08.14.2012 Town Council PacketPage 1 of 3
]
1. Call to Order / Roll Call.
2. Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance, and Pledge to the Texas Flag.
3. Announcements of dates and times of upcoming community events.
4. Presentation by Prosper Area Soccer Organization.
CONSENT AGENDA
(Items placed on the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and are considered non-
controversial. The Consent Agenda can be acted upon in one motion. A majority vote of the Council
is required to remove any item for discussion and separate action. Council members may vote nay on
any single item without comment and may submit written comments as part of the official record.)
5. MINUTES, RESOLUTIONS AND OTHER ITEMS
5a. Consider and act upon minutes from the following Council meeting(s) (AP)
July 24, 2012 – Regular Town Council Meeting
5b. Consider and act upon Resolution No. 12-54, amending Resolution No. 12-46
ordering a Special Election to fill the vacancy in Town Council Place 1 for
remainder of the current term to revise the early voting locations; and providing for
an effective date. (AP)
5c. Consider and act upon Resolution No. 12-55, supporting Collin County’s
prioritization of proposed RTR funded transportation projects. (HW)
5d. Consider and act upon 1) an Escrow Agreement between the Town of Prosper and
First Texas Homes, Inc., related to the construction of turn lane improvements to
serve Lakes of La Cima, Phase 7 with the First Street Improvements (Preston Road
to Coit Road) and 2) Resolution No. 12-56, authorizing the Town Manager to
execute the same. (MB)
5e. Consider and act upon Change Order #4 to RLK Engineering, Inc, for the First Street
Improvements (Preston Road to Coit Road) and Coit Road Improvements (First
Street to US 380). (MB)
5f. Consider and act upon the establishment of an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) by and between
the Town of Prosper, Texas and the Prosper Independent School District for Public Safety
Communications Services. (KM)
AGENDA
Regular Meeting of the Prosper Town Council
Prosper Municipal Chambers
108 W. Broadway, Prosper, Texas
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Board & Commission - Meet & Greet at 5:00 p.m.
Regular Meeting at 6:00 p.m.
Page 2 of 3
5g. Consider and act upon Resolution No. 12-58, amending Resolution No. 12-53 for the sole
purpose of establishing the possible source(s) of funding that the Town of Prosper may utilize
to purchase the real property made the subject of the real estate purchase contract between the
Town of Prosper and Sexton Farms, Ltd. (“Real Estate Contract”). (LD)
6. CITIZEN’S COMMENT
(The public is invited to address the Council on any topic. However, the Council is unable to discuss
or take action on any topic not listed on this agenda. Please complete a “Public Comments Form” and
present it to the Town Secretary prior to the meeting.)
Other Comments by the Public -
REGULAR AGENDA
(If you wish to address the Council during the regular agenda portion of the meeting, please fill out a
“Speaker Request Form” and present it to the Town Secretary prior to the meeting. Citizens wishing
to address the Council for items listed as public hearings will be recognized by the Mayor.
Those wishing to speak on a non-public hearing related item will be recognized on a case-by-case
basis, at the discretion of the Mayor and Town Council.)
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
7. A public hearing to consider and act upon a request to rezone 10.6± acres, located on the northwest
corner of Custer Road and Prosper Trail, from Agricultural (A) to Planned Development-Office (PD-
O). (Z12-0007) (CC)
DEPARTMENT ITEMS
8. Consider and act upon acceptance of a Local Option Petition for sale of all alcoholic beverages for
off-premise consumption only. (AP)
9. Consider and act upon Resolution No. 12-57, a resolution of the Town Council of the Town of
Prosper, Collin and Denton Counties, Texas, ordering the Special Election to be held and
administered by Denton County Elections Administration and Collin County Administration on
November 6, 2012. (AP)
10. Submission and discussion of the FY 2012-2013 Budget and Budget Message by the Interim Town
Manager. (LD)
11. Consider and act upon a schedule for public hearings on the FY 2012-2013 Budget. (MG)
12. Consider and act upon a proposed 2012 property tax rate. (MG)
13. Consider and act upon a schedule for public hearings on the proposed 2012 tax rate. (MG)
14. Consider and act upon the 2012 Town of Prosper Comprehensive Plan Update. (CA12-0001) (CC)
15. Presentation and update regarding Capital Improvement Projects. (MB)
Page 3 of 3
16. EXECUTIVE SESSION
Recess into Closed Session in compliance with Section 551.001 et. seq. Texas Government Code, as
authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act to deliberate regarding;
16a. Section 551.074. To deliberate the appointment, employment and/or duties of the Town
Manager.
16b. Section 551.087. To deliberate regarding Economic Development Negotiations regarding
property located north of Highway 380, east of 1385, south of Frontier and west of Custer
Road.
16c. Section 551.071. Meeting with Town Attorney regarding a matter in which the duty of the
Town Attorney under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar
of Texas conflicts with the Public Information Act regarding legal issues relating to a pending
public information request.
To reconvene in Regular Session and take any action necessary as a result of the Closed Session.
17. Possibly direct Town Staff to schedule topic(s) for discussion at a future meeting.
18. Adjourn
CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned authority, do hereby certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted on the inside window at the Town Hall of the Town of Prosper, Texas, a place
convenient and readily accessible to the general public at all times, and said notice was posted at least 72 hours before said meeting was convened.
_________________________________ ________________ ____________________
Amy Piukana, TRMC
Town Secretary Date Notice Posted Date Notice Removed
In addition to any specifically identified Executive Sessions, Council may convene into Executive Session under Section 551 of the Texas Government Code at any
point during the open meeting to discuss any item posted on this agenda. The Open Meetings Act provides specific exceptions that require that a meeting be open.
Should Council elect to convene into Executive Session, those exceptions will be specifically identified and announced. Any subsequent action, as a result of this
Executive Session, will be taken and recorded in open session.
NOTICE OF ASSISTANCE AT PUBLIC MEETINGS: The Prosper Town Council Meetings are wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to
attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary aids or services such as Interpreters for persons who are deaf or hearing impaired, readers, or large print, are
requested to contact the Town Secretary’s Office at (972) 569-1011. BRAILLE IS NOT AVAILABLE.
Page 1 of 6
]
Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Miller made a motion to convene into Executive Session at 5:18 p.m. Motion
seconded by Council Member Wilson. Motion approved by vote of 5-0.
1. EXECUTIVE SESSION
Recess into Closed Session in compliance with Section 551.001 et. seq. Texas Government Code, as
authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act to deliberate regarding;
1a. Section 551.072. To deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property located
south of Prosper Trail, east of the BNSF railroad, west of Custer, and north of Highway 380.
1b. Section 551.071. Meeting with Town Attorney regarding a matter in which the duty of the
Town Attorney under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar
of Texas conflicts with the Open Meetings Act regarding legal issues relating to the proposed,
updated Comprehensive Plan.
1c. Section 551.074. To deliberate the appointment, employment and/or duties of the permanent
Town Manager.
To reconvene in Regular Session and take any action necessary as a result of the Closed
Session.
Council Member Wilson made a motion to reconvene into regular session at 6:11p.m. Motion
seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Miller. Motion approved by vote of 5-0.
2. Call to Order / Roll Call.
Council present included: Mayor Ray Smith; Mayor Pro Tem Meigs Miller, Danny Wilson, Curry
Vogelsang Jr., and Jason Dixon.
Council Member(s) absent: Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Dugger
Staff present included: Lyle Dresher, Interim Town Manager; Rebecca Brewer, Town Attorney;
Amy Piukana, Town Secretary; Hulon Webb, Director of Development Services; Chris Copple,
Planning Director; and Matthew Garrett, Finance Director
3. Pastor John Fowler with First Presbyterian Church in Prosper gave the invocation. The Pledge of
allegiance and pledge to the Texas Flag were given.
4. Announcements of dates and times of upcoming community events. Mayor Smith announced Lyle
Dresher has been selected as the new Interim Town Manager.
Minutes
Regular Meeting of the Prosper Town Council
Prosper Municipal Chambers
108 W. Broadway, Prosper, Texas
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Council Meeting
5:00 p.m.
Page 2 of 6
Development Director Hulon Webb announced the Town will hold its first community cook-out and
picnic at Frontier Park schedule for September 9, 2012, at 5 p.m. Mr. Webb stated further details will
be posted on the Town’s webpage.
CONSENT AGENDA
(Items placed on the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and are considered non-
controversial. The Consent Agenda can be acted upon in one motion. A majority vote of the Council
is required to remove any item for discussion and separate action. Council members may vote nay on
any single item without comment and may submit written comments as part of the official record.)
5. MINUTES, RESOLUTIONS AND OTHER ITEMS
5a. Consider and act upon minutes from the following Council meeting(s) (AP)
July 10, 2012 – Regular Town Council Meeting
5b. Consider and act upon the June 30, 2012 monthly financial statements. (MG)
5c. Consider and act upon the quarterly investment report for the quarter ending June 30, 2012.
(MG)
5d. Consider and act upon a joint Library Agreement with City of Celina and Town of Prosper for
Librarian Services. (MG)
Mayor Pro Tem Miller made a motion to approve Consent Items 5a., 5b., 5c, and 5d, as presented.
Motion seconded by Council Member Wilson. Motion approved by vote of 5-0.
6. CITIZEN’S COMMENT
(The public is invited to address the Council on any topic. However, the Council is unable to discuss
or take action on any topic not listed on this agenda. Please complete a “Public Comments Form” and
present it to the Town Secretary prior to the meeting.)
Other Comments by the Public –
Prosper resident George Dupont spoke recognizing Town Leaders and staff for a job well done with
the Windmill Playground Community Build project. Mr. Dupont explained an issue with a
neighboring property being discussed tonight as Case No. Z12-006, noting this property has had
issues with trespassing and off road vehicles. Mr. Dupont gave an example of an off road violator
and disagreed with the explanation the Police Department gave the property owner stating the
property owner was advised they must post no trespassing signs every twenty feet at all sides of the
property. Mr. Dupont urged Council to make sure the policy issues are handled properly through
Council.
Prosper resident Kelly Cooper spoke regarding the Comprehensive Plan and asked that the wording
“Upscale small town feel” be added to the vision statement on page 22. Ms. Cooper also urged
Council to delete the light rail photo shown on page 30 of the Community Vision page and the
wording“a station platform with enhanced architectural features” be deleted. She added that the
wording that reads “determine resident’s ultimate vision for vacant land along the rail line” be deleted
along with the word “land” which she noted should be revised to, “and”. Ms. Cooper explained that
Page 3 of 6
no Executive Summary was found. Ms. Cooper read a letter from resident Anne Lieber who was not
in attendance; however, she requests that the Veloweb definition be revised to read the true and
correct definition or be taken off completely.
Prosper resident Jeff Burandt spoke stating he agrees completely with all Ms. Cooper’s
recommendations.
REGULAR AGENDA
(If you wish to address the Council during the regular agenda portion of the meeting, please fill out a
“Speaker Request Form” and present it to the Town Secretary prior to the meeting. Citizens wishing
to address the Council for items listed as public hearings will be recognized by the Mayor.
Those wishing to speak on a non-public hearing related item will be recognized on a case-by-case
basis, at the discretion of the Mayor and Town Council.)
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Mayor Ray Smith recused himself from the meeting due to a conflict of interest regarding Item No. 7.
7. A public hearing to consider and act upon a request to rezone 41.3± acres, located on the south side
of Frontier Parkway, 2,600± feet west of Custer Road, from Agricultural (A) to Planned
Development-Single Family-Estate (PD-SF-E). (Z12-0006). Planning Director Chris Copple briefed
Council regarding the case noting, besides lot, setback and dwelling area requirements, the standards
proposed that vary from straight zoning are residential development criteria along major creeks,
fencing, drainage, access and cul-de-sac length.
Council Member Dixon asked the Town Engineer if he agrees with the plans presented and noted that
he does not want the Town to be financially liable if the Development work is not done accurately.
Mayor Pro Tem Miller asked Town Engineer Hulon Webb if he agrees with the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommendation of having the drainage and floodway easement privately owned and
maintained.
Town Engineer Hulon Webb stated he prefers the HOA own and maintain the flood area at the creek,
noting he does not recommend private ownership of the drainage and floodway easement. Hulon
stated parameters could be added to the plat if Council chooses.
Council Member Dixon made a motion to open the Public Hearing. Motion seconded by Council
Member Wilson. Motion approved by vote of 4-0.
The following citizens spoke regarding the case:
Applicant Engineer Matt Dorsett stated he prepared the Concept Plan, noting original plans adhered
to subdivision ordinance to have the open space lot along Wilson Creek, he noted that the HOA
would be responsible for the middle of the creek even if it is privately owned. He noted that
language could be added to the Plat and Deed restrictions indicating the HOA would be responsible
for the easements and maintenance floodway responsibilities along the creek. He noted that the
developer did not remove the fence requirements.
Page 4 of 6
Prosper resident George Dupont spoke in support of the development. He stated he is the president
of the Amberwood Farms Home Owner’s Association. He stated that the lots backing to Wilson
Creek and the drainage that runs to Amberwood Farms are considered 4,000 square foot lots and
wants clarification that this includes all homes south of the property line of Twin Creeks. (Not just
homes that back to Wilson Creek.) Mr. Dupont spoke regarding access of increased traffic to the
creek. Mr. Dupont noted that if HOA property, it will have common area problems with twelve
homes that are private property and if there is a common area, twenty nine homes that have access to
the creek. His concern is with increased traffic and his fear that traffic could possibly cause flooding
issues. Mr. Dupont noted he prefers wrought iron fencing along the western and southern boundaries
and does not recommend common area. Mr. Dupont urged Council to spell out the maintenance and
easement responsibilities on the plans.
The Developer Rex agrees to 4,000 square foot minimums and stated the majority of citizens that
attended the P&Z Meeting did not want fencing to be required, only optional.
Council Member Vogelsang asked for clarification of common area verses HOA easement. Town
Engineer Hulon Webb explained that HOA lot and HOA easement are not much different. Mr. Webb
noted nothing can be built because it is an easement.
Celina resident Mike Lish stated he has a drainage and utility easement behind his house and states
not much maintenance has been required as the creek is in its natural state.
Council Member Dixon made a motion to close the Public Hearing. Motion seconded by Council
Member Vogelsang. Motion approved by vote of 4-0.
Mayor Pro Tem Miller made a motion to approve a request to rezone 41.3± acres, located on the
south side of Frontier Parkway, 2,600± feet west of Custer Road, from Agricultural (A) to Planned
Development-Single Family-Estate with the stipulations that language be added to the plat adopting
the P&Z recommendations and noting the no build easement and the drainage and floodway
maintenance wording per the Subdivision Ordinance be added to the Planned Development. Motion
seconded by Council Member Dixon. Motion approved by vote of 4-0.
DEPARTMENT ITEMS
Mayor Smith returned to the meeting.
8. Discuss and provide direction regarding the 2012 Town of Prosper Comprehensive Plan Update.
(CA12-0001). Planning Director Chris Copple briefed Council regarding this item. Planning
Director Chris Copple noted that changes were made per the July 10th Town Council Meeting and
with the P&Z recommended changes. Mr. Copple introduced Brandon Gonzalez with Freese &
Nichols who was present to answer any questions. Mr. Copple asked that Council review changes
and provide direction of any other revisions. He noted that the Town Charter requires Council to take
action to either approve or deny the Comp Plan within 60 days and that August 14, 2012 will be the
next Council meeting which meets this requirement.
Prosper resident Capp Perry spoke regarding density concerns and wants clarification of growth and
how it is measured, asking if it is calculated by the number of rooftops, retail, and/or population. He
stated more clarity is needed on how growth is being measured.
Page 5 of 6
Jack Dixon spoke regarding number of apartments, size, and population of the Town, lot sizes and
rail stop. His main concern is that he doesn’t feel the comp plan has addressed all the residents
needs, he prefers a citizen survey. Mr. Dixon urged Council to work on getting a grocery store and
more restaurants. He noted that he does not want big retail like Frisco and McKinney; he wants
Prosper to be unique and have quality retail.
Kelly Cooper spoke stating the Comp Plan needs more specific direction; she was a part of CPAC
and feels additional citizen education and comments would be beneficial. She noted the vision
statement needs to be addressed and urged that page 22 light rail be deleted from the Comp Plan.
Shawn Turner spoke in opposition to the new Vision Statement stating the revised statement is too
generic and prefers more language used in the original statement.
Council Member Wilson thanked everyone for their time and work on the Comp Plan. Council
Member Wilson noted that new information has been given regarding the Comp Plan and he stated
Council will be proactive and is listening to everyone’s input to move the town into a positive
direction.
Council Member Vogelsang thanked the community for their feedback. Council Member Vogelsang
explained that the open feel wording was used to capture the open family based feeling that the town
has. Council Member Vogelsang noted that Prosper must plan for growth and structure to provide
quality and excellence. He added that a good tax base is needed and preferably on quality retail.
Council Member Vogelsang asked staff to add all P&Z comments, citizen comments and Council
input to the Comp Plan.
Mayor Smith stated that the Comp Plan can be reviewed annually if needed, and thanked citizens for
all their input and time. Mayor Smith states Council is flexible and wants the Plan to reflect positive
growth for the Town of Prosper.
Mayor Pro Tem Miller recommended staff to add all comments from P&Z, staff, and citizens and
prepare the Plan for adoption at the August 14, 2012 Town Council meeting.
9. Possibly direct Town Staff to schedule topic(s) for discussion at a future meeting. Council asked that
staff provide a road and Capital Improvement Project update at the August 14, 2012 Council
Meeting.
Resident Kelly Cooper stated she wants to see what revisions will be made to the Comp Plan and she
wanted to make sure Council understands they have 60 days to review the plans before approval.
10. Adjourn-Mayor Pro Tem Miller made a motion to adjourn at 7:49 p.m. Motion seconded by Council
Member Wilson. Motion approved by vote of 5-0.
Meeting adjourned at 7:49 p.m.
APPROVED:
___________________________________
Ray Smith, Mayor
ATTEST:
Page 6 of 6
_______________________________
Amy M. Piukana, TRMC
Town Secretary
Prosper is a place where everyone matters.
ADMINISTRATION
To: Mayor and Town Council
From: Amy Piukana, Town Secretary
CC: Lyle Dresher, Town Manager
Re: Town Council Meeting – August 14, 2012
Date: August 3, 2012
Agenda Item:
Consider and act upon Resolution No. 12-54, amending Resolution No. 12-46 ordering a
Special Election to fill the vacancy created in Town Council Place 1 for the remainder of the
current term to revise the Early Voting Locations.
Description of Agenda Item:
Originally, the order of Election indicated voters could early vote at Denton County
Elections Office located at 401 W. Hickory, Ste 125, Denton, TX 76201, however; this
resolution is amended to read that the Main Early Voting location will be at Town of Prosper
Municipal Chambers location only, located at 108 W . Broadway, Prosper, Texas. Denton
County will not conduct early voting at the Denton County Elections Office.
The Election Day polling site will be at the Town’s regular site (Prosper Community Library,
Reynolds Middle School, 700 N. Coleman Road.)
The proposed resolution amends the early voting location and authorizes joint election services
with Denton County.
Attached Documents:
Resolution No. 12-54
Town Staff Recommendation:
Town staff recommends that the Town Council approve Resolution No. 12-54, amending
Resolution No. 12-46, ordering a Special Election for September 15, 2012 to fill the
vacancy created in Town Council Place 1 for the remainder of the current term revising
the early voting locations, as presented.
Page 1 of 1
Amendment to Order of September 15, 2012 Special Election Page 1
613174
TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. 12-54
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER,
COLLIN AND DENTON COUNTIES, TEXAS, AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 12-46 ORDERING A SPECIAL ELECTION TO FILL THE VACANCY
CREATED IN TOWN COUNCIL PLACE 1 FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE
CURRENT TERM TO REVISE THE EARLY VOTING LOCATIONS; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Prosper, Texas (“Town Council”) previously
passed and approved Resolution No. 12-46, ordering a special election to fill the vacancy created in
Town Council Place 1 (“Election”); and
WHEREAS, subsequent to ordering the Election, the Denton County Elections Administrator
advised the Town of Prosper, Texas (“Prosper”), that for purposes of the Election, he would not be
conducting early voting at the Denton County Elections Office, 401 W. Hickory, Ste. 125, Denton,
Texas 76201 (“Denton County Elections Office”); and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 12-46 included the Denton County Elections Office as an early
voting location; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has investigated and determined that it is necessary to amend
Resolution No. 12-46 to remove the Denton County Election Office as an early voting location.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF PROSPER, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1: Findings Incorporated. The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body
of this Resolution as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2: Amendment to Section of Resolution No. 12-46. Section 2 of Resolution No. 12-
46 is hereby amended as follows:
“…
SECTION 2: Early voting by personal appearance shall be available at: Prosper Municipal
Chambers, 108 W. Broadway, Prosper, Texas 75078. Early voting will begin on Wednesday, August
29, 2012, thru Friday, September 7, 2012, during the normal weekday working hours of 8:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m., with extended voting hours on Saturday, September 10, 2012, and Sunday, September 11,
2012, from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Applications for ballot by mail shall be requested from and mailed to
the Denton County Elections Office, Attn. Frank Phillips, Elections Administrator, Joseph A. Carroll
Bldg., 401 W. Hickory, Ste. 125, Denton, Texas 76201. Applications for ballots by mail must be
received no later than the close of business on the seventh (7th) day before election day.
…”
SECTION 3: Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effective immediately upon its
passage.
Amendment to Order of September 15, 2012 Special Election Page 2
613174
DULY PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town Council of the Town of Prosper, Collin, and
Denton Counties, Texas on this the 14th day of August, 2012.
___________________________
Ray Smith, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Amy Piukana, TRMC
Town Secretary
CIUDAD DE PROSPER, TEXAS RESOLUCIÓN NO. 12-54
UNA RESOLUCIÓN DEL AYUNTAMIENTO DE LA CIUDAD DE PROSPER,
CONDADOS DE COLLIN Y DENTON, TEXAS, SE ORDENA LA ELECCIÓN
ESPECIAL PARA LLENAR UN VACANTE PRODUCIDA EN LA CIUDAD LUGAR
DEL CONSEJO 1 POR EL RESTO DEL TÉRMINO ACTUAL; DESIGNAR LUGARES
DE VOTACIÓN TEMPRANA; ORDENAR LOS ANUNCIOS DE LA ELECCIÓN QUE
SE DA CONFORME A LA LEY EN RELACIÓN CON DICHA ELECCIÓN, Y PARA
PROVEER EL NOMBRAMIENTO DE JUECES ELECTORALES
AHORA, POR LO TANTO, SE RESUELVE POR EL AYUNTAMIENTO DE LA
CIUDAD DE PROSPER, TEXAS, QUE:
SECCIÓN 1: Una elección especial se ordena para que se lleve acabo el Sábado, 15 de
Septiembre 2012, con el propósito de elegir a una persona para llenar la vacante creada en la
ciudad de un lugar del Consejo por el resto del actual termino (hasta Mayo 2013).
Dicha elección será administrada por el administrador de elecciones del Condado de
Denton.
SECCIÓN 2: votación temprana en persona estará disponible en: la cámaras municipals
de Prosper, 108 W. Broadway, Prosper, Texas 75078; o en la Oficina de elecciones del Condado
de Denton, Joseph A. Carroll Bldg., 401 W. Hickory, Ste 125, Denton, Texas 76201. Votación
temprana comenzará el Miércoles, 29 de Agosto de 2012, hasta Viernes, 7 de Septiembre de
2012, durante el día de semana normal horarios de 8:00 a.m. a 5:00 p.m., con horario extendido
de votación el Lunes, 10 de Septiembre del 2012, y Martes, 11 de Septiembre de 2012, de 7:00
a.m. has las 7:00 p.m. Las solicitudes de voto por correo serán solicitadas y enviadas a la
Oficina de Elecciones del Condado de Denton Attn. Frank Phillips, Administrador de las
Elecciones, Joseph A. Carroll Bldg., 401 W. Hickory, Ste 125, Denton, Texas 76201. Las
solicitudes de boletas por correo deben recibirse no más tarde del cierre de las operaciones en el
éptimo día (7) antes del día de la elección.
SECCIÓN 3: Las máquinas de votación directa de registro electrónico (DRE) se
utilizarán en esta elección para la votación temprana por apariencia personal y el día de la
elección. Se utilizarán las boletas de escaneo óptico para la votación temprana por correo.
SECCIÓN 4: El Secretario de la ciudad esta autorizado y dirigido a publicar, en el
tiempo y forma prescrito por la ley, todos los avisos que se requiera ser publicados o escritos en
relación con la conducta de esta elección. La elección, además de proporcionar el aviso de la
elección, se llevará a cabo de conformidad con el código electoral de Texas y otras leyes
aplicables, y todos los votantes registrados y calificados residentes de la ciudad serán elegibles
para votar en la elección.
SECCIÓN 5: Al recibir las recomendaciones de la Secretaria de la ciudad o del
Administrador de Elecciones del Condado de Denton, el Ayuntamiento designará la votación
temprana y el día de la elección de jueces.
En caso de que los jueces nombrados son incapaces de ejecutar o completar sus deberes
por cualquier motivo, el Secretario de la ciudad o el Administrador de Elecciones del Condado
de Denton se puede identificar a los magistrados suplentes que el Ayuntamiento nombrará tan
pronto como sea possible.
El Alcalde y el Secretario de la ciudad, en consulta con el Abogado de la Ciudad, por lo
presente esta autorizado y dirigida a tomar cualquier y todas las acciones necesarias para cumplir
con lo dispuesto en el código electoral de Texas y cualquier otra ley estatal o federal en la
realización y la realización de las elecciones, sean o no expresamente autorizado en este
documento.
DEBIDAMENTE PASADO Y APROBADO por el Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de
Prosper, y los condados de Collin, y Denton, Texas en este el 26 día de Junio del 2012.
_________________________
Ray Smith, Alcalde
ATESTO:
_________________________
Amy Piukana, Secretario de la Ciudad
City of Allen, Texas City of Frisco, Texas
By:___________________________ By:___________________________
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By:___________________________ By:___________________________
Name: Name:
Resolution No.__________________ Resolution No._________________
City of McKinney, Texas City of Plano, Texas
By:___________________________ By:___________________________
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By:___________________________ By:___________________________
Name: Name:
Resolution No.__________________ Resolution No._________________
Town of Prosper, Texas City of Richardson, Texas
By:___________________________ By:___________________________
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By:___________________________ By:___________________________
Name: Name:
Resolution No.__________________ Resolution No._________________
Funding
Gap
Stage of
Project ADT Congestion
Economic
Development
Increased
Mobility
Avail. Of
Other Funds
/ Matching $
City Priority
Weight = 1x Weight = 1.5x Weight = 1x Weight = 1x Weight = 1x Weight = 1x Weight = 1x Weight = 2x
100 TXDOT FM 2478 US 380 Stonebridge Dr.Construction 2009 $ 1,005,000
100 TXDOT FM 3537 SH 289 FM 2478 Construction 2011 $ 8,000,000
100 TXDOT FM 455 US 75 NB Frontage Rd SH 5 ROW/Utilities/Const 2013 $ 6,000,000
100 TXDOT SH 121 SH 5 E. of FM 455 ROW/Utilities/Const 2013 $ 20,600,000
100 TXDOT US 380 West of CR 608 in Farmersville East of Floyd St Construction 2011 $ 4,750,000
100 TXDOT US 75 North of Melissa Rd FM 455 ROW/Util.2015 $ 20,000,000
100 TXDOT US 75 SPUR 399 (SH 121 South)Wilson Creek Construction 2011 $ 3,000,000
100 TXDOT US 75 Telephone Road North of Melissa Rd Eng/ROW/Util.2012 $ 12,000,000
100 TXDOT US 75 Wilson Creek South of US 380 Construction 2011 $ 3,000,000
100 TXDOT/ALLEN Stacy Rd/FM 2786 E. of Angel Pkway FM 1378 ROW/Const 2012 $ 1,100,000
100 TXDOT/MURPHY FM 2551 FM 544 FM 2514 Construction 2011 $ 2,000,000
100 TXDOT/PARKER FM 2514 FM 2551 FM 1378 Construction 2014 $ 5,000,000
100 TXDOT/PLANO US 75 @ PGBT Construction 2015 $ 18,000,000
$ 104,455,000
$ 27,134,873
$ 77,320,127
65 ALLEN Exchange Parkway US 75 Allen Heights Eng/Const 2013 8 8 7 7 6 8 9 4 3,120,000$
64 WYLIE/LUCAS FM 1378 N. Parker Rd S. Parker Road ROW/Const 2013 7 8 4 8 7 8 8 5 4,250,000$
63.5 RICHARDSON Routh Creek Parkway/Infocom/Infocom Renner/Plano Rd/US 75
Infocom/Routh Crk/DART Rail
Line Eng/Const 2013 5 9 6 6 9 7 7 5 9,479,950$
63 MCKINNEY Stacy Rd/FM 2786 Ridge Rd. SH 121 Eng/Const 2012 9 10 7 6 5 7 6 4 1,600,000$
62 FRISCO FM 2478 SH 121 Stonebridge Drive Engineering 2014 10 6 8 8 8 9 6 2 983,000$
62 MCKINNEY FM 546 Connector SH 5 Airport Dr.Eng/ROW 2014 6 6 6 6 9 8 8 5 6,100,000$
61 PLANO DNT @ PGBT Construction 2014 4 6 10 10 9 9 2 4 15,000,000$
59.5 FRISCO Dallas Parkway SH 121 Eldorado Pkway Engineering 2015 8 5 8 8 7 9 6 3 2,170,000$
59.5 LUCAS West Lucas Road FM 2551 FM 1378 Eng/ROW/Const 2013 9 9 5 5 7 7 3 5 1,500,000$
59 FRISCO Rockhill Road CR 26 Preston Rd.Construction 2012 8 8 3 4 6 8 10 4 3,690,000$
59 PROSPER/CELINA Frontier Parkway (CR5)SH 289 (Preston Rd.)DNT Eng/ROW/Const 2014 6 6 4 4 9 9 8 5 5,442,722$
58.5 PRINCETON US 380 at Second Street (turn Lanes)Eng/Const 2013 10 9 6 4 5 6 6 4 350,000$
58 ANNA US 75 at FM 455 Engineering 2014 8 6 2 7 8 7 7 5 2,000,000$
57.5 RICHARDSON East Infocom Plano Road Wyndham Eng/Const 2013 6 9 6 6 8 7 7 2 5,577,000$
56.5 LUCAS West Lucas Road @ FM 1378 Eng/ROW/Const 2013 10 9 5 6 4 7 3 4 500,000$
56 MCKINNEY Virginia Pkwy Mallard Lks US 75 Eng/ROW/Const 2012 6 10 7 8 5 7 6 1 8,900,000$
56 MURPHY Betsy Lane North Murphy Road McCreary Rd Construction 2012 8 8 4 6 5 8 3 5 3,200,000$
55.5 ALLEN/PARKER FM 2551/Angel Parkway FM 2514 (Parker Rd)FM 2170 / Main St.Eng/ROW/Utilities/Const 2016 3 5 5 7 7 9 7 5 17,600,000$
55 MCKINNEY Virginia Pkwy Ridge Rd. Mallard Lks.Eng/Const 2014 8 6 7 7 5 7 6 3 2,800,000$
55 PLANO Misc. Intersection Improvements Eng/Const 2012 8 10 4 7 5 8 6 1 1,996,500$
55 FRISCO/PROSPER US 380 CR 26 Custer Construction 2014 5 6 7 5 8 9 6 3 9,000,000$
54 WYLIE McMillan Rd.McCreary Rd.FM 1378 Eng/ROW/Const 2013 5 8 4 5 6 6 8 4 7,502,925$
52.5 LUCAS FM 2170 (Estates Parkway)FM 2551 FM 1378 Eng/ROW/Const 2013 9 9 2 5 7 7 3 3 1,700,000$
52 LOWRY CROSSING Bridgefarmer @ US 380 (Turn Lanes)Construction 2013 10 8 7 4 4 6 3 3 1,000,000$
51.5 MELISSA US 75 Melissa Rd.Outerloop Construction 2013 1 9 8 4 5 9 1 5 72,137,739$
51.5 PRINCETON Monte Carlo @ FM 75 (Bridge and addiotnal paving)Eng/Const 2013 10 9 3 3 4 7 5 3 800,000$
51.5 SACHSE Maxwell Creek Rd Ranch Rd City Limits Eng/ROW/Const 2016 10 5 3 4 6 6 9 3 241,346$
51 ST. PAUL FM 2514 East of Lavon Parkway Butschers Block Construction 2014 6 6 4 5 6 9 2 5 -$
50.5 SACHSE Ranch Rd Dewitt Rd.Clearmeadow Ln.Eng/ROW/Const 2016 9 5 2 3 6 6 9 4 1,342,525$
49.5 ANNA FM 455 SH 5 east to SH 121 Eng/ROW/Utilities/Const 2013 6 9 4 4 7 6 7 1 6,551,340$
49.5 ANNA Ferguson Pkwy (CR 367)FM 455 (W. White St) Ratton Elementary School Eng/ROW/Const 2013 10 9 2 3 5 5 9 1 703,000$
49 WYLIE Park Blvd.FM 1378 City Limits Eng/ROW/Const 2014 7 6 5 5 6 6 5 3 3,470,000$
48.5 ANNA US 75 Melissa Rd.Grayson County Line Eng/ROW/Utilities/Const 2013 1 9 8 4 7 6 1 4 174,423,390$
48.5 MELISSA US 75 Outer Loop Grayson County Line Eng/ROW 2025 4 1 8 9 6 9 1 5 13,650,000$
48.5 MCKINNEY SH 5 reconstruction FM 546 US 380 Eng/Const 2015 3 5 7 7 7 6 7 2 18,400,000$
48 ST. PAUL FM 2514 FM 1378 East of Lavon Parkway Eng/ROW/Const 2014 4 6 4 7 5 9 2 4 15,942,825$
47.5 FARMERSVILLE CR610/CR611 (Ext. Farmersville Parkway) SH 78 US 380 Eng/ROW/Const 2015 6 5 1 2 9 5 7 5 7,100,000$
47 MCKINNEY FM 546 Connector SH 5 Airport Dr.Construction 2014 3 4 6 6 9 8 7 1 19,000,000$
46 ALLEN Ridgeview Drive US 75 Alma Drive Eng/ROW/Utilities/Const 2014 4 6 2 4 7 8 8 2 12,600,000$
46 FRISCO Coit Rd Panther Creek U.S. 380 Eng/Const 2014 7 6 1 4 6 7 10 1 4,720,000$
45 PROSPER Coit Road First St.FM 1461 Eng/Const 2014 6 6 3 4 7 7 7 1 8,450,000$
44.5 LAVON SH 205 in Collin county Eng/ROW/Const 2016 2 5 4 6 5 9 1 5 -$
44 LUCAS FM 3286 (East Lucas Road)at FM 1378 Eng/ROW/Const 2014 8 6 5 6 4 7 3 1 2,500,000$
44 PARKER Springhill Estates Drive FM 2514 (Parker Rd)Chaparral Drive Construction 2013 6 8 3 4 4 7 2 3 5,600,000$
43.5 PARKER Lewis Lane FM 2514 (Parker Rd)Lucas Rd.Construction 2013 6 9 3 5 5 7 2 1 6,400,000$
42 PROSPER DNT Southbound Frontage Road CR 5 US 380 Eng/Const 2014 3 6 3 4 9 3 7 2 19,559,286$
42 PARKER Chaparral Drive Cottonwood Creek (Plano/Parker
border)Malone (Allen)Construction 2013 6 8 3 4 4 7 2 2 -$
42 PROSPER Prosper Trail SH 289 FM 2478 Eng/Const 2014 4 6 3 4 7 7 2 3 12,750,000$
40.5 ROYSE CITY FM 1138 SH 66 (in Rockwall CO)CR 590 Eng/ROW/Const 2016 5 5 2 5 5 6 4 3 -$
38.5 ROYSE CITY FM 1777 SH 66 (in Rockwall CO)IH 30 (in Rockwall CO)Eng/ROW/Const 2016 5 5 1 3 6 6 4 3 -$
37.5 CELINA Collin County Outer Lop Seg 3a From DNT FM 2478 Eng/ROW/Const 2016 2 5 1 4 8 8 1 3 41,800,000$
36 ALLEN Ridgeview Drive at US 75 Eng/ROW/Utilities/Const 2017 3 2 1 6 6 8 7 1 29,250,000$
35.5 LOWRY CROSSING Bridgefarmer Rd. In Lowry Crossing Engineering 2015 2 5 7 3 4 6 2 2 -$
34.5 ANNA SH 5 SH 121 Grayson County Line (CR 375) Eng/ROW/Utilities/Const 2016 2 5 3 3 5 7 1 3 33,013,857$
34 WYLIE Park Blvd.FM 2514 (Parker Rd.)Spring Creek Eng/ROW/Const 2017 5 2 1 4 6 6 7 1 9,178,333$
31.5 ANNA FM 455 US 75 west to East Fork Creek Eng/ROW/Utilities/Const 2015 3 5 1 3 6 5 2 2 -$
28.5 ANNA SH 121 Outer Loop Fannin County Line Eng/ROW/Const 2020 3 1 5 4 5 6 2 1 18,165,518$
$ 653,211,256
$ 730,531,383
COLLIN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PRIORITY PROJECTS FOR RTR FUNDING
Funding Gap
PROJECT INFORMATION MATRIX CRITERIA
FUNDING GAP TOTAL (With TxDOT Optional Projects):
TxDOT TOTAL FUNDING GAP
CITY TOTAL FUNDING GAP
Matrix Total
Agency Roadway Name Plimit From Plimit To Project Type Letting Date
SAVINGS ON RTR PROJECTS
TOTAL AMOUNT REQUESTED
Page 1 of 1
To: Mayor and Town Council
From: Hulon T. Webb, Jr., P.E., Director of Development Services/Town Engineer
CC: Mike Land, Town Manager
Re: Town Council Meeting – August 14, 2012
Date: August 8, 2012
Agenda Item:
Consider and act upon 1) an Escrow Agreement between the Town of Prosper and First Texas
Homes, Inc. related to the construction of turn lane improvements to serve Lakes of La Cima,
Phase 7 with the First Street Improvements (Preston Road to Coit Road) and 2) a resolution
authorizing the Town Manager to execute the same.
Description of Agenda Item:
In conjunction with the construction of First Street, First Texas Homes, Inc., requested staff
make the necessary modifications to include the construction of a west bound left turn lane and
east bound right turn lane at Hidden Lakes. In addition, the Town will extend existing drainage
facilities and construct the street approach on the south side of First Street. These changes will
eliminate the need for the developer to remove paving within the First Street right-of-way, and
should provide a more consistent finished product.
The attached agreement between the Town of Prosper and First Texas Homes, Inc., obligates
the developer to deposit with the Town the estimated $39,149.49 towards the construction of
the improvements within 15 days after receiving written notice from the Town.
Budget Impact:
N/A
Legal Obligations and Review:
Escrow Agreement prepared by the Town Attorney
Attached Documents:
The following documentation is being provided for review:
1. Escrow Agreement
2. Resolution
Town Staff Recommendation:
Town staff recommends that the Town Council: 1) approve an Escrow Agreement with First
Texas Homes, Inc. related to the construction of turn lane improvements to serve Lakes of La
Cima, Phase 7 with the First Street Improvements (Preston Road to Coit Road) and 2) a
resolution authorizing the Town Manager to execute the same.
ENGINEERING
Prosper is a place where everyone matters.
TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. 12-56
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
PROSPER, TEXAS, HEREBY AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER
OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, TO EXECUTE AN ESCROW
AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TURN LANE
IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE LAKES OF LA CIMA, PHASE 7 WITH
THE FIRST STREET IMPROVEMENTS (PRESTON ROAD TO COIT
ROAD) BETWEEN FIRST TEXAS HOMES, INC., AND THE TOWN OF
PROSPER.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS:
SECTION 1: The Town Manager of the Town of Prosper, Texas, is hereby
authorized to execute, on behalf of the Town Council of the Town of Prosper, Texas, an
Escrow Agreement for construction of turn lane improvements to serve Lakes of La
Cima, Phase 7 with the First Street Improvements (Preston Road to Coit Road) between
First Texas Homes, Inc., and the Town of Prosper, as hereto attached.
SECTION 2: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
RESOLVED THIS THE 14th day of August, 2012.
_________________________
Ray Smith, Mayor
ATTEST TO:
_________________________
Amy Piukana
Town Secretary
Page 1 of 2
To: Mayor and Town Council
From: Michael Bulla, CIP Project Manager
CC: Mike Land, Town Manager
Hulon T. Webb, Jr., P.E., Director of Development Services/Town Engineer
Re: Town Council Meeting – August 14, 2012
Date: August 7, 2012
Agenda Item:
Consider and act upon Change Order #4 to RLK Engineering, Inc, for the First Street
Improvements (Preston Road to Coit Road) and Coit Road Improvements (First Street to US 380).
Description of Agenda Item:
On March 25, 2008, Town Council approved a design service contract for the First Street
Improvements (Preston Road to Coit Road) and Coit Road Improvements (First Street to US 380)
to RLK Engineering, Inc. The contract included the design of a four-lane divided roadway with
concrete curb and underground drainage. Turn lanes and median openings, as well as conduits
necessary for irrigation and median lighting, were also included.
November 10, 2009, Council approved Change Order #1 in the amount of $12,045.38 to RLK
Engineering, Inc. which provided for additional design services associated with the proposed
church site on the southwest corner of First Street and Coit Road, the drainage system from the
Estates and Mansions, and a new Hike & Bike Trail parking lot on the south side of First Street
near the water storage tanks.
February 23, 2010, Council approved Change Order #2 in the amount of $9,425.00 to RLK
Engineering Inc., which provided for 29 additional right-of-way and easement documents.
December 13, 2011, Council approved Change Order #3 in the amount of $19,350.00 to RLK
Engineering Inc., for the re-bidding of the First Street and Coit Road project, and revising sheets
for additional driveway connections.
This request provides for $15,400.00 of additional compensation to RLK Engineering Inc., for
proposed design changes to First Street. The first alteration ($3,400.00) will amend the necessary
Paving and Drainage sheets to construct the southern half of the Hidden Lakes and First Street
intersection. These changes will accommodate the impending development of La Cima Phase 7.
The remaining portion of the fee ($12,000.00) creates proposed new Drainage and Grading sheets
for the intersection of Preston Road and First Street. If left unaltered, a six to eight foot deep open
channel will remain in place between the headwalls on the northeast corner First Street and
Preston Road. Town Staff has proposed integrating the two drainage systems to allow for the filling
of this high profile area. Once final acceptance of the plan is received from TxDOT, staff will
Prosper is a place where everyone matters.
ENGINEERING
Page 2 of 2
present a funding agreement for the improvements, between the Town of Prosper, the Prosper
Economic Development Corporation, and the adjoining property owner for Council’s consideration.
The Prosper Economic Development Corporation has tentatively approved a contribution not to
exceed $55,000.00 and the adjoining property owner has agreed to contribute $50,000.00 towards
the estimated $118,226.33 cost of the improvements. The balance of the funding will be realized
from savings generated ($25,160.00) by the deletion of the headwall on First Street.
Budget Impact:
The original design contract in the amount of $493,250.00, Change Orders #1, #2, and #3 in the
amount of $40,820.38, were funded from the 2006 CO Bonds. The total cost of Change Order #4 is
$15,400.00 and will be funded from the 2006 CO Bonds. Upon Town Council’s approval August
14th, 2012, $3,400 of Change Order #4 will be reimbursed by Escrow Agreement with First Texas
Homes, Inc.
Legal Obligations and Review:
No legal review of this request by the Town’s attorney is required.
Attached Documents:
1. Change Order #4
2. Sketch of proposed drainage improvements at Preston Road and First Street.
Board, Committee and/or Staff Recommendation:
Town staff recommends that the Town Council approve Change Order #4 to RLK Engineering for
the First Street Improvements (Preston Road to Coit Road) and Coit Road Improvements (First
Street to US 380).
Project Cost per
Quantity Unit Unit
P4 Embankment (Density Control)3000 CY 2.00$ 6,000.00$
D3 30" RCP 15 LF 54.60$ 819.00$
D15 10'x3' RCB 200 LF 344.05$ 68,810.00$
D16 2-6'x4' MBC 30 LF 396.60$ 11,898.00$
D19A Storm Junction Box (18'x10')1 EA 18,500.00$ 18,500.00$
D36 Stone Riprap (TxDOT Common Grouted)30 SY 51.50$ 1,545.00$
D37 Trench Excavation Protection for Storm Sewer 245 LF 0.10$ 24.50$
XX Remobilization & Survey Charges 1 LS 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$
This preliminary opinion of construction cost has been prepared based upon limited existing information available and is subject to change upon
design completion. This opinion of construction cost was prepared by John E. Elliott, P.E. Project Manager, on June 22, 2012.
Sub-Total Add Storm Construction Amount
Total Add Paving Construction Amount
112,596.50$
118,226.33$
5% Project Contingency Amount 5,629.83$
Order #1 - Add Storm Connection At Preston Road & First St.
FIRST STREET / COIT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
First Street - Craig Street to East of Coit Road
Coit Road - US Highway 380 to North of First Street
Proposed Professional Services Change
Storm Drainage
Total Item Cost
112,596.50$
Item #
Total Storm Drainage Bid Amount
Item Description
Engineering Design Fee 12,000.00$
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES PAGE 1 OF 9
#612833
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE TOWN OF PROSPER,
TEXAS AND THE PROSPER INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
This Interlocal Agreement for Public Safety Communications Services (“Agreement”), is
made and entered into this____ day of ______________, 2012 (“Effective Date”), by and
between the TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, a Texas municipal corporation, (“Town”) and the
PROSPER INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, a Texas political subdivision, (“PISD”).
Town and PISD are individually and collectively referred to herein as “Party” or “Parties”.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, PISD has hired a Police Chief (“PISD’s Police Chief”); and
WHEREAS, PISD has requested that Town’s Police Department (“PPD”) provide certain
Public Safety Communications Services (hereinafter defined) to PISD; and
WHEREAS, PPD currently has equipment and operator availability above and beyond
the immediate needs of Town and available to address and provide and the Public Safety
Communications Services as set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, Town and PISD has determined it to be in the best interest of the public for
Town to provide the Public Safety Communications Services; and
WHEREAS, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791, Texas Local Government Code
(“Code”), provides the authority to political subdivisions for contracts by and between each other
to facilitate the governmental functions and services of said political subdivisions under the
terms of the Act; and
WHEREAS, Town and PISD deem it to be in the best interest of both entities to enter
into this Agreement regarding the provision of Public Safety Communications Services.
NOW, THEREFOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, Town
and PISD hereby agree as follows:
1. Term of Agreement/Extensions/Termination/Additional Territory.
A. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall terminate
one (1) year following the Effective Date (“Initial Term”), unless extended or
terminated earlier as provided herein.
B. Request to Extend. PISD may request Town to renew the Initial Term, or any
subsequent term of this Agreement, for one, 1-year term, by providing notice of
its intent to renew in writing to PPD prior to the end of the Initial term subject to
the provisions set forth herein. Town, after conferring with PPD, will notify
PISD, in writing within sixty (60) days of Town’s receipt of PISD’s request to
extend, whether it will agree to any such extension.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES PAGE 2 OF 9
#612833
C. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated prior to the expiration date
noted in Paragraphs A or B above, as applicable, with the occurrence of either of
the following:
(i) Either Party may, with our without cause and without liability for
damages, except as provided hereinafter, terminate the Agreement
upon providing the other Party written notice of termination at
least ninety (90) days prior to the anticipated date of termination;
or
(ii) Mutual agreement of termination of the Agreement, executed in
writing by both Parties, without the requisite ninety (90) days prior
written notice.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, any termination of this
Agreement shall not, under any circumstance relieve PISD from payment of any
fees set forth below.
D. Additional Territory. At the sole discretion of Town, this Agreement may be
terminated or renegotiated in the event PISD includes any additional territory
within the district. Immediately upon the completion of any inclusion of
additional territory by the district, PISD shall notify Town of the same, in writing,
and provide Town with a legal description of the additional territory.
2. Performance of Public Safety Communications Services/Operational Issues.
A. Performance of Public Safety Communications Services. PPD shall provide to
PISD, on a non-exclusive basis, the following services which shall be referred to
herein as “Public Safety Communications Services”:
i. Emergency Telephone Services. PPD will receive and process all PISD
emergency telephone calls, including those received on E 9-1-1 telephone
lines and on published ten digit emergency telephone lines. All requests
for Public Safety Communications Services will be received and
processed by PPD for incidents occurring at any PISD campus within
Town and its extra territorial jurisdiction (“Service Locations”), except for
Baker Elementary School located in McKinney, Texas for which 9-1-1
calls will be transferred from the McKinney Police Department. PPD will
make arrangements with the North Texas Council of Governments E 9-1-1
Program Office to direct 9-1-1 calls from PISD Service Locations to the E
9-1-1 trunk lines answered at PPD.
ii. Computer Aided Dispatch System and Computer Services.
(a) Unit Status Function. PPD will maintain an accurate status of all
available PISD PD personnel. PISD will provide PPD with unit
status changes as they occur. PPD will maintain a unit history
report for all PISD units on-line.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES PAGE 3 OF 9
#612833
(1) Radio Procedures. PISD agrees to utilize radio procedures
that conform to the CAD procedures outlined by PPD.
Upon execution of this Agreement, PPD will supply PISD
with these written procedures. This will reduce the
possibility of error by the dispatcher and increase the speed
of inquiries.
(2) Police Unit Availability. PISD will notify PPD as soon as
its personnel are available for dispatch to events. PISD will
further notify PPD of officer identification, beat assignment
and radio call identification at the beginning of each shift
and whenever there is a change in unit availability, as well
as, all necessary dispatching information unique to PISD’s
operations.
(b) Incident Status. PPD will record all police and fire calls for
service and any incident requiring a police incident report or police
case report in an incident log. The incident log will demonstrate
the real time of receipt, entry, dispatch and closure of all incidents,
as well as, all unit activity associated with the incident.
(c) Incident Numbering. PPD will only record one level of incident
numbering. The numbers are in the format of [first two (2) digits
represent the year of the incident with the remaining numbers
being assigned to calls sequentially as received]. The numbers are
assigned to calls sequentially. The Call for Service Number is
applied to all incidents as described above.
(d) Geofile. PPD maintains a geofile in the CAD system that indicates
the police beat and unit response order, as well as a fire station
order to a particular location. The geofile includes street name,
block range, odd/even breakdown and fire map page references.
(1) PISD agrees to provide PPD with the geofile data necessary
to maintain an accurate system no later than thirty (30) days
after the Effective Date of this Agreement.
(2) If PISD desires any significant changes to the geofile after
the Effective Date of this Agreement, it can train their staff
on how to make a geofile change and perform the work
themselves at PPD. PPD personnel will supervise this
work.
(e) TLETS Inquires and Updates. In accordance with the Texas
Department of Public Safety (DPS) rules, will sign a “Non Twenty
Twenty-Four Terminal Agency Agreement” asking DPS to route
PISD TLETS inquiries to PPD will be completed within ten (10)
days of the Effective Date of this Agreement. PPD will perform
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES PAGE 4 OF 9
#612833
all TLETS inquiries for PISD’s Police Chief in the field. PPD will
fax copies of TLETS entries or updates to PISD’s Police Chief
within two (2) hours of performing the work.
B. Operational Issues.
i. Policies and Procedures. PISD is responsible for establishing its
departmental policies and procedures on dispatching services in that are
compatible with PPD.
ii. Conflict Resolution. PISD’s Police Chief should attempt to resolve
problems involving dispatch by contacting PPD’s Assistant Police Chief,
or his designee, as soon as possible. Any unresolved or repetitive
problems should be referred to PPD’s Chief of Police. The decision of
PPD’s Chief of Police will be final.
iii. Police Radio Identifiers. To avoid conflict with PPD identifiers, PISD’s
radio identifiers will need to be modified to eliminate the duplication of
numbers. PPD’s Assistant Chief of Police will be responsible for ensuring
that duplications do not exist.
iv. Protective Order Files. PPD will maintain protective orders which list an
incident occurring at PISD’s Service Locations. PPD will enter protective
orders into the TLETS file according to the legal requirements therefore.
v. Verifying Status of Police Reports. TCIC and FBI NCIC require that law
enforcement agencies entering data into various state or federal computer
systems be able to verify the status of the records within ten (10) minutes.
When PPD receives a request to verify the status of an outstanding TCIC
or NCIC record, PPD will access a copy of the PISD validation files kept
at PPD. PISD will be responsible for monthly validations from DPS-
Austin and for maintaining the original record in a validation file.
vi. Special Events. PISD will notify PPD of any planned special events at
least thirty days (30) in advance. If extra communications personnel are
required to handle the unusual workload caused by a special event, PISD
agrees to reimburse Town for all direct costs associated therewith. The
special event and direct costs associated therewith will be reviewed and
agreed to in writing in advance of the event between PISD’s Chief of
Police and PPD’s Chief of Police.
3. Compensation.
A. PISD shall bear, pay and discharge any and all obligations, costs, fees or expenses
incurred by Town in performing Public Safety Communications Services. All
such charges shall be paid directly by PISD and in no event shall any charges be
made or accrued to Town. For the Initial Term, PISD shall not be required to pay
Town for the costs associated with providing the Public Safety Communications
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES PAGE 5 OF 9
#612833
Services. Should the Initial Term be extended as set forth herein, Town, with
input from PPD, shall review the call load to determine if Town needs to
commence charging PISD for the costs associated Public Safety Communications
Services. Should Town determine, in its sole discretion, that it is fiscally
necessary for PISD to commence compensating Town for the costs associated
with providing the Public Safety Communications Services, Town will notify, in
writing, PISD of the amount PISD will be required to pay monthly for the costs of
providing said services. Should PISD fail to agree, in writing, to the
compensation, this Agreement shall automatically terminate without any liability,
whatsoever, of Town.
B. Should PISD agree to compensate Town for the costs of providing the Public
Safety Communications Services as set forth herein, such costs shall be examined
annually for the purpose of Town determining whether any adjustments in the
costs should be made. The provisions of Paragraph 3(A) above shall apply with
regard to this Paragraph.
C. Should PISD commence compensating Town for the costs of providing the Public
Safety Communications Services set forth in this Paragraph 3, such payments
shall be tendered by PISD to Town on the tenth (10th) day of the month following
PISD’s receipt of Town’s invoice for the services provided. Should a fixed
monthly sum be agreed to in writing by the Parties, said fixed sum shall be due to
Town on the tenth (10th) day of each month that this Agreement remains in effect.
D. PISD’s failure to pay any fees for the provision of the Public Safety
Communications Services within thirty (30) days of the due date thereof may be
considered sufficient reason to temporarily suspend and/or terminate, as solely
determined by Town, services furnished by Town under this Agreement.
E. Compensation for any period shall be prorated in any period termination occurs
prior to the expiration date.
4. Miscellaneous Provisions.
A. Town’s Responsibility. Town agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the
acts, negligence and/or omissions of all Town employees and agents.
B. PISD’s Responsibility. PISD agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts,
negligence and/or omissions of all PISD employees and agents.
C. No Property Rights Granted. It is specifically agreed and understood by the
Parties hereto that this Agreement is permissive only and no property rights are
granted hereunder.
D. No Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to
create any right in any third party not a signatory to this Agreement, and the
Parties do not intend to create any third party beneficiaries by entering into this
Agreement.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES PAGE 6 OF 9
#612833
E. Correspondence Regarding Services Rendered. Correspondence, comments,
requests, and complaints regarding services rendered under this Agreement shall
be reduced to writing and forwarded to the persons designated in subparagraph H
below. In no case shall any person make any complaint, request, comment or
demand, other than those that would be considered normal business transactions
under this Agreement.
F. Consideration. This Agreement is executed by the Parties hereto without coercion
or duress for any substantial consideration, the sufficiency of which is forever
confessed.
G. INDEMNITY. IN CONSIDERATION OF TOWN EXECUTING THIS AGREEMENT, PISD
AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS TOWN, ITS CITY COUNCIL
MEMBERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS AND REPRESENTATIVES FROM ANY
AND ALL COSTS, INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
(INCLUDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES INCURRED IN ENFORCING THIS
INDEMNITY) AND DAMAGES ARISING FROM PISD’S, ITS BOARD MEMBERS,
OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS AND REPRESENTATIVES, NEGLIGENCE INCIDENT
TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES PROVIDED HEREIN
(“CLAIMS”). PISD IS EXPRESSLY REQUIRED TO DEFEND TOWN AGAINST SUCH
CLAIMS.
IN ITS SOLE DISCRETION, TOWN SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPROVE OR
SELECT DEFENSE COUNSEL TO BE RETAINED BY PISD IN FULFILLING ITS
OBLIGATION HEREUNDER TO DEFEND AND INDEMNIFY TOWN, UNLESS SUCH
RIGHT IS EXPRESSLY WAIVED BY TOWN IN WRITING. TOWN RESERVES THE
RIGHT TO PROVIDE A PORTION OR ALL OF ITS OWN DEFENSE; HOWEVER, TOWN
IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO DO SO. ANY SUCH OBLIGATION BY TOWN IS NOT
TO BE CONSTRUED AS A WAIVER OF PISD’S OBLIGATION TO DEFEND TOWN OR
AS A WAIVER OF PISD’S OBLIGATION TO INDEMNIFY TOWN PURSUANT TO THIS
AGREEMENT. PISD SHALL RETAIN TOWN-APPROVED DEFENSE COUNSEL
WITHIN SEVEN (7) BUSINESS DAYS OF TOWN’S WRITTEN NOTICE THAT TOWN IS
INVOKING ITS RIGHT TO INDEMNIFICATION UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. IF PISD
FAILS TO RETAIN DEFENSE COUNSEL WITHIN SUCH TIME PERIOD, TOWN SHALL
HAVE THE RIGHT TO RETAIN DEFENSE COUNSEL ON ITS OWN BEHALF, AND PISD
SHALL BE LIABLE FOR ALL COSTS INCURRED BY TOWN.
THIS SUBPARAGRAPH SHALL SURVIVE THE TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT.
H. Notice. Any notice provided or permitted to be given under this Agreement must
be in writing and may be served by depositing same in the United States mail,
addressed to the Party to be notified, postage pre-paid and registered or certified
with return receipt requested, or b delivering the same in person to such Party via
a hand-delivery service, Federal Express or any courier service that provides a
return receipt showing the date of actual delivery of same to the addressee thereof.
Notice given in accordance herewith shall be effective upon receipt at the address
of the addressee. For purposes of notification, the addresses of the Parties shall be
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES PAGE 7 OF 9
#612833
as follows:
If to PISD, to: Prosper Independent School District
Attn: Dr. Drew Watkins
605 East Seventh Street
Prosper, Texas 75078
Facsimile: (972) 346-9247
E-mail: dwatkins@prosper-isd.net
If to Town, to: Town of Prosper
Attn: Mr. Lyle H. Dresher
P. O. Box 307
170 N. Preston Road
Prosper, Texas 75078
Facsimile: (972) 346-9335
E-mail: lyle_dresher@prospertx.gov
I. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement
between the Parties hereto and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations
and/or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only
by a written instrument signed by both Parties.
J. Venue. This Agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws
of the State of Texas and venue shall be in Collin County, Texas.
K. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of
the Parties and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal
representatives and successors.
L. Authority to Execute. The individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of the
respective Parties below represent to each other and to others that all appropriate
and necessary action has been taken to authorize the individual who is executing
this Agreement to do so for and on behalf of the Party for which his or her
signature appears, that there are no other parties or entities required to execute this
Agreement in order for the same to be an authorized and binding agreement on
the Party for whom the individual is signing this Agreement and that each
individual affixing his or her signature hereto is authorized to do so, and such
authorization is valid and effective on the date hereof.
M. Severability. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this
Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in
any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any
other provision thereof, and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid,
illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein.
N. Amendments. Town and PISD may amend this Agreement only by an instrument
in writing.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES PAGE 8 OF 9
#612833
O. Counterparts. The Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed to be an original.
P. Assignment. This Agreement is not assignable.
Q. Sovereign Immunity. The Parties agree that neither has waived its sovereign
immunity by entering into and performing its obligations under this Agreement.
R. Representations. Each signatory represents this Agreement has been read by the
Party for which this Agreement is executed, that each Party has had an
opportunity to confer with counsel, on the matters contained herein.
S. No Waiver. Waiver by either Party of any breach of this Agreement affecting
such Party, or the failure of either Party to enforce any of the provisions of this
Agreement, shall not in any way affect, limit or waive such Party’s right
thereafter to enforce and compel strict compliance.
T. Governmental Functions. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the
performance by Town, PPD and PISD of their respective obligations under this
Agreement constitute governmental functions.
U. Headings. The headings of the various sections of this Agreement are included
solely for convenience of reference and are not to be full or accurate descriptions
of the content thereof.
V. Recitals. The recitals contained in this Agreement: (a) are true and correct as of
the Effective Date; (b) form the basis upon which the Parties negotiated and
entered into this Agreement; and (c) reflect the final intent of the Parties with
regard to the subject matter of this Agreement. If it becomes necessary to
interpret any provision of this Agreement, the intent of the Parties, as evidenced
by the recitals, shall be given full effect. The Parties have relied, to their material
detriment, upon the recitals as part of the consideration for entering into this
Agreement and, but for the recitals, would not have entered into this Agreement.
W. Drafting Provisions. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been drafted
equally by all Parties hereto. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall be
constructed as a whole according to its fair and common meaning, and any
presumption or principle that the language herein is to be construed against any
party shall not apply. Headings in this Agreement are for the convenience of the
Parties and are not intended to be used in construing this Agreement.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES PAGE 9 OF 9
#612833
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the
dates set forth herein to be effective on the Effective Date.
PROSPER INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Drew Watkins, Superintendent
Date: __________________________
TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS
Lyle H. Dresher, Interim Town Manager
Date: __________________________
Prosper is a place where everyone matters.
ADMINISTRATION
To: Mayor and Town Council
From: Amy Piukana, Town Secretary
CC: Lyle Dresher, Town Manager
Re: Town Council Meeting – August 14, 2012
Date: August 9, 2012
Agenda Item:
Consider and act upon Resolution No. 12-58, amending Resolution No. 12-53 for the sole
purpose of establishing the possible source(s) of funding that the Town of Prosper may utilize
to purchase the real property made the subject of the real estate purchase contract between
the Town of Prosper and Sexton Farms, Ltd. (“Real Estate Contract”).
Description of Agenda Item:
As you know, the Real Estate Contract provides that the Town: (i) may purchase an Owner’s Title
Policy; and (ii) must provide the Seller with a commitment for a Loan Policy. Lawyers Title, the
title company closing the transaction, has requested evidence of the Town’s ability to fund the
purchase according to the payment terms set forth in the Real Estate Contract; therefore, the
Town Attorney recommended the Council consider and act upon the attached Resolution.
As a reminder, the Real Estate Contract provides for a purchase price of $3,905,000.00 and
requires: (i) that $800,000.00 of the purchase price be paid as a down payment at closing; and (ii)
with the balance of the purchase price being paid in two (2) equal installments, the first of which
being due and payable on the two-year anniversary of the closing date (which is anticipated to
occur in mid-October 2012) and the second of which being due and payable on the four-year
anniversary of the closing date.
Attached Document:
Resolution No. 12-58
Town Staff Recommendation:
Town staff recommends that the Town Council approve Resolution No. 12-__, amending
Resolution No. 12-53, for the sole purpose of establishing the possible source(s) of
funding that the Town may utilize for the purchase of the real property made the subject
of Resolution No. 12-53.
Solo Page
613688.1
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 1 of 34
613677
TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. ____________
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
PROSPER, TEXAS, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 12-53 FOR THE
SOLE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING THE POSSIBLE SOURCE(S) OF
FUNDING THAT THE TOWN OF PROSPER MAY UTILIZE TO
PURCHASE THE REAL PROPERTY MADE THE SUBJECT OF THE
REAL ESTATE PURCHASE CONTRACT, BY AND BETWEEN THE
TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS AND SEXTON FARMS, LTD., A TEXAS
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; PROVIDING FOR REPEALING, SAVINGS
AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS:
SECTION 1: Amendment to Resolution No. 12-53. The Town Council (“Town
Council”) of the Town of Prosper, Texas (“Town”) hereby amends Resolution No. 12-53
for the sole purpose of establishing the possible source(s) of funding that the Town may
utilize for the purchase (“Purchase”) of the real property (“Property”) made the subject of
Resolution No. 12-53. The following is the Town’s intended source of funding for the
Purchase of the Property:
A. Down Payment at Closing. The Town intends to use funds received from
a grant for parkland, or a portion thereof, as well as cash; and
B. Two (2) Installment Payments. With regard to funding the two (2)
installment payments, evidencing the full payment of the Purchase of the
Property, the Town may use one or more of the following sources:
(i) General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012, issued and sold, or to be
issued and sold, pursuant to a Town election (“Election”) held on
May 14, 2011, approving five (5) propositions, totaling
$25,040,000.00. Proposition 4 (“Proposition 4”) of the Election
provided “Purpose of designing, constructing, improving and
equipping parks, trails and recreational facilities and a park
administration facility, and the acquisition of land and interests in
land for such purposes [emphasis added]”, as evidenced by
Ordinance No. 12-14, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and
incorporated herein for all purposes (“Ordinance”). Pursuant to the
Ordinance, of the $6,200,000.00 approved for Proposition 4,
$320,000.00 has been issued, leaving a balance of unissued
designated funds in the amount of $5,880,000.00; and/or
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 2 of 34
613677
(ii) Undesignated funds from the Parkland Dedication fees collected
pursuant to Town Ordinance No. 12-22, as amended.
SECTION 2: Savings/Repealing Clause. Resolution No. 12-53 shall remain in
full force and effect, except as amended by this or any other Resolution. All provisions
of any resolution in conflict with this Resolution are hereby repealed; but such repeal
shall not abate any pending matters of the repealed resolution. Any remaining portions
of conflicting resolutions shall remain in full force an effect.
SECTION 3: Severability. Should any section, subsection, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Resolution be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent
jurisdiction, it is expressly provided that any and all remaining portions of this Resolution
shall remain in full force and effect. The Town hereby declares that it would have
passed this Resolution, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses,
and phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid.
SECTION 4: Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately from
and after its passage.
DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF PROSPER, TEXAS on this ____ day of August, 2012.
____________________________
RAY SMITH, Mayor
ATTEST TO:
_________________________
Amy Piukana, Town Secretary
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 3 of 34
613677
Exhibit “A”
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 4 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 5 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 6 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 7 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 8 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 9 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 10 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 11 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 12 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 13 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 14 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 15 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 16 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 17 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 18 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 19 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 20 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 21 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 22 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 23 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 24 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 25 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 26 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 27 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 28 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 29 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 30 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 31 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 32 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 33 of 34
613677
Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-53 (Sexton Farms Real Estate Purchase-Funding) Page 34 of 34
613677
To: Mayor and Town Council
From: Chris Copple, AICP, Planning Director
Cc: Lyle Dresher, Interim Town Manager
Hulon T. Webb, Jr., P.E., Director of Development Services/Town Engineer
Re: Town Council Meeting – August 14, 2012
Date: August 8, 2012
Agenda Item:
A public hearing to consider and act upon a request to rezone 10.6± acres, located on the
northwest corner of Custer Road and Prosper Trail, from Agricultural (A) to Planned Development-
Office (PD-O). (Z12-0007).
Description of Agenda Item:
The zoning and land use of the surrounding properties are as follows:
Zoning
Current Land Use Future Land Use Plan
North
Agricultural/Single Family-15
(Rhea Mills Estates)
Landscape
Contractor/Single Family
Residential
Low Density Residential
East City of McKinney Undeveloped City of McKinney
South Planned Development-9
(Whitley Place) Single Family Residential Low Density Residential
West
Single Family-15 (Rhea Mills
Estates)/Agricultural/Prosper
ETJ
Single Family Residential Low Density Residential
Requested Zoning – Z12-0007 is a request to rezone 10.6± acres, located on the northwest corner
of Custer Road and Prosper Trail, from Agricultural (A) to Planned Development-Office (PD-O).
The Planned Development regulations are attached. The property consists of two existing church
buildings, which were both constructed prior to the property being annexed into the Town in 2009.
The proposed PD-O District’s purpose is to bring the existing uses on the property into
conformance with the Zoning Ordinance and to reduce the list of permitted uses from those
allowed under straight Office zoning. Rezoning the property to PD-O, instead of straight Office
zoning, eliminates the following uses from being permitted on the property:
Prosper is a place where everyone matters.
PLANNING
Antenna and/or Antenna Support Structure, Non-Commercial C
Assisted Care or Living Facility S
Automobile Paid Parking Lot/Garage S
Automobile Parking Lot/Garage
Bed and Breakfast Inn S
Bank, Savings and Loan, or Credit Union
Caretaker's/Guard's Residence
Cemetery or Mausoleum S
Commercial Amusement, Indoor
Day Care Center, Adult S
Dry Cleaning, Minor
Farm, Ranch, Stable, Garden, or Orchard
Fraternal Organization, Lodge, Civic Club, Fraternity, or Sorority
Golf Course and/or Country Club
Governmental Office
Helistop S
Homebuilder Marketing Center
Hospital
Museum/Art Gallery
Municipal Uses operated by the Town of Prosper
Print Shop, Minor
Private Club S
Private Utility, Other Than Listed
Recycling Collection Point
Rehabilitation Care Institution S
Restaurant or Cafeteria C
School District Bus Yard C
Sewage Treatment Plant/Pumping Station S
School, Public
Stealth Antenna, Commercial C
Telephone Exchange
Temporary Building C
Utility Distribution/Transmission Facility S
Water Treatment Plant S
Future Land Use Plan – The Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) recommends Low Density Residential
uses for the property. The zoning request for Planned Development-Office (PD-O) deviates from
the FLUP. The Comprehensive Plan provides criteria that should be considered when a zoning
request deviates from the FLUP. These criteria, as well as staff’s responses for each, are below:
1. The property is physically appropriate for non-residential uses.
The property has approximately 10.6± acres located adjacent to Custer Road, a future six lane
divided thoroughfare, and Prosper Trail, a future four lane divided thoroughfare. The property
consists of two existing non-residential buildings. The property is physically appropriate for non-
residential uses.
2. The rezoning will not create a situation where non-residential traffic will negatively impact
established and proposed residential development, schools, and/or parks.
The property is adjacent to Custer Road, a future six lane divided thoroughfare, and Prosper
Trail, a future four lane divided thoroughfare. Due to the direct access to Custer Road and
Prosper Trail, the rezoning will not create a situation where non-residential traffic will negatively
impact established and proposed residential development, schools, and/or parks.
3. The rezoning will not leave any residual tracts of residentially zoned property or an area
designated for residential use on the Future Land Use Plan.
The rezoning does not leave any residual tracts of residentially zoned property or an area
designated for residential use on the Future Land Use Plan.
4. The rezoning should provide an appropriate transition between non-residential and residential
uses.
An existing 170 foot wide overhead electric utility easement separates the existing non-
residential buildings from the adjacent single family residential lots. The Office District is the
most restrictive non-residential district in the Town’s Zoning Ordinance and the applicant is
proposing to reduce the list of permitted uses from those allowed under straight Office zoning.
5. The rezoning will not create a negative impact on the Town’s existing or future infrastructure
(water, sanitary sewer, drainage, or thoroughfares).
The Town Engineer has reviewed the zoning request. The rezoning will not create a negative
impact on the Town’s existing or future infrastructure.
6. The rezoning will not create a negative impact on the Town’s existing or future public services
(schools, fire and police, library, parks, or sanitation).
Due to the uses permitted in the PD-O District and the size of the property, the rezoning will not
significantly impact the Town’s existing or future public services.
7. The rezoning conforms to the goals and objectives of the Town’s Comprehensive Plan.
The FLUP recommends Low Density Residential uses for property. The property does not
have cross access through adjacent single family residential property, so future single family
development on the property is unlikely. Due to the location and size of the property, the
nature of the existing development and uses, and access to the property from Custer Road and
Prosper Trail, the PD-O District is appropriate for the property.
8. The rezoning enhances the health, public safety, and welfare of the Town of Prosper.
The rezoning would allow for church, office, service, and public uses on property adjacent
Custer Road, a future six lane divided thoroughfare, and Prosper Trail, a future four lane
divided thoroughfare.
Thoroughfare Plan – The property is adjacent to Custer Road, a future six lane divided
thoroughfare, and Prosper Trail, a future four lane divided thoroughfare. The zoning exhibit
complies with the Thoroughfare Plan.
Water and Sanitary Sewer Services – Water and sewer service have been extended to the
property.
Access – Access to the property is provided from Custer Road and Prosper Trail. Adequate
access is provided to the property.
Schools – This property is located within the Prosper Independent School District (PISD).
Parks – It is not anticipated that this property will be needed for the development of a park at this
time.
Environmental Considerations – There is no 100-year floodplain located on the property.
Budget Impact:
There are no significant budget implications associated with this zoning request.
Legal Obligations and Review:
Zoning is discretionary. Therefore, the Town Council is not obligated to approve the request.
Notification was provided to neighboring property owners as required by state law. Town staff has
received seven (7) public hearing notice reply forms, with five (5) in opposition to the request, and
one (1) email, also in opposition to the request. Two (2) of the forms in opposition are from outside
the 200 foot notification area.
Attached Documents:
1. Zoning Exhibits A
2. Zoning Exhibit B (redlined copy) to reflect Planning & Zoning Commission recommendation.
3. Zoning Exhibit B to reflect Town Staff recommendation.
4. Zoning map of surrounding area.
5. Future Land Use Plan.
6. Public hearing notice reply forms and an email.
Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation:
At their August 7, 2012 meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended the Town
Council approve the request to rezone 10.6± acres, located on the northwest corner of Custer
Road and Prosper Trail, from Agricultural (A) to Planned Development-Office (PD-O), by a vote of
6-0 subject to:
1. Deletion of the following uses that are listed in Section 1.0 (Permitted Uses):
a. Accessory Building
b. Civic/Convention Center
c. College or University
d. Insurance Office
e. Private Recreation Center
f. Retail/Service Incidental Use
2. Revisions to the following uses that are listed in Section 1.0 (Permitted Uses):
a. Athletic Field: Revised to require a Specific Use Permit (S).
b. Day Care Center, Child: Revised to remove the conditional requirement “C”.
c. Day Care Center, Incidental: Revised to remove the requirement for a specific use
permit “S”.
d. Health/Fitness Center: Revised to be allowed only in existing buildings on the
property at the time of ordinance adoption.
The applicant supports the proposed changes recommended by the Planning & Zoning
Commission and the attached Exhibit B has been revised to reflect the Commission’s
recommendation.
Town Staff Recommendation:
Town staff recommends the Town Council approve the request to rezone 10.6± acres, located on
the northwest corner of Custer Road and Prosper Trail, from Agricultural (A) to Planned
Development-Office (PD-O) as recommended by the Planning & Zoning Commission with the
additional requirement that the Day Care Center, Child use retain its conditional requirement (“C”)
and the Day Care Center, Incidental use retain its requirement for a Specific Use Permit (“S”).
EXHIBIT “B”
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Lighthouse Christian Fellowship
Prosper, Texas
The tract shall develop and operate under the regulations of the Office (O) District as
outlined in the Town’s Zoning Ordinance No. 05-20, as it exists or may be amended,
with the following conditions:
1.0 Permitted Uses
The land uses followed with an “S” are only permitted with a Specific Use
Permit and uses followed by a “C” are only permitted subject to the conditional
development standards set forth in the Town’s Zoning Ordinance. The
permitted land uses within this Planned Development-Office District are:
Administrative, Medical, or Professional Office (use is only permitted within
the existing buildings on the property at the time of ordinance adoption)
Athletic Field S
Business Service (use is only permitted within the existing buildings on the
property at the time of ordinance adoption)
Community Center (use is only permitted within the existing buildings on the
property at the time of ordinance adoption)
Day Care Center, Child C
Day Care Center, Incidental S
Health/Fitness Center (use is only permitted within the existing building on the
property at the time of ordinance adoption)
House of Worship
Park or Playground
School, Private or Parochial
EXHIBIT “B”
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Lighthouse Christian Fellowship
Prosper, Texas
The tract shall develop and operate under the regulations of the Office (O) District as
outlined in the Town’s Zoning Ordinance No. 05-20, as it exists or may be amended,
with the following conditions:
1.0 Permitted Uses
The land uses followed with an “S” are only permitted with a Specific Use
Permit and uses followed by a “C” are only permitted subject to the conditional
development standards set forth in the Town’s Zoning Ordinance. The
permitted land uses within this Planned Development-Office District are:
• Accessory Building
• Administrative, Medical, or Professional Office (use is only permitted within
the existing buildings on the property at the time of ordinance adoption)
• Athletic Field S
• Business Service (use is only permitted within the existing buildings on the
property at the time of ordinance adoption)
• Civic/Convention Center
• College or University
• Community Center (use is only permitted within the existing buildings on the
property at the time of ordinance adoption)
• Day Care Center, Child C
• Day Care Center, Incidental S
• Health/Fitness Center (use is only permitted within the existing building on the
property at the time of ordinance adoption)
• House of Worship
• Insurance Office (use is only permitted within the existing buildings on the
property at the time of ordinance adoption)
• Park or Playground
• Private Recreation Center
• Retail/Service Incidental Use (use is only permitted within the existing
buildings on the property at the time of ordinance adoption)
• School, Private or Parochial
Z12-0007
A
SF-15
SF-10/12.5/15/22/E
PD-9 N CUSTER RDE PROSPER TRL CR 123
MESA DRRHEA MILLS CIRESCALANTE TRL0 100 200 300
Feet
1 inch = 200 feet
Prosper is a place where everyone matters.
ADMINISTRATION
To: Mayor and Town Council
From: Amy Piukana, Town Secretary
CC: Lyle Dresher, Town Manager
Re: Town Council Meeting – August 14, 2012
Date: August 3, 2012
Agenda Item:
Consider and act upon acceptance of a Local Option Petition for the Purpose of allowing the
legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only.
Description of Agenda Item:
On June 28, 2012, the Town of Prosper received from Texas Petition Strategies (TPS), an
application for petition for a Local Option Election:
“The Legal Sale of all Alcoholic Beverages for off-premise consumption only.”
The applications were verified with the required 10 signatures of registered voters of the Town
of Prosper. The appropriate proof of publication was given and notices were sent to the
Secretary of State, Texas Alcohol and Beverage Commission. The petition forms were printed
by and embossed by the Town and issued to Texas Petition Strategies on July 5, 2012.
The petition is required by the Texas Election Code Section 501, to be submitted to the Town
Secretary within 60 days, and was submitted on July 15, 2012.
The verification process for the petition was completed on Monday, August 6, 2012. The
Petition has met Election Code 501.032 requirements to order an election which states that the
petition must be signed by at least 35% of the registered voters who voted in the most recent
gubernatorial election. The total number of signatures required was 734 and a total of 767
signatures were verified as registered voters in the Town of Prosper.
Attached Documents:
• Submission Letter from Texas Petition Strategies
• Proof of Publication
• Verification Letter
(The complete petitions are available for viewing in the Office of the Town Secretary.)
Town Staff Recommendation:
Town staff recommends that the Town Council accept a Local Option Petition for the
Purpose of allowing the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise
consumption only.
1
August 7, 2012
Honorable Mayor Smith and the Prosper Town Council,
I, Amy Piukana, Town Secretary for the Town of Prosper, Texas, received from qualified
voters of the Town of Prosper on July 15, 2012, the following petitions for Local Option
Election to Legalize
“The legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only,”
I have verified the following number of signers on each petition as qualified voters in the
Town of Prosper:
Verified - 767 (Required 734)
An adequate number of qualified voters have signed these petitions to satisfy the
conditions of Election Code, Chapter 501 Local Option Elections, Section 501.032
Requirements to Order Election, Subsection (1) At least 35% of the registered voters in
Prosper who voted in the most recent gubernatorial election.
Respectfully submitted,
Amy Piukana, TRMC
Town Secretary
Town of Prosper, Texas
Prosper is a place where everyone matters.
ADMINISTRATION
To: Mayor and Town Council
From: Amy Piukana, Town Secretary
CC: Lyle Dresher, Town Manager
Re: Town Council Meeting – August 14, 2012
Date: August 3, 2012
Agenda Item:
Consider and act upon Resolution No. 12-57, ordering a Special Election to be held and
administered by Denton County Elections Administration and Collin County Administration on
November 6, 2012 for a Local Option Election.
Description of Agenda Item:
On June 28, 2012, the Town of Prosper received from Texas Petition Strategies (TPS), an
application for petition for a Local Option Election:
“The Legal Sale of all Alcoholic Beverages for off-premise consumption only.”
The applications were verified with the required 10 signatures of registered voters of the Town
of Prosper. The appropriate proof of publication was given and notices were sent to the
Secretary of State, Texas Alcohol and Beverage Commission. The petition forms were printed
by and embossed by the Town and issued to Texas Petition Strategies on July 5, 2012.
The petition was submitted on July 15, 2012.
The verification process for the petition was completed on Monday, August 6, 2012. The
Petition has met Election Code 501.032 requirements to order an election which states that the
petition must be signed by at least 35% of the registered voters who voted in the most recent
gubernatorial election. The total number of signatures required was 734 and a total of 767
signatures were verified as registered voters in the Town of Prosper.
Attached Documents:
• Resolution No. 12-57
• Notification Letter to the Secretary of State
• Notification Letter to the Texas Alcohol Beverage Commission
(The complete petitions are available for viewing in the Office of the Town Secretary.)
Town Staff Recommendation:
Town staff recommends that the Town Council adopt Resolution No. 12-57, ordering a
Special Election to be held and administered by Denton County Elections Administration
and Collin County Administration on November 6, 2012 for a local option election for,
“The Legal Sale of all Alcoholic Beverages for off-premise consumption only.”
Order of November 6, 2012 Special Election Page 1
612973.1
TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. 12-57
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER,
COLLIN AND DENTON COUNTIES, TEXAS, ORDERING A SPECIAL
LOCAL OPTION ELECTION TO CONSIDER LEGALIZING THE
FOLLOWING ISSUE: (1) THE LEGAL SALE OF ALL ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION ONLY IN THE TOWN
OF PROSPER, TEXAS; DESIGNATING EARLY VOTING LOCATIONS;
ORDERING NOTICES OF ELECTION TO BE GIVEN AS PRESCRIBED BY
LAW IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH ELECTION; AND PROVIDING FOR
THE APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF PROSPER, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1: A special local option election is hereby ordered to be held on Tuesday,
November 6, 2012, for the purpose of considering the legalization of the following issue in the Town of
Prosper, Texas:
1. The legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only.
Said Election shall be administered by the Denton County Elections Administrator and Collin
County Elections Administrator.
SECTION 2: Collin County Voters: Early voting will begin on Monday, October 22, 2012
through Friday, November 2, 2012, during the normal working hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., with
extended voting hours on Saturday, October 27, 2012, from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Sunday, October 28,
2012, from 1:00 p.m.to 6:00 p.m. and Monday, October 29, 2012, from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. through
Friday, November 2, 2012, from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Applications for ballot by mail shall be
requested from and mailed to the Collin County Elections Office, Attn. Sharon Rowe, Elections
Administrator, 2010 Redbud Blvd., Suite 102, McKinney, Texas 75069. Applications for ballots by
mail must be received no later than the close of business on seventh (7th) day before Election Day.
Early voting by personal appearance shall be available for all eligible voters at any of the following
early voting locations:
Address City Commissioner Precinct
Collin County Elections
(Main Early Voting Location)
2010 Redbud Blvd.
Ste 102
McKinney Precinct 3
Allen Municipal Courts Facility 301 Century Pkwy. Allen Precinct 3
Carpenter Park Recreation Center 6701 Coit Road Plano Precinct 1
Celina ISD Administration Building 205 S. Colorado Celina Precinct 1
Christ United Methodist Church 3101 Coit Road Plano Precinct 4
Collin College - Central Park Campus
2200 W. University Drive McKinney Precinct 3
Collin College - Preston Ridge Campus 9700 Wade Blvd. Frisco Precinct 1
Collin College - Spring Creek Campus
2800 E. Spring Creek
Plano Precinct 2
Collin College – Higher Education
Center
3452 Spur 399 McKinney Precinct 3
Frisco Senior Center 6670 Moore Street Frisco Precinct 1
Haggard Library 2501 Coit Road Plano Precinct 4
Order of November 6, 2012 Special Election Page 2
612973.1
Harrington Library 1501 18th Street Plano Precinct 2
John and Judy Gay Library 6861 W. Eldorado Parkway McKinney Precinct 3
Lavon City Hall 120 School Road Lavon Precinct 2
Maribelle Davis Library 7501 Independence
Plano Precinct 1
McKinney Fire Station #7 861 S. Independence
McKinney Precinct 1
Murphy City Hall 206 North Murphy Road Murphy Precinct 2
Old Settlers Recreation Center
1201 E. Louisiana McKinney Precinct 3
Parr Library 6200 Windhaven Pkwy. Plano Precinct 1
PISD Administration Center 2700 W. 15th Street Plano Precinct 4
Princeton City Hall 123 W. Princeton Drive Princeton Precinct 3
Prosper Municipal Chambers 108 W. Broadway Prosper Precinct 1
Renner-Frankford Library 6400 Frankford Dallas Precinct 4
Wylie Municipal Complex Library
300 Country Club Wylie Precinct 2
Denton County Voters: Early voting by personal appearance shall be available at: Denton
Elections Office, Joseph A. Carroll Bldg., 401 W. Hickory, Ste. 125, Denton, Texas 76201 or additional
locations subsequently approved by the Denton County Commissioner’s Court. Early voting will begin
on Monday, October 22, 2012 through Friday, November 2, 2012, during the normal working hours of
8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., with extended voting hours on Saturday, October 27, 2012, from 7:00 a.m. to
7:00 p.m., Sunday, October 28, 2012, from 1:00 p.m.to 6:00 p.m. and Monday, October 29, 2012, from
7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. through Friday, November 2, 2012, from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Applications for
ballot by mail shall be requested from and mailed to the Denton County Elections Office, Attn. Frank
Phillips, Elections Administrator, Joseph A. Carroll Bldg., 401 W. Hickory, Ste. 125, Denton, Texas
76201. Applications for ballots by mail must be received no later than the close of business on seventh
(7th) day before Election Day.
SECTION 3: Direct Record Electronic (DRE) voting machines shall be used in this election for
early voting by personal appearance and Election Day voting. Optical-scan ballots shall be used for
early voting by mail.
SECTION 4: The Town Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to publish and/or post, in
the time and manner prescribed by law, all notices required to be so published and/or posted in
connection with the conduct of this election. The election, including providing notice of the election,
shall be conducted in accordance with the Texas Election Code and other applicable law, and all
resident qualified and registered voters of the Town shall be eligible to vote at the election.
SECTION 5: Upon the receipt of recommendations from the Town Secretary and/or the
Denton County Elections Administrator or Collin County Elections Administrator, the Town Council
shall appoint the early voting and Election Day judges.
In the event the appointed judges are unable to execute or complete their duties for any reason,
the Town Secretary and/or Denton County Elections Administrator or Collin County Elections
Administrator may identify alternate judges that the Town Council shall appoint as soon as possible.
The Mayor and the Town Secretary of the Town, in consultation with the Town Attorney, are
hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions necessary to comply with the provisions of the
Texas Election Code and any other state or federal law in carrying out and conducting the election,
whether or not expressly authorized herein.
SECTION 6: The Mayor and the Town Secretary of the Town, in consultation with the Town
Order of November 6, 2012 Special Election Page 3
612973.1
Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions necessary to comply with the
provisions of the Texas Election Code and any other state or federal law in carrying out and conducting
the election, whether or not expressly authorized herein.
DULY PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town Council of the Town of Prosper, Collin, and
Denton Counties, Texas on this the 14th day of August, 2012.
___________________________
Ray Smith, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Amy Piukana, Town Secretary
CIUDAD DE PROSPER, TEJAS RESOLUCIÓN NÚM. 12-57
RESOLUCIÓN DEL AYUNTAMIENTO DE LA CIUDAD DE
PROSPER, COLLIN Y CONDADOS DENTON, TEJAS, ORDENADO
UNA OPCIÓN ESPECIAL DE ELECCIONES LOCALES PARA
CONSIDERAR LA LEGALIZACIÓN A LA SIGUIENTE CUESTIÓN:
(1) LA VENTA LEGAL DE TODAS LAS BEBIDAS ALCOHÓLICAS
PARA CONSUMO FUERA DE LAS INSTALACIONES SÓLO EN LA
CIUDAD DE PROSPER, TEJAS; DESIGNAR LOS SITIOS DE
VOTACIÓN; ORDENANDO LOS AVISOS DE LA ELECCIÓN QUE SE
DA EN LO PRESCRITO POR LA LEY EN RELACIÓN CON DICHA
ELECCIÓN, Y LA PROVISIÓN PARA EL NOMBRAMIENTO DE LOS
JUECES ELECTORALES
AHORA, POR LO TANTO, SER RESUELTO POR EL AYUNTAMIENTO DE LA
CIUDAD DE PROSPER, TEJAS, QUE:
SECCIÓN 1: una elección de opción local especial por la presente se ordena celebrará el
Martes, 06 de Noviembre del 2012, con el propósito de considerar la legalización de la cuestión
siguiente en la ciudad de Prosper, Tejas:
1. La venta legal de todas bebidas alcohólicas para consumo fuera de las
instalaciones.
Dicha elección debe ser administrada por el Administrador de Eleccionesdel
Condado de Collin y el Administrador de Elecciones del condado de Denton.
SECCIÓN 2: Votantes del Condado de Collin: votación temprana comenzará en
Lunes, 22 de Octubre del 2012 hasta el Viernes, 02 de Noviembre del 2012, durante las horas
normales de trabajo de 8:00 a.m. hasta 5:00 p.m., con horario de votación extendida en Sábado,
27 de Octubre del 2012, de 7:00 a.m. a 7:00 p.m., Domingo, 28 de Octubre del 2012, desde 1:00
p.m.hasta 6 p.m. y Lunes, 29 de Octubre de 2012, de 7:00 a.m. hasta 7:00 p.m. Y el Viernes 2 de
Noviembre del 2012, de 7:00 a.m. hasta 7:00 p.m. Las solicitudes de votación por correo deben
de ser enviados por correo a la Oficina de elecciones del Condado de Collin, Attn Sharon Rowe,
Administrador de las Elecciones, 2010 Redbud Blvd., Suite 102, McKinney, Tejas 75069. Las
solicitudes de boletas por correo deben recibirse al mas tardar el cierre de las operaciones en el
Séptimo día (7) antes del día de la elección. Votación temprana en persona estará disponible para
todos los votantes elegibles en cualquiera de los siguientes lugares de votación anticipada:
Domicilio Ciudad Comisionado Electoral.
Collin County Elections
2010 Redbud Blvd.
McKinney Precincto 3
Allen Municipal Courts Facility 301 Century Pkwy. Allen Precincto 3
Carpenter Park Recreation Center 6701 Coit Road Plano Precincto 1
Celina ISD Administration Building 205 S. Colorado Celina Precincto 1
Christ United Methodist Church 3101 Coit Road Plano Precincto 4
Collin College - Central Park Campus 2200 W. University Drive McKinney Precincto 3
Collin College - Preston Ridge Campus 9700 Wade Blvd. Frisco Precincto 1
Collin College - Spring Creek Campus 2800 E. Spring Creek
Plano Precincto 2
Collin College – Higher Education
Center
3452 Spur 399 McKinney Precincto 3
Frisco Senior Center 6670 Moore Street Frisco Precincto 1
Haggard Library 2501 Coit Road Plano Precincto 4
Harrington Library 1501 18th Street Plano Precincto 2
John and Judy Gay Library 6861 W. Eldorado Parkway McKinney Precincto 3
Lavon City Hall 120 School Road Lavon Precincto 2
Maribelle Davis Library 7501 Independence
Plano Precincto 1
McKinney Fire Station #7 861 S. Independence
McKinney Precincto 1
Murphy City Hall 206 North Murphy Road Murphy Precincto 2
Old Settlers Recreation Center
1201 E. Louisiana McKinney Precincto 3
Parr Library 6200 Windhaven Pkwy. Plano Precincto 1
PISD Administration Center 2700 W. 15th Street Plano Precincto 4
Princeton City Hall 123 W. Princeton Drive Princeton Precincto 3
Prosper Municipal Chambers 108 W. Broadway Prosper Precincto 1
Renner-Frankford Library 6400 Frankford Dallas Precincto 4
Wylie Municipal Complex Library 300 Country Club Wylie Precincto 2
Votantes del Condado de Denton: Votación temprara por aparición personal estará disponible
en: Denton Elections Office, Edificio de Joseph A. Carroll, 401 W. Hickory, Ste. 125, Denton,
Texas 76201 o posiciones adicionales posteriormente aprobada por el Tribunal del Comisario de
Denton County. La votación temprana comenzará el Lunes, 22 de Octubre deL 2012 hasta el
Viernes, 2 de Noviembre del 2012, durante las horas de trabajo normales de las 8:00 a.m. hasta
las 7:00 p.m., con horario de votación extendido el Sábado, 27 de Octubre de 2012, de las 7:00
a.m. hasta las 7:00 p.m., el Domingo, 28 de Octubre del 2012, de las 1:00 p.m. hasta las 6: p.m. y
el Lunes, 29 de Octubre del 2012, de 7:00 a.m a 7:00 p.m. hasta el Viernes, 2 de Noviembre del
2012, de 7:00 a.m. hasta 7:00 p.m. Las solicitudes de la votación por correo deben ser solicitadas
y enviadas a las Elecciones la Oficina de Elecciones de Denton County, Attn. Frank Phillips,
Administrador de Elecciones, Edificio de Joseph A. Carroll, 401 W. Hickory, Ste. 125, Denton,
Texas 76201. Las solicitudes de votaciones por correo no deben ser recibidas más tarde que el
cierre de negocios durante el Séptimo (7mo) día antes del Día de las elecciones.
SECCIÓN 3: Las máquinas de votación directa de registro electrónico (DRE) se
utilizarán en esta elección para la votación temprana por la apariencia personal y para votar el día
de la elección. Se utilizarán las boletas de escaneo óptico para la votación temprana por correo.
SECCIÓN 4: El Secretario de la ciudad es por lo presente autorizado y dirigido a
publicar/o anunciar, en el tiempo y forma prescrito por la ley, todos los avisos que se requiera ser
tan publicado o escrito en relación con la conducta de esta elección. La elección, además de
proporcionar el aviso de la elección, se llevará a cabo de conformidad con el código electoral de
Texas y otras leyes aplicables, y todos los votantes registrados y cualificados residentes de la
ciudad serán elegibles para votar en la elección.
SECCIÓN 5: Al recibir las recomendaciones de la Secretaria de la ciudad o el
Administrador de Elecciones del Condado de Denton o el Administrador de Elecciones del
Condado de Collin, el Ayuntamiento designará la votación temprana y el día de la elección de
jueces.
En todo caso de que los jueces nombrados son incapaces de ejecutar o completar sus
deberes por cualquier motivo, el Secretario de ciudad o el Administrador de Elecciones del
Condado de Denton o el Administrador de Elecciones del Condado de Collin puede identificar a
jueces suplentes que el Ayuntamiento nombrará tan pronto como sea posible.
El Alcalde y el Secretario de la ciudad, en consulta con el Abogado de la ciudad, por la
presente autorizado y dirigida a tomar cualquier y todas las acciones necesarias para cumplir con
lo dispuesto en el Código Electoral de Tejas y cualquier otra ley estatal o federal en la
realización y la realización de las elecciones, sean o no expresamente autorizado en este
documento.
SECCIÓN 6: El alcalde y el Secretario de la ciudad, en consulta con el Abogado de la
ciudad, por la presente son autorizados y dirigidos para tomar cualquier y todas las acciones
necesarias para cumplir con lo dispuesto en el Código Electoral de Tejas y cualquier otra ley
estatal o federal en la realización y la realización de las elecciones, sean o no expresamente
autorizado en el presente.
DEBIDAMENTE PASADO Y APROBADO por el Concilio de la Ciudad de Prosper,
condados Collin, y Denton , Tejas en este el 14to día de Agosto del 2012.
____________________________________
Ray Smith, Alcalde
DOY FE:
________________________________________
Amy Piukana, Secretario de la Ciudad
Page 1 of 1
To: Mayor and Town Council
From: Matthew B. Garrett, Finance Director
CC: Lyle Dresher, Interim Town Manager
Re: Town Council Meeting – August 14, 2012
Date: August 10, 2012
Agenda Item:
Consider and act upon a schedule for public hearings on the FY 2012-2013 Budget.
Description of Agenda Item:
According to Local Government Code Chapter 102, the Town must hold a public hearing on the
proposed budget and must publish the notice for this meeting in addition to the notice required
under Truth in Taxation guidelines.
The budget hearings are recommended to be scheduled on the same days as the public
hearings on the proposal to increase tax revenues if required.
September 11th is a regularly scheduled meeting and meets the requirements of the Local
Government Code. Given the timelines for publishing in the Prosper Press, staff will be
submitting the notice of the public hearing on the budget to print in the August 22 or August 29
Prosper Press.
Budget Impact:
Cost to publish the notice is budgeted.
Legal Obligations and Review:
N/A
Attached Documents:
N/A
Board/Committee Recommendation:
N/A
Town Staff Recommendation:
Town staff recommends that the Town Council,
“Make a motion to schedule a public hearing on the FY 2012-2013 Proposed Budget for
September 11, 2012 at 6:00 pm at the Prosper Municipal Chambers located at 108 W.
Broadway St., Prosper, TX.”
Prosper is a place where everyone matters.
Administration
Page 1 of 2
To: Mayor and Town Council
From: Matthew B. Garrett, Finance Director
CC: Lyle Dresher, Interim Town Manager
Re: Town Council Meeting – August 14, 2012
Date: August 10, 2012
Agenda Item:
Consider and act upon a schedule for public hearings on the proposed 2012 tax rate.
Description of Agenda Item:
According to the Property Tax Code Section 26.05(d), the Town is required to hold two public
hearings and publish newspaper ads before adopting a tax rate that exceeds the effective rate
or rollback rate, whichever is lower.
If the Council votes to propose the recommended tax rate of $0.52 per $100 valuation,
this item will need to be acted on setting the public hearings and posting one-quarter page
notices as called for in Truth in Taxation. A quorum must be present at each public hearing.
September 5th is a suggested special meeting to comply with Truth in Taxation parameters
September 11th is a regular meeting.
If the Council votes to propose a tax rate equal or less than $0.511076 per $100 valuation,
the public hearings and publications are not necessary and this item requires no action.
Budget Impact:
Cost to publish the notices is budgeted.
Legal Obligations and Review:
N/A
Attached Documents:
N/A
Board/Committee Recommendation:
N/A
Town Staff Recommendation:
Town staff recommends that the Town Council
Prosper is a place where everyone matters.
Administration
Page 2 of 2
If the proposed rate is the recommended $0.52 or otherwise exceeds the rollback rate,
which is $0.511076/$100 valuation, please,
“Make a motion to set the public hearings on the proposal to increase total tax revenues and the
proposed tax rate of $_____ per $100 in valuation for September 5th at 6:00 pm and September
11th at 6:00pm, with each meeting taking place at the Prosper Municipal Chambers at 108 W.
Broadway St, Prosper, TX.”
If the proposed rate is equal or less than the rollback rate, please
Take no action on this item provided the rate proposed is lower than the rollback rate and public
hearings are not required.
To: Mayor and Town Council
From: Chris Copple, AICP, Planning Director
Cc: Lyle Dresher, Interim Town Manager
Hulon T. Webb, Jr., P.E., Director of Development Services/Town Engineer
Re: Town Council Meeting – August 14, 2012
Date: August 2, 2012
Agenda Item:
Consider and act upon an ordinance adopting the Town of Prosper’s 2012 Amended
Comprehensive Plan. (CA12-0001).
Description of Agenda Item:
On July 24, 2012, the Town Council directed Town staff to prepare an ordinance adopting the
Town of Prosper’s 2012 Amended Comprehensive Plan subject to addressing the recommended
changes by the Planning & Zoning Commission, the Town Council, and the Town’s consultants.
The attached Comprehensive Plan reflects the recommended changes and Town staff has
prepared an ordinance adopting the Town of Prosper’s 2012 Amended Comprehensive Plan.
Budget Impact:
There are no significant budget implications associated with adoption of the Amended
Comprehensive Plan, but the Plan shall serve as a guide to all future Town Council action
concerning land use and development regulations and expenditures for capital improvements.
Legal Obligations and Review:
The Town Charter requires the Town Council to hold at least one public hearing prior to taking
action on any additions or amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. The Town Council held the
required public hearing on June 26, 2012. The Town Attorney has reviewed the Amended
Comprehensive Plan and has prepared the attached ordinance.
Attached Documents:
1. Ordinance adopting the Town of Prosper’s 2012 Amended Comprehensive Plan.
2. The Town of Prosper’s 2012 Amended Comprehensive Plan.
Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation:
At their May 15, 2012 meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended the Town
Council approve the 2012 Town of Prosper Comprehensive Plan Update by a vote of 4-3, subject
to:
1. The Commission’s list of requested changes being reconciled in the Comprehensive Plan,
and
Prosper is a place where everyone matters.
PLANNING
2. The addition of an executive summary, which is to include the Future Land Use Plan, being
placed at the beginning of the Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioners Senkel, McClung, and Cox voted in opposition to the motion. Commissioners
Senkel, McClung, and Cox had previously voted in support of a motion to approve the
Comprehensive Plan Update subject to the Commission’s list of requested changes being
reconciled in the Comprehensive Plan and removing the references to lot sizes on pages 39, 47,
and 61 of the Comprehensive Plan. That motion failed by a vote of 3-4.
Town Staff Recommendation:
Town staff recommends the Town Council approve an ordinance adopting the Town of Prosper’s
2012 Amended Comprehensive Plan.
ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 04-103 (2004 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN);
ADOPTING THE 2012 AMENDED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PAGE 1 OF 4
#613197
TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 12-21
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 04-103, WHICH ADOPTED THE TOWN OF
PROSPER’S 2004 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; ADOPTING THE TOWN
OF PROSPER’S 2012 AMENDED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN;
PROVIDING FOR REPEALING SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY
CLAUSES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS
ORDINANCE.
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Prosper, Texas (“Town Council”)
previously adopted the Town of Prosper, Texas’ (“Town”) 2004 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to
Ordinance No. 04-103 (“2004 Comprehensive Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Town Council retained a professional Planning Consultant to assist in
the preparation of the proposed amendments to the 2004 Comprehensive Plan (“2012 Proposed
Amendments”); and
WHEREAS, the Town Council appointed a Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee to
further assist in the preparation of the 2012 Proposed Amendments, guiding the formation of the
same and ensuring that said amendments reflected the vision desired by the Town’s residents;
and
WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the 2012 Proposed Amendments include, but
are not limited to, the Future Land Use Plan and the Thoroughfare Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council further finds that the 2012 Proposed Amendments
provide for, among other things, the physical development of the Town and contain
recommendations for the growth, development and beautification of the Town and its
extraterritorial jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council further finds that the 2012 Proposed Amendments were
reviewed by the Town’s Planning & Zoning Commission, with said commission providing its
recommended modifications to the same; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council further finds that at least one (1) public hearing was
conducted relating to the 2012 Proposed Amendments at which the public was given the
opportunity to give testimony and present written evidence regarding said amendments; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council further finds that the 2012 Proposed Amendments were
forwarded to the Town Manager who submitted the same to the Town Council, together with his
recommendations, if any; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council hereby adopts the 2012 Proposed Amendments, with the
Town Council modifications thereto (“2012 Amended Comprehensive Plan”); and
ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 04-103 (2004 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN);
ADOPTING THE 2012 AMENDED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PAGE 2 OF 4
#613197
WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the adoption of the 2012 Amended
Comprehensive Plan occurred within sixty (60) days following the submission of the 2012
Proposed Amendments by the Town Manager; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council further finds that the 2012 Amended Comprehensive
Plan shall serve as a guide to all future Town Council action concerning land use and
development regulations and expenditures for capital improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council hereby instructs the Town Manager to place the
following statement in a clearly visible manner on the 2012 Amended Comprehensive Plan: “A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE ZONING REGULATIONS OR ESTABLISH ZONING
DISTRICT BOUNDARIES”; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that it has complied with all applicable laws
relating to the adoption of the 2012 Amended Comprehensive Plan, including but not limited to,
Chapter 213, Texas Local Government Code, as amended, as well as the Town’s Charter,
adopted on November 7, 2006 and revised on May 14, 2011.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS THAT:
Section 1. Findings Incorporated. The findings set forth above are incorporated
into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein.
Section 2. Amendment of Ordinance No. 04-103 (2004 Comprehensive Plan);
Adoption of the 2012 Amended Comprehensive Plan. Ordinance No. 04-103, which adopted
the 2004 Comprehensive Plan, is hereby amended as set forth in the 2012 Amended
Comprehensive Plan. The Town Council hereby adopts the 2012 Amended Comprehensive
Plan, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein
for all purposes. An original copy of the 2012 Amended Comprehensive Plan shall be
maintained by the Town Secretary for public inspection during regular business hours.
Section 3. Savings/Repealing. Ordinance No. 04-103 shall remain in full force and
effect, save and except as amended by this Ordinance. All provisions of any ordinance in
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent they are in conflict; but such repeal
shall not abate any pending prosecution for violation of the repealed ordinance, nor shall the
repeal prevent a prosecution from being commenced for any violation if occurring prior to the
repeal of the ordinance. Any remaining portions of said ordinances shall remain in full force and
effect.
Section 4. Severability. Should any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase
of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it
is expressly provided that any and all remaining portions of this Ordinance shall remain in full
force and effect. The Town hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each
section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof regardless of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid.
ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 04-103 (2004 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN);
ADOPTING THE 2012 AMENDED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PAGE 3 OF 4
#613197
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after
its passage and adoption.
DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF PROSPER, TEXAS, on this _____ day of ___________, 2012.
_____________________________________
RAY SMITH, Mayor
ATTESTED AND CORRECTLY
RECORDED:
________________________________
AMY PIUKANA, Town Secretary
ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 04-103 (2004 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN);
ADOPTING THE 2012 AMENDED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PAGE 4 OF 4
#613197
Exhibit “A”
2012 Amended Comprehensive Plan
(______ pages attached hereto)
Prosper Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper, Texas
Adopted XXXX, 2012
Prosper is a place where everyone matters.
i Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
Acknowledgements
TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS
Ray Smith, Mayor
Dave Benefield, Place 1
Kenneth Dugger, Place 2, Mayor Pro-Tem
Curry Vogelsang Jr., Place 3
Meigs Miller, Place 4
Danny Wilson, Place 5
Jason Dixon, Place 6
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEMBERS
Mark DeMattia, Chair
Mike McClung, Vice Chair
Chris Keith, Secretary
Bruce Carlin
Jim Cox
Bill Senkel
Rick Turner
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Jason Dixon, Chair
Craig Moody, Vice Chair
Ane Casady, Secretary
Kelly Cooper
Mark DeMattia
Michael Goddard
Kyle Huckelberry
Ann Lieber
Meigs Miller
Eric Nishimoto
Jordan Simms
Daniel Ting
Doug Trumbull
TOWN STAFF
Mike Land, Town Manager
Hulon T. Webb, Jr., P.E., Director of Development
Services/Town Engineer
Chris Copple, AICP, Planning Director
CONSULTANT: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC
Dan Sefko, FAICP, Group Manager
Edmund Haas, AICP, Project Manager
Brandon Gonzalez, Project Planner
ii
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
iii Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................... E-i
What is a Comprehensive Plan? ................................................................................... 1
Planning to Plan ........................................................................................................... 2
Regional Relationship .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3
Population Analysis .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4
Regional Growth ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
Housing Characteristics .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Existing Land Use ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Development Patterns ............................................................................................................................................................................. 8
Physical Development Patterns ........................................................................................................................................................... 9
Town Limits................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11
Planning Context ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 13
Regional Initiatives ................................................................................................................................................................................. 18
Community Vision .................................................................................................. 19
Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee (CPAC) ................................................................................................................... 20
Vision Statement ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Visual Character Survey ........................................................................................................................................................................ 22
Town Hall Meeting .................................................................................................................................................................................. 23
Community Goals ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 25
Future Land Use ...................................................................................................... 27
Process .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28
Land Use Types ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 29
Land Use Map ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 35
Land Use Acreages ................................................................................................................................................................................... 37
Ultimate Capacity ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 37
Population Projections .......................................................................................................................................................................... 39
Community Livability ............................................................................................................................................................................. 40
Land Use Concepts .................................................................................................................................................................................. 41
Livable Neighborhoods ......................................................................................................................................................................... 48
Corridors and Districts .......................................................................................................................................................................... 54
Image Enhancement ............................................................................................................................................................................... 61
Maintaining compatibility between the Zoning Map and the Future Land Use Plan ................................................ 64
TRANSPORTATION PLAN ............................................................................................ 65
Planning Context ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 66
Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................................................................. 69
Projected Conditions .............................................................................................................................................................................. 69
iv
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
Projected Traffic Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................... 70
Planning Principles ................................................................................................................................................................................. 71
Transportation Plan ................................................................................................................................................................................ 75
Cross Sections ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 79
Plan Modifications ................................................................................................................................................................................... 83
Economic Analysis ..................................................................................................... 87
Analysis from Catalyst ........................................................................................................................................................................... 87
Future Land Use Plan Acreage ........................................................................................................................................................... 88
Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 89
Economic Analysis Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................... 92
Infrastructure Assessment ......................................................................................... 93
Previous Planning Efforts..................................................................................................................................................................... 93
Infrastructure Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................................................................ 93
Water System ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 94
Wastewater System ................................................................................................................................................................................ 99
Storm Drain System ............................................................................................................................................................................. 103
Implementation Plan ............................................................................................... 105
Proactive and Reactive Implementation .................................................................................................................................... 105
Roles of the Comprehensive Plan .................................................................................................................................................. 106
Regulatory Mechanisms ..................................................................................................................................................................... 107
Implementation Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................................................................... 108
Figures and Plates
Figure 1: Historic Population Growth ...................................................................................................................... 4
Figure 2: Regional Growth ....................................................................................................................................... 5
Plate 1: Existing Land Use ........................................................................................................................................ 7
Figure 3: Existing Land Use ...................................................................................................................................... 7
Plate 2: Future Land Use Map ............................................................................................................................... 35
Figure 4: Future Land Use Acreage ....................................................................................................................... 37
Figure 5: Ultimate Capacity ................................................................................................................................... 38
Figure 6: Population Projections ........................................................................................................................... 39
Figure 7: Functional Street Classifications ............................................................................................................. 72
Plate 3: Thoroughfare Plan .................................................................................................................................... 77
Figure 8: Retail Demand Forecast ......................................................................................................................... 87
Figure 9 : Ad Valorem Estimates ........................................................................................................................... 90
Figure 10: Tax Gap Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 91
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ei Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
Executive Summary
Prosper’s 2012 Comprehensive Plan is a plan to
preserve the past, realize the potential of the
present, and guide the future of the Town. It is
a coordinated effort of citizens, decision
makers, Town staff, and other stakeholders.
The Plan analyzes the issues presented by the
current conditions to develop a vision for the
future of Prosper and designs the pathway to
achieve that desired future. As we have seen in
the last decade, growth in Prosper is inevitable.
This Plan is meant to help preserve the Town’s
history, culture and resources, as well as
manage growth sensibly and responsibly. This
Plan is intended to be a dynamic, flexible and
adaptable guide to help decision‐makers,
citizens, Town staff, developers and business
owners shape Prosper’s future on a continual,
proactive basis.
This planning document forms the basis for
policy decisions. Policy‐makers and Town staff
will use this document as a guide only while
reviewing development projects, Town budget,
prioritizing capital improvement projects and
drafting ordinances to direct growth that leads
to the vision identified in this document. For
citizens and potential developers, this plan can
be used as a guide to:
Compare development requests or
projects with the vision and strategies
of this plan;
Choose the right project or realign the
request to meet the vision; and
Review recommendations and
implementation ideas to determine an
appropriate development model.
Plan Elements
Prosper’s 2012 Comprehensive Plan is
structured into seven sections – Planning to
Plan, Community Vision, Community Character,
Transportation Plan, Economic Analysis,
Infrastructure Assessment and Implementation
Plan.
Planning to Plan
This section provides introductory information
that should be considered as planning decisions
are made. Historical population growth for
both Prosper and the region, general household
characteristics, existing land use, planning
constraints and past planning efforts are
identified to begin to set the baseline, or
context from which plan recommendations
should be made.
Community Vision
One of the most critical elements of the
planning process was identifying the Town’s
vision. This process included a Comprehensive
Plan Advisory Committee (CPAC) made up of 13
Town residents who were ultimately
responsible for formulating Plan
recommendations. In addition to the CPAC, two
Town Hall meetings were conducted on June
27, 2011 and February 13, 2012. Town
residents participated in roundtable discussions
and other exercises designed to gather
feedback on the Town’s vision. A Visual
Character Survey (VCS) was made available on
the Town’s website over the duration of a 4
week period. A total of over 440 Town
residents participated in the online VCS where
residents rated nearly 200 individual images.
Key characteristics identified by the public
included the desire for maintaining the small-
town feel, preserving large-lot homes and
providing high-quality retail shopping and
restaurants.
Community Character
The Community Character element examined
both land use and livability characteristics. The
existing 2004 Comprehensive Plan was used as
a basis for land use decisions and necessary and
appropriate altercations were made based upon
the Community Vision. Overall densities in all
residential categories were lowered from the
2004 Plan and lot-size guidelines were
provided. Based upon the Future Land Use
Plan, the Town could support approximately
69,000 residents and, based upon recent
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Eii
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
growth trends, build out could potentially occur
between 2035 and 2040.
Livability guidelines included keeping the more
intense development along the Dallas North
Tollway and Highway 380 while maintaining
Preston Road as an internal corridor respective
of adjacent residential neighborhoods. General
considerations for neighborhood design were
derived with an eye towards providing a wide
range of housing in Prosper, taking into
consideration, among other things, data
relating to income, education levels and
ethnicity. A land use and roadway character
plan for Old Town was created in order to
preserve the historical element of the Town’s
founding. Finally, gateway and image
enhancement recommendations were
provided.
Transportation Plan
The Town recently completed an update to its
Thoroughfare Plan and therefore no major
modifications were needed. Minor
modifications to the South Coleman Couplet
were proposed in addition to creating backage
roads for access along the Dallas North Tollway,
upgrading Hayes Road and providing frontage
roads along Highway 380 between the Lovers
Lane Loop. Finally, roadway sections for Old
Town were created. Roadway sections are
intended to preserve and enhance the historical
elements of Old Town.
Economic Analysis
A general economic analysis was conducted to
determine the Town’s retail needs at build-out
and to approximate the financial benefits of the
Future Land Use Plan in terms of potential sales
and property tax contributions. Findings
indicate that retail acreage on the Future Land
Use Plan can support the Town’s future needs
and accounts for additional market capture due
to the Towns major regional corridors. Ad
Valorem and Sales Tax estimates, combined
with current per capita expenditures, indicate
that the Future Land Use Plan is diversified and
can potentially permit the Town to provide
additional services and amenities in the future.
Infrastructure Assessment
An evaluation of overall water and wastewater
infrastructure within the Town was conducted.
Based upon recommendations within the
Town’s recently completed water and
wastewater master plans, the Town can provide
water and wastewater services to
accommodate a potential build-out of
approximately 69,000 residents.
Implementation Plan
The Implementation Plan provides objectives
related to the six community goals identified
within the Community Vision. These objectives
are intended to provide direction towards
achieving the ultimate vision for the Town. The
Implementation Plan also includes an issue
prioritization derived from citizen voting during
the February 13, 2012 Town Hall meeting. This
prioritization is intended guide Town staff and
decision-makers as future projects and needs
are identified.
Differences from 2004 Plan
The following are the noticeable changes from
the 2004 Comprehensive Plan.
Vision Statement: the 2004 Plan does
not include a Vision Statement.
Single Family Densities and Lot Size:
The 2004 Plan recommends densities of
less than 2.0 dwelling units per acre
(DUA) in low density residential areas
and between 2.1 and 3.5 DUA in
medium density residential areas. The
2004 Plan does not give a
recommendation on lot sizes. The 2012
Comprehensive Plan recommends less
than 1.6 DUA in low density residential
area and between 1.6 and 2.5 DUA in
medium density residential areas. The
2012 Plan also recommends lots greater
than 15,000 square feet in low density
areas and between 12,500 and 20,000
square feet in medium density
residential areas.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Eiii Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
Multifamily: The 2004 Comprehensive
Plan supports 215 acres of multifamily
and an estimated 3,425 multifamily
units. The 2012 Comprehensive Plan
anticipates the Town having
approximately 6,248 high density
residential units at ultimate capacity.
Artesia Municipal Utility District: The
2004 Plan does not recognize Artesia
and recommended medium density
residential. The 2012 Plan recognizes
Artesia and identifies the area as high
density single family.
Ultimate Capacity: The 2004 Plan
estimates a build-out population of
89,919 people. The 2012 Plan
estimates a build-out population of
69,303 people.
Business Park District: Due to the
nature of existing zoning, the 2012 Plan
recommends a variety of potential uses,
such as light industrial, commercial
warehousing, office storage and
commercial uses with outside storage.
Removal of Commercial Boulevard and
Industrial along US 380: The 2012 Plan
shows medium density residential in
place of the commercial Boulevard
District and the Industrial District has
been replaced by the Highway 380
District, which allows for a variety of
uses such as big box retail, commercial
services, hotels, banks and convenience
stores, among others.
Retail Space: The 2004 Plan
recommends 1,900,000 square feet of
retail space. The 2012 Plan suggests
approximately 5.7 million square feet of
retail space due to the regional nature
of the Town’s commercial corridors.
Downtown Prosper: The 2004 Plan did
not provide specific land use or
transportation recommendations for
Old Town. The 2012 Plan incorporates
the 2007 Land Use Plan for Old Town
and provides a detailed transportation
plan for the area.
Passenger Rail: the 2004 Plan does not
mention the possibility of future
passenger rail on the BNSF Railroad.
Although not desired at this time, the
2012 Plan addresses the possibility of
passenger rail in the future but leaves
the decision of whether or not
passenger rail is appropriate in Prosper
to future community leaders.
2012 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
1 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
PLANNING CONTEXT
What is a Comprehensive Plan?
The comprehensive plan for the Town of
Prosper is intended solely as a guide to direct
future development decisions made by Town
staff, elected officials and all other decision
makers. The comprehensive plan tells the story
of who the community is and what it wishes to
become. This document is intended to serve as
a flexible long-range planning tool that guides
the growth and physical development of
Prosper for ten years, twenty years or an even
longer period of time.
The Comprehensive Plan is a long-range
statement of public policy. According to
Chapter 213 of the Texas Local Government
Code, a comprehensive plan may:
Include but is not limited to provisions
on land use, transportation and public
facilities;
Consist of a single plan or a coordinated
set of plans organized by subject and
geographic area;
Be used to coordinate and guide the
establishment of development
regulations.
Legal Authority
The right for a community to plan is rooted in
the Texas Local Government Code. The
following are the specific chapters which
directly relate to the Town’s ability to plan.
Chapter 211: Allows the governing body
of a community to regulate zoning.
Chapter 212: Allows the governing
body of a community to regulate
subdivision development within the City
and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ).
Chapter 213: Allows the governing body
of a community to create a
comprehensive plan for the long-range
development of the community and to
address a wide range of issues including
land use and transportation.
When putting together a puzzle, it is
often helpful to know what the
ultimate outcome of the puzzle will
be.
While you would still be able to
assemble the puzzle without the
vision, knowing your ultimate vision
makes assembling the puzzle much
easier. The Comprehensive Plan
works in this same fashion…it serves
as the vision and makes assembling
the various pieces of the
development puzzle much easier.
PLANNING CONTEXT
2
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
Planning to Plan
The Town of Prosper sits at an exciting and
determining point in its history. Decisions made
now will have a lasting physical impact on the
Town for generations to come. The Town has a
significant amount of vacant land, and while
many pre-arranged development agreements
currently exist, the ultimate objective of this
Plan is to set policies and a vision to ultimately
guide such developments, ensuring that all
development that occurs within Prosper is
compatible and fits into the community’s long
term vision.
This 2012 Comprehensive Plan (Plan) will serve
as the compass, or guide for the long-term
growth of the Town. The following Plan will
include an examination of the following issues:
Future Land Use;
Livability
Transportation;
Economic Analysis; and
Infrastructure.
A comprehensive plan, however visionary, must
also be rooted in the present. Therefore, prior
to examining the above elements, it will be
important and helpful to understand where
Prosper is today and what planning efforts have
been conducted prior to this Plan. This starting
point, or baseline analysis, will allow
coordination with previous planning efforts.
This examination will be helpful to establish an
understanding of Prosper’s population growth,
housing characteristics, existing land use,
physical constraints and past planning efforts.
Over the past several decades, rapid
development has defined the northern side of
the Dallas/Fort Worth Metropolitan Area. The
DFW Metro Area is now ranked as the 4th
largest metropolitan area in the nation and is
expected to nearly double in size by the year
2050. Growth is not a question, but is
inevitable. Community planning, a vision
accompanied by guiding policies, will help
ensure that Prosper develops in an orderly
fashion, considering and respecting, among
other things, data relating to income,
education levels, ethnicity as well as the
physical values of the community. Community
planning will protect the quality of life which
makes Prosper one of DFW’s most livable
communities.
3 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
PLANNING CONTEXT
Regional Relationship
The Town of Prosper is located at the
northern edge of the Dallas/Fort Worth
Metropolitan area, in western Collin
County and eastern Denton County. The
Town’s immediate neighbors include
Frisco, McKinney, Celina and Little Elm.
The Town of Prosper is currently situated
at the northern terminus of the Dallas
North Tollway and future expansions will
take the Tollway through the Town. The
Tollway provides direct access to
Downtown Dallas as well as to other
major regional highways, such as Highway
121/Sam Rayburn Tollway, President
George Bush Turnpike and IH 635/LBJ.
Highway 380, traversing the southern
border of the Town, provides access to the
cities of McKinney and Denton and to
Interstate 35 and Highway 75/Central
Expressway.
Location Mileage
Downtown Dallas 34
Love Field 31
DFW Airport 33
Stonebriar Centre (Frisco) 11
Dallas Galleria 23
Addison 22
McKinney (downtown) 13
Denton 20
75 Central Expressway 11
Interstate 35 23
SH 121 12
President George Bush Turnpike 18
PLANNING CONTEXT
4
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
Population Analysis Examining historical population growth trends
helps to tell the story of how Prosper has grown
in the past and may give some insight into how
Prosper may grow in the future. There are a
number of different variables that must be
considered when examining population growth
trends, but one of the primary factors is
location. Communities in rural areas, not
adjacent to a major metropolitan area, typically
experience very gradual yet steady growth over
time. Many rural communities experience very
little growth at all, and in some cases
experience negative growth, or decline.
Communities near metropolitan areas,
however, are characterized differently.
Typically speaking, communities on the fringe of
metropolitan areas began as rural, somewhat
isolated communities characterized by slow but
steady growth. Eventually, the urbanized/
developed area encroaches on these rural
communities causing a period of very rapid and
robust growth until the community reaches its
carrying capacity, or build-out. At this point,
the growth rapidly slows once again. This
pattern has characterized growth within the
North Dallas region. Garland, Richardson,
Plano, Frisco and McKinney are all examples of
this type of growth.
When examining historical growth patterns for
the Town of Prosper, we see that Prosper, too,
fits into this type of growth pattern. In 1970,
the community contained only 500 residents.
Between 1970 and 2000, the community added
approximately 1600 residents. Since 2000,
however, the Town has added over 7,000 new
residents, indicating that Prosper has likely
reached the beginning of a period of rapid and
robust growth. Although impossible to predict
the future housing market, reasonable
assumptions seem to indicate that this period of
rapid growth over the past 10 years was not an
accident, but is indicative of the rapid northern
expansion of the DFW Metropolitan Area.
Based on this assumption, it is likely that rapid
and robust growth will continue to characterize
Prosper for the decades to come.
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
11,000
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Year Population Change Growth CAGR*
1970 501 - -
7.6%
1980 675 174 34.7%
1990 1,018 343 50.8%
2000 2,097 1,079 106.0%
2010 9,350 7,253 345.9%
*Compound Annual Growth Rate
Source: United States Census
Population Synopsis
From 1970 to 2000, the Town of Prosper
experienced relatively fast, but steady,
population growth. Since 2000, however, the
Town has experienced very rapid and robust
growth and reached a population of 9,350
residents according to the 2010 U.S. Census.
2011 NCTCOG Population estimates put the
population of Prosper at 10,550 residents.
The Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) is a
method of analyzing annual average rates of
growth. Between 1970 and 2010, Prosper
experienced a CAGR of 7.6 percent. Generally
speaking, this is a high rate of growth for a
community. Since 2000, the CAGR for the
community has risen dramatically to 16.1
percent.
2011: 10,550
2010: 9,350
Figure 1: Historic Population Growth
5 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
PLANNING CONTEXT
Regional Growth
2010 U.S. Census numbers provided insight into
just how rapidly the State of Texas, and its
metropolitan areas, are growing. The
Dallas/Fort Worth Metropolitan area added
nearly 1,500,000 people during the 2000-2010
period. Collin County, in particular, has
experienced some of the most robust growth
over the past several decades. Collin County
alone added nearly 200,000 new residents
between 2000 and 2010 and is rapidly
approaching the 1,000,000 resident mark, a
significant milestone considering that only
67,000 residents called Collin County home in
1970.
Between 1970 and 2000, Little Elm and Frisco
experienced the fastest rates of growth. Since
2000, however, Little Elm and Prosper have
experienced the highest rates of growth at
21.7% and 16.2% respectively. Although Frisco
experienced the third highest rate of growth
between 2000 and 2010, the City experienced
the highest numerical increase, adding over
83,000 new residents during the past decade. It
is also important to note that Prosper and every
one of its neighbors experienced higher rates of
growth over the past decade than in the prior
years. This indicates that growth within Prosper
and its neighbors is increasing.
Place Year CAGR
1970-
2000
CAGR
2000-2010
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Collin County 66,920 144,576 264,036 491,675 782,341 6.3% 4.8%
Celina 1,272 1,520 1,737 1,861 6,028 4.0% 12.5%
Frisco 1,845 3,499 6,138 33,714 116,989 10.9% 13.3%
Little Elm 363 926 1,255 3,646 25,898 11.3% 21.7%
McKinney 15,193 16,256 21,283 54,369 131,117 5.5% 9.2%
Prosper 501 675 1,018 2,097 9,423 7.6% 16.2%
Forecasted Regional Growth
The Dallas/Fort Worth metropolitan area is
currently the fourth largest metropolitan area
in the United States, behind New York City,
Los Angeles and Chicago. According to the
North Central Texas Council of Governments
(NCTCOG), the population of the Dallas/Fort
Worth metropolitan region is expected to
reach 9.8 million by 2035 and 10.5 million by
2040. This would result in the addition of
over 3 million new residents over the next 20-
30 years.
Source: 2010 Census
Figure 2: Regional Growth
PLANNING CONTEXT
6
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
Housing Characteristics
Household type refers to how the people who
live within a household are related, if they do
not live alone. Generally speaking, Prosper
contains a large number of married-couple
households and households with children under
the age of 18.
Within Prosper, the average household size is
3.4 persons per household (PPH) for single
family dwelling units and 2.4 persons per
household for multifamily units. The PPH for
single family dwelling units is significantly
higher than the State average of 2.81 PPH,
Frisco at 2.94 PPH, and Celina at 3.10 PPH. Only
Little Elm has a larger average household size
than Prosper at 3.43 PPH. This data indicates a
large number of families call Prosper home.
Occupancy rate is an important indicator of the
local housing market and housing saturation. A
high occupancy rate may indicate an immediate
need for additional housing stock to
accommodate new population growth. A low
occupancy rate may indicate an oversaturation
of homes in the housing market. Typically,
healthy cities have at least a 90% occupancy
rate, something fairly common in the rapidly
growing DFW area.
Currently, Prosper has a 91.3% occupancy rate
for single family dwelling units. This is
indicative of a healthy housing saturation. The
Town has a 94.5% occupancy rate for
multifamily units. This too is a very healthy
multifamily saturation rate.
92.8%
94.3%
95.1%
92.6%
91.3%
89%90%91%92%93%94%95%96%
Celina
Frisco
Little Elm
McKinney
Prosper
Single Family Occupancy Rates
3.1
2.9
3.4
3.0
3.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
Celina Frisco Little Elm McKinney Prosper
Persons per Household (PPH)
Household Type
Family Households 85.1%
Non-Family Households 14.9%
Of the total Family Households, 53.1% have
children under the age of 18, 75.2% are
married couple households, 3% are single
parent male households, and 6.9% are single
female parent households.
12.1% of the total households in Prosper are
householder living alone.
Source: 2010 Census
Source: 2010 Census
7 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
PLANNING CONTEXT
Existing Land Use
The existing land use of the Town of Prosper is
predominantly characterized by vacant land.
Within the Town boundaries, the majority of
land, 80%, is currently vacant. This is a
significant portion of land that will drastically
impact the overall urban form of the
community as it develops. While a majority of
undeveloped property in Prosper has already
been zoned, there may be opportunities to
work with developers to incorporate the
identified community vision. Such
opportunities should be pursued, particularly as
circumstances arise which necessitate zoning
adjustments or changes.
When excluding vacant land and only examining
developed land, the predominant land use in
Prosper is single family residential. Parks &
Open Space constitutes the second highest land
use followed by public/semi-public and
commercial. Discussed previously, very little
residential variations currently exist.
Additionally, only 2% of the developed land use
is currently occupied by retail.
Duplex
0% Commercial
8%
Industrial
3%
Multi-Family
1%
Mobile Home
1%
Office
0% Parks & Open
Space
15%
Public Semi-
Public
10%
Retail
2%
Single-Family
59%
Commercial
2%
Industrial
1%
Multi-
Family
0% Mobile
Home
0%
Office
0%
Parks &
Open Space
3%
Public Semi-
Public
2%
Retail
0%
Single
Family
12%
Vacant
80%
All Land
Developed Land Only
Figure 3: Existing Land Use
Plate 1: Existing Land Use
PLANNING CONTEXT
8
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
Development Patterns
The majority of development within Prosper has
occurred over the past decade, in conjunction
with the rapid increase in population. The vast
majority of development has been single family
residential, although some retail has been
added along Preston Road.
Most new residential construction has occurred
to the east of Coleman Road and the original
town center. Some residential development has
begun on the western side of the planning area,
with more expected in the near future. A
significant number of large-lot homes were
constructed in Prosper prior to 2005, coinciding
with septic tank requirements that mandate a
minimum lot size of 1 acre. As sewer service
has been expanded and has become more
readily available, lot sizes within new residential
areas have become significantly smaller. In
2011, over 80 percent of approved housing
permits were on lots under 15,000 square feet
in size. In 2011, only 6 building permits were
issued to lots at or above one acre in size while
51 permits, approximately 14 percent, were
issued on lot sizes under 10,000 square feet.
The amount of vacant land within the
community is advantageous, because it allows
for new development opportunities on
undeveloped land, rather than more expensive
redevelopment. It will be important to ensure
that the thoroughfare plan is coordinated with
land use, to ensure that appropriate right-of-
way is acquired during the subdivision of land.
Additionally, it will be important to ensure
connectivity is provided within and between
new residential subdivisions, so that upon
buildout, a connected street system serves the
community.
Finally, a significant amount of infill land is
available within the community. This land is
located between subdivisions and along major
roadways. It will be important to insure that
development in these areas is compatible with
adjacent residential subdivisions.
Large-Lot Residential
Vacant Land/Infill
Small-Lot Residential
9 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
PLANNING CONTEXT
Physical Development Patterns
Local development patterns refer to the factors
that have influenced the shape and growth of
the Town. Understanding such features creates
knowledge of how the Town can grow in the
future. These patterns are divided into two
primary categories: “Natural Constraints”
which examine the geographical aspects of
Prosper and “Man-Made Constraints,” which
examine features which have been constructed
or added to the Town.
Natural Constraints
Natural features influence what type of
development can occur and where such
development can occur. Topography, soils,
vegetation, and wildlife are all factors which can
have a direct effect on development within the
Town and are all important factors which
should be considered during the planning
process.
The Town of Prosper is located along a major
ridge line which runs to the east of Preston
Road. Areas to the west of the ridge line drain
into Lake Lewisville. Areas to the east of the
ridge line drain toward Lake Lavon.
Most topographical variations within Prosper
are located along the major ridge line, near
Preston Road. While a certain degree of
topography exists within Prosper, the relative
flatness of Prosper and the surrounding area is
advantageous for accommodating future
development.
The two largest floodplain areas are located in
the extreme eastern and western portions of
the community; Doe Branch Creek in the west
and Wilson Creek and Rutherford Branch Creek
in the east. The floodplain areas along Doe
Branch Creek, Wilson Creek and Rutherford
Branch Creek contain the most natural tree
cover within the planning area.
Doe Branch Creek
Wilson Creek
Rutherford Branch Creek
PLANNING CONTEXT
10
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
Man-Made Features
The importance of man-made features, such as
transportation facilities, Town boundaries and
infrastructure, are significant factors that
greatly influence development patterns. The
following discussion relates to the significant
man-made features which currently exist within
Prosper.
Preston Road, Highway 380 and the future
Dallas North Tollway are the major arterial
roadways within the community. As
development occurs, Teel Parkway, Legacy
Drive, Coit Road, FM 1385/Gee Road and Custer
Road will grow in importance and will provide
additional north-to-south corridors within the
community. Prosper Trail and First Street will
serve as major east-to-west corridors within the
community. In addition to these roadways, the
Dallas North Tollway will serve as a major
transportation addition within the community
and will increase accessibility within the
community, will provide quick access to the
regional highway network and will serve as a
catalyst in attracting new development.
In the State of Texas, the extraterritorial
jurisdiction (ETJ) refers to the land that an
incorporated community may legally annex for
the purpose of planning and accommodating
future development. The Town has entered
into boundary agreements with Frisco,
McKinney, Celina and Little Elm and has no
plans to expand west of FM 1385 at this time.
For this reason, the general planning area for
the Town is established and well-defined,
allowing the Town to concentrate on the
annexation of internal properties. The
advantage of a defined Town boundary is
knowing exactly where Prosper is able to grow.
This enables Town staff to more effectively plan
for growth, particularly the necessary
infrastructure that will be needed to
accommodate future growth within the Town
boundaries.
Prosper Trail
Broadway Street
Dallas North Tollway, Frisco
Z
0 0.5 1 1.50.25
Miles Plate 1
City LimitandETJ
January 2012
FishTrap Rd.Preston Rd.1st. Street
Prosper Trail
F.M. 1461
Coit Rd.F.M. 2478£¤380
!(289
Legacy Dr.Parvin Rd.
Virginia Pkwy.Coit Rd.Custer Rd.F.M. 423BNSF RRF.M. 2478Preston Rd.Frontier Pkwy.Dallas North TollwayLa Cima Blvd.Custer Rd.Teel Pkwy.GeeF.M. 1385S. ColemanN. ColemanDenton CountyCollin CountyUS 380
Legend
TOWN
ETJ
13 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
PLANNING CONTEXT
Planning Context
In order for this Comprehensive Plan to truly be
comprehensive, it will be important to consider
the context in which the Plan is being created.
The planning context includes a number of
different factors including current and past
planning efforts, regional initiatives, and
external issues that, although may be beyond
direct control of the community, have the
ability to directly impact growth decisions,
primarily the Dallas North Tollway extension.
Building upon past planning efforts and
considering external factors which impact
Prosper’s growth will allow for realistic growth
assumptions to be made and will help to insure
a cohesive, inclusive and truly comprehensive
plan.
Planning Efforts
2004 Comprehensive Plan
In 2004, The Town adopted a Comprehensive
Plan to guide land use decisions within the
community for the next 5 to 10 years. This Plan
included the development of a future land use
and community framework scenario and also
examined the thoroughfare system and
infrastructure of the community.
It is typically recommended that a
Comprehensive Plan be updated every 5 to 10
years, depending upon how rapidly the
community is growing. Since 2004, Prosper has
continued to grow quite rapidly, necessitating
the review and update of the Comprehensive
Plan.
Land Use decisions made during the 2004
Comprehensive Plan will be examined and
evaluated to determine if changes are
necessary. Various development plans and
agreements have been submitted to or
approved by the Town. Updating the Future
Land Use Plan will re-examine the community’s
vision and values. While the majority of land
within Prosper is zoned, an updated Future
Land Use Plan will provide the framework for
discussions and negotiations with developers as
changes to zoning occur.
2004 Future Land Use Plan
Past
Efforts
Current
Initiatives
External
Issues
Regional
Initiatives
Plan
PLANNING CONTEXT
14
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
2007 Parks Recreation and Open Space
Master Plan
In 2007, the Town completed a Parks,
Recreation and Open Space Master Plan (Parks
Plan) to direct the growth of the Town’s parks
and trails as the community grows over the next
several decades. The importance of the Parks
Plan cannot be understated. Parks provide
recreational opportunities for community
residents and help to increase the overall
quality of life of the community. In the same
manner, trails provide recreational
opportunities for residents to walk, run or bike
throughout the community. Trails provide
access to open space, parks, schools,
community facilities and help to link various
areas of the community to one another.
As development occurs, incremental
implementation of the Parks Plan will occur.
Ensuring that it is updated as changes occur,
will help the Town leverage and negotiate with
developers as vacant land is developed,
ultimately enabling the Town to impose a
proportional cost of park development on
developers.
It will be important that the Parks Plan be
consulted by Town decision makers as
development proposals are received. While
slight deviations may be permitted to
accommodate site layouts, the location of parks
and trails have been chosen for intentional
reasons and therefore the general locations of
trails and parks should be adhered to as close as
possible.
Town Lake Park
Frontier Park
Parks and Trails Master Plan
15 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
PLANNING CONTEXT
2007 Old Town Core District Amendment
In 2007, the Town created the Old Town Core
District Amendment to guide the land use
development of Old Town. This area serves as
the historical core of the community and the
visible center of Prosper. While other areas of
the community are currently more
opportunistic for development due to vacant,
available land, the core of the community
cannot be forgotten. The history of Prosper is
rooted within this area. Commercial, retail,
office and single-family residential uses were
applied within the Old Town area in addition to
areas of green space and the school location.
The planning efforts conducted by the Town in
2007 will be built upon during the creation of
this Plan in order to insure consistency.
2007 Old Town Core District Map
Historic Grain Silos, Old Town Prosper
PLANNING CONTEXT
16
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
2010Thoroughfare Plan
The Town of Prosper completed an update to its Thoroughfare Plan in 2010, re-examining issues and
redefining the Town’s roadway network. This Plan will build upon previous work efforts and will seek to
coordinate land use decisions with previous transportation efforts. Any changes that result from land
use decisions will be included as recommendations within this Plan and should be considered as the
future Thoroughfare Plan update is made.
2008-2010 Annexation Plan
The Town of Prosper has taken a proactive
approach towards defining its planning area.
Annexation is a tool that communities use to
proactively manage growth and ensure that
future growth meets the established standards
set by the community. This is particularly
important due to the number of Municipal
Utility Districts (MUD’s) that have developed
along Highway 380, in Celina and other areas
around the Metroplex.
State law requires any community engaging in
annexation to have a three year annexation
plan. The annexation plan for Prosper was
done in three phases: 2008, 2009 and 2010.
The 2008 phase included 14 properties that
were primarily confined to the center and
southeastern areas of the community. The
2009 phase included 12 properties on the
northwestern and west central areas of the
community. Finally, the 2010 phase included 9
properties on the far western side of the
community.
Annexation phases coincided with a desire by
Town Council to annex everything inside the
Town’s boundaries defined by boundary
agreements with Frisco, McKinney, Celina and
Little Elm (FM 1385, Frontier/Parvin, Custer and
Highway 380).
With the exception of the Artesia Municipal
Utility District, only a few parcels of land remain
to be annexed within the Town’s boundaries.
Artesia may be considered for annexation at
some point in the future.
17 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
PLANNING CONTEXT
Prosper ISD
Throughout the planning process, schools have
been identified as one of the single most
important features of the Town. As the Town
continues to grow, it is of prime importance
that the exemplary status and reputation of
Prosper’s schools be maintained.
While the Town and Prosper Independent
School District operate as two separate entities,
they are inevitably related to each other.
Growth in the Town increases the overall tax
base and provides revenue for the School
District. Additionally, excellent schools enable
the Town to continue to attract new residents
and new development.
The Town and Prosper ISD should therefore be
in direct communication, clearly identifying
areas of growth and assessing future
educational needs. Communication between
the Town and PISD will inevitably allow for
coordinated infrastructure decisions, such as
when new roads allowing access to new schools
should be constructed.
The Town and Prosper ISD should also
coordinate on population growth rates and
potential future school locations. Establishing a
working relationship between the two entities
will benefit the Town, PISD and the residents of
Prosper themselves.
PLANNING CONTEXT
18
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
Regional Initiatives
North Central Texas Council of
Governments (NCTCOG)
NCTCOG is the metropolitan planning
organization that encompasses the 16 county
North Texas region. NCTCOG works to promote
orderly and balanced growth within the North
Texas region. The metropolitan transportation
plan created by NCTCOG, known as Mobility
2035, contains a number of different
components including arterial roadway
networks, freeways, rail transit and a Veloweb
Network (regional trail system).
Coordination with NCTCOG will help to
streamline projects within Prosper, particularly
if outside funding is desired or necessary.
Typically, funding is awarded to projects which
show planning and coordination at multiple
levels. Ensuring that future roadway and
transportation plans by the Town are
coordinated with NCTCOG will help Prosper
attract investment from both the public and
private sector and will ensure that roadways are
better coordinated between adjacent
communities.
In addition to transportation, there are various
grants that are awarded to communities in
North Texas by NCTCOG. These grants are used
to incentivize regional cooperation without
requiring compliance. NCTCOG has established
the Center of Development Excellence which
provides 12 guiding principles that it
recommends communities to consider.
Communities in North Texas are encouraged to
incorporate these principles, where best
applicable, and are awarded grants and
additional funding to help communities with
some of the initial costs, studies and plans
associated with quality planning.
.
12 Principles
Development Diversity
Efficient Growth
Pedestrian Design
Housing Choice
Activity Centers
Environmental Stewardship
Quality Places
Efficient Mobility Options
Resource Efficiency
Educational Opportunity
Healthy Communities
Implementation
www.developmentexcellence.com
19 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY VISION
Community Vision
A fundamental component of the
comprehensive planning process evolves
around the vision of the community. The
importance of the vision cannot be
overstated—the vision guides land use
decisions and allows Town staff and decision
makers to determine whether or not decisions
are ultimately in conformance with the long
term vision for Prosper, as defined by its
residents. In other words, the vision is the
roadmap that guides decisions within the
community and serves as the basis for the
Future Land Use Plan and policy
recommendations.
For this Plan, the visioning process was guided
by a Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee
(CPAC) and included several deliberate
exercises. The visioning process included:
Seven CPAC Meetings
CPAC SWOT Analysis
CPAC Visual Character Survey (VCS)
Two Town Hall Meetings
Town Hall Brainstorming Groups
A Public Visual Character Survey on the
Town’s website
Public Hearings During Adoption.
The following pages contain the who and the
what of the visioning process, highlighting the
various groups involved, exercises used and
preliminary results derived from the visioning
process.
Community Vision
VCS
Town
Hall
SWOT
Every community is distinctive and has its
own set of values, aspirations and
objectives. The purpose of the visioning
section is to determine the ultimate vision
of the community based upon resident
input.
Unique, Distinctive,
Exceptional
The community vision is used to guide the
formation of the comprehensive plan and
is ultimately used by decision makers as
they weigh the vision with development
proposals and future opportunities.
20
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY VISION
Comprehensive Plan Advisory
Committee (CPAC)
A committee of community residents and
business owners was compiled in order to assist
in the development of the Plan. Committee
members were selected based upon a variety of
criteria including the area of the community
where they reside, past or current council
experience, economic development knowledge
and business ownership. The CPAC’s role in the
process was to guide the formation of the Plan
document and ensure that the Plan created
ultimately reflected the vision desired by
Prosper residents.
Seven meetings were conducted with the CPAC:
Orientation Meeting on May 2, 2011
Visioning Meeting on June 6, 2011
Future Land Use Meeting on September
12, 2011
Livability Meeting on October 10, 2011
Economic Analysis, Transportation and
Infrastructure Assessment on
November 14th, 2011
Transportation Continued and Plan
Review on December 14, 2011
Town Hall Review and Final Comments
on March 19, 2012
All CPAC meetings were conducted at 6:30 p.m.
and were open to the public. Community
residents and representatives from the
development community were present at
several meetings.
Energized and productive discussions were had
at CPAC meetings, representative of the diverse
opinions and backgrounds present on the
committee. The exchange of ideas with various
points of view ensured a thorough process
where the realities of external factors affecting
Prosper were weighted with the ultimate vision
of the Town.
Comprehensive Plan Advisory
Committee
Jason Dixon, Chair
Craig Moody, Vice Chair
Ane Casady, Secretary
Kelly Cooper
Mark DeMattia
Michael Goddard
Kyle Huckelberry
Ann Lieber
Meigs Miller
Eric Nishimoto
Jordan Simms
Daniel Ting
Doug Trumbull
21 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY VISION
Vision Statement
A vision communicates the reason for existence, the purpose behind planning and the overall goals of a
community from a long-range planning and development perspective. The primary benefit of visioning
is that it clarifies how a community will approach its critical planning, development and growth issues.
With the clarified approach that visioning provides, the resulting Plan will better address the future of
the Town in a manner that is reflective of the community’s interests.
The vision statement for a community should describe the community as it will ideally exist in the
future. A vision statement spells out goals or values at a high level and promotes what the Town should
become. The vision statement for this Plan is as follows:
Prosper is a community committed to excellence. It is a high quality,
family oriented community maintaining a visually aesthetic open feel
with quality commercial development directed to the Town’s major
transportation corridors all while maintaining strong fiscal
responsibility.
22
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY VISION
Visual Character Survey
A Visual Character Survey (VCS) is a technique in
which respondents are asked to score a series
of photographs based on what they find to be
visually preferable for Prosper. The images used
are selected in order to illustrate different
aesthetic, architectural, and visual elements
within any particular built environment and are
used in order to quantify exactly what types of
developments are desired and appropriate for
Prosper. Although the VCS is not necessarily
scientific in nature, it is an effective method of
receiving attitudinal, aesthetic-based input.
Three VCS surveys were conducted for this Plan.
The first survey was conducted with the CPAC at
the June 6, 2011 meeting. The second VCS was
made available through the Town’s website
following the Town Hall meeting. Town Hall
attendees were given a passcode in order to
take this VCS. The third and final VCS was made
available to the general public through the
Town’s website and contained no passcode.
This survey remained available for
approximately 3 weeks. A total of 434 residents
participated in the online VCS for the
community.
The VCS for Prosper was divided into 8
categories:
Dallas North Tollway
Preston Road
Highway 380
Housing Mix
Street Design
Signage
BNSF
Public Space
23 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY VISION
Town Hall #1
A Town Hall meeting was conducted on
Monday June 27, 2011. The purpose of the
Town Hall meeting was to gather feedback from
the public on what the vision for Prosper should
be. Over 140 residents from the community
attended the event that was held at Prosper
High School.
Town Hall attendees were first given an
introduction to the planning process. During
this presentation, an overview of past planning
efforts, existing conditions and growth patterns
within our region was explained. The
presentation concluded by informing residents
of the planning process as well as introducing
members of the Comprehensive Plan Advisory
Committee to attendees.
A visioning exercise was conducted with
attendees in order to engage the public and
gather initial feedback on Prosper’s future.
Topic tables were arranged so that each
participant in attendance would rotate to each
of the following tables:
Land Use/Corridors;
Transportation;
Housing;
Livability; and
Community Identity.
At each of the tables, a member of the CPAC,
Town staff or consultant guided discussion on
each group’s major issues, concerns or ideas.
Issues gathered were then compiled and
presented to the CPAC to guide discussion on
elements within the Plan.
24
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY VISION
Town Hall #2
On February 13, 2012, a Town Hall meeting was
conducted at Prosper High School in order to
present the Draft Comprehensive Plan to the
public and to gather comments and feedback
from the public on plan recommendations.
Over 275 attendees were present at the
meeting. Attendees participated in round table
discussions where individualized feedback on
plan recommendations was obtained.
Participants were asked whether the Draft Plan
accurately described the vision for Prosper, if
there were any components of the plan that
excited them, if there were components of the
plan that concerned them and finally were
asked to prioritize a list of issues based upon
their personal order of importance.
The information collected from Town Hall
attendees was then tabulated in order to
identify consistent themes and priorities from
the public. This information was discussed with
the CPAC and necessary clarifications and/or
text modifications to the Draft Plan were made.
Yes
69%
Mostly
25%
No
6%
Question #1: Does the Plan Accurately
Describe the Community’s Vision for Prosper?
25 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY VISION
Community Goals
Community goals are created to direct the formation of the Plan. They are practical yet general points
under which more specific objectives may be located. The goals for the Plan are purposely designed to
cover a wide array of individual objectives, but were specifically crafted to address many of the
comments, issues, ideas and concerns defined during the visioning portion of the Plan’s creation.
The following goals are intended to provide a framework for the creation of applicable and economically
feasible land use decisions and special districts. The goals are also intended to establish guidelines for
preserving Prosper’s neighborhoods and creating quality new residential areas, maintaining and
enhancing Prosper’s quality of life and physical characteristics, providing a safe and attractive
transportation network and ultimately ensuring that the Town’s infrastructure systems will be adequate
to accommodate 20-year growth. Plan objectives are located within the Implementation Chapter of this
Plan.
Goal 1: Provide a variety of land uses, in accordance with the vision of Prosper
residents, which diversify the tax base and enable all types of people to live,
work, shop, eat and relax in Prosper.
Goal 2: Maintain and enhance the high quality of life and small-town feel currently
available and expected by Prosper residents.
Goal 3: Protect the quality and integrity of Prosper’s neighborhoods.
Goal 4: Require high-quality and visually attractive architectural characteristics in
both residential and non-residential developments.
Goal 5: Develop quality, open roadways that enhance the Town’s rural image, are
compatible with adjacent development and provide safe and convenient
traffic movements.
Goal 6: Ensure that water, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure systems are
able to meet future growth demands.
26
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY VISION
27 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Future Land Use
The right of a municipality to coordinate growth
is rooted in its need to protect the health,
safety, and welfare of local citizens. An
important part of establishing the guidelines for
such responsibility is the Future Land Use Plan,
which establishes an overall framework for the
preferred pattern of development within
Prosper. In general, the Future Land Use Plan is
intended solely to be a comprehensive
blueprint of Prosper’s vision for its future land
use pattern. Specifically, the Future Land Use
Plan designates various areas within the Town
for particular land uses, based principally on the
specific land use policies outlined herein.
The Future Land Use Plan is graphically depicted
for use during the development plan review
process with the Future Land Use Plan map. The
Future Land Use Plan should ultimately be
reflected through the Town’s policy and
development decisions. The Future Land Use
Plan map is not a zoning map, which deals with
specific development requirements on
individual parcels. The zoning map and changes
in zoning should, however, be based on the
Future Land Use Plan and related Future Land
Use Plan map.
Legal Authority
Authority of a community to create a
comprehensive plan is rooted in Chapters 211,
212 and 213 of the Texas Local Government
Code.
Chapter 211
Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government
Code allows the government body of a
community to regulate zoning.
Chapter 212
Chapter 212 of the Texas Local Government
Code allows the governing body of a community
to regulate subdivision development within the
community limits and also within the
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) which varies
depending upon the population of the
community.
Chapter 213
Chapter 213 of the Texas Local Government
Code allows the governing body of a community
to create a comprehensive plan for the “long-
range development of the municipality.” Basic
recommendations for comprehensive planning
are to address land use, transportation and
public facilities, but may also include a wide
variety of other issues determined by the
community.
It is important to note that a comprehensive
plan is NOT a zoning ordinance, but rather is
intended to be used as a tool to guide
development, infrastructure and land use
decisions in the future. The comprehensive
plan does, however, serve as a basis on which
zoning decisions are made, as specified by
Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Development
Code.
28
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Process
The Future Land Use Plan was derived through
a defined and deliberate process. Existing land
uses, development agreements and planned
developments were combined with extensive
public input in order to create a Future Land
Use Plan that is both realistic, attainable and
reflects the public’s vision for Prosper’s future.
The first consideration was existing land use.
Existing land use includes analyzing past
development trends and working to ensure that
future growth occurring within the community
coincides with existing development patterns
and does not negatively impact the integrity of
existing neighborhoods.
An examination of potential planned
developments was the second step. This
involved an understanding of existing
development agreements that are in place
within Prosper. Understanding what types of
development may occur in the future helps to
determine what the adjacent land uses should
be.
Finally, an extensive public input process was
conducted with the general public and the
CPAC. The public and CPAC described the
characteristics which should define Prosper and
identified many of the needs within the
community.
Additionally, a VCS was conducted with
attendees of the CPAC, Town Hall meeting and
the general public. A significant number of
responses were received and the results of the
survey helped to determine the visual
aesthetics and development characteristics that
were felt to be appropriate within Prosper.
The results of this process ultimately concluded
in a land use scenario for the Town. This land
use scenario is not a mandate, but should be
used to guide Town staff and decision makers
as development intensifies in the coming years.
29 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Land Use Types
Residential Low Density
This land use is indicative of large-lot single-
family homes. Typically speaking, lot sizes
within any low density development will range
between 15,000 square feet and 1+ acre in size.
While a variety of lot sizes may be used, the
total gross density of low density residential
neighborhoods should not exceed 1.6 dwelling
units per acre. Large-lot homes will provide a
continuation of the rural atmosphere and feel
that was intensely expressed by Prosper’s
residents. Most low density residential areas
will be located in Northwest and Northeast
Prosper.
Residential Medium Density
Medium density residential is also
representative of single family detached
dwelling units. Lot sizes in medium density
residential neighborhoods could range between
12,500 and 20,000 square feet in size. A
variation in lot sizes may be permitted to
achieve a goal range in density. While a variety
of lot sizes may be used within medium density
residential neighborhoods, the gross density of
such developments will typically not be less
than 1.6 dwelling units per acre or greater than
2.5 dwelling units per acre.
30
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Residential High Density
High density residential represents the most
intense residential land uses permitted in
Prosper. High density single family uses will
consist of developments greater than 2.5
dwelling units per acre and lot sizes smaller
than 10,000 square feet. Within Prosper, the
high-density residential district is reflective of
the Artesia development, where single family
residential lot sizes and dwelling units per acre
will be substantially higher than the rest of the
community. High density residential may be
located within the Dallas North Tollway,
Highway 380, town Center and Old Town
Districts. In such areas, high density residential
may take the form of multifamily or single
family attached dwelling units and may include
mixed-use lofts/apartments, patio homes,
snout houses, brownstones and townhomes.
Retail and Neighborhood Services
Neighborhood services typically include retail
establishments that provide merchandise for
retail sale, banks, neighborhood office and
small medical offices. Retail uses are
particularly important because they contribute
to Prosper’s tax base through both property
and sales taxes, making their inclusion
attractive and often times competitive. Within
Prosper, neighborhood service uses will likely
occur at major intersections along the Dallas
North Tollway, HIghway 380 and Preston Road
corridors. Neighborhood service uses should
also be strategically placed along the Town’s
perimeter in order to attract patrons from
neighboring communities, enhancing sales tax
revenue opportunities. The majority of
neighborhood service activity within Prosper
will likely be included within the Dallas North
Tollway, Highway 380, Town Center and Old
Town districts.
31 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Dallas North Tollway District
The Dallas North Tollway district will consist of
the most intense land uses within Prosper. A
diverse mixture of office, retail and residential
will likely develop along the corridor. Mid-rise
office (up to 12 stories) may be permitted
throughout the corridor. Office buildings
should be designed for a “campus feel”—they
should be oriented towards common public
space with significant landscaping and should
be linked by a pedestrian network. A common
architectural theme should also be established
for a consistent visual appearance. Mixed-use
development should be encouraged and should
contain a mixture of office, retail and residential
uses. Mixed-use lofts/apartments would be the
most appropriate residential use within this
district. Structured parking should be
encouraged in more intense areas to limit the
presence and visibility of large parking lots.
Structured parking should be oriented in a way
that minimizes visibility from the Tollway.
Highway 380 District
Much like the Dallas North Tollway district, the
Highway 380 district will contain a variety of
different uses. The major contrast between
Highway 380 and other districts will be the
inclusion of a big box development and
commercial service uses. Types of appropriate
commercial include hotels, banks, vehicle
refilling stations with a convenience store,
home service centers with outside storage,
garden center with outside storage and other
similar uses which serve the community but are
not necessarily desired on Preston Road or
within the Dallas North Tollway corridor.
Residential land uses may be appropriate within
certain areas, particularly away from major
intersections where retail and commercial will
be the highest and best land use. Residential
land uses may include patio homes, snout
houses, townhomes and brownstones. These
residential areas may serve as a buffer between
more intense activity along Highway 380 and
low density residential areas to the north.
32
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Town Center District
The Town Center district is a continuation of the
area defined by previous planning efforts as a
future location for a large scale mixed-use
development. The Town Center would include
a mixture of land uses but development will be
less intense than that located along Highway
380 and the Dallas North Tollway. Retail, small
scale office, and residential uses would be
included within this district, but the primary
intent should be focused on dining and
shopping. Public space should be a major
component of this area, creating space for
families and residents of Prosper to meet and
socialize. Open space located within the Town
Center could be used for community events,
festivals and school events. Urban design
should accommodate the pedestrian while
providing automobile access and discreet
parking. Residential uses may include mixed-
use lofts/apartments, patio homes, townhomes
and brownstones. Areas of single family
residential may also be permitted, particularly
on the northern side where the development
abuts the Old Town district.
Old Town District
The Old Town district is the heart of Prosper.
This historic area of the community is intended
to include a variety of boutique type land uses,
ranging from unique and local retail
establishments, restaurants and offices. Many
of the historic homes within the Old Town
district, particularly areas along First Street and
Broadway, may gradually convert to boutique
office and retail establishments. The most
opportunistic possibility for a transit stop, if
desired by future residents, would be within the
Old Town district, which could facilitate
redevelopment of the downtown area. If this
occurs, high density residential options, such as
live-above lofts/apartments, may be
considered. The historic past of the community
should be preserved. The community’s
beginnings as a farm community in rural Collin
County are part of what defines Prosper, and
these attributes should be preserved as new
infill development occurs.
33 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Business Park
A Business Park district, located to the west of
the BNSF Railroad between Prosper Trial and
First Street, will include a variety of potential
land uses including light industrial, commercial
warehousing, office storage and commercial
uses with outside storage. While outside
storage will likely occur and be necessary within
this district, significant effort should be placed
on the visual integrity of the district, particularly
when located in higher visibility areas. When
such uses abut roadways, larger landscape
setbacks, such as 40 feet setbacks, that include
berms and evergreen shrubs/trees should be
used to protect the visual integrity of roadways
and the public view. All outside storage should
also be screened from public view and from
adjacent properties. The location of the BNSF
railroad and close proximity to the Dallas North
Tollway provide the Business Park with
significant accessibility. Uses located along First
Street, Prosper Trail and other perimeter areas
should incorporate a higher degree of
landscaping and architectural design in order to
protect the visual integrity of Prosper’s
roadways.
34
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Z
0 0.5 1 1.50.25
Miles Plate 2
FutureLand UsePlan
July 2012
kj
kj kj
kj
kj
kj
kj
kj kj kj
kj kj
kjkj
kj
Parvin Rd.F.M. 1385GeeFish Trap Rd.
U.S. 380 Dallas North TollwayProsper Trail
First St.La Cima Blvd.
Frontier Pkwy.Preston Rd.Coit Rd.F.M. 1461 F.M. 2478F.M. 2478Custer Rd.F.M. 423Teel Pkwy.Legacy Dr.Legacy Dr.Virginia Pkwy.BNSF RRS. ColemanN. ColemanLovers Ln Hays RdLegend
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Retail & Neighborhood Services
Business Park
Old Town District
Town Center
Tollway District
US 380 District
100 Year Floodplain
kjMajor Gateway
kj Minor Gateway
Town of Prosper
ETJ
Note: A comprehensive plan shall not constitute
zoning regulations or establish zoning district
boundaries.
37 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Land Use Acreages
Based upon the Future Land Use Scenario,
medium density residential will constitute
the largest future land use within Prosper
at 35 percent, followed by low density
residential at 34%. In terms of non-
residential development, the Dallas North
Tollway district will be the largest
commercial district constituting 9% of the
total land use in Prosper, followed by the
Highway 380 district at 8%. In total, 73%
of the total land in Prosper will be reserved
for residential uses with the remaining
27% being a combination of retail, office,
commercial and high density residential.
Ultimate Capacity
The ultimate capacity for Prosper is based on the Future Land Use Scenario. Certain assumptions
were made in order to calculate the Ultimate Capacity. For low density residential, lot sizes greater
than 15,000 square feet, 1.2 dwelling units per acre was used for our assumptions.
For the purpose of estimating ultimate capacity, medium density residential includes lot sizes
between 10 and 20,000 square feet in size. For purposes of our assumptions, an average of 2.3
dwelling units per acre was assumed for medium density residential.
High density single family residential is indicative of Artesia. Artesia is an existing Municipal Utility
District, located in Prosper’s ETJ in Denton County, which has the right to develop 2,170 single family
lots and 600 multifamily units. While Artesia is not currently located within the Town of Prosper, it
is located in the Town’s planning area and therefore, is included in this Plan. Based upon actual
dwelling units and acreage, a high density single family density of 4.8 DUA and multifamily density of
20 DUA was used.
Conservative estimates based upon developer agreements, planned developments and Town zoning
indicate that over 5,000 more high density dwelling units may be built in Prosper. This number
constitutes nearly 30% of the total dwelling units.
Business Park
2%
High Density
4%
Low Density
34% Medium
Density
35%
Old Town
2%
Neighbor-
hood Services
2%
Town Center
4%
Tollway
District
9%
US 380
District
8%
Figure 4: Future Land Use Acreage
38
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Based upon the future land use scenario and the previous assumptions, the ultimate capacity
for Prosper is approximately 69,300 residents, as delineated in Figure 5 below. Changes in
overall development patterns that deviate from the Plan’s recommendations could significantly
impact the ultimate capacity of the community.
Land Use Acreage DUA* Dwelling
Units PPH** Total
Pop
Low Density 2,573 1.2 3,087 3.4 10,498
Medium Density 3,763 2.3 8,654 3.4 29,427
High Density Single-Family (Artesia) 450 4.8 2,170 3.4 7,378
High Density Multi-Family (Artesia) 30 20 600 2.4 1,440
High Density Residential - - 5,000 2 10,000
Additional Population 58,743
Existing Population 10,560
Total Build-Out Capacity 69,303
*DUA (Dwelling Units per Acre)
**Persons per Household
Figure 5: Ultimate Capacity
39 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Population Projections
The Town of Prosper has experienced extremely
rapid growth over the past several decades,
which was discussed in more detail in the
Planning Context. External factors seem to
indicate that growth within Collin County will
likely continue in the foreseeable future.
Likewise, with the extension of the Dallas North
Tollway through Prosper, it is very likely that
rapid growth within the Town will also
continue.
It is often difficult to calculate population
projection growth rates for fringe communities,
such as Prosper, particularly when such
communities are in the beginning stages of
their growth and maturity. It is therefore
beneficial to examine a wide range of potential
growth numbers including the historical growth
rates of Prosper, its neighbors and Collin
County, as a whole.
Six different growth rates were examined. A
7.6% growth rate is indicative of Prosper’s 40
year CAGR, a 10.9% growth rate is indicative of
the average 20 year growth of Prosper, its
neighbors and Collin County. An 11.8% growth
rate is indicative of Prosper’s growth over the
past 20 years, a 16.2% growth rate is indicative
of Prosper’s growth between 2000 and 2010,
and finally an 8.0% growth rate was used
representative of the projected compound
annual growth rate of Prosper through buildout.
1990-2010
CAGR Average
Collin County 5.6%
10.9%
Celina 6.4%
Frisco 15.8%
Little Elm 16.3%
McKinney 9.5%
Prosper 11.8%
Source Percent
Growth
Texas Water Board 50 Year
Projection 4.2
40 Year Prosper Growth Rate 7.6
Projected Growth Rate 8.0
20 Year Regional Average 10.9
20 Year Prosper Growth Rate 11.8
10 Year Prosper Growth Rate 16.2
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
10 Year Prosper Average
20 Year Prosper Average
20 Year Region Average
Projected 8% Growth
40 Year Prosper Average
Texas Water Board
Regional Population Growth
Figure 6: Population Projections
40
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Community Livability
What does the term livability mean with regard
to urban planning? Generally, livability reflects
the characteristics, aesthetics, design and social
aspects of Prosper that make the Town unique
and which help to establish a sense of
community. There are many intangibles that
make a place livable, such as a sense of
community, a strong sense of place in particular
areas, civic pride and the friendliness of
neighbors. There are also tangible aspects that
can promote livability as well.
Prosper is a unique community with its own
values and vision. The following section
describes in more detail some of those tangible
aspects that, when tailored to fit the needs and
vision of Prosper, can help the Town to grow in
a manner that enhances the quality of its
neighborhoods and helps to create vibrant
retail establishments. This section is intended
to describe, in more detail, the characteristics
of the Future Land Use Plan and is intended to
be used to guide decision makers what the
public believes the character of Prosper should
be as it grows. This section includes a
discussion of various land use concepts and
how they apply to Prosper, general
neighborhood characteristics, housing mix,
corridors and image enhancement.
It should be noted a significant number of
pictures in this section were taken directly from
the Visual Character Survey that was made
available to the public during August 2011.
Livability Guidelines
Preserve small-town, rural feel
Maintain open spaces that create a
quiet, open feel
Provide a range of housing in
Prosper, taking into consideration,
among other things, data relating
to income, education levels and
ethnicities.
“Raise the bar” on development/
attract quality development
Attract neighborhood services,
such as a grocery store
Build a system of connected parks
and trails for outdoor recreation
Clearly brand and identify Prosper
through gateways and other
identifying features
Provide entertainment venues for
families
Create high quality mixed-use
centers where residents may shop,
dine, socialize and live
Enhance Old Town Prosper
Encourage a mixture of high-quality
41 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Land Use Concepts
Mixed-Use
Mixed-use refers to a development style that
combines a mix of land uses within one defined
zoning district. For example, residential, retail,
restaurants, office and public uses may be
allowed in the same building, same lot, same
tract, block or zoning district. Benefits of
mixed-use development include:
Flexibility of building spaces over time;
Long term viability of commercial
districts;
Providing higher quality high density
residences;
Inclusion of public facilities;
Reduction in the frequency of vehicular
trips; and
Minimizing land consumption.
Mixed-use developments are defined by their
design—building orientation, roadway
configuration and amenities such as shade
trees, benches and lighting create a safe
environment that is conducive for walking.
Intentional integration of diverse land uses
within one localized area creates a lifestyle
option where a person can perform many of
their daily needs and recreational desires within
a short distance of home. Such environments
are particularly attractive to young
professionals, young couples and empty
nesters.
Mixed-uses are typically either horizontal or
vertical in nature. Horizontal mixed-uses
involve retail, office and residential all located
within one defined area, but within separate
buildings. Vertical mixed-use developments
would include any combination of retail, office
and residential within the same building. A
common example of vertical mixed-use is
residential lofts and apartments above street-
level retail and office space.
General Guidelines
Reduced Setbacks: bring building
facades closer to the street.
Central Gathering Space or Focal
Point: Create an identity through
public space.
Pedestrian Orientation: Facilitate
the pedestrian experience through
quality urban design. Ensure
access and connectivity to adjacent
neighborhoods.
Architecture: moldings, spires,
canopies, balconies and building
locations all create a sense of
identity and contribute to the
experience.
Strategic Parking: utilize shared
parking, on-street parking, parking
behind buildings and structured
parking.
Connectivity: mixed use areas
should be tied in to adjacent
residential development.
42
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
What does mixed-use development look like in Prosper? We asked the community in a public
Visual Character Survey. The highest rated mixed-use pictures are shown below.
Past planning efforts, including the Town’s previous comprehensive plan, have indicated that the most
opportunistic location for a Town Center, a large mixed-use district, would be the area roughly
bounded by First Street to the north, Highway 380 to the south, BNSF Railroad to the west and Preston
Road to the east. This area is currently identified as a planned development by the Town’s zoning
ordinance.
Within Prosper, mixed-use areas may be appropriate along the Dallas North Tollway, Highway 380,
Town Center and Old Town districts, as shown below.
43 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Horizontal and Vertical Mixed-Use
Development
Mixed-use developments that include a range
of land uses incorporated within the same
building, but typically at different levels, are
referred to as vertical mixed-use developments.
Common examples of vertical integration
include apartments and lofts over ground level
retail and office uses. Examples of vertical
mixed-use developments are Shops at Legacy in
Plano, Watters Creek in Allen and the West
Village/State-Thomas areas of Dallas. Vertical
mixed-use development was preferred by
Prosper residents.
Horizontal mixed-use development is
representative of a mixture of uses within close
proximity to each other, but not necessarily
within the same building. Horizontal mixed-use
developments typically include residential uses
along the periphery of the larger development
area, separate from a more intense retail and
office core. An example of horizontal mixed-
use development is Southlake Town Center.
The central area of the Town Center includes
retail and office uses with residential
townhomes located on the periphery of the
development, primarily on the east side.
Two factors considered when determining
whether vertical or horizontal integration
should be utilized are land availability and land
value. In more intense areas of development,
land values are typically higher and land
availability may be significantly less. In such
locations, vertical integration, and higher
densities (up to 5 stories), would be most
appropriate. In Prosper, vertical integration of
mixed uses will likely occur within the Dallas
North Tollway and Town Center districts.
Horizontal mixed-use integration typically
occurs where land availability and value can
accommodate an overall lower density. Here,
1-3 story retail and office may be surrounded by
townhomes, patio homes, multi-unit homes and
other less intense uses. In Prosper, horizontal
mixed uses will likely occur within the Highway
380 and Town Center districts.
Vertical Mixed-Use
Characteristics
o Multiple uses within the same building
o Live-above lofts and apartments
o More urban in nature
o 4-5 story height for buildings with
residential uses located above the first
floor
o Structured Parking
Considerations
o Consume less land
o Land value (density to maximize value)
o Higher density (typically more urban )
Horizontal Mixed-Use
Characteristics
o Multiple uses within a planned areas,
but not necessarily within the same
building
o 1-3 story heights/lower density nature
o Areas of apartments, townhomes,
brown stones, patio homes and multi-
unit homes around the periphery,
buffering low-density neighborhoods.
o Structured parking or rear parking/rear
entry garages
Considerations
o Consume more land
o With buffering, may be located near
residential areas along HWY 380
44
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Transit Oriented Development
If transit oriented development becomes a desire in Prosper, it
should reflect the Town’s values and should be customized to fit
the Town’s built environment.
As the Town and DFW region continue to grow, and as the
regional transit network becomes more established, transit may
become a more viable and desired option for Prosper residents,
particularly for commuters. Feedback received from the Town Hall
indicates that transit is not desired at the current time. While rail
transit may not be an immediate need and may not be realistically
achieved for some time, discussion with the CPAC indicated that it
may be in the best interest of the Town to identify a potential
location for a rail stop and allow future residents to determine
whether or not rail will be appropriate if the 19.5 mile line to
Celina becomes a reality. If the North Carrolton to Celina Line is
constructed, the train will traverse the center of Prosper multiple
times daily. If this scenario occurs, it was expressed that rail
should be used to benefit the community, particularly as an
economic development asset.
If the desire for rail connectivity arises in the future, the most
appropriate location for a future transit stop, and for transit
oriented development, may be in the Old Town district of the
community, likely at the intersection of the BNSF railroad and First
Street. In addition to an existing rail line, the Old Town district
contains the historical past of the Town and therefore presents
many opportunities for a mixture of preservation and
redevelopment—a theme consistent with what community
residents indicated during visioning exercises. A station in Old
Town should be architecturally and aesthetically compatible with
the development in the Town Center and Old Town districts.
As Prosper continues to grow, development and redevelopment of
the Old Town area may become more realistic. If transit is
deemed appropriate in the future, its location in Old Town may
help to bring a unique mix of business, restaurants and offices to
the Old Town core.
The ultimate decision on whether or not transit is appropriate for
Prosper should be left to future residents and future Town Councils
to decide.
45 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Context Sensitive Solutions
Context sensitive solutions is the practice of
developing transportation projects that serve all
users and meet the needs of the neighborhoods
through which they pass. It is a collaborative
process that involves Town staff, property
owners, developers and business owners in
development of street designs that fit into the
character of surrounding neighborhoods while
maintaining safety and mobility. The key is that
elements of the street should complement the
context of surrounding or adjacent
development in order to generate a “roadway
experience” and therefore the roadway may
take on certain characteristics to support and
be compatible with adjacent development. The
process of designing CSS roadways is similar to
the process of designing traditional
thoroughfares in that automobile traffic is
considered with traffic counts, traffic demand
and level of service information-gathering
efforts. The difference is that in addition to
automobile traffic, other elements, such as
pedestrian traffic, building form and land use,
are also carefully considered.
The CSS approach recommends designing
thoroughfares based upon:
Community objectives
Functional classes
Thoroughfare types
Adjacent land use
Environmental considerations
In order to design accordingly, decision makers
must understand the key relationship between
transportation and land use, particularly the
flexibility that may be needed in roadway
design in order to accommodate a thoroughfare
to changing urban form within the community.
Understanding key community objectives for
land use within the community is also
important in order to ensure that public
infrastructure investments are in line with
ultimate land use objectives.
A roadway may traverse a wide range of land uses. It is important to design the roadway
considering its role and impact in each particular area.
46
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Coleman Road is a prime example of an
application of context sensitive solutions in
Prosper. Coleman Road will transition as it
traverses the community. The southern portion
of Coleman Road will traverse the Town Center.
In this area, it must consider the more intense
development that will likely be located within
the Town Center and its focus will be primarily
placed on moving traffic and safely
accommodating the pedestrian. As the
roadway moves into the Old Town district, it
must respect the character of Old Town. The
roadway will likely narrow and head-in and
parallel parking will likely be utilized. Other
pedestrian amenities, such as bulb outs, street
trees and enhanced sidewalks may be
considered. As Coleman Road continues to the
north of Old Town, it will transition into a
residential thoroughfare with more lanes added
and on-street parking removed.
Context Sensitive Principles
Satisfies purpose and needs as
agreed to by a full range of
stakeholders
Safe facility for user and
community
Project in harmony with
community, preserves natural,
aesthetic, historic and natural
resource values of the area
Project exceeds the expectations
of designers and stakeholders—
achieves a level of excellence.
Project involves efficient and
effective use of resources
Designed and built with minimal
disruption to community
Project seen to have lasting value
to the community
An ITE Recommended Practice: Context Sensitive
Solutions in Designing Major Urban Thoroughfares for
Walkable Communities (2006)
Safe and attractive roadways
for pedestrians and traffic in
retail areas
On-street parking in
historic areas or high
pedestrian areas
Transition into resdiential
areas
47 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Building Orientation
Building orientation has the ability to
significantly affect the appearance of the
community. Over the past several decades,
strip shopping centers have been defined by
large setbacks and with parking areas located
between the building and the roadway. With
this type of design, much of the visual identity
of the corridor is placed on the parking lots and
vehicles, rather than on the architecture and
identity of the community and the buildings
themselves.
During visioning exercises, many Prosper
residents indicated that high quality non-
residential development should be a priority in
Prosper and that the “cookie-cutter” strip
centers that define many suburban
neighborhoods should be discouraged within
Prosper. Building orientation is a way to ensure
that high-quality retail and commercial centers
are developed within Prosper.
Retail centers should be clustered together,
when possible, creating nodes of activity rather
than strips of activity. Neighborhood retail
centers will most likely be located at major
intersections within Prosper. Clustering of
buildings into nodes of activity can often help to
define outdoor spaces such as plazas and
courtyards and the strategic orientation of
buildings can also minimize circulation conflicts.
An additional design which may be considered
is the placement of parking areas behind
buildings rather than along the roadway
frontage. The visual experience is then focused
upon the landscaping and architectural design
of the building, rather than on a large parking
lot located in the front.
Parking Lot Frontage and Building Frontage
Strip Center Retail and Nodal Retail
48
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Livable Neighborhoods
Life-Cycle Housing Connectivity Identity Recreational
Access
Quality
Development
Neighborhood
Conveniences
Open Space Neighborhood
Signage
Encourage a variety of
housing types and sizes
to accommodate
different stages of life
within Prosper. Ensure a
range of housing that
takes into consideration,
among other things, data
relating to income,
education levels, and
ethnicity
Encourage connected
neighborhoods which
emphasize both internal
and external connectivity.
Neighborhoods should be
linked to each other as
well as to the community
as a whole.
Encourage neighborhood
events, such as National
Night Out, block parties
and other neighborhood
events to promote social
interaction among
neighbors and to foster a
sense of community.
Incorporate the Parks
Master Plan in order to
create outdoor
recreational
opportunities for both
neighborhoods and the
community, enhancing
the quality of life of
Prosper.
Continue to encourage
the creation of custom
homes, a definitive
feature of Prosper,
through anti-monotony
standards and by
requiring quality building
materials that reduce
maintenance and
preserve long-term
appearance.
Incorporate
neighborhood retail
centers in strategic
locations which optimize
convenience for adjacent
neighborhoods. Offer
walkable connections to
adjacent neighborhood
as well as automobile
connections and discreet
parking.
In addition to parks and
trails, neighborhoods
should include open
space in order to
preserve the rural nature
of Prosper.
Delineate different
neighborhoods through
entrance features and
signage toppers.
Livable neighborhoods, regardless of what type of environment, have some common characteristics.
The following is a discussion of some of these common characteristics as well as strategies to ensure
that neighborhoods are protected, preserved and enhanced as development continues to occur
within the Town.
49 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Long Term Neighborhood Viability
Neighborhoods are often defined in more
abstract terms by the sense of “community”
and the quality of life enjoyed by the people
who live and play there. Well-designed
neighborhoods provide a setting for residents
to develop a strong sense of belonging, which is
promoted by their interactions. The quality and
livability of the Town’s neighborhoods are
integral components of the overall character.
The key to a successful neighborhood is creating
a livable and affordable environment where the
ongoing investment in property is supported by
public investment in parks and greenbelt areas;
opportunities for social interaction; accessibility
for pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicles; and
distinctive characteristics which give an area a
unique identity. Prosper neighborhoods may be
quantified in terms of the following
characteristics:
• Opportunities for neighborhood
interaction;
• Careful and strategic placement of
retail uses and other appropriate
non-residential uses within access
of the neighborhood area;
• Continued investment in public and
private property to stabilize
property values;
• Condition of public facilities and
infrastructure serving the area;
• A sense of “community” and
belonging among residents through
distinctive neighborhood identities;
and
• Access to amenities such as parks,
open spaces, public facilities and
trails; and
• Incorporating open spaces within
neighborhoods as a definitive
feature of Prosper.
The majority of Prosper’s housing stock is
relatively new and in good physical condition.
Ensuring that the preceding principles are used
to guide new development will protect the long
term viability and continued investment in
Prosper’s neighborhoods in the future.
The following is feedback received
from Prosper Residents during the
Public Meeting regarding its
neighborhoods:
Open space/tree preservation
Neighborhood services
Sidewalks
Bicycle/Jogging Trails
Minimal Street lighting
Sound barriers/buffers on high-
traffic corridors
“Chic Country” community
Space for community/
neighborhood festivals and
events
Entertainment for families
50
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Housing Mix
It is important for communities to provide a
variety of housing for its citizens and to meet
the needs of different segments of the
population. The “full-life cycle” is intended to
describe all stages of life.
Housing Mix-Alternative Housing Options
Generally speaking, most of Prosper’s housing
options are, and will continue to be, single
family homes. Prosper residents have indicated
that other housing types are appropriate within
the community but that such units should
primarily be confined within the Dallas North
Tollway, Highway 380, Town Center and Old
Town districts. Many housing options in these
districts take place on smaller lots, such as in
the case of townhomes, brownstones, patio
homes, and zero lot line homes. Design
approaches for these types of homes tend to
favor rear entry garages for two primary
reasons; aesthetics and drainage.
Rear-entry garages on developments with lot
sizes less than 50 feet in width help to protect
the visual integrity of the streetscape by
reducing the visibility of closely situated garages
and driveways. This is particularly important
when looking at townhomes, brownstones,
zero-lot line homes and patio homes which are
either attached or closely situated to one
another. Rear entry garages allow more
landscaping opportunities and create a more
walkable environment in such areas by reducing
the frequency of individual driveways.
In addition to aesthetics, rear-entry garages
may also aid with drainage. Determining where
water that collects in ones backyard should
drain is often a contested issue. Having rear-
entry garages or a small rear yard/rear patio
feature can be a design advantage to this effect.
While rear-entry garages should be considered
for the densest forms of residential housing
options, it is likely that front-entry garages will
continue in the majority of Prosper’s lower
density neighborhoods.
Rear-Entry Townhome
Front-Entry Townhome
51 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Transitional Uses, Screening and Buffering
The Future Land Use Plan seeks to minimize
conflict between residential and nonresidential
areas, but screening and buffering efforts can
help to mitigate any remaining incompatibility
between land uses.
The Town should consider reviewing the
existing screening and buffering requirements
between residential and nonresidential
developments. There are several options to
alleviate the conflict: require transitional uses,
screening, and/or buffering.
Larger setbacks, such as a 40 foot setback, may
be utilized to protect the public view and create
a more rural feel. Within such setbacks,
extensive landscaping, such as berms, double
rows of large trees and solid living evergreen
screens may be used. Examples of “living
screens” were rated favorably in the Visual
Character Survey and include the types of
screening mentioned above, typically on
setbacks greater than 25 feet. When landscape
berms are used, consideration for maintenance
should be a priority. Typically speaking a 1:3
slope should be used for landscape berms to
ensure proper maintenance. So, for example, a
25’ setback would allow a 4’ berm; a 30‘setback
would allow a 5’ berm; and a 40’ setback would
allow a 6’ berm.
If a screening wall is used, the wall should be
constructed entirely of brick, masonry, or other
like material consistent with the exterior finish
of the primary structure. It should also be at
least 6 feet in height. Wood is a high
maintenance material and therefore is not
recommended for screening walls.
Construction of such a wall would typically be a
responsibility of the nonresidential land use
developer. If a retaining wall is located on the
property line, the screening wall should be
located on top of the retaining wall to maximize
visual screening.
In addition to screening
residential areas from non-
residential areas, screening and
buffering techniques should also
be used to protect the visual
realm from unwanted eyesores
such as:
o Trash receptacles
o Utility Boxes
o Commercial loading docks
o Expansive parking lots
A variety of screening uses may be
utilized including masonry or brick
walls, shrubs, trees and landscape
berms, among others.
52
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Open Space Preservation
A common theme expressed by CPAC members
and Town Hall attendees was the need to
preserve open space within Prosper. Many
residents have chosen to live in Prosper due to
its quiet, rural feel and abundant open spaces.
Prosper is located along a prime development
corridor and therefore significant pressure will
be placed on land owners to sell property and
existing open spaces for development in the
future. Therefore, in order to preserve open
space within the community, Prosper may
consider the following options.
Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) is a
program that enables the community, or a land
trust, to purchase the development rights from
a landowner. Essentially, the municipality or
trust would purchase the difference between
the appraised and market value (what a
developer would pay for purchase of the
property) in exchange for the landowner not
developing the land. The landowner can
continue to use the land as farmland or open
space. Once an agreement is reached, the land
may not be subdivided or developed. In the
future, the property owner may sell the land at
the appraised value, but the restrictions on
development remain. One advantage to PDR is
the preservation of open space and the
continued ownership of land by the property
owner. The disadvantage is such land remains
under the control of the landowner, even after
development rights have been purchased, and
therefore is not public space. Only the
development rights have been purchased, not
the land itself.
Transfer of Development Rights (TDR)
While not commonly used in Texas, TDR is a
way of transferring development rights from a
transfer area, or open space, to a receiving area
(area approved for development). If, for
example, the tollway district was identified as a
receiving zone, a developer that was seeking
development greater than the approved density
for that district could purchase the
development rights from an area containing
open space and transfer that right to develop to
his/her property along the tollway. The
developer is therefore able to build at a higher
density and open space is able to be preserved
elsewhere. This increased density option would
only be allowed in areas identified as receiving
zones, not within individual neighborhoods.
Conservation Easements are another method
of preserving open space. Conservation
easements are initiated by the land owner in an
attempt to protect their property from future
development. In its publication Conservation
Easements: A Guide for Texas Landowners, The
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department outlines
many of the advantages of conservation
easements, including tax benefits. Typically, a
property owner voluntarily creates an
agreement with a municipality or county that
limits development on the landowner’s
property. In a conservation easement, the
landowner will limit their right to one or more
of the following: right to manage resources,
change use, subdivide or develop. Conservation
easements ensure that a farm, ranch, estate or
open space area is preserved from
development pressures in the future. The
advantage to conservation easements is that
land is preserved indefinitely and such
easements may be sold or donated to land
trusts for significant tax credits. The
disadvantage is that the landowner receives no
monetary reimbursement for not developing,
such as in the purchase of development rights
scenario, other than tax credits.
Parks Plan
The Town of Prosper currently has a park
dedication ordinance that requires 1 acre of
park dedication for every 35 units or 5% of total
land. The system of parks and trails established
by the 2007 Parks Master Plan is the most
significant way open space can be preserved
within Prosper. Park land dedication should be
guided by the adopted Parks Plan.
53 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Social Interaction
The term community naturally implies the
congregation and interaction of people.
Residents identified that one of the defining
features of Prosper were its residents and the
sense of community that exists within the
Town.
As the Town continues to grow, a sense of
community will continue to be an important
characteristic of the Town. With a larger
population, the built environment will need to
provide spaces and opportunities for residents
to meet, congregate, interact and enjoy life.
Creating such venues will help foster a sense of
community among residents and will create
family environments where interaction begets
new friendships.
An amphitheater was seen as a potential
opportunity to host Town events. This
Amphitheater, when combined with a larger
open space/park area, could serve as a central
location for Town festivals and events.
In addition to a community garden, many
communities in North Texas have begun to offer
farmers markets, encouraging local growers to
bring in fresh produce for residents to purchase.
The number of farmers markets has increased
17% from 2010 to 2011, with the second largest
growth occurring in Texas at 38% (US
Department of Agriculture – Agricultural
Marketing Service news release, Aug 5, 2011).
Farmers markets and community gardens can
also be beneficial in supporting the local
economy and encouraging social interaction.
The creation of the Town Center and other
mixed uses will also help to create additional
places for Prosper residents to interact and
socialize with other families by creating
opportunities for retail shopping and dining.
54
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Corridors and Districts
Preston Road
A major component of the visioning exercises pertained to the three major corridors in Prosper:
Preston Road, Dallas North Tollway and Highway 380. The following discussions on each corridor
are a result of the visioning exercises and feedback received from the comprehensive plan
advisory committee and the general public.
Land Use
Preston Road was described by numerous residents as “our road.”
Traversing the center of the community, Preston Road will have a
variety of land uses and will have a varying context. In the
southern portion of Prosper, Preston Road will accommodate
higher degrees of traffic, particularly as it traverses the Town
Center. Retail, office and some medium density residential will be
located along Preston Road on the southern end of the Town,
gradually becoming more residential in nature as it moves north.
Small scale office and retail may be located in certain areas along
Preston Road and these should be the types of uses which service
adjacent neighborhoods. Big box uses, mid-rise development, and
more intense land uses were generally not viewed as favorable as
small-scale retail and office uses. Residents identified an upscale
grocery store, such as a Central Market or a Whole Foods, as one
of their top priorities along Preston Road.
Character
The character of Preston Road should be more rural in nature,
respecting the small-town character of the community. Large,
heavily landscaped setbacks should be prevalent along the
roadway helping to differentiate Prosper from Frisco while
also providing a natural sense of calm for Prosper residents.
Wide setbacks are particularly important as the roadway
traverses residential areas generally north of First Street.
Areas of retail should be designed to the highest level of
quality and architectural characteristics within individual
developments should follow a theme consistent with recently
completed development. Residents felt that retail areas
should be organized in a nodal nature rather than in a strip
center fashion in order to prevent the entire roadway
frontage from being consumed by retail. Unanchored, stand-
alone retail establishments should be discouraged in favor of
a nodal shopping center development.
55 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Dallas North Tollway
Land Use
Unlike Preston Road, regional development pressures will
likely be placed along the Dallas North Tollway. Feedback
received from the public indicated that more intense uses
would be appropriate along the corridor. Types of uses that
scored relatively well included mid-rise office buildings,
mixed-use development and corporate office parks, among
others. Generally speaking, the DNT corridor will contain
land uses that support a more regional context and will likely
include office space, retail uses and business parks. High
density residential is appropriate within the DNT corridor.
Mixed-use lofts/apartments are the preferred style of high
density residential within this district. Images depicting big
box retail, auto sales centers and commercial services, such
as self-storage facilities, scored the lowest along the Dallas
North Tollway.
Character
The character of the Dallas North Tollway will be significantly
more intense than the rest of the Town. The most intense
development will be located in the southern portion of the
corridor, primary around the interchange of the Dallas North
Tollway and Highway 380. Development in the Northeast
corner of this intersection will likely be a continuation of the
Town Center district, much in the same way office uses
surround Legacy Town Center in Plano. Areas on the
Northwest corner of the interchange are currently identified as
mixed-use. A mixture of office, retail and medium to high
density residential will likely develop within this area.
Floodplain on the north side of the Northwest corner will serve
as a buffer between the more intense development and the
low density residential neighborhoods to the north. Intensity
of development should gradually decrease on the north side of
the Dallas North Tollway corridor and backage roads will help
to facilitate the creation of pad sites that may buffer the
Tollway from residential uses.
56
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Highway 380
Land Use
Of the three major corridors, Highway 380 contains the
longest stretch of potential development. Generally
speaking, land uses along the Highway 380 Corridor were
seen to be more commercial in nature. Unlike Preston Road
and the Dallas North Tollway, big-box retail scored relatively
well along Highway 380, in addition to office, hotel uses,
retail centers and service uses, such as a gas station and fast
food restaurant. Similar to the other categories, industrial
uses, including warehouses, were not seen as a highly
appropriate use along the Highway 380 corridor. Due to the
length of the corridor, a variety of land uses will be located
along the corridor. Typically speaking, retail and service
establishments will locate adjacent to Highway 380 and
along major intersections, in a nodal pattern of activity.
Such uses capitalize on higher traffic counts and require a
higher degree of visibility. Big box uses may also be located
along the corridor, but pad sites should be located adjacent
to Highway 380 to capitalize on visibility and pass-by trips.
Residential uses, such as patio homes, snout homes and
townhomes and brownstones may be located within this
district. Such uses will likely be used as a buffer between
more intense uses along Highway 380 and lower intensity
residential neighborhoods to the north. Such uses may also
be located mid-block, reserving major intersections for retail
and commercial uses.
Character
The character of Highway 380 will be much more
commercial in nature. Wide setbacks with large
landscape buffering will protect the visual appearance of
the corridor, while still allowing more intense
commercial land uses to operate. Big Box retailers may
be permitted, but they should be designed to the highest
possible quality, incorporating significant landscaping,
high quality materials, such as stone and brick, and
should contain architectural enhancements and building
articulation.
Medium and high density residential options may be
included within the Highway 380 corridor but such uses
should be carefully designed to protect, enhance and
buffer low density neighborhoods to the north from
more intense development along Highway 380.
57 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Old Town
The Old Town area of Prosper is, in many ways, the heart and soul of the community. As the Town
continues to experience rapid growth, it is this core and center than can serve as an identifying
feature of the Town and can also serve to showcase Prosper’s humble beginnings. Many
communities in the Dallas/Fort Worth metropolitan area have used their downtowns as an
identifying feature. Prosper residents have identified the significance of the downtown area and
have indicated its potential role in the future of the community.
Coleman Road serves as a divider between residential uses to the east and non-residential uses to
the west. The western side of Coleman will be the primary area of focus for redevelopment and
infill. The Old Town district indicates that commercial, office, retail and single family uses will be
permitted within the district. It is anticipated that many single family dwelling units along First
Street and Broadway will gradually convert to boutique retail and cottage office uses, requiring
flexibility in land use decisions as these areas transition over time.
Coleman, Broadway and First Street will serve as the primary corridors within the downtown area.
Special attention to context sensitivity should be given to these roadways as they move from newer
areas into the downtown. Parallel and head-in parking will likely be included along with pedestrian
walkways and streetscape enhancements.
If a transit station is built at First Street and the BNSF railroad, higher density residential options
should be permitted near the station. Currently, only studio apartments are permitted within the
Old Town district. High density residential options, such as vertical mixed-use development,
townhomes and brownstones should be considered within close proximity of the transit station.
Locating high-density residential within 1/4 mile of the transit station will help ensure long term
viability and effectiveness of transit and will ensure that Prosper’s transit station is more than simply
a “park-and-ride.”
All future development should be consistent in theme, possibly emphasizing an “old downtown” feel
consistent with Texas downtowns at the turn of the 20th century. Lewisville, McKinney and Plano are
examples of successful downtown rehabilitation projects which project such an image.
58
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Old Town Transportation Plan
Section A: Four lane divided roadway with a landscaped median
and a landscaped parkway separating pedestrians from traffic.
This section serves as a major entrance into Old Town from the
east. No on-street parking.
Section B: Two lane divided boulevard with a large center median
containing landscaping. Wide travel lanes allow for bicycle
accommodation and a landscaped parkway separates pedestrians
from traffic. No on-street parking.
Section C: Two lane divided boulevard with a large center median
containing landscaping. On-street parallel parking is permitted and
a landscaped parkway separates pedestrians from traffic.
Section D: Two lane undivided urban roadway. Wide 20’ sidewalks
accommodate patio seating, pedestrian traffic and street trees.
On-street angled parking is permitted and bulb-outs are located at
intersections to enhance pedestrian visibility at crosswalks.
Section E: Two lane undivided roadway with on-street parallel
parking and an immediately adjacent 8’ sidewalk. A large private
setback of 25’ is included.
Section F: Two lane undivided roadway with on-street parallel
parking and a 15’ sidewalk. 10’ of the sidewalk will be located
within the right-of-way and the additional 5 feet will be a 5’
setback to building face.
Section G: Two lane divided roadway with a center median
containing landscaping. On-street parallel parking and a 10’
sidewalk are included.
Land Use
The predominant land use within Old Town will be single-family
residential. All infill development within such areas should conform to the
architectural guidelines established for the Old Town district. Such
guidelines are created to protect the continuity of look and feel within Old
Town.
Along Broadway and First Street, single-family uses will gradually
transition to boutique, cottage-style office and/or specialty retail uses.
Broadway west of Coleman, will be the retail core of the downtown.
Shops, restaurants, and small office uses may be located within the main
street retail area. This area is intended to be the heart and main activity
center of the Old Town Area. As redevelopment occurs, building
frontages should be brought to the property line to be consistent with
ultimate streetscape improvements.
Adjacent to the retail core, a mixed-use district incorporating mixed use
lofts/apartments will serve as a buffer between the Business Park and the
core of Old Town. This area will also provide rooftops that service
adjacent retail establishments.
The Green space area will serve as a community park and its location
adjacent to the retail core of Old Town and the mixed-use district will
make it an opportunistic and useable open space area.
Niche retail is recommended along Preston Road and at the northern end
of Coleman. Retail development within these areas should fit within the
architectural framework of the Old Town area. Setbacks should be
reduced, when possible, along Coleman and Broadway to frame the
roadways.
61 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Image Enhancement
Prosper is a unique community. Many who
have moved to the Town express their diverse
reasons for relocating to Prosper. Reasons
include its excellent school system, its wide
open spaces, its large lot homes, its friendly
neighbors and rural setting with access to the
Town, among others. This section seeks to
define some of those attributes and using these
attributes to establish a recognizable image for
the community’s built environment.
Branding
Community branding is the concept of establishing an identity and
then working to ensure that the desired identity is reflected and
portrayed in the built environment. In Prosper, residents have
clearly identified that the rural, open spaces of the community are a
defining feature of Prosper, particularly defining when compared
with other North Dallas suburbs such as Frisco, Plano, McKinney and
Little Elm.
Residents identified that a common perception and image of
Prosper to outsiders is an upscale, rural community with open
spaces and large-lot homes. Despite the current availability of open
spaces and agricultural land, the Town will continue to grow and
develop. As the community grows, however, development
standards may reflect certain architectural characteristics that may
be unique to Prosper, helping to visually distinguish the Town from
adjacent communities, particularly its retail centers. Additionally,
setbacks and landscaping may be used along major corridors to
create a more rural atmosphere, even as the Town develops. Large
setbacks and medians may be heavily landscaped with trees, shrubs
and other natural elements. As trees grow and mature, the
presence of a dense tree canopy will help to create a more natural
feel within the community. Additionally, the Town may reduce the
amount of internal lighting to mitigate light pollution and enhance
dark skies, further enhancing the rural feel.
The Town’s extensive Parks Plan, as it is implemented, will also
significantly help to create and preserve open spaces and will
contribute significantly to the Town’s quality of life by providing
outdoor recreational opportunities.
As development occurs, all new development should not only meet
the development standards of the community, but should also be
analyzed based upon how they will contribute to the image and
branding of the community based upon Prosper’s vision, goals and
values.
62
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Gateways
The visual monotony that is often inherent to
communities within a particular geographic
area makes it appear that each one is just like
its neighbors. For example, the visual
appearance of a community to a traveler along
the Dallas North Tollway may be very similar to
the appearance of any other nearby
community. This lack of design variety,
especially along major corridors, tends to create
anonymity, and it becomes difficult for people
to know when they have left one community
and entered another. Gateways can provide a
strong sense of arrival to, as well as a sense of
departure from, the community. These features
are the first thing visitors see when they arrive
and the last impression visitors have when they
leave.
The design of gateways into the Town of
Prosper should be guided by several factors.
One of the most obvious factors is the number
of people using a particular entry point. The
most heavily traveled the roadway entering the
community will be the Dallas North Tollway.
Although it may be difficult to create an
aesthetically-pleasing gateway visible from the
highway, the bridges and the frontage roads are
alternate options. Improved overpasses with
decorative rails, landscaping, lighting, and
possibly signage are possibilities. In addition,
two entry features for the Town placed directly
along the Dallas North Tollway frontage roads,
both leading into and out of the community
(i.e., at the northern and southern corporate
limits) would be a positive step in creating a
visual identity once the Tollway is constructed.
Gateways could include the use of signage,
landscaping, and other design elements such as
lighting, fencing, paving patterns, art/sculptural
elements, a variety of earth forms, or other
identifier that signifies arrival into the Town.
Another important factor in the design of
gateways is to develop an entryway that
provides a sense of identity for the community
while projecting a desirable image for the Town.
For example, the windmill is a component of
the Prosper logo and may be used as a
component of Town gateways, if so desired by
the community. The windmill feature is a
strong representation of who Prosper is –it
identifies the Town’s humble beginnings as a
small agrarian town and also highlights and
reflects many of the Town’s values such as large
lots, open spaces and rural, small town feel.
Consideration should be given to establishing a
uniform design concept for all gateway areas,
and hierarchical distinction between major and
minor gateways can be achieved through design
modification for each type of entry feature.
Minor gateways could be specific to the
individual neighborhood, reflecting the distinct
character of each area.
Design of entry features should take into
consideration the setting in which each feature
will be placed. Although an entry feature might
ideally be placed at the corner of a roadway
intersection which is at, or near, the true Town
limits, the design of the feature might conflict
either visually or aesthetically with an adjacent
retail use at the intersection. In such a
situation, it may be prudent to move the entry
feature further into the community to provide a
better setting and better visibility, such as
placing it upon the thoroughfare median, if
there is one. The traffic speed at which an entry
feature is viewed must also be taken into
account, and the size, boldness and scale of the
feature should be designed accordingly.
It is important for the Town of Prosper to assert
its differing qualities to distinguish itself from
the surrounding communities. Gateway
features are a simple first step in this direction.
Priority for funding entry features, both in
terms of total dollars spent per entry and in
terms of the timing of expenditures, should be
directly related to the number of people using a
particular entry point. Often, donations can be
solicited from civic groups to assist in the
funding of specific gateways and/or their
maintenance (e.g., an "adopt a gateway"
program).
63 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Gateway size and design should consider traffic,
traffic speeds land use context. In Prosper,
primary gateways will be located along the
Dallas North Tollway, Highway 380, Preston
Road and the “corners” along the Town’s
perimeters. Secondary gateways may be
located along Coit, Legacy, Teel, Lovers Lane,
Gee and other minor entrances into Prosper.
Gateways take a wide variety of shapes, sizes
and forms. They may be very large, such as the
Frisco gateway at SH 121 and the Dallas North
Tollway, or they may be small. Some logos
include the community logo, others incorporate
art or design that is reflective of the
community’s values and history.
Prosper may desire to use the windmill as a
design element within its future gateways. The
windmill is a symbol that is reflective of the
Town’s history and past and is currently a
component of the Town’s logo. The design of the
Town’s gateways should be consistent in theme
and should help to identify Prosper to visitors as
well as welcome residents home.
64
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
Maintaining compatibility between
the Zoning Map and the Future Land
Use Plan
Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government
Code states that “zoning regulations must be
adopted in accordance with a comprehensive
plan.” Consequently, a zoning map and zoning
decisions should reflect the Future Land Use
Plan to the fullest extent possible. Therefore,
approval of development proposals that are
inconsistent with the Future Land Use Plan will
often result in inconsistency between the
Future Land Use Plan and the zoning
regulations.
At times, the Town will likely encounter
development proposals that do not directly
reflect the purpose and intent of the land use
pattern as shown on the Future Land Use Plan
map. Review of such development proposals
should include the following considerations:
Will the proposed change enhance the
site and the surrounding area?
Is the proposed change a better use
than that originally envisioned and
depicted on the Future Land Use Plan
map?
Will the proposed use impact adjacent
residential areas in a negative manner?
Will the proposed use be compatible
with and/or enhance adjacent
residential uses?
Are uses adjacent to the proposed use
similar in nature in terms of
appearance, hours of operation, and
other general aspects of compatibility?
Does the proposed use present a
significant benefit to the public health,
safety, welfare and/or social well-being
of the community?
Would it contribute to the Town’s long-
term economic stability?
Development proposals that are inconsistent
with the Future Land Use Plan map (or that do
not meet its general intent) should be reviewed
based upon the above questions and should be
evaluated on their own merit. It should be
incumbent upon the applicant making such a
proposal to provide evidence that the proposal
meets the aforementioned considerations,
supports community goals and objectives as set
forth within this Plan, and represents long term
economic and/or social benefits for the
community as a whole, not just a short-term
financial gain for whoever is developing the
project.
It is important to recognize that proposals not
directly consistent with the Plan could reflect
higher and better long-term uses than those
originally envisioned and shown on the Future
Land Use Plan map for a particular area. This
may be due to changing markets, demographics
and/or economic trends that occur at some
point in the future after the Plan is adopted. If
such changes occur, and especially if there are
demonstrated significant social and/or
economic benefits to the Town of Prosper, then
these proposals should be approved and the
Future Land Use Plan map should be amended
accordingly.
65 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The thoroughfare system forms one of the most
visible and permanent elements of a
community. It establishes the framework for
community growth and development and, along
with the Future Land Use Plan, forms a long-
range statement of public policy. As the
alignment and right-of-way of major
transportation facilities are established and
adjacent property developed, it is difficult to
facilitate system changes without significant
financial impacts. However, by incorporating
programmed land uses and densities of the
Future Land Use Plan, strategies can be
developed that maximize the land
use/transportation relationship.
Several key principles were recognized in the
preparation of Plan recommendations and
included the following:
• Prosper should have safe and
convenient internal circulation between
neighborhoods, core community assets,
and special areas.
• Transportation facilities should define
rather than split residential areas in
order to preserve neighborhood
integrity. Through traffic should be
routed to specific facilities designed to
accommodate non-local and regional
traffic.
• A sidewalk and trail system connecting
Prosper’s amenities and parks with
neighborhoods should be available.
• Key corridors and gateways should
include enhanced landscaping to
promote image/identity.
• Monitor regional growth implications in
order to proactively address mobility
and accessibility issues to/from the
Town.
66
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
TRANSPORTATION
Planning Context
2010 Thoroughfare Plan
Updated in July 2010, the Prosper Thoroughfare
Plan established a traditional grid network of
streets with connectivity of major roadways to
key streets in adjacent communities. Key to this
plan is the identification of strategic corridors
for accommodating local and long-term regional
travel demand. As regional growth is rapidly
moving northward through Collin County,
several key roadway facilities have been
identified for accommodating future cross-town
movement while others are aimed at
accommodating localized traffic.
Key north-south and east-west roadways (up to
six-lane) include Dallas North Tollway (DNT),
Preston Road (SH 289), Custer, Coit, Legacy,
Teel, FM1385/Gee Road, Highway 380 and FM
1464 Frontier Parkway/Parvin Road. Several
other east-west roadways are aimed at
accommodating localized traffic on smaller
sized streets (up to four-lane divided) and
include Prosper Trail, First Street/Fishtrap, and
Lovers Lane.
The Plan also established special roadway
considerations for Old Town, Town Center area,
backage roads along DNT and portions of
Highway 380.
The roadway network established in the 2010
Thoroughfare Plan is a departure from the
“modified hub and spoke” concept established
as part of the 2004 Comprehensive Plan. That
concept was aimed at localizing traffic from
within the community to desired hubs of
development situated within the Town. While
not dissimilar in nature to the grid network, the
plan also included an internal loop road, couplet
streets and connection points for development
support along DNT.
Other Planning Initiatives
NCTCOG Planning
The Regional Thoroughfare Plan (RTP) and the
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) are
both important to consider when making
decisions locally. Coordination of planning
efforts may help accelerate funding sources and
ultimately help to ensure that roadways at a
regional level are functional and compatible.
The North Central Texas Council of
Governments (NCTCOG) is responsible for
creating both the RTP and the MTP—both are
directly related to the ability of the region to
compete nationally for federal transportation
funds. It is important that the Town monitor
both the RTP and the MTP and communicate
any changes in order to ensure that plans within
Prosper are understood by other agencies and
reflected accordingly.
2010 Prosper Thoroughfare Plan
67 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
TRANSPORTATION
Collin County Transportation Plan
In 1999, Collin County adopted the first
Transportation Mobility Plan aimed at
coordinating regional roadway
improvements among the
various municipalities and
agencies to address long-term
County growth needs and
capital improvements
planning. Subsequently
updated in 2003 and 2007,
Collin County is currently in the
process of initiating the next
generational update slated for
2012.
Within the Town, the 2007
County Plan contains some
differences relative to the
Prosper Thoroughfare Plan
including:
• Prosper Trail as a six-lane
divided (Plan has four
lanes)
• First Street as a six-lane
divided (Plan has four lanes)
• Extension of Independence Parkway
north of US380 to First Street (not on
Plan)
• Extension of La Cima beyond north First
Street to Frontier Parkway (not on Plan)
As the update to the 2012 Mobility Plan is
developed, it is recommended that Prosper’s
Thoroughfare Plan elements be conveyed to
County planners for inclusion into their plan.
The County Plan also contains the northeastern
section of the planned Dallas-Ft. Worth
Regional Outer Loop. Currently, only a portion
of this corridor, from Dallas North Tollway to SH
5, remains in the NCTCOG Metropolitan
Transportation Plan: Mobility 2035 as viable
due to financial funding constraints. While not
a direct impact to Prosper, a long-term benefit
of this improvement is the potential reduction
in north/south travel on surface streets in favor
of highway access on the DNT.
Area Transportation Service
A topic identified early in the planning process
was a desire to provide shuttle service for
seniors within Prosper. Collin County Area
Regional Transit (CCART) currently provides
transit services in Collin County, including on-
call/demand response. This service provided by
the County can be utilized by seniors, or other
Town residents, when there is a need for
transportation assistance.
CCART operates Monday through Friday with
service from 6am to 6pm. Advanced
reservations also can be made from 6am to
6pm.
2007 Collin County Transportation Plan
68
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
TRANSPORTATION
Highway Improvements
Plans are underway for improvements to key
highway corridors within Prosper. The
following summarizes activity on Preston Road
(SH 289), US 380 and the DNT:
• Preston Road (SH 289) Overpass at
Highway 380: Construction is underway to
expand this overpass from two to six-lane
lane divided. Work on this project began in
March 2011 and is slated for completion in
September 2012.
• Preston Road (SH 289): Preston Road will
be expanded from two to six-lane divided
between Highway 380 and
FM1461/Frontier Parkway. Construction is
set to begin in the first quarter 2012 with
completion targeted for first quarter 2014.
All major crossings with Preston will be at-
grade.
• Highway 380: TXDOT is currently
developing schematic plans to expand this
facility from 4/5 lanes to six-lanes between
Custer Road and the Collin County line.
Between Lovers Lane, both east of Preston
and west of DNT, a differing roadway
section is being planned and will contain
grade separated main lanes at Preston and
DNT and frontage roads. The Highway 380
frontage roads will intersect with frontage
roads of DNT and Preston will be similar to
the SH 121/DNT/Preston interchange (three
level interchange). This 2-3 year project is
slated to begin early 2014 with completion
in 2016 or early 2017. Within the Denton
County portion of Highway 380, there are
no current plans for expansion at this time.
• Dallas North Tollway: Currently, no timing
has been established for the
implementation of the adjoining frontage
road or extension of main lanes to FM 428
in Celina. The Town is working with the
County to potentially initiate the
implementation of the southbound
frontage road between Highway 380 and
Frontier Parkway, however no plans have
been finalized at this time. Grade
separations are envisioned at Lovers Lane,
First Street, Prosper Trail and Frontier
Parkway.
Regional Rail
In 2005, NCTCOG initially examined the
feasibility of long-term regional rail service to
various areas of the Metroplex. Within the
Prosper area, analysis of regional rail extended
only through Frisco. The Frisco Line, a 34.3 mile
line extending from Irving to just south of
Highway 380 in Frisco, was considered in the
study. Evaluations considered long-term
population and employment growth, existing
rail corridors and compatibility with other
freight operations, projected rider-ship, capital
and operations/maintenance costs, system
connectivity, among others in the analysis. A
potential station location within Prosper is the
BNSF Railroad at First Street within the Old
Town district.
The analysis concluded with a rider-ship
forecast of 1,000 to 3,000 persons daily at the
far northern end of the line in Frisco, and was
initially recommended for inclusion to Mobility
2030 as a corridor for further evaluation. While
no funding has been identified at this time, this
line has been recommended for long-term
consideration in Mobility 2035.
Mobility 2035 has also identified the
consideration of this rail line through Prosper to
the northern county limit as a “corridor for
future evaluation”.
69 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
TRANSPORTATION
Existing Conditions
An analysis of existing traffic volume was
conducted to identify travel patterns and serve
as a basis for identifying roadway needs. Traffic
volume data collected in April 2010 as part of
the roadway impact fee system update was
used to conduct a level of service analysis. Data
collected as part of that study effort contained
PM peak hour directional volume—roadway
capacity values based on roadway functional
class and existing street cross-section.
“Level of service” refers to the operation
condition of a roadway segment under traffic
demand and is a calculation of volume to
capacity. Level of service is gauged with a
measure of “A” through “F”, with “A” reflecting
roadways with free flow and little or no
congestion, and “F” reflecting roadways with
severe congestion. The analysis revealed that
the majority of roadways in Prosper appear to
be operating at acceptable levels of service
(A/B/C). The exceptions were Highway 380,
Preston Road and portions of Coit and Custer
Road north of Highway 380 during the peak
hour—these segments were calculated to
operate at or below acceptable levels of service
(LOS D and E/F). Planned expansion to Highway
380 and Preston should alleviate traffic
demands currently experienced. While peak
volumes are relatively low on Coit and Custer
Roads, the narrow roadway sections contribute
to the reduction in operational service.
Projected Conditions
The assessment of projected travel conditions
on the thoroughfare network is important to
determining the capability of the roadway
system to accommodate projected area growth
and roadway needs for a 20-year planning
period.
Two approaches were used to assess projected
travel demand conditions for a 20-year horizon.
The first approach involved review of travel
model forecasts prepared by NCTCOG as part of
Mobility 2035. The second approach involved
development of travel demand characteristics
based on remaining developable land within
Prosper and then assignment of projected
growth on this remaining developable land to
the adjacent road network to yield roadway
needs.
Existing Traffic Volume and Level of Service Analysis
70
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
TRANSPORTATION
Projected Traffic Conditions
The Thoroughfare Plan network was compared
to travel forecasts prepared by NCTCOG in
order to assess its ability to accommodate
traffic from future land uses within the Town.
Regional travel forecast data from Mobility
2035: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for
North Central Texas was used as a basis for the
comparison. This sophisticated model forecasts
traffic demand on the regional transportation
network relative to projected population and
employment growth for year 2035.
Projected 2035 traffic volumes for key
roadways include:
• Preston Road – 53,000
• Highway 380 – 65,000
• Custer Road – 36,000
• Coit Road – 7,000
• Frontier Parkway – 20,000
• FM 1385—34,000
It is important to note that assumptions are
made with respect to the amount of roadway
network in place for Year 2035. For example,
with Coit Road not included to its ultimate
configuration (6-lane), travel demand shifts
occur to roadways offering availability of higher
capacity. This partly explains the higher
volumes that resulted on Preston Road. With
Coit Road fully in place, localized traffic would
shift from away Preston Road.
Under the Mobility 2035 forecast (and network
assumptions contained within), all roads within
Prosper are forecasted to operate at acceptable
levels-of-service with the exception of Preston
Road and Highway 380, which is anticipated to
experience very high travel demand.
Thoroughfare Plan Compatibility
A screen line analysis was conducted to
compare projected volume relative to capacity
provided by the Thoroughfare Plan network at
its ultimate configuration. Separate screens
were used to segregate north-south from east-
west demand, as well as demands east and
west of the Dallas North Tollway. Adjustments
were made for factor up travel demands
commensurate with a population of 60,000
within Prosper in 2035, based upon the 8%
growth projection.
The analysis revealed the Thoroughfare Plan to
have sufficient capacity at ultimate
configuration to accommodate projected
demands at year 2035. A sensitivity analysis
was then conducted to assess network impacts
with select roadways not to full buildout.
Specifically, the north-south thoroughfares of
Teel Parkway, Legacy Drive, and Coit Road were
evaluated under a 4-lane scenario (all other
Major Thoroughfares to 6-lane). The analysis
revealed sufficient capacity of the network to
be available at 2035. While ultimately, these
specific roadways may need to be built to six
lanes, a phased approach to facility
implementation could be undertaken.
71 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
TRANSPORTATION
Planning Principles
Prosper’s Thoroughfare Plan is built upon
traditional thoroughfare planning concepts,
which focuses on a functional roadway network
providing mobility and accessibility to vehicular
traffic. In order to address the community’s
goals of providing multi-modal options to
residents, such as sidewalks and trails for
walking and biking, it will be important to
incorporate the trail system from the recently
completed Parks Plan. Together, these
components offer a range of mode choices from
which residents move about the community.
Functional Street Classification
Functional street classification recognizes that
streets are part of a system having diverse
origins and destinations. Functional
classifications also describe and reflect a set of
characteristics common to all roadways within
each class. Functions range from providing
mobility for through traffic and major traffic
flows, to providing access to specific properties.
Characteristics unique to each classification
include the degree of continuity, general
capacity, and traffic control characteristics.
In short, the functional classification of streets
provides for the circulation of traffic in a
hierarchy of movement from one classification
to the next. Functional classes can be
subdivided further into major and minor
designations to further detail their role in the
community.
Access and movement functions are directly
related in that as uninhibited movement
increases (speed), points of access decrease and
vice versa. This is typically why freeways, with a
high level of movement, have limited access
points where as streets in neighborhood areas
have more access points and reduced speed.
Proper’s current Thoroughfare Plan recognizes
four general classifications for roadways based
upon a hierarchical function and include:
• Major Thoroughfare: 6-lane divided
roadway within 120’ ROW. These streets
are designed to provide a high degree of
mobility, service relatively high traffic
volumes, have high operational speeds,
and service a significant portion of
through travel.
• Minor Thoroughfare: 4-lane divided
roadway with a similar function to the
Major Thoroughfare, but more local in
nature. The urban section is a curbed
roadway within 90‘ROW.
• Commercial Collector: 2 and 3-lane
undivided roadway serving as connections
between arterials and local streets. The
2-lane section consists of 36’ of pavement
within a 60’ROW. This section is also
aimed at serving residential applications.
The 3-lane section contains a continuous
left-turn bay and on-street parking within
a 60’ROW and is used for handling
commercial applications.
• Neighborhood Street: 2-lane streets for
accommodating neighborhood traffic. An
urban and rural section are both
contained within a 50’ ROW. The urban
section is curbed with 31’ of pavement
and the rural section contains 27’ of
pavement.
Major Arterial
Major ArterialCollector Minor ArterialCollectorMajor Arterial
Major ArterialCollector Minor ArterialCollector
72
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
TRANSPORTATION
Type of Roadway Function Spacing (Miles) Direct Land Access Roadway Intersection Spacing (3) Volume Ranges (Veh./Day) Speed Limit (MPH) Parking Comments Highway/ Tollway Traffic Movement;
long distance travel. 1-5 Provided by
on/off ramping
schematics to
continuous
frontage roads.
1 mile 45,000 to
125,000 55-70 None Supplements
capacity of
arterial street
system and
provides high
speed mobility. Major Thoroughfare Moderate distance
inter-community,
intra-metro area,
traffic movement.
Serves long trip
lengths. ½ -1 ½ (2) Restricted –
some
movements
may be
prohibited;
number and
spacing of
driveways
controlled.
1/4 mile
36,000 to
45,000 40-55
“Backbone” of
the street
system. Minor Thoroughfare Mobility function is
primary; access
function is
secondary. Serves
moderate trip
lengths.
May be limited
to major
generators;
number and
spacing of
driveways
controlled.
1/8 mile
20,000 to
28,000 30-45
Provides route
and spacing
continuity with
major arterials. Commercial Collector Primary – collect /
distribute traffic
between local
streets and arterial
system. Serves
commercial/ mixed
use development;
inter-neighborhood
traffic movement. ¼ -½ (2) Safety
controls;
limited
regulation.
300 feet 12,000 to
18,000 30-40 Permitted Through traffic
should be
discouraged. Residential Collector Primary – internal
to one
neighborhood;
serves short trip
lengths. Provides
land access.
300 feet 6,000 to
12,000 30-35 Permitted Neighborhood Street Land access. 2 lot lengths Safety control
only. 125 feet 200 to
1,500 25-30 Permitted (1) Spacing determination should also include consideration of (travel within the area or corridor based upon) ultimate antic ipated development.
(2) Denser spacing needed for commercial and high-density residential districts.
(3) Spacing and intersection design should be in accordance with state and local thoroughfare standards.
Figure 7: Functional Street Classifications
73 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
TRANSPORTATION
Access Coordination
Flow of traffic is typically a major concern for
most communities. The ability to move
traffic efficiently along a corridor with
minimal interference from traffic turning off
and onto intersecting driveways/streets is a
major benefit to motorists. Ideally, traffic
should be able to avoid unnecessary “stop-
and-go” traffic due to the abundance of
intersecting driveways/ streets. While the
implementation of deceleration lanes for
streets and driveways on major and minor
thoroughfares enhances capacity and
accessibility, promotion of access
management offers added benefits for the
following reasons:
1) Reduces the number of ingress and
egress points improving vehicular flow
and reducing collisions;
2) Reduced driveways permit more
landscaping frontage thereby
enhancing roadway aesthetics; and
3) Reducing the number of driveways
enhances the pedestrian experience by
reducing pedestrian contact with
turning traffic.
Along key corridors, the concept of access
coordination can be extended from individual
sites to address corridor-wide segments.
Master planning at a corridor scale enables:
• Coordination of transportation and land
use planning/decision making;
• Allows for flexible and special area
consideration to adjacent site
development, special access and utilities
coordination, and limits unnecessary
connection points;
• Economic benefits, aesthetics and
amenity considerations; and
• Promotes activity-based development
centers, not strip retail.
In larger corridors, the implementation of
backage roads further helps to support main
road safety and operations, internal and
external site accessibility, and quality
development patterns and design.
Shared Access and Cross Access
Reducing the number of driveways enhances
corridor landscaping and aesthetics
74
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
TRANSPORTATION
2007 Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Master Plan
A component in providing mobility choice is
contained within the recently completed Parks
Plan. The incorporated trail system is
particularly important to mobility choice due to
the connective nature that they serve from
both within the community and the region—
they may connect neighborhoods, schools,
retail areas, recreational facilities and other
core community or regional assets. Community
trails are able to be utilized by residents for
walking, jogging, biking and other recreational
activities. Although intangible, trails have the
ability to significantly improve the quality of life
within the community by creating recreational
options for residents and therefore serve a
multitude of purposes beyond simply
connectivity. It is important that elements of
the Parks Plan be considered as new
development occurs.
The completed Parks Plan incorporates trails
along several major roadways within the Town
such as along Prosper Trail, First Street and
Preston Road. Reflecting these trail
connections on the Thoroughfare Plan
emphasizes the significance of these trail
connections within the overall connectivity
framework.
As roadway improvements coinciding with
growth continue to occur, the Town should
work to incorporate these roadway adjacent
trail connections beginning with roadway
planning and design.
75 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
TRANSPORTATION
Transportation Plan
The Transportation element of this Plan is
intended to serve as a guide for
transportation decisions within the Town. It
was developed based upon past
transportation planning efforts, connectivity
efforts on key thoroughfares with adjacent
communities and input from the CPAC, Town
Staff and public input.
This Plan should be used as a reference when
updating the Town’s Thoroughfare Plan,
Thoroughfare and Circulation Design
Standards and any related ordinances, and
should be referred to when considering a
wide range of decisions related to both
transportation and land use. Transportation
decisions do not exist within a vacuum, but are
directly related to decisions regarding land use
and building form. Therefore, the ultimate
objective of this Plan is to create a balanced
transportation system within Prosper which
provides for the safe mobility of residents,
considers both current and future needs,
enhances connectivity and mobility options,
and promotes a more livable community
through a proactive approach to the Town’s
appearance.
The Thoroughfare Plan is reflected in Plate 3.
Street classifications were developed based
upon a number of factors including the
roadways regional significance, current or
projected traffic volumes, and land use. It is
important to note that although a roadway may
be identified as a Major Thoroughfare, the
roadway design should not be rigid, but should
consider a multitude of factors during its design
including adjacent land use and context, among
others.
Transportation
Building
Form
Land
Use
Example high-rated street design
photos from the VCS
76
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
TRANSPORTATION
kj
kj kj
kj
kj
kj
kj
kj kj kj
kj kj
kjkj
kj
Parvin Rd.F.M. 1385GeeFish Trap Rd.
U.S. 380 Dallas North TollwayProsper Trail
First St.La Cima Blvd.
Frontier Pkwy.Preston Rd.Coit Rd.F.M. 1461 F.M. 2478F.M. 2478Custer Rd.F.M. 423Teel Pkwy.Legacy Dr.Virginia Pkwy.BNSF RRS. ColemanN. ColemanLovers Ln Hays RdThoroughfare Plan
Plate 3
March 2012
0 0.5 1 1.50.25
MilesZ
Thoroughfare Description
Old Town District (Section varies)
Minor Thoroughfare (4 lane; 90' ROW)
Commercial Couplet (3 lane; 65' ROW)
Commercial Collector (2 lane; 60' ROW)
Access Roads
Dallas North Tollway
Major Thoroughfare (6 lane; 120' ROW)
Town of Prosper
ETJ
100 Year Floodplain
kj Minor Gateway
Grade Separation
RR Grade Separation
Major Gatewaykj
79 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
TRANSPORTATION
Cross Sections
High Degree of regional mobility, traffic
volumes and higher operational speeds
Connected to regional thoroughfare
facilities
Access is carefully managed
4 lane divided roadway with median
expandable to 6 lanes
Curb and gutter with underground
stormwater drainage
Examples in Prosper include Frontier
Parkway, Legacy Dr, Teel Parkway, Gee
Rd, Preston Rd, Coit Rd and Custer Rd
High degree of regional mobility, traffic
volumes and higher operational speeds
Connected to regional thoroughfare
facilities
Access is carefully managed
6 lane divided roadway with median
Curb and gutter with underground
stormwater drainage
Examples in Prosper include Frontier
Parkway, Legacy Dr, Teel Parkway, Gee
Rd, Preston Rd, Coit Rd, Custer Rd and
Highway 380
80
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
TRANSPORTATION
Cross-town mobility
Secondary to Major Thoroughfare
but still accommodate higher
operational speeds and traffic
volumes
Access is carefully managed
4 lane divided roadway with median
Examples in Prosper include Prosper
Trail, Fishtrap Rd, First Street, Lovers
Lane and La Cima Blvd
Curb and gutter drainage
Collection/distribution of traffic
Back access to Frontage Road
development
Connectivity between arterial and
residential collector streets
On-street parking permitted
81 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
TRANSPORTATION
Collection/distribution of traffic
Back access to Frontage Road
development
Connectivity to thoroughfare and
residential collector streets
On-street parking permitted
Local residential street.
Traverse internally within residential
neighborhoods
Access to properties
2 lane undivided roadway
Underground stormwater utilities
with curb and gutter
82
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
TRANSPORTATION
Local rural residential street.
Traverse internally within residential
neighborhoods
Access to properties
2 lane undivided roadway
Bar ditches for drainage(width varies
based on area calculations)
For large rural area lots over 1 acre
83 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
TRANSPORTATION
Plan Modifications
Old Town District Considerations
Roadways in this district are geared toward
retaining the historic feel of the Old Town area.
A series of two-lane streets with varying cross-
sections are aimed to support residential,
boutique/cottage style office and specialty
retail, and a mixed-use core area at Broadway
and McKinley Streets. Wide landscaped
medians, parkways and sidewalks are intended
to provide an open feel to key corridors in the
district.
Section A: Four lane divided roadway with a landscaped median and a landscaped parkway
separating pedestrians from traffic. This section serves as a major entrance into Old Town
from the east. No on-street parking.
Section B: Two lane divided roadway with a large center median containing landscaping.
Wide travel lanes allow for bicycle accommodation and a landscaped parkway separates
pedestrians from traffic. No on-street parking.
Section C: Two lane divided roadway with a large center median containing landscaping. On-
street parallel parking is permitted and a landscaped parkway separates pedestrians from
traffic.
Section D: Two lane undivided urban roadway. Wide 20’ sidewalks accommodate patio
seating, pedestrian traffic and street trees. On-street angled parking is permitted and bulb-
outs are located at intersections to enhance pedestrian visibility at crosswalks.
Section E: Two lane undivided roadway with on-street parallel parking and an immediately
adjacent 8’ sidewalk. A large private setback of 25’ is included.
Section F: Two lane undivided roadway with on-street parallel parking and a 15’ sidewalk. 10’
of the sidewalk will be located within the right-of-way and the additional 5’ will be a 5’ setback
to building face.
Section G: Two lane divided roadway with a center median containing landscaping. On-street
parallel parking and a 10’ sidewalk are included.
The following modifications to the Thoroughfare Plan were developed as part of this planning
process. These adjustments were developed based upon input received from the CPAC, Town
Staff, land programming of the Future Land Use Plan and supporting transportation analyses.
Within the mixed-use core area, wide sidewalks and on-street parking are envisioned to create a
“sense of place” and allow for street amenities and gathering area. Development setbacks would
also create opportunity for outdoor activity, dining or retail.
Gateways and intersection treatments at key intersections have been identified to define district
edge as well as tie the area together. Features for these treatments should be coordinated with
theme, look and color.
84
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
TRANSPORTATION
85 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
TRANSPORTATION
DNT Backage Roads
The thoroughfare plan calls for paralleling
system of streets to support anticipated
corridor development along the Dallas
North Tollway. Sometimes referred as
backage roads, these roads help to support
development connectivity and accessibility.
At Prosper Trail, a realignment of the
backage road east of the Tollway was
identified to avoid existing development
and retain continuity for development
opportunity to the north and south. This
realigned commercial collector would still
allow for 400-600’ lot depth for properties
along the Tollway.
Hays Road Collector
Upgrade Hays Road as a commercial
collector street to support future
commercial/retail development opportunity
along Preston Road north of First Street.
Extending from First Street, Hays should be
realigned at the north end to intersect
Preston Road at Bridgeport Drive. This
realignment would also help to reduce
intersection points along Preston Road. The
realignment of Hays at Bridgeport would
also require a realigned intersection for
Chandler Circle.
South Coleman Road
Extend and realign S. Coleman Road to intersect
with Richland Blvd. at Preston Road. In addition
to supporting development within Town Center,
this connection would also create back
access/connectivity with development
anticipated east of Preston along Highway 380.
Within Town Center, S. Coleman Road should
be upgraded to a four-lane divided minor
Thoroughfare (90’ ROW) to provide roadway
capacity to support heavy development
anticipated for this area. Consequently, the
previously identified loop road extending from
S. Coleman Road and back to McKinley Street
should be removed from the Plan.
South Craig Road
Upgrade Craig Road between Preston Road and
Broadway Street as a 3 lane couplet street to
support retail development opportunity both
within the Old Town District and along Preston
Road.
Highway 380 Access Roads
The inclusion of access roads along Highway
380 between the Lovers Lane loop.
86
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
87 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economic Analysis
Analysis from Catalyst
Acreage
Retail Demand Forecast 2011 City Estimate Total Build Out Capacity
Population 10,560 69,303
Households 3,504 23,024
2010 Median Disposable Income $67,422 $67,422
2010 Per Capita Income $35,716 $35,716
Total Retail Trade per HH $37,183 $37,183
Household Income $107,641 $107,641
Retail percentage of HH Income 34.54% 34.54%
Forecasted Total Retail Trade Potential $130,284,948 $856,013,933
Est. Retail Sales per Square Foot $300
Retail Square Footage Demand* 152,575 2,853,379
Sales Tax Analysis
Annual Total $1,103,400 $17,120,278
Allocation General Fund $551,700 $8,560,139
Economic Development $275,850 $4,280,069
Property Tax Reduction $275,850 $4,280,069
*Est. $300 sales per square foot based upon International Council of Shopping Centers
An analysis using the projected build-out population of Prosper at 69,303 served as a basis to
project a retail purchasing power of $856,013,933, assuming 23,024 households with a $37,183
retail trade per household. This would equate to roughly 2,853,379 square feet of retail space.
For assumption purposes, we assumed a Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.18 for retail. Dividing the
total square footage of retail by the FAR and further dividing by 43,560 achieves the estimated
retail acres that would be needed to accommodate the 2,853,379 square feet of retail space. This
number is 364 acres.
An important factor to consider in the planning process is how land use decisions ultimately
impact the future financial state of the community. Therefore, Prosper’s Future Land Use Plan
not only guides development within the community but it provides the financial framework
enabling Prosper to provide high-quality services for its residents. The following section
pertains to this very topic and provides estimates on the potential sales tax and ad valorem tax
revenue that could be collected by the Town at build-out. In order to provide a detailed analysis,
experts at Catalyst Commercial were consulted and provided information on future retail trade
potential in Prosper based upon the Future Land Use Plan.
Figure 8: Retail Demand Forecast
88
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Future Land Use Plan Acreage
Retail Assumptions Comp. Plan Total
Acres
Retail Acres per
Category
Neighborhood Services* 331 231.7
Town Center** 575 258.8
Tollway District*** 1,426 142.6
US 380**** 1,248 124.8
Total 3,580 757.9
* Assumed 70% retail component
**Assumed 45% retail component
***Assumed 10% retail component
****Assumed 10 % retail component
In order to determine whether or not the Future Land Use Plan could accommodate the 364 retail acres
projected by the economic analysis, a number of additional assumptions were made. These
assumptions were derived from staff discussions, existing zoning regulations and future characteristics
believed to define each district and include:
1. Approximately 70% of the Neighborhood Services will be retail in nature.
2. Approximately 45% of the Town Center would be retail in nature. The Town Center will likely
have a mixture of retail, office, residential and public space. The primary use, however, will likely
be oriented around retail.
3. 10% of the Tollway District will be retail. Office uses will constitute the largest majority of land
within the Tollway District. Retail areas within the Town Center will likely be at major
intersections and on the first floor of vertical mixed-use apartments/lofts.
4. 10% of the Highway 380 district will be retail. Commercial uses and residential uses will
constitute a significant portion of the corridor. Retail areas at major intersections, including big-
box retailers, will constitute the majority of retail establishments within the corridor.
Given these assumptions, a total of 757 retail acres is expected, based upon the Future Land Use Plan
scenario and the above assumptions. Additionally, the presence of visible and attractive corridors in
Prosper suggests the Town will be able to attract patrons from outside of the Town itself. Our
preliminary analysis indicates that, based on current spending trends experienced today, the Future
Land Use Plan contains more than sufficient retail space to meet the future needs of Prosper.
89 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Analysis
Retail Sales Tax
While 364 acres of retail is recommended by
the economic analysis, a number of different
factors may affect long-term retail needs in
Prosper and include the following:
• A potential build-out population higher
than the current estimate of69,303.
The 2004 Comprehensive Plan and
recent impact fee reports all estimate a
buildout population of over89,000
residents. Assuming a population of
82,000 residents, Prosper could
accommodate approximately 430 acres
of retail.
• Prosper will have a regional retail
center in the Town Center. This area of
the community will have a regional
draw and will attract retail patrons from
outside of Prosper. Additional retail
acreage, therefore, can be
accommodated due to the regional
nature of such retail.
• Within retail areas, other uses such as
churches, public facilities, schools and
other non-retail uses may occur.
Due to the above factors, it is believed that the
Town could potentially accommodate the 757
retail acres depicted in the chart on page 98. As
the Town grows, and as further comprehensive
plan studies are completed, this number should
be carefully examined and adjusted, if
necessary. Based upon the assumptions from
page 97, 750 acres of retail would essentially
double the initial 364 acre estimates from a
17.1 million total sales tax contribution to
approximately $34 million in sales tax revenue
($17.1 million to the general fund, $8.6 million
to Economic Development and $8.6 million to
property tax reduction). This sales tax revenue,
when combined with estimated Ad Valorem Tax
revenue, would enable Prosper to be financially
secure and provide high level services and/or
property tax reductions to its citizens. It is also
recommended that additional neighborhood
service retail zoning beyond what is
recommended on the Future Land Use Plan
should be avoided.
The 750 acres recommended by this economic
analysis should be sufficient to meet Prosper’s
retail needs. Additional neighborhood services
retail zoning should be avoided. Nodal retail
activity should be concentrated at primary
intersections, and the “four corner” principle
should be avoided to reduce the possibility of
an oversupply of retail acreage. Strip center
development along major roadways should also
be avoided, as the plan recommends.
The consequences of an oversupply of retail
may include:
• Vacant, underutilized land;
• Lower rental rates leading to
undesirable uses;
• Pressures for additional multifamily to
fill vacant parcels; and
• Blighted corridors.
Based upon an extremely conservative allocation of retail acres, the Future Land Use Plan may
accommodate approximately 750 retail acres. This is significantly higher than the 364 retail acres
recommended by the economic analysis.
90
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Ad Valorem Tax
An Ad Valorem analysis was conducted. Comparative properties were selected in each of the
following Future Land Use Plan categories. Based upon the data collected from the Collin and
Denton County Appraisal Districts, an average value per acre was assessed on the comparative
properties to derive an estimated value per acre per land use category. The derived value per
acre was then multiplied by the total number of acres within each district to calculate the total
gross value of the district. Using the current tax rate of .52 cents per $100 of assessed value, an
approximate gross Ad Valorem tax contribution per district was calculated. In order to account
for right-of-way, such as public streets, and tax exemptions, such as schools and churches, 30% of
the total value was subtracted to derive the estimated value and Ad Valorem amount that could
be contributed to the General Fund annually.
It is important to note that this analysis is for estimation purposes only and is based upon
assessed values in 2011 dollars. The purpose of this analysis is to determine the approximate Ad
Valorem contributions that could be generated based upon the Future Land Use Plan.
District Taxable Value Value per Acre Tax Revenue (.52)
Dallas North Tollway $2,790,756,612 $1,957,052 $14,511,934
Highway 380 $1,321,585,597 $1,058,963 $6,872,245
Town Center $2,465,780,302 $4,288,314 $12,822,057
Business Park $247,358,925 $666,736 $1,286,266
Neighborhood Services $478,977,403 $1,447,062 $2,490,682
Old Town $140,457,586 $407,123 $730,379
High Density $564,358,076 $928,221 $2,934,661
Medium Density $7,015,502,244 $1,223,919 $36,480,611
Low Density $3,136,282,464 $567,550 $16,308,668
Gross Ad Valorem Total
Value $18,161,059,208 - $94,437,507
Total Ad Valorem Value
(30% ROW & Exemption) $12,712,741,445 - $66,106,255
Figure 9 : Ad Valorem Estimates
91 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Tax Gap
Total Town Ad Valorem Income at Build-out $66,106,255
Total Sales Tax Income at Build-out $17,120,278
Total Income from Tax at Build-out $83,590,594
Total Expenditures $52,323,765
Tax Gap Surplus* 31,266,829
In order to determine whether or not the sales and Ad Valorem taxes generated by the Future Land
Use Plan will be sufficient to cover the overall expenses incurred by the community at build-out, an
approximate General Fund budget was calculated based upon the average per capita expenditures
at today’s spending levels.
The Fiscal Year 2010-11 budget indicates that the Town of Prosper had a General Fund budget of
$7,115,112. When this number is divided by the 2010 population of 9,423, an average per capita
expenditure of $755 per person is derived. This per capita expenditure by Prosper is comparable
with other regional communities. Southlake has the highest per capital expenditure among the
comparative group primarily due to its high residential property values, high-quality non-residential
uses and its regional Town Center drawing patrons from outside the community. This situation
enables Southlake to provide higher level services and enhanced aesthetics to its residents. The
similarities between the economics and vision between Prosper and Southlake are similar in nature.
2010
Population
FY 2010-2011
General Fund
Budget
Per Capita
Expenditure
Southlake 26,575 $30,410,480 $1,144
Richardson 99,223 $94,180,002 $949
Allen 84,246 $72,270,464 $858
Prosper 9,423 $7,115,112 $755
Argyle 3,282 $2,320,366 $707
Plano 258,841 $182,758,485 $706
McKinney 131,117 $90,788,018 $692
Frisco 116,989 $77,945,250 $666
Celina 6,028 $3,945,684 $655
Desoto 49,047 $29,760,521 $607
Rowlett 56,199 $33,793,677 $601
Little Elm 25,898 $13,157,771 $508
Multiplying the per capita expenditure of
$755 per person by the ultimate capacity
of 69,303, an ultimate capacity General
Fund budget for Prosper of $52,323,765 is
derived.
Discussed in the previous sections, the
approximate Ad Valorem contribution to
the General Fund at build-out would be
approximately $66.1 million. The
approximate sales tax contribution to the
general fund based upon the 750 retail
acres would be approximately $17.1
million. Based upon this scenario, total
General Fund income from taxes at build-
out would be approximately $83.5 million.
This scenario would position Prosper to be
in a similar situation to Southlake and
Richardson, enabling the Town to provide
high quality services for its residents.
It should be noted that additional forms of sales tax, such as Industry Tax and Inventory Tax, are not
included and will create additional avenues for income. These numbers are approximate and are
derived for estimation purposes only.
*This is an estimate based upon the projected sales tax revenue and possible Ad Valorem revenue. This estimate does not include
additional forms of sales tax such as Industry Tax and Inventory Tax.
Figure 10: Tax Gap Analysis
92
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economic Analysis Conclusion
Forecasted potential sales tax data indicates
that Prosper has the potential to derive a
significant monetary amount from sales tax
receipts at build-out. This is ultimately
dependent upon the community attracting
high-quality retail establishments that serve
residents of the community and provide
regional retail destinations that attract patrons
from outside of Prosper. The primary regional
destinations will be located within the Town
Center and at the intersection of the Dallas
North Tollway and Highway 380. Additional
retail may be located within the Dallas North
Tollway and Highway 380 districts, but will likely
be less intense in nature.
Retail/Neighborhood Service areas away from
the major districts will likely serve the internal
needs of Prosper, providing less intensive
services to adjacent residential neighborhoods.
Additional retail/neighborhood services zoning
outside of the Dallas North Tollway, Town
Center and Highway 380 districts should be
carefully considered in order to avoid an
oversupply of retail zoning. Flexibility within
the Dallas North Tollway, Highway 380 and
Town Center districts will enable Town staff to
make appropriate, market-based land use
decisions as development occurs.
An estimate of Ad Valorem taxes at build-out
suggests that Prosper will have the potential for
a significant Ad Valorem contribution to its
General Fund. Prosper’s high-quality
neighborhoods and its dedication to providing
high-quality retail destinations will be a primary
factor in determining the ultimate Ad Valorem
value of the community. As development
occurs, the community has expressed a desire
to attract the highest quality development
possible to protect the Town’s visual character
and maximize the taxable value for both the
General Fund and Prosper ISD. Future non-
residential land use decisions should consider
the long-term potential contributions of that
particular development to the community,
favoring clustered nodal retail activity centers,
Class A office space (office space defined by
high-quality furnishings, state-of-the-art
facilities and excellent accessibility) and
corporate campuses over strip retail and stand-
alone retail establishments.
The retail data provided indicates that the
Future Land Use Plan created for Prosper
provides a significant amount of retail space to
meet the future needs of Prosper residents.
The Future Land Use Plan also gives Town Staff,
Planning & Zoning Commission and Town
Council ultimate flexibility to determine where
retail areas should be located within the
established districts.
While the numbers provided are estimates on
the potential sales tax and Ad Valorem income
of the community at build-out, it is important to
note that these are only estimates. To ensure
that Prosper has a financially secure future, the
land use and character principles outlined in
this Plan should be used as a guide to attract
the highest quality development possible. High-
quality and long-lasting development is
ultimately the key in ensuring that Prosper has
a sound financial future. Focusing on attracting
and maintaining such development will enable
Prosper to meet the essential needs of its
future residents.
93 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT
Infrastructure Assessment
Planning for and providing infrastructure is
perhaps one of the most important
responsibilities of a municipality. Citizens need
to be secure in the knowledge that they can rely
on their local government to ensure that there
is adequate and safe water supply and
wastewater capacity for current populations
and that proper plans are developed to provide
for future growth. There are numerous
technical studies that can be used to analyze
these current and future needs for the Town.
This 2012 Comprehensive Plan is not intended
to take the place of these detailed technical
efforts. The purpose of the Comprehensive Plan
is to determine whether the Town has made or
plans on undertaking these efforts. This
Infrastructure Assessment is intended to
provide an overview of Prosper’s infrastructure
system and capacity of that system in relation
to the current population and the future
projected population.
Previous Planning Efforts
The most recent large scale, in-depth analysis of
future water and wastewater needs was
completed in 2006 by Freese and Nichols, Inc.
(FNI). At that time FNI developed a Water
Distribution Master Plan and a Wastewater
Collection Master Plan. These studies analyzed
growth based on the Future Land Use Plan in
place at that time and used typical usage factors
for water and wastewater based on historical
water usage and wastewater flows in Prosper.
The study developed Capital Improvement
Plans intended on implementing the
recommendations in the technical studies and
provided mapping of the proposed
improvements. The Water and Wastewater
Capital Improvement Plans were updated in
2011 for the Impact Fee Update, also
performed by FNI. The recommended
improvements outlined in the Impact Fee Study
are intended to provide the required capacity
and reliability to meet projected water
demands and wastewater flows through
Buildout. Due to timing of the Impact Fee Study
and Comprehensive Plan projects, the
recommended water and wastewater projects
developed in the Impact Fee Study were based
on growth rates and Future Land Use Plan
developed prior to the 2012 Comprehensive
Plan.
Infrastructure Goals and Objectives
The goal and objectives for infrastructure are
shown below:
Goal: Ensure that existing water,
wastewater and storm drainage
systems and future plans adequately
serve current and future residents
and businesses.
Objective 1: Investigate any deficiencies in the
infrastructure systems.
Objective 2: Develop concepts that will
address deficiencies of the
infrastructure system.
Objective 3: Strive for an infrastructure system
that will effectively and
economically serve existing and
projected needs of the
community in a safe and efficient
manner.
Objective 4: Ensure that infrastructure is
compatible or expanded to
support future development,
specifically in key development
areas.
Existing Lift Station in Prosper
94
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT
Water System
Existing Characteristics
North Texas Municipal Water District (NTMWD)
is a regional water provider with a treatment
capacity of 770 million gallons of water per day
and serves approximately 1.6 million people.
NTMWD currently serves water to the Town of
Prosper through a 48” transmission line in the
northwest portion of NTMWD’s system. The
water from NTMWD is dropped into a 3 million
gallon (MG) ground storage tank and re-
pumped to serve the Prosper distribution
system through a 30” water line. The NTMWD
delivery point into the Town of Prosper is in the
southeast portion of the Town, and this is the
only existing treated water delivery point. The
Town relies on NTMWD for all treated water
and does not utilize existing wells in the system.
In addition, there are not emergency water
connections with surrounding entities.
Storage and Usage
The Town had an average daily flow of 1.9
million gallons per day in 2010, and Town
records show 3,230 active water accounts. This
number includes both normal domestic
connections and irrigation-only connections.
The Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality (TCEQ) requires 200 gallons per
connection of storage of which 100 gallons
must be elevated storage. The Town currently
has a 2 million gallon elevated storage tank near
Preston Road and First Street and 3 million
gallons in ground storage at the NTMWD
delivery point. Since the limiting factor in this
case is the elevated storage capacity, based on
the current elevated capacity of 2 million
gallons, the number of connections that would
be allowed by TCEQ is 20,000. FNI developed
criteria in the 2011 Impact Fee Update for sizing
of storage and pumping capacity for the Town.
These criteria are more stringent than TCEQ
requirements and take into consideration many
additional factors including operational
flexibility, fire protection, system redundancy,
and energy efficiency. The design criteria
recommended to size ground storage tank
capacity is to provide adequate storage volume
to meet 8 hours of maximum day demand. The
design criteria recommended for elevated
storage capacity is twice the required volume
needed to meet 35% of the peak hour demand
for a duration of 3 hours. The design criteria
recommended for pump station capacity is
providing a firm pumping capacity to meet 65%
of the peak hour demand. The firm pumping
capacity is defined as the total available
pumping capacity with the largest pump out of
service to each pressure plane.
95 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT
Considerations for the Future
Generally speaking, the planning that has taken
place regarding water infrastructure has served
the Town very well. The population and land
use data in the 2011 Impact Fee Update was
used to develop future water demands.
Conservation measures in place for the future
were taken into account in determining the
projected water usage. The current Water
System Capital Improvement Plan was
completed in 2011 for the Impact Fee Update,
and recommended improvements to serve the
Town through Buildout are shown on Plate4.
Since that time, and as a result of this Plan,
population growth has changed and land uses
have changed. In order to remain relevant, the
Capital Improvements Plan should be either
revised or updated as plans are developed in
order to ensure consistency.
Water Short Term Recommendations:
1. Yearly monitoring of growth to guide
implementation of water system
projects.
2. Evaluate whether the Lower Pressure
Plane should be served through a
dedicated Lower Pressure Plane Pump
Station at the existing NTMWD delivery
point site or through a new Upper
Trinity Regional Water District (UTRWD)
delivery point on the west side of the
Town. This should be determined prior
to design of the proposed 42” Lower
Pressure Plane line and Pump Station,
and this project is recommended to be
under design in 2016 based on growth
rates and land use assumptions in the
2011 Impact Fee Study.
Water Long Term Recommendations:
1. Coordinate with NTMWD to receive
additional water supply capacity to
meet projected water demands.
2. Continue implementation of the
projects indicated in the 2011 Impact
Fee Update.
3. Update Water Master Plan and Impact
Fee CIP at least every 5 years or more
frequently if land use assumptions or
service provider assumptions change
significantly.
4. Investigate an emergency interconnect
with an adjacent entity to increase
water system reliability and
redundancy.
96
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT
Collin CountyCollin County(((###UUUTTT(#UT[ÚUT!A!A!AProposed 2.5 MGFM 1385 EST (2030)Overflow Elev.: 785 ftProposed 2.5 MGCounty Line EST (2021)Overflow Elev.: 785 ftNTMWDDelivery Point2.0 MGPreston Rd. ESTOverflow Elev.: 926 ftProposed 2.0 MGProsper Trail EST (2015)Overflow Elev.: 926 ft(3(4(4(3(3(5(5(19(12(11(7(7(2(2(9(9(1B(1B(1B(LPP)(LPP)(LPP)(LPP)(LPP)(10(10(10(10(6(6(17(18(16(8(18(18(14(13(13(15(15(16(16(25(28(38(29(32(26(33(33(33(23(36(30(30(34(37(22(22(27(34(31(17(21(2012"20"42''16''3 0 ''20''24''12''16''20''30''42''16''42''16''20''42''20''20''16''42''24''20''20''20''16''16''16''20''42''20''24''42''24''20''30''12''24''20''12''20''24''12''16''16''24''16''16''12''24''42''16''16''20''16''20''16''20''30''20''24''16''16''20''20''16''20''30''20''16''20''24''8''30''20''16''12''30''20''20''16''12 ''12''12''16''30''12''20''16''20''16''20''30''20''30''12''30''20''20''12''12''20''12''20''16''16''30''16''12''30''30''16''12''20''12''20''30''30''30''36''16''12''20''24''24''36''12''12''16''16''20''36''16''16''20''16''12''16''12''16''20''12''12''16''16''16''20''16''12''16''20''16''20''16''12''12''16''16''24''12''12''12''1 2''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8 ''8''8''8 ''6''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6 ''8''8''8''8''8''8''8 ''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8 ''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''6''8''6''8''8 ''8''6''8''8''8''6''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8 ''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8 ''8''8 ''8''8 ''8''8''8''8 ''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8 ''8''8''8''6 ''6''6''8''8''8''8''6''8''6''8''8 ''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6 ''6 ''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''6''8''8''6''6''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''6''8''8''8''8''6 ''8''8''6''8''8''8''6''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''6''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''6''6''6 ''8''8''8''8''6''8''6''8''8''8''2''6''4''1.5''4''6''6''6''2''6''6''6''6''6''1.5''2''CR 25FM 1385E FIRST STCR 6W UNIVERSITY DRFISHTRAP RDPARVIN RDCR 51CR 83E UNIVERSITY DRN CUSTER RDCR 84W FIRST STSMILEY RDFM 2478CR 26E FRONTIER PKWYFM 423SH 289CAREY RDPROSPER RDCOIT RDN DALL AS PKWY CR 933DOE CREEK RDDALLAS PKWYGOOD HOPE RDFM 428 WCR 50CR 124FM 1461S PRESTON RDCUSTER RDCR 123HAWKINS LNBONAR RDBYRAN RDCR 86E US 380EUREKA LNS COLEMAN STCR 970BRISTOL DRCR 857CR 858ARTESIA BLVDCR 7C R 856PRESTON HILLS CIRPR 5155GIBBS RDCR 854FALCON RDVIRGINIA PKWYCR 855M A GNOLIA BLVDE BROADWAY STCR 852FIELDS RDCRUTCHFIELD DRCR 853BRINKMANN RANCH RDTWIN LAKES DRRED BUD DRHARPER RDPR 5156HERITAGE TRLBENBROOK BLVDPANTHER CREEK RDBEDFORD LNPR 5405DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAYHIGHPOINT DRVIRGINIA HILLS DRCROSSLAKE CTE SEVENTH STSEA PINES DROAK BEND TRLWHITE ROCK BLVDSHASTA DRJULIETTE DRSTO NI NGT O N DRPRESTONVIEW DRQUAIL HOLLOWWARREN DRNOLES RDTWIN MALLETS LNWENK CTPR 5436WATCH HILL LNBRADFORD DREQUESTRIAN WAYCOUNTRY VIEW DRNEWPORT LNCOASTAL DRBROWNWOOD BL V D CR 860OLD DAIRY FARM RD PHANTOM LNLONG LEAF DRCARRIAGE LNSHARED DRIVEWAYSA N M A R C O S D RS REDWOOD CIRHAVENBROOK LNPIEDMONT PLYAK DRASCOT PLGARDENIA BLVDCOVENTRY DRFALCON CTDOOLITTLE DRDERICK LNDOVE CREEK ST
GOOD HOPE RDDALLAS PKWYCR 26CR 50W UNIVERSITY DR6''8''2''6''6''8''8''8''6''6''8''6''6''6''6''6''2''6''8''6''6''6''8''6''2''2''8''6''8''6''8''6''8 ''6''6''6''6''6''8''6''6''6''6''6''6''6''6''8''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12 ''
12''Doe BranchWilso n C r e e k
Panthe r C re e k
G entle CreekParvin BranchRutherford BranchLittle Elm CreekStreamR o w le tt C re e k
Mustang CreekParvin BranchGentle CreekParvin BranchRutherford BranchStreamParvin BranchStreamLEGEND!APressure Reducing Valve(#UT2011 - 2021 Elevated Storage Tank(#UT2022 - BuildoutElevated Storage Tank(#UTExisting Elevated Storage TankUTExisting Ground Storage Tank[ÚExisting Pump Station2011 - 2021 Water Line Improvement2022 - BuildoutWater Line Improvement8" and Smaller Water Lines10" and Larger Water LinesRoadRailroadStreamLakeParcelTown LimitETJ BoundaryCounty BoundaryLower Pressure PlaneUpper Pressure PlanePLATE 4TOWN OF PROSPERBUILDOUT WATER SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTSJanuary 19, 201201,750 3,500SCALE IN FEETICreated By Freese and Nichols, Inc.Job No.: PRP11118Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\DELIVERABLES\04_W_WW_Capital_Improvements_Revisions\(Plate-3)_Water_CIP_(2021_and_Buildout).mxdUpdated: Friday, November 04, 2011 9:23:21 AMExpand UPP PS to 20 MGD and Add 5.0 MG GST(2013)Construct 10 MGD LPP Pump Station(2018)Expand UPP PS to 30 MGD, Add 5.0 MG GSTand Expand LPP to 25 MGD (2024)Expand LPP PS to 40 MGD and Add 5.0 MG GST(2034)NTMWD Delivery Point Improvements(10(24(35(1A
99 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT
Wastewater System
Existing Characteristics
The Town of Prosper is currently served by the
NTMWD for wastewater treatment. The
treatment plant serving the Town is the Wilson
Creek Regional Treatment Plant located near
Fairview on Lake Lavon. This plant also serves
Anna, Melissa, Princeton, McKinney, Allen,
Fairview, Frisco, Lucas, Richardson, Parker, and
Plano. The current average day capacity of the
Wilson Creek WWTP is 48 MGD, with a build-
out capacity of 112 MGD. The NTMWD
interceptor runs through the northeast corner
of the Town of Prosper.
Due to the terrain within the Town, lift stations
are required to make the collection system
effective and send all wastewater flow to the
NTMWD system. The Town currently has 6 large
lift stations in operation for this purpose. The
Gentle Creek and Steeple Chase lift stations
have already been abandoned, and the
remainder of the lift stations with the exception
of La Cima will be abandoned in the future with
proposed projects.
Considerations for the Future
Generally speaking, the planning that has taken
place regarding wastewater infrastructure has
served the Town very well. The Town signed an
agreement with Upper Trinity Regional Water
District (UTRWD) in December 2007 to send a
majority of future wastewater flows to an
existing UTRWD interceptor in the west side of
Prosper. This was a very strategic move for the
Town as it will allow the Town to abandon a
majority of existing lift stations and significantly
reduce capital and operations and maintenance
(O&M) costs by removing lift stations and force
mains from the Wastewater Capital
Improvement Plan. The current Wastewater
System Capital Improvement Plan was
completed in 2011 for the Impact Fee Update,
and recommended improvements to serve the
Town through Buildout are shown on Plate5. As
soon as the interceptor from the abandoned
WWTP to the UTRWD interceptor is completed,
the lift station at the WWTP and 12” force main
will no longer be utilized to send Subbasin 2 and
4 wastewater flows to the NTMWD system. The
long term plan is to continue to send
wastewater flows in Subbasins 5 and 6 to the
NTMWD system, and wastewater flows in
Subbasins 1, 2, 3, and 4 will be sent to the
UTRWD system.
Since development of the Capital Improvement
Plan for the Impact Fee Update, and as a result
of this Plan, population growth has changed and
land uses have changed. In order to remain
relevant, the Capital Improvements Plan should
be either revised or updated as plans are
developed in order to ensure consistency.
Wastewater Short Term Recommendations:
1. Yearly monitoring of growth to guide
implementation of wastewater system
projects.
2. Continue to eliminate existing lift
stations to reduce O&M costs.
Wastewater Long Term Recommendations:
1. Future acquisition of additional
wastewater treatment capacity from
NTMWD and UTRWD.
2. Continue implementation of the
projects indicated in the 2011 Impact
Fee Update.
3. Update Wastewater Master Plan and
Impact Fee CIP at least every 5 years or
more frequently if land use
assumptions or service provider
assumptions change significantly.
4. Consider conversion of existing services
on septic systems to the Prosper
wastewater system.
100
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT
VVVVVVVVVVääääääääääUUPTWW)"C`10''10''10''(27(212''WastewaterTreatment Plant(Abandoned)La CimaLift StationCapacity: 3.0 MGDLa Cima # 2Decommission LS and FMSteeple ChaseLift Station(Abandoned)GreenspointDecommission LS and FMWhispering FarmsDecommission LS and FMGentle CreekLift Station(Abandoned)Decommission LS and FM15"(3(3(4(4(5(5(1(1(1(13(1(1(12(27(27(27(27(27(27(1(1(9(9(11(8(8(22(21(21(21(21(23(18(18(17(17(16(16(26(25(24(20(19(6(10(14(7(7(7(8(6(15(8(15(9(9(10(14(81 2''30''15''10''18''24''27''21''18''10''10''18''10''10''24''15''21''10''10''10''12''10''24''10''10''10''24''10''18''21''10''12''15''24''10''10''10''21''10''15''27''10''10''21''15''21''10''15''1 0 ''21''18''10''10''18''10''10''24''10''10''21''10''24''10 ''12''10''10''27''10''24''21''18''12''12''10''24''15''24''21''21''24''21''10''24''21''15''10''15''27''15''10''10''24''24''12''24''10''24''15''24''10''21''24''12''18''27''15''12''12''15''1 2''27''10''1 5''27''10''18''18''10''15''10''10''10''10''12''24''12''10''10''10''10''10''10''15''10''10''27''12''10''10''24''27''10''
10''10 ''10''21''15''10''1 0''
10''24''10''10''24''24''27''24''27''10''12''10''10'' F.M27''30''24''21''12''12''12''21''21''2 4 ''24''21''12'' F.M.10'' F.M.6 '' F .M .12'' F.M.8'' F.M.10'' F.M.4'' F.M.12'' F.M.10'' F.M.12''15 ''10''21''12''10''12''12''15''12''10''10''12''10''10''12 ''10''10''15''10''15 ''6''8''4''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8 ''4''6''8''8''8''8''6''6''8''8''8''8 ''8''8''8''8 ''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''6''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''4''8''8''8''8 ''8''8''8''
8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''6''6''8''8''8''6''8 ''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8 ''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''6''8''6''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8 ''8''8''8''8''6''8''8 ''8''6''8 ''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8 ''6''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8 ''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''8''SUBBASIN 3SUBBASIN 3SUBBASIN 6SUBBASIN 6SUBBASIN 2SUBBASIN 2SUBBASIN 4SUBBASIN 4SUBBASIN 1SUBBASIN 1SUBBASIN 5SUBBASIN 58''6''6''8''6''6''8''8''8''8''6''8''8''8''6''6''6''15''12''15''15''15''15''W ilson C reekPanthe r C re e k
Doe BranchGentle C reek
Parvin BranchRutherford BranchStreamLittle Elm CreekR o w le tt C re e kPond
StreamParvin BranchParvin BranchStreamParvin BranchDoe BranchLEGENDUUPTWW)Wastewater Treatment PlantVäExisting Lift Station"C`NTMWD MeterExisting 10" and LargerWastewater LineExisting 8" and SmallerWastewater LineExisting Force Main2011- 2021 Wastewater Line2022- Buildout Wastewater LineUTRWD Wastewater LineNTMWD Wastewater LineRoadRailroadStreamLakeParcelTown LimitETJ BoundaryCounty BoundaryPLATE 5TOWN OF PROSPERBUILDOUT WASTEWATER SYSTEMCAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTSJanuary 19, 201201,750 3,500SCALE IN FEETIMAJOR BASINSSubbasin 1Subbasin 2Subbasin 3Subbasin 4Subbasin 5Subbasin 6Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc.Job No.: PRP11118Location: H:\W_WW_PLANNING\DELIVERABLES\04_W_WW_Capital_Improvements_Revisions\(Plate-4)_Wastewater_CIP_(2021_and_Buildout).mxdUpdated: Friday, November 04, 2011 9:24:44 AM
103 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT
Storm Drain System
Freese and Nichols, Inc. assessed the Town’s
existing drainage utility system needs and
identified recommended updates to the existing
drainage utility system fee in 2010 as part of the
Drainage Utility System Fee Development
Report. The assessment included a visual
inspection, as well as discussions with Town
Staff, of several areas within the Town that
have flooding or potential flooding issues. The
study identified and prioritized storm drain
infrastructure facilities across the Town that are
in need of replacement or upsizing to anticipate
increases in flows or to correct current drainage
problems. Eight major maintenance and capital
projects and seven routine maintenance
projects were identified. All solutions
presented in the study were conceptual in
nature and only used to provide a range of
estimated construction costs for comparison
purposes. Each capital project location will
require a detailed study by a licensed engineer
that should consider other alternatives before a
final solution can be determined. As the Town
continues to develop, a Comprehensive
Drainage Utility System Master Plan should be
completed to further identify and refine storm
water management projects.
The Town is currently not subject to new
federal storm water quality regulations (Phase II
MS4) that would require the Town to further
protect and enhance water quality in creeks and
lakes through the development of a storm
water quality management program. However,
the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality (TCEQ) will issue the next Phase II MS4
permit in August 2012, and the determination
of regulated communities would be based upon
each community’s 2010 U.S. Census population.
Based on population growth in and around
Prosper over the last decade, it is likely that the
Town will become subject to the Phase II MS4
requirements.
As an operator of a small municipal separate
storm sewer system (MS4), the Town would be
required to develop a multi-faceted program to
protect storm water quality before it enters
creeks, rivers, and lakes. The program includes
a number of measures to protect storm water
quality, such as the following:
• Drainage utility system maintenance;
• Structural and non-structural water
quality protection measures;
• Drainage utility system mapping and
inspections;
• Public education, outreach and
involvement;
• Town ordinances regulating
construction activity, illicit discharges,
and post-construction runoff; and
• Town staff training and operations
improvements.
104
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT
Considerations for the Future
As development continues within the Town of
Prosper, several actions should be taken to
handle drainage and storm water management
issues.
Storm Water Short Term Recommendations:
1. Consider establishing a program to
conduct routine inspections and
operations and maintenance (O&M)
activities throughout the drainage
utility system to minimize flooding
potential, reduce creek erosion, and
protect storm water quality.
2. Yearly monitoring of capital project
needs to guide implementation of
storm drain system projects outlined in
the 2010 Drainage Utility System Fee
Development Report.
Storm Water Long Term Recommendations:
1. Develop a Comprehensive Drainage
Utility System Master Plan. This plan
will provide an in-depth analysis of
current drainage facilities and project
the need for future facilities (detention,
culverts, channel enhancements, etc.)
based on the adopted Future Land Use
Plan. The drainage utility system
master plan can be a powerful tool that
helps define the direction of future
development, the protection of natural
resources, and the integration of public
spaces such as parks in the Town.
2. Review current subdivision standards to
ensure that new developments bear
responsibility to ensure that these
developments do not adversely impact
the overall storm water system within
the Town.
3. Review the drainage utility system fee
rates in several years to consider any
changes that the Town might want to
incorporate in the drainage utility
system fee rate. Potential changes
might include increased costs for
equipment, additional CIP projects that
may be needed, increasing water
quality regulatory compliance
requirements and others.
4. Continue implementation of projects
outlined in the 2010 Drainage Utility
System Fee Development Report.
5. Prepare a storm water quality
management plan and implement over
a 5-year period a storm water quality
management program to meet the
requirements of the pending 2012 TCEQ
Phase II MS4 general permit.
105 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Implementation Plan
The importance of planning can never be overstated—planning provides for the protection of private
property and ensures future development occurs in a coordinated and organized fashion, consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan. The future of Prosper will be shaped with the policies and
recommendations developed in this 2012 Comprehensive Plan. Based on this Plan, decisions will be
made that will influence many aspects of the Town’s built and social environments. Prosper has taken
an important leadership role in defining its future, with the adoption of this Plan. The Plan will provide a
very important tool for Town Staff and civic leaders to use in making sound planning decisions regarding
the long-term growth and development of Prosper. The future quality of life in Prosper will be
substantially influenced by the manner in which the Plan recommendations are administered and
maintained.
Planning for the Town's future should be a continuous process, and this Plan is designed to be a dynamic
tool that can be modified and periodically updated to keep it in tune with changing conditions and
trends. Changes in Prosper’ socioeconomic climate and in development trends that were not
anticipated during preparation of the Plan will occur from time to time, and therefore, subsequent
adjustments will be required. Elements of the Town that were treated in terms of a general relationship
to the overall area may, in the future, require more specific and detailed attention.
Plan policies and recommendations may be put into effect through adopted development regulations,
such as zoning and subdivision, and through capital improvement programs. Many recommendations
within the Plan can be implemented through simple refinement of existing Town regulations or
processes, while others may require the establishment of new regulations, programs, or processes. This
final section of the 2012 Comprehensive Plan describes specific ways in which Prosper can take the
recommendations within this plan from vision to reality.
Proactive and Reactive Implementation
There are two primary methods of Plan implementation: proactive and reactive methods. To
successfully implement the Plan and fully realize its benefits, both methods must be used in an effective
manner. Both proactive and reactive actions that could be used by Prosper are described within this
Implementation Chapter.
Examples of proactive methods include:
Establishing or updating subdivision regulations;
Establishing or updating zoning regulations; and
Developing a capital improvements program (CIP), by which the Town expends funds to finance
public improvements to meet objectives cited within the Plan.
Examples of reactive methods include:
Approving a rezoning application submitted by a property owner consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan;
Site plan review; and
Subdivision review.
106
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Roles of the Comprehensive Plan
Guide for Daily Decision-Making
The current physical layout of the Town is a product of previous efforts put forth by many diverse
individuals and groups. In the future, each new development that takes place, whether a subdivision
that is platted, a home that is built, or a new school, church or shopping center that is constructed,
represents an addition to Prosper’ physical form. The composite of all such efforts and facilities creates
the Town as it is seen and experienced by its citizens and visitors. If planning is to be effective, it must
guide each and every individual development decision. The Town, in its daily decisions pertaining to
whether to surface a street, to approve a residential plat, to amend a zoning ordinance provision, to
enforce the building codes, or to construct a new utility line, should always refer to the basic proposals
outlined within the Comprehensive Plan. The private builder or investor, likewise, should recognize the
broad concepts and policies of the Plan so that their efforts become part of a meaningful whole in
planning the Town.
Flexible and Alterable Guide
This 2012 Comprehensive Plan is intended to be a dynamic planning document for Prosper – one that
responds to changing needs and conditions. Plan amendments should not be made without thorough
analysis of immediate needs, as well as consideration for long-term effects of proposed amendments.
The Town Council and other Prosper officials should consider each proposed amendment carefully to
determine whether it is consistent with the Plan's goals and policies, and whether it will be beneficial for
the long-term health and vitality of Prosper.
Annual Review
At one-year intervals, a periodic review of the Plan with respect to current conditions and trends should
be performed. Such on-going, scheduled evaluations will provide a basis for adjusting capital
expenditures and priorities, and will reveal changes and additions that should be made to the Plan in
order to keep it current and applicable long-term. It would be appropriate to devote one annual
meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission to reviewing the status and continued applicability of
the plan in light of current conditions, and to prepare a report on these findings to the Town Council.
Those items that appear to need specific attention should be examined in more detail, and changes
and/or additions should be made accordingly. By such periodic evaluations, the Plan will remain
functional, and will continue to give civic leaders effective guidance in decision-making. Periodic reviews
of the plan should include consideration of the following:
The Town's progress in implementing the plan;
Changes in conditions that form the basis of the plan;
Community support for the plan's goals, objectives & policies; and
Changes in State laws.
The full benefits of the Plan for Prosper can only be realized by maintaining it as a vital, up-to-date
document. As changes occur and new issues within the Town become apparent, the Plan should be
revised rather than ignored. By such action, the Plan will remain current and effective in meeting the
Town's decision-making needs.
107 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Complete Review and Update with Public Participation
In addition to periodic annual reviews, the Comprehensive Plan should undergo a complete, more
thorough review and update every 5 or 10 years. The review and updating process should begin with
the establishment of a Steering Committee, similar to the one that was appointed to assist in the
preparation of this Plan. If possible, this committee or the Planning and Zoning Commission should be in
charge of periodic review of the plan. Specific input on major changes should be sought from various
groups, including property owners, neighborhood groups, civic leaders and developers and business
owners.
Regulatory Mechanisms
The usual processes for reviewing and processing zoning amendments, development plans, and
subdivision plans provide significant opportunities for implementing the Plan. Each zoning,
development and subdivision decision should be evaluated and weighed against applicable proposals
contained within the Plan. If decisions are made that are inconsistent with Plan recommendations, then
they should include actions to modify or amend the Plan accordingly in order to ensure consistency and
fairness in future decision-making. Amending the Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance
represent two major proactive measures that the Town can take to implement 2012 Comprehensive
Plan recommendations.
Zoning Ordinance
Zoning is perhaps the single most powerful tool for implementing Plan recommendations. The Town’s
Zoning Ordinance should be updated with the recommendations contained within the chapters of this
2012 Comprehensive Plan. All zoning and land use changes should be made within the context of
existing land uses, future land uses, and planned infrastructure, including roadways, water and
wastewater.
Zoning Text Amendments
Consideration should be given to updating areas of the zoning ordinance that may allow ideas, principles
or design standards identified within this Comprehensive Plan to be more easily achieved. Their
implementation will not only improve future development and interaction between land uses, but will
also improve Prosper’s overall image and livability. Such changes may involve landscaping setbacks,
non-residential building design, and additional tree requirements, to name a few. These
recommendations should be itemized and prioritized, and should be incorporated into the Zoning
Ordinance accordingly.
Zoning Map Amendments
State law gives power to cities to regulate the use of land, but regulations should be based on a plan.
Therefore, Prosper’s Zoning Map should be as consistent as possible with the Comprehensive Plan,
specifically the Future Land Use Plan. It is not reasonable, however, to recommend that the Town make
large-scale changes in its zoning map changes immediately. It is therefore recommended that the Town
prioritize areas where a change in current zoning is needed in the short-term and that efforts be
concentrated on making such changes. In the long-term, consistent zoning policy in conformance with
the Future Land Use Plan will achieve the Town’s preferred land use pattern over time.
Subdivision Ordinance
The act of subdividing land to create building sites has a major effect on the overall design and image of
Prosper. Much of the basic physical form of the Town is currently created by the layout of streets,
easements, and lots. In the future, the basic physical form of Prosper will be further affected by such
action. Requirements for adequate public facilities are essential to ensure the Town’s orderly and
108
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
efficient growth. Plan recommendations, such as cross-access easements, should be incorporated
within the Subdivision Ordinance.
Implementation Goals and Objectives
Implementation is one of the most important, yet most difficult, aspects of the comprehensive planning
process. Without viable, realistic strategies for implementation, the recommendations contained within
this 2012 Comprehensive Plan will be difficult to realize.
The following section contains the original six community goals established within the Community Vision
chapter of this comprehensive plan. Under each of the six community goals, more specific objectives
are included to guide plan implementation. The objectives listed are derived from recommendations
contained within the comprehensive plan document as well as ideas heard from the CPAC and general
public.
Goal 1. Provide a variety of land uses, in accordance with the vision of Prosper Residents, which
diversify the tax base and enable all types of people to live, work, shop, eat and relax in Prosper.
Objective 1.1: Provide a range of housing in Prosper, which takes into consideration, among
other things, data relating to income, education levels and ethnicity.
Objective 1.2: Maximize development along the Dallas North Tollway by providing
opportunities for Class A office space (office space defined by high-quality
furnishings, state-of-the-art facilities and excellent accessibility), corporate
campus development and mixed-use retail/residential development.
Objective 1.3: Create specific landscaping and thematic design guidelines for development
along the Dallas North Tollway.
Objective 1.4: Promote larger-scale master planned developments over small-scale individual
developments along the Dallas North Tollway by discouraging individual
developments under 5 acres in size.
Objective 1.5: Maximize development opportunity along Highway 380 by providing nodal
commercial and retail activity. Retail, commercial, service and big-box uses
should be focused primarily around major intersections with mid-block sections
being utilized for medium density residential uses and office space. Continuous
strip development should be avoided.
Objective 1.6: Utilize the Town Center for a regional draw, bringing in patrons from outside of
Prosper.
Objective 1.7: Ensure that the core of the Town Center contains a higher degree of urban
design with buildings situated up to the building line, wide sidewalks, street
trees and pedestrian amenities. Preferred examples include the Shops at Legacy
and the Shops at Watters Creek.
Objective 1.8: Include public space within the Town Center to serve as a focal point for the
Town Center and to provide space for community events and festivals.
Objective 1.9: Encourage the use of structured parking within the Town Center and Dallas
North Tollway Districts to minimize the negative impact of large scale parking
lots. Require structured parking to be strategically located to minimize visibility
from the public view.
Objective 1.10: Include public facilities, such as a new Town Hall, Community Services facility or
Library, within the Town Center or Old Town districts.
109 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Objective 1.11: Provide a network of connections, both vehicular and pedestrian, that allow
movement and access to various portions of the Town Center and adjacent
neighborhoods and districts.
Objective 1.12: Preserve the integrity of Old Town and encourage complementary and
compatible redevelopment and infill development including new single family
residences containing a farm/ranch theme, residential to office conversions and
“main street” retail with studio apartments along the western end of Broadway.
Objective 1.13: Plant trees within the parkway along roads in Old Town to establish a mature
tree canopy thereby contributing to the historic theme of the area.
Objective 1.14: Utilize the Old Town Roadway Plan to prioritize street improvements within Old
Town and utilize street improvements to facilitate new development.
Objective 1.15: Utilize the BNSF railroad to create a high-tech, clean industry Business Park.
Goal 2. Maintain and enhance the high quality of life and small-town feel currently available and
expected by Prosper residents.
Objective 2.1: Encourage the implementation of the Parks Master Plan as development occurs
to facilitate the creation of an interconnected park and trails system in Prosper
at buildout.
Objective 2.2: Update the 2004 Facilities Master Plan to ensure that public facilities, such as
fire, police and other public services, are coordinated with land use projections
in the Future Land Use Plan.
Objective 2.3: Work with Prosper Independent School District to coordinate future school
facilities planning with land use projections in the Future Land Use Plan.
Objective 2.4: Continue to require developers to dedicate 1 acre of park land for every 35
dwelling units constructed.
Objective 2.5: Encourage developers to preserve riparian zones and mature tree stands on
development sites and utilize such areas for residential park and open space
areas.
Objective 2.6: Preserve existing tree cover, when possible, by creating a tree preservation
ordinance and by conducting a natural assets inventory plan.
Objective 2.7: Encourage the use of rural design characteristics on new roadway construction
projects including the use of traditional lighting features, wide setbacks, native
plant materials, wildflowers and increased tree coverage.
Objective 2.8: Utilize cladding and form-lining at culvert crossings to create the impression of a
roadway bridge.
Objective 2.9: Determine if certain roadways within the community can maintain their existing
rural context, particularly roadways that may not require widening to meet
future demands.
Objective 2.10: Identify roadways that may be intentionally designed to be more rural in
character, potentially containing bioswales and other natural drainage features.
Appropriate roadways may include those that traverse residential districts and
contain little if any commercial development.
Objective 2.11: Encourage developers to use native planting materials and rural planting
designs within the private setback zone/landscape easement.
Objective 2.12: Develop and utilize design guidelines that address the use of rural
characteristics on development walls, neighborhood entrances and other
accessory strictures visible from the public right-of-way.
110
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Objective 2.13: Consistently use rural architectural/design guidelines within neighborhood
service retail centers.
Objective 2.14: Consider “dark skies.”
Objective 2.15: Work with the Prosper Historical Society to encourage the preservation of key
historic landmarks within Old Town and ensure that new development within
Old Town is designed to reflect an early 20th century historic theme.
Goal 3. Protect the quality and integrity of Prosper’s neighborhoods.
Objective 3.1: Encourage the development of quality housing throughout Prosper that meets
the needs of a diversity of housing needs, taking into consideration, among
other things, data relating to income, education levels and ethnicity, for the full
life-cycle of citizens to include, but not limited to:
Ensure that there are provisions for meeting the housing type and
affordability needs of families with children, single parents with
children, young adults just leaving home, young professionals, empty-
nesters retirees and the elderly.
Ensure that there is an adequate supply of workforce housing
throughout Prosper for those who work in the service industry in
Prosper.
Ensure that all homes are situated with an appropriate level of positive
attributes to maintain desirability, value and reinvestment.
Objective 3.2: Require the use of long-lasting/durable building materials, such as stone or
brick, and encourage the use of high pitched roofs to enhance the overall
housing appearance.
Objective 3.3: Require the formation of neighborhood associations (HOAs) with all new
developments to maintain common property, provide a sense of identity and
encourage long-term private property maintenance.
Objective 3.4: Encourage developers to include neighborhood amenities such as parks, open
spaces, neighborhood pools and other such features which enhance the overall
desirability of individual neighborhoods.
Objective 3.5: Encourage developers to arrange lots in a manner that maximizes residential
access to open space when natural areas are present.
Objective 3.6: Work with developers to ensure that the majority of lot sizes within a given
development are over 12,500 square feet in size.
Objective 3.7: Low density residential areas should not exceed a gross density of 1.6 dwelling
units per acre.
Objective 3.8: Medium density residential areas should not exceed a gross density of 2.5
dwelling units per acre.
Objective 3.9: Ensure that single family residential neighborhoods are protected from more
intensive areas of development, such as development located within the Dallas
North Tollway, Town Center, Business Park and Highway 380 districts, by using
screening and buffering techniques. Screening may include enhanced
landscaping, brick or masonry screening walls and landscaping berms, among
others.
Objective 3.10: Encourage the use of floodways as a natural buffer between low and high
intensity areas.
111 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Objective 3.11: Utilize the trail network identified within the Park Plan to provide access to the
network of community parks and to enhance connectivity between individual
neighborhoods.
Objective 3.12: Ensure that neighborhoods have at least two roadway access points and
encourage roadway connections between neighborhoods to provide more
direct and interconnected forms of vehicular and pedestrian travel.
Goal 4. Require high-quality and visually attractive architectural characteristics in both residential and
non-residential developments.
Objective 4.1: Zone key roadway intersections for retail while utilizing remaining land adjacent
to major roadways for residential to avoid stripped out arterial roadways
Objective 4.2: Avoid four-corner retail zoning to avoid an oversupply of retail zoning.
Objective 4.3: Limit driveways within 150 feet of major intersections to encourage larger scale,
master planned retail centers over individual retail establishments.
Objective 4.4: Encourage the creation of nodal, master planned retail centers over strip center
developments to encourage long term viability and investment in retail centers.
No additional unanchored strip retail is recommended.
Objective 4.5: Mandate the use of high-quality building materials, such as brick and stone, to
protect the long-term durability of non-residential construction. Require all
non-residential developments to be 100% masonry and prohibit metal building
construction.
Objective 4.6: Create a menu-choice matrix for non-residential developments, requiring new
developments to choose from a palate of predetermined colors and styles.
Objective 4.7: Require architectural enhancements, such as pitched roofs, awnings, enhanced
canopies and building articulation to create visually attractive developments.
Objective 4.8: Require all parking rows to contain ending landscape islands.
Objective 4.9: Encourage the planting of trees within parking lots so that 25% of the parking
lot is covered by a shade canopy at tree maturity.
Objective 4.10: Encourage large parking lots to contain a shaded pedestrian way.
Objective 4.11: Incentivize the use of dispersed landscaped stormwater areas within parking
lots rather than large detention ponds. Allow stormwater best management
practices (BMPs) to count towards a portion of landscaping requirements.
Objective 4.12: Encourage the use of thematic, decorative and enhanced lighting features
within the public right-of-way, residential areas (when necessary) and
retail/commercial areas.
Goal 5. Develop a quality and functional transportation network that enhances the Town’s image and
provides safe and convenient residential mobility.
Objective 5.1: Utilize the updated Thoroughfare Plan Map as future roadway improvements
are designed and constructed.
Objective 5.2: Ensure that Prosper’s thoroughfare network is coordinated with neighboring
communities and work to negotiate and resolve any conflicting issues.
Objective 5.3: Utilize the functional street classification system, a hierarchical network of
roadway classifications, to create a network of major and minor thoroughfares,
collector and local streets.
Objective 5.4: Utilize shared access and cross-access easements to provide connectivity
between adjacent non-residential uses, limiting the number of driveways along
major corridors and allowing for more continuous landscaping.
112
Comprehensive Plan
Town of Prosper
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Objective 5.5: Connect various portions of the community, including neighborhoods, the Town
Center, Old Town, public facilities and parks, with a system of pedestrian and
bicyclist trails to provide interconnectivity and create a system of non-motorized
linkages within the community.
Objective 5.6: Ensure that sufficient right-of-way is acquired and dedicated during platting or
roadway design to accommodate ultimate roadway configurations and
designated trails.
Objective 5.7: Utilize Context Sensitive Solutions to design roadways within the context of
their adjacent development.
Objective 5.8: Utilize the Old Town District Roadway Plan as a guide during roadway design
within the Old Town area.
Objective 5.9: Create backage roads along the Dallas North Tollway to support development
connectivity and accessibility.
Objective 5.10: Upgrade Hays Road to a commercial collector to support and provide back
access to future commercial and retail development along Preston Road.
Objective 5.11: Extend and realign South Coleman Road to intersect with Richland Boulevard. at
Preston Road providing connectivity between Old Town, the Town Center and
development along Highway 380.
Objective 5.12: Include access roads along Highway 380, between the Lovers Lane Loop, in
order to provide access to development along the grade-separated segment of
Highway 380.
Objective 5.13: Create a streetscape design program that intentionally characterizes individual
roadways based upon anticipated forms of development.
Objective 5.14: Investigate amending the Town ordinances to allow for ornamental walls and
fences and other types of materials, such as split iron/wood. Identify key
corridors where standards would be applicable in order to create greater
corridor consistency.
Objective 5.15: Consider wider setbacks along Preston Road with enhanced landscaping to
maintain a more rural feel and to create a larger barrier between Preston Road
and adjacent neighborhoods.
Objective 5.16: Monitor regional rail initiatives for changes or updates to the Frisco Commuter
Rail Line, particularly how such changes impact Prosper.
Goal 6. Ensure that water, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure is able to meet future growth
demands.
Objective 6.1: Investigate any deficiencies in the infrastructure systems.
Objective 6.2: Develop concepts that will address deficiencies of the infrastructure systems.
Objective 6.3: Strive for an infrastructure system that will effectively and economically serve
existing and projected needs of the community in a safe and efficient manner.
Objective 6.4: Ensure that infrastructure is comparable or expanded to support future
development, specifically in key development areas.
113 Town of Prosper, TX
Comprehensive Plan
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
1705 N. Market Street
Suite 500
Dallas, Texas 75202
(214) 217‐2200
www.freese.com