Loading...
09.15.26 PZ Agenda PacketPage 1 of 2 ] Welcome to the Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. Citizens may watch the meeting live by using the following link: www.prospertx.gov/livemeetings Addressing the Planning and Zoning Commission: Those wishing to address the Planning and Zoning Commission must complete the Public Comment Request Form located on the Town's website or in the Council Chambers. If you are attending in person, please submit this form to the Town Secretary or the person recording the minutes for the Board/Commission prior to the meeting. When called upon, please come to the podium, and state your name and address for the record. If you are watching online, please submit this form to the Town Secretary prior to 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting in order for your comments to be read into the record. The Town assumes no responsibility for technical issues beyond our control. In compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, the Town Council/Board/ Commission may not deliberate or vote on any matter that does not appear on the agenda. The Council/Board/Commission, however, may provide statements of fact regarding the topic, request the topic be included as part of a future meeting, and/or refer the topic to Town Staff for further assistance. Citizens and other visitors attending Planning and Zoning Commission meetings shall observe the same rules of propriety, decorum, and good conduct applicable to members of the Commission. Any person making personal, impertinent, profane or slanderous remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the Commission or while attending the meeting shall be removed from the room, if so directed by the Planning and Zoning Chair or presiding officer, and the person shall be barred from further audience before the Commission during that session of the meeting. Disruption of a public meeting could constitute a violation of Section 42.05 of the Texas Penal Code. 1. Call to Order / Roll Call. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. CONSENT AGENDA: Items placed on the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and are considered non- controversial. The Consent Agenda can be acted upon in one motion. Items may be removed from the Consent Agenda by the request of a Commission Member or Staff. 3a. Consider and act upon the minutes from the September 1, 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission work session meeting. 3b. Consider and act upon the minutes from the September 1, 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting. AGENDA Planning and Zoning Commission Prosper Town Hall, Council Chambers 250 W. First Street, Prosper, Texas Tuesday, September 15, 2026 6:30 PM 1 Page 2 of 2 3c. Consider and act upon a request for a Preliminary Plat of Barrington Lake, on 44.5± acres, located on the east side of Coit Road and 1,280± feet north of First Street. (DEVAPP-26-0063) CITIZEN COMMENTS The public is invited to address the Planning & Zoning Commission on any topic. However, the Commission is unable to discuss or take action on any topic not listed on this agenda. Please complete a “Public Comment Request Form” and present it to the Town Staff prior to the meeting. Comments are limited up to three minutes with a cumulative total for Citizens’ Comments not to exceed 15 minutes. REGULAR AGENDA: Pursuant to Section 551.007 of the Texas Government Code, any individuals wishing to address the Planning and Zoning Commission during a Public Hearing item, will be recognized when the public hearing is opened. A “Public Comment Request Form” must be completed and presented to the Town Staff prior to the meeting. Comments are limited up to three minutes. If multiple individuals wish to speak, they may yield their three minutes to one individual appointed to speak on their behalf. All individuals yielding their time must be present at the meeting, and the appointed individual will be limited to a total of 15 minutes. Comments during a public hearing are limited to a cumulative total of 60 minutes for those in favor of an item, and 60 minutes for those in opposition to an item. 4. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request for a rezoning from Agriculture to Planned Development for Light Industrial Buildings on Collin County School Land Survey 12, Abstract 147, Tract 179, on 2.0± acres, located on the west side of Business Park Drive and 1,095± feet south of First Street. (ZONE-26-0004) 5. Review actions taken by the Town Council and possibly direct Town Staff to schedule topic(s) for discussion at a future meeting. 6. Adjourn. CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned authority, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted at Prosper Town Hall, located at 250 W. First Street, Prosper, Texas 75078, a place convenient and readily accessible to the general public at all times, and said Notice was posted by 5:00 p.m., on Wednesday, September 9, 2026, and remained so posted at least three (3) business days before said meeting was convened. _______________________________ _________________________ Michelle Lewis Sirianni, Town Secretary Date Notice Removed Pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission reserves the right to consult in closed session with its attorney and to receive legal advice regarding any item listed on this agenda. NOTICE OF ASSISTANCE AT PUBLIC MEETINGS: The Prosper Town Planning and Zoning Commission meetings are wheelchair accessible. For special services or assistance, please contact the Town Secretary’s Office at (972) 569-1073 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time. 2 Page 1 of 1 ] Call to Order / Roll Call The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM Commissioners Present: Chair Damon Jackson, Secretary Glen Blanscet, Brett Butler, John Hamilton, Matt Furay, and Deborah Daniel Vice Chair Josh Carson arrived at 6:16 PM Staff Members Present: David Hoover, AICP (Director of Development Services), Suzanne Porter, AICP (Planning Manager), Dakari Hill (Senior Planner), Jerron Hicks (Planner), and Michelle Crowe (Senior Administrative Assistant) Other(s) Present: Terrence S. Welch, Town Attorney Items for Individual Consideration: 1. Discuss items on the September 1, 2026, Planning and Zoning Commission agenda. Town Staff provided a brief overview of Consent Agenda Items 3a – 3g and Regular Agenda Items 4 and 5. The Commission and Staff discussed Item 3c regarding the proposed pond amenities, confirmation that there is no fencing along the east side of the pond/property, and recording the plat. Staff noted that the Homeowners’ Association documents are under review. These documents are required by the Unified Development Code. Once approved by the Town Attorney, they will be recorded. This must be done prior to filing the Final Plat. The Commission and Staff discussed Item 3d regarding access to Coit Road. Staff clarified that a note on the plat identifies the access as an exit only and for emergency services. The Commission stated there is a need for controlled access. Mr. Hoover presented Item 4. Commissioners discussed the water consumption, substation, lot coverage, parking, economic considerations, and road construction. The Commission asked about the Future Land Use District designation request of Business Park. Staff clarified what is included in the Planned Development zoning proposal; any future changes would require an amendment to the Planned Development. The Commission and Staff discussed Item 5 and reviewed the staff report and recommendations related to amending the Future Land Use Plan to a district that would support the proposed Planned Development for a Data Center. 2. Adjourn. The work session was adjourned at 6:37 p.m. ______________________________________ _______________________________ Michelle Crowe, Senior Administrative Assistant Glen Blanscet, Secretary MINUTES Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission Work Sesson Prosper Town Hall – Council Chambers 250 W. First Street, Prosper, Texas Tuesday, September 1, 2026 6:00 PM 3 Page 1 of 6 1. Call to Order / Roll Call The meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chair Damon Jackson, Vice Chair Josh Carson, Secretary Glen Blanscet, John Hamilton, Matt Furay, Brett Butler, and Deborah Daniel Staff Members Present: David Hoover, AICP (Director of Development Services), Suzanne Porter, AICP (Planning Manager), Dakari Hill (Senior Planner), Jerron Hicks (Planner), Michelle Crowe (Senior Administrative Assistant) Other(s) Present – Terrence S. Welch, Town Attorney 2. Recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. CONSENT AGENDA: 3a. Consider and act upon the minutes from the August 18, 2026, Planning and Zoning Commission work session meeting. 3b. Consider and act upon the minutes from the August 18, 2026, Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting. 3c. Consider and act upon a request for a Final Plat of Brookhollow Townhomes, on 20.1± acres, located 500± feet north of University Drive and 2,585± feet west of Custer Road. (DEVAPP-25-0076) 3d. Consider and act upon a request for a Final Plat of Anvita Addition, on 16.4± acres, located on the southeast corner of Coit Road and First Street. (DEVAPP-25-0148) 3e. Consider and act upon a request for a Site Plan for a Drive-Through Restaurant on Westside Addition, Block A, Lot 3, on 0.9± acre, located on the east side of FM 1385 and 290± feet north of University Drive. (DEVAPP-26-0024) 3f. Consider and act upon a request for a Final Plat of Westside Addition, Block A, Lot 3, on 0.9± acre, located on the east side of FM 1385 and 290± feet north of University Drive. (DEVAPP-26-0029) 3g. Consider and act upon a request for a Facade Plan for a Drive-Through Restaurant on Westside Addition, Block A, Lot 3, on 0.9± acre, located on the east side of FM 1385 and 290± feet north of University Drive. (DEVAPP-26-0016) Commissioner Hamilton made a motion to approve Items 3a and 3b with corrections and Items 3c through 3g. The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Carson. The motion was carried unanimously by a vote of 7-0. MINUTES Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting Prosper Town Hall – Council Chambers 250 W. First Street, Prosper, Texas Tuesday, September 1, 2026 7:00 PM 4 Page 2 of 6 CITIZEN COMMENTS: Mayor David Bristol spoke in opposition to Item 4. REGULAR AGENDA: 4. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request for a rezoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development for a Data Center on a portion of Parvin 1385 Addition, Block A, Lot 2, on 37.3± acres, located 1,590± feet south of Parvin Road and 855± feet east of FM 1385. (ZONE-26-0007) Mr. Hoover presented Item 4 to the Commission. Jeff Eigenbrood with White Rose Partners, the applicant, presented the request to the Commission. Mr. Eigenbrood introduced the project team and stated that White Rose Partners and its affiliated consultants had experience developing data center projects throughout Texas and the United States. Mr. Eigenbrood stated that the proposal consisted of one approximately 225,000-square-foot data center building. He highlighted the applicant’s transparency, project scale, noise controls, and closed-loop cooling system. Additionally, he stated that the proposed Planned Development would establish a maximum noise level and require closed-loop cooling. John Varin, White Rose Partners, provided an overview of data centers and their role in supporting internet, financial, healthcare, communications, and other technology services. He discussed the proposed employment and economic benefits, projected tax revenues, and associated economic activity. He also highlighted the proposed hike-and-bike trail and the project’s proximity to the existing electrical substation. Bill Dahlstrom, with Jackson Walker, addressed the land-use request. He stated that the property currently has multiple Comprehensive Plan designations, including high-density residential and retail and neighborhood services. The applicant requested a Comprehensive Plan amendment to Business Park and a Planned Development district specifically tailored to the proposed data center use. Mr. Dahlstrom stated that the Planned Development would establish site-specific standards, including building size, buffers, screening, open space, lighting, noise, and water-use requirements. He stated that the open-space area between the proposed data center and the electrical substation would remain undeveloped unless subsequently amended through the Planned Development process. Michael Carlisle, with Kimley-Horn, presented the preliminary site design, building elevations, screening, setbacks, landscaping, and noise study. He stated that the proposal included an eight- foot wrought-iron security fence, an eight-foot masonry wall around the generator yard, rooftop equipment screening, preservation of existing trees where feasible, additional landscaping, increased setbacks, and a hike-and-bike trail along the eastern portion of the property. Mr. Carlisle discussed the preliminary sound study. He stated that preliminary modeling considered rooftop chillers, emergency generators, varying ambient temperatures, and generator operation. Additionally, he added that the model did not include existing or proposed vegetation or certain required equipment screening. Geoff Overholt, DFW Consulting Group, discussed the proposed mechanical, water, and electrical systems. He stated that the project would use closed-loop cooling rather than evaporative cooling and would connect to the Town’s water system instead of relying on wells or aquifers. Mr. Overholt also discussed the proposed electrical service from the adjacent Brazos Electric Cooperative substation and stated that required substation improvements would be funded by the project. Mr. Varin discussed the projected economic benefits, including capital investment, jobs, projected annual tax and franchise-fee revenues, and estimated long-term revenues to local taxing entities. 5 Page 3 of 6 Mr. Eigenbrood stated that no end user or tenant had yet been identified. He added that the proposed facility would be designed for a single tenant and that could include various data- processing applications. Additionally, he explained that the project’s power availability would establish a limit on the facility’s size and associated infrastructure requirements. The Commission questioned the proposed 50% maximum lot coverage. Mr. Eigenbrood stated that the 50% provision was derived from the base zoning of Commercial and acknowledged that the applicant did not anticipate needing the full amount. He stated that the provision could be reduced. He further stated that the preliminary building size was approximately 225,000 square feet and could ultimately be smaller depending on available electrical capacity. The Commission questioned building height and rooftop equipment. Mr. Eigenbrood stated that the office portion would be two stories while the primary data hall would be single story. The proposed building height was approximately 40 feet, with rooftop mechanical equipment and screening potentially extending above the roofline. The applicant stated that the 20-foot rooftop- equipment allowance was conservative and that approximately 15 feet might ultimately be sufficient. The applicant further stated that rooftop equipment would be screened with materials intended to complement the building façade. The Commission discussed potential noise impacts and requested clarification regarding the type, frequency, and duration of noise generated by the facility. The applicant stated that the principal sources would be mechanical HVAC/chiller equipment and backup generators. Chillers would operate according to ambient conditions, while generators would operate primarily during extended power outages and periodic testing. The applicant stated that the limit proposed in the Planned Development was intended as an enforceable maximum and that additional refinement of the noise study could potentially support a lower limit. The Commission questioned whether the modeled facility noise could be compared directly with existing traffic noise. The applicant clarified that the preliminary modeling treated the proposed facility separately from existing ambient conditions and did not calculate the combined future noise level. Mr. Eigenbrood stated that the applicant would work with its acoustical engineer to provide a more readily understandable analysis and anticipated that the study would be finalized as the design and equipment selections progressed. The Commission asked about generator screening. The applicant stated that generators would have individual sound enclosures and would also be located behind the required masonry screening wall. Mr. Carlisle stated that applicable screening requirements required the screening wall to be at least as tall as the equipment being screened. The Commission questioned the proposed accessory uses. The applicant stated that the listed accessory uses were intended to be comprehensive for the proposed facility. Rooftop antennas would generally consist of weather-monitoring equipment rather than standalone towers. Battery systems would be designed and protected in accordance with applicable fire codes and would include monitoring and detection systems. Equalization basins would provide temporary chilled- water capacity during power interruptions and could be located inside the building. Generator fuel would be diesel, with approximately 24–72 hours of storage anticipated. The laydown yard would be used temporarily for construction materials and would be removed after construction. Water storage could include chilled-water and/or fire-water storage, subject to applicable requirements. The Commission questioned electrical capacity and the proposed substation improvements. The applicant stated that preliminary discussions with CoServ and Brazos indicated that the required power could be accommodated through improvements within the existing substation footprint. The applicant stated that a new transformer and related design, engineering, equipment, and construction costs required to serve the project would be funded by the applicant. No new overhead transmission lines were anticipated. The applicant stated that final capacity and 6 Page 4 of 6 engineering requirements remained subject to the utility providers’ ongoing design and review process. The Commission asked whether the project could affect electrical rates for surrounding customers. Mr. Eigenbrood stated that the applicant would be responsible for infrastructure costs necessary to serve the project and that the applicant did not anticipate other customers subsidizing those costs. He stated that the project would provide a consistent electrical load but acknowledged that the utility, rather than the applicant, would determine applicable rates. The Commission asked about the ultimate tenant and whether an artificial-intelligence-oriented use could result in greater power, water, or noise impacts. Mr. Eigenbrood stated that no tenant had yet been selected. He explained that the Planned Development would establish limits on the use and infrastructure, including closed-loop cooling and the available electrical capacity, and that the facility could be reduced in size if less power were ultimately available. He stated that the project would not operate as a carrier hotel but could support edge computing, artificial intelligence, or other data-processing applications. The Commission questioned potential impacts on surrounding property values. Mr. Eigenbrood stated that the applicant had not commissioned a site-specific property-value study but referenced studies from other jurisdictions, including Northern Virginia, that the applicant stated found no discernible impact on nearby residential property values. The Commission asked about discussions with Toll Brothers concerning the property to the east. Mr. Eigenbrood stated that the applicant had met with representatives of Toll Brothers to discuss project details and neighboring concerns. He stated that Toll Brothers had not expressed a position for or against the proposal. Chair Jackson asked about the long-term viability of the proposed facility and potential changes in technology. Mr. Eigenbrood stated that data center buildings can be adapted over time but that any change to a use not permitted by the Planned Development would require an amendment to the zoning. He stated that the applicant anticipated continued demand for computing capacity and electrical infrastructure over the long term. The Planning and Zoning Commission took a brief recess at 8:55 p.m. The Planning and Zoning Commission reconvened the meeting at 9:00 p.m. The public hearing was opened at 9:00 p.m. for those in favor of Item 4.  Mark Nias, 4720 Lopiano, Prosper, TX, spoke in favor of Item 4.  Randal Zigler, 8961 Marigold Lane, Prosper, TX, spoke in favor of Item 4.  Cara Matson, 6205 Crownmere Drive, Aubrey, TX, spoke in favor of Item 4. The public hearing closed for those in favor of Item 4 at 9:11 p.m. The public hearing was opened at 9:11 p.m. for those in opposition to Item 4.  Monica Barlow, 1709 Gold Mine Trail, Aubrey, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 4.  Aileen Blachowski, 3790 Dewberry Lane, Prosper, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 4.  Nicolas Strain, 2501 Wheeler Avenue, Aubrey, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 4.  Walt Lewis, 4610 Acacia Parkway, Prosper, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 4.  Diana Spector, 4411 Autumn Sage Drive, Prosper, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 4.  Sandy Suzuki, 501 Esperanza Drive, Prosper, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 4.  Joseph Mayes, 101 Red Oak Drive, Aubrey, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 4.  Vincent Spreuwenberg, 301 Pearland Drive, Prosper, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 4.  Donna Morris 3517 Juniper Drive, Aubrey, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 4.  Daniel Harrerra, 2208 Hubbard Park Lane, Prosper, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 4.  Richard Abraham, 1812 Hackamore Lane, Aubrey, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 4. 7 Page 5 of 6 The public hearing closed at 10:12 p.m. for this in opposition to Item 4. The Commission discussed the proposed development, with several expressing concerns regarding the Town's limited remaining developable land and the long-term implications of rezoning agricultural property. The following themes were identified:  Land Use and Long-Term Planning: Commissioners emphasized the limited amount of remaining developable land in Prosper and the importance of making land-use decisions that will remain appropriate over the long term. Several Commissioners noted that the proposal is inconsistent with the current Future Land Use Plan and expressed concern about making a significant change from agricultural use to a data center/business park use.  Location and Proximity to Residential Areas: Commissioners expressed concerns regarding the proposed location and its proximity to existing and planned residential neighborhoods. Several noted that data centers may be appropriate in certain locations but questioned whether this site was appropriate.  Noise and Environmental Impacts: Noise was identified as a significant concern. Commissioners indicated that additional expert analysis and more detailed information was needed regarding noise, environmental impacts, accessory uses, and other potential impacts of the development.  Utilities and Infrastructure: Commissioners discussed concerns regarding electricity consumption and the potential impacts on local utility infrastructure. Additional information from CoServ and greater detail regarding utility impacts were requested. Water-Use Concerns: Commissioners noted that information presented during the meeting addressed previously raised concerns regarding water consumption.  Economic and Community Benefits: Commissioners acknowledged the potential economic and tax benefits of data centers but questioned whether the overall net benefit to Prosper justified the proposed land-use change. Commissioners also noted that their primary responsibility is to the Town of Prosper while recognizing the regional implications of the project.  Public Input: Commissioners expressed appreciation for the significant public participation and correspondence received regarding the proposal. Some noted that public input was valuable while also expressing concern regarding misinformation contained in some submissions.  Need for Additional Information: Several Commissioners stated that they were not comfortable making a recommendation without additional studies, expert testimony, utility information, and a more comprehensive evaluation of the proposal. Chair Jackson, Vice Chair Carson, Secretary Blanscet, Commissioner Butler, Commission Hamilton, Commissioner Furay, and Commissioner Daniel each expressed opposition to approval of the proposal, citing various combinations of the concerns outlined above. Chair Jackson stated that additional information, studies, expert input, and a broader work session involving Town Staff, the Town Council, the Commission, and residents would be beneficial. Commissioner Hamilton made a motion to deny Agenda Item 4. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Daniel. The motion carried unanimously by a vote of 7-0. 5. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request to amend the Future Land Use Plan from Medium Density Residential and Retail and Neighborhood Services to Business Park, on 37.3± acres, located 1,590± feet south of Parvin Road and 855± feet east of FM 1385. (COMP-26-0001) Mr. Hoover presented Item 5 to the Commission. The public hearing was opened at 10:30 p.m. 8 Page 6 of 6 Bill Dahlstrom, representing the applicant, stated that the applicant had submitted a letter addressing the seven criteria applicable to a Comprehensive Plan amendment and was available to answer questions. Mr. Hoover explained to the public the purpose of the Town’s Future Land Use Plan, noting that it serves as a long-range guide for desired land uses and development patterns rather than establishing the current zoning of individual properties. He stated that amendments to the Future Land Use Plan are generally considered in conjunction with a proposed change in land use. Mr. Hoover stated that, because the Commission had recommended denial of the associated rezoning request, there was no longer a corresponding end use supporting the requested Future Land Use Plan amendment. He recommended that the Commission deny the Comprehensive Plan amendment as well. Mr. Hoover further stated that the Comprehensive Plan amendment and associated zoning request should be considered together and recommended denial of Item 5, the Comprehensive Plan amendment.  Donna Morris, 3517 Juniper Drive, Aubrey, TX, spoke in favor of Item 5.  Diana Spektor, 4411 Autunm Sage Drive, Prosper, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 5.  Marina Vice, 1405 Starlight, Aubrey, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 5.  Alexander Gorokhovsky, 4411 Autunm Sage Drive, Prosper, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 5.  Donna Freeman, 1061 Copper Canyon Drive, Prosper, TX, spoke in opposition to Item 5. The Public Hearing closed at 10:40 p.m. Commissioner Furay clarified that his earlier reference to Agricultural zoning was not intended to suggest that the property should remain undeveloped. He stated that development under Agricultural zoning presents a different set of considerations and provides the Town additional flexibility to ensure an appropriate future use. Commissioner Furay noted that the existing Future Land Use Plan identifies several potential uses for the property and stated that, in his view, the existing Future Land Use Plan should remain unchanged. Commissioner Furay made a motion to deny Agenda Item 5. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Butler. The motion was carried unanimously by a vote of 7-0. 6. Review actions taken by the Town Council and possibly direct Town Staff to schedule topic(s) for discussion at a future meeting. Mr. Hill Informed the Commissioners of past Town Council actions and upcoming cases for Planning and Zoning Commission consideration. 7. Adjourn. Commissioner Hamilton made a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Daniel. The motion was carried unanimously by a vote of 7-0. The meeting was adjourned at 10:47 p.m. _____________________________________ _________________________________ Michelle Crowe, Senior Administrative Assistant Glen Blanscet, Secretary 9 Page 1 of 2 To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item No. 3c From: Suzanne Porter, AICP, Planning Manager Through: David Hoover, AICP, Director of Development Services Re: Preliminary Plat of Barrington Lake Meeting: September 15, 2026 Agenda Item: Consider and act upon a request for a Preliminary Plat of Barrington Lake, on 44.5± acres, located on the east side of Coit Road and 1,280± feet north of First Street. (DEVAPP-26-0063) Future Land Use Plan: The Future Land Use Plan designates this area as Low Density Residential. Zoning: The property is zoned Planned Development-18 (Single-Family). Conformance: The Final Plat conforms to the development standards of Planned Development-18. * Bolded items in this section represent what is reflected on the Preliminary Plat while the items in parenthesis show the requirements outlined in Planned Development-18. * Type 1 Lots  Size of Lots: o Minimum Lot Size – 10,400 SF (Min. of 10,000 SF) o Minimum Lot Width – 80’ (Min. of 80’) o Minimum Lot Depth – 120’ (Min. of 120’)  Size of Yards: o Minimum Front Yard – 30’ (Min. of 30’) o Minimum Side Yard and Adj. to Street – 15’ in Total (Min. of 15’), 15’ (Min. of 15’) o Minimum Rear Yard – 20’ (Min. of 20’) PLANNING 10 Page 2 of 2 Type 3 Lots  Size of Lots: o Minimum Lot Size – 22,000 SF (Min. of 20,000 SF) o Minimum Lot Width – 100’ (Min. of 100’) o Minimum Lot Depth – 150’ (Min. of 150’)  Size of Yards: o Minimum Front Yard – 40’ (Min. of 40’) o Minimum Side Yard and Adj. to Street – 25’ in Total (Min. of 25’), 25’ (Min. of 25’) o Minimum Rear Yard – 25’ (Min. of 25’) Description of Agenda Item: The purpose of the Preliminary Plat is to construct 76 single-family homes and nine common area lots. The Preliminary Plat consists of 64 Type 1 Lots (10,000 SF) and 12 Type 3 Lots (20,000 SF). Access: Access is provided from Coit Road and through connection to the adjacent subdivision to the north, Estates at Greenspoint, and the adjacent subdivision to the south, Greenspoint. Landscaping, Open Space, and Screening: The proposed development complies with all landscaping, open space, and screening requirements. A pocket park, maintained by the Homeowners’ Association, will be provided on Block A, Lot 3X per PD-18 requirements. The amenities in the area will be finalized with the Final Plat review. The overall development of the Planned Development is required to provide a minimum of ten percent (or 11.76 acres) of common open space of the gross acreage and can include pocket parks, water areas, trails, creeks, and natural preserved areas. Open space requirements are met with the approximately 1.2 acres of open space within the existing residential subdivisions and 11.1± acres of open space in the Barrington Lake development. Companion Item: There is no companion item on this Planning and Zoning Commission agenda. Attached Documents: 1. Location Map 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Open Space Plan Town Staff Recommendation: Town Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to: 1. Street names shall be approved prior to the approval of the Final Plat. 2. The front building line on Block B, Lot 1 shall be evaluated and finalized prior to the approval of the Final Plat. 11 Preliminary Plat Barrington Lake DEVAPP-26-0063 FM 1385FISHTRAPRD LACIM ABLVDUS HIGHWAY 380 E FIRST ST PRESTONRDCOIT RDPROSPER TRL LEGACY DRCUSTER RDDALLASNORTHTOLLWAYFM423TEELPKWYMAHARDPKWYFRONTIER PKWY LOVERS LN BROADWAY ST SHAWNEE TRLW FIRST S T R I C H L A N D BLVD COLEM A N ST P RAIRIE DRIVE GEE RD HAYS RDPARVIN RD GREENSPOINT LN TOWN L A K E DRPERRY LNL A K E P O I N T C I R LONGMONT LN N COIT RDKEW CTS P R I N G B R O OK D RMORGANLN E FIRST ST STONYBROOK DR C H A L K H I L L L N SCOITRDOVERBROOK LNSUNDANCECTCOUN T R Y BROO K L N C E D A R B R OOK L N ELM TERRACE LN 0 620 1,240310Feet ¯ This map for illustration purposes only. 12 13 14 BAAAABCCEEEEDRAYMONDCOMMUNITY PARKVOL. 2026, PG. 198WHISPERINGFARMS - PHASE 1CAB. P, PG. 638ESTATES AT GREENSPOINTPHASE 2BVOL. 2015, PG. 514THE ESTATESAT GREENSPOINTVOL. 2007, PG. 151ESTATES AT GREENSPOINTPHASE 2BVOL. 2015, PG. 514P.R.C.C.T.169.263 ACRES170 FIRST STREETPROSPER, LLCINST. NO. 2022000098876GREENSPOINT - PHASE 1VOL. 2006, PG. 345P.R.C.C.T.ESTATES AT GREENSPOINTPHASE 2AVOL. 2008, PG. 168LOT 1A, BLOCK AACCESS, DRAINAGE,DETENTION & FLOODWAYEASEMENTN. COIT ROAD(VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) 15' PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT 15' PROPOS E D DRAINAGE E A S E M E N T FINAL TRAIL LAYOUT TOBE DETERMINED BY TOWNPARKS DEPARTMENTPROPOSED 100 YEAR FLOODTO BE RECLAIMEDAMENITY AREAAMENITY AREAEXISTING FEMA100-YR FLOODPLAINAPPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FLOODEASEMENT TO COLLIN COUNTYSOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTVOL. 611, PG.90EASEMENT TO BE AMENDED UPONDEVELOPMENT OF EACH LOTPlot Date/Time: 9/8/2026 1:27 PM N:\0071900.00\06 CAD\DWG\Site Design\Entitlements\Preliminary Plat\_Exhibits\0071900.00-OPEN SPACE EXHIBITOPEN SPACE EXHIBITAUGUST 2026TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXASBARRINGTON LAKE0'300'200'100'NON-OPEN SPACE = 1,451,554 SF33.32 ACOPEN SPACE (USABLE) = 484,636 SF 11.13 ACTOTAL AREA = 1,936,190 SF44.45 ACTOTAL % OF USABLE = 25.03%OPEN SPACELEGEND15 Page 1 of 6 To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item No. 4 From: Jerron Hicks, Planner Through: David Hoover, AICP, Director of Development Services Cc: Suzanne Porter, AICP, Planning Manager Re: Planned Development for 490 Business Park Meeting: September 15, 2026 Agenda Item: Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request for a rezoning from Agriculture to Planned Development for Light Industrial Buildings on Collin County School Land Survey 12, Abstract 147, Tract 179, on 2.0± acres, located on the west side of Business Park Drive and 1,095± feet south of First Street. (ZONE-26-0004) Description of Agenda Item: The applicant is requesting to rezone the subject property from Agricultur e to a Planned Development to allow the two existing vacant buildings to accommodate commercial and light industrial uses. The property contains approximately 2.0 acres and includes two existing buildings totaling approximately 18,537 square feet. Building A contains 11,297 square feet, and Building B contains 7,240 square feet. The proposed development includes the dedication of approximately 30 feet of right-of-way along Business Park Drive for the future expansion of the roadway. Future Land Use Plan: The Future Land Use Plan recommends the Dallas North Tollway District. PLANNING 16 Page 2 of 6 Zoning: The property is zoned Agriculture. Compatibility: The subject property contains two existing vacant buildings. Surrounding properties consist of existing light industrial development and vacant property. The submitted exhibits identify surrounding zoning classifications including Planned Development-54 Commercial, Commercial Corridor, and Planned Development-42 Commercial. The surrounding properties shown on the applicant's exhibit are within the Tollway District on the Future Land Use Plan. The zoning and land use of the surrounding properties are shown below. Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use Plan Subject Property Agriculture (A) Two vacant buildings Dallas North Tollway District North Planned Development-54 (Commercial) Light Industrial Dallas North Tollway District East Planned Development-42 (Commercial) Vacant Dallas North Tollway District South Commercial Corridor (CC) Vacant Dallas North Tollway District West Commercial Corridor (CC) Vacant Dallas North Tollway District District Regulations: The proposed Planned Development will conform to the development standards of the Commercial District within the Unified Development Code, except as specifically modified by the proposed Development Standards. The Development Standards specify that the existing buildings may remain as currently constructed provided that no expansions or additions are made; maintenance and repairs will be permitted. 17 Page 3 of 6 Commercial District (Unified Development Code) Size of Yards Front: 30’ Side: 15’ (Adj. to Commercial) 30’ (Adj. to Thoroughfare) 40’ (1-Story Adj. to Residential) 60’ (2-Story Adj. to Residential) Rear: 15’ (Adj. to Commercial) 40’ (1-Story Adj. to Residential) 60’ (2-Story Adj. to Residential) Size of Lots Area: 10,000 SF Width: 100’ Depth: 100’ Maximum Height Height: 40’ Lot Coverage Maximum: 50% Floor Area Ratio Maximum: 0.5:1 Uses: The Planned Development proposes a range of commercial and light industrial uses. The list of permitted uses within this Planned Development is shown below. Uses followed by an S are permitted by Specific Use Permit (SUP) and uses followed by a C are permitted subject to conditional development standards. o Administrative, Medical, or Professional Office o Antique Shop and Used Furniture o Artisan’s Workshop o Auto Parts Sale, Inside o Automobile Repair, Major, C & S o Automobile Repair, Minor, C (use allowed by right without an SUP) o Building Material and Hardware Sales, Minor o Business Service o Cabinet/Upholstery Shop o Contractor's Shop (No Outdoor Storage), S o Equipment and Machinery Sales and Rental, Minor o Furniture, Home Furnishings and Appliance Store o Furniture Restoration o Health/Fitness Center o Indoor Gun Range, S o Limited Assembly and Manufacturing Use Complying with Performance Standards o Locksmith/Security System Company o Office/Showroom o Office/Warehouse o Print Shop, Minor o Repair Service, Indoor o Research and Development Center, C o Retail/Service Incidental Use o Veterinarian Clinic and/or Kennel, Indoor, C 18 Page 4 of 6 Building Materials: Buildings will be allowed to remain as is, as long as no expansions or additions are made. Only maintenance and repairs will be allowed. Business Park Drive: The proposed development includes approximately 30 feet of right-of-way dedication along Business Park Drive. The Conceptual Plan indicates that Business Park Drive will be resurfaced with temporary asphalt until the full right-of-way and roadway expansion occurs. The Development Standards further provide that Business Park Drive will be brought to current width standards and may initially be improved with asphalt. If the roadway has not been brought to all current standards within ten years, it will be required to be reconstructed to current standards at the owner's expense. Landscaping: The landscaping regulations within this Planned Development compared to the regulations in the Unified Development Code are shown below. Perimeter Landscaping The Conceptual Landscape Plan provides the required perimeter landscape buffers along Business Park Road and the north, west, and south property lines. A minimum 15-foot landscape buffer is required along Business Park Road; however, the Planned Development requires a 20- foot buffer to offset easements between the building and street. Additionally, the 5-foot landscape buffers are provided along the remaining property lines. Along the south property line, the required number of trees cannot be accommodated entirely within the landscape buffer due to existing utilities. The plan provides 17 trees within this area, with the remaining required trees provided elsewhere on the property. The plan provides 25 five- gallon shrubs along the south property line, exceeding the 22 shrubs required. The landscape plan will be finalized with the review of construction plans. Perimeter Landscaping Proposed Regulations (Development Standards) Town Regulations (Unified Development Code) Business Park Road 20' buffer 9 (3" cal.) trees 131 (5 gal.) shrubs 15' buffer 9 (3" cal.) trees 131 (5 gal.) shrubs North Property Line 5' buffer 22 small trees 22 (5 gal.) shrubs 5' buffer 22 small trees 22 (5 gal.) shrubs West Property Line 5' buffer 17 (3" cal.) trees 17 (5 gal.) shrubs 5' buffer 17 small trees 17 (5 gal.) shrubs South Property Line 5' buffer 17 trees, remainder added elsewhere on property to avoid utilities 25 (5 gal.) shrubs 5' buffer 22 small trees 22 (5 gal.) shrubs 19 Page 5 of 6 Interior Parking Lot Landscaping The project includes 51 parking spaces. The Unified Development Code requires 780 square feet of interior parking-lot landscaping and five (5) 3-inch caliper trees. The Conceptual Landscape Plan provides 2,609 square feet of landscaping and eight (8) 3-inch caliper trees, exceeding the requirement. Interior Parking Lot Landscaping Proposed Required (UDC) Parking Spaces 51 51 Landscape Area 2609 sq ft 780 sq ft Trees (3” cal.) 8 5 Open Space: The Planned Development requires 8 percent open space based on the net lot area for the existing development. Vehicular paving, required parking lot landscape islands, building footprints, utility yards, required landscape setbacks, sidewalks, and the detention pond are excluded from the open-space calculation. If the property is redeveloped in the future, open space will be required to comply with the Unified Development Code standards in effect at that time. The Conceptual Landscape Plan reflects the 8 percent open-space requirement as 6,341 square feet based on a net lot area of 79,264 square feet. The area of open space provided (7,670 square feet) slightly exceeds this amount. Open Space Proposed (8%) Provided Area 6341 sq ft 7670 sq ft Detention: A dry detention pond is proposed on the eastern portion of the property, adjacent to Building B. The detention pond will be amenitized with 24-inch shrubs planted a maximum of 36 inches on center, solid Bermuda sod, and permanent irrigation. The detention pond will be maintained by the property owner. If the property is redeveloped in the future, the detention facility will be required to comply with the Town's detention requirements in effect at the time of redevelopment. Screening: Screening for the proposed development will comply with the requirements of the Unified Development Code. No deviations from the Town's screening requirements are proposed with this Planned Development. The proposed development does not abut property zoned or designated for residential uses; therefore, a masonry screening wall along the perimeter of the property is not required. Parks Master Plan: The Parks Master Plan does not indicate a park is needed on the subject property. 20 Page 6 of 6 Legal Obligations and Review: Notification was provided as required by the Unified Development Code and state law. Staff has not received any response to the proposed zoning request to date. Attached Documents: 1. Aerial Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Future Land Use Exhibit 4. Exhibit A-1 – Written Metes and Bounds 5. Exhibit A-2 – Boundary Exhibit 6. Exhibit B – Letter of Intent 7. Exhibit C – Development Standards 8. Exhibit D – Conceptual Plan 9. Exhibit E – Development Schedule 10. Exhibit F – Elevations 11. Exhibit G – Landscape Plan 12. Exhibit H – Open Space Plan 13. Draft Development Agreement Town Staff Recommendation: The rezoning request provides for upgrades to the site while allowing the use of the existing structures. The proposed Planned Development also addresses the future expansion of Business Park Drive through right-of-way dedication and establishes development standards specific to the existing conditions of the property. Stipulations have been made to ensure that future development is compliant with standards in effect at that time. For these reasons, Town Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve a request for a rezoning from Agriculture to Planned Development for Light Industrial Buildings on Collin County School Land Survey 12, Abstract 147, Tract 179, on 2.0± acres, located on the west side of Business Park Drive and 1,095± feet south of First Street. Town Council Public Hearing: Upon a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, a Public Hearing for this item will be scheduled for the Town Council at their regular meeting on October 13, 2026. 21 0 330 660165 Feet J E WEEMS BLVDBUSINESS PARK DRS DALLAS PKWYFM 1385FISHTRAP RD LACIMA BLVDUS HIGHWAY 380 FRONTIER PKWY E FIRST ST PRESTONRDCOIT RDLEGACY DRCUSTER RDDALLAS NORTHTOLLWAYFM423TEELPKWYMAHARD PKWYPROSPER TRL LOVERS LN BROADWAY ST SHAWNEE TRLW F I R S T ST RIC H LAND BLVDCOLEMAN STPRAIRIE DRIVE GEE RD HAYS RDPARVIN RD ¯ This map for illustration purposes only ZONE-26-0004 490 Business Park Planned Development 22 0 330 660165 Feet CC A SF-15 A C A CC CC SF-15 C PD-42 CC PD-54 C SF-15 CC PD-42 CJ E WEEMS BLVDBUSINESSPARK DRS DALLASPKWYFM 1385FISHTRAP RD LACIMA BLVDUS HIGHWAY 380 FRONTIER PKWY E FIRST ST PRESTONRDCOIT RDLEGACY DRCUSTER RDDALLAS NORTHTOLLWAYFM423TEELPKWYMAHARD PKWYPROSPER TRL LOVERS LN BROADWAY ST SHAWNEE TRLW F I R S T ST RIC H LAND BLVDCOLEMAN STPRAIRIE DRIVE GEE RD HAYS RDPARVIN RD ¯ This map for illustration purposes only ZONE-26-0004 490 Business Park Planned Development 23 Future Land Use Exhibit 24 14200 Midway Road, Suite 130 Dallas, TX 75224 T: 469.784.9321 W: TraverseLandSurveying.com Texas Firm No. 10194631 ” METES AND BOUNDS EXHIBIT 1.999 ACRES OUT OF THE COLLIN COUNTY SCHOOL LAND SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 147 COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS Surveying Construction Staking Platting EXHIBIT A-1 25 S0°16'37"W260.93'N0°20'15"W260.93'WWWWWWFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLEX. TRUCK DOCK N89°57'11"E 335.18' S89°57'11"W 332.38' 490 BUS. PARK 79264 SQ FT 1.820 ACRES 30' ROW DEDICATION 7828 SQ FT 0.180 ACRES624624625625626626 6276286 2 7 62762 7627627 628 628628628 628 62 9 EXISTING DRIVE ZONING: A PROPOSED USE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - COMMERCIAL 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFEREXISTING RETAINING WALL 30.00' POINT OF BEGINNING N: 7134835.12 E: 2483281.79 PROSPER BUSINESS PARK, LP INST. NO. 1790310 O.P.R.C.C.T. LOT 2, BLOCK A WARREN / AVANT-GARDE ADDITION INST. NO. 2006-615 P.R.C.C.T. LAND USE: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE: TOLLWAY DISTRICT ZONING: PD-54 C TOLLWAY FIRST PARTNERS, LP INST. NO. 20140220000159450 O.P.R.C.C.T. LAND USE: VACANT FUTURE LAND USE: TOLLWAY DISTRICT ZONING: CC GODWIN INVESTMENTS, LTD INST. NO. 20190829001064690 O.P.R.C.C.T. LAND USE: VACANT FUTURE LAND USE: TOLLWAY DISTRICT ZONING: CC GODWIN INVESTMENTS, LTD INST. NO. 20050630000872220 O.P.R.C.C.T. LAND USE: VACANT FUTURE LAND USE: TOLLWAY DISTRICT ZONING: PD-42 C PROPOSED USE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - COMMERCIAL PROPERTY EXHIBIT00 20'40' GRAPHIC SCALE 20' SHEET NUMBER DRAWN BY: MD SCALE AS SHOWN DATE JULY 2026 ACE PROJECT: 01103SHEET TITLE:CROSSLAND BLUE STAR PROSPERNO.REVISIONSDATEBYThursday, August 6, 2026 11:19:39 AMG:\Shared drives\Projects\01103-Crossland Blue Star Prosper\CAD\Exhibits\Exhibit A-2.dwg490 BUSINESS PARKDRIVEPROSPER, TEXAS© 2026 ANIMAS CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC PHONE: 214-803-1099 TX F-26500 VICINITY MAP N.T.S. N S W ES. DALLAS PARKWAYBUSINESS PARK DR.W. FIRST STREET EXHIBIT 'A-2' PROPERTY EXHIBIT ZONE-26-0004 490 BUSINESS PARK 1.999 ACRES PREPARED DATE: 08/06/26 APPLICANT: ANIMAS CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC PO BOX 830974 RICHARDSON, TX 75083 CONTACT: MICHAEL DOGGETT, P.E. PHONE: 214-803-1099 OWNER: CROSSLAND TEXAS INDUSTRIAL, LLC 833 S. EAST AVE. COLUMBUS, KS 66725 CONTACT: ROCKY HUSSMAN PHONE: 972-347-5659 SURVEYOR: TRAVERSE LAND SURVEYING, LLC 14200 MIDWAY ROAD, SUITE 130 DALLAS, TX 75224 CONTACT: GRAYSON CEBALLOS PHONE: 469-784-9321 FLOODPLAIN NOTE: NO 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN EXISTING ON THE SITE. THOROUGHFARE NOTE: THE THOROUGHFACE ALIGNMENT(S) SHOWN ON THIS EXHIBIT ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES AND DOES NOT SET THE ALIGNMENT. THE ALIGNMENT IS DETERMINED AT TIME OF FINAL PLAT. Land Description Being a 1.999-acre tract of land situated in the Collin County School Land Survey, Abstract No. 147, Collin County, Texas, being all of that same tract of land conveyed to Crossland Texas Industrial, LLC by deed recorded in Instrument No. 2024000086619, of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas (O.P.R.C.C.T.), and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2-inch iron rod found with a cap stamped ''Votex RPLS 4818” for corner, said point being the Southwest corner of Lot 2, Block A of Warren / Avant-Garde Addition, an addition to Collin County, Texas, according to the plat thereof recorded in Instrument No. 2006--615 of the Plat Records of Collin County, Texas, same being the Northwest corner of said Crossland Texas Industrial, LLC tract and lying on the East line of a tract of land conveyed to Tollway First Partners, LP by deed recorded in Instrument No. 20140220000159450 of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas; THENCE North 89 Degrees 57 Minutes 11 Seconds East, departing the East line of said Tollway First Partners, LP tract, with the South line of said Lot 2, a distance of 335.18 feet to a point for corner, said point being the Southeast corner of said Lot 2, same being the Northeast corner of said Crossland Texas Industrial, LLC tract, and lying on the West line of a tract of land conveyed to Godwin Investments, Ltd. by deed recorded in Volume 5951, Page 1651 of the Deed Records of Collin County, Texas, from which a 1/2 inch iron rod found for reference bears North 85 Degrees 57 Minutes 30 Seconds West, a distance of 0.22 feet; THENCE South 00 Degrees 16 Minutes 37 Seconds West, with the West line of said Godwin Investments, Ltd. tract, a distance of 260.93 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod found for corner, said point being the Southeast corner of said Crossland Texas Industrial, LLC tract, same being the Northeast corner of a tract of land conveyed to Godwin Investments, Ltd. by deed recorded in Instrument No. 20190829001064690, of the Official Public Records of Collin County, Texas; THENCE South 89 Degrees 57 Minutes 11 Seconds West, departing the West line of said first-referenced Godwin tract, and with the North line of said second-referenced Godwin tract, a distance of 332.38 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pipe found for corner, said point being the Southeast corner of said Tollway First Partners, LP tract, same being the Southwest corner of said Crossland Texas Industrial, LLC tract; THENCE North 00 Degrees 20 Minutes 15 Seconds West, departing the North line of said second-referenced Godwin tract, and with the East line of said Tollway First Partners, LP tract, a distance of 260.93 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 87,092 square feet or 1.999 acres of land, more or less. 26 ZONE-26-0004 EXHIBIT B STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PURPOSE The intent and purpose of this Zoning change request from Agriculture (A) to Planned Development Commercial (PD-C) is to allow the existing vacant buildings constructed in 2009 to operate with commercial uses on the approximate 1.999-acre lot. 27 ZONE-26-0004 EXHIBIT C PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The proposed development will conform to the development standards of the Commercial District of the Town of Prosper’s Unified Development Code, as it exists or may be amended, except as otherwise set forth in these Development Standards. 1. Development Plans a. Concept Plan: The tract shall be developed in general accordance with the attached concept plan, set forth in Exhibits D. b. Elevations: The tract shall be developed in general accordance with the attached elevations, set forth in Exhibits F. 2. Uses. The list of permitted uses within this Planned Development is shown below. Uses followed by an S are permitted by Specific Use Permit (SUP) and uses followed by a C are permitted subject to conditional development standards.  Administrative, Medical or Professional Office  Antique Shop and Used Furniture  Artisan’s Workshop  Auto Parts Sale, Inside  Automobile Repair, Major, C & S  Automobile Repair, Minor, C (use allowed by right without an SUP)  Building Material and Hardware Sales, Minor  Business Service  Cabinet/Upholstery Shop  Contractor's Shop (No Outdoor Storage), S  Equipment and Machinery Sales and Rental, Minor  Furniture, Home Furnishings and Appliance Store  Furniture Restoration  Health/Fitness Center  Indoor Gun Range, S  Limited Assembly and Manufacturing Use Complying with Performance Standards  Locksmith/Security System Company  Office/Showroom  Office/Warehouse  Print Shop, Minor  Repair Service, Indoor  Research and Development Center, C  Retail/Service Incidental Use  Veterinarian Clinic and/or Kennel, Indoor, C 28 3. Regulations: a. Buildings will be allowed to remain as is, as long as no expansions or additions are made. Only maintenance and repairs will be allowed. b. A twenty (20) foot landscape easement along Business Park Drive is provided as shown on Exhibit D. c. A detention pond for the existing development will be an above-ground dry pond and amenitized with 24” tall shrubs planted a minimum 36” on center, solid Bermuda sod and a permanent irrigation system. The detention pond will be maintained to keep landscape well- manicured, free from trash and/or debris, and prevent the intrusion of unwanted vegetation and sediment build-up. If the property is redeveloped, the detention pond requirements applicable at that time shall be met. d. Business Park Drive will need to be brought to current width standards and may be done so with asphalt. However, if within ten (10) years Business Park Drive has not been brought up to all current standards, it will have to be reconstructed to current standards at owner’s expense. Additionally, if during the interim time period an occasion arises that emergency or maintenance equipment is required to traverse the existing roadway, any damage done will be required to be repaired at the owner’s expense. e. Open space for the existing development shall be 8% of the net lot area. Open space cannot include vehicular paving, required parking lot landscape islands, building footprints, utility yards, required landscape setbacks, sidewalk and detention ponds. If the property is redeveloped, open space shall be provided in compliance with the Unified Development Code standards applicable at that time. 29 S0°16'37"W260.93'N0°20'15"W260.93'WWWWWWFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLEX. TRUCK DOCK N89°57'11"E 335.18' S89°57'11"W 332.38' 490 BUS. PARK 79264 SQ FT 1.820 ACRES 30' ROW DEDICATION 7828 SQ FT 0.180 ACRES 15 7 13 8 BUILDING 'A' 11,297 S.F. BUILDING 'B' 7,240S.F.S0°16'37"W260.93'FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL F L FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL 8 S 30'R 20'R30 'R3 0 'R 3 0 'R 6246246256256266266276286296306306306306306306 2 7 627 627 627627 628 628628628 628 62 9629630631631626626627628 629 EXISTING DRIVE 103.86'FH FHFH 160.32'24.00'24.00'20.00'20.00'9.00' (TYP)65.24'9.00' (TYP)9.00'(TYP)24.00'150.30'75.16' 60.18'120.32'45.38'3.67'3.67'10.00'39.75'65.27'10.00'41.24'0.00' 20.00'7.94' ZONING: A 10'x10' W.E. BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TO BE RESURFACED WITH TEMPORARY ASPHALT UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE FULL RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ROADWAY EXPANSION OCCURS. UPON APPROVAL OF THE PD, BUSINESS PARK DRIVE WILL NEED TO BE BROUGHT UP TO CURRENT STANDARDS IF NOT IMPROVED WITHIN 10-YEARS OF FINAL CITY COUNCIL ACTION. 15' D.E. F.A.U.D.E. F.A.U.D.E. 10'x10' W.E. 10'x10' W.E. 15' D.E. DRAINAGE & UTIL ESMT 54 'R 12.00'11.00'F.A.U.D.E.VARIABLE HEIGHT RETAINING WALL (APPROX. 3' TALL) W/ GUARD RAIL 8' MASONRY DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE W/ SOLID METAL GATES EX. SEPTIC TANK TO BE REMOVED WATER & SEWER EASEMENT BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT NO CURBNO CURBWHEEL STOPS (TYP.)NO CURBDETENTION POND (DRY) AMENITIZED WITH 24" TALL SHRUBS PLANTED 36" O.C., SOLID BERMUDA SOD, PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND CONCRETE PILOT CHANNELS. PROPOSED USE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - COMMERCIAL FDCFDC 6'x6' RISER ROOM 6'x6' RISER ROOM 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER20' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' EXISTING RETAINING WALL EX. F.H. 30.00' 30' BUILDING SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK30' BUILDING SETBACKFUTURE ROADWAY EXPANSION BY OTHERS FUTURE SIDEWALK BY OTHERS. WESTERN SIDEWALK TO BE ESCROWED. 2.00' 2.00' 2.00' 10'x10' W.E. 10'x10' W.E. FH S S PROSPER BUSINESS PARK, LP INST. NO. 1790310 O.P.R.C.C.T. LOT 2, BLOCK A WARREN / AVANT-GARDE ADDITION INST. NO. 2006-615 P.R.C.C.T. LAND USE: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE: TOLLWAY DISTRICT ZONING: PD-54 C TOLLWAY FIRST PARTNERS, LP INST. NO. 20140220000159450 O.P.R.C.C.T. LAND USE: VACANT FUTURE LAND USE: TOLLWAY DISTRICT ZONING: CC GODWIN INVESTMENTS, LTD INST. NO. 20190829001064690 O.P.R.C.C.T. LAND USE: VACANT FUTURE LAND USE: TOLLWAY DISTRICT ZONING: CC GODWIN INVESTMENTS, LTD INST. NO. 20050630000872220 O.P.R.C.C.T. LAND USE: VACANT FUTURE LAND USE: TOLLWAY DISTRICT ZONING: PD-42 C 3 0 'R3 0'R30'R 3 0 'R 5 4 'R 5 4 'R 5 4 ' R 20'R 24.00'POINT OF BEGINNING N: 7134835.12 E: 2483281.79 DETENTION OUTFALL STRUCTURE CONCRETE PILOT CHANNEL (TYP.) PROPOSED USE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - COMMERCIAL 4.00'4.00'4.00'CONCEPTUAL PLAN00 20'40' GRAPHIC SCALE 20' SHEET NUMBER DRAWN BY: MD SCALE AS SHOWN DATE JULY 2026 ACE PROJECT: 01103SHEET TITLE:CROSSLAND BLUE STAR PROSPERNO.REVISIONSDATEBYTuesday, September 8, 2026 5:49:01 PMG:\Shared drives\Projects\01103-Crossland Blue Star Prosper\CAD\Exhibits\Exhibit D.dwg490 BUSINESS PARKDRIVEPROSPER, TEXAS© 2026 ANIMAS CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC PHONE: 214-803-1099 TX F-26500 G S FL FL VICINITY MAP N.T.S. NOTES ·ALL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SHALL FOLLOW TOWN STANDARDS. ·LANDSCAPING SHALL CONFORM TO LANDSCAPE PLANS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF PROSPER. ·ALL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SHALL FOLLOW FIRE REQUIREMENTS PER THE TOWN OF PROSPER. ·HANDICAPPED PARKING AREAS AND BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY SHALL CONFORM TO THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) AND WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CURRENT, ADOPTED BUILDING CODE. ·ALL SIGNAGE IS SUBJECT TO BUILDING OFFICIAL APPROVAL. ·IMPACT FEES WILL BE ASSESSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION(S) IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE DATA SUMMARY TABLE; HOWEVER, CHANGES TO THE PROPOSED LAND USE AT THE TIME OF CO AND/OR FINISH-OUT PERMIT MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEES AND/OR PARKING REQUIREMENTS. ·THE APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SHALL BE EFFECTIVE FOR A PERIOD OF TWO (2) YEARS FROM THE DATE THAT THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN IS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION, AT THE END OF WHICH TIME THE APPLICANT MUST HAVE SUBMITTED AND RECEIVED THE APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION. IF A SITE PLAN IS NOT APPROVED WITHIN SUCH TWO (2) YEAR PERIOD, THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS NULL AND VOID. IF SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS ONLY FOR A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, THE APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FOR THE REMAINING PROPERTY SHALL BE NULL AND VOID. ·OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS SHALL FOLLOW THE ZONING ORDINANCE, PER TRACT. OPEN SPACE SHALL NOT INCLUDE VEHICULAR PAVING, REQUIRED PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, BUILDING FOOTPRINT, UTILITY YARDS, REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACKS, SIDEWALKS*, AND DETENTION POND * N S W ES. DALLAS PARKWAYBUSINESS PARK DR.W. FIRST STREET 71.23' 71.51' EXHIBIT 'D' CONCEPTUAL PLAN ZONE-26-0004 490 BUSINESS PARK 1.999 ACRES PREPARED DATE: 09/08/26 1 2 WATER METER SCHEDULE I.D. TYPE SIZE NO. SAN. SEW. DOMESTIC 2" 1 6" DOMESTIC 2" 1 6" 3 IRRIGATION 1" 1 N/A 1 2 3 FLOODPLAIN NOTE: NO 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN EXISTING ON THE SITE. THOROUGHFARE NOTE: THE THOROUGHFACE ALIGNMENT(S) SHOWN ON THIS EXHIBIT ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES AND DOES NOT SET THE ALIGNMENT. THE ALIGNMENT IS DETERMINED AT TIME OF FINAL PLAT. APPLICANT: ANIMAS CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC PO BOX 830974 RICHARDSON, TX 75083 CONTACT: MICHAEL DOGGETT, P.E. PHONE: 214-803-1099 OWNER: CROSSLAND TEXAS INDUSTRIAL, LLC 833 S. EAST AVE. COLUMBUS, KS 66725 CONTACT: ROCKY HUSSMAN PHONE: 972-347-5659 SURVEYOR: TRAVERSE LAND SURVEYING, LLC 14200 MIDWAY ROAD, SUITE 130 DALLAS, TX 75224 CONTACT: GRAYSON CEBALLOS PHONE: 469-784-9321 *REQUIRED PARKING SHALL BE DETERMINED ONCE PROPOSED TENANT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED. A SITE PLAN SHALL BE REQUIRED TO CONFIRM PARKING REQUIREMENTS MEETING THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ARE MET FOR THE PROPOSED USE. 30 Print Date: 4/16/2026 2:40:43 PMExhibit E - Development Schedule Job #: Job Number Start Date: 4/16/2026 Finish Date: 4/2/2027 Page 1 of 1 View: 1. Adding Activities and Resp Codes Update as of:: 4/16/2026 Filter: None Line Name Responsibility Duration Predecessors Successors Start Finish 2026 2027 May June July August September October November December January February MarchApril April 20 27 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 1 8 15 22 29 5 12 19 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 Exhibit E - Development Schedule Rezoning Submittal - Due 4-21 Rezoning Process Civil Coments Civil Permit Construction 4d 90d 30d 1d 120d 2 3 4 5 3 4 5 6 4/16/2026 4/22/2026 8/28/2026 10/12/2026 10/13/2026 4/21/2026 8/27/2026 10/9/2026 10/12/2026 4/2/2027 Rezoning Submittal - Due 4-21 Rezoning Process Civil Coments Civil Permit Construction Rezoning Submittal - Due 4-21 Rezoning Process Civil Coments Civil Permit Construction 31 BUILDING 'A' - EAST ELEVATION EXHIBIT 'F' BUILDING 'A' - SOUTH ELEVATION APPLICANT: ANIMAS CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC PO BOX 830974 RICHARDSON, TX 75083 CONTACT: MICHAEL DOGGETT, P.E. PHONE: 214-803-1099 OWNER: CROSSLAND TEXAS INDUSTRIAL, LLC 833 S. EAST AVE. COLUMBUS, KS 66725 CONTACT: ROCKY HUSSMAN PHONE: 972-347-5659 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE ZONE-26-0004 490 BUSINESS PARK PREPARED 05/21/26 32 ZONE-26-0004 BUILDING 'A' - WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 'A' - NORTH ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE EXHIBIT 'F' 490 BUSINESS PARK PREPARED 05/21/26 APPLICANT: ANIMAS CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC PO BOX 830974 RICHARDSON, TX 75083 CONTACT: MICHAEL DOGGETT, P.E. PHONE: 214-803-1099 OWNER: CROSSLAND TEXAS INDUSTRIAL, LLC 833 S. EAST AVE. COLUMBUS, KS 66725 CONTACT: ROCKY HUSSMAN PHONE: 972-347-5659 33 ZONE-26-0004 BUILDING 'B' - EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 'B' - SOUTH ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE EXHIBIT 'F' 490 BUSINESS PARK PREPARED 05/21/26 APPLICANT: ANIMAS CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC PO BOX 830974 RICHARDSON, TX 75083 CONTACT: MICHAEL DOGGETT, P.E. PHONE: 214-803-1099 OWNER: CROSSLAND TEXAS INDUSTRIAL, LLC 833 S. EAST AVE. COLUMBUS, KS 66725 CONTACT: ROCKY HUSSMAN PHONE: 972-347-5659 34 ZONE-26-0004 BUILDING 'B' - WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 'B' - NORTH ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE EXHIBIT 'F' 490 BUSINESS PARK PREPARED 05/21/26 APPLICANT: ANIMAS CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC PO BOX 830974 RICHARDSON, TX 75083 CONTACT: MICHAEL DOGGETT, P.E. PHONE: 214-803-1099 OWNER: CROSSLAND TEXAS INDUSTRIAL, LLC 833 S. EAST AVE. COLUMBUS, KS 66725 CONTACT: ROCKY HUSSMAN PHONE: 972-347-5659 35 15 7 13 8 BUILDING 'A' 11,297 S.F. BUILDING 'B' 7,240S.F.S0°16'37"W260.93'FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLF L F L FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL 8 S S SS W W W W W W W W SS SS SS SSSSSS W W W W W W W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W W W W W W WW W W W W W W W W W W S 490 BUS. PARK 79264 SQ FT 1.820 ACRES S0°16'37"W260.93'N0°20'15"W260.93'30' ROW DEDICATION 7828 SQ FT 0.180 ACRES N89°57'11"E335.18' S89°57'11"W 332.38' 1 CE 1 RO BERMUDA SOLID SOD, TYP. BERMUDA SOLID SOD, TYP.//////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////// ////////////////// // // //////// // /////////////////////// / // // //////////////////// ////// // ////// ////// // /// / // ////// ////// // //////////////////////////////////////////4 CM 13 NRS 23 DBH 3 MP 5 RB 5 CM 5 RB 1 RO1 RO 1 RO 3 MP 1 RO 1 RO 7 CM 5 RB 5 CM 3 NRS 39 DBH 4 CM 3 MP 1 RO 10 RB 2 CE 26 AB 30 AM 23 DS 6 CE 28 RY 24 MS 3 MP 18" WIDE, 2-4" RIVER ROCK BAND, TYP. STEEL EDGE, TYP. STEEL EDGE, TYP. 45 BBL//1 RO //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// / / // // // ////////////////////////////////38 DBH 15 AB SHEET NUMBER DRAWN BY: MD SCALE AS SHOWN DATE AUGUST 2025 ACE PROJECT: 01103SHEET TITLE:CROSSLAND BLUE STAR PROSPERNO.REVISIONSDATEBYFriday, June 26, 2026 1:59:00 PMS:\awr\jobs\2025\25130_490 Business Park Drive, Prosper\AutoCAD\sheets\25130_Landscape Series.dwg490 BUSINESS PARKDRIVEPROSPER, TEXAS© 2025 ANIMAS CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC PHONE: 214-803-1099 TX F-26500 a W R AWR Designs, LLC P.O. Box 1746 Aledo, Texas 76008 amanda@awr-designs.com c. 512.517.5589 STA TE O F T E XASTCETHI R C A EPACSDNALDEE GEISRRT572 4AMANARIC H DW . A RDSONGRAPHIC SCALE FEET04020 Scale 1"=20' - 0"CONCEPTUALLANDSCAPE PLANTOWN OF PROSPER LANDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES: STANDARD LANGUAGE AND/OR NOTATIONS, AS FOLLOWS: 1.PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MEASURED AND SIZED ACCORDING TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1) 2.ALL PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO TOWN APPROVAL AND MUST BE SPECIFIED ON THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. 3.GROUND COVERS USED IN LIEU OF TURF GRASS MUST PROVIDE COMPLETE COVERAGE WITHIN ONE (1) YEAR OF PLANTING AND MAINTAIN ADEQUATE COVERAGE AS APPROVED BY THE TOWN. 4.TREES MUST BE PLANTED FOUR (4) FEET OR GREATER FROM CURBS, SIDEWALKS, UTILITY LINES, SCREENING WALLS, AND ALL STRUCTURES. SINGLE-TRUNK TREES SHALL HAVE A SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER, AND ALL TREES SHALL BE FULL, WITH BALANCED CANOPY. MAJOR DAMAGE TO TRUNK(S), OR BRANCHES, WILL BE CAUSE FOR DENIAL. 5.ALL ROOT FLARES SHALL BE SET AT THREE (3) TO FOUR (4) INCHES ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE 6.THE TREE PIT SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH NATIVE TOPSOIL FREE OF ROCK AND OTHER DEBRIS 7.BURLAP, TWINE, AND WIRE BASKETS SHALL BE SEVERED AND REMOVED FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. 8.A 3-4” LAYER OF MULCH SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND THE BASE OF THE PLANTED TREE. THE MULCH SHALL BE PULLED BACK 1-2” FROM THE TRUNK OF THE TREE. 9.NO PERSON(S) OR ENTITY MAY USE IMPROPER OR MALICIOUS MAINTENANCE OR PRUNING TECHNIQUES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,: TOPPING OR OTHER NON SYMMETRICAL TRIMMING OF TREES, DAMAGE FROM A BACKHOE, OR USE OF FIRE OR POISON FOLLOW THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1) GUIDELINES ON PRUNING AND MAINTENANCE. 10.TOPSOIL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF EIGHT (8) INCHES IN DEPTH IN PLANTING AREAS. SOIL SHALL BE FREE OF STONES, ROOTS, AND CLODS AND ANY OTHER FOREIGN MATERIAL THAT IS NOT BENEFICIAL FOR PLANT GROWTH. 11.ALL PLANT BEDS SHALL BE TOP-DRESSED WITH A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) INCHES OF MULCH. 12.TREES OVERHANGING WALKS AND PARKING SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CLEAR BRANCH HEIGHT OF SEVEN (7) FEET. TREES OVERHANGING PUBLIC STREET PAVEMENT DRIVE AISLES AND FIRE LANES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CLEAR BRANCH HEIGHT OF FOURTEEN (14) FEET. 13.A VISIBILITY TRIANGLE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL INTERSECTIONS, WHERE SHRUBS ARE NOT TO EXCEED THIRTY (30) INCHES INNHEIGHT, AND TREES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CLEAR TRUNK HEIGHT OF NINE (9) FEET. 14.TREES PLANTED ON A SLOPE SHALL HAVE THE TREE WELL AT THE AVERAGE GRADE OF THE UPHILL SLOPE. 15.ALL AREAS OF LESS THAN THREE (3) FEET IN WIDTH SHALL BE GRASS, GROUNDCOVER, OR SOME TYPE OF DECORATIVE RIVER ROCK, PAVERS, OR CONCRETE. 16.THE OWNER, TENANT, AND/OR THEIR AGENTS, IF ANY, SHALL BE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE, ESTABLISHMENT, AND PERMANENCE OF PLANT MATERIAL. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A NEAT AND ORDERLY AT ALL TIMES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, MOWING, EDGING, PRUNING, FERTILIZING, WATERING, DE-WEEDING, AND TRASH REMOVAL. 17.PLANT MATERIAL THAT IS DAMAGED, DESTROYED, OR REMOVED SHALL BE REPLACED WITH PLANTS MEETING MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. ALL TURF/GROUND COVER AREAS ARE TO BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO RECEIPT OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE TOWN. 18.AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED TO IRRIGATE ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS INTO STREETS, SIDEWALKS, OR ALLEYS. 19.NO PLANTING AREAS SHALL EXCEED 3:1 SLOPE (3 FT HORIZONTAL TO 1 FT VERTICAL). 20.EARTHEN BERMS SHALL NOT INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. 21.ALL WALKWAYS SHALL MEET ADA AND TAS REQUIREMENTS. 22.LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION MUST COMPLY WITH APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS, AND AS-BUILT PLANS SUBMITTED TO PARKS AND RECREATION, PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE TOWN AND/OR OBTAINING A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 23.FINAL INSPECTION AND APPROVAL OF SCREENING WALLS, IRRIGATION, AND LANDSCAPE IS SUBJECT TO ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO MANHOLES, VALVES, WATER METERS, CLEANOUTS, AND OTHER APPURTENANCES BEING ACCESSIBLE, ADJUSTED TO GRADE, AND TO THE TOWN OF PROSPER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. 24.IMPORTANT: MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR PLANTS, AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE TAKEN SERIOUSLY BY THE TOWN AND PARKS AND RECREATION. INSTALLING INFERIOR PLANTS WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM A PARKS REPRESENTATIVE MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF SOME OR ALL PLANTS, THEREBY DELAYING RECEIPT OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. ARCHITECTS AND LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO NOTIFY THE PARKS DEPARTMENT TO DISCUSS POSSIBLEDEFICIENCIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 25.CALL PARKS AND RECREATION AT (972) 569-1160 AT LEAST FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS PRIOR TO THE FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS: ·PROPOSED TRAIL ALIGNMENT ·BERM CONSTRUCTION & GRADING ·ESCROW RELEASE ·FINAL INSPECTION EXHIBIT 'G' CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN ZONE-26-0004 490 BUSINESS PARK 1.999 ACRES PREPARED DATE: 06/2/26 **detention area not included in open space calculation 8% 79,264 6341 36 15 7 13 8 BUILDING 'A' 11,297 S.F. BUILDING 'B' 7,240S.F.S0°16'37"W260.93'FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLF L F L FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL 8 S S SS W W W W W W W W SS SS SS SSSSSS W W W W W W W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W W W W W W WW W W W W W W W W W W S 490 BUS. PARK 79264 SQ FT 1.820 ACRES S0°16'37"W260.93'N0°20'15"W260.93'30' ROW DEDICATION 7828 SQ FT 0.180 ACRES N89°57'11"E335.18' S89°57'11"W 332.38' 1 CE 1 RO BERMUDA SOLID SOD, TYP. BERMUDA SOLID SOD, TYP.//////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////// ////////////////// // // //////// // /////////////////////// / // // //////////////////// ////// // ////// ////// // /// / // ////// ////// // //////////////////////////////////////////4 CM 13 NRS 23 DBH 3 MP 5 RB 5 CM 5 RB 1 RO1 RO 1 RO 3 MP 1 RO 1 RO 7 CM 5 RB 5 CM 3 NRS 39 DBH 4 CM 3 MP 1 RO 10 RB 2 CE 26 AB 30 AM 23 DS 6 CE 28 RY 24 MS 3 MP 18" WIDE, 2-4" RIVER ROCK BAND, TYP. STEEL EDGE, TYP. STEEL EDGE, TYP. 45 BBL//1 RO //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// / / // // // ////////////////////////////////38 DBH 15 AB SHEET NUMBER DRAWN BY: MD SCALE AS SHOWN DATE AUGUST 2025 ACE PROJECT: 01103SHEET TITLE:CROSSLAND BLUE STAR PROSPERNO.REVISIONSDATEBYFriday, June 26, 2026 1:57:50 PMS:\awr\jobs\2025\25130_490 Business Park Drive, Prosper\AutoCAD\sheets\25130_Landscape Series.dwg490 BUSINESS PARKDRIVEPROSPER, TEXAS© 2025 ANIMAS CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC PHONE: 214-803-1099 TX F-26500 a W R AWR Designs, LLC P.O. Box 1746 Aledo, Texas 76008 amanda@awr-designs.com c. 512.517.5589 STA TE O F T E XASTCETHI R C A EPACSDNALDEE GEISRRT572 4AMANARIC H DW . A RDSONGRAPHIC SCALE FEET04020 Scale 1"=20' - 0"CONCEPTUALLANDSCAPE PLANTOWN OF PROSPER LANDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES: STANDARD LANGUAGE AND/OR NOTATIONS, AS FOLLOWS: 1.PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MEASURED AND SIZED ACCORDING TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1) 2.ALL PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO TOWN APPROVAL AND MUST BE SPECIFIED ON THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. 3.GROUND COVERS USED IN LIEU OF TURF GRASS MUST PROVIDE COMPLETE COVERAGE WITHIN ONE (1) YEAR OF PLANTING AND MAINTAIN ADEQUATE COVERAGE AS APPROVED BY THE TOWN. 4.TREES MUST BE PLANTED FOUR (4) FEET OR GREATER FROM CURBS, SIDEWALKS, UTILITY LINES, SCREENING WALLS, AND ALL STRUCTURES. SINGLE-TRUNK TREES SHALL HAVE A SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER, AND ALL TREES SHALL BE FULL, WITH BALANCED CANOPY. MAJOR DAMAGE TO TRUNK(S), OR BRANCHES, WILL BE CAUSE FOR DENIAL. 5.ALL ROOT FLARES SHALL BE SET AT THREE (3) TO FOUR (4) INCHES ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE 6.THE TREE PIT SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH NATIVE TOPSOIL FREE OF ROCK AND OTHER DEBRIS 7.BURLAP, TWINE, AND WIRE BASKETS SHALL BE SEVERED AND REMOVED FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. 8.A 3-4” LAYER OF MULCH SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND THE BASE OF THE PLANTED TREE. THE MULCH SHALL BE PULLED BACK 1-2” FROM THE TRUNK OF THE TREE. 9.NO PERSON(S) OR ENTITY MAY USE IMPROPER OR MALICIOUS MAINTENANCE OR PRUNING TECHNIQUES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,: TOPPING OR OTHER NON SYMMETRICAL TRIMMING OF TREES, DAMAGE FROM A BACKHOE, OR USE OF FIRE OR POISON FOLLOW THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1) GUIDELINES ON PRUNING AND MAINTENANCE. 10.TOPSOIL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF EIGHT (8) INCHES IN DEPTH IN PLANTING AREAS. SOIL SHALL BE FREE OF STONES, ROOTS, AND CLODS AND ANY OTHER FOREIGN MATERIAL THAT IS NOT BENEFICIAL FOR PLANT GROWTH. 11.ALL PLANT BEDS SHALL BE TOP-DRESSED WITH A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) INCHES OF MULCH. 12.TREES OVERHANGING WALKS AND PARKING SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CLEAR BRANCH HEIGHT OF SEVEN (7) FEET. TREES OVERHANGING PUBLIC STREET PAVEMENT DRIVE AISLES AND FIRE LANES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CLEAR BRANCH HEIGHT OF FOURTEEN (14) FEET. 13.A VISIBILITY TRIANGLE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL INTERSECTIONS, WHERE SHRUBS ARE NOT TO EXCEED THIRTY (30) INCHES INNHEIGHT, AND TREES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CLEAR TRUNK HEIGHT OF NINE (9) FEET. 14.TREES PLANTED ON A SLOPE SHALL HAVE THE TREE WELL AT THE AVERAGE GRADE OF THE UPHILL SLOPE. 15.ALL AREAS OF LESS THAN THREE (3) FEET IN WIDTH SHALL BE GRASS, GROUNDCOVER, OR SOME TYPE OF DECORATIVE RIVER ROCK, PAVERS, OR CONCRETE. 16.THE OWNER, TENANT, AND/OR THEIR AGENTS, IF ANY, SHALL BE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE, ESTABLISHMENT, AND PERMANENCE OF PLANT MATERIAL. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A NEAT AND ORDERLY AT ALL TIMES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, MOWING, EDGING, PRUNING, FERTILIZING, WATERING, DE-WEEDING, AND TRASH REMOVAL. 17.PLANT MATERIAL THAT IS DAMAGED, DESTROYED, OR REMOVED SHALL BE REPLACED WITH PLANTS MEETING MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. ALL TURF/GROUND COVER AREAS ARE TO BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO RECEIPT OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE TOWN. 18.AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED TO IRRIGATE ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS INTO STREETS, SIDEWALKS, OR ALLEYS. 19.NO PLANTING AREAS SHALL EXCEED 3:1 SLOPE (3 FT HORIZONTAL TO 1 FT VERTICAL). 20.EARTHEN BERMS SHALL NOT INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. 21.ALL WALKWAYS SHALL MEET ADA AND TAS REQUIREMENTS. 22.LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION MUST COMPLY WITH APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS, AND AS-BUILT PLANS SUBMITTED TO PARKS AND RECREATION, PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE TOWN AND/OR OBTAINING A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 23.FINAL INSPECTION AND APPROVAL OF SCREENING WALLS, IRRIGATION, AND LANDSCAPE IS SUBJECT TO ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO MANHOLES, VALVES, WATER METERS, CLEANOUTS, AND OTHER APPURTENANCES BEING ACCESSIBLE, ADJUSTED TO GRADE, AND TO THE TOWN OF PROSPER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. 24.IMPORTANT: MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR PLANTS, AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE TAKEN SERIOUSLY BY THE TOWN AND PARKS AND RECREATION. INSTALLING INFERIOR PLANTS WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM A PARKS REPRESENTATIVE MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF SOME OR ALL PLANTS, THEREBY DELAYING RECEIPT OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. ARCHITECTS AND LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO NOTIFY THE PARKS DEPARTMENT TO DISCUSS POSSIBLEDEFICIENCIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 25.CALL PARKS AND RECREATION AT (972) 569-1160 AT LEAST FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS PRIOR TO THE FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS: ·PROPOSED TRAIL ALIGNMENT ·BERM CONSTRUCTION & GRADING ·ESCROW RELEASE ·FINAL INSPECTION EXHIBIT 'G' CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN ZONE-26-0004 490 BUSINESS PARK 1.999 ACRES PREPARED DATE: 06/2/26 **detention area not included in open space calculation 8% 79,264 6341 EXHIBIT 'H' CONCEPTUAL OPEN SPACE PLAN 37 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 1 of 16 490 BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS 490 BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between the Town of Prosper, Texas (“Town”), and Crossland Texas Industrial, LLC (“Developer”), individually, a “Party” and collectively, the “Parties,” to be effective (the “Effective Date”) on the latest date executed by a Party. WHEREAS, the Town is a home-rule municipal corporation, located in Collin County and Denton County, Texas, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Texas; and WHEREAS, Developer is developing a project in the Town known as 490 Business Park (“Property”), a legal description of which Property is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, the Property was rezoned by the Town Council on or about ________, 2026, and this Agreement seeks to incorporate, in part, the negotiated and agreed upon development standards contained in the underlying zoning ordinance, as may be amended, and/or this Development Agreement, to recognize Developer ’s reasonable investment-backed expectations in said development, as may be amended, and as more fully described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties to this Agreement agree as follows: 1. Development Standards. For any structure built on the Property following the Effective Date, it shall comply with the requirements contained in Exhibit B, “Building Materials,” attached hereto and incorporated herein. The Parties agree and acknowledge that the provisions of this Paragraph shall apply to any structure constructed subsequent to the execution of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to modify or otherwise amend any zoning regulation duly adopted by the Town, previously or in the future. 2. Covenant Running with the Land. The terms, conditions, rights, obligations, benefits, covenants and restrictions of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed covenants running with the land, and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Developer and its heirs, representatives, successors and assigns. This Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated into each deed and conveyance of the Property or any portion thereof hereafter made by any other Developers of the Property, regardless of whether this Agreement is expressly referenced therein. 38 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 2 of 16 3. Maintenance of Landscape Areas. A. Developer agrees to maintain all Landscape Areas (including all vegetation) on the Property, as referenced and/or depicted in the applicable zoning ordinance, as amended, free of weeds, tall grass, rubbish, brush and other objectionable, unsightly or unsanitary matter, as defined in Article 6.03 of Chapter 6 of the Town’s Code of Ordinances, as amended. Further, Developer agrees that landscape maintenance obligations referenced herein include mulching of Landscape Areas, prompt replacement of dead or dying vegetation with new vegetation, mowing of Landscape Areas, where required, and other routine and regular maintenance of plants and other vegetation. B. In the event that any Landscape Area or plants or vegetation is/are not properly maintained in accordance with this Agreement, the Town may give written notice to Developer of such failure to maintain and Developer shall promptly address such failure, taking into account the type(s) and species of such plants and vegetation and applicable planting cycles of same. After such notice, and Developer ’s failure to address same, Developer agrees and acknowledges that the Town shall have the right to go onto Developer’s property and replace, replant or otherwise address such failure to maintain any Landscape Area or plants or vegetation, with an invoice of costs incurred by the Town being promptly provided by the Town to Developer. In the event Developer does not pay such invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt by Developer, the Town may file a lien on the Property for the costs it incurred for the work done, including a reasonable administrative fee. Any failure to maintain any Landscape Area, plants or vegetation shall not be considered a default in accordance with Paragraph 7 of this Agreement, and any obligations referenced in said Paragraph shall not be applicable to this Paragraph 2. C. Notwithstanding any provision in this Paragraph to the contrary, the Town specifically reserves the right to take enforcement action and/or file a complaint against Developer in the Town’s municipal court (or other appropriate forum) relative to weeds, tall grass, rubbish, brush and other objectionable, unsightly or unsanitary matter on the Property, in accordance with Article 6.03 of Chapter 6 of the Town ’s Code of Ordinances, as amended. 4. Periodic Review of the Property’s Zoning by the Town Council. The Town Council reserves the right to periodically review the progress and/or scope of development of the Property pursuant to the terms of any zoning regulations applicable to the Property, and in the event any amendment(s) or revi sion(s) to said zoning regulations are deemed reasonably appropriate and have the written approval of the Developer, the Town may provide appropriate notices for Town consideration of same, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Gove rnment Code, as amended, and the Town’s Zoning Ordinance, as amended. 39 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 3 of 16 5. Certain Business Establishments Prohibited. Developer agrees and acknowledges that it will not lease, sell or otherwise permit or authorize on the Property any of the following business establishments: (1) credit access businesses, as defined in Texas Finance Code § 393.601, as amended, including but not limited to payday lending businesses, “cash for title” lenders, and credit services businesses, as defined in Texas Finance Code § 393.001, as amended); (2) body art facilities; (3) smoke or vape shops; (4) any business entity that sells drug para phernalia; (5) any business establishment offering gaming or slot machines; (6) sex shops, including but not limited to business entities whose primary purpose is the sale of lewd merchandise; (7) pawn shops; and (8) business entities which primarily utilize outdoor storage or displays. Additionally, Developer agrees and acknowledges that it will not lease, sell or otherwise permit or authorize on the Property a package liquor store, which for purposes of this Agreement is defined as any business entity th at is required to obtain a Package Store Permit (P) from the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission for the off -premises consumption of alcohol. 6. Applicability of Town Ordinances. Developer shall develop the Property, and construct all structures on the Property, in accordance with all applicable Town ordinances and building/construction codes. 7. Default. No Party shall be in default under this Agreement until notice of the alleged failure of such Party to perform has been given (which notice shall set forth in reasonable detail the nature of the alleged failure) and until such Party has been given a reasonable time to cure the alleged failure (such reasonable time determined based on the nature of the alleged failure, but in no event less than thirty (3 0) days after written notice of the alleged failure has been given). In addition, no Party shall be in default under this Agreement if, within the applicable cure period, the Party to whom the notice was given begins performance and thereafter diligently and continuously pursues performance until the alleged failure has been cured. If either Party is in default under this Agreement, the other Party shall have the right to enforce the Agreement in accordance with applicable law, provided, however, in no event shall any Party be liable for consequential or punitive damages 8. Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, and all obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in Collin County, Texas. Exclusive venue for any action arising under this Agreement shall lie in Collin County, Texas. 9. Notice. Any notices required or permitted to be given hereunder (each, a “Notice”) shall be given by certified or registered mail, return re ceipt requested, to the addresses set forth below or to such other single address as either party hereto shall notify the other: 40 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 4 of 16 If to the Town: The Town of Prosper 250 W. First Street Prosper, Texas 75078 Attention: Town Manager If to Developer: Crossland Texas Industrial, LLC c/o Ivan Crossland 833 S. East Avenue Columbus, KS 66725 10. Prevailing Party. In the event any person initiates or defends any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret any of the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party in any such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs and attorney’s fees (including its reasonable costs and attorney’s fees on any appeal). 11. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties hereto with respect to development of the Property and supersedes all prior agreements, oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof. The provisions of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole and not strictly for or against any Party. 12. Savings/Severability. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the Agreement shall, to the extent reasonably possible, remain in force as to the balance of its provisions as if such invalid provision were not a part hereof. 13. Binding Agreement. A telecopied facsimile of a duly executed counterpart of this Agreement shall be sufficient to evidence the binding agreement of each party to the terms herein, including without limitation a scanned copy sent via electronic mail by either Party. 14. Authority to Execute. This Agreement shall become a binding obligation on the Parties upon execution by all Parties hereto. The Town warrants and represents that the individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the Town has full authority to execute this Agreement and bind the Town to the same. Developer warrants and represents that the individual executing this Agreement on behalf of Developer has full authority to execute this Agreement and bind Developer to the same. The Town Council hereby authorizes the Town Manager of the Town to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Town. 41 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 5 of 16 15. Filing in Deed Records. This Agreement, and any and all subsequent amendments to this Agreement, shall be filed in the deed records of Collin County, Texas. 16. Mediation. In the event of any disagreement or conflict concerning the interpretation of this Agreement, and such disagreement cannot be resolved by the signatories hereto, the signatories agree to submit such disagreement to nonbinding mediation. 17. Notification of Sale or Transfer; Assignment of Agreement. Developer shall notify the Town in writing of any sale or transfer of all or any portion of the Property, within ten (10) business days of such sale or transfer. Developer has the right (from time to time without the consent of the Town, but upon written notice to the Town) to assign this Agreement, in whole or in part, and including any obligation, right, title, or interest of Developer under this Agreement, to any person or entity (an “Assignee”) that is or will become a Developer of any portion of the Property or that is an entity that is controlled by or under common control with Developer. Each assignment shall be in writing executed by Developer and the Assignee and shall obligate the Assignee to be bo und by this Agreement. A copy of each assignment shall be provided to the Town within ten (10) business days after execution. Provided that the successor Developer assumes the liabilities, responsibilities, and obligations of the assignor under this Agre ement, the assigning party will be released from any rights and obligations under this Agreement as to the Property that is the subject of such assignment, effective upon receipt of the assignment by the Town. No assignment by Developer shall release Deve loper from any liability that resulted from an act or omission by Developer that occurred prior to the effective date of the assignment. Developer shall maintain true and correct copies of all assignments made by Developer to Assignees, including a copy o f each executed assignment and the Assignee’s Notice information. 18. Sovereign Immunity. The Parties agree that the Town has not waived its sovereign immunity from suit by entering into and performing its obligations under this Agreement. 19. Effect of Recitals. The recitals contained in this Agreement: (a) are true and correct as of the Effective Date; (b) form the basis upon which the Parties negotiated and entered into this Agreement; (c) are legislative findings of the Town Council; and (d) reflect the final intent of the Parties with regard to the subject matter of this Agreement. In the event it becomes necessary to interpret any provision of this Agreement, the intent of the Parties, as evidenced by the recitals, shall be taken into consideration and, to the maximum extent possible, given full effect. The Parties have relied upon the recitals as part of the consideration for entering into this Agreement and, but for the intent of the Parties reflected by the recitals, would not have entered into th is Agreement. 42 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 6 of 16 20. Consideration. This Agreement is executed by the Parties hereto without coercion or duress and for substantial consideration, the sufficiency of which is forever confessed. 21. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in a number of identical counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original for all purposes. A facsimile signature will also be deemed to constitute an original. 22. Amendment. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended except in writing signed by the Parties. A copy of each amendment to this Agreement, when fully executed and recorded, shall be provided to each Party, Assignee and successor Developer of all or any part of the Property; however, the failure to provide such copies shall not affect the validity of any amendment. 23. Miscellaneous Drafting Provisions. This Agreement shall be deemed drafted equally by all Parties hereto. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning, and any presumption or principle that the language herein is to be construed against any Party shall not apply. 24. Waiver of Texas Government Code § 3000.001 et seq. With respect to any and all Structures to be constructed on the Property pursuant to this Agreement, Developer hereby waives any right, requirement or enforcement of Texas Government Code §§ 3000.001-3000.005, as amended. 25. Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create any right in any Third-Party not a signatory to this Agreement, and the Parties do not intend to create any third-party beneficiaries by entering into this Agreement. 26. Rough Proportionality. Developer hereby agrees that any land or property donated and/or dedicated pursuant to this Agreement, whether in fee sim ple or otherwise, to the Town relative to any development on the Property is roughly proportional to the need for such land and Developer hereby waives any claim therefor that it may have. Developer further acknowledges and agrees that all prerequisites t o such a determination of rough proportionality have been met, and that any costs incurred relative to said donation are related both in nature and extent to the impact of the development referenced herein. Both Developer and the Town further agree to waive and release all claims one may have against the other related to any and all rough proportionality and individual determination requirements mandated by the United States Supreme Court in Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), and its progeny, as well as any other requirements of a nexus between development conditions and the provision of roadway services to the Property. 27. Exactions/Infrastructure Costs. Developer has been represented by legal counsel in the negotiation of this Agreement and bee n advised or has had the 43 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 7 of 16 opportunity to have legal counsel review this Agreement and advise Developer, regarding Developer’s rights under Texas and federal law. Developer hereby waives any requirement that the Town retain a professional engineer, licensed pursuant to Chapter 1001 of the Texas Occupations Code, to review and determine that the exactions required by the Town are roughly proportional or roughly proportionate to the proposed development’s anticipated impact. Developer specifically reserves its right to appeal the apportionment of municipal infrastructure costs in accordance with § 212.904 of the Texas Local Government Code; however, notwithstanding the foregoing, Developer hereby releases the Town from any and all liability under § 212.904 of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended, regarding or related to the cost of those municipal infrastructure requirements imposed by this Agreement. (REMINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) 44 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 8 of 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this document to be executed as of the date referenced herein. TOWN: THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS By: ___________________________ Name: Mario Canizares Title: Town Manager, Town of Prosper STATE OF TEXAS ) ) COUNTY OF COLLIN ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ___ day of ______________, 2026, by Mario Canizares, Town Manager of the Town of Prosper, Texas, on behalf of the Town of Prosper, Texas. ____________________________________ Notary Public, State of Texas My Commission Expires: _________________ 45 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 9 of 16 DEVELOPER: Crossland Texas Industrial, LLC By: _____________________________ Name: Ivan Crossland Title: ____________________________ STATE OF TEXAS ) ) COUNTY OF ________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ___ day of _______________, 2026, by Ivan Crossland on behalf of Crossland Texas Industrial, LLC, known to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and that he executed the same on behalf of and as the act of Developer. ____________________________________ Notary Public, State of Texas My Commission Expires: _________________ 46 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 10 of 16 EXHIBIT A (Property Description & Depiction) 47 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 11 of 16 48 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 12 of 16 EXHIBIT B (Building Design and Materials) EXTERIOR APPEARANCE OF BUILDINGS: A. Architectural Standards 1. The tract shall be developed in general accordance with the elevations in Exhibit B. 2. Buildings will be allowed to remain as is, as long as no expansions or additions are made. Only maintenance and repairs will be allowed. 49 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 13 of 16 BUILDING 'A' - SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 'A' - EAST ELEVATION 50 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 14 of 16 BUILDING 'A' - NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 'A' - WEST ELEVATION 51 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 15 of 16 BUILDING 'B' - SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 'B' - EAST ELEVATION 52 DEVAGRE-26-00XX Page 16 of 16 BUILDING 'B' - NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 'B' - WEST ELEVATION 53