federal funding to attract other, non-Federal sources of infrastructure investment; use innovative approaches to improve safety and expedite project delivery A State or group of States; metropolitan planning organization; unit of local government/group of local governments; a political subdivision of a State or local government; special purpose district or public authority with a transportation function; Federal land management agency that applies jointly with a State or group of States; tribal government, single or group Must be listed on the NHS; projects that address congestion in major urban areas, specifically through congestion pricing or deployment of advanced tech.; projects that: bridge gaps in service in rural areas; attract private economic development; maximize state, local, and private sector funding; raise revenue directly; projects that pair INFRA with broader-scale innovative financing (e.g. TIFIA, RRIF) Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) US Department of Transportation To upgrade infrastructure across America, making our transportation systems safer and more efficient. "State, local and tribal governments, including U.S. territories, transit agencies, port authorities, metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), and other political subdivisions of State or local governments. " "Surface transportation projects. A. Capital projects that include, but are not limited to: (1) Highway, bridge, or other road projects eligible under title 23, United States Code; (2) public transportation projects eligible under chapter 53 of title 49, (3) passenger and freight rail transportation projects; (4) port infrastructure investments (including inland port infrastructure and land ports of entry); (5) intermodal projects; and (6) projects investing in surface transportation facilities that are located on tribal land and for which title or maintenance responsibility is vested in the Federal Government. B. Planning projects: related to the planning, preparation, or design—including environmental analysis, feasibility studies, and other pre-construction activities—of eligible surface transportation capital projects. In addition, eligible activities related to multidisciplinary projects or regionalplanning may include: (1) Development of master plans, comprehensive plans, or corridor plans; (2) Planning activities related to the development of a multimodal freight corridor, including those that seek to reduce conflicts with residential areas and with passenger and non-motorized traffic; (3) Development of port and regional port planning grants, including State-wide; (4) Risk assessments and planning to identify vulnerabilities and address the transportation system’s ability to withstand probable disaster."Page 1356 Item 18. 165 Downtown Master Plan Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Transportation - infrastructure and mobility (pedestrian and bicycle) - Cont’d Loan or Grant Maximum Terms/Requirements/ Notes Funding Cycle Contact Website "Maximum federal funding ratio for capital, planning and administrative costs of 80% and a maximum state/local match of 20% on most projects. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and Clean Air projects may receive up to 90% federal funding. The funding ratio for net operating costs is 50% federal match and 50% state/local match" Funds are distributed by the FTA using a formula based on population and population density. In areas with populations over 200,000, grants are awarded directly to the local recipient. Grants for urban areas with populations under 200,000 may be made to the governor or to local recipients designated by the governor. Currently, cities apply directly to FTA. No cycle per se; allocations are determined by formula and then distributed annually. "Office of Program Management Federal Transit Administration, 202- 366-2053" https://www.transit. dot.gov/funding/ grants/urbanized- area-formula- grants-5307 Grant for up to 60% of total project costs; 90% of funding for large projects; 10% for small projects and > 25% of funds are designated for rural areas; Large projects > $100 M & min $25 M grant; Small projects < $100 M & min $5 M grant; Rural areas = non metropolitan statistical areas; Up to $200 M available for freight rail, water, ports, and intermodal freight projects on the National Highway Freight Network Annual program, dependent on funding; typically in February or March. "Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy, 202-366-4544, INFRAgrants@dot. gov" https://www. transportation. gov/buildamerica/ financing/infra-grants/ infrastructure- rebuilding-america "No maximum listed but limited by total appropriations. 20% non-federal match required. A project must also have an estimated project cost exceeding $500,000." "The TA program dictates that 50% of funds received are to be suballocated based on MPO and COG based on their relative share of the total 2010 Census population. The remaining 50% of the funds are to be available for use in any area of the State, to be administered by the Department, or may be transferred to another category. " Two-step application process with pre-applications typically due in March and final applications due in June. "Phillip Hays, 817- 370-6591 Phillip.Hays@txdot. gov Also should work through NCTCOG." https://www.txdot. gov/inside-txdot/ division/public- transportation/ bicycle-pedestrian. html#:~:text=%20 Transportation%20 Alternatives%20 Set-Aside%20 %28TA%29%20 Program%20 TxDOT%20 Page 1357 Item 18. 166 Town of Prosper Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Transportation - infrastructure and mobility (pedestrian and bicycle) Program Agency Purpose / Goals Eligible Applicants Eligible Use of Funds Governor's Community Achievement Awards Keep Texas Beautiful in partnership with Texas Department of Transportation To award Texas communities for their outstanding overall efforts to keep their communities beautiful. Texas communities The funds are to be used for landscaping projects along local rights-of-way. A community's environmental program is judged on achievements in seven areas: community leadership and coordination, public awareness, education, beautification and community improvement, litter prevention and cleanup, solid waste management, litter law and illegal dumping enforcement. AARP Foundation Grants AARP To improve housing, transportation, public space, technology ("smart cities"), civic engagement and more. 501(C)(3), 501(C)(4) and 501(c)(6) nonprofits, government entities, other types of organizations will be considered on a case-by-case basis. "Prioritize projects that aim to achieve the following outcomes: * Increasing civic engagement with innovative and tangible projects that bring residents and local leaders together to address challenges and facilitate a greater sense of community inclusion and diversity. * Create vibrant public places that improve open spaces, parks and access to other amenities. * Deliver a range of transportation and mobility options that increase connectivity, walkability, bikeability, wayfinding, access to transportation options and roadway improvements. * Support the availability of a range of housing that increases accessible and affordable housing options. * Demonstrate the tangible value of “Smart Cities” with programs that engage residents in accessing, understanding and using data, and participating in decision-making to increase the quality of life for all. * Other community improvements: In addition to the five areas of focus, AARP wants to hear about local needs and new, innovative ideas for addressing them. " "Asphalt Art Initiative" Bloomberg Philanthropies Using art to reimagine roadways and vertical infrastructure, improving street safety, revitalizing public spaces, and bringing communities together. U.S. cities with populations of 30,000- 500,000 "Three categories: 1. ART ON THE ROADWAY - mural projects on paved areas that are accessible to motor vehicles, such as intersections, crosswalks, and other surfaces within the active roadway. 2. ART IN PEDESTRIAN SPACE - art projects on paved areas that are inaccessible to motor vehicles while the artwork is in place, such as curb and sidewalk extensions as well as any surface that has been temporarily or permanently converted into a public space or plaza. 3. ART ON VERTICAL INFRASTRUCTURE - art projects installed on vertical infrastructure, including utility boxes, traffic barriers, and highway underpasses. " Page 1358 Item 18. 167 Downtown Master Plan Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Transportation - infrastructure and mobility (pedestrian and bicycle) - Cont’d Loan or Grant Maximum Terms/Requirements/ Notes Funding Cycle Contact Website "Maximum federal funding ratio for capital, "Maximum federal funding ratio for capital, planning and administrative costs of 80% and planning and administrative costs of 80% and a maximum state/local match of 20% on most a maximum state/local match of 20% on most projects. projects. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and Clean Air projects may receive up to 90% and Clean Air projects may receive up to 90% federal funding. federal funding. The funding ratio for net operating costs is The funding ratio for net operating costs is 50% federal match and 50% state/local match"50% federal match and 50% state/local match" Funds are distributed by the FTA using a formula based on population and population density. In areas with populations over 200,000, grants are awarded directly to the local recipient. Grants for urban areas with populations under 200,000 may be made to the governor or to local recipients designated by the governor. Currently, cities apply directly to FTA. No cycle per se; allocations are determined by formula and then distributed annually. "Office of Program Management Federal Transit Administration, 202-366-2053" https://www.transit. dot.gov/funding/ grants/urbanized-area- formula-grants-5307 Grant for up to 60% of total project costs; 90% of funding for large projects; 10% for small projects and > 25% of funds are designated for rural areas; Large projects > $100 M & min $25 M grant; Small projects < $100 M & min $5 M grant; Rural areas = non metropolitan statistical areas; Up to $200 M available for freight rail, water, ports, and intermodal freight projects on the National Highway Freight Network Annual program, dependent on funding; typically in February or March. "Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy, 202-366-4544, INFRAgrants@dot. gov" https://www. transportation. gov/buildamerica/ financing/infra-grants/ infrastructure- rebuilding-america Maximum grant award is $25,000; no match Maximum grant award is $25,000; no match required; however, competitive proposals will required; however, competitive proposals will include in-kind support from the municipality include in-kind support from the municipality and/or funding from other sources.and/or funding from other sources. Eligible sites can include portions of active roadways, sidewalks, pedestrian plazas, or transportation infrastructure such as traffic barriers, highway underpasses, or utility boxes. Sites may be located in and managed by one or multiple jurisdictions (city, state or county, public utility, regional transit authority, etc.) but must be largely or completely on public property and be fully open to the public. Rolling application period; no deadline for submittal. - "https://asphaltart. bloomberg.org/ grants/" Page 1359 Item 18. 168 Town of Prosper Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Transportation - infrastructure and mobility (pedestrian and bicycle) Program Agency Purpose / Goals Eligible Applicants Eligible Use of Funds People for Bikes People for Bikes To build momentum for bicycling in communities across the U.S. Non-profit organizations, city or county agencies or departments, and state or federal agencies working locally Bicycle infrastructure projects such as: Bike paths, lanes, trails, and bridges; Mountain bike facilities; Bike parks and pump tracks; BMX facilities; End-of-trip facilities such as bike racks, bike parking, bike repair stations and bike storage. Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Small and Local Business Development Program Agency Purpose / Goals Eligible Applicants Eligible Use of Funds Rural Business Development Grant US Department of Agriculture Provide technical assistance and training for small rural businesses. Small means that the business has fewer than 50 new workers and less than $1 million in gross revenue. Towns, nonprofit corporations, colleges/universities, rural cooperatives "Grants must be used on projects to benefit small and emerging businesses in rural areas as specified in the grant application. Uses may include: Training and technical assistance, such as project planning, business counseling and training, market research, feasibility studies, professional or/technical reports or producer service improvements. Acquisition or development of land, easements, or rights of way; construction, conversion, renovation of buildings; plants, machinery, equipment, access for streets and roads; parking areas and utilities; pollution control and abatement; the capitalization of revolving loan funds, including funds that will make loans for start-ups and working capital; distance adult learning for job training and advancement; rural transportation improvement; community economic development; Technology-based economic development; feasibility studies and business plans; leadership and entrepreneur training; rural business incubators; long-term business strategic planning." Product Development and Small Business Incubator Fund (PDSBI) Texas Economic Development Long-term, asset-backed loans to product development companies and small business incubators/accelerators located in Texas. The loans finance the development and production of new or improved products or the stimulations of new or existing small businesses in Texas. The program targets those businesses which may be unable to obtain full financing or financing on workable terms in traditional capital markets. A small business, defined as a legal entity which is domiciled in the State of Texas or has at least 51% of its employees located in the state, employs fewer than 100 full-time employees, and is independently owned and operated. A new or improved product being developed, produced, and/ or commercialized in the State of Texas, to include an invention, device, technique, or process, without regard to whether a patent has been or could be granted, that has advanced beyond the theoretical stage and has or is readily capable of having a commercial application. Page 1360 Item 18. 169 Downtown Master Plan Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Transportation - infrastructure and mobility (pedestrian and bicycle) - Cont’d Loan or Grant Maximum Terms/Requirements/ Notes Funding Cycle Contact Website Grant, 50% up to $10,000 "Two-step application process: 1. Letter of Interest 2. Full Application: PFB will request a full project application from a short list of qualified applicants." Currently no open grant cycle but they typically have two grant rounds in the spring and fall. "Zoe Kircos, (720) 726-3335 zoe@ peopleforbikes.org" https://peopleforbikes. org/our-work/ community-grants/ Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Small and Local Business Development - Cont’d Loan or Grant Maximum Terms/Requirements/ Notes Funding Cycle Contact Website There is no maximum grant amount; however, smaller requests are given higher priority. There is no cost sharing requirement. Opportunity grants are limited to up to 10 percent of the total Rural Business Development Grant annual funding. Rural Business Development Grant money must be used for projects that benefit rural areas or Towns outside the urbanized periphery of any city with a population of 50,000 or more. Applications due March 31, 2021. "Daniel Torres 254-742-9700" https://www.txdot. gov/inside-txdot/ forms-publications/ publications/ highway-safety.html Generally range from $1 million - $5 million; low variable IR; 15 years if financing personal property or working capital; 20 years for real property All applicants must have 3 years of operating history to be eligible for a loan. Rolling application period; no deadline for submittal. 512-936-0100 https://gov.texas. gov/business/ page/product- development-and- small-business- incubator-fund Page 1361 Item 18. 170 Town of Prosper Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Small and Local Business Development Program Agency Purpose / Goals Eligible Applicants Eligible Use of Funds Texas Rural Business Fund (TxRBF) Texas Department of Agriculture A pilot program that provides funding to rural communities and counties to incentivize job creation and industry development in rural Texas. Applicants must demonstrate how the business recruitment or expansion significantly impacts the community and region. " Eligible applicants are rural cities located in counties with less than 200,000 population." Projects must support an established business in the agricultural & food manufacturing business, bio-technology & life sciences, energy, information technology, manufacturing, supply chain and logistics industries that will create skilled jobs and have the potential to spur further economic development. TxRBF funds must be used for public infrastructure improvements. Infrastructure includes road, rail, water, sewer, electric, and telecommunications. TxRBF funds may also be used for engineering costs related to the public infrastructure improvements. Skills for Small Business Program Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) Small businesses can apply to TWC for training offered by their local community or technical college, or the Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service (TEEX) Supports businesses with fewer than 100 employees and emphasizes training for new workers though it also may help upgrade the skills of incumbent workers. Skills for Small Business emphasizes training newly hired employees, those who have been hired by the business up to twelve months prior to the date that TWC receives an application. Impact Grants First National Bank of Omaha We help strengthen local economies through small business and entrepreneurial development and job creation by supporting training, technical assistance, education and microfinance. "Organizations that have not received a grant from FNBO in the past must email the Impact by FNBO Team to receive a link to the application. This step can be completed at any time and you do not need to wait until the grant cycle opens to request a link. " Organizations that have not received a grant from FNBO in the past must email the Impact by FNBO Team to receive a link to the application. This step can be completed at any time and you do not need to wait until the grant cycle opens to request a link. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - Enrepreneurship Grants Ewing Marion Kauffman Foun- dation The Kauffman Foundation works in part- nership with organizations that share our vision and passion for education and entrepreneurship. "The majority of our grants are proactive and made to tax-ex- empt organizations " Various funding opportunities - see webiste link. Page 1362 Item 18. 171 Downtown Master Plan Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Small and Local Business Development - Cont’d Loan or Grant Maximum Terms/Requirements/ Notes Funding Cycle Contact Website No maximum grant amount listed reach out via email for more details.TxRBF funds may not be used for administrative costs. No funding cycle listed reach out via email for more details. Economic Develop- ment@TexasAgricul- ture.Gov https://www. texasagriculture. gov/GrantsServices/ GrantsandServices/ TexasRuralBusiness- Fund.aspx The program pays up to $1,800 for each new employee being trained and $900 for existing employees per 12-month period. "All training must be provided by a public community or technical college, or the Texas A&M Engineering Ex- tension Service (TEEX). No third-party vendor training is allowed. Training must be selected from active course catalogs/ schedules— credit, continuing education, online or other available unpublished courses. Employers must pay the prevailing wages in the local labor market for the trainees funded under the grant." No funding cycle listed 877-463-1777 or SkillsforSmallBusi- ness@twc.texas.gov https://www.twc. texas.gov/business- es/skills-small-busi- ness-employ- ers#overview Organizations that have not received a grant from FNBO in the past must email the Impact by FNBO Team to receive a link to the applica- tion. This step can be completed at any time and you do not need to wait until the grant cycle opens to request a link. Organizations that have not received a grant from FNBO in the past must email the Impact by FNBO Team to receive a link to the application. This step can be completed at any time and you do not need to wait until the grant cycle opens to request a link. Grant applications are anticipated in January 2023 with grant award notifications will be sent in March/ April 2023. impactbyfnbo@fnni. com https://www.fnbo. com/community/ request-support/ Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation - Enrepreneurship Grants Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation The Kauffman Foundation works in partnership with organizations that share our vision and passion for education and entrepreneurship. "The majority of our grants are proactive and made to tax- exempt organizations " Various funding opportunities - see webiste link. Page 1363 Item 18. 172 Town of Prosper Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Event and Programing Program Agency Purpose / Goals Eligible Applicants Eligible Use of Funds ARTPLACE America Collaboration among a number of foundations, federal agencies, and financial institutions A future of equitable, healthy, and sustainable communities in which everyone has a voice and agency in creating contextual, adaptive, and responsive solutions. Five groups: civic, social and faith, commercial, government, nonprofit, and philanthropy Broad definition of art: craft and culinary arts, dance, design and architecture, film and media, folk and traditional, literature, musicl, visual arts, theater and performance, and other formal and informal creative practices. Community Sponsorships First National Bank of Omaha FNBO is proud to support nonprofit organizations and community events that are important to our communities. nonprofit organizations and community events A community sponsorship is defined as unrestricted financial support to a nonprofit organization in association with a community event or other general fund raising effort for the primary purpose of providing support to the organization. This can include but is not limited to:Fundraisers or other events (i.e. galas, festivals, luncheons, parades) General activities/operations of an organization Season “sponsorships” for organizations dedicated to enhancing arts and culture Blue Bear Event Sponsorship Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas For more than 90 years, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas (BCBSTX) has forged alliances with private and public organizations to honor our commitment to improve the health of all Texans. Our charitable contributions allow us to connect with not just our customers, but also community partners, local leaders and policymakers inter- ested in making Texas a healthier state. Through these partner- ships, BCBSTX seeks to support sustainable, measurable programs and impactful organizations that strengthen and enrich Texas communities. We accept requests for sponsor- ships and grants from organi- zations that are located within Texas and have at least one of the following designations: Defined as a non-profit under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service Code Government, civic and cultural organizations In Texas, sponsorship dollars are prioritized to organizations that support the following areas: Access to Care: Projects that increase awareness and understand- ing of access to preventive and health care services for underin- sured, uninsured, minority and low-income households. Prevention and Risk Reduction: Projects that increase awareness and understanding of healthy choices in everyday living and promote a healthy lifestyle. Examples of project areas include: nutrition, physical activity, weight management and tobacco cessation. Chronic Disease Management: Projects that increase awareness and understanding of living with and managing chronic condi- tions. Examples of project areas include: diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and mental illnesses such as Alzheimer’s. Community Involvement: As a corporate entity, brand visibility and community involvement are important to business growth. Through these sponsorships we seek opportunities that allow BCBSTX to grow its presence in communities. Page 1364 Item 18. 173 Downtown Master Plan Potential Funding Sources for Prosper, TX Event and Programing - Cont’d Loan or Grant Maximum Terms/Requirements/ Notes Funding Cycle Contact Website Dependent on foundation Dependent on foundation Dependent on foundation sarah.westlake@ artplaceamerica.org http://www. artplaceamerica. org/ about/introduction Request desired amount.Request desired amount.None listed. BCBSTX is unable to fund: Organizations or projects with written policies that discriminate against individuals based on race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, religious creed, national origin, physical or mental disability, or protected veteran status or any other characteristic protected by law. School athletic programs Applications from individuals Applications that do not align with our funding priorities https://www.fnbo. com/community/ request-support/ None listed. BCBSTX is unable to fund: Organizations or projects with written policies that discriminate against individuals based on race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, religious creed, national origin, physical or mental disability, or protect- ed veteran status or any other characteristic protected by law. School athletic programs Applications from individuals Applications that do not align with our funding priori- ties Letter of Intent: February; Applica- tion Process: March Helen Dorsey 972-766-1736 helen_m_dorsey@ bcbstx.com bcbstx.com/com- pany-info/commu- nity-involvement/ apply-for-funding Page 1365 Item 18. 174 Town of Prosper Branding and Tourism Program Agency Purpose / Goals Eligible Applicants Eligible Use of Funds Rural Business Development Grant US Department of Agriculture Provide technical assistance and training for small rural busi- nesses. Small means that the business has fewer than 50 new workers and less than $1 million in gross revenue. Towns, nonprofit corporations, colleges/universitues, rural cooperatives Grants must be used on projects to benefit small and emerging businesses in rural areas as specified in the grant application. Uses may include: Training and technical assistance, such as project planning, business counseling and training, market research, feasibility studies, professional or/technical reports or producer service improvements. Acquisition or development of land, easements, or rights of way; construction, conversion, renovation of buildings; plants, machinery, equipment, access for streets and roads; parking areas and utilities; pollution control and abatement; the capitalization of revolving loan funds, including funds that will make loans for start-ups and working capital; distance adult learning for job training and advancement; rural transportation improvement; community economic development; Technology-based economic development; feasibility studies and business plans; leadership and entrepreneur training; rural business incubators; long-term business strategic planning. Page 1366 Item 18. 175 Downtown Master Plan Branding and Tourism - Cont’d Loan or Grant Maximum Terms/Requirements/ Notes Funding Cycle Contact Website 8There is no maximum grant amount; however, smaller requests are given higher priority. There is no cost sharing requirement. Opportunity grants are limited to up to 10 percent of the total Rural Business Develop- ment Grant annual funding. Rural Business Development Grant money must be used for projects that benefit rural areas or Towns outside the urbanized periphery of any city with a population of 50,000 or more. Applications due March 31.Daniel Torres 254-742-9700 https://www.txdot. gov/inside-txdot/ forms-publications/ publications/high- way-safety.html Page 1367 Item 18. 176 Town of Prosper Alternate Street Cross -Sections The Town has formally adopted the Old Town Transportation Plan to guide future roadway replacement projects. Since the Master Plan process began multiple projects within the overall downtown area have progressed in the plan development process. These projects, along with the catalyst sites as developed may alter development patterns slightly from what was anticipated when the Old Town Transportation Plan was prepared. As the Town prepares for future roadway improvement projects, they should be evaluated in context with the Master Plan and any new or proposed development within the impacted area. The following street cross-sections may be considered as alternates for various segments and would be compatible with the Master Plan. These cross sections do not supersede the formally adopted Old Town Transportation Plan, including after adoption of this Master Plan. First Street: McKinley to Coleman First Street: Coleman to Craig DRIVE LANE DRIVE LANE BIKE LANESIDEWALK Public Right of Way CURB &GUTTERCURB &GUTTER SETBACKSETBACK SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0” 2’1’2’2’6’-8’2’10’12’12’End of Right of WayEnd of Right of WaySHARED LANE SETBACKSETBACKSHARED LANESIDEWALK SIDEWALK Public Right of Way CURB &GUTTER CURB &GUTTER SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0” 2’1’2’2’4’-5’4’-5’2’12’12’End of Right of WayEnd of Right of WayAPPENDIX E Page 1368 Item 18. 177 Downtown Master Plan First Street: Craig to Preston Broadway Street: McKinley to Coleman Broadway Street: Coleman to Preston DRIVE LANESETBACK SETBACKDRIVE LANE TURN LANE SIDEWALKSIDEWALKDRIVE LANE DRIVE LANE Public Right of Way CURB &GUTTERCURB &GUTTER SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0” 2’1’2’2’2’6’-8’6’-8’11’11’11’11’11’End of Right of WayEnd of Right of WayANGLED PARKING SHARED LANESIDEWALK SIDEWALKANGLED PARKINGSHARED LANE Public Right of Way CURBCURBBUFFER BUFFER P P 2’4’10’10’16.5’16.5’12’12’2’4’ SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”End of Right of WayEnd of Right of WayPARKING PARKINGSIDEWALKBIKE LANE BIKE LANEDRIVE LANE DRIVE LANE Public Right of WayCURB CURBBUFFER SIDEWALKBUFFER P P SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0” 2’7’7’6’-8’8’8’11’11’End of Right of WayEnd of Right of Way2’5’5’6’-8’5’5’ Page 1369 Item 18. 178 Town of Prosper Main Street SHARED LANESIDEWALK SIDEWALKANGLED PARKINGSHARED LANE Public Right of Way CURBCURBBUFFER BUFFERPARKING P 2’4’10’10’16.5’12’12’2’4’ SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”End of Right of WayEnd of Right of WayP 7’ PARKING PARKINGSIDEWALKDRIVE LANE DRIVE LANE Public Right of WayCURB CURBBUFFER BUFFER SIDEWALK P P SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0” 2’7’7’6’-8’11’11’End of Right of WayEnd of Right of Way2’3’+3’+6’-8’ McKinley Street Alternate Street Cross -Sections Page 1370 Item 18. 179 Downtown Master Plan Coleman Street: First to Broadway SIDEWALK Public Right of WayCURBCURBBUFFER SETBACKSETBACKSIDEWALKBUFFERDRIVE LANE CURBCURBDRIVE LANEMEDIANBIKE LANE BIKE LANEEnd of Right of WayEnd of Right of WaySCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0” 4’-5’2’2’4’4’-5’4’11’2’2’11’12’10’10’ Coleman Street: North of Fifth Public Right of Way SETBACK SETBACKBIKE LANE SIDEWALKDRIVE LANE DRIVE LANECURB &GUTTER CURB &GUTTEREnd of Right of WayEnd of Right of Way2’2’2’2’1’12’12’6’-8’6’-8’ SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0” Coleman Street: Coleman South of First SIDEWALK Public Right of WayCURBCURBBUFFER SETBACKSIDEWALKBUFFERDRIVE LANE CURBCURBDRIVE LANEMEDIANBIKE LANE BIKE LANEEnd of Right of WayEnd of Right of WaySCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0” 4’-5’2’2’4’4’-5’4’11’2’2’11’12’10’10’ Page 1371 Item 18. 180 Town of Prosper Page 1372 Item 18. 181 Downtown Master Plan Page 1373 Item 18. 182 Town of Prosper DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN Page 1374 Item 18. Page 1 of 2 To: Mayor and Town Council From: Hulon T. Webb, Jr., Interim Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure Services Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon approving a resolution supporting the proposed revised alignment of FM 1461 from SH 289 (Preston Road) to FM 2478 (Custer Road). Description of Agenda Item: Since 2017, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) has been designing the expansion of FM 1461 (Frontier Parkway) from SH 289 (Preston Road) to County Road 165 in McKinney from a two-lane asphalt rural road to a four-lane urban road expandable to an ultimate six-lane configuration. The Town of Prosper’s initial involvement in the project began in December 2017, during review of the draft schematic design. During multiple reviews and meetings with TxDOT, the Town of Prosper requested alternative design considerations to address the impacts to the south of the roadway caused by the alignment of the roadway. The proposed alignment affects the existing trees and landscape berms along the corridor. In addition, TxDOT’s decision to construct a new bridge south of the existing bridge, instead of widening both sides of t he existing bridge, further compound the inequity of additional right-of-way required on the south side of the roadway. At the April 27, 2021, Town Council meeting, the Town Council approved a resolution strongly opposing the proposed alignment of FM 1461 from SH 289 (Preston Road) to FM 2478 (Custer Road) since TxDOT had commenced with completing the design of the project without addressing the Town’s comments, and was engaged in the right-of-way acquisition phase of the project. Since that time the Town of Prosper, City of Celina, and TxDOT have met several times to resolve the Town’s concerns. Adjacent to the Gentle Creek subdivision, the City of Celina and Town of Prosper agreed to a reduction in the sidewalk width from ten feet (10’) to six feet (6’) and reducing the lane widths from twelve feet (12’) to eleven feet (11’) to accommodate the proposed revised alignment to shift the centerline of FM 1461 to the north approximately fifteen feet (15’) to nearly match the existing centerline of the current roadway except as the road transitions on the eastern edge towards the existing bridge. Since the proposed centerline of FM 1461 adjacent to the Highland Meadows and Amberwood Farms subdivisions is similar to the existing centerline, no changes were made. However, the Town is requesting that TxDOT reduce the sidewalk width from ten feet (10’) to six feet (6’) adjacent to these subdivisions to allow additional green space. Prosper is a place where everyone matters. ENGINEERING SERVICES Page 1375 Item 19. Page 2 of 2 Legal Obligations and Review: Terrence Welch of Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P., has reviewed the resolution as to form and legality. Attached Documents: 1. Resolution 2. Proposed Revised Alignment Centerline Exhibits Town Staff Recommendation: Town staff recommends that the Town Council approve a resolution supporting the proposed revised alignment of FM 1461 from SH 289 (Preston Road) to FM 2478 (Custer Road). Proposed Motion: I move to approve a resolution supporting the proposed revised alignment of FM 1461 from SH 289 (Preston Road) to FM 2478 (Custer Road). Page 1376 Item 19. TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. 2022- __ A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, SUPPORTING THE REVISED ALIGNMENT OF FM 1461 (FRONTIER PARKWAY FROM PRESTON ROAD TO CUSTER ROAD IN THE TOWN) FROM STA 177+00 TO STA 203+00; MAKING FINDINGS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) has completed the design of the alignment of FM 1461 (Frontier Parkway) which roadway alignment in the Town is from Preston Road to Custer Road; and WHEREAS, the December 2017 TxDOT Draft Schematic for such alignment included a right turn lane at Winding Creek Road; and WHEREAS, at a meeting on February 12, 2018, Town Staff requested alternative sections to narrow medians, and retaining walls to minimize impact on existing trees, landscape berms, and underground water line adjacent to Gentle Creek subdivision; and WHEREAS, on May 31, 2018, Town Staff commented again about looking at alternative sections to mitigate the right-of-way on the south side of the roadway; and WHEREAS, the June 2018 Schematic was approved with the removal of the right turn lane into Gentle Creek subdivision and a significant shift of main lanes to the south; and WHEREAS, after multiple meetings with TxDOT, it appeared that the Town’s comments and concerns apparently were not addressed by TxDOT and design plans reflected an approximate shift of fifteen feet (15’) in right-of-way from the current centerline of FM 1461 which disproportionally impacted the Gentle Creek subdivision on the south side of FM 1461; and WHEREAS, the Town Council approved a resolution on April 27, 2021, strongly opposing the proposed alignment of FM 1461 from SH 289 (Preston Road) to FM 2478 (Custer Road); and WHEREAS, thereafter representatives from TxDOT, the City of Celina and the Town met in an effort to resolve outstanding concerns, and TxDOT has agreed to modify the proposed revised alignment to shift the centerline of the proposed roadway to the north adjacent to the Gentle Creek subdivision, thereby matching the centerline of the current roadway; and WHEREAS, the sidewalk adjacent to the Gentle Creek subdivision was reduced from ten feet (10’) to six feet (6’) and the lane widths reduced from twelve feet (12’) to eleven feet (11’) to accommodate the revised alignment; and WHEREAS, the Town is requesting that TxDOT reduce the sidewalk adjacent to the Highland Meadows and Amberwood Farms subdivisions from ten feet (10’) to six feet (6’) to provide additional green space; and WHEREAS, the Town Council is supportive of the revised alignment and is appreciative of the cooperation of the City of Celina and TxDOT in their efforts to address the concerns of the Town. Page 1377 Item 19. Resolution No. 2022-__, Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1 The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Resolution as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2 The Town Council of the Town of Prosper, Texas, hereby expresses its support of the proposed revised alignment of FM 1461 from SH 289 (Preston Road) to FM 2478 (Custer Road). SECTION 3 The Town Council hereby requests that TxDOT reduce the sidewalk adjacent to the Highland Meadows and Amberwood Farms subdivisions from ten feet (10’) to six feet (6’), similar to the Gentle Creek subdivision, to provide additional green space. SECTION 4 The Town Council hereby repeals Resolution No. 2021-23 in its entirety, said Resolution having been adopted on or about April 27, 2021. SECTION 5 Any and all resolutions, rules, regulations, policies, or provisions in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed and rescinded to the extent of any conflict herewith. SECTION 6 This Resolution shall be effective from and after its passage by the Town Council. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, ON THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022. ___________________________________ David F. Bristol, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Michelle Lewis Sirianni, Town Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _________________________________ Terrence S. Welch, Town Attorney Page 1378 Item 19. DENSETREES V V DENSETREES V CONCRETE DENSETREES ONLYONLYONLYONLYPBX ONLYONLY ONLY ONLYONLY ONLY CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES PT 105+12.16 PC 104+55.24PT 102+93.44 PC 108+83.49 105+00PC 101+29.71PT 109+50.31 TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY CALLED 124.655 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. 20130726001053280 DOCUMENT NO. MERITAGE HOMES OF TEXAS, LLC OWNER: REMAINDER OF 134.88 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4957, PAGE 2455 KEERAN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LTD. OWNER: REMAINDER TRACT O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20170711000905730 BLUE STAR LAND, L.P. OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2013, PAGE 561 FRONTIER ESTATES LOT 1, BLOCK A REMAINDER OF O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2018, PAGE 699 VICTORY AT FRONTIER LOT 2, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET C, PAGE 784 ADDITION PRESTON HILLS LOT 2 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2018, PAGE 699 VICTORY AT FRONTIER LOT 3, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET C, PAGE 784 PRESTON HILLS ADDITION LOT 1 D.R.C.C.T. 20090721000915890 DOCUMENT NO. TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20170215000206880 AND AARON W. JOHNSON JANNA L. JOHNSON OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET C, PAGE 784 PRESTON HILLS ADDITION LOT 3 CALLED 1.920 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 625, PAGE 37 TRACT #2 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 9.710 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 625, PAGE 37 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 2.167 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 625, PAGE 37 TRACT #1 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 0.0316 ACRES DOCUMENT NO. 20110810000839420 PARCEL 1 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 1.203 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 281 STATE OF TEXAS O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 3178 VOLUME 4791 EASEMENT TELEPHONE COMPANY SOUTHWESTERN BELL O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 94-0086227 TELEPHONE COMPANY EASEMENT SOUTHWESTERN BELL O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2018, PAGE 699 TOWN OF PROSPER 30' ROW DEDICATION O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20080623000754670 TOWN OF PROSPER 10' WATER EASEMENT ABSTRACT NO. 167 SCHOOL LAND SURVEY COLLIN COUNTY (NO DEED OF RECORD FOUND) STATE OF TEXAS ABSTRACT NO. 172 SCHOOL LAND SURVEY COLLIN COUNTY CALLED 0.3904 ACRES DOCUMENT NO. 20110718000741730 PARCEL 4 STATE OF TEXAS ABSTRACT NO. 788 SPENCER RICE SURVEY SH 289 (PRESTON ROADSH 289 (PRESTON ROADO.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4029, PAGE 1820 CITY OF PROSPER WATERLINE EASEMENT FM 1461 ROW MONUMENT NO. (CM) "TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOUND 3-1/2"ALUMINUM DISK STAMPED "ALLIANCE" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD N 88°32'39" E 351.27' S 82°45 '47" E 207 .32 '340.67' N 89°15'12" E N 88°52'13" E 199.55'N 00°42'05" W 849.69'361.91' N 89°15'12" E 103.55' N 43°13'10" E N 88°52'13" E 304.98'N 01°24'20" EN 88°32'39" E 316.81' N 83°24'27" E 159.42' 296.58'59.15'N 01°24'20" E74.88' N 42°35'47" E N 88°11'33" E 124.16' N 89°18'29" E 3,878.30' MONUMENT BEARS FOUND TXDOT TYPE I MONUMENT (CM) FOUND WOOD TXDOT IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" "KHA" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4029, PAGE 1820 CITY OF PROSPER WATERLINE EASEMENT N 89°28'56" E TRANSPORTATION (CM) DEPARTMENT OF STAMPED "TEXAS FOUND 4"BRASS DISK "WINDROSE" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8"IRON ROD IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" "KHA" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8"IRON ROD "KHA" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8"IRON ROD WOOD MONUMENT (CM) FOUND TXDOT N 88°32'39" E N 88°52'13" E TYPE I MONUMENT (CM) FOUND TXDOT (CM) WOOD MONUMENT FOUND TXDOT TRANSPORTATION (CM) DEPARTMENT OF STAMPED "TEXAS FOUND 4"BRASS DISK "WINDROSE" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8"IRON ROD 8.40' 483.29' N 89°15'12" E CALLED 2.642 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 305 STATE OF TEXAS L1S 89°51'16" E 207.82' 46.02'L2 S 46°40'21" E 536.83'L3S 00°23'03" E 175.15'294.65' 416.91' N 00°42'05" W 0.34'BEARS FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD N 89°18'29" E 3,878.69' NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE ABSTRACT NO. 1030 JONATHAN WESTOVER SURVEY 1 2 & PARCEL 4 PARCEL 2 P.O.B. 80.00' LT STATION 109+62.65 E=2,494,241.57 N=7,147,749.00 80.00' RT STA 106+11.66 95.00' RT STA 104+52.42 96.23' RT STA 101+37.11 171.05' RT STA 100+65.59 79.94' RT STA 109+16.90 109.12' LT STA 101+60.40 110.17' LT STA 105+12.51 80.00' LT STA 107+17.62 80.06' LT STA 109+16.90 ** ** ** ** ** ** 4 CALLED 0.924 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 287 STATE OF TEXAS & PARCEL 4 PARCEL 2 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2014, PAGE 697 FRONTIER ESTATES PHASE 1 LOT 19, BLOCK Q O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2014, PAGE 697 FRONTIER ESTATES PHASE 1 LOT 18, BLOCK Q & PARCEL 3 PARCEL 1 P.O.C. "SPIARS ENG" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD 3 11"x17" SCALE: 1" = 100' 22"x34" SCALE: 1" = 50' N 0'25'50'100' GRAPHIC SCALE 50' 1 PLPL PL PL2 PL PL PLPLPARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE)EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W. LINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.C. P.O.B. PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) LINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.B. P.O.C. LS LSLS LSPLPL PLPL PLPLPLPL PL EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. STATE FED. RD. DIV. NO. DISTRICT NO. HIGHWAY NO. SHEET NO. STATE FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. CONTROL NO. SECTION NO. JOB NO. 6 TEXAS COUNTY 03COLLIN FM 1461 1973 01 018 N/A 18 PLPL LINE TABLE L1 S 00°42'05" E 34.02' L2 S 46°40'21" E 79.72' L3 S 00°23'03" E 36.09' PL PLPL PL PLPL PLPL PL PLP.O.C. 4 EXISTING R.O.W.PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. LINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.B. R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.C. PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) 3 EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. = 163.73'CHORD DISTANCE = N 89°00'48" ECHORD BEARING = 10,000.00'RADIUS = 163.73'LENGTH = 81.87'TANGENT = 00°34'23"DEGREE OF CURVE = 00°56'17"DELTA = 2,493,491.71PI EASTING = 7,147,652.95PI NORTHING = 102+11.58PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 56.92'CHORD DISTANCE = N 88°42'26" ECHORD BEARING = 10,000.00'RADIUS = 56.92'LENGTH = 28.46'TANGENT = 00°34'23"DEGREE OF CURVE = 00°19'34"DELTA = 2,493,763.75PI EASTING = 7,147,659.87PI NORTHING = 104+83.70PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 66.82'CHORD DISTANCE = N 89°03'42" ECHORD BEARING = 10,000.00'RADIUS = 66.82'LENGTH = 33.41'TANGENT = 00°34'23"DEGREE OF CURVE = 00°22'58"DELTA = 2,494,196.86PI EASTING = 7,147,668.41PI NORTHING = 109+16.90PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.TRANSPORTATION (CM) DEPARTMENT OF STAMPED "TEXAS FOUND 4"BRASS DISK ** N 84°28'31" E 183.46' THE REMAINDER OF PARCELS 3 & 4 NOTE: SEE SHEET 04 FOR ** ** 1,629.16' CALLED 15.00 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. (AN UNDIVIDED 96.1759% INTEREST) AND VOLUME 5470, PAGE 2182 (AN UNDIVIDED 3.8241% INTEREST) VOLUME 5470, PAGE 2177 BLUE STAR LAND, L.P. OWNER: & PARCEL 3 PARCEL 1 P.O.B. 79.97' RT STATION 109+08.44 E=2,494,189.78 N=7,147,588.25 DISK SE 3-1/4"ALUMINUM HM#E0430166 LONG. = 96°47'03.3781" W LAT. = 33°15'45.2668" N E = 2,493,280.29 N = 7,147,651.04 STA. 100+00.15 RCSJ: 1973-01-018 CCSJ: 1973-01-015 BEGIN PROJECT E=2,493,674.5332 N=7,146,243.1619 GRID COORDINATE E=2,492,701.1330 N=7,146,092.5016 GRID COORDINATE E=2,492,444.2946 N=7,146,882.2486 GRID COORDINATE E=2,493,798.9874 N=7,146,984.5891 GRID COORDINATE (VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)(VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)(VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)Page 1379 Item 19. DENSETREES PBX PBX PBX V DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES PBX DENSETREES DENSETREES V CONCRETE V DENSETREES DENSETREES VV CONCRETE CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES PBX V V V V PT 123+41.05 PC 122+74.43 PT 121+74.43 PC 121+12.66 120+00119+18.38 115+00 PC 108+83.49 PT 109+50.31 112+78.43 TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINEAPPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINEEXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY CALLED 124.655 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20130726001053280 MERITAGE HOMES OF TEXAS, LLC OWNER: REMAINDER TRACT O.P.R.C.C.T. 20170711000905730 DOCUMENT NO. BLUE STAR LAND, L.P. OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2013, PAGE 561 FRONTIER ESTATES LOT 1, BLOCK A REMAINDER OF P.R.C.C.T. CABINET C, PAGE 784 PRESTON HILLS ADDITION LOT 2 P.R.C.C.T. CABINET C, PAGE 784 PRESTON HILLS ADDITION LOT 1 P.R.C.C.T. CABINET C, PAGE 784 PRESTON HILLS ADDITION LOT 35 P.R.C.C.T. CABINET C, PAGE 784 PRESTON HILLS ADDITION LOT 34 O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20100107000018010 JAMES L. HARGIS OWNER:O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20170215000206880 AND AARON W. JOHNSON JANNA L. JOHNSON OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET C, PAGE 784 PRESTON HILLS ADDITION LOT 36 P.R.C.C.T. CABINET C, PAGE 784 PRESTON HILLS ADDITION LOT 3 CALLED 8.87 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 2000-0054434 AND WIFE, MARIA E. MILLEN MICHAEL R. MILLEN OWNER: CALLED 0.924 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 287 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 2.642 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 305 STATE OF TEXAS D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 287 STATE OF TEXAS RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT CALLED 1.203 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 281 STATE OF TEXAS P.R.C.C.T. CABINET C, PAGE 784 30' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET C, PAGE 784 DRAINAGE EASEMENT ABSTRACT NO. 172 SCHOOL LAND SURVEY COLLIN COUNTY P.R.C.C.T. CABINET C, PAGE 784 BUILDING LINE PRESTON HILLS CIRCLEO.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4029, PAGE 1820 CITY OF PROSPER WATERLINE EASEMENT N 89°15'12" E 340.67'199.55' N 88°52'13" E N 00°42'05" W 849.69'N 89°30'50" E 155.08' N 86°25'08" E 228.63' N 89°15'12" E 361.91' 304.98' N 88°52'13" E 100.00' N 86°38'52" E296.58' N 13°33'32" E 0.46'BEARS FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD N 89°30'50" E N 87°24'16" E N 89°15'12" E 8.40' 483.29' N 89°18'29" E 3,878.30' N 88°52'13" E FM 1461 L146.02' 536.83'L3S 00°23'03" E 175.15'294.65' 416.91' L4L5L6 L7 N 85°25'16" E 229.01' 417.87'62.38' N 89°26'49" E 427.22'N 03°18'42" W 175.53'S 03°18'42" E 206.11' L9 L10 L11L13L14 S 00°42'49" E 206.36'L15 S 01°49'36" E 1.12'BEARS FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD L16205.79' 416.70' N 89°26'49" E 0.78'BEARS FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD 461.77' N 89°30'50" E 480.25'N 89°10'27" E 194.07' N 89°30'50" E 320.20'N 89°10'27" E 194.29' N 00°42'05" W 0.34'BEARS FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD 1,629.16' L8 60.06' 23.22' 197.04' N 89°18'29" E 3,878.69' "CBG SURVEYING" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE ABSTRACT NO. 1030 JONATHAN WESTOVER SURVEY & PARCEL 4 PARCEL 2 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 & PARCEL 4 PARCEL 2 P.O.B. 80.00' LT STATION 109+62.65 E=2,494,241.57 N=7,147,749.00 & PARCEL 3 PARCEL 1 P.O.B. 79.97' RT STATION 109+08.44 E=2,494,189.78 N=7,147,588.25 & PARCEL 7 PARCEL 6 PARCEL 5 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" & PARCEL 6 PARCEL 5 P.O.B. 70.00' LT STATION 114+37.92 E=2,494,717.25 N=7,147,744.47 PARCEL 7 P.O.B. 70.00' LT STATION 118+55.80 E=2,495,135.11 N=7,147,748.01 79.94' RT STA 109+16.90 80.06' LT STA 109+16.90 80.00' LT STA 112+57.31 116.00' LT STA 112+93.04 116.00' LT STA 113+41.04 79.67' LT STA 113+77.37 70.00' LT STA 119+18.17 70.00' LT STA 121+12.66 78.55' LT STA 123+18.76 80.00' LT STA 123+41.05 80.00' RT STA 112+79.45 80.00' RT STA 113+43.45 94.00' RT STA 113+29.4594.00' RT STA 112+93.45 75.00' RT STA 119+18.3875.00' RT STA 115+98.40 75.00' RT STA 121+12.45 69.00' RT STA 123+41.05 80.00' RT STA 114+98.53 ** ** ** **** ** ** ** ** **** **** ****** ** ** ** O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 94-0086227 TELEPHONE COMPANY EASEMENT SOUTHWESTERN BELL CALLED 3.440 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 485, PAGE 147 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 17.99 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20150127000089990 AND WIFE MARIA E. MILLEN MICHAEL R. MILLEN OWNER: N 89°18'47" E O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2014, PAGE 697 FRONTIER ESTATES PHASE 1 LOT 19, BLOCK Q O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2014, PAGE 697 FRONTIER ESTATES PHASE 1 LOT 18, BLOCK Q & PARCEL 3 PARCEL 1 P.O.C. "SPIARS ENG" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD 590.29' 8 LS PARCEL 8 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 05 NOTE: P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR 1 PLPL PL PL2 PL PL PLPLPARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE)EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W. LINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.C. P.O.B. PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) LINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.B. P.O.C. 11"x17" SCALE: 1" = 100' 22"x34" SCALE: 1" = 50'STATE FED. RD. DIV. NO. DISTRICT NO. HIGHWAY NO. SHEET NO. STATE FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. CONTROL NO. SECTION NO. JOB NO. 6 TEXAS COUNTY 04COLLIN FM 1461 1973 01 018 N/A 18 0'25'50'100' GRAPHIC SCALE 50'PL PLPL PL PLPL PLPL R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.C. PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) 3 EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. PLPL PL PLPLPLPL PL PLPLPL LINE R.O.W. NEW PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) LINE R.O.W. NEWP.O.C. 7 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) P.O.C. P.O.B. 8 EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PLPLPLPLPLPLEXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W. LINE TABLE L1 S 00°42'05" E 34.02' L3 S 00°23'03" E 36.09' L4 S 44°30'50" W 51.05' L5 S 89°30'50" W 48.00' L6 N 45°29'10" W 51.38' L7 S 81°24'48" E 61.32' S 45°29'10" E 19.80' L8 N 89°18'47" E 352.86' L9 N 89°30'50" E 36.00'L10 N 44°30'50" E 19.80'L11 N 89°18'47" E 400.80'L12 S 03°18'42" E 35.74'L13 S 03°18'42" E 25.84'L14 S 00°42'49" E 24.32'L15 S 00°42'54" E 38.50'L16 L12 = 66.82'CHORD DISTANCE = N 89°03'42" ECHORD BEARING = 10,000.00'RADIUS = 66.82'LENGTH = 33.41'TANGENT = 00°34'23"DEGREE OF CURVE = 00°22'58"DELTA = 2,494,196.86PI EASTING = 7,147,668.41PI NORTHING = 109+16.90PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 61.77'CHORD DISTANCE = N 88°17'21" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 61.77'LENGTH = 30.89'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 01°46'11"DELTA = 2,495,423.43PI EASTING = 7,147,681.79PI NORTHING = 121+43.55PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 66.62'CHORD DISTANCE = N 88°21'31" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 66.62'LENGTH = 33.31'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 01°54'31"DELTA = 2,495,587.47PI EASTING = 7,147,689.23PI NORTHING = 123+07.75PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA CALLED 15.00 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. (AN UNDIVIDED 96.1759% INTEREST) AND VOLUME 5470, PAGE 2182 (AN UNDIVIDED 3.8241% INTEREST) VOLUME 5470, PAGE 2177 BLUE STAR LAND, L.P. OWNER:PLTHE REMAINDER OF PARCELS 1 & 2 NOTE: SEE SHEET 03 FOR THE REMAINDER OF PARCELS 3 & 8 NOTE: SEE SHEET 05 FOR N N 87°10'27" E O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4791 PAGE 3178 EASEMENT TELEPHONE COMPANY SOUTHWESTERN BELL DISK SE 3-1/4"ALUMINUM HM#E0430176 EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.E=2,495,168.9556 N=7,147,006.9790 GRID COORDINATEE=2,493,758.0167 N=7,147,019.3117 GRID COORDINATE E=2,493,934.1718 N=7,146,263.8491 GRID COORDINATE E=2,495,089.1925 N=7,146,340.3981 GRID COORDINATEP.R.C.C.T.CABINET C, PAGE 784(60' RIGHT-OF-WAY)(VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) Page 1380 Item 19. DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES PBX V V DENSETREES PBX DENSETREES V PBX CONCRETE CONCRETE PBX CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES V V V PBXPBX CONCRETE DENSETREES PBX CONCRETE PBX V DENSETREES V PBX PBX V DENSETREES DENSETREES PBX PBX PBX DENSETREES PBX PBX PBX V V DENSETREES V CONCRETE PBX DENSETREESDENSETREES V PBX PBX V V PBX PBX PBX DENSETREES CONCRETE PBXPBX DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES PBX CONCRETE CONCRETE DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE CONCRETE PBX V DENSETREES V CONCRETE DENSETREES 130+00 125+00 PT 123+41.05 PC 122+74.43 TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTY COLLIN COUNTY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINECITY LIMIT LINEAPPROXIMATEEXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY CALLED 3.308 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 96-0081180 AND WIFE KELLEY J BELVIS DEAN A BELVIS OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 2, BLOCK C P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 PHASE THREE HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 13, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 HIGHLAND MEADOWS PHASE THREE LOT 14, BLOCK A CALLED 124.655 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20130726001053280 MERITAGE HOMES OF TEXAS, LLC OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 3, BLOCK C P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 4, BLOCK C P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 5, BLOCK C P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 2, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 6, BLOCK C P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 7, BLOCK C O.P.R.C.C.T. 20160527000660700 DOCUMENT NO. AND DAVID L FENLEY DONNA FENLEY OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20160126000094550 KEVIN FULTON AND EMILEE FULTON OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20140919001017030 DOCUMENT NO. AND SANDRA K FOLEY JOHN J. FOLEY, III OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 PHASE THREE HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 15, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 PRESTON MEADOW PHASE 2 LOT 26, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20081204001386850 AND WIFE DEBORAH TRZCINSKI MICHAEL TRZCINSKI OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2013, PAGE 561 FRONTIER ESTATES LOT 1, BLOCK A REMAINDER OF O.P.R.C.C.T. 20120904001098070 DOCUMENT NO. MELISSA A. BARRETT OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 PRESTON MEADOW PHASE 2 LOT 2, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. 20160525000639280 DOCUMENT NO. AND SHELBY MCMURTRE BILLY MCMURTRE OWNER: 8.87 ACRES CALLED O.P.R.C.C.T. 2000-0054434 DOCUMENT NO. MARIA E. MILLEN AND WIFE, MICHAEL R. MILLEN OWNER: CALLED 17.99 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20150127000089990 AND WIFE MARIA E. MILLEN MICHAEL R. MILLEN OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 PRESTON MEADOW PHASE 2 LOT 1, BLOCK A CALLED 3.440 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 485, PAGE 147 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 3.200 ACRES DOCUMENT NO. 96-0009946 MARCEY L METTICA DONALD E METTICA, OWNER: CALLED 2.958 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 334 STATE OF TEXAS O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 5' UTILITY EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 25' BUILDING LINE O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 & SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 7.5' DRAINAGE, WATER O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 100' DRAINAGE EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 SEWER EASEMENT WATER & SANITARY 40' LANDSCAPE BUFFER, ABSTRACT NO. 1030 JONATHAN WESTOVER SURVEY O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 & SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 15' DRAINAGE, WATER ABSTRACT NO. 172 SCHOOL LAND SURVEY COLLIN COUNTY O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 PRESTON MEADOW PHASE 2 LOT 25, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 10' UTILITY EASEMENT ABSTRACT NO. 179 ELISHA CHAMBERS SURVEY D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 287 STATE OF TEXAS RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 CITY OF CELINA ROW DEDICATION O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 CITY OF CELINA ROW DEDICATION O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 SEWER EASEMENT WATER & SANITARY 40' LANDSCAPE BUFFER, O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 10' UTILITY EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 30' BUILDING LINE O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4029, PAGE 1820 CITY OF PROSPER WATERLINE EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 & SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 15' DRAINAGE, WATER O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4029, PAGE 1813 CITY OF PROSPER WATERLINE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 EASEMENT 15' DRAINAGEP.R.C.C.T. PAGE 885 CABINET K EASEMENT 15' DRAINAGE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 UTILITY EASEMENT 15' DRAINAGE & O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 & SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 7.5' DRAINAGE, WATER P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 5' UTILITY EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 30' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 35' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 1, BLOCK ATWIN LAKES DRIVEHI GHLAND MEADOWS DRI VEP.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 42' DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 30' DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 5' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 35' BUILDING LINE O.P.R.C.C.T. 20160908001198970 DOCUMENT NO. AND COURTNEY FERRARI ANTHONY LOUIS FERRARI OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 30' DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 30' DRAINAGE EASEMENT HIGHLAND MEADOWS COURT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 UTILITY EASEMENT 30' LANDSCAPE & FM 1461 228.63' N 86°25'08" E N 89°18'29" E 3,878.30' P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 1, BLOCK C N 87°24'16" E N 89°18'47" E N 89°18'29" E 3,878.69' 229.01' N 85°25'16" E L16205.79' 461.77' L8 23.22' 590.29' 203.76' 1,629.16' S 89°29'40" W 0.54'BEARS FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD CALLED 2.642 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 305 STATE OF TEXAS 276.24' 197.04' L17 L18 L19L20 N 89°18'47" E 346.27'N 89°18'47" E 244.33'S 00°03'16" W 185.11'175.11'S 00°14'34" W 0.49'BEARS FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD L21 L22L23L24 N 89°18'47" E 437.93' 750.89' "SPIARS ENG" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD "SPIARS ENG" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2"N 00°39'13" W 189.32'L25 L26 L27 L28 L29 L30 TOWN OF PROSPER N 89°18'47" E 618.18' P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 HIGHLAND MEADOWS PHASE THREE LOT 12, BLOCK A 29.03'L3115.56' 24.46'C1C2C3N 89°16'22" E 346.98'C4N 89°16'22" E 343.87' IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" S 21°19'05" W 0.47' IRON ROD BEARS FOUND 1/2" 10.04' 458.78' O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480 PRESTON MEADOW PHASE 2 LOT 3, BLOCK A S 00°00'47" E 150.97'IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" "SPIARS ENG" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD "SPIARS ENG" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD L34N 04°35'37" E 0.82'BEARS WITH CAP STAMPED "CBG" FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD N 16°23'38" E 0.71'BEARS WITH CAP (ILLEGIBLE) FOUND 5/8"IRON ROD STAMPED "DAA" ROD WITH CAP FOUND 5/8"IRON 96.79'N 00°39'35" WL35L36L37L38L39N 89°18'47" E 751.72' NEW R.O.W. LINE 3 7 8 9 10 12 11 16 13 14 15 17 18 & PARCEL 10 PARCEL 9 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" & PARCEL 10 PARCEL 9 P.O.B. 75.00' RT STATION 128+14.31 E=2,496,094.91 N=7,147,620.31 & PARCEL 14 PARCEL 13 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" & PARCEL 14 PARCEL 13 P.O.B. 75.00' RT STATION 132+35.18 E=2,496,515.74 N=7,147,625.36 & PARCEL 12 PARCEL 11 P.O.C. IN CONCRETE (CM) FOUND "X" CUT PARCEL 8 P.O.B. 90.00' LT STATION 129+08.85 E=2,496,187.45 N=7,147,786.43 & PARCEL 12 PARCEL 11 P.O.B. 80.00' LT STATION 132+54.99 E=2,496,533.69 N=7,147,780.58 & PARCEL 17 PARCEL 15 P.O.C. WITH CAP (ILLEGIBLE) (CM) FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD PARCEL 8 P.O.C. "SPIARS ENG" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD 80.00' LT STA 123+41.05 69.00' RT STA 123+41.05 69.00' RT STA 125+38.09 80.00' LT STA 126+93.91 104.00' LT STA 127+59.85 104.00' LT STA 127+95.85 90.00' LT STA 128+34.32 75.00' LT STA 133+15.22 75.00' LT STA 135+59.55 104.26' LT STA 135+88.81 104.26' LT STA 136+30.30 69.00' RT STA 127+41.85 85.00' RT STA 127+57.85 85.00' RT STA 128+04.34 & PARCEL 17 PARCEL 15 P.O.B. 98.00' RT STATION 136+18.07 E=2,496,898.87 N=7,147,606.95 75.00' RT STA 130+32.11 75.00' RT STA 133+15.18 75.00' RT STA 135+66.04 98.00' RT STA 135+89.04 75.00' RT STA 136+42.04 98.00' RT STA 136+19.04 80.00' LT STA 129+08.72 & PARCEL 18 PARCEL 16 P.O.B. 75.00' LT STATION 136+59.50 E=2,496,938.23 N=7,147,780.43 ** **** ****** **** ** ** **** ** ** ** ** **** **** ** ** L12 78.55' LT STA 123+18.76 & PARCEL 18 PARCEL 16 P.O.C. "SPIARS ENG" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD O.P.R.C.C.T. 20160128000100130 DOCUMENT NO. CITY OF CELINA PIPELINE EASEMENT WASTEWATER TRANSMISSION PARCEL 3 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 04 NOTE: P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR PARCEL 7 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 04 NOTE: P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR STATE FED. RD. DIV. NO. DISTRICT NO. HIGHWAY NO. SHEET NO. STATE FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. CONTROL NO. SECTION NO. JOB NO. 6 TEXAS COUNTY 05COLLIN FM 1461 1973 01 018 N/A 1811"x17" SCALE: 1" = 100' 22"x34" SCALE: 1" = 50' N 0'25'50'100' GRAPHIC SCALE 50'PL PLPL PL PLPL PLPL R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.C. PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) 3 EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. PLPL PL PLPLPLPL PL PLPLPL LINE R.O.W. NEW PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) LINE R.O.W. NEWP.O.C. 7 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) P.O.C. P.O.B. 8 EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.PLPL PLLINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.B. 17 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. R.O.W.EXISTINGLINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.B. 18 EXISTING R.O.W.PLPL PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. PL PLPLPL PL PL PL P LPL PL PL PL PL P LPLPLPLPLPLPL PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLLS LSLS = 66.62'CHORD DISTANCE = N 88°21'31" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 66.62'LENGTH = 33.31'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 01°54'31"DELTA = 2,495,587.47PI EASTING = 7,147,689.23PI NORTHING = 123+07.75PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA LINE TABLE L8 N 89°18'47" E 352.86' N 89°18'47" E 400.80'L12 S 00°42'54" E 38.50'L16 L17 N 69°18'47" E 70.17' L18 N 89°18'47" E 36.00' L19 S 70°41'13" E 40.93' L20 N 89°18'47" E 74.53' L21 S 85°56'29" E 60.44' L22 N 44°18'47" E 41.37' L23 N 89°18'18" E 41.49' L24 S 45°37'34" E 41.34' L25 S 45°41'13" E 22.63' L26 N 89°18'47" E 46.49' C1 2,530.38'03°33'59" (LT)S 02°39'43" E 157.48'157.51' C2 970.00'01°24'33" (RT)S 03°44'28" E 23.86'23.86' C3 970.00'00°54'19" (RT)S 02°35'02" E 15.33'15.33' C4 1,030.00'00°34'19" (RT)S 02°20'07" E 10.28'10.28' ARC LENGTH CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH LINE TABLE L27 N 44°14'17" E 14.12' L28 S 45°41'13" E 32.53' L29 N 89°18'47" E 30.00' L30 N 44°18'47" E 32.53' L31 S 00°03'16" W 50.03' L32 S 00°00'47" E 34.96' L33 N 00°41'23" W 18.95' L34 N 00°39'13" W 24.97' L35 S 00°39'13" E 24.99' L36 N 00°39'13" W 25.96' L37 N 00°39'13" W 25.00' L38 N 00°39'13" W 25.01' L39 N 00°39'35" W 48.04' EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W.EXI STI NG R.O.W.EXI STI NG R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. NEW R.O.W. LINE 302.89'414.31'PLL33 O.P.R.C.C.T. 20160406000406990 DOCUMENT NO. CITY OF CELINA PIPELINE EASEMENT WASTEWATER TRANSMISSION 24.92'L32THE REMAINDER OF PARCELS 3 & 7 NOTE: SEE SHEET 04 FOR THE REMAINDER OF PARCELS 17 & 18 NOTE: SEE SHEET 06 FOR P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 885 CABINET K, HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 3, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 7.5' UTILITY EASEMENT 217.80'203.07' 203.07' 250.85'390.35' 80.00' 80.00' 217.80'PLP.R.C.C.T.CABI NET K, PAGE 885(VARI ABLE WI DTH RI GHT-OF-WAY) P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 885 (50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) (VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)O.P.R.C.C.T.VOLUME 2006, PAGE 480(60' RIGHT-OF-WAY)E=2,495,416.3511 N=7,146,887.5048 GRID COORDINATE E=2,495,356.5703 N=7,146,256.4660 GRID COORDINATE E=2,496,410.6921 N=7,146,329.2384 GRID COORDINATE E=2,496,483.8581 N=7,146,999.4452 GRID COORDINATE To allow for the centerline to shift back to the north 15-feet along the Gentle Creek neighborhood, Celina allowed encroachment into their existing easement. TxDOT and Celina also agreed to reduced the lane widths from 12-feet to 11-feet through this area (Approximate STA 179+00 through STA 199+00, +/-). Additionally, the Town is recommending 6-foot wide sidewalks be constructed instead of the proposed 10-foot width in the areas of Highland Meadows, Gentle Creek, and Amberwood Farms to allow for a wider green space between the roadway and the neighborhoods. HIGHLAND MEADOWS ORIGINAL REVISED ROADWAY CENTERLINE ROW AREA RETURNED Page 1381 Item 19. PBX V PBX ONLYDENSETREES DENSETREES PBX DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE ONLYCONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES PARKING AREA DENSETREES DENSETREES ONLYPBX CONCRETE PBX PBXPBX V PBX PBX PBX V PBX CONCRETE P B X DENSETREES PBX P B X P B XPBX PBX VV V PBX CONCRETE VV V V PBX DENSETREES PBX CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES V V PBX PBX PBX PBX DENSETREES PBX V CONCRETE V CONCRETE V V DENSETREES PBX CONCRETE PBX DENSETREES PBX PBX V DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE V 150+00145+00142+60.22140+00 COLLIN COUNTY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY CALLED 3.308 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 96-0081180 AND WIFE KELLEY J BELVIS DEAN A BELVIS OWNER: OWNER: MICKAEL A. MOORE AND SHARON P. MOORE DOCUMENT NO. 20140811000851520 O.P.R.C.C.T CALLED 3.222 ACRES CALLED 10.00 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. 20150706000823550 DOCUMENT NO. R.L. WHITE LIVING TRUST OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 PHASE THREE HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 13, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 PHASE THREE HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 14, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4549, PAGE 420 THE COUNTY OF COLLIN EASEMENT TO O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20140610000583930 FARAZ PAUL AND SARAH PAUL OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 HIGHLAND MEADOWS PHASE THREE LOT 17, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 PHASE THREE HIGHLAND MEADOWS LOT 15, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. 20081204001386850 DOCUMENT NO. DEBORAH TRZCINSKI AND WIFE MICHAEL TRZCINSKI OWNER:P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 HIGHLAND MEADOWS PHASE THREE LOT 16, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 HIGHLAND MEADOWS PHASE THREE LOT 18, BLOCK A CALLED 2.00 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5937, PAGE 3136 ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH CHRISTIAN CHAPEL CALLED 2.549 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5937, PAGE 3136 ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH CHRISTIAN CHAPEL O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 4008 VOLUME 4569, THE COUNTY OF COLLIN EASEMENT TO CALLED 12.853 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20160129000111830 BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. OWNER. CALLED 10.372 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. 20161221001731270 DOCUMENT NO. PARTNERS, LP FRONTIER RETAIL OWNER: NO. 258 ABSTRACT SURVEY ABIAH DYER ABSTRACT NO. 179 ELISHA CHAMBERS SURVEY CALLED 3.200 ACRES DOCUMENT NO. 96-0009946 DONALD E METTICA, MARCEY L METTICA OWNER: CALLED 2.9971 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T DOCUMENT NO. 20060406000449980 TRACT 1 AND WIFE, DIANE H. STEPHENS SANDY H. STEPHENS OWNER: CALLED 2.958 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 334 STATE OF TEXAS ABSTRACT NO. 1030 JONATHAN WESTOVER SURVEY O.P.R.C.C.T. 20160406000407010 DOCUMENT NO. CITY OF CELINA PIPELINE EASEMENT WASTEWATER TRANSMISSION O.P.R.C.C.T. 20160128000100130 DOCUMENT NO. CITY OF CELINA PIPELINE EASEMENT WASTEWATER TRANSMISSION O.P.R.C.C.T. 20151204001521140 DOCUMENT NO. CITY OF CELINA PIPELINE EASEMENT WASTEWATER TRANSMISSIONFALCON ROADCOUNTY ROAD 83BLUE FOREST DRIVEP.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 35' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 35' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 5' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 41' ACCESS, UTILITY P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 9' ACCESS, UTILITY D.R.C.C.T.VOLUME 489, PAGE 43LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENTTEXAS POWER &O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4029, PAGE 1813 CITY OF PROSPER WATERLINE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 30' DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 5' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 UTILITY EASEMENT 30' LANDSCAPE &D.R.C.C.T.VOLUME 489, PAGE 43LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENTTEXAS POWER &D.R.C.C.T.VOLUME 489, PAGE 43LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENTTEXAS POWER &O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5334, PAGE 3792 TOWN OF PROSPER DRAINAGE EASEMENT COUNTY ROAD 83 (COIT ROAD)FM 1461 N 89°46'01" E "DAA" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD N 89°18'29" E 3,878.69' N 89°46'01" E 765.44'N 89°18'47" E 437.93' TOWN OF PROSPER P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 HIGHLAND MEADOWS PHASE THREE LOT 12, BLOCK A 458.78' L40L41L42 L43 L44 451.58'313.86' IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" 50.12'136.34'407.37'331.74' N 89°48'59" E 739.11' N 44°21'26" E 140.38'89.86' N 89°43'48" E 74.94' N 89°18'47" E "DAA" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD "DAA" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD N 89°18'29" E 3,878.30' "DAA" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD N 89°18'47" E 618.18' IN CONCRETE (CM) FOUND "X"CUT IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" "ROOME" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD N 89°46'02" E 775.76'118.30'S 45°35'42" E N 19°31'03" E 125.85'L47227.83'265.33' N 89°48'59" E 740.06'S 45°30'50" E 135.37'99.82'S 01°01'26" ES 01°01'26" EIRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" WITH CAP (ILLEGIBLE) (CM) FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD (BENT) (CM) FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD L48IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" 60.43' 101.82'N 45°17'38" E N 00°33'24" W 927.03'L46 L49L50L52L45 L56L57 "HUITT-ZOLLARS (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8" IRONROD L55 87.82'17 18 20 19 21 22 24 23 25 26 PART 1 & PARCEL 22 PARCEL 19 P.O.C. "DAA" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD & PARCEL 22 PARCEL 19 P.O.B. 75.00' RT STATION 145+26.14 E=2,497,806.03 N=7,147,638.72 75.00' RT STA 140+32.39 75.00' RT STA 142+60.81 75.00' RT STA 150+36.57 245.25' RT STA 151+41.97 75.00' RT STA 147+26.98 & PARCEL 25 PARCEL 24 P.O.B. 158.12' RT STATION 151+20.75 E=2,498,400.98 N=7,147,558.02 PART 1 PARCEL 26 P.O.B. 245.35' RT STATION 152+13.20 E=2,498,493.77 N=7,147,471.17 & PARCEL 21 PARCEL 20 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" & PARCEL 21 PARCEL 20 P.O.B. 94.09' LT STATION 141+68.58 E=2,497,447.05 N=7,147,805.62 PARCEL 23 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" PARCEL 23 P.O.B. 70.00' LT STATION 147+11.52 E=2,497,990.82 N=7,147,784.48 75.00' LT STA 140+97.43 95.83' LT STA 141+18.52 70.00' LT STA 141+92.36 70.00' LT STA 142+60.22 70.00' LT STA 150+25.39 139.81' LT STA 150+94.42 S 28°06'18" W 0.63'BEARS TYPE I MONUMENT FOUND TXDOT 139.78' LT STA 151+41.67 90.00' LT STA 152+87.49 27 ** **** ****** ** ** ** ** ** **** ** ** P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 91 HIGHLAND MEADOWS PHASE THREE LOT 19, BLOCK A CALLED 3.440 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 485, PAGE 147 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 3.885 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 275 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 3.558 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 285 STATE OF TEXAS 85.00' RT STA 153+20.57 & PARCEL 25 PARCEL 24 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" STATE FED. RD. DIV. NO. DISTRICT NO. HIGHWAY NO. SHEET NO. STATE FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. CONTROL NO. SECTION NO. JOB NO. 6 TEXAS COUNTY 06COLLIN FM 1461 1973 01 018 N/A 1811"x17" SCALE: 1" = 100' 22"x34" SCALE: 1" = 50' N 0'25'50'100' GRAPHIC SCALE 50' 17 & 18 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 05 NOTE: P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR PARCEL PARCEL 27 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 07 NOTE: P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR PLPL PLLINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.B. 17 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. R.O.W.EXISTINGLINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.B. 18 EXISTING R.O.W.PLPL PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. PL PLPLPL PLPL LINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.B. 27 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. LOCATED ON SHEET 07 NOTE: P.O.C. FOR PARCEL 26 IS PLPL P.O.C. 26 EXISTING R.O.W.PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) R.O.W. EXISTING P.O.B. P.O.B. P.O.C. PART 1 26 PART 2 LINE R.O.W. NEW PL PLPLPL LINE TABLE L40 N 44°40'43" E 29.64' L41 S 88°41'49" E 50.09' L42 S 45°19'17" E 33.85' L43 N 89°18'47" E 68.13' L44 N 44°26'49" E 98.18' L45 N 89°48'43" E 47.24' L47 S 13°54'56" E 89.67' L48 N 24°06'27" E 108.46' L46 N 89°46'01" E 206.93' LINE TABLE L49 S 00°00'46" E 55.75' L50 S 00°03'24" E 54.00' L51 S 00°02'26" W 29.91' L52 N 00°39'35" W 25.07' L53 N 19°31'03" E L54 N 00°12'14" W 25.08' L55 N 57°10'37" E 23.54' L56 N 00°33'24" W 99.24' L57 S 89°42'22" E 45.27' 26.82' PL PL PL PL PL PL25 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) P.O.B. P.O.C. LINE R.O.W. NEW LSLS PL PL PL PL PL PL P L P L PL PL PL PLPLPLPL PLEXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W. 146.52' RT STA 152+57.90 NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.390.35' 414.31'271.54'230.87'PLPLEXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.S 00°03'24" E 201.71'THE REMAINDER OF PARCELS 17 & 18 NOTE: SEE SHEET 05 FOR THE REMAINDER OF PARCELS 27 NOTE: SEE SHEET 07 FOR CALLED 9.624 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. 20100426000402810 DOCUMENT NO. VI RAAMA, LLC, OWNER:PLLINE NEW R.O.W. N 57°10'37" E 282.71' 309.60' 317.41'L54200.83' 191.78'L53L51S 00°02'26" W 203.34'PLPL PLLINE R.O.W. NEW PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) 23 EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.P.O.B. P.O.C. (NO DEED OF RECORD FOUND)(VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)(VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)P.R.C.C.T.CABINET P, PAGE 91(50 RIGHT-OF-WAY)P.R.C.C.T.CABINET I, PAGE 344(50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)E=2,497,861.1137 N=7,146,276.5949 GRID COORDINATE E=2,496,770.7409 N=7,146,180.8046 GRID COORDINATE E=2,496,692.3227 N=7,146,919.6686 GRID COORDINATE E=2,497,996.6974 N=7,146,962.9654 GRID COORDINATE S 48°33'00" E 135.37' To allow for the centerline to shift back to the north 15-feet along the Gentle Creek neighborhood, Celina allowed encroachment into their existing easement. TxDOT and Celina also agreed to reduced the lane widths from 12-feet to 11-feet through this area (Approximate STA 179+00 through STA 199+00, +/-). Additionally, the Town is recommending 6-foot wide sidewalks be constructed instead of the proposed 10-foot width in the areas of Highland Meadows, Gentle Creek, and Amberwood Farms to allow for a wider green space between the roadway and the neighborhoods. HIGHLAND MEADOWS REVISED ROADWAY CENTERLINE ROW AREA RETURNED ORIGINAL Page 1382 Item 19. DENSETREES CONCRETE CONCRETE DENSETREES V V V V V PBX PBX CONCRETE PBX PBX PBX PBX V CONCRETE PBX CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES PBX PBX PBX PBX DENSETREES PBX DENSETREES PBX DENSETREES ONLYONLYPBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX V V ONLYCONCRETE PBX PBX PBX PBXPBXPBX V V PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX ONLY165+00160+00PT 158+24.62PC 156+68.97PT 155+68.97155+00 PC 154+12.75TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY CALLED 20.00 ACRES O.P.C.C.R.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20090421000463380 JIANMING HE AND CYNTHIA ZHENG OWNER: CALLED 10.00 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20150706000823550 R.L. WHITE LIVING TRUST OWNER: CALLED 18.00 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20150706000823560 R.L. WHITE LIVING TRUST OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 20' WATER EASEMENT CALLED 10.013 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20190109000026970 FRONTIER RETAIL PARTNERS, LP OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 CITY OF CELINA FRONTIER PARKWAY / F.M. 1461 WIDENING 15' RESERVATION FOR FUTURE O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4569, PAGE 4008 THE COUNTY OF COLLIN EASEMENT TO CALLED 10.372 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20161221001731270 FRONTIER RETAIL PARTNERS, LP OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20161221001731300 DOCUMENT NO. 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 2X, BLOCK P O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 LILYANA PHASE I DRAINAGE & DETENTION EASEMENT LOT 1X, BLOCK L D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 487, PAGE 352 STATE OF TEXAS RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20151211001549870 CITY OF CELINA PIPELINE EASEMENT 20' WASTEWATER TRANSMISSION O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 7.5 UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK R LOT 3X O.P.R.C.C.T.VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199(A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)LI LYANA LANEO.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20151211001549870 CITY OF CELINA PIPELINE EASEMENT 20' WASTEWATER TRANSMISSION ABSTRACT NO. 258 ABIAH DYER SURVEY CALLED 3.558 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 285 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 3.885 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 275 STATE OF TEXAS ABSTRACT NO. 1030 JONATHAN WESTOVER SURVEY COUNTY ROAD 83(COIT ROAD)COUNTY ROAD 83(NO DEED OF RECORD FOUND)(A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)FM 1461 S 85°45'27" E N 89°47'01" E 89.86' N 89°43'48" E S 48°33'00" E 135.37' N 89°45'56" E 868.94' 74.94'L48N 00°10'38" E 1,076.20'IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2"101.82'N 45°17'38" E N 00°33'24" W 927.03'L56L57 "HUITT-ZOLLARS (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD S 89°47'25" W 496.39' IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8"S 00°12'35" E 274.75'S 85°45'27" E 320.34' N 89°47'01" E 200.43' 99.35' S 84°31'57" E N 89°46'31" E 510.27' SEE DETAIL "A" 38.39' S 87°26'58" E 411.81' N 89°47'01" E 512.45'N 85°11'28" E 187.34'N 89°47'01" E 1,004.76'L59 209.49' 202.32' 592.17' 780.44' L63 MAG NAIL (CM) FOUND 471.87'125.00' 868.94' 510.27'L58 50.11'L62868.94' 99.35'L58 29 L61P.O.B. 274.75'780.84' NOT TO SCALE DETAIL "A" L58 38.39' 29 NOT TO SCALE DETAIL "B" 50.11' SEE DETAIL "B" L64 L65 N 89°45'56" E 871.00' N 89°45'56" E 1,802.77' L68 L69L7087.82'291.47'579.53' 134.84'778.92' IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" 50.11' 26 PART 1 PARCEL 26 P.O.B. 245.35' RT STATION 152+13.20 E=2,498,493.77 N=7,147,471.17 & PARCEL 28 PARCEL 26 PART 2 P.O.B. 84.66' RT STATION 156+28.84 E=2,498,901.85 N=7,147,623.01 85.00' RT STA 153+20.57 90.00' LT STA 152+87.49 & PARCEL 29 PARCEL 27 P.O.C. "HUITT-ZOLLARS" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8"IRON ROD 27 28 30 31 26PART 2 29 PART 1 75.24' LT STATION 166+74.04 E=2,499,952.78 N=7,147,777.45 "HUITT-ZOLLARS" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8"IRON ROD PARCEL 30 PART 1 P.O.B. PARCEL 30 PART 1 P.O.C. "HUITT-ZOLLARS" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8"IRON ROD 75.16' LT STATION 161+13.67 E=2,499,392.41 N=7,147,775.25 & PARCEL 29 PARCEL 27 P.O.B. 91.60' LT STA 154+90.86 84.97' LT STA 158+13.92 85.00' LT STA 160+14.81 75.17' LT STA 161+63.77 85.00' RT STA 154+12.64 85.00' RT STA 158+24.62 85.00' RT STA 163+37.07 70.00' RT STA 165+23.81 **** ** ** ** **** **** ** ** ** O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 568 PHASE SEVEN GENTLE CREEK ESTATES TRACT 34 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 568 PHASE SEVEN GENTLE CREEK ESTATES TRACT 37 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 568 PHASE SEVEN GENTLE CREEK ESTATES TRACT 35 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 568 PHASE SEVEN GENTLE CREEK ESTATES TRACT 36 IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" 146.88' S 89°37'10" W 110.00' & PARCEL 28 PARCEL 26 PART 2 P.O.C. (ILLEGIBLE) (CM) WITH CAP FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD PARCEL 26 PART 1 P.O.C. "SPARR SURVEYING" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2"IRON ROD N 89°46'01" E PLPL PLPL LINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.B. 27 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. PLPL P.O.C. 26 EXISTING R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING P.O.B. P.O.B. P.O.C. PART 1 26 PART 2 LINE R.O.W. NEW PL PLPLPL STATE FED. RD. DIV. NO. DISTRICT NO. HIGHWAY NO. SHEET NO. STATE FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. CONTROL NO. SECTION NO. JOB NO. 6 TEXAS COUNTY 07COLLIN FM 1461 1973 01 018 N/A 1811"x17" SCALE: 1" = 100' 22"x34" SCALE: 1" = 50' N 0'25'50'100' GRAPHIC SCALE 50' 31 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 08 NOTE: P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR PARCELPLPL PL P LPL PL PLLINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.C. 30 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) P.O.B. PART 1 LINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.B. 29 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE)PLPLPLPLPL PL P.O.C. R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.C. 28 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE)PLPLPL P.O.B. LINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.B. 31 PLPL PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. PLPARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" PLPL PLPLPLPLPLPL PL LS LINE TABLE L48 N 24°06'27" E 108.46' L56 N 00°33'24" W 99.24' L57 S 89°42'22" E 45.27' L58 N 89°46'31" E 50.10' L59 N 89°46'01" E 92.08' L61 S 00°12'35" E 5.24' L62 S 00°13'29" E 5.24' L63 N 00°14'04" W 10.00' L64 S 00°13'29" E 15.15' L65 S 44°46'30" W 28.28' L68 N 00°10'38" E 19.99' L69 N 00°14'04" W 25.00' L70 N 00°15'07" W 54.99' = 156.18'CHORD DISTANCE = S 87°59'43" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 156.22'LENGTH = 78.15'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 04°28'32"DELTA = 2,498,770.48PI EASTING = 7,147,717.65PI NORTHING = 154+90.90PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 155.61'CHORD DISTANCE = S 87°59'13" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 155.65'LENGTH = 77.86'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 04°27'32"DELTA = 2,499,025.79PI EASTING = 7,147,698.71PI NORTHING = 157+46.84PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE 60.43'L46 PART 1 146.52' RT STA 152+57.90 PLPLPLPL PLPLPLPL PLN 89°45'56" E 2,339.07' EXISTING R.O.W. 27 30 1 PART REMAINDER OF PARCELS 31 NOTE: SEE SHEET 08 FOR THE L46 N 89°46'01" E 206.93'EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W.EXI STI NG R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.NEW R.O.W. LINE R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W.EXI S TI NGR.O.W.EXI STI NGR.O.W. EXISTING E=2,499,417.8046 N=7,146,204.9121 GRID COORDINATE E=2,498,206.6997 N=7,146,210.1536 GRID COORDINATE E=2,498,175.9668 N=7,146,940.1483 GRID COORDINATE E=2,499,471.4563 N=7,146,930.4541 GRID COORDINATE (VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) 20,252 sf 2,448 sf 47,965 sf 7,197 sf 1,717 sf Page 1383 Item 19. DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES V V PBX V DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES PBX PBXDENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES V V DENSETREES CONCRETE PBX PBX DENSETREES PBX PBXONLYONLYE PBX V E PBX E CONCRETE V V PBX PBX PBX PBX E PBX V V V E PBX PBX V EV PARKING AREA V PBX PBX V V PBX V E PBX V PBX PBX PBX V DENSETREES V PBXV V PBX PBX PBX V DENSETREES E PBX PBX E V V PBX CONCRETE V PBX PBX E V PBX V PBX PBX V V PBX E E PBX V PBX V PBX V DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES 175+00170+00 TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY CALLED 20.00 ACRES O.P.C.C.R.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20090421000463380 JIANMING HE AND CYNTHIA ZHENG OWNER: CALLED 20.831 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20060512000645050 DA' HOOD TRUST OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20160706000857580 MICHAEL D. ROGERS AND KRISTA M. ROGERS OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 GENTLE CREEK ESTATES, PHASE TWO LOT 3, BLOCK C P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 GENTLE CREEK ESTATES, PHASE TWO LOT 2, BLOCK C P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 PHASE TWO GENTLE CREEK ESTATES, LOT 4, BLOCK C O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 3, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 9, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 6, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 10, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 12, BLOCK A LOT 6X O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 25' BUILDING LINE O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 29 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 26 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 24 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 PHASE I LILYANA BLOCK C LOT 19 LOT 1 LOT 2 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 4, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 5, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 7, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 8, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 11, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 13, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 14, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 15, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 16, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 17, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 18, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 19, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 DRAINAGE EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 7.5 UTILITY EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 2X, BLOCK P P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK R LOT 4X O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 32 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 31 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 30 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 28 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 27 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 25 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 23 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 22 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 21 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 20 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 7.5 UTILITY EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 25' BUILDING LINE O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 15' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK R LOT 3X P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 21, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 20, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 19, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 22, BLOCK B O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 (A 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) SNAPDRAGON COURTGINGER ROADSUNFLOWER LANEO.P.R.C.C.T.VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199(A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)LANELILYANACALLED 3.885 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 275 STATE OF TEXAS ABSTRACT NO. 1030 JONATHAN WESTOVER SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 258 ABIAH DYER SURVEY P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 15' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 40' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 LANDSCAPE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 15' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 50' BUILDING LINE FM 1461 N 89°47'01" E N 89°45'56" E 2,339.07'N 00°14'47" W 1,077.11'33 N 89°47'01" E 1,004.76'S 79 °54 '43 " E 139 .76 ' N 89°47'01" E 162.90' N 89°47'01" E 562.89'L60 296.63'S 89°51'30" E 486.96' N 89°45'56" E 536.68' 592.17'412.59' 113.63' 70.88' 49.27'S 00°15'25" E 140.00'N 00°15'25" W 293.92'MAG NAIL (CM) FOUND 125.00'1,711.61' N 89°46'31" E 1,691.64'L66 L67 N 89°45'56" E 1,802.77'L71L72778.92' 812.79'76.22' "J.E. SMITH" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED "PLS INC" FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD 372.51'L73L74 L75L76 "HUITT-ZOLLARS" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD "HUITT-ZOLLARS" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD "HUITT-ZOLLARS" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD "HUITT-ZOLLARS" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD "HUITT-ZOLLARS" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD & PARCEL 32 PARCEL 31 P.O.B. 70.00' RT STATION 171+15.98 E=2,500,395.27 N=7,147,633.88 PARCEL 32E P.O.B. 95.00' RT STATION 177+15.34 E=2,500,994.72 N=7,147,611.15 31 30 32 32E PART 2 PARCEL 30 PART 2 P.O.C. "HUITT-ZOLLARS" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8"IRON ROD 75.26' LT STATION 167+99.04 E=2,500,077.78 N=7,147,777.94 PARCEL 30 PART 2 P.O.B. 70.00' RT STA 175+28.57 95.00' RT STA 176+66.07 75.00' RT STA 179+28.80 95.00' RT STA 178+28.97 81.08' RT STA 178+98.47 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 CITY OF CELINA FRONTIER PARKWAY / F.M. 1461 WIDENING 15' RESERVATION FOR FUTURE ** ** ** ** ** NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE CALLED 3.558 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 285 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 2.064 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 307 STATE OF TEXAS O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 568 PHASE SEVEN GENTLE CREEK ESTATES TRACT 24 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 568 PHASE SEVEN GENTLE CREEK ESTATES TRACT 22 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2006, PAGE 568 PHASE SEVEN GENTLE CREEK ESTATES TRACT 23 & PARCEL 32E PARCEL 32 PARCEL 31 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 3/8" STATE FED. RD. DIV. NO. DISTRICT NO. HIGHWAY NO. SHEET NO. STATE FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. CONTROL NO. SECTION NO. JOB NO. 6 TEXAS COUNTY 08COLLIN FM 1461 1973 01 018 N/A 1811"x17" SCALE: 1" = 100' 22"x34" SCALE: 1" = 50' N 0'25'50'100' GRAPHIC SCALE 50' 33 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 09 NOTE: P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR PARCEL LINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.B. 31 PLPL PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. PLPLPLLSLINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.C. 32 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. P.O.B. 32E PL R.O.W. LINE NEW 33 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) P.O.C. P.O.B. EXISTING R.O.W. R.O.W.EXISTINGPLLSPLPLLINE TABLE L60 N 78°27'19" E 101.82' L66 S 45°13'29" E 28.28' L67 S 00°13'29" E 15.13' L71 N 00°14'47" W 40.23' L72 N 00°17'07" W 45.49' L73 S 73°08'30" E 68.12' L74 S 45°58'24" E 74.53' L75 S 17°10'15" E 71.09' L76 N 89°47'01" E 44.00' LS ABSTRACT NO. 376 WILLIAM T HORN SURVEY LSEXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.GENTLE WAYR.O.W.EXI STI NGEXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.PL PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPLPL PL PL PL PLPLPL PLPLO.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 20' WATER EASEMENT PLPL(VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)O.P.R.C.C.T.VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199(50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)O.P.R.C.C.T.VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199(50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)P.R.C.C.T.CABINET K, PAGE 476(50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)E=2,500,865.2957 N=7,146,186.9375 GRID COORDINATE E=2,499,674.7209 N=7,146,176.5682 GRID COORDINATE E=2,499,743.7851 N=7,146,852.9860 GRID COORDINATE E=2,500,999.5228 N=7,146,861.4440 GRID COORDINATE REMAINDER OF PARCEL 31 NOTE: SEE SHEET 07 FOR THE AND 33 REMAINDER OF PARCELS 30 PART 2 NOTE: SEE SHEET 09 FOR THE 73,178 sf 24,207 sf ORIGINAL REVISED ROADWAY CENTERLINE ROW AREA RETURNED To allow for the centerline to shift back to the north 15-feet along the Gentle Creek neighborhood, Celina allowed encroachment into their existing easement. TxDOT and Celina also agreed to reduced the lane widths from 12-feet to 11-feet through this area (Approximate STA 179+00 through STA 199+00, +/-). Additionally, the Town is recommending 6-foot wide sidewalks be constructed instead of the proposed 10-foot width in the areas of Highland Meadows, Gentle Creek, and Amberwood Farms to allow for a wider green space between the roadway and the neighborhoods. GENTLE CREEK25'-0"Page 1384 Item 19. DENSETREES DENSETREES V V CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE PBXCONCRETE DENSETREES PBX P B XE E V E V V CONCRETE E V E DENSETREES DENSETREES V CONCRETE V DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES PBX PBX DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE CONCRETE PBX CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES PBX V PBX CONCRETE CONCRETE V CONCRETE DENSETREES PBX PBX DENSETREES DENSETREES PBX DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE CONCRETE PBX CONCRETE V V DENSETREES PBX PBX DENSETREES PBX V PBX CONCRETE V CONCRETE DENSETREES PBX DENSETREES PBX DENSETREES PBX PBX PBX DENSETREES V DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES PBX PBX PBX PBX V V PBX PBX PBX V CONCRETE DENSETREES PBX DENSETREES DENSETREES V V CONCRETE DENSETREES V PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX CONCRETE PBX CONCRETE DENSETREES PBX V PBXV V V V DENSETREES DENSETREES PBX V PBX V V DENSETREES PBX DENSETREES DENSETREES PT 197+59.62 PC 196+04.55 PT 195+04.55 195+00 PC 193+49.48 190+00 185+00184+49.96 TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY O.P.R.C.C.T. 20100908000949220 DOCUMENT NO. BEVERLY D. GIVENS WILLIAM F. GIVENS AND OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20070813001118530 DOCUMENT NO. AND JOYCE L. PETERS EDMOND L. PETERS OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20180111000048870 DOCUMENT NO. URSULA J. BALLARD OWNER:P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 GENTLE CREEK ESTATES LOT 6 THROUGH LOT 27, BLOCK A, REPLAT OF LOT 6R, BLOCK A REMAINDER OF P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 GENTLE CREEK ESTATES LOT 27, BLOCK A, LOT 6 THROUGH REPLAT OF LOT 7R, BLOCK A REMAINDER OF O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20160526000649070 AND CHRISTY JO ZUEHL SCOTT M. ZUEHL OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20131209001622490 AND SHIRLEY C. KIMBRIL DONALD R. KIMBRIL OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 PHASE ONE GENTLE CREEK ESTATES LOT 1, BLOCK C P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 PHASE ONE GENTLE CREEK ESTATES LOT 4, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 PHASE ONE GENTLE CREEK ESTATES LOT 1, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 PHASE ONE GENTLE CREEK ESTATES LOT 2, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 PHASE ONE GENTLE CREEK ESTATES LOT 3, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 PHASE ONE GENTLE CREEK ESTATES LOT 5, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 6040, PAGE 456 JAMES DAVID LATIMER OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20120905001108140 DOCUMENT NO. AND STACIA MALONE DANNY PAUL MALONE OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20160706000857580 DOCUMENT NO. KRISTA M. ROGERS AND MICHAEL D. ROGERS OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 PHASE TWO GENTLE CREEK ESTATES, LOT 2, BLOCK C O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 19 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 17 O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK C LOT 18 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 CITY OF CELINA 30' ROW DEDICATION O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 20, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 21, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I LOT 22, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 TWELVE OAKS PHASE I LOT 13, BLOCK B O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20170428000540720 AND DEBORAH L. CARTER M JAY CARTER OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 7.5 UTILITY EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 7.5 UTILITY EASEMENT HEATHER LANEO.P.R.C.C.T.VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199(A 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2011, PAGE 380 TWELVE OAKS, PHASE I LOT 10R-1 AND LOT 11R, BLOCK B, LOT 11R, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 & UTILITY EASEMENT 10' DRAINAGE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 LANDSCAPE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 10' COSERV UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 TWELVE OAKS PHASE I LOT 12, BLOCK B O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20180523000628460 MICHAEL J. HAWKINS OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 (A 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) TWELVE OAKS LANE O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20140722000761870 AND APRIL L KOOIMAN BRIAN B. KOOIMAN OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2011, PAGE 380 TWELVE OAKS, PHASE I LOT 10R-1 AND LOT 11R, BLOCK B, LOT 10R-1, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 CITY OF CELINA 40' ROW DEDICATION P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 30' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 10' COSERV UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 10' UTILITY EASEMENT(A 70' RIGHT-OF-WAY)COUNTY ROAD 84P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 30' BUILDING LINE CALLED 2.064 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 307 STATE OF TEXAS ABSTRACT NO. 945 COLEMAN WATSON SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 376 WILLIAM T HORN SURVEY P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 15' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 15' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 15' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 40' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 15' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 40' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 LANDSCAPE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 LANDSCAPE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 5' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 15' WATER EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 SWBT EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T.CABINET K, PAGE 476(A 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)GENTLE WAYP.R.C.C.T.CABINET K, PAGE 474(A 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)WINDING CREEK ROADWINDING CREEK ROAD P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 40' BUILDING LINE (A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 3460 VOLUME 5231, STATE OF TEXAS FM 1461 N 89°47'01" E S 86°16'06" E N 89°17'21" E N 89°17'21" E N 00°08'31" E 272.90'& PARCEL 34 PARCEL 33 P.O.B. 75.00' RT STATION 183+01.32 E=2,501,580.62 N=7,147,633.36 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 42 40 43 44 45 562.89' N 89°47'01" E 296.63'190.33' S 89°51'30" E 486.96' N 89°45'56" E 536.68'N 89°16'56" E 936.78' 1,711.61' 1,691.64' N 89°46'31" E 372.51'190.38' IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" 75.00' RT STA 189+52.8775.36' RT STA 184+91.00 75.00' RT STA 193+02.88 73.55' RT STA 194+27.02 80.00' LT STA 195+26.41 81.56' LT STA 194+27.02 80.00' LT STA 189+92.4390.00' LT STA 189+01.53 87.38' LT STA 189+25.35 94.98' LT STA 185+11.53 75.15' LT STA 184+91.33 30.61'39.52' 30.59'39.41' N 89°16'56" E 870.87' 344.18' 339.14'148.14' MONUMENT (CM) FOUND TXDOT TYPE I N 83°32'16" E 273.92' 328.08' N 89°20'44" E 153.57' O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5241, PAGE 4108 STATE OF TEXAS & PARCEL 37 PARCEL 36 P.O.C. "RPLS 4084" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2 " IRON ROD & PARCEL 37 PARCEL 36 P.O.B. 90.00' LT STATION 185+81.49 E=2,501,859.38 N=7,147,800.55 23.97'67.49' N 89°17'21" E 320.04' N 89°17'21" E 437.72'102.53' S 86°16'06" E L77L78 L79 272.06'165.66' 181.57' & PARCEL 43 PARCEL 40 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" "5439" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD 120.35' 30 PART 2 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 CITY OF CELINA F.M. 1461 WIDENING FRONTIER PARKWAY / 15' RESERVATION FOR FUTURE MONUMENT (CM) FOUND TXDOT TYPE I & PARCEL 42 PARCEL 41 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2"& PARCEL 45 PARCEL 44 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" PARCEL 46 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 DRAINAGE EASEMENT FLOODWAY & & PARCEL 43 PARCEL 40 P.O.B. 80.00' LT STATION 192+64.50 E=2,502,542.46 N=7,147,799.02S 00°07'16" E 338.57'S 00°43'48" E 321.71'IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" N 89°17'21" E 837.13' 75.0' RT STATION 185+87.01 E=2,501,866.94 N=7,147,635.63 PARCEL 35 P.O.B. PARCEL 35 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" (CM) IRON ROD FOUND 5/8" "RPLS 4701" (CM) CAP STAMPED IRON ROD WITH FOUND 1/2" & PARCEL 39 PARCEL 38 P.O.B. 75.00' RT STATION 187+77.87 E=2,502,057.79 N=7,147,638.00 & PARCEL 42 PARCEL 41 P.O.B. 75.00' RT STATION 191+27.87 E=2,502,407.77 N=7,147,642.34 & PARCEL 45 PARCEL 44 P.O.B. 77.57' RT STATION 194+83.14 E=2,502,757.81 N=7,147,639.82 190.86'175.00'175.00'175.00'121.27' 190.49'175.00'175.00'175.00'175.02' N 89°38'30" E 890.51' IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" S 83°25 '39" E 431.98 '54.15 '377.83 'OF TRANSPORTATION" (CM) STAMPED "TEXAS DEPARTMENT FOUND 3-1/2" BRASS DISK IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" "BUSBY RPLS 4967" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD 384.95'N 45°43'02" E N 00°21'17" W 307.51'N 00°21'30" W 312.22'N 00°21'30" W 294.70'S 87°29'29" E 474.76'L80L81L82L83L84L85L86L87L88L89L90L91L92C5 C6C7 95.96' N 89°04'33" E L93 42.49' (NO DEED OF RECORD FOUND) STATE OF TEXAS ** ** ** **** ** ** ** ** ** NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 LANDSCAPE EASEMENT CALLED 3.885 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 275 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 4.375 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 289 STATE OF TEXAS P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 50' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 15' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 LANDSCAPE EASEMENT ABSTRACT NO. 1030 JONATHAN WESTOVER SURVEY STATE FED. RD. DIV. NO. DISTRICT NO. HIGHWAY NO. SHEET NO. STATE FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. CONTROL NO. SECTION NO. JOB NO. 6 TEXAS COUNTY 09COLLIN FM 1461 1973 01 018 N/A 1811"x17" SCALE: 1" = 100' 22"x34" SCALE: 1" = 50' N 0'25'50'100' GRAPHIC SCALE 50' R.O.W. LINE NEW 33 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) P.O.C. P.O.B. EXISTING R.O.W. R.O.W.EXISTINGPLLSPLPL R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.C. 45 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. PLPL R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.C. 43 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. PLPLR.O.W. EXISTING "ROOME" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD & PARCEL 34 PARCEL 33 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" & PARCEL 39 PARCEL 38 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 PHASE TWO GENTLE CREEK ESTATES, LOT 3, BLOCK C P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 476 10' UTILITY EASEMENT LINE TABLE N 44°49'38" E 28.31' S 86°38'32" E 70.13' S 84°26'01" E 91.46' S 00°07'16" E 34.83' S 00°11'18" E 32.92' S 00°07'16" E 30.11' S 00°43'48" E 27.44' S 00°43'48" E 20.02' L77 L78 L79 L80 L81 L82 L83 L84 LINE TABLE N 00°08'31" E 43.66' N 00°08'30" E 39.93' N 00°08'30" E 40.35' N 00°21'30" W 39.93' N 00°21'30" W 38.85' N 00°21'30" W 37.77' N 00°21'30" W 36.70' N 00°21'17" W 51.87' L85 L86 L87 L88 L89 L90 L91 L92 = 155.03'CHORD DISTANCE = S 88°29'22" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 155.07'LENGTH = 77.58'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 04°26'33"DELTA = 2,502,706.00PI EASTING = 7,147,721.04PI NORTHING = 194+27.06PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 155.03'CHORD DISTANCE = S 88°29'22" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 155.07'LENGTH = 77.58'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 04°26'33"DELTA = 2,502,960.60PI EASTING = 7,147,704.44PI NORTHING = 196+82.13PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA LS PL PL PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLLSLSEXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 755 CABINET N, EASEMENT FLOODPLAIN 100 YEAR ARC LENGTH CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH C5 62.50'02°19'34" (RT)N 00°59'19" W 2.54'2.54' C6 62.50'18°09'58" (LT)N 09°54'57" E 19.73'19.82' C7 62.50'00°41'27" (RT)N 00°29'14" E 0.75'0.75' O.P.R.C.C.T. 2002-0027675 DOCUMENT NO. AND CARLEY STIGLETS JAMES STIGLETS OWNER: 96.00' N 89°53'24" E P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 199 VOLUME 2017 LILYANA PHASE I BLOCK A LOT 19, PLEXISTING R.O.W. N 89°45'56" E 2,339.07' EXISTING R.O.W. AND 33 REMAINDER OF PARCELS 30 PART 2 NOTE: SEE SHEET 08 FOR THE L93 N 00°21'17" W 9.39' P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 24 CABINET M, EASEMENT 10' UTILITY P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 40' BUILDING LINE O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 (A 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) SNAPDRAGON COURT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 199 25' BUILDING LINE E=2,502,256.8814 N=7,146,300.5077 GRID COORDINATE E=2,501,243.7785 N=7,146,287.2708 GRID COORDINATE E=2,501,187.7505 N=7,147,034.8984 GRID COORDINATE E=2,502,533.4880 N=7,146,935.1333 GRID COORDINATE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 474 (50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) 30 PART 2 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 08 NOTE: P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR PARCEL REMAINDER OF PARCEL 45 NOTE: SEE SHEET 10 FOR THE 22,728 sf 72,171 sf 7,100 sf ORIGINAL REVISED ROADWAY CENTERLINE ROW AREA RETURNED To allow for the centerline to shift back to the north 15-feet along the Gentle Creek neighborhood, Celina allowed encroachment into their existing easement. TxDOT and Celina also agreed to reduced the lane widths from 12-feet to 11-feet through this area (Approximate STA 179+00 through STA 199+00, +/-). Additionally, the Town is recommending 6-foot wide sidewalks be constructed instead of the proposed 10-foot width in the areas of Highland Meadows, Gentle Creek, and Amberwood Farms to allow for a wider green space between the roadway and the neighborhoods. GENTLE CREEK 15'-0"5'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"5'-0"5'-0"Page 1385 Item 19. DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE CONCRETE V CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES V V PBX PBX V DENSETREES PBX PBX PBX PBX CONCRETE PBX PBX PBX DENSETREES PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBXPBX PBX PBX V CONCRETE PBX DENSETREES V V V V DENSETREES V DENSETREES V CONCRETE PBX PBX DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE PBXPBX DENSETREES CONCRETE V V DENSETREES PBX PBX V V DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES CONCRETE CONCRETE V V V V V V V PBX PBX PBX PBX DENSETREES V PBX CONCRETE PBX P B XDENSETREES E V CONCRETE DENSETREES 210+00 PT 206+50.38205+00 PC 204+95.31PT 203+95.31PC 202+40.24 200+00 PT 197+59.62 TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY REMAINDER OF CALLED 39.970 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20121003001259750 TRACT 1 PROSPER TWIN CREEK PARTNERS, LP OWNER: CALLED 20.18 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20121003001259750 TRACT 2 PROSPER TWIN CREEK PARTNERS, LP OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 GENTLE CREEK ESTATES LOT 6 THROUGH LOT 27, BLOCK A, REPLAT OF LOT 6R, BLOCK A REMAINDER OF P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 GENTLE CREEK ESTATES LOT 6 THROUGH LOT 27, BLOCK A, REPLAT OF LOT 7R, BLOCK A REMAINDER OF P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 GENTLE CREEK ESTATES LOT 27, BLOCK A, LOT 6 THROUGH REPLAT OF LOT 8R, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20160526000649070 AND CHRISTY JO ZUEHL SCOTT M. ZUEHL OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20131209001622490 DOCUMENT NO. AND SHIRLEY C. KIMBRIL DONALD R. KIMBRIL OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 EASEMENT 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 10' COSERV EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' DRAINAGE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 30' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 TWELVE OAKS PHASE II LOT 1, BLOCK D P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 TWELVE OAKS PHASE II LOT 3, BLOCK D O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2011, PAGE 380 TWELVE OAKS, PHASE I LOT 10R-1 AND LOT 11R, BLOCK B, LOT 11R, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' DRAINAGE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 SEWER EASEMENT 15' WATER & SANITARY O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5241, PAGE 4108 STATE OF TEXAS O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20140722000761870 AND APRIL L KOOIMAN BRIAN B. KOOIMAN OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2011, PAGE 380 TWELVE OAKS, PHASE I LOT 11R, BLOCK B, LOT 10R-1 AND LOT 10R-1, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 (A 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2011, PAGE 380 EASEMENT 20' FLOODPLAIN O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5432, PAGE 4919 20' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 SEWER EASEMENT 15' WATER & SANITARY P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 FLOODPLAIN EASEMENT 100 YEAR P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 SEWER EASEMENT 5' WATER & SANITARY P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 & LANDSCAPE EASEMENT 50' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 TWELVE OAKS PHASE II LOT 4, BLOCK D P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 TWELVE OAKS PHASE II LOT 2, BLOCK C P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 TWELVE OAKS PHASE II LOT 3, BLOCK C P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 TWELVE OAKS PHASE II LOT 2, BLOCK D O.P.R.C.C.T. 20150918001190270 DOCUMENT NO. CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20170217000219220 DOCUMENT NO. AND GELAREH F TRICKEY SHANE P TRICKEY OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20141222001391340 DOCUMENT NO. SPOUSE AE C. ROGERS LARRY B. ROGERS AND OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20161003001329530 DOCUMENT NO. DONNA RILEY LUCADO OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20130314000346820 DOCUMENT NO. AND KELLY TOKARCZYK JAMES TOKARCZYK OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 TWELVE OAKS PHASE II LOT 1, BLOCK C O.P.R.C.C.T. 20100201000099430 DOCUMENT NO. AND CHRISTOPHER J. GLAMETTA KRISTI W. GLAMETTA OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' DRAINAGE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' DRAINAGE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 & LANDSCAPE EASEMENT 50' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 10' COSERV EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 30' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 30' BUILDING LINE PEBBLE CREEK DRIVEPECAN GROVE LANE CALLED 4.375 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 289 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 2.339 ACRES VOLUME 484, PAGE 309 D.R.C.C.T. STATE OF TEXAS O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5194, PAGE 3206 STATE OF TEXAS ABSTRACT NO. 945 COLEMAN WATSON SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 419 WM T HORN SURVEY O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4265, PAGE 1983 CITY OF PROSPER WATERLINE EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4265, PAGE 1983 CITY OF PROSPER WATERLINE EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4265, PAGE 1983 CITY OF PROSPER WATERLINE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 15' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 LANDSCAPE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 DRAINAGE EASEMENT FLOODWAY & O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5225, PAGE 5017 STATE OF TEXAS O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5231, PAGE 3460 STATE OF TEXAS FM 1461205+00 N 89°17'21" E N 84°50'48" E N 89°17'21" E 45 46 47 53 54525150 49 48 110.00' RT STA 200+75.25 WITH WASHER SET MAG NAIL 110.00' RT STA 201+93.17 69.17' RT STA 204+58.21 70.00' RT STA 206+48.61 69.99' LT STA 209+47.53 70.10' LT STA 206+28.67 100.01' LT STA 206+00.33 86.58' LT STA 203+55.21 N 89°20'44" E 328.08' 181.57'146.51' 431.98 'S 83°25 '39" E 377.83 'PARCEL 46 P.O.B. 110.00'' RT STATION 198+75.63 E=2,503,155.54 N=7,147,596.85 110.00' RT STA 198+53.24 N 45°43'02" E 384.95' S 87°29'29" E 474.76' S 84°46'02" E 260.94' 143.87' 67.84' 49.23' 84.97' LT STA 202+24.45 N 89°17'17" E 175.28'N 89°17'17" E 671.36' L94 L95 N 89°16'56" E 1,712.98'251.46' FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" & PARCEL 49 PARCEL 48 P.O.C. IRON ROD(CM) FOUND 1/2" OF TRANSPORTATION" (CM) STAMPED "TEXAS DEPARTMENT FOUND 3-1/2" BRASS DISK 170.11'137.83'181.78'181.79' IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" "EC&D RPLS 5439" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD 182.41'182.40'170.20'169.34' 73.71'' LT STATION 205+30.41 E=2,503,802.83 N=7,147,804.63 & PARCEL 49 PARCEL 48 P.O.B. & PARCEL 51 PARCEL 50 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" EC&D RPLS 5439 (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD N 89°17'21" E 339.93' N 78°24'21" E 275.00' N 86°51'36" E 185.00' N 89°17'21" E 815.47' 308.95' 506.52' 22.39' 199.62'117.92'C8L96L97L98 L99 L100L101 & PARCEL 51 PARCEL 50 P.O.B. 69.98' LT STATION 207+65.74 E=2,504,042.49 N=7,147,807.61 L102 L103 & PARCEL 54 PARCEL 52 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" 69.99' LT STATION 211+29.92 E=2,504,406.64 N=7,147,812.14 & PARCEL 54 PARCEL 52 P.O.B. S 00°42'02" E 404.17'S 00°43'24" E 406.46'L104 L105 OF TRANSPORTATION" (CM) STAMPED "TEXAS DEPARTMENT FOUND 3-1/2" BRASS DISK OF TRANSPORTATION" (CM) STAMPED "TEXAS DEPARTMENT FOUND 3-1/2" BRASS DISK N 82°12'16" E 274.82' N 89°16'56" E 1,634.00' 611.08' 500.74'L106& PARCEL 53 PARCEL 47 P.O.B. 70.00' RT STATION 209+57.62 E=2,504,236.09 N=7,147,670.02 39.80' S 87°29'15" E 87.28' S 87°29'19" E ** ** **** ** ** ** ** ** NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE ABSTRACT NO. 376 WILLIAM T HORN SURVEY P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 UTILITY EASEMENT 10' COSERV P.R.C.C.T. CABINET N, PAGE 755 10' UTILITY EASEMENT N 08°00'36" E 680.03'EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W. LS LSPL PL PL PL PL PLPL PLPL PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL& PARCEL 53 PARCEL 47 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 3/4" 45 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 09 NOTE: P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR PARCEL STATE FED. RD. DIV. NO. DISTRICT NO. HIGHWAY NO. SHEET NO. STATE FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. CONTROL NO. SECTION NO. JOB NO. 6 TEXAS COUNTY 10COLLIN FM 1461 1973 01 018 N/A 1811"x17" SCALE: 1" = 100' 22"x34" SCALE: 1" = 50' N 0'25'50'100' GRAPHIC SCALE 50' R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.C. 45 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. PL PL R.O.W. EXISTING P.O.B. 46 EXISTIN G R.O.W. PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) R.O.W. EXISTING P.O.C. R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.B. PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) P.O.B. EXISTING R.O.W. 47 PLPL PLPLPLP LPLP L P L PLPLPLPLPL P.O.B. 53 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. R.O.W. LINE NEW PLPLPL PL PL PLP.O.C. 54 EXISTING R.O.W.PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) P.O.B. R.O.W. LINE NEWPLE X IST IN G R .O .W . EXISTING R.O.W. = 155.03'CHORD DISTANCE = S 88°29'22" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 155.07'LENGTH = 77.58'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 04°26'33"DELTA = 2,502,960.60PI EASTING = 7,147,704.44PI NORTHING = 196+82.13PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 155.03'CHORD DISTANCE = N 87°04'05" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 155.07'LENGTH = 77.58'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 04°26'33"DELTA = 2,503,596.32PI EASTING = 7,147,712.33PI NORTHING = 203+17.82PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 155.03'CHORD DISTANCE = N 87°04'05" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 155.07'LENGTH = 77.58'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 04°26'33"DELTA = 2,503,850.44PI EASTING = 7,147,735.24PI NORTHING = 205+72.89PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA LINE TABLE L94 N 87°06'56" E 125.82' L95 S 46°23'19" E 42.04' L96 S 16°49'41" W 35.73' L97 S 02°38'53" W 31.08' L98 S 02°38'53" W 9.86' L99 N 67°01'45" E 77.55' L100 S 02°30'50" W 39.27' L101 S 00°42'02" E 9.82' L102 S 00°39'59" E 9.80' L103 S 00°43'24" E 9.78' L104 N 45°43'02" E 106.09' L105 S 50°13'02" E 109.16' L106 N 08°00'36" E 40.66' ARC LENGTH CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH C8 1,686.59'03°43'31" (RT)S 01°26'37" E 109.64'109.66' P.R.C.C.T. CABINET M, PAGE 24 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT CALLED 2.064 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 307 STATE OF TEXAS PL REMAINDER OF PARCELS 53 & 54 NOTE: SEE SHEET 11 FOR THE LOCATED ON SHEET 09 NOTE: P.O.C. PARCEL FOR 46 IS 70.14'EXISTING R.O.W. (VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)P.R.C.C.T.CABINET P, PAGE 486(50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)E=2,504,003.2761 N=7,146,528.7296 GRID COORDINATE E=2,502,891.4980 N=7,146,299.6331 GRID COORDINATE E=2,502,734.1092 N=7,147,143.1632 GRID COORDINATE E=2,504,111.5505 N=7,147,029.3292 GRID COORDINATE REMAINDER OF PARCEL 45 NOTE: SEE SHEET 09 FOR THE 13,079 sf 87,913 sf 5'-0"REVISED ROADWAY CENTERLINE ROW AREA RETURNED ORIGINAL To allow for the centerline to shift back to the north 15-feet along the Gentle Creek neighborhood, Celina allowed encroachment into their existing easement. TxDOT and Celina also agreed to reduced the lane widths from 12-feet to 11-feet through this area (Approximate STA 179+00 through STA 199+00, +/-). Additionally, the Town is recommending 6-foot wide sidewalks be constructed instead of the proposed 10-foot width in the areas of Highland Meadows, Gentle Creek, and Amberwood Farms to allow for a wider green space between the roadway and the neighborhoods. GENTLE CREEK Page 1386 Item 19. DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE PBX V V PBX V PBX DENSETREES V V DENSETREES V PBX PBX PBX PBX DENSETREES V DENSETREES DENSETREES V CONCRETE V DENSETREES V CONCRETE DENSETREES V CONCRETE PBX V V V V V DENSETREES CONCRETE V V V V V V CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES V V PBX CONCRETE PBX ONLYCONCRETE V V ONLYV PBX PBX PBX V PBX PBX PBX V PBX V V PBX V DENSETREES V V V PBX PBX ONLYPBXP BXPBX PBX PBX PBX PBX V PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBXP BXPBX V PBX PBX PBXPBX V PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX PBX V PBXPBX PT 225+15.86 225+00PC 223+15.47 220+00 PT 219+65.47PC 218+41.83 PC 216+07.36 215+00 PT 217+41.83 PC 226+15.86 TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTY EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINEAPPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY REMAINDER OF CALLED 39.970 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20121003001259750 TRACT 1 PROSPER TWIN CREEK PARTNERS, LP OWNER: CALLED 1.4999 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20170330000404710 ARSHAD NIAZ OWNER; P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 515 PHASE ONE AMBERWOOD FARMS LOT 33, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 3277 VOLUME 5595, ANITA HAWKINS OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 515 PHASE ONE AMBERWOOD FARMS LOT 32, BLOCK A CALLED 21.53 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20170629000854270 OM FRONTIER ESTATES, LLC OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 TWELVE OAKS PHASE II LOT 30, BLOCK C P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' DRAINAGE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 SEWER EASEMENT 15' WATER & SANITARY O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 30' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' DRAINAGE O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 DETENTION EASEMENT DRAINAGE & O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 SEWER EASEMENT 15' SANITARY O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 5' WALL MAINTENANCE EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 MUSTANG LAKES PHASE ONE LOT 1, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 MUSTANG LAKES PHASE ONE LOT 2, BLOCK B O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 MUSTANG LAKES PHASE ONE LOT 4X, BLOCK C O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 MUSTANG LAKES PHASE ONE LOT 2X, BLOCK B O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 EASEMENT 5' WALL MAINTENANCE O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20170905001187960 MUSTANG LAKES OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 TWELVE OAKS PHASE II LOT 4, BLOCK D P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 TWELVE OAKS PHASE II LOT 29, BLOCK C P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 TWELVE OAKS PHASE II LOT 28, BLOCK C O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20161006001355070 & ANNA CARINA JONSSONHJALBER JAN OLOF HJALBER OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20100201000099430 DOCUMENT NO. AND CHRISTOPHER J. GLAMETTA KRISTI W. GLAMETTA OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 EASEMENT 25'X25' VISIBILITY O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 30' BUILDING LINE AMERICAN PHAROAH WAYP.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 30' BUILDING LINE WATERVIEW TRAIL OAK BEND TRAILP.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 & UTILITY EASEMENT 20' DRAINAGE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 30' BUILDING LINE **EE-07 **EE-01 P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 10' COSERV EASEMENT **EE-02 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 10' UTILITY EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. 20170905001187960 DOCUMENT NO. ASSOCIATION, INC. MUSTANG LAKES OWNERS OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 10' UTILITY EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 DRAINAGE EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 10' UTILITY EASEMENT *EE-09 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 MUSTANG LAKES PHASE ONE LOT 1, BLOCK B O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5880, PAGE 28 ACCESS EASEMENT 25' PERMANENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 PHASE ONE MUSTANG LAKES LOT 1X, BLOCK A **EE-04 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 7.5' UTILITY EASEMENT **EE-10 *EE-06 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 CITY OF CELINA 20' RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 DETENTION EASEMENT DRAINAGE & CALLED 0.719 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 342 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 2.339 ACRES VOLUME 484, PAGE 309 D.R.C.C.T. STATE OF TEXAS **EE-06 ABSTRACT NO. 419 WM T HORN SURVEY O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4265, PAGE 1989 CITY OF PROSPER WATERLINE EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4265, PAGE 1983 CITY OF PROSPER WATERLINE EASEMENT N 89°17'21" E S 86°51'31" E N 89°35'56" E N 83°51'30" E 53 57 58 56 55 54 59 60 85.00' RT STA 216+07.36 85.00' RT STA 219+65.47 88.86' RT STA 224+37.02 196.31' RT STA 224+44.50 208.49' RT STA 225+14.72 105.25' RT STA 225+47.93 85.49' LT STA 226+18.25 112.48' LT STA 226+05.45 121.07' LT STA 225+18.26 100.86' LT STA 224+92.45 94.55' LT STA 223+89.59 96.48' LT STA 219+77.35 75.44' LT STA 217+53.06 69.99' LT STA 213+97.04 69.99' LT STA 212+99.26 1,712.98' N 89°16'56" E 170.20'169.34' IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" N 89°17'21" E 815.47'S 84°43'54" E 144.00' S 88°11'25" E 357.57'N 89°35'56" E 476.87'107.75'S 08°15'05" E78.28' S 86°09'12" E 108.48'N 11°44'55" EN 79°26'09" E 263.80' 506.52' IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" "EC&D RPLS 5439" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD N 89°16'56" E 1,634.00' 500.74' 313.44'208.74' N 89°17'17" E 360.96' L108 387.51' & PARCEL 56 PARCEL 55 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" & PARCEL 56 PARCEL 55 P.O.B. 100.19' LT STATION 213+66.79 E=2,504,643.12 N=7,147,845.28 WITH CAP (ILLEGIBLE) (CM) FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD 229.28' **EE-05 "EC&D RPLS 5439" WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD "DAA" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD 10.66' L109 212.56'N 89°40'25" E 196.16' 70.09' L110 L111L112 L1 1 3C9 EASEMENT SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED 15' 727.21' N 89°40'30" E O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 SEWER EASEMENT 15' SANITARY *EE-08 *EE-08 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5880, PAGE 28 WATER LINE EASEMENT 15' PERMANENT *EE-09 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 20' UTILITY EASEMENT *EE-06 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 TRIANGLE EASEMENT 45'X45' SIGHT VISIBILITY **EE-07 P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 & LANDSCAPE EASEMENT 50' BUILDING LINE **EE-01 P.R.C.C.T. CABINET P, PAGE 486 SEWER EASEMENT 15' WATER & SANITARY **EE-02 O.P.R.C.C.T. 20160218000186210 DOCUMENT NO. BELL TELEPHONE EASEMENT 20'X20' SOUTHWESTERN **EE-03 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 20' COSERV EASEMENT **EE-04 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 10' UTILITY EASEMENT **EE-05 **EE-07 131.87' P.O.C. PARCEL 59 WITH CAP (ILLEGIBLE) (CM) FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD **EE-03 86.09' LT STATION 217+52.64 E=2,505,034.84 N=7,147,830.60 PARCEL 59 P.O.B. S 00°55'19" W 140.25'L1 1 4 L107 L115 L116L117 9.72 "DAA" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 468, PAGE 125 VOLUME 467, PAGE 480 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT COOPERATIVE, INC. DENTON COUNTY ELECTRIC **EE-10 "DAA" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD 752.57' N 89°40'07" E 2,592.42'L118L119WITH CAP (ILLEGIBLE) (CM) FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD "GEER 4117" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD "GEER 4117" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD N 00°10'12" W 272.68'& PARCEL 58 PARCEL 57 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" PARCEL 57 P.O.B. 70.00' RT STATION 214+64.14 E=2,504,742.57 N=7,147,676.31 PARCEL 58 P.O.B. 86.76' RT STATION 216+75.69 E=2,504,951.35 N=7,147,661.02 65.41' 292.16' 930.97' 911.31' N 89°18'17" E 208.71'N 00°09'51" W 254.86'N 89°40'07" E 2,591.69' APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE ******** ****** **** ** ** ** **** ** ** ** NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE ABSTRACT NO. 945 COLEMAN WATSON SURVEY P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 515 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 515 CABINET K, EASEMENT 10' UTILITY 53 & 54 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 10 NOTE: P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR PARCEL 60 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 12 NOTE: P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR PARCEL STATE FED. RD. DIV. NO. DISTRICT NO. HIGHWAY NO. SHEET NO. STATE FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. CONTROL NO. SECTION NO. JOB NO. 6 TEXAS COUNTY 11COLLIN FM 1461 1973 01 018 N/A 1811"x17" SCALE: 1" = 100' 22"x34" SCALE: 1" = 50' N 0'25'50'100' GRAPHIC SCALE 50' P.O.B. 53 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. R.O.W. LINE NEW PLPLPL PL PL PLP.O.C. 54 EXISTING R.O.W.PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) P.O.B. R.O.W. LINE NEWPLE X IST IN G R .O .W . EXISTING R.O.W. R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.C. 58 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. PLPL PL 60EXISTING R.O.W.PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. P.O.B. R.O.W. LINE NEW PLPLPLPLPLPL LINE TABLE S 45°45'32" E 42.75' N 89°16'52" E 219.14' L107 L108 N 82°18'39" E 98.03' N 44°40'30" E 31.78' N 89°29'10" E 87.61' S 31°40'59" E 29.92' S 19°57'15" E 37.07' N 65°11'32" E 73.97' L109 L110 L111 L112 L113 L114 L115 S 05°43'55" E 9.80' L116 S 05°35'59" E 40.10' L117 S 00°55'19" W 20.38' L118 N 00°10'12" W 40.25' L119 N 00°09'51" W 58.16' ARC LENGTH CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH C9 1,686.59'03°18'30" (LT)S 02°02'36" E 97.37'97.38' = 134.44'CHORD DISTANCE = S 88°47'05" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 134.46'LENGTH = 67.26'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 03°51'08"DELTA = 2,504,952.16PI EASTING = 7,147,748.91PI NORTHING = 216+74.62PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 123.63'CHORD DISTANCE = S 88°37'47" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 123.65'LENGTH = 61.84'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 03°32'32"DELTA = 2,505,180.92PI EASTING = 7,147,736.36PI NORTHING = 219+03.67PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 200.30'CHORD DISTANCE = N 86°43'43" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 200.38'LENGTH = 100.28'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 05°44'26"DELTA = 2,505,693.03PI EASTING = 7,147,739.94PI NORTHING = 224+15.75PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 202.95'CHORD DISTANCE = N 86°46'00" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 203.04'LENGTH = 101.61'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 05°49'00"DELTA = 2,505,993.18PI EASTING = 7,147,772.24PI NORTHING = 227+17.47PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA LS FM 1461 PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PLPLPLPLPL PLEXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXI STI NG R.O.W.EXI STI NG R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EX IST IN G R .O .W .EXISTING R.O.W.N 89°17'17" E 671.36' REMAINDER OF PARCELS 53 & 54 NOTE: SEE SHEET 10 FOR THE REMAINDER OF PARCELS 58 & 60 NOTE: SEE SHEET 12 FOR THE CITY LIMIT LINEAPPROXIMATECALLED 4.375 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 289 STATE OF TEXAS O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20190916010003940 WELLSPRING ESTATES PHASE I OPEN SPACE/PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT LOT 1X, BLOCK H CALLED 112.274 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20150731000953760 SUNSHINE DEVELOPMENT GROUP. LTD OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20190916010003940 PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT N 89°41'52" E 566.90' (VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)P.R.C.C.T.CABINET P, PAGE 486(50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 (VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)P.R.C.C.T.CABINET P, PAGE 486(50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)E=2,504,151.2789 N=7,146,328.4350 GRID COORDINATE E=2,505,315.8507 N=7,146,284.0665 GRID COORDINATE E=2,505,585.0591 N=7,146,871.3278 GRID COORDINATE E=2,504,072.5759 N=7,147,028.0121 GRID COORDINATE 7,877 sf 5,626 sf 104,976 sf 19,281 sf Page 1387 Item 19. DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES PBX V V DENSETREES V V DENSETREES PBX DENSETREES DENSETREES V DENSETREES V DENSETREES DENSETREES V V DENSETREES V V V V V V V V V CONCRETE V V V V V PBX V V V DENSETREES PBX V PBX DENSETREES V V PBX PBX PBX V DENSETREES DENSETREES ONLYDENSETREES V V V V V CONCRETE CONCRETE DENSETREES V DENSETREES CONCRETE CONCRETE DENSETREES 240+00235+00230+00 PT 228+18.89 TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTY TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTY JURISDICTION EXTRATERRITORIAL TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 515 PHASE ONE AMBERWOOD FARMS LOT 1, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 515 PHASE ONE AMBERWOOD FARMS LOT 33, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. 20140512000466000 DOCUMENT NO. RICHARD B HONEA OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5595, PAGE 3277 ANITA HAWKINS OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 1, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 2, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 3, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 1, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 10, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 2, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 3, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 8, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 9, BLOCK B O.P.R.C.C.T. 20170630000863510 DOCUMENT NO. PHILLIP JOHNSON OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20130114000058550 DOCUMENT NO. MALCOLM CAMPBELL OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2747, PAGE 410 CHARLA KAY DUNN RODNEY WAYNE DUNN AND OWNER: CALLED 21.53 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20170629000854270 OM FRONTIER ESTATES, LLC OWNER: CALLED 0.719 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 342 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 3.667 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 269 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 0.264 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 277 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 1.321 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 269 STATE OF TEXAS **EE-13 ABSTRACT NO. 412 GEORGE HORN SURVEY **EE-15 **EE-12**EE11 **EE-14 **EE-16 P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 515 40' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 515 UTILITY EASEMENT 10' DRAINAGE & P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 40' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 515 40' BUILDING LINE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 515 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 515 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 515 10' UTILITY EASEMENT AMBERWOOD LANE P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 PROSPER, TEXAS RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 40' BUILDING LINE COLLIN GREEN BOULEVARDFM 1461 N 89°40'30" E 61 63 66 65 67 68 75.00' RT STA 228+18.89 73.64' RT STA 238+22.18 70.00' RT STA 241+22.22 N 79°26'09" E 263.80' CALLED 112.274 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20150731000953760 SUNSHINE DEVELOPMENT GROUP. LTD OWNER: ABSTRACT NO. 945 COLEMAN WATSON SURVEY O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20190916010003940 CITY OF CELINA RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION LOT 12 LOT 11 LOT 10 LOT 9 LOT 8 LOT 7 LOT 6 LOT 5 LOT 4 LOT 3 LOT 2 PHASE I WELLSPRING ESTATES LOT 13X, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20190916010003940 WELLSPRING ESTATES PHASE I OPEN SPACE/PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT LOT 1X, BLOCK H SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT PROPOSED 15' O.P.R.C.C.T. 20190916010003940 DOCUMENT NO. 7.5' UTILITY EASEMENT FOUNTAIN PARK DRIVE (A 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)WELLSPRING PARKWAYN 89°40'30" E 727.21' O.P.R.C.C.T. 20190916010003940 DOCUMENT NO. WELLSPRING ESTATES PHASE I BLOCK A 62 64 131.87'595.34' & PARCEL 61 PARCEL 60 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" &PARCEL 61 PARCEL 60 P.O.B. 76.43' LT STATION 227+44.71 E=2,506,017.35 N=7,147,847.38 N 89°40'07" E 2,592.42' PARCEL 62 P.O.C. "CORWIN ENG INC" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20190916010003940 WELLSPRING ESTATES PHASE I OPEN SPACE LOT 14X, BLOCK A 75.00' LT STATION 233+37.23 E=2,506,612.68 N=7,147,850.75 PARCEL 62 P.O.B. CALLED 92.349 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20150731000953760 SUNSHINE DEVELOPMENT GROUP. LTD OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5880, PAGE 8 CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS & TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 25' PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT **EE11 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5880, PAGE 8 CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS WATER LINE EASEMENT 15' PERMANENT **EE-12 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5120, PAGE 4665 COSERV GAS, LTD. SYSTEM EASEMENT NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION **EE-13 D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2503, PAGE 952 EASEMENT ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. DENTON COUNTY **EE-14 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4772, PAGE 981 COSERV GAS, LTD 10' EASEMENT TO **EE-15 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5880, PAGE 1 CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS & TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 25' PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT **EE-16 PARCEL 64 P.O.C. "CORWIN ENG INC" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD 80.00' LT STATION 234+73.78 E=2,506,749.20 N=7,147,856.53 PARCEL 64 P.O.B. O.P.R.C.C.T. 20190916010003940 DOCUMENT NO. MAINTENANCE EASEMENT 5' WALL & **EE-17 N 87°34'41" E 136.64'N 89°40'30" E 889.39' 1,839.85' **EE-18 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5880, PAGE 1 CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS WATER LINE EASEMENT 15' PERMANENT **EE-18 109.83'S 01°57'47" WN 89°37'02" E 436.28' 107.67' N 89°40'30" E N 89°40'30" E 239.92' 500.02' N 89°40'30" E L120 L121 L122 L123 L124 L125 L126 75.02' RT STA 228+86.25 67.27' RT STA 228+96.89 MONUMENT (CM) FOUND TXDOT WOOD "GEER 4117" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" 433.44' 66.83' RT STA 233+30.339 79.49' RT STA 233+41.28 79.49' RT STA 234+48.95 69.70' RT STA 234+60.32 & PARCEL 65 PARCEL 63 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" "DAA" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD S 00°07'50" W 192.25'& PARCEL 65 PARCEL 63 P.O.B. 69.59' RT STATION 235+72.30 E=2,506,848.57 N=7,147,707.50 73.64' RT STA 235+82.26 "CORWIN ENG INC" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD 653.13'N 89°43'48" E 249.90' 2.84' 250.01'250.01' P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 10' UTILITY EASEMENT & PARCEL 67 PARCEL 66 P.O.B. 70.00' RT STATION 238+72.21 E=2,507,148.48 N=7,147,708.79 IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" & PARCEL 67 PARCEL 66 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" 250.01'250.01' N 89°43'48" E 500.02' L127 L128 12.54' 17.40' L129L130L131 L132 N 89°45'22" E 689.12' L133 L134L135L136 10.11' 14.65' N 89°40'07" E 2,591.69'1,007.59' L137 L138 L139 ABSTRACT NO. 419 WM T HORN SURVEY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE CALLED 112.274 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20150731000953760 SUNSHINE DEVELOPMENT GROUP. LTD OWNER:S 00°07'50" W 191.00'IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2"S 00°07'50" W 189.01'** ** ** ** ** **** **** ** **** NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE *EE-09 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5880, PAGE 28 ACCESS EASEMENT 25' PERMANENT**EE-10 *EE-06 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 CITY OF CELINA DEDICATION 20' RIGHT-OF-WAY 566.90' N 89°41'52" E *EE-08 131.87' "CORWIN ENG INC" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD L127 L128 12.54' 17.40' O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 MUSTANG LAKES PHASE ONE LOT 4X, BLOCK C O.P.R.C.C.T. 20170905001187960 DOCUMENT NO. OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. MUSTANG LAKES OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 74 VOLUME 2017, EASEMENT DETENTION DRAINAGE & NOT TO SCALE DETAIL "A" &PARCEL 61 PARCEL 60 P.O.B. 76.43' LT STATION 227+44.71 E=2,506,017.35 N=7,147,847.38 SEE DETAIL "A" **EE-17 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 SEWER EASEMENT 15' SANITARY *EE-08 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5880, PAGE 28 WATER LINE EASEMENT 15' PERMANENT *EE-09 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2017, PAGE 74 20' UTILITY EASEMENT *EE-06 D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 468, PAGE 125 VOLUME 467, PAGE 480 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT COOPERATIVE, INC. DENTON COUNTY ELECTRIC **EE-10 58 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 11 NOTE: P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR PARCEL REMAINDER OF PARCELS 58 & 60 NOTE: SEE SHEET 11 FOR THE REMAINDER OF PARCELS 64 & 68 NOTE: SEE SHEET 13 FOR THE 68 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 13 NOTE: P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR PARCEL 11"x17" SCALE: 1" = 100' 22"x34" SCALE: 1" = 50'STATE N FED. RD. DIV. NO. DISTRICT NO. HIGHWAY NO. SHEET NO. STATE FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. CONTROL NO. SECTION NO. JOB NO. 6 TEXAS COUNTY 12COLLIN FM 1461 1973 01 018 N/A 18 0'25'50'100' GRAPHIC SCALE 50' 58 60 PLR.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.C. 58 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. PLPL PL 60EXISTING R.O.W.PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. P.O.B. R.O.W. LINE NEW PLPLPLPLPLPL LINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.C. 61 EXISTING R.O.W.PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. PL PL PL PLPL R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.B. 68 EXISTING R.O.W.PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. PLPL = 202.95'CHORD DISTANCE = N 86°46'00" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 203.04'LENGTH = 101.61'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 05°49'00"DELTA = 2,505,993.18PI EASTING = 7,147,772.24PI NORTHING = 227+17.47PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA L121 N 44°51'48" E 10.99' L122 S 41°10'44" E 16.74' L123 N 48°56'51" E 15.01' L124 N 89°37'02" E 111.98' L125 S 68°11'51" E 10.76' L126 N 85°31'04" E 50.16' L127 S 01°57'47" W 9.93' L128 S 01°57'47" W 20.02' L129 S 44°43'31" W 23.49' LINE TABLE L120 N 89°41'23" E 67.35'L130 N 44°43'31" E 18.91' L131 S 45°16'29" E 30.32' L132 S 45°16'29" E 12.13' L133 N 89°45'22" E 95.99' L134 S 82°38'57" E 75.66' L135 N 44°51'48" E 31.74' L136 N 00°12'21" E 24.76' L137 N 00°07'50" E 13.92' L138 N 00°07'50" E 10.24' L139 N 00°07'50" E 10.00' LINE TABLE PL PLPL PL PL PLPL PL PL PL PLPLPL PLPL PL PLEXISTING R.O.W. NEW R.O.W. LINE 60 61 PLPL PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLLS LSEXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.R.O.W.EXISTINGR.O.W.EXISTINGEXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W. O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 1133 VOLUME 4923, ASSOCIATION, INC. HOMEOWNERS AMBERWOOD FARMS OWNER: ** O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20190916010003940 DRAINAGE EASEMENT PROPOSED O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20190916010003940 DRAINAGE EASEMENT PROPOSED O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20190916010003940 10' UTILITY EASEMENT S 89°45'22" E 582.46'PLPLPL930.97' 911.31'N 00°12'21" E 194.31'752.57' 752.57' 566.90' N 89°41'52" E CALLED 4.375 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. PAGE 289 VOLUME 484, STATE OF TEXAS P.R.C.C.T.CABINET K, PAGE 515(50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)P.R.C.C.T. CABINET K, PAGE 515 (50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)(VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)(VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) E=2,507,032.0370 N=7,146,298.5254 GRID COORDINATE E=2,506,995.1849 N=7,146,942.7832 GRID COORDINATE E=2,505,756.7866 N=7,146,964.4575 GRID COORDINATE E=2,505,663.7011 N=7,146,379.3138 GRID COORDINATE 67.27' RT STA 228+94.06 9,604 sf 14,874 sf 3,678 sf 30,318 sf 30,494 sf To allow for the centerline to shift back to the north 15-feet along the Gentle Creek neighborhood, Celina allowed encroachment into their existing easement. TxDOT and Celina also agreed to reduced the lane widths from 12-feet to 11-feet through this area (Approximate STA 179+00 through STA 199+00, +/-). Additionally, the Town is recommending 6-foot wide sidewalks be constructed instead of the proposed 10-foot width in the areas of Highland Meadows, Gentle Creek, and Amberwood Farms to allow for a wider green space between the roadway and the neighborhoods. AMBERWOOD FARMS REVISED ROADWAY CENTERLINE ROW AREA RETURNED ORIGINAL Page 1388 Item 19. DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES V V V PARKING AREA V V DENSETREES PBX PBX CONCRETE DENSETREES CONCRETE PBX V DENSETREES DENSETREES V DENSETREES PARKING AREA DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE V CONCRETE PBX DENSETREES V V DENSETREES CONCRETE V V PBX V DENSETREES DENSETREES CONCRETE V V V ONLYDENSETREES PBX CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES PC 257+12.70 255+00 PT 250+21.04 250+00 PC 249+08.23 PT 248+08.23 PC 246+95.41 245+54.76245+00 PC 257+12.70 TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINEEXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINECITY LIMIT LINEAPPROXIMATECALLED 11.22 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5358, PAGE 1583 AND WIFE, WYNELLE H. KLEBER WILLIAM M. KLEBER OWNER: CALLED 34.62 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20121219001618900 YOUNG LEI KIM OWNER: CALLED 2.60 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20090601000664970 DESCRIBED IN PR.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. PB1-0300-2012 NANCY ANN CASHON OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 21, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2016, PAGE 698 LOT 1, BLOCK A PROSPER SELF STORAGE, LOT 1, BLOCK A CALLED 4.2662 ACRES REMAINDER OF O.P.R.C.C.T. 20090127000082580 DOCUMENT NO. STORAGE, LP, PROSPER SELF OWNER: P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 10, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 8, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 9, BLOCK B P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 22, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 16, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 15, BLOCK A P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 COLLIN GREEN LOT 14, BLOCK A O.P.R.C.C.T. 20120813000992270 DOCUMENT NO. TINA ROBINSON BRIAN ROBINSON AND OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20170630000863510 DOCUMENT NO. PHILLIP JOHNSON OWNER: CALLED 1.172 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. 20190130000096120 DOCUMENT NO. QSI PARTNERS LLC OWNER: 1.321 ACRES CALLED D.R.C.C.T. PAGE 269 VOLUME 484, STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 34.62 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20141007001097150 NAZNAT LP OWNER: ABSTRACT NO. 412 GEORGE HORN SURVEY CALLED 1.321 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 269 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 0.116 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 340 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 0.356 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 283 STATE OF TEXAS 3.689 ACRES CALLED D.R.C.C.T. PAGE 277 VOLUME 484, TEXAS STATE OF **EE-15 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5858, PAGE 1 CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS WATER LINE EASEMENT 15' PERMANENT **EE-19 (NO EASEMENT OF RECORD FOUND) CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS WATER LINE EASEMENT 15' PERMANENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 40' BUILDING LINEP.R.C.C.T.CABINET K, PAGE 515(50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)MEADOW GREENO.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2016, PAGE 698 16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2010, PAGE 108 & UTILITY EASEMENT 25' FIRE LANE, ACCESS P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 PROSPER, TEXAS RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 10' UTILITY EASEMENT P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 40' BUILDING LINE O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2010, PAGE 108 TOWN OF PROSPER RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2010, PAGE 108 & UTILITY EASEMENT 25' FIRE LANE, ACCESS O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 2010, PAGE 108 DETENTION EASEMENT DRAINAGE & O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 698 VOLUME 2016 ACCESS EASEMENT 9' PEDESTRIAN O.P.R.C.C.T. PAGE 698 VOLUME 2016, EASEMENT WATER FM 2478 (CUSTER ROAD)FM 1461 N 89°40'30" E N 86°59'13" E S 89°46'52" E S 89°46'52" E 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 75(E) 70.00' RT STA 244+22.23 70.00' RT STA 246+95.41 IN CONCRETE SET "X" CUT 71.08' RT STA 249+78.13 WITH WASHER SET MAG NAIL 71.53' RT STA 252+72.87 80.40' RT STA 252+73.02 83.32' RT STA 255+03.58 89.15' RT STA 254+96.28 80.33' RT STA 254+87.17 155.86' RT STA 256+27.62 70.00' LT STA 256+08.63 70.00' LT STA 255+08.63 99.00' LT STA 255+37.63 99.00' LT STA 255+79.63 70.98' LT STA 249+59.42 ABSTRACT NO. 945 COLEMAN WATSON SURVEY LOT 3 LOT 2 LOT 1 PHASE I WELLSPRING ESTATES LOT 8, BLOCK C PHASE I WELLSPRING ESTATES LOT 9X, BLOCK C PHASE I WELLSPRING ESTATES LOT 7, BLOCK C PHASE I WELLSPRING ESTATES LOT 6, BLOCK C MILL POND DRIVEO.P.R.C.C.T. 20190916010003940 DOCUMENT NO. PHASE I WELLSPRING ESTATES BLOCK A 64 70 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 4772, PAGE 981 COSERV GAS, LTD 10' EASEMENT TO **EE-15 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5880, PAGE 1 CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS & TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 25' PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT **EE-16 **EE-17 O.P.R.C.C.T. 20190916010003940 DOCUMENT NO. MAINTENANCE EASEMENT 5' WALL & **EE-17 PHASE I WELLSPRING ESTATES LOT 13X, BLOCK A CALLED 112.274 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20150731000953760 SUNSHINE DEVELOPMENT GROUP. LTD OWNER: N 89°40'30" E 889.39'S 89°46'52" E 953.97'749.40' S 89°46'52" E 26.54' S 89°46'41" E 1,202.31' O.P.R.C.C.T. 20190916010003940 DOCUMENT NO. CITY OF CELINA RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION **EE-18 O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5880, PAGE 1 CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS WATER LINE EASEMENT 15' PERMANENT **EE-18 & PARCEL 72 PARCEL 70 P.O.C. "CORWIN ENG INC" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD 84.76'98.08'S 00°42'38" WO.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5858, PAGE 1 CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS & TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 25' PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT **EE-19 250.01' P.R.C.C.T. CABINET G, PAGE 245 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 250.01' N 89°43'48" E 500.02' N 89°45'22" E 689.12' 1,007.59' L140 L141 **EE-18 "CORWIN ENG INC" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD 52.59' CALLED 112.274 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20150731000953760 SUNSHINE DEVELOPMENT GROUP. LTD OWNER: MONUMENT BEARS FOUND TXDOT TYPE I IRON ROD BEARS FOUND 1/2" L143L144L14582.00' LT STATION 246+06.96 E=2,507,883.13 N=7,147,864.46 & PARCEL 72 PARCEL 70 P.O.B. 350.00'551.38'425.92' 350.00'825.77' "GEER 4117" BEARS WITH CAP STMAPED FOUND 1/2 " IRON ROD N 00°07'50" E 192.99'IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" 70.00' RT STATION 243+72.23 E=2,507,648.49 N=7,147,711.62 PARCEL 68 P.O.B. PARCEL 68 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" 500.02' N 89°40'30" E L146 & PARCEL 71 PARCEL 69 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 3/8" PARCEL 73 P.O.C. 60D NAIL (CM) FOUND 140.31' S 89°46'52" EL147 25.10' N 89°43'48" E 157.45' 115.21' N 88°06'23" E 284.16'S 89°46'52" E 293.21' 112.65' 171.51' 70.00' RT STA 245+55.09 IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2"136.31'N 01°09'29" WN 00°46'00" W 201.20'PARCEL 73 P.O.B. 68.91' RT STATION 248+04.29 E=2,508,083.59 N=7,147,715.84 & PARCEL 71 PARCEL 69 P.O.B. 70.00' RT STATION 245+80.20 E=2,507,855.79 N=7,147,712.56 MONUMENT (CM) FOUND TXDOT TYPE I 227.08'464.72' S 89°46'41" E 946.83' 255.03' "TX NO 3258" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD O.P.R.C.C.T. 20071203001611560 DOCUMENT NO. TOWN OF PROSPER WATER LINE EASEMENT & PARCEL 75(E) PARCEL 75 P.O.C. "TX NO 3258" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD S 89°49'01" E 269.72' WITH CAP ILLEGIBLE (CM) FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD 83.31' RT STATION 255+54.61 E=2,508,829.91 N=7,147,808.54 PARCEL 75(E) P.O.B. 71.36' RT STATION 255+42.58 E=2,508,817.93 N=7,147,719.53 PARCEL 75 P.O.B. S 89°48'00" E 214.15' L148 L149 L150 L151 L152 L153 L154L155 L156 L157 L158 L159 L160 L161 L162 L163 L164 L165 L166 L167L168L169"CORWIN ENG INC" (CM) WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD ** ** **** **** ** ******** **** ** ** NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE **EE-16 CALLED 92.349 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20150731000953760 SUNSHINE DEVELOPMENT GROUP. LTD OWNER: CITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY CALLED 3.667 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 269 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 2.522 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 311 STATE OF TEXAS STATE FED. RD. DIV. NO. DISTRICT NO. HIGHWAY NO. SHEET NO. STATE FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. CONTROL NO. SECTION NO. JOB NO. 6 TEXAS COUNTY 13COLLIN FM 1461 1973 01 018 N/A 1811"x17" SCALE: 1" = 100' 22"x34" SCALE: 1" = 50' 0'25'50'100' GRAPHIC SCALE 50' REMAINDER OF PARCELS 64 & 68 NOTE: SEE SHEET 12 FOR THE R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.B. 68 EXISTING R.O.W.PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. PLPL LINE R.O.W. NEW P.O.B. 72 PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.C. PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. PL PLPLP.O.B. 74 PL PLPLPLPL PL L140 N 88°13'01" E 78.59' L141 N 89°40'30" E 113.42' L143 N 45°13'08" E 41.01' L144 S 89°46'52" E 42.00' L145 S 44°46'52" E 41.01' L146 N 89°40'30" E 50.00' L147 N 89°40'30" E 132.20' L148 N 45°59'04" E 28.67' L149 S 42°22'43" E 16.10' L150 N 89°45'22" E 80.27' L151 S 83°00'43" E 75.17' L152 S 00°42'38" W 21.14' L153 S 00°42'38" W 15.32' L154 S 00°42'38" W 36.49' L155 N 00°07'50" E 9.76' L156 N 00°07'50" E 9.71' LINE TABLE L157 N 00°59'08" E 15.74' L158 N 00°59'08" E 9.80' L159 N 00°46'00" W 21.37' L160 S 00°44'37" E 15.03' L161 S 00°44'37" E 8.87' L162 S 45°42'19" E 12.68' L163 N 51°36'34" E 9.34' L164 S 89°48'00" E 51.03' L165 S 44°57'40" E 21.06' L166 S 44°57'40" E 16.95' L167 N 89°50'28" W 28.66' L168 N 44°57'40" W 102.93' L169 N 00°59'08" E 61.05' LINE TABLE = 112.80'CHORD DISTANCE = N 88°36'10" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 112.82'LENGTH = 56.42'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 03°13'55"DELTA = 2,508,027.69PI EASTING = 7,147,781.91PI NORTHING = 247+51.84PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 112.80'CHORD DISTANCE = N 88°36'10" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 112.82'LENGTH = 56.42'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 03°13'55"DELTA = 2,508,240.24PI EASTING = 7,147,793.09PI NORTHING = 249+64.65PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 129.09'CHORD DISTANCE = S 87°55'55" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 129.11'LENGTH = 64.58'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 03°41'55"DELTA = 2,509,052.89PI EASTING = 7,147,789.99PI NORTHING = 257+77.28PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PLPLPL PLPLPLPL LS EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.FOUNTAIN PARK DRIVE EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.(90' RIGHT-OF-WAY)MCKINNEY CITY OF COLLIN COUNTY O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20190916010003940 7.5' UTILITY EASEMENT O.P.R.C.C.T. 20190916010003940 DOCUMENT NO. 25' BUILDING LINE PL N 62 66 N 89°40'07" E 2,591.69' N 89°40'07" E 2,591.68' 1,839.85' DISK SE 3-1/4"ALUMINUM HM#E0430186 (VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) E=2,508,121.0149 N=7,146,330.4064 GRID COORDINATE E=2,508,469.4080 N=7,146,932.6633 GRID COORDINATE E=2,507,107.5278 N=7,146,991.5187 GRID COORDINATE E=2,507,373.7077 N=7,146,215.7539 GRID COORDINATE(50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)(50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) REMAINDER OF PARCEL 74 NOTE: SEE SHEET 14 FOR THE PARCEL 64 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 12 NOTE: THE P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR PARCEL 74 IS LOCATED ON SHEET 14 NOTE: THE P.O.C. AND P.O.B. FOR Page 1389 Item 19. DENSETREES ONLYONLYDENSETREES CONCRETE CONCRETE DENSETREES DENSETREES PBX V V DENSETREES DENSETREES V 270+00265+00 PT 260+83.91 260+00 PC 259+41.80 PT 258+41.80 PC 257+12.70 PC 257+12.70 TOWN OF PROSPER COLLIN COUNTYAPPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINECITY OF CELINA COLLIN COUNTY APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINE APPROXIMATE CITY LIMIT LINECITY OF MCKINNEY COLLIN COUNTY CITY OF MCKINNEY COLLIN COUNTY CALLED 402,489 SQ. FT.O.P.R.C.C.T.DOCUMENT NO. 20180424000490140STATE OF TEXASPARCEL 47REMAINDER OF 1.752 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20130125000113620 THE NICID LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OWNER: CALLED 23,449 SQ. FT. O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20180419000461970 PARCEL 48 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 35.544 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20190624000727970 BILLINGSLY CORNELL CAPITAL, L.P. OWNER: CALLED 11,571 SQ. FT. O.P.R.C.C.T. 20180813001009980 DOCUMENT NO. PARCEL 50 STATE OF TEXAS LIS PENDENS CALLED 6,297 SQ. FT. O.P.R.C.C.T. 20180413000449590 DOCUMENT NO. PARCEL 51 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 34.62 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20121219001618900 YOUNG LEI KIM OWNER: O.P.R.C.C.T. 20181114001407210 DOCUMENT NO. PARCEL 49A STATE OF TEXAS REMAINDER OF 134.44 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20100610000588740 HAGGARD RHEA MILLS, LLC OWNER: REMAINDER OF 134.44 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20100610000588740 HAGGARD RHEA MILLS, LLC OWNER: CALLED 2.376 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 273 STATE OF TEXAS D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 760, PAGE 574 STATE OF TEXAS EASEMENT TO 0.500 ACRES REMAINDER OF O.P.R.C.C.T. 20170607000738910 DOCUMENT NO. TRACT 4 MWE HOLDINGS, L.L.C. OWNER: REMAINDER OF 2.000 ACRES O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO. 20170607000738910 TRACT 3 MWE HOLDINGS, L.L.C. OWNER: ABSTRACT NO. 816 LANGDON C. SEARCY SURVEY CALLED 2.522 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 311 STATE OF TEXAS CALLED 3.689 ACRES D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 484, PAGE 277 STATE OF TEXAS O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5893, PAGE 9 CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS WATER LINE EASEMENT 15' PERMANENT O.P.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 5893, PAGE 9 CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS & TEMPORARYCONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 25' PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT (VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)FM 2478 (CUSTER ROAD)O.P.R.C.C.T. DOCUMENT NO 20180918001170760 COSERV GAS, LTD. SYSTEM EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION FM 2478 (CUSTER ROAD)(VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)(90' RIGHT-OF-WAY)FM 2478 (CUSTER ROAD)FM 1461 S 89°46'52" E S 86°04'57" E N 89°50'47" E 74 77 76 78 76 127.43' RT STA 257+48.05 79.98' RT STA 257+94.99 86.32' RT STA 260+12.86 82.95' LT STA 263+58.97 ABSTRACT NO. 945 COLEMAN WATSON SURVEY S 89°46'52" E 749.40' 1,202.31' S 89°46'41" E 425.92' 825.77' & PARCEL 77 PARCEL 74 P.O.C. IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2"S 00°08'06" E 157.84'84.44' LT STATION 260+33.35 E=2,509,310.43 N=7,147,859.01 & PARCEL 77 PARCEL 74 P.O.B. 323.48' 80.68'N 44°51'22" E PART 1 PART 2 MONUMENT BEARS FOUND TXDOT WOOD TRANSPORTATION ROW MONUMENT" (CM) STAMPED "TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP TRANSPORTATION ROW MONUMENT" (CM) STAMPED "TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP TRANSPORTATION ROW MONUMENT" (CM) STAMPED "TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP TRANSPORTATION ROW MONUMENT" (CM) STAMPED "TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" TRANSPORTATION ROW MONUMENT" (CM) STAMPED "TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP MONUMENT" (CM) TRANSPORTATION ROW "TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD MONUMENT" BEARS TRANSPORTATION ROW "TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD TRANSPORTATION ROW MONUMENT" (CM) STAMPED "TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP N 89°50'47" E 542.76' 237.24'305.52' TRANSPORTATION ROW MONUMENT" (CM) STAMPED "TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 1/2" PARCEL 78 P.O.C. ROW MONUMENT" (CM) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WITH CAP STAMPED "TEXAS FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD 81.68' LT STATION 266+21.33 E=2,509,896.28 N=7,147,857.20 PARCEL 78 P.O.B. 75.41'S 45°08'32" E N 89°46'19" E 1,457.23' N 89°44'56" E 3,813.00' N 89°50'53" E 423.87' TRANSPORTATION ROW MONUMENT" STAMPED "TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH CAP IRON ROD (CM) FOUND 5/8" MONUMENT" (CM) TRANSPORTATION ROW "TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WITH CAP STAMPED FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD PARCEL 76 PART 1 P.O.C. ROW MONUMENT" (CM) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WITH CAP STAMPED "TEXAS FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD 85.00' RT STATION 263+73.07 E=2,509,648.47 N=7,147,689.86 PARCEL 76 PART 1 P.O.B. S 84°54'26" E 219.09' N 89°50'47" E 363.26'73.47'N 45°08'38" W65.05'N 45°03'56" EN 89°50'47" E 561.41' PARCEL 76 PART 2 P.O.C. ROW MONUMENT" (CM) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WITH CAP STAMPED "TEXAS FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD 73.29' RT STATION 266+44.73 E=2,509,920.09 N=7,147,702.30 PARCEL 76 PART 2 P.O.B. 87.23'N 44°51'22" E N 89°46'19" E 1,434.03' N 89°50'47" E 408.91' N 89°44'56" E 3,810.57' L170 L171 L172L173L174L177L178L179818.37' 1,472.51 ** ** ** **** ** ** ** NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE NEW R.O.W. LINE (NO EASEMENT OF RECORD FOUND) CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS WATER LINE EASEMENT 15' PERMANENT 2.920 ACRES CALLED D.R.C.C.T. VOLUME 760, PAGE 577 STATE OF TEXAS ABSTRACT NO. 412 GEORGE HORN SURVEY 11"x17" SCALE: 1" = 100' 22"x34" SCALE: 1" = 50'STATE N FED. RD. DIV. NO. DISTRICT NO. HIGHWAY NO. SHEET NO. STATE FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. CONTROL NO. SECTION NO. JOB NO. 6 TEXAS COUNTY 14COLLIN FM 1461 1973 01 018 N/A 18 0'25'50'100' GRAPHIC SCALE 50' R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.C. EXISTING R.O.W.PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. 74 PL PLPLPLPL PL R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.C. 76 EXISTING R.O.W.PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.P.O.B. PART 1 R.O.W. LINE NEW P.O.B. EXISTING R.O.W.PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.C. 76 PART 2 PL PLR.O.W. LINE NEWP.O.C. 78EXISTING R.O.W.PARENT TRACT INSERT (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING R.O.W. P.O.B. PL PLL170 N 44°50'47" E 20.98' L171 S 00°08'06" E 20.06' L172 N 44°51'22" E 25.40' L173 S 45°08'32" E 30.64' L174 S 45°09'07" E 18.76' L177 S 45°08'38" E 28.33' L178 N 44°51'22" E 18.85' L179 N 44°50'47" E 23.62' LINE TABLE = 129.09'CHORD DISTANCE = S 87°55'55" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 129.11'LENGTH = 64.58'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 03°41'55"DELTA = 2,509,052.89PI EASTING = 7,147,789.99PI NORTHING = 257+77.28PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA = 142.08'CHORD DISTANCE = S 88°07'05" ECHORD BEARING = 2,000.00'RADIUS = 142.11'LENGTH = 71.08'TANGENT = 02°51'53"DEGREE OF CURVE = 04°04'16"DELTA = 2,509,288.00PI EASTING = 7,147,773.89PI NORTHING = 260+12.89PI STATION CENTERLINE CURVE DATA LS LSPLPLPL EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. R.O.W. EXISTING EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING R.O.W. R.O.W. EXISTING EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.(VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) E=2,510,004.1602 N=7,146,304.1251 GRID COORDINATE E=2,508,656.9648 N=7,146,315.8804 GRID COORDINATE E=2,508,655.6786 N=7,147,057.7054 GRID COORDINATE E=2,510,017.0794 N=7,146,970.3868 GRID COORDINATE AND 78 REMAINDER OF PARCELS 76 PART 2 NOTE: SEE SHEET 15 FOR THE REMAINDER OF PARCEL 74 NOTE: SEE SHEET 13 FOR THE Page 1390 Item 19. Page 1 of 2 To: Mayor and Town Council From: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon an ordinance establishing a Homestead Tax Exemption. Description of Agenda Item: Chapter 11.13(n) of the State of Texas Tax Code provides for an optional residential homestead exemption by any taxing unit. Each taxing unit decides if it will offer the exemption and at what percentage. This optional homestead exemption cannot be less than $5,000 or greater than twenty percent of the qualifying property’s assessed value. The Town’s current assessed homestead tax exemption rate is 10%. Property tax revenue is split between the General Fund (Maintenance and Operations) and the Interest and Sinking Fund (Debt Service). The 2022 tax rate as approved during the last budget cycle provides for the following tax rate: $0.3280 for Maintenance and Operations $0.1820 for Debt Service $0.5100 Total Tax Rate Budget Impact: Staff is estimating lost revenue based on the preliminary roll information provided by the appraisal districts to be approximately $778,000. Legal Obligations and Review: Terrence Welch with Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P., has reviewed the attached ordinance as to form and legality. Attached Documents: 1. Ordinance Town Staff Recommendation: Town staff recommends that the Town Council establish a Homestead Tax Exemption of twelve and a half percent (12.5%). Prosper is a place where everyone matters. FINANCE DEPARTMENT Page 1391 Item 20. Page 2 of 2 Proposed Motion: I move to approve an ordinance establishing a Homestead Tax Exemption of twelve and a half percent (12.5%). Page 1392 Item 20. TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 2022-XX AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, REPEALING TOWN OF PROSPER ORDINANCE NO. 17-50; ESTABLISHING A HOMESTEAD TAX EXEMPTION IN THE AMOUNT OF TWELVE AND A HALF PERCENT (12.5%) OF THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE HOMESTEAD; PROVIDING FOR APPROPRIATE NOTICE TO BE GIVEN BY THE CHIEF APPRAISERS OF DENTON COUNTY AND COLLIN COUNTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Texas was amended in 1981 by a vote of the people to allow cities the local option to grant homestead exemptions; and WHEREAS, on or about June 27, 2017, the Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 17-50, which ordinance authorized a homestead exemption in the amount of ten percent (10%); and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Town Council to repeal Ordinance No. 17-50 in its entirety and hereby authorize a homestead exemption in the amount of twelve and a half percent (12.5%). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1 The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2 Town of Prosper Ordinance No. 17-50, adopted by the Town Council on or about June 27, 2017, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION 3 From and after the effective date of this Ordinance, a homestead exemption of twelve and a half percent (12.5%) is granted to all qualified homeowners subject to the Town’s property tax pursuant to the laws of the State of Texas regulating the assessment of ad valorem taxes. If this percentage produces an exemption of less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) when applied to a particular residence homestead, the individual shall be entitled to an exemption of five thousand dollars ($5,000) of the assessed value of the property. SECTION 4 Page 1393 Item 20. Ordinance No. 2022- __, Page 2 The Chief Appraiser for the Denton County Appraisal District and the Chief Appraiser for the Collin County Appraisal District shall give appropriate notice to the general public advising it of the availability of the exemption. SECTION 5 This Ordinance shall apply to the 2022 tax roll and all subsequent tax rolls unless repealed or amended by ordinance. SECTION 6 This Ordinance shall become effective after its passage. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022. APPROVED: ___________________________________ David F. Bristol, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________________ Michelle Lewis Sirianni, Town Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _____________________________________ Terrence S. Welch, Town Attorney Page 1394 Item 20. Page 1 of 1 To: Mayor and Town Council From: Dan Baker, Parks and Recreation Director Through: Harlan Jefferson, Town Manager Robyn Battle, Executive Director of Community Services Re: Town Council Meeting – June 28, 2022 Agenda Item: Discussion on Raymond Community Park. Description of Agenda Item: At the March 29th Town Council Meeting, an agreement with Dunaway Associates was approved related to the Raymond Community Park Phase 1 design plans. At this time, Dunaway has completed an assessment of the site, and has identified a first phase and theme as it relates to the development of Raymond Community Park. Attached Documents: 1. Raymond Community Park Phase 1 Presentation Town Staff Recommendation: Town staff recommends that the Town Council give staff feedback and direction on Raymond Community Park. Prosper is a place where everyone matters. PARKS & RECREATION Page 1395 Item 21. Phase I Page 1396 Item 21. Create a landmark park in Prosper that respects the rich heritage of the community, the site, and its name . Our Team’s Commitment Page 1397 Item 21. Community Legacy Site Sensitivity Honoring Dudley Page 1398 Item 21. Community Legacy Agriculture Production Economy Investment History Generations Family Farm Cultivate Stewardship Fruitful Prosperity Growth Legacy RootsPage 1399 Item 21. Nature Wildlife Trees Roots Agriculture Water Wildflowers Butterflies Natural Resources Native Enduring Escape Prairie Perennials Ecosystem Site Sensitivity Page 1400 Item 21. Memories Prosper Commemoration Life Family Design Fun Respect Tribute Joyful Giving Supportive Buoyant Honor Happiness Legacy Honoring Dudley Page 1401 Item 21. Site Overview Page 1402 Item 21. Page 1403 Item 21. Page 1404 Item 21. Page 1405 Item 21. Page 1406 Item 21. Page 1407 Item 21. Conceptual Alternative Page 1408 Item 21. Key Features2015 Master Plan •Central 4-Plex w/ 250’ Foul Lines •Multi -Use Field Sports at Perimeter •Highly Visible Community Center at First & Coit Intersection •(4) Full-Size Tennis Courts •Community Gathering w/ Amphitheater at Water’s Edge •Neighborhood Park Amenities at Pond •Trail Connections to Town Trail Network •Parking +/-645 Spaces Page 1409 Item 21. Sports Lighted 4-Plex Multi-Use Fields Tennis & Pickleball Trails Hike & Bike Trails Trailheads Wayfinding Community Inclusive Playground Amphitheater Sprayground Vehicular Primary Entries Parking Areas Drop Off / Access Multi-Use Field Sports Multi-Use Field Sports Field Complex (4) Tennis & Pickleball Multi-Use Field Sports Restroom Existing Lake Playground / Sprayground Gateway Entry Entry Concrete Trail Trail Network Connection Group Pavilion / Pump Room Amphitheater Terraced Seating Entry Monument Restroom / Concession Drop Off Drop Off Arrival Park Signage EAST FIRST STREET COIT ROADExisting Pond Overlook Nature Trail Parking (450 Spaces) Overlook Parking (130 Spaces) Parking (35 Spaces) Parking (44 Spaces) Warm Up Area Pedestrian Bridge Gateway Entry Picnic Station Picnic Station Open Space Picnic Station 225’190’ 190’190’360’360’190’360’225’’190’360’225’ 190’360’190’360’(Future Community Center) 2022 Revised Concept Plan Feature Updates •Prominent entries off Coit & First •Organize circulation off 4-plex symmetry •Parking serves different recreation areas •Civic space enjoys backdrop of trees & water •Tennis & pickleball have distinct space •Maintained areas for Field Sports Program Elements Architecture Group Pavilion / Restroom & Concession / Monuments360’Page 1410 Item 21. Ballfield 4-Plex Page 1411 Item 21. Multi-Use Fields Page 1412 Item 21. Pickleball & Tennis Page 1413 Item 21. Amphitheater Page 1414 Item 21. Playground Page 1415 Item 21. Hike & Bike Trails Page 1416 Item 21. Identity Monuments Page 1417 Item 21. Restroom & Concession Translucent Panels Large Stone Veneer Standing Seam Metal Roofing Page 1418 Item 21. Restroom & ConcessionPage 1419 Item 21. Large Group Pavilion Translucent Panels Large Stone Veneer Standing Seam Metal Roofing Page 1420 Item 21. Large Group PavilionPage 1421 Item 21. Multi-Use Field Sports (non-lit) Field Complex (4) Tennis & Pickleball Multi-Use Field Sports (non-lit) Existing Lake Playground Entry Concrete Trail Trail Network Connection Group Pavilion Restroom / Concession Drop Off Drop Off Arrival Park Signage EAST FIRST STREET COIT ROADExisting Pond Overlook Nature Trail Parking (315 Spaces) Overlook Parking (100 Spaces) Warm Up Area Pedestrian Bridge Gateway Entry Picnic Station Picnic Station Open Space Picnic Station 225’190’ 190’190’360’360’190’360’225’’190’ (Future Community Center) Phase I Considerations GENERAL SITE ITEMS OVERALL PARK IMPROVEMENTS PARKING & DRIVES (Approx. 415 Spaces) BALLFIELD COMPLEX PARK & PERIMETER TRAILS TENNIS & PICKLEBALL BASE SUBTOTAL +/-15% CONTINENGENCY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $2,000,000 $1,375,000 $2,900,000 $5,200,000 $1,600,000 $1,000,000 $14,075,000 $2,000,000 $16,075,000 Projected Budget –Phase I Page 1422 Item 21. Next Steps A.Topo Survey B.Phase I Conceptual Alternative •Park Board -June 9th •Town Council –June 28th C.Schematic Design D.Design Development E.Final Construction Documents F.Bid Phase G.Construction Phase Page 1423 Item 21.